Phenotypic Analysis of Separation-of-Function Alleles of MEI-41, Drosophila ATM/ATR

Corresponding author: Tin Tin Su, 347 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0347., tin.su{at}colorado.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: K. GOLIC

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

ATM/ATR kinases act as signal transducers in eukaryotic DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Mutations in ATM/ATR homologs have pleiotropic effects that range from sterility to increased killing by genotoxins in humans, mice, and Drosophila. Here we report the generation of a null allele of mei-41, Drosophila ATM/ATR homolog, and the use of it to document a semidominant effect on a larval mitotic checkpoint and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) sensitivity. We also tested the role of mei-41 in a recently characterized checkpoint that delays metaphase/anaphase transition after DNA damage in cellular embryos. We then compare five existing mei-41 alleles to the null with respect to known phenotypes (female sterility, cell cycle checkpoints, and MMS resistance). We find that not all phenotypes are affected equally by each allele, i.e., the functions of MEI-41 in ensuring fertility, cell cycle regulation, and resistance to genotoxins are genetically separable. We propose that MEI-41 acts not in a single rigid signal transduction pathway, but in multiple molecular contexts to carry out its many functions. Sequence analysis identified mutations, which, for most alleles, fall in the poorly characterized region outside the kinase domain; this allowed us to tentatively identify additional functional domains of MEI-41 that could be subjected to future structure-function studies of this key molecule.

IN eukaryotes, genome stability is maintained in part by checkpoint pathways that monitor the state of DNA and regulate the cell division cycle, activate DNA repair, or promote cell death as required. A central place in DNA damage and replication checkpoints in diverse eukaryotes is occupied by homologs of ATM/ATR kinases.

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog, Rad3, was initially identified in a screen for DNA damage sensitive mutants and later found to act in the DNA damage and replication checkpoints (AL-KHODAIRY and CARR 1992 ; SEATON et al. 1992 ). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog Mec1 was isolated as a gene essential for cell cycle progression (KATO and OGAWA 1994 ; SIEDE et al. 1996 ). ATM was identified by studies of the human disease ataxia telangiectasia (AT; SAVITSKY et al. 1995A ). Additional homologs include AtATM and AtRAD3 of Arabidopsis thaliana, Ce-atl-1 of Caenorhabditis elegans and UVSB of Aspergillus nidulans. All are large proteins of >2500 amino acids (aa) that share little similarity outside the kinase domain.

In vitro studies have identified several phosphorylation targets of both ATM and ATR (KIM et al. 1999 ). These include other proteins in the checkpoint pathways such as homologs of CHK1 and CHK2 (SANCHEZ et al. 1996 ; CLIBY et al. 1998 ; MARTINHO et al. 1998 ; MATSUOKA et al. 1998 , MATSUOKA et al. 2000 ). These studies led to a model in which ATM/ATR homologs act early in the checkpoint pathway to sense the presence of damaged or incompletely replicated DNA and relay this signal to the remainder of the checkpoint pathway via phosphorylation. As such, the kinase domain, which is at the C terminus, has been shown to be required for function of both RAD3 and ATR (JIMENEZ et al. 1992 ; SAVITSKY et al. 1995A , SAVITSKY et al. 1995B ; SIEDE et al. 1996 ). For instance, mutations in the catalytic loop of the kinase affect all functions known for RAD3 and ATR, creating dominant negative activities (BENTLEY et al. 1996 ; CLIBY et al. 1998 ). A temperature-sensitive mutation in the kinase domain of rad3 disrupts the DNA damage checkpoint response and other functions analyzed (MARTINHO et al. 1998 ). Despite its importance, the kinase domain by itself is insufficient for function (MORGAN et al. 1997 ; CHAPMAN et al. 1999 ).

Relatively little, however, is known about the function of sequences outside the kinase domain in the PI3K-l family. In fission yeast, N-terminal sequences consisting of a leucine zipper and a putative protein-protein interaction site called the P site can confer dominant negative activity when overexpressed (MORGAN et al. 1997 ; CHAPMAN et al. 1999 ). A possible explanation for this result is that N-terminal sequences facilitate interaction of PI3K-l proteins with their partners and therefore compete with the endogenous protein when overexpressed.

An ATM/ATR homolog in Drosophila is encoded by mei-41. mei-41 is essential for the DNA damage checkpoint in larval imaginal discs and neuroblasts and for the DNA replication checkpoint in the embryo (HARI et al. 1995 ; BRODSKY et al. 2000 ; GARNER et al. 2001 ). mei-41 also has an essential role during early nuclear divisions in embryos, where it is required to delay mitosis in response to incomplete DNA replication (SIBON et al. 1999 ). Consistent with these functions, mei-41 mutants are sensitive to hydroxyurea, an inhibitor of DNA replication, and DNA-damaging agents such as X-ray and alkylating agents (BOYD et al. 1976 ; SIBON et al. 1999 ). MEI-41 also plays an important role during meiosis, where it is proposed to monitor double-strand-break repair during meiotic crossing over, to regulate the progression of prophase I, and to enforce metaphase I delay observed at the end of oogenesis (GHABRIAL and SCHUPBACH 1999 ; MCKIM et al. 2000 ).

All existing mei-41 mutant alleles were isolated in screens for mutants with meiotic defects, female sterility, or increased killing by genotoxins. Therefore, only viable alleles would have been recovered (BAKER and CARPENTER 1972 ; SMITH 1973 ; BOYD et al. 1976 ; MOHLER 1977 ). One of the strongest of these, mei-41^D3, has been described as a null allele on the basis of the absence of detectable protein and complete female sterility in these mutants (SIBON et al. 1999 ). Our recent sequence analysis (see below), however, sheds doubt on whether it is a true null that would be a valuable tool for analysis of MEI-41 function.

Here we report the generation of a null mutant of mei-41, which we find to be fully viable in the absence of DNA damage and to show a semidominant effect on a larval mitotic checkpoint and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) sensitivity. We use the null allele to document the role of mei-41 in a recently characterized checkpoint that delays metaphase/anaphase transition in response to DNA damage in cellular embryos (SU and JAKLEVIC 2001 ). We then compared five existing mei-41 alleles to the null with respect to known phenotypes (female sterility, G₂/M regulation after DNA damage in larvae, and sensitivity to MMS). Four of these alleles lack meiotic defects; thus, female sterility can be attributed to the failure to regulate syncytial divisions where mei-41 is required to delay mitosis in response to incomplete DNA replication. Interestingly, we find that not all phenotypes are affected equally by each allele; thus some are separation-of-function alleles. Sequence analysis identified mutations that revealed the importance of N-terminal sequences and identified putative functional domains of MEI-41. Our results support a model in which mei-41 interacts with different sets of upstream and downstream effectors to carry out its many functions.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Stocks:
Several mei-41 alleles were tested for lethality: A9 and 12-1483 were homozygous lethal. A16, D18, and 12-3616 were semilethal. In the case of two lethal alleles and one semilethal allele (12-3616), we have been able to separate the lethality from the mei-41 locus by recombination. Additionally, all heteroallelic combinations of semilethal alleles were fully viable, suggesting that semilethality in mei-41^A16 and mei-41^D18 mutants is also due to mutations at other loci. Other alleles were fully viable and fell into three classes with regard to female fertility: A8, A11, D1, D2, D3, D4, D7, D8, D9, D10, D11, and D18 were female sterile, with fertility ranging from 0 to 5%. The second class showed fertility ranging from 5 to 15% and was composed of alleles A1, A7, A11, A12, A15, A16, A22, A27, A28, A29, 12-3616, D19, RT1, and RT2. The last class of alleles, A10, D5, D9, D12, D13, D14, and D15, expressed fertility ranging from 50 to 98%. The deficiency Df(1)19 has previously been shown to be mei-41 deficient and Dp(1;4)r⁺f⁺, generated by FALK et al. 1984 , has been shown to contain a wild-type mei-41 gene (BANGA et al. 1995 ). Lethal mutations in genes l(1)14Ca, l(1)14Cc, l(1)14Cd, and l(1)14Ce were represented by deficiencies and alleles XR4, XR18, 11b8, i19e², 4d2-5, and 4a47, which were provided by R. Stanewsky (STANEWSKY et al. 1993 ; BANGA et al. 1995 ). Genes and chromosomes used in this study but not described in the text can be found in the Drosophila reference works (LINDSLEY and ZIMM 1992 ; FLYBASE 2002 ).

Transposon mobilization:
The screen to recover null alleles was conducted with the two P insertion alleles, mei-41^RT1 and mei-41^RT2 (Fig 2). Introduction of a P-element-encoding transposase (denoted TMS) into these genetic backgrounds should allow a screen for products of imprecise excision that removes flanking coding sequences. However, because MEI-41 is required to repair the damage created by transposon mobilization, combination of a strong mei-41 mutant and a source of transposase is usually lethal (BANGA et al. 1991 ; our unpublished observations). Furthermore, newly induced mutations at the mei-41 locus might cause lethality in germ cells, in which case products of imprecise excision may not be recovered. To circumvent these difficulties, we used the duplication Dp(1;4)r⁺f⁺ to provide a copy of the mei-41 gene on the fourth chromosome. Only mei-41^RT1 females survived the imposed genomic context. That is, Dp(1;4)r⁺f⁺ rescued the viability of mei-41/Df(1)19; TMS/+; Dp(1;4)r⁺f⁺/+ females but not mei-41/Y; TMS/+; Dp(1;4)r⁺f⁺/+ males, for reasons that remain unclear. Therefore, we performed the screen for imprecise excision in the female germline (Fig 2). To increase the frequency of P-element losses during the experiment, we provided a deficiency of the region on the homologous chromosome. Without a sister chromatid as a template, repair of the double-strand breaks created by the transposase provided in trans is less accurate (ENGELS et al. 1990 ; JOHNSON-SCHLITZ and ENGELS 1993 ). From the daughters of mei-41/Df(1)19; TMS/+; Dp(1;4)r⁺f⁺/+ females, a total of 454 chromosomes were recovered and analyzed for female sterility over mei-41^D3 allele. Lethal chromosome recovered (78B) was tested for complementation with lethal mutations in l(1)14Ca, l(1)14Cc, l(1)14Cd, and l(1)14Ce.

View larger version (0K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 1. Sequence analysis of mei-41 alleles. (A) In the map of the mei-41 locus, the insertion site of the P-element responsible for the mei-41RT1 mutation is shown along with the primers used to screen for null alleles (MATERIALS AND METHODS). The protein is highlighted in three shades: white for the N terminus, gray for the rad3 domain, and black for the kinase domain. Asterisks indicate the site of unique mutations affecting D13, D9, D15, D14, D12, and D5. The nucleotide numbers refer to the sequence of the 10.5-kb fragment containing the mei-41 open reading frame (GenBank accession no. U34925). (B) Comparison of mei-4129D, mei-4199B, and wild-type sequences. Predicted proteins are depicted at the same scale as full-length MEI-41 protein in A. Wild-type (WT) nucleotide sequence is shown at the top. The 8-bp target site that was duplicated in 99B is italicized. Boldface nucleotides are filler sequences that became added upon transposon excision. Nucleotide numbers correspond to the genomic clone presented in A. The 29D allele contains up to nucleotide 2401 of the wild-type sequence (encoding the first 28 amino acids), followed by a 975-bp deletion. Wild-type sequence resumes at nucleotide 3376, but insertion of an A (in bold) results in a frameshift that produces a stop codon after 11 additional amino acids. (C) Phylogenic tree as calculated from C-terminal 360 amino acids, which correspond to the kinase domain, of the following proteins (GenBank accession numbers in parentheses): Ce-atl-1 (AB018598), UVSB (AF176575), RAD3 (CAA70297), ATR (U76308), MEI-41 (U34925), CG6535 (AE003708), MEC-1/ESR1 (Z36005), ATM (U33841), AtATR (BAA92828), AtATM (AJ250248), Tel1S.p. (T41243), and Tel1S.c. (S45416). Maximum parsimony and neighbor-joining methods were used to investigate protein relationships. (D) Mutations in mei-41D9, mei-41D14, and mei-41D15 alleles. Helical wheel of the predicted -helix in which these mutations are located is shown. Hydrophobic amino acids are italicized. (E) Alignment of a part of the rad3/TRAPP homologous domain in which the mei-41D12 mutation is located. Amino acids of similar hydrophobicity or structure across species are denoted with a triangle.

View larger version (0K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 2. The mating scheme to recover null alleles of mei-41. The mei-41RT1 allele was combined with a stable transposase source on the third chromosome, TMS. These females also carry Df(1)19, uncovering the mei-41 region, and a duplication of the same region on the fourth chromosome, Dp(1;4)r+f+. Two females were mated with males carrying the FM7a,f balancer chromosome in 180 crosses. The minute phenotype associated with the Df allowed us to monitor X chromosomes in the progeny and the dominant Sb mutation on TMS, the third chromosome. To rescue any lethal chromosome generated, single virgin f, pol females were mated individually to mei-41D3 males carrying the Dp(1;4)r+f+ chromosome. Each cross is tagged to keep track of cluster events. The sterility of 10–20 w, pol daughters was analyzed with their Dp(1;4)r+f+/pol sisters as a control. From the same brood, males carrying the mutagenized chromosome were saved to raise stocks. Lines showing no pol males were carrying an X lethal mutation. *, mutagenized chromosome; mm, male; ff, female. See MATERIALS AND METHODS for stock and genotype information.

Measurement of female fertility, recombination, and X chromosome loss:
During the screen for a null allele of mei-41, female sterility was checked by allowing 10 females to mate with 5–10 FM7a,f brothers, and the number of progeny (adult flies) were counted after 10 days. Other fertility experiments as reported in Table 2 were conducted by crossing 5 females to 5–10 wild-type (Canton-S) males. Eggs were collected for 24 hr and scored 24 hr later for hatching to determine the percentage of fertility. To estimate recombination and X chromosome loss frequencies, w mei-41; net ho dp Sp b pr cn/+ virgins were crossed to net ho dp b pr cn males. Crosses were scored for net, ho, dp, and b markers for recombination frequencies and chromosome loss was estimated from the number of (w+) males. Flies were raised on standard corn-meal-molasses-agar medium and grown in an incubator at 25°.

PCR and DNA sequencing:
The nucleotide numbers refer to the sequence of the 10.5-kb fragment containing the mei-41 open reading frame (GenBank accession no. U34925). Primer sequences (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) and PCR conditions are available upon request. Location of primers with respect to the mei-41 sequences shown in Fig 1A. Amplification of genomic DNA from mei-41^RT1 and mei-41^RT2 flies with primers Pout and 2-1 generated fragments of 900 and 400 bp, respectively. Fragments digested with EcoRI-NotI for mei-41^RT1 and PstI-NotI for mei-41^RT2 were cloned and sequenced. P-element insertion creates a direct duplication of 8 bp at its site of insertion (O'HARE and RUBIN 1983 ). These direct duplications have been localized at 3370 bp (GTTCATAC) and 3870 bp (GGCCAGCT) and share similarity with the described consensus (O'HARE and RUBIN 1983 ).

For mutant flies recovered from the described screen (Fig 2), amplifications were performed with Pout:1964, Pout:2-1, and Pout:2549 primer pairs to determine the presence of the P element on the chromosome. With 1964:2-1, we checked for deletion in the vicinity of the insertion site. The 1964-2-1 amplicon was double digested with SacI and EcoRI after purification and cloned. DNA from a 29D/78B hybrid fly did not yield any signal with the 31000A:2549 couple. Sequence matching the primer 31000A is located within the 975 bp that is missing in the 29D allele; therefore the deficiency in 78B chromosome includes at least part of the mei-41 gene. We sequenced the following alleles in entirety: mei-41^D3, mei-41^D5, mei-41^D9, mei-41^D12, mei-41^D13, mei-41^D14, and mei-41^D15. PCR products generated from independent vials were used in sequencing. For each allele, we were able to identify single mutations that differ from background; these mutations are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.

MMS treatment:
MMS sensitivity was quantified as follows. mei-41/FM7 virgin females were crossed to mei-41 males to determine the sensitivity of homozygotes. mei-41/FM7a,f virgin females were crossed to Canton-S to determine the sensitivity of heterozygous females. Eggs were collected in vials for 24 or 48 hr from 5–10 batches of five females and five males each. After 24 hr at 25°, 250 µl of MMS solution was applied to the food, and the progeny were allowed to develop. Several hundred flies and all classes of progeny were scored for each dose.

Antibody production and Western blotting:
To produce a fragment of MEI-41, the largest EcoRI fragment of the mei-41 genomic DNA inserted into the pCasper vector (predicted to produce the last 402 aa) was subcloned into the unique EcoRI site of the pET21b expression vector (Novagen, Cambridge, MA). The plasmid was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) strain and the protein was induced with isopropyl thiogalactoside according to manufacturer's instructions (Novagen). The expressed protein was gel purified and used to immunize rabbits using a commercial facility (Cocalico Biologicals, Reamstown, PA). Antisera were purified against the antigenic protein fragment immobilized on PDVF membranes (Immobilon-P; Millipore, Bedford, MA). Plasmid maps and detailed protocols for subcloning and antibody purification are available upon request.

For Western blotting, embryos were dechorionated for 2 min in 50% bleach, rinsed in water, and homogenized in HEMG buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 5 mM MgCl₂, 1.5 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (10 mM ß-glycerol phosphate, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml each of leupeptin, peptstatin, and aprotinin). An equal volume of 2x SDS loading dye was added to the sample, which was then boiled for 10 min before being subjected to electrophoresis on 5% polyacrylamide gels. The proteins were blotted onto PDVF membranes using a semidry apparatus (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). The blots were blocked in PBT + 5% milk before being probed with the primary antibody diluted (typically 1:300–500) in blocking solution. The membranes were washed in blocking solution and probed with a secondary antibody (HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody; Pharmacia Biotech) diluted 1:2000 in blocking solution. The membranes were washed in PBT and processed for enhanced chemiluminescence detection according to manufacturer's instructions (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The migration of high-molecular-weight markers (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) was used in a semilogarithmic plot of mobility vs. molecular weight to estimate the mass of the putative MEI-41 protein in Fig 5.

View larger version (0K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 3. DNA damage checkpoint and MMS sensitivity in mei-41 mutant larvae. (A–D) Mitotic cells are visualized by PH3 staining in larval eye discs. In wild-type (Canton-S) larvae, each disc contains 121 ± 11.1 mitotic cells (A) while this number decreased >10-fold to 9.2 ± 1.4 after irradiation (B), indicating a delay in entry to mitosis in the latter. In mei-4129D homozygotes, each eye disc contains 156 ± 10 mitotic cells before irradiation (data not shown) and 127 ± 21.3 mitotic cells after irradiation (C), indicating that these larvae are unable to block mitosis after irradiation. In mei-4129D heterozygotes, each eye disc contains 170.3 ± 14.4 mitotic cells before irradiation and this number decreased only 2-fold to 69.3 ± 13.3 after irradiation (D), indicating a partial loss of the ability to block mitosis. (E) MMS sensitivity of mei-41 heterozygotes. The ratio of heterozygous to wild-type females recovered at different MMS concentrations is shown for three alleles. Homozygous mutants for all three alleles show complete lethality at all MMS doses shown here except for 0% MMS (data not shown).

View larger version (0K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 4. Embryonic mitotic checkpoints that respond to irradiation require mei-41. (A) Mitotic entry checkpoint in the embryo. Embryos (325–335 min old) in which the dorsal ectodermal cells are in interphase of cycle 16 (FOE et al. 1993 ) were irradiated with 0 (-RAD) or 5.7 Gy of X rays (+RAD). Embryos were fixed 20 min later, when dorsal ectodermal cells should be in mitosis of cycle 16, and stained with an antibody to phosphorylated histone H3 to visualize mitotic cells (red). Embryos were also stained to visualize DNA (blue). Mitotic cells are counted in the dorsal ectoderm region, enclosed by brackets. Irradiation reduced the number of mitotic cells in wild type (WT; from 111 ± 14 to 19 ± 11) and mei4129D homozygous embryos from heterozygous mothers (29D; from 103 ± 9 to 16 ± 5), indicating a delay in entry into mitosis. Irradiated mei41D12 homozygous embryos (D12) from homozygous mothers showed only twofold reduction in the number of mitotic cells compared to unirradiated controls of the same genotype (63 ± 7 to 29 ± 4), indicating that the ability to regulate the entry into mitosis after irradiation has been compromised in these mutants. D12 mutant embryos in these experiments are at the same developmental stage as WT, 355 ± 5 min, but present a significantly lower number of mitotic cells when untreated. We do not address this issue. (B) Metaphase/anaphase checkpoint in mei-41 mutants. The ratio of the number of metaphase cells to the sum of anaphase and telophase cells in mitosis 16 in the dorsal ectoderm was quantified from unirradiated (-RAD) embryos or embryos that had been irradiated 40 min before fixing (+RAD). Cells in wild-type embryos delay metaphase-anaphase transition after irradiation, as indicated by a threefold increase in meta/(ana+telo) ratio. This increase is diminished in mei-41 mutants. Data are compiled from at least 3600 mitotic cells from at least 30 embryos for each genotype in two or three experiments. Metaphase/(aNa+telo) ratio was also measured at 20 min after irradiation in mei41D12 mutants with similar results (not shown). mei-4129D homozygous embryos from heterozygous mothers were identified by the lack of ß-galactosidase staining from the FM7, ftz:lacZ chromosome. mei-41D12 and mei-41D13 embryos are from homozygous mutant mothers.

View larger version (0K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 5. Western blot analysis of mei-41D3 mutants. Extracts from 1- to 5-hr-old embryos from homozygous mei-41D3 mutant mothers (D3/D3) and heterozygous mei-41D3/FM7 mutant mothers (D3/+) or 0- to 2-hr-old wild-type Sevelen (WT) embryos were analyzed by Western blotting using an affinity-purified antibody against MEI-41. Equal loading among lanes was ensured by controlling for the number of embryo-equivalent material loaded (100 per lane). On the basis of the location of size markers (MATERIALS AND METHODS), the band that is present in WT and mei-41D3 heterozygotes and absent in mei-41D3 homozygotes is calculated to have a MW of 242 kD (arrowhead) and is presumed to represent the MEI-41 protein (predicted MW of 258 kD).

G₂/M checkpoint quantification in imaginal discs:
Climbing larvae were collected and sexed. Males from the mei-41/C(1)DX/Y stocks or from the Canton-S control stock were irradiated on petri dishes with X rays from ¹³⁷Cs source at 5-Gy dose (Astrophysics Research, Long Beach, CA). Irradiated and nonirradiated larvae were kept on grape agar plates for 1–2 hr at 25° and then dissected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.13 M NaCl, 4 mM Na₂HPO₄, 3 mM NaH₂PO₄, pH 7.5). The anterior portions of bisected larvae were inverted to expose the imaginal discs, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min, and washed in PBT (PBS + 0.3% Triton X-100) for 1 hr. Discs were blocked for 1 hr in 5% bovine serum albumin (albumin fraction V from United States Biochemical, Cleveland) in PBT and incubated for 2 hr (at room temperature) or 12 hr (at 4°) in anti-phosphohistone H3 antibody (1:1000 in PBT; Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY). After another washing and blocking step, discs were incubated for 2 hr (at room temperature) or 12 hr (at 4°) with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit at 1:500 in blocking solution; Zymed, S. San Francisco). After another washing step, 3,3'diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride solution in NiCl was applied according to manufacturer's recommendation. The reaction was stopped by several rapid washes in PBT. Discs were stained with a DNA dye, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride at 0.05 µg/ml. The discs were then further dissected to remove extraneous tissues and mounted in PBT solution. Slides were observed under visible and UV light on an axioplan Zeiss microscope. Ten or more eye discs were scored to estimate the checkpoint defects, and data are presented ±SE. Chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis) unless stated otherwise.

Mitotic checkpoints in the embryo:
To detect the G₂/M delay, embryos were collected for 10 min, aged for 325 min at 25° to reach interphase of embryonic cycle 16 (FOE et al. 1993 ), irradiated, and allowed to rest for 20 min before fixing in 37% formaldehyde for 5 min. To detect the metaphase/anaphase delay, embryos were collected for 60 min and aged for 330 min at 25° before fixing (for unirradiated controls) or aged for 310 min, irradiated, and allowed to rest for 40 min before fixing. Embryos were irradiated with 5.7 Gy of X rays in a TORREX X-ray generator (Astrophysics Research) set at 115 kV and 5 mA (producing 1.32 Gy/min). Fixed embryos were blocked in PBT containing 3% normal goat serum and stained with the antiphosphohistone H3 antibody to visualize mitotic cells. Embryos were also counterstained with the DNA dye, Hoechst 33258, at 10 µg/ml in PBT.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Generation of null alleles of mei-41 via internal deletions:
The mei-41^RT1 allele contains a single nonautonomous P-element transposon inserted in the mei-41 coding region (Fig 1A; YAMAMOTO et al. 1990 ). Following mobilization of this transposon (MATERIALS AND METHODS; Fig 2), 454 chromosomes were recovered and tested for female sterility when heterozygous with the mei-41^D3 allele. A total of 392 recovered chromosomes caused reduced female fertility when heterozygous with the mei-41^D3 allele, similar to mei-41^D3/mei-41^RT1 control females. Thirty-three chromosomes were female fertile when heterozygous with the mei-41^D3 allele and thus may represent revertants. Twenty-nine exhibited female sterility when heterozygous with mei-41^D3. One of these 29, 78B, carries a homozygous lethal mutation and was rescued by a chromosomal duplication, Dp(1;4)r⁺f⁺, that includes mei-41. However, 78B fails to complement lethal mutations at l(1)14Ce locus (alleles 4d25 and 4a27) and therefore is likely to carry a deficiency (MATERIALS AND METHODS).

Genomic DNA from the above 29 mutants was amplified by PCR and analyzed. Three mutants, 29D, 99B, and deficiency-bearing 78B, were found to lack the P element. Further sequence analysis showed that the 29D chromosome is missing 975 bp of mei-41 coding sequence. Moreover, transposon excision was accompanied by the insertion of an extra A, creating a frameshift in the remaining coding sequence (Fig 1B). Consequently, the 40th codon is expected to encode a "stop," leaving a truncated protein of 39 aa; the native mei-41 gene encodes 2347 aa. The 99B line presents an 8-bp direct duplication with most of the P-element sequence deleted, leaving behind 13 bp of 5' inverted repeat (IR) and 17 bp of the 3' IR that are separated by nucleotides, CA. This rearrangement creates a stop codon downstream of the insertion site and is predicted to encode a truncated protein of 340 aa (Fig 1B). 29D and 99B are thus null mutants; we refer to these new alleles as mei-41^29D and mei-41^99B.

Despite the severe nature of lesions, homozygous females and hemizygous males bearing mei-41^29D or mei-41^99B alleles are fully viable. Thus null alleles of mei-41 do not appear to act as zygotic lethal mutations. Note that the recovery of the 78B deficiency indicates that lethal alleles of mei-41 would have been recovered had they been induced. In mammals, ATR is an essential gene while ATM is not (BARLOW et al. 1996 ; XU and BALTIMORE 1996 ; BROWN and BALTIMORE 2000 ). The Genome Project identified a second ATM/ATR homolog in the Drosophila genome (CG6535), which is more closely related to ATM; MEI-41 is more closely related to ATR (Fig 1C). It is therefore interesting that mei-41 appears to be nonessential while ATR is.

The phenotype of null alleles:
Prior to further analysis, we first confirmed that newly generated null alleles exhibit phenotypes expected of strong mei-41 alleles. In assays for sensitivity to a genotoxin, MMS, doses as low as 0.01% killed 100% of homozygotes for the mei-41^29D and mei-41^99B alleles. Moreover, mei-41^29D homozygous females are semisterile (97.3% of embryos fail to hatch at 25° and 92% at 20°) and display meiotic defects such as reduction of recombination (13% of normal between net and ho markers) and increased chromosome losses and nondisjunction (10% X chromosome loss; control shows <1%). Likewise, the ability to delay the entry into mitosis upon DNA damage is disrupted in homozygous mei-41^29D mutant larvae (Fig 3). These phenotypes are identical to those caused by the strongest mei-41 alleles isolated to date, namely D1, D3, and 195.

BOYD et al. 1976 reported a semidominant effect on MMS sensitivity for at least one strong allele of mei-41. We find that mei-41^29D and mei-41^99B also exhibited a semidominant effect on larval MMS sensitivity and the ability to block mitosis after DNA damage in larval discs (Fig 3). However, female sterility does not appear to be dose dependent since one copy of the mei-41 genomic DNA can rescue embryonic lethality to wild-type levels (SIBON et al. 1999 ).

The role of mei-41 in mitotic metaphase/anaphase delay:
We next used mei-41^29D mutants to determine the role of mei-41 in a recently defined metaphase checkpoint in embryos (SU and JAKLEVIC 2001 ). In embryonic cell cycles, DNA damage due to ionizing radiation or MMS causes a delay in the entry into mitosis. After this delay, cells recover but subsequently delay in metaphase/anaphase transition (SU and JAKLEVIC 2001 ). This is seen in live measurement of mitotic timing, where duration of metaphase increased about threefold, as well as in quantification of mitotic phases in fixed embryos; the ratio of metaphase to {anaphase + telophase} increases by about threefold in irradiated embryos (SU and JAKLEVIC 2001 ; Fig 4). Metaphase/anaphase delay appears to be due to stabilization of a mitotic cyclin, but the role of checkpoint genes in this response has not been addressed.

We find that the number of mitotic cells in the dorsal ectoderm was reduced at 20 min after irradiation in wild type and in homozygous mei-41^29D embryos from heterozygous mothers, but not in homozygous mei-41^D12 embryos from homozygous mei-41^D12 mothers (Fig 4A; see figure legend for mitotic indices). There are several possible explanations for these observations. First, homozygous mei-41^29D embryos would have inherited wild-type mei-41 gene products from their heterozygous mothers, and the maternal product may persist long enough to enforce the mitotic entry checkpoint; D12 embryos from homozygous D12 mothers, in contrast, would not have inherited any wild-type mei-41 gene products. It is also possible that mei-41 is dispensable for the regulation of mitotic entry after X-ray damage in embryos or plays a redundant role with a second ATM/ATR homolog that exists in Drosophila.

More important for this work, at longer times (40 min) after irradiation when cells have recovered and entered mitosis, the ratio of metaphase to {anaphase + telophase} increased in wild type; this increase was severely diminished in mei-41^29D and mei-41^D12 embryos and partially diminished in mei-41^D13 embryos (Fig 4B). Thus, all three mei-41 alleles tested are defective in the metaphase/anaphase checkpoint, implicating this gene in the regulation of mitotic progression in response to X-ray damage.

mei-41^29D embryos have an intact mitotic entry checkpoint but not an intact metaphase/anaphase checkpoint. This could be either because the latter is more sensitive to the level of maternal mei-41 gene products that persists or because maternal mei-41 products are able to substitute for zygotic mei-41 products in the first checkpoint but not in the second. Thus, the data presented here implicate mei-41 in the regulation of metaphase/anaphase transition after DNA damage but do not conclusively address the role of mei-41 in the embryonic mitotic entry checkpoint. Nonetheless, metaphase/anaphase regulation is defective in mei-41 mutants that are either able (29D) or unable (D12) to regulate the entry into mitosis. This result excludes the possibility that metaphase/anaphase defects are due to variations in the time of entry into mitosis between wild type and mutants.

The phenotype of partial loss-of-function mutants:
ATR homologs act as signal transducers in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. The presence of DNA defects activates ATR homologs, which are kinases, which in turn carry out their function by phosphorylation of downstream substrates. Drosophila ATM/ATR, MEI-41, when mutated, leads to a number of phenotypes as described above, ranging from female sterility to MMS sensitivity. If the same checkpoint pathway and components are at work in processes whose failure generates these phenotypes, we might expect that an allele that affects one phenotype will affect others to a similar extent. If, on the other hand, the function of mei-41 is being executed via different partners/substrates in different processes, we might expect that an allele that affects one phenotype may not necessarily affect another.

To address these possibilities, we compared the phenotypes of 7 previously isolated alleles to each other and to the null allele we generated. Five (D9, D12, D13, D14, and D15) were chosen out of 33 tested alleles (named in MATERIALS AND METHODS) because they behave as wild type in two standard assays for meiotic functions, namely X chromosome nondisjunction frequency and meiotic recombination levels (MASON et al. 1981 , MASON et al. 1989 ). Thus, we can rule out the contribution of meiotic defects to female sterility. The sixth, D5, was selected because it affected partially all mei-41 phenotypes described herein (Table 1); mutant females are meioticaly impaired, showing 5% of X nondisjunction. Finally, D3 was selected because it behaved as a null and we thus expected to find a mutation abolishing all mei-41 functions. Additionally, because all 7 alleles were generated during a single EMS mutagenesis, we reasoned that they will share a common background and therefore sequence analysis would reveal mutations affecting mei-41 functions. Results of phenotypic comparison are presented in Fig 4B for metaphase/anaphase delay (in 3 alleles) and summarized in Table 1 for other phenotypes.

A comparison of mei-41 alleles leads us to two conclusions. First, not all phenotypes are affected equally by each allele. For instance, D12 and D13 alleles present wild-type levels of female fertility but defective metaphase/anaphase checkpoints in the embryo (Fig 4) and defective mitotic checkpoints in larval discs (Table 1). Conversely, the larval mitotic checkpoint is as robust in D15 as in wild type, even though D15 mutants are MMS sensitive and partially female sterile. Second, an allele that is more defective than another with regard to one phenotype is not necessarily so with regard to another phenotype. For instance, the D14 allele is more severe than D9 in female fertility but is less severe than D9 in the mitotic checkpoint in larval discs. Likewise, D12 shows less severe female fertility and MMS sensitivity than D15 does, but is more severe than D15 in larval mitotic checkpoint regulation. These observations raise the possibility that some aspects of the mei-41 phenotype may reflect the specific mutational ablation of domains critical for a specific function. To address this, we determined the sequence of the mutant alleles.

DNA sequence changes in partial loss-of-function alleles:
Sequence analysis revealed several differences between mutant alleles and the published mei-41 sequence. We found 70 silent mutations, 12 of which are shared by all seven mutant alleles (Table 2), and 10 mutations leading to amino-acid changes, all of which are shared by two or more alleles (Table 3). These deviations could be due to variability originally present in the mutagenized population (as indicated by common mutations within each of two different groups: D3 and D14 in one group and D5, D9, D12, D13, and D15 in the other; Table 2) and/or accumulation of mutations in mei-41 mutants. In addition to these common mutations, a single unique mutation was found for each allele and may account for the phenotype. For mei-41^D3, a T A change at nucleotide 3768 is predicted to convert a nonpolar A to a nonpolar V. We postulate additional mutations in the noncoding region for mei-41^D3 because we detect very little protein in these mutants (SIBON et al. 1999 ; Fig 5). The mei-41^D5 mutation changes proline²¹⁵⁹ in the kinase domain to a leucine. This proline is conserved among all members of the PI3K-L family except for UVSB (which has a T) and Ce-atl-1 (which has an A). mei-41^D5 shows a partial defect in all assayed phenotypes, suggesting that kinase activity of MEI-41 is important for all its functions. Likewise, mutations in the kinase domain affect all functions known for RAD3 and ATR (BENTLEY et al. 1996 ; CLIBY et al. 1998 ; MARTINHO et al. 1998 ).

Interestingly, unique mutations in the other five alleles analyzed here fall outside of the kinase domain. Among PI3K-l family members, there is little sequence similarity outside of the kinase domain. The exception is a computationally defined region of 500 amino acids, called the FAT domain that is shared with the TRRAP family of proteins (BOSOTTI et al. 2000 ). This domain is a part of the rad3 domain, which is conserved only in a subgroup that includes Mec1p, Rad3, ATR, and MEI-41, but not ATM. We find that the mei-41^D12 mutation affects a conserved histidine within the rad3/FAT domain (Fig 1E). mei-41^D13 is a mutation in the N terminus where an algorithm designed to detect DNA-binding domains detects a putative helix-turn-helix, I⁸²MWSAVAKWLDMGCMTRQELKR (Network Protein Sequence Analysis; DODD and EGAN 1990 ). We find that mei-41^D9, mei-41^D14, and mei-41^D15 affect a predicted -helix in the N terminus (Fig 1D). The mei-41^D14 and mei-41^D15 mutations change, respectively, a leucine to a phenylalanine and a threonine to a proline and are likely to disorganize the putative -helix (Table 1). mei-41^D9 mutants show a more severe defect in larval mitotic checkpoint than do mei-41^D14 and mei-41^D15 mutants; this suggests that the predicted change of a reactive serine⁶⁴⁷ to a hydrophobic phenylalanine in mei-41^D9 may not only destabilize the putative helix but also specifically disrupt interaction(s) in which this helix participates. In sum, the sequence analysis of partial loss-of-function alleles suggests the importance of N-terminal sequences and identifies mutations that presumably affect one phenotype more severely than another.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

A large body of work indicates that ATM/ATR homologs play a central role in DNA checkpoints in eukaryotes. Loss of ATM/ATR function leads to pleiotropic defects, which in humans range from sterility and mental retardation to increased killing by ionizing radiation. The diversity of these phenotypes is recapitulated in model organisms such as Drosophila, which are amenable to genetic manipulation and provide an opportunity to understand the function of these key molecules. A question of interest is whether the pleiotropic nature of mutations in ATM/ATR homologs is due to the participation of these molecules in different molecular pathways or their participation in a single signal transduction pathway that is important for several cellular processes. Our identification of several alleles of mei-41 that affect some phenotypes more severely than others is consistent with the function of mei-41 in several molecular contexts.

ATR homologs act to stall mitosis in response to two types of DNA defects, namely, incompletely replicated DNA and damaged DNA. In Drosophila, mei-41 is required to stall mitosis when DNA replication is blocked experimentally during embryonic cleavage divisions (SIBON et al. 1999 ), which occur in a syncytium and are driven by maternally supplied gene products. Embryos from homozygous mothers of strong mei-41 alleles such as D3 and 29D do not progress beyond syncytial cycles (SIBON et al. 1999 ). Therefore, in the absence of meiotic defects, female sterility may be attributed to the failure of syncytial divisions. Syncytial division defects have been proposed to occur due to a failure to delay mitosis in the presence of ongoing DNA replication during these rapid division cycles (SIBON et al. 1999 ).

According to the above discussion, mei-41^D12 and mei-41^D13 mutants, which present a wild-type level of syncytial division function (because they are female fertile) but are unable to regulate metaphase/anaphase in cellularized embryos or G₂/M transition in embryos and larvae following DNA damage, may be responsive to incompletely replicated DNA replication but not to damaged DNA. This could be because syncytial divisions simply require less MEI-41 activity than larval and embryonic checkpoints do. Indeed, 29D heterozygotes, which presumably have wild-type MEI-41 but at reduced levels, have normal female fertility but an 50% loss of larval G₂/M checkpoint (Fig 3 legend). If so, however, we would expect mei-41^D14 mutants that show a more severe fertility phenotype to be more defective than mei-41^D12 or mei-41^D13 mutants for larval mitotic checkpoint. This is not the case. Therefore, we propose, instead, that mei-41^D12 and mei-41^D13 represent separation-of-function alleles that retained normal activity for syncytial divisions but not for DNA damage checkpoints. Conversely, mei-41^D14 allele is compromised for syncytial cycle function while retaining nearly wild-type activity for larval mitotic checkpoints. Such alleles should be potentially useful for identifying genes that interact with mei-41 in one context but not another. Additionally, all five alleles (i.e., all except D3 and D5) show a wild-type level of meiotic function as previously described and yet show defects in mitotic cycles during embryogenesis and larval development. Thus, all represent separation-of-function alleles that have normal meiotic function but are defective for regulation of mitotic proliferation.

Interestingly, mei-41^D15 mutants that have a wild-type level of mitotic checkpoint are more MMS sensitive than mei-41^D12 mutants that have a severely defective mitotic checkpoint. Likewise, mei-41^D14 and mei-41^D15 mutants show significantly different levels of female fertility (thus, possibly different DNA replication checkpoint activity) and yet have similar MMS sensitivity. We propose that defects in cell cycle regulation cannot fully explain the MMS sensitivity of mei-41 mutants. It is likely that the role of mei-41 in DNA repair, cell death, and other yet-to-be-characterized processes contributes to MMS sensitivity.

One key question concerning checkpoint proteins is whether they are essential for viability in unperturbed cell cycles or they are essential only in the presence of genetic aberrations. Some PI3K-l proteins are essential for cellular viability, while others are not. mec1 deletion mutants of budding yeast are inviable and ATR mutant mice die after the blastocyst stage (KATO and OGAWA 1994 ; BROWN and BALTIMORE 2000 ). However, the S. pombe rad3 strain, in which rad3 is disrupted, is viable and the ATM mutations observed to date in mice are fully viable (JIMENEZ et al. 1992 ; SEATON et al. 1992 ; BARLOW et al. 1996 ; ELSON et al. 1996 ; XU and BALTIMORE 1996 ). We find that null mutants of mei-41 are viable as homozygous mutant flies are produced from heterozygous parents. It is possible, however, that homozygous mei-41 mutant progeny survive due to a supply of wild-type MEI-41 deposited into the eggs by heterozygous mothers. Because embryos from homozygous mutant females fail to progress beyond cleavage divisions (SIBON et al. 1999 ), mei-41 does have an essential role in early embryogenesis.

Interestingly, heterozygotes for the null allele of mei-41 show checkpoint defects and MMS sensitivity. Heterozygous phenotypes have been described for ATM-deficient cells of human and mouse, including increased sensitivity to killing by mutagens, defective cell cycle checkpoints, and chromosome aberrations, among others (NAEIM et al. 1994 ; SCOTT et al. 1994 ; TCHIRKOV et al. 1997 ; DJUZENOVA et al. 1999 ). In mice, heterozygous ATR ES cells did not display increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents although other phenotypes such as cell cycle regulation remain to be assayed (DE KLEIN et al. 2000 ). Haplo-insufficiency of ATM/ATR homologs for checkpoint regulation may explain why heterozygous mutant mice display increased tumor incidence (BROWN and BALTIMORE 2000 ). This notion remains controversial, however, because recent work suggests that the ATM heterozygotes in question may harbor a mutant allele that acts in a dominant negative manner to inhibit the remaining wild-type allele (SPRING et al. 2002 ). Our null allele, mei-41^29D, is predicted to encode only 39 aa and is therefore unlikely to produce a dominant negative MEI-41. As such, MEI-41 may be truly haplo-insufficient for optimal checkpoint regulation.

We document here a novel role for mei-41 in the regulation of metazoan mitotic progress. DNA damage blocks mitosis but the exact mitotic step blocked can differ from cell type to cell type (ELLEDGE 1996 ). In fission yeast, the entry into mitosis is blocked whereas in budding yeast, chromosome segregation and metaphase/anaphase transition are blocked. Drosophila and human cells, on the other hand, appear capable of blocking both the entry into mitosis and the metaphase/anaphase transition (SMITS et al. 2000 ; SU et al. 2000 ; SU and JAKLEVIC 2001 ). The role of mei-41 in blocking the entry into mitosis after DNA damage has been documented before, but this report documents for the first time that an ATM/ATR homolog is needed to block mitotic progression in metazoa. Moreover, our results rule out the possibility that damaged chromosomes present a physical barrier to their separation and consequently delay anaphase. Rather, the delay of anaphase is more likely to be an active response since it requires a checkpoint gene.

We describe here several mutations that fall outside of the kinase domain but appear to affect mei-41 function profoundly. Although unique mutations described here are most likely culprits for the phenotype of each allele, we cannot rule out the contribution of other mutations present within or without the mei-41 coding region. Site-directed mutagenesis to obliterate domains implicated by our data would be valuable in addressing this issue unequivocally. Nonetheless, in fission yeast, N terminus of RAD3 and, in particular, a putative leucine zipper and a putative protein-protein interaction domain can confer dominant functions when overexpressed (CHAPMAN et al. 1999 ). In humans, N-terminal 247 aa of ATM are required for interaction with p53 in vitro (KHANNA et al. 1998 ). Thus, N-terminal sequences may contribute to the function of ATM/ATR family members via protein-protein interaction. Interestingly, in two-hybrid assays, a MEI-41 N-terminal fragment containing this helix interacts with MUS304, a protein needed for larval DNA damage checkpoint and a homolog of mammalian ATRIP proteins (BRODSKY et al. 2000 ; M. BRODSKY, personal communication).

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that mei-41 null mutants are viable and show dose-sensitive defects in cell cycle checkpoints and MMS sensitivity. Sequence analysis reveals the importance of the kinase domain in all aspects of MEI-41 function and identifies a putative -helix in the N terminus, which may be important for mei-41 function in DNA-damage-induced G₂/M checkpoint and syncytial divisions. Two other mutations located in a putative helix-loop-helix in the N terminus and a conserved amino acid in the rad3/FAT domain may be causing defective DNA-damage checkpoint while sparing syncytial division functions. These possibly represent separation-of-function alleles of mei-41, which may be useful in screens for interacting genes. The fact that not all phenotypes are affected equally by the five alleles we studied is consistent with the idea that mei-41 operates in many different molecular contexts to carry out its many functions. There is precedent for this idea because grp, a Drosophila chk1 homolog, that is thought to function downstream of mei-41, appears to do so in regulation of mitosis but not of meiosis (SIBON et al. 1999 ; MCKIM et al. 2000 ). Our data suggest that even in mitotic cycles, signaling networks in which mei-41 participates may not be rigid, but change at different stages in development (syncytial vs. larval) or in response to different kinds of DNA defects (DNA damage vs. incomplete replication).

	FOOTNOTES

¹ Present address: CGMC UMR 5534, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
² Present address: Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280.
³ Present address: Stowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 E. 50th St., Kansas City, MO 64110.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Katherine Hollis and Ginger Elkins for technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the American Cancer Society and the AT Children's Project to R.S.H. and a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01 GM66441) and funding from the Cancer League of Colorado to T.T. S.A.P. was supported by a predoctoral training grant from the National Institutes of Health.

Manuscript received October 23, 2002; Accepted for publication March 11, 2003.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

AL-KHODAIRY, F. and A. M. CARR, 1992  DNA repair mutants defining G2 checkpoint pathways in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 11:1343-1350.[Medline]

BAKER, B. S. and A. T. CARPENTER, 1972  Genetic analysis of sex chromosomal meiotic mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 71:255-286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BANGA, S. S., A. VELAZQUEZ, and J. B. BOYD, 1991  P transposition in Drosophila provides a new tool for analyzing postreplication repair and double-strand break repair. Mutat. Res. 255:79-88.[Medline]

BANGA, S. S., A. H. YAMAMOTO, J. M. MASON, and J. B. BOYD, 1995  Molecular cloning of mei-41, a gene that influences both somatic and germline chromosome metabolism of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Gen. Genet. 246:148-155.[Medline]

BARLOW, C., S. HIROTSUNE, R. PAYLOR, M. LIYANAGE, and M. ECKHAUS et al., 1996  Atm-deficient mice: a paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia. Cell 86:159-171.[Medline]

BENTLEY, N. J., D. A. HOLTZMAN, G. FLAGGS, K. S. KEEGAN, and A. DEMAGGIO et al., 1996  The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. EMBO J. 15:6641-6651.[Medline]

BOSOTTI, R., A. ISACCHI, and E. L. SONNHAMMER, 2000  FAT: a novel domain in PIK-related kinases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:225-227.[Medline]

BOYD, J. B., M. D. GOLINO, T. D. NGUYEN, and M. M. GREEN, 1976  Isolation and characterization of X-linked mutants of Drosophila melanogaster which are sensitive to mutagens. Genetics 84:485-506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BRODSKY, M. H., J. J. SEKELSKY, G. TSANG, R. S. HAWLEY, and G. M. RUBIN, 2000  mus304 encodes a novel DNA damage checkpoint protein required during Drosophila development. Genes Dev. 14:666-678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BROWN, E. J. and D. BALTIMORE, 2000  ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 14:397-402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CHAPMAN, C. R., S. T. EVANS, A. M. CARR, and T. ENOCH, 1999  Requirement of sequences outside the conserved kinase domain of fission yeast Rad3p for checkpoint control. Mol. Biol. Cell 10:3223-3238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CLIBY, W. A., C. J. ROBERTS, K. A. CIMPRICH, C. M. STRINGER, and J. R. LAMB et al., 1998  Overexpression of a kinase-inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints. EMBO J. 17:159-169.[Medline]

DE KLEIN, A., M. MUIJTJENS, R. VAN OS, Y. VERHOEVEN, and B. SMIT et al., 2000  Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr. Biol. 10:479-482.[Medline]

DJUZENOVA, C. S., D. SCHINDLER, H. STOPPER, H. HOEHN, and M. FLENTJE et al., 1999  Identification of ataxia telangiectasia heterozygotes, a cancer-prone population, using the single-cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay. Lab. Invest. 79:699-705.[Medline]

DODD, I. B. and J. B. EGAN, 1990  Improved detection of helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motifs in protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:5019-5026.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ELLEDGE, S. J., 1996  Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274:1664-1672.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ELSON, A., Y. WANG, C. J. DAUGHERTY, C. C. MORTON, and F. ZHOU et al., 1996  Pleiotropic defects in ataxia-telangiectasia protein-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13084-13089.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ENGELS, W. R., D. M. JOHNSON-SCHLITZ, W. B. EGGLESTON, and J. SVED, 1990  High-frequency P element loss in Drosophila is homolog dependent. Cell 62:515-525.[Medline]

FALK, D. R., L. ROSELLI, S. CURTISS, D. HALLADAY, and C. KLUFAS, 1984  The characterization of chromosome breaks in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Mass isolation of deficiencies which have an end point in the 14A–15A region. Mutat. Res. 126:25-34.[Medline]

FLYBASE,, 2002  The FlyBase database of the Drosophila genome projects and community literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:106-108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

FOE, V. E., G. M. ODELL and B. A. EDGAR, 1993 Mitosis and morphogenesis in the Drosophila embryo, pp. 149–300 in The Development of Drosophila melanogaster, edited by M. BATE and A. MARTINEZ ARIAS. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

GARNER, M., S. VAN KREEVELD, and T. T. SU, 2001  mei-41 and bub1 block mitosis at two distinct steps in response to incomplete DNA replication in Drosophila embryos. Curr. Biol. 11:1595-1599.[Medline]

GHABRIAL, A. and T. SCHUPBACH, 1999  Activation of a meiotic checkpoint regulates translation of Gurken during Drosophila oogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:354-357.[Medline]

HARI, K. L., A. SANTERRE, J. J. SEKELSKY, K. S. MCKIM, and J. B. BOYD et al., 1995  The mei-41 gene of D. melanogaster is a structural and functional homolog of the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell 82:815-821.[Medline]

JIMENEZ, G., J. YUCEL, R. ROWLEY, and S. SUBRAMANI, 1992  The rad3+ gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe is involved in multiple checkpoint functions and in DNA repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:4952-4956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

JOHNSON-SCHLITZ, D. M. and W. R. ENGELS, 1993  P-element-induced interallelic gene conversion of insertions and deletions in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:7006-7018.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

KATO, R. and H. OGAWA, 1994  An essential gene, ESR1, is required for mitotic cell growth, DNA repair and meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:3104-3112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

KHANNA, K. K., K. E. KEATING, S. KOZLOV, S. SCOTT, and M. GATEI et al., 1998  ATM associates with and phosphorylates p53: mapping the region of interaction. Nat. Genet. 20:398-400.[Medline]

KIM, S. T., D. S. LIM, C. E. CANMAN, and M. B. KASTAN, 1999  Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J. Biol. Chem. 274:37538-37543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LINDSLEY, D. L., and G. G. ZIMM, 1992 The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, New York.

MARTINHO, R. G., H. D. LINDSAY, G. FLAGGS, A. J. DEMAGGIO, and M. F. HOEKSTRA et al., 1998  Analysis of Rad3 and Chk1 protein kinases defines different checkpoint responses. EMBO J. 17:7239-7249.[Medline]

MASON, J. M., M. M. GREEN, K. E. SHAW, and J. B. BOYD, 1981  Genetic analysis of X-linked mutagen-sensitive mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 81:329-343.[Medline]

MASON, J. M., N. N. SCOBIE, and A. H. YAMAMOTO, 1989  Genetic characterization of the mei-41 locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Gen. Genet. 215:190-199.[Medline]

MATSUOKA, S., M. HUANG, and S. J. ELLEDGE, 1998  Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 282:1893-1897.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MATSUOKA, S., G. ROTMAN, A. OGAWA, Y. SHILOH, and K. TAMAI et al., 2000  Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:10389-10394.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MCKIM, K. S., J. K. JANG, J. J. SEKELSKY, A. LAURENÇON, and R. S. HAWLEY, 2000  mei-41 is required for precocious anaphase in Drosophila females. Chromosoma 109:44-49.[Medline]

MOHLER, J. D., 1977  Developmental genetics of the Drosophila egg. I. Identification of 59 sex-linked cistrons with maternal effects on embryonic development. Genetics 85:259-272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MORGAN, S. E., C. LOVLY, T. K. PANDITA, Y. SHILOH, and M. B. KASTAN, 1997  Fragments of ATM which have dominant-negative or complementing activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2020-2029.[Abstract]

NAEIM, A., C. REPINSKI, Y. HUO, J. H. HONG, and L. CHESSA et al., 1994  Ataxia-telangiectasia: flow cytometric cell-cycle analysis of lymphoblastoid cell lines in G2/M before and after gamma-irradiation. Mod. Pathol. 7:587-592.[Medline]

O'HARE, K. and G. M. RUBIN, 1983  Structures of P transposable elements and their sites of insertion and excision in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Cell 34:25-35.[Medline]

SANCHEZ, Y., B. A. DESANY, W. J. JONES, Q. LIU, and B. WANG et al., 1996  Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271:357-360.[Abstract]

SAVITSKY, K., A. BAR-SHIRA, S. GILAD, G. ROTMAN, and Y. ZIV et al., 1995a  A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science 268:1749-1753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SAVITSKY, K., S. SFEZ, D. A. TAGLE, Y. ZIV, and A. SARTIEL et al., 1995b  The complete sequence of the coding region of the ATM gene reveals similarity to cell cycle regulators in different species. Hum. Mol. Genet. 4:2025-2032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SCOTT, D., A. R. SPREADBOROUGH, and S. A. ROBERTS, 1994  Radiation-induced G2 delay and spontaneous chromosome aberrations in ataxia-telangiectasia homozygotes and heterozygotes. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 66:S157-S163.[Medline]

SEATON, B. L., J. YUCEL, P. SUNNERHAGEN, and S. SUBRAMANI, 1992  Isolation and characterization of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 gene, involved in the DNA damage and DNA synthesis checkpoints. Gene 119:83-89.[Medline]

SIBON, O. C., A. LAURENÇON, R. HAWLEY, and W. E. THEURKAUF, 1999  The Drosophila ATM homologue Mei-41 has an essential checkpoint function at the midblastula transition. Curr. Biol. 9:302-312.[Medline]

SIEDE, W., J. B. ALLEN, S. J. ELLEDGE, and E. C. FRIEDBERG, 1996  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MEC1 gene, which encodes a homolog of the human ATM gene product, is required for G1 arrest following radiation treatment. J. Bacteriol. 178:5841-5843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SMITH, P. D., 1973  Mutagen sensitivity of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Isolation and preliminary characterization of a methyl methanesulphonate-sensitive strain. Mutat. Res. 20:215-220.[Medline]

SMITS, V. A., R. KLOMPMAKER, L. ARNAUD, G. RIJKSEN, and E. A. NIGG et al., 2000  Polo-like kinase-1 is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:672-676.[Medline]

SPRING, K., F. AHANGARI, S. P. SCOTT, P. WARING, and D. M. PURDIE et al., 2002  Mice heterozygous for mutation in Atm, the gene involved in ataxia-telangiectasia, have heightened susceptibility to cancer. Nat. Genet. 32:185-190.[Medline]

STANEWSKY, R., K. G. RENDAHL, M. DILL, and H. SAUMWEBER, 1993  Genetic and molecular analysis of the X chromosomal region 14B17–14C4 in Drosophila melanogaster: loss of function in NONA, a nuclear protein common to many cell types, results in specific physiological and behavioral defects. Genetics 135:419-442.[Abstract]

SU, T. T. and B. JAKLEVIC, 2001  DNA damage leads to a cyclin A-dependent delay in metaphase-anaphase transition in the Drosophila gastrula. Curr. Biol. 11:8-17.[Medline]

SU, T. T., J. WALKER, and J. STUMPFF, 2000  Activating the DNA damage checkpoint in a developmental context. Curr. Biol. 10:119-126.[Medline]

TCHIRKOV, A., J. O. BAY, D. PERNIN, Y. J. BIGNON, and P. RIO et al., 1997  Detection of heterozygous carriers of the ataxia-telangiectasia (ATM) gene by G2 phase chromosomal radiosensitivity of peripheral blood lymphocytes. Hum. Genet. 101:312-316.[Medline]

XU, Y. and D. BALTIMORE, 1996  Dual roles of ATM in the cellular response to radiation and in cell growth control. Genes Dev. 10:2401-2410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

YAMAMOTO, A. H., R. K. BRODBERG, S. S. BANGA, J. B. BOYD, and J. M. MASON, 1990  Recovery and characterization of hybrid dysgenesis-induced mei-9 and mei-41 alleles of Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 229:17-28.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Szalontai, I. Gaspar, I. Belecz, I. Kerekes, M. Erdelyi, I. Boros, and J. Szabad HorkaD, a Chromosome Instability-Causing Mutation in Drosophila, Is a Dominant-Negative Allele of lodestar Genetics, February 1, 2009; 181(2): 367 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. A. Titen and K. G. Golic Telomere Loss Provokes Multiple Pathways to Apoptosis and Produces Genomic Instability in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, December 1, 2008; 180(4): 1821 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. S. Rong Loss of the Histone Variant H2A.Z Restores Capping to Checkpoint-Defective Telomeres in Drosophila Genetics, December 1, 2008; 180(4): 1869 - 1875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Wei and Y. S. Rong A Genetic Screen For DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Mutations in Drosophila Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 63 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Barbosa, N. Kimm, and R. Lehmann A Maternal Screen for Genes Regulating Drosophila Oocyte Polarity Uncovers New Steps in Meiotic Progression Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 1967 - 1977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Trowbridge, K. McKim, S. J. Brill, and J. Sekelsky Synthetic Lethality of Drosophila in the Absence of the MUS81 Endonuclease and the DmBlm Helicase Is Associated With Elevated Apoptosis Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 1993 - 2001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. LaRocque, D. L. Dougherty, S. K. Hussain, and J. Sekelsky Reducing DNA Polymerase {alpha} in the Absence of Drosophila ATR Leads to P53-Dependent Apoptosis and Developmental Defects Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1441 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. LaRocque, B. Jaklevic, T. T. Su, and J. Sekelsky Drosophila ATR in Double-Strand Break Repair Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1023 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Sakaguchi and R. Steward Aberrant monomethylation of histone H4 lysine 20 activates the DNA damage checkpoint in Drosophila melanogaster J. Cell Biol., January 16, 2007; 176(2): 155 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Smolik and K. Jones Drosophila dCBP Is Involved in Establishing the DNA Replication Checkpoint Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2007; 27(1): 135 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Ciapponi, G. Cenci, and M. Gatti The Drosophila Nbs Protein Functions in Multiple Pathways for the Maintenance of Genome Stability Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1447 - 1454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Wichmann, B. Jaklevic, and T. T. Su Ionizing radiation induces caspase-dependent but Chk2- and p53-independent cell death in Drosophila melanogaster PNAS, June 27, 2006; 103(26): 9952 - 9957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Bi, D. Srikanta, L. Fanti, S. Pimpinelli, R. Badugu, R. Kellum, and Y. S. Rong Drosophila ATM and ATR checkpoint kinases control partially redundant pathways for telomere maintenance PNAS, October 18, 2005; 102(42): 15167 - 15172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Bi, M. Gong, D. Srikanta, and Y. S. Rong Drosophila ATM and Mre11 Are Essential for the G2/M Checkpoint Induced by Low-Dose Irradiation Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 845 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Purdy, L. Uyetake, M. G. Cordeiro, and T. T. Su Regulation of mitosis in response to damaged or incompletely replicated DNA require different levels of Grapes (Drosophila Chk1) J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2005; 118(15): 3305 - 3315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. I. de Vries, L. Uyetake, W. Lemstra, J. F. Brunsting, T. T. Su, H. H. Kampinga, and O. C. M. Sibon Grp/DChk1 is required for G2-M checkpoint activation in Drosophila S2 cells, whereas Dmnk/DChk2 is dispensable J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2005; 118(9): 1833 - 1842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Oikemus, N. McGinnis, J. Queiroz-Machado, H. Tukachinsky, S. Takada, C. E. Sunkel, and M. H. Brodsky Drosophila atm/telomere fusion is required for telomeric localization of HP1 and telomere position effect Genes & Dev., August 1, 2004; 18(15): 1850 - 1861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Laurencon, C. M. Orme, H. K. Peters, C. L. Boulton, E. K. Vladar, S. A. Langley, E. P. Bakis, D. T. Harris, N. J. Harris, S. M. Wayson, et al. A Large-Scale Screen for Mutagen-Sensitive Loci in Drosophila Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 217 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Iida and M. A. Lilly missing oocyte encodes a highly conserved nuclear protein required for the maintenance of the meiotic cycle and oocyte identity in Drosophila Development, March 1, 2004; 131(5): 1029 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Brodsky, B. T. Weinert, G. Tsang, Y. S. Rong, N. M. McGinnis, K. G. Golic, D. C. Rio, and G. M. Rubin Drosophila melanogaster MNK/Chk2 and p53 Regulate Multiple DNA Repair and Apoptotic Pathways following DNA Damage Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2004; 24(3): 1219 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]