- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Myburg, A. A.
- Articles by Whetten, R. W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Myburg, A. A.
- Articles by Whetten, R. W.
Genetics of Postzygotic Isolation in Eucalyptus: Whole-Genome Analysis of Barriers to Introgression in a Wide Interspecific Cross of Eucalyptus grandis and E. globulus
Alexander A. Myburga,b, Claus Voglc, A. Rod Griffind, Ronald R. Sederoffa,b, and Ross W. Whettenaa Department of Forestry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695,
b Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695,
c Department of Computer Science, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
d CRC for Sustainable Production Forestry and School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia
Corresponding author: Alexander A. Myburg, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa., zander.myburg{at}fabi.up.ac.za (E-mail)
Communicating editor: O. SAVOLAINEN
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The genetic architecture of hybrid fitness characters can provide valuable insights into the nature and evolution of postzygotic reproductive barriers in diverged species. We determined the genome-wide distribution of barriers to introgression in an F1 hybrid of two Eucalyptus tree species, Eucalyptus grandis (W. Hill ex Maiden.) and E. globulus (Labill.). Two interspecific backcross families (N = 186) were used to construct comparative, single-tree, genetic linkage maps of an F1 hybrid individual and two backcross parents. A total of 1354 testcross AFLP marker loci were evaluated in the three parental maps and a substantial proportion (27.7% average) exhibited transmission ratio distortion (
= 0.05). The distorted markers were located in distinct regions of the parental maps and marker alleles within each region were all biased toward either of the two parental species. We used a Bayesian approach to estimate the position and effect of transmission ratio distorting loci (TRDLs) in the distorted regions of each parental linkage map. The relative viability of TRDL alleles ranged from 0.20 to 0.72. Contrary to expectation, heterospecific (donor) alleles of TRDLs were favored as often as recurrent alleles in both backcrosses, suggesting that positive and negative heterospecific interactions affect introgression rates in this wide interspecific pedigree.
THE nature of postzygotic reproductive barriers is a fundamental question in evolutionary genetics. More than 60 years after it was proposed that postzygotic barriers may be by-products of genetic differentiation among diverging species (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The prevailing view emerging from studies of postzygotic barriers in plants and animals is that postzygotic isolation is caused mostly by extensive negative epistatic interactions in hybrid genomes (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Over the past decade, the increased accessibility and automation of molecular marker systems such as amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
With the exception of examples such as the Ods hybrid male sterility gene in Drosophila (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here we present the results of a comparative, genome-wide analysis of postzygotic reproductive barriers in a wide interspecific backcross pedigree of two Eucalyptus tree species, Eucalyptus grandis (W. Hill ex Maiden.) and E. globulus spp. globulus (Labill.). These two well-diverged species belong to different sections of the subgenus Symphyomyrtus and are isolated by strong prezygotic and postzygotic barriers (![]()
![]()
![]()
In this article, we describe the use of the Bayesian approach developed by ![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Study system:
Natural populations of E. grandis and E. globulus are completely allopatric. E. globulus populations range from
38°S to 43°S and are restricted to eastern Tasmania and the southern extremes of Victoria, while E. grandis populations occur between 16°S and 33°S along the eastern coastline of New South Wales and Queensland (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Generation of mapping pedigree:
Details of the mapping pedigree used in this study are presented elsewhere (![]()
![]()
|
AFLP analysis and linkage map construction:
AFLP marker analysis and the construction of framework linkage maps of the F1 hybrid tree and the two backcross parents are described in detail in ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The testcross (1:1) markers segregating in the two parents of each backcross were used to construct four framework linkage maps. A paternal linkage map of the F1 hybrid and maternal linkage map of the E. grandis backcross parent were constructed in the E. grandis backcross family, while a maternal linkage map of the F1 hybrid and a paternal linkage map of the E. globulus backcross parent were constructed with data of the E. globulus backcross family. All four maps were aligned using testcross markers shared between the two maps of the F1 hybrid and intercross markers shared between the maps of the F1 hybrid and that of the backcross parents.
The species origin of markers in the maps of the F1 hybrid was inferred by genotyping the original E. grandis seed parent of the F1 hybrid (tree G50, Fig 1). Since the two linkage phases in the maps of the F1 hybrid represent AFLP markers amplified from either the E. grandis or the E. globulus chromosome of each homologous pair, we were able to infer the species origin of all the testcross markers in the F1 hybrid. This allowed us to determine the rate of transmission of donor (heterospecific) alleles from the F1 hybrid to backcross progeny throughout all linkage groups.
Detection of TRD and candidate TRDL regions:
Before analysis of TRD in the maps of the F1 hybrid, all marker data were recoded to reflect the presence (1) or absence (0) of the E. globulus marker alleles. The phase of linkage was therefore consistent across all of the linkage groups in the maternal and paternal maps of the F1 hybrid. This inference was not possible for the maps of the pure species parents, because the respective grandparents were not available for genotyping.
The observed genotypic ratio of each testcross AFLP fragment was compared to the expected Mendelian ratio of 1:1. Chi-square tests were performed for each of these markers at the 0.05 level of significance.
Distorted genotypic ratios of individual markers can arise purely by chance through sampling of a finite number of gametes or through linkage to a hybrid fitness factor. The identification of candidate regions containing hybrid fitness factors (or TRDLs) therefore necessitates the use of a genome-wide significance threshold. However, TRD of marker loci linked to viability or sterility factors should be limited by recombination to subchromosomal blocks of linked markers. A genome-wide significance threshold that is based on the effective number of independent tests should therefore be based on the number of independent genomic regions in each parental linkage map. In this study, the testcross markers were distributed across 11 linkage groups within each parental map. Assuming that each linkage group corresponds to one chromosome (n = 11 in Eucalyptus) and that each chromosome contains at least two independent regions (the average length of linkage groups was 125 cM; ![]()
0.002 would therefore be required to obtain a genome-wide error rate of
= 0.05. However, to ensure that regions with weak TRDLs are included and to evaluate epistatic interactions among as many putative TRDLs as possible, we applied a threshold of
= 0.01 and recorded all distorted regions with two or more distorted markers.
Mapping and estimation of TRDL effects:
The Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method of ![]()
![]()
For the MCMC procedure (described in detail in ![]()
Evaluation of epistatic interactions between TRDLs:
To test for epistatic interactions between pairs of TRDLs, we selected the most distorted marker in each candidate region as representative of the putative TRDL. Contingency tests of all the two-locus TRDL allele combinations within each parental map were performed using Fisher's exact test as implemented in the JMP statistical software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We also tested for interaction between distorted loci in the two parental maps of each backcross. Only unlinked marker pairs were considered in the tests for epistasis. An experimentwise significance threshold was set to account for the number of pairwise tests performed in each backcross family.
We evaluated the overall fitness effect of epistatic interactions among all putative TRDLs in each backcross family using a previously proposed regression method (![]()
![]()

The log-transformed ratio of the observed/expected frequency f(i) was then regressed on i. Two models for viability selection were compared within each backcross family. The simple linear model, ln f(i) = a + b1i, was compared to
, a model with a quadratic term to represent all possible pairwise interactions. In the absence of interaction between the TRDLs, a simple linear relationship is expected, while considerable negative interactions among TRDLs should result in a significant negative coefficient for the interaction term in the quadratic regression model (![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Low fitness of E. grandis x E. globulus hybrids:
The F1 hybrid (tree BBT01058, Fig 1) selected for backcrossing was a rare superior individual in a large F1 polymix progeny set. A total of 45 polymix families were produced by controlled pollination of selected E. grandis mother trees with two 10-tree pollen mixes of E. globulus parents. Only 4.4% of F1 seed germinated and many weak and abnormal phenotypes were observed at the seedling stage. Only 3.2% of the surviving F1 hybrid trees were sufficiently vigorous and normal to be advanced to clonal evaluation, and of these, only 9% met the selection criteria for commercial forest tree clones. Considerable variation in F1 hybrid viability was observed among different combinations of E. grandis mother trees and E. globulus pollen mixes, which suggested that variation in hybrid combining ability existed within both species (![]()
F1 hybrid individual (BBT01058) was cross-fertile with both backcross parents, but the germination rate of the F2 backcross seed was only
50%. A greater proportion of normal plants were observed in the F2 generation than in the F1 generation. However, abnormal phenotypes such as dwarfs, abnormal leaf pigmentation, abnormal rooting, deformed stems, and deformed shoots were observed in many of the backcross individuals (data not shown).
Comparative genetic linkage maps and TRD of testcross AFLPs:
Linkage analysis of >800 testcross and intercross AFLP fragments in each of the backcross families allowed us to construct comparative maps (Fig 2) of all 11 linkage groups expected in this mapping pedigree (2n = 22 in Eucalyptus). No crossover of marker positions or large clusters of markers, indicative of gross chromosomal rearrangements, were detected at the resolution of the four parental maps (Fig 2). In addition, recombination was generally not suppressed in the F1 hybrid genome relative to that of the pure species as would be expected if major chromosomal incompatibilities existed (![]()
|
A total of 704 testcross markers segregating in the E. globulus backcross family and 650 in the E. grandis backcross family were evaluated for TRD (Table 1). Approximately 27 and 30% of testcross markers were distorted at the 0.05 level of significance in the E. globulus and E. grandis backcross families, respectively. At the 0.002 level of significance (approximate genome-wide
of 0.05),
13% of the testcross markers in each backcross family were significantly distorted. More testcross markers were distorted than could be explained by chance at both levels of significance.
|
Distribution of TRD in the comparative maps:
The distribution of TRD in the comparative framework maps of the F1 hybrid and the two backcross parents is shown in Fig 2 and Fig 3. For the purpose of discussion, linkage groups of the maternal and paternal linkage maps of the F1 hybrid are indicated below by "m" and "p," while linkage groups of the E. grandis and E. globulus backcross parents are indicated by "gr" and "gl," respectively.
|
Regions of the parental maps that contained two or more distorted markers were all unidirectionally distorted with respect to linkage phase (Fig 3). These regions were all distorted with P values <0.01 and they were therefore recorded as candidate regions for TRDL analysis (Table 2). Although this pattern of TRD could have resulted from sampling bias in some regions, it is also possible that these regions contained weak hybrid fitness factors. The distortion of the same genomic regions in different genetic backgrounds (e.g., LG2, LG3, and LG6; Fig 2) provided additional evidence for the presence of TRDLs in these regions. We excluded individually distorted markers at the ends of linkage groups, especially where the direction of allelic bias was opposite to that of neighboring markers (e.g., LG8gl and LG7p, Fig 3), due to the less stringent criteria associated with the placement of framework markers at terminal positions of linkage groups.
|
In all of the distorted map regions, TRD was highly directional with respect to allelic origin. In some cases (e.g., LG6gl, LG11m, LG1p, LG3gr, and LG11gr) directional distortion extended over almost the full length of the linkage group, while in other cases (e.g., LG2m, LG2p, LG8m, LG8p, and LG10gr), it was restricted to a smaller region of the linkage group (Fig 3). Generally, marker loci that were not distorted at the 0.05 level of significance exhibited random fluctuation in the direction of deviation from a 1:1 segregation ratio (e.g., LG10gl, Fig 3).
The most severely biased map region (LG6p and LG6m, Fig 3) exhibited TRD in both backcrosses. A marked excess of E. globulus marker alleles occurred in this region of the F1 genome in both backcross families. Up to 80.6% of individuals in the E. globulus backcross and 94.2% of individuals in the E. grandis backcross carried E. globulus alleles in this region of LG6 (Table 2).
The ability to infer the species identity of the linkage phases of the maps of the F1 hybrid allowed us to distinguish between donor (heterospecific) and recurrent (conspecific) alleles in both genetic backgrounds. On the basis of this inference, we found that donor alleles inherited via the F1 hybrid were favored at approximately the same frequency as recurrent alleles in the two backcrosses. For example, in the paternal map of the F1 hybrid donor (E. globulus) alleles were in excess on LG5p, LG6p, LG8p, and LG9p, while recurrent (E. grandis) alleles were favored on LG1p, LG2p, and LG3p. In the maternal map of the F1 hybrid, three of the six distorted regions (LG1m, LG7m, and LG8m) were biased in favor of donor (E. grandis) alleles (Fig 3).
Multipoint comparative mapping of TRDLs:
The Bayesian MCMC method of ![]()
The posterior probability of TRDLs in each distorted map region was estimated by the frequency of TRDL detection in the map region during MCMC iterations (![]()
The posterior means of TRDL effects ranged from 8.2 to 33.4% in the genomes of the three parents (Table 2). This corresponded to an excess or deficiency in individual TRDL alleles of 16.466.8%. In a backcross design, where allelic frequencies equal genotypic frequencies, TRDL effects can also be expressed as the relative viability (t) of gametes or zygotes with alternative genotypes and 0 < t < 1 (![]()
The maximum number of TRDLs inferred on a single linkage group was three (for LG6p). Two separate TRDLs were inferred on LG6p at 93 and 166 cM with mean effects of 23.3 and 33.4%, respectively (Table 2). These TRDLs accounted for the severely distorted region at the lower end of this linkage group. A third TRDL of opposite effect was inferred at 51 cM. This TRDL may account for the abrupt change in the magnitude of distortion in the middle of LG6p. A more gradual change in distortion and more defined peak in distortion were observed in LG6m. A single TRDL with a mean effect of 28% was inferred in this linkage group (at 92 cM). The only TRDL detected in the map of the E. globulus backcross parent was located at a similar position (96 cM) on LG6gl (Fig 3).
Apparent homologous TRDLs were also detected on four other syntenic linkage groups. LG1m and LG1p were both biased in favor of E. grandis alleles (Fig 3). The same region of LG2m and LG2p contained an excess of alleles of the respective recurrent parents. Similar regions of LG8m and LG8p were distorted and in both cases the TRDL allele of the respective donor parent was favored (Fig 3). Finally, putative TRDLs were detected on LG3p and LG3gr in the two parental maps of the E. grandis backcross family.
Epistatic interactions among TRDLs:
Contingency tests for interaction between TRDLs revealed one interaction in the E. globulus backcross and two interactions in the E. grandis backcross at the 0.05 level of significance (Table 3). Only one interaction, that between distorted markers on LG7m and LG11m, was significant (P = 0.0007) at the experimentwise significance level (Table 3). The frequency of E. globulus backcross progeny with the E. grandis donor allele at both marker loci, AAA/CGA-114 on LG7m and ACG/CCA-271 on LG11m, was 30% lower than expected, while 23.6% fewer than expected individuals carried E. globulus alleles at both loci.
|
We also tested the cumulative fitness effect of interactions among TRDLs segregating in each backcross family, using a modified version of the method of ![]()
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Comparative genetic maps of F1 hybrids and their parental species can be used as powerful tools to study postzygotic reproductive barriers in plant species (![]()
![]()
Genetic architecture of postzygotic barriers between E. grandis and E. globulus:
Postzygotic barriers between E. grandis and E. globulus manifest in this interspecific backcross mapping pedigree as regions of TRD in the genetic maps of the F1 hybrid and the two backcross parents. Allelic transmission ratios in these three trees may be altered from an expected 1:1 ratio (for testcross AFLPs) by selection on their gametes or by selection on the F2 zygotes produced after fusion of these gametes. The fertilization ability of F1 gametes and viability of F2 zygotes may in turn be affected by genic incompatibilities between the genomes of E. grandis and E. globulus or by chromosomal rearrangements that result in abnormal meiotic products in the F1 hybrid. The relative contribution of these two sources of hybrid incompatibility to postzygotic isolation of E. grandis and E. globulus is unknown and constitutes an important question addressed in this study.
The results of our comparative mapping effort (Fig 2 and ![]()
![]()
![]()
Before interpreting the patterns of TRD observed in this study, it is important to be aware of potential nongenetic sources of TRD. These include sampling bias, reduced marker penetrance, comigration of DNA fragments during electrophoresis, and scoring error. Except for sampling bias, which affects groups of linked markers through random over- or underrepresentation of chromosome arms, all of these sources of error affect the genotypic ratios of individual markers in a random fashion and should therefore not have resulted in directional distortion of groups of linked markers in our linkage maps. In addition, we previously estimated scoring error to be <2% in our mapping data (![]()
It is also important to be aware of the limitations of our experimental design for inferring the genetic mechanisms (e.g., gametic vs. zygotic selection) underlying the reproductive barriers (TRDLs) observed in this study. The unidirectional crossing barrier between E. grandis and E. globulus prevented the construction of reciprocal backcrosses. The fertilization ability of the paternal and maternal gametes of the F1 hybrid were consequently evaluated in two different hybrid genetic backgrounds, which precluded us from directly discriminating between sex-specific gametophyte selection and zygotic selection in backcross progeny. The use of dominant AFLP markers and a backcross design also prevented us from distinguishing between these two sources of TRD. This issue can be addressed in the future by using codominant microsatellite markers and an outcrossing mapping model. A genome-wide set of highly informative microsatellite markers is currently under development in Eucalyptus and will be extremely useful for comparative analysis of postzygotic isolation barriers (![]()
To interpret the patterns of TRD observed in the F1 hybrid, it is useful to consider (a) whether a map region was distorted in both backcrosses (LGs 1, 2, 6, and 8) or in only one backcross (LG3p, LG5p, LG7m, LG9p, and LG11m), (b) whether the distortion was in the same direction (LGs 1 and 6) or different directions (LGs 2 and 8) in the two backcrosses, and (c) whether the same region was also distorted in either of the backcross parents (LG3p or LG6m). These categories of TRDLs have to be matched to the patterns of segregation expected for different selective mechanisms. For example, genetic factors that caused differential fertility of F1 hybrid pollen should segregate in the paternal map of the F1 hybrid (e.g., LG3p, LG5p, and LG9p; Fig 3), while factors that affected the fertilization of F1 hybrid ovules should segregate in the maternal map (e.g., LG7m and LG11m, Fig 3). Both types of gametic factors may exhibit interactions with loci in the backcross parent maps, if these loci affect interspecific gamete compatibility and they are heterozygous in both parents. In contrast, genetic factors that influenced the viability of F2 zygotes, the germination rate of backcross seed, or early seedling survival may segregate in any of the parental maps. These factors may also be part of heterospecific interactions between E. grandis and E. globulus genes in the F1 hybrid or "donor-recurrent" interactions between factors in the F1 hybrid and the backcross parents. Clearly, some of the categories of TRDLs described above can be associated with more than one selective mechanism, depending on the mode of action and heterozygosity of the loci involved. For example, TRDLs with fitness effects in only one of the two backcrosses (e.g., LG7m, LG11m, LG5p, and LG9p; Fig 3) may indicate male- or female-specific selection of F1 gametes or may result from background-specific selection of TRDL alleles in F2 zygotes. It is also possible that some of the TRDLs detected in the same regions of the paternal and maternal maps of the F1 hybrid (e.g., LG1, LG2, LG6, and LG8) represent nonhomologous genetic factors segregating in a background-specific manner.
Pollen tube growth characteristics may be a source of very strong gametic selection in this study. Genes that determine differences in pollen tube growth, a strong unilateral crossing barrier between these two species, should segregate in the F1 hybrid and may cause severe TRD in the paternal map. E. globulus alleles of these genes may confer a selective advantage to their gametes due to the fact that pollen tubes of E. globulus grow farther and faster than those of the small-flowered E. grandis. Four TRDLs in the paternal map (LG5p, -6p, -8p, and -9p; Fig 3) were distorted in favor of E. globulus alleles. However, only the TRDLs on LG5p and LG9p were unique to the paternal map and fit the predicted pattern of male-specific gametophyte selection.
One of the most remarkable results of our study is the extent to which donor alleles in the F1 hybrid were favored in the two backcross families. Selection against donor alleles in the "recurrent" genetic backgrounds (e.g., LG2m and LG2p, Fig 3) was expected to be the dominant force shaping the genomic composition of E. grandis x E. globulus backcross progeny. However, we found that four out of seven distorted regions in the paternal map of the F1 hybrid were biased toward the donor parent (E. globulus) in the backcross to E. grandis, while three of the six distorted regions in the maternal map of the F1 hybrid were biased in favor of the donor parent (E. grandis) in the backcross to E. globulus (Fig 3). Selection for donor genetic material has also been reported in hybrids of other plant species such as iris (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It is not clear how many of the reproductive barriers in the F1 hybrid represent fixed genetic differences that have accumulated between the genomes of E. grandis and E. globulus. Fixed hybrid fitness loci should all be heterozygous in the F1 hybrid, segregate in both backcrosses, and exhibit a deficiency of the respective donor alleles in at least one of the two backcrosses (consistent with the Dobzhansky-Muller model of negative heterospecific interactions). Only one genomic region in the F1 hybrid (LG2m and LG2p, Fig 3) exhibited a deficiency of donor alleles in both backcrosses. Three other regions (LG1p, LG3p, and LG11m; Fig 3) were deficient in donor alleles in only one of the two backcrosses, which may indicate background specificity of the incompatible interactions or that these loci are not fixed between E. grandis and E. globulus. The two regions that were distorted in the F1 hybrid and the respective backcross parent (LG6m-LG6gl and LG3p-LG3gr, Fig 3) may represent hybrid fitness loci that are segregating in one of the two species and fixed in the other. Loci that affect hybrid fitness may indeed segregate within the two species, providing that they do not have serious fitness effects within the parental species (![]()
We found only one TRDL interaction that was indicative of a simple Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibility between a recurrent allele in the backcross parent and a donor allele in the F1 hybrid. In the E. grandis backcross family, the frequency of individuals with the E. globulus donor allele on LG1p and one of the TRDL alleles on LG10gr was 45% lower than expected (P = 0.0048, Table 3). Such interactions can of course be detected only if the loci in the F1 hybrid and the backcross parent are both heterozygous. If not, only one of the two interacting loci (most likely that in the F1 hybrid) will be detected by TRD analysis, which may explain the presence of the recurrent-biased TRDLs on LG3p and LG11m that showed no deleterious interactions with loci in the respective backcross parents.
Finally, our evaluation of the overall fitness effect of two-locus epistatic interactions among TRDLs using the regression method of ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Implications for natural and artificial hybridization in Eucalyptus:
Viable, fertile F1 progeny of E. grandis and E. globulus are completely absent in nature and very rare in artificial crosses. Even after prezygotic barriers between E. grandis x E. globulus crosses are overcome by artificial hybridization, <0.2% of F1 hybrids are sufficiently viable and vigorous to produce offspring (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Knowledge of the genetic basis of prezygotic and postzygotic hybridization barriers in Eucalyptus is a prerequisite for the development of effective strategies for hybrid breeding in this genus. Much has already been learned from the study of natural and artificial hybrids in Eucalyptus (![]()
![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We express our gratitude to Pablo Santini and co-workers of Shell Uruguay Renewables S.A. for the maintenance of the backcross families and to Jane Harbard of Shell Forestry Technical Services, United Kingdom for the controlled pollinations that produced the backcross families. We thank David Remington and two anonymous reviewers for valuable insights and comments on this manuscript. This work was supported by funding from the North Carolina State University Forest Biotechnology Industrial Associates Consortium and by the National Institutes of Health (grant GM45344-06). A.A.M. was funded by the Fulbright Program and the National Research Foundation of South Africa. The plant materials used in this study were managed and provided by Shell Forestry, Forestal y Agricola Monte Aguila S.A., Chile, and Forestal Oriental S.A., Uruguay.
Manuscript received September 26, 2002; Accepted for publication November 10, 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
BERT, P. F., G. CHARMET, P. SOURDILLE, M. D. HAYWARD, and F. BALFOURIER, 1999 A high-density molecular map for ryegrass (Lolium perenne) using AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:445-452.[CrossRef]
BOREVITZ, J. O., D. LIANG, D. PLOUFFE, H.-S. CHANG, and T. ZHU et al., 2003 Large-scale identification of single-feature polymorphisms in complex genomes. Genome Res. 13:513-523.
BRONDANI, R. V. P., C. BRONDANI, and D. GRATTAPAGLIA, 2002 Towards a genus-wide reference linkage map for Eucalyptus based exclusively on highly informative microsatellite markers. Mol. Genet. Genomics 267:338-347.[CrossRef][Medline]
BURKE, J. M. and M. L. ARNOLD, 2001 Genetics and the fitness of hybrids. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35:31-52.[CrossRef][Medline]
BURKE, J. M., T. J. VOSS, and M. L. ARNOLD, 1998 Genetic interactions and natural selection in Louisiana Iris hybrids. Evolution 52:1304-1310.[CrossRef]
BUROW, M. D., C. E. SIMPSON, J. L. STARR, and A. H. PATERSON, 2001 Transmission genetics of chromatin from a synthetic amphidiploid to cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): broadening the gene pool of a monophyletic polyploid species. Genetics 159:823-837.
CHENG, R., A. SAITA, Y. TAKANO, and Y. UKAI, 1996 Estimation of the position and effect of a lethal factor locus on a molecular marker linkage map. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:494-502.[CrossRef]
CHENG, R., A. KLEINHOFS, and Y. UKAI, 1998 Method for mapping a partial lethal factor locus on a molecular marker linkage map of a backcross and doubled-haploid population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:293-298.[CrossRef]
DOBZHANSKY, T., 1937 Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
ELDRIDGE, K., J. DAVIDSON, C. HARWOOD and G. VAN WYK, 1993 Eucalypt Domestication and Breeding. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
ELLIS, M. F., M. SEDGLEY, and J. A. GARDNER, 1991 Interspecific pollen pistil interaction in Eucalyptus L'Hér. (Myrtaceae)the effect of taxonomic distance. Ann. Bot. 68:185-194.
FISHMAN, L. and J. H. WILLIS, 2001 Evidence for Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities contributing to the sterility of hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus.. Evolution 55:1932-1942.[CrossRef][Medline]
FISHMAN, L., A. J. KELLY, E. MORGAN, and J. H. WILLIS, 2001 A genetic map in the Mimulus guttatus species complex reveals transmission ratio distortion due to heterospecific interactions. Genetics 159:1701-1716.
FU, Y. B. and K. RITLAND, 1994a Evidence for the partial dominance of viability genes contributing to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus.. Genetics 136:323-331.[Abstract]
FU, Y. B. and K. RITLAND, 1994b On estimating the linkage of marker genes to viability genes controlling inbreeding depression. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:925-932.
FU, Y. B. and K. RITLAND, 1996 Marker-based inferences about epistasis for genes influencing inbreeding depression. Genetics 144:339-348.[Abstract]
GORE, P. L., B. M. POTTS, P. W. VOLKER, and J. MEGALOS, 1990 Unilateral cross-incompatibility in Eucalyptus: the case of hybridization between Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens.. Aust. J. Bot. 38:383-394.[CrossRef]
GRATTAPAGLIA, D. and R. SEDEROFF, 1994 Genetic linkage maps of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus urophylla using a pseudo-testcross mapping strategy and RAPD markers. Genetics 137:1121-1137.[Abstract]
GRIFFIN, A. R., I. P. BURGESS, and L. WOLF, 1988 Patterns of natural and manipulated hybridization in the genus Eucalyptus L'Herita review. Aust. J. Bot. 36:41-66.[CrossRef]
GRIFFIN, A. R., J. HARBARD, C. CENTURION and P. SANTINI, 2000 Breeding Eucalyptus grandis x globulus and other interspecific hybrids with high inviabilityproblem analysis and experience at Shell Forestry Projects in Uruguay and Chile, pp. 113 in Hybrid Breeding and Genetics of Forest Trees: Proceedings of QFRI/CRC-SPF Symposium, April 914, 2000, Noosa, Queensland, Australia, edited by H. S. DUNGEY, M. J. DIETERS and D. G. NIKLES. Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, Australia.
HARBARD, J. L., A. R. GRIFFIN, and J. ESPEJO, 1999 Mass controlled pollination of Eucalyptus globulus: a practical reality. Can. J. For. Res. 29:1457-1463.[CrossRef]
HARDNER, C. M. and B. M. POTTS, 1997 Postdispersal selection following mixed mating in Eucalyptus regnans.. Evolution 51:103-111.[CrossRef]
HARUSHIMA, Y., M. NAKAGAHRA, M. YANO, T. SASAKI, and N. KURATA, 2001 A genome-wide survey of reproductive barriers in an intraspecific hybrid. Genetics 159:883-892.
HEDRICK, P. W. and O. MUONA, 1990 Linkage of viability genes to marker loci in selfing organisms. Heredity 64:67-72.
JIANG, C. X., P. W. CHEE, X. DRAYE, P. L. MORRELL, and C. W. SMITH et al., 2000 Multilocus interactions restrict gene introgression in interspecific populations of polyploid Gossypium (cotton). Evolution 54:798-814.[CrossRef][Medline]
KARKKAINEN, K., H. KUITTINEN, R. VAN TREUREN, C. VOGL, and S. OIKARINEN et al., 1999 Genetic basis of inbreeding depression in Arabis petraea.. Evolution 53:1354-1365.[CrossRef]
LESPINASSE, D., M. RODIER-GOUD, L. GRIVET, A. LECONTE, and H. LEGNATE et al., 2000 A saturated genetic linkage map of rubber tree (Hevea spp.) based on RFLP, AFLP, microsatellite, and isozyme markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:127-138.[CrossRef]
LOPEZ, G. A., B. M. POTTS, and P. A. TILYARD, 2000 F1 hybrid inviability in Eucalyptus: the case of E. ovata x E. globulus.. Heredity 85:242-250.
LYNCH, M. and A. G. FORCE, 2000 The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am. Nat. 156:590-605.[CrossRef]
MARQUES, C. M., J. A. ARAUJO, J. G. FERREIRA, R. WHETTEN, and D. M. O'MALLEY et al., 1998 AFLP genetic maps of Eucalyptus globulus and E. tereticornis.. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:727-737.[CrossRef]
MITCHELL-OLDS, T., 1995 Interval mapping of viability loci causing heterosis in Arabidopsis.. Genetics 140:1105-1109.[Abstract]
MULLER, H. J., 1942 Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6:71-125.
MYBURG, A. A., D. L. REMINGTON, D. M. O'MALLEY, R. R. SEDEROFF, and R. W. WHETTEN, 2001 High-throughput AFLP analysis using infrared dye-labeled primers and an automated DNA sequencer. BioTechniques 30:348-357.[Medline]
MYBURG, A. A., A. R. GRIFFIN, R. R. SEDEROFF, and R. W. WHETTEN, 2003 Comparative genetic linkage maps of E. grandis



