- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Genevaux, P.
- Articles by Kelley, W. L.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Genevaux, P.
- Articles by Kelley, W. L.
Scanning Mutagenesis Identifies Amino Acid Residues Essential for the in Vivo Activity of the Escherichia coli DnaJ (Hsp40) J-Domain
Pierre Genevauxa, Françoise Schwagera, Costa Georgopoulosa, and William L. Kelley2,aa Département de Biochimie Médicale, Centre Médical Universitaire, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
Corresponding author: Pierre Genevaux, Centre Médical Universitaire, 1, rue Michel-Servet, CH-1211 Genève 4, Switzerland., pierre.genevaux{at}medecine.unige.ch (E-mail)
Communicating editor: A. L. SONENSHEIN
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The DnaJ (Hsp40) cochaperone regulates the DnaK (Hsp70) chaperone by accelerating ATP hydrolysis in a cycle closely linked to substrate binding and release. The J-domain, the signature motif of the Hsp40 family, orchestrates interaction with the DnaK ATPase domain. We studied the J-domain by creating 42 mutant E. coli DnaJ variants and examining their phenotypes in various separate in vivo assays, namely, bacterial growth at low and high temperatures, motility, and propagation of bacteriophage
. Most mutants studied behaved like wild type in all assays. In addition to the 33HisProAsp35 (HPD) tripeptide found in all known functional J-domains, our study uncovered three new single substitution mutations (Y25A, K26A, and F47A) that totally abolish J-domain function. Furthermore, two glycine substitution mutants in an exposed flexible loop (R36G, N37G) showed partial loss of J-domain function alone and complete loss of function as a triple (RNQ-GGG) mutant coupled with the phenotypically silent Q38G. Interestingly, all the essential residues map to a small region on the same solvent-exposed face of the J-domain. Engineered mutations in the corresponding residues of the human Hdj1 J-domain grafted in E. coli DnaJ also resulted in loss of function, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved interaction surface. We propose that these clustered residues impart critical sequence determinants necessary for J-domain catalytic activity and reversible contact interface with the DnaK ATPase domain.
THE Hsp70 chaperone machine performs many diverse roles in the cell, including folding of nascent proteins, translocation of polypeptides across organelle membranes, coordinating responses to stress, and targeting selected proteins for degradation (![]()
![]()
(![]()
![]()
![]()
The J-domain represents an
70-amino-acid-long residue signature sequence of the Hsp40 family and helps direct specific interaction with the Hsp70 ATPase domain (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In this study, we sought to identify amino acid side chains that comprise the regulatory DnaK/DnaJ contact interface. Alanine and glycine scanning mutants across the entire J-domain coding sequence in E. coli DnaJ were engineered, and their mutant phenotypes were analyzed in vivo using several independent assays for functional DnaJ cochaperone activity, namely, bacterial growth at low and high temperature (![]()
![]()
![]()
growth. This genetic approach has allowed the characterization of novel amino acid residues critical for J-domain biological function.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Bacterial strains and plasmids:
E. coli WKG190 is MC4100 dnaJ::Tn10-42
cbpA::kan and has been described previously (![]()
cbpA::kan was constructed by standard bacteriophage P1 transduction. Plasmids pWKG90 and pWKG90H71T have been described (![]()
![]()
or DH10B (Invitrogen/Life Technologies).
Mutagenesis:
To be consistent with the DnaJ numbering in the Protein Database (PDB) accession 1XBL (![]()
![]()
![]()
helixIV was constructed using the primer L57 + Kpn 5'-ccggtacccagaacttcataagcttc-3' (KpnI site underlined) and the upstream fusion PCR primer followed by EcoRI-KpnI digestion and subcloning into pWKG90H71T cleaved with the same enzymes. The numbering for all hdj1 mutants uses methionine start codon as 0, consistent with PDB accession 1HDJ (![]()
Immunoblot analysis:
Whole-cell extracts were prepared as previously described (![]()
In vivo DnaJ activity assays:
Bacteriophage
cI (clear plaque former) and
cI dnaJ+ transducing plaque-forming assays were performed at 30° as described (![]()
cbpA dnaJ-Tn10-42 grown to OD600 1.2 in LB broth at 30°. Aliquots (1 µl) were spotted on soft agar plates (1% tryptone, 0.5% NaCl, 0.35% agar), with or without L-arabinose inducer. Motility was analyzed after 6 hr of incubation at 30°. The pBAD22 vector alone and pWKG91 encoding the dnaJ259 (H33Q) inactivating mutation (![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Choice of mutations for structure and function analysis:
The high-resolution structure of the J-domain fold shows that it is stabilized by a core of buried, or partially buried, hydrophobic residues (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Double and triple mutants rapidly exclude nonessential regions:
We first constructed a series of adjacent double- or triple-alanine scanning mutants bounded by amino acid residues 255 of the minimal J-domain fold to identify rapidly those regions containing important amino acids. The mutations KQD(3-5)AAA, KT(14-15)AA, RE(19-20)AA, MK(30-31)AA, GD(39-40)AA, KE(41-42)AA, KE(48-49)AA, and KE(51-52)AA did not show any discernible effect upon J-domain function in all assays employed (data not shown). Similarly, single-point mutants E8A, S13A, Y32A, E44A, K46A, Y54A, and E55A showed no effect on J-domain function in any of the assays (data not shown).
We observed that mutation EE(17-18)AA measurably affected J-domain function for bacterial growth only at high temperatures, albeit significantly less than the canonical H33Q inactivating mutation, which totally abolishes all J-domain function (![]()
. When we engineered the separate E17A and E18A point mutations we found that neither single mutation had a discernible phenotype in any assay. E17A and E18A proteins were stable and were produced to levels equivalent to those of wild-type DnaJ (data not shown). In contrast, the EE(17,18)AA double-mutant protein was not detectable either in Coomassie-blue-stained gels or by immunoblot. Most likely, this double amino acid substitution severely disrupts protein stability since residue E17 or E18 acts structurally as the helix II N-cap (![]()
Mutations in the flexible helices II-III loop reveal the importance of the 33HPDRN37 pentapeptide loop:
The HPD tripeptide motif, located in the loop joining helices II and III, is highly conserved in all known functional Hsp40 proteins and has been predicted to mediate interaction with DnaK (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
We found that the deletion of H33, P34, or D35 abolished bacterial growth at high and low temperature, although the steady-state mutant protein levels of all mutants were comparable to those of wild type. Motility and bacteriophage
growth were also concomitantly abolished by these mutations (data not shown). Similarly, the P34F point mutation, which is known to inactivate the SV40 J-domain (![]()
The triple glycine substitution mutant, RNQ(36-38)GGG, adjacent to the HPD tripeptide, was defective for J-domain function in all assays, although it showed steady-state protein levels comparable to those of wild-type control. Single glycine substitution of each residue R36, N37, and Q38, within the helices II and III loop, revealed that R36 and N37 were also important for J-domain function, while Q38G behaved phenotypically like wild-type DnaJ. Titration of arabinose inducer levels showed that R36G and N37G could not complement for bacterial growth at 0.01% arabinose, whereas at 0.1% arabinose, both mutants could support bacterial growth at low and high temperatures, although the complementation by R36G was reproducibly less robust than that by N37Q (Table 1). The cluster of contiguous critical residues 33HPDRN37 is noteworthy since mutation of residues 3840 (QGD) following this pentapeptide had no measurable phenotypic effect (Table 1). We conclude that the 33HPDRN37 pentapeptide constitutes an essential region for J-domain function.
F47, in close proximity to H33, is essential for J-domain function:
The classical mutation H33Q, or the equivalent change in at least eight other Hsp40 proteins, from organisms including yeast and humans, abolishes J-domain biological function (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
III is an essential residue for J-domain function.
|
In this respect, it is important to emphasize that we observed no other alteration of residues in
III, apart from F47, that resulted in measurable disruption of J-domain function. For example, mutations KE(41,42)AA, E44A, K46A, KE(48,49)AA, KE(51,52)AA, Y54A, and E55A were all phenotypically silent in each assay (data not shown).
Helix II mutations reveal the importance of Y25 and K26:
Helix II is amphipathic with a solvent-exposed face composed of predominantly positively charged side chains, evolutionarily conserved among J-domains (![]()
|
We observed that the quadruple mutant RK(22,23)AA/KR(26,27)AA abolished J-domain activity in every assay. Expression of the triple-alanine mutant YKR(25-27)AAA was highly toxic in WGK190 cells and was not investigated further. The double-alanine mutant RK(22,23)AA alone did not show a measurable defect in any assay and could not be distinguished from control cells expressing wild-type DnaJ. In contrast, the double-mutant KR(26,27)AA alone abolished J-domain activity to an extent comparable to the quadruple mutant. These results suggested that the region spanning residues 2527, but not residues 2123, was important for J-domain function. To refine this analysis, we next analyzed the phenotypes of the single-alanine mutants Y25A, K26A, and R27A.
As shown in Fig 3, mutant R27A was phenotypically indistinguishable from control wild-type DnaJ, whereas either Y25A or K26A abolished bacterial growth at both low and high temperatures. The phenotype of Y25A was judged more severe since we observed concomitant loss of motility and bacteriophage
growth, whereas K26A retained partial activity in both the motility and
plaque assays. Importantly, we observed that K26A acted synergistically with the phenotypically silent R27A mutant, resulting in a double mutant with a more severe phenotype than that of either single-mutant clone. This result suggested that the presence of positively charged side chains at position 2627 was important for DnaJ function. Consistent with this conclusion, a charge reversal mutant, K26E, showed a more severe inactivating phenotype than that of K26A in all assays employed (data not shown). Control immunoblots showed that the steady-state levels of all mutant proteins were equivalent to those of wild-type DnaJ (Fig 3). We conclude from this analysis that the solvent-exposed K26 side chain and the partially exposed Y25 side chain in
II are especially important for J-domain function. Taken together, our results reveal a striking demarcation of the contiguous essential loop residues 33HPDRN37, since we observed no measurable phenotypic changes arising with mutants in any of the six residues, 27KLAMKY32, preceding, or the four residues, 38GDKE41, following the 33HPDRN37 pentapeptide.
Mutations of helix IV residues exert no measurable effect on J-domain function:
A fourth helix, helix IV, terminates the J-domain motif, but its structural role in anchoring the essential fold is minimal (![]()
![]()
(58-69), also showed no significant phenotypic difference from wild-type DnaJ in any of our in vivo assays under our standard laboratory conditions (Fig 4).
|
Hdj1 inactivating mutations at the corresponding position of critical DnaJ residues:
The overall J-domain fold of the human Hdj1 (![]()
![]()
![]()
plaque-forming efficiency, whereas RR(25,26)AA and F45A completely abolished
plaque formation (efficiency of plating <10-5) under all conditions tested. The Hdj1 mutant K35G behaved like its DnaJ counterpart, R36G, by showing marked effects on growth and
plaque formation. In contrast and unlike the DnaJ N37G mutant, the Hdj1 N36G behaved like wild type in all assays (Fig 6).
|
|
Mapping essential residues on the J-domain structure:
We mapped the critical residues Y25, K26, 33HPDRN37, and F47 that we identified on the three-dimensional structure of the E. coli J-domain (Fig 5A and Fig B). Interestingly, these residues cluster in a small region on the same face of the J-domain. We also mapped the critical residues Y24, RR(25,26), K35, and F45 of Hdj1 on its J-domain three-dimensional structure (Fig 5C). As with DnaJ, these residues in Hdj1 also cluster together on the same spatial solvent-exposed face of the J-domain. Since most of other DnaJ mutants tested resulted in no detectable phenotype under any of our in vivo experimental conditions, we conclude that this compact region must encompass the totality, or major functional portion, of the J-domain interacting surface with DnaK.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
In this study, we have used an exhaustive directed mutagenesis to identify residues in the E. coli DnaJ J-domain that are required for its cochaperone function with DnaK in vivo. Our extensive mutagenic screen has uncovered a new set of residues (Y25, K26, P34, R36, N37, and F47), in addition to those previously described, namely, dnaJ259 (H33Q) and dnaJ236 (D35N), that are important for J-domain function. Interestingly, all of these critical residues, located in helix II, helix III, and the helices II and III loop, project their side chains on the same solvent-exposed face of the J-domain. These same amino acids are highly conserved in the human Hdj1 J-domain and occupy a similar three-dimensional spatial arrangement (![]()
It is surprising that we identified so few essential amino acid residues. Of the 48 residues mutated in the J-domain, only 8 resulted in a significant phenotype in our in vivo assays. These results, together with the fact that the E. coli DnaJ J-domain can be functionally replaced with a variety of distantly related J-domainsfor instance, mammalian papovavirus T antigens (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Our in vivo genetic data are consistent with in vitro biochemical and biophysical studies that have attempted to map the J-domain interaction surface. Peptide competition studies using native Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ydj1p (Hsp40)-Ssa1p (Hsp70) interaction also predicted that the hinge region between
II and
III, including HPD, mediated productive interaction with Hsp70 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
An electrostatic surface plot predicted that the DnaJ J-domain was highly asymmetric with respect to charge and that the positive face of helix II could provide an important recognition surface for the predominantly negative potential of the DnaK ATPase domain (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The mechanistic role of the F47 residue is presently unclear. One possibility is that a bulky side chain projecting at this position may sterically constrain the limits of the helices II and III loop movement. This phenylalanine is highly conserved and positive charge residues flanking this residue have been proposed to play a role in mediating interaction with Hsp70 (![]()
![]()
![]()
Two in vitro studies suggest that the conserved 61QKRAA65 motif of helix IV might contribute to binding to DnaK, although likely in the substrate cavity (![]()
![]()
IV, had no significant phenotype. Although we cannot exclude that helix IV plays an as yet undetermined role in the biology of DnaJ, these results indicate that amino acid residues of
IV are not required for DnaJ to perform as DnaK cochaperone in vivo. Although polyomavirus and SV40 J-domains can replace DnaJ J-domain in vivo (![]()
![]()
Finally, the E. coli J-domain cannot by itself stimulate DnaK's ATPase and requires either an adjacent contiguous sequence, such as the Gly-Phe domain (G/F; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Present address: Division des Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Cantonal de Genève, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Sam Landry and Maurizio Pellecchia for helpful discussions and Kyle Tanner for advice with PovRay. This work was supported by grant FN-31-065403.01 from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Canton of Geneva.
Manuscript received June 16, 2002; Accepted for publication August 9, 2002.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AUGER, I., J. M. ESCOLA, J. P. GORVEL, and J. ROUDIER, 1996 HLA-DR4 and HLA-DR10 motifs that carry susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis bind 70-kD heat shock proteins. Nat. Med. 2:306-310.[Medline]
BERJANSKII, M. V., M. I. RILEY, A. XIE, V. SEMENCHENKO, and W. R. FOLK et al., 2000 NMR structure of the N-terminal J domain of murine polyomavirus T antigens: implications for DnaJ-like domains and for mutations of T antigens. J. Biol. Chem. 275:36094-36103.
BUKAU, B. and A. L. HORWICH, 1998 The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell 92:351-366.[Medline]
CYR, D. M., X. LU, and M. G. DOUGLAS, 1992 Regulation of eukaryotic hsp70 function by a dnaJ homolog. J. Biol. Chem. 267:20927-20931.
DELOCHE, O., W. L. KELLEY, and C. GEORGOPOULOS, 1997 Structure-function analyses of the Ssc1p, Mdj1p, and Mge1p Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial proteins in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 179:6066-6075.
GASSLER, C. S., A. BUCHBERGER, T. LAUFEN, M. P. MAYER, and H. SCHRODER et al., 1998 Mutations in the DnaK chaperone affecting interaction with the DnaJ cochaperone Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:15229-15234.
GASSLER, C. S., T. WIEDERKEHR, D. BREHMER, B. BUKAU, and M. P. MAYER, 2001 Bag-1M accelerates nucleotide release for human Hsc70 and Hsp70 and can act concentration-dependent as positive and negative cofactor. J. Biol. Chem. 276:32538-32544.
GENEVAUX, P., A. WAWRZYNOW, M. ZYLICZ, C. GEORGOPOULOS, and W. L. KELLEY, 2001 DjlA is a third DnaK co-chaperone of Escherichia coli, and DjlA-mediated induction of colanic acid capsule requires DjlA-DnaK interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 276:7906-7912.
GREENE, M. K., K. MASKOS, and S. J. LANDRY, 1998 Role of the J-domain in the cooperation of Hsp40 with Hsp70. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:6108-6113.
HARTL, F. U., 1996 Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 381:571-580.[Medline]
HENNESSY, F., M. E. CHEETHAM, H. W. DIRR, and G. L. BLATCH, 2000 Analysis of the levels of conservation of the J domain among the various types of DnaJ-like proteins. Cell Stress Chaperones 5:347-358.[Medline]
HIGUCHI, R., B. KRUMMEL, and R. K. SAIKI, 1988 A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:7351-7367.
HILL, R. B., J. M. FLANAGAN, and J. H. PRESTEGARD, 1995 1H and 15N magnetic resonance assignments, secondary structure, and tertiary fold of Escherichia coli DnaJ (1-78). Biochemistry 34:5587-5596.[Medline]
HUANG, K., R. GHOSE, J. M. FLANAGAN, and J. H. PRESTEGARD, 1999 Backbone dynamics of the N-terminal domain in E. coli DnaJ determined by 15N- and 13CO-relaxation measurements. Biochemistry 38:10567-10577.[Medline]
KARZAI, A. W. and R. MCMACKEN, 1996 A bipartite signaling mechanism involved in DnaJ-mediated activation of the Escherichia coli DnaK protein. J. Biol. Chem. 271:11236-11246.
KELLEY, W. L., 1998 The J-domain family and the recruitment of chaperone power. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:222-227.[Medline]
KELLEY, W. L. and C. GEORGOPOULOS, 1997 The T/t common exon of simian virus 40, JC, and BK polyomavirus T antigens can functionally replace the J-domain of the Escherichia coli DnaJ molecular chaperone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:3679-3684.
KIM, H.-Y., B.-Y. AHN, and Y. CHO, 2001 Structural basis for the inactivation of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by SV40 large T antigen. EMBO J. 20:295-304.[Medline]
KUNKEL, T. A., J. D. ROBERTS, and R. A. ZAKOUR, 1987 Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 154:367-383.[Medline]
LIBEREK, K., J. MARSZALEK, D. ANG, C. GEORGOPOULOS, and M. ZYLICZ, 1991 Escherichia coli DnaJ and GrpE heat shock proteins jointly stimulate ATPase activity of DnaK. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:2874-2878.
LIBEREK, K., D. WALL, and C. GEORGOPOULOS, 1995 The DnaJ chaperone catalytically activates the DnaK chaperone to specifically bind the
32 heat shock transcriptional regulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:6224-6228.
LYMAN, S. K. and R. SCHEKMAN, 1997 Binding of secretory precursor polypeptides to a translocon subcomplex is regulated by BiP. Cell 88:85-96.[Medline]
MISSELWITZ, B., O. STAECK, and T. A. RAPOPORT, 1998 J proteins catalytically activate Hsp70 molecules to trap a wide range of peptide sequences. Mol. Cell 2:593-603.[Medline]
PEDEN, K. W. and J. M. PIPAS, 1992 Simian virus 40 mutants with amino-acid substitutions near the amino terminus of large T antigen. Virus Genes 6:107-118.[Medline]
PELLACCHIA, M., T. SZYPERSKI, D. WALL, C. GEORGOPOULOS, and K. WÜTHRICH, 1996 NMR structure of the J-domain and the Gly/Phe-rich region of the Escherichia coli DnaJ chaperone. J. Mol. Biol. 260:236-250.[Medline]
QIAN, Y. Q., D. PATEL, F.-U. HARTL, and D. J. MCCOLL, 1996 Nuclear magnetic resonance solution structure of the human Hsp40 (HDJ-1) J-domain. J. Mol. Biol. 260:224-235.[Medline]
RAABE, T. and J. L. MANLEY, 1991 A human homologue of the Escherichia coli DnaJ heat shock protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:6645.
SCHLENSTEDT, G., S. HARRIS, B. RISSE, R. LILL, and P. A. SILVER, 1995 A yeast DnaJ homologue, Scj1p, can function in the endoplasmic reticulum with BiP/Kar2p via a conserved domain that specifies interactions with Hsp70's. J. Cell Biol. 129:979-988.
SHI, W., Y. ZHOU, J. WILD, J. ADLER, and C. A. GROSS, 1992 DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE are required for flagellum synthesis in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 174:6256-6263.
SUH, W. C., W. F. BURKHOLDER, C. Z. LU, X. ZHAO, and M. E. GOTTESMAN et al., 1998 Interaction of the Hsp70 molecular chaperone, DnaK, with its cochaperone DnaJ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:15223-15228.
SULLIVAN, C. S., J. D. TREMBLAY, S. W. FEWELL, J. A. LEWIS, and J. L. BRODSKY et al., 2000 Species-specific elements in the large T-antigen J domain are required for cellular transformation and DNA replication by simian virus 40. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5749-5757.
SZABO, A., T. LANGER, H. SCHRÖDER, J. FLANAGAN, and B. BUKAU et al., 1994 The ATP hydrolysis-dependent reaction cycle of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 system-DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10345-10349.
SZYPERSKI, T., M. PELLACCHIA, D. WALL, C. GEORGOPOULOS, and K. WÜTHRICH, 1994 NMR structure determination of the Escherichia coli DnaJ molecular chaperone: secondary structure and backbone fold of the N-terminal region (residues 2108), containing the highly conserved J-domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:11343-11347.
TSAI, J. and M. G. DOUGLAS, 1996 A conserved HPD sequence of the J-domain is necessary for YDJ1 stimulation of hsp70 ATPase activity at a site distinct from substrate binding. J. Biol. Chem. 271:9347-9354.
UEGUCHI, C., T. SHIOZAWA, M. KAKEDA, H. YAMADA, and T. MIZUNO, 1995 A study of the double mutation of dnaJ and cbpA, whose gene products function as molecular chaperones in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 177:3894-3896.
WALL, D., M. ZYLICZ, and C. GEORGOPOULOS, 1994 The NH2-terminal 108 amino acids of the Escherichia coli DnaJ protein stimulate the ATPase activity of DnaK and are sufficient for
replication. J. Biol. Chem. 269:5446-5451.
WILD, J., E. ALTMAN, T. YURA, and C. A. GROSS, 1992 DnaK and DnaJ heat shock proteins participate in protein export in Escherichia coli.. Genes Dev. 6:1165-1172.
ZIEGELHOFFER, T., P. LOPEZ-BUESA, and E. A. CRAIG, 1995 The dissociation of ATP from hsp70 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is stimulated by both Ydj1p and peptide substrates. J. Biol. Chem. 270:10412-10419.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Yang, H. A. Owen, and P. Yang Dimeric heat shock protein 40 binds radial spokes for generating coupled power strokes and recovery strokes of 9 + 2 flagella J. Cell Biol., January 28, 2008; 180(2): 403 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Wright, S. W. Fewell, M. L. Sullivan, J. M. Pipas, S. C. Watkins, and J. L. Brodsky The Hsp40 Molecular Chaperone Ydj1p, Along With the Protein Kinase C Pathway, Affects Cell-Wall Integrity in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1649 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Ullers, D. Ang, F. Schwager, C. Georgopoulos, and P. Genevaux Trigger Factor can antagonize both SecB and DnaK/DnaJ chaperone functions in Escherichia coli PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3101 - 3106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Cajo, B. E. Horne, W. L. Kelley, F. Schwager, C. Georgopoulos, and P. Genevaux The Role of the DIF Motif of the DnaJ (Hsp40) Co-chaperone in the Regulation of the DnaK (Hsp70) Chaperone Cycle J. Biol. Chem., May 5, 2006; 281(18): 12436 - 12444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Whalen, R. de Jesus, J. A. Kean, and B. S. Schaffhausen Genetic Analysis of the Polyomavirus DnaJ Domain J. Virol., August 1, 2005; 79(15): 9982 - 9990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hennessy, W. S. Nicoll, R. Zimmermann, M. E. Cheetham, and G. L. Blatch Not all J domains are created equal: Implications for the specificity of Hsp40-Hsp70 interactions Protein Sci., July 1, 2005; 14(7): 1697 - 1709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Gruschus, L. E. Greene, E. Eisenberg, and J. A. Ferretti Experimentally biased model structure of the Hsc70/auxilin complex: Substrate transfer and interdomain structural change Protein Sci., August 1, 2004; 13(8): 2029 - 2044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Rohmer, D. S. Guttman, and J. L. Dangl Diverse Evolutionary Mechanisms Shape the Type III Effector Virulence Factor Repertoire in the Plant Pathogen Pseudomonas syringae Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1341 - 1360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. D'Silva, B. Schilke, W. Walter, A. Andrew, and E. A. Craig J protein cochaperone of the mitochondrial inner membrane required for protein import into the mitochondrial matrix PNAS, November 25, 2003; 100(24): 13839 - 13844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Linke, T. Wolfram, J. Bussemer, and U. Jakob The Roles of the Two Zinc Binding Sites in DnaJ J. Biol. Chem., November 7, 2003; 278(45): 44457 - 44466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Genevaux, F. Lang, F. Schwager, J. V. Vartikar, K. Rundell, J. M. Pipas, C. Georgopoulos, and W. L. Kelley Simian Virus 40 T Antigens and J Domains: Analysis of Hsp40 Cochaperone Functions in Escherichia coli J. Virol., October 1, 2003; 77(19): 10706 - 10713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Genevaux, P.










