- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Cao, L.
- Articles by Zouros, E.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Cao, L.
- Articles by Zouros, E.
Differential Segregation Patterns of Sperm Mitochondria in Embryos of the Blue Mussel (Mytilus edulis)
Liqin Caoa, Ellen Kenchingtona,b, and Eleftherios Zourosc,aa Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada,
b Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4A2, Canada
c Department of Biology, University of Crete, Iraklion, GR 71003 Crete, Greece
Corresponding author: Ellen Kenchington, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, 1 Challenger Dr., P.O. Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4A2, Canada., kenchingtone{at}mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca (E-mail)
Communicating editor: M. A. ASMUSSEN
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
In Mytilus, females carry predominantly maternal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) but males carry maternal mtDNA in their somatic tissues and paternal mtDNA in their gonads. This phenomenon, known as doubly uniparental inheritance (DUI) of mtDNA, presents a major departure from the uniparental transmission of organelle genomes. Eggs of Mytilus edulis from females that produce exclusively daughters and from females that produce mostly sons were fertilized with sperm stained with MitoTracker Green FM, allowing observation of sperm mitochondria in the embryo by epifluorescent and confocal microscopy. In embryos from females that produce only daughters, sperm mitochondria are randomly dispersed among blastomeres. In embryos from females that produce mostly sons, sperm mitochondria tend to aggregate and end up in one blastomere in the two- and four-cell stages. We postulate that the aggregate eventually ends up in the first germ cells, thus accounting for the presence of paternal mtDNA in the male gonad. This is the first evidence for different behaviors of sperm mitochondria in developing embryos that may explain the tight linkage between gender and inheritance of paternal mitochondrial DNA in species with DUI.
STRICTLY maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is the general rule in animals (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This separate transmission of M and F mitochondrial genomes gives rise to two distinct, gender-associated lineages of mtDNA, which in Mytilus may show 1020% sequence divergence (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It is known from early electron microscopy studies (![]()
![]()
Clearly, in species with DUI, different mechanisms of mitochondrial replication and/or destruction must operate between the sexes to produce adult females in which the M genome has largely disappeared and adult males in which somatic cells are primarily or entirely F-type but the gonads are M-type. In a passive model, where sperm mtDNA has the same fate as egg mtDNA with regard to rate of replication and cell distribution in the developing embryo, the M genome would be subject to stochastic elimination or random presence in one or another tissue. This is consistent with observations made in some females using PCR techniques (![]()
To determine which of these mechanisms are operative, it is necessary to link in vivo observations of sperm mitochondria to the sex of the individual. Mussels cannot be reliably sexed histologically, even under the best culture conditions, at less than a year of age. PCR assays using sex-specific mtDNA markers may lead to false characterization of a male animal as female through amplification error, since the female state is determined by absence of amplification product using male-specific markers. Occasionally the paternal mtDNA may have an F-like sequence (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here we use a combination of genetic and cytological evidence made on selected crosses of pedigreed females, known to produce different proportions of male and female offspring, to obtain strong evidence for differential mitochondrial segregation patterns between the sexes. In female embryos the sperm mitochondria disperse randomly among the cells. However, in male embryos the sperm mitochondria aggregate in the large cell (CD) at the two-cell stage and remain aggregated through subsequent cell divisions. These results are discussed in terms of the DUI model.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Mussel pair matings:
Animals were collected from a mussel farm in Country Harbour, Nova Scotia, Canada. Because M. trossulus, a sibling species, is known to occur in the region, we confirmed species identity by restriction fragment analyses of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal RNA genes (![]()
![]()
The methods used for in vitro spawning and subsequent mixing of eggs with sperm were as described in ![]()
|
Fluorescence labeling:
MitoTracker Green FM (MitoFM; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) is a mitochondria-specific vital dye. It is essentially nonfluorescent in an aqueous solution and becomes fluorescent when its chloromethyl moieties form covalent bonds with protein thiols in the mitochondrion (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
MitoFM was diluted to a concentration of 1 mM in dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis) and added to the sperm suspension to a final concentration of 200 nM. The sperm were incubated in the dye for 20 min at 18° and then washed thoroughly on a Millipore filter and suspended in seawater. Labeled sperm were added to eggs at a very low concentration of
100 sperm/ml for 10 min. The resulting zygotes were washed three times on a 20-µm filter to remove sperm that did not participate in fertilization but adhered to the surface of the eggs.
To observe the relative position of the mitochondria with regard to the nucleus, sperm nuclei were counterstained with propidium iodide (Molecular Probes), at a final concentration of 3 µg/ml for 10 min.
To examine the possibility that staining of the sperm mitochondria might have an effect on the distribution of paternal mtDNA among progeny, we conducted a subsidiary experiment in which eggs from two females were separately fertilized with stained and unstained sperm from the same male. One of the females (X102E) was known from a previous mating to produce only daughters and the other to produce predominately sons (99wF1).
Sex determination:
Some progeny of all families were raised to sexual maturity and the sex ratio was determined for each family through microscopic examination of the gonads.
Visualization of labeled mitochondria in developing mussel embryos:
An undetermined number of embryos from each family were extracted from the pool of offspring and mounted in seawater on glass slides under coverslips, sealed, and placed in the dark at 18° for 20 min. Epifluorescent microscopy was then used to determine the position of sperm mitochondria in individual embryos. At first we used a polyvar epifluorescent microscope (Reichert-Jung, Wien, Austria) with a 200-W mercury arc lamp and an ORCA 100/C4742-95 Hamamatsu digital camera (Hamamatsu Photonics KK, Japan) operated by SimplePCI software (Compix, Mars, PA). A combination of a 450- to 495-nm bandpass exciter filter and a 520- to 560-nm bandpass barrier filter was employed. Individual embryos were examined by focusing down from one side of the embryo to the other, with several images being acquired at different focal planes. We subsequently used a Nikon (Japan) E800 epifluorescence microscope equipped with a 450- to 490-nm bandpass excitation and a 520-nm longpass emission filter block set. A series of optical sections were made by focusing down through the embryos at
2- to 7-µm intervals. Images were captured with a Nikon DXM 1200 high-resolution color digital camera.
Epifluorescent microscopy was used to capture data on embryos at the early stages of development. After the embryos reached the four- or eight-cell stage, detection of the sperm mitochondria became more difficult. For these and later cell stages (trochophore and D stage) that acquire a background autofluorescence, and for capturing images of the sperm alone, confocal microscopy was used. However, the increased time associated with collecting images with this method prohibited its use for extracting data for analytical purposes.
For confocal microscopy, MitoFM-stained sperm and trochophore larvae were excited with 488-nm laser light, and the emission was collected with a 515- to 540-nm bandpass filter. Older D stage larvae were excited with 558-nm laser light and imaged through a 575- to 640-nm bandpass filter. This was done to distinguish the MitoFM signal from the autofluorescence background. The two images of the same larva were overlain such that orange coloration showed the autofluorescence and green coloration denoted stained sperm mitochondria within the embryo. Images of double-labeled sperm alone were obtained following the same procedure as with D stage larvae.
The number of fluorescent mitochondria and their distribution among the cells were recorded for individual embryos at the two-, four-, or eight-cell stages. Observations of later developmental stages, through to the trochophore stage, were also made from each family with varying degrees of success.
In many embryos the observed number of sperm mitochondria was less than five. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the actual number of mitochondria in the parental sperm, the position of the mitochondrion in the cell interfering with visualization, the density of staining, and organelle death. All microscopic observations were made without prior knowledge of the family codes to avoid bias in the results.
Statistical analyses:
Chi-square tests were used to evaluate the nonrandomness of (1) the distribution of sperm mitochondria among the cells of the embryo within families at the two- and four-cell stages according to the number of sperm mitochondria observed, (2) the occurrence of aggregated and dispersed sperm mitochondrial distribution patterns among embryos within families irrespective of the number of sperm mitochondria observed, (3) the specific location of sperm mitochondria at the two-cell stage (small AB cell or large CD cell) within the distribution pattern (aggregated, replicate equals embryo; dispersed, replicate equals sperm mitochondrion) within families, (4) the occurrence of aggregated and dispersed sperm mitochondrial distribution patterns among families sired by the same male and among families producing only daughters and those producing mostly sons, and (5) the specific location of sperm mitochondria at the two-cell stage (AB or CD cell) among families sired by the same male and among families producing only daughters and those producing mostly sons.
For the first of these tests, the number of possible scenarios of the distribution of sperm mitochondria within families varied according to the number of mitochondria observed and the number of cells. Embryos with one observed mitochondrion were excluded from the data, leaving observations of two, three, four, or five sperm mitochondria per embryo. In a two-cell embryo in which three sperm mitochondria were observed there are two possible scenarios: 3:0 (all three mitochondria in one cell) and 2:1 (two mitochondria in one cell and one mitochondrion in the other cell). Symmetrical scenarios (e.g., 3:0 and 0:3) were pooled together. In most of these tests the expected numbers were small and so a Monte Carlo approach to estimating the probabilities was followed (cf. ![]()
= 0.05 was used throughout; however, by using this level of
we accept a number of type I errors, with three falsely significant results expected across the 62 tests performed.
At the two-cell stage developmentally defined cells could be distinguished, and we tested whether one or the other of these cells received more or fewer sperm mitochondria than expected by chance alone, by assuming that a mitochondrion had an equal chance to land in one or the other cell.
Because the aggregation of all mitochondria in one cell is the main feature that differentiates the aggregated from the dispersed pattern, we tested whether embryos with all mitochondria in one cell are more than expected by chance. For this we produced the composite "aggregated" class by summing all embryos where the two, three, four, or five sperm mitochondria were observed in one cell. All other scenarios were lumped together to form the complementary "dispersed" class.
| RESULTS |
|---|
Sperm of M. edulis stained with MitoFM showed a ring of five large mitochondria in the midpiece (Fig 1). This is consistent with previous transmission electron microscopy studies (![]()
|
In all families, sperm penetrated the egg at various points in relation to the location of the first meiotic spindle, as observed by ![]()
|
Following the system of nomenclature developed by ![]()
![]()
The sperm mitochondria retained the vital stain through to the late D stage, indicating that the organelles were still alive. During this phase of larval development, replication or fusion of the sperm mitochondria was never observed. Rare observations of more than five mitochondria were made but these were present at fertilization, of equal large size, and attributed to polyspermy, which is common in bivalves.
The number of embryos examined and the total number of sperm mitochondria observed in each family at the two-cell and four-cell stages are given in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. At the two-cell stage the number of embryos in each family varied from 31 to 44 and the average number of sperm mitochondria per embryo varied from 2.97 to 4, with a mean across families of 3.27 (SD = 0.36). For the four-cell stage the range was 33.92 (mean across families 3.47, SD = 0.46), and for the eight-cell stage, 3.083.9 (mean across families 3.41, SD = 0.30; not shown in the tables). Thus, the observed number of sperm mitochondria per embryo did not vary among families (or among cell stages).
|
As early as polar lobe formation in the first division, sperm mitochondria appear to follow two distinct patterns of behavior, which we have named dispersed and aggregated:
- The dispersed pattern: In some embryos the sperm mitochondria appeared to disperse randomly in the egg before cell division (Fig 3A) and segregate also at random into different cells at the various developmental stages (Fig 3, BD). This pattern was observed as late as the early trochophore stage (Fig 3E), but could not be identified at the D stage. This may be because dispersion makes the detection of the mitochondrial dye at late developmental stages more difficult.

View larger version (93K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
Figure 3. Dispersed pattern of sperm mitochondria at various cell stages in embryos of M. edulis. Bright field was followed by fluorescent field for each embryo. Fluorescent images were taken at different focal planes. Numbers indicate individual sperm mitochondria stained by MitoTracker Green FM. (A) One-cell zygote with polar lobe (arrow). (B) Two-cell embryo. (C) Four-cell embryo. (D) Eight-cell embryo. (E) Trochophore larva. AD, epifluorescent microscope was used; E, confocal microscope was used. Bars, 20 µm. - The aggregated pattern: In other embryos, all five sperm mitochondria moved into the polar lobe while it was developing. It appeared that these mitochondria were pushed back later by the cytoplasm of the polar lobe as it fused with the CD blastomere, along either the cleavage furrow that divided the AB and the CD blastomeres (Fig 4A) or the margin of the CD cell (Fig 4B). This process appeared to occur very quickly and was observed repeatedly. Consequently, all of the sperm mitochondria were sequestered in the CD blastomere at the two-cell stage (Fig 4C and Fig D). The five sperm mitochondria were also found to aggregate in D and 1D cells at the four-cell (Fig 4E) and the eight-cell (Fig 4F) stages, respectively. When all sperm mitochondria aggregated in one cell, they were usually located close to the cell membrane. As with the dispersed pattern, the aggregated pattern was observed to persist as late as the trochophore stage (Fig 4G) and even in larvae of the D stage (Fig 4H), almost 72 hr postfertilization.

View larger version (143K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
Figure 4. Aggregate pattern of sperm mitochondria at various cell stages in embryos of M. edulis. Bright field was followed by fluorescent field for each embryo. Fluorescent images were taken at different focal planes. Numbers indicate individual sperm mitochondria stained by MitoTracker Green FM. (A) Late one-cell zygote with polar lobe (arrow). Sperm mitochondria are along the cleavage furrow. (B) Late one-cell embryo with polar lobe (arrow). Sperm mitochondria are along the line between the polar lobe and the large cell. (C and D) Two-cell embryo. (E) Four-cell embryo. (F) Eight-cell embryo. (G) Trochophore larva. (H) D-stage larva. AF, epifluorescent microscope was used; G and H, confocal microscope was used. Bars, 20 µm.
No effect of sperm mitochondria labeling on sex ratio:
All of the progeny of a female known from a previous mating to produce only daughters (X102E) were female, and all of her progeny arising from unstained (N = 28) and stained sperm (N = 79) were female. Progeny of a female known to produce mostly sons (99wF1) produced 65% male offspring when eggs were fertilized by unstained sperm (N = 29) and 61% male offspring when eggs were fertilized with stained sperm (N = 28). These results provide evidence for our assumption that labeling the mitochondria with the fluorescent tag did not bias the sex ratio (
2 = 0.1412, P = 0.707).
The distribution of the two patterns in families and correspondence between mitochondrial distribution pattern and gender:
The distribution of sperm mitochondria was studied in two- and four-cell embryos from the seven families. Table 1 lists all possible distribution patterns in two-cell embryos for each observed number of mitochondria (two to five). Families 1, 2, 3, and 4 produced only daughters and families 5, 6, and 7 produced mostly sons (Table 1). Table 2 presents the equivalent information for four-cell embryos from families 2, 3, and 5. No observations beyond the two-cell stage were made in families 1 and 4, and for families 6 and 7 the numbers of examined four-cell embryos were small and are not given in the table. There were marked differences between the families. In families that produce no sons, the observed distribution of mitochondria among the cells rarely deviated significantly from expectation. There were three exceptions in the 16 comparisons in Table 1 and two in 8 in Table 2. The distribution of sperm mitochondria among the cells within these families is random. In contrast, the observed distribution of sperm mitochondria in the families producing mostly sons deviated strongly from expectations in 10 of 12 comparisons in Table 1 and in all 4 comparisons in Table 2.
In two-cell embryos we could consistently record if an observed sperm mitochondrion was in the AB or the CD cell. However, unambiguous cell identification was not always possible at the four-cell stage. Chi-square tests of the frequency of occurrence of the aggregated and dispersed patterns within families were significant in two of the four daughter-producing families (families 2 and 4) and for all families producing predominantly sons (Table 3A). In the four daughter-producing families, an aggregated pattern is equally likely to be found in the AB (small) or CD (large) cell (Table 3B). Among embryos with an aggregated distribution of sperm mitochondria, from families producing mostly sons, the aggregation was more commonly found in the CD cell (Table 3B). For the dispersed pattern, in all families, there is no tendency for the sperm mitochondria to be delivered preferentially to the CD cell, and location of the sperm aggregation is random (Table 3B).
|
Noninvolvement of the male parent:
Of the four males used in our families (Table 1), one (wm24) was used to produce families 3 and 5 and another (wm26) to produce families 4, 6, and 7. Families with the same male parent but different female parents were heterogeneous for two characters, the frequency of the aggregated pattern in two-cell embryos and the distribution of mitochondria between AB and CD cells (Table 4). In contrast, the grouping of the seven families according to whether the female parent produces only daughters or mostly sons, regardless of the male parent, results in two homogeneous classes for both characters of sperm mitochondrial distribution. This test provides further evidence that the fate of sperm mitochondria in the fertilized egg is under the control of the female parent.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Our observations of the distribution of sperm mitochondria in the early developmental stages of mussel embryos allow several inferences to be made about the fate of these mitochondria and, by extension, about the fate of paternal mtDNA. The first conclusion is that sperm mitochondria destruction in M. edulis does not occur during the early developmental stages. A mechanism of this kind involving ubiquitin is known to exist in mice and bovines, where it appears to operate almost immediately after the entrance of the sperm into the ovum (![]()
![]()
![]()
To explain the abundance of paternal mtDNA in the male gonad, early publications on the phenomenon of DUI (![]()
![]()
Our observations suggest a mechanism that would account for the difference between the genders in the mitochondrial type of the gonad and provide a description of the very first steps of that mechanism. Our hypothesis is that in early-stage female embryos, sperm mitochondria behave like egg mitochondria. They are assorted at random among the early cells and start replicating at the same time and rate as maternal mitochondria, sometime after the D stage of larval development. In sharp contrast, sperm mitochondria follow a very regimented path in male embryos. They aggregate together just before the first cell division and are sequestered in the large CD cell. This aggregation into the same cell appears to continue for several successive cell divisions. We could not identify, in terms of developmental destiny, the chain of cells through which the aggregate passes, nor do we have data as to when and where the aggregate is dissolved. The fact that germ cells descend from the CD rather than from the AB cell is compatible with the hypothesis that the aggregate follows a path that leads to primordial germ cells. However, our observations are not of a nature to provide direct confirmation of this hypothesis.
The existence of a mechanism through which sperm mitochondria are delivered to the first germ cells would explain why the paternal genome is found almost exclusively in the male gonad, but cannot explain why the gonad contains only paternal mtDNA. One way this could happen is if sperm mitochondria are the only mitochondria that enter the first germ cells. If, however, both egg and sperm mitochondria enter the germ cells, then we would require either that the former are actively eliminated from the germ line or that during gonad development the paternal mtDNA multiplies at a much faster rate than maternal mtDNA. There is indirect evidence in support of the latter hypothesis. One well-established feature of DUI is that occasionally a maternally transmitted mitochondrial genome may invade the paternal transmission route. The phenomenon, known as "masculinization" (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Whereas the stochastic behavior of sperm mitochondria in female embryos requires no further explanation, the aggregation of these mitochondria and the delivery of this aggregate to specific cells in male embryos require the existence of a specific mechanism. At present we can offer no explanation for how this mechanism might operate. Our study is not, however, the first to report a nonrandom distribution of mitochondria after cell division. In yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), mitochondria are transmitted from the mother cell to the bud daughter cell through a directed linear movement facilitated by actin (![]()
The existence of a mechanism that operates in male mussel embryos, but not in female embryos, is the central piece of a model that was put forward to explain the two main observations of DUI in mussels: the presence of paternal mtDNA in the male but not female gonads and the strong female-dependent sex bias. The model (![]()
![]()
This study takes this model one important step forward by indicating that the mechanism through which the mitochondrial factor is delivered to the germ cells operates through the aggregation of sperm mitochondria. Further evidence for the model comes from the presence of paternal mtDNA in somatic tissues. As stated, most females (
70%) contain no paternal mtDNA, but when they do it is found in low amounts and in specific tissues that vary from individual to individual (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In conclusion, we have identified two distinct gender-associated patterns of distribution of sperm mitochondria in developing embryos of the mussel M. edulis. These results are significant because they provide the first demonstration of a sex-specific behavior of sperm mitochondria and because they open an important path toward the understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie the phenomenon of doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank D. Jackson, A. Thompson, and B. MacDonald of the Invertebrate Fisheries Division, Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), Bedford Institute of Oceanography (Dartmouth, Nova Scotia), for their assistance in producing and sexing the mussel families. D. Jackson further assisted with microscopic procedures and imaging. We also thank C. J. Bird of the National Research Council of Canada (Halifax, Nova Scotia) for use of the microscope and associated equipment. We are grateful to B. K. Hall, T. J. Kenchington, and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript and to S. J. Smith (DFO) and M. Johnston for helpful suggestions on statistics. We especially thank the anonymous reviewer who greatly assisted us in revising this manuscript. This work was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through a Discovery Grant to E.K. L.C. received additional support from Dalhousie University (graduate scholarship) and the Lett Fund (biology department).
Manuscript received July 15, 2003; Accepted for publication October 14, 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
BEAGLEY, C. T., K. A. TAYLOR, and D. R. WLOSTENHOLME, 1997 Gender-associated diverse mitochondrial DNA molecules of the mussel Mytilus californianus.. Curr. Genet. 31:318-324.[CrossRef][Medline]
BIRKY, C. W., JR., 1995 Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:11331-11338.
CONKLIN, E. G., 1897 The embryology of Crepidula.. J. Morphol. 13:1-226.[CrossRef]
CUMMINS, J. M., T. WAKAYAMA, and R. YANAGIMACHI, 1997 Fate of microinjected sperm components in the mouse oocyte and embryos. Zygote 5:301-308.[Medline]
FISHER, C. and D. O. F. SKIBINSKI, 1990 Sex-biased mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in the marine mussel Mytilus.. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 242:149-156.[CrossRef]
GARRIDO-RAMOS, M. A., D. T. STEWART, B. W. SUTHERLAND, and E. ZOUROS, 1998 The distribution of male-transmitted and female-transmitted mitochondrial DNA types in somatic tissues of blue mussels: implications for the operation of doubly uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial DNA. Genome 41:818-824.[CrossRef]
GELLER, J. B., 1994 Sex-specific mitochondrial DNA haplotypes and heteroplasmy in Mytilus trossulus and Mytilus galloprovincialis populations. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotech. 3:334-337.
GYLLENSTEN, U., D. WHARTON, A. JOSEFSSON, and A. C. WILSON, 1991 Paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in mice. Nature 352:255-257.[CrossRef][Medline]
HAUGLAND, R. P., 1996 Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Chemicals, Ed. 6. Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR.
HAYASHI, J.-I., H. YONEKAWA, O. GOTOH, J. WATANABE, and Y. TAGASHIRA, 1978 Strictly maternal inheritance of rat mitochondrial DNA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 83:1032-1038.[CrossRef][Medline]
HEATH, D. D., P. D. RAWSON, and T. J. HILBISH, 1995 PCR-based nuclear markers identify alien blue mussel (Mytilus spp.) genotypes on the west coast of Canada. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52:2621-2627.
HOEH, W. R., D. T. STEWART, B. W. SUTHERLAND, and E. ZOUROS, 1996 Multiple origins of gender associated mitochondrial DNA lineages in bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Evolution 50:2276-2286.[CrossRef]
HUMPHREYS, W. J., 1962 Electron microscope studies on eggs of Mytilus edulis.. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 7:467-487.[CrossRef][Medline]
KANEDA, H., J.-I. HAYASHI, S. TAKAHAMA, C. TAYA, and K. F. LINDAHL et al., 1995 Elimination of paternal mitochondrial DNA in intraspecific crosses during early mouse embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:4542-4546.
KENCHINGTON, E., B. MACDONALD, L. CAO, D. TSAGKARAKIS, and E. ZOUROS, 2002 Genetics of mother-dependent sex-ratio in blue mussels (Mytilus spp.) and implications for doubly uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 161:1579-1588.
KONDO, R., Y. SATTA, E. T. MATSUURA, H. ISHIWA, and N. TAKAHATA et al., 1990 Incomplete maternal transmission of mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila. Genetics 126:657-663.[Abstract]
LADOUKAKIS, E. D. and E. ZOUROS, 2001 Direct evidence for homologous recombination in mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1168-1175.
LADOUKAKIS, E. D., C. SAAVEDRA, A. MAGOULAS, and E. ZOUROS, 2002 Mitochondrial DNA variation in a species with two mitochondrial genomes: the case of Mytilus galloprovincialis from the Atlantic, the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Mol. Ecol. 11:755-769.[CrossRef][Medline]
LIU, H. P., J. B. MITTON, and S. K. WU, 1996 Paternal mitochondrial DNA differentiation far exceeds maternal DNA and allozyme differentiation in the freshwater mussel, Anodonta grandis grandis.. Evolution 50:952-957.[CrossRef]
LONGO, F. J. and E. ANDERSON, 1969 Cytological aspects of fertilization in the lamellibranch, Mytilus edulis. II. Development of the male pronucleus and the association of the maternally and paternally derived chromosomes. J. Exp. Zool. 172:97-120.[CrossRef][Medline]
LONGO, F. J. and E. J. DORNFELD, 1967 The fine structure of spermatid differentiation in the mussel, Mytilus edulis.. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 20:462-480.[CrossRef][Medline]
MAGOULAS, A. and E. ZOUROS, 1993 Restriction-site heteroplasmy in anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) indicates incidental biparental inheritance of mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:319-325.
MANLY, B. F. J., 1997 Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, Ed. 2. Chapman & Hall, London.
PASSAMONTI, M. and V. SCALI, 2001 Gender-associated mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in the venerid clam Tapes philippinarum (Mollusca Bivalvia). Curr. Genet. 39:117-124.[CrossRef][Medline]
QUESADA, H., R. WENNE, and D. O. F. SKIBINSKI, 1999 Interspecies transfer of female mitochondrial DNA is coupled with role-reversals in the mussel Mytilus trossulus.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:655-665.[Abstract]
RAWSON, P. D. and T. J. HILBISH, 1995 Evolutionary relationships among the male and female mitochondrial DNA lineages in the Mytilus edulis species complex. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:893-901.[Abstract]
RAWSON, P. D., C. L. SECOR, and T. J. HILBISH, 1996 The effects of natural hybridization on the regulation of doubly uniparental mtDNA inheritance in blue mussels (Mytilus spp.). Genetics 144:241-248.[Abstract]
SAAVEDRA, C., M. I. REYERO, and E. ZOUROS, 1997 Male-dependent doubly uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial DNA and female-dependent sex-ratio in the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis.. Genetics 145:1073-1082.[Abstract]
SIMON, V. R., S. L. KARMORT, and L. A. PON, 1997 Mitochondrial inheritance: cell cycle and actin cable dependence of polarized mitochondrial movements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 37:199-210.[CrossRef][Medline]
SKIBINSKI, D. O. F., C. GALLAGHER, and C. M. BEYNON, 1994a Mitochondrial DNA inheritance. Nature 368:817-818.[Medline]
SKIBINSKI, D. O. F., C. GALLAGHER, and C. M. BEYNON, 1994b Sex-limited mitochondrial DNA transmission in the marine mussel Mytilus edulis.. Genetics 138:801-809.[Abstract]
STEWART, D. T., C. SAAVEDRA, R. R. STANWOOD, A. O. BALL, and E. ZOUROS, 1995 Male and female mitochondrial lineages in the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) species group. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:735-747.[Abstract]
SUTOVSKY, P., C. S. NAVARA, and G. SCHATTEN, 1996 Fate of the sperm mitochondria, and the incorporation, conversion, and disassembly of the sperm tail structures during bovine fertilization. Biol. Reprod. 55:1195-1205.[Abstract]
SUTOVSKY, P., R. MORENO, J. RAMALHO-SANTOS, T. DOMINKO, and C. SIMERLY et al., 1999 Ubiquitin tag for sperm mitochondria. Nature 402:371-372.[CrossRef][Medline]
SUTOVSKY, P., R. MORENO, J. RAMALHO-SANTOS, T. DOMINKO, and C. SIMERLY et al., 2000 Ubiquitinated sperm mitochondria, selective proteolysis and the regulation of mitochondrial inheritance in mammalian embryos. Biol. Reprod. 63:582-590.
VAN DEN BIGGELAAR, J. A. M., W. J. A.G. DICTUS and F. SERRAS, 1994 Molluscs, pp. 7791 in Embryos: Color Atlas of Development, edited by J. B. L. BARD. Wolfe Publishing, London.
VERDONK, N. H., and J. A. M. VAN DEN BIGGELAAR, 1983 Early development and the formation of the germ layers, pp. 91122 in The Mollusca Vol. 3: Development, edited by N. H. VERDONK, J. A. M. VAN DEN BIGGELAAR and A. S. TOMPA. Academic Press, New York.
ZOUROS, E., A. O. BALL, C. SAAVEDRA, and K. R. FREEMAN, 1994a Mitochondrial DNA inheritance. Nature 368:817-818.
ZOUROS, E., A. O. BALL, C. SAAVEDRA, and K. R. FREEMAN, 1994b A new type of mitochondrial DNA inheritance in the blue mussel Mytilus.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7463-7467.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Burzynski, M. Zbawicka, D. O. F. Skibinski, and R. Wenne Doubly Uniparental Inheritance Is Associated With High Polymorphism for Rearranged and Recombinant Control Region Haplotypes in Baltic Mytilus trossulus Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1081 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Valles and J. L. Boore Lophotrochozoan mitochondrial genomes Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 46(4): 544 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Breton, G. Burger, D. T. Stewart, and P. U. Blier Comparative Analysis of Gender-Associated Complete Mitochondrial Genomes in Marine Mussels (Mytilus spp.) Genetics, February 1, 2006; 172(2): 1107 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Nishimura, T. Yoshinari, K. Naruse, T. Yamada, K. Sumi, H. Mitani, T. Higashiyama, and T. Kuroiwa Active digestion of sperm mitochondrial DNA in single living sperm revealed by optical tweezers PNAS, January 31, 2006; 103(5): 1382 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mizi, E. Zouros, N. Moschonas, and G. C. Rodakis The Complete Maternal and Paternal Mitochondrial Genomes of the Mediterranean Mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis: Implications for the Doubly Uniparental Inheritance Mode of mtDNA Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 952 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Cao, L.
- Articles by Zouros, E.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Cao, L.
- Articles by Zouros, E.





