- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Andrews, T. D.
- Articles by Gojobori, T.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Andrews, T. D.
- Articles by Gojobori, T.
Strong Positive Selection and Recombination Drive the Antigenic Variation of the PilE Protein of the Human Pathogen Neisseria meningitidis
T. Daniel Andrewsa,b and Takashi Gojoboriba The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom
b Centre for Information Biology and DNA Databank of Japan, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka-ken 411-8540, Japan
Corresponding author: T. Daniel Andrews, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The PilE protein is the major component of the Neisseria meningitidis pilus, which is encoded by the pilE/pilS locus that includes an expressed gene and eight homologous silent fragments. The silent gene fragments have been shown to recombine through gene conversion with the expressed gene and thereby provide a means by which novel antigenic variants of the PilE protein can be generated. We have analyzed the evolutionary rate of the pilE gene using the nucleotide sequence of two complete pilE/pilS loci. The very high rate of evolution displayed by the PilE protein appears driven by both recombination and positive selection. Within the semivariable region of the pilE and pilS genes, recombination appears to occur within multiple small sequence blocks that lie between conserved sequence elements. Within the hypervariable region, positive selection was identified from comparison of the silent and expressed genes. The unusual gene conversion mechanism that operates at the pilE/pilS locus is a strategy employed by N. meningitidis to enhance mutation of certain regions of the PilE protein. The silent copies of the gene effectively allow "parallelized" evolution of pilE, thus enabling the encoded protein to rapidly explore a large area of sequence space in an effort to find novel antigenic variants.
THE Neisseria meningitidis bacterium is a human pathogen and a causative agent of meningitis and septicemia. N. meningitidis most commonly achieves asymptomatic infection of the nasopharynx, yet in a small but significant portion of these infections the bacteria gain entry to the bloodstream where they cause meningococcemia. A key component of the N. meningitidis infection machinery is the pilus, which aids binding of the bacterium to both epithelial and endothelial cells of the human host. The pilus is a filamentous structure that extends several micrometers from the bacterial cell surface and is composed primarily of a large number of identical subunits of the pilin protein encoded at the pilE/pilS locus (![]()
![]()
The crystal structure of the highly homologous PilE protein from N. gonorrhoeae shows that the protein forms an asymmetrical "ladle"-like structure. The handle of the ladle is formed by an unusually long
-helix and is attached to a globular
-ß roll domain, which forms the ladle bowl (![]()
-helical handles of each subunit pack to form a hydrophobic core, around which the globular domains wrap in a spiral. PilE itself appears not to be the primary mediator of host cell attachment. This role is performed by PilC, a protein that has been found to copurify with PilE and is thought to form the pilus tip (![]()
The exposed regions of PilE are subject to intense scrutiny by the host immune system and display high levels of antigenic variation (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-helical handle, are buried by hypervariable residues that are exposed to the host immune system (![]()
![]()
![]()
-helical "handle" of the PilE protein and is highly conserved. The adjacent semivariable region (residues 54114) displays more sequence diversity, but also contains five strongly conserved sequence elements (Sv15; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
|
The pilE gene of N. meningitidis lies in an unusual locus. Immediately upstream of the gene are eight truncated pseudogene-like homologs called the "silent" pilin genes (pilS; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The tandem array of pilS genes upstream of the pilE gene provides the N. meningitidis bacterium with a set of "contingency genes" (see ![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Sequence data and alignment:
The complete nucleotide sequence of the genomes of N. meningitidis strain Z2491 (serogroup A; ![]()
![]()
![]()
Detection of recombination:
Putative recombination breakpoints were detected using the method of ![]()
![]()
Tree reconstruction:
Maximum likelihood trees were estimated using fastDNAml (![]()
![]()
![]()
Analysis of selection:
The maximum likelihood method of ![]()
![]()
![]()
). Additionally, likelihood estimation was performed using model M0 (one ratio). In each of these tests, values of
< 1,
= 1, or
> 1 were interpreted as being indicative of purifying selection, neutral evolution, or positive selection, respectively. Model M0 assumes all codon sites have the same value of
and as such allows a test of selection across all sites. Model M1 allows two codon site classes with values of
fixed at 0 and 1. Model M1 is commonly compared to models M2 and M3, which have one more codon site class that allows
> 1. LRTs of M1 vs. M2 and M1 vs. M3 test whether a model that allows some sites to evolve under positive selection better describes the data. If the likelihood score of models M2 or M3 is significantly better than that of model M0 and if
> 1 for one or more of the three values as estimated by model M2 or M3, then this is evidence that positive selection may exist in the data. Models M2 and M3 differ in the number of site classes that allow
> 1. Model M2 allows just one site class where
> 1, whereas M3 has the freedom to set
> 1 for all of its three site classes. An LRT between models M2 and M3 tests whether a single class of positively selected sites describes the data better than multiple classes do. Model M7 allows 10 codon site classes (each with a restriction
< 1), whereas M8 has one extra site class that allows
> 1. Once again, good evidence for positive selection is found if the likelihood score gained from M8 is significantly better than that from M7 and
> 1. The likelihood ratio test statistic used to determine the level of significance was calculated as twice the difference of the likelihood scores estimated by each model (2
l). The null distribution of such test statistics can be approximated by a
2 distribution, with the number of degrees of freedom calculated as the difference in the number of estimated parameters between models. Hence, the degrees of freedom for the M1 vs. M2, M1 vs. M3, M2 vs. M3, and M7 vs. M8 tests were 2, 4, 3, and 2, respectively (![]()
Should LRTs indicate the presence of positive selection in a data set, it is then possible to perform an empirical Bayesian analysis to calculate for each codon site the posterior probability that it belonged to a positively selected codon class (![]()
Ad hoc pairwise comparison of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions between sequences was calculated using the method of ![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
An elevated rate of protein evolution in the pilE/pilS gene locus was initially identified from exhaustive analysis of synonymous and nonsynonymous evolutionary rates of homologous genes in the two complete N. meningitidis genome sequences. Even at the crudest level, over the semi- and hypervariable regions of the sequence, identity between the two Neisseria serogroup PilE protein sequences is lower (86.5%) than that for the nucleotide sequences (89.8%), indicating that extreme and active diversification of the protein sequence has taken place.
Analysis of recombination:
The process of frequent gene conversion of the pilE gene by pilS gene fragments appears almost entirely unidirectional (![]()
![]()
The method of ![]()
A second method for detection of recombination was employed. The method of ![]()
![]()
Given the possibility that the pilE/pilS sequences may contain a number of independently recombining sequence blocks, all subsequent analysis used the data set of truncated sequences described above and used to determine the tree in Fig 1. Although truncation of the full sequences to the hypervariable region reduced the length of the analyzed sequences to just 135 nucleotides, this data set still contained >60% (or 52 out of 83) of the informative sites of the full data set. Informative sites were counted as being those positions that were variant within at least two sequences. Further tests for breakpoints using the method of ![]()
Tests of positive selection:
Ad hoc pairwise comparison of the hypervariable region of the pilS sequences with pilE sequences from both N. meningitidis strains shows that nonsynonymous substitutions are more prevalent than synonymous substitutions in almost all comparisons (Table 1). A number of pairwise comparisons show a large excess of nonsynonymous substitutions compared to synonymous substitutions. Pairwise comparison of the two expressed pilE sequences shows a small excess of nonsynonymous substitutions compared to synonymous substitutions. Comparisons between pairs of pilS fragments showed results of similar character and magnitude as shown in Table 1, but for brevity the matrix of nonsynonymous and synonymous substitution rates is not presented.
|
This pairwise demonstration of rapid protein evolution in the pilE/pilS locus motivated a further statistical analysis of whether positive selection could be an explanation. Fig 1 shows the reconstructed tree that was used for these tests. Table 2 shows the parameter estimates, likelihood scores, and the results of LRTs performed with the pilE and pilS genes. At the simplest level, the M0 model that allows just one class of codons shows that each site has an estimated value of
= 1.51. This alone indicates positive selection is acting in the hypervariable region of the pilE/pilS sequence. The results of the LRTs provide further support for this result. Each test (except that between models M2 and M3) strongly rejects the null hypothesis and indicates that positive selection may have taken place within this data set. For each of these tests, the test statistic was highly significant at P < 0.0005. The tests that employed models M1 vs. M2 and M1 vs. M3 showed clearly that a model that includes at least one site class that allows
> 1 (M2 and M3 models) describes the evolution of these sequences much better than a model that does not (model M1). Estimation of parameters for model M2 showed that the site class that allows
> 1 accounts for more than one-third of all sites and has a very high value of
= 3.59.
|
The result of the likelihood estimation using model M3 shows extraordinarily that two of the three site classes have values
> 1. Between them, these two site classes account for almost two-thirds of all codons and have high estimated values of
(
2 = 1.35 and
3 = 3.76). Furthermore, the result of the model M7 vs. M8 LRT also exhibits a similar pattern. The M8 model with its extra site class that allows for values of
> 1 describes the evolution of the pilin genes better than the M7 model does. More than one-third of all sites in the hypervariable region of the pilin gene are assigned to this positively selected site class, and the estimated value of
for these sites is high at 3.21.
Table 2 also shows a listing of amino acid positions in the translated sequence that have strong support for belonging to a site class identified as being under possible positive selection (in the M2, M3, or M8 models). The concordance of the identity of the positively selected sites between each model is strong. With the M3 model, as two site classes are estimated to have values of
> 1, there are a greater number of sites with a high posterior probability of being positively selected. Between the M2 and M8 models, the positively selected sites predicted are in perfect agreement and are a subset of the sites predicted by model M3. The potentially positively selected codons lie between the two conserved Cys regions and predominantly cluster closer to the Cys2 region (Fig 2). An alternative method of predicting the identity of positively selected sites (![]()
![]()
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
This analysis found that the pilE/pilS gene locus from N. meningitidis strains Z2491 and MC58 displays a strong case of positive selection. Given that the selection seems to work to produce novel antigens of the PilE protein, it may also be termed diversifying selection. Importantly, the selection among the pilE and pilS genes is detectable even though it is apparent that it must act through the proxy of gene conversion. This finding implies that novel amino acid changes in the pilE/pilS locus are highly important to N. meningitidis for evasion of the host immune response. We postulate that mutation and recombination within the silent pilin genes generates sequence diversity, which is then subject to strong selection should the silent fragment recombine with the expressed gene. Given that the mechanism for gene conversion does not alter the donor gene and that each of the pilS genes are preserved with valid reading frames, each silent fragment in the pilS locus possibly represents a "souvenir" of a gene conversion event that has led to a successful infection of a human host.
While gene conversion of the expressed gene by the silent copies is almost entirely a unidirectional process (![]()
![]()
![]()
estimated using the M0 model was quite large (
= 1.51). While the effect of recombination must be considered when the results of the LRTs are interpreted, overall it seems that positive selection is an important feature of the rapid protein evolution observed in the hypervariable region of the PilE protein.
Given the high evolutionary rate of the pilE genes, it is important to note that this rate may be enhanced by gene conversion with pilS genes from extrachromosomal DNA fragments. Neisseria species are well known for their autolytic behavior and their ability to selectively uptake other Neisserial DNA fragments (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The Neisserial pilus consists mostly of PilE protein subunits, with the PilC protein located at the pilus tip to mediate host cell attachment (![]()
![]()
= 1.13). Among the pilC1 sequences and between the pilC1 and pilC2 sequences, the synonymous substitution rate was marginally higher than the nonsynonymous rate (average
= 0.843). While this information suggests that the pilC genes have a somewhat elevated rate of nonsynonymous evolution, it is generally less than that of the pilE/pilS genes. The apparent lack of silent pilC genes in the N. meningitidis genome implies that pilC1 and pilC2 do not evolve via the same gene conversion mechanism as the pilS/pilE locus and may evolve at a lower rate as a direct consequence of this. In addition, the structure of the PilC protein may not be as amenable to sustaining mutation, as compared to the hypervariable region of PilE protein, which seems to exist for the purpose of accommodating mutation.
If the gene conversion mechanism that operates within the N. meningitidis pilE/pilS locus is so effective at generating protein diversity for evading the host immune system, other organisms may also have employed this approach. Certainly, the pilE and pilS genes of the closely related pathogen N. gonorrhoeae are highly homologous to those found in N. meningitidis. Although the pilS fragments in N. gonorrhoeae are scattered throughout the genome, an almost identical mechanism of gene conversion between pilE and pilS has been shown to exist (see ![]()
Gene conversion has also been implicated as the mechanism for generating antigenic diversity among other proteins from other organisms. The outer membrane protein msp2 from Anaplasma marginale (![]()
![]()
![]()
Compared to the gene loci of other organisms that employ gene conversion to generate antigenic variation, the N. meningitidis pilE/pilS locus is somewhat different in that the pilS genes are always found only as gene fragments. Genetic economy is possibly the main reason why the pilS genes are just fragments. However, if the pilS genes are always only fragmentary, this avoids the potential problem where a silent gene may become "accidentally" expressed. If the silent genes were occasionally expressed, this would mean that not only would the pilE gene need to be antigenically novel, but also so would any expressed pilS genes. Due to the pilS genes being fragments and therefore never directly expressed, the effect of mutation and recombination at this locus is parallelized and concentrated. This parallelized evolution via the intermediacy of gene conversion may be an important factor that allows the pilE gene to evolve antigenic diversity at such a great rate.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank A. Wyndham for helpful discussions and two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved this manuscript. This work was performed in part while T.D.A. was the recipient of a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science postdoctoral fellowship.
Manuscript received June 8, 2003; Accepted for publication September 14, 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AHO, E. L., A. M. KEATING, and S. M. MCGILLIVRAY, 2000 A comparative analysis of pilin genes from pathogenic and nonpathogenic Neisseria species. Microb. Pathog. 28:81-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
ANISIMOVA, M., R. NIELSEN, and Z. YANG, 2003 Effect of recombination on the accuracy of the likelihood method for detecting positive selection at amino acid sites. Genetics 164:1229-1236.
BRAYTON, K. A., G. H. PALMER, A. LUNDGREN, J. YI, and A. F. BARBET, 2002 Antigenic variation of Anaplasma marginale msp2 occurs by combinatorial gene conversion. Mol. Microbiol. 43:1151-1159.[CrossRef][Medline]
DIAZ, J. L., M. VIRJI, and J. E. HECKELS, 1984 Structural and antigenic differences between two types of meningococcal pili. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 21:181-184.[CrossRef]
FELSENSTEIN, J., 1981 Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.[CrossRef][Medline]
FOREST, K. T., S. L. BERNSTEIN, E. D. GETZOFF, M. SO, and G. TRIBBICK et al., 1996 Assembly and antigenicity of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae pilus mapped with antibodies. Infect. Immun. 64:644-652.
GIBBS, C. P., B. Y. REIMANN, E. SCHULTZ, A. KAUFMANN, and R. HAAS et al., 1989 Reassortment of pilin genes in Neisseria gonorrhoeae occurs by two distinct mechanisms. Nature 338:651-652.[CrossRef][Medline]
GOODMAN, S. D. and J. J. SCOCCA, 1988 Identification and arrangement of the DNA sequence recognized in specific transformation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:6982-6986.
GRASSLY, N. C. and E. C. HOLMES, 1997 A likelihood method for the detection of selection and recombination using nucleotide sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:239-247.[Abstract]
HAAS, R. and T. F. MEYER, 1986 The repertoire of silent pilus genes in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: evidence for gene conversion. Cell 44:107-115.[CrossRef][Medline]
HAAS, R., S. VEIT, and T. F. MEYER, 1992 Silent pilin genes of Neisseria gonorrhoeae MS11 and the occurrence of related hypervariant sequences among other gonococcal isolates. Mol. Microbiol. 6:197-208.[CrossRef][Medline]
HAMRICK, T. S., J. A. DEMPSEY, M. S. COHEN, and J. G. CANNON, 2001 Antigenic variation of gonococcal pilin expression in vivo: analysis of the strain FA1090 pilin repertoire and identification of the pilS gene copies recombining with pilE during experimental human infection. Microbiology 147:839-849.
HECKELS, J. E., 1989 Structure and function of pili of pathogenic Neisseria species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2(Suppl):S66-S73.
HOWELL-ADAMS, B. and H. S. SEIFERT, 2000 Molecular models accounting for the gene conversion reactions mediating gonococcal pilin antigenic variation. Mol. Microbiol. 37:1146-1158.[CrossRef][Medline]
JIGGINS, F. M., G. D. D. HURST, and Z. YANG, 2002 Host-symbiont conflicts: positive selection on an outer membrane protein of parasitic but not mutualistic Rickettsiaceae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1341-1349.
KISHINO, H. and M. HASEGAWA, 1989 Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29:170-179.
MAYNARD-SMITH, J., 1992 Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J. Mol. Evol. 34:126-129.[Medline]
MOXON, E. R., P. B. RAINEY, M. A. NOWAK, and R. E. LENSKI, 1994 Adaptive evolution of highly mutable loci in pathogenic bacteria. Curr. Biol. 4:24-33.[CrossRef][Medline]
NASSIF, X., 1999 Interaction mechanisms of encapsulated meningococci with eucaryotic cells: What does this tell us about the crossing of the blood-brain barrier by Neisseria meningitidis? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:71-77.[CrossRef][Medline]
NEI, M. and T. GOJOBORI, 1986 Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:418-426.[Abstract]
NIELSEN, R. and Z. YANG, 1998 Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics 148:929-936.
NOORMOHAMMADI, A. H., P. F. MARKHAM, A. KANCI, K. G. WHITHEAR, and G. F. BROWNING, 2000 A novel mechanism for control of antigenic variation in the haemagglutinin gene family of Mycoplasma synoviae.. Mol. Microbiol. 35:911-923.[CrossRef][Medline]
OLSEN, G. J., H. MATSUDA, R. HAGSTROM, and R. OVERBEEK, 1994 fastDNAml: a tool for construction of phylogenetic trees of DNA sequences using maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10:41-48.
PARGE, H. E., K. T. FOREST, M. J. HICKEY, D. A. CHRISTENSEN, and E. D. GETZOFF et al., 1995 Structure of the fibre-forming protein pilin at 2.6 Å resolution. Nature 378:32-38.[CrossRef][Medline]
PARKHILL, J., M. ACHTMAN, K. D. JAMES, S. D. BENTLEY, and C. CHURCHER et al., 2000 Complete DNA sequence of a serogroup A strain of Neisseria meningitidis Z2491. Nature 404:502-506.[CrossRef][Medline]
PERRY, A. C., I. J. NICOLSON, and J. R. SAUNDERS, 1988 Neisseria meningitidis C114 contains silent, truncated pilin genes that are homologous to Neisseria gonorrhoeae pil sequences. J. Bacteriol. 170:1691-1697.
POTTS, W. J. and J. R. SAUNDERS, 1988 Nucleotide sequence of the structural gene for class I pilin from Neisseria meningitidis: homologies with the pilE locus of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.. Mol. Microbiol. 2:647-653.[CrossRef][Medline]
RAHMAN, M., H. KALLSTROM, S. NORMARK, and A. B. JONSSON, 1997 PilC of pathogenic Neisseria is associated with the bacterial cell surface. Mol. Microbiol. 25:11-25.[CrossRef][Medline]
RUDEL, T., I. SCHEURERPFLUG, and T. F. MEYER, 1995 Neisseria PilC protein identified as type-4 pilus tip-located adhesin. Nature 373:357-359.[CrossRef][Medline]
SARUBBI, F. A. and P. F. SPARLING, 1974 Transfer of antibiotic resistance in mixed cultures of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.. J. Infect. Dis. 130:660-663.[Medline]
SEGAL, E., P. HAGBLOM, H. S. SEIFERT, and M. SO, 1986 Antigenic variation of gonococcal pilus involves assembly of separated silent gene segments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:2177-2181.
SEIFERT, H. S., 1996 Questions about gonococcal pilus phase- and antigenic variation. Mol. Microbiol. 21:433-440.[Medline]
SEIFERT, H. S., R. S. AJIOKA, C. MARCHAL, P. F. SPARLING, and M. SO, 1988 DNA transformation leads to pilin antigenic variation in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.. Nature 336:392-395.[CrossRef][Medline]
SPARLING, P. F., 1966 Genetic transformation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to streptomycin resistance. J. Bacteriol. 92:1364-1371.
SUZUKI, Y. and T. GOJOBORI, 1999 A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1315-1328.[Abstract]
SUZUKI, Y., T. GOJOBORI, and M. NEI, 2001 ADAPTSITE: detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. Bioinformatics 17:660-661.
TETTELIN, H., N. J. SAUNDERS, J. HEIDELBERG, A. C. JEFFRIES, and K. E. NELSON et al., 2000 Complete genome sequence of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B strain MC58. Science 287:1809-1815.
THOMPSON, J. D., D. G. HIGGINS, and T. J. GIBSON, 1994 CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
URWIN, R., E. C. HOLMES, A. J. FOX, J. P. DERRICK, and M. C. MAIDEN, 2002 Phylogenetic evidence for frequent positive selection and recombination in the meningococcal surface antigen PorB. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1686-1694.
YANG, Z., 2000 Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML), Version 3.0. University College, London.
YANG, Z., R. NIELSEN, N. GOLDMAN, and A.-M. K. PEDERSEN, 2000 Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431-449.
ZHANG, J. R. and S. J. NORRIS, 1998 Genetic variation of the Borrelia burgdorferi gene vlsE involves cassette-specific, segmental gene conversion. Infect. Immun. 66:3698-3704.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. May and D. R. Brown Diversifying and Stabilizing Selection of Sialidase and N-Acetylneuraminate Catabolism in Mycoplasma synoviae J. Bacteriol., June 1, 2009; 191(11): 3588 - 3593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Corradi, B. Ruffner, D. Croll, A. Colard, A. Horak, and I. R. Sanders High-Level Molecular Diversity of Copper-Zinc Superoxide Dismutase Genes among and within Species of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 1, 2009; 75(7): 1970 - 1978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Orsi, D. R. Ripoll, M. Yeung, K. K. Nightingale, and M. Wiedmann Recombination and positive selection contribute to evolution of Listeria monocytogenes inlA Microbiology, August 1, 2007; 153(8): 2666 - 2678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vos and G. J. Velicer Genetic Population Structure of the Soil Bacterium Myxococcus xanthus at the Centimeter Scale Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 1, 2006; 72(5): 3615 - 3625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kakizawa, K. Oshima, H.-Y. Jung, S. Suzuki, H. Nishigawa, R. Arashida, S.-i. Miyata, M. Ugaki, H. Kishino, and S. Namba Positive Selection Acting on a Surface Membrane Protein of the Plant-Pathogenic Phytoplasmas J. Bacteriol., May 1, 2006; 188(9): 3424 - 3428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Weber and R. Koebnik Positive Selection of the Hrp Pilin HrpE of the Plant Pathogen Xanthomonas J. Bacteriol., February 15, 2006; 188(4): 1405 - 1410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Harrison Prospects for Vaccine Prevention of Meningococcal Infection Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2006; 19(1): 142 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Baldo, N. Lo, and J. H. Werren Mosaic Nature of the Wolbachia Surface Protein J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2005; 187(15): 5406 - 5418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tummler and P. Cornelis Pyoverdine Receptor: a Case of Positive Darwinian Selection in Pseudomonas aeruginosa J. Bacteriol., May 15, 2005; 187(10): 3289 - 3292. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Drummond, J. J. Silberg, M. M. Meyer, C. O. Wilke, and F. H. Arnold On the conservative nature of intragenic recombination PNAS, April 12, 2005; 102(15): 5380 - 5385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Andrews, T. D.
- Articles by Gojobori, T.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Andrews, T. D.
- Articles by Gojobori, T.







