A dnaC Mutation in Escherichia coli That Affects Copy Number of ColE1-Like Plasmids and the PriA-PriB (but Not Rep-PriC) Pathway of Chromosomal Replication Restart

Corresponding author: J. Gowrishankar, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, ECIL Rd., Nacharam, Hyderabad 500 076, India., shankar{at}cdfd.org.in (E-mail)

Communicating editor: G. R. SMITH

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Escherichia coli nusG and rho mutants, which are defective in transcription termination, are killed following transformation with several ColE1-like plasmids that lack the plasmid-encoded copy-number regulator gene rom because of uncontrolled plasmid replication within the cells. In this study, a mutation [dnaC1331(A84T)] in the dnaC gene encoding the replicative helicase-loading protein was characterized as a suppressor of this plasmid-mediated lethality phenotype. The mutation also reduced the copy number of the plasmids in otherwise wild-type strains. In comparison with the isogenic dnaC⁺ strain, the dnaC mutant was largely unaffected for (i) growth on rich or minimal medium, (ii) tolerance to UV irradiation, or (iii) survival in the absence of the PriA, RecA, or RecB proteins. However, it was moderately SOS-induced and was absolutely dependent on both the Rep helicase and the PriC protein for its viability. A dnaC1331(A84T) dam mutant, but not its mutH derivative, exhibited sensitivity to growth on rich medium, suggestive of a reduced capacity in the dnaC1331(A84T) strains to survive chromosomal double-strand breaks. We propose that DnaC-A84T is proficient in the assembly of replication forks for both initiation of chromosome replication (at oriC) and replication restart via the Rep-PriC pathway, but that it is specifically defective for replication restart via the PriA-PriB pathway (and consequently also for replication of the Rom^– ColE1-like plasmids).

THE replication fork represents a complex of enzymes that act in concert to achieve unidirectionally processive semiconservative replication of the template DNA, notwithstanding the opposing polarity of its two strands. In Escherichia coli, the replication fork that is involved in replication of the chromosome as well as of various plasmids and coliphages is composed of the 5'–3' replicative helicase DnaB, the primase DnaG, and two catalytic polymerase subassemblies of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (one each for the leading and lagging template DNA strands; reviewed in KORNBERG and BAKER 1992 ; MARIANS 1996 ; MESSER and WEIGEL 1996 ).

Initiation of replication fork assembly on the chromosome involves the delivery by DnaC protein of the DnaB helicase to a specific region oriC at which the initiator protein DnaA is bound. This assembly is also known as the ABC primosome (MARIANS 1996 ). DnaB then recruits DnaG (TOUGU and MARIANS 1996 ) and DNA polymerase III (KIM et al. 1996 ) to constitute the replication fork. Two replication forks so constituted at oriC then travel in opposite directions to achieve replication of the entire chromosome.

In the past few years, it has been recognized that replication forks initiated at oriC often do not progress to completion around the chromosome but instead collapse or disintegrate spontaneously at, for example, sites of template DNA damage. In such cases, the fork may be reassembled at the site of its collapse in a process called replication restart, which in turn is intimately connected to the process of RecA-dependent recombinational repair of the damaged DNA (reviewed in KOGOMA 1997 ; KUZMINOV 1999 ; COX et al. 2000 ; MICHEL 2000 ; SANDLER and MARIANS 2000 ; COX 2001 ; MCGLYNN and LLOYD 2002 ).

Although the mechanism of replication restart is not understood in all its detail, it is DnaA independent and shares many features with phage X174 replication. Biochemical studies with purified proteins in vitro have suggested that during replication restart, a restart primosome (also called the X-type primosome) is constituted at a three-way-junction DNA structure, the D-loop, which is an intermediate in recombinational repair (MCGLYNN et al. 1997 ; LIU and MARIANS 1999 ; LIU et al. 1999 ; XU and MARIANS 2003 ). The restart primosome is formed by the sequential action of three proteins, PriA, PriB, and DnaT, at the D-loop. PriA is a bifunctional protein that both initiates X-type primosome assembly and acts as a 3'–5' DNA helicase, but studies in vitro (LIU et al. 1999 ) and in vivo (SANDLER et al. 1996 , SANDLER et al. 2001 ; JAKTAJI and LLOYD 2003 ) have suggested that the latter function is dispensable for replication restart at D-loops; PriB is a structural component of the primosome whose precise role in replication restart is not established, while DnaT apparently promotes the transfer of DnaB from the DnaB-DnaC complex in solution to the PriA-PriB-DNA complex (MARIANS 1996 ). The subsequent steps of replication fork formation are similar to those at DnaA-bound oriC.

Genetic evidence not only has provided corroboration for the involvement of PriA and PriB in replication restart at D-loops (in the so-called PriA-PriB pathway), but also has suggested that two additional pathways exist for this process (SANDLER et al. 1999 , SANDLER et al. 2001 ; SANDLER 2000 ). Both proposed pathways require the PriC protein (which, like PriB, was originally identified as a factor required for X174 replication in vitro but has otherwise not been well characterized), acting with either PriA (PriA-PriC pathway) or another 3'–5' DNA helicase Rep (Rep-PriC pathway); however, biochemical data in support of either pathway are not available.

Finally, replication fork assembly is also important for plasmid replication. In the case of the ColE1-like plasmids (see CESARENI et al. 1991 ; DEL SOLAR et al. 1998 for reviews), an RNA primer generated by the processing of the plasmid-specified transcript RNA-II is extended by DNA polymerase I to form a D-loop that is then believed to serve for replication fork assembly in much the same way as that described above for replication restart on the chromosome. RNA-II processing to generate the primer is modulated by an antisense inhibitor RNA-I, and the interaction between RNA-II and its inhibitor is stabilized by the Rom protein, encoded by the plasmid-borne rom gene. Null mutants in priA do not support ColE1 plasmid replication, and point mutations in priA as well as a triple substitution mutant allele of priB that confer a reduced plasmid-copy-number phenotype have been described (LEE and KORNBERG 1991 ; NURSE et al. 1991 ; SANDLER et al. 1996 , SANDLER et al. 2001 ; BERGES et al. 1997 ; JAKTAJI and LLOYD 2003 ).

Although it is apparent from the description above that DnaC-mediated delivery of DnaB is the first common step in all mechanisms of replication fork assembly, it is not clear whether the same domain of DnaC is involved in interacting with the different structures (such as DnaA-bound oriC or the restart primosome assembled at a D-loop). dnaC mutants that are temperature sensitive (Ts) for growth have been characterized (WECHSLER 1975 ; MAISNIER-PATIN et al. 2001 ), consistent with the protein's essential role in replication fork assembly at oriC (and perhaps also in replication restart). Other dnaC mutations have been recovered as suppressors of sickness or inviability associated with priA disruption (KOGOMA et al. 1996 ; SANDLER et al. 1996 , SANDLER et al. 1999 , SANDLER et al. 2001 ; GREGG et al. 2002 ; RANGARAJAN et al. 2002 ; JAKTAJI and LLOYD 2003 ). In this article, we report the identification and characterization of a novel dnaC mutant [dnaC1331(A84T)] that exhibits both a reduced-copy-number phenotype with Rom^– ColE1-like plasmids and synthetic lethality with certain genes, such as rep and priC, implicated in replication restart. Our results suggest that DnaC-A84T is affected for the PriA-PriB pathway but not for the Rep-PriC pathway of replication restart or for replication fork assembly at oriC.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Bacterial strains, growth conditions, and plasmids:
Genotypes of E. coli K-12 strains are listed in Table 1. The routinely employed rich and minimal growth media were, respectively, Luria broth (LB) and glucose-minimal A (MILLER 1992 ). Antibiotics were used at the following final concentrations (micrograms per milliliter): ampicillin (Amp), 100; rifampicin (Rif), 100; chloramphenicol (Cm), 25; kanamycin (Kan), 50; spectinomycin (Spec), 50; and tetracycline (Tet), 15. Unless otherwise indicated, the growth temperature was 30°.

Plasmids previously described include (salient features in parentheses): (i) p15A-derived: pACYC184 (Cm^R Tet^R; CHANG and COHEN 1978 ); (ii) pMB9-derived: pBR322 (Amp^R Tet^R; BOLIVAR et al. 1977 ), pUC19 (Amp^R; YANISCH-PERRON et al. 1985 ), pBR329 (Amp^R Cm^R Tet^R; COVARRUBIAS and BOLIVAR 1982 ), and pHYD762 (Amp^R; HARINARAYANAN and GOWRISHANKAR 2003 ); and (iii) pSC101-derived: pLG339 (Kan^R; WILLIAMS et al. 1996 ), and pCL1921 (Spec^R; LERNER and INOUYE 1990 ).

Plasmid pHYD554 is a pCL1921 derivative carrying a 5-kb chromosomal fragment that includes the rep⁺ gene and was obtained by subcloning of a KpnI-PstI fragment from the phage clone 556 of the ordered genomic library of KOHARA et al. 1987 into the corresponding sites of pCL1921.

DNA methods:
Standard protocols were followed for experiments involving recombinant DNA (SAMBROOK et al. 1989 ). Intracellular content of test plasmids in different strains was estimated following agarose gel electrophoresis of plasmid preparations that were made from constant numbers of cells withdrawn from the cultures; prior to the plasmid isolation procedure, a fixed volume of culture of DH5 carrying plasmid pHYD762 (2.2 kb) was added as loading control to normalize for efficiency of plasmid recovery (HARINARAYANAN and GOWRISHANKAR 2003 ). The dnaTC locus (see Fig 1) was PCR amplified from chromosomal DNA preparations of isogenic strains GJ1541 (spl-16) and GJ1556 (spl⁺) with the aid of primers DNACFP (5'-GGCAATGGCACAGCACAG-3') and DNATRP (5'-GTGCGTTATCCATCGGTC-3'); both primers were used also for sequencing the PCR products (each 1.54 kb long), along with a third internal primer, DNACIP (5'-CATACTGGCGCGCTTTGC-3').

View larger version (24K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 1. Association of the spl-16 [dnaC1331(A84T)] mutation with loss of the BsmI site in dnaC. The dnaTC locus was PCR amplified from individual KanR transductants of a cross [P1(CAG18619) x GJ1538] in which the spl+ and spl-16 alleles were segregating and the PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis following digestion with BsmI. Positions of DNA size markers (in base pairs) are marked beside the gels. (Top) Linear depictions of the PCR products from the dnaC+ and dnaC1331(A84T) strains with the expected sizes (in base pairs) of the BsmI fragments obtained therefrom marked (BsmI recognition sites shown as solid diamonds). Marked beneath the gel lanes are the phenotypes of the transductants with respect to lethality (+, that is, spl+) or survival (–, that is, spl-16) following pACYC184 transformation and the deduced presence (+) or absence (–) of the BsmI site overlapping the codon 84 in dnaC. Transductants in gel I were first classified as spl+ or spl-16 and subsequently tested for BsmI polymorphism, while those in gel II were first classified on the basis of BsmI polymorphism and then tested for pACYC184-mediated lethality. R, strain GJ1538 (spl-16) used as recipient in the transduction.

Transposon tagging of the spl-16 locus:
Random transpositions of the Kan^R-encoding mini-Tn10 derivative Tn10dKan into the chromosome of the nusG spl-16 (dnaC1331) strain GJ1538 were generated following infection with phage 1316, as described (KLECKNER et al. 1991 ; MILLER 1992 ). A P1 lysate prepared on a pool of 10⁶ Kan^R clones was used to transduce the nusG spl⁺ strain GJ1504 to Kan^R. The Kan^R transductants were pooled and transformed with plasmid pACYC184 to identify derivatives of GJ1504 that, by virtue of their coinheriting the spl-16 allele (from GJ1538) with a linked Tn10dKan insertion, survived transformation with pACYC184. One clone (GJ1539) so identified was subsequently shown to have a Kan^R insertion (designated zji-901::Tn10dKan) 90% cotransducible with the spl-16 locus.

UV survival tests:
Sensitivity of a strain to UV was determined essentially as described by MILLER 1992 . Cells from a 50-ml volume of LB culture (grown at 37° to an A₆₀₀ of 0.5) were chilled on ice for 30 min and resuspended in an equal volume of 0.1 M MgSO₄. Five-milliliter aliquots of the suspension were placed in 85-mm petri dishes and exposed to UV (at 0.4 J/M²/sec) for different lengths of time, after which they were protected from visible light. Appropriate dilutions of each aliquot were then plated on LB for estimation of the viable count.

Other methods:
All strain constructions were by P1 transduction (GOWRISHANKAR 1985 ); when the recipient strain carried an Amp^R plasmid, transductants were recovered at limiting dilutions to minimize the extent of Amp degradation by the recipient lawn on the selection plates. The mutator phenotype of a strain was scored by spotting 10⁷ cells of LB-grown cultures on LB-Rif plates; typically, the mut⁺ and mut strains yielded, respectively, <3 and 50–100 Rif^R colonies per spot. Procedures for nitrosoguanidine mutagenesis and ß-galactosidase assays were as described (MILLER 1992 ).

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Identification of dnaC1331(A84T) as a suppressor of nusG-pACYC184 lethality:
We have recently described a novel lethality phenotype associated with runaway replication (that is, uncontrolled increase in copy number) of ColE1-like plasmids such as pACYC184 in E. coli nusG or rho mutants that are defective in factor-dependent transcription termination (HARINARAYANAN and GOWRISHANKAR 2003 ). Following nitrosoguanidine mutagenesis of a nusG strain GJ1313, an extragenic suppressor mutant GJ1538 was identified that survived transformation with pACYC184. The mutation was designated spl-16 (for suppressor of plasmid lethality). To facilitate mapping and transfer of the suppressor mutation into other strain backgrounds, it was tagged with a transposon (Tn10dKan) marker as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Conjugational and transductional mapping experiments (data not shown) demonstrated that the Tn10dKan insertion (zji-901::Tn10dKan) and the spl-16 mutation are at 98 min on the E. coli linkage map and that the latter is 42 and 97% cotransducible, respectively, with the previously described transposon insertions zji-3188::Tn10kan and mdoB::Tn10 (previously called zji-202::Tn10; BERLYN et al. 1996 ; NICHOLS et al. 1998 ).

On the basis of our finding (see below) that the mutation affects copy number of ColE1-like plasmids in otherwise wild-type strains, we reasoned that it may be situated in the dnaTC locus [which is 3 kb from mdoB (BLATTNER et al. 1997 )] whose products are known to be involved in replication fork assembly. Accordingly, the dnaTC operon from a pair of isogenic spl⁺ and spl-16 strains was PCR amplified and sequenced. A single mutation was identified in the spl-16 strain that altered codon 84 of dnaC from GCG to ACG (which is deduced to cause the change of a conserved Ala residue to Thr in the protein). The mutation has been designated below as dnaC1331(A84T).

The fact that the mutation also results in loss of a BsmI site allowed us to test for cosegregation of the BsmI polymorphism with suppression of pACYC184-mediated lethality in the nusG spl-16 strain. A P1 lysate prepared on strain CAG18619 (which has the Tn10kan marker 42% linked to spl⁺) was used to transduce GJ1538 (nusG spl-16) to Kan^R, and a complete concordance between presence (or absence) of the BsmI site and lethality (or survival) following pACYC184 transformation was observed among 20 transductants that were tested (Fig 1). These results established that the dnaC1331(A84T) mutation (or another closely linked mutation) is responsible for suppression of pACYC184-mediated lethality in the nusG strain.

We have shown previously that a rho-A243E mutant is also killed following transformation with pACYC184 (HARINARAYANAN and GOWRISHANKAR 2003 ). With the aid of the linked Tn10dKan marker, the dnaC1331 allele was introduced into the rho strain, and here, too, it was able to suppress the plasmid-mediated lethality (data not shown).

dnaC1331(A84T) reduces copy number of Rom^– ColE1-like plasmids:
HARINARAYANAN and GOWRISHANKAR 2003 have shown that lethality in pACYC184 transformants of the nusG and rho strains was accompanied by a substantial increase in plasmid copy number that is most prominent in the early stationary phase of growth; furthermore, mutations in several loci (including hns, rpoB, pcnB, and polA), as well as in multicopy recG⁺ or rom⁺, were identified as suppressors of lethality that were all also associated with reversal of the copy number alteration in the mutants.

The dnaC1331(A84T) suppressor mutation, characterized in the present study, also behaved like the suppressors previously described in that it was able to reverse the increase in pACYC184 content otherwise observed in cultures of the nusG strain in the early-stationary growth phase (Fig 2). Densitometric analysis of the band intensity of pACYC184 (relative to that of the loading control) in each of the lanes in Fig 2 indicated that the pACYC184 content (per unit of biomass) in the nusG mutant in the exponential and stationary phases of growth was, respectively, two- and ninefold higher than that in the corresponding culture aliquots of either the wild-type strain or the nusG dnaC1331 double mutant. The latter two strains themselves exhibited an approximate doubling in pACYC184 content as the cultures progressed from the log phase to the stationary phase.

View larger version (31K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 2. Intracellular content of test plasmid pACYC184 in derivatives of wild-type (MC4100), nusG (GJ1504), and nusG dnaC1331 (GJ1541) strains as a function of growth phase. Plasmid preparations were made from a constant number of cells that had each been withdrawn at the indicated values of A600 of the cultures. See MATERIALS AND METHODS for description of loading control. Plasmid preparations were digested with EcoRI before gel electrophoresis.

Two mechanisms have been identified by which the different suppressors act to suppress nusG- or rho-pACYC184 lethality. The first is by reversing the transcription termination defect in the mutants, and the second is by a primary effect on plasmid copy number even in the nusG⁺ rho⁺ strain (HARINARAYANAN and GOWRISHANKAR 2003 ). The dnaC1331(A84T) mutation did not alleviate the defect in transcription termination in the nusG and rho strains, as judged by the extent of transcriptional polarity relief at different loci such as galP3 (an IS2 insertion in the interval between the promoter and the first structural gene of the gal operon) or trpE (Oc; a nonsense mutation in the first gene of the trp operon; data not shown). On the other hand, the mutation was associated with a pronounced decrease in plasmid pACYC184 content even in the nusG⁺ rho⁺ background (Fig 3).

View larger version (34K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 3. Content of test plasmids pACYC184, pBR329, pBR322, and pUC19 in dnaC+ (+) or dnaC1331(A84T) (–) derivatives GJ3128 and GJ3127, respectively. See MATERIALS AND METHODS for description of loading control. Plasmid preparations were digested with EcoRI before gel electrophoresis.

As mentioned in the Introduction, the plasmid-encoded Rom protein serves to downregulate the copy number of ColE1-like plasmids by stabilizing the interaction between RNA-II and its antisense inhibitor RNA-I. When plasmids such as pUC19, pBR329, or pBR322 were examined in isogenic dnaC⁺ and dnaC1331(A84T) mutants, it was observed that the content of the first two (which, like pACY184, are Rom^–) is also markedly reduced in dnaC relative to dnaC⁺, whereas that of the third (which is Rom⁺) is only marginally affected in the mutant (Fig 3). Densitometric analysis of the test plasmid band intensities in Fig 3 (after normalization against the corresponding loading controls) indicated that the ratio of plasmid content in the dnac1331 mutant to that in dnaC⁺ was, respectively, 0.19, 0.06, and 0.27 for the plasmids pACYC184, pBR329, and pUC19 and that it was 0.77 for plasmid pBR322. These results also established that there is no correlation between plasmids conferring lethality in the nusG or rho mutants and those whose copy number is reduced by the dnaC1331(A84T) mutation [since pBR329 is an example of a plasmid that does not kill the nusG/rho strains (HARINARAYANAN and GOWRISHANKAR 2003 ) and yet whose copy number is reduced in the dnaC strain].

Suppression by dnaC1331(A84T) or priB of the Ts growth phenotype of pUC19 transformants:
LIN-CHAO et al. (1992) have shown that (i) the very-high-copy-number phenotype of plasmid pUC19 is the result of a mutation in its gene encoding RNA-II, which destabilizes the latter's interaction with the inhibitor RNA-I; (ii) the interaction of pUC19-encoded RNA-II with RNA-I is rendered even less stable at 42°, so that cultures that have been shifted from 30° to 42° exhibit a further increase in plasmid copy number and a reduction in growth rate; and (iii) Rom protein expression rescues the slow-growth phenotype at 42°.

We confirmed in this study that pUC19 transformants of the wild-type strain GJ3128 exhibit a pronounced increase in plasmid copy number upon temperature upshift to 42° (Fig 4A).The transformants also exhibited a Ts growth phenotype on LB agar medium (Fig 4B). The isogenic dnaC1331(A84T) mutant GJ3127 exhibited neither the plasmid copy number increase at 42° (Fig 4A) nor the Ts growth phenotype (Fig 4B).

View larger version (109K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 4. Suppression of Ts phenotype associated with increased pUC19 copy number at 42°. (A) Content of test plasmid pUC19 in cultures of dnaC+ (+) or dnaC1331(A84T) (–) derivatives GJ3128 and GJ3127, respectively, either upon continuous incubation at 30° or following upshift (at an A600 of 0.5) to 42° for 4 hr (30 42°). See MATERIALS AND METHODS for description of loading control. Plasmid preparations were digested with EcoRI before gel electrophoresis. (B) Growth phenotypes on LB medium at 30° and 42° of wild-type (GJ3128), dnaC1331 (GJ3127), pcnB (GJ3185), priB (SS135), and priC (GJ5204) strains with (+) or without (–) pUC19, as indicated. Inocula were taken from LB medium plates that had been incubated at 30°.

As expected, the pUC19-associated Ts phenotype was also suppressed in a pcnB strain [in which plasmid copy number is reduced because of an increased stability of the inhibitor RNA-I (XU et al. 1993 ; Fig 4B)]. When null mutations in priB or priC were tested, the former but not the latter suppressed the Ts phenotype (Fig 4B). [In the absence of pUC19, the wild type and all the mutant strains were unaffected for growth at 42° (Fig 4B).] A priB missense mutant with reduced copy number of Rom^– ColE1-like plasmids has previously been reported (BERGES et al. 1997 ).

Chronic SOS induction in the dnaC1331(A84T) mutant and synthetic lethality with rep or priC mutations:
The growth rates of the wild-type strain GJ3128 and its dnaC1331(A84T) derivative GJ3127 were indistinguishable in both LB (2.47 and 2.44 hr^–1, respectively, at 37°; see also Fig 4B and Fig 6) and glucose-minimal A (0.87 and 0.88 hr^–1, respectively, at 37°), suggesting that the mutant protein is unaffected in its ability to load DnaB helicase at replication forks initiated at oriC. At the same time, the mutation conferred a moderate level of chronic SOS induction with a threefold increase of sulA-lac expression in the dnaC1331(A84T) strain; the increase was abolished, as expected, upon introduction of recA or lexA3 mutations that render the SOS regulon noninducible (WALKER 1996 ; Fig 5). These observations suggested that the dnaC1331 mutant might be affected for replication fork assembly at restart primosomes.

View larger version (15K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 5. Chronic SOS induction in dnaC1331(A84T) mutant. Expression of sulA-lac was measured in isogenic dnaC+ (open bars) and dnaC1331 (solid bars) derivatives without any additional mutation (wild type) or with recA or lexA3 as indicated. ß-Galactosidase specific activity values (each the average of at least three individual measurements, with standard error of the mean as marked) are given in Miller units (MILLER 1992 ). Strain pairs employed were (in the order, dnaC+ and dnaC1331) wild type, GJ5205 and GJ5206; recA, GJ5207 and GJ5208; and lexA3, GJ5209 and GJ5210.

View larger version (61K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 6. Viability of double mutants of dnaC1331(A84T) with recA::Kan, recB::Tn10, or priA::Kan. Growth was scored on LB agar plates of the following pairs of strains (in the order, dnaC+ and dnaC1331): with no additional mutation (Nil), GJ3128 and GJ3127; recA, GJ5223 and GJ5222; recB, GJ5225 and GJ5224; and priA, GJ5221 and GJ5220.

As a test of this possibility, we looked for synthetic lethal interactions between dnaC and other genes previously implicated in recombinational repair and replication restart pathways. In the first approach, double mutants of dnaC1331(A84T) with each of the other mutations were sought to be constructed by P1 transduction. As shown in Fig 6, viable double mutants were recovered with recA::Kan, recB::Tn10, or priA::Kan; likewise, double mutants were also obtained at the expected frequencies for three other loci: recG258::Kan, ruvABC::Cm, and priB302 (data not shown). [Consistent with an earlier report (GREGG et al. 2002 ), the priA single mutant was itself very sick and gave rise to many faster-growing suppressor clones (see Fig 6).] Growth of each of the double mutants was in general no more significantly impaired than that of the respective single-locus mutants, although the recB dnaC strain alone did exhibit a 40% slower growth rate than recB (see Fig 6). On the other hand, no transductants were obtained when we sought to introduce the rep::Kan, rep::Cm, or priC::Kan alleles into the dnaC1331(A84T) strain (data not shown).

Two additional experiments were undertaken to establish that rep is synthetically lethal with dnaC-A84T. The strategy for the first was analogous to that employed by SANDLER 2000 for demonstrating rep-priA lethality and involved an attempt to introduce dnaC1331(A84T) in a nonselective fashion into the rep strain. A P1 lysate prepared on a strain (GJ3127) carrying the dnaC1331 mutation along with the closely linked mdoB::Tn10 marker was used to transduce a pair of isogenic rep⁺ and rep::Cm strains (MC4100 and GJ5203, respectively) to Tet^R. The recipient strains also carried plasmid pUC19 that rendered them Ts for growth (see above). As expected, the vast majority (39/40) of the Tet^R transductants in the cross into the rep⁺ strain had become temperature resistant, indicating coinheritance of dnaC1331(A84T), whereas none of 40 transductants in the rep::Cm strain had become temperature resistant. In a variation of this experiment, the recipient strains did not carry plasmid pUC19 and inheritance of the dnaC1331 mutation in the transductants was scored directly by testing each of them (with the PCR-based method described above) for concomitant loss of the BsmI site in the gene. Of 11 transductants tested from the cross into the rep⁺ strain, 10 had lost the BsmI site in dnaC, whereas none of 12 from the cross into the rep::Cm strain had lost this site (Fig 7).

View larger version (26K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 7. Synthetic lethality of dnaC1331(A84T) with rep::Cm or priC::Kan. Lanes in the three panels represent individual TetR transductants obtained from crosses into the recipient strains wild type (MC4100), rep::Cm (GJ5203), or priC303::Kan (GJ5204), as indicated, with a P1 lysate grown on GJ3127 (dnaC1331 linked 95% to mdoB::Tn10). Chromosomal DNA from each transductant was subjected to PCR of and BsmI polymorphism testing at the dnaC locus, as described in the text and in the legend to Fig 1. R, chromosomal DNA from the corresponding recipient strain. Marked beneath each lane is the dnaC genotype (+, dnaC+; –, dnaC1331) of the strain, as inferred from the BsmI polymorphism analysis.

In the second experiment, the frequency of loss of a Spec^R plasmid carrying rep⁺ (pHYD554) in either a rep::Cm dnaC⁺ (GJ5202) or a rep::Cm dnaC1331 (GJ5201) strain was scored following introduction of a second plasmid, pLG339 (Kan^R), that is incompatible with pHYD554. In the former strain, after 20 generations of growth in the absence of Spec, 26 of 30 Kan^R transformants had become Spec^S even as they retained the rep::Cm marker. On the other hand, in the dnaC strain, only 5 of 30 were Spec^S and in all these cases, the strains had also become rep⁺ on the chromosome (that is, Cm^S) presumably by recombination between the plasmid and the chromosome. These results indicated that a rep dnaC mutant cannot survive in the absence of the plasmid with rep⁺.

That priC is synthetically lethal with dnaC1331(A84T) was also established by the experiment of P1 transduction with the lysate of the mdoB::Tn10 dnaC strain (GJ3127) into isogenic priC⁺ and priC::Kan recipients (MC4100 and GJ5204, respectively) carrying plasmid pUC19. As with rep, none of 50 Tet^R transductants in the priC mutant had lost the Ts phenotype (as compared to 47/50 in the priC⁺ strain), indicating the absence of inheritance of the dnaC mutation in any of them. By the PCR-based BsmI polymorphism test as well, none of 12 Tet^R transductants examined of GJ5204 (without pUC19) had inherited the dnaC1331 allele (Fig 7).

mutH-suppressible broth sensitivity of the dnaC1331(A84T) mutant:
The synthetic lethality of dnaC1331(A84T) with rep or priC mutations suggested that the former may be compromised for one or more pathways of replication restart on the chromosome. We reasoned that the mutant may also consequently be unable to tolerate conditions that increase the need for replication restart, and to test this possibility we introduced a dam mutation into the dnaC1331 strain. Mutants deficient in the Dam methylase suffer an increased frequency of double-strand breaks (DSBs) by a process that is dependent on a functional mismatch repair system encoded by the mutHLS genes (RADMAN and WAGNER 1986 ; WANG and SMITH 1986 ; KUZMINOV 1999 ; MARINUS 2000 ). In general, the need for replication restart is also increased during growth of cultures in rich medium (when the time interval between successive replication forks is considerably reduced) when compared to that in minimal medium, and priA mutants that are defective in replication restart or priB gyrB strains exhibit rich-medium sensitivity (KOGOMA 1997 ; GREGG et al. 2002 ; GROMPONE et al. 2003 ).

Transductants recovered from the cross in which a dam::Tn9 mutation was introduced into the dnaC1331(A84T) strain were very sick on LB but not on glucose-minimal agar plates (see Fig 8) and gave rise to spontaneous fast-growing suppressors. Five of eight such suppressors that were tested had acquired a mutator phenotype, suggestive of the loss of mismatch repair functions in them. dam::Tn9 transductants that were recovered in a dnaC1331(A84T) mutH strain GJ5212 also did not exhibit the rich-medium-sensitive phenotype (Fig 8).

View larger version (68K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 8. Rich-medium sensitivity in dnaC1331(A84T) dam mutant and its suppression by mutH. Strains GJ3127 (dnaC), GJ5211 (dam dnaC), and GJ5213 (dam dnaC mutH) were scored for growth on glucose-minimal A (Min A) and LB agar plates.

These data provide strong support for the notion that the dnaC1331 mutant is rendered growth sensitive by the increased frequency of replication-directed DSBs that are generated in the absence of Dam methylase. On the other hand, the dnaC1331(A84T) single mutant was no more sensitive to UV irradiation than was its isogenic dnaC⁺ parent (Fig 9), suggesting that the mutant protein is able to function as effectively as the wild type to satisfy the increased need for replication restart on UV-damaged DNA templates.

View larger version (15K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 9. UV tolerance of dnaC+ (GJ3128, ) and dnaC1331 (GJ3127, •) strains. The percentage fraction of surviving cells, following exposure to UV for the indicated time periods, was determined. Two independent experiments yielded similar results, and the data from one of them are plotted. The initial culture densities for the two strains were, respectively, 1.2 x 108 and 9.2 x 107/ml.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

The dnaC1331(A84T) mutation was identified in this study by its ability to suppress the lethality associated with runaway replication of Rom^– ColE1-like plasmids in transcription termination-defective nusG and rho mutants and was shown to do so by a primary effect on plasmid copy number even in otherwise wild-type strains. The amino acid alteration in the mutant protein has occurred in a short stretch of identified sequence similarity with the P protein (which is functionally analogous to DnaC in phage replication; NAKAYAMA et al. 1987 ). The dnaC1331(A84T) allele was also synthetically lethal with the rep or priC null mutations. These results are interpreted below in terms of a model in which the dnaC mutant is specifically defective in the PriA-PriB pathway of replication restart.

DnaC and assembly of replication forks by different pathways:
As mentioned above, DnaC delivers the DnaB helicase for replication fork assembly during the processes of (i) initiation of chromosome replication at oriC, (ii) replication restart following the collapse of previously assembled forks, and (iii) plasmid replication. The dnaC1331(A84T) mutant exhibits chronic SOS induction, which suggests some perturbation in chromosomal DNA replication in the strain. The fact that the mutant has a normal growth rate in both rich and minimal media argues that it is not affected for replication fork assembly at the ABC primosome (that is, DnaA-bound oriC). That, on the other hand, it may be affected for replication restart (that is, at the X-type primosome at D-loops) is suggested by the findings that (i) dnaC1331(A84T) confers rich-medium sensitivity in combination with dam (that is, when the requirement for replication restart functions is expected to be increased because of frequent DSBs) and (ii) this inviability is suppressed by mutation in the gene mutH for mismatch repair.

Sandler and co-workers have obtained genetic data to suggest that three alternative pathways exist for replication restart at D-loops in wild-type cells, which have been designated (on the basis of respective gene product requirements) as the PriA-PriB, PriA-PriC, and Rep-PriC pathways (SANDLER et al. 1999 , SANDLER et al. 2001 ; SANDLER 2000 ). Of these, it is only for the PriA-PriB pathway that supporting biochemical evidence is available at present (XU and MARIANS 2003 ).

Many phenotypes associated with the dnaC1331(A84T) mutation (for example, that it is synthetically lethal with priC but not with either priA or priB) may be explained by this multiple-pathway model of replication restart by making the additional assumptions that (i) the ability to restart replication at D-loops is important for viability and (ii) in the dnaC1331 strain, the PriA-PriB pathway of replication restart at D-loops is rendered largely, if not completely, nonfunctional; consequently, the mutant is dependent on the functionality of the PriA-PriC and Rep-PriC pathways for its survival. The fact that the dnaC1331 mutant is sensitive to Dam methylase deficiency (Fig 8), but not to UV irradiation (Fig 9), would then suggest that there is a much greater need for the PriA-PriB pathway of replication restart on DNA templates with DSBs than on those with single-strand lesions. MCGLYNN and LLOYD 2000 have also provided evidence that replication-generated DSBs are infrequent in UV-irradiated E. coli.

Consistent with the model that the PriA-PriB pathway is rendered nonfunctional in the dnaC1331(A84T) mutant is the finding that the dnaC1331 strain shares several phenotypic features in common with the null priB mutant (SANDLER et al. 1999 ; SANDLER 2000 ; GROMPONE et al. 2003 ; this study): minimal or no growth phenotype as single mutants, no change in UV tolerance, reduced copy number of ColE1-like plasmids, viability in combination with priA, and severe sickness or lethality in combination with rep or priC. On the other hand, the dnaC1331 mutant, but not the priB mutant, is SOS induced, which suggests that the former might harbor some reversible trapped intermediates of the PriA-PriB pathway that activate the coprotease activity of RecA but do not compromise growth.

One finding of ours that is not readily accounted for by the three-pathway replication restart model of Sandler and co-workers is that of rep-dnaC1331 synthetic lethality (because the PriA-PriC pathway would still be expected to be functional in the double mutants). One possibility is that the PriA-PriC pathway requires the Rep helicase (as has also been speculated earlier; SANDLER and MARIANS 2000 ); in such a case, however, rep would be expected to exhibit synthetic lethality with priB, but the double mutants have been reported to be viable (SANDLER 2000 ). The alternative possibility is that PriA-PriC may not represent a major pathway of replication restart, as is further discussed below.

Two lines of genetic evidence were earlier interpreted as support for a PriA-PriC pathway of replication restart: (i) priB or priC single mutants are reasonably healthy whereas a priBC double mutant is even more sick than priA (SANDLER et al. 1999 ) and (ii) the priA300 mutation, which specifies an altered PriA protein that is competent for X-type primosome assembly but is defective for the 3'–5' DNA helicase activity, behaves like the priA knock-out when combined with a priB but not a priC null mutation; it was proposed that the mutant protein is proficient for replication restart via the PriA-PriB but not via the PriA-PriC pathway (SANDLER et al. 2001 ). However, both these findings may also be explained by an alternative model in which the helicase activity of PriA participates in an additional, PriB- and PriC-independent pathway of replication restart (see Fig 10). Indeed, a pathway of direct resetting of regressed replication forks (that can occur following blockage of normal fork progression; SEIGNEUR et al. 1998 ; MCGLYNN and LLOYD 2000 ) that is mediated by the combined actions of the RecG (or RecBCD) and PriA proteins (including the latter's 3'–5' helicase activity) has been proposed by Lloyd and co-workers (MCGLYNN and LLOYD 2000 ; GREGG et al. 2002 ; JAKTAJI and LLOYD 2003 ). Furthermore, FLORES et al. 2002 have shown that in a strain with increased frequency of replication fork regression because of a DNA polymerase III -subunit mutation, replication restart is compromised by the priA300 mutation but not by a priC null mutation [suggesting that the pathway rendered defective in the priA300 strain is one that does not require PriC, which is contrary to the proposal made by SANDLER et al. 2001 ].

View larger version (19K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 10. A depiction of DnaC's role in different postulated pathways of replication fork assembly and of the defect associated with DnaC-A84T. PriA(1) and PriA(2) refer to the 3'–5' DNA helicase and X-type primosome assembly activities, respectively, of PriA.

On the basis of these arguments, therefore, we suggest that replication restart events occur primarily by the PriA-PriB and Rep-PriC pathways at D-loops, as well as by the direct resetting of regressed replication forks (Fig 10) and that, in the dnaC1331(A84T) mutant, the PriA-PriB pathway is rendered nonfunctional.

dnaC1331(A84T) and replication of ColE1-like plasmids:
The dnaC1331(A84T) mutation was associated with a reduction in content of the Rom^– ColE1-like plasmids pACYC184, pBR329, or pUC19 (and consequently with suppression of the Ts phenotype of pUC19 transformants), but not with that of the Rom⁺ plasmid pBR322. One way to explain these results is to assume that DnaB loading by the mutant DnaC protein at the D-loop formed in the plasmid ori region occurs with reduced efficiency and that it consequently becomes the rate-limiting step for replication of Rom^– plasmids, but that for Rom⁺ plasmids, it is the number of replication primers that remains rate limiting for replication [since the Rom protein reduces the proportion of RNA-II molecules that are processed to generate them (CESARENI et al. 1991 ; DEL SOLAR et al. 1998 )]. Consistent with this explanation, we have found that the dnaC1331 mutation also does not affect the copy number of Rom^– plasmids in a pcnB strain [in which the half-life of the inhibitor RNA-I is increased (XU et al. 1993 ), so that once again fewer replication primers are generated from RNA-II (data not shown)]. Our hypothesis is very similar to that proposed by BERGES et al. 1997 , who showed that a missense priB mutant harbors reduced copy numbers of Rom^– but not of Rom⁺ ColE1-like plasmids.

The effects on plasmid replication of dnaC1331(A84T), priB null, or priC null mutations, as inferred from the data obtained in this study (Fig 4), are also in accord with a model in which replication fork assembly on the plasmid template is served primarily by the components of the PriA-PriB pathway of replication restart.

Need for and relative efficiency of the different replication restart pathways:
When one considers the multiple replication restart pathways (Fig 10), two major questions are: What fraction of replicating chromosomes in wild-type cells (in the absence of exogenous DNA-damaging agents) suffers fork collapse necessitating replication restart? And what is the relative efficiency of each of the pathways in the process? The estimated values, in answer to the first question, have varied from 18 to 50 to 100% by different approaches, as discussed below.

1. The lower-end value was obtained in experiments involving growth of dnaC(Ts) mutants at the restrictive temperature (MAISNIER-PATIN et al. 2001 ). However, our own observations with dnaC1331(A84T) suggest that dnaC mutants may be differentially affected for DnaB loading at different fork-precursor structures, and it is therefore possible that, in the work of MAISNIER-PATIN et al. (2001), all pathways of replication restart were not inactivated at the restrictive temperature. The dnaC(Ts) mutants employed in their study were "slow stop" for DNA synthesis (WECHSLER 1975 ), suggestive of a block mainly for fork assembly at oriC.

2. The midrange value was the estimate obtained from the proportion of viable cells in cultures of recA strains defective in recombinational repair (reviewed in KUZMINOV 1999 ; COX et al. 2000 ), but once again there is evidence for the existence of RecA-independent pathways of replication restart (MCGLYNN and LLOYD 2001 , MCGLYNN and LLOYD 2002 ; MIRANDA and KUZMINOV 2003 ).

3. Finally, the argument that the capacity for replication restart is essential in every cell was based on both the extreme sickness or inviability of priA, priBC, or priAC mutants and the fact that these phenotypes could be suppressed by dnaC mutations (SANDLER et al. 1999 , SANDLER et al. 2001 ; SANDLER 2000 ). As mentioned above, our finding in this study that the combination of dnaC1331(A84T) with priC is inviable also supports the notion that replication restart is required in every cell.

A related question in this context has been on the role of the Rep helicase in E. coli chromosome replication. Simultaneous deficiency of Rep and PriA is associated with inviability, but two alternative explanations have been offered for it. According to one model, Rep deficiency leads to increased frequency of replication fork collapse so that PriA becomes essential for survival (SEIGNEUR et al. 1998 ). According to the second model, Rep and PriA participate in redundant pathways for replication restart (SANDLER 2000 ). According to the second model, therefore, cell viability is again absolutely dependent on the capacity to restart replication, and our finding that rep dnaC1331(A84T) double mutants are inviable is in accord with it. MAISNIER-PATIN et al. (2001) showed also that 100% of rep dnaC(Ts) cells failed to complete replication initiated at oriC following a temperature upshift, but whether this was because of increased fork collapse or decreased restart associated with the rep mutation is not clear.

With regard to the relative efficiency of different pathways for restart, the extreme sickness of priA mutants has again been taken to mean that the PriA-independent pathways are at best minor contributors to replication restart. On the other hand, our finding in this study that the dnaC1331(A84T) single mutant is quite normal for growth but is inviable in combination with priC [which, unlike priA and priB, has so far been implicated only in "minor" pathway(s) of replication restart (SANDLER 2000 ; SANDLER et al. 2001 ; FLORES et al. 2002 ; GROMPONE et al. 2003 )] strongly suggests that the Rep-PriC pathway may indeed potentially be as efficient as the "major" PriA-PriB pathway.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank M. K. B. Berlyn, C. A. Gross, K. Isono, C. G. Lerner, B. Michel, M. Radman, and S. J. Sandler for various strains, phages, and plasmids. We acknowledge V. Vamsee Krishna and T. Giri Babu for technical assistance, Mehar Sultana for primer synthesis, N. Nagesh for DNA sequencing, and Manjula Reddy and other members of the J.G. laboratory for advice and discussions. R.H. was a Research Fellow of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. J.G. is an honorary faculty member of the Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research. This work was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Department of Biotechnology (government of India) project no. BT/PR2430.

Manuscript received September 5, 2003; Accepted for publication December 9, 2003.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

BERGES, H., J. OREGLIA, E. JOSEPH-LIAUZUN, and O. FAYET, 1997  Isolation and characterization of a priB mutant of Escherichia coli influencing plasmid copy number of delta rop ColE1-type plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 179:956-958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BERLYN, M. K. B., K. B. LOW, K. E. RUDD and M. SINGER, 1996 Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, Ed. 9, pp. 1715–1902 in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, edited by F. C. NEIDHARDT, R. CURTISS, III, J. L. INGRAHAM, E. C. C. LIN, K. B. LOW et al. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.

BLATTNER, F. R., G. PLUNKETT, C. A. BLOCH, N. T. PERNA, and V. BURLAND et al., 1997  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277:1453-1474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BOLIVAR, F., R. L. RODRIGUEZ, P. J. GREENE, M. C. BETLACH, and H. L. HEYNEKER et al., 1977  Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles. II. A multipurpose cloning system. Gene 2:95-113.[Medline]

CESARENI, G., M. HELMER-CITTERICH, and L. CASTAGNOLI, 1991  Control of ColE1 plasmid replication by antisense RNA. Trends Genet. 7:230-235.[Medline]

CHANG, A. C. and S. N. COHEN, 1978  Construction and characterization of amplifiable multicopy DNA cloning vehicles derived from the P15A cryptic miniplasmid. J. Bacteriol. 134:1141-1156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

COVARRUBIAS, L. and F. BOLIVAR, 1982  Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles. VI. Plasmid pBR329, a new derivative of pBR328 lacking the 482-base-pair inverted duplication. Gene 17:79-89.[CrossRef][Medline]

COX, M. M., 2001  Recombinational DNA repair of damaged replication forks in Escherichia coli: questions. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35:53-82.[CrossRef][Medline]

COX, M. M., M. F. GOODMAN, K. N. KREUZER, D. J. SHERRATT, and S. J. SANDLER et al., 2000  The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature 404:37-41.[CrossRef][Medline]

DEL SOLAR, G., R. GIRALDO, M. J. RUIZ-ECHEVARRIA, M. ESPINOSA, and R. DIAZ-OREJAS, 1998  Replication and control of circular bacterial plasmids. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:434-464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

FLORES, M. J., S. D. EHRLICH, and B. MICHEL, 2002  Primosome assembly requirement for replication restart in the Escherichia coli holD^G10 replication mutant. Mol. Microbiol. 44:783-792.[CrossRef][Medline]

GOWRISHANKAR, J., 1985  Identification of osmoresponsive genes in Escherichia coli: evidence for participation of potassium and proline transport systems in osmoregulation. J. Bacteriol. 164:434-445.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

GREGG, A. V., P. MCGLYNN, R. P. JAKTAJI, and R. G. LLOYD, 2002  Direct rescue of stalled DNA replication forks via the combined action of PriA and RecG helicase activities. Mol. Cell 9:241-251.[CrossRef][Medline]

GROMPONE, G., S. D. EHRLICH, and B. MICHEL, 2003  Replication restart in gyrB Escherichia coli mutants. Mol. Microbiol. 48:845-854.[CrossRef][Medline]

HARINARAYANAN, R. and J. GOWRISHANKAR, 2003  Host factor titration by chromosomal R-loops as a mechanism for runaway plasmid replication in transcription termination-defective mutants of Escherichia coli.. J. Mol. Biol. 332:31-46.[CrossRef][Medline]

JAKTAJI, R. P. and R. G. LLOYD, 2003  PriA supports two distinct pathways for replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells. Mol. Microbiol. 47:1091-1100.[CrossRef][Medline]

JAYASHREE, P. and J. GOWRISHANKAR, 1995  An unusual suicidal interaction in Escherichia coli involving nucleoid protein H-NS. J. Genet. 74:1-17.

KIM, S., H. G. DALLMANN, C. S. MCHENRY, and K. J. MARIANS, 1996  Coupling of a replicative polymerase and helicase: a Tau-DnaB interaction mediates rapid replication fork movement. Cell 84:643-650.[CrossRef][Medline]

KLECKNER, N., J. BENDER, and S. GOTTESMAN, 1991  Uses of transposons with emphasis on Tn10.. Methods Enzymol. 204:139-180.[Medline]

KOGOMA, T., 1997  Stable DNA replication: interplay between DNA replication, homologous recombination, and transcription. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61:212-238.[Abstract]

KOGOMA, T., G. W. CADWELL, K. G. BARNARD, and T. ASAI, 1996  The DNA replication priming protein, PriA, is required for homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. J. Bacteriol. 178:1258-1264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

KOHARA, Y., K. AKIYAMA, and K. ISONO, 1987  The physical map of the whole E. coli chromosome: application of a new strategy for rapid analysis and sorting of a large genomic library. Cell 50:495-508.[CrossRef][Medline]

KORNBERG, A., and T. BAKER, 1992 DNA Replication. W. H. Freeman, New York.

KUZMINOV, A., 1999  Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:751-813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LEE, E. H. and A. KORNBERG, 1991  Replication deficiencies in priA mutants of Escherichia coli lacking the primosomal replication n' protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3029-3032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LERNER, C. G. and M. INOUYE, 1990  Low copy number plasmids for regulated low-level expression of cloned genes in Escherichia coli with blue/white insert screening capability. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:4631.[Free Full Text]

LIN-CHAO, S., W. T. CHEN, and T. T. WONG, 1992  High copy number of the pUC plasmid results from a Rom/Rop-suppressible point mutation in RNA II. Mol. Microbiol. 6:3385-3393.[CrossRef][Medline]

LIU, J. and K. J. MARIANS, 1999  PriA-directed assembly of a primosome on D loop DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 274:25033-25041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LIU, J., L. XU, S. J. SANDLER, and K. J. MARIANS, 1999  Replication fork assembly at recombination intermediates is required for bacterial growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:3552-3555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MAISNIER-PATIN, S., K. NORDSTROM, and S. DASGUPTA, 2001  Replication arrests during a single round of replication of the Escherichia coli chromosome in the absence of DnaC activity. Mol. Microbiol. 42:1371-1382.[CrossRef][Medline]

MARIANS, K. J., 1996 Replication fork propagation, pp. 749–763 in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, edited by F. C. NEIDHARDT, R. CURTISS, III, J. L. INGRAHAM, E. C. C. LIN, K. B. LOW et al. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.

MARINUS, M. G., 2000  Recombination is essential for viability of an Escherichia coli dam (DNA adenine methyltransferase) mutant. J. Bacteriol. 182:463-468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MCGLYNN, P. and R. G. LLOYD, 2000  Modulation of RNA polymerase by (p)ppGpp reveals a RecG-dependent mechanism for replication fork progression. Cell 101:35-45.[CrossRef][Medline]

MCGLYNN, P. and R. G. LLOYD, 2001  Rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG: simultaneous translocation on the leading and lagging strand templates supports an active DNA unwinding model of fork reversal and Holliday junction formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:8227-8234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MCGLYNN, P. and R. G. LLOYD, 2002  Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:859-870.[CrossRef][Medline]

MCGLYNN, P., A. A. AL-DEIB, J. LIU, K. J. MARIANS, and R. G. LLOYD, 1997  The DNA replication protein PriA and the recombination protein RecG bind D-loops. J. Mol. Biol. 270:212-221.[CrossRef][Medline]

MESSER, W., and C. WEIGEL, 1996 Initiation of chromosome replication, pp. 1579–1601 in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, edited by F. C. NEIDHARDT, R. CURTISS, III, J. L. INGRAHAM, E. C. C. LIN, K. B. LOW et al. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.

MICHEL, B., 2000  Replication fork arrest and DNA recombination. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:173-178.[CrossRef][Medline]

MILLER, J. H., 1992 A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics: A Laboratory Manual and Handbook for Escherichia coli and Related Bacteria. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

MIRANDA, A. and A. KUZMINOV, 2003  Chromosomal lesion suppression and removal in Escherichia coli via linear DNA degradation. Genetics 163:1255-1271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

NAKAYAMA, N., M. W. BOND, A. MIYAJIMA, J. KOBORI, and K. ARAI, 1987  Structure of Escherichia coli dnaC: identification of a cysteine residue possibly involved in association with dnaB protein. J. Biol. Chem. 262:10475-10480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

NICHOLS, B. P., O. SHAFIQ, and V. MEINERS, 1998  Sequence analysis of Tn10 insertion sites in a collection of Escherichia coli strains used for genetic mapping and strain construction. J. Bacteriol. 180:6408-6411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

NURSE, P., K. H. ZAVITZ, and K. J. MARIANS, 1991  Inactivation of the Escherichia coli priA DNA replication protein induces the SOS response. J. Bacteriol. 173:6686-6693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

RADMAN, M. and R. WAGNER, 1986  Mismatch repair in Escherichia coli.. Annu. Rev. Genet. 20:523-538.[CrossRef][Medline]

RANGARAJAN, S., R. WOODGATE, and M. F. GOODMAN, 2002  Replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli involving pols II, III, V, PriA, RecA and RecFOR proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 43:617-628.[CrossRef][Medline]

REDDY, M. and J. GOWRISHANKAR, 2000  Characterization of the uup locus and its role in transposon excision and tandem repeat deletion in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 182:1978-1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SAISREE, L., M. REDDY, and J. GOWRISHANKAR, 2000  lon incompatibility associated with mutations causing SOS induction: null uvrD alleles induce an SOS response in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 182:3151-3157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SAMBROOK, J., E. F. FRITSCH and T. MANIATIS, 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Ed. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

SANDLER, S. J., 2000  Multiple genetic pathways for restarting DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli K-12. Genetics 155:487-497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SANDLER, S. J. and K. J. MARIANS, 2000  Role of PriA in replication fork reactivation in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 182:9-13.[Free Full Text]

SANDLER, S. J., H. S. SAMRA, and A. J. CLARK, 1996  Differential suppression of priA2::kan phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12 by mutations in priA, lexA, and dnaC.. Genetics 143:5-13.[Abstract]

SANDLER, S. J., K. J. MARIANS, K. H. ZAVITZ, J. COUTU, and M. A. PARENT et al., 1999  dnaC mutations suppress defects in DNA replication- and recombination-associated functions in priB and priC double mutants in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol. Microbiol. 34:91-101.[CrossRef][Medline]

SANDLER, S. J., J. D. MCCOOL, T. T. DO, and R. U. JOHANSEN, 2001  PriA mutations that affect PriA-PriC function during replication restart. Mol. Microbiol. 41:697-704.[CrossRef][Medline]

SEIGNEUR, M., V. BIDNENKO, S. D. EHRLICH, and B. MICHEL, 1998  RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks. Cell 95:419-430.[CrossRef][Medline]

TOUGU, K. and K. J. MARIANS, 1996  The interaction between helicase and primase sets the replication fork clock. J. Biol. Chem. 271:21398-21405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

WALKER, G. C., 1996 The SOS response of Escherichia coli, pp. 1400–1416 in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, edited by F. C. NEIDHARDT, R. CURTISS, III, J. L. INGRAHAM, E. C. C. LIN, K. B. LOW et al. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.

WANG, T. C. and K. C. SMITH, 1986  Inviability of dam recA and dam recB cells of Escherichia coli is correlated with their inability to repair DNA double-strand breaks produced by mismatch repair. J. Bacteriol. 165:1023-1025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

WECHSLER, J. A., 1975  Genetic and phenotypic characterization of dnaC mutations. J. Bacteriol. 121:594-599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

WILLIAMS, R. M., S. RIMSKY, and H. BUC, 1996  Probing the structure, function, and interactions of the Escherichia coli H-NS and StpA proteins by using dominant negative derivatives. J. Bacteriol. 178:4335-4343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

XU, F., S. LIN-CHAO, and S. N. COHEN, 1993  The Escherichia coli pcnB gene promotes adenylylation of antisense RNAI of ColE1-type plasmids in vivo and degradation of RNAI decay intermediates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:6756-6760.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

XU, L. and K. J. MARIANS, 2003  PriA mediates DNA replication pathway choice at recombination intermediates. Mol. Cell 11:817-826.[CrossRef][Medline]

YANISCH-PERRON, C., J. VIEIRA, and J. MESSING, 1985  Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103-119.[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. C. Heller and K. J. Marians Unwinding of the Nascent Lagging Strand by Rep and PriA Enables the Direct Restart of Stalled Replication Forks J. Biol. Chem., October 7, 2005; 280(40): 34143 - 34151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Sandler Requirements for Replication Restart Proteins During Constitutive Stable DNA Replication in Escherichia coli K-12 Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 1799 - 1806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-H. Liu, T.-W. Chang, C.-Y. Huang, S.-U. Chen, H.-N. Wu, M.-C. Chang, and C.-D. Hsiao Crystal Structure of PriB, a Primosomal DNA Replication Protein of Escherichia coli J. Biol. Chem., November 26, 2004; 279(48): 50465 - 50471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]