- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Cinar, H. N.
- Articles by Newman, A. P.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Cinar, H. N.
- Articles by Newman, A. P.
The EGL-13 SOX Domain Transcription Factor Affects the Uterine
Cell Lineages in Caenorhabditis elegans
Hediye Nese Cinar1,a,
Keri L. Richardsa,
Kavita S. Oommenb, and
Anna P. Newmana,b
a Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030
b Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030
Corresponding author: Anna P. Newman, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, MS 319B, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030., anewman{at}bcm.tmc.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: B. J. MEYER
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
We isolated egl-13 mutants in which the
cells of the Caenorhabditis elegans uterus initially appeared to develop normally but then underwent an extra round of cell division. The data suggest that egl-13 is required for maintenance of the
cell fate.
DURING metazoan development, cells respond to inductive signals by acquiring particular fates and differentiating. One broadly used signaling pathway, defined by the LIN-12/Notch receptors (![]()
![]()
![]()
The C. elegans uterine-vulval connection is organized by the uterine anchor cell (AC; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
(rather than
) cell fate (Fig 1; ![]()
cells generate the uterine cell types [utse (uterine-seam cell) and uv1 cell] that connect to the vulva (![]()
|
The AC also induces underlying vulval precursor cells (VPCs) to adopt vulval (1° and 2°) cell fates (![]()
![]()
![]()
daughters and the AC.
The LIN-11 LIM domain and COG-2 SOX domain transcription factors are expressed in
cells and their daughters (![]()
![]()
![]()
cell lineages are similar to wild type in lin-11 mutants. By contrast, the differentiation of the utse is abnormal in lin-11 mutants, the AC fails to fuse with the utse, and a functional uterine-vulval connection is not made (![]()
cells were found to divide along the correct axis in cog-2 mutants, and it was hypothesized that the cog-2 gene might function specifically in fusion of the AC with the utse (![]()
To identify mutants with defects in C. elegans uterine
development, we performed an EMS mutagenesis of the N2 strain (![]()
cells differ from those of the alternative fate
cells in that (1)
cells divide along a dorsoventral (rather than longitudinal or transverse) axis; (2)
cells produce two daughters rather than four; and (3)
cell daughters connect to the vulva (![]()
![]()
cell development on the basis of one or more of the above characteristics. From 20,000 haploid genomes screened, we obtained one allele each of the presenilin gene sel-12 and the heterochronic gene lin-29 (![]()
![]()
![]()
| The n483, ty3, ty7, and ty8 alleles alter conserved residues of the EGL-13 SOX domain transcription factor |
|---|
Another genetic screen had identified the cog-2 gene, which encodes a SOX domain transcription factor (![]()
SOX domain transcription factors, which function broadly in development, have a conserved 79-amino-acid DNA-binding domain known as the SOX box (![]()
![]()
![]()
|
It was previously argued that ku194, which truncates the protein prior to the SOX box, was likely to be a molecular null (![]()
The uterine cell lineages are abnormal in egl-13 mutants |
|---|
As discussed above,
cells differ from
cells in dividing along a dorsoventral axis, undergoing one less round of cell division, and expressing egl-13 and lin-11. An earlier study found that, in egl-13 mutants, presumptive
cells were essentially normal in division axis and expression of egl-13 and lin-11 (![]()
cell division in the n483, ty3, or ty8 mutants (data not shown). By contrast, there was a striking change in number of divisions. Specifically, we found that many presumptive
daughters divided in each of these three alleles (Table 1). In the previous analysis of ku194, the presumptive
cells had not been observed for an additional round of cell division to determine whether their daughters divided. When we observed the uterine cell lineages of ku194 and ku241 mutant animals, we found that most
cell daughters divided (Table 1). Thus, in all five egl-13 alleles whose cell lineages were observed, presumptive
cells initially divided along a dorsoventral axis as in the wild type, but then often underwent an additional round of cell division. We conclude that, in egl-13 mutants, the
cell lineage is initiated but not completed correctly.
|
| Expression of an egl-13::GFP reporter construct is abnormal in egl-13 mutants |
|---|
As discussed above, an egl-13::GFP transcriptional fusion is expressed in the uterine
cells and their daughters. We created additional strains with the egl-13::GFP construct (pWH17) integrated into the C. elegans genome and utilized tyIs4 (see Table 2 footnote d) as well as the previously characterized kuIs29 to conduct genetic analyses of mutants involved in
cell development. It was previously observed that the kuIs29 expression pattern was the same in egl-13 (ku194) and egl-13 (+) backgrounds during the early L4 stage (![]()
cell fates are being specified among the VU intermediate precursor population to just prior to the final round of uterine division (when
cell daughters normally divide and maintenance-defective
cell daughters would abnormally divide). However, it was also noted that egl-13 mutant animals sometimes contained extra cells with weak fluorescence during the late L4 stage (![]()
cell green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression during the early-mid- and mid-L4 stages in wild-type and egl-13 mutant animals.
|
When we observed kuIs29 and tyIs4 control lines during the early-mid-L4 stage, we saw an average of six to seven fluorescent uterine nuclei per side (Table 2; Fig 3). This is about the range expected for the daughters of three
cells on each side plus or minus the AC nucleus (which may become fluorescent at this early stage and has an equal chance of moving to the left or right in the process of fusing with the utse). An average close to 6.5 GFP+ cells per side persisted through the mid-L4 (Table 2) and late L4 stages, with the uv1 nuclei often showing brighter fluorescence than the utse nuclei as previously reported (![]()
cell daughter that divided. However, the presence of additional GFP-positive nuclei is consistent with the cell lineage data presented above, which demonstrates that presumptive
cells often undergo an extra round of cell division in egl-13 mutants.
|
It was previously observed that in egl-13 (+) animals containing the kuIs29 array, the AC becomes GFP+ upon fusion with the utse (![]()
cell defect revealed by the altered cell lineage.
Presumptive cells undergo an extra round of division in egl-13; lin-12(d) double mutants |
|---|
In lin-12 gain-of-function mutants [lin-12(d)], excess
cell fates are specified, and most VU intermediate precursor cells divide only once (![]()
cell daughters observed, 38 divided (Table 1). Thus the cell lineages of the double mutant are similar to those of egl-13 alone. This is consistent with the egl-13 gene's functioning downstream of lin-12, which is also suggested by the fact that lin-12 mutants have an earlier
cell developmental defect than do egl-13 mutants.
Genetic control of uterine cell development |
|---|
We have previously shown that lin-12 is required for specification of the uterine
cell fate, while the lin-11 LIM domain transcription factor is required for differentiation of
cell daughters (![]()
![]()
cell lineages are essentially wild type, although the
daughters occasionally divide. By contrast, differentiation of the utse is defective; this includes a failure to fuse with the AC. lin-11 appears to be a direct target of LIN-12 signaling in the
cells (![]()
We have shown here that egl-13 mutants disrupt
cell development at an earlier stage than do lin-11 mutants. Thus, while lin-11 mutants have only a slight effect on the
cell lineages, egl-13 mutants have a striking cell lineage defect in which most of the presumptive
cell daughters divide. In addition, the utse does not fuse with the AC in egl-13 mutants. Thus, egl-13 appears required for the maintenance of the
cell fate and subsequent differentiation of its daughters. egl-13 and lin-11 appear not to be required for each other's expression (![]()
![]()
cells in the C. elegans uterus.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Present address: Sinsheimer Laboratories, Department of MCD Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, Wendy Hanna-Rose, Bob Horvitz, and Paul Sternberg for strains. Thanks go to Zheng Zhou and Xiaomeng Yu for their comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the William Stamps Farish Fund and the National Institutes of Health (NIH; GM-57462) to A.P.N. This publication was also made possible by grant no. T32 ES07332 from the NIH National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences to K.S.O.
Manuscript received December 30, 2002; Accepted for publication August 4, 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
BOWLES, J., G. SCHEPERS, and P. KOOPMAN, 2000 Phylogeny of the SOX family of developmental transcription factors based on sequence and structural indicators. Dev. Biol. 227:239-255.[Medline]
BRENNER, S., 1974 The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans.. Genetics 77:71-94.
CINAR, H. N., K. L. SWEET, K. E. HOSEMANN, K. EARLEY, and A. P. NEWMAN, 2001 The SEL-12 presenilin mediates induction of the Caenorhabditis elegans uterine
cell fate. Dev. Biol. 237:173-182.[Medline]
FREYD, G., S. K. KIM, and H. R. HORVITZ, 1990 Novel cysteine-rich motif and homeodomain in the product of the Caenorhabditis elegans cell lineage gene lin-11.. Nature 344:876-879.[Medline]
GREENWALD, I., 1998 LIN-12/Notch signaling: lessons from worms and flies. Genes Dev. 12:1751-1762.
GREENWALD, I. S., P. W. STERNBERG, and H. R. HORVITZ, 1983 The lin-12 locus specifies cell fates in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Cell 34:435-444.[Medline]
GUPTA, B. P. and P. W. STERNBERG, 2002 Tissue-specific regulation of the LIM homeobox gene lin-11 during development of the Caenorhabditis elegans egg-laying system. Dev. Biol. 247:102-115.[Medline]
HANNA-ROSE, W. and M. HAN, 1999 COG-2, a Sox domain protein necessary for establishing a functional vulval-uterine connection in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Development 126:169-179.[Abstract]
KADESCH, T., 2000 Notch signaling: a dance of proteins changing partners. Exp. Cell Res. 260:1-8.[Medline]
KIMBLE, J., 1981 Lineage alterations after ablation of cells in the somatic gonad of Caenorhabditis elegans.. Dev. Biol. 87:286-300.[Medline]
KIMBLE, J. and D. HIRSH, 1979 Post-embryonic cell lineages of the hermaphrodite and male gonads in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Dev. Biol. 70:396-417.[Medline]
KIMBLE, J. and P. SIMPSON, 1997 The LIN-12/Notch signaling pathway and its regulation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:333-361.[Medline]
NEWMAN, A. P. and P. W. STERNBERG, 1996 Coordinated morphogenesis of epithelia during development of the Caenorhabditis elegans uterine-vulval connection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:9329-9333.
NEWMAN, A. P., J. G. WHITE, and P. W. STERNBERG, 1995 The C. elegans lin-12 gene mediates induction of ventral uterine specialization by the anchor cell. Development 121:263-271.[Abstract]
NEWMAN, A. P., J. G. WHITE, and P. W. STERNBERG, 1996 Morphogenesis of the C. elegans hermaphrodite uterus. Development 122:3617-3626.[Abstract]
NEWMAN, A. P., G. Z. ACTON, E. HARTWIEG, H. R. HORVITZ, and P. W. STERNBERG, 1999 The lin-11 LIM domain transcription factor is necessary for morphogenesis of C. elegans uterine cells. Development 126:5319-5326.[Abstract]
NEWMAN, A. P., T. INOUE, M. WANG, and P. W. STERNBERG, 2000 The Caenorhabditis elegans heterochronic gene lin-29 coordinates the vulval-uterine-epidermal connections. Curr. Biol. 10:1479-1488.[Medline]
PEVNY, L. A. and R. LOVELL-BADGE, 1997 Sox genes find their feet. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:338-344.[Medline]
SEYDOUX, G. and I. GREENWALD, 1989 Cell autonomy of lin-12 function in a cell fate decision in C. elegans.. Cell 57:1237-1245.[Medline]
SHARMA-KISHORE, R., J. G. WHITE, E. SOUTHGATE, and B. PODBILEWICZ, 1999 Formation of the vulva in Caenorhabditis elegans: a paradigm for organogenesis. Development 126:691-699.[Abstract]
STERNBERG, P. W. and H. R. HORVITZ, 1986 Pattern formation during vulval development in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Cell 44:761-772.[Medline]
TRENT, C., N. TSUNG, and H. R. HORVITZ, 1983 Egg-laying defective mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.. Genetics 104:619-647.
WERNER, M. H., J. R. HUTH, A. M. GRONENBORN, and G. M. CLORE, 1995 Molecular basis of human 46X, Y sex reversal revealed from the three-dimensional solution structure of the human SRY-DNA complex. Cell 81:705-714.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. S. Oommen and A. P. Newman Co-regulation by Notch and Fos is required for cell fate specification of intermediate precursors during C. elegans uterine development Development, November 15, 2007; 134(22): 3999 - 4009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kagoshima, R. Nimmo, N. Saad, J. Tanaka, Y. Miwa, S. Mitani, Y. Kohara, and A. Woollard The C. elegans CBF{beta} homologue BRO-1 interacts with the Runx factor, RNT-1, to promote stem cell proliferation and self-renewal Development, November 1, 2007; 134(21): 3905 - 3915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sun, B. L. Nelms, S. F. Sleiman, H. M. Chamberlin, and W. Hanna-Rose Modulation of Caenorhabditis elegans Transcription Factor Activity by HIM-8 and the Related Zinc-Finger ZIM Proteins Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 1221 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. J.P. Robert, T. Sijen, J. van Wolfswinkel, and R. H.A. Plasterk Chromatin and RNAi factors protect the C. elegans germline against repetitive sequences Genes & Dev., April 1, 2005; 19(7): 782 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Cinar, H. N.
- Articles by Newman, A. P.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Cinar, H. N.
- Articles by Newman, A. P.





