- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Dopman, E. B.
- Articles by Harrison, R. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Dopman, E. B.
- Articles by Harrison, R. G.
Genetic Mapping of Sexual Isolation Between E and Z Pheromone Strains of the European Corn Borer (Ostrinia nubilalis)
Erik B. Dopmana, Steven M. Bogdanowicza, and Richard G. Harrisonaa Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Corresponding author: Erik B. Dopman, Corson Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853., ebd5{at}cornell.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: M. A. F. NOOR
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The E and Z pheromone strains of the European corn borer (ECB) provide an exceptional model system for examining the genetic basis of sexual isolation. Differences at two major genes account for variation in female pheromone production and male behavioral response, components of the pheromone communication system known to be important for mate recognition and mate choice. Strains of ECB are morphologically indistinguishable, and surveys of allozyme and DNA sequence variation have revealed significant allele frequency differences at only a single sex-linked locus, Tpi. Here we present a detailed genetic linkage map of ECB using AFLP and microsatellite markers and map the factors responsible for pheromone production (Pher) and male response (Resp). Our map covers 1697 cM and identifies all 31 linkage groups in ECB. Both Resp and Tpi map to the Z (sex) chromosome, but the distance between these markers (>20 cM) argues against the hypothesis that patterns of variation at Tpi are explained by tight linkage to this "speciation gene." However, we show, through analysis of marker density, that Tpi is located in a region of low recombination and suggest that a second Z-linked reproductive barrier could be responsible for the origin and/or persistence of differentiation at Tpi.
ALTHOUGH evolutionary biologists and systematists often do not agree on the relative merits of competing species concepts, most students of the speciation process adopt the biological species concept (BSC), in which the origin of new species involves the evolution of intrinsic barriers to gene exchange between diverging populations (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Until very recently, this research agenda was pursued successfully in only a few model organisms and, indeed, most of our knowledge about the genetics of speciation came from detailed studies of hybrid sterility and inviability in Drosophila (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
One of the non-Drosophila model systems mentioned by ![]()
![]()
11-14:Oac; Z strain) and another in which females produce and males respond to a 99:1 E/Z blend (E strain; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Laboratory analyses of E and Z borers suggest that sexual isolation stems from stereotypic differences in male response to pheromone blend composition (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Segregation patterns assessed from F1, F2, and backcross progeny produced using Z- and E-strain parents indicate that pheromone production and male behavioral response are each determined by single major genes. Pheromone production exhibits autosomal inheritance, whereas male behavioral response is sex linked (![]()
![]()
![]()
Although differentiated with respect to pheromone communication, the Z and E strains of ECB are otherwise difficult to distinguish (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here we describe the first genetic linkage map for ECB based on a combination of dominant amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and codominant microsatellite molecular markers. Because crossing over during oogenesis does not occur in female Lepidoptera, families can be generated in which all markers on the same chromosome cosegregate as a single unit. Conversely, crossing over during spermatogenesis in male Lepidoptera allows families to be generated in which recombinational distance affects the cosegregation of markers on the same chromosome. This "biphasic" nature of crossing over facilitates mapping of major loci underlying phenotypes by using a sequential analysis of female- and male-informative crosses (![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Insect populations:
Two cultures of ECB, maintained by Wendell Roelofs and colleagues at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station (NYSAES) in Geneva, New York, were used as sources for initiating mapping families. The first culture consisted of Z-strain insects that were isolated from field-collected larvae, pupae, and adults in corn stubble from Bouckville, New York in April 1994. The second culture consisted of E-strain insects isolated from corn stubble near Geneva, New York in May 1996. We set up 12 F1 crosses between E females and Z males and chose 1 cross that was segregating at the Tpi locus to begin the backcross generation. Backcross families were started using an F1 female crossed to an E male for BC1F and an F1 male crossed to an E female for BC1M (Fig 1). All insects were reared under a 16:8 L:D photoperiod at 25°30° and 5060% relative humidity.
|
Marker development:
Genomic DNA was extracted from adult moths using a DNeasy tissue kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). AFLP markers (![]()
50 to
450 bp. AFLP fragments were sized in GENESCAN (version 3.1; ABI) and segregating markers were visualized with GENOTYPER (version 2.1; ABI).
Sequences containing microsatellites were isolated as described by ![]()
) cells. Colonies were plated on Luria agar supplemented with ampicillin, replicated onto nylon membranes, and probed with the same oligonucleotides (now radiolabeled) that were used in the enrichment. Sequences from positive colonies were obtained with universal M13 primers that flank the cloning site. Primers were designed using PRIMERSELECT (DNASTAR, Madison, WI), and unlabeled and 5' fluorescently labeled primers (HEX, 6-FAM) were ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA).
PCR reactions for genotyping individuals contained 1 µl (
10 ng) genomic DNA in a 10-µl total volume that included 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 1.5 pmol each primer, and 0.5 units Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Thermal cycling consisted of a "touchdown" procedure that began at 95° for 50 sec, 67° for 1 min, and 72° for 1 min. The annealing temperature was dropped 2° per cycle for the first 7 cycles (range of temperatures 67°55°), followed by 28 cycles with an annealing temperature of 52°. Up to six loci were multiplexed per lane on an ABI 377 automated sequencer according to the manufacturer's protocols. Fragments were analyzed identically to AFLPs.
Genotyping moths for Tpi:
Moths were genotyped for Tpi either by characterizing protein mobility on cellulose acetate plates or by use of a diagnostic restriction site difference. For protein electrophoresis, three legs from adult ECB in BC1M were removed prior to genomic DNA extraction, and homogenized leg tissue was applied to cellulose acetate plates for allozyme analysis. Samples were electrophoresed for 13 min at 200 V in Tris/glycine buffer. Agar-overlay stain components (Sigma, St. Louis) for single 76- x 76-mm acetate plates included 3.5 mg dihydroxyacetone phosphate as a substrate together with 2 ml NAD (2 mg/ml), 10 mg Na2HASO4, 130 µl MTT (10 mg/ml), 130 µl PMS (2 mg/ml), 20 µl G3PDH, and 3 ml agar (16 mg/ml). From Tpi DNA sequence data (E. B. DOPMAN, L. PEREZ, S. M. BOGDANOWICZ and R. G. HARRISON, unpublished results) we identified a diagnostic BsrI restriction site between the Tpi-1 and Tpi-2 alleles. Following amplification of genomic DNA using primers that flank the recognition site, the PCR product was digested with BsrI (New England Biolabs) following the manufacturer's protocol.
Female pheromone blend and male behavioral response assays:
Adult 1- to 2-day-old females in the BC1F and BC1M mapping populations were prepared for the pheromone blend assay by being placed in 10-ml plastic cups covered with aluminum foil. Following an 18- to 24-hr period in the dark, abdominal tips were exposed and clipped into one drop of HPLC-grade hexane (Sigma). Tips were removed after 1 hr and solutions were stored at 80°. Pheromone samples were concentrated to 1 µl under an N2 stream before being injected into a HP 5890 GC (for BC1F) or a Shimadzu GC-17A (for BC1M) gas chromatograph, both of which were equipped with 30-m polar EC-Wax columns (Alltech, Deerfield, IL). The running program for the HP 5890 began at 80° for 2 min followed by a ramping rate of 15°/min to 190°, 4°/min to 220°, and ending at 200° for 4 min, whereas for the Shimadzu, running conditions were 40° for 2 min, increased at 15°/min to 250°, and held for 10 min. Under these conditions, females that are E/Z at the production locus exhibit a 65:35 ratio of E/Z
11-14:OAc and females that are E/E at this locus exhibit a 99:1 ratio of E/Z
11-14:OAc (![]()
Male behavioral response for BC1M males was characterized by flying 1- to 2-day-old males to synthetic pheromone blends in a sustained-flight tunnel according to the conditions and protocol of ![]()
BC1Flinkage group construction and test of effect on pheromone production:
In BC1F, informative markers were those present in the F1 mother and absent in the recurrent E male parent (Fig 1). Using the labeling scheme developed for use in MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0 (![]()
= 0.05/31 where the counts of BC1F females' pheromone blend (99:1 E/Z or 65:35 E/Z) were compared to chromosomal origin (Z or E grandparent).
BC1Mmapping markers and traits within linkage groups:
In BC1M, informative markers were those present in the F1 father and absent in the recurrent E female parent (Fig 1). Segregation ratios (1:1) were tested using a chi-square test and homologous markers from BC1F were noted to identify groups of markers originating from the same chromosome. Linkage was established under an initial score of LOD
3.0 with a maximum distance of 40 cM. For linkage groups possessing <9 markers, the "compare" command was used to order markers and traits within linkage groups and distances were estimated using the Kosambi mapping function. The "suggest subset" command was used to identify equally spaced markers for linkage groups with 10 or more markers and the "build" or "try" commands were used to place additional markers at a threshold of 2.0. Finally, marker order was tested using the "ripple" command. Markers that were not automatically placed because of a low number of recombinants were added to the map under their most likely positions as long as their addition did not result in substantial map extension.
Estimation of recombination rate:
For the majority of species in which a physical map is unknown, information about genome-wide recombination patterns can be obtained indirectly. ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We compared the number of markers per linkage group with those expected under a Poisson distribution to test for a random physical distribution of AFLP and microsatellite markers among ECB chromosomes. Within each linkage group, the number of markers in a 10-cM bandwidth on the genetic map was compared to that expected under a Poisson distribution to detect significant marker density variation. Density estimates could be inflated due to codominant AFLP markers mapping to the same position; however, codominance would be possible only if markers exhibited complementary segregation and if markers mapping to the same position were derived from the same primers. We checked for these allelic effects and markers that exhibited this pattern were removed from the analysis. Local recombination rates were estimated for the Z chromosome by taking the inverse of the cosine-kernel density function with an 8-cM bandwidth using the R environment (version 1.7-18; ISBN 3-901167-51-X). A reflecting boundary was employed to minimize biased estimates near edges (see ![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
BC1Flinkage group construction and test of effect on pheromone production:
Fifty-seven female BC1F progeny produced sufficient pheromone for gas chromatographic analysis. Of these, 12 females producing 99:1 E/Z and 13 females producing 65:35 E/Z were chosen as material for genetic analysis. Six BC1F males were also analyzed to identify markers linked to the sex chromosomes. A total of 216 AFLPs and 32 microsatellites segregated in BC1F and, as expected, the majority of markers originated from the paternal Z grandparent because the recurrent parent was from the E strain (Fig 1). Linkage analysis produced groups of cosegregating markers indicating a lack of recombination in female ECB. The number of markers for the 30 groups identified ranged in size from 2 to 26, and the single unlinked AFLP marker was included as group 31 because n = 31 for ECB (![]()
= 0.05/31; Fig 2). Females producing the 99:1 E/Z pheromone derived their chromosome 12 from the E grandparent and females producing the 65:35 E/Z pheromone derived their chromosome 12 from the Z grandparent.
|
BC1Mmapping markers and traits within linkage groups:
In the BC1M mapping family, 81 males showed unambiguous flight behaviors and 38 females produced measurable pheromone. Seventy-nine BC1M progeny were genotyped for AFLP markers (41 males and 38 females), and 38 progeny were genotyped for microsatellites. All males and females were genotyped for Tpi. A total of 213 AFLP and 45 microsatellite markers segregated in BC1M. By noting which markers in BC1M showed homology with those used in BC1F, apparently independent linkage groups could be located on the same chromosome, even when they did not sort together under the LOD threshold of 3.0. These fragmented groups coalesced under a higher LOD score of 4.0, producing a total of 31 linkage groups with 218 markers per group. The combined AFLP and microsatellite map covered 1697.3 cM with linkage groups ranging from 2.5 cM (group 30) to 127.3 cM (group 1) in length. The average interval distance between mapped markers was 8.8 cM.
The locus for pheromone blend production (Pher) mapped to linkage group 12, 9.3 ± 5.5 cM from AFLP p18_85 and 17.9 ± 6.0 cM from AFLP p40_149 (Fig 3). Six additional AFLPs and one microsatellite were placed on linkage group 12, producing a 62.3-cM map. The gene for male response (Resp) mapped to the Z chromosome (linkage group 7), 12.2 ± 4.3 cM away from AFLP p17_130 and 6.0 ± 2.5 cM away from microsatellite ma169. Interestingly, Tpi mapped 28.1 ± 4.1 cM from Resp. The Z chromosome map consisted of 12 additional AFLP markers for a total map length of 66.9 cM. A cluster of markers on the Z chromosome grouped in the region surrounding Tpi, including 4 AFLP markers mapping to the same position as Tpi and 2 AFLPs mapping together at a second site.
|
Estimation of recombination rate:
The distributions of both microsatellite (
2 = 1.51, 3 d.f., P = 0.59) and AFLP (
2 = 2.58, 3 d.f., P = 0.83) markers among linkage groups were not significantly different from random expectations. In contrast, after correcting for multiple comparisons (
= 0.05/28) six linkage groups showed nonrandom marker distributions, including the Z chromosome. Linkage groups 3 (
2 = 20.72, 4 d.f., P = 0.0004), 10 (
2 = 27.89, 4 d.f., P = 7 x 106), and 14 (
2 = 20.9, 4 d.f., P = 0.0009) showed a more even distribution of markers than expected, whereas linkage groups 19 (
2 = 25.1, 5 d.f., P = 2 x 105), 20 (
2 = 12.92, 2 d.f., P = 0.0016), and the sex chromosome (
2 = 37.45, 5 d.f., P = 6.9 x 107), showed a distribution of markers with a significant excess of marker clustering. Other linkage groups may exhibit a random distribution of markers, but a lack of power due to low marker density is likely for some linkage groups. Using the indirect method of ![]()
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
One fundamental goal for the study of speciation is to characterize the genetic basis for trait differences that contribute to reproductive isolation among natural populations. A necessary prerequisite is knowledge of the underlying genetic architecture, but unfortunately, for all but a few species this information is lacking (see ![]()
![]()
![]()
Our linkage map for ECB covers 1697.3 cM across 31 linkage groups with an average interval distance of 8.8 cM (Fig 3). Genome sizes in moths are generally in the 400- to 1000-Mb range (![]()
290 kb/cM, at the lower end of the range seen in other insects (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
From the female-informative backcross, we detected one autosomal linkage group (chromosome 12) that contributes significantly to variation in E/Z pheromone blend between the E and Z strains of ECB (Fig 2). Through the male-informative backcross, we were able to map the factor responsible for this variation and to locate AFLP markers within 10 cM (Fig 3). Previous research has shown that the Z (sex) chromosome has a significant effect on variation in male behavioral response between E and Z strains (![]()
Differences in the pheromone blend produced by female ECB are likely due to changes in the specificity of the reactions in which
11-14-carbon-precursor acids are reduced and acetylated to produce the E and Z acetates, which are the pheromone components. Both hybrids and "pure" strain ECB females produce an
70:30 mixture of E/Z precursor acids. Because the acetylation of the alcohol precursors is not selective (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The Tpi locus is the only marker assayed thus far that exhibits significant differences in allele frequencies between the pheromone strains, and these differences persist even where E and Z borers are sympatric (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Prior to this study, selection at the male response locus seemed a plausible explanation for the origin and maintenance of differentiation at Tpi because both are Z linked. Scenarios could be proposed involving either a selective sweep of alleles for male response or incompatibilities due to hybrid males having reduced success in obtaining mates. However, the map distance of 28.1 ± 4.1 cM between Resp and Tpi (Fig 3) makes it unlikely that Tpi allele frequencies have been influenced via hitchhiking associated with selection at the Resp locus. Furthermore, the persistence of linkage disequilibrium between Resp and Tpi in sympatric populations of E and Z strains becomes more difficult to explain. One possibility is that Resp does have an influence on Tpi, but through its effects on assortative mating. Limited mating between E and Z borers would cause any initial linkage disequilibrium to decay slowly between Resp and Tpi. A second explanation is that strong premating isolation and/or substantially reduced F1 hybrid fitness impedes all gene flow between pheromone strains; such a strong barrier would maintain linkage disequilibrium indefinitely. Yet another possibility is that a second reproductive barrier on the Z chromosome is limiting gene flow at Tpi, possibly in addition to the effects of Resp.
Postdiapause development (PDD) describes the time it takes for overwintering larvae to pupate under diapause-breaking conditions. In upstate New York, populations of ECB exhibit either one or two generations per year as a consequence of individual differences in PDD (![]()
![]()
Beyond the understanding of the genetics of mating signals and responses provided by comparisons of the ECB strains, broader comparisons between ECB and other Ostrinia species should be informative about the evolution of sexual communication in the genus. The adzuki bean borer (O. scapulalis), a congener of ECB, expresses striking similarity in its pheromone blend variation to ECB strains (![]()
![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Wendell Roelofs, Paul Robbins, Charles Linn, Kathy Poole, and Paul Feeny for their gracious intellectual and logistical assistance with ECB rearing and phenotyping. David Heckel, David Hawthorne, Mohamed Noor, and an anonymous reviewer provided helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This work was supported by a predoctoral fellowship from the National Center for Environmental Research, a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science to Achieve Results program grant (U-91589501-0) to E.B.D., and by a grant (2001-35302-11123) from the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program for Entomology and Nematology to R.G.H.
Manuscript received December 1, 2003; Accepted for publication January 26, 2004.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AQUADRO, C. F., 1997 Insights into the evolutionary process from patterns of DNA sequence variability. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:835-840.[CrossRef][Medline]
BRADSHAW, H. D., S. M. WILBERT, K. G. OTTO, and D. W. SCHEMSKE, 1995 Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in Monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Nature 376:762-765.[CrossRef]
BUTLIN, R. and M. G. RITCHIE, 2001 Evolutionary biology: searching for speciation genes. Nature 412:31-33.[CrossRef][Medline]
CAFFREY, D. J., and L. H. WORTHLEY, 1927 A progress report on the investigations of the European corn borer. USDA Bull. No. 1476, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
CARDÉ, R. T., W. L. ROELOFS, R. G. HARRISON, A. T. VAWTER, and P. F. BRUSSARD et al., 1978 European corn borer: pheromone polymorphism or sibling species. Science 199:555-556.
CIANCHI, R., S. MAINI, and L. BULLINI, 1980 Genetic distance between pheromone strains of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis: different contribution of variable substrate, regulatory and non-regulatory enzymes. Heredity 45:383-388.
COYNE, J. A. and H. A. ORR, 1989 Patterns of speciation in Drosophila.. Evolution 43:362-381.[CrossRef]
COYNE, J. A. and H. A. ORR, 1998 The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353:287-305.[CrossRef][Medline]
GLOVER, T., M. CAMPBELL, P. ROBBINS, and W. ROELOFS, 1990 Sex-linked control of sex-pheromone behavioral responses in European corn borer moths (Ostrinia nubilalis) confirmed with TPI marker gene. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 15:67-77.[CrossRef]
GLOVER, T. J., J. J. KNODEL, P. S. ROBBINS, C. J. ECKENRODE, and W. L. ROELOFS, 1991 Gene flow among three races of European corn borers (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in New York state. Environ. Entomol. 20:1356-1362.
GLOVER, T. J., P. S. ROBBINS, C. J. ECKENRODE, and W. L. ROELOFS, 1992 Genetic control of voltinism characteristics in European corn borer races assessed with a marker gene. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 20:107-117.
GREGORY, T. R., 2001 Animal genome size database (http://www.genomesize.com).
GUTHRIE, W. D., E. J. DOLLINGER, and J. F. STETSON, 1965 Chromosome studies of the European corn borer, smartweed borer, and lotus borer (Pyralidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 58:100-105.
HAMILTON, M. B., E. L. PINCUS, A. DI FIORE, and R. C. FLEISCHER, 1999 Universal linker and ligation procedures for construction of genomic DNA libraries enriched for microsatellites. Biotechniques 27:500-507.[Medline]
HARRISON, R. G., 1998 Linking evolutionary pattern and process, pp. 1931 in Endless Forms, edited by D. J. HOWARD and S. H. BERLOCHER. Oxford University Press, New York.
HARRISON, R. G. and A. T. VAWTER, 1977 Allozyme differentiation between pheromone strains of European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 70:717-720.
HAWTHORNE, D. J. and S. VIA, 2001 Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 412:904-907.[CrossRef][Medline]
HECKEL, D. G., L. J. GAHAN, Y. B. LIU, and B. E. TABASHNIK, 1999 Genetic mapping of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in diamondback moth using biphasic linkage analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:8373-8377.
HUANG, Y. P., T. TAKANASHI, S. HOSHIZAKI, S. TATSUKI, and Y. ISHIKAWA, 2002 Female sex pheromone polymorphism in adzuki bean borer, Ostrinia scapulalis, is similar to that in European corn borer, O. nubilalis.. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:533-539.[CrossRef][Medline]
HUNT, G. J. and R. E. PAGE, 1995 Linkage map of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, based on RAPD markers. Genetics 139:1371-1382.[Abstract]
KLUN, J. A. and S. MAINI, 1979 Genetic basis of an insect chemical communication system: European corn borer. Environ. Entomol. 8:423-426.
KLUN, J. A., O. L. CHAPMAN, K. C. MATTES, P. W. WOJTKOWS, and M. BEROZA et al., 1973 Insect sex pheromones: minor amount of opposite geometrical isomer critical to attraction. Science 181:661-663.
KLUN, J. A., P. L. ANGLADE, F. BACA, O. L. CHAPMAN, and H. C. CHIANG, 1975 Insect sex pheromonesintraspecific pheromonal variability of Ostrinia nubilalis in North America and Europe. Environ. Entomol. 4:891-894.
KOCHANSKY, J., R. T. CARDÉ, J. LIEBHERR, and W. L. ROELOFS, 1975 Sex pheromones of the European corn borer in New York. J. Chem. Ecol. 1:225-231.
KRAFT, T., T. SALL, I. MAGNUSSON-RADING, N. O. NILSSON, and C. HALLDEN, 1998 Positive correlation between recombination rates and levels of genetic variation in natural populations of sea beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima). Genetics 150:1239-1244.
LANDER, E. S., P. GREEN, J. ABRAHAMSON, A. BARLOW, and M. J. DALY et al., 1987 MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174-181.[CrossRef][Medline]
LIEBHERR, J., 1974 Studies on two strains of European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner). Masters Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
LIEBHERR, J. and W. ROELOFS, 1975 Laboratory hybridization and mating period studies using two pheromone strains of Ostrinia nubilalis.. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 68:305-309.
LINN, C., K. POOLE, A. ZHANG, and W. ROELOFS, 1999 Pheromone-blend discrimination by European corn borer moths with inter-race and inter-sex antennal transplants. J. Comp. Physiol. A 184:273-278.[CrossRef]
LINN, C. E., M. S. YOUNG, M. GENDLE, T. J. GLOVER, and W. L. ROELOFS, 1997 Sex pheromone blend discrimination in two races and hybrids of the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis.. Physiol. Entomol. 22:212-223.
LÖFSTEDT, C., 1993 Moth pheromone genetics and evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340:167-177.
LYON, M. F., 1976 Distribution of crossing-over in mouse chromosomes. Genet. Res. 28:291-299.[Medline]
MARCON, P., D. B. TAYLOR, C. E. MASON, R. L. HELLMICH, and B. D. SIEGFRIED, 1999 Genetic similarity among pheromone and voltinism races of Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Insect Mol. Biol. 8:213-221.[CrossRef][Medline]
NACHMAN, M. W. and G. A. CHURCHILL, 1996 Heterogeneity in rates of recombination across the mouse genome. Genetics 142:537-548.[Abstract]
ORR, H. A., 2001 The genetics of species differences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:343-350.[CrossRef][Medline]
PARSONS, Y. M. and K. L. SHAW, 2002 Mapping unexplored genomes: a genetic linkage map of the Hawaiian cricket Laupala.. Genetics 162:1275-1282.
PEICHEL, C. L., K. S. NERENG, K. A. OHGI, B. L. E. COLE, and P. F. COLOSIMO et al., 2001 The genetic architecture of divergence between threespine stickleback species. Nature 414:901-905.[CrossRef][Medline]
PORNKULWAT, S., S. R. SKODA, G. D. THOMAS, and J. E. FOSTER, 1998 Random amplified polymorphic DNA used to identify genetic variation in ecotypes of the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91:719-725.
PRESGRAVES, D. C., L. BALAGOPALAN, S. M. ABMAYR, and H. A. ORR, 2003 Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila. Nature 423:715-719.[CrossRef][Medline]
RIESEBERG, L. H., J. WHITTON, and K. GARDNER, 1999 Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species. Genetics 152:713-727.
RITCHIE, M. G., and S. D. F. PHILLIPS, 1998 The genetics of sexual isolation, pp. 291308 in Endless Forms, edited by D. J. HOWARD and S. H. BERLOCHER. Oxford University Press, New York.
ROELOFS, W., T. GLOVER, X. H. TANG, I. SRENG, and P. ROBBINS et al., 1987 Sex-pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:7585-7589.
ROELOFS, W. L. and W. A. WOLF, 1988 Pheromone biosynthesis in Lepidoptera. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:2019-2031.[CrossRef]
SCHLUTER, D. and L. M. NAGEL, 1995 Parallel speciation by natural selection. Am. Nat. 146:292-301.[CrossRef]
TING, C. T., S. C. TSAUR, and C.-I WU, 2000 The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5313-5316.
VIA, S., and D. J. HAWTHORNE, 1998 The genetics of speciation: promises and prospects of quantitative trait locus mapping, pp. 352366 in Endless Forms, edited by D. J. HOWARD and S. H. BERLOCHER. Oxford University Press, New York.
VOS, P., R. HOGERS, M. BLEEKER, M. REIJANS, and T. VANDELEE et al., 1995 AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.
WILLETT, C. S. and R. G. HARRISON, 1999 Insights into genome differentiation: pheromone-binding protein variation and population history in the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis). Genetics 153:1743-1751.
ZHU, J. W., C. H. ZHAO, F. LU, M. BENGTSSON, and C. LOFSTEDT, 1996 Reductase specificity and the ratio regulation of E/Z isomers in pheromone biosynthesis of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 26:171-176.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Malausa, L. Leniaud, J.-F. Martin, P. Audiot, D. Bourguet, S. Ponsard, S.-F. Lee, R. G. Harrison, and E. Dopman Molecular Differentiation at Nuclear Loci in French Host Races of the European Corn Borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2343 - 2355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. Dopman, L. Perez, S. M. Bogdanowicz, and R. G. Harrison Consequences of reproductive barriers for genealogical discordance in the European corn borer PNAS, October 11, 2005; 102(41): 14706 - 14711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Dopman, E. B.
- Articles by Harrison, R. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Dopman, E. B.
- Articles by Harrison, R. G.





