- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Supplemental Tables
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Wulff, B. B. H.
- Articles by Jones, J. D. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Wulff, B. B. H.
- Articles by Jones, J. D. G.
Genetic Variation at the Tomato Cf-4/Cf-9 Locus Induced by EMS Mutagenesis and Intralocus Recombination
Brande B. H. Wulff1,a, Colwyn M. Thomas1,b, Martin Parniskea, and Jonathan D. G. Jonesaa Sainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Norwich, NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
b School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom
Corresponding author: Jonathan D. G. Jones, John Innes Centre, Norwich, NR4 7UH, United Kingdom., jonathan.jones{at}sainsbury-laboratory.ac.uk (E-mail)
Communicating editor: D. CHARLESWORTH
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The interaction between tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and the leaf mold pathogen Cladosporium fulvum is an excellent model for investigating disease resistance gene evolution. The interaction is controlled in a gene-for-gene manner by Cf genes that encode type I transmembrane extracellular leucine-rich repeat glycoproteins that recognize their cognate fungal avirulence (Avr) proteins. Cf-4 from L. hirsutum and Cf-9 from L. pimpinellifolium are located at the same locus on the short arm of tomato chromosome 1 in an array of five paralogs. Molecular analysis has shown that one mechanism for generating sequence variation in Cf genes is intragenic sequence exchange through unequal crossing over or gene conversion. To investigate this we used a facile genetic selection to identify novel haplotypes in the progeny of Cf-4/Cf-9 trans-heterozygotes that lacked Cf-4 and Cf-9. This selection is based on the ability of Avr4 and Avr9 to induce Cf-4- or Cf-9-dependent seedling death. The crossovers were localized to the same intergenic region defining a recombination hotspot in this cross. As part of a structure-function analysis of Cf-9 and Cf-4, nine EMS-induced mutant alleles have been characterized. Most mutations result in single-amino-acid substitutions in their C terminus at residues that are conserved in other Cf proteins.
TOMATO Cf genes confer resistance to the leaf mold pathogen Cladosporium fulvum through recognition of distinct fungal-encoded avirulence (Avr) peptides secreted into the leaf apoplast during infection. The interaction between tomato and C. fulvum is an attractive model system to study the molecular basis of recognition specificity in plant disease resistance (R) proteins (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 genes were introgressed into the cultivated tomato Lycopersicon esculentum cv. "Moneymaker" (Cf0), from wild relatives. Their protein products activate a plant defense response upon recognition of the C. fulvum Avr4 and Avr9 proteins, respectively. Cf-4 (from L. hirsutum) and Cf-9 (from L. pimpinellifolium) each reside in an array of five paralogs at the Milky Way (MW) locus on the short arm of chromosome 1 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As a result of studies on several R gene families in Arabidopsis, flax, maize, rice, lettuce, and tomato, two models for R gene evolution have been proposed. On the basis of molecular analysis of the tomato Pto and the lettuce Dm3 loci, ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Comparative sequencing and the analysis of genetic stability at R gene loci have revealed key molecular mechanisms affecting R gene evolution such as inter- and intragenic recombination, gene conversion, mutation, and transposon insertion (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Details of tomato lines used:
Near-isogenic lines (NILs) of L. esculentum cv. Moneymaker containing Cf-4 (Cf4), Cf-9 (Cf9), or no genes for resistance to C. fulvum (Cf0) were maintained as described previously (![]()
![]()
Mutagenesis with EMS:
The mutagenesis procedure was similar to that described previously (![]()
200 in seed flats. Viable seedlings were transferred to individual pots and treated with a 105 M solution of the gibberellic acid biosynthesis inhibitor paclobutrazol. This helped to maintain the large number of M1 plants in a semi-dwarf state. The first fruit truss was removed since it is more likely to contain chimeric material. Selfed seed were collected from the second fruit truss of M1 plants. The effectiveness of the mutagenic procedure was assessed by scoring several phenotypic characters in M2 families as described by HAMMOND-KOSACK et al. (1994b). The frequency of visible mutations was similar to that reported previously (results not shown).
Mutant identification:
Mutants compromised in their ability to induce an Avr4- or Avr9-dependent hypersensitive response were identified by inoculating M2 families with recombinant potato virus X (PVX) expressing the C. fulvum Avr4 (PVX:Avr4) or Avr9 (PVX:Avr9) genes fused to the plant Pr1A signal peptide sequence for targeting to the leaf apoplast. In contrast to a previous report (![]()
![]()
Kanamycin resistance assays:
Resistance to kanamycin in tomato seedlings was determined by germination on Murashige and Skoog media supplemented with 300 µg ml1 kanamycin.
Generation of a line expressing Avr4 and Avr9:
A line expressing Avr4 and Avr9 transgenes was constructed by intercrossing a kanamycin-resistant transgenic line expressing Avr9 (SLJ6021 A; ![]()
![]()
Generation of molecular markers at the Milky Way locus:
A cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) marker named MW3, located 3' of the LoxR gene in the MW locus, was used to distinguish the Cf0, Cf4, and Cf9 haplotypes (Fig 1). Amplification with the primer combination LoxR-F1 and LoxR-R1 (Table S1, supplementary information at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/) yields a 496-bp product from Cf0, a 408-bp product from Cf4, and a 496-bp product from Cf9. Digestion with HincII generates 262- and 234-bp fragments derived from the Cf0 allele and 262 and 146 bp from the Cf4 allele, while the Cf9 allele is not cut with this enzyme. The CAPS marker MW5 was used to distinguish the Cf4 and Cf9 haplotypes at the 5' end of the MW locus (Fig 1). Amplification with the primers 99A8, 99A10R, and 99A9R generates a 601-bp product from Cf4, which is not cleaved by RsaI, while a 611-bp product is generated from Cf9, which is cleaved by RsaI to produce fragments of 502 and 109 bp. This primer combination does not amplify a product from the Cf0 haplotype. The CAPS marker MW1 was used to delimit recombination events in tract II (Fig 1), which includes the Hcr9-4C and Hcr9-9E 5' flanking regions (Fig 4B). Amplification with 99DE1F and 99DE2R (Table S1) gave products of 1.512 and 1.467 kbp from Cf4 and Cf9, respectively, but only the Cf9 allele can be digested by AvaI to generate fragments of 502 and 965 bp.
|
|
|
|
DNA gel blot analysis:
Tomato genomic DNA was prepared as previously described (![]()
![]()
DNA sequence analysis:
Mutant Cf-4 and Cf-9 alleles were amplified from genomic DNA using gene-specific primers. The primer combination F10/F5 (Table S1) amplifies a 1.377-kbp fragment from the 5' half of Cf-4 and a 1.568-kbp fragment from the 5' half of Cf-9. The primer combination F6/Cf4-16 (Table S1) amplifies a 1.500-kbp fragment from the 3' half of Cf-4 or Cf-9. The amplified gene fragments were directly sequenced on both strands. The location of mutations was verified by direct sequencing of a PCR product encompassing the modified nucleotide. Hcr9 promoter sequences were aligned and analyzed as previously described (![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Isolation and characterization of EMS-induced Cf-9 and Cf-4 mutants:
As part of a structure-function analysis of the Cf-9 and Cf-4 proteins, and to identify extragenic suppressors of Cf gene function (![]()
![]()
![]()
Four Cf9 M2 families (S568, S315, S87, and F965) in which
25% of the seedlings did not exhibit plant death were identified (Table 1). Only one Cf4 M2 family (H249) containing
25% survivors was identified (Table 1). These mutants were investigated genetically by testcrossing to Cf0 and backcrossing to Cf9 or Cf4 (Table 1). Progeny of the four Cf9 mutants backcrossed to Cf9 and the single Cf4 mutant backcrossed to Cf4 were infected with the appropriate PVX:Avr construct. All of the progeny exhibited an Avr-dependent necrotic phenotype (Table 1). This analysis suggests that all five are recessive loss-of-function mutants (Table 1). None of the progeny from testcrosses between the mutants and Cf0 exhibited plant death after infection with recombinant PVX (Table 1). Therefore all five mutations map to the introgressed region within the Cf4 and Cf9 NILs that contain the corresponding Cf genes. The Cf-4 and Cf-9 alleles from each mutant were characterized by PCR amplification and DNA sequence analysis (Table 1).
|
Four recessive Cf-9 mutants isolated in a previous study were also characterized (![]()
1 and Cf-9
2) and were analyzed on DNA gel blots (results not shown). Both mutants originated from sequence deletions at the Cf-9 locus. In the case of Cf-9
2 a deletion of
300 bp that included the 3' terminal sequences of Cf-9 occurred. In Cf-9
1 a more extensive deletion that included Cf-9 and the adjacent paralog Hcr9-9D was observed (results not shown).
Two Cf-9 partial loss-of-function mutants that were reported previously were also investigated (Cf-9M164 and Cf-9M525; ![]()
Meiotic stability of Cf-4:
Cf-9 has been shown to be meiotically stable (![]()
Cf-4 stability was measured previously in an experiment to isolate Cf-4 by transposon tagging (![]()
![]()
![]()
Genetic selection for novel haplotypes at the Cf-4/Cf-9 locus:
We used a facile genetic selection to identify recombinants lacking Cf-4 and Cf-9 on the basis of an Avr4- and Avr9-dependent seedling lethal assay (![]()
![]()
![]()
The progeny of seven S1 plants (H822, H881, H888, H889, H891, H896, and J091) from crosses where Cf-4/Cf-9 trans-heterozygotes were used as female parents segregated 15:1 for kanamycin resistance, suggesting they arose from a testcross. These S1 plants were tested for functional Avr4 and Avr9 transgenes by testcrossing to Cf4 and Cf9 NILs. The progeny segregated 1:1 for wild-type and seedling lethal phenotypes, confirming that each S1 parent contained a functional Avr4 and Avr9 transgene (Table S3 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/).
Two additional S1 survivors (G640 and G641) arose from crosses where Cf-4/Cf-9 trans-heterozygotes were used as male parents. The S2 progeny of these plants also segregated 15:1 for resistance to kanamycin (Table S2 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). To confirm that these testcross survivors were not due to silencing of the Avr4 or Avr9 transgenes, S2 seedlings were infected with PVX:Avr4 and PVX:Avr9 (Table S4 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). No necrotic S2 seedlings were observed, whereas Cf4 and Cf9 controls died, demonstrating that G640 and G641 must also lack Cf-4 and Cf-9.
The progeny of 26 S1 survivors were all sensitive to kanamycin and further genetic tests showed they lacked functional Avr4 and Avr9 transgenes (results not shown). These plants arose in experiments where Cf-4/Cf-9 trans-heterozygotes were used as female parents and were most probably due to self-pollination.
Seven other S1 plants were completely sterile and did not produce S2 seed. Molecular analysis and functional NPT assays suggested that one survivor may be due to androgenesis in one case (i.e., the development of an embryo containing only paternal chromosomes) and gynogenesis in the others (results not shown). The rate of gynogenesis for tomato was previously estimated as 1.24.2 x 104 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In summary, of 42 S1 plants recovered from 17,601 Cf-4/Cf-9 testcross progeny, only 9 originated from controlled crosses (H822, H881, H888, H889, H891, H896, J091, G640, and G641), retained functional Avr4 and Avr9 transgenes, and lacked Cf-4 and Cf-9 (Tables S2S4).
Molecular characterization of novel haplotypes:
The nine S2 populations were analyzed with CAPS markers to determine if loss of Cf-4 and Cf-9 was associated with flanking marker exchange. The CAPS markers MW3 and MW5 were developed to distinguish the Cf0, Cf4, and Cf9 haplotypes at the 3' and 5' ends of the MW locus, respectively (Fig 1 and MATERIALS AND METHODS). All survivors contained sequences from the Cf4 haplotype at the 5' end of the MW locus and sequences from the Cf9 haplotype at the 3' end of the MW locus (Table 2). The simplest explanation for these data is that loss of Cf-4 and Cf-9 resulted from crossing over at the Cf-4/Cf-9 locus. The analysis enabled identification of individuals homozygous for the recombinant chromosome that could be used to determine their Hcr9 composition.
|
DNA gel blots, PCR amplification, and DNA sequencing were used to locate the crossovers in the homozygotes. Genomic DNA was digested with BglII, blotted, and hybridized with a probe from the 5' half of Cf-9. All nine recombinants lacked BglII fragments from Cf-4 and Cf-9 (Fig 4A) and a 6.6-kbp BglII fragment derived from Hcr9-4C. All retained a 4.1-kbp BglII fragment derived from Hcr9-4B and BglII fragments derived from Hcr9-9E (Fig 4A and Fig B). Therefore, the crossovers in the new recombinants appear to be located within the Hcr9-4B to Hcr9-4C region within the Cf4 haplotype and in the Hcr9-9D to Hcr9-9E region within the Cf9 haplotype. This is a region of highly homologous DNA sequence that contains the 5' flanking region and coding sequences of Hcr9-4C and Hcr9-9E (Fig 1 and Fig 4B).
Two distinct classes of recombinants were discerned on the basis of their characteristic Hcr9-9E-derived BglII fragments. Five recombinants (H882, H888, H891, H896, and J091) retained a 3.6-kbp BglII Hcr9-9E fragment present in the Cf9 haplotype (Fig 4A). The remaining recombinants (G640, G641, H881, and H889) contained a novel Hcr9-9E BglII fragment of
3.2 kbp (Fig 4A). This difference is due to a 353-bp deletion in the Hcr9-4C 5' flanking DNA compared to the corresponding Hcr9-9E flanking region (Fig 4B). Crossovers located downstream of this deletion contain a chimeric BglII fragment of
3.2 kbp containing the Hcr9-9E coding region (Fig 4B). The crossovers in these latter recombinants could thus be delimited to a 2.289-kbp region downstream of the deletion in the Hcr9-4C 5' flanking DNA and upstream of the Hcr9-9E coding sequence (Fig 4B).
Crossovers in the other recombinants (H882, H888, H891, H896, and J091) were delimited to a region 3' to the Hcr9-4B gene in the Cf4 haplotype. The CAPS marker MW1 (Fig 4B) was used to further delimit the crossovers in these recombinants. All five recombinants retained MW sequences derived from the Cf4 haplotype (Table 2 and Fig 4). This delimited the crossovers to a 3.6-kbp region between MW1 and the 353-bp insertion in the Hcr9-9E 5' flanking region within the Cf9 haplotype (Fig 4B). DNA fragments spanning these regions were PCR amplified and sequenced. The crossovers were then localized to a region between the two closest flanking polymorphic nucleotides (Table 2). Some crossovers in class II recombinants are coincident with AT (V408, H881) and ATT (V517, V512, H891, and J091) microsatellite repeats (Fig 4C).
Of the nine recombinants reported here five were similar to the previously reported class IIa intergenic recombinants (H822, H888, H891, H896, and J091) and four were similar to the previously reported class IIb intergenic recombinants (G640, G641, H881, and H889see Table 2; ![]()
![]()
20 times higher than the genome average for tomato of 740 kbp/cM (![]()
In this genetic selection, the loss of Cf-4 or Cf-9 gene function as a result of unequal crossing over was 1 in 1955, which is not significantly different from the rate of 1 in 1500 (
2 = 0.64) obtained in the screen for disease sensitivity using C. fulvum race 5 (![]()
![]()
Measuring Cf-9 intragenic recombination in Cf-4/Cf-9 trans-heterozygotes:
No Hcr9 intragenic recombination events have been observed in the progeny of Cf-4/Cf-9 trans-heterozygotes. We used a genetic screen to identify intragenic recombinants in trans-heterozygous plants containing Cf-4 and EMS-induced mutant alleles of Cf-9. The trans-heterozygous plants were testcrossed to a Cf0 Avr9 line (Fig 3C). Intragenic recombinants between Cf-9 and another Hcr9 (such as Cf-4) could reconstitute a functional Cf-9 gene that would be identified as a necrotic individual. Cf-4 and Cf-9 contain several kilobase pairs of homologous 5' and 3' flanking DNA (tract III in Fig 1). As Cf-4 and Cf-9 encode the same amino acid sequence in the last 1 kbp of their 3' halves, in vivo intragenic recombinants in this region would be expected to be functional. Before commencing the screen, it was established that sufficient DNA could be isolated for functional characterization of the chimeric gene from seedlings showing early signs of necrosis.
To identify intragenic recombinants Cf4 was crossed to three different Cf-9 mutants (Cf-9D508N, Cf-9R582Ter, and Cf-9S567Lsee Table 1 and Fig 2). All of the mutations in Cf-9 are located downstream of the amino acid L457. This residue is the most C-terminal variant amino acid that distinguishes Cf-9 from Cf-4 that is required for Avr9 recognition (![]()
![]()
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Characterization of EMS-induced mutants of Cf-9 and Cf-4:
Six EMS-induced point mutants of Cf-9 and one Cf-4 mutant were characterized at the molecular level. Two mutants affecting LRRs 21 and 26 (Cf-9R582Ter and Cf-9Q734Ter) would result in the production of truncated Cf-9 proteins lacking the C-terminal domains D, E, F, and G (Fig 2). These domains are essential for Cf-9 function (![]()
The Cf-9G825R mutant would result in substitution of an aliphatic amino acid with a positively charged amino acid in the hydrophobic
-helical transmembrane domain. The G825 residue forms part of a tri-tandem GXXXG motif (see Fig 2) that is required for homo- and heterodimerization of membrane proteins in vivo (![]()
The other mutations (Cf-9D365N, Cf-9D508N, and Cf-9S675L) would result in substitution of single putative solvent-exposed amino acids within the xxLxLxx motif in Cf-9 C-terminal LRRs (Table 1 and Fig 2). These mutations could also alter the glycosylation pattern within Cf-9 (Fig 2). The protein encoded by the Cf-9D365N mutant allele would contain a substituted amino acid within the two additional N-terminal LRRs of Cf-9 (compared to Cf-4) that are required to induce an Avr9-dependent hypersensitive response (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
No extragenic suppressors of Cf-9 or Cf-4 function were identified, in contrast to a previous screen (![]()
![]()
A recombination hotspot in Cf-4/Cf-9 trans-heterozygotes:
This selection identified recombinant Hcr9 haplotypes similar to our previous genetic screen (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thirteen of the 14 crossovers were localized within tract II, in the 5' flanking regions of Hcr9-4C and Hcr9-9E, while only one was located in tract I (Fig 1 and Fig 4B). The 13 crossovers in tract II are clustered in two groups within a 3.6-kbp region (Fig 4B and Fig C). The apparent preference for tract II over tract I may be due to the fact that it is significantly longer. This would be consistent with results from other studies in humans and plants (![]()
![]()
Recombination hotspots in plants usually occur within genes (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The most extensive regions of sequence homology at MW are in tracts II, III, and V (Fig 1). However, a large number of the predicted recombinant classes would not be identified using the current genetic selection; e.g., crossing over within tract V would not result in recombinant chromosomes lacking Cf-4 and Cf-9. The most extensive tract of sequence homology is tract III that includes the 5' and 3' flanking sequences of Cf-4 and Cf-9 (Fig 1). Only intragenic crossovers that involved the 5' coding sequences of Cf-4 and Cf-9 might generate a chimeric Hcr9 that lacked Avr4 or Avr9 recognition specificity (![]()
![]()
![]()
Intragenic recombination at the Cf-4/Cf-9 locus:
We attempted to measure the frequency of intragenic recombination in three crosses containing Cf-9 mutant alleles and Hcr9-4's (Fig 2 and Fig 3C). No gain-of-function Cf-9 alleles were detected in 15,600 testcross progeny (Table 3). Functional analysis of Cf-9 has shown that L457 in LRR 16 is essential for Avr9 recognition (Fig 2; ![]()
![]()
Comparative sequencing of the Cf-4/Cf-9 locus suggested that gene conversion and intragenic recombination have played significant roles in generating sequence variation (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It has been proposed that sequence differences in the Hcr9 intergenic regions suppress mispairing between Hcr9 paralogs, thereby preventing sequence homogenization of the gene cluster, while facilitating intragenic exchange between orthologs (![]()
![]()
|
In the case of Cf-4/Cf-9 trans-heterozygotes, where the genes originated from different Lycopersicon species, crossing over may be restricted to the regions of maximum sequence homology. High levels of recombination are observed in this cross, but it is not clear why this is apparently restricted to the intergenic regions. It is possible that the frequency of Hcr9 intragenic recombination in this cross is below the level that could be detected by our analysis. One way to analyze the rate of intragenic recombination at this locus would be to determine the gain-of-function frequency in Cf-9 trans-heterozygotes containing distinct mutant alleles (e.g., excision alleles of Dissociation-tagged Cf-9 mutants; ![]()
Clearly, other strategies will need to be devised to determine the molecular mechanisms of Hcr9 evolution at this locus. Identifying the full spectrum of recombinant chromosomes will require high-throughput genetic or molecular screens that can reveal an exchange of flanking markers at the Cf-4/Cf-9 locus.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 These authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Edward Nicholls for help with screening EMS-mutagenized tomato families; Matthew Smoker for help with the NPT enzyme assays; Sara Perkins, Mike Hills, and Damian Alger for horticultural assistance; and David Baker and Patrick Bovill for DNA sequencing. The work with recombinant PVX was performed under the conditions of Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs license PHL 161A/4357/(12/2002). The Sainsbury Laboratory is funded by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation. B.B.H.W. received a postgraduate training grant from the Danish Research Academy.
Manuscript received July 22, 2003; Accepted for publication January 16, 2004.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
BERNATZKY, R., E. PICHERSKY, V. S. MALIK, and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1988 CR1a dispersed repeated element associated with the Cab-1 locus in tomato. Plant Mol. Biol. 10:423-433.[CrossRef]
BONNEMA, G., D. SCHIPPER, S. VAN HEUSDEN, P. ZABEL, and P. LINDHOUT, 1997 Tomato chromosome 1: high resolution genetic and physical mapping of the short arm in an interspecific Lycopersicon esculentum x L. peruvianum cross. Mol. Gen. Genet. 253:455-462.[CrossRef][Medline]
BROWN, J. and V. SUNDARESAN, 1991 A recombinational hotspot in the maize A1 intragenic region. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:185-188.[CrossRef]
BÜSCHGES, R., K. HOLLRICHER, R. PANSTRUGA, G. SIMONS, and M. WOLTER et al., 1997 The barley Mlo gene: a novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell 88:695-705.[CrossRef][Medline]
CHIN, D. B., R. ARROYO-GARCIA, O. E. OCHOA, R. V. KESSELI, and D. O. LAVELLE et al., 2001 Recombination and spontaneous mutation at the major cluster of resistance genes in lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Genetics 157:831-849.
COLLINS, N., J. DRAKE, M. AYLIFFE, Q. SUN, and J. ELLIS et al., 1999 Molecular characterization of the maize Rp1-D rust resistance haplotype and its mutants. Plant Cell 11:1365-1376.
DANGL, J. L. and J. D. G. JONES, 2001 Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses. Nature 411:826-833.[CrossRef][Medline]
DE VICENTE, M. C. and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1991 Genome-wide reduction in recombination of backcross progeny derived from male versus female gametes in an interspecific cross of tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:173-178.[CrossRef]
DIXON, M. S., D. A. JONES, J. S. KEDDIE, C. M. THOMAS, and K. HARRISON et al., 1996 The tomato Cf-2 disease resistance locus comprises two functional genes encoding leucine-rich repeat proteins. Cell 84:451-459.[CrossRef][Medline]
DIXON, M. S., K. HATZIXANTHIS, D. A. JONES, K. HARRISON, and J. D. G. JONES, 1998 The tomato Cf-5 disease resistance gene and six homologs show pronounced allelic variation in leucine-rich repeat copy number. Plant Cell 10:1915-1925.
DIXON, M. S., C. GOLSTEIN, C. M. THOMAS, E. A. VAN DER BIEZEN, and J. D. G. JONES, 2000 Genetic complexity of pathogen perception by plants: the example of Rcr3, a tomato gene required specifically by Cf-2.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:8807-8814.
DODDS, P. N., G. J. LAWRENCE, and J. G. ELLIS, 2001a Contrasting modes of evolution acting on the complex N locus for rust resistance in flax. Plant J. 27:439-453.[CrossRef][Medline]
DODDS, P. N., G. J. LAWRENCE, and J. G. ELLIS, 2001b Six amino acid changes confined to the leucine-rich repeat beta-strand/beta-turn motif determine the difference between the P and P2 rust resistance specificities in flax. Plant Cell 13:163-178.
DOONER, H. K. and I. M. MARTÍNEZ-FÉREZ, 1997 Recombination occurs uniformly within the bronze gene, a meiotic recombination hotspot in the maize genome. Plant Cell 9:1633-1646.[Abstract]
ECOCHARD, R., M. S. RAMANNA, and D. DE NETTANCOURT, 1969 Detection and cytological analysis of tomato haploids. Genetica 40:181-190.[CrossRef]
EGGLESTON, W. B., M. ALLEMAN, and J. L. KERMICLE, 1995 Molecular organization and germinal instability of R-stippled maize. Genetics 141:347-360.[Abstract]
ELLIS, J. G., G. J. LAWRENCE, J. E. LUCK, and P. N. DODDS, 1999 Identification of regions in alleles of the flax rust resistance gene L that determine differences in gene-for-gene specificity. Plant Cell 11:495-506.
GERBER, D. and Y. SHAI, 2001 In vivo detection of hetero-association of glycophorin-A and its mutants within the membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 276:31229-31232.
HAMMOND-KOSACK, K. E., K. HARRISON, and J. D. G. JONES, 1994a Developmentally regulated cell death on expression of the fungal avirulence gene Avr9 in tomato seedlings carrying the disease-resitance gene Cf-9.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10445-10449.
HAMMOND-KOSACK, K. E., K. HARRISON, and J. D. G. JONES, 1994b Identification of two genes required in tomato for full Cf-9-dependent resistance to Cladosporium fulvum. Plant Cell 6:361-374.[Abstract]
HAMMOND-KOSACK, K. E., B. J. STASKAWICZ, J. D. G. JONES, and D. C. BAULCOMBE, 1995 Functional expression of a fungal avirulence gene from a modified potato virus X genome. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 8:181-185.
HAMZA, S., C. CAMILLERI, J.-M. POLLIEN, H. VAUCHERET, and J.-P. BOURGIN et al., 1993 Selection for spontaneous tomato haploids using a conditional lethal marker. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:657-664.
HELLENS, R. P., E. A. EDWARDS, N. R. LEYLAND, S. BEAN, and P. M. MULLINEAUX, 2000 pGreen: a versatile and flexible binary Ti vector for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 42:819-832.[CrossRef][Medline]
IVANOVA, S. V., L. I. DOLGODVOROVA, G. I. KARLOV, and E. V. KUCHKOVSKAJA, 2000 Morphometric and cytogenetic characteristics of haploid tomato plants. Russ. J. Genet. 36:41-50.
JONES, D. A., C. M. THOMAS, K. E. HAMMOND-KOSACK, P. J. BALINT-KURTI, and J. D. G. JONES, 1994 Isolation of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum by transposon tagging. Science 266:789-793.
KOORNEEF, M., J. A. M. VAN DIEPEN, C. J. HANHART, A. C. KIEBOOM-DE WAART, and L. MARINELLI et al., 1989 Chromosomal instability in cell- and tissue cultures of tomato haploids and diploids. Euphytica 43:179-186.[CrossRef]
LAUGÉ, R., A. P. DMITRIEV, M. H. A. J. JOOSTEN, and P. J. G. M. DE WIT, 1998a Additional resistance gene(s) against Cladosporium fulvum on the Cf-9 introgression segment are associated with strong PR accumulation. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 11:301-308.
LAUGÉ, R., M. H. A. J. JOOSTEN, J. P. W. HAANSTRA, P. H. GOODWIN, and P. LINDHOUT et al., 1998b Successful search for a resistance gene in tomato targeted against a virulence factor of a fungal protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:9014-9018.
LAUGÉ, R., P. H. GOODWIN, P. J. G. M. DE WIT, and M. H. A. J. JOOSTEN, 2000 Specific HR-associated recognition of secreted proteins from Cladosporium fulvum occurs in both host and non-host plants. Plant J. 23:735-745.[CrossRef][Medline]
LUCK, J. E., G. J. LAWRENCE, E. J. FINNEGAN, D. A. JONES, and J. G. ELLIS, 1998 A flax transposon identified in two spontaneous mutant alleles of the L6 rust resistance gene. Plant J. 16:365-369.[CrossRef][Medline]
LUCK, J. E., G. J. LAWRENCE, P. N. DODDS, K. W. SHEPHERD, and J. G. ELLIS, 2000 Regions outside of the leucine-rich repeats of flax rust resistance proteins play a role in specificity determination. Plant Cell 12:1367-1377.
MCDOWELL, J. M., M. DHANDAYDHAM, T. A. LONG, M. G. M. AARTS, and S. GOFF et al., 1998 Intragenic recombination and diversifying selection contribute to the evolution of the downy mildew resistance at the RPP8 locus of Arabidopsis.. Plant Cell 10:1861-1874.
METZENBERG, A. B., G. WURZER, T. H. J. HUISMAN, and O. SMITHIES, 1991 Homology requirements for unequal crossing over in humans. Genetics 128:143-161.[Abstract]
MEYERS, B. C., D. B. CHIN, K. A. SHEN, S. SIVARAMAKRISHNAN, and D. O. LAVELLE et al., 1998 The major resistance gene cluster in lettuce is highly duplicated and spans several megabases. Plant Cell 10:1817-1832.
MICHELMORE, R. W. and B. C. MEYERS, 1998 Clusters of resistance genes in plants evolve by divergent selection and a birth-and-death process. Genome Res. 8:1113-1130.
NOËL, L., T. L. MOORES, E. A. VAN DER BIEZEN, M. PARNISKE, and M. J. DANIELS et al., 1999 Pronounced intraspecific haplotype divergence at the RPP5 complex disease resistance locus of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11:2099-2111.
OKAGAKI, R. J. and F. W. CLIFFORD, 1997 Analysis of recombination sites within the maize waxy locus. Genetics 147:815-821.[Abstract]
PANTER, S. N., K. E. HAMMOND-KOSACK, K. HARRISON, J. D. G. JONES, and D. A. JONES, 2002 Developmental control of promoter activity is not responsible for mature onset of Cf-9B-mediated resistance to leaf mold in tomato. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 15:1099-1107.[Medline]
PARNISKE, M. and J. D. G. JONES, 1999 Recombination between diverged clusters of the tomato Cf-9 plant disease resistance gene family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:5850-5855.
PARNISKE, M., K. E. HAMMOND-KOSACK, C. GOLSTEIN, C. M. THOMAS, and D. A. JONES et al., 1997 Novel disease resistance specificities result from sequence exchange between tandemly repeated genes at the Cf-4/9 locus of tomato. Cell 91:821-832.[CrossRef][Medline]
RICHTER, T. E., T. J. PRYOR, J. L. BENNETZEN, and S. H. HULBERT, 1995 New rust resistance specificities associated with recombination in the Rp1 complex in maize. Genetics 141:373-381.[Abstract]
RIVAS, S. and C. M. THOMAS, 2002 Recent advances in the study of tomato Cf resistance genes. Mol. Plant Pathol. 3:277-282.
SCHNABLE, P. S., A.-P. HSIA, and B. NIKOLAU, 1998 Genetic recombination in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1:123-129.[CrossRef][Medline]
SUN, Q., N. C. COLLINS, M. AYLIFFE, S. M. SMITH, and J. DRAKE et al., 2001 Recombination between paralogues at the rp1 rust resistance locus in maize. Genetics 158:423-438.
TAKAHASHI, Y., Y. NIWA, Y. MACHIDA, and T. NAGATA, 1990 Location of the cis-acting auxin-responsive region in the promoter of the par gene from tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:8013-8016.
TAKKEN, F. L. W., D. SCHIPPER, H. J. J. NIJKAMP, and J. HILLE, 1998 Identification and Ds-tagged isolation of a new gene at the Cf-4 locus of tomato involved in disease resistance to Cladosporium fulvum race 5. Plant J. 20:279-288.[CrossRef]
TAKKEN, F. L. W., C. M. THOMAS, M. H. A. J. JOOSTEN, C. GOLSTEIN, and N. WESTERINK et al., 1999 A second gene at the tomato Cf-4 locus confers resistance to Cladosporium fulvum through recognition of a novel avirulence determinant. Plant J. 20:279-288.[Medline]
TANKSLEY, S. D., M. W. GANAL, J. P. PRINCE, M. C. DEVICENTE, and M. W. BONIERBALE et al., 1992 High-density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132:1141-1160.[Abstract]
THOMAS, C. M., D. A. JONES, M. PARNISKE, K. HARRISON, and P. J. BALINT-KURTI et al., 1997 Characterization of the tomato Cf-4 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum identifies sequences that determine recognitional specificity in Cf-4 and Cf-9. Plant Cell 9:2209-2224.[Abstract]
THOMAS, C. M., S. J. TANG, K. HAMMOND-KOSACK, and J. D. G. JONES, 2000 Comparison of the hypersensitive response induced by the tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 genes in Nicotiana spp.. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 13:465-469.[Medline]
VAN DER HOORN, R. A. L., R. ROTH, and P. J. G. M. DE WIT, 2001a Identification of distinct specificity determinants in resistance protein Cf-4 allows construction of a Cf-9 mutant that confers recognition of avirulence protein AVR4. Plant Cell 13:273-285.
VAN DER HOORN, R. A. L., M. KRUIJT, R. ROTH, B. F. BRANDWAGT, and M. H. A. J. JOOSTEN et al., 2001b Intragenic recombination generated two distinct Cf genes that mediate AVR9 recognition in the natural population of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:10493-10498.
WULFF, B. B. H., C. M. THOMAS, M. SMOKER, M. GRANT, and J. D. G. JONES, 2001 Domain swapping and gene shuffling identify sequences required for induction of an Avr-dependent hypersensitive response by the tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 proteins. Plant Cell 13:255-272.
YAO, H., Q. ZHOU, J. LI, H. SMITH, and M. YANDEAU et al., 2002 Molecular characterisation of meiotic recombination across the 140-kb multigenic a1-sh2 interval of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:6157-6162.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Sun, Y. Zhang, S. Yang, J.-Q. Chen, B. Hohn, and D. Tian Insertion DNA Promotes Ectopic Recombination during Meiosis in Arabidopsis Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2008; 25(10): 2079 - 2083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. C. Collins, N. J. Shirley, M. Saeed, M. Pallotta, and J. P. Gustafson An ALMT1 Gene Cluster Controlling Aluminum Tolerance at the Alt4 Locus of Rye (Secale cereale L.) Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 669 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A.L. van der Hoorn, B. B.H. Wulff, S. Rivas, M. C. Durrant, A. van der Ploeg, P. J.G.M. de Wit, and J. D.G. Jones Structure-Function Analysis of Cf-9, a Receptor-Like Protein with Extracytoplasmic Leucine-Rich Repeats PLANT CELL, March 1, 2005; 17(3): 1000 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Kellogg and J. L. Bennetzen The evolution of nuclear genome structure in seed plants Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2004; 91(10): 1709 - 1725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Supplemental Tables
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Wulff, B. B. H.
- Articles by Jones, J. D. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Wulff, B. B. H.
- Articles by Jones, J. D. G.








