Genetics, Vol. 164, 821-828, June 2003, Copyright © 2003

An Argonaute-Like Protein Is Required for Meiotic Silencing

Dong W. Leea, Robert J. Pratta, Malcolm McLaughlina, and Rodolfo Aramayoa
a Department of Biology, College of Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3258

Corresponding author: Rodolfo Aramayo, College of Science, Texas A&M University, Rm. 415, Bldg. BSBW, College Station, TX 77843-3258., raramayo{at}mail.bio.tamu.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. E. ZOLAN


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*LITERATURE CITED

We demonstrate the involvement of suppressor of meiotic silencing-2 (sms-2+), a Neurospora gene coding for an Argonaute-like protein, in meiotic silencing and normal sexual development.


DURING meiosis, chromosomes "sense" each other through a process called meiotic transvection (ARAMAYO and METZENBERG 1996 Down), which was discovered by studying the Ascospore maturation-1 (Asm-1) locus in Neurospora crassa (ARAMAYO and METZENBERG 1996 Down; ARAMAYO et al. 1996 Down). The presence of unpaired DNA was proposed to activate RNA silencing (SHIU et al. 2001 Down) on the basis of the demonstration that mutations in an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) gene called Suppressor of ascus dominance-1 (Sad-1) eliminate the ascus dominance of unpaired DNA from Asm-1 and other genes (SHIU et al. 2001 Down). Scanning of the Neurospora genome revealed the existence of a paralog for quelling deficient-2 (qde-2), which we call Suppressor of meiotic silencing-2 (Sms-2). The involvement of qde-2 and of the Sad-1 paralog [quelling deficient-1 (qde-1)] in the haploid vegetative RNA-silencing pathway called quelling has been firmly established (COGONI and MACINO 1997 Down; CATALANOTTO et al. 2000 Down, CATALANOTTO et al. 2002 Down). The identification of Sms-2 as a second gene related to qde-2 suggested its potential involvement in the meiotic silencing pathway. This is particularly attractive because SMS-2 belongs to the functionally novel, but highly conserved eukaryotic Argonaute protein family (Fig 1). We postulated that if Sms-2 is involved in meiotic silencing, Sms-2 loss-of-function mutants should suppress the ascus-dominant phenotype of unpaired Asm-1 DNA.



View larger version (50K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. Alignment of SMS-2-like proteins. (A) Histogram representation of the T-Coffee alignment (NOTREDAME et al. 2000 Down) of SMS-2-related proteins. Histograms showing the consensus strength across all aligned proteins (All) and among only the six fungal proteins (Fungi) are shown (see Table S3, electronic supplementary material at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/ for a complete description of the proteins, organisms, and identifiers). The strength of the alignment consensus as determined by MegAlign (DNASTAR, Madison, WI) using the PAM250 matrix correlates with the height of the bars. The tallest bars represent absolutely conserved positions in the alignment. The histograms were scaled to the alignment consensus sequence. Diagrammed below the histogram is the aligned SMS-2 protein with the PAZ and Piwi domains as determined by SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/; SCHULTZ et al. 1998 Down; LETUNIC et al. 2002 Down; see full alignment in Figure S2, electronic supplementary material at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). (B) A Bayesian phylogenetic tree of SMS-2-related proteins created by MrBayes v2.01 (HUELSENBECK and RONQUIST 2001 Down; HUELSENBECK et al. 2001 Down) using the alignment represented in A. Branch lengths are scaled below the tree (see Figure S3, electronic supplementary material at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/ for branch lengths and posterior probability values for the clades). Note that the fungal proteins cluster into two clearly distinguishable clades that we argue represent vegetative (quelling) and developmental (meiotic silencing) pathways in fungi (GALAGAN et al. 2003 Down). Intriguingly, the animal proteins also cluster into two distinguishable clades, perhaps signifying two functional classes of Argonaute proteins in animals.

To test this hypothesis, we constructed two different null alleles of Sms-2 and tested their ability to suppress meiotic silencing. sms-2+ was mutagenized using repeat induced point mutation (RIP), generating two probable null alleles that we called Sms-2RIP2 and Sms-2RIP88. RIP occurs prior to meiosis when a sequence in Neurospora is present in more than one copy in the haploid genome (SELKER 1990 Down). The Sms-2RIP2 allele was generated by duplicating a 2374-bp DNA region corresponding only to the coding region of the gene, whereas the Sms-2RIP88 was generated by duplicating the entire 5534-bp DNA region encompassing the upstream, coding, and downstream regions of Sms-2. In both cases the regions were duplicated by integration at the histidine-3 (his-3) locus in linkage group I (LG I). Sequencing of these alleles revealed, among many GC-to-AT transition mutations typical of RIP (see Figure S1, electronic supplementary material at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental), a CAG-to-TAG mutation changing a glutamine to a stop signal at position 118, thus potentially allowing the synthesis of a short truncated polypeptide from the Sms-2RIP2 allele and an ATG-to-ATA mutation in the translation start codon of Sms-2RIP88, thus blocking the synthesis of a complete polypeptide by this allele. As expected, these two alleles differ in the number of transition mutations present along their DNA regions. Most of the mutations present in Sms-2RIP2 map only to the coding region of the gene. In contrast, the mutations present in Sms-2RIP88 are distributed along the promoter, coding, and downstream regions of the allele.

The resulting Sms-2 mutants have no obvious defects during vegetative growth or asexual sporulation. In contrast, homozygous Sms-2RIP2/Sms-2RIP2 or Sms-2RIP88/Sms-2RIP88 crosses and heterozygous Sms-2RIP2/Sms-2RIP88 crosses are completely barren, as was demonstrated in homozygous crosses between Sad-1 loss-of-function alleles (SHIU et al. 2001 Down). Similarly to Sad-1, heterozygous sms-2+/Sms-2RIP2 and sms-2+/Sms-2RIP88 crosses were fertile and produced normal ascospores (Table 1, crosses 1–5; Table 2; Table S2, electronic supplementary material at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/).


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 1. SMS-2 is required for meiotic silencing in N. crassa


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 2. Fungal strains used in this study

The role of Argonautes in RNA silencing is not completely understood and may differ in the different systems studied (CARMELL et al. 2002 Down). In Drosophila, Argonaute2 has been isolated as part of the RNA-inducing silencing complex (RISC; i.e., acting at the effector cycle, Fig 2; HAMMOND et al. 2001 Down; HANNON 2002 Down). In Caenorhabditis elegans, RDE-1 has been demonstrated to interact with RDE-4, a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-binding protein, and also with Dicer, an endonuclease (i.e., acting in the initiation step, Fig 2; HANNON 2002 Down; TABARA et al. 2002 Down). In Neurospora, testing the involvement of sms-2+ in meiotic silencing is not straightforward. The meiotic lethality observed in crosses involving homozygous loss-of-function Sms-2 alleles complicates the conceptually simple experiment of assaying meiotic silencing in the complete absence of sms-2+. The best-known experiments that can be done are to assay the degree of meiotic silencing in heterozygous sms-2+/Sms-2RIP2 or sms-2+/Sms-2RIP88 crosses (Fig 3). We predicted this to be possible because, according to the meiotic silencing model, in these crosses the inability of sms-2+ to pair with Sms-2RIP2 or with Sms-2RIP88 presumably induces partial silencing of the sms-2+ allele itself (Fig 3A). This cis-silencing is thus expected to significantly decrease the amounts of sms-2+ transcript and SMS-2 protein below that which is expected from a single fully functional gene. According to this logic, if there is enough active SMS-2 protein in heterozygous crosses (probably synthesized before the sms-2+ gene is silenced) to allow meiosis to proceed, but not enough to maintain a fully functional meiotic silencing machinery, we should be able to determine the involvement of sms-2+ in meiotic silencing.



View larger version (35K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. Proposed meiotic silencing pathway of N. crassa: the proposed two steps and two cycles involved in initiating and maintaining meiotic silencing, respectively. Paired DNA does not induce the pathway. Unpaired DNA triggers the induction step, which involves the synthesis of aberrant RNA (aRNA) and its conversion to dsRNA by the SAD-1 RdRP. The presence of dsRNA triggers the initiation of the meiotic RNA-silencing process, which is composed of the following: the conversion of the dsRNA trigger into siRNAs (initiation step), predicted to occur via a Dicer-like endonuclease; the use of guide RNAs (gRNAs) as primers and single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) as template by SAD-1 RdRP to generate dsRNA (amplification cycle); and the incorporation of the gRNAs generated by both the initiation step and the amplification cycles into the RISC to direct the endonucleolytic cleavage of mRNA or ssRNA (effector cycle).



View larger version (30K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 3. Testing the role of sms-2+ in meiotic silencing in a diploid zygote cell. Boxed areas show the pairing of LG I, LG V, and LG VII chromosomes. Both LG V chromosomes carry wild-type alleles of Asm-1 (asm-1+). On LG I, one chromosome contains a DNA fragment corresponding to the Asm-1 region inserted at the his-3 locus, whereas the other chromosome carries no insert. On LG VII, one chromosome carries a wild-type allele of Sms-2 (sms-2+), whereas the other chromosome carries either a mutant allele of Sms-2 (Sms-2RIP; A and B) or a wild-type allele of Sms-2 (sms-2+; C). To the right is the schematic representation of a single ascus containing the predicted outcome from the different crosses. Inside these asci, solid ovals and open ovals represent viable and inviable ascospores, respectively.

To test this idea, we set up crosses heterozygous for Sms-2 (Fig 3A) and induced meiotic silencing by unpairing a copy of the reporter gene Asm-1. Silencing of Asm-1, whose gene product ASM-1 is required for ascospore maturation, results in white and inviable ascospores. We designed two strains; the first contained either Sms-2RIP2 or Sms-2RIP88 at the canonical locus in LG VII (Sms-2RIP) in an otherwise wild-type background. The second strain contained Asm-1 DNA integrated at the his-3 locus in LG I (his-3+::Asm-1). Both strains contained wild-type asm-1+ alleles at their normal chromosomal positions in LG V (asm-1+). Because the unpaired Asm-1 region present in LG I (his-3+::Asm-1) has no pairing partner on the homologous chromosome, it is expected to trigger meiotic silencing, which, in turn, will silence all unpaired and paired copies of Asm-1 present in the genome. Under these conditions, if SMS-2 is part of the meiotic silencing machinery, a progeny of black and viable ascospores should be produced by these crosses despite the presence of an unpaired copy of Asm-1 (Fig 3A). In contrast, if SMS-2 is not part of the meiotic silencing machinery, the unpaired copy of Asm-1 (his-3+::Asm-1) will silence all Asm-1 copies present in the genome, resulting in a progeny of white and inviable ascospores (Fig 3B). In any case, control crosses homozygous for sms-2+ are expected to result in the production of a progeny of inviable ascospores (Fig 3C).

Progeny of viable ascospores were observed in crosses heterozygous for either Sms-2RIP2 (crosses 6 and 7) or Sms-2RIP88 (cross 8; Table 1). The percentage of mature ascospores observed in experimental crosses vs. the percentage observed in control crosses was 17.9% (cross 6) vs. 0.3% (cross 9), 30% (cross 7) vs. 0.3% (cross 10), and 23.2% (cross 8) vs. 0.3% (cross 10), respectively.

The persistence of a fraction of immature white ascospores, in our opinion, is at least partially attributable to RIP (SELKER 1990 Down) and/or to an incomplete suppression (remember, these crosses are heterozygous for Sms-2). If RIP occurs in a gene that is essential for ascospore maturation, like Asm-1, spores carrying only the RIPed allele will not mature (ARAMAYO and METZENBERG 1996 Down). In addition, if RIP occurs, the crippled silencing machinery present in the zygote of these heterozygous crosses is more capable of silencing the only remaining functional gene than of silencing the three functional genes that are present when RIP does not occur (D. W. LEE and R. ARAMAYO, unpublished results). Consistent with this interpretation, we observed a direct relationship between the insert size of the Asm-1 fragments used to induce silencing and the amount of black and viable ascospores produced (data not shown).

These results therefore establish the participation of Sms-2 in meiotic silencing and are consistent with qde-2 and Sms-2 functioning in two different RNA-silencing pathways (i.e., quelling and meiotic silencing, respectively). The biological roles of QDE-2 and SMS-2 proteins are neither redundant nor interchangeable on the basis of the fact that homozygous Sms-2RIP2/Sms-2RIP2 or Sms-2RIP88/Sms-2RIP88 crosses and heterozygous Sms-2RIP2/Sms-2RIP88 crosses, all homozygous for qde-2+, are completely barren and that expression of the qde-2+ coding region under the control of the Sms-2 promoter does not complement the meiotic barrenness of crosses homozygous for Sms-2 loss-of-function alleles (R. J. PRATT and R. ARAMAYO, unpublished results). In addition, homozygous qde-2 loss-of-function crosses undergo normal meiosis (R. J. PRATT and R. ARAMAYO, unpublished results). At the DNA level, Sms-2 is as related to an unrelated gene like Asm-1 as it is to qde-2 (data not shown), and at the protein level, SMS-2 is more identical to Argonaute-like proteins from Homo sapiens [e.g., 44.4% identity to brain-specific protein KIAA1567 (GenBank accession no. BAB13393.1)] than to QDE-2 (i.e., 37.7%; Fig 1B). On the basis of what we know, however, we still cannot exclude the possibility that genes like qde-2 play a minor role in meiotic silencing.

In contrast, demonstrating that Sad-1 and Sms-2 are both part of the same and only meiotic RNA-silencing pathway is not trivial, due to the nonlinear behavior of RNA-silencing pathways (HANNON 2002 Down). On the basis of the hypothesis that proteins that function together in a pathway or structural complex are likely to evolve in a correlated fashion (MARCOTTE et al. 1999A Down, MARCOTTE et al. 1999B Down; PELLEGRINI et al. 1999 Down), we argue that Sad-1 and Sms-2 are both part of the same silencing pathway. This is because, in phylogenetic trees, SAD-1 and SMS-2 cluster consistently with their corresponding homologs of the single functional pathway observed in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (HALL et al. 2002 Down; VOLPE et al. 2002 Down) and GALAGAN et al. 2003 Down.

To study the genetic relationship between Sad-1 and Sms-2, we tested the meiotic behavior of single and double mutants. We generated a null allele of Sad-1 (Sad-1RIP64) using RIP by duplicating a 2711-bp DNA region corresponding to the promoter and coding region of the gene at the his-3 locus in LG I (for details see Methods, electronic supplementary material at http://www.gentics.org/supplemental/). As predicted for a loss-of-function allele, homozygous Sad-1RIP64/Sad-1RIP64 crosses were completely barren, as was found in homozygous crosses between Sad-1{Delta} deletion alleles (SHIU et al. 2001 Down; SHIU and METZENBERG 2002 Down). Heterozygous sad-1+/Sad-1RIP64 crosses produced ascospores, but their number was greatly reduced compared to the number generated in crosses between sad-1+ strains (K. BAKER and R. ARAMAYO, unpublished data). Therefore, as in the case of Sms-2, testing the involvement of sad-1+ in meiotic silencing in the complete absence of sad-1+ is not possible, and here again, performing heterozygous crosses is the best known way to go.

We first tested the ability of Sad-1RIP64 to suppress meiotic silencing. For this we constructed strains containing Sad-1RIP64 at the canonical locus in LG I in either an asm-1+ or an Asm-1{Delta} background [Asm-1{Delta}(3430-9336); Table 1]. In both cases, strains contained wild-type asm-1+ alleles at the ectopic his-3 chromosomal position in LG I. During meiosis, asm-1+ at its canonical position has no pairing partner due to the presence of the Asm-1{Delta}(3430-9336) deletion allele in the homologous chromosome. This is expected to trigger silencing, which, in turn, will silence all unpaired and paired copies of Asm-1 present in the genome. As expected, viable ascospore progeny were observed in crosses heterozygous for Sad-1RIP64 (crosses 11–14, Table 1). The percentage of mature ascospores observed in reciprocal experimental crosses vs. the percentage observed in control crosses was 51.3% (cross 11) and 48.9% (cross 12) vs. 0% (cross 13) and 53.5% (cross 14) and 52% (cross 15) vs. 0.1% (cross 16), respectively. We then determined the fraction of mature ascospores produced by crosses heterozygous for Sms-2 (sms-2+/Sms-2RIP88) and Sad-1, Sms-2 (sad-1+/Sad-1RIP64, sms-2+/Sms-2RIP88), to be 16.7% (cross 17) and 48.7% (cross 18; Table 1), respectively. The reduced percentage of mature ascospores observed in crosses between strains, each of them containing duplicated DNA (36.8%, cross 19, Table 1), in our opinion is attributable to RIP and to the consequent induction of meiotic silencing that results from the inability of the asm-1+ allele(s) to pair with their RIPed partners in their homologous chromosomes.

These results are consistent with the idea that Sad-1 and Sms-2 are both necessary but not sufficient for meiotic silencing. They also demonstrate that Sad-1 is genetically epistatic to Sms-2. In addition, under our working meiotic silencing model (Fig 2), it is expected that mutations in Sad-1 would have a more profound effect than mutations in Sms-2 in the functioning of the pathway. This is because mutations affecting Sad-1, whose gene product is predicted to act at two different stages within the pathway (Fig 2), are expected to stop the silencing reaction at an early stage. In contrast, mutations affecting Sms-2, whose gene product is predicted to act in the effector cycle (Fig 2), are not expected to affect the silencing mediated by the SAD-1-RdRP and Dicer in the initiation step (Fig 2). Two Dicer-like genes in the Neurospora genome could serve this function (GALAGAN et al. 2003 Down). This interpretation is consistent with the accumulation of siRNA detected during quelling in qde-2 loss-of-function mutants (CATALANOTTO et al. 2002 Down).

The connection between the presence of unpaired DNA and RNA silencing during meiosis is tantalizing. Every component of the meiotic silencing pathway identified to date is required for the completion of meiotic prophase (SHIU et al. 2001 Down). Current dogma dictates that all RNA-based gene-silencing mechanisms share the objective of protecting the genome from invading transposable elements, but why would a meiotic RNA-silencing pathway be conserved in a genome that has evolved very efficient mechanisms for detecting repeated elements (e.g., RIP)? In our view, the products of the meiotic RNA-silencing machinery either play a previously unrecognized gene regulatory role during meiosis (e.g., via production of micro-RNAs; AMBROS 2001 Down; LAGOS-QUINTANA et al. 2001 Down; LAU et al. 2001 Down; LEE and AMBROS 2001 Down) or have evolved as key components of the meiotic chromosome biology (e.g., via formation of heterochromatin; BERNARD et al. 2001 Down; ALLSHIRE 2002 Down; DERNBURG and KARPEN 2002 Down; JENUWEIN 2002 Down; REINHART and BARTEL 2002 Down; VOLPE et al. 2002 Down).


*  FOOTNOTES

Sequence data from this article have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank Data Libraries under accession nos. AF500110, AF508210, AF508211, and AF508212. Back


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Michael D. Manson, Debby Siegele, and Jim Hu for constant encouragement. R.J.P. was partially supported by the Program in Microbial Genetics and Genomics. This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant GM58770 to R.A.

Manuscript received August 29, 2002; Accepted for publication February 5, 2003.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*LITERATURE CITED

ALLSHIRE, R., 2002  Molecular biology. RNAi and heterochromatin—a hushed-up affair. Science 297:1818-1819.[Free Full Text]

AMBROS, V., 2001  microRNAs: tiny regulators with great potential. Cell 107:823-826.[Medline]

ARAMAYO, R. and R. L. METZENBERG, 1996  Meiotic transvection in fungi. Cell 86:103-113.[Medline]

ARAMAYO, R., Y. PELEG, R. ADDISON, and R. METZENBERG, 1996  Asm-1+, a Neurospora crassa gene related to transcriptional regulators of fungal development. Genetics 144:991-1003.[Abstract]

BERNARD, P., J. F. MAURE, J. F. PARTRIDGE, S. GENIER, and J. P. JAVERZAT et al., 2001  Requirement of heterochromatin for cohesion at centromeres. Science 294:2539-2542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CARMELL, M. A., Z. XUAN, M. Q. ZHANG, and G. J. HANNON, 2002  The Argonaute family: tentacles that reach into RNAi, developmental control, stem cell maintenance, and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 16:2733-2742.[Free Full Text]

CATALANOTTO, C., G. AZZALIN, G. MACINO, and C. COGONI, 2000  Gene silencing in worms and fungi. Nature 404:245.[Medline]

CATALANOTTO, C., G. AZZALIN, G. MACINO, and C. COGONI, 2002  Involvement of small RNAs and role of the qde genes in the gene silencing pathway in Neurospora.. Genes Dev. 16:790-795.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

COGONI, C. and G. MACINO, 1997  Isolation of quelling-defective (qde) mutants impaired in posttranscriptional transgene-induced gene silencing in Neurospora crassa.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:10233-10238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

DERNBURG, A. F. and G. H. KARPEN, 2002  A chromosome RNAissance. Cell 111:159-162.[Medline]

GALAGAN, J. E., S. E. CALVO, K. A. BORKOVICH, E. U. SELKER, and N. D. READ et al., 2003  The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Nature 422:859-868.[Medline]

GRIFFITHS, A. J. F. and A. M. DELANGE, 1978  Mutations of the a mating-type gene in Neurospora crassa. Genetics 88:239-254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

HALL, I. M., G. D. SHANKARANARAYANA, K. NOMA, N. AYOUB, and A. COHEN et al., 2002  Establishment and maintenance of a heterochromatin domain. Science 297:2232-2237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

HAMMOND, S. M., S. BOETTCHER, A. A. CAUDY, R. KOBAYASHI, and G. J. HANNON, 2001  Argonaute2, a link between genetic and biochemical analyses of RNAi. Science 293:1146-1150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

HANNON, G. J., 2002  RNA interference. Nature 418:244-251.[Medline]

HUELSENBECK, J. P. and F. RONQUIST, 2001  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

HUELSENBECK, J. P., F. RONQUIST, R. NIELSEN, and J. P. BOLLBACK, 2001  Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

JENUWEIN, T., 2002  Molecular biology. An RNA-guided pathway for the epigenome. Science 297:2215-2218.[Free Full Text]

LAGOS-QUINTANA, M., R. RAUHUT, W. LENDECKEL, and T. TUSCHL, 2001  Identification of novel genes coding for small expressed RNAs. Science 294:853-858.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LAU, N. C., L. P. LIM, E. G. WEINSTEIN, and D. P. BARTEL, 2001  An abundant class of tiny RNAs with probable regulatory roles in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Science 294:858-862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LEE, R. C. and V. AMBROS, 2001  An extensive class of small RNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Science 294:862-864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LETUNIC, I., L. GOODSTADT, N. J. DICKENS, T. DOERKS, and J. SCHULTZ et al., 2002  Recent improvements to the SMART domain-based sequence annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:242-244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LUPTON, S. D., L. L. BRUNTON, V. A. KALBERG, and R. W. OVERELL, 1991  Dominant positive and negative selection using a hygromycin phosphotransferase-thymidine kinase fusion gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:3374-3378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MARCOTTE, E. M., M. PELLEGRINI, H. L. NG, D. W. RICE, and T. O. YEATES et al., 1999a  Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science 285:751-753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MARCOTTE, E. M., M. PELLEGRINI, M. J. THOMPSON, T. O. YEATES, and D. EISENBERG, 1999b  A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature 402:83-86.[Medline]

NOTREDAME, C., D. G. HIGGINS, and J. HERINGA, 2000  T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 302:205-217.[Medline]

PELLEGRINI, M., E. M. MARCOTTE, M. J. THOMPSON, D. EISENBERG, and T. O. YEATES, 1999  Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:4285-4288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

REINHART, B. J. and D. P. BARTEL, 2002  Small RNAs correspond to centromere heterochromatic repeats. Science 297:1831.[Free Full Text]

SCHULTZ, J., F. MILPETZ, P. BORK, and C. P. PONTING, 1998  SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:5857-5864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SELKER, E. U., 1990  Premeiotic instability of repeated sequences in Neurospora crassa.. Annu. Rev. Genet. 24:579-613.[Medline]

SHIU, P. K. and R. L. METZENBERG, 2002  Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA: properties, regulation and suppression. Genetics 161:1483-1495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SHIU, P. K. T., B. N. RAJU, D. ZICKLER, and R. METZENBERG, 2001  Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA. Cell 107:905-916.[Medline]

TABARA, H., E. YIGIT, H. SIOMI, and C. C. MELLO, 2002  The dsRNA binding protein RDE-4 interacts with RDE-1, DCR-1, and a DExH-Box helicase to direct RNAi in C. elegans.. Cell 109:861-871.[Medline]

VOLPE, T. A., C. KIDNER, I. M. HALL, G. TENG, and S. I. GREWAL et al., 2002  Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science 297:1833-1837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
N. Kadotani, T. Murata, N. B. Quoc, Y. Adachi, and H. Nakayashiki
Transcriptional Control and Protein Specialization Have Roles in the Functional Diversification of Two Dicer-Like Proteins in Magnaporthe oryzae
Genetics, October 1, 2008; 180(2): 1245 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
T. M. Hammond, J. W. Bok, M. D. Andrewski, Y. Reyes-Dominguez, C. Scazzocchio, and N. P. Keller
RNA Silencing Gene Truncation in the Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus nidulans
Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2008; 7(2): 339 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
T. M. Hammond, M. D. Andrewski, M. J. Roossinck, and N. P. Keller
Aspergillus Mycoviruses Are Targets and Suppressors of RNA Silencing
Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2008; 7(2): 350 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. C. Segers, X. Zhang, F. Deng, Q. Sun, and D. L. Nuss
Evidence that RNA silencing functions as an antiviral defense mechanism in fungi
PNAS, July 31, 2007; 104(31): 12902 - 12906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
J. V. Hartig, Y. Tomari, and K. Forstemann
piRNAs--the ancient hunters of genome invaders
Genes & Dev., July 15, 2007; 21(14): 1707 - 1713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J. M. A. Turner
Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation
Development, May 15, 2007; 134(10): 1823 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
N. B. Raju, R. L. Metzenberg, and P. K. T. Shiu
Neurospora Spore Killers Sk-2 and Sk-3 Suppress Meiotic Silencing by Unpaired DNA
Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 43 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. A. Kowalczyk, A. M. Anderson, M. Arce-Larreta, and D. L. Chalker
The germ line limited M element of Tetrahymena is targeted for elimination from the somatic genome by a homology-dependent mechanism
Nucleic Acids Res., November 6, 2006; 34(20): 5778 - 5789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
Y. Costa, R. M. Speed, P. Gautier, C. A. Semple, K. Maratou, J. M.A. Turner, and H. J. Cooke
Mouse MAELSTROM: the link between meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and microRNA pathway?
Hum. Mol. Genet., August 1, 2006; 15(15): 2324 - 2334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. G. Kelly
Standing guard: Perinuclear localization of an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase
PNAS, February 14, 2006; 103(7): 2007 - 2008.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. M. Hammond and N. P. Keller
RNA Silencing in Aspergillus nidulans Is Independent of RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerases
Genetics, February 1, 2005; 169(2): 607 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. J. Pratt, D. W. Lee, and R. Aramayo
DNA Methylation Affects Meiotic trans-sensing, Not Meiotic Silencing, in Neurospora
Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 1925 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
Q. Wang and G. G. Carmichael
Effects of Length and Location on the Cellular Response to Double-Stranded RNA
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2004; 68(3): 432 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. W. Lee, K.-Y. Seong, R. J. Pratt, K. Baker, and R. Aramayo
Properties of Unpaired DNA Required For Efficient Silencing in Neurospora crassa
Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 131 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
K. A. Borkovich, L. A. Alex, O. Yarden, M. Freitag, G. E. Turner, N. D. Read, S. Seiler, D. Bell-Pedersen, J. Paietta, N. Plesofsky, et al.
Lessons from the Genome Sequence of Neurospora crassa: Tracing the Path from Genomic Blueprint to Multicellular Organism
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2004; 68(1): 1 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
M. PAL-BHADRA, U. BHADRA, and J.A. BIRCHLER
Interrelationship of RNA Interference and Transcriptional Gene Silencing in Drosophila
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2004; 69(0): 433 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]