| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Corresponding author: F. Paul Doerder, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, 2121 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44115., f.doerder{at}csuohio.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: S. L. ALLEN
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The SerH locus of Tetrahymena thermophila is one of several paralogous loci with genes encoding variants of the major cell surface protein known as the immobilization antigen (i-ag). The locus is highly polymorphic, raising questions concerning functional equivalency and selective forces acting on its multiple alleles. Here, we compare the sequences and expression of SerH1, SerH3, SerH4, SerH5, and SerH6. The precursor i-ags are highly similar. They are rich in alanine, serine, threonine, and cysteine and they share nearly identical ER translocation and GPI addition signals. The locations of the 39 cysteines are highly conserved, particularly in the 3.5 central, imperfect tandem repeats in which 8 periodic cysteines punctuate alternating short and long stretches of amino acids. Hydrophobicity patterns are also conserved. Nevertheless, amino acid sequence identity is low, ranging from 60.7 to 82.9%. At the nucleotide level, from 9.7 to 26.7% of nucleotide sites are polymorphic in pairwise comparisons. Expression of each allele is regulated by temperature-sensitive mRNA stability. H mRNAs are stable at <36° but are unstable at >36°. The H5 mRNA, which is less affected by temperature, has a different arrangement of the putative mRNA destabilization motif AUUUA. Statistical analysis of SerH genes indicates that the multiple alleles are neutral. Significantly low ratios of the rates of nonsynonymous to synonymous amino acid substitutions suggest that the multiple alleles are subject to purifying (negative) selection enforcing constraints on structure.
THE variant surface proteins of ciliate protists are encoded by families of allelic and nonallelic genes whose expression is regulated by environmental conditions, principally temperature. Also known as the immobilization antigen (i-ag), these glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-linked proteins coat the entire external surface of the cell. These proteins are so named because exposure of cells to antisera raised against the i-ag results in the cessation of swimming, i.e., immobilization, thus providing a simple assay for their presence. Usually, only one i-ag type is found on the cell surface. The role of the i-ag is not known, but seasonal variation in frequencies of cells expressing different i-ag paralogs and their interlocked expression suggest an important functional role (![]()
Tetrahymena thermophila has at least nine families of paralogous genes encoding alternative forms of i-ags expressed under different environmental conditions (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The SerH alleles of inbred strains are expressed from 20° to 36° and encode GPI-linked proteins migrating from 44 to 52 kD (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
400 amino acids. Both precursor proteins contain typical endoplasmic reticulum (ER) translocation and GPI-linkage signals and are especially rich in alanine, serine, threonine, and cysteine. The mature protein is divided into three domains: the amino-terminal region, 3.5 central imperfect tandem repeats each delineated by eight periodic cysteines, and the carboxyl-terminal region.
|
The upper limit of SerH expression (36°) is marked by a dramatic shift in mRNA stability. At 30°, for instance, H3 mRNA has a half-life of >60 min, whereas at 40°, the half-life is <3 min (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In this article the sequence and expression of five SerH alleles from geographically separate isolates are analyzed. SerH4 from inbred strains and SerH5 and SerH6 from wild isolates are compared with corrected sequences of SerH1 and SerH3. We focus on the question as to whether these multiple alleles identified by antigenic differences are functionally equivalent. The results indicate that the encoded proteins are structurally similar and that structural constraint is likely the result of purifying selection.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Strains:
Inbred T. thermophila strains A, B, B3, and C2 (homozygous for SerH1, SerH3, SerH4, and SerH4, respectively) were originally obtained from Dr. David L. Nanney. The SerH4 allele in strains B3 and C2 is identical by selection during inbreeding from a common ancestor; results were identical with both strains. ANF683, ANF12090, ANF16006, ANF16020, ANF16057, ANF16062, and ANF16015 (H3 expressing lines), ANF18021 (SerH6 expressing line), and ANF5906 and ANF6707 (SerH5-expressing lines) were collected as previously described (![]()
![]()
Reverse transcription-PCR, cloning, and sequencing:
For RNA isolation, T. thermophila strains were grown in 24 ml of PPY medium at room temperature for 2 days (
3 x 105 cells/ml). Total RNA was isolated utilizing RNeasy Midi kits (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). Contaminating DNA was removed with RQ1 DNaseI (Promega, Madison, WI), followed by phenol:chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Reverse transcription was performed with MMLV reverse transcriptase (Promega) and 10 µg of total RNA according to manufacturer's directions. Standard PCR amplification of the reverse transcription (RT) product was performed with primers H3AT (5'-GTAAAACAAAACTATAATAATTTG-3'; works on all SerH alleles except SerH2) and dTRI (5'-CGCGAATTCCT22-3'). The 5'-UTR was obtained by 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) utilizing terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Promega) and dG tailing followed by standard PCR.
The RT-PCR and standard PCR products were purified with a QiaQuick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN). The purified product was ligated into either pGEM-T or pGEM-T Easy vectors (Promega). Plasmids recovered from Escherichia coli "Sure" cells (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) were sequenced in both directions either manually with the SequiTherm EXCEL II DNA sequencing kit (Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI) or with an automated sequencer. Multiple clones were sequenced in both directions.
For RFLP analysis, RT-PCR was utilized to avoid amplification of possible pseudogenes. Following reverse transcription, cDNA was amplified by standard PCR with primers specific for the amino and carboxyl termini (H3AT; H3CT, 5'-TCAAAAAGTGCAATTTTAATTC-3'). PCR products were purified as above and restriction fragments were separated on polyacrylamide gels.
Northern blots, nuclear runoff, and slot blots:
For RNA isolation, T. thermophila strains were grown in 16 ml of PPY medium at the appropriate temperature for 2 days (
3 x 105 cells/ml). Total RNA was isolated with Trizol Reagent (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer's directions for animal cell RNA isolation. Ten micrograms of each RNA was separated on a 1% agarose-formaldehyde gel and blotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis) overnight in 20x SSC pH 7. Full-length SerH3 and SerH4 probes were prepared utilizing the DIG high prime DNA labeling and detection starter kit (Boehringer Mannheim). A random-primed (MBI Fermentas) 32P-labeled actin control probe was made from a 1000-bp RT-PCR product. In vitro nuclear runoff assays and slot blots were performed as described previously (![]()
DNA isolation and Southern blotting:
DNA isolation and Southern blotting were performed according to standard protocol (![]()
Statistical analysis of nucleotide and amino acid sequences:
ClustalX was used to align deduced amino acid sequences of SerH alleles. After minor manual adjustments, DAMBE (version 4.0.36; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Polymorphism at the SerH locus:
Among ANF isolates there appear to be numerous SerH alleles in addition to those already described. The antigenically distinct ANF i-ag previously referred to as "C" (![]()
Each major ANF pond has yielded isolates that are immobilized by anti-H1, anti-H2, anti-H3, anti-H4, or anti-H5 (![]()
|
SerH5 in natural populations:
The SerH5 allele was studied in isolates ANF5906 and ANF6707, both isolated from pond SG29. Antisera against each strain fully cross-reacted, but did not immobilize strains expressing other SerH alleles, suggesting a new allele as verified by segregation analysis (data not shown). RT-PCR using H3AT and dTRI primers yielded a single product from each strain, and sequencing of these products showed that SerH5 from both isolates was identical. However, Southern analysis (Fig 2A) showed that strain ANF6707 likely has an additional version of SerH5, a result confirmed by PCR, which amplified two bands from genomic DNA of ANF6707 but not ANF5906 (Fig 2B). Since RT-PCR results indicate a single transcript from both strains, the larger 1.4-kb genomic product from ANF6707 may be a SerH5 pseudogene. Pseudogenes were previously shown to be associated with SerH1 and SerH3 (![]()
![]()
|
Sequences of SerH4, SerH5, and SerH6:
The nucleotide sequences of SerH4, SerH5, and SerH6 cDNAs are deposited in GenBank (Table 1) and are not shown here. The SerH4 sequence was identical in inbred strains B3 and C2, which is consistent with their common inbreeding parentage. Genomic (macronuclear) versions of SerH4 and SerH5 were identical to their respective cDNAs, indicating the absence of introns (the genomic version of SerH6 was not sequenced). Properties of these cDNAs and the encoded ORFs are shown in Table 1 where they are compared to the corrected sequences of SerH1 and SerH3. The 5'-UTRs (not shown) are exceptionally AU rich and are characterized by a length of 1015 adenines upstream of the AUG start codon. The 3'-ends are described below. Except for length, the ORFs are strikingly similar. The ORF is 42% GC, substantially higher than the 21% GC in the 3'-UTR, an observation consistent with the pattern repeatedly observed with other T. thermophila genes.
Codon usage is highly biased in i-ag genes, a property previously noted (![]()
![]()
The precursor proteins encoded by SerH alleles are substantially alike in amino acid composition and structure but differ in certain details. The proteins are exceptionally rich in alanine, serine, and threonine residues (totaling
47%; Table 1) and other small amino acids and are lacking histidine and glutamate (Fig 3). Sequence identity (Table 2) ranges from 60.7% between H1 and H4 to 82.9% between H3 and H6, generally low values for alleles. The precursor proteins are divided into three regions: an amino-terminal region of 105109 amino acids, 3.5 imperfect tandem repeats each consisting of 7585 amino acids delineated by eight periodic cysteines, and a carboxyl-terminal region of 2729 amino acids. The well-conserved N-terminal 2127 residues are hydrophobic and are identified as a putative cleavable ER translocation signal sequence (Fig 4). Additionally, in common with most other ciliate i-ags, the isoleucine at position 7 is conserved. The well-conserved C-terminal 14 residues are highly hydrophobic, and the region resembles GPI addition sites found in other GPI-linked proteins (![]()
; Fig 4). Experimental verification is necessary to confirm these predictions.
|
|
|
The remaining central portion of the protein consists primarily of 3.5 imperfect tandem repeats with eight periodic cysteines per full repeat (Fig 4). H1, H3, and H6 have
85 amino acids per repeat, whereas H4 and H5 have
75 amino acids per repeat. Sequence identity is greatest in the third and fourth repeats (Fig 4), portions of the molecule likely to be closest to the membrane. The cysteine periodicity is remarkably conserved with a pattern of alternating long and short stretches of amino acids between cysteines (Fig 4 and Fig 5A). Periods II and IV are the most variable in length, each with several indels. In addition to cysteine periodicity, hydrophobicity is also conserved across repeats and among alleles. An example with respect to the first repeat from i-ags H5 and H6 is shown in Fig 5B.
|
Evolution of SerH alleles:
The existence of similar, multiple SerH alleles, each with apparently low frequency, raises questions as to the selective forces operating on these alleles. It is important to know whether the multiple SerH alleles are equivalent (neutral) or the result of positive selection for as yet unknown function(s). The conservation of cysteine periodicity and the overall similarity of amino acid composition among the five i-ags suggest that there are structural constraints. Paradoxically, unlike most alleles in other systems, the five SerH alleles display considerable nucleotide polymorphism (Table 2). In pairwise comparisons, from 9.7 to 27.5% of
1200 nucleotide sites (after removing alignment gaps) are polymorphic, and among the five alleles a total of 422 sites (37.4%) are polymorphic for a total of 476 mutations (of 1128 shared nucleotide sites, 372 are dimorphic, 46 are trimorphic, and 4 are tetramorphic). As indicated by the sequence identities in Table 2, a considerable portion of the polymorphism alters the amino acid sequence. The mutations, both synonymous and nonsynonymous, are largely confined to the first third of the gene (encoding the amino-terminal region and first repeat) when comparisons are made among SerH1, SerH3, and SerH6 (Fig 5C) or between SerH4 and SerH5, but are spread throughout the gene when the former are compared to the latter (Fig 5C). Among the five alleles, 46.7% of the nucleotide sites (426) in the amino terminus and first repeat are polymorphic, compared to 31.8% of sites (702) in the remaining portion of the molecule.
Standard tests such as those of ![]()
![]()
or when they are tested with sliding windows (not shown). This suggests the action of purifying (negative) selection in maintaining neutral multiple SerH alleles. This was more robustly tested by comparing the ratios of the rates of nonsynonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) substitutions in the coding sequences. A ratio
significantly >1.0 indicates positive selection, while
< 1.0 indicates negative, or purifying, selection (![]()
![]()
and test by maximum likelihood for significant departure from
= 1 (no selection; ![]()
![]()
|
Expression of SerH i-ag genes:
For SerH1 and SerH3 alleles of inbred strains, temperature shift to >36° results in expression of SerT in place of SerH, a shift that occurs in <1 hr (![]()
![]()
![]()
18 hr. As expected, at 30°, H1, H3, H4, and H5 i-ag-expressing lines were immobilized by their respective antisera. At 40°, H1, H3, and both H4 expressing lines were unaffected by specific antisera, indicating a switch to T expression. Interestingly, both H5-expressing lines at 40° were immobilized by anti-H5, indicating continued H5 expression. Northern blot analyses were consistent with immobilization results (Fig 6). H1, H3, and H4 mRNA was present at 30° and undetected at 40°. H5 mRNA was abundant at 30° and still present, though greatly reduced, at 40°. In nuclear runoff assays SerH4 and SerH5 transcripts were detected at about the same levels for both 30° and 40° (blot not shown), indicating continued transcription, as in SerH1 and SerH3. SerH5, therefore, is exceptional regarding the increased stability of its mRNA.
|
The number (Table 1) and arrangement of AUUUA motifs implicated in mRNA instability in a variety of systems vary among the SerH alleles (Fig 7). A distinct doublet pattern, AUUUAXXAUUUA, is found in the 3'-UTRs of SerH1, SerH3, SerH4, and SerH6 but is absent in SerH5. It also should be noted that the poly(A) addition site is variable (Fig 7), and AUUUA exists downstream of proximal poly(A) sites for H1 and H4. Whether differences in AUUUA motifs and in poly(A) addition sites are responsible for greater stability of H5 mRNA awaits experimental tests.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
The SerH i-ag locus of T. thermophila is a highly polymorphic locus with numerous alleles encoding variants of the cell surface immobilization antigen. Many of its alleles were originally recognized at the protein level by discriminating antisera, whereas others were directly recognized at the molecular level, for example, through differences in restriction sites. The antigenic types are geographically widely distributed and the multiple alleles are simultaneously present in ponds, raising questions concerning the type of selection acting on these alleles. Here, we compare the sequences of five alleles distinguished by differences in antigenicity, a trait unlikely to be related to their function.
The polymorphism at the SerH locus is considerably higher than that of similar systems. Among the five alleles, 37.4% of nucleotide sites (excluding indels) are polymorphic. By contrast, two much larger G i-ag alleles of Paramecium primaurelia (156G, GenBank accession no.
X03882; 168G, GenBank accession no.
X52133) are polymorphic at only 6.3% of 8064 nucleotide sites (after removing alignment gaps), with the bulk of the mutations confined to the central portion of the gene (![]()
![]()
![]()
All five H i-ag precursor proteins have the same structure: the amino-terminal region of
100 amino acids with a putative ER translocation signal, 3.5 central imperfect tandem repeats of 7585 amino acids each, and the carboxyl-terminal region of
30 amino acids with a putative GPI attachment sequence. Each precursor protein is similar in amino acid composition, and each contains 39 cysteines. Each repeat contains 8 cysteines in a pattern in which short (usually 2) and long (6 to 19) stretches of amino acids alternate between cysteines (Fig 5A). Although the arrangement of disulfide linkages is unknown (reduced and nonreduced i-ags migrate differently in SDS-PAGE, indicating that such linkages are formed), the consistently even number of cysteines per repeat and their consistent periodicity indicate that the same structure is formed by all H i-ags. We speculate that disulfide linkages occur between the cysteines separated by long stretches of amino acids, forming a fibrous structure, as hypothesized years ago for Paramecium i-ags (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The apparent functional equivalency of the H i-ags must be qualified by two additional observations. The first is that SerH2 has not yet been successfully cloned. This gene is not recognized on blots by full-length probes made from other SerH alleles, nor does it amplify in PCR with primers that amplify other SerH alleles, including combinations of various primers to the relatively conserved ER translocation and GPI addition signals. SerH2 is possibly a completely different allele, or possibly it is a null allele with a different paralog expressed in its place. The second observation is that while the upper cutoff for most SerH alleles is 36°, for some alleles like SerH5, expression continues past this temperature. The difference might be in the 3'-UTR where alleles differ in the arrangement of the mRNA destabilization motif, AUUUA. AUUUA motifs are typically found in the 3'-ORF and 3'-UTR and are recognized by trans-acting adenosine- and uracil-binding proteins (AUBPs) that may regulate the rate of deadenylation and/or decapping (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The apparent functional equivalency of multiple SerH alleles raises the question as to whether differences between SerH and its paralogs are the result of positive selection. The observations that the J i-ag encoded by SerJ (which is expressed under H conditions), is expressed epistatically over H and that frequencies of cells expressing H and J vary inversely in ponds (![]()
100 amino acids and 10 cysteines, whereas L has two, five, or six repeats, each containing
60 amino acids and 6 cysteines (![]()
![]()
100 amino acids in the amino-terminal region prior to the first repeat, in J and L the repeats begin at the end of the putative ER signal peptide; in other words, there is no amino-terminal region in J and L, only repeats. This longer amino-terminal region of H has 10 cysteines as in the J repeats, but the cysteines do not alternate between short and long stretches of amino acids as do J repeats, suggesting a different structure at the end of the molecule likely most exposed to the environment. Whether these differences among paralogous i-ags are of adaptive significance requires additional investigation.
An important point concerns the tandem repeats characteristic of ciliate i-ags. In some instances the repeats are identical or nearly so, even at the nucleotide level. In the case of most Paramecium i-ags, which have from 31 to 38 repeats, the 2 or 3 central-most repeats are identical. A similar situation is observed with the large (6-repeat) L i-ag of T. thermophila. With the availability of allelic variants for both T. thermophila (SerH) and P. primaurelia (G) it is clear that repeat identity is greater within alleles than between alleles. Indeed, for the (G) alleles, the regions of identical repeats are the most divergent regions of the two alleles (![]()
![]()
Finally, these results clearly show that multiple SerH alleles are simultaneously present in ANF ponds. The recovery of SerH1 and SerH3 from the same pond near Woods Hole, Massachusetts, is consistent with this observation. In addition, isolates immobilized by anti-H1 were found in Illinois and isolates immobilized by anti-H3 have been found in Illinois and Michigan (![]()
![]()
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Present address: Department of Cell Biology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., NC-10, Cleveland, OH 44195. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Harry van Keulen for technical advice and Bob Krebs for discussion and comments on the manuscript. We also thank Dr. Joe Deak for his constructive suggestions during the course of this work. Dr. Ted Clark first called our attention to the SerH3 sequencing error. Preliminary sequencing of SerH6 was done by Paul Sweeny. The actin control was prepared by James Bartram. Christina Merwin-Gerber assisted with characterization of poly(A) addition site variability of SerH mRNA. This work was supported by the Cleveland State University College of Graduate Studies and National Institutes of Health grant GM-55887.
Manuscript received November 17, 2001; Accepted for publication January 25, 2002.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ALLEN, S. L., and I. GIBSON, 1973 Genetics of Tetrahymena, pp. 307373 in Biology of Tetrahymena, edited by A. M. ELLIOTT. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, PA.
ARSLANYOLU, M. and F. P. DOERDER, 2000 Genetic and environmental factors affecting mating type frequency in natural isolates of Tetrahymena thermophila.. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 47:412-418[Medline].
ASSON-BATRES, M. A., S. L. SPURGEON, J. DIAZ, T. G. DELOUGHERY, and G. C. BAGBY, JR., 1994 Evolutionary conservation of the AU-rich 3' untranslated region of messenger RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1318-1322
BALMER, L. A., D. J. BEVERIDGE, J. A. JAZAYERI, A. M. THOMSON, and C. E. WALKER et al., 2001 Identification of a novel AU-rich element in the 3' untranslated region of epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA that is the target for regulated RNA-binding proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:2070-2084
BREUER, M., G. SCHULTE, K. J. SCHWEGMANN, and H. J. SCHMIDT, 1996 Molecular characterization of the D surface protein gene subfamily in Paramecium tetraurelia.. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 43:314-322[Medline].
CHEN, C. Y. and A. B. SHYU, 1995 AU-rich elements: characterization and importance in mRNA degradation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:465-470[Medline].
DEAK, J. C. and F. P. DOERDER, 1995 Sequence, codon usage and cysteine periodicity of the SerH1 gene and in the encoded surface protein of Tetrahymena thermophila.. Gene 164:163-166[Medline].
DOERDER, F. P., 1979 Differential expression of immobilization antigen genes in Tetrahymena thermophila. I. Genetic and epistatic relations among recessive mutations which alter normal expression of i-antigens. Immunogenetics 9:551-562.
DOERDER, F. P., 2000 Sequence and expression of the SerJ immobilization antigen gene of Tetrahymena thermophila regulated by dominant epistasis. Gene 257:319-326[Medline].
DOERDER, F. P. and M. S. BERKOWITZ, 1986 Purification and partial characterization of the H immobilization antigens of Tetrahymena thermophila.. J. Protozool. 33:204-208[Medline].
DOERDER, F. P. and C. A. GERBER, 2000 Molecular characterization of the SerL paralogs of Tetrahymena thermophila.. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 278:621-626[Medline].
DOERDER, F. P., M. ARSLANYOLU, Y. SAAD, M. KACZMAREK, and M. MENDOZA et al., 1996 Ecological genetics of Tetrahymena thermophila: mating types, i-antigens, multiple alleles and epistasis. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 43:95-100.
EISENHABER, B., P. BORK, and F. EISENHABER, 1999 Prediction of potential GPI-modification sites in proprotein sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 292:741-758[Medline].
FU, Y.-X. and W.-H. LI, 1993 Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133:639-709.
JACOBSON, A. and S. W. PELTZ, 1996 Interrelationships of the pathways of mRNA decay and translation in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65:693-739[Medline].
KILE, J. P., H. D. LOVE, JR., C. A. HUBACH, and G. A. BANNON, 1988 Reproducible and variable rearrangements of a Tetrahymena thermophila surface protein gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:5043-5046
KO, Y.-G. and G. A. J. THOMPSON, 1992 Immobilization antigens from Tetrahymena thermophila are glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-linked proteins. J. Protozool. 39:719-723[Medline].
LAGNADO, C. A., C. Y. BROWN, and G. J. GOODALL, 1994 AUUUA is not sufficient to promote poly(A) shortening and degradation of an mRNA: the functional sequence within AU-rich elements may be UUAUUUA(U/A)(U/A). Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:7984-7995
LARSEN, L. K., P. H. ANDREASEN, H. DREISIG, L. PALM, and H. NIELSEN et al., 1999 Cloning and characterization of the gene encoding the highly expressed ribosomal protein L3 of the ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila. Evidence for differential codon usage in highly expressed genes. Cell Biol. Int. 23:551-560[Medline].
LIU, X. W. and M. A. GOROVSKY, 1993 Mapping the 5' and 3' ends of Tetrahymena thermophila messenger RNAs using RNA ligase mediated amplification of cDNA ends (RLM-RACE). Nucleic Acids Res. 21:4954-4960
LOEFER, J. B. and R. D. OWEN, 1961 Characterization and distribution of "H" serotypes in 25°C cultures of Tetrahymena pyriformis, variety 1. J. Protozool. 8:387-391.
LOVE, H. D. J., A. ALLEN-NASH, Q. A. ZHAO, and G. A. BANNON, 1988 mRNA stability plays a major role in regulating the temperature-specific expression of a Tetrahymena thermophila surface protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:427-432
MARGOLIN, P., J. B. LOEFER, and R. D. OWEN, 1959 Immobilizing antigens of Tetrahymena pyriformis.. J. Protozool. 6:207-215.
MCMILLAN, P. J., M. M. TONDRAVI, and G. A. BANNON, 1993 rseB, a chromosomal locus that affects the stability of a temperature specific surface protein messenger RNA in Tetrahymena thermophila.. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:4356-4362
NANNEY, D. L. and J. M. DUBERT, 1960 The genetics of the H serotype system in variety 1 of Tetrahymena pyriformis.. Genetics 45:1335-1349
NIELSEN, R., 2001 Statistical tests of selective neutrality in the age of genomics. Heredity 86:641-647[Medline].
POLLEY, S. D. and D. J. CONWAY, 2001 Strong diversifying selection on domains of the Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 gene. Genetics 158:1505-1512
PRAT, A., 1990 Conserved sequences flank variable tandem repeats in two alleles of the G surface protein of Paramecium primaurelia.. J. Mol. Biol. 211:521-535[Medline].
PREER, J. R., JR., 1959 Studies on the immobilization antigens of Paramecium III. Properties. J. Immunol. 83:385-391.
RON, A., N. E. WILLIAMS, and F. P. DOERDER, 1992 The immobilization antigens of Tetrahymena thermophila are glycoproteins. J. Protozool. 39:508-510[Medline].
ROSS, J., 1996 Control of messenger RNA stability in higher eukaryotes. Trends Genet. 12:171-175[Medline].
ROZAS, J. and R. ROZAS, 1999 DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15:174-175
SAAD, Y. and F. P. DOERDER, 1995 Immobilization antigen variation in natural isolates of Tetrahymena thermophila.. Eur. J. Protistol. 31:45-53.
SAMBROOK, J., E. F. FRITSCH and T. MANIATIS, 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
SMITH, D. L., M. S. BERKOWITZ, D. POTOCZAK, M. KRAUSE, and C. RAAB et al., 1992 Characterization of the T, L, I, S, M and P cell surface (immobilization) antigens of Tetrahymena thermophila: molecular weights, molecular isoforms, and crossreactivity of antisera. J. Protozool. 39:420-428[Medline].
TAJIMA, F., 1989 Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585-595
TONDRAVI, M. M., R. L. WILLIS, H. D. LOVE, JR., and G. A. BANNON, 1990 Molecular characterization of SerH3, a Tetrahymena thermophila gene encoding a temperature-regulated surface antigen. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:6091-6096
UDENFRIEND, S. and K. KODUKULA, 1995 How glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins are made. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64:563-591[Medline].
WILLIAMS, N. E., F. P. DOERDER, and A. RON, 1985 Expression of a cell surface immobilization antigen during serotype transformation in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:1925-1932
WILUSZ, C. J., M. WORMINGTON, and S. W. PELTZ, 2001 The cap-to-tail guide to mRNA turnover. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2:237-246[Medline].
XIA, X. and Z. XIE, 2001 DAMBE: software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. J. Hered. 92:371-373
YANG, Z., 1997 PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:555-556
YANG, Z. and J. P. BIELAWSKI, 2000 Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:496-503[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. A. Katz, O. Snoeyenbos-West, and F. P. Doerder Patterns of Protein Evolution in Tetrahymena thermophila: Implications for Estimates of Effective Population Size Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 608 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Ardell, C. A. Lozupone, and L. F. Landweber Polymorphism, Recombination and Alternative Unscrambling in the DNA Polymerase {alpha} Gene of the Ciliate Stylonychia lemnae (Alveolata; class Spirotrichea) Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1761 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |