- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by You, L.
- Articles by Yin, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by You, L.
- Articles by Yin, J.
Dependence of Epistasis on Environment and Mutation Severity as Revealed by in Silico Mutagenesis of Phage T7
Lingchong Youa and John Yina,ba Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
b Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Corresponding author: John Yin, University of Wisconsin, 1415 Engineering Dr., Madison, WI 53706., yin{at}engr.wisc.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: P. D. KEIGHTLEY
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Understanding how interactions among deleterious mutations affect fitness may shed light on a variety of fundamental biological phenomena, including the evolution of sex, the buffering of genetic variations, and the topography of fitness landscapes. It remains an open question under what conditions and to what extent such interactions may be synergistic or antagonistic. To address this question, we employed a computer model for the intracellular growth of bacteriophage T7. We created in silico 90,000 mutants of phage T7, each carrying from 1 to 30 mutations, and evaluated the fitness of each by simulating its growth cycle. The simulations sought to account for the severity of single deleterious mutations on T7 growth, as well as the effect of the resource environment on our fitness measures. We found that mildly deleterious mutations interacted synergistically in poor-resource environments but antagonistically in rich-resource environments. However, severely deleterious mutations always interacted antagonistically, irrespective of environment. These results suggest that synergistic epistasis may be difficult to experimentally distinguish from nonepistasis because its effects appear to be most pronounced when the effects of mutations on fitness are most challenging to measure. Our approach demonstrates how computer simulations of developmental processes can be used to quantitatively study genetic interactions at the population level.
THE interaction among mutations in their effects on fitness, known as epistasis, plays a major role in evolutionary processes (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]() |
(1) |
where w is the fitness of the organism relative to wild type, n is the number of deleterious mutations the organism carries, and
and ß are parameters. For deleterious mutations,
> 0 and
is larger for more severe mutations. The type and strength of the epistasis among the mutations are determined by ß, where ß = 1 for independent interactions (nonepistasis), ß > 1 for synergistic epistasis, and 0 < ß < 1 for antagonistic epistasis (Fig 1). The degree of epistasis increases as |log(ß)| increases. The power model has an advantage over the more commonly used log-quadratic model (![]()
, which can erroneously predict an increase in fitness for large n in the case of antagonistic epistasis (ß' < 0).
|
Numerous experimental studies have been conducted to determine the dependence of fitness on the number of deleterious mutations, in particular, whether synergistic epistasis is ubiquitous in nature. Several of them have examined directly the variation in epistasis and found that both synergistic and antagonistic interactions are prevalent among individual sets of mutations (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The confusion results from several factors. First, it is difficult to accurately estimate the fitness because of the complex life cycles of the model organisms (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Given current limitations in generating, characterizing, and quantifying the effects of mutations on the fitness of organisms in the laboratory or in the field, we chose to study how simulated mutations affect the development of bacteriophage T7 in a computer model of its life cycle. The construction of this model is detailed elsewhere (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Our use of the phage T7 model here to study epistasis shares advantages with approaches based on artificial-life programs (![]()
![]()
By incorporating the results of extensive experimental studies on T7, we have sought with our simulation to create a faithful quantitative representation of its intracellular infection dynamics. Nevertheless, gaps in our knowledge remain. Functions and mechanisms for many T7 genes are lacking (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Phage T7 model:
By accounting for and incorporating existing experimental data and mechanisms, we developed a genetically structured model to simulate the infection of a single E. coli BL21 cell by a single wild-type T7 particle (![]()
Although in previous simulations we assumed that host resources were unbounded (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
All versions of the T7 model have been compared with available experimental data. Simulated one-step growth curves agree well with experiments for wild-type T7 and a gene 1-deletion mutant complemented by constitutive expression of gene 1 in a recombinant host (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Definition of fitness:
The infection of an E. coli cell by phage T7 is often characterized by a one-step growth curve, from which we can extract parameters to define its fitness (Fig 2). Fitness is essentially determined by the interplay between the genotype of an organism and the environment in which it grows; so one genotype can exhibit different fitnesses in different environments. Here we consider two extreme scenarios. First, if a phage grows in an environment that permits only one cycle of infection, the fecundity of the phage, characterized by its burst size (Y), or the number of progeny produced per infected host bacterium, will be the most crucial parameter in determining its fitness. Phage that maximize their burst size in such poor-resource environments maximize their chances of survival. Therefore, an appropriate fitness measure (Wpoor) in this poor-resource environment is the burst size, or
, where t is the time after infection initiation and N(t) is the number of phage particles at t (Fig 2A). In the second scenario, if the phage grows in a rich environment that allows an infinite number of infection cycles, then both the burst size (Y) and the burst time (
), the time when the burst occurs, will contribute to its fitness. For example, let us start with a single phage at time zero and ask how many phage there will be at time tm, assuming infinite host resources. For large tm, the number of phage will be
, where tm/
corresponds approximately to the number of phage generations elapsed at time tm. This expression suggests a different measure of fitness: Y1/
. Since the phage with the highest fitness will burst at a time that maximizes Y1/
, we define
(Fig 2B).
|
We further denote the relative fitness values of a mutant phage for the cases above with
and
, respectively, where the subscript wt indicates the fitness values for the wild-type phage. Note that both wpoor and wrich are fitness measures in the Darwinian scale.
Constructing T7 mutants in silico:
Although we cannot yet predict how mutations at the DNA, RNA, or protein level influence molecular function, we do know that such changes can quantitatively alter function. By altering function they change molecular properties that are typically described by parameters such as enzymatic rates, equilibrium binding constants that characterize interactions between molecular components, promoter strengths, or extents of regulatory inhibition or enhancement of other molecular functions. Taking this perspective, we simulated the effects of mutations on specific T7 functions by altering T7 parameters from their wild-type default values. We then used one or more altered parameters in our simulation to calculate how one or more mutations could affect the intracellular development of the phage. Further, we defined a deleterious mutation as a single-parameter change that would reduce the T7 relative fitness, wrich, to a value below one. Different fitness metrics can be used to characterize phage growth, so the same mutation may be deleterious for one metric but not for another. However, for all cases examined, single mutations that were deleterious in wrich were also deleterious or at least neutral in wpoor.
Thirty T7 parameters were specified as potential targets for mutations; for each parameter, a range was specified from which random selected values corresponded to random deleterious mutations. The parameters, their default values, and their ranges normalized to the default values are listed in Table 1. These parameters were identified and their ranges were determined on the basis of a single-parameter sensitivity analysis on all T7 parameters. In the sensitivity analysis, each parameter varied from 0 to 100-fold in its default value and the resulting change in wrich was examined for deleterious effect. For instance, if we reduce the T7RNAP elongation rate from its default value (200 bp/sec) to 0, the simulated wrich will decrease from 1 to 0; thus the deleterious range for this parameter is (0, 1). To control the magnitude of deleterious mutations, we further partitioned each parameter range into five equal-width subranges. Each subrange was labeled by an index from 1 to 5, on the basis of its deviation from the default parameter value, 1 for the least deviant and 5 for the most deviant. Again consider the elongation rate of the T7 RNA polymerase as an example. Its complete range (0, 1) was partitioned into the five subranges: subrange 1, (0.8, 1.0); subrange 2, (0.6, 0.8); subrange 3, (0.4, 0.6); subrange 4, (0.2, 0.4); and subrange 5, (0, 0.2). We call a mutation in subrange k a class k mutation. For a given parameter, the deleterious effect of a mutation increases with its class index. A special subrange(0.9, 1.0)was created to represent mutations with very mild effects, which we called class 0.5 mutations.
|
A T7 mutant with n random class k deleterious mutations was constructed by randomly selecting n parameters and then setting each selected parameter to a value randomly sampled from the class k subrange following a uniform distribution.
Simulation and statistical analysis:
For each n, where 1
n
30, 500 T7 mutants carrying the same class of random deleterious mutations were constructed, and a simulation was performed for each mutant to compute its fitness using two measures, wpoor and wrich. The means and the standard deviations of log(wpoor) and log(wrich) were calculated for each n; the means were then fitted by least squares against n using Equation 1 to obtain
and ß values. For each fitted curve, R2 was calculated as the ratio of the difference between the corrected total sum of squares and the residual sum of squares to the corrected total sum of squares. The magnitudes of ß values obtained for wpoor and wrich may be compared; however, because the
values from wrich curves depend arbitrarily on the dimensions of time t, comparisons between
values obtained for wpoor and wrich will not be meaningful. A sample size of 500 appeared to be sufficient; sampling 1000 did not yield significantly different results. Further, all the simulations were conducted assuming a host growth rate of 1.5 doublings per hour. The same conclusion as presented here was reached when assuming other host growth rate values. The statistical analysis was conducted using Matlab and Mathematica.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
Effects of environment and mutation severity on epistasis:
The power model matched well the fitness loss for phage strains carrying up to 30 class 1 mutations in poor- and rich-resource environments (Fig 3, a and b). Moreover, these strains exhibited either synergistic or antagonistic epistasis, when tested in a poor- or rich-resource environment, respectively. When the analysis was extended to other mutation classes, the power model also served well to capture data trends (Fig 4). By extracting the
and ß values from each curve fit and then plotting ß vs. log(
) we were able to probe how the form of epistasis, measured by ß, depended on the mutation severity, measured by
, in different environments (Fig 5). In a poor environment ß was >1 for mildly deleterious mutations (classes 0.5, 1, and 2), indicating synergism, but it rapidly decreased with increasing
; it was nearly 1 for class 3 mutations and then became <1 for the most severe mutations (classes 4 and 5), reflecting antagonism (Fig 5A). These results show that the form of epistasis can depend on the severity of the mutations. By contrast, in a rich environment the epistasis was always antagonistic, but the antagonism decreased with decreasing severity of mutations (Fig 5B). Note the almost linear dependence of ß on log(
) in either case. This relationship was stronger in the poor environment, where a least-squares linear fit between ß and log(
) yielded an R2 of 0.9971 compared with an R2 of 0.9655 in the rich environment. Further, the rich environment deviation of the data from linearity suggests that ß may asymptotically approach unity instead of crossing it (Fig 5B), a trend that is further discussed below.
|
|
|
From these results we draw two main conclusions, summarized in Table 2. First, mildly deleterious mutations tend to interact synergistically in a poor-resource environment, where fecundity is the primary determinant of fitness. This result is consistent with the notion that synergistic epistasis can emerge from competition for food or limited resources (![]()
|
Correlation between epistasis and mutation severity:
Inverse correlations between ß and
(Fig 5) have also recently been observed by ![]()
they considered sequences composed of a finite fixed number of monomers, where the fitness of mutants was defined as either neutral or lethal. Assuming that the fitness always decreased with the number of mutations, following a power model (Equation 1), they suggested that ß must be inversely correlated with
due to a conservation law that the total number of neutral mutants in the genetic space is constant (![]()
However, this argument cannot be directly mapped to our study because of the infinite diversity of mutational effects on fitness in our system. Furthermore, the apparent linear dependence of ß on log(
) in Fig 5 suggests an alternative mechanism. If ß and log(
) followed an exactly linear relation, then the different log(w)-vs.-n curves, each specified by a different pair of
and ß values, would share two points of intersection, one at n = 0 (wild type) and the other at some large number of mutations (n >> 30, for our examples). The reasoning is as follows. At the large n intersection point, we have
, where N is the number of mutations and wN is its corresponding fitness. This equation defines a linear relation between ß and log(
), since
. We assume that the power model is valid if and only if n
N; otherwise, for n > N it would predict that mutants carrying severe mutations would have a higher average fitness than mutants carrying the same number of mild mutations. Within this framework mutations that yield a fitness wN are effectively lethal since a fitness equal to zero is not defined. Further, the dependence of fitness on the accumulation of mutations will, for differing degrees of mutation severity, all originate from wild type but follow different paths that ultimately converge to the same fitness wN of the effectively lethal mutants. Hence, to reach this fitness with N mutations, mild mutations will tend to reinforce each other, leading to synergistic epistasis, whereas severe mutations will tend to buffer each other, resulting in antagonistic epistasis.
Antagonism in rich environments:
In light of the above argument for a linear correlation between ß and log(
), it appears contradictory that mildly deleterious mutations should still exhibit antagonistic epistasis in rich environments. We found that the relative fitness in a rich environment, wrich, is generally more sensitive to mutations than the measure in a poor environment, wpoor; mutations that changed the latter also changed the former, but the inverse was not true. It would be thus conceivable that the same mutations could have a greater deleterious effect on wrich than on wpoor. (Note that the higher sensitivity of wrich to mutations is not reflected by the
values, because the absolute value of
rich depends on the time units we use in the definition of wrich.) Perhaps if mutations were sufficiently mild, their interactions in a rich environment would become synergistic, following the pattern of epistasis in a poor environment. To test this possibility we examined interactions among mutations that were >100-fold milder than our 0.5 class mutations. These very mild mutations exhibited very slight antagonism in the rich environment (not shown) and behavior that was indistinguishable from wild type in the poor environment. This result further confirms the overall trend of changes in ß in a rich environment (Fig 5B): As severity of mutations decreases, the interaction among these mutations asymptotically approaches multiplicativity (ß = 1). Therefore, the differences in the forms of epistasis between our metrics do not merely reflect differences of degree to which these metrics are affected by mutations, but rather intrinsic differences in the nature of their responses to deleterious mutations.
Limits to observability:
Besides its implication that epistasis and mutational effect could evolve only in a coordinated fashion (![]()
) further leads to a dilemma for any attempts to distinguish synergistic epistasis (ß > 1) from nonepistasis (ß = 1): If synergistic epistasis is present (for example, in a poor environment), it will be highest under conditions where the effects of mutations on fitness are minimal and most challenging to accurately measure (mutation severity class 0.5). This challenge may be better understood by considering a quantitative example. Weak synergistic epistasis is apparent for class 2 mutations, where 30 mutations decrease the fitness by about one-half (Fig 4A). The average deleterious effect of each mutation should thus be no greater than
. That is, each mutation on average should decrease the fitness by <3%.
Although fitness effects of
2% might be experimentally established in competition experiments using microbes, the resulting synergistic epistasis would be mild (ß is only slightly <1.0). To measure such synergistic epistasis, one would need to quantify the fitness of a large number of mutants, ranging from those with single mutations to those with a large number of mutations. This would be a daunting experimental task. If the mutations overall are mild enough to demonstrate a high degree of synergistic epistasis, the effects of individual mutations may be too small and fall within the experimental variability of most fitness measures. For example, most experimental studies to date have measured only mutations with average selection coefficients >0.01 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Extensions of in silico mutagenesis:
We have focused here on probing the effects of mutational severity and resource environment on the form and extent of epistasis in the simulated intracellular growth of a well-studied bacteriophage. This work may serve as a foundation to test the consequences of additional mechanisms or assumptions. For example, to study the effects of mutation severity on fitness we have assumed the mutations carried by each strain are uniformly distributed across each class of mutation severity. More natural distributions could be implemented by making mild mutations more frequent than severe mutations. From this perspective, our simulations of low severity (class 0.5 and class 1) mutations more likely reflect the effects of natural distributions than those involving severe mutations. Our current study has also neglected pleiotropic effects, where a mutation in one gene may affect more than one phenotypic trait. For example, a mutation that altered the processivity of the T7 RNA polymerase could at the same time influence the strength of its association with the T7 lysozyme, which downregulates the polymerase activity. To account for such effects, one would need to obtain data that quantitatively described the nature of each pleiotropic effect or assume and implement a mathematical model for its form.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank J. F. Crow, S. F. Elena, R. Kishony, and R. E. Lenski for helpful comments and suggestions and H. Wang for assistance with the statistical analysis. Support was provided by the National Science Foundation.
Manuscript received October 4, 2001; Accepted for publication January 14, 2002.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
CHARLESWORTH, B., 1990 Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genet. Res. 55:199-221[Medline].
CROW, J. F., 1970 Genetic loads and the cost of natural selection, pp. 128177 in Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics, edited by K. KOJIMA. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
DAVIES, E. K., A. D. PETERS, and P. D. KEIGHTLEY, 1999 High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 285:1748-1751
DE VISSER, J. A. G. M. and R. F. HOEKSTRA, 1998 Synergistic epistasis between loci affecting fitness: evidence in plants and fungi. Genet. Res. 71:39-49.
DE VISSER, J. A. G. M., R. F. HOEKSTRA, and H. VAN DEN ENDE, 1996 The effect of sex and deleterious mutations on fitness in Chlamydomonas. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263:193-200
DE VISSER, J. A., R. F. HOEKSTRA, and H. VAN DEN ENDE, 1997a An experimental test for synergistic epistasis and its application in Chlamydomonas. Genetics 145:815-819[Abstract].
DE VISSER, J. A. G. M., R. F. HOEKSTRA, and H. VAN DEN ENDE, 1997b Test of interaction between genetic markers that affect fitness in Aspergillus niger. Evolution 51:1499-1505.
ELENA, S. F. and R. E. LENSKI, 1997 Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria. Nature 390:395-398[Medline].
ENDY, D., 1997 Development and application of a genetically structured simulation for bacteriophage T7. Ph.D. Thesis, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
ENDY, D., D. KONG, and J. YIN, 1997 Intracellular kinetics of a growing virus: a genetically structured simulation for bacteriophage T7. Biotech. Bioeng. 55:375-389.
ENDY, D., L. YOU, J. YIN, and I. J. MOLINEUX, 2000 Computation, prediction, and experimental tests of fitness for bacteriophage T7 mutants with permuted genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5375-5380
FRY, J. D., P. D. KEIGHTLEY, S. L. HEINSOHN, and S. V. NUZHDIN, 1999 New estimates of the rates and effects of mildly deleterious mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:574-579
HAIGH, J., 1978 The accumulation of deleterious genes in a populationMuller's ratchet. Theor. Popul. Biol. 14:251-267[Medline].
KEIGHTLEY, P. D., A. CABALLERO, and A. GARCÍA-DORADO, 1998 Population genetics: surviving under mutation pressure. Curr. Biol. 8:R235-R237[Medline].
KIMURA, M. and T. MARUYAMA, 1966 The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. Genetics 54:1337-1351
KONDRASHOV, A. S., 1993 Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. J. Hered. 84:372-387
LENSKI, R. E., C. OFRIA, T. C. COLLIER, and C. ADAMI, 1999 Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms. Nature 400:661-664[Medline].
MOLINEUX, I. J., 2001 No syringes please, ejection of phage T7 DNA from the virion is enzyme driven. Mol. Microbiol. 40:1-8[Medline].
MUKAI, T., 1969 The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanoganster. VII. Synergistic interactions of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 61:749-761
MUKAI, T., S. I. CHIGUSA, L. E. METTLER, and J. F. CROW, 1972 Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72:335-355
MULLER, H. J., 1964 The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. 1:2-9.
PECK, J. R. and D. WAXMAN, 2000 Mutation and sex in a competitive world. Nature 406:399-404[Medline].
PETERS, A. D. and P. D. KEIGHTLEY, 2000 A test for epistasis among induced mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Genetics 156:1635-1647
PETERS, A. D., and C. M. LIVELY, 2000 Epistasis and the maintenance of sex, pp. 99112 in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process, edited by J. B. WOLF, E. D. BRODIE, III and M. J. WADE. Oxford University Press, New York.
PHILLIPS, P. C., S. P. OTTO and M. C. WHITLOCK, 2000 Beyond the average, pp. 2038 in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process, edited by J. B. WOLF, E. D. BRODIE, III and M. J. WADE. Oxford University Press, New York.
SPASSKY, B., T. DOBZHANSKY, and W. W. ANDERSON, 1965 Genetics of natural populations. XXXVI. Epistatic interactions of the components of the genetic load in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 52:653-664
WEST, S. A., A. D. PETERS, and N. H. BARTON, 1998 Testing for epistasis between deleterious mutations. Genetics 149:435-444
WHITLOCK, M. C. and D. BOURGUET, 2000 Factors affecting the genetic load in Drosophila: synergistic epistasis and correlations among fitness components. Evolution 54:1654-1660[Medline].
WHITLOCK, M. C., P. C. PHILLIPS, F. B.-G. MOORE, and S. J. TONSOR, 1995 Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:601-629.
WILKE, C. O. and C. ADAMI, 2001 Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 268:1469-1474[Medline].
WLOCH, D. M., R. H. BORTS, and R. KORONA, 2001a Epistatic interactions of spontaneous mutations in haploid strains of the yeast Sacchromyces cerevisiae. J. Evol. Biol. 14:310-316.
WLOCH, D. M., K. SZAFRANIEC, R. H. BORTS, and R. KORONA, 2001b Direct estimate of the mutation rate and the distribution of fitness effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Genetics 159:441-452
WOLF, J., E. D. BRODIE, III and M. J. WADE (Editors), 2000 Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press, New York.
YOU, L. and J. YIN, 2000 Patterns of regulation from mRNA and protein time series. Metab. Eng. 2:210-217[Medline].
YOU, L., and J. YIN, 2001 Simulating the growth of viruses. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 532543.
YOU, L., P. F. SUTHERS, and J. YIN, 2002 Effects of Escherichia coli physiology on growth of phage T7 in vivo and in silico. J. Bacteriol. 184:1888-1894
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Jasnos, K. Tomala, D. Paczesniak, and R. Korona Interactions Between Stressful Environment and Gene Deletions Alleviate the Expected Average Loss of Fitness in Yeast Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2105 - 2111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. MacCarthy and A. Bergman Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction PNAS, July 31, 2007; 104(31): 12801 - 12806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. de la Iglesia and S. F. Elena Fitness Declines in Tobacco Etch Virus upon Serial Bottleneck Transfers J. Virol., May 15, 2007; 81(10): 4941 - 4947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Harrison, B. Papp, C. Pal, S. G. Oliver, and D. Delneri Plasticity of genetic interactions in metabolic networks of yeast PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2307 - 2312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Gjuvsland, B. J. Hayes, S. W. Omholt, and O. Carlborg Statistical Epistasis Is a Generic Feature of Gene Regulatory Networks Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 411 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Liberman and M. W. Feldman Evolutionary theory for modifiers of epistasis using a general symmetric model PNAS, December 19, 2006; 103(51): 19402 - 19406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sanjuan and S. F. Elena Epistasis correlates to genomic complexity PNAS, September 26, 2006; 103(39): 14402 - 14405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Joshi, A. K. Pandey, N. Capite, S. M. Fortune, E. J. Rubin, and C. M. Sassetti Characterization of mycobacterial virulence genes through genetic interaction mapping PNAS, August 1, 2006; 103(31): 11760 - 11765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sanjuan Quantifying antagonistic epistasis in a multifunctional RNA secondary structure of the Rous sarcoma virus J. Gen. Virol., June 1, 2006; 87(6): 1595 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Roux, C. Camilleri, S. Giancola, D. Brunel, and X. Reboud Epistatic Interactions Among Herbicide Resistances in Arabidopsis thaliana: The Fitness Cost of Multiresistance Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1277 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sanjuan, J. M. Cuevas, A. Moya, and S. F. Elena Epistasis and the Adaptability of an RNA Virus Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1001 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by You, L.
- Articles by Yin, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by You, L.
- Articles by Yin, J.




; and (b) antagonistic for wrich,
. Each circle represents the mean of log(fitness) values of 500 mutants; each vertical line represents the corresponding standard deviation.

for the poor environment and
for the rich environment. All ß values are significantly different from 1.0, with P < 0.01 for ß - 1, except the ß value for wpoor and class 3 mutations, where P = 0.087 for ß - 1.


