- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- HTML Page - index.htslp
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Glinka, S.
- Articles by De Lorenzo, D.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Glinka, S.
- Articles by De Lorenzo, D.
Demography and Natural Selection Have Shaped Genetic Variation in Drosophila melanogaster: A Multi-locus Approach
Sascha Glinka1,a, Lino Ometto1,a, Sylvain Mousseta, Wolfgang Stephana, and David De Lorenzoaa Section of Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology II, University of Munich, D-80333 Munich, Germany
Corresponding author: David De Lorenzo, Department of Biology II, University of Munich, Luisenstrasse 14, D-80333 Munich, Germany., delorenzo{at}lmu.de (E-mail)
Communicating editor: M. VEUILLE
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Demography and selection have been recognized for their important roles in shaping patterns of nucleotide variability. To investigate the relative effects of these forces in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster, we used a multi-locus scan (105 fragments) of X-linked DNA sequence variation in a putatively ancestral African and a derived European population. Surprisingly, we found evidence for a recent size expansion in the African population, i.e., a significant excess of singletons at a chromosome-wide level. In the European population, such an excess was not detected. In contrast to the African population, we found evidence for positive natural selection in the European sample: (i) a large number of loci with low levels of variation and (ii) a significant excess of derived variants at the low-variation loci that are fixed in the European sample but rare in the African population. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the European population has experienced frequent selective sweeps in the recent past during its adaptation to new habitats. Our study shows the advantages of a genomic approach (over a locus-specific analysis) in disentangling demographic and selective forces.
IN the past decade, evidence that natural selection plays a key role in shaping genome-wide patterns of variability in Drosophila has been mounting (![]()
![]()
Drosophila melanogaster, originating from sub-Saharan Africa, is believed to have expanded its range after the last glaciation (i.e.,
10,00015,000 years ago; ![]()
![]()
To distinguish demographic and selective processes important for the recent adaptations of D. melanogaster, we compared a putatively ancestral population from Africa (Zimbabwe) with a derived population from Europe (The Netherlands). Since a whole-genome scan of DNA sequence variation is currently not feasible, we used a multi-locus approach. The availability of the genomic sequence of D. melanogaster made this approach possible. To be able to discern different selective regimes, we focused on chromosomal regions of normal recombination (![]()
![]()
0.1 Ne (effective population size) generations ago can be detected with sufficiently high power using single nucleotide polymorphisms (![]()
![]()
10,00015,000 years. This window of time matches very well the colonization of Europe by D. melanogaster. Thus, the use of DNA sequence variation should enable us to detect most of the sweeps that have occurred during this colonization period and hence to obtain a reliable estimate of the rate of advantageous substitutions. In contrast, with microsatellites that mutate faster than nucleotides we may be able to observe only the very recent sweeps. Since this is the first screen of DNA sequence variation in D. melanogaster, we concentrated on the X chromosome.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Population samples:
D. melanogaster data were collected from 24 highly inbred lines derived from two populations: 12 lines from Africa (Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe; ![]()
PCR amplification and DNA sequencing:
On the basis of the available DNA sequence of the D. melanogaster genome (FlyBase 2000, Release 2, http://www.flybase.org), we amplified and sequenced 105 fragments of noncoding DNA (from 63 introns and 42 intergenic regions), randomly distributed across the entire euchromatic portion of the X chromosome. Most fragments are located in regions of intermediate to high recombination rates. However, 11 fragments are from the telomeric region exhibiting low recombination rates, i.e., distal to the white locus (see online supplemental Tables 1 and 2 available at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental). We amplified and sequenced the homologous 105 fragments in a single strain of D. simulans.
We extracted genomic DNA from 10 females of each inbred line using the PUREGENE DNA isolation kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis). The PCR products were then purified with EXOSAP-IT (USB, Cleveland). Sequencing reactions were performed for both strands according to the protocol of the DYEnamic ET terminator cycle sequencing kit (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) and run on a MegaBACE 1000 automated capillary sequencer (Amersham Biosciences). Analysis of the data was done using the software Cimarron 3.12 (Amersham Biosciences) for lane tracking and base calling. Only good-quality sequences (MegaBACE quality score of at least 95 out of 100) were aligned and checked manually with the application Seqman of the DNAstar (Madison, WI) package. Singletons were confirmed by reamplification and resequencing. The sequences were deposited in the EMBL database (for accession numbers, see online supplemental information at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental).
Statistical analysis:
Basic population genetic parameters were estimated with the program DnaSP 3.98 (![]()
(![]()
(![]()
To test the neutral equilibrium model, we employed the multi-locus Hudson-Kreitman-Aguadé (HKA) and Tajima's D tests (![]()
![]()
![]()
In addition, we used the following statistics: the number of haplotypes, K, and the haplotype diversity, H (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Recombination rate:
We estimated r (recombination rate per site per generation) for each fragment as follows. We used a computer program of ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For the latter method, we used the absolute position of each fragment to calculate physical distances. The estimate of the recombination rate is therefore expressed in centimorgans per megabase instead of centimorgans per band (see ![]()
![]()
Demographic modeling of the European population:
Because extant European D. melanogaster are believed to be derived from an ancestral African population (![]()
![]()
![]()
The following parameters had to be specified for each fragment: the mutational parameter,
(estimated from data); the sample size, n; and the fragment length, L. Constant-population-size models were tested using the observed average
value of the European population, while the bottleneck models were conditioned on the observed average
value of the African population (i.e., the value of the hypothetical ancestral population). Our simple models assumed no intragenic recombination but did assume free recombination between fragments. We used several combinations of values of Nb, N0/Ni, and Tb. Tm was adjusted to obtain a total number of segregating sites in a simulation close to the observed value of 737. For each fragment, 10,000 genealogies were simulated using the program "ms" (![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
DNA sequences for 105 X chromosome fragments were obtained from 1012 lines of an African and a European population of D. melanogaster (with an average of 11.9 lines per sample). The size of the fragments varied between 240 and 781 bp (excluding insertions and deletions) with a mean (SE) of 517 bp (11 bp). The total region from which these fragments derive spans
14 Mb. This results in an average distance between adjacent fragments of
140 kb (Fig 1).
|
There are several large gaps in our genome scan (Fig 1), in which we could not recover a sufficient number of sequences (i.e., at least 10 per sample and the sequence of the D. simulans line). The majority of fragments (103) are located in two segments (between coordinates 1.9 and 4.1 Mb and between 6.5 and 16.4 Mb from the telomere, respectively), thus spanning a region of 12 Mb with an average distance of 119 kb between fragments. The region between these two segments appears to contain a high density of repetitive DNA (for instance, microsatellites; ![]()
In both D. melanogaster samples, intergenic regions and introns did not produce significantly different results when analyzed separately (results not shown) and are therefore pooled in the following analyses.
Polymorphism patterns in the African population:
Fig 2, ac, and Table 1 in the online supplemental information at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental provide a summary of the polymorphism and divergence data. Of the 54,944 sites sequenced (excluding insertions and deletions), 2057 are polymorphic. The mean of
(SE) is 0.0127 (0.0007), which is higher than the average value of 0.0071 reported for noncoding regions on the D. melanogaster X chromosome (![]()
![]()
, the result is similar: 0.0112 (0.0007) to 0.0074 (![]()
![]()
|
We tested our data for compatibility with the neutral equilibrium model. The HKA test is used to determine whether the levels of intraspecific polymorphism and interspecific divergence at our set of fragments are consistent with the equilibrium model (![]()
2 = 93.31, P = 0.765).
|
We also calculated the Tajima's D statistic for each fragment and tested whether the observed average across fragments was consistent with the equilibrium model by estimating the critical values of this distribution from coalescent simulations (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). In these simulations, we assumed no intragenic recombination (but free recombination between fragments). The African population shows a negative average value (SE) of Tajima's D of -0.578 (0.058). None of the 10,000 simulated samples of 105 fragments had a more extreme average value of D. This suggests that our data depart from the neutral equilibrium model. In fact, most of the fragments have negative D values (sign test, two-tailed, P < 0.001; Fig 2D).
To further investigate the pattern of variation in the African sample, we focused on two statistics, the number of haplotypes, K, and the haplotype diversity, H (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We found that the observed haplotype diversity, H, was higher than the simulated median in 78 of the 105 fragments; this proportion is significantly larger than expected (sign test, two-tailed, P < 0.001). For the number of haplotypes, K, a significant trend toward a higher number was also observed (sign test, two-tailed, P = 0.03). High values of haplotype diversity and large numbers of haplotypes can result from a star-like genealogy due to population expansion or complete hitchhiking events (![]()
Assuming that recurrent complete selective sweeps occur along a recombining chromosome, we expected to detect the footprints of partial sweeps as well. We thus examined whether there is evidence for partial hitchhiking events using the K- and H-haplotype tests (![]()
![]()
![]()
These results, together with the observations from the HKA test, argue against a model of recurrent selective sweeps (![]()
Is there any evidence for a signature of selection in the African population? Using two-tailed tests, we found a (weak) positive correlation between recombination rate and nucleotide variation (as measured by
and
; see Fig 2, a and b): for
, Pearson's R = 0.246, P < 0.02, Spearman's R = 0.237, P < 0.02; for
, Pearson's R = 0.237, P < 0.02, Spearman's R = 0.234, P < 0.02. If this observation were due to a lower neutral mutation rate in regions of reduced recombination, then these regions should also be less diverged. However, we found no correlation between recombination rate and levels of divergence (Pearson's R = 0.003, P > 0.10, Spearman's R = 0.028, P > 0.10; Fig 2C). If we consider only fragments above a certain recombination rate (for example, 2 x 10-8 recombination events per base pair per generation, which corresponds to our previously defined region II; see MATERIALS AND METHODS), thus including 94 loci, then the correlation between recombination rate and polymorphism disappears (for
, Pearson's R = 0.158, P > 0.10; for
, Pearson's R = 0.115, P > 0.20). These conclusions hold for all three measures of recombination rates (see MATERIALS AND METHODS), except that the (weak) correlation between nucleotide diversity and ACE was still found when the 11 fragments located in regions of low recombination were excluded (Pearson's R = 0.203, P < 0.05, and Pearson's R = 0.199, P < 0.05 for
and
, respectively). This suggests that the strong positive correlation between recombination rates and nucleotide diversity reported in previous studies is attributable mainly to loci in low recombination regions (![]()
![]()
![]()
Polymorphism patterns in the European population:
A summary of the polymorphism and divergence data is shown in Fig 2E&NDASH;G. Of the 55,150 sites sequenced, 737 are polymorphic. The number of segregating sites and estimates of nucleotide diversity for each fragment are shown in the online supplemental Table 2 available at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/. The means (SE) of
and
across the X chromosome are 0.0046 (0.0005) and 0.0044 (0.0004), respectively.
In Fig 2E and Fig F, the estimates of
and
are plotted against the recombination rate. We observed no significant correlation between nucleotide diversity and any of the three estimates of the recombination rate (MATERIALS AND METHODS). With regard to the first of these recombination rate estimates, the results of the correlation analysis are as follows (two-tailed tests): Pearson's R = 0.150 and 0.180 with P > 0.12 and P > 0.06 for
and
, respectively; Spearman's R = 0.137 and 0.183 with P > 0.16 and P > 0.06. Also, no correlation between recombination rate and divergence was observed (Fig 2G; Pearson's R = 0.035, P > 0.73, Spearman's R = 0.021, P > 0.82). These results contradict to some extent our findings in the African sample, where a weak positive correlation between recombination rate and levels of variation was detected. Since this correlation has been proposed to be an effect of selection (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Using the same approach as for the African population sample, we computed the distribution of the H- and K-haplotype statistics (![]()
To further investigate whether the data deviate from the neutral equilibrium model, we used the multi-locus version of the HKA test (MATERIALS AND METHODS). A significant departure of the data from this model was detected (
2 = 238.28, P = 0.0016). Fig 3B shows the contributions of each fragment to the summary statistic (see also online Table 3 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/ for details). Furthermore, Fig 3B depicts whether the observed polymorphism and divergence values are lower or higher than expected. The HKA test was repeated with the exclusion of just those fragments with the strongest departures from expectation. The value of the overall test statistic dropped below the critical value at which the test was no longer significant, if 24 fragments with the largest contributions were removed (data not shown; 12 of these fragments show an excess of polymorphism, and 12 a deficiency of polymorphism; see Fig 3B). Note that some of these low-polymorphism fragments contribute to the overall test statistic to a very similar degree as the ones following at higher ranks; i.e., between the fragments at rank 20 and at rank 30 the per-fragment contribution differs by <0.5. All these fragments have values of
0.0011.
Next we analyze the fragments exhibiting low levels of variation. In our survey, 13 fragments had no polymorphic sites at all (Fig 1 and online Table 2 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). Furthermore, 12 low-variation fragments have been identified by the HKA test, including 8 of the nonpolymorphic fragments and 4 with extremely reduced nucleotide variability (
0.0007).
We first concentrate our analysis on the set of fragments with zero polymorphisms. We used coalescent simulations to test the hypothesis that simple demographic null models (see MATERIALS AND METHODS) can explain our observation of 13 fragments with zero polymorphisms. These are a neutral model of constant population size and various bottleneck models (Table 1). Since the European population is believed to be derived from Africa (![]()
![]()
106). Different values of N0 for the European population (between 0.25 and 0.5 Ni)accounting for the fact that the observed
value in the European population is about one-third of the estimate of the African populationwere assumed. Severe bottlenecks were introduced mimicking the founding of the European D. melanogaster population. The values of the parameters (describing the time of occurrence, severity, and duration of a bottleneck) were chosen such that the current simulated population has about the same number of segregating sites as observed.
|
Among the models tested, a likelihood-ratio two-tailed test shows that some models fit the observation of 13 fragments with no polymorphism better than the neutral (constant population size) model [e.g., bottleneck (Bot) 10, G = 14.1, P = 0.014, see Table 1]. Appreciable probabilities of getting at least 13 fragments with no polymorphic sites were obtained only for parameter values of the bottleneck model in which the effective population size recovered to its current size in a relatively short time period (
0.1 N0 generations). Other more realistic scenarios, in which the European population was founded 10,00015,000 years ago, corresponding to >
100,000 generations (![]()
![]()
Further evidence against a simple model of population founding followed by expansion is provided by the last two columns of Table 1. First, the average value of Tajima's D is negative in all simulations of the bottleneck model. Second, very few simulation runs produced values of Tajima's D greater than the observed value (across fragments).
Comparison of the African and European populations:
The European population shows lower levels of variation than the African population shows (see above). These differences are statistically significant (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, two-tailed, P < 0.0001 for both
and
). As evident from the larger difference in the means of
(relative to those of
), the African population harbors more rare variants than the European population does. This is also suggested by the significantly negative average value of Tajima's D for the African population, whereas, in the European population, average D is close to zero.
A large proportion (65%) of the polymorphisms in the European population are also present in the African one (comprising
23% of the variation found in the African population). This result supports the African origin of the European population. Nonetheless, both populations are considerably differentiated: average FST (SE; ![]()
Because of suggestions in the literature of differential migration patterns of neutral and selected loci (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For each fragment, we recorded the frequency of the derived variants in the African and the European samples. A variant was classified as ancestral when present also in D. simulans; when neither of the two D. melanogaster variants was found in D. simulans, the segregating site was not considered. A total of 1974 segregating sites were classified, including shared polymorphisms, population-specific polymorphisms, and fixed differences. The fragments were partitioned into two groups: (i) those with very low polymorphism [using the HKA test, this was defined in two ways (see above); independent of this definition, however, this group contained the fragments with zero polymorphisms] and (ii) the rest of the fragments. Our results of the HKA test suggest classifying a fragment as a low-variation fragment if (a)
0.0007 (21 fragments) or if (b)
0.0011 (29 fragments).
Fig 4 compares the relative number of segregating sites for each frequency class for the low-variation fragments defined by criterion b; criterion a gave similar results (data not shown). In this analysis, a total of 260 segregating sites with the variant fixed in the European population sample have been used (53 and 72 in the low-variation fragments for a and b, respectively). In the fragments with low variation, there is an excess of derived variants that are fixed in the European sample and rare in the African population. The difference between the low-variation fragments and the rest of the fragments is highly significant. If all 12 frequency classes are considered separately,
2 = 28.72, d.f. = 11, P = 0.0025, and
2 = 32.39, d.f. = 11, P = 0.0007 for a and b, respectively; if the low-frequency classes "0" and "1" are lumped together into a single category, leaving all the other classes as the second category,
2 = 25.19, d.f. = 1, P < 0.0001, and
2 = 26.42, d.f. = 1, P < 0.0001 for a and b, respectively.
|
A neutral model, in which the European variants were "sampled" from the African pool and, after colonization, reached high frequency by drift, cannot explain the observed excess of derived variants that are fixed in the low-variation fragments of the European sample and in low frequency in Africa. This observation is consistent with the result that the European population is significantly more diverged from D. simulans than is the African population (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, two-tailed, P < 0.001).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Our genomic scan of X-linked variation in an African and a European D. melanogaster population provides evidence for the impact of demography and natural selection in the recent past during which this species expanded its range. The main features of our data are discussed below.
Demography:
Our findings that levels of polymorphism are higher in the African population and that the majority of the sites segregating in the European population are also polymorphic in the African sample confirm previous results (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A surprising observation, however, was that the African population shows a signature of a recent population size expansion, i.e., a significant excess of singletons at a chromosome-wide level. The reason for this population size expansion remains unclear. Since we found only very little evidence for selective adaptations in the African population (see below), the population size increase does not appear to mirror a change of or an expansion to a new habitat.
The demographic processes that have occurred in the European population are more complex. Our observation that a large number of loci have strongly positive and negative D values (although the mean of Tajima's D across loci is close to zero) argues against the simple explanation that the European population is in equilibrium. It is more likely that several different confounding processes have occurred during the habitat expansion of D. melanogaster, thus producing a mean value of D close to zero with a significantly higher-than-expected variance. Since some fragments show a significant haplotype structure (see RESULTS and online supplemental Table 2 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/), admixture following different colonization events may have shaped the observed pattern of polymorphism (in addition to the occurrence of a bottleneck). This scenario should lead to positive D values. The observed mean of Tajima's D of
0 may therefore be explained by counteracting demographic and selective effects (i.e., population size expansion following colonization and positive directional selection due to local adaptation, both producing negative D values).
Selection:
The influence of demographic factors on the patterns of variation poses a problem for detecting possible footprints of selection. However, at least to some extent, this difficulty was overcome by our multi-locus approach using a large number of fragments. As discussed above, it allowed us to get insights into demographic forces that shaped the standing variation in both populations. However, since the level of polymorphism across all fragments is on average relatively high, it was also possible to search for fragments with low variation that may be footprints of recent positive directional selection (selective sweeps).
In the highly variable African population, we did not find clear evidence for positive selection. Although we employed a series of neutrality tests (including the HKA test, Depaulis and Veuille's haplotype tests, and Fay and Wu's H test), only one test was significant in one fragment. This observation is surprising. It may, however, not generally hold for African populations, as ![]()
Under a recurrent hitchhiking model, average Tajima's D value is expected to be negative due to a skew in the frequency spectrum toward an excess of rare variants (![]()
![]()
The data from the European population show two salient features: (i) a large number of fragments with zero or low levels of variation and (ii) a significant excess of derived variants at the low-variation loci (relative to the rest of the fragments) that are fixed in the European sample but rare in the African population. Both observations are difficult to explain without invoking positive natural selection. First, demographic modeling suggests that our observation of 13 fragments with zero variation is not consistent with a neutral equilibrium model or a neutral model of population founding followed by expansion. To explain our second finding, an evolutionary force needs to be postulated that brings newly arisen or rare African variants into high frequency in Europe in genomic regions of low variation (but not in the rest of the genome examined). It is difficult to imagine that any evolutionary force other than locus-specific positive directional selection is able to simultaneously produce both features i and ii. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the European population has experienced frequent selective sweeps in the recent past during its adaptation to new habitats.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 These authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank K. Bhuiyan and H. Geisert for excellent technical assistance and M. Veuille and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (STE 325/6-1). S.M. was supported by a Marie-Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship from the European Union (MCFI-2002-01461).
Manuscript received June 24, 2003; Accepted for publication July 23, 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ANDOLFATTO, P., 2001 Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:279-290.
ANDOLFATTO, P. and M. PRZEWORSKI, 2001 Regions of lower crossing over harbor more rare variants in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 158:657-665.
AQUADRO, C. F., 1997 Insights into the evolutionary process from patterns of DNA sequence variability. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:835-840.[Medline]
AQUADRO, C. F., D. J. BEGUN and E. C. KINDAHL, 1994 Selection, recombination and DNA polymorphism in Drosophila, pp. 4655 in Non-neutral Evolution: Theories and Molecular Data, edited by B. GOLDING. Chapman & Hall, New York.
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster.. Nature 356:519-520.[Medline]
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1993 African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature 365:548-550.[Medline]
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1995 Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.. Genetics 140:1019-1032.[Abstract]
BEGUN, D. J. and P. WHITLEY, 2000 Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5960-5965.
BRAVERMAN, J. M., R. R. HUDSON, N. L. KAPLAN, C. H. LANGLEY, and W. STEPHAN, 1995 The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics 140:783-796.[Abstract]
CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L., 1966 Population structure and human evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 164:362-379.[Medline]
CHARLESWORTH, B., 1996 Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genet. Res. 68:131-149.[Medline]
COMERON, J. M., M. KREITMAN, and M. AGUADÉ, 1999 Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. Genetics 151:239-249.
DAVID, J. R. and P. CAPY, 1988 Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. Trends Genet. 4:106-111.[Medline]
DEPAULIS, F. and M. VEUILLE, 1998 Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite-site model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1788-1790.[Medline]
DEPAULIS, F., S. MOUSSET, and M. VEUILLE, 2001 Haplotype tests using coalescent simulations conditional on the number of segregating sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1136-1138.
FAY, J. C. and C.-I WU, 2000 Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics 155:1405-1413.
HARR, B., M. KAUER, and C. SCHLÖTTERER, 2002 Hitchhiking mapping: a population-based fine-mapping strategy for adaptive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:12949-12954.
HUDSON, R. R., 1990 Gene genealogies and the coalescent process, pp. 144 in Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, edited by D. FUTUYMA and J. ANTONOVICS. Oxford University Press, New York.
HUDSON, R. R., 1993 The how and why of generating gene genealogies, pp. 2336 in Mechanisms of Molecular Evolution: Introduction to Molecular Paleopopulation Biology, edited by N. TAKAHATA and A. G. CLARK. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
HUDSON, R. R., 2002 Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 18:337-338.
HUDSON, R. R., M. KREITMAN, and M. AGUADÉ, 1987 A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116:153-159.
HUDSON, R. R., M. SLATKIN, and W. P. MADDISON, 1992 Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132:583-589.[Abstract]
KIM, Y. and W. STEPHAN, 2000 Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation. Genetics 155:1415-1427.
KIM, Y. and W. STEPHAN, 2002 Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics 160:765-777.
KLIMAN, R. M. and J. HEY, 1993 Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1239-1258.[Abstract]
KLIMAN, R. M., P. ANDOLFATTO, J. A. COYNE, F. DEPAULIS, and M. KREITMAN et al., 2000 The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics 156:1913-1931.
LACHAISE, D., M. CARIOU, J. R. DAVID, F. LEMEUNIER, L. TSACAS et al., 1988 Historical biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup, pp. 159225 in Evolutionary Biology, edited by M. K. HECHT, B. WALLACE and G. T. PRANCE. Plenum, New York.
LAZZARO, B. P. and A. G. CLARK, 2003 Molecular population genetics of inducible antibacterial peptide genes in Drosophila melanogaster.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:914-923.
LEWONTIN, R. C. and J. KRAKAUER, 1973 Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. Genetics 74:175-195.
LI, Y. J., Y. SATTA, and N. TAKAHATA, 1999 Paleo-demography of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup: application of the maximum likelihood method. Genes Genet. Syst. 74:117-127.[Medline]
MAYNARD SMITH, J. and J. HAIGH, 1974 The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet. Res. 23:23-35.[Medline]
MORIYAMA, E. N. and J. R. POWELL, 1996 Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:261-277.[Abstract]
MOUSSET, S., L. BRAZIER, M.-L. CARIOU, F. CHARTOIS, and F. DEPAULIS et al., 2003 Evidence of a high rate of selective sweeps in African Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 163:599-609.
NEI, M. and T. MARUYAMA, 1975 Lewontin-Krakauer test for neutral genes. Genetics 80:395.
PRZEWORSKI, M., 2002 The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics 160:1179-1189.
PRZEWORSKI, M., J. D. WALL, and P. ANDOLFATTO, 2001 Recombination and the frequency spectrum in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:291-298.
ROBERTSON, L. S., 1975 Gene frequency distributions as a test for selective neutrality. Genetics 81:775-785.
ROZAS, J. and R. ROZAS, 1999 DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15:174-175.
TAJIMA, F., 1983 Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105:437-460.
TAJIMA, F., 1989 Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585-595.
WALL, J. D., P. ANDOLFATTO, and M. PRZEWORSKI, 2002 Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans.. Genetics 162:203-216.
WATTERSON, G. A., 1975 On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7:256-276.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Svetec, P. Pavlidis, and W. Stephan Recent Strong Positive Selection on Drosophila melanogaster HDAC6, a Gene Encoding a Stress Surveillance Factor, as Revealed by Population Genomic Analysis Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 1549 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gonzalez, J. M. Macpherson, P. W. Messer, and D. A. Petrov Inferring the Strength of Selection in Drosophila under Complex Demographic Models Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2009; 26(3): 513 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Parsch, Z. Zhang, and J. F. Baines The Influence of Demography and Weak Selection on the McDonald-Kreitman Test: An Empirical Study in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2009; 26(3): 691 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-M. Chevin and F. Hospital Selective Sweep at a Quantitative Trait Locus in the Presence of Background Genetic Variation Genetics, November 1, 2008; 180(3): 1645 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Zivkovic and T. Wiehe Second-Order Moments of Segregating Sites Under Variable Population Size Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 341 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R Haddrill and B. Charlesworth Non-neutral processes drive the nucleotide composition of non-coding sequences in Drosophila Biol Lett, August 23, 2008; 4(4): 438 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Baines, S. A. Sawyer, D. L. Hartl, and J. Parsch Effects of X-Linkage and Sex-Biased Gene Expression on the Rate of Adaptive Protein Evolution in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1639 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Pool and R. Nielsen The Impact of Founder Events on Chromosomal Variability in Multiply Mating Species Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1728 - 1736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Macpherson, J. Gonzalez, D. M. Witten, J. C. Davis, N. A. Rosenberg, A. E. Hirsh, and D. A. Petrov Nonadaptive Explanations for Signatures of Partial Selective Sweeps in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1025 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Beisswanger and W. Stephan Evidence that strong positive selection drives neofunctionalization in the tandemly duplicated polyhomeotic genes in Drosophila PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5447 - 5452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Riebler, L. Held, and W. Stephan Bayesian Variable Selection for Detecting Adaptive Genomic Differences Among Populations Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1817 - 1829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Derome, E. Baudry, D. Ogereau, M. Veuille, and C. Montchamp-Moreau Selective Sweeps in a 2-Locus Model for Sex-Ratio Meiotic Drive in Drosophila simulans Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 409 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Nolte and C. Schlotterer African Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Populations Have Similar Levels of Sequence Variability, Suggesting Comparable Effective Population Sizes Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 405 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Macpherson, G. Sella, J. C. Davis, and D. A. Petrov Genomewide Spatial Correspondence Between Nonsynonymous Divergence and Neutral Polymorphism Reveals Extensive Adaptation in Drosophila Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2083 - 2099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Jensen, V. L. Bauer DuMont, A. B. Ashmore, A. Gutierrez, and C. F. Aquadro Patterns of Sequence Variability and Divergence at the diminutive Gene Region of Drosophila melanogaster: Complex Patterns Suggest an Ancestral Selective Sweep Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 1071 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Casillas, A. Barbadilla, and C. M. Bergman Purifying Selection Maintains Highly Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2222 - 2234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Arunyawat, W. Stephan, and T. Stadler Using Multilocus Sequence Data to Assess Population Structure, Natural Selection, and Linkage Disequilibrium in Wild Tomatoes Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2310 - 2322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hutter, H. Li, S. Beisswanger, D. De Lorenzo, and W. Stephan Distinctly Different Sex Ratios in African and European Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Inferred From Chromosomewide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Data Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 469 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Turner and M. W. Hahn Locus- and Population-Specific Selection and Differentiation between Incipient Species of Anopheles gambiae Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2132 - 2138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Orengo and M. Aguade Genome Scans of Variation and Adaptive Change: Extended Analysis of a Candidate Locus Close to the phantom Gene Region in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2007; 24(5): 1122 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Sawyer, J. Parsch, Z. Zhang, and D. L. Hartl Inaugural Article: Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila PNAS, April 17, 2007; 104(16): 6504 - 6510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Baines and B. Harr Reduced X-Linked Diversity in Derived Populations of House Mice Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1911 - 1921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Shapiro, W. Huang, C. Zhang, M. J. Hubisz, J. Lu, D. A. Turissini, S. Fang, H.-Y. Wang, R. R. Hudson, R. Nielsen, et al. Adaptive genic evolution in the Drosophila genomes PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2271 - 2276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Mustonen and M. Lassig Adaptations to fluctuating selection in Drosophila PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2277 - 2282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Thornton and J. D. Jensen Controlling the False-Positive Rate in Multilocus Genome Scans for Selection Genetics, February 1, 2007; 175(2): 737 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Wiehe, V. Nolte, D. Zivkovic, and C. Schlotterer Identification of Selective Sweeps Using a Dynamically Adjusted Number of Linked Microsatellites Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 207 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Presgraves and W. Stephan Pervasive Adaptive Evolution among Interactors of the Drosophila Hybrid Inviability Gene, Nup96 Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 306 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pfaffelhuber, B. Haubold, and A. Wakolbinger Approximate Genealogies Under Genetic Hitchhiking Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 1995 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bachtrog and P. Andolfatto Selection, Recombination and Demographic History in Drosophila miranda Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2045 - 2059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Presgraves Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2203 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Proschel, Z. Zhang, and J. Parsch Widespread Adaptive Evolution of Drosophila Genes With Sex-Biased Expression Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 893 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Cutter, S. E. Baird, and D. Charlesworth High Nucleotide Polymorphism and Rapid Decay of Linkage Disequilibrium in Wild Populations of Caenorhabditis remanei Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 901 - 913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Glinka, D. De Lorenzo, and W. Stephan Evidence of Gene Conversion Associated with a Selective Sweep in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1869 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Quesada, S. E. Ramos-Onsins, J. Rozas, and M. Aguade Positive Selection Versus Demography: Evolutionary Inferences Based on an Unusual Haplotype Structure in Drosophila simulans Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2006; 23(9): 1643 - 1647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Innan Modified Hudson-Kreitman-Aguade Test and Two-Dimensional Evaluation of Neutrality Tests Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1725 - 1733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Charlesworth and A. Eyre-Walker The Rate of Adaptive Evolution in Enteric Bacteria Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2006; 23(7): 1348 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Teshima, G. Coop, and M. Przeworski How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps? Genome Res., June 1, 2006; 16(6): 702 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Baudry, N. Derome, M. Huet, and M. Veuille Contrasted Polymorphism Patterns in a Large Sample of Populations From the Evolutionary Genetics Model Drosophila simulans Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 759 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Hamblin, A. M. Casa, H. Sun, S. C. Murray, A. H. Paterson, C. F. Aquadro, and S. Kresovich Challenges of Detecting Directional Selection After a Bottleneck: Lessons From Sorghum bicolor Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 953 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Hahn Accurate Inference and Estimation in Population Genomics Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 911 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Stephan, Y. S. Song, and C. H. Langley The Hitchhiking Effect on Linkage Disequilibrium Between Linked Neutral Loci Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2647 - 2663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Thornton and P. Andolfatto Approximate Bayesian Inference Reveals Evidence for a Recent, Severe Bottleneck in a Netherlands Population of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1607 - 1619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Pool, V. B. DuMont, J. L. Mueller, and C. F. Aquadro A Scan of Molecular Variation Leads to the Narrow Localization of a Selective Sweep Affecting Both Afrotropical and Cosmopolitan Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, February 1, 2006; 172(2): 1093 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Galtier, E. Bazin, and N. Bierne GC-Biased Segregation of Noncoding Polymorphisms in Drosophila Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 221 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schlotterer, H. Neumeier, C. Sousa, and V. Nolte Highly Structured Asian Drosophila melanogaster Populations: A New Tool for Hitchhiking Mapping? Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 287 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Beisswanger, W. Stephan, and D. De Lorenzo Evidence for a Selective Sweep in the wapl Region of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 265 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ashburner and C. M. Bergman Drosophila melanogaster: A case study of a model genomic sequence and its consequences Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1661 - 1667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Thornton Recombination and the Properties of Tajima's D in the Context of Approximate-Likelihood Calculation Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 2143 - 2148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. B. DuMont and C. F. Aquadro Multiple Signatures of Positive Selection Downstream of Notch on the X Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 639 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ometto, S. Glinka, D. De Lorenzo, and W. Stephan Inferring the Effects of Demography and Selection on Drosophila melanogaster Populations from a Chromosome-Wide Scan of DNA Variation Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 2119 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Li and W. Stephan Maximum-Likelihood Methods for Detecting Recent Positive Selection and Localizing the Selected Site in the Genome Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 377 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schofl, F. Catania, V. Nolte, and C. Schlotterer African Sequence Variation Accounts for Most of the Sequence Polymorphism in Non-African Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1701 - 1709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Braverman, B. P. Lazzaro, M. Aguade, and C. H. Langley DNA Sequence Polymorphism and Divergence at the erect wing and suppressor of sable Loci of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1153 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Haddrill, K. R. Thornton, B. Charlesworth, and P. Andolfatto Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations Genome Res., June 1, 2005; 15(6): 790 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Schlenke and D. J. Begun Linkage Disequilibrium and Recent Selection at Three Immunity Receptor Loci in Drosophila simulans Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2013 - 2022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ometto, W. Stephan, and D. De Lorenzo Insertion/Deletion and Nucleotide Polymorphism Data Reveal Constraints in Drosophila melanogaster Introns and Intergenic Regions Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1521 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Schmid, S. Ramos-Onsins, H. Ringys-Beckstein, B. Weisshaar, and T. Mitchell-Olds A Multilocus Sequence Survey in Arabidopsis thaliana Reveals a Genome-Wide Departure From a Neutral Model of DNA Sequence Polymorphism Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1601 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Catania and C. Schlotterer Non-African Origin of a Local Beneficial Mutation in D. melanogaster Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2005; 22(2): 265 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bazin, L. Duret, S. Penel, and N. Galtier Polymorphix: a sequence polymorphism database Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2005; 33(suppl_1): D481 - D484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Stajich and M. W. Hahn Disentangling the Effects of Demography and Selection in Human History Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2005; 22(1): 63 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nikoh, A. Duty, and G. Gibson Effects of Population Structure and Sex on Association Between Serotonin Receptors and Drosophila Heart Rate Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 1963 - 1974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Das, S. Mohanty, and W. Stephan Inferring the Population Structure and Demography of Drosophila ananassae From Multilocus Data Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 1975 - 1985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Baines, A. Das, S. Mousset, and W. Stephan The Role of Natural Selection in Genetic Differentiation of Worldwide Populations of Drosophila ananassae Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 1987 - 1998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sezgin, D. D. Duvernell, L. M. Matzkin, Y. Duan, C.-T. Zhu, B. C. Verrelli, and W. F. Eanes Single-Locus Latitudinal Clines and Their Relationship to Temperate Adaptation in Metabolic Genes and Derived Alleles in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 923 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Storz, B. A. Payseur, and M. W. Nachman Genome Scans of DNA Variability in Humans Reveal Evidence for Selective Sweeps Outside of Africa Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2004; 21(9): 1800 - 1811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Orengo and M. Aguade Detecting the Footprint of Positive Selection in a European Population of Drosophila melanogaster: Multilocus Pattern of Variation and Distance to Coding Regions Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 1759 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Palsson, A. Rouse, R. Riley-Berger, I. Dworkin, and G. Gibson Nucleotide Variation in the Egfr Locus of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1199 - 1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mousset, N. Derome, and M. Veuille A Test of Neutrality and Constant Population Size Based on the Mismatch Distribution Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2004; 21(4): 724 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- HTML Page - index.htslp
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Glinka, S.
- Articles by De Lorenzo, D.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Glinka, S.
- Articles by De Lorenzo, D.



) and divergence (
) data are shown. Values above (below) the x-axis indicate a larger (smaller) contribution than expected. Fragments are ranked along the x-axis according to their total contribution to the test statistic (including polymorphism and divergence components). When the 24 fragments at the left of the vertical dashed line were excluded from the test (for the European sample), the value of the overall test statistic dropped below the critical value.





