- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Symonds, V. V.
- Articles by Lloyd, A. M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Symonds, V. V.
- Articles by Lloyd, A. M.
An Analysis of Microsatellite Loci in Arabidopsis thaliana: Mutational Dynamics and Application
V. Vaughan Symondsa and Alan M. Lloydaa Section of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology and Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
Corresponding author: Alan M. Lloyd, Cell, and Developmental Biology, MBB 1.448b, 2500 Speedway, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712., lloyd{at}uts.cc.utexas.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: V. SUNDARESAN
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Microsatellite loci are among the most commonly used molecular markers. These loci typically exhibit variation for allele frequency distribution within a species. However, the factors contributing to this variation are not well understood. To expand on the current knowledge of microsatellite evolution, 20 microsatellite loci were examined for 126 accessions of the flowering plant, Arabidopsis thaliana. Substantial variability in mutation pattern among loci was found, most of which cannot be explained by the assumptions of the traditional stepwise mutation model or infinite alleles model. Here it is shown that the degree of locus diversity is strongly correlated with the number of contiguous repeats, more so than with the total number of repeats. These findings support a strong role for repeat disruptions in stabilizing microsatellite loci by reducing the substrate for polymerase slippage and recombination. Results of cluster analyses are also presented, demonstrating the potential of microsatellite loci for resolving relationships among accessions of A. thaliana.
MICROSATELLITE loci are tandemly repeated DNA motifs of 16 bp in length; they are also referred to as simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLPs), simple sequence repeats, simple tandem repeats, and variable number tandem repeats (VNTRs). These loci occur at high frequency in all eukaryotes examined (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Microsatellite loci increase and decrease in length due to polymerase slippage during DNA replication (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Arabidopsis thaliana has long been a model genetic and molecular system for plant biology. Recently, natural variation within this species has come into focus (![]()
Previous studies on A. thaliana microsatellite loci have shown that they are abundant (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Plant materials:
Genetic variation among 120 "wild" accessions and several commonly used reference accessions (including Col-0, Ler, and WS) of A. thaliana was surveyed (Table 1). Line selection was based on global population coverage and, for a subset of lines, local proximity. That is, a few nested accessions including separate collections made from near the same location were selected. Although microsatellite size data exist for the three reference accessions, different size scoring methods tend to yield varying results (our personal observation). Therefore, the reference accessions were included in our analyses to derive data directly comparable with all other accessions included. Two stocks, Cal-0 and Tac-0, were generously provided by Johanna Schmitt and Lisa Dorn. Three of the reference accessions used were lab stocks. All remaining seed stocks were acquired from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center. Although all accessions of A. thaliana are reportedly nearly completely homozygous (![]()
|
Microsatellite survey:
Total DNAs were extracted from several rosette leaves of a single individual for each accession following a modified CTAB method (modified from ![]()
All lines were screened at 20 microsatellite marker loci. These loci were selected to provide approximately equal coverage across the genome at a density equivalent to that required for rough-scale mapping (approximately every 30 cM), taking into consideration both the distance between pairs of markers and the distance between centromere and chromosome end positions (Table 2). Primer sequences for all loci, which were originally described by ![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Amplification reactions were carried out in 10-µl volumes containing 1x PCR buffer (Invitrogen), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 µM each dNTP, and either 600 nM each primer (for reactions with labeled forward primer) or 150 nM labeled M13 and reverse primers and 10 nM unlabeled forward primer (for M13 tailed primer scheme). Approximately 50 ng of each DNA extraction was used as template for individual locus amplification in a standard 96-well plate format. Standard amplification conditions consisted of 95° for 3 min, 30 cycles of denaturing at 94° for 1 min, annealing at 55° for 1 min, and polymerization at 72° for 1 min, followed by a final extension for 6 min at 72°. As the annealing temperature for the M13 primers is lower than that of the average SSLP primer, amplification conditions for the M13 scheme were modified by lowering the annealing temperature to 52°. Although two amplification schemes were used, the amplification conditions for each locus were consistent among all accession templates amplified and no significant difference in amplification rate was observed between the two protocols.
Microsatellite length polymorphisms were detected and scored by capillary electrophoresis on a Beckman-Coulter CEQ 2000XL DNA analyzer. Although all amplification reactions were carried out individually, the use of three different dyes allowed for the pool-plexing of samples during separation and allele sizing. Typically, the PCR products of three separate reactions for one individual, each labeled with a different dye (D2, D3, and D4) were pooled. The pooled products were then purified in vacuum filter plates (Millipore MANU030) at 20 in. Hg for 4 min (manufacturer's specifications) and subsequently eluted in 30 µl H2O. A total of 1.25 µl of each cleaned, pooled sample was then added to 0.5 µl of 400-bp size standard (labeled with D1 dye) and 38 µl of sample loading solution (Beckman-Coulter) in a well of a 96-well sample plate and overlaid with mineral oil. Each pool-plexed sample was separated on the CEQ using the standard Frag-1 method. This pool-plexing system resulted in the separation of products at three different loci simultaneously through a single capillary along with an internal size standard. Fragments were sized using the default fragment analysis protocol for the appropriate set of dyes used (AE2 or PA1 options).
Microsatellite data analyses:
The CEQ raw data from each run were analyzed using the appropriate dye mobility calibration settings for each dye and the default fragment analysis settings for the 400-bp size standard. Alleles reported here reflect the amplification product size, as scored on a CEQ 2000XL DNA analyzer. Simply inferring the number of repeats from size data ignores potentially informative data from indels. Often alleles are sized on the basis of assumptions regarding the locus; for example, alleles at a dinucleotide repeat locus are often assumed to fall only into size classes 2 bp apart. However, our sequence data show real indels and real 1-bp differences among alleles at dinucleotide repeat loci in our data set. Therefore, we report all observed size classes, regardless of the repeat type.
Microsatellite cloning and sequencing:
To investigate the nature of length variations within loci, several alleles were cloned and sequenced for six loci. Three loci were randomly selected from among the low-diversity loci (nga1107, nga1145, and nga129) and three from among the high-diversity loci (CIW7, nga172, and nga8). Individual alleles were amplified with unlabeled (no dye) forward and reverse primers as described in the preceding section from individual accessions. One microliter of PCR product was then added to a cloning reaction using the TOPO-TA cloning kit (Invitrogen). Colonies with inserts were initially identified by blue/white screening, followed by PCR amplification from individual colonies and size confirmation on agarose gels. Multiple clones for each reaction were identified and plasmid DNA minipreparations were prepared from selective overnight liquid cultures. DNA minipreparations were carried out following a modified SDS protocol where DNA precipitation is preceded by separate phenol and chloroform extractions. Approximately 500 ng of vector with insert were used as template in sequencing reactions using either the T7 or the M13 reverse primer. Sequencing reactions were purified using Sephadex G-50 columns and the sequences were analyzed on an MJ Research (Watertown, MA) BaseStation DNA analyzer. Postrun data were processed using the Cartographer v. 1.2.4sg software (MJ Research). Sequence alignments for alleles of each locus were carried out using Megalign (DNASTAR, Madison, WI).
Associations between locus length and locus diversity:
Associations between the genetic diversity of a locus and some measure of locus length, typically mean length, are commonly reported for microsatellite loci (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Genetic analyses:
Gene diversity estimates for each locus were calculated by n(1 -
p2i)/(n - 1), where n is the number of samples and pi is the frequency of the ith allele, following the methods of ![]()
![]()
The fit of each locus' distribution to expected distributions under three different mutation models, the SMM, the IAM, and an intermediate two-phase model (TPM), was tested using the program BOTTLENECK (![]()
To describe the distribution of alleles for each locus, measures of skewness (g1) and kurtosis (g2) were calculated following ![]()
![]()
![]()
For similarity analyses, allele size class data were transformed into alphanumeric codes. From this transformed data set, pairwise distances were obtained on the basis of the proportion of shared alleles, as implemented in PAUP*4.0b10 (![]()
Because low- and high-diversity loci may be influenced by differing mutation dynamics, we conducted a partition homogeneity test implemented in PAUP (![]()
![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Amplification fidelity:
Amplification success varied both across the 20 loci and among the 126 accessions of A. thaliana. Amplification frequencies for each of the 20 loci investigated are listed in Table 2. Amplification success ranged from 77 to 98% across loci and from 70 to 100% among accessions (excluding four accessions; data not shown), with a total of 90% amplification success. No significant correlation was found between amplification success and any measure of locus diversity (analyses not shown). Of the 2526 marker-by-individual data points, only 4 (0.2%) were found to be heterozygous. This frequency is similar to that reported for 12 accessions of A. thaliana by ![]()
![]()
Allelic diversity within and among loci:
There is a high degree of variation for allelic diversity among microsatellite loci (Fig 1). The most striking differences are in the variation at a locus (number of alleles scored) and how that variation is distributed among alleles at a locus (gene diversity). These two measures are reported for all loci in Table 2. The average number of alleles detected per locus is 17.6 (range, 438). The average gene diversity estimate from our data is 0.76 (range, 0.410.96; Fig 2) and does not differ appreciably from that of 0.79, reported by ![]()
|
|
High-diversity loci tend to be either somewhat normally distributed or strongly positively skewed (
skewness = 1.11). These loci also tend to have leptokurtotic distributions (
kurtosis = 1.71). Low-diversity loci show distribution patterns similar to those of the high-diversity loci, typically positively skewed (
skewness = 1.79) and leptokurtotic (
kurtosis = 3.98), but to a significantly greater degree (P < 0.05 for both tests). The tendency of microsatellite loci to mutate more frequently to larger allele sizes than to smaller sizes (becoming positively skewed) is well documented (![]()
![]()
Sequence results:
As initially scored, PCR products for many loci displayed single-base-pair differences among alleles; however, our sequence data showed that
95% of single-base-pair differences initially detected were artifactual. Reexamination of the original electropherograms determined that these discrepancies were attributable to the inconsistent nontemplate-dependent terminal transferase activity of Taq polymerase that adds a single deoxyadenosine (A) to the 3' ends of PCR products. Although at a low frequency, instances of true single-base-pair differences were also revealed (e.g., see alleles of locus nga129 in Fig 3). All sequenced size outliers proved to be the expected locus.
|
Molecular variation at high-diversity loci:
Individual alleles of three loci demonstrating high gene diversity were cloned and sequenced. An allelic alignment for a representative locus is shown in Fig 3 (Nga8). All 34 alleles sequenced from these loci were found to be either "perfect," that is, without interruptions of any kind within the repeated region (Nga172 and CIW7), or possessing nearly fixed interruptions in the extreme end of the repeat region (Nga8). With this one exception, the only source of size variation identified at these high-diversity loci was changes in repeat number. Although point mutations were identified in flanking regions, no insertions and deletions were revealed.
Molecular variation at low-diversity loci:
The three low-diversity loci for which alleles were sequenced each revealed alleles with interruptions within the repeated region (Fig 3). In each case, the interruptions consisted of 2-bp insertions, back-to-back nucleotide substitutions, or some combination thereof; the origins of interruptions within tandemly repeated regions typically cannot be distinguished from among these possibilities.
Of the 17 alleles of the nga129 locus that were sequenced, only one size class (the most common) revealed an interruption. The 190-bp allele possesses a CT doublet within the repeat region, along with a 2-bp mutation, that immediately flanks the 3' end of the microsatellite locus. These two mutations were always found to be linked. That is, no alleles were sequenced that possess one mutation and not the other. This pair of mutations was found only in the 190-bp allele, and all 8 alleles of this size that were sequenced are identical. The remaining variation detected among alleles at this locus appears to be the result of varying repeat number only.
Upon sequencing 25 alleles from the nga1145 locus, an AA interruption three repeat units from the 3' end of the locus was discovered. Unlike the nga129 locus, this interruption is evident in many alleles (size classes), rather than in only the most common allele. Other sources of variation at this locus include a unique GG mutation, immediately flanking the AA interruption, and a single finding of an apparent duplication event composed of the entire microsatellite locus (accession no. 6672). For this locus also, all remaining allelic diversity appears to be due to repeat-number variation.
As with most loci, the primary source of size variation is change in repeat number for the nga1107 locus also; however, this locus is the most complex with regard to interruptions. It consists of four GA repeat regions, separated by 11-, 14-, and 2-bp interruptions, from the 5' to 3' ends, respectively. The second of these three interruptions appears to be a complex of successive VNTR loci (GCGC/TT/AAA/CCC/TA). Excepting its absence from one line, however, no sequence variation was uncovered within this complex among the seven accessions sequenced. Interestingly, the accession missing this insertion is the common reference strain, Col-0. Col-0 also lacks the second insertion and, despite these deletions (or lack of insertions), possesses the longest allele sampled at this locus due to many more repeats.
Relationship between contiguous repeat length and gene diversity for all loci:
Correlation analyses show a general positive relationship between number of repeats possessed by the mean allele of a locus and locus diversity; however, this relationship varies depending on how the data are partitioned (Table 3). For the comparisons made, Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients are in general agreement; therefore, unless stated otherwise, discussion applies to results of both tests. For the 15 loci with GA repeats, the total number of repeats possessed by the mean allele does positively correlate with locus diversity. However, the number of uninterrupted repeats demonstrates a stronger and (for Pearson's) more significant correlation with locus diversity. Analyses including only high- or low-diversity loci show the same trend, with one clear exception; for low-diversity loci, the total number of repeats in the mean allele shows no significant correlation with locus diversity. The four TA repeat loci show the same general positive correlation between locus diversity and repeat number, again, with the number of contiguous repeats being more tightly correlated with diversity than the total number of repeats. The smaller sample size for TA repeat loci precluded more detailed analyses.
|
Testing the SMM, TPM, and IAM:
Results of mutation model tests are shown in Table 2. Of the 20 loci examined, 5 potentially fit all three models of evolution tested and 6 display distributions that do not differ significantly from the expected distribution under any of the three models tested (SMM, TPM, and IAM). Only 3 loci rejected two of the three models, suggesting the third as a reasonable fit. On average, low-diversity loci show a much higher model rejection rate than do high-diversity loci (Table 4), although the relative rejection rate among tests is consistent between the two sets of loci. Consistent with other reports (see review by ![]()
|
Performance of microsatellite data in cluster analyses:
To evaluate the performance of A. thaliana microsatellite loci for estimating intraspecific relationships, a majority-rule consensus tree based on 1000 UPGMA cluster analyses was generated (Fig 4). Because of the inclusion of particular pairs and sets of accessions, many relationships could be predicted. For example, groups of accessions collected from the same locale were included (e.g., Nok-0. Nok-1, Nok-2, etc.) and were expected to cluster together. The cluster analysis presented here reveals many groupings that are consistent with predicted associations. A selection of expected clusters are highlighted in Fig 4 and are discussed below. Interestingly, partition homogeneity tests revealed no significant incongruence between low- and high-diversity loci (P = 0.90).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Over the past decade, the frequency of microsatellite locus use has increased considerably (see reviews by ![]()
![]()
Amplification fidelity:
Each primer pair successfully primed amplification in an average of 90% of all accessions examined. This amplification rate is similar to that reported in other studies of A. thaliana microsatellites (![]()
![]()
Forces affecting mutation patterns:
As has been reported in other systems (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Beyond these models, it has been suggested that microsatellite locus equilibrium is a balance between polymerase slippage rate and mutation rate (![]()
![]()
To investigate this further, we examined the relationship between mean allele length and locus diversity for different data partitions (Table 3). If repeat disruptions stabilize loci simply by breaking them into smaller segments, then the degree of stability conferred should be dependent upon the lengths of the resulting repeat segments. This was tested by comparing the strengths of association between locus diversity and (1) the total number of repeats possessed by the mean allele at a locus and (2) the largest number of contiguous repeats possessed by the mean allele. The results show that gene diversity is more strongly correlated with the number of contiguous repeats than with the total number of repeats (Table 3); the number of contiguous repeats accounts for 12% (all GA repeats), 66% (low-diversity GA repeats), and 40% (TA repeats) more of the observed variation in genetic diversity, as determined by comparing coefficients of determination (r2). The nature of this difference becomes evident when high- and low-diversity loci are examined separately; this was possible only for the GA repeat loci, where sample size was sufficient. The correlation with diversity turns out to be identical for total repeat number and contiguous repeat number for high-diversity loci. This is a result of high-diversity loci tending not to be interrupted, which means that the total number of repeats is equal to the contiguous number of repeats. Conversely, low-diversity loci demonstrate no (Spearman's) and very weak (Pearson's) relationships between total number of repeats and diversity (Table 3), whereas including only the number of contiguous repeats yielded some of the strongest associations with diversity observed among all complete and partitioned data sets. This provides strong evidence supporting a role for repeat disruptions in locus stability, one that is highly dependent upon placement of the interruption and the lengths of the remaining contiguous repeats. Because several of the low-diversity loci are without interruptions, this tight relationship also indicates that interrupted loci with few contiguous repeats behave in a manner similar to that of uninterrupted loci with few total repeats. As marker selection is often governed by criteria such as gene diversity, contiguous repeat number for mean allele size may provide a valuable predictor of marker utility. How broadly this relationship holds will require similar analyses in other organisms.
Size homoplasy:
At any taxonomic level, the issue of size homoplasy in microsatellite data sets is an important and complicated one (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Cluster analyses:
Previous efforts toward genealogy reconstruction within A. thaliana have resulted in somewhat well-resolved phylogenies including few accessions (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A. thaliana accessions are derived from natural populations that likely have histories involving interpopulation gene flow and recombination. Because of this, their reticulate evolutionary history cannot be fully represented by analyses that yield bifurcating trees. However, to provide some reference of similarity among many A. thaliana accessions, a cluster analysis is presented here and selections of the results are discussed below. The tree presented (Fig 4) is not proposed as a phylogeny, but instead as a tentative framework and test of genealogical signal. This tree is a majority rule consensus of 1000 independent UPGMA runs and shows only relationships with strong support (i.e., only relationships that occur in 70% or more of all independent runs are represented), while relationships with weak support are collapsed back to a central node. The finding of strongly supported clusters and unresolved relationships between clusters likely reflects the presumed reticulate history of populations within the species and recent independent evolution of separate lineages. Below we briefly discuss a few of the more interesting results.
The relationship between the two most-utilized reference strains, Col-0 and Ler, remains unresolved. These two accessions are purportedly derived from the same seed stock, although details of that original stock remain elusive (Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center; http://nasc.nott.ac.uk). The accumulation of mutations due to either irradiation (in the Ler line) or generations in cultivation likely cannot explain this finding as Ler does show strong similarity to La-0 (6765), which was also derived from the above-mentioned stock. The Col-0 genotype does not match identically with any other accessions examined in our lab. In addition, our Col-0 DNA sequences match those in the database so that seed or DNA contamination in our lab also would not appear to explain this finding. Given the low levels of both phenotypic (personal observation) and genetic similarity between Col-0 and Ler, it would appear that the original stock was more heterogeneous than originally suspected; this is also in accord with reports of strong sequence divergence between the two accessions (e.g., ![]()
![]()
Notwithstanding the exception just discussed, accessions originating from a common seed stock or collection site typically cluster together (e.g., the Nok cluster). However, instances where all accessions from a locality do not cluster together (e.g., the two NW clusters) are also evident. In all, 70% of expected groupings were resolved. Again, these findings may be due to local populations that are quite heterogeneous.
Past reports on A. thaliana genealogies have shown little to no correspondence between geographic origin and relatedness. This has been suggested to be the result of recolonization of central and northern Europe from glacial refugia (![]()
For cases in which similarity is incongruent with geography, there are two likely explanations: (1) the resolved relationship is correct and explanations for the pattern observed must be sought or (2) the genealogy is incorrect and a more appropriate marker is required. Differentiating between these two is, of course, not always simple. One approach to this problem is to seek corroborating or refuting evidence for specific genealogical hypotheses. For example, our results show strong similarity between the Br-0 (6626) accession from Czechoslovakia and Mir-0 (6798) from Italy (Glabrous A cluster in Fig 4). It happens that both of these lines are glabrous (lacking hairs), a relatively uncommon phenotype among wild-derived accessions. Others have reported sequence data showing that these two accessions share the same allele at the GL1 locus (![]()
![]()
Conclusions:
This analysis reveals several important aspects of microsatellite evolution and application in A. thaliana. Most loci examined support no individual mutation model. Instead, it appears that sequence interruptions within the repeat region of microsatellite loci have a strong influence on the potential diversification of loci and should be taken into consideration in the construction of new microsatellite mutation models. Specifically, the magnitude of the effect of repeat interruptions is proportional to the lengths of the remaining intact repeat regions. Additionally, microsatellite loci of A. thaliana possess a high level of intraspecific phylogenetic signal. As these marker data are potentially of broad use, they can be accessed at http://www.esb.utexas.edu/arabidopsis2010/.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Sequence data from this article have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank Data Libraries under accession nos.
AY295838,
AY295839,
AY295840,
AY295841,
AY295842,
AY295843,
AY295844,
AY295845,
AY295846,
AY295847,
AY295848,
AY295849,
AY295850,
AY295851,
AY295852,
AY295853,
AY295854,
AY295855,
AY295856,
AY295857,
AY295858,
AY295859,
AY295860,
AY295861,
AY295862,
AY295863,
AY295864,
AY295865,
AY295866,
AY295867,
AY295868,
AY295869,
AY295870,
AY295871 and
AY293992,
AY293993,
AY293994,
AY293995,
AY293996,
AY293997,
AY293998,
AY293999,
AY294000,
AY294001,
AY294002,
AY294003,
AY294004. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to U. Mueller, D. Levin, R. Jansen, D. Hillis, J. Tate, V. Godoy, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful discussions and comments during the preparation of this manuscript. Additionally, we thank G. Stein and A. Ellington for technical assistance and facility use, respectively. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. MCB-0114976.
Manuscript received November 1, 2002; Accepted for publication June 23, 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ALONSO-BLANCO, C. and M. KOORNNEEF, 2000 Naturally occurring variation in Arabidopsis: an underexploited resource for plant genetics. Trends Plant Sci. 5:22-29.[Medline]
BACHTROG, D., M. AGIS, M. IMHOF, and C. SCHLÖTTERER, 2000 Microsatellite variability differs between dinucleotide repeat motifsevidence from Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:1277-1285.
BALLOUX, F. and N. LUGON-MOULIN, 2002 The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Mol. Ecol. 11:155-165.[Medline]
BARKER, G. C., 2002 Microsatellite DNA: a tool for population genetic analysis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 96:S21-S24.
BELL, C. J. and J. R. ECKER, 1994 Assignment of 30 microsatellite loci to the linkage map of Arabidopsis. Genomics 19:137-144.[Medline]
BERGELSON, J., E. STAHL, S. DUDEK, and M. KREITMAN, 1998 Genetic variation within and among populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 148:1311-1323.
BOREVITZ, J. O., D. LIANG, D. PLOUFFE, H. S. CHANG, and T. ZHU et al., 2003 Large-scale identification of single-feature polymorphisms in complex genomes. Genome Res. 13:513-523.
BOUTIN-GANACHE, I., M. RAPOSO, M. RAYMOND, and C. F. S DESCHEPPER, 2001 M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-sizing methods. Biotechniques 31:24-28.[Medline]
BROHEDE, J., C. R. PRIMMER, A. MOLLER, and H. ELLEGREN, 2002 Heterogeneity in the rate and pattern of germline mutation at individual microsatellite loci. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1997-2003.
CASACUBERTA, E., P. PUIGDOMENECH, and A. MONFORT, 2000 Distribution of microsatellites in relation to coding sequences within the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Plant Sci. 157:97-104.[Medline]
CHAKRABORTY, R., M. KIMMEL, D. N. STIVERS, L. J. DAVISON, and R. DEKA, 1997 Relative mutation rates at di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide microsatellite loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:1041-1046.
CLAUSS, M. J., H. COBBAN, and T. MITCHELL-OLDS, 2002 Cross-species microsatellite markers for elucidating population genetic structure in Arabidopsis and Arabis (Brassicaceae). Mol. Ecol. 11:591-601.[Medline]
CORNUET, J. M. and G. LUIKART, 1996 Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001-2014.[Abstract]
CRUZAN, M., 1998 Genetic markers in plant evolutionary ecology. Ecology 79:400-412.
CUNNIFF, C., 2001 Molecular mechanisms in neurologic disorders. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol. 8:128-134.[Medline]
DOYLE, J. F. and J. L. DOYLE, 1987 A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf material. Phytochem. Bull. 19:11-15.
DRISCOLL, C. A., M. MENOTTI-RAYMOND, G. NELSON, D. GOLDSTEIN, and S. J. O'BRIEN, 2002 Genomic microsatellites as evolutionary chronometers: a test in wild cats. Genome Res. 12:414-423.
ECKERT, K. A., A. MOWERY, and S. E. HILE, 2002 Misalignment-mediated DNA polymerase beta mutations: comparison of microsatellite and frame-shift error rates using a forward mutation assay. Biochemistry 41:10490-10498.[Medline]
ELLEGREN, H., 2000 Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends Genet. 16:551-558.[Medline]
ESTOUP, A., and B. ANGERS, 1998 Microsatellites and minisatellites for molecular ecology: theoretical and empirical considerations, pp. 5586 in Advances in Molecular Ecology (Nato Sciences Series), edited by G. R. CARVALHO. IOS Press, Amsterdam/Washington, DC.
ESTOUP, A., and J. CORNUET, 1999 Microsatellite evolution: inferences from population data, pp. 4965 in Microsatellites: Evolution and Applications, edited by D. B. GOLDSTEIN and C. SCHLÖTTERER. Oxford University Press, New York.
ESTOUP, A., P. JARNE, and J. M. CORNUET, 2002 Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetics analysis. Mol. Ecol. 11:1591-1604.[Medline]
FARRIS, J. S., M. KELLERSJO, A. G. KLUGE, and C. BULT, 1994 Testing significance of congruence. Cladistics 10:315-320.
FARRIS, J. S., M. KELLERSJO, A. G. KLUGE, and C. BULT, 1995 Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Bot. 44:570-572.
GILL, P., A. J. JEFFREYS, and D. J. WERRETT, 1985 Forensic application of DNA "fingerprints.". Nature 318:577-579.[Medline]
GRIMALDI, M. C. and B. CROUAU-ROY, 1997 Microsatellite allelic homoplasy due to variable flanking sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 44:336-340.[Medline]
HANCOCK, J. M., 1999 Microsatellites and other simple sequences: genomic context and mutational mechanisms, pp. 19 in Microsatellites: Evolution and Applications, edited by D. GOLDSTEIN and C. SCHLÖTTERER. Oxford University Press, New York.
HAUSER, M. T., B. HARR, and C. SCHLÖTTERER, 2001 Trichome distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana and its close relative Arabidopsis lyrata: molecular analysis of the candidate gene GLABROUS1. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1754-1763.
HILE, S. E., G. YAN, and K. A. ECKERT, 2000 Somatic mutation rates and specificities at TC/AG and GT/CA microsatellite sequences in nontumorigenic human lymphoblastoid cells. Cancer Res. 60:1698-1703.
INNAN, H., R. TERAUCHI, and N. T. MIYASHITA, 1997 Microsatellite polymorphism in natural populations of the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 146:1441-1452.[Abstract]
KATTI, M. V., P. K. RANJEKAR, and V. S. GUPTA, 2001 Differential distribution of simple sequence repeats in eukaryotic genome sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1161-1167.
KRUGLYAK, S., R. T. DURRETT, M. D. SCHUG, and C. F. AQUADRO, 1998 Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:10774-10778.
KUBO, S., Y. FUJITA, Y. YOSHIDA, K. KANGAWA, and I. TOKUNAGA et al., 2002 Personal identification from skeletal remain by D1S80, HLA DQA1, TH01 and polymarker analysis. J. Med. Invest. 49:83-86.[Medline]
LITT, M. and J. A. LUTY, 1989 A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 44:397-401.[Medline]
LUKOWITZ, W., C. S. GILLMORE, and W. SCHEIBLE, 2000 Positional cloning in Arabidopsis. Why it feels good to have a genome initiative working for you. Plant Physiol. 123:795-805.
MATSUOKA, Y., S. E. MITCHELL, S. DRESOVICH, M. GOODMAN, and J. DOEBLEY, 2002 Microsatellites in Zeavariability, patterns of mutations, and use for evolutionary studies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104:436-450.[Medline]
MCCOUCH, S. R., X. CHEN, O. PANAUD, S. TEMNYKH, and Y. XU et al., 1997 Microsatellite marker development, mapping and applications in rice genetics and breeding. Plant. Mol. Biol. 35:89-99.[Medline]
METZGAR, D., E. THOMAS, C. DAVIS, D. FIELD, and C. WILLS, 2001 The microsatellites of Escherichia coli: rapidly evolving repetitive DNAs in a non-pathogenic prokaryote. Mol. Microbiol. 39:183-190.[Medline]
MORIGUCHI, Y., H. IWATA, T. UJINO-IHARA, K. YOSHIMURA, and H. TAIRA et al., 2003 Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for Cryptomeria japonica D. Don. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106:751-758.
NEI, M., 1973 Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70:3321-3323.
NOEL, L., T. L. MOORES, E. A. VAN DER BIEZEN, M. PARNISKE, and M. J. DANIELS et al., 1999 Pronounced intraspecific haplotype divergence at the RPP5 complex disease resistance locus of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11:2099-2112.
NOOR, M. A., R. M. KLIMAN, and C. A. MACHADO, 2001 Evolutionary history of microsatellites in the obscura group of Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:551-556.
RANUM, L. P. and J. W. DAY, 2002 Dominantly inherited, non-coding microsatellite expansion disorders. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12:266-271.[Medline]
RICHARD, G. F. and F. PAQUES, 2000 Mini- and microsatellite expansions: the recombination connection. EMBO Rep. 1:122-126.[Medline]
ROLFSMEIER, M. L. and R. S. LAHUE, 2000 Stabilizing effects of interruptions on trinucleotide repeat expansions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:173-180.
RUBINSZTEIN, D. C., B. AMOS, and G. COOPER, 1999 Microsatellite and trinucleotide-repeat evolution: evidence for mutational bias and different rates of evolution in different lineages. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 354:1095-1099.[Medline]
SAKAMOTO, T. and N. OKAMOTO, 2000 Microsatellite linkage map of rainbow trout and its application for QTL analysis. Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso 45:2872-2879. (in Japanese).[Medline]
SCHUG, M. D., K. A. WETTERSTRAND, M. S. GAUDETTE, R. H. LIM, and C. M. HUTTER et al., 1998 The distribution and frequency of microsatellite loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Ecol. 7:57-70.[Medline]
SHARBEL, T. F., B. HAUBOLD, and T. MITCHELL-OLDS, 2000 Genetic isolation by distance in Arabidopsis thaliana: biogeography and postglacial colonization of Europe. Mol. Ecol. 9:2109-2118.[Medline]
SHRIVER, M. D., L. JIN, R. CHAKRABORTY, and E. BOERWINKLE, 1993 VNTR allele frequency distributions under the stepwise mutation model: a computer simulation approach. Genetics 134:983-993.[Abstract]
SIA, E. A., R. J. KOKOSKA, M. DOMINSKA, P. GREENWELL, and T. D. PETES, 1997 Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on repeat unit size and DNA mismatch repair genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2851-2858.[Abstract]
SOKAL, R. R., and F. J. ROHLF, 1995 Biometry. W. H. Freeman, New York.
SWOFFORD, D. L., 2002 PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
THUILLET, A. C., D. BRU, J. DAVID, P. ROUMET, and S. SANTONI et al., 2002 Direct estimation of mutation rate for 10 microsatellite loci in durum wheat, Triticum turgidum (L.) Thell. ssp durum desf. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:122-125.
VAN TREUREN, R., H. KUITTINEN, K. KARKKAINEN, E. BAENA-GONZALEZ, and O. SAVOLAINEN, 1997 Evolution of microsatellites in Arabis petraea and Arabis lyrata, outcrossing relatives of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:220-229.[Abstract]
VIGOUROUX, Y., J. S. JAQUETH, Y. MATSUOKA, O. S. SMITH, and W. D. BEAVIS et al., 2002 Rate and pattern of mutation at microsatellite loci in maize. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1251-1260.
VISION, T. J., D. G. BROWN, and S. D. TANKSLEY, 2000 The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science 290:2114-2117.
WIERDL, M., M. DOMINSKA, and T. D. PETES, 1997 Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on the length of the microsatellite. Genetics 146:769-779.[Abstract]
ZANE, L., L. BARGELLONI, and T. PATARNELLO, 2002 Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol. Ecol. 11:1-16.[Medline]
ZWETTLER, D., C. P. VIEIRA, and C. SCHLÖTTERER, 2002 Polymorphic microsatellites in Antirrhinum (Scrophulariaceae), a genus with low levels of nucle




