Genetics, Vol. 160, 1273-1281, April 2002, Copyright © 2002

Dependence of Epistasis on Environment and Mutation Severity as Revealed by in Silico Mutagenesis of Phage T7

Lingchong Youa and John Yina,b
a Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
b Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Corresponding author: John Yin, University of Wisconsin, 1415 Engineering Dr., Madison, WI 53706., yin{at}engr.wisc.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: P. D. KEIGHTLEY


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Understanding how interactions among deleterious mutations affect fitness may shed light on a variety of fundamental biological phenomena, including the evolution of sex, the buffering of genetic variations, and the topography of fitness landscapes. It remains an open question under what conditions and to what extent such interactions may be synergistic or antagonistic. To address this question, we employed a computer model for the intracellular growth of bacteriophage T7. We created in silico 90,000 mutants of phage T7, each carrying from 1 to 30 mutations, and evaluated the fitness of each by simulating its growth cycle. The simulations sought to account for the severity of single deleterious mutations on T7 growth, as well as the effect of the resource environment on our fitness measures. We found that mildly deleterious mutations interacted synergistically in poor-resource environments but antagonistically in rich-resource environments. However, severely deleterious mutations always interacted antagonistically, irrespective of environment. These results suggest that synergistic epistasis may be difficult to experimentally distinguish from nonepistasis because its effects appear to be most pronounced when the effects of mutations on fitness are most challenging to measure. Our approach demonstrates how computer simulations of developmental processes can be used to quantitatively study genetic interactions at the population level.


THE interaction among mutations in their effects on fitness, known as epistasis, plays a major role in evolutionary processes (WOLF et al. 2000 Down). It affects the mutation load of a population (KIMURA and MARUYAMA 1966 Down; CROW 1970 Down), the drift and fixation of deleterious mutations (PHILLIPS et al. 2000 Down), and the topography of fitness landscapes (WHITLOCK et al. 1995 Down; PHILLIPS et al. 2000 Down). Epistasis is also an essential component of models on the evolution of sex (KONDRASHOV 1993 Down; PETERS and LIVELY 2000 Down). In small populations Muller's ratchet (MULLER 1964 Down) offers sexual organisms an advantage over their asexual counterparts even in the absence of interactions among deleterious mutations (HAIGH 1978 Down). However, the mutational deterministic hypothesis, which addresses the advantages to sex for any population size, requires synergistic epistasis (KONDRASHOV 1993 Down); in this case the collective effect of two or more deleterious mutations is more severe than their combined effect, had they acted independently. Following LENSKI et al. 1999 Down, one may distinguish among different forms of epistasis using a power model,

(1)

where w is the fitness of the organism relative to wild type, n is the number of deleterious mutations the organism carries, and {alpha} and ß are parameters. For deleterious mutations, {alpha} > 0 and {alpha} is larger for more severe mutations. The type and strength of the epistasis among the mutations are determined by ß, where ß = 1 for independent interactions (nonepistasis), ß > 1 for synergistic epistasis, and 0 < ß < 1 for antagonistic epistasis (Fig 1). The degree of epistasis increases as |log(ß)| increases. The power model has an advantage over the more commonly used log-quadratic model (CHARLESWORTH 1990 Down), , which can erroneously predict an increase in fitness for large n in the case of antagonistic epistasis (ß' < 0).



View larger version (18K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. Three forms of epistasis as described by the power model (Equation 1). Multiplicative, {alpha} = 0.002, ß = 1; synergistic, {alpha} = 0.0001, ß = 2; antagonistic, {alpha} = 0.009, ß = 0.5.

Numerous experimental studies have been conducted to determine the dependence of fitness on the number of deleterious mutations, in particular, whether synergistic epistasis is ubiquitous in nature. Several of them have examined directly the variation in epistasis and found that both synergistic and antagonistic interactions are prevalent among individual sets of mutations (DE VISSER et al. 1997B Down; ELENA and LENSKI 1997 Down; WHITLOCK and BOURGUET 2000 Down). However, the nature of epistasis across populations is all but clear. Some studies find synergistic epistasis (SPASSKY et al. 1965 Down; MUKAI 1969 Down), while others find multiplicative interactions (DE VISSER et al. 1997B Down; ELENA and LENSKI 1997 Down). Further complications follow as different forms of epistasis may occur for different fitness components, such as the longevity or the productivity of an organism (DE VISSER et al. 1997A Down; DE VISSER and HOEKSTRA 1998 Down; PETERS and KEIGHTLEY 2000 Down; WHITLOCK and BOURGUET 2000 Down).

The confusion results from several factors. First, it is difficult to accurately estimate the fitness because of the complex life cycles of the model organisms (DE VISSER et al. 1997B Down; DE VISSER and HOEKSTRA 1998 Down; PETERS and KEIGHTLEY 2000 Down; WHITLOCK and BOURGUET 2000 Down). Second, although the Darwinian fitness is the appropriate measure for w in Equation 1 (WEST et al. 1998 Down), the Malthusian parameter, which is the natural logarithm of the Darwinian fitness, has been used instead in some studies (DE VISSER et al. 1997A Down). This is problematic because synergism in the Malthusian scale can correspond to multiplicative or antagonistic interactions in the Darwinian scale. Third, theories on the advantages of sex have suggested that the most relevant interactions are those among mildly deleterious mutations, because deleterious mutations with large effects can easily be eliminated, even in small populations (KEIGHTLEY et al. 1998 Down). The effect of deleterious mutations, however, has yet to be adequately quantified or controlled. Fourth, mutants with many deleterious mutations are difficult to construct systematically in experiments, even for a relatively simple organism like the bacterium Escherichia coli; the resulting data are thus insufficient to distinguish at the population level among different types of epistasis (ELENA and LENSKI 1997 Down). Efforts to accumulate many mutations, for instance, by applying mutagens (DE VISSER et al. 1996 Down; PETERS and KEIGHTLEY 2000 Down) or by growing the organism under minimum pressure of natural selection (MUKAI 1969 Down; WLOCH et al. 2001A Down), replace this difficulty with that of accurately estimating the number of deleterious mutations. Finally, two related methods that detect epistasis by comparing the mean log-fitness of the parents with that of the offspring after a cross (DE VISSER et al. 1996 Down) or by testing the skewness of the log-fitness distribution of these offspring (DE VISSER et al. 1997A Down; WLOCH et al. 2001A Down) suffer several methodological limitations that may obscure their conclusions (WEST et al. 1998 Down).

Given current limitations in generating, characterizing, and quantifying the effects of mutations on the fitness of organisms in the laboratory or in the field, we chose to study how simulated mutations affect the development of bacteriophage T7 in a computer model of its life cycle. The construction of this model is detailed elsewhere (ENDY et al. 1997 Down, ENDY et al. 2000 Down; YOU and YIN 2000 Down; YOU et al. 2002 Down). Briefly, it incorporates biochemical, genetic, and mechanistic data accumulated on phage T7 over the last four decades, and it uses ordinary differential equations and algebraic equations to describe the major molecular processes of T7 development: entry of T7 DNA into the host, transcription and translation of T7 genes, protein-protein interactions that regulate transcription, procapsid assembly, DNA replication, and progeny formation. It predicts, as a function of time postinfection, the intracellular levels of mRNAs, proteins, DNA, and, eventually, phage progeny. In essence, the model bridges the genotype of a phage with its growth phenotype, a feature we exploit here to predict how simulated phage mutations affect fitness.

Our use of the phage T7 model here to study epistasis shares advantages with approaches based on artificial-life programs (LENSKI et al. 1999 Down; WILKE and ADAMI 2001 Down). Both approaches allow for the efficient creation and appraisal of thousands of in silico mutants. However, the T7 model is based on established biochemical mechanisms while the artificial-life programs are not. Simulated T7 mutations correspond to changes in molecular functions, such as binding constants between interacting proteins, promoter strengths, or terminator efficiencies, just as mutations alter molecular functions in laboratory mutants of T7. Mutations in any function can quantitatively span a broad parameter range and produce a correspondingly broad range of effects on phage growth, a unique feature of the T7 model that enables us to probe, at the level of individuals or populations, the severity of mutation effects on growth.

By incorporating the results of extensive experimental studies on T7, we have sought with our simulation to create a faithful quantitative representation of its intracellular infection dynamics. Nevertheless, gaps in our knowledge remain. Functions and mechanisms for many T7 genes are lacking (ENDY et al. 2000 Down; MOLINEUX 2001 Down; YOU et al. 2002 Down) and only sparse data exist for the effects of host-cell physiology on phage growth (YOU et al. 2002 Down). Our imperfect knowledge was most evident when we employed the simulation to predict the behavior of T7 mutants carrying permuted genomes (ENDY et al. 2000 Down); while the simulation captured qualitatively the detrimental effects on growth of repositioning an important early gene to locations downstream of its wild-type position, it was unable to account quantitatively for the resulting highly perturbed protein expression profiles. In contrast, under conditions that are closer to wild type, the simulation has performed well. Specifically, it has enabled us to better understand how a mutant carrying a single-gene deletion grows faster than wild type (ENDY et al. 1997 Down), and more recently, the simulation has, together with laboratory experiments, provided a means for us to identify likely host-resource limitations to T7 growth (YOU et al. 2002 Down). Our current work here employs no permutated genomes or other large excursions from wild type. Instead, we study how slightly deleterious mutations interact against a backdrop of essentially wild-type T7 behavior. As a result, we expect that deficiencies or imperfections in our detailed knowledge and simulated implementation of T7 biology will have little if any effect on the outcomes of this study.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Phage T7 model:
By accounting for and incorporating existing experimental data and mechanisms, we developed a genetically structured model to simulate the infection of a single E. coli BL21 cell by a single wild-type T7 particle (ENDY et al. 1997 Down). The present T7 model recasts the previous versions using an object-oriented approach. It treats the genome as an array of 145 functional genetic elements, including 59 genes, 7 E. coli RNA polymerase (EcRNAP) promoters, 17 T7 RNA polymerase (T7RNAP) promoters, two terminators, 10 RNase III splicing sites, and 50 spacer DNAs. These genetic elements constitute 74 genetic blocks, where each "block" consists of one genetic element or multiple overlapping genetic elements. This model accounts for the mechanisms of the entry of T7 DNA into the host cell; the logical definition of mRNA species based on the order of promoters, terminators, and RNase III splicing sites; synthesis of T7 mRNAs and proteins; regulation of T7 gene expression; degradation of host DNA and replication of T7 DNA; assembly of procapsids; and finally, formation of T7 progeny. It extends the earlier versions by accounting for the stoichiometric relation of the T7 helicase/primase (gp4A) and the DNA polymerase (gp5) in forming replication complexes, or replisomes, as well as the stoichiometric balance between the number of replication complexes and the maximum number of replication forks that can form on the newly synthesized T7 genomes. In addition, it allocates EcRNAPs and T7RNAPs to the synthesis of different mRNAs on the basis of the relative strengths of the promoters. Further, it incorporates a module that facilitates the sensitivity analysis of the model with respect to single parameters or two parameters simultaneously. All simulations in this study were conducted with a host growth rate of 1.5 doublings per hour.

Although in previous simulations we assumed that host resources were unbounded (ENDY et al. 1997 Down, ENDY et al. 2000 Down; YOU and YIN 2000 Down), this model incorporates an empirically based host-cell model that accounts for experimentally observed correlations between the E. coli growth rate and resources such as the numbers of EcRNAPs and ribosomes, the pool sizes of NTPs and amino acids, and the cell volume (YOU et al. 2002 Down). In setting up the host-cell model, we treated the host cell as a spatially homogeneous resource reservoir, where the levels of the resources were defined at the initiation of the T7 infection. We also assumed that (1) cell volume was constant over the course of infection, (2) there was negligible exchange of metabolites between the infected cell and its extracellular environment during infection, (3) the model host cell represented an average of a cell population that was growing at the exponential phase immediately prior to phage infection, (4) the initial NTP pool size was equivalent to the total RNA content of the cell, (5) NTPs were not consumed as the energy source for the reactions, and (6) the initial amino acid pool size was equivalent to the total protein content of the cell (YOU et al. 2002 Down).

All versions of the T7 model have been compared with available experimental data. Simulated one-step growth curves agree well with experiments for wild-type T7 and a gene 1-deletion mutant complemented by constitutive expression of gene 1 in a recombinant host (ENDY 1997 Down). Although previous simulations that assumed unlimited host resources predicted poorly the growth of two T7 mutants carrying permuted genomes (ENDY et al. 2000 Down), better agreement was found when levels of host resources were adjusted to empirically observed levels (YOU and YIN 2001 Down; L. YOU, unpublished data). Further, we recently demonstrated that the present model predicted well the dependence of T7 growth on the host cell growth rate (YOU et al. 2002 Down).

Definition of fitness:
The infection of an E. coli cell by phage T7 is often characterized by a one-step growth curve, from which we can extract parameters to define its fitness (Fig 2). Fitness is essentially determined by the interplay between the genotype of an organism and the environment in which it grows; so one genotype can exhibit different fitnesses in different environments. Here we consider two extreme scenarios. First, if a phage grows in an environment that permits only one cycle of infection, the fecundity of the phage, characterized by its burst size (Y), or the number of progeny produced per infected host bacterium, will be the most crucial parameter in determining its fitness. Phage that maximize their burst size in such poor-resource environments maximize their chances of survival. Therefore, an appropriate fitness measure (Wpoor) in this poor-resource environment is the burst size, or , where t is the time after infection initiation and N(t) is the number of phage particles at t (Fig 2A). In the second scenario, if the phage grows in a rich environment that allows an infinite number of infection cycles, then both the burst size (Y) and the burst time ({tau}), the time when the burst occurs, will contribute to its fitness. For example, let us start with a single phage at time zero and ask how many phage there will be at time tm, assuming infinite host resources. For large tm, the number of phage will be , where tm/{tau} corresponds approximately to the number of phage generations elapsed at time tm. This expression suggests a different measure of fitness: Y1/{tau}. Since the phage with the highest fitness will burst at a time that maximizes Y1/{tau}, we define (Fig 2B).



View larger version (12K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. Definition of fitness. (a) The fitness measure for a poor-resource environment (Wpoor) is defined from the simulated one-step growth curve as the maximum value of N(t), where t is the time (minutes) after infection initiation, and N(t) is the number of phage progeny at t. (b) The fitness measure for a rich-resource environment (wrich) is defined as the maximum value of N(t)1/t. In the midsection of the growth curve, N(t) is approximately linear in t; thus the function N(t)1/t will always have a maximum. The rationale for these definitions is provided in the text.

We further denote the relative fitness values of a mutant phage for the cases above with and , respectively, where the subscript wt indicates the fitness values for the wild-type phage. Note that both wpoor and wrich are fitness measures in the Darwinian scale.

Constructing T7 mutants in silico:
Although we cannot yet predict how mutations at the DNA, RNA, or protein level influence molecular function, we do know that such changes can quantitatively alter function. By altering function they change molecular properties that are typically described by parameters such as enzymatic rates, equilibrium binding constants that characterize interactions between molecular components, promoter strengths, or extents of regulatory inhibition or enhancement of other molecular functions. Taking this perspective, we simulated the effects of mutations on specific T7 functions by altering T7 parameters from their wild-type default values. We then used one or more altered parameters in our simulation to calculate how one or more mutations could affect the intracellular development of the phage. Further, we defined a deleterious mutation as a single-parameter change that would reduce the T7 relative fitness, wrich, to a value below one. Different fitness metrics can be used to characterize phage growth, so the same mutation may be deleterious for one metric but not for another. However, for all cases examined, single mutations that were deleterious in wrich were also deleterious or at least neutral in wpoor.

Thirty T7 parameters were specified as potential targets for mutations; for each parameter, a range was specified from which random selected values corresponded to random deleterious mutations. The parameters, their default values, and their ranges normalized to the default values are listed in Table 1. These parameters were identified and their ranges were determined on the basis of a single-parameter sensitivity analysis on all T7 parameters. In the sensitivity analysis, each parameter varied from 0 to 100-fold in its default value and the resulting change in wrich was examined for deleterious effect. For instance, if we reduce the T7RNAP elongation rate from its default value (200 bp/sec) to 0, the simulated wrich will decrease from 1 to 0; thus the deleterious range for this parameter is (0, 1). To control the magnitude of deleterious mutations, we further partitioned each parameter range into five equal-width subranges. Each subrange was labeled by an index from 1 to 5, on the basis of its deviation from the default parameter value, 1 for the least deviant and 5 for the most deviant. Again consider the elongation rate of the T7 RNA polymerase as an example. Its complete range (0, 1) was partitioned into the five subranges: subrange 1, (0.8, 1.0); subrange 2, (0.6, 0.8); subrange 3, (0.4, 0.6); subrange 4, (0.2, 0.4); and subrange 5, (0, 0.2). We call a mutation in subrange k a class k mutation. For a given parameter, the deleterious effect of a mutation increases with its class index. A special subrange—(0.9, 1.0)—was created to represent mutations with very mild effects, which we called class 0.5 mutations.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 1. The list of parameters investigated in this study

A T7 mutant with n random class k deleterious mutations was constructed by randomly selecting n parameters and then setting each selected parameter to a value randomly sampled from the class k subrange following a uniform distribution.

Simulation and statistical analysis:
For each n, where 1 <= n <= 30, 500 T7 mutants carrying the same class of random deleterious mutations were constructed, and a simulation was performed for each mutant to compute its fitness using two measures, wpoor and wrich. The means and the standard deviations of log(wpoor) and log(wrich) were calculated for each n; the means were then fitted by least squares against n using Equation 1 to obtain {alpha} and ß values. For each fitted curve, R2 was calculated as the ratio of the difference between the corrected total sum of squares and the residual sum of squares to the corrected total sum of squares. The magnitudes of ß values obtained for wpoor and wrich may be compared; however, because the {alpha} values from wrich curves depend arbitrarily on the dimensions of time t, comparisons between {alpha} values obtained for wpoor and wrich will not be meaningful. A sample size of 500 appeared to be sufficient; sampling 1000 did not yield significantly different results. Further, all the simulations were conducted assuming a host growth rate of 1.5 doublings per hour. The same conclusion as presented here was reached when assuming other host growth rate values. The statistical analysis was conducted using Matlab and Mathematica.


*  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Effects of environment and mutation severity on epistasis:
The power model matched well the fitness loss for phage strains carrying up to 30 class 1 mutations in poor- and rich-resource environments (Fig 3, a and b). Moreover, these strains exhibited either synergistic or antagonistic epistasis, when tested in a poor- or rich-resource environment, respectively. When the analysis was extended to other mutation classes, the power model also served well to capture data trends (Fig 4). By extracting the {alpha} and ß values from each curve fit and then plotting ß vs. log({alpha}) we were able to probe how the form of epistasis, measured by ß, depended on the mutation severity, measured by {alpha}, in different environments (Fig 5). In a poor environment ß was >1 for mildly deleterious mutations (classes 0.5, 1, and 2), indicating synergism, but it rapidly decreased with increasing {alpha}; it was nearly 1 for class 3 mutations and then became <1 for the most severe mutations (classes 4 and 5), reflecting antagonism (Fig 5A). These results show that the form of epistasis can depend on the severity of the mutations. By contrast, in a rich environment the epistasis was always antagonistic, but the antagonism decreased with decreasing severity of mutations (Fig 5B). Note the almost linear dependence of ß on log({alpha}) in either case. This relationship was stronger in the poor environment, where a least-squares linear fit between ß and log({alpha}) yielded an R2 of 0.9971 compared with an R2 of 0.9655 in the rich environment. Further, the rich environment deviation of the data from linearity suggests that ß may asymptotically approach unity instead of crossing it (Fig 5B), a trend that is further discussed below.



View larger version (22K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 3. The dependence of the forms of epistasis on the fitness metrics. For mildly deleterious mutations (class 1), epistasis is (a) synergistic for wpoor, ; and (b) antagonistic for wrich, . Each circle represents the mean of log(fitness) values of 500 mutants; each vertical line represents the corresponding standard deviation.



View larger version (24K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 4. The dependence of the two different fitness measures on the number of deleterious mutations with varying severity. Each symbol represents the mean of log(fitness) values of 500 mutants. For clarity, standard deviations of the simulated fitness values are not shown. Good fit between the power model and simulated data is found in all cases (R2 > 0.99).



View larger version (14K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 5. The dependence of ß on {alpha} for (a) the poor environment and (b) the rich environment. Dashed lines indicate multiplicative interactions among mutations (ß = 1, nonepistasis). A linear equation fits well the dependence of ß on log({alpha}) in each case, with for the poor environment and for the rich environment. All ß values are significantly different from 1.0, with P < 0.01 for ß - 1, except the ß value for wpoor and class 3 mutations, where P = 0.087 for ß - 1.

From these results we draw two main conclusions, summarized in Table 2. First, mildly deleterious mutations tend to interact synergistically in a poor-resource environment, where fecundity is the primary determinant of fitness. This result is consistent with the notion that synergistic epistasis can emerge from competition for food or limited resources (PECK and WAXMAN 2000 Down). Second, deleterious mutations tend to interact antagonistically in a rich-resource environment, and the degree of antagonism increases as the mutation severity increases. This conclusion may provide an intuitive explanation to the controversy over the nature of epistasis: Perhaps previous studies reached different conclusions because they focused on different environments or were based on mutations of differing severity.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 2. The dependence of epistasis on growth environment and the magnitude of deleterious mutations

Correlation between epistasis and mutation severity:
Inverse correlations between ß and {alpha} (Fig 5) have also recently been observed by WILKE and ADAMI 2001 Down in self-replicating computer programs and models for RNA folding. To probe the relationship between ß and {alpha} they considered sequences composed of a finite fixed number of monomers, where the fitness of mutants was defined as either neutral or lethal. Assuming that the fitness always decreased with the number of mutations, following a power model (Equation 1), they suggested that ß must be inversely correlated with {alpha} due to a conservation law that the total number of neutral mutants in the genetic space is constant (WILKE and ADAMI 2001 Down).

However, this argument cannot be directly mapped to our study because of the infinite diversity of mutational effects on fitness in our system. Furthermore, the apparent linear dependence of ß on log({alpha}) in Fig 5 suggests an alternative mechanism. If ß and log({alpha}) followed an exactly linear relation, then the different log(w)-vs.-n curves, each specified by a different pair of {alpha} and ß values, would share two points of intersection, one at n = 0 (wild type) and the other at some large number of mutations (n >> 30, for our examples). The reasoning is as follows. At the large n intersection point, we have , where N is the number of mutations and wN is its corresponding fitness. This equation defines a linear relation between ß and log({alpha}), since . We assume that the power model is valid if and only if n <= N; otherwise, for n > N it would predict that mutants carrying severe mutations would have a higher average fitness than mutants carrying the same number of mild mutations. Within this framework mutations that yield a fitness wN are effectively lethal since a fitness equal to zero is not defined. Further, the dependence of fitness on the accumulation of mutations will, for differing degrees of mutation severity, all originate from wild type but follow different paths that ultimately converge to the same fitness wN of the effectively lethal mutants. Hence, to reach this fitness with N mutations, mild mutations will tend to reinforce each other, leading to synergistic epistasis, whereas severe mutations will tend to buffer each other, resulting in antagonistic epistasis.

Antagonism in rich environments:
In light of the above argument for a linear correlation between ß and log({alpha}), it appears contradictory that mildly deleterious mutations should still exhibit antagonistic epistasis in rich environments. We found that the relative fitness in a rich environment, wrich, is generally more sensitive to mutations than the measure in a poor environment, wpoor; mutations that changed the latter also changed the former, but the inverse was not true. It would be thus conceivable that the same mutations could have a greater deleterious effect on wrich than on wpoor. (Note that the higher sensitivity of wrich to mutations is not reflected by the {alpha} values, because the absolute value of {alpha}rich depends on the time units we use in the definition of wrich.) Perhaps if mutations were sufficiently mild, their interactions in a rich environment would become synergistic, following the pattern of epistasis in a poor environment. To test this possibility we examined interactions among mutations that were >100-fold milder than our 0.5 class mutations. These very mild mutations exhibited very slight antagonism in the rich environment (not shown) and behavior that was indistinguishable from wild type in the poor environment. This result further confirms the overall trend of changes in ß in a rich environment (Fig 5B): As severity of mutations decreases, the interaction among these mutations asymptotically approaches multiplicativity (ß = 1). Therefore, the differences in the forms of epistasis between our metrics do not merely reflect differences of degree to which these metrics are affected by mutations, but rather intrinsic differences in the nature of their responses to deleterious mutations.

Limits to observability:
Besides its implication that epistasis and mutational effect could evolve only in a coordinated fashion (WILKE and ADAMI 2001 Down), the correlation between ß and log({alpha}) further leads to a dilemma for any attempts to distinguish synergistic epistasis (ß > 1) from nonepistasis (ß = 1): If synergistic epistasis is present (for example, in a poor environment), it will be highest under conditions where the effects of mutations on fitness are minimal and most challenging to accurately measure (mutation severity class 0.5). This challenge may be better understood by considering a quantitative example. Weak synergistic epistasis is apparent for class 2 mutations, where 30 mutations decrease the fitness by about one-half (Fig 4A). The average deleterious effect of each mutation should thus be no greater than . That is, each mutation on average should decrease the fitness by <3%.

Although fitness effects of ~2% might be experimentally established in competition experiments using microbes, the resulting synergistic epistasis would be mild (ß is only slightly <1.0). To measure such synergistic epistasis, one would need to quantify the fitness of a large number of mutants, ranging from those with single mutations to those with a large number of mutations. This would be a daunting experimental task. If the mutations overall are mild enough to demonstrate a high degree of synergistic epistasis, the effects of individual mutations may be too small and fall within the experimental variability of most fitness measures. For example, most experimental studies to date have measured only mutations with average selection coefficients >0.01 (SPASSKY et al. 1965 Down; MUKAI et al. 1972 Down; ELENA and LENSKI 1997 Down; FRY et al. 1999 Down; WLOCH et al. 2001B Down), and it has been suggested that the majority of deleterious mutations have effects that are immeasurably small under laboratory conditions (DAVIES et al. 1999 Down).

Extensions of in silico mutagenesis:
We have focused here on probing the effects of mutational severity and resource environment on the form and extent of epistasis in the simulated intracellular growth of a well-studied bacteriophage. This work may serve as a foundation to test the consequences of additional mechanisms or assumptions. For example, to study the effects of mutation severity on fitness we have assumed the mutations carried by each strain are uniformly distributed across each class of mutation severity. More natural distributions could be implemented by making mild mutations more frequent than severe mutations. From this perspective, our simulations of low severity (class 0.5 and class 1) mutations more likely reflect the effects of natural distributions than those involving severe mutations. Our current study has also neglected pleiotropic effects, where a mutation in one gene may affect more than one phenotypic trait. For example, a mutation that altered the processivity of the T7 RNA polymerase could at the same time influence the strength of its association with the T7 lysozyme, which downregulates the polymerase activity. To account for such effects, one would need to obtain data that quantitatively described the nature of each pleiotropic effect or assume and implement a mathematical model for its form.


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank J. F. Crow, S. F. Elena, R. Kishony, and R. E. Lenski for helpful comments and suggestions and H. Wang for assistance with the statistical analysis. Support was provided by the National Science Foundation.

Manuscript received October 4, 2001; Accepted for publication January 14, 2002.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

CHARLESWORTH, B., 1990  Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genet. Res. 55:199-221[Medline].

CROW, J. F., 1970 Genetic loads and the cost of natural selection, pp. 128–177 in Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics, edited by K. KOJIMA. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.

DAVIES, E. K., A. D. PETERS, and P. D. KEIGHTLEY, 1999  High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 285:1748-1751[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DE VISSER, J. A. G. M. and R. F. HOEKSTRA, 1998  Synergistic epistasis between loci affecting fitness: evidence in plants and fungi. Genet. Res. 71:39-49.

DE VISSER, J. A. G. M., R. F. HOEKSTRA, and H. VAN DEN ENDE, 1996  The effect of sex and deleterious mutations on fitness in Chlamydomonas. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263:193-200[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DE VISSER, J. A., R. F. HOEKSTRA, and H. VAN DEN ENDE, 1997a  An experimental test for synergistic epistasis and its application in Chlamydomonas. Genetics 145:815-819[Abstract].

DE VISSER, J. A. G. M., R. F. HOEKSTRA, and H. VAN DEN ENDE, 1997b  Test of interaction between genetic markers that affect fitness in Aspergillus niger. Evolution 51:1499-1505.

ELENA, S. F. and R. E. LENSKI, 1997  Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria. Nature 390:395-398[Medline].

ENDY, D., 1997 Development and application of a genetically structured simulation for bacteriophage T7. Ph.D. Thesis, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.

ENDY, D., D. KONG, and J. YIN, 1997  Intracellular kinetics of a growing virus: a genetically structured simulation for bacteriophage T7. Biotech. Bioeng. 55:375-389.

ENDY, D., L. YOU, J. YIN, and I. J. MOLINEUX, 2000  Computation, prediction, and experimental tests of fitness for bacteriophage T7 mutants with permuted genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5375-5380[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FRY, J. D., P. D. KEIGHTLEY, S. L. HEINSOHN, and S. V. NUZHDIN, 1999  New estimates of the rates and effects of mildly deleterious mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:574-579[Abstract/Free Full Text].

HAIGH, J., 1978  The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population—Muller's ratchet. Theor. Popul. Biol. 14:251-267[Medline].

KEIGHTLEY, P. D., A. CABALLERO, and A. GARCÍA-DORADO, 1998  Population genetics: surviving under mutation pressure. Curr. Biol. 8:R235-R237[Medline].

KIMURA, M. and T. MARUYAMA, 1966  The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. Genetics 54:1337-1351[Free Full Text].

KONDRASHOV, A. S., 1993  Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. J. Hered. 84:372-387[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LENSKI, R. E., C. OFRIA, T. C. COLLIER, and C. ADAMI, 1999  Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms. Nature 400:661-664[Medline].

MOLINEUX, I. J., 2001  No syringes please, ejection of phage T7 DNA from the virion is enzyme driven. Mol. Microbiol. 40:1-8[Medline].

MUKAI, T., 1969  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanoganster. VII. Synergistic interactions of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 61:749-761[Free Full Text].

MUKAI, T., S. I. CHIGUSA, L. E. METTLER, and J. F. CROW, 1972  Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72:335-355[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MULLER, H. J., 1964  The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. 1:2-9.

PECK, J. R. and D. WAXMAN, 2000  Mutation and sex in a competitive world. Nature 406:399-404[Medline].

PETERS, A. D. and P. D. KEIGHTLEY, 2000  A test for epistasis among induced mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Genetics 156:1635-1647[Abstract/Free Full Text].

PETERS, A. D., and C. M. LIVELY, 2000 Epistasis and the maintenance of sex, pp. 99–112 in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process, edited by J. B. WOLF, E. D. BRODIE, III and M. J. WADE. Oxford University Press, New York.

PHILLIPS, P. C., S. P. OTTO and M. C. WHITLOCK, 2000 Beyond the average, pp. 20–38 in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process, edited by J. B. WOLF, E. D. BRODIE, III and M. J. WADE. Oxford University Press, New York.

SPASSKY, B., T. DOBZHANSKY, and W. W. ANDERSON, 1965  Genetics of natural populations. XXXVI. Epistatic interactions of the components of the genetic load in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 52:653-664[Free Full Text].

WEST, S. A., A. D. PETERS, and N. H. BARTON, 1998  Testing for epistasis between deleterious mutations. Genetics 149:435-444[Abstract/Free Full Text].

WHITLOCK, M. C. and D. BOURGUET, 2000  Factors affecting the genetic load in Drosophila: synergistic epistasis and correlations among fitness components. Evolution 54:1654-1660[Medline].

WHITLOCK, M. C., P. C. PHILLIPS, F. B.-G. MOORE, and S. J. TONSOR, 1995  Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:601-629.

WILKE, C. O. and C. ADAMI, 2001  Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 268:1469-1474[Medline].

WLOCH, D. M., R. H. BORTS, and R. KORONA, 2001a  Epistatic interactions of spontaneous mutations in haploid strains of the yeast Sacchromyces cerevisiae. J. Evol. Biol. 14:310-316.

WLOCH, D. M., K. SZAFRANIEC, R. H. BORTS, and R. KORONA, 2001b  Direct estimate of the mutation rate and the distribution of fitness effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Genetics 159:441-452[Abstract/Free Full Text].

WOLF, J., E. D. BRODIE, III and M. J. WADE (Editors), 2000 Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press, New York.

YOU, L. and J. YIN, 2000  Patterns of regulation from mRNA and protein time series. Metab. Eng. 2:210-217[Medline].

YOU, L., and J. YIN, 2001 Simulating the growth of viruses. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 532–543.

YOU, L., P. F. SUTHERS, and J. YIN, 2002  Effects of Escherichia coli physiology on growth of phage T7 in vivo and in silico. J. Bacteriol. 184:1888-1894[Abstract/Free Full Text].




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. Jasnos, K. Tomala, D. Paczesniak, and R. Korona
Interactions Between Stressful Environment and Gene Deletions Alleviate the Expected Average Loss of Fitness in Yeast
Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2105 - 2111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. MacCarthy and A. Bergman
Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction
PNAS, July 31, 2007; 104(31): 12801 - 12806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
F. de la Iglesia and S. F. Elena
Fitness Declines in Tobacco Etch Virus upon Serial Bottleneck Transfers
J. Virol., May 15, 2007; 81(10): 4941 - 4947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Harrison, B. Papp, C. Pal, S. G. Oliver, and D. Delneri
Plasticity of genetic interactions in metabolic networks of yeast
PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2307 - 2312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. B. Gjuvsland, B. J. Hayes, S. W. Omholt, and O. Carlborg
Statistical Epistasis Is a Generic Feature of Gene Regulatory Networks
Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 411 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
U. Liberman and M. W. Feldman
Evolutionary theory for modifiers of epistasis using a general symmetric model
PNAS, December 19, 2006; 103(51): 19402 - 19406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Sanjuan and S. F. Elena
Epistasis correlates to genomic complexity
PNAS, September 26, 2006; 103(39): 14402 - 14405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. M. Joshi, A. K. Pandey, N. Capite, S. M. Fortune, E. J. Rubin, and C. M. Sassetti
Characterization of mycobacterial virulence genes through genetic interaction mapping
PNAS, August 1, 2006; 103(31): 11760 - 11765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
R. Sanjuan
Quantifying antagonistic epistasis in a multifunctional RNA secondary structure of the Rous sarcoma virus
J. Gen. Virol., June 1, 2006; 87(6): 1595 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
F. Roux, C. Camilleri, S. Giancola, D. Brunel, and X. Reboud
Epistatic Interactions Among Herbicide Resistances in Arabidopsis thaliana: The Fitness Cost of Multiresistance
Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1277 - 1288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. Sanjuan, J. M. Cuevas, A. Moya, and S. F. Elena
Epistasis and the Adaptability of an RNA Virus
Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1001 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]