Genetics, Vol. 160, 463-470, February 2002, Copyright © 2002

RNA Interference in the Pathogenic Fungus Cryptococcus neoformans

Hong Liua, Tricia R. Cottrella, Lynda M. Pierinib, William E. Goldmana, and Tamara L. Doeringa
a Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110
b Department of Biochemistry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York 10021

Corresponding author: Tamara L. Doering, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110., doering{at}borcim.wustl.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: A. P. MITCHELL


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Cryptococcus neoformans is a pathogenic fungus responsible for serious disease in immunocompromised individuals. This organism has recently been developed as an experimental system, with initiation of a genome project among other molecular advances. However, investigations of Cryptococcus are hampered by the technical difficulty of specific gene replacements. RNA interference, a process in which the presence of double-stranded RNA homologous to a gene of interest results in specific degradation of the corresponding message, may help solve this problem. We have shown that expression of double-stranded RNA corresponding to portions of the cryptococcal CAP59 and ADE2 genes results in reduced mRNA levels for those genes, with phenotypic consequences similar to that of gene disruption. The two genes could also be subjected to simultaneous interference through expression of chimeric double-stranded RNA. Specific modulation of protein expression through introduction of double-stranded RNA thus operates in C. neoformans, which is the first demonstration of this technique in a fungal organism. Use of RNA interference in Cryptococcus should allow manipulation of mRNA levels for functional analysis of genes of interest and enable efficient exploration of genes discovered by genome sequencing.


THE challenge of using eukaryotic genome sequence information to focus research efforts on productive areas is shared by those who investigate organisms with genomes of all magnitudes and complexities. One fungal genome, that of Cryptococcus neoformans (24 Mb), has been currently sequenced to approximately seven times shotgun coverage by the Stanford Genome Technology Center (http://www-sequence.stanford.edu) and The Institute for Genomic Research (http://www.tigr.org). C. neoformans is an encapsulated fungal pathogen responsible for severe disease in immunocompromised individuals. It usually grows as a haploid yeast that reproduces by budding, but under certain environmental conditions it may also undergo a sexual cycle resulting in the production of basidiospores (KWON-CHUNG 1975 Down). In recent years Cryptococcus has been developed as an experimental system, with advances in molecular techniques enabling detailed investigation of virulence factors and interactions with the mammalian host. Notable among these advances have been the establishment of transformation systems suitable for episomal expression and chromosomal integration (EDMAN and KWON-CHUNG 1990 Down; TOFFALETTI et al. 1993 Down) and the initiation of genome sequencing efforts (HEITMAN et al. 2000 Down). More difficult has been the development of methods for efficient gene replacement in C. neoformans, which has been hampered by both the propensity of cryptococcus to modify exogenous DNA (KWON-CHUNG et al. 1998 Down) and its high frequency of nonhomologous recombination. Despite these obstacles several dozen targeted gene replacements have now been accomplished, mainly by the groups of J. Perfect (Duke University Medical Center), J. Heitman (Duke University Medical Center), and J. Kwon-Chung (National Institutes of Health), which have tremendous value for functional analysis of cryptococcal genes and virulence studies in animal models. To exploit the forthcoming genome sequence efficiently, however, it will be necessary to develop more rapid methods to test the function of gene products, instead of relying on individual gene disruptions.

One recently developed method for downregulating gene function that may facilitate studies in C. neoformans is double-stranded RNA interference (RNAi). In this process double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) induces the specific destruction of mRNA to which it is homologous (FIRE et al. 1998 Down; reviewed in SHARP 1999 Down; BASS 2000 Down; CARTHEW 2001 Down; HAMMOND et al. 2001 Down). The dsRNA "trigger" is thought to be cleaved into shorter fragments (21–25 nucleotides; ZAMORE et al. 2000 Down), which then guide specific degradation of the corresponding mRNA, catalyzed by a protein or protein complex with nuclease activity (BAULCOMBE 2001 Down). Before cleavage the trigger can be as short as 26 nucleotides and has no specific requirements as far as sequence motif or base composition, but must be double stranded (PARRISH et al. 2000 Down). Interference can persist for many rounds of cell division and growth and may even be passed through the germline (FIRE et al. 1998 Down). Specific inhibition of gene expression by RNAi has been demonstrated in a range of organisms, from the initial report on Caenorhabditis elegans (FIRE et al. 1998 Down) to works on trypanosomes (NGO et al. 1998 Down), Drosophila (KENNERDELL and CARTHEW 1998 Down), early mouse embryos (SVOBODA et al. 2000 Down; WIANNY and ZERNICKA-GOETZ 2000 Down), and mammalian cells in culture (ELBASHIR et al. 2001 Down). RNAi has proved a valuable tool for probing functions of individual gene products (e.g., KENNERDELL and CARTHEW 1998 Down; BASTIN et al. 2000 Down) and offers a powerful approach for functional genomic studies (KUWABARA and COULSON 2000 Down; KIM 2001 Down). In the best-studied and most tractable system, C. elegans, over a third of all genes have now been assessed for the phenotypic effects of RNAi. We hypothesized that this technique could be useful in C. neoformans, both to circumvent the difficulties of gene replacement for functional studies of individual gene products and to initiate larger-scale investigations of genes discovered through sequencing efforts. In this article we show that C. neoformans gene expression can be specifically inhibited by RNA interference.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Strains and cell growth:
C. neoformans was grown with continuous shaking at 30° in YPD medium [1% (w/v) Bacto yeast extract; 2% (w/v) peptone, 2% dextrose] or minimal medium lacking uracil (AUSUBEL et al. 2001 Down). Low adenine plates contained yeast nitrogen base supplemented with (per liter) 20 g glucose; 24 mg uracil; 40 mg each arginine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, and tryrosine; 60 mg phenylalanine and tryptophan; 120 mg homoserine; 180 mg valine; and 10 mg adenine. For experiments using 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA), plates contained the same medium with adenine raised to 40 mg/liter and the addition of 1 g/liter 5-FOA. Wild-type serotype D strain B4500 and cap59 strain TYCC33 (CHANG and KWON-CHUNG 1994 Down) were from Dr. June Kwon-Chung (National Institutes of Health), and ura5 strain JEC43 (WICKES et al. 1997 Down) was from Dr. Joseph Heitman (Duke University Medical Center). JEC43 cells transformed with a control plasmid alone (CIP-GUST.Cla.Kpn; see below) are designated "control." JEC43 cells transformed with a plasmid designed to interfere with CAP59 expression (described below) were termed CAP59i, with numbers following this designation to indicate individual transformants (e.g., CAP59i-1). A similar convention was used for naming constructs designed to interfere with ADE2 or with both CAP59 and ADE2.

Constructs and transformation:
Constructs for RNA interference were designed with inverted repeats of ~500 bp of coding sequence of the gene of interest separated by a spacer segment of green fluorescent protein (GFP) sequence. For construction of pCAP59i (Fig 1, top), a portion of the coding sequence of CAP59 was PCR amplified from B4500 genomic DNA using primers 1 and 2 (Table 1) to add an NdeI restriction site at the 5' end and a portion of GFP sequence at the 3' end (product A). Product A was further amplified using primers 3 and 4 to incorporate BglII restriction sites at each end (product B). A segment of GFP was amplified (from an enhanced version designed for C. elegans from Dr. Andrew Fire, Carnegie Institute of Washington) using primers 5 and 6 to incorporate the 3' end of the CAP59 sequence in product A at the 5' end and a BglII restriction site at the 3' end (product C). PCR products A and C were then used as the template for a PCR reaction with primers 1 and 6 to amplify a 750-bp fragment (product D); this was then digested with NdeI and BglII and ligated into the similarly restricted plasmid CIP-GUST.Cla-Kpn, from Dr. Brian Wickes (University of Texas Health Science Center). (This plasmid contains AmpR and C. neoformans URA5 markers, as well as the GUS reporter gene flanked by the C. neoformans GAL7 promoter and terminator; digestion with NdeI and BglII releases the GUS coding sequence.) The ligation product was isolated from Escherichia coli, digested with BglII, and ligated to the BglII restricted product B. Products were tested by restriction digestion to select one in which the CAP59 repeats were in opposite orientations, and this was digested with NdeI and ClaI to remove the GAL7 promoter. To form pCAP59i (Fig 1) the GAL7 promoter was replaced with a cryptococcal ACT promoter amplified with primers 7 and 8 from plasmid GMC200 (from Dr. Gary Cox, Duke University Medical Center). An identical cloning scheme was used to construct pADE2i, except that primers 1*–6* (Table 1) were used in place of primers 1–6 above. All PCR reactions were done using Taq polymerase under standard conditions and PCR products were purified before use in subsequent reactions. Both plasmids were checked by DNA sequencing.



View larger version (11K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. Plasmid design. pCAP59i was used to interfere with CAP59 expression, and pCAP59/ADE2i was used for tandem interference with both CAP59 and ADE2.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 1. Primers used in plasmid construction

To incorporate cryptococcal telomere sequences, the 1.4-kb NotI fragment of pTEL-HYG (from Dr. Gary Cox, Duke University) was inserted into the unique NotI site of pCAP59i, forming pCAP59i-tel. pCAP59/ADE2i was generated by adding duplicates of the same portion of ADE2 used in pADE2i to pCAP59i, in the positions and orientations shown in Fig 1 (cloning details available on request). For the promoterless version of pCAP59i the plasmid was digested with NdeI and ClaI to remove the actin promoter, the sticky ends were filled in with T4 DNA polymerase, and the plasmid was religated.

JEC43 cells were transformed by electroporation as described (WICKES and EDMAN 1994 Down) using 5 µg of linearized DNA per 3 x 108 cells with selection of transformants on minimal plates lacking uracil. pCAP59i-tel was linearized with SceI so that the telomeres formed the ends of the DNA used for transformation; all other plasmids were linearized with NotI. Transformants were streaked to master plates of the same medium and stored at 4°.

RNA preparation and reverse transcription-PCR:
C. neoformans cells were washed with pyrocarbonic acid diethyl ester-treated water, suspended in Trizol Reagent (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), and broken in a MiniBeadbeater-8 (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, OK) in the presence of 0.5-mm glass beads (3 x 1-min bursts, 4°). Cell lysis was typically 60–80% for encapsulated strains and 80–100% for acapsular strains. Total RNA was precipitated using standard methods (AUSUBEL et al. 2001 Down) with a yield of 1.5–3.0 mg/500 OD600 units of cells. For cDNA synthesis, 100 µg of total RNA was treated with amplification grade DNase I (GIBCO BRL), ethanol precipitated, and used in the Superscript preamplification system for first strand cDNA synthesis using Oligo(dT) primer (GIBCO BRL) according to manufacturer's instructions.

For reverse transcription (RT)-PCR experiments, ~2 µg of cDNA was amplified in a 100-µl reaction using Taq polymerase and appropriate primers (see Table 2 and text). The amplification program was (i) 94° for 2 min; (ii) 26–35 cycles of 94° for 1 min, 55° for 1 min, 68° for 1 min; and (iii) 68° for 7 min. Ten-microliter samples were removed every 3 cycles immediately after the 68° incubation, beginning as early as the eleventh cycle. PCR products were resolved on 1.5% agarose gels run in TAE buffer and stained (45 min, RT) with SYBR Green I nucleic acid gel stain (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in TAE buffer. DNA-associated fluorescence was visualized using a FluorImager SI (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA), and data were analyzed using Scanalytics IPLab gel and Microsoft Excel software with subtraction of background fluorescent signal.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 2. Primers used for RT-PCR

Cell imaging:
For immunofluorescence, cells were grown in YPD medium, washed twice in PBS, and treated with anticapsule monoclonal antibody 2H1 (from Dr. Arturo Casadevall, Albert Einstein College of Medicine) that was tagged with Cy3 (as in PIERINI and DOERING 2001 Down). Differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence images were acquired simultaneously with a Zeiss (Jena, Germany) LSM510 laser scanning confocal microscope. All samples were imaged with identical acquisition settings to allow direct quantitative comparison. Average fluorescence intensities were based on measurements of at least 25 cells per condition. Postacquisition image analysis was performed with MetaMorph imaging software (Universal Imaging Corporation, West Chester, PA), and images were prepared for publication using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA).


*  RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

To test RNAi in C. neoformans we chose two genes that would produce clear phenotypes if the technique was successful. The first of these is CAP59, which encodes a product required for synthesis of the polysaccharide capsule in cryptococcus. The capsule is absolutely required for virulence of this fungal pathogen, and cells in which CAP59 is disrupted are acapsular and avirulent (CHANG and KWON-CHUNG 1994 Down). The second gene tested was ADE2, which encodes phosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxylase; disruption of this gene yields pink colonies due to accumulation of adenine biosynthetic intermediates.

Several approaches have been used to express double-stranded RNA for interference testing. It can be synthesized in vitro or in vivo either as independent RNA molecules corresponding to a sequence and its complement or as a single polynucleotide containing duplicate sequences in opposite orientation separated by a spacer. In the former situation the sense and antisense strands, which may be formed by convergent promoters transcribing the same DNA sequence, anneal to form the required dsRNA. In the latter case the single RNA forms a hairpin with a double-stranded stem. dsRNA may be delivered by injection (FIRE et al. 1998 Down; GURU 2000 Down), electroporation, soaking, or feeding (the last two in C. elegans; TABARA et al. 1998 Down; TIMMONS and FIRE 1998 Down), or it may be expressed within the cell of interest (NGO et al. 1998 Down; KENNERDELL and CARTHEW 2000 Down; WANG et al. 2000 Down). For initial attempts to interfere with CAP59 expression in cryptococcus, we designed a plasmid with convergent promoters flanking a segment of the gene. These studies were not successful (not shown), so we designed another construct employing a hairpin scheme with duplicate sequences of ~500 bp of CAP59 in opposite orientation separated by a 250-bp spacer of GFP sequence (pCAP59i, Fig 1). Constitutive expression was driven by a cryptococcal actin promoter, and the chimeric sequence was followed by a GAL7 terminator.

C. neoformans cells of serotype D were transformed by electroporation with the linearized interference construct (pCAP59i) or a control plasmid. Transformants were restreaked to a master plate and replica plated to medium for capsule induction. Ten percent of the pCAP59i transformants and 0% of the control transformants demonstrated a clear mutant phenotype, with dull colonies due to the absence of polysaccharide capsule (Table 3). Cells from one dull and one shiny colony transformed with pCAP59i (CAP59i-1 and CAP59i-2, respectively) were chosen for closer examination.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 3. Efficiency of generation of mutant phenotypes

By light microscopy (Fig 2, first column) CAP59i-1 cells were noted to clump together, similar to strains in which CAP59 has been disrupted (cap59). In contrast, parental cells (not shown) or those transformed with a control plasmid rarely clump. Examination of cells in the presence of india ink (not shown), which is excluded from the capsule, showed a characteristic halo in the case of parental and control cells. CAP59i-1 and cap59 cells exhibited no halo, but CAP59i-2 showed an intermediate phenotype with a mixture of encapsulated and a few acapsular cells.



View larger version (99K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. Light microscopy of CAP59 interference and control strains. The indicated strains (see text) were labeled with Cy3-conjugated monoclonal antibody 2H1 and then examined by confocal microscopy. DIC (left image of each pair) and fluorescence (right image of each pair) images are shown. CAP59i-1, like cap59, demonstrates clumping and a lack of capsule, which is reversed after growth on 5-FOA (Cap59i-1 + FOA). An acapsular phenotype is also seen with double interference cells (CAP59/ADE2i). Capsule is not affected by inhibition or mutation of ADE2 alone (ADE2i-1 and ade2, respectively). Bar, 10 µm.

To test the presence of capsule with a more sensitive method, we treated cells with a monoclonal antibody to cryptococcal capsule, which we conjugated to Cy3 (PIERINI and DOERING 2001 Down), and examined them by confocal microscopy (Fig 2, second column). Cells transformed with a control plasmid showed brightly fluorescent surface staining, as was the case with CAP59i-2 cells. In contrast, and similar to cap59 mutants, CAP59i-1 cells showed fluorescence <1% of control (Fig 2), even when grown in capsule-inducing medium (not shown). Quantitation showed no difference in fluorescence intensity between CAP59i-1 and cap59 cells (P < 0.001), and electron microscopy confirmed the absence of capsule on CAP59i-1 and cap59 cells (not shown). These results suggest that a fraction of transformants (e.g., CAP59i-1) show complete interference with normal gene expression, while others (e.g., CAP59i-2) do not (see DISCUSSION).

To confirm that the interference phenotype depended on exogenous DNA, CAP59i-1 cells were streaked on 5-FOA plates to select against maintenance of the URA5-marked interference construct. Colonies that grew under these conditions regained a shiny appearance and displayed wild-type capsule staining by immunofluorescence (Fig 2), demonstrating association of the acapsular phenotype with presence of the interfering plasmid. Southern blotting and PCR experiments showed that the endogenous CAP59 gene was intact in CAP59i-1 and confirmed that the interfering construct had not been integrated and was lost after growth on 5-FOA (not shown). To assess dependence of interference on transcription, pCAP59i was modified by removing the promotor sequence; this plasmid (pCAP59i-noP) yielded no phenotypically altered transformants (Table 3).

If the observed acapsular phenotype of CAP59i-1 resulted from RNA interference, the levels of CAP59 RNA in those cells should be reduced compared to controls. To test this we used a quantitative RT-PCR method. cDNA prepared from cells to be tested was used as a substrate for PCR reactions that were sampled every three cycles (see MATERIALS AND METHODS), and products were quantitated using SYBR green dye (sensitivity 60 pg dsDNA). Fluorescence was plotted vs. number of cycles, and the starting amounts of cDNA from each strain were adjusted such that the exponential phase of PCR product accumulation for a constitutively expressed control gene (ACT, amplified with primers 9 and 10 in Table 2) overlapped closely for all strains (Fig 3A and Fig B). These normalized amounts of cDNA were then used in experiments to quantitate the presence of specific RNA species in each strain. PCR product accumulation was plotted as above, and comparisons between several points in the exponentially increasing portions of the curves were used to calculate relative amounts of product. As expected, GFP-specific sequences were detected only in CAP59i-1 and CAP59i-2 cells, and sequences from CAP59 that were also present in pCAP59i were detected in all cells except cap59 (not shown). PCR was also performed with primers homologous to CAP59 sequences that were absent from pCAP59i, to specifically assess amounts of cellular mRNA (Fig 3C and Fig D). In these reactions CAP59i-1 cells showed <23% as much CAP59-specific mRNA as control cells. cap59 cells, as expected, had no CAP59-specific mRNA.



View larger version (56K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 3. RT-PCR analysis of CAP59 expression. RT-PCR analysis of the indicated strains was performed as described in the text, using amounts of cDNA normalized to actin mRNA expression. The results of RT-PCR reactions using primers 9 and 10 for detection of ACT mRNA are shown in A and quantitation of the corresponding PCR product is plotted in B in arbitrary fluorescence units. RT-PCR reactions using primers 15 and 16 to detect CAP59 mRNA are shown and plotted in C and D. Control cells, solid circles; cap59, open circles; CAP59i-1, solid squares; and CAP59i-2, open squares.

To examine the effect of dsRNAi on another gene product an interference construct was made with a segment of the cryptococcal ADE2 gene (pADE2i, see MATERIALS AND METHODS). Similar to results with pCAP59i, 7% of cells transformed with pADE2i showed an interference phenotype (Table 3), producing pink colonies (e.g., ADE2i-1 in Fig 4). RT-PCR experiments confirmed significant reduction in ADE2 mRNA in the cells (not shown). The phenotype was plasmid dependent, as growth of ADE2i-1 on 5-FOA to select against maintenance of pADE2i yielded colonies of the wild-type cream color, which regained adenine prototrophy (Fig 5). Inhibition of expression of ADE2, as of CAP59, was specific, with no alterations of growth or morphology detected to suggest that dsRNA initiated nonspecific protein inhibition (as observed in some mammalian systems; WILLIAMS 1999 Down). The successful inhibition of this second gene product indicates that dsRNAi offers a general technique for gene suppression in C. neoformans.



View larger version (61K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 4. Interference with ADE2. Cells were streaked on YPD plates and incubated for 3 days at 30° to demonstrate the pink color resulting from the accumulation of adenine biosynthetic intermediates. Two ADE2i strains are shown, one that shows the mutant phenotype (ADE2i-1) and one that does not (ADE2i-2), along with ade2 cells and cells transformed with a control plasmid for comparison. The mutant phenotype is also exhibited by a double interference transformant (CAP59/ADE2i-25), but is not induced by inhibition or mutation of CAP59 alone (CAP59i-1, cap59).



View larger version (34K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 5. 5-FOA reversal of ADE2 interference. ADE2i-1 cells and cells transformed with a control plasmid were grown on medium without (-) or with (+) 5-FOA. Growth in the presence of 5-FOA led to reversal of the ADE2i-1 mutant phenotype.

In studies with both pCAP59i and pADE2i we noted that some transformants remained phenotypically wild type, as exemplified by CAP59i-2 (Fig 2) and ADE2i-2 (Fig 4). Other transformants demonstrated intermediate phenotypes, such as reduced fluorescence with cell clumpiness for CAP59i or less intense pink color for pADE2i (not shown). We hypothesized that these partial phenotypes were due to variable expression of the transforming plasmid, possibly resulting from variable modification of the exogenous DNA expression (EDMAN 1992 Down; VARMA et al. 1992 Down; KWON-CHUNG et al. 1998 Down). To test this idea we quantitated the CAP59 mRNA in CAP59i-2 cells (Fig 3) and found it to be 72% as abundant as control, which is severalfold higher than the phenotypically mutant CAP59i-1 cells. We also examined the DNA from CAP59i-1 and CAP59i-2 cells by Southern blotting and noted that while the plasmids in both had been modified and enlarged, probably by a combination of degradation and telomere addition (KWON-CHUNG et al. 1998 Down), the former had been extended to a greater extent (not shown). Intermediate phenotypes are discussed further below.

To stabilize the plasmid and reduce modifications, which might alter expression of the interference construct, we incorporated cryptococcal telomere sequences into pCAP59i. In transformations with this plasmid (pCAP59i-tel) we found a higher fraction of phenotypically mutant cells (Table 3), and we observed reduced modification of the input plasmid (not shown).

Because not all cells transformed with interfering plasmids demonstrate mutant phenotypes, investigation of novel genes could be slowed, as it would require initial assessment of mRNA levels in a number of transformants before phenotypes could be examined with confidence that interference was occurring. One way to mark transformants that exhibit interference would be to simultaneously interfere with the gene of interest and with a marker gene, which would provide an easily tracked phenotype. To test this approach we constructed an interference plasmid incorporating portions of both CAP59 and ADE2 (Fig 1, pCAP59/ADE2i). Transformants were both dull and pink, indicating simultaneous inhibition of expression of both genes (Table 3). Some colonies did exhibit only one phenotype (usually pink but not dull), again suggesting some variation in efficiency of inhibition (see DISCUSSION). Even with this variation, however, >80% of pink colonies were also acapsular, showing that this approach could effectively indicate cells in which interference was operating.


*  DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

We have explored the utility of double-stranded RNA interference as a tool for specific inhibition of gene expression in C. neoformans. Our goal was to find a method to efficiently assess the phenotypic consequences of preventing production of specific gene products, both to circumvent the difficulty of gene disruption in this organism and to exploit the rapidly emerging genome sequence of this fungus for studies of its biology and pathogenicity. We have shown that double-stranded RNA interference occurs in C. neoformans by demonstrating specific inhibition of expression of genes involved in capsule synthesis and adenine biosynthesis, both individually and together. To date, there are no published reports of dsRNAi in a yeast or fungus. These observations should be of great practical value to investigations of important pathogens like C. neoformans that are less amenable to genetic manipulation than are model systems.

Studies of RNAi-resistant mutants in C. elegans have identified several genes believed to encode proteins involved in interference (TABARA et al. 1999 Down). Interestingly, several of these have homologs known to participate in other post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) processes, such as the quelling phenomenon in Neurospora crassa (whereby endogenous genes are silenced by introduction of a transgenic copy) or the PTGS observed in plants, suggesting shared mechanisms (CATALANOTTO et al. 2000 Down; FAGARD et al. 2000 Down; MAINE 2000 Down; VAUCHERET et al. 2001 Down). We examined the available C. neoformans genome sequence for homology to the Arabidopsis AGO1 gene, one member of a gene family conserved across the three systems (FAGARD et al. 2000 Down). The longest available contiguous stretch of cryptococcal sequence was 33% identical and 50% positive, as scored in an NCBI BLAST search with the BLOSUM62 matrix (ALTSCHUL et al. 1997 Down), when compared to the region of Ago1 from amino acids 552–1002; the most conserved region within it (corresponding to amino acids 772–986 of Ago1) was 46% identical and 59% positive. Notably, the latter group of identical residues included 45 of the 61 residues that are identical in Ago1 and its homologs in Neurospora (QDE-2) and C. elegans (RDE-1). The cryptococcal genome project also has generated sequences encoding polypeptides with significant homology to the C. elegans Ego-1, which encodes a putative RNA-dependent RNA polymerase with homologs in Arabidopsis thaliana and N. crassa, and to the N. crassa QDE-3, a putative helicase. The presence in the cryptococcal database of an Ago-1-like sequence and homologs of other proteins implicated in RNAi is consistent with this pathogen utilizing RNAi or related processes in post-transcriptional gene silencing.

For the two genes we tested, 7–10% of transformants demonstrated a complete mutant phenotype, although others with less mRNA inhibition displayed intermediate or wild-type phenotypes (Fig 2 and Fig 4 and data not shown). This is consistent with observations in Trypanosoma brucei, where individual transformants demonstrate variable efficiency of interference (E. ULLU, personal communication). Our results suggest that for the observation of some phenotypes (e.g., complete lack of capsule detected by antibody binding) mRNA levels must drop below a threshold, which may be different for each protein depending on its mechanism of action and regulation. This would explain why in experiments with simultaneous interference of two genes we did obtain colonies where only one mutant phenotype was expressed and also why in almost all of these cases the same single phenotype was observed. It is not clear why a range of interference occurs in cryptococcus, but it may be that the interference plasmid is variably modified by the cell before stabilization by addition of telomeres (EDMAN 1992 Down; VARMA et al. 1992 Down; KWON-CHUNG et al. 1998 Down). This could result in plasmids that are variably expressed and thus have different degrees of efficacy in mediating mRNA degradation. Addition of telomeric sequences to the interfering plasmid did increase the yield of mutant phenotypes and decrease the degree of plasmid modification after transformation.

For some purposes the availability of cells with different degrees of RNA interference may have advantages over complete disruptions, as intermediate phenotypes might be available for investigation. For example, if complete inhibition of a gene were lethal, this technique might still yield cells for study. Similarly, regulated expression of interfering constructs might permit manipulation of levels of inhibition. This could be useful for investigation of nonessential genes and also for potentially determining whether a gene is essential, at present a difficult question to address directly in cryptococcus.

One disadvantage of the spectrum of interference observed is that to investigate novel genes would require two phases of study: initial investigation of a series of transformants to determine their levels of the mRNA of interest and then further analysis of those transformants exhibiting appropriate levels of interference. To simplify this process we propose use of ADE2, or another readily observed marker, in tandem interference constructs with the gene of interest. For example, transformants that are pink, indicating that ADE2 expression is inhibited and interference is operating, could be easily selected for further study of the second gene. Tandem interference may also be useful for cases where a double mutant is desired for study, as in Cryptococcus this will certainly be more rapid than either sequential gene disruptions or independent disruptions and genetic crossing. It may also be possible to interfere with more than two genes simultaneously. In our experiments we have used relatively large portions of the genes to be inhibited (500 bp), but the literature suggests that much smaller segments are effective. This indicates that plasmid size will not be limiting and it will be possible to test multi-interfering constructs. It may also be possible to interfere with several related genes simultaneously if they share specific sequences that may be incorporated into the interfering plasmid; this may allow coordinate inhibition of a family of genes (FIRE et al. 1998 Down).

Double-stranded RNA interference holds great promise for studies of cryptococcus and other fungi. In particular, it should provide a way to exploit the rapidly accumulating genome sequence of C. neoformans without requiring disruption of each gene of potential interest. Because only a short segment of the gene sequence is needed for interference, open reading frame identification will suffice for this method and complete annotation will not be required. This will allow screening of sequences of interest and subsequent choice of genes for further study. Other advantages of this method include the rapidity of functional disruption, the potential for regulated specific inhibition of gene expression, and the feasibility of simultaneous inhibition of several genes or a gene family. Together these features indicate that the specific inhibition of gene expression in cryptococcus using RNA interference will be a valuable tool in an organism where gene disruption is a time-consuming and labor-intensive process.


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We appreciate the efforts of Erin Brosnahan, Scott Handley, and Jacquelyn Engle in helping to develop the quantitative RT-PCR method and of Wandy Beatty for her examination of cells by electron microscopy. We are grateful for helpful discussions with Elisabetta Ullu, Mark Johnston, members of the Doering lab, and colleagues at the Molecular Mycology Course at the Marine Biological Laboratories. We thank June Kwon-Chung and Joe Heitman for strains, Brian Wickes and Andy Fire for DNA, and Arturo Casadevall for antibody. T.R.C.'s work on this project was supported by an American Society for Microbiology Undergraduate Research Fellowship and Howard Hughes Medical Institute Summer Research funds to Washington University. L.M.P. was supported by an Atorvastatin Research Award from Pfizer/Parke Davis. W.E.G. was supported by the National Institutes of Health (AI25584). T.L.D. and work in her laboratory were supported by the National Institutes of Health (AI49173), National Science Foundation (POWRE 0096115), a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Junior Investigator Award in Molecular Pathogenic Mycology, the Andrew and Virginia Craig Faculty Research Fund, and a Neose Corporation GRANT award.

Manuscript received July 11, 2001; Accepted for publication November 13, 2001.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

ALTSCHUL, S. F., T. L. MADDEN, A. A. SCHÄFFER, J. ZHANG, and Z. ZHANG et al., 1997  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402[Abstract/Free Full Text].

AUSUBEL, F. M., R. BRENT, R. E. KINGSTON, D. D. MOORE, J. G. SEIDMAN et al. (Editors), 2001 Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

BASS, B. L., 2000  Double-stranded RNA as a template for gene silencing. Cell 101:235-238[Medline].

BASTIN, P., K. ELLIS, L. KOHL, and K. GULL, 2000  Flagellum ontogeny in trypanosomes studied via an inherited and regulated RNA interference system. J. Cell Sci. 113:3321-3328[Abstract].

BAULCOMBE, D., 2001  Diced defense. Nature 409:295-296[Medline].

CARTHEW, R. W., 2001  Gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:244-248[Medline].

CATALANOTTO, C., G. AZZALIN, G. MACINO, and C. COGONI, 2000  Gene silencing in worms and fungi. Nature 404:245[Medline].

CHANG, Y. C. and K. J. KWON-CHUNG, 1994  Complementation of a capsule-deficient mutation of Cryptococcus neoformans restores its virulence. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4912-4919[Abstract/Free Full Text].

EDMAN, J. C., 1992  Isolation of telomerelike sequences from Cryptococcus neformans and their use in high-efficiency transformation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:2777-2783[Abstract/Free Full Text].

EDMAN, J. C. and J. K. KWON-CHUNG, 1990  Isolation of the URA5 gene from Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans and its use as a selective marker for transformation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:4538-4544[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ELBASHIR, S., J. HARBORTH, W. LENDECKEL, A. YALCIN, and K. WEBER et al., 2001  Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 411:494-498[Medline].

FAGARD, M., S. BOUTET, J.-B. MOREL, C. BELLINI, and H. VAUCHERET, 2000  AGO1, QDE-2, and RDE-1 are related proteins required for post-transcriptional gene silencing in plants, quelling in fungi, and RNA interference in animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:11650-11654[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FIRE, A., S. XU, M. K. MONTGOMERY, S. A. KOSTAS, and S. E. DRIVER et al., 1998  Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Nature 391:806-811[Medline].

GURU, T., 2000  A silence that speaks volumes. Nature 404:804-808[Medline].

HAMMOND, S. M., A. A. CAUDY, and G. J. HANNON, 2001  Post-transcriptional gene silencing by double stranded RNA. Nat. Rev. 2:110-119.

HEITMAN, J., J. K. LODGE, A. CASADEVALL, and J. R. PERFECT, 2000  Cryptococcus neoformans genome sequencing project. Mycopathologia 148:1-7.

KENNERDELL, J. R. and R. W. CARTHEW, 1998  Use of dsRNA-mediated genetic interference to demonstate that frizzled and frizzled 2 act in the wingless pathway. Cell 95:1017-1026[Medline].

KENNERDELL, J. R. and R. W. CARTHEW, 2000  Heritable gene silencing in Drosophila using double-stranded RNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 18:896-898[Medline].

KIM, S. K., 2001  Functional genomics: the worm scores a knockout. Curr. Biol. 11:R85-R87[Medline].

KUWABARA, E. and A. COULSON, 2000  RNAi—Prospects for a general technique for determining gene function. Parasitol. Today 16:347-349[Medline].

KWON-CHUNG, K. J., 1975  A new genus, Filobasidiella, the perfect state of Cryptococcus neoformans.. Mycologia 68:821-833.

KWON-CHUNG, K. J., W. E. GOLDMAN, B. KLEIN, and P. J. STANISZLO, 1998  Fate of transforming DNA in pathogenic fungi. Med. Mycol. 36(Suppl. 1):38-44.

MAINE, E. M., 2000  A conserved mechanism for post-transcriptional gene silencing? Genome Biol. 1:1018-1011. 1018.1014..

NGO, H., C. TSCHUDI, K. GULL, and E. ULLU, 1998  Double stranded RNA induces mRNA degradation in Trypanosoma brucei.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:15502-15507[Abstract/Free Full Text].

PARRISH, S., J. FLEENOR, X. S. C. MELLO, and A. FIRE, 2000  Functional anatomy of a dsRNA trigger: differential requirement for the two trigger strands in RNA interference. Mol. Cell 6:1077-1087[Medline].

PIERINI, L. M. and T. L. DOERING, 2001  Spatial and temporal sequence of capsule construction in Cryptococcus neoformans.. Mol. Microbiol. 41:105-115[Medline].

SHARP, P. A., 1999  RNAi and double-strand RNA. Genes Dev. 13:139-141[Free Full Text].

SVOBODA, P., P. STEIN, H. HAYASHI, and R. M. SCHULTZ, 2000  Selective reduction of dormant maternal mRNAs in mouse oocytes by RNA interference. Development 127:4147-4156[Abstract].

TABARA, H., A. GRISHOK, and C. MELLO, 1998  Soaking in the genome sequence. Science 282:430-431[Free Full Text].

TABARA, H., M. SARKISSIAN, W. G. KELLY, J. FLEENOR, and A. GRISHOK et al., 1999  The rde-1 gene, RNA interference, and transposon silencing in C. elegans.. Cell 99:123-132[Medline].

TIMMONS, A. and A. FIRE, 1998  Specific interference by ingested dsRNA. Nature 395:854[Medline].

TOFFALETTI, D. L., T. H. RUDE, S. A. JOHNSTON, D. T. DURACK, and J. R. PERFECT, 1993  Gene transfer in Cryptococcus neoformans by use of biolistic delivery of DNA. J. Bacteriol. 175:1405-1411[Abstract/Free Full Text].

VARMA, A., J. C. EDMAN, and K. J. KWON-CHUNG, 1992  Molecular and genetic analysis of URA5 transformants of Cryptococcus neoformans.. Infect. Immun. 60:1101-1108[Abstract/Free Full Text].

VAUCHERET, H., C. BECLIN, and M. FAGARD, 2001  Post-transcriptional gene silencing in plants. J. Cell Sci. 114:3083-3091[Abstract/Free Full Text].

WANG, Z., J. C. MORRIS, M. E. DREW, and P. T. ENGLUND, 2000  Inhibition of Trypanosoma brucei gene expression by RNA interference using an integratable vector with opposing T7 promoters. J. Biol. Chem. 275:40174-40179[Abstract/Free Full Text].

WIANNY, F. and M. ZERNICKA-GOETZ, 2000  Specific interference with gene function by double-stranded RNA in early mouse development. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:70-75[Medline].

WICKES, B. L., and J. C. EDMAN, 1994 Development of a transformation system for Cryptococcus neoformans, pp. 309–313 in Molecular Biology of Pathogenic Fungi: A Laboratory Manual, edited by B. MARESCA and G. C. KOBAYASHI. Telos Press, New York.

WICKES, B. L., U. EDMAN, and J. C. EDMAN, 1997  The Cryptococcus neoformans STE12alpha gene: a putative Saccharomyces cerevisiae STE12 homologue that is mating type specific. Mol. Microbiol. 26:950-960.

WILLIAMS, B. R., 1999  PKR; a sentinel kinase for cellular stress. Oncogene 18:6112-6120[Medline].

ZAMORE, P. D., T. TUSCHL, P. A. SHARP, and D. P. BARTEL, 2000  RNAi: double-stranded RNA directs the ATP-dependent cleavage of mRNA at 21–23 nucleotide intervals. Cell 101:23-33[Medline].




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
T. M. Hammond, J. W. Bok, M. D. Andrewski, Y. Reyes-Dominguez, C. Scazzocchio, and N. P. Keller
RNA Silencing Gene Truncation in the Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus nidulans
Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2008; 7(2): 339 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
T. Krajaejun, G. M. Gauthier, C. A. Rappleye, T. D. Sullivan, and B. S. Klein
Development and Application of a Green Fluorescent Protein Sentinel System for Identification of RNA Interference in Blastomyces dermatitidis Illuminates the Role of Septin in Morphogenesis and Sporulation
Eukaryot. Cell, August 1, 2007; 6(8): 1299 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
T. R. Cottrell, C. L. Griffith, H. Liu, A. A. Nenninger, and T. L. Doering
The Pathogenic Fungus Cryptococcus neoformans Expresses Two Functional GDP-Mannose Transporters with Distinct Expression Patterns and Roles in Capsule Synthesis
Eukaryot. Cell, May 1, 2007; 6(5): 776 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
D. Janus, B. Hoff, E. Hofmann, and U. Kuck
An Efficient Fungal RNA-Silencing System Using the DsRed Reporter Gene
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2007; 73(3): 962 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
M. A. Walti, C. Villalba, R. M. Buser, A. Grunler, M. Aebi, and M. Kunzler
Targeted Gene Silencing in the Model Mushroom Coprinopsis cinerea (Coprinus cinereus) by Expression of Homologous Hairpin RNAs.
Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2006; 5(4): 732 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
S. H. Namekawa, K. Iwabata, H. Sugawara, F. N. Hamada, A. Koshiyama, H. Chiku, T. Kamada, and K. Sakaguchi
Knockdown of LIM15/DMC1 in the mushroom Coprinus cinereus by double-stranded RNA-mediated gene silencing
Microbiology, November 1, 2005; 151(11): 3669 - 3678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
K. Nielsen, G. M. Cox, A. P. Litvintseva, E. Mylonakis, S. D. Malliaris, D. K. Benjamin Jr., S. S. Giles, T. G. Mitchell, A. Casadevall, J. R. Perfect, et al.
Cryptococcus neoformans {alpha} Strains Preferentially Disseminate to the Central Nervous System during Coinfection
Infect. Immun., August 1, 2005; 73(8): 4922 - 4933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
U. Sommer, H. Liu, and T. L. Doering
An {alpha}-1,3-Mannosyltransferase of Cryptococcus neoformans
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2003; 278(48): 47724 - 47730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
I. Bose, A. J. Reese, J. J. Ory, G. Janbon, and T. L. Doering
A Yeast under Cover: the Capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans
Eukaryot. Cell, August 1, 2003; 2(4): 655 - 663.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. P. Coller, J. M. Mansfield, and D. M. Paulnock
Glycosylinositolphosphate Soluble Variant Surface Glycoprotein Inhibits IFN-{gamma}-Induced Nitric Oxide Production Via Reduction in STAT1 Phosphorylation in African Trypanosomiasis
J. Immunol., August 1, 2003; 171(3): 1466 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
P. T. Magee, C. Gale, J. Berman, and D. Davis
Molecular Genetic and Genomic Approaches to the Study of Medically Important Fungi
Infect. Immun., May 1, 2003; 71(5): 2299 - 2309.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
R. C. Davidson, J. R. Blankenship, P. R. Kraus, M. de Jesus Berrios, C. M. Hull, C. D'Souza, P. Wang, and J. Heitman
A PCR-based strategy to generate integrative targeting alleles with large regions of homology
Microbiology, August 1, 2002; 148(8): 2607 - 2615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]