- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Lanzov, V. A.
- Articles by Clark, A. J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Lanzov, V. A.
- Articles by Clark, A. J.
Conjugational Hyperrecombination Achieved by Derepressing the LexA Regulon, Altering the Properties of RecA Protein and Inactivating Mismatch Repair in Escherichia coli K-12
Vladislav A. Lanzovb, Irina V. Bakhlanovab, and Alvin J. Clarkaa Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0106
b Division of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics, Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Gatchina/St. Petersburg, 188350 Russia
Corresponding author: Alvin J. Clark, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0106., ajclark{at}email.arizona.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: G. R. SMITH
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The frequency of recombinational exchanges (FRE) that disrupt co-inheritance of transferred donor markers in Escherichia coli Hfr by F- crosses differs by up to a factor of two depending on physiological factors and culture conditions. Under standard conditions we found FRE to be 5.01 ± 0.43 exchanges per 100-min units of DNA length for wild-type strains of the AB1157 line. Using these conditions we showed a cumulative effect of various mutations on FRE. Constitutive SOS expression by lexA gene inactivation (lexA71::Tn5) and recA gene mutation (recA730) showed, respectively,
4- and 7-fold increases of FRE. The double lexA71 recA730 combination gave an
17-fold increase in FRE. Addition of mutS215::Tn10, inactivating the mismatch repair system, to the double lexA recA mutant increased FRE to
26-fold above wild-type FRE. Finally, we showed that another recA mutation produced as much SOS expression as recA730 but increased FRE only 3-fold. We conclude that three factors contribute to normally low FRE under standard conditions: repression of the LexA regulon, the properties of wild-type RecA protein, and a functioning MutSHL mismatch repair system. We discuss mechanisms by which the lexA, recA, and mutS mutations may elevate FRE cumulatively to obtain hyperrecombination.
DURING bacterial conjugation, donor Hfr strains transfer a single strand of DNA with a leading 5'-end into recipients where this strand is converted into a double-stranded (ds) form by discontinuous complementary strand synthesis via Okazaki fragments (for references, see ![]()
![]()
![]()
At least three quantitative parameters have been used to characterize conjugational recombination. These are the yield of recombinants, the linkage or co-inheritance of two transferred donor markers, and the heterogeneity of progeny resulting from multiple recombination events proceeding in one transconjugant (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Linkage is disrupted by recombination between selected and unselected markers. The frequency of this disruptive recombination can be stated as either the average distance between two recombination exchanges, symbolized by
, or the frequency of recombination exchanges per unit of distance (FRE). Several attempts have been made to estimate the value of FRE in conjugational recombination. We recalculated values of FRE, from 4.4/100 min up to 10.9/100 min, using a modified Haldane formula and linkage values measured in different crosses (Table 1). (See MATERIALS AND METHODS for the rationale behind our choice of this unit and a description of the formula.)
|
The reasons for this twofold discrepancy remain obscure. One possible reason is that the strains used by the various investigators carry different mutations affecting exchange frequency. Another reason is that different experimental conditions may affect FRE. Consistent with the former explanation, two genes controlling SOS induction (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In this study we have sought to answer four questions. First, are there experimental conditions that can provide constant and reproducible findings of FRE values? In other words, we tested various physiological factors to see how much they might influence FRE. Second, does derepression of the LexA regulon reproducibly alter FRE or are other functions of recA and lexA involved? Third, what is the maximal increase of FRE that can be achieved by the use of different mutations that could be involved in recombination? Fourth, are alterations in FRE connected with alterations in the mechanism of recombination?
In the search for the answers to these questions, we show that various physiological factors affect the FRE value by no more than 2-fold. Keeping physiological factors constant we show that on average about five exchanges per 100-min interval occur during conjugational recombination. Furthermore, we show that the number of exchanges can be increased by
17-fold by mutations affecting recA and the state of derepression of the LexA regulon. Finally, we show that a 26-fold increase can be achieved by additional inactivation of mismatch repair. We discuss the mechanisms possibly involved in this hyperrecombination.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Bacterial strains:
The strains used are listed in Table 2. JC18401, JC18411, and JC18414 were made for this study by allowing P1 to multiply on JCD1060 and by using the lysate to transduce, respectively, KL227, EST1450, and EST1799 to Camr. malB::Tn9 in JCD1060 contains the gene for Camr and is 75% cotransducible with lexA3 (![]()
![]()
![]()
phage, indicating that the CI repressor was constitutively degraded (![]()
|
AB1157S was made by a P1vir transduction of the mutS215::Tn10 allele from JCD1424 into AB1157 strain, checking for both Tetr and Mut+ phenotypes. A higher level of both direct (rifampicin-resistant) and reverse (lac+) mutants in the population of AB1157S cells compared to levels in the population of AB1157 cells was used to monitor the mutator phenotype (i.e., Mut+).
K197S was made by a consecutive P1vir transduction of, first, the srl+ allele from HB101 recA13 into K197 to obtain an intermediate strain K197T where the presence of recA730 and lexA71 alleles was checked by UVr and Kanr phenotypes and, second, the mutS215::Tn10 allele into the K197T strain, checking for both Tetr and Mut+ phenotypes as mentioned above.
Conjugation and transduction:
Conjugation and P1 transduction were carried out essentially as described by ![]()
![]()
![]()
Some crosses were performed to compare recombination frequencies in exponential and stationary-phase cells. Cultures were prepared as follows: An overnight culture was grown with aeration in 56/2 medium in a thermostated room at 37° to reach deep stationary phase. A small portion of the culture was diluted 1:50 and aerated in a water bath shaker at 37° for 33.5 hr to reach middle exponential phase (OD600
0.5). The remaining portion was aerated in a water bath shaker at 37° for 33.5 hr and was diluted to the same concentration (OD600
0.5) as the exponential culture. Both exponential and stationary cultures were mated with Hfr KL227 exponential culture under the same condition.
Genetic analysis:
After conjugation Arg+, Thr+, or Ara+ transconjugants were selected; contraselection was achieved with streptomycin. The Hfr strains KL227 and KL226 (![]()
![]()
![]()

where µ is the fractional co-inheritance and l is the distance in transfer minutes between the co-inherited markers. We used the following marker positions from the physical 100-min map of ![]()
![]()
![]()
When co-inheritance of the proximal unselected markers (leu+, proA+, or lacY+) with any of the distal selected markers (argE+, thr+, or ara+) falls below 0.50, the Haldane formula cannot be used to estimate exchange frequency. Such low co-inheritance may mean that the DNA corresponding to the unselected marker is degraded, that sequence-specific recombination occurs, or that some other unknown process affects independent inheritance of selected and unselected markers. When we encounter co-inheritance values <0.5, we say the FRE values cannot be determined.
Notes on the experimental system:
We chose to examine the argE-leu region of the E. coli chromosome because it does not span either the oriC or the ter region and hence we thought it would minimize any influence of the origin and termination of replication. Besides, the Haldane formula can be applied to the region argE-tsx to describe recombination events by the RecBCD pathway (![]()
Measurement of ß-galactosidase synthesis:
This was carried out precisely as described by ![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Culture and physiological conditions can affect exchange frequencies twofold:
Thinking that the twofold discrepancy in published exchange frequency values might be due to differences in culture conditions, we tested the effects of temperature, pH, and the type of media. Table 3 shows that for the most part FRE values ranged around five exchanges per 100 min. Only in Table 3A did we find a statistically significant twofold difference caused by changing the temperature at which the strains were grown, mated, and plated from 37° to 44°. In Table 3C and Table 3D, there was also a significant difference between the FRE values obtained with 56/2 vs. Luria broth (LB) growth and mating media (plating pH of 6.5), but the difference was less than twofold. Nonetheless, we concluded that differences in the physiological conditions might explain the twofold discrepancy among exchange frequency values found in the literature. Consequently, we used only one set of conditions to perform the experiments described below (except where noted), namely 56/2 medium at pH 7.5 for growth, mating, and selection at 37° throughout.
|
Mutations activating constitutive SOS expression can affect exchange frequencies up to 17-fold:
![]()
|
Additional evidence that LexA regulon derepression stimulates exchange frequencies was found by testing a strain carrying lexA71::Tn5, an inactive repressor allele. Table 5 shows that in a large 13.3-min interval (argEleu) the effect was large but quantitatively unmeasurable; in a short 0.3-min interval (araleu) a 4-fold effect was measured. Interestingly, the combination recA730 lexA71 resulted in a 17-fold increase of FRE. Since recA730 is identical to recA1211 (![]()
|
Mutations of RecA protein alter exchange frequency without appreciably affecting expression of the LexA regulon:
To this point we have been concerned with the state of expression of the LexA regulon and its effect on FRE. However, the data in Table 4 and Table 5 show two indications that modifications of RecA protein can affect FRE independently of their effects on expression of the LexA regulon. First, lexA3 does not completely suppress the effects of recA1211 on FRE (Table 4). Since lexA3 is expected to prevent any induced expression of the LexA regulon, a higher FRE in the double mutant compared to wild type implies that RecA1211 protein can intrinsically increase recombination frequencies. Second, recA730 when added to the lexA71 strain increases the FRE value substantially (Table 5). Here we expect that the null lexA71 allele has already completely derepressed the LexA regulon (![]()
![]()
Table 6 shows another indication that the nature of RecA protein can influence recombination frequencies independently of its effect on LexA regulon expression. In this table we look at the effects on FRE of two recA mutants isolated by ![]()
|
Absence of mismatch repair increases exchange frequency:
Previous experiments showed that mutations of the methyl-directed mismatch correction (MutSHL) system increased intragenic recombination (![]()
![]()
The data presented in Table 7 show that mutS215 increases the FRE value in the recA+lexA+ background about sixfold and increases the already high FRE value in the recA730 lexA71::Tn5 background
50%. Thus, the MutSHL system inhibits intergenic recombination at both the low level found in the recA+lexA+ strain and the elevated level found in the recA730 lexA71::Tn5 strain. Although revertants were more frequent in the populations of the mutS215 strains (data not shown), they did not exceed 0.01% of the selected recombinants (Table 7) and hence made no significant contribution to the co-inheritance frequencies measured.
|
![]()
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Validity of the Haldane formula for analyzing conjugational recombination:
The Haldane formula was invented to describe recombination between the linear autonomous chromosomes of eukaryotes. In the case of conjugational recombination in E. coli only one of the two interacting DNA elements is autonomous, the circular chromosome, and only one is linear, the nonautonomous exogenote. Research has shown that there is a high frequency of recombination near each of the two ends of the exogenote (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We use the Haldane formula to describe events that occur in the midregion of the exogenote, presumably independent of the end-associated events. We show in this article (see Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6) that, for wild type, the Haldane formula describes a relatively uniform recombination frequency for three different size intervals in the 12-min region of E. coli chromosome between argE and leu (![]()
We note that a uniform recombination frequency in the midregion of conjugational exogenotes contrasts with the view of ![]()
80% co-inheritance of proximal markers located from 5 to 21 min from the selected marker. Smith's resulting view was that 80% of exogenotes show no recombination in the midregion and the 20% that do recombine do so in a small region close to the selected marker. We think that this particular view describes a situation in which midregion breaks are rare and consequently FRE is low. This thought is supported by an analysis of the data referenced by ![]()
![]()
|
If midregion breaks are more frequent and randomly distributed, however, one would expect to obtain a uniform midregion recombination frequency such as we observe. We expect that the frequency of such midregion double-strand breaks and single-strand gaps will vary with experimental conditions, which is the reason we used a standard set of conditions, and with the genotype of parental strains. Therefore, our view is that recombination can occur at any position of a donor exogenote where a double-strand end occurs. Such ends would certainly exist near the origin and distal terminus of the exogenote, but they might also occur in between. In addition single-strand gaps occurring between the origin and distal terminus might initiate a recombinational exchange either directly or by being converted to double-strand ends (![]()
Consistent with this view ![]()
![]()
Summary of results:
One contribution of this work is to show that culture conditions can affect the frequency of recombination between thr and leu when thr is the selected marker and all zygotes that have received the donor's thr+ allele have also received the donor's leu+ allele. Although the range of effects is small (twofold), we have standardized culture conditions to allow us to isolate the effects of various mutations. Using standard conditions and ara (or thr) as the selected marker and leu as the unselected marker, we have shown that recA, lexA, and mutS alleles increase FRE. We have also shown that the combination of two of the alleles, recA730 and lexA71, leads to a higher recombination frequency than does either of the single alleles. Finally, we have shown that adding mutS215 to the combination of the recA and lexA alleles leads to a still higher recombination frequency. Contributions of each single mutation and combinations of mutations are shown in Table 10.
|
Ways of achieving an increase in FRE:
There are several ways to explain the effects of recA, lexA, and mutS alleles. First, the mutations might lead to selective enrichment of Leu- recombinants at the expense of the Leu+ recombinants. We think this is unlikely because the recA, lexA, and mutS genes are not known to affect the relative survival of Leu+ and Leu- recombinants while their products are known to play a role in the process of recombination and the related process of replication. Second, the mutations might lead to an increased frequency of integrating short regions of donor DNA. This might result from more breaks in the exogenote DNA as it is being used as a template for lagging-strand DNA synthesis. Finally, the mutations might alter the extent of heteroduplex regions of DNA formed by recombination. In this case either shortening or lengthening the heteroduplex regions could explain an increase in FRE. In the discussion that follows we explore which of these possibilities might explain our results with recA, lexA, and mutS alleles.
Derepression of the LexA regulon increases FRE:
We observed that a LexA defective mutation, lexA71, by itself increased FRE. This could be interpreted as either a direct effect on the RecA-DNA complex produced by the absence of LexA protein or an indirect effect due to the induction of one or more LexA regulon proteins. The direct effect is plausible because wild-type LexA protein can interfere with the binding of double-stranded DNA to the complex of RecA protein and single-stranded DNA (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
RecA protein structure affects FRE:
Derepression of the LexA regulon is not alone in increasing FRE because the coprotease-constitutive recA730 mutation increased the FRE values in a strain already fully derepressed because of its repressor-inactivating lexA71 allele (![]()
![]()
The effect of RecA730 protein structure is possibly the explanation for the elevated FRE levels in the recA1211 lexA3 strain (Table 3) because recA730 and recA1211 are due to the same mutation (![]()
![]()
![]()
Another phenomenon in need of explanation is the phenotype of the recA1219 lexA+ strain. The recA1219 mutation derepressed the LexA regulon as much as recA1211 (see MATERIALS AND METHODS) but affected FRE only about one-third as much (Table 6). One possibility is that RecA1219 protein derepresses the regulon by a mechanism different from that employed by RecA1211 (and RecA730) protein. In other words RecA1219 protein may not compete more successfully than RecA+ protein with SSB protein for single-stranded DNA. Perhaps the complex made by this protein and single-stranded DNA has a higher affinity for LexA protein or perhaps it is a more active coprotease. Alternatively, the recA1219 mutation may enhance the unwinding activity of RecA protein (![]()
Mismatch correction reduces FRE:
Methyl-directed mismatch repair has a well-established antirecombinational effect in bacterial experiments (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We note that there is another possibility. A very short patch (VSP) type of mismatch correction uses MutS and MutL together with Dcm to correct G:T mismatches to G:C in a small set of specific sequences (![]()
![]()
Cumulative effect of recA, lexA, and mutS mutations:
The most striking feature of our data is the cumulative effect of the recA730, lexA71, and mutS215 mutations. Together these mutations increase FRE to the point that there appears to be the equivalent of one crossover every 0.75 min or 30 kb approximately. Table 10 shows that adding the FRE values determined for each mutation separately yields a FRE value less than the value we observe for the multiple mutants. This implies that the mechanisms by which each mutation increases FRE interact in some way, but we know too little about the situation to draw a firm conclusion to this effect. In fact, we want to express a caution against overinterpreting the quantitative aspects of our data. As discussed above, each of the mutations we studied may have complex and partially offsetting effects. The mathematical model that we used to calculate the frequencies cannot resolve such complexities. Such a model can calculate only the net frequency of recombination; it cannot distinguish how many recombinants have been lost and how many have been gained by mutational changes affecting the mechanisms of recombination and replication. If the mismatch repair system, derepression of the LexA regulon, and specific alterations in RecA protein structure are involved in preventing recombination by one mechanism, stimulating recombination by a different mechanism and interfering with each other, the FRE values will give us an incomplete picture of the molecular events occurring.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are very grateful to the late B. Bachmann and H. Echols, as well as to M. Berlin, A. Blinkova, K. Smith, I. Tessman, and M. Volkert for supplying bacterial strains and to L. Yurchenko for help in strain construction. V.A.L. acknowledges with gratitude all members of A. J. Clark's former research group for hospitality and providing assistance in the work. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant AI05371. The work carried out in Russia was supported by a Fogarty International Research Collaboration Award (grant 1 R03 TWO1319-01A1) and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant 02-04-48332).
Manuscript received August 14, 2002; Accepted for publication January 3, 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ADELBERG, E. A. and S. M. BURNS, 1960 Genetic variation in the sex factor of Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 79:321-330.
BACHMANN, B. J., 1972 Pedigrees of some mutant strains of Escherichia coli K-12. Bacteriol. Rev. 36:525-557.
BACHMANN, B. J., 1990 Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12. Microbiol. Rev. 54:130-197.
BACHMANN, B. J., K. B. LOW, and A. L. TAYLOR, 1976 Recalibrated linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12. Bacteriol. Rev. 40:116-167.
BIRGE, E. A., 1983 Site-specific recombination following conjugation in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol. Gen. Genet. 192:366-372.[Medline]
BLATTNER, F. R., G. PLUNKETT, III, C. A. BLOCH, N. T. PERNA, and V. BURLAND et al., 1997 The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277:1453-1474.
BRESLER, S. E. and V. A. LANZOV, 1978 Inducible recombination in Escherichia coli K-12: recombinogenic effect of tif1 mutation. Rep. Acad. Sci. USSR 238:715-717.
BRESLER, S. E., V. A. LANZOV, and L. R. MANUKIAN, 1973 Mechanism of genetic recombination during bacterial conjugation of Escherichia coli K-12. IV. Heterogeneity of progeny of exconjugants. Mol. Gen. Genet. 123:347-353.[Medline]
BRESLER, S. E., S. V. KRIVONOGOV, and V. A. LANZOV, 1978 Scale of the genetic map and genetic control of recombination after conjugation in Escherichia coli K-12. Hot spots of recombination. Mol. Gen. Genet. 166:337-346.[Medline]
BRESLER, S. E., I. Y. GORYSHIN, and V. A. LANZOV, 1980 Single-stranded conjugation in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol. Gen. Genet. 177:519-525.[Medline]
CASTELLAZZI, M., J. GEORGE, and G. BUTTIN, 1972 Prophage induction and cell division in E. coli. I. Further characterization of the thermosensitive mutation tif1 whose expression mimics the effect of UV irradiation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 119:139-152.[Medline]
CSONKA, L. N. and A. J. CLARK, 1980 Construction of an Hfr strain useful for transferring recA mutations between E. coli strains. J. Bacteriol. 143:529-530.
CUNNINGHAM, R. P., T. SHIBATA, C. DASGUPTA, and C. M. RADDING, 1979 Single strands induce recA protein to unwind duplex DNA for homologous pairing. Nature 281:191-195.[Medline]
DE HAAN, P. G. and C. VERHOEF, 1966 Genetic recombination in Escherichia coli. II. Calculation of incorporation frequency and relative map distance by recombinant analysis. Mutat. Res. 3:111-117.[Medline]
DIMPFL, J. and H. ECHOLS, 1989 Duplication mutation as an SOS response in Escherichia coli: enhanced duplication formation by a constitutively activated RecA. Genetics 123:255-260.
FEINSTEIN, S. I. and B. K. LOW, 1986 Hyper-recombining recipient strains in bacterial conjugation. Genetics 113:13-33.
FENG, G., H. C. TSUI, and M. E. WINKLER, 1996 Depletion of the cellular amounts of the MutS and MutH methyl-directed mismatch repair proteins in stationary-phase Escherichia coli K-12 cells. J. Bacteriol. 178:2388-2396.
HALDANE, J. B. S., 1919 The combination of linkage values and the calculation of distance between the loci of linked factors. J. Genet. 8:299-309.
JACOB, F., and E. L. WOLLMAN, 1961 Sexuality and the Genetics of Bacteria. Academic Press, New York.
KENYON, C. J. and G. C. WALKER, 1980 DNA-damaging agents stimulate gene expression at specific loci in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:2819-2823.
KUZMINOV, A., 2001 DNA replication meets genetic exchange: chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:8461-8468.
LANZOV, V. A., 2002 Hyper-recombination in Escherichia coli with and without SOS response, pp. 2138 in Recent Research Development in DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, edited by M. RUIZ-RUBIO, E. ALEJANDRE-DURAN and T. ROLDAN-ARJONA. Research Signpost, Kerala, India.
LANZOV, V., I. STEPANOVA, and G. VINOGRADSKAJA, 1991 Genetic control of recombination exchange frequency in Escherichia coli K-12. Biochimie 73:305-312.[Medline]
LAVERY, P. E. and S. C. KOWALCZYKOWSKI, 1992 Biochemical basis of the constitutive repressor cleavage activity of RecA730 protein. A comparison to RecA441 and RecA803 proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 267:20648-20658.
LEDERBERG, J., 1957 Sibling recombinants in zygote pedigrees of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 43:1060-1064.
LIEB, M., 1987 Bacterial genes mutL, mutS, and dcm participate in repair of mismatches at 5-methylcytosine sites. J. Bacteriol. 169:5241-5246.
LIEB, M. and S. REHMAT, 1995 Very short patch repair of T:G mismatches in vivo: importance of context and accessory proteins. J. Bacteriol. 177:660-666.
LIN, L. L. and J. W. LITTLE, 1989 Autodigestion and RecA- dependent cleavage of Ind- mutant LexA proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 210:439-452.[Medline]
LITTLE, J. W. and D. W. MOUNT, 1982 The SOS-regulatory system of Escherichia coli.. Cell 29:11-22.[Medline]
LLOYD, R. G., 1978 Hyper-recombination in Escherichia coli K-12 mutants constitutive for protein X synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 134:929-935.
LLOYD, R. G. and C. BUCKMAN, 1995 Conjugational recombination in Escherichia coli: genetic analysis of recombinant formation in Hfr x F- crosses. Genetics 139:1123-1148.[Abstract]
LLOYD, R. G. and G. J. SHARPLES, 1993 Processing of recombination intermediates by the RecG and RuvAB proteins of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:1719-1725.
LOVETT, S. T. and A. J. CLARK, 1983 Genetic analysis of regulation of the RecF pathway of recombination in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 153:1471-1478.
LOW, B., 1965 Low recombination frequency for markers very near the origin in conjugation in E. coli.. Genet. Res. 6:469-473.[Medline]
LOW, K. B., 1973 Rapid mapping of conditional and auxotrophic mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 113:798-812.
MATIC, I., C. RAYSSIGUIER, and M. RADMAN, 1995 Interspecies gene exchange in bacteria: the role of SOS and mismatch repair systems in evolution of species. Cell 80:507-515.[Medline]
MILLER, J. H., 1972 Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
MODRICH, P., 1991 Mechanisms and biological effects of mismatch repair. Annu. Rev. Genet. 25:229-253.[Medline]
OPPENHEIM, A. B. and M. RILEY, 1967 Covalent union of parental DNAs following conjugation in Escherichia coli.. J. Mol. Biol. 28:503-511.[Medline]
PANSEGRAU, W. and E. LANKA, 1996 Enzymology of DNA transfer by conjugative mechanism. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 54:197-251.[Medline]
PITTARD, J. and E. M. WALKER, 1967 Conjugation in Escherichia coli: recombination events in terminal regions of transferred deoxyribonucleic acid. J. Bacteriol. 94:1656-1663.
RADMAN, M., 1989 Mismatch repair and genetic recombination, pp. 169192 in Genetic Recombination, edited by R. KUCHERLAPATI and G. SMITH. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
REHRAUER, W. M., P. E. LAVERY, E. L. PALMER, R. N. SINGH, and S. C. KOWALCZYKOWSKI, 1996 Interaction of Escherichia coli RecA protein with LexA repressor. I. LexA repressor cleavage is competitive with binding of a secondary DNA molecule. J. Biol. Chem. 271:23865-23873.
ROCA, A. I. and M. M. COX, 1990 The RecA protein: structure and function. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25:415-467.[Medline]
RUDD, K. E., 1998 Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the physical map. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:985-1019.
SHEN, P. and H. V. HUANG, 1989 Effect of base pair mismatches on recombination via the RecBCD pathway. Mol. Gen. Genet. 218:358-360.[Medline]
SMITH, G. R., 1991 Conjugational recombination in E. coli: myths and mechanisms. Cell 64:19-27.[Medline]
TAYLOR, A. L. and E. A. ADELBERG, 1960 Linkage analysis with very high frequency males of Escherichia coli. Genetics 45:1233-1243.
TEMPLIN, A., S. R. KUSHNER, and A. J. CLARK, 1972 Genetic analysis of mutations indirectly suppressing recB and recC mutations. Genetics 72:105-115.
TESSMAN, E. S. and P. PETERSON, 1985 Plaque color method for rapid isolation of novel recA mutants of Escherichia coli K-12: new classes of protease-constitutive recA mutants. J. Bacteriol. 163:677-687.
VOLOSHIN, O. N., B. E. RAMIREZ, A. BAX, and R. D. CAMERINI-OTERO, 2001 A model for the abrogation of the SOS response by an SOS protein: a negatively charged helix in DinI mimics DNA in its interaction with RecA. Genes Dev. 15:415-427.
WALMSLEY, R. H., 1969 The general theory of mapping functions for random genetic recombination. Biophys. J. 9:421-431.
YASUDA, T., K. MORIMATSU, T. HORII, T. NAGATA, and H. OHMORI, 1998 Inhibition of Escherichia coli RecA coprotease activities by DinI. EMBO J. 17:3207-3216.[Medline]
ZIEG, J. and S. R. KUSHNER, 1977 Analysis of genetic recombination between two partially deleted lactose operons of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 131:123-132.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Baitin, I. V. Bakhlanova, D. V. Chervyakova, Y. V. Kil, V. A. Lanzov, and M. M. Cox Two RecA Protein Types That Mediate Different Modes of Hyperrecombination J. Bacteriol., April 15, 2008; 190(8): 3036 - 3045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Baitin, I. V. Bakhlanova, Y. V. Kil, M. M. Cox, and V. A. Lanzov Distinguishing Characteristics of Hyperrecombinogenic RecA Protein from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Acting in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2006; 188(16): 5812 - 5820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Lanzov, V. A.
- Articles by Clark, A. J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Lanzov, V. A.
- Articles by Clark, A. J.
