- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Mauricio, R.
- Articles by Bergelson, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Mauricio, R.
- Articles by Bergelson, J.
Natural Selection for Polymorphism in the Disease Resistance Gene Rps2 of Arabidopsis thaliana
Rodney Mauricio1,a,b, Eli A. Stahl1,a,c, Tonia Korvesa, Dacheng Tiana, Martin Kreitmana,c, and Joy Bergelsona,ca Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637,
b Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-7223
c Committee on Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Corresponding author: Joy Bergelson, 1101 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637., jbergels{at}midway.uchicago.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: M. AGUADÉ
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Pathogen resistance is an ecologically important phenotype increasingly well understood at the molecular genetic level. In this article, we examine levels of avrRpt2-dependent resistance and Rps2 locus DNA sequence variability in a worldwide sample of 27 accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. The rooted parsimony tree of Rps2 sequences drawn from a diverse set of ecotypes includes a deep bifurcation separating major resistance and susceptibility clades of alleles. We find evidence for selection maintaining these alleles and identify the N-terminal part of the leucine-rich repeat region as a probable target of selection. Additional protein variants are found within the two major clades and correlate well with measurable differences among ecotypes in resistance to the avirulence gene avrRpt2 of the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Long-lived polymorphisms have been observed for other resistance genes of A. thaliana; the Rps2 data suggest that the long-term maintenance of phenotypic variation in resistance genes may be a general phenomenon and are consistent with diversifying selection acting in concert with selection to maintain variation.
PLANTS are attacked by a multitude of pathogens and can respond to a subset of these attacks by mounting an induced defense response (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The RPS2 protein contains a nucleotide-binding site (NBS) and a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) region, two characteristics of a large family of plant R genes (e.g., ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Disease resistance genes are often polymorphic for resistance and susceptibility alleles (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here we extend the results of ![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Plant materials:
Twenty-seven accessions of A. thaliana were chosen to create a worldwide sample for Rps2 sequencing representing the major geographic regions in the species' distribution (Table 1). Twelve of these accessions were taken from collections of J. Bergelson and R. Mauricio. Fifteen were selected from those at the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC) at random, except avoiding an excess of accessions from any one country. These accessions were obtained from the ABRC, and seeds from single individuals were harvested to create single-seed stocks for producing the plant materials used in the study. Two individuals of A. lyrata from Indiana (collected by R. Mauricio and D. Jacobson) were used to determine a consensus sequence of the locus for this species.
|
Phenotype assessment:
Resistance phenotypes to the P. syringae avirulence gene, avrRpt2, were determined in all but six of the sequenced accessions, as well as the "Columbia" accession and the mutant, rps2-101C (in a Columbia background). Plants were grown from seed in Promix soil with a 12-hr day length at 20°. When the plants were 34 weeks old, one entire new leaf was infiltrated with P. syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 at OD of 0.0002 using a blunt 1-cc syringe. The pathogen strain used in these infections contained a plasmid: either pLAFR3 or pLABL18. The pLABL18 plasmid is identical to the pLAFR3 plasmid, but contains an additional 3.6-kb fragment containing the avrRpt2 gene (![]()
Plants were identified as resistant or susceptible by comparing the growth (colony-forming units per leaf punch, log-transformed) of the two pathogen strains in an analysis of variance (ANOVA) that included experimental day for accessions evaluated on multiple days. Accessions in which the pathogen strain with pLABL18 grew significantly less than the strain with pLAFR3 (Table 1, column 3) were designated "resistant." Other accessions were designated "susceptible."
For those accessions designated resistant, resistance was quantified by comparing pathogen growth in each focal accession with growth in the Columbia accession. Resistance relative to Columbia (Table 1, column 4) was calculated by dividing the difference in the growth of the strains pLABL18 and pLAFR3 in the focal accession by the difference in the growth of the strains in Columbia, as assessed on the same experimental days. Gaps in the distribution of relative resistance values were used to categorize accessions by degree of resistance. Accessions in the group with lower resistance than that of Columbia were labeled "mildly resistant" (mR), and those in the group with higher values than that of Columbia were labeled "strongly resistant" (sR). To determine the significance level for the degree of resistance relative to Columbia, we evaluated the significance of the interaction between accession (Columbia vs. the focal accession) and the pathogen strain (containing pLAFR3 or pLAB18) using ANOVA.
DNA sequence determination:
For each accession, DNA was extracted from young rosette leaves using protocols described previously (![]()
We found differences between our sequences from accessions Wu-0 and Zu-0 and those reported by ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Population genetic analyses:
Silent (noncoding and synonymous) and amino acid replacement (nonsynonymous) polymorphism and divergence (Jukes-Cantor corrected) calculations were conducted using DnaSP (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
W/
T, where
W is average pairwise nucleotide difference within populations and
T is that in total (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We analyzed a coalescent model with selection and recombination as described in ![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
avrRpt2-dependent resistance phenotypes:
For each of 21 accessions, we compared the growth of P. syringae strain DC3000 with avrRpt2 and DC3000 without avrRpt2. If an accession is resistant, the growth of the strain with avrRpt2 should be significantly less than the growth of the strain without avrRpt2. The log of growth of the pathogen without avrRpt2 minus that of the pathogen with avrRpt2 is listed in Table 1; this measure of resistance is unitless since it is equivalent to the log of the ratio of growth for the two pathogen strains. The results of our ANOVAs indicate that 17 of the 21 accessions tested were resistant. Accessions BG-4, Po-1, Zu-0, and Knox-2 and the Columbia rps2 mutant showed no indication of resistance. Statistical designations of resistance and susceptibility were consistent with observed disease symptoms.
We determined whether resistant accessions inhibited bacterial growth of DC3000 with avrRpt2 to different extents by comparing bacterial growth in each line relative to this same measure in a common paired control line, Columbia. Relative resistance values (Table 1) ranged from 0.285 to 1.61. Gaps in the distribution of relative resistance values, between 0.67 and 0.945 and between 1.14 and 1.39, allowed us to group alleles into three operational subclasses of resistance, mild (mR), intermediate (R), and strong (sR). We used relative resistance values rather than ANOVA P values (Table 1) to categorize accessions because the power to detect differences from Columbia varied among accessions. The mR group included accessions AB-7, GR-6, Wu-0, Yo-0, and Cvi-0, and the sR group included Pog-0, RLD-1, Co-1, and Tsu-0.
Low growth of DC3000 without avrRpt2 in Pu-8 suggested partial resistance to the DC3000 background; additional resistance in the presence of avrRpt2 indicated that Pu-8 is resistant, but we were unable to measure its relative resistance. Also, Wu-0 has been reported previously as susceptible (![]()
![]()
![]()
Molecular variation at Rps2:
We surveyed DNA sequence variability in 27 accessions from throughout the species range, including the accessions whose resistance phenotypes we determined (Table 1), and from the closely related species A. lyrata. The sequenced region spans 4248 base pairs (bp) in A. thaliana accession Columbia (GenBank accession no.
AL049483), from 1003 bp upstream of the Rps2 start codon to 521 bp downstream of its stop codon. Our survey yielded a 4461-bp alignment including the A. lyrata sequence, with 3755 sites at which polymorphism and divergence were ascertained (Table 2).
|
The data including the outgroup sequence revealed a total of 197 nucleotide differences fixed between A. lyrata and all A. thaliana sequences and 58 single nucleotide polymorphisms distinguishing 18 haplotypes in the 27 A. thaliana alleles (Fig 1; Table 2). Within the Rps2 coding sequence, we detected 55 nonsynonymous (amino acid changing) differences between species and 20 nonsynonymous polymorphisms. The Rps2 coding sequence reading frame is intact in all individuals, despite two one-codon insertions in A. lyrata relative to A. thaliana at Columbia residues 741 and 771 (both in the LRR region) and a four-codon deletion at 877 (near the RPS2 C terminus). We also introduced one-codon insertion/deletions (indels; in both A. lyrata and A. thaliana) at Columbia residues 86 and 737, where the two species differ at all three nucleotide positions; these three-base differences were not included in polymorphism analysis. We found numerous indels between species in noncoding regions and five indel polymorphisms all outside of the coding sequence. A homonucleotide run at 821 varied between two A. lyrata individuals, but in A. thaliana no microsatellites were detected. No heterozygous sites were detected in A. thaliana individuals. Overall levels of polymorphism and divergence at Rps2 (Table 2) fall within the range seen at other loci in A. thaliana and A. lyrata (![]()
![]()
![]()
In Table 3, levels of polymorphism and divergence in the LRR region are presented. Within this region, the ß-pleated sheet structural motif consensus sequence (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Evidence for balancing selection at Rps2:
Fig 2 shows a parsimony tree inferred from silent and nonsynonymous polymorphism and divergence, with accession name and avrRpt2-dependent resistance phenotype shown for each allele. The Rps2 gene tree reveals the presence of two highly supported major clades. This haplotype structure is evident for synonymous as well as amino acid replacement polymorphisms, but only for polymorphisms falling in the middle of the coding sequence. Tests for nonrandom associations between all pairs of nonsingleton polymorphisms (Fig 3) reveal that linkage disequilibrium is clustered within a central segment of the Rps2 coding sequence. Indeed only polymorphisms in this segment show significant linkage disequilibrium after correction for multiple tests of association. Outside of this central segment of the Rps2 coding sequence, the data reveal little haplotype structure (Fig 1 and Fig 3).
|
|
Sliding window analysis of nucleotide diversity between the two major clades (Fig 4) shows a peak of silent polymorphism in the center of the coding sequencethe 300 bp 5' of the region encoding the RPS2 LRR region and in the 5' half of the region encoding the RPS2 LRR region itself (hereafter referred to as the 5' LRR region)corresponding to the region containing the cluster of polymorphic sites in linkage disequilibrium. Peak nucleotide diversity between the two major clades reaches
b = 0.086 in the Rps2 5' LRR region, a value approaching estimates of silent divergence between species. Clustering of silent polymorphism within this segment of the Rps2 coding sequence results in significant heterogeneity in the ratio of polymorphism to divergence across the sequenced region (sliding window average G: entire region, P
0.004; coding sequence, P
0.0014; ![]()
|
Alleles from resistant and susceptible accessions are not scattered throughout the Rps2 gene tree, but are grouped together; therefore, we refer to the two major clades as the resistance (R) clade and susceptibility (S) clade. We tested for a significant association between Rps2 sequence variation and avrRpt2-dependent resistance variation by analyzing differentiation (an FST estimator based on nucleotide diversities; ![]()
0.47, P
0.019), marginally significant differentiation between R and mR phenotypes (FST = 0.12, P = 0.09), and no significant differentiation for other comparisons between resistant phenotypes (FST < 0.005, P > 0.3). Thus, sequence variation at Rps2 correlates with avrRpt2-dependent disease resistance, suggestive of causal links between the two (see DISCUSSION).
Geographic differentiation:
In contrast to avrRpt2-dependent resistance, accessions from the same geographic region are scattered throughout the Rps2 gene tree (Fig 2). We categorized accessions into five regions, (1) Eastern Europe, Asia, and Africa; (2) Central and Northern Europe; (3) Western and Southern Europe; (4) Eastern North America; and (5) Western North America, on the basis of the recent expansion of A. thaliana from Western Asia and Eastern Europe to its current worldwide distribution (![]()
![]()
0.14, P
0.15). In addition, Rps2 variation does not differentiate North America from other continents (FST = 0.043, P > 0.5), revealing no evidence for a founder effect in the colonization of the Western hemisphere by A. thaliana. These results are typical of studies of a single or few loci and moderate sample sizes in A. thaliana (![]()
![]()
![]()
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Previously, ![]()
Our statistical confirmation of a peak of polymorphism should not be taken, in and of itself, as a strong refutation of neutral evolution. For example, ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We favor balancing selection as an explanation for Rps2 variation, on the basis of features of the data that distinguish our results from those of other studies that find biallelic variation but favor a population structure hypothesis. As indicated in the sliding window analysis (Fig 4), most of the variation is present in the coding segment of the Rps2 gene and overlaps with the functional domain of the protein implicated in pathogen recognition. Seven amino acid replacement changes separate the R and S clades, four in the LRR region, and the suggestion that differences between Rps2 allelic classes could be functional is consistent with a role of selection. Furthermore, accessions' Rps2 allelic classes correspond closely with their resistance phenotypes. Since selection can act only if functionally distinct alleles exist, a correspondence between phenotype and genotype provides additional evidence in support of balancing selection. Others have also pointed to the importance of possible functional differences distinguishing diverged alleles. For example, ![]()
![]()
Balancing selection is expected to lead to a signature in which neutral variation accumulates between the alleles surrounding the site(s) under selection. This signature is a simple manifestation of the genealogical correlation of tightly linked sites: as a balanced polymorphism becomes old, so too do the genealogical ages of sites tightly linked to it. In HUDSON and KAPLAN's (1988) coalescent treatment of balanced polymorphism, the physical scale of neutral polymorphism linked to the site under selection is, to a first approximation, determined by a balance between the origination of new neutral mutations (governed by the scaled neutral mutation rate, 4Neu, where Ne is the effective population size and u is the neutral mutation rate per site per generation) and the decay of the linkage disequilibrium between these mutations and the site under selection (governed by the scaled recombination rate, 4Ner, where r is the per generation recombination rate between adjacent sites). Even for a highly self-fertilizing species, balancing selection can be expected to produce a relatively sharp peak of neutral polymorphism linked to a site under selection (![]()
![]()
![]()
We note that the balancing selection analysis is based on a constant-size panmictic population model and does not take into account departures from this model in the demographic history of A. thaliana. Nevertheless, given that the peak of polymorphism is restricted to within the Rps2 coding sequence, that polymorphisms within the peak are not in linkage disequilibrium with polymorphisms outside it, and that significant linkage disequilibrium is rarely observed between loci in A. thaliana (![]()
![]()
In our balancing selection analysis, the best-fit mutation rate between allelic classes was found to be equal to 0.01, i.e., on the order of one-hundredth the rate of neutral coalescence (1/Ne). Higher mutation rates between the selected alleles would lead to more recent common ancestry between them, and if large enough may not result in an observable peak of polymorphism even with balancing selection. Many kinds of mutations can cause loss of function; therefore the rate of origination of new susceptibility alleles might be expected to be quite high. An ancient balanced polymorphism between a resistance and a susceptibility allele would imply that selection favors one susceptibility allele over others and that the rate of origination of this particular susceptibility allele is low. Alternative resistance alleles, on the other hand, might be expected to have a low rate of origination. Thus, the observation of a signature of selection between the two major Rps2 clades is consistent with the hypothesis that the two major allelic classes of Rps2 contain functional resistance alleles. Indeed, ![]()
![]()
Rps2 exhibits marked sequence variability in association with phenotypic variation. Seven of the nine phenotypic changes that would be inferred by simply mapping phenotypes onto the Rps2 gene tree are associated with amino acid polymorphisms, six with polymorphisms in the LRR region (Fig 1 and Fig 2). Polymorphisms that distinguish the R and S clades are found upstream of the LRR region (not shown) and in nonconserved residues between LRR frames (Fig 5); these changes could confer phenotypic variation that is maintained by natural selection (![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Previous studies have found evidence for rapid adaptive substitution rates in LRR region solvent-exposed residues among R gene paralogs (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Sequence data from this article have been deposited with the EMBL/Genbank Data Libraries under accession nos. AF487796AF487823. ![]()
1 These authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank A. Berry, I. Cetl, M. Nachman, G. Robellen, O. Savolainen, and J. Winterer for collecting A. thaliana seeds, as well as the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center at Ohio State University for providing seeds of A. thaliana accessions. F. Ausubel provided seed of rps2-101C. We acknowledge the assistance of M. Aguadé and the reviewers who provided careful and helpful reviews. This work was funded by a Sloan Foundation/National Science Foundation Fellowship in Molecular Evolution and University of Georgia Faculty Research grant to R.M., a Sloan Foundation/Department of Energy Fellowship in Computational Molecular Biology to E.A.S., and a Packard Fellowship and National Institutes of Health awards GM-57994 and GM-62504 to J.B.
Manuscript received August 7, 2002; Accepted for publication November 11, 2002.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AGUADÉ, M., 2001 Nucleotide sequence variation at two genes of the phenylpropanoid pathway, the FAH1 and F3H genes, in Arabidopsis thaliana.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1-9.
AXTELL, M. J., T. W. MCNELLIS, M. B. MUDGETT, C. S. HSU, and B. J. STASKAWICZ, 2001 Mutational analysis of the Arabidopsis RPS2 disease resistance gene and the corresponding Pseudomonas syringae avrRpt2 avirulence gene. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 14:181-188.[Medline]
BANERJEE, D., X. ZHANG, and A. F. BENT, 2001 The leucine-rich repeat domain can determine effective interaction between RPS2 and other host factors in Arabidopsis RPS2-mediated disease resistance. Genetics 158:439-450.
BENT, A. F., B. N. KUNKEL, D. DAHLBECK, K. L. BROWN, and R. SCHMIDT et al., 1994 RPS2 of Arabidopsis thaliana: a leucine-rich repeat class of plant disease resistance genes. Science 265:1856-1860.
BERGELSON, J., E. A. STAHL, S. DUDEK, and M. KREITMAN, 1998 Genetic variation within and among populations. Genetics 148:1311-1323.
BERGELSON, J., M. KREITMAN, E. A. STAHL, and D. TIAN, 2001 Evolutionary dynamics of plant R-genes. Science 292:2281-2285.
BITTNER-EDDY, P. D., I. R. CRUTE, E. B. HOLUB, and J. L. BEYNON, 2000 RPP13 is a simple locus in Arabidopsis thaliana for alleles that specify downy mildew resistance to different avirulence determinants in Peronospora parasitica.. Plant J. 21:177-188.[Medline]
BREYNE, P., D. ROMBAUT, A. VAN GYSEL, M. VAN MONTAGU, and T. GERATS, 1999 AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and between Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 261:627-634.[Medline]
BURDON, J. J., 1987 Diseases and Plant Population Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
CAICEDO, A. L., B. A. SCHAAL, and B. N. KUNKEL, 1999 Diversity and molecular evolution of the RPS2 resistance gene in Arabidopsis thaliana.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:302-306.
CLARK, A. G., 1993 Evolutionary inferences from molecular characterization of self-incompatibility alleles, pp. 79108 in Mechanisms of Molecular Evolution, edited by N. TAKAHATA and A. G. CLARK. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
DONG, X., M. MINDRINOS, K. R. DAVIS, and F. M. AUSUBEL, 1991 Induction of Arabidopsis defense genes by virulent and avirulent Pseudomonas syringae strains and by a cloned avirulence gene. Plant Cell 3:61-72.
ELLIS, J., P. DODDS, and T. PRYOR, 2000 Structure, function and evolution of plant disease resistance genes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3:278-284.[Medline]
ELLIS, J. G., G. J. LAWRENCE, J. E. LUCK, and P. N. DODDS, 1999 Identification of regions in alleles of the flax rust resistance gene L that determine differences in gene-for-gene specificity. Plant Cell 11:495-506.
FLOR, H. H., 1956 The complementary genic systems in flax and flax rust. Adv. Genet. 8:29-54.
FLOR, H. H., 1971 Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 9:275-296.
HAUSER, M.-T., B. HARR, and C. SCHLOTTERER, 2001 Trichome distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana and its close relative Arabidopsis lyrata: molecular analysis of the candidate gene GLABROUS1.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1754-1763.
HOLSINGER, K. E. and R. J. MASON-GAMER, 1996 Hierarchical analysis of nucleotide diversity in geographically structured populations. Genetics 142:629-639.[Abstract]
HOLUB, E. B., 2001 The arms race is ancient history in Arabidopsis, the wildflower. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:516-527.[Medline]
HUDSON, R. R., 1993 The how and why of generating gene genealogies, pp. 2336 in Mechanisms of Molecular Evolution, edited by N. TAKAHATA and A. G. CLARK. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
HUDSON, R. R. and N. L. KAPLAN, 1988 The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination. Genetics 120:831-840.
HUDSON, R. R., D. D. BOOS, and N. L. KAPLAN, 1992a A statistical test to detect geographic subdivision. Mol. Biol. Evol 9:138-151.[Abstract]
HUDSON, R. R., M. SLATKIN, and W. P. MADISON, 1992b Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132:583-589.[Abstract]
HUGHES, A. L. and M. NEI, 1988 Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class-I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature 335:167-170.[Medline]
INNAN, H., F. TAJIMA, R. TERAUCHI, and N. T. MIYASHITA, 1996 Intragenic recombination in the Adh locus of the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana.. Genetics 143:1761-1770.[Abstract]
INNAN, H., R. TERAUCHI, and N. T. MIYASHITA, 1997 Microsatellite polymorphism in natural populations of the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana.. Genetics 146:1441-1452.[Abstract]
JAKOB, K., E. M. GOSS, H. ARAKI, T. VAN, and M. KREITMAN et al., 2002 Pseudomonas viridiflava and P. syringaenatural pathogens of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 15:1195-1203.[Medline]
JONES, D. A. and J. D. G. JONES, 1997 The role of leucine-rich repeat proteins in plant defenses. Adv. Bot. Res. 24:89-167.
KAWABE, A. and N. T. MIYASHITA, 1999 DNA variation in the basic chitinase locus (ChiB) region of the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana.. Genetics 153:1445-1453.
KAWABE, A., H. INNAN, R. TERAUCHI, and N. T. MIYASHITA, 1997 Nucleotide polymorphism in the acidic chitinase locus (ChiA) region of the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1303-1315.[Abstract]
KAWABE, A., K. YAMANE, and N. T. MIYASHITA, 2000 DNA polymorphism at the cytosolic phosphoglucose isomerase (PgiC) locus of the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 156:1339-1347.
KUNKEL, B. N., 1996 A useful weed put to work: genetic analysis of disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana.. Trends Genet. 12:63-69.[Medline]
KUNKEL, B. N., A. F. BENT, D. DAHLBECK, R. W. INNES, and B. J. STASKAWICZ, 1993 RPS2, an Arabidopsis disease resistance locus specifying recognition of Pseudomonas syringae strains expressing the avirulence gene avrRpt2.. Plant Cell 5:865-875.
LEISTER, R. T. and F. KATAGIRI, 2000 A resistance gene product of the nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeats class can form a complex with bacterial avirulence proteins in vivo.. Plant J. 22:345-354.[Medline]
LUCK, J. E., G. J. LAWRENCE, P. N. DODDS, K. W. SHEPHERD, and J. G. ELLIS, 2000 Regions outside of the leucine-rich repeats of flax rust resistance proteins play a role in specificity determination. Plant Cell 12:1367-1377.
MCDONALD, J. H., 1998 Improved tests for heterogeneity across a region of DNA sequence in the ratio of polymorphism to divergence. Mol. Biol. Evol 15:377-384.[Abstract]
MCDONALD, J. H. and M. KREITMAN, 1991 Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351:652-654.[Medline]
MCDOWELL, J. M., M. DHANDAYDHAM, T. A. LONG, M. G. M. AARTS, and S. GOFF et al., 1998 Intragenic recombination and diversifying selection contribute to the evolution of downy mildew resistance at the RPP8 locus of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10:1861-1874.
MEYERS, B. C., K. A. SHEN, P. ROHANI, B. S. GAUT, and R. W. MICHELMORE, 1998 Receptor-like genes in the major resistance locus of lettuce are subject to divergent selection. Plant Cell 10:1833-1846.
MINDRINOS, M., F. KATAGIRI, G.-L. YU, and F. M. AUSUBEL, 1994 The A. thaliana disease resistance gene RPS2 encodes a protein containing a nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeats. Cell 78:1089-1099.[Medline]
MONDRAGÓN-PALOMINO, M., B. C. MEYERS, R. W. MICHELMORE, and B. S. GAUT, 2002 Patterns of positive selection in the complete NBS-LRR gene family of Arabidopsis thaliana.. Genome Res. 12:1305-1315.
NOEL, L., T. L. MOORES, E. A. VAN DER BIEZEN, M. PARNISKE, and M. J. DANIELS et al., 1999 Pronounced intraspecific haplotype divergence at the RPP5 complex disease resistance locus of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11:2099-2112.
NORDBORG, M., 1997 Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. Genetics 146:1501-1514.[Abstract]
NORDBORG, M., B. CHARLESWORTH, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1996 Increased levels of polymorphism surrounding selectively maintained sites in highly selfing species. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263:1033-1039.
NORDBORG, M., J. O. BOREVITZ, J. BERGELSON, C. C. BERRY, and J. CHORY et al., 2002 The extent of linkage disequilibrium in the highly selfing species Arabidopsis thaliana.. Nat. Genet. 30:190-193.[Medline]
PARNISKE, M., K. E. HAMMOND-KOSACK, C. GOLSTEIN, C. M. THOMAS, and D. A. JONES et al., 1997 Novel disease resistance specificities result from sequence exchange between tandemly repeated genes at the Cf-4/9 locus of tomato. Cell 91:821-832.[Medline]
PRICE, R. A., J. D. PALMER and I. A. AL-SHEHBAZ, 1994 Systematic relationships of Arabidopsis: a molecular and morphological perspective, pp. 719 in Arabidopsis, edited by E. M. MEYEROWITZ and C. R. SOMERVILLE. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
PURUGGANAN, M. D. and J. I. SUDDITH, 1999 Molecular population genetics of floral homeotic loci: departures from the equilibrium-neutral model at the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA genes of Arabidopsis thaliana.. Genetics 151:839-848.
ROZAS, J. and R. ROZAS, 1997 DnaSP version 2.0: a novel software package for extensive molecular population genetics analysis. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:307-311.
SALMERON, J. M., G. E. D. OLDROYD, C. M. T. ROMMENS, S. R. SCOFIELD, and H. S. KIM et al., 1996 Tomato Prf is a member of the leucine-rich repeat class of plant disease resistance genes and lies embedded within the Pto kinase gene cluster. Cell 86:123-133.[Medline]
SHARBEL, T. F., B. HAUBOLD, and T. MITCHELL-OLDS, 2000 Genetic isolation by distance in Arabidopsis thaliana: biogeography and post-glacial colonization of Europe. Mol. Ecol. 9:2109-2118.[Medline]
STAHL, E. A., G. DWYER, R. MAURICIO, M. KREITMAN, and J. BERGELSON, 1999 Dynamics of disease resistance polymorphism at the Rpm1 locus of Arabidopsis. Nature 400:667-671.[Medline]
STASKAWICZ, B. J., F. M. AUSUBEL, B. J. BAKER, J. G. ELLIS, and J. D. G. JONES, 1995 Molecular genetics of plant disease resistance. Science 292:661-667.
SWOFFORD, D., 1996 PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
TAO, Y., F. YUAN, R. T. LEISTER, F. M. AUSUBEL, and F. KATAGIRI, 2000 Mutational analysis of the Arabidopsis nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat resistance gene RPS2.. Plant Cell 12:2541-2554.
THOMAS, C. M., D. A. JONES, M. PARNISKE, K. HARRISON, and P. J. BALINT-KURTI et al., 1997 Characterization of the tomato Cf-4 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum identifies sequences that determine recognitional specificity in Cf-4 and Cf-9. Plant Cell 9:2209-2224.[Abstract]
TIAN, D., H. ARAKI, E. A. STAHL, J. BERGELSON, and M. KREITMAN, 2002 Signature of balancing selection in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11525-11530.
WHALEN, M. C., R. W. INNES, A. F. BENT, and B. J. STASKAWICZ, 1991 Identification of Pseudomonas syringae pathogens of Arabidopsis and a bacterial locus determining avirulence on both Arabidopsis and soybean. Plant Cell 3:49-59.
YU, G.-L., F. KATAGIRI, and F. M. AUSUBEL, 1993 Arabidopsis mutations at the RPS2 locus result in loss of resistance to Pseudomonas syringae strains expressing the avirulence gene avrRpt2.. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 6:434-443.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. L. Caicedo Geographic diversity cline of R gene homologs in wild populations of Solanum pimpinellifolium (Solanaceae) Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2008; 95(3): 393 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kuang, H. J. van Eck, D. Sicard, R. Michelmore, and E. Nevo Evolution and Genetic Population Structure of Prickly Lettuce (Lactuca serriola) and Its RGC2 Resistance Gene Cluster Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1547 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M.P. Van Poecke, M. Sato, L. Lenarz-Wyatt, S. Weisberg, and F. Katagiri Natural Variation in RPS2-Mediated Resistance among Arabidopsis Accessions: Correlation between Gene Expression Profiles and Phenotypic Responses PLANT CELL, December 1, 2007; 19(12): 4046 - 4060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Orgil, H. Araki, S. Tangchaiburana, R. Berkey, and S. Xiao Intraspecific Genetic Variations, Fitness Cost and Benefit of RPW8, A Disease Resistance Locus in Arabidopsis thaliana Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2317 - 2333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




The window is 150 silent sites wide, slid by 10-site increments. Beneath the sliding window plot the corresponding functional regions of RPS2 are shown, with amino acid differences between the clades indicated by asterisks (*).


