| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Corresponding author: Thomas W. Cline, University of California, 11 Koshland Hall, Mail Code 3204, Berkeley, CA 94720-3204., sxlcline{at}uclink.berkeley.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: T. C. KAUFMAN
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
In flies, scute (sc) works with its paralogs in the achaete-scute-complex (ASC) to direct neuronal development. However, in the family Drosophilidae, sc also acquired a role in the primary event of sex determination, X chromosome counting, by becoming an X chromosome signal element (XSE)an evolutionary step shown here to have occurred after sc diverged from its closest paralog, achaete (ac). Two temperature-sensitive alleles, scsisB2 and scsisB3, which disrupt only sex determination, were recovered in a powerful F1 genetic selection and used to investigate how sc was recruited to the sex-determination pathway. scsisB2 revealed 3' nontranscribed regulatory sequences likely to be involved. The scsisB2 lesion abolished XSE activity when combined with mutations engineered in a sequence upstream of all XSEs. In contrast, changes in Sc protein sequence seem not to have been important for recruitment. The observation that the other new allele, scsisB3, eliminates the C-terminal half of Sc without affecting neurogenesis and that scsisB1, the most XSE-specific allele previously available, is a nonsense mutant, would seem to suggest the opposite, but we show that housefly Sc can substitute for fruit fly Sc in sex determination, despite lacking Drosophilidae-specific conserved residues in its C-terminal half. Lack of synergistic lethality among mutations in sc, twist, and dorsal argue against a proposed role for sc in mesoderm formation that had seemed potentially relevant to sex-pathway recruitment. The screen that yielded new sc alleles also generated autosomal duplications that argue against the textbook view that fruit fly sex signal evolution recruited a set of autosomal signal elements comparable to the XSEs.
NATURAL selection can generate new regulatory gene functions by co-opting existing genes (reviewed recently in ![]()
![]()
![]()
To function as XSEs, these genes had to acquire two abilities: to be expressed at an extremely early point in embryonic development before most zygotic genes are first expressed and to interact with their target, SxlPe, the "sex-pathway establishment" promoter. What cis-acting information drives such early expression? Was it present in connection with these genes' non-sex-specific functions prior to recruitment, or did it instead arise in the course of recruitment as information specific to sex determination? Were changes in protein sequence required for XSE gene products to interact with SxlPe, and if so, are these new residues important only for sex determination? These questions are explored below in connection with scute (sc), the strongest (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In its non-sex-specific (proneural) role, sc works with the adjacent gene, achaete (ac), to help specify sense-organ mother cells (SMCs; reviewed in ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Despite the attention it has received, sc has proven remarkably difficult to understand, even with the help of modern molecular tools. Handicaps impeding its analysis include the considerable functional redundancy between Sc and Ac proteins (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As a consequence of the unusually high ratio of regulatory to coding DNA for sc, previous screens for sc mutations have generated a vast excess of gross chromosome rearrangements over point or pseudopoint mutations in or near the transcription unit, except when carried out in genetic backgrounds that include other lesions in the ASC from which new mutants cannot be separated (![]()
The nature of the lesion in one of these new sex-specific alleles led us to ask whether the evolution of the C-terminal half of Sc protein was influenced by sc's acquisition of a sex-determination role. To address this question, we isolated new ASC orthologs and paralogs from a variety of fly species and generated the most detailed sequence comparison yet presented for the three most closely related members of the ASC. To test the functional significance of Sc residues highlighted by this comparative sequence analysis, we determined whether Sc protein lacking these residues could provide XSE function and whether Ac could substitute for Sc in sex determination. Because these experiments were designed so that the timing and level of expression of the tested proteins would be wild type, they provide a more meaningful test of interchangeability than do previous studies.
The lesion in the other new sex-specific allele led us to a cis-acting regulatory region downstream of the transcription unit that is likely to help drive the extremely early expression specifically required for XSE function. Strong functional synergism was observed between a deletion of this 3' sequence and lesions engineered in a heptameric sequence upstream of sc that was identified earlier (![]()
The screen that generated these new sc alleles also produced autosomal duplications. These duplications do not support the textbook view of the Drosophila sex-determination signal (see ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Fly stocks and culture:
Drosophila were cultured in uncrowded conditions on a standard cornmeal, yeast, sucrose, and molasses medium. Transgenes were tested for sisB+ activity only after five generations of backcrossing to a standard scM6 stock to generate homogeneous genetic backgrounds. Markers and balancers are described at http://flybase.bio.indiana.edu. D. virilis and Scaptodrosophila lebanonensis were from the Drosophila Species Stock Center (Bowling Green State University), while Musca domestica was from Carolina Biologicals.
A powerful F1 genetic selection scheme for mutations in elements of the primary sex-determination signal:
The scheme diagrammed in Fig 1 was used to recover loss-of-function mutations in XSEs as well as duplications of autosomal signal elements (ASEs) as suppressors of male-specific lethality caused by simultaneous duplication of sisB+ and its target, Sex-lethal+. The extra copy of Sxl+ was present as a tandem duplication on the X chromosome [Dp(1;1)jnR1-A, Sxl+ l(1)7Aaa Sxl+l(1)7Aac], while the extra sisB+ copy was carried on an insertion of most of the ASC and the nearby marker allele yellow+ into chromosome II. Table 1 describes the yield from two rounds of such a screen with gamma rays as the mutagen (4- to 5-day-old males exposed to 2750 rad from a 137Cs source). We also examined 33,000 and 115,000 X chromosomes that had been mutagenized instead by ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) or diepoxybutane (DEB), respectively (see Table 1 legend).
|
|
Fewer than 0.06% of unmutagenized males carrying the sisB+ duplication (y+ sons from cross 2, Fig 1) survived (data not shown); however, such a low escaper rate was observed only if growth temperature was kept at 18° not only for the sons themselves during early embryogenesis, but also for their mothers from the time that they pupated until they laid their eggsa remarkably long time, considering that no mutant maternal effect is involved. Regardless of the mutagen used, the escaper rate for mutagenized males was several times higher than that for unmutagenized animals, but always <1% if maternal and zygotic culture temperatures were kept low. The four times higher escaper rate in round A vs. round B in Table 1 reflects the use in A of a shits-based scheme for generating virgins in large numbers that exposed developing mothers to 29°. Once the importance of maternal temperature was appreciated, the pn-Kpn scheme for making virgins shown in Fig 1 was used instead. Because rare y+ males were immediately subjected to a simple retest cross (Fig 1, cross 3) in which most proved to be sterile, even the relatively high escaper rate in round A was not a serious inconvenience. Although this retest cross was run at 25° for convenience, the distinction between escapers and suppressors was unambiguous even at this higher temperature. Lines were established and maintained only for suppressors rescuing >30% of males in this retest because experience taught us that genetic characterization of suppressors less effective than this was impractical. Even with the 30% cutoff, many partial-loss-of-function, fully viable alleles of the fairly weak XSE outstretched (os), an essential gene, were recovered.
The standard mutagen EMS was ineffective in this F1 screen, undoubtedly because EMS induces mosaic genetic change (![]()
Originally, only y sons from positive retest crosses (Fig 1, cross 3) were sent through cross 4, the purpose being to discover whether survival of their y+ brothers in the retest cross might have been due to a spontaneous mutation in Dp(ASC), rather than to an induced mutation elsewhere. By not also applying the test to sons from apparently negative retest crosses, we knew we would miss suppressors induced on chromosome II, since they would segregate from the Dp(ASC) used to show suppression in the retest. However, when it became apparent that we were unlikely to recover any suppressors on chromosome III, we felt it worthwhile to apply the cross 4 test to progeny from all fertile retest crosses. By removing the chromosome II blind spot in this way, we could learn whether the screen was at least able to detect duplications of the one known autosomal signal element, deadpan (dpn). Only if we recovered changes in dpn could we attach significance to a failure to recover suppressors on III. This expanded test was applied to 35% of the DEB screen and to all of round B of the gamma-ray screen (Table 1).
Cross 5 (Fig 1) generated lines from progeny of males that had passed the retest hurdle and could be maintained with minimum effort pending further characterization. In these lines, the Dp(ASC) chromosome [homozygous male sterile in our stock even in the absence of Dp(Sxl+)] was balanced against an In(2)NS chromosome carrying a recessive lethal. This arrangement forced males to keep Dp(ASC), and hence each new suppressor, each generation.
Using variously marked Dp(Sxl+) chromosomes in trans, we roughly mapped suppression of Dp(ASC),sisB+ male lethality for each line relative to pn (0.8), cm (18.9, very near Sxl at 19.1), sn (21.0), v (33.0), and f (56.7). This effort also told us (a) whether the suppressor behaved as a single gene trait, (b) whether it was X linked or autosomal, and (c) whether it might be associated with a chromosome rearrangement. With this information, we could remove Dp(Sxl+) from X chromosomes carrying suppressors in genes other than Sxl to ascertain whether those suppressors displayed the female-specific lethality seen previously for mutations in XSEs.
When suppressors mapped near cm, the marker closest to Sxl, or when recombination relative to cm was blocked, indicating a rearrangement that would preclude separating the suppressor from the tandem duplication of Sxl, we used a simple genetic test to determine if the survival of y+ males was due to mutations in one of the two tandem copies of Sxl+ on the mutagenized X chromosome. This test discriminates between one vs. two copies of Sxl+ and is based on the antimorphic allele splicing-necessary-factor1621 (snf1621), which specifically interferes with Sxl autoregulation (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
DNA and RNA analysis:
Genomic DNA was isolated using either DNAzol (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati) or the Quick fly genomic DNA prep from the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project Protocol (![]()
![]()
Molecular analysis of sc mutations:
For scsisB1, scsisB2, and scsisB3, PCR fragments were generated from genomic DNA and both strands of the coding region were sequenced. Each allele was sequenced independently twice. For scsisB2 and scsisB3, a 5.2-kb Xba-EcoRI fragment extending 0.6 kb 5' and 3.2 kb 3' to the transcription unit was sequenced in its entirety. Southern analysis (DIG System protocol, Boerhinger Mannheim, Indianapolis) was carried out for all sc alleles and covered 35 kb of genomic DNA including scute and lethal-of-scute (l'sc; from 13.4 kb upstream of sc to 6.9 kb downstream of l'sc) and 9 kb flanking ac (4.9 kb upstream and 3.3 kb downstream).
RNase protection analysis of sc mutants:
Total RNA was made from pooled collections of 1- to 3-hr embryos grown at 25°. Oligotex (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) beads were used to isolate poly(A)+ mRNA. RNase protections were carried out according to the RPA III protocol (Ambion, Austin, TX) using 1 µg of poly(A)+ RNA with an excess of labeled probes (2 fmol each of scute and tubulin) and loading the entire reaction mixture. Two different dilutions of an RNase A/T1 mix were used. The sc probe was generated from a 453-bp XhoI-NciI genomic fragment subcloned into pBluescript (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) overlapping the transcriptional start sites. The tub probe was a 400-bp fragment that extended across an intron (![]()
Cloning ASC genes from non-melanogaster species:
On the basis of the sc protein-coding sequence from D. melanogaster and D. subobscura (![]()
![]()
Isolation of D. virilis genomic DNA flanking the sc transcription unit:
An
5-kb PCR fragment of genomic DNA including information 5' to the sc transcription unit was generated using one primer internal to sc and another corresponding to an SMC enhancer reported previously (![]()
Site-directed mutagenesis and germline transformation:
Standard techniques were used for germline transformation (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To facilitate replacement of the melanogaster sc coding region with a variety of other sequences as NotI-AflII fragments, we used site-directed mutagenesis to place restriction sites at the beginning and end of the sc protein-coding region. The melanogaster and simulans sc translation start sites are unusual in beginning upstream of those in all other sequenced sc genes. Hence, to avoid disrupting potential regulatory information that might be specific for melanogaster sc, the foreign protein-coding regions to be tested were inserted at the site of a methionine 12 residues downstream of the melanogaster start site. This methionine is conserved in all sc genes sequenced and is the initiating methionine in most. Introducing a NotI site at this methionine in the cassette changed the next residue from a conserved serine (a signature residue for Sc) to alanine for the D. melanogaster and M. domestica Sc transgenes. D. melanogaster Ac was unchanged, since it already had alanine at this position. This change was introduced using two complementary 38-bp oligomers (scNcoF and scNcoR) with the following single-nucleotide change: 5'-CAACGAAAAGCACTACCATGGCATCGAGTGTGCTGTCC-3' (wild type: CTACCATGTCAT).
Following introduction of the N-terminal change, we used two complementary 40-bp oligomers (scAflF and scAflR) to introduce a single change just after the TGA stop at the C terminus that introduced an AflII site: 5'-CTCTATGGCAGGAGCAGTGACTTAAGCCCCAAAATTTACC-3' (wild type: TGACTTAATCCC). By positioning the AflII site this way, in all cases the termination triplet would belong to the inserted coding region of interest, but everything more 3' would be from the melanogaster gene. The only change caused by the AflII site was conversion of a nonconserved T to G six nucleotides distal to the stop codon.
Inserts with an NcoI site at the start codon and an AflII site just following the stop codon were constructed for melanogaster ac and Musca sc using a single forward primer for the NcoI site and a single reverse primer for the AflII site (the complement of the reverse primer is shown). For the ac gene, the protein generated was wild type, while for the sc gene, the serine following methionine was changed to alanine. For melanogaster ac: acNcoF, 5'-TCTTACCATGGCTTTGGGCAGC-3' (changed from wild type: AAAATGGCT); acAflR, 5'-GACCTGTAACTTAAGAGATCAAATC-3' (wild type: TAAAAAAACAGA). For Musca scute: MscNcoF, 5'-CAAATACGACCATGGCAAGTGTTAG-3' (wild type: CGAGAATGTCAA); MscAflR, 5'-GGCAGGAACAGTAACTTAAGAACACAAAATC-3' (wild type: TAAAAACAAAAC). PCR products were subcloned into the pCRII vector (Invitrogen), cut with NcoI and AflII, and subcloned into the wild-type cassette vector described.
For the scsisB2 deletion-mimic transgene, site-directed mutagenesis introduced an AvrII restriction site at the exact location of the 5' end of the deletion breakpoint (indicated as "/" below) The oligomer (and complement not shown) for G15Avr2REV was: 5'-GAAATCAAGGCAGCGAC/CTAGGTTCACAGGACTCGCG-3' (scsisB2 parental was: GCGAC/TCAGTTTC). The Casper clone was cut with EcoRI and gel purified, cut with AvrII, and then treated with mung bean nuclease. The fragment was gel purified, mixed with DNA ligase, transformed, and screened using PCR. Positives were sequenced for the presence of the desired junction: 5'-genomic GAAATCAAGGCAGCGAC/CTAGTATGTATGCasper polylinker-3'. For the transgenes containing both the heptamer triple knockout and the scsisB2 deletion, a small band from the mutant heptamer construct was cut and inserted into the scsisB2 deletion transformation vector.
| RESULTS |
|---|
This study of the relationship between the sex-determination and proneural functions of scute began with the recovery of two new sc alleles that were unlike any previously described with respect to the degree of specificity of their functional defect: they seemed to be defective only for sex determination. Consequently, they seemed likely to reveal aspects of sc gene structure uniquely involved in XSE function. These alleles were generated along with a number of other mutations shown in Table 1 in a powerful F1 suppressor screen for mutations in zygotically acting regulators of Sxl (see MATERIALS AND METHODS).
Recovery of mutations in XSEs:
Five new mutations from this screen identified a previously unknown regulator of Sxl, the vital gene os (alias unpaired). Their characterization and experiments establishing that os is a bona fide XSE are reported elsewhere (![]()
Five gamma-ray-induced and one DEB-induced X-linked mutation listed in Table 1 were identified as likely lesions in the X-linked ASC on the basis of map position and/or bristle phenotype. One of these, In(1)acT1, displayed a classic ac bristle phenotype; however, since this chromosome had an inversion with one breakpoint in or near the ASC and the other in the vicinity of Dp(Sxl), the possibility that its recovery was due to disruption of Sxl rather than of the ASC could not be excluded, despite passing a test for Sxl+ function described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Protein-coding regions for ac and sc in this chromosome were wild type (data not shown). Of the five other mutants, three displayed bristle phenotypes consistent with ASC lesions. Two of these had especially severe bristle phenotypes and were <25% viable, indicating a gross lesion in the ASC affecting more than one gene, and were not studied further. The third, ultimately named scT1, was molecularly characterized because it had high male viability and displayed a classic strong scute phenotype. The last two mutants in this group, scsisB2 and scsisB3, generated the most interest because they displayed no bristle defects.
Two y+ males in the gamma-ray mutagenesis, and two in the DEB screen, came through the selection because the ASC+ duplication Dp(1;2)sc19 contributed by their mothers had mutated spontaneously. Two of the four mutant duplications were likely to be gross disruptions, since they failed to complement Df(1)sc19, the corresponding deletion of most of the ASC, for viability in males. The other two mutants, scT2 and scT3, were viable in this test and were characterized molecularly.
Recovery of mutations in ASEs:
Five suppressors on chromosome II were recovered (Table 1). All were large tandem duplications. Three duplicated overlapping regions in 2R: MR1 (42C44D), MR2 (42A45E), and MR3 (41F44D). For all three lines, suppression segregated from a w+-tagged P-element insertion at 44D in trans, indicating that suppression was caused by the rearrangements. This point was established directly for MR2 when the loss of suppressing activity in one line was seen to be associated with spontaneous loss of the duplication. All three 2R rearrangements increase the dose of deadpan (at 44C), the only ASE identified in an earlier, extensive, genome-wide screen for loss-of-function mutations in ASEs (![]()
Viability effects of sc mutants reveal Sxl activation by XSEs to be intrinsically heat sensitive:
The two new mutant alleles scsisB2 and scsisB3 that appeared wild type for bristle formation (neurogenesis) behaved as recessive, female-specific lethals (crosses A and B, Table 2). In both cases, lethality was temperature dependent, as was scsisB1 (cross E), the most female-specific sc allele previously known (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
The fact that scsisB2 and scsisB3 were less lethal than scM6 suggested that the new alleles are hypomorphic rather than amorphic for XSE function. Data in Table 3 confirm this point. In this experiment, the relative strength of each mutant's sex-determination defect is assayed as a dominant, female-specific lethal synergism with a mutation in sisA, the other strong XSE. By this assay, the defect in scsisB2 is comparable to that for scsisB1, while that of scsisB3 is somewhat more severe, but not as strong as scM6. This phenotypic series for XSE activity is the same as that from the different assay in Table 2. Three new sc alleles with strong bristle defects are also included in Table 3 (crosses 6, 7, and 8) for comparison. These mutants are as defective as scM6 for sex determination.
|
Two different crosses (4 and 5) for assaying the strength of scM6 are shown to illustrate the variability (9 vs. 1%) that one typically encounters as a consequence of uncontrolled differences in genetic background and maternal age. In light of this variability, the most reliable comparisons for assessing the relative strength of two XSE mutations are made when both alleles are transmitted to the affected daughters from the same set of parents, as in crosses 9 and 10. Again, daughters with the new sisB alleles were more viable than their sisters with scM6, arguing again that the mutants have not lost all sc XSE function. And again, scsisB2 appeared less impaired than scsisB3, despite the fact that the magnitude of the lethal interaction was different in crosses 9 and 10 than in crosses 2 and 3 (69 and 36% vs. 30 and 14%, respectively).
Even by more stringent tests, scsisB2 and scsisB3 are essentially wild type for neurogenesis:
Unless an allele is devoid of function, hemizygous mutant females are expected to have half as much sc proneural activity as homozygous mutant females or hemizygous mutant males; hence, a mild defect in proneural function for scsisB2 or scsisB3 might be exposed in hemizygous females that would not be apparent in homozygous females or in males. Fig 2 compares hemizygous and homozygous mutant females with respect to bristle formation. Potential complications from viability effects were minimized by the use of SxlM4 to provide the required Sxl+ function, regardless of XSE activity. In(1)sc8Lsc4R (abbreviated
scute) eliminates 22 kb of ASC DNA that includes the sc transcription unit, while Df(1)sc19 (
ASC in Fig 2) deletes this and 68 kb more, including the two flanking transcription units ac and l'sc (![]()
|
The data for sc+ in Fig 2 show that a single copy of the ASC normally suffices for bristle formation in females: only a few bristles were occasionally abnormal in females hemizygous for the complex. In contrast, females with scsisB1 in trans to
scute were clearly abnormal, and in trans to
ASC the phenotype approached that of homozygotes for the putative null, scM6. Clearly, scsisB1 is more impaired for proneural activity than is apparent from homozygous females or hemizygous males. Bristle defects with scsisB1 in trans to
scute had been reported earlier (![]()
For scM6 as well, the bristle phenotype of
scute hemizygous females was considerably more extreme than that of homozygotes. By itself, this observation would indicate that scM6 is not null; however, the observation that the phenotype of the
ASC hemizyotes was even worse showed that the level of products from ac and/or l'sc is relevant to the sc mutant bristle phenotype when the activity of sc itself is low. Hence, the difference between scM6 homozygotes and scM6/
scute hemizygotes may reflect effects of this sc- deletion on expression of ac and/or l'sc (![]()
![]()
ASC hemizygotes.
In contrast to scsisB1 and scM6, the mutants scsisB2 and scsisB3 displayed wild-type bristle patterns even in trans to
ASC, strong evidence that these two XSE-defective alleles are wild type with respect to proneural activity. Because this conclusion is so important, its validity was tested by a second, very different assay that we believed would be even more sensitive to reductions in proneural function. This assay is based on the fact that extramacrochaetae (emc) is a negative regulator of sc (reviewed in ![]()
|
Cross 1 in Table 4 shows that the putative null allele scM6 had the expected dramatic effect on ectopic bristle formation. Not only did it eliminate most ectopic bristles in hemizygous males, but also it reduced their number to below half of the sc+ control value even when only heterozygous in females. Hence a mutation that reduced sc activity by only half in males would be expected to have an unambiguous effect in this assay. Even by this sensitive test, scsisB2 is essentially wild type. Mutant males showed a wild-type level of ectopic bristles in the notum and scutellum. Ectopic bristles in the head were somewhat reduced but still above half of the wild-type reference value. The effect of scsisB3 was a bit stronger, but even this allele must have more than half the activity of a wild-type allele, since its effects on ectopic bristle number in males were less than those of scM6 in heterozygous females in all but the dorsal head region where few ectopic bristles were observed even in the sc+ control.
Another negative regulator of the ASC that we exploited for tests of functional specificity is hairy (h). This repressor was originally thought to be specific for ac with respect to its regulation of the ASC (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Surprises in the molecular characterization of old as well as new sc alleles:
Fig 3 shows the molecular lesions associated with the five new suppressors of Dp(XSE)-induced male lethality that mapped to the ASC and were not associated with gross chromosomal rearrangements or greatly reduced male viability. The figure also shows the lesion reported for the strong mutant scM6 (which we confirmed), and the lesion we discovered for scsisB1, the most sex-specific sc mutant available prior to this study. All five of the new sc alleles selected for defective XSE function had lesions in the region defined by the smallest (5.2 kbp) transgene with full XSE activity. The three new mutants with strong sc bristle phenotypes were associated with gross changes in the local DNA. scT2 carried an insertion of a b104 transposable element in the protein-coding region. We did not determine the specific nature of the alterations at the scT1 and scT3 breakpoints, nor did we define the location of those breakpoints more precisely than shown by the regions bracketed in Fig 3.
|
The molecular lesions in the two new alleles with reduced XSE activity but normal proneural function were remarkably different from each other. scsisB2 was deleted for 2594 bp starting 2.15 kbp downstream of the end of the sc transcription unit; hence, this mutant identifies cis-acting sequences needed for, and possibly only for, XSE function. In contrast, for scsisB3, five foreign base pairs were substituted for six endogenous residues beginning at Gly172, introducing an immediate translation termination codon and a frameshift that would garble translational readthrough products. The lesion is predicted to eliminate more than half of the Sc protein, including the highly conserved C terminus.
Although the phenotype of scsisB1 is comparable to that of scsisB2 and scsisB3 with respect to XSE activity and includes only rather subtle defects in neurogenesis, we were surprised to discover that its lesion more closely resembles that of the far more defective allele, scM6: a nonsense mutation at Lys136 within the bHLH region, not far downstream from the scM6 nonsense mutation (Gln114). Lys136 is conserved among all the higher Diptera examined and helps distinguish Sc from its two closest paralogs in the ASC (see below). The higher activity of scsisB1 relative to scM6 is most likely due to the fact that the scsisB1 chromosome carries a tandem duplication that doubles the dose of the scsisB1 allele and the adjacent wild-type l'sc transcription unit (Fig 4). The breakpoints of this duplication did not fall within 5.3 kb of either side of the sc transcription unit or within 2.6 kb upstream or 1.5 kb downstream of the l'sc transcription unit (data not shown). The simplest interpretation of our Southern data would limit this duplication to the vicinity of the sc and l'sc transcription units.
|
RNAse protection analysis presented in Fig 5 supports this view of scsisB1. The level of mutant RNA extracted from 1- to 3-hr-old scsisB1 embryos is clearly higher than that of either the wild-type or the two new sex-specific mutants. In contrast, the mRNA level for scsisB2 is significantly lower than that for wild type during very early development, as expected if the DNA deleted in this allele influences the timing or rate of transcription. The mRNA level for the protein-coding-defective allele scsisB3 appeared normal.
|
Protein sequence conservation patterns for ASC genes do not account for the sex-specific phenotype of scsisB3 but do show that sc diverged from ac before becoming an XSE:
The lesion in scsisB3 suggested that the C-terminal half of Sc is far more important for sex determination than for neurogenesis and led us to ask whether the pattern of Sc protein sequence conservation in this region might suggest which, if any, residues were required only for sex determination and hence were relevant to the recruitment of sc as an XSE. Residues that are completely conserved among flies that use sc as a sex signal but differ from the corresponding residues in Sc from flies that do not would be the best XSE-specific candidates. If residues satisfying this criterion were involved in recruitment, we would expect their frequency to be higher in sc than in the paralogous ASC genes ac and l'sc for which no comparable role in sex determination is expected. Although there is relatively little direct information on which species use sc as part of their sex signal beyond D. melanogaster and D. virilis (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Using lack of conservation of residues among sc paralogs to argue for the significance of any Drosophilidae-specific pattern of conservation in sc would be reasonable only if the duplication event that gave rise to the divergence between ac and sc occurred before sc was recruited as a sex signal. Prior to our study, ac, the closest relative of sc, had not been found outside of the Drosophila genus (![]()
For the purposes of ASC protein comparisons, we sequenced ac, sc, and l'sc protein-coding regions from S. lebanonensis and M. domestica. We also sequenced sc and ac from D. virilis, but could not recover l'sc from that species. We drew on information already available for sc from D. simulans, D. yakuba, and D. subobscura (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Fig 6 presents a summary of the pattern of conservation among Sc protein sequences from the seven species within the family Drosophilidae and the three species outside it mentioned above. A similar comparison was made for Ac and L'sc with somewhat fewer species. Information is presented in the context of the D. melanogaster sequences. Surprisingly, the region of Sc past the position of the change in scsisB3, whose deletion has so little effect on neurogenesis, includes two regions of homology (boxed in Fig 6) that are apparent in all three paralogs, both of which contain "signature" residues that distinguish Sc from its paralogs in all species examined, regardless of whether they are likely to use sc as a sex signal. As many signature residues are in the region eliminated by scsisB3 as are in the highly conserved basic-Helix-Loop-Helix domain (shaded box in Fig 6), which is the functional heart of all three transcription factors. Although the region eliminated by scsisB3 includes 11 candidate sex-determination-specific residues, 6% of the total in this region, the corresponding region of L'sc, which is considerably shorter, has nearly twice the frequency of such residues11% (12/106)despite having no apparent involvement in sex determination. The corresponding amount for Ac is also 11% (12/105), but this is uncorrected for the fact that only one sequence outside the Drosophilidae was available for comparison. If only this one "outside" species had been available for Sc and L'sc, the frequencies of sex-determination residues for them would have been 14 and 21%, respectively. Thus, with respect to the number of residues with characteristics one might expect for involvement in sex determination, Ac has the same frequency as Sc, and L'sc has significantly more, which is not the expected result. The extensive comparisons presented here show that Sc, L'sc, and Ac proteins acquired unique identities long before sc was recruited as a sex signal, but the effects, if any, on protein sequence of sc's recruitment to the sex-determination hierarchy are not apparent.
Musca Sc, and to a much lesser extent, D. melanogaster Ac, can substitute for D. melanogaster Sc in sex determination:
The protein sequence comparisons described above suggest that if recruitment of sc to the sex-determination pathway involved changes in the sc gene, those changes are likely to be in cis-acting regulatory sequences rather than in protein-coding sequences. By this hypothesis, Musca Sc protein should be able to substitute for melanogaster Sc in regulating Sxl. But to infer the significance of a positive result in such an experiment, one would also need to know whether Drosophila ASC paralogs can substitute for Sc.
We answered these questions using a melanogaster transgene cassette in which essentially all the melanogaster protein-coding region on a 9.1-kb Pst-Sal genomic fragment containing sc could be replaced easily by any coding region of choice as a NotI-AflII fragment. This allowed us to express any protein under the control of wild-type melanogaster sc regulatory sequences that we knew were sufficient to provide full XSE activity (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). The transgenes' XSE activity was assayed by their ability to suppress the female-specific lethality of scM6, the putative null allele. Because the specific level of scM6 female viability measured in any cross where rescue is incomplete is extremely sensitive to genetic background, we normalized the genetic backgrounds prior to all assays by backcrossing transgenic animals to animals from a reference balanced scM6 stock for many generations. Only in this way could meaningful comparisons be made.
We first had to determine whether the altered Sc signature residue in the sisB protein-coding exchange cassette (see MATERIALS AND METHODS) had any adverse effect on sisB+ activity. The top two rows of Fig 7 show that the behavior of the cassette transgene was indistinguishable from that of the parental transgene: each raised the viability of females relative to their sc+ sisters to an average of 100% while, in the absence of either transgene, female viability averaged well below 1%.
|
Despite differing from its D. melanogaster ortholog at 52% of the Drosophila residues, Sc protein from the housefly was nearly as effective as the endogenous melanogaster protein at rescuing females: relative viability of transgenic scM6 females averaged 90% (Fig 7, third row), and all nine lines rescued more than half the mutant females. In contrast, Ac protein from melanogaster was far less effective: relative viability averaged only 9%, and two of the eight lines exhibited no rescue. On the other hand, the fact that females were rescued to some extent by six of the eight Ac-expressing lines, with one line even achieving 46% rescue, shows that other proteins of the ASC can substitute for Sc to some degree when expressed at levels and at times that are normal for sc. Taken together, the results from Fig 7 show that the protein sequence changes that distinguish Sc from Ac are far more relevant to Sxl regulation than those that distinguish Musca Sc from melanogaster Sc. This observation is strong evidence that the acquisition by sc of a role in sex determination did not involve significant changes in Sc protein sequence.
scsisB2 identifies a regulatory region downstream of the sc transcription unit that is involved in sex determination:
Having found no evidence that changes in Sc protein were relevant to this gene's acquisition of a sex-determination role, we turned our attention to cis-acting regulatory sequences. The deletion associated with scsisB2 indicated that such sequences might lie beyond the 3' end of the transcription unit. As shown in Fig 3, this deletion eliminates a region of sc within the smallest transgene known (![]()
|
The heptamer CAGGTAG is involved in sex determination:
The discovery that all D. melanogaster XSEs, except the somewhat atypical element runt, have the sequence CAGGTAG or its complement repeated three times within 500 bp upstream of their transcription start sites suggested that this sequence might be important for driving the extremely early expression specifically required for XSE function (![]()
![]()
![]()
3 kb) upstream of the transcription start site (J. TENBOSCH, unpublished results). To test the functional significance of the CAGGTAG cluster upstream of sc, we mutated all three copies in a sisB transgene and assayed for rescue of scM6 females. Fig 8 shows that elimination of this cluster did not abolish rescue, but it did have an effect comparable to that of the scsisB2 deletion.
Although neither the scsisB2 deletion nor the triple-heptamer knockout eliminated sc sex-determination activity by themselves, data in Fig 8 show that the combination of the two alterations on opposite sides of the transcription unit did: not a single line among 17 independent transgene inserts carrying both mutations could rescue scM6 females. On the other hand, when we remobilized one of these nonrescuing mutant transgenes and selected for rescue of scM6 females, at a low frequency we could recover reinsertions that had regained full rescuing activity, presumably by coming under the influence of those rare enhancers able to drive very early gene expression (data not shown). This resurrection of XSE activity established that lack of rescue in the 17 lines of Fig 8 was not an artifact of transgene misconstruction and shows that this mutant transgene can be used as an enhancer trap to identify cis-acting regulatory information capable of driving or boosting preblastoderm gene expressionenhancers perhaps belonging to genes whose extremely early zygotic expression has been masked by maternal transcripts.
A test for lethal dominant interactions does not support the proposal of a third general role for sc in early development:
RNA in situ hybridization studies suggested that sc may work with twist and snail to generate mesoderm and neurectoderm in the very young embryo (![]()
![]()
This idea that sc might be involved in mesoderm formation arose from the observation of a triple dominant interaction between loss-of-function mutations in the genes sc, twist (twi), and maternal dorsal (dl), which together, and only together, appeared to block ventral furrow formation and prevent the establishment of mesoderm. Conclusions were clouded somewhat by the fact that the null allele of sc used was on a chromosome that was also somewhat impaired for ac; however, the fact that the effect of this chromosome was indistinguishable from that of a chromosome deleted for all members of the ASC pointed to a strong involvement of sc. Although the 1993 study was based on the earlier observation by