- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Wieczorek, D. J.
- Articles by Feiss, M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Wieczorek, D. J.
- Articles by Feiss, M.
Genetics of cosQ, the DNA-Packaging Termination Site of Phage
: Local Suppressors and Methylation Effects
Douglas J. Wieczoreka and
Michael Feissa
a Genetics Ph.D. Program and Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Corresponding author: Douglas J. Wieczorek, University of Iowa, 3-315 BSB, Iowa City, IA 52242., wieczorekd{at}mail.medicine.uiowa.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: G. R. SMITH
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The cos site of the bacteriophage
chromosome contains the sites required for DNA processing and packaging during virion assembly. cos is composed of three subsites, cosQ, cosN, and cosB. cosQ is required for the termination of chromosome packaging. Previous studies have shown cosQ mutations to be suppressed in three ways: by a local suppressor within cosQ; by an increase in the length of the
chromosome; and by missense mutations affecting the prohead's portal protein, gpB. In the first study reported here, revertants of a set of cosQ mutants were screened for suppressors, and cis-acting suppressors of cosQ mutations were studied; these included second-site cosQ point mutations, base-pair insertions within cosQ, and an additional genome-lengthening suppressor. The 7-bp-long cosQ, with the sequence 5'-GGGTCCT-3', coincides exactly with the recognition site for the EcoO109I restriction/methylation system, which has the consensus sequence 5'-PuGGNCCPy-3'. In a second study, EcoO109I methylation was found to strongly interfere with the residual cosQ function of leaky cosQ mutants. cis-acting suppressors that overcome methylation-associated defects, including a methylation-dependent suppressor, were also isolated. Models of cosQ suppression are presented.
MANY double-stranded DNA viruses have replication and recombination pathways that produce concatemers, i.e., end-to-end multimers of virus chromosomes. For a subset of these viruses, including many tailed bacteriophages and the herpes viruses, the concatemers are cut at specific sites to generate unit-length virion chromosomes (![]()
Phage
chromosomes are 48.5-kb duplexes with 12-base-long, single-stranded extensions at the 5' ends of the strands. These extensions, called cohesive ends, are complementary and enable the chromosome to cyclize in an infected cell. Late during infection, concatemers produced by rolling circle replication and recombination are cut by terminase and packaged into empty shells called proheads (![]()
![]()
![]()
200-bp segment, orchestrate the recognition, processing, and packaging of
DNA (Fig 1). In addition to cosN, the adjacent site cosB is required for cutting at cosN to initiate DNA packaging. Terminase consists of a large subunit, gpA, which contains the endonuclease, and a small subunit, gpNu1, which binds cosB to anchor gpA during cosN cutting. After a concatemer's cosN is cut, terminase remains bound to the resulting cosB-containing DNA end, which is the left end of the chromosome to be packaged. The terminase-
DNA complex binds to the portal vertex of a prohead, and translocation of the DNA into the shell ensues. Translocation moves the DNA-packaging complex along the DNA until the next cos is encountered and the terminase docked at the portal vertex recognizes and cuts the downstream cos. Following cleavage, terminase undocks from the newly filled head and remains bound to the left end of the next chromosome along the concatemer, sponsoring its packaging. cosQ, although not required for initiation of DNA packaging, is required for cleavage of the downstream cos. Because cosQ mutants fail to cut the downstream cos and fail to stop translocation at cos, the shell is filled to capacity, and because the protruding DNA prevents tail attachment, the cosQ defect is lethal. The bypassed downstream cos in cosQ mutants is properly nicked on the top strand of cosN, but the bottom strand is not nicked. The depolarization model proposes that cosQ acts in presenting a gpA subunit to the bottom strand of cosN by forming a bend in the region of DNA between cosQ and cosN, forming a loop for cosQ and cosN to be aligned in the same orientation. A second version of the model proposes that cosQ is needed for a pause in the packaging process to recruit the second of two gpA subunits from solution to the cosN site for the nicking of the bottom strand of DNA (![]()
![]()
|
Three classes of suppressors of cosQ mutations have been identified (![]()
![]()
29 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In a previous study, we used saturation mutagenesis to determine that cosQ is 7 bp long, composed of
base pairs 48,47348,479 with the sequence 5'-GGGTCCT-3' (![]()
80, and N15 (![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Media:
Media were prepared as described by ![]()
Strains:
Strains used in this study are described by ![]()
![]()
General recombinant DNA techniques:
General recombinant DNA techniques are described by ![]()
![]()
Sequence designations:
All references to
sequence are based on the numbering convention described by ![]()
sequence begins with the first base of the left cohesive end and continues along the top strand in a 5' to 3' direction. The position of each restriction cut site is given as the first nucleotide of the recognition sequence.
Phage yield determinations:
Phage yield determinations are described by ![]()
Identification and isolation of plaque-forming revertants:
Lysogens of non-plaque-forming
cosQ mutants were induced and lysates titered on MF1427. Also, lysogens of
cosQ T48,479C were induced and lysates titered on MF1427 expressing the EcoO109I methylase. Plaque-forming revertants were selected and single plaque purified. Lysogens of the revertants were constructed by infecting MF1427 with phages isolated from plaques. PCR amplification followed by restriction enzyme analysis and DNA sequencing were performed to determine the cosQ sequence.
Introduction of B suppressor mutations into the
genome:
The introduction of B suppressor mutations into the
genome is described by ![]()
cosQ G48,473A.
E. coli mutD mutagenesis:
The method of E. coli mutD mutagenesis is described by ![]()
PCR mutagenesis:
PCR mutagenesis of the B gene is described by ![]()
4000 transformed colonies were scraped from the plates and resuspended in Luria broth. The pooled transformed lysogens were grown overnight, prophages were induced, and lysates were titered on MF1427 as described previously.
DNase protection assay:
A 100-µl aliquot of each lysate was incubated with 5 units of DNase, 20 µl of RNase A (500 µg/ml), 6 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM CaCl2 at room temperature for 30 min. Ten microliters of 0.5 M EDTA was added for 10 min at room temperature to stop the reaction. Five nanograms of linearized pUC19 was included as a control for DNA recovery. The lysate was extracted twice with phenol-CHCl3-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, v/v) and once with CHCl3. Samples included 30 of 200 µl (15%) of the extracted DNA. The DNA was subjected to electrophoresis on a 0.8% gel. To quantify the amount of DNA, the DNA was denatured and transferred to a GeneScreen Plus (New England Nuclear) membrane. DNA hybridization was performed using [
-32P]dCTP-labeled (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) linearized pUC19 and whole-length
DNA as probes. An autoradiogram was obtained by exposure of the membrane to a Fuji Super RX film for 8 hr at -70°. The recovery of pUC19 DNA and the amount of DNA packaged in the methylated and unmethylated lysates was determined by phosphorimaging on a Packard Instantimager. The packaging ratio is the yield of packaged phage DNA per induced lysogen in the presence of the methylase relative to the yield of packaged phage DNA per induced lysogen in the absence of the methylase. For example, the effect of methylation on the packaging of wild-type
DNA was calculated by dividing the counts per minute per induced lysogen from lane 8 by the counts per minute per induced lysogen from lane 3 (Fig 2). The yields were further adjusted to account for the percentage recovery of pUC19 as an indicator of the overall recovery of packaged
DNA. More than 87% of the control pUC19 DNA was recovered for each sample. Portions of each culture were removed prior to induction, diluted 1:10,000 in 10 mM MgSO4, and plated on tryptone agar. Plates were incubated overnight at 31° to determine the number of viable lysogens.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
Local suppressors in pseudorevertants of
cosQ mutants
Local suppressors in spontaneous pseudorevertants of
cosQ mutants:
cosQ is 7 bp long, so there are 21 possible base pair changes in cosQ. Earlier, we constructed phages with these 21 cosQ mutations and classified them by phenotypic severity (![]()
1.0 virion/induced lysogen, and 3 were moderate lethals with yields between 1.0 and 5.5 (see ![]()
![]()
We first examined spontaneous revertants of
cosQ mutants. Efforts were taken to minimize siblings among the revertants by using multiple induced lysates in the screening process. We screened plaque-forming revertants in unmutagenized lysates of phages with the eight severe lethal cosQ mutations: G48,473T, G48,473C, G48,474A, G48,474T, G48,474C, C48,478A, C48,478T, and C48,478G (see Table 1 in ![]()
![]()
cosQ G48,473C (5'-CGGTCCT-3') contained an insertion of an A between base pairs 48,475 and 48,476 to give the sequence 5'-CGGATCCT-3'. Rev28 and Rev15 of
cosQ G48,473T contained insertions of A or T, respectively, also between base pairs 48,475 and 48,476. These nucleotide insertions appeared to suppress the original cosQ mutation by shifting the original mutation one position to the left, resulting in a new 7-bp cosQ site. The novel cosQ sites created by the insertion suppressors begin at base pair 48,474 instead of 48,473, with the inserted base pair representing the only mutation in cosQ in the third base pair of cosQ.
|
Our previous work showed that
mutants with an A or T in the third cosQ base pair (5'-GGATCCT-3' or 5'-GGTTCCT-3') were viable (![]()
cosQ G48,475A and
cosQ G48,475T. First, we compared the yields of Rev12 of
cosQ G48,473C and Rev28 of
cosQ G48,473T with that of
cosQ G48,475A, which has the same 7-bp cosQ sequence. The yields of Rev12 and Rev28, at 15 and 19% that of wild type, respectively, agree closely with the 19% value for
cosQ G48,475A (Table 1). Second, Rev15 of
cosQ G48,473T, with a relative yield of 33% that of wild type, had a yield in close agreement with that of
cosQ G48,475T, with a relative virus yield of 35%. The results strongly support the proposal that the insertion suppressors create new cosQs.
Local suppressors in pseudorevertants of
cosQ mutants subjected to E. coli mutD mutagenesis:
The vast majority of revertants of
cosQ mutants were true revertants, making the isolation of pseudorevertants difficult. To vary the strategy, we searched for pseudorevertants in lysates of mutD-mutagenized cosQ mutants with the moderate mutations G48,475C and T48,479G and with the severe mutations G48,473T, G48,473C, G48,474C, G48,474A, G48,474T, C48,478A, C48,478T, and C48,478G. The mutD mutation inactivates
, the proofreading exonuclease subunit of DNA polymerase III (![]()
500-fold increase in the number of plaque-forming revertants identified when compared with nonmutagenized control lysates. Lysogens of revertants were first screened by using PCR to generate cos-containing segments and then digested with the EcoO109I restriction enzyme. Since cosQ+ is identical to the EcoO109I recognition sequence, digestion with EcoO109I indicates reversion to cosQ+.
As with spontaneous revertants, most mutD-induced cosQ revertants were true revertants (see ![]()
![]()
cosQ G48,473A and
cosQ C48,477T have more severe defects than the
cosQ G48,473A C48,477T double mutant. We also recovered C48,477T as a suppressor of our
cosQ G48,473A mutant (not shown). C48,477T was also identified as a suppressor of the two other point mutations at position 48,473 of cosQ:
cosQ G48,473C (Rev16) and
cosQ G48,473T (Rev41). Thus, all three mutations at position 48,473 of cosQ, G
A, G
C, and G
T, are suppressed by C48,477T, or vice versa, resulting in large increases in virus yield (Table 1). A local suppressor of the G48,475C mutation was also identified as the T48,479C mutation (Rev8), affecting the last base pair of cosQ (Table 1). Curiously, in all four cases involving these local suppressors, the distance between the original mutation and the suppressor within the cosQ site is 4 bp. Given that all three changes at 48,473 were suppressors of the C48,477T mutation, we were curious to see if multiple examples of suppression involving base pairs 48,475 and 48,479 were possible.
Suppression study of base pairs 48,475 and 48,479: To determine which combinations of mutations affecting base pairs 48,475 and 48,479 showed mutual suppression, we constructed all possible combinations of cosQ changes affecting base pairs 48,475 and 48,479. Of the nine double mutants constructed, the only viable combination recovered was that found previously, G48,475C and T48,479C (GGCTCCC; yield = 16 phage/induced lysogen). An additional pair, the combination of two viable cosQ mutations, G48,475T and T48,479C (GGTTCCC), produced a significant yield (0.6 phage/induced lysogen), although the yield was insufficient for plaque formation.
The results show that in all observed cases of mutual suppression one of the base pairs involved is one of the symmetrically disposed pairs of base pairs at 48,475 and 48,477 (base pairs G48,473A/T/C + C48,477T and G48,475C + T48,479C). However, the combinations of suppressing base pairs are not symmetric. That is, the mutations G48,475C and C48,477T affect symmetrically disposed base pairs, but while the C48,477T mutation is suppressed by any change of the first cosQ base pair at 48,473, only the T48,479C change in the last cosQ base pair (not T48,479A or T48,479G) suppresses the G48,475C mutation.
Segment-specific PCR mutagenesis:
In a previous study we employed PCR mutagenesis to identify suppressors of cosQ mutations (![]()
![]()
![]()
cosQ T48,479A obtained using this strategy was an unusual phage, Rev19. Rev19 retained the T48,479A mutation and had no suppressor within cosQ or B. Previous work had shown that the C48,477T mutation was suppressed by an increase in phage chromosome length (![]()
3-kb duplication within the head genes of
involving A, W, parts of Nu1, and B (data not shown).
Effects of cosQ methylation on cosQ function
EcoO109I methylation of cosQ:
The 7-bp region of cosQ with the DNA sequence 5'-GGGTCCT-3' corresponds to the target sequence of the EcoO109I restriction and modification enzymes that have the recognition sequence 5'-PuG
GNCCPy-3' (![]()
has two EcoO109I restriction sites: at
base pairs 48,473 (cosQ) and 2815. To see if cosQ methylation affects cosQ function, we determined the effects of EcoO109I methylation on phage yield. A lysogen of
wild type was transformed with a clone of the EcoO109I methylase in the vector pACYC184, and, following induction, the phage yield was determined (Table 2). The expression of EcoO109I methylase during
wild-type phage production resulted in a virus yield of 42 (±3) in comparison to the unmethylated
wild-type control transformed with the pACYC184 vector alone with a yield of 136 (±9), roughly a threefold decrease in phage yield. The virus yield in the absence of the pACYC184 vector was 87 (±3). It is unclear why the virus yield was higher in the presence of the pACYC184 vector, which served as a positive control.
|
EcoO109I methylation of
cosQ mutants:
We noted that some cosQ mutations left the EcoO109I target sequence intact. To study further the effects of cosQ methylation, we studied the growth of two phages bearing cosQ mutations that retained the EcoO109I recognition site, namely
cosQ T48,476G and
cosQ T48,479C. As controls, we also used three phages with cosQ mutations that inactivated the EcoO109I site,
cosQ G48,475A,
cosQ G48,475T, and
cosQ C48,477A. All five cosQ mutations used are nonlethal. The mutants with methylatable cosQ sites had severe decreases in burst sizes when grown in the host expressing the EcoO109I methylase (Table 2). That is,
cosQ T48,476G and
cosQ T48,479C had 97- and 76-fold decreases in virus yields [relative to the pACYC184 (+) control], respectively, when grown in the presence of the EcoO109I methylase, and consequently were unable to form plaques. In contrast, the phages with nonmethylatable cosQ sites had mild decreases in yield when grown in the presence of the methylase (
1.3- to 2.5-fold), decreases comparable to that of
wild type (
3-fold). Since these mutants retained only the single EcoO109I site at 2815, it is possible that methylation of the base pair 2815 site mildly decreases the virus yield. Since only cosQ mutants with methylatable cosQ sites showed severe growth defects, we concluded that these severe growth defects were due to methylation of the mutant cosQ site. Because EcoO109I methylation had only mild effects on
cosQ+'s yield, we further concluded that phages with weakened cosQ sites are particularly sensitive to methylation. We speculate that the cosQ mutations interfere with recognition of cosQ by some component of the packaging machinery and that recognition is further weakened when cosQ is methylated.
Suppression of EcoO109I methylation defects of cosQ by suppressors in gene B:
Numerous suppressors of cosQ mutations have previously been identified as missense mutations in gene B, which encodes the portal protein (![]()
![]()
![]()
cosQ G48,473A is able to form tiny plaques in the absence of the methylase, but is unable to form plaques on MF1427 expressing the EcoO109I methylase. Brev98, Brev22, Brev33, and Brev31 are all mild suppressors that increase the virus yield of
cosQ T48,479A three- to eightfold, and they are general suppressors of other cosQ mutations (![]()
First we tested the abilities of four B suppressors for suppression of G48,473A in the absence of the methylase. Prophages bearing the G48,473A mutation and several of the B suppressors were constructed, and virus yields were determined.
cosQ G48,473A Brev98,
cosQ G48,473A Brev33,
cosQ G48,473A Brev22, and
cosQ G48,473A Brev31 had virus yields increased by 1.5- to 5-fold in comparison to
cosQ G48,473A, indicating that each of the B suppressors of T48,479A is also able to mildly suppress the G48,473A mutation in the absence of methylation, as expected for general suppressors (Table 3). The relative strengths of suppression of G48,473A are similar to that previously shown for T48,479A (![]()
|
We next tested the ability of the B suppressors of
cosQ G48,473A to suppress the defects associated with EcoO109I methylation. The EcoO109I methylase expression plasmid was used to transform lysogens of
cosQ G48,473A containing the various B suppressors. Lysogens with and without the EcoO109I methylase were induced and virus yields were determined (Table 3).
cosQ G48,473A grown in the presence of the methylase had a yield 5.3% of its yield in the absence of the methylase. In contrast,
cosQ G48,473A Brev98,
cosQ G48,473A Brev33,
cosQ G48,473A Brev22, and
cosQ G48,473A Brev31 grown in the presence of the methylase had yields of 11, 11, 31, and 14%, respectively, of their yields in the absence of the methylase. Overall, the presence of the B suppressors resulted in two- to sixfold increases in virus yield in the presence of the EcoO109I methylase when compared to
cosQ G48,473A alone. Thus, the B mutations resulted in mild suppression of the defects associated with EcoO109I methylation of cosQ. The B mutations were effective to similar extents in suppressing cosQ mutations and cosQ methylation, both resulting in plaque formation, indicating that effects of cosQ methylation on cosQ function are similar to the effects of cosQ mutations.
Pseudorevertants of EcoO109I-methylated
cosQ mutants:
cosQ T48,476G and
cosQ T48,479C carry moderate cosQ mutations and are able to form plaques on the host E. coli strain MF1427 in the absence of the EcoO109I methylase but are unable to form plaques on MF1427 expressing the methylase. We looked for pseudorevertants among plaque-forming revertants of
cosQ T48,476G and
cosQ T48,479C for suppressors. We assumed we would identify cis-acting suppressors that would alter cosQ and prevent recognition by the EcoO109I methylase. Lysates of
cosQ T48,476G and
cosQ T48,479C were plated on MF1427 cells carrying the EcoO109I methylase-expressing plasmid [pACYC184-EcoO109IM]. Among 38 plaque-forming revertants of the two mutants, 35 were true revertants and 3 were pseudorevertants of
cosQ T48,479C that carried the original cosQ mutation and an additional cosQ change (Table 4). Methrev1 and Methrev21 each contained an additional transition mutation within cosQ, while Methrev3 contained a single base-pair deletion of the original T48,479C mutation, in effect, generating a wild-type cosQ sequence shifted 1 bp to the right, i.e., toward cosN.
|
Lysogens of the pseudorevertants that contained the EcoO109I methylase expression plasmid [pACYC184-EcoO109IM] were induced to prepare lysates. We determined the efficiency of plating of the pseudorevertants on MF1427 and MF1427 [pACYC184-EcoO109IM] (Table 4). While the
cosQ T48,479C parent plated with an efficiency of 10-5 on MF1427 [pACYC184-EcoO109IM], relative to the titer on MF1427, the plating efficiencies of Methrev3 and Methrev21 were only mildly reduced. Clearly, these phages are able to grow well in the presence of the EcoO109I methylase. Interestingly, Methrev1 exhibited an
8000-fold higher titer on MF1427 [pACYC184-EcoO109IM] than on MF1427; i.e., Methrev1 was methylation dependent.
Packaged
DNA is resistant to attack by DNase I (![]()
wild type,
cosQ T48,479C, Methrev1, Methrev3, and Methrev21 were studied. When methylated
wild type, packaged 81% of DNA compared to unmethylated
wild type. Recall that the burst size data of
cosQ+ showed a threefold reduction in phage yield when grown in the presence of the methylase (Table 2); the discrepancy is likely due to DNA recovery errors inherent in the DNase protection assay. Methylation of
cosQ T48,479C reduced DNA packaging to 10%, reflecting that phage's inability to produce plaques in the presence of the methylase. Methylated Methrev3 and Methrev21 packaged 53 and 121%, respectively, of the amount of DNA packaged in the absence of the methylase. The methylation-dependent virus Methrev1 packaged >6-fold more DNA when grown in the presence of the methylase than when grown in the absence of the methylase. Thus, Methrev1 is dependent on EcoO109I methylation for efficient phage production. These data are in reasonable agreement with the results of the plaque-forming assays. The
8000-fold increase in plating efficiency of Methrev1 in the presence of the methylase is due to the requirement for plaque formation in the plating assay. While mature phages are produced in the absence of the methylase, the yield is less than the yield (>5.5/cell) required for plaque formation.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
We have carried out a detailed pseudoreversion study of cosQ mutants, using a previously isolated complete set of cosQ point mutants (![]()
![]()
Local cosQ suppressors: frameshift mutations:
Two suppressors of the cosQ point mutations G48,473C (found in Rev12) and G48,473T (found in Rev28 and Rev15) were identified as insertions of an A or a T between base pairs 48,475 and 48,476 within the cosQ site (Table 1). These nucleotide insertions shift the original mutation one position to the left and result in a new 7-bp cosQ site, with novel cosQ sites beginning at base pair 48,474 instead of at base pair 48,473. Thus, the inserted base pair now represents the third base pair of cosQ and is the only mutation present in cosQ. Consistent with this interpretation, we previously found that cosQ mutants with an A or a T at the third cosQ base pair were viable (![]()
A genome-lengthening cosQ suppressor: a tandem duplication:
Restriction analysis of the Rev19
cosQ T48,479A revertant revealed the presence of an
3-kb duplication within the head genes of
, involving W and at least part of Nu1, A, and B (data not shown). ![]()
;
90% of these mutations occurred on the left arm of the chromosome. Our identification of this duplication as a suppressor of the T48,479A mutation validates the findings of ![]()
chromosome to increase the length of the
cosQ C48,477T chromosome from 46.2 to 5051 kb. They showed that suppression did not depend on the particular DNA segment duplicated; that is, the important feature of this type of suppression was chromosome lengthening per se. Thus, increased chromosome length is a general mechanism of suppression of cosQ mutations. Increased chromosome length is proposed to slow the rate of DNA packaging during the late stages of DNA packaging, thus increasing the efficiency of mutant cosQ recognition (![]()
![]()
cis-acting cosQ suppressors: a symmetric pattern of substitution mutations:
Some pseudorevertants of cosQ mutants contained local suppressors that were substitution mutations within the 7-bp cosQ segment, as follows. Secondary mutations in the cosQ sites of two pseudorevertants of
cosQ C48,477T were G48,473C (in Rev16) and G48,473T (in Rev41). An earlier study found that C48,477T was suppressed by the G48,473A mutation. Thus, all three mutations at position 48,473 of cosQ, G
A, G
C, and G
T, show mutual suppression with C48,477T. Of the base pair 48,473 and 48,477 mutations involved in mutual suppression, two, G48,473T and G48,473C, are lethal, and the other two, G48,473A and C48,477T, are nonlethal but have significant phenotypic effects (![]()
A local suppressor of the G48,475C mutation was T48,479C (found in Rev8), which by itself has no phenotype (![]()
|
A second observation suggests that cosQ may be a rotationally symmetric element: the 7-bp cosQ segment is coincident with an EcoO109I restriction-modification system target site, 5'-PuGGNCCPy-3'. The EcoO109I site has twofold rotational symmetry and is presumably recognized by symmetrically disposed subunits of the restriction enzyme and methylase. The coincidence of cosQ and the symmetric EcoO109I site also raises the possibility that cosQ itself is symmetric. Third, all the possible mutations affecting the symmetrically disposed cosQ base pairs G48,474 and C48,478 are severe lethals, and mutations affecting the symmetric base pairs G48,475 and C48,477 impart less severe changes.
There are also asymmetric phenotypic effects of cosQ point mutations. For example, the first position of cosQ, base pair 48,473, requires a G for cosQ function, whereas the seventh position, base pair 48,479, can be a T or a C. It is possible that cosQ is functionally symmetric, with asymmetry imposed by either base pairs flanking cosQ or the other cos subsites that function with cosQ. There are precedents for external imposition of asymmetric effects on a symmetric site. For example, the rate of cleavage of some restriction sites by type II restriction enzymes, such as EcoRI, is strongly affected by the sequences flanking the site (![]()
![]()
![]()
EcoO109I methylation severely affects the yield of cosQ mutants:
The EcoO109I methylase has at best marginal effects on the growth of
cosQ and cosQ mutants with cosQ sites that cannot be methylated by the EcoO109I enzyme. In contrast, two cosQ mutants with methylatable cosQ sites, cosQ T48,476G and cosQ T48,479C, showed very strong inhibition, such that the virus yield is reduced to 12% of the yield in the absence of the methylase (Table 2). These results indicate that wild-type cosQ functions normally when methylated, but that cosQ recognition already weakened by a cosQ mutation is severely affected by cosQ methylation. We cannot exclude the alternative explanation that the cosQ of
wild type is methylated much less efficiently than the cosQ sites of
cosQ T48,476G and
cosQ T48,479C.
cosQ suppressors located in gene B also suppress defects in cosQ function caused by EcoO109I methylation:
Numerous non-allele-specific suppressors of cosQ mutations map to B, the gene for
's portal protein (![]()
cosQ G48,473A 1.5- to 5-fold (Table 3). These modest increases in phage yield are in agreement with other studies (![]()
cosQ G48,473A 2- to 6-fold. We note that, although the B suppressors suppressed the effects of methylation on
cosQ G48,473A to the same extent that they suppressed the effects of cosQ mutations, the extent of suppression was not sufficient to permit plaque formation by
cosQ G48,473A. Nevertheless, the similar extents of suppression of cosQ mutations and cosQ methylation indicate that methylation interferes with cosQ function by the same mechanism and that the B suppressors act by enhancing recognition of the altered cosQ site.
Local suppressors of methylation-induced cosQ defects:
We further studied methylation-induced cosQ defects by isolating pseudorevertants of
cosQ T48,479C, a phage unable to grow on the EcoO109I-expressing cells.
Methrev3 of
cosQ T48,479C:
Methrev3 of
cosQ T48,479C contains a single base-pair deletion of the cosQ T48,479C mutation. The new sequence contains a wild-type cosQ sequence shifted 1 bp closer to cosN (Table 4). Although other deletions between cosN and cosQ have not been studied, we note that addition of a single base pair between cosQ and cosN has little effect on virus yield (![]()
Methrev21 of
cosQ T48,479C:
Methrev21 of
cosQ T48,479C contains a second mutation within cosQ, C48,477T, and had virus yields of 43 and 19% in the absence and presence of the methylase, respectively, when compared to the wild-type phage (Table 4). The cosQ sequence of this revertant from base pair 48,473 to 48,479 with the C48,477T mutation is unable to be methylated. Thus, the virus yield is expected to be unaffected by the presence of the methylase. The high yield in the absence of the methylase is inconsistent with the yield expected for
cosQ C48,477T, since a yield 6% that of wild type was found previously for
cosQ C48,477T (![]()
T mutation at the third position of the sequence. The G
T mutation blocks methylation of the second site. We propose that this nonmethylatable second cosQ site is utilized and that it sponsors efficient phage production by Methrev21. Methrev21 is predicted to have a relative virus yield comparable to
cosQ G48,475T in both the presence and the absence of the methylase, since the effect of the 1-bp shortening of the cosQ-cosN spacing region is expected to have little effect on virus yield. In fact, the
cosQ G48,475T mutant has a yield of 43% that of wild type, in excellent agreement with the yield of 43% of Methrev21 in the absence of the methylase (Table 4).
Methrev1 of
cosQ T48,479C:
Methrev1 of
cosQ T48,479C contains a second mutation within cosQ, T48,476G; this phage was dependent on methylation for viability, showing an
8000-fold increase in plating efficiency on cells expressing EcoO109I methylase, relative to cells lacking the methylase. In addition, Methrev1 packaged >6-fold more DNA when grown in the presence of the methylase than when grown in the absence of the methylase (Fig 2). Thus, Methrev1 is dependent on EcoO109I methylation for efficient phage production.
Upon examination of Methrev1's cosQ, two potential cosQ sites are identified, both of which are methylatable: the 5'-GGGGCCC-3' sequence from base pairs 48,473 to 48,479, containing two mutations, and the sequence 5'-GGGCCCT-3' from base pairs 48,474 to 48,480, a sequence identical to that of
cosQ G48,476C (Table 4). In the absence of the methylase, the 5'-GGGGCCC-3' cosQ sequence is not likely to permit healthy growth due to the presence of the two cosQ mutations. The T48,476G mutation alone reduces the virus yield to 30% that of wild type, while the T48,479C mutation alone has little effect on virus yield (see ![]()
cosQ G48,476C, which has the second cosQ sequence, 5'-GGGCCCT-3', has a virus yield 10% that of wild type and forms tiny plaques. In the context of Methrev1, the shift of the second cosQ 1 bp closer to cosN, even if it had only a slight effect, might be enough to prevent plaque formation. So how can we explain the viability of methylated Methrev1?
Structural models of cosQ:
The symmetry properties of the cosQ site and the symmetric aspect of the local cosQ substitution suppressors (Fig 3) suggest that cosQ may be recognized by symmetrically disposed protomers of a component of the packaging machinery, namely a prohead protein or terminase. The absence of allele-specific cosQ suppressors may be because two symmetrically disposed cosQ mutations might be necessary for isolation of allele-specific suppressors affecting the subunits of a symmetric multimer of the recognition factor.
If cosQ is recognized by symmetrically disposed subunits of a component of the translocation complex, how does one explain the types of local substitution suppressors? The suppression pattern is that certain mutations affecting the inner GC base pairs at 48,475 and 48,477 can be suppressed by mutations affecting base pairs 48,479 and 48,473, respectively (Fig 3). If cosQ interacts with symmetrically disposed subunits of a binding protein, then base pairs 48,475 and 48,477 would form equivalent contacts with the subunits. A reasonable but highly speculative model to explain the substitution suppression data can be constructed as follows. If we suppose that a mutation affecting base pairs 48,475 weakens the binding protein's cosQ interaction, then a suppressing change at 48,479 might compensate by strengthening the protein-cosQ interaction. The base pair of this example, 48,475 and 48,479, affect the proposed left and right cosQ half sites. Base pair 48,475 is rotationally symmetric with base pairs 48,477, and if the cosQ symmetry model is correct, it is puzzling that changes at 48,479 were not found as suppressors of mutations at 48,477. Similarly, mutations at 48,473 were found as suppressors of mutations at 48,477 but not as suppressors of mutations affecting 48,475. In each case, the suppressors are located in the cosQ half-site opposite the half-site containing the mutation that is suppressed. Why would the mutation at 48,479 be unable to suppress a mutation at 48,477? Suppose that the R-groups of the amino acids of a structural element of the cosQ-interacting protein, such as an
-helix (or a ß-strand), were involved in making contacts with cosQ half-sites. The original mutation and its suppressor might alter the geometry of the cosQ-protein interaction. It is possible that altered R-group/base pair geometry could be accommodated if the two base pair changes were in opposite half-sites, but not if both cosQ changes were in the same half-site. This model, although highly speculative, rationalizes the substitution suppression data (Fig 3).
An alternative explanation for the puzzling suppression and methylation effects is that cosQ might be a DNA element with an unusual structure. Studies by ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
terminase, but cannot be cleaved. Cleavage is restored late during infection by the occasional methylation of a hemi-methylated pac site before the site is protected by pacase binding. Thus, the methylation of these sites within the pac sequence may alter the local DNA structure, as has been proposed for cosQ, to allow for DNA cleavage by the P1 pacase.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank our co-workers, Nicole Brogden, Alok Dhar, Carol Duffy, Sara Gaeth, Qi Hang, Jason Luke, Jenny Meyer, and Jean Sippy, for advice and interest during the course of this work. We also thank Shuang-yong Xu and New England Biolabs for generously providing clones of the EcoO109I methylase. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grant GM-51611 (M.F.), Genetics Research Training grant T32GM08629 (D.W.), and the NIH Iowa Kidney Disease, Hypertension, and Cell Biology Research Training Grant DK07690-10 (D.W.).
Manuscript received January 15, 2003; Accepted for publication April 21, 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ADELMAN, K., B. SALMON, and J. D. BAINES, 2001 Herpes simplex virus DNA packaging sequences adopt novel structures that are specifically recognized by a component of the cleavage and packaging machinery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:3086-3091.
ARBER, W., L. ENQUIST, B. HOHN, N. E. MURRAY and K. MURRAY, 1983 Experimental methods for use with lambda, pp. 433466 in Lambda II, edited by R. W. HENDRIX, J. W. ROBERTS, F. W. STAHL and R. A. WEISBERG. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
BECKER, A. and H. MURIALDO, 1990 Bacteriophage
DNA: the beginning of the end. J. Bacteriol. 172:2819-2824.
BODE, V. C. and F. D. GILLIN, 1971 The arrangement of DNA in lambda phage heads. I. Biological consequences of micrococcal nuclease attack on a portion of the chromosome exposed in tailless heads. J. Mol. Biol. 62:493-502.[Medline]
CATALANO, C. E., D. CUE, and M. FEISS, 1995 Virus DNA packaging: the strategy used by phage
. Mol. Microbiol. 16:1075-1086.[Medline]
CUE, D. and M. FEISS, 1997 Genetic evidence that recognition of cosQ, the signal for termination of phage
DNA packaging, depends on the extent of head filling. Genetics 147:7-17.[Abstract]
CUE, D. and M. FEISS, 1998 Termination of packaging of the bacteriophage
chromosome: cosQ is required for nicking the bottom strand of cosN.. J. Mol. Biol. 280:11-29.[Medline]
DANIELS, D., J. SCHROEDER, W. SZYBALSKI, F. SANGER, A. COULSEN et al., 1983 Completed annotated lambda sequence, pp. 519676 in Lambda II, edited by R. W. HENDRIX, J. W. ROBERTS, F. W. STAHL and R. A. WEISBERG. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
DIEKMANN, S. and L. W. MCLAUGHLIN, 1988 DNA curvature in native and modified EcoRI recognition sites and possible influence upon the endonuclease cleavage reaction. J. Mol. Biol. 202:823-834.[Medline]
EMMONS, S. W., 1974 Bacteriophage lambda derivatives carrying two copies of the cohesive end site. J. Mol. Biol. 83:511-525.[Medline]
FEISS, M., 1986 Terminase and the recognition, cutting, and packaging of
chromosomes. Trends Genet. 2:100-104.
FUJISAWA, H. and P. HEARING, 1994 Structure, function, and specificity of the DNA packaging signals in double-stranded DNA viruses. Semin. Virol. 5:5-13.
HANG, J. Q., C. E. CATALANO, and M. FEISS, 2001 The functional asymmetry of cosN, the nicking site for bacteriophage
packaging, is dependent on the terminase binding site, cosB.. Biochemistry 40:13370-13377.[Medline]
KITA, K., J. TSUDA, and R. NISHIGAKI, 2001 Characterization and overproduction of EcoO109I methyltransferase. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 65:2512-2518.[Medline]
MARUYAMA, M., T. HORIUCHI, H. MAKI, and M. SEKIGUCHI, 1983 A dominant (mutD5) and a recessive (dnaQ49) mutator of Escherichia coli.. J. Mol. Biol. 167:757-771.[Medline]
MISE, K. and K. NAKAJIMA, 1985 Restriction endonuclease EcoO109I from Escherichia coli H709c with heptanucleotide recognition site 5'-PuG
GNCCPy. Gene 36:363-367.[Medline]
RAVIN, V., N. RAVIN, S. CASJENS, M. E. FORD, and G. F. HATFULL et al., 2000 Genomic sequence and analysis of the atypical temperate bacteriophage N15. J. Mol. Biol 299:53-73.[Medline]
SIX, E. and C. A. C. KLUG, 1973 Bacteriophage P4: a satellite virus depending on a helper such as prophage P2. Virology 51:327-344.[Medline]
SMITH, M. P. and M. FEISS, 1993 Sites and gene products involved in lambdoid phage DNA packaging. J. Bacteriol. 175:2393-2399.
SMITH, D. E., S. J. TANS, S. B. SMITH, S. GRIMES, and D. L. ANDERSON et al., 2001 The bacteriophage
29 portal motor can package DNA against a large internal force. Nature 413:748-752.[Medline]
STERNBERG, N. and J. N. COULBY, 1988 Processing of the bacteriophage P1 packaging site (pac) is regulated by adenine methylation. Gene 74:203.[Medline]
STERNBERG, N. and J. COULBY, 1990 Cleavage of the bacteriophage P1 packaging site (pac) is regulated by adenine methylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:8070-8074.
THOMAS, M. and R. W. DAVIS, 1975 Studies on the cleavage of bacteriophage lambda DNA with EcoRI restriction endonuclease. J. Mol. Biol. 91:315-328.[Medline]
WIECZOREK, D. J. and M. FEISS, 2001 Defining cosQ, the site required for termination of bacteriophage
DNA packaging. Genetics 158:495-506.
WIECZOREK, D. J., L. DIDION, and M. FEISS, 2002 Alterations of the portal protein of bacteriophage
suppress mutations in cosQ, the site required for termination of DNA packaging. Genetics 161:21-31.
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Wieczorek, D. J.
- Articles by Feiss, M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Wieczorek, D. J.
- Articles by Feiss, M.

