Genetics, Vol. 166, 1783-1794, April 2004, Copyright © 2004

Nucleotide Variation and Recombination Along the Fourth Chromosome in Drosophila simulans

Wen Wang1,a,c, Kevin Thornton1,b, J. J. Emersona, and Manyuan Longa,b
a Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
b The Committee on Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
c CAS-Max Planck Junior Scientist Group, Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, People's Republic of China

Corresponding author: Manyuan Long, University of Chicago, 1101 East 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637., mlong{at}midway.uchicago.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: L. HARSHMAN


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

The fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster and its sister species are believed to be nonrecombining and have been a model system for testing predictions of the effects of selection on linked, neutral variation. We recently examined nucleotide variation along the chromosome of D. melanogaster and revealed that a low average level of recombination could be associated with considerably high levels of nucleotide variation. In this report, we further investigate the variation along the fourth chromosome of D. simulans. We sequenced 12 gene regions evenly distributed along the fourth chromosome for a worldwide collection of 11 isofemale lines and 5 gene regions in a local population of 10 isofemale lines from South America. In contrast to predictions for regions of very low recombination, these data reveal that the variation levels in many gene regions, including an intron region of the ci gene, vary considerably along the fourth chromosome. Nucleotide diversity ranged from 0.0010 to 0.0074 in 9 gene regions interspersed with several regions of greatly reduced variation. Tests of recombination indicate that the recombination level is not as low as previously thought, likely an order of magnitude higher than that in D. melanogaster. Finally, estimates of the recombination parameters are shown to support a crossover-plus-conversion model.


INVESTIGATION of evolutionary forces at the sequence level often relies on the understanding of the relationship between recombination and variation. Of particular interest is the effect of natural selection on levels of neutral variation at linked sites. Both background selection (CHARLESWORTH et al. 1993 Down) and recurrent selective sweeps (BERRY et al. 1991 Down) reduce levels of neutral variation at linked sites. A significant positive correlation between the rate of recombination and nucleotide variation has been observed in Drosophila (AGUADE et al. 1989A Down, AGUADE et al. 1989B Down, AGUADE et al. 1994 Down; STEPHAN and LANGLEY 1989 Down; BERRY et al. 1991 Down; BEGUN and AQUADRO 1992 Down; AQUADRO et al. 1994 Down), Mus (NACHMAN 1997 Down), humans (NACHMAN 2001 Down), and Aegilops (DVORAK et al. 1998 Down). These empirical studies, bolstered by the theoretical interpretations of hitchhiking effects of selection, lead us to expect extremely low levels of variation in genomic regions of low recombination.

Two evolutionary genetic models have been proposed to account for the correlation. The classic model, selective sweep via the hitchhiking effect (MAYNARD-SMITH and HAIGH 1974 Down; KAPLAN et al. 1989 Down; HUDSON 1990 Down), posits that recent directional selection purges variation on selected and linked loci, allowing current alleles little time to accumulate mutations. The low level of polymorphism, then, is a result of the young age of the alleles that originated after the selected allele dominated the population. An alternative model, background selection, was subsequently proposed to account for the same phenomenon (CHARLESWORTH et al. 1993 Down, CHARLESWORTH et al. 1995 Down, CHARLESWORTH et al. 1997 Down; HUDSON and KAPLAN 1994 Down; CHARLESWORTH 1996 Down; NORDBORG et al. 1996 Down). This model posits that the negative selection against deleterious mutation will decrease the size of effective population by a fraction, depending on both the recombination rate and the mutation rate to deleterious alleles. The number of mutation-free alleles will significantly decrease in the regions of low recombination that contain high numbers of deleterious mutations. Consequently, the neutral variation, as a function of population size N (e.g., nucleotide diversity {pi} = 4Nµ), will be reduced. In these genetic models the effect of selection is so strong that in regions of extremely low recombination variation is severely reduced. Even though the fourth chromosome was previously thought to be virtually free of recombination, either selective sweep or background selection can reduce variation.

Genomic regions of low recombination have become a hunting ground for detection of selection, even though it is unclear that the selection is positive or negative. One such region is the small fourth chromosome of Drosophila. Although the chromosome contains ~5 Mbp, only one-quarter of it in the right arm of the chromosome is euchromatic, encoding only ~80 genes (ADAMS et al. 2000 Down; LOCKE et al. 2000 Down; SUN et al. 2000 Down). Genetic analyses of the fourth chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster conducted by BRIDGES 1935 Down and PATTERSON and MULLER 1930 Down(for later reviews, see HOCHMAN 1976 Down; ASHBURNER 1989 Down) failed to observe any crossovers in thousands of normal flies, except under special laboratory conditions like heat shock or artificially introduced interchromosomal effects. Here, the chromosome was concluded to be essentially nonrecombining; a conclusion with nontrivial consequences for subsequent evolutionary genetic analysis. The assumption of no recombination implies that the whole chromosome would evolve as a single unit. Qualitatively, both selective sweeps and background selection can explain low levels of variation.

The first direct observation of nucleotide variation on the fourth chromosome was an analysis of polymorphism at the cubitus interruptus (ci) gene in D. melanogaster and simulans (BERRY et al. 1991 Down). In these 1-kb exon sequences, no polymorphism was observed in 10 alleles from D. melanogaster and only one polymorphism was observed in 9 alleles from D. simulans. When the analysis of ci was extended to the other two sibling species, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana, similarly low levels of variation ({theta} = 0–0.0003) were observed (HILTON et al. 1994 Down). These observations, albeit on a single gene, suggest that the entire chromosome lacks variation and that different chromosome regions should not exhibit great differences in the level of variation. Especially in light of early conclusions of Bridges and Muller (BRIDGES 1935 Down) that the chromosome is nonrecombining, this implicated selective sweeps as an important factor in reducing variation on the fourth chromosome. The conclusion that the fourth chromosomes in all three sibling species of D. melanogaster are nonrecombining was not tested by genetic experiments and inferred only on the basis of the early experiments on the D. melanogaster fourth chromosome. Since then, the Drosophila fourth chromosome has become a standard example of how directional selection could purge the variation in a whole chromosome. Meanwhile, theoretical models of background selection were also able to account for the deficit of variation in the chromosome (CHARLESWORTH et al. 1993 Down, CHARLESWORTH et al. 1995 Down, CHARLESWORTH et al. 1997 Down; HUDSON and KAPLAN 1994 Down; CHARLESWORTH 1996 Down). CARR et al. 2001 Down reported several retrotransposon insertions with high frequencies in natural populations of D. melanogaster. JENSEN et al. 2002 Down reported a low level of polymorphism in the ankyrin (ank) gene in D. melanogaster and D. simulans with frequency spectra that are unlikely to be explained by selective sweep. Furthermore, JENSEN et al. 2002 Down and SHELDAHL et al. 2003 Down found evidence for recombination in a few loci of the fourth chromosome.

The conclusion that the fourth chromosome is essentially nonrecombining was questioned in general when we analyzed the polymorphism data of Sphinx (Spx). A young gene that recently originated in the single lineage of D. melanogaster, Spx and its flanking region (WANG et al. 2002A Down) revealed a considerably high level of variation with a peculiar haplotype structure. In a chromosome-wide survey of polymorphisms in the D. melanogaster worldwide collections of both isofemale lines and local populations (WANG et al. 2002B Down), we found that the chromosome is variable in several regions that possess long chromosome domains (20–30% of the euchromatic arm) with highly variable dimorphic haplotype structures. This suggests that the chromosome does not evolve as a single unit. We also identified possible recombination events, using the four-gamete method (HUDSON and KAPLAN 1985 Down), although the levels of recombination appeared two orders of magnitude lower than that in the other three chromosomes. Evolutionary analyses suggest that some form of positive selection, possibly the balancing selection, might govern the dimorphism domain. In this report, we extend the analysis to the fourth chromosome of D. simulans and document several findings that substantially differ from what we have previously known about the chromosome in either this species or D. melanogaster.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Drosophila strains:
Eleven D. simulans isofemale lines collected from different geographic areas were investigated for sequence variation (Fig 1) and have been kept in a lab for >15 years. DNA extracted from a single male of each stock served as the PCR template for amplification of all 12 regions surveyed. Ten isofemale lines of a local population from Quito, Ecuador (collected by W. Ballard in 2000) were also used in this study.



View larger version (32K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. Polymorphisms in the surveyed genes on the Drosophila simulans fourth chromosome. (a) The sequenced gene regions and their approximate positions on the D. simulans fourth chromosome, with the ci gene adjacent to the telomere and the pho gene close to the centromere. All the sequences are orientated from the 5' to 3' direction. The circle indicates the centromere. (b) Polymorphisms in 12 gene regions. Positions start from the first nucleotide in the forward PCR primers of each gene region (Table 1). The sequenced length is given beneath the name of each gene region. i1, CGAA; i2, TA; i3, GTTAAGTTAA; i4, 49 bp; i5, TAAACTGTAAAATT; d5, ATATAGT------; i6, GAATGCT; i7, GCAG; i8, TAA. –, one nucleotide deletion; X, the absence of nucleotide caused by a long deletion; 0, in the ci-exon region, no polymorphic sites found in its sequence of 835 nucleotides. The four-gamete sites (Rm) are labeled by adjacent double arrows. And the outgroup states are derived by comparison with the D. melanogaster sequences (ADAMS et al. 2000 Down). (c) Summary statistics of polymorphisms. Total length sequenced is 12,091 bp, with Tajima's D = –0.19169. For all Tajima's D's, P > 0.10. –, absence of information. The values of divergence between D. melanogaster and D. simulans in the ci intron (9.24%) and bip2 intron (12.28%) are calculated in the alignable regions of these two intron sequences.

Gene regions and sequencing:
We chose 12 gene regions to survey for nucleotide variation of the worldwide samples (Fig 1), which are evenly distributed along the chromosome. We also sequenced five gene regions for variation in the Ecuador population (Fig 2). These gene regions were PCR amplified using a high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis) with the extension temperature at 68°, as recommended by the manufacturer (the primers are listed in Table 1). The PCR products were cleaned with the PCR product purification kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) and sequencing was accomplished on an Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) 377 sequencer. Alignments were manually inspected and all polymorphisms were resequenced and carefully verified to avoid artifacts. All primers and fly strains are available upon request. No heterozygous nucleotide sites were found in worldwide-collected lines. In a few lines of the local population of Quito, some heterozygous sites were found, and one of two nucleotides in such sites was randomly chosen, although used in the analysis of variation only. Recombination and linkage disequilibrium were analyzed in the worldwide-collected lines, but not in the local population because of its heterozygous sites.



View larger version (20K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. Nucleotide variation in the fourth chromosome in the Ecuador population of D. simulans.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 1. Sequenced gene regions and primers

Gene order in the region between CG11153 and Pho genes:
LOCKE et al. 2000 Down reported gene order in the region that differs from ADAMS et al. 2000 Down. We performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments to confirm their results in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Our previous FISH experiments on D. melanogaster (WANG et al. 2002B Down) indicated that the gene order, between Pho and CG11153 genes, was erroneously inverted in the results of the Drosophila genome project (ADAMS et al. 2000 Down), supporting a physical map of LOCKE et al. 2000 Down. Recently, Locke's group reported that the whole right arm of the fourth chromosome of D. simulans is inverted compared to that of D. melanogaster (PODEMSKI et al. 2001 Down). To determine gene order and relative distance between genes, we did further FISH on the polytene chromosomes of D. melanogaster and D. simulans, using probes of pho, CG11153, and spx genes. PCR amplified DNA fragments of these genes, which were labeled with digoxigenin (DIG) or biotin (purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals). FISH was conducted according to the method of WANG et al. 2000 Down.

Evolutionary genetic analysis:
The major goal of the analysis is to test various statistical expectations on the basis of two conventional beliefs: (1) The D. simulans fourth chromosome lacks variation and (2) the D. simulans fourth chromosome, similar to the chromosome of D. melanogaster, is nonrecombining (BERRY et al. 1991 Down; TRUE et al. 1996 Down). We therefore conducted the following analyses:

  1. Estimation of summary statistics: We first generated polymorphism data, including polymorphism created by both nucleotide substitutions and insertion-deletion (indel) changes. We then calculated the following statistics from the sequences and polymorphism data: Numbers of synonymous sites (silent sites), numbers of nonsynonymous sites (replacement sites), nucleotide diversity {pi} (NEI 1987 Down) in total sites and synonymous sites, Watterson's estimator {theta} (WATTERSON 1975 Down) in total sites and synonymous sites, number of substitutions per synonymous site (KS), and number of substitutions per nonsynonymous site (KA). These statistics were computed by using DnaSP (ROZAS and ROZAS 1999 Down).

  2. Statistical comparison between observed and expected values of variation: Under the assumption of neutrality, a probability distribution of polymorphism for an expected variation parameter {theta} = 4Nµ was calculated following the recursion equation

    (HUDSON 1990 Down), where N and µ are effective population size and mutation rate per nucleotide site, respectively, and

    in which l is length of DNA sequence and n is number of alleles. Two values of {theta} were used in the calculation: {theta} = 0.0002 for the ci gene and {theta} = 0.0005 for the ank gene (JENSEN et al. 2002 Down).

  3. Test of homogeneity across gene regions: We tested a null hypothesis that the variation in different regions is similar, on the basis of the evolutionary hypothesis that the fourth chromosome evolved as a single unit. This was conducted by calculating a goodness-of-fit statistic in which the observed and the expected number of segregating sites at the ith region (Si; KREITMAN and HUDSON 1991 Down),

    which follows the {chi}2 distribution with k – 1 d.f. (k = number of gene regions). This statistic was shown to be insensitive to assumptions of recombination [see p. 572 of KREITMAN and HUDSON 1991 Down]. In this equation, the expectation Exp(Si) and variance Var(Si) of the segregating sites in the ith gene regions are

    and

    where {theta} was computed as nucleotide diversity using the total number of polymorphic sites of all k gene regions, li as the length of the ith gene region, and n as the sample size for polymorphism survey.

  4. Tests based on the site frequency spectrum: By taking advantage of a large number of polymorphic sites [56 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) out of 82 polymorphic sites including indels] pooled from all gene regions, we used Tajima's D (TAJIMA 1989 Down) to test the prediction that selective sweeps on the fourth chromosome reduce variation such that the polymorphism spectrum is skewed toward rare variants. BRAVERMAN et al. 1995 Down and SIMONSEN et al. 1995 Down showed in simulation studies that such deviation from the spectra predicted from neutrality can distinguish either directional selection or demographic effects from background selection, although both types of forces can reduce the variation in regions of low recombination.

Recombination estimation:
Given that our sequence data are from noncontinuous gene regions, we used two methods to detect recombination.

  1. First, we used the four-gamete method (HUDSON and KAPLAN 1985 Down) to compute the minimum number of possible recombination events, Rm. Because Rm is an increasing function of a sample's size and is well correlated with the change of {rho} = 4Nr (r is the rate of recombination caused by crossing over), as shown in the simulation (HUDSON and KAPLAN 1985 Down), we computed the Rm density as the Rm value per kilobase of sequences per chromosome and compared with the Rm density in different regions. Because the value of Rm is dependent on the sample size, we made the comparison with other samples that have similar sample sizes with comparable levels of variation. For instance, KREITMAN 1983 Down sampled 11 Adh alleles; the D. melanogaster fourth chromosome variation data are from 10 chromosomes. Both data sets have similar sample sizes compared to that of the D. simulans we used in this study (11). We show that the levels of nucleotide variation in the D. simulans fourth chromosome are not as low as previously thought; hence the comparisons among the different regions and samples under study provide insight.

  2. In addition, we investigated estimates of the population recombination parameter {rho} and the rate of gene conversion f (f = g/r, where g is the probability of a conversion at a nucleotide site per generation), using the composite-likelihood method of HUDSON 2001 Down(see also FRISSE et al. 2001 Down). The individual D. simulans fourth chromosome loci that we sequenced from the worldwide sample were assembled into a single polymorphism table for the entire chromosome. The positions of the segregating sites were estimated from the D. melanogaster fourth chromosome sequence (ADAMS et al. 2000 Down), assuming that the distances between loci are the same in the two species. We note that the inversion on this chromosome between D. melanogaster and D. simulans involves the entire euchromatic region so that the relative gene order within the chromosome is conserved (PODEMSKI et al. 2001 Down).

The three parameters of interest are: {rho}, the product of four times the effective population size times the per-generation recombination rate per site; f, the rate of gene conversion relative to crossing over; and t, the mean tract length of a conversion event. The model of gene conversion under which parameters are estimated is that of WIUF and HEIN 2000 Down, which is a simple model of unbiased gene conversion with symmetric heteroduplexes and a geometric distribution of tract lengths. We obtained composite-likelihood estimates of {rho} both without gene conversion and with gene conversion, over a range of tract lengths. In all cases, maximum composite-likelihood estimates (MCLE) were obtained by evaluating the composite likelihood of the data over a grid of parameter values, using software provided by Richard Hudson (http://home.uchicago.edu/rhudson1). We first estimated {rho} assuming no gene conversion. Then, to estimate {rho} and gene conversion parameters, we evaluated the composite-likelihood statistic on a grid of 500 values of {rho} ranging from 0.0001 to 0.0011848, which is the estimate of {rho} obtained assuming no conversion. The grid of f was 250 values in the range 0.001 to 500. For {rho} and f, the distances between points on the grid were geometric rather than uniform to ensure coverage of low values of the two parameters. Eleven values for t were used (50 bp and 100–1000 bp in increments of 100 bp).


*  RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Levels of variation:
Fig 1 lists nucleotide polymorphism in all 12 gene regions on the fourth chromosome in 11 worldwide lines, revealing unexpected levels of variation. The average levels of variation over all 12 gene regions are {pi} = 0.0024 and {theta} = 0.0023. These levels are significantly higher than the reported variation in ci and ank (P < 0.0001), although they still appear to be lower than the average variation in other chromosome regions (BEGUN and WHITLEY 2000 Down; ANDOLFATTO 2001 Down). A more interesting result is that this average is accompanied with a great heterogeneity in the variation levels among 12 gene regions. Several regions do not show reduced variation, contrary to previous surveys in ci and ank in D. simulans. The nucleotide diversity at silent sites (introns and synonymous sites) in 9 gene regions ranges from 0.0019 to 0.0074 and only four genes, Pho, RfaBP, unc-13, and the exon region of ci, have a low level of variation ({pi} = 0–0.00086 at silent sites). Table 2 lists the probabilities under a null hypothesis that the variation levels for all these regions are from the same distributions of polymorphism for {theta} = 0.0002 (the ci gene; BERRY et al. 1991 Down) and for {theta} = 0.0005 (ank; JENSEN et al. 2002 Down). These tests showed that the levels of nucleotide polymorphism for 9 of the 11 gene regions are significantly higher than those of the exon regions of ci, and for 8 of the 11 genes they are significantly higher than those of ank. It should be noted that the variation would be even higher than the expectation if the indel polymorphisms in the four gene regions are considered [the average indel polymorphism in 7 gene regions (0.74 x 10–3) is threefold higher than the indel polymorphism (0.22 x 10–3) in ank (JENSEN et al. 2002 Down)]. The distribution of the variation overlaps with the range of variation in other chromosomes that do not include genes in regions of low crossing over per physical length (BEGUN and WHITLEY 2000 Down).


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 2. Comparison between observed and expected polymorphisms of the D. simulans fourth chromosome

Variation in diversity levels:
While a large proportion of gene regions are more variable than previously expected, several regions show low levels of variation. An exon region of the ci gene was previously found to have little variation: Of nine alleles for a 958-bp region, there was only one polymorphic site, a singleton (BERRY et al. 1991 Down). We confirmed this result in a worldwide sample, finding no polymorphism in the region. The other two regions, unc-13 and pho, also show very low levels of variation. The substitutions at synonymous sites between D. simulans and D. melanogaster in the three genes are 0.11 (ci exon), 0.09 (unc-13), and 0.16 (pho). These are in the normal range of synonymous divergence between the two species (POWELL 1997 Down, Figure 10-5), revealing no significant reduction in mutation rates in these regions. Furthermore, tests of homogeneity ({chi}2 = 39.58, P = 4.2 x 10–5) show that the nucleotide variation levels in different regions are not homogenous. These analyses indicate that the chromosome does not evolve as a single unit; rather, different regions have different histories, as we found in the D. melanogaster fourth chromosome. These conclusions derived from the worldwide sample are consistent with the five genes we analyzed from the Ecuadorian population (Fig 2). Once again, the local population revealed variable and relatively high levels of variation and a high proportion of heterozygosity at a number of sites, which is a result of a higher level of variation.

Unexpectedly high variation in the ci intron:
In contrast to the low levels of variation in the exon regions of this gene, as detected in previous work (BERRY et al. 1991 Down; HILTON et al. 1994 Down), we found a high level of polymorphisms in the intron region of this gene. There are 32 segregating sites with the nucleotide diversity of {theta} = 0.0087 (4 indels included). This level of variation is not significantly different from the average level of the genome ({theta} = 0.019, P = 0.1231), in stark contrast to previous observations of exons in the same gene. The intron region is located toward centromere, whereas the exon with the low-variation region is toward the telomere. The sharp boundary between the exon and the intron reveals distinct histories of evolution in the two regions of the same gene.

Recombination and linkage equilibrium:
The four-gamete analysis (HUDSON and KAPLAN 1985 Down) reveals 10 exchanges in the history of the fourth chromosome samples here, as shown by the line-arrow signs in Fig 1B. Between-region recombination events often involve long tracts of haplotype structure. For example, the crk-bip2 contains some haplotypes consisting of eight polymorphisms inside a 250-kb region. The hypothesis of parallel mutations may not explain such a highly organized polymorphism structure, suggesting recombination between two considerably diverged ancestral alleles. The hypothesis of gene conversions may have greater difficulty explaining this long tract of haplotype structure than the crossover hypothesis, because, in general, conversion tracts have been shown to be ~350 nucleotides in length (HILLIKER et al. 1994 Down; LANGLEY et al. 2000 Down).

Intralocus recombination events reflect rates of recombination in a given stretch of DNA better than recombination events detected between genes where only one recombination event is detectable although many additional recombination events are possible. Thus, we incorporated only six within-gene recombination events to calculate the Rm density 6/12.1 kb/11 chromosomes = 0.0451 Rm/kb/chromosome. This is 27.0% of the estimate of the moderately recombining Adh gene of D. melanogaster (0.1673 Rm/kb/chromosome; KREITMAN 1983 Down), which is 9 times the estimate of the D. melanogaster fourth chromosome (0.005 Rm/kb/chromosome; WANG et al. 2002B Down). This result suggests a recombination rate much higher than previously assumed on the basis of the genetic analysis of the D. melanogaster fourth chromosome. We estimated 4Nr = 0.01185 per base for D. simulans, assuming no gene conversion, using the method of HUDSON 2001 Down. We also estimated 4Nr = 0.00016 per base for the D. melanogaster fourth chromosome, using the data of WANG et al. 2002B Down. It should be noted that this latter data set contains 50% of each of the two haplotypes in a dimorphic region, slightly different from the worldwide sample from which we previously estimated frequencies of 40 and 60%. However, the following analysis shows a revealing comparison. Thus, it appears that the recombination rate of D. simulans is 74 times higher, assuming that effective population sizes of the two species are similar. Furthermore, the estimated level of recombination in the D. simulans fourth chromosome means that a ratio of 4Nr/4Nµ = r/µ = ~7, higher than that of most previously observed D. simulans genes (ANDOLFATTO and PRZEWORSKI 2000 Down). Given that the recombination rate in chromosomes X, 2, and 3 of D. simulans is only slightly (30%) higher than that in D. melanogaster (TRUE et al. 1996 Down), more than one order of difference in magnitude between the fourth chromosomes of D. simulans and D. melanogaster is unusual.

We attempted to estimate the population recombination and gene conversion rates from the data, using a composite-likelihood procedure (HUDSON 2001 Down). For a model with no gene conversion, we estimate {rho} to be 0.011848 (ln L = –5466.821254). With gene conversion, we always estimated {rho} to be the minimum value used on the grid ({rho} = 0.0001). Because this result suggests we did not fully explore the likelihood surface, we also evaluated the likelihood of the data for {rho} < 0.0001 and {rho} = 0. For values of {rho} < 0.0001, the likelihood of the data decreases rapidly and the data are not compatible with a no-recombination model (data not shown). The effect of varying t is shown in Table 3, which suggests that the data are compatible with a range of {rho}, conversion rates, and mean tract lengths. This is not surprising because {rho} and f are confounded in the estimation procedure; with a fixed mean tract length, for a given set of values for {rho} and f, another pair of values (with a higher {rho} and lower f, or vice versa) can be found for which the probability of recombination (i.e., crossover or conversion) between two adjacent sites is identical (see Equation 1 of FRISSE et al. 2001 Down). However, Table 3 suggests that models with nonzero f and nonzero t are slightly more likely than models with no conversion. Given the expectation from laboratory experiments that the rate of crossing over is very low on the D. melanogaster fourth chromosome, it may not be unlikely that some recombination events are nonreciprocal exchanges (gene conversions). In general, our estimates of {rho} are nearly an order of magnitude less than those obtained by WALL et al. 2002 Down from loci on the third chromosome of D. simulans.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 3. Estimates of recombination parameters

We also estimated linkage disequilibrium using the correlation coefficient, r2 (HARTL and CLARK 1997 Down). Fig 3 reported the distribution of r2 in the D. simulans fourth chromosomes. While most r2 values are not high, a proportion of r2 are significant at the levels of P = 0.01 and 0.05, suggesting some degrees of linkage disequilibrium among distant sites. Although the comparison among sites is not independent, some suggestive observations can be made. It is interesting to see a decay of r2 for the polymorphism separated <1 kb apart (see Fig 3, inset). These results suggest a possibility of gene conversion in short distance.



View larger version (25K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 3. Distribution of linkage disequilibrium over the nucleotide distances of gene pairs on the D. simulans fourth chromosome. The disequilibrium is measured as correlation coefficients (r2). The inset is the distribution of r2 for short distances. The dashed lines indicate the r2 values for P = 0.01 and P = 0.05, which were determined by a chi-square distribution {chi}2 = nr2, with d.f. = 1, where n is the number of alleles (HARTL and CLARK 1997 Down).

Evolutionary forces:
Our results show unexpected levels of DNA sequence polymorphism in genes on the fourth chromosome of D. simulans that were not predicted from previous reports or simple theoretical predictions. Are there any detectable forces of evolution driving the evolution of the chromosome? We considered three possible forces hypothesized in previous studies: variable neutral mutation rates, recent selective sweep, and background selection.

Divergence between D. melanogaster and D. simulans at silent sites fell well within the range of normal values for these two species (POWELL 1997 Down), suggesting that the neutral mutation rates of the fourth chromosome loci do not differ substantially from the genome average. We calculated Tajima's D for every gene region and pooled data over all gene regions (including the ci-intron region with the ci-exon region excluded; Fig 1). In 11 gene regions that contain polymorphisms, Tajima's D values range from –1.0 to 1.04, none of them significant at the 5% level. Tajima's D based on pooled data is –0.1917 with a probability of 0.10 under the assumption of neutrality. Thus, the hypothesis of a recent selective sweep is not supported in general, although this test does not exclude the possibility that the selective sweep could happen in some local regions, especially considering the limited detecting power with the sample size used in this study. On the other hand, we found that the variation in most gene regions is not as low as previously thought, but is an order of magnitude lower than the variation in the chromosome regions of a normal level of recombination (ANDOLFATTO 2001 Down). This appears to be consistent with a lower than normal level of recombination in this chromosome. These two results are not unexpected from what background selection predicts: Regions of low recombination are expected to contain large regions of reduced variation.

Gene orders:
Both ADAMS et al. 2000 Down and LOCKE et al. 2000 Down published the gene orders of the fourth chromosome in D. melanogaster, but with different gene orders in the region from CG11153 to Pho. We did FISH experiments to ascertain the order of the region, using several genes as probes (Fig 4), which shows that the gene order of LOCKE et al. 2000 Down is correct. We also mapped these probes on the strain used to sequence the D. melanogaster genome, which did not support the gene order of ADAMS et al. 2000 Down in the region. Recently, the same group investigated the gene orders on the fourth chromosomes in eight species of the D. melanogaster subgroup and concluded that all chromosomes are homosequential, i.e., in intact gene orders (PODEMSKI et al. 2001 Down). Interestingly, it was found that the entire right arm of the fourth chromosome in D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia was inverted, relative to the D. melanogaster fourth chromosome. Thus, the ci gene is adjacent to the centromere in D. melanogaster, but the ci gene in D. simulans is near the telomere. However, the patterns of polymorphisms in different gene regions of D. simulans and D. melanogaster (WANG et al. 2002B Down) seem independent of the inverted gene orders, suggesting that the fourth chromosomes in the two species evolved independently under no effect of gene orders. Finally, the physical length of the D. simulans fourth chromosome has not been measured. But the morphology and size of the chromosome seems similar to that of D. melanogaster; thus we used the gene orders and the distances between the genes in D. melanogaster as an approximate description of the D. simulans chromosome. The small actual differences in the total chromosomal length between the species should not change the estimate of 4Nr drastically.



View larger version (58K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 4. FISH results showing the gene order between CG11153 and Pho. The arm of D. simulans chromosome 4 is inverted, compared to that of D. melanogaster (PODEMSKI et al. 2001 Down). Pho (green) is close to the chromocenter in D. simulans (A) but adjacent to the telomere in D. melonogaster (B). Note that the positions of CG11153 and Spx are consistent with the depiction in Fig 1 drawn on the basis of the D. melanogaster map (ADAMS et al. 2000 Down) with the correction of scaffold orientation between Pho and CG11153.


*  DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Variability in the D. simulans fourth chromosome:
It is clear that the D. simulans fourth chromosome is not devoid of nucleotide variation, unlike the ci locus (BERRY et al. 1991 Down) in which only one polymorphic site was detected from nine lines and ank (JENSEN et al. 2002 Down) in which a 20-fold reduction in variation was observed. Instead, a high proportion of gene regions on the D. simulans fourth chromosome contain considerably high levels of variation, significantly higher than those typical of low-recombination regions. One region, the intron in the ci gene, even demonstrates levels of polymorphism close to the average variation of the D. simulans genome. However, a few regions of the fourth chromosome do indeed show low levels of variation, such as the exon region of ci, pho, RfzBp, and unc-13. Recently, JENSEN et al. 2002 Down reported that ank, a gene region between ci and crk (Fig 1), also demonstrates a low level of polymorphism, with a silent nucleotide diversity around 0.0005 in both D. simulans and D. melanogaster.

Recombination:
The heterogeneity in levels of variation among different regions was shown to be highly significant. These data and analysis do not support the prevailing prediction that the entire fourth chromosome evolved as a single unit. Instead, they indicate that different gene regions have different evolutionary trajectories. To be consistent with this observation, recombination must be invoked.

The analysis of Rm revealed that the chromosome is recombining and the rate of recombination is not so low as previously assumed (BERRY et al. 1991 Down; HILTON et al. 1994 Down). Further estimation of recombination parameters using the likelihood method indicates that the level of recombination in the D. simulans fourth chromosome is more than one order of magnitude higher than that in D. melanogaster. We note that an equal haplotype sample in D. melanogaster (WANG et al. 2002B Down) might slightly bias the recombination {rho}. However, the rate of recombination detected in the D. simulans fourth chromosome is too high to be explained by the level of recombination predicted from comparisons to D. melanogaster (TRUE et al. 1996 Down), which revealed ~30% higher rates of recombination in the D. simulans genome, excluding chromosome 4. Thus, the previous assumption that the fourth chromosomes in the two species are similar in the level of recombination is incorrect. Finally, the level of recombination in the D. simulans fourth chromosome is also consistent with the observed levels of variation in the fourth chromosomal genes.

The mechanisms of meiotic recombination generally include gene conversion and crossing over. BERRY and BARBADILLA 1999 Down revealed the important role of gene conversion in the variation in Drosophila natural populations. LANGLEY et al. 2000 Down further inferred that there was high level of gene conversion in the su(s) and su(w(a)) regions of low crossing over in the D. melanogaster X chromosome. Our analysis (Table 3) supports crossover-plus-conversion models. We can further ask whether or not the gene conversion alone can account for the detected recombination in the chromosome. Indeed, a model invoking only gene conversion at first seems plausible, because historically BRIDGES 1935 Down and others (e.g., PATTERSON and MULLER 1930 Down; HOCHMAN 1976 Down) already concluded that there was no crossing over in D. melanogaster. Genetic analyses, as reviewed by HAWLEY et al. 1993 Down, generally indicate no crossing over in normal laboratory conditions.

Nevertheless, crossing over in natural populations can be hypothesized to explain a part of the detected recombination. Several observations suggest the possibility of reciprocal exchanges. One difference between crossing over and conversion is that the former can create large regions or even chromosome-wide recombination while the gene conversion usually involves a short conversion tract. The linkage relationship between the sites outside conversion tracts does not change. A nonrecombining chromosome would show chromosome-wide linkage disequilibrium. In our linkage disequilibrium analysis across the chromosome, we observed some linkage disequilibrium among distant sites and a decay of the disequilibrium among the sites of short distance (Fig 3), suggesting a role of gene conversion. However, Fig 1 reveals that some sites displaying all four gametes showed long recombination tracts. The lengths of these tracts, >100 kb, are difficult to explain as the tracts of gene conversions that are more often several hundred nucleotide long (HILLIKER et al. 1994 Down; LANGLEY et al. 2000 Down) and may be a signature of crossing over. It has been shown that some conditions, e.g., heat shock and interchromosomal effects, could lead to crossing over in D. melanogaster (GRELL 1971 Down; HOCHMAN 1976 Down; SANDLER and SZAUTER 1978 Down). It is conceivable that some of the similar conditions may exist in nature, which would trigger crossing over in natural populations of the two Drosophila species.

Evolutionary forces:
In above analyses of evolution of the fourth chromosome, the hypothesis of the neutrality that assumes variable mutation rates was excluded. The synonymous substitution rates of most gene regions (Fig 1) are from 0.0111 to 0.0178 in a normal level of between-species divergence (POWELL 1997 Down). This small range of variation in KS is not consistent with large heterogeneity of the nucleotide diversity ({pi} values for synonymous sites in the 12 gene regions are from 0.0000 to 0.0074, Fig 1). For example, the divergence levels in silent sites between D. melanogaster and D. simulans are 0.1110 in the ci-exon region and 0.0924 in an alignable region of ci intron of 277 nucleotides. However, ci exon has 0 polymorphisms in both species [in BERRY et al. 1991 Down, only 1 polymorphism was observed in nine alleles] whereas the alignable ci-intron region contains 16 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in D. simulans. A Hudson-Kreitman-Aguade test (HUDSON et al. 1987 Down) rejects the neutral hypothesis that polymorphism and divergence are coupled for the two regions of ci ({chi}2 = 5.85, P = 0.0150), suggesting that the level of polymorphism in the ci-intron region is not due to an elevated mutation rate. A recent selective sweep over the whole chromosome is neither supported by the high level of variation observed in many gene regions nor supported by results of Tajima's D tests for both individual genes and the pooled chromosomal polymorphism, which are not significant. On the other hand, the possibility of background selection cannot be ruled out, as both recombination and variation are lower than the levels of the chromosome regions of normal recombination.

In the ci gene, we found that a high level of variation in introns is in sharp contrast to the low level of nucleotide polymorphism in exons. Despite the small sample size, it can be seen that the polymorphism in the intron region seems to reflect geographic origins of the isofemale lines; e.g., the three Reunion lines appear to have peculiar variations although their exons are devoid of variation. This observation questions the previous conclusion that a recent selective sweep has occurred in the ci gene (BERRY et al. 1991 Down), because such a scenario would predict a low level of variation in the intron too. It can be speculated that such a sweep may not be complete, e.g., beyond the Reunion population, because the introns of non-Reunion populations contain little polymorphism. However, this partial selective sweep hypothesis would predict polymorphism in exon regions of the Reunion ci, which is not supported by the data. The ci gene has a low KA/KS ratio (0.l4, a value lower than that of almost all other gene regions on the chromosome; Fig 1) and a KA (0.0157) lower than the average KA, 0.0185, for ~193 genes between the two species from BETANCOURT and PRESGRAVES 2002 Down(all Acp genes excluded) of the ci exon region; it may be more likely that the exon region of ci has been under purifying selection, consistent with the results of JENSEN et al. 2002 Down that there is no strong evidence for sweeps in either D. melanogaster or D. simulans.

In this work, we revealed considerably high levels of the nucleotide variation associated with most of the genes we surveyed, suggesting that most parts of the chromosome are variable. The several low-variation regions that are scattered within the chromosome delineate the different chromosomal regions that have been governed by different evolutionary processes. Interpretation of such a level of variation with different evolutionary histories has to invoke recombination, probably crossing over. Furthermore, a level of recombination close to the Adh region of D. melanogaster was detected. The difference between D. melanogaster and D. simulans in the level of recombination is so large that the previous assumption that the chromosomes in the two Drosophila sibling species experience similar levels of recombination has to be reconsidered. Thus, our population genetic analysis demonstrates a level of recombination on the D. simulans fourth chromosome previously deemed unlikely in genetic analyses, allowing the persistence of a high level of natural variation.


*  FOOTNOTES

1 These authors contributed equally to this work. Back


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank M.-L. Wu and W. Ballard for the D. simulans strains; K. Burtis for providing the strain used in the D. melanogaster genome sequencing project; J. Locke for valuable discussion of gene orders in Drosophila; R. R. Hudson, M. Kreitman, C.-I Wu, S. Hawley, and two anonymous reviewers for stimulating discussion and suggestions; C. H. Langley and M. Kreitman for critically reading the manuscript; and D. J. Begun for sending the published polymorphism data on D. simulans. We are especially indebted to R. R. Hudson for his help in computational analysis of recombination. We thank Jeff Wall for providing recombination rate estimates for D. simulans. This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (MCB9977990 and CAREER award), National Institutes of Health (R01GM065429-01A1), and David and Lucile Packard Foundation (Packard Fellowship in Science and Engineering) to M.L.

Manuscript received December 10, 2003; Accepted for publication December 23, 2003.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

ADAMS, M. D., S. E. CELNIKER, R. A. HOLT, C. A. EVANS, and J. D. GOCAYNE et al., 2000  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.. Science 287:2185-2195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

AGUADE, M., N. MIYASHITA, and C. H. LANGLEY, 1989a  Restriction-map variation at the zeste-tko region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:123-130.[Abstract]

AGUADE, M., N. MIYASHITA, and C. H. LANGLEY, 1989b  Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 122:607-615.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

AGUADE, M., W. MEYERS, A. D. LONG, and C. H. LANGLEY, 1994  Single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis coupled with stratified DNA sequencing reveals reduced sequence variation in the su(s) and su(wa) regions of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:4658-4662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ANDOLFATTO, P., 2001  Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:279-290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ANDOLFATTO, P. and M. PRZEWORSKI, 2000  A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics 156:257-268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

AQUADRO, C. F., D. J. BEGUN and E. C. KINDAHL, 1994 Selection, recombination, and DNA polymorphism in Drosophila, pp. 46–55 in Non-Neutral Evolution: Theories and Molecular Data, edited by B. GOLDING. Chapman & Hall, New York.

ASHBURNER, M., 1989 Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1992  Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster.. Nature 356:519-520.[CrossRef][Medline]

BEGUN, D. J. and P. WHITLEY, 2000  Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5960-5965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BERRY, A. J., and A. BARBADILLA, 1999 Gene conversion is a major determinant of genetic diversity at the DNA level, pp. 102–123 in Evolutionary Genetics: From Molecules to Morphology, edited by R. SINGH and C. KRIMBAS. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.

BERRY, A. J., J. W. AJIOKA, and M. KREITMAN, 1991  Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics. 129:1111-1117.[Abstract]

BETANCOURT, A. J. and D. C. PRESGRAVES, 2002  Linkage limits the power of natural selection in Drosophila.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:13616-13620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BRAVERMAN, J. M., R. R. HUDSON, N. L. KAPLAN, C. H. LANGLEY, and W. STEPHAN, 1995  The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics 140:783-796.[Abstract]

BRIDGES, C. B., 1935  The mutants and linkage data of chromosome four of Drosophila melanogaster.. J. Biol. (Moscow) 4:401-420.

CARR, M., J. R. SOLOWAY, T. E. ROBINSON, and J. F. BROOKFIELD, 2001  An investigation of the cause of low variability on the fourth chromosome of Drosophila.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:2260-2269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CHARLESWORTH, B., 1996  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genet Res. 68:131-149.[Medline]

CHARLESWORTH, B., M. T. MORGAN, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1993  The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134:1289-1303.[Abstract]

CHARLESWORTH, B., M. NORDBORG, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1997  The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Genet Res. 70:155-174.[CrossRef][Medline]

CHARLESWORTH, D., B. CHARLESWORTH, and M. T. MORGAN, 1995  The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics 141:1619-1632.[Abstract]

DVORAK, J., M. C. LUO, and Z. L. YANG, 1998  Restriction fragment length polymorphism and divergence in the genomic regions of high and low recombination in self-fertilizing and cross-fertilizing aegilops species. Genetics 148:423-434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

FRISSE, L., R. R. HUDSON, A. BARTOSZEWICZ, J. D. WALL, and J. DONFACK et al., 2001  Gene conversion and different population histories may explain the contrast between polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium levels. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69:831-843.[CrossRef][Medline]

GRELL, R. F., 1971  Heat induced exchange in the fourth chromosome of diploid females of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 69:523-527.[Free Full Text]

HARTL, D. L., and A. G. CLARK, 1997 Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

HAWLEY, R. S., K. S. MCKIM, and T. ARBEL, 1993  Meiotic segregation in Drosophila melanogaster females: molecules, mechanisms, and myths. Annu. Rev. Genet. 27:281-317.[Medline]

HILLIKER, A. J., G. HARAUZ, A. G. REAUME, M. GRAY, and S. H. CLARK et al., 1994  Meiotic gene conversion tract length distribution within the rosy locus of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 137:1019-1026.[Abstract]

HILTON, H., R. M. KLIMAN, and J. HEY, 1994  Using hitchhiking genes to study adaption and divergence during speciation within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Evolution 48:1900-1913.[CrossRef]

HOCHMAN, B., 1976 The fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster, pp. 903–928 in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 1b, edited by M. ASHBURNER and E. NOVITSKI. Academic Press, New York.

HUDSON, R. R., 1990  Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:1-42.

HUDSON, R. R., 2001  Two-locus sampling distributions and their application. Genetics 159:1805-1817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

HUDSON, R. R. and N. L. KAPLAN, 1985  Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111:147-164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

HUDSON, R. R., and N. L. KAPLAN, 1994 Gene trees with background selection, pp. 140–153 in Non-Neutral Evolution: Theories and Molecular Data, edited by B. GOLDING. Chapman & Hall, New York.

HUDSON, R. R., M. KREITMAN, and M. AGUADE, 1987  A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116:153-159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

JENSEN, M. A., B. CHARLESWORTH, and M. KREITMAN, 2002  Patterns of genetic variation at a chromosome 4 locus of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.. Genetics 160:493-507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

KAPLAN, N. L., R. R. HUDSON, and C. H. LANGLEY, 1989  The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics 123:887-899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

KREITMAN, M., 1983  Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster.. Nature 304:412-417.[CrossRef][Medline]

KREITMAN, M. and R. R. HUDSON, 1991  Inferring the evolutionary histories of the Adh and Adh-dup loci in Drosophila melanogaster from patterns of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics 127:565-582.[Abstract]

LANGLEY, C. H., B. P. LAZZARO, W. PHILLIPS, E. HEIKKINEN, and J. M. BRAVERMAN, 2000  Linkage disequilibria and the site frequency spectra in the su(s) and su(w(a)) regions of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Genetics 156:1837-1852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LOCKE, J., L. PODEMSKI, N. AIPPERSBACH, H. KEMP, and R. HODGETTS, 2000  A physical map of the polytenized region (101EF–102F) of chromosome 4 in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 155:1175-1183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MAYNARD-SMITH, J. and J. HAIGH, 1974  The hitch-hiking effect of a favorable gene. Genet. Res. 23:23-35.[Medline]

NACHMAN, M. W., 1997  Patterns of DNA variability at X-linked loci in Mus domesticus. Genetics 147:1303-1316.[Abstract]

NACHMAN, M. W., 2001  Single nucleotide polymorphisms and recombination rate in humans. Trends Genet. 17:481-485.[CrossRef][Medline]

NEI, M., 1987 Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.

NORDBORG, M., B. CHARLESWORTH, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1996  The effect of recombination on background selection. Genet. Res. 67:159-174.[Medline]

PATTERSON, J. T. and H. J. MULLER, 1930  Are "progressive" mutations produced by X-rays? Genetics 15:495-578.[Free Full Text]

PODEMSKI, L., C. FERRER, and J. LOCKE, 2001  Whole arm inversions of chromosome 4 in Drosophila species. Chromosoma 110:305-312.[Medline]

POWELL, J. R., 1997 Progress and Prospects in Evolutionary Biology: The Drosophila Model. Oxford University Press, New York.

ROZAS, J. and R. ROZAS, 1999  DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15:174-175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SANDLER, I. and P. SZAUTER, 1978  The effect of recombination-defective meiotic mutants on the fourth-chromosome crossing over in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 90:6