- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Saleem, M.
- Articles by Nevo, E.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Saleem, M.
- Articles by Nevo, E.
Inherited Differences in Crossing Over and Gene Conversion Frequencies Between Wild Strains of Sordaria fimicola From "Evolution Canyon"
Muhammad Saleem1,a, Bernard C. Lamba, and Eviatar Nevoba Biology Department, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
b Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel
Corresponding author: Bernard C. Lamb, Biology Department, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom., b.lamb{at}ic.ac.uk (E-mail)
Communicating editor: M. K. UYENOYAMA
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Recombination generates new combinations of existing genetic variation and therefore may be important in adaptation and evolution. We investigated whether there was natural genetic variation for recombination frequencies and whether any such variation was environment related and possibly adaptive. Crossing over and gene conversion frequencies often differed significantly in a consistent direction between wild strains of the fungus Sordaria fimicola isolated from a harsher or a milder microscale environment in "Evolution Canyon," Israel. First- and second-generation descendants from selfing the original strains from the harsher, more variable, south-facing slope had higher frequencies of crossing over in locus-centromere intervals and of gene conversion than those from the lusher north-facing slopes. There were some significant differences between strains within slopes, but these were less marked than between slopes. Such inherited variation could provide a basis for natural selection for optimum recombination frequencies in each environment. There were no significant differences in meiotic hybrid DNA correction frequencies between strains from the different slopes. The conversion analysis was made using only conversions to wild type, because estimations of conversion to mutant were affected by a high frequency of spontaneous mutation. There was no polarized segregation of chromosomes at meiosis I or of chromatids at meiosis II.
TO understand biodiversity, adaptation, and evolution, one must explore the causes of variation and the controls of processes causing genetic variation. Most natural inherited variation arises through mutation and recombination, and ![]()
Our aims were to see whether there were significant differences in recombination properties between the strains overall, between strains from the two different slopes (SFS and NFS), or between strains from the same slope; to determine whether two different aspects of recombinationcrossing over in the gene-centromere intervals and gene conversionshowed similar or different changes between strains; and to see whether recombination differences were consistent in amount and direction for different intervals (crossing over) or for different mutation sites (gene conversion). We were particularly interested in whether any differences were environment related and possibly adaptive. The working hypothesis was that the harsher, more changeable, and more diverse SFS environment might favor processes increasing genetic variation, including a higher mutation rate and more recombination through crossing over and/or gene conversion, compared with the milder NFS environment. Our mutation studies (![]()
![]()
The large samples of ordered octads needed for the recombination studies provided extensive data on whether there was polarized segregation (![]()
![]()
The south-facing slope of Evolution Canyon, Lower Mount Carmel, Israel, bears African and Asian xeric tropical species, has up to 300% more solar radiation (the total solar radiation on a horizontal surface at the site is 700725 gram-calories per square centimeter per day), and is warmer, drier, more fluctuating, and more heterogeneous than the lush "temperate European" north-facing slope, with only 100400 m between the slopes (see ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
16 known loci for ascospore pigmentation (CATALOGUE OF STRAINS 1996) in Olive's strains in several linkage groups, but strains of different origin are often not interfertile, so it is difficult to compare mutations from different strains. We crossed our Evolution Canyon strains to Olive's strains but they were not interfertile (![]()
The wild isolates were obtained vegetatively, not from ascospores, and were subcultured as little as possible, using large inocula to minimize genetic drift. From the SFS, S1 was isolated from dung near the top, S2 from dung near the middle, and S3 from soil near the bottom. From the NFS, N5 was isolated from soil near the bottom, N6 from soil near the middle, and N7 from dung near the top. Selfed generation 1 strains were isolated by germinating black ascospores from the original wild-type strains, and selfed generation 2 strains were obtained from selfed generation 1 black ascospores. Because there can be some effects of premeiotic conditions (such as temperature) on recombination at meiosis in Sordaria (![]()
For comprehensive reviews of stress and evolution, see ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Isolation of strains:
Strains were isolated between August 1994 and February 1995; see ![]()
Procedures, strains, and controls:
Crosses were made at 17.5° in the light by inoculation of one strain in the center (selfing), or two strains on opposite sides, of 9-cm petri dishes of minimal medium (![]()
![]()
|
|
|
|
Each ascospore color mutant, obtained from an original SFS or NFS wild strain, was crossed to different strains that were wild type for spore color, two derived from SFS strains and two from NFS strains. Perithecia were dissected in 2 M sucrose solution to display the linear ordered octads. The six ordered tetrad classes (numbered as in ![]()
Estimation of crossing over:
Crossing over was measured in gene-centromere intervals from the percentage of asci showing second-division segregation patterns; scoring was visual under the microscope. Centromere distances in centimorgans are half the percentage of asci with second division segregation (DS) in crosses of mutant (m) x wild type (+). Interpreting differences in the percentage of asci with second division segregation in terms of differences in crossing-over frequencies in the gene-centromere interval is complicated because of the upper limit of 66.7% on the percentage of second DS. Differences in percentage of second DS will be less than the differences in crossing-over frequency, especially for loci far from their centromeres.
Estimation of gene conversion properties:
Gene conversion was studied from the visually observed frequencies of asci with particular non-4+:4m segregations in + x m crosses. Conversion direction (measured by the percentage of conversion asci with conversion to wild type, out of all conversion ratio asci) and a measure of correction inefficiency from hybrid DNA (the percentage of conversion asci with postmeiotic segregation among conversions to wild type) were determined to test whether hybrid DNA correction was affected as well as conversion initiation. Correction direction was measured by (8:0 + 7:1 + 6:2 + 5:3) x 100/(8:0 + 7:1 + 6:2 + 5:3 + 3:5 + 2:6 + 1:7 + 0:8), where each octad ratio is given as + (black ascospore):m (color mutant ascospore). Correction inefficiency in asci with conversion to wild type was measured by (7:1 + 5:3) x 100/(8:0 + 7:1 + 6:2 + 5:3). When controls for spontaneous mutation to ascospore color mutants (![]()
Changing the percentages of second division segregation into map distances based on calculated crossover frequencies:
If there is no chromosome interference or chromatid (strand) interference, then the expected upper limit for percentage second division segregation is 66.7% (see ![]()
(1 - e-3x), where yt is the observed fraction of second division segregations or of tetratype segregations, and x is the map units/100 (see ![]()
![]()
![]()
Mapping:
Recombination frequencies for mapping ascospore color mutants were obtained from the numbers of parental ditype, nonparental ditype, and tetratype asci from repulsion-phase dihybrid crosses, with
800 asci per cross. Allelism is extremely difficult to determine for closely linked ascospore color mutations, which are expressed only in haploid ascospores, as the cis/trans test needs diploids or partial diploids. The 11 color mutants are therefore known by their strain designations rather than by locus designations.
Nomenclature of strains and mutations:
S is for a strain used by Saleem, followed by R for black ascospores, or by w (white), lg (light gray), or g (gray) for ascospore color mutations, then a number for the octad, a full stop, and a number for the spore within the octad from which the strain was isolated. Thus, strain Slg60.3 is a strain of Saleem with light gray ascospores, from octad 60, ascospore 3, obtained when new mutants were being isolated from an original wild-type strain (S2); the tables carry the information that this is a selfed generation 1 strain from the original S2 wild strain and so is of SFS ancestry.
Statistical tests:
At the suggestion of an anonymous referee, for the significant values of
2, the usual probability values of 0.05 and 0.01 have been divided by the number of tests in each table, to make the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests. For example, in Table 1 and Table 2, with 10 tests each, the level required for a significant difference (*) is P = 0.005 instead of 0.05, and P = 0.001 instead of 0.01 for a highly significant difference (**). The two-tailed test of equal binomial proportions was also carried out, but the significance results were so similar to the
2 results that they are not given here.
Another approach used was the analysis of deviance (![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 show the results for six color mutations from SFS strains and for five from NFS strains, with each mutation crossed to two selfed generation 1 or 2 SFS wild types (i.e., two strains of wild-type genotype for spore color, derived from an original SFS strain by selfing) and to two selfed generation 1 or 2 NFS wild types. For the four or more replicates or repeats of each cross, there was generally good agreement for the percentage of second DS and for gene conversion frequencies, with no more significant differences than expected by chance. Agreement between replicates was better than in the corresponding mutation work (![]()
Controls for crossing-over experiments: absence of polarized segregation, spindle overlap, and differential dehiscence biases:
As shown in Table 3, the two first division classes for ordered octads generally showed the expected 1:1 ratio and the four second division classes generally showed the expected 1:1:1:1 ratio. There was no consistent trend for class I > class II nor for class V > class VI and class IV > class III, so there was no genuine polarized segregation and no apparent polarized segregation that would have indicated preferential dehiscence of certain octad classes with possible bias in the percentage of second DS (![]()
![]()
![]()
Crossing over: between-slope differences between wild-type strains:
Table 1 shows the percentage second division segregation pooled for crosses of color mutants to two SFS wild types and pooled for crosses to two NFS wild types. For all six SFS mutations, and for all four NFS color mutations that were fertile with NFS and SFS wild types, there were completely consistent, highly significant differences, with the crosses to SFS wild types always (10 cases) giving a higher percentage of second DS than crosses of the same mutation to NFS wild types.
The magnitude of the between-slope differences varied for different mutations, being greatest for Sw92.1, where the difference between 49.5% second DS in crosses to NFS wild types and 62.0% in crosses to SFS wild types is proportionately larger when these values are converted to 45.1 and 88.8 map units, respectively, if there is no chromosome interference. In S. fimicola, ![]()
![]()
By what proportion did the frequency of crossing over increase in crosses to SFS wild types compared to crosses to NFS wild types? Table 1 shows the centromere distances in calculated map units (MU, calculated by allowing mathematically for nondetection of certain crossovers in double or multiple crossovers) for each mutation in pooled cross-values under two conditions: no chromosome or chromatid interference (k = 1) or with strong positive chromosome interference within chromosome arms at a level common in Neurospora crassa and Drosophila melanogaster; k = 0.2. See ![]()
83.5 for loci far from their centromere. Using the standard formula, centromere distance in centimorgans equals second DS/2 and is equivalent to assuming that k = 0, complete positive chromosome interference.
With no chromatid interference, the proportional increase in crossing over (measured by changes in the calculated mutation-to-centromere map distances) in crosses to SFS wild types compared with crosses to NFS wild types varied from <10%, e.g., from 45.3 to 49.6 MU for Sw24.3, to >100%, e.g., from 102 to 242.2 MU for Sw67.1. With positive interference, the calculated proportional changes are smaller. Whatever the level of interference, the direction of the between-slope difference was absolutely consistent, with significantly more crossing over in crosses to SFS wild types than to NFS wild types.
Crossing over: within-slope differences between wild-type strains:
For crossing over in the locus-centromere intervals, there were some highly significant between-strain differences within slopes when using selfed generation 1-derived wild types (the majority of cases) or selfed generation 2-derived wild types (for crosses of color mutation Sw67.1). One can therefore conclude that there are genetic differences for recombination control genes between some SFS strains, e.g., between SR2.3 (from original strain S3) and SR4.2 (from original strain S2) and between some NFS strains. These within-slope differences can be attributed to genetic differences between the different original isolates obtained from the wild in Evolution Canyon, e.g., between S2 and S3, inherited by selfed generation 1 and 2 strains obtained from self-fertilized perithecia.
For the six south-facing slope color mutations, results were very diverse. Four mutations showed no significant differences between crosses to two different SFS wild types, and two showed significant differences. For the same six SFS mutations in crosses to two different NFS wild types, three showed no significant differences and three showed highly significant differences. For the five north-facing slope color mutations in crosses to two different SFS wild types, four showed no significant differences and one was not fertile. For the same five NFS color mutations in crosses to two different NFS wild types, four showed no significant differences and one showed a highly significant difference.
From Table 3 it can be seen that selfed generation 1 strains SR1.4 and SR5.3, respectively, derived from original wild strains N5 and N7, gave highly significant differences in the percentage of second DS with three out of four of the color mutations to which they were crossed. Each time, SR1.4 gave higher values than did SR5.3, showing a consistent within-slope difference in crossing over. Selfed generation 1 strains SR2.3 and SR4.2, derived, respectively, from original wild strains S3 and S2, gave a highly significant difference in the percentage of second DS with Sw24.3, but not with three other color mutants (Sw18.2, Slg60.3, and Sw92.1), although the genetic intervals overlap. There could therefore be some degree of separate control for different linked loci, even for Sw18.2 and Sw24.3, which are only 2.1 cM apart, in their different responses to two SFS wild types, SR2.3 and SR4.2.
In the case of SFS color mutations, where there were significant within-slope differences, S3-derived wild types twice gave higher values than S2-derived wild types; N5-derived wild types gave a higher percentage of second DS than N7-derived wild types in all three cases. For the NFS color mutation with a significant within-slope difference, the N5-derived wild type gave a higher value than the N7-derived wild type. The significant within-slope differences were thus consistent in direction.
Gene conversion: controls for new ascospore color mutations, reversions to wild type, and phenocopies:
Spontaneous reversions from spore color mutations to black wild-type ascospores were not found for any mutations in samples for each mutant of
20,000 asci from selfed perithecia, so asci with apparent conversion to wild type were genuine, especially as phenocopies were not found (see below). In samples of >38,000 asci, each from selfed wild-type strains of selfed generation 1 (the same generation as that used in the recombination experiments), asci with four black:four nonblack ascospores occurred with frequencies of 0.66% (for strain N7), 0.84% (N5), 1.71% (S1), and 2.06% (S3; ![]()
The classes affected by mutations to mutant in the + x m crosses are the 2+:6m and 0+:8m patterns, with lesser effects on the 4+:4m patterns. The effects on different ascal classes depend on whether the new mutation arose in the wild type or in the known color mutant strain and whether the new mutation is linked to the known one and on the centromere distances of the two mutations. Comparisons between strains for conversion frequency are therefore based here entirely on conversions to wild type, because these were unbiased by mutation or reversion. Other measures, such as apparent overall conversion frequencies, are given for completeness in Table 4, but are not discussed. The important unbiased measure, the frequency of conversion to wild type, is given in boldface type in Table 4.
Ascospores from >100 asci with gene conversion patterns were isolated, germinated, and allowed to self-fertilize to test for phenocopies such as black spores that were genotypically color mutant, e.g., in a 6 black:2 mutant octad, or for color mutant spores that were genotypically wild type, e.g., in a 2 black:6 color mutant octad. That is, we tested for false gene conversions caused by phenocopies, but found none.
Conversion analysis based only on unbiased conversions to wild type: between-slope differences in conversion frequency:
Of 10 between-slope comparisons in pooled data in Table 2, six had highly significant differences, always with the crosses to the SFS wild type giving higher conversion frequencies than crosses to NFS strains, and four had no significant differences.
The magnitude of the significant between-slope differences varied for different mutants, being greatest at 2.3-fold for Sg4.3 and least at 1.3-fold for Sw41.3, but as explained in the DISCUSSION, the genetic differences are underestimated by a factor of 2. Conversion frequencies therefore follow a very similar pattern of between-slope differences as for the percentage of second DS, with SFS wild types giving higher values than NFS wild types.
There was also an effect of the color mutant strain on conversion frequencies to wild type, which were generally higher in color mutants from SFS strains (average 1.24% in crosses to SFS wild types, 0.94% in crosses to NFS wild types) than those from NFS strains (0.69% in crosses to SFS wild types, 0.52% in crosses to NFS wild types); these figures include all color mutants, not just those showing significant differences. Crosses of SFS-derived color mutations averaged 1.09% conversion to wild type, compared to 0.61% for crosses of NFS-derived color mutations, a 1.8-fold difference for SFS/NFS. This is higher than the 1.32-fold difference for SFS color mutants crossed to SFS vs. NFS wild types and the 1.33-fold difference for NFS color mutations crossed to SFS vs. NFS wild types.
Conversion analysis based only on unbiased conversions to wild-type: within-slope differences:
Of 21 cases in which a color mutant was crossed to two different SFS wild types or to two different NFS wild types, three cases gave significant or highly significant within-slope heterogeneity, but differences were not significant in the other 18 cases (Table 4). All three significant cases had higher frequencies of conversion to wild type in the cross to the S3-derived wild type rather than to the S2-derived one.
Analysis of deviance results for percentage of second division segregation and the frequency of conversion to wild type:
Table 5 shows the results of this analysis. Dramatic decreases in deviance, and hence increases in goodness of fit, were achieved by incorporating more terms into the model. The best-fitting models (4, 6, and 7) include differences between mutations and between slopes and/or origin interactions involving slopes (see Table 5). The best-fitting model tried, model 7, includes differences between mutations and slopes and different mutation/slope interactions for each mutation. Checks of residuals and fitted values revealed that the best model represented a good fit to the data. The analysis of deviance results therefore agree with the
2 and equal binomial proportions test results in showing differences in recombination properties between strains from different slopes.
|
The frequency of asci with conversion to wild type that have postmeiotic segregation:
There were no significant differences for this character between strains from the two different slopes (Table 2). As expected, there were clear differences in this measure between different color mutants, ranging from 41 to 58%, as different heterozygous mutations had different levels of correction of hybrid DNA, but they were not dependent on which wild-type strain the mutant was crossed to, nor on whether the color mutant was in a SFS or NFS strain.
Mapping:
The results (Fig 1), with recombination distances between mutations of 0.010.1 cM for 9 of the 11 mutations, and some larger distances for the remaining 2, showed that a number of different ascospore color loci were involved, although the mutations cannot be assigned to distinct loci because the standard cis/trans allelism test is not possible in haploid ascospores. No rigid genetic distance would conclusively define 2 mutations as being alleles or nonalleles, but 2 mutations are increasingly likely to be at different loci as they get farther apart. Mutations 0.1 cM apart could be alleles or in adjacent loci, but 2 mutations
5 cM apart are most unlikely to be alleles: Sw17.2 and Sw67.1 are 8.8 cM apart (see Fig 1) and so are presumably at different loci, leading to the conclusion that a number of different loci must be involved. Sw18.2 and Slg14.3 showed no recombination in >700 asci and so may well be alleles. They are definitely different mutations as they were isolated independently, one from a SFS strain and one from a NFS strain, and they differed in phenotype, one being white and the other being light gray, which allowed crossed perithecia to be identified from selfed ones for mapping in the cross between them. If both had been white, that would have been very difficult.
|
All 11 mutants tested were in the same linkage group, which was unexpected because spore color loci occur in several different linkage groups in Olive's strains (CATALOGUE OF STRAINS 1996). Any loci for which color mutants give poor ascospore germination would be scored in the mutation work but would be underrepresented in mapping, crossing over, and gene conversion data, as isolation of color mutant strains requires ascospore germination. From Fig 1, the additivity can be seen to be very good, with no major map expansion or contraction effects with increasing distance. Mutations from the original SFS and NFS wild-type strains were intermingled on the map.
Crosses with Olive's strains:
A range of wild-type selfed generation 1 and two strains from S1, S3, N5, and N7 were crossed to Olive's spore color mutant strains such as C7 hyaline and gray, and Olive's wild-type strains were crossed to spore color mutant strains from Evolution Canyon. Although various crossing methods were tried, including inoculating strains on opposite sides of petri dishes, inoculating them together at the side of the dish, and inoculating them on solid medium after growing them together as hyphal fragments in liquid crossing medium, no crossed perithecia were found, even from very self-fertile strains.
In which regions of the chromosome are the changes in recombination occurring?
In Table 1 and Table 2, the color mutants are listed in map order, going away from the centromere (see Fig 1). There is a gap of
23 cM between the centromere and the most proximal site and then most mutations are within 10 cM of the most proximal site, Sw17.2. Any change in crossover frequency in the interval between the centromere and the most proximal site would affect that site and all sites distal to it: all sites showed significant between-slope differences, with more crossing over in crosses to SFS strains than to NFS strains. If there were also parallel differences in crossing over within the
10 cM region within which most sites occurred, the more distal sites should show proportionally larger changes in crossover frequency than the more proximal sites. Unfortunately, because of the maximum theoretical value of 66.7% second DS, having proportionally more crossing over between a distal site and the centromere would not show as a proportionally greater change in percentage of second DS compared with changes for a more proximal site. In Table 1, if one takes the centromere distance in map units with no interference, instead of as percentage of second DS, then the proportional changes in crossing over between SFS and NFS strains in successive intervals going away from the centromere are 1.1, 1.1, 2.0, 1.2, and 2.4 for SFS color mutants and 1.2, 1.2, 1.2, and 1.5 for NFS color mutants, with some indication of larger changes for more distal sites.
The best evidence on regions of change in recombination between slopes comes from the unbiased results on gene conversion to wild type (Table 2), which are unaffected by theoretical upper limit problems and unaffected by the problem of having some intervals in common. For SFS color mutations, sites with highly significant between-slope conversion differences were proximal, medial, and distal, with the largest proportional change being for the most distal site. For NFS color mutants, the two proximal sites showed highly significant between-slope differences, but the two distal sites did not. Taking the crossing over and conversion data together, the changes in recombination are seen to have occurred in proximal, medial, and distal regions of the chromosome, not just in any one region such as the immediately centromeric region, but more data are needed to test whether these different regions differed in the amount of change.
Were any of the original strains from the wild (S1, S2, S3, N5, N6, N7) heterokaryotic for recombination control factors?
If there were genetic heterogeneity for recombination-control genes within single colonies obtained as multinucleate, haploid, and possibly heterokaryotic vegetative cultures from the wild, it would show up as differences in recombination between different selfed generation 1 strains derived from the same wild type, e.g., selfed generation 1 wild types SR2.3 and SR10.2, which were obtained from different asci from selfed perithecia from original wild strain S3. In the present work, color mutants were always crossed to wild types derived from different original strains, but the different selfed generation 1 color mutants derived from the same original wild isolate provide examples of strains that could differ in any recombination-control genes heterokaryotic within their original wild strain. For example, all five north-slope color mutants used came from original strain N5, and Sw18.2, Sw24.3, and Slg60.3 all came from S3. The fact that, for percentage of second DS, Sw18.2 showed no differences when crossed to SR2.3 and SR4.2, while Sw24.3 showed highly significant differences in the two crosses, could well be due to different alleles for recombination controls in the two color mutants, rather than to separate controls for different intervals, especially as those two mutations share most of their locus-centromere intervals. It therefore seems likely that there was heterokaryosis for different recombination-control alleles in one original strain from the wild, S3. The nuclear ratios in the heterokaryons for the different recombination control types would determine how often the different selfed generation 1 strains from the same original strain showed differences for recombination measures.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Magnitude of recombination effects:
The genetic differences for recombination controls between two strains (e.g., two wild types) are twice as great as measured from their crosses to a common tester strain (e.g., an ascospore color mutant) because the tested strain provides only half the genes in the diploid fusion nucleus that undergoes meiosis in these crosses. This underestimation factor of two applies to crossing over and to gene conversion and could be affected by the dominance relations of control factor alleles.
Crossing over in the locus-centromere intervals:
The biggest and most consistent differences for percentage of second DS were between slopes, not within slopes. For Sw92.1, for example, within-slope differences were 61.4 vs. 62.7% second DS for SFS wild types and 47.1 vs. 52.1% for NFS wild types, but the between-slope difference was 62.0% for SFS vs. 49.5% for NFS strains. Both types of difference, within-slope and between slope, must have a genetic basis from genes controlling crossing-over frequencies, as all selfed generation 1 and 2 strains were raised and crossed in the same lab constant environment.
The percentage of second DS for mutations isolated from SFS strains was generally higher (average, 60.0% in crosses to SFS wild types, 56.0% in crosses to NFS wild types) than those from NFS strains (55.5% in crosses to SFS wild types, 54.2% in crosses to NFS wild types), although their sites are intermingled along the chromosome. This fits with recombination-controlling gene differences between SFS and NFS color mutation strains, as well as between the SFS and NFS wild types, as might be expected.The percentage of second DS for some loci could be of some survival value, as the ascospores from a single meiosis usually dehisce in a compact group and so often land on the same substrate. If several spores germinate together, they could form vegetative heterokaryons, with possibly beneficial interactions (e.g., heterosis) between different alleles at the same locus. One often observes incompletely dehisced asci (![]()
Gene conversion:
The best estimate of overall between-slope differences in conversion to wild type comes from comparing SFS color mutations x SFS wild types with NFS color mutations x NFS wild types, where the 1.24 vs. 0.52%, respectively, gives a 2.4-fold difference based on very large sample sizes (Table 2 and Table 4). One cannot repeat these calculations to get a comparable estimate for crossing over, because of the already described problem of changing the percentage of second DS into crossover units, but the direction of change was the same.
Genetics of the recombination-control factors:
The data do not allow an estimate of the number of different recombination-control factors. Taking average values for conversion to wild type over all mutations studied, for different types of cross with respect to different slopes, we get SFS + x SFS m, 1.24%; SFS + x NFS m, 0.69%; NFS + x SFS m, 0.94%; NFS + x NFS m, 0.52%. With SFS x SFS giving the highest conversion frequencies, NFS x NFS giving the lowest values, and SFS x NFS giving intermediate values, additive action or partial dominance is seen, not complete dominance. While there could be complete dominance for some recombination factors and additive action for others, these results fit an overall pattern of additive action in the diploid ascus cell undergoing meiosis. It is more difficult to do a comparable test for additive action for percentage of second DS, because three mutations from SFS strains are in the group farthest from the centromere, with only one from NFS strains (Fig 1). Average percentages of second DS values were 60.0% for SFS + x SFS m, 54.2% for NFS + x NFS m, 55.5% for SFS + x NFS m, and 56.0% for NFS + x SFS m. The results are compatible with overall additive action.
General discussion:
As the recombination differences were found under constant lab conditions between strains in both selfed generations 1 and 2, none of which had been exposed to growth in Evolution Canyon, they were heritable. Although the results for conversion and crossing over were not identical, they were sufficiently similar, especially in direction, for the main between-slope differences for these two different aspects of recombination to have been caused largely by the same genetic controls. The results for centromere interval crossing over and gene conversion fitted the working hypothesis very well, with more recombination in the strains from the harsher, more stressful, and more varied south-facing slope than in strains from the lusher north-facing slope.
The percentage of conversion asci with postmeiotic segregation among conversions to wild type was looked at because the mispair or nonpair correction enzymes for hDNA in recombination might be related to those involved in repair of premutational lesions involved in mutation. ![]()
There were some recombination differences between strains from the same slope, but the between-slope differences were much more consistent and usually larger. There was evidence that one strain isolated from the wild was heterokaryotic for recombination control factors, but the experiments were not set up to test that rigorously. The fact that genetic heterogeneity for recombination has been found between strains in testing only a few isolates from the wild suggests the presence of a large amount of genetic variation in the wild for genes controlling recombination frequencies. Selection could act on that variation to give optimum levels for this variation-generating process in any particular environment. See ![]()
There are no asexual reproductive propagules for dispersal in S. fimicola, and the ascospores usually dehisce over distances of less than a meter (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The value to an organism of being able to adapt its recombination frequencies to its environment, either by mutational changes in recombination controls or by physiological adaptation (e.g., genetically predetermined responses of recombination frequencies to temperature effects), is limited by the following considerations. Recombination controls are irrelevant to nonsyntenic loci and to syntenic loci so far apart that they show 50% recombination. They are also irrelevant unless two syntenic loci are both heterozygous, as crossing over has no effect on allele arrangements where only one locus is heterozygous. The only cases where changing crossover frequencies will have any effect are where two or more syntenic loci are all heterozygous and are not so far apart as to show independent assortment.
Because S. fimicola is homothallic and self-fertile with no mating types, manyprobably mostperithecia from sexual reproduction in the wild will be selfed, when all chromosomes are homozygous in the diploid fusion nucleus, and recombination frequencies from independent assortment, crossing over, and gene conversion are irrelevant. Recombination frequency importance is possible only for syntenic loci in crossed perithecia. As there are no gametes, getting crossed perithecia depends on getting colonies that are heterokaryotic from vegetative fusion of genetically different colonies, or if colonies have become heterokaryotic through internal mutation. There are several well-established genetic systems controlling recombination in heterothallic fungi such as A. immersus and N. crassa (e.g., see ![]()
The present correlation between an organism's recombination frequencies and its different environments supports the idea that recombination between loci can be beneficial for survival. Crossing over produces new variants that may be able to colonize new habitats or be more successful in the existing environment or respond to a changing environment, but many new variants will be less successful than an already well-adapted parent, especially if there are clusters of co-adapted genes. Both reciprocal crossing over and nonreciprocal gene conversion can produce new alleles in a doubly heterozygous locus, e.g., giving 1-, 2- and/or 1+, 2+ from 1-, 2+/1+, 2-. The functions of recombination include the production of new alleles as well as new combinations of existing alleles at different loci.
The recombination differences between strains from the south- and north-facing slopes may have a selective value in adapting the strains to their particular microscale environment, with more recombination in the harsher, more variable, and fluctuating environment where more variation may assist survival even if many variants are less successful than their parents. The results agree well with other findings from Evolution Canyon, especially those of ![]()
![]()
![]()
The between-slope differences were clear and completely consistent in direction, affecting a number of different gene intervals in crossing-over and mutational sites in gene conversion. The within-slope differences were sometimes significant, sometimes not, and were not consistent in direction, so it is not worth speculating on possible ecological factors involved in within-slope differences. Finding recombination-control differences between the descendants of just four original wild-type strains (S2, S3, N5, and N7) suggests that genetic differences for recombination are very frequent in Sordaria in wild strains.
In locusts, BUGROV and VYSOTSKYA (1988) found that species with large variations in recombination (chiasma frequency) were ecologically flexible and less specialized, while species with stable chiasma frequencies occupied narrow ecological niches. There therefore seems to be selection on recombination variability as well as for particular recombination levels in particular circumstances. The efficiency of recombination as a source of variability depends on the organism's breeding system, life cycle duration, ploidy level, and chromosome numbers, as well as on crossover frequency and distribution, and on their genetic and environmental variation (![]()
![]()
The genetic control of gene conversion may be partly related to the control of crossing over, as the same initiating mechanisms are probably responsible for both processes. There could also be a different selection for particular levels of gene conversion, as conversion can have several different roles, including recombination of alleles within genes if they do not co-convert. Biased gene conversion (say with conversion favoring the wild-type allele in some cases or the mutant allele in other cases; see ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Genetic variation in a population is reduced by stabilizing and directional selection, and by genetic drift, and is increased by mutation and recombination. In fungi like Sordaria with haploid vegetative stages and haploid sexual spores, selection against deleterious recessives is much stronger than in diploids where they are protected in heterozygotes. Similarly, the concept of additive genetic variation does not really apply in haploids, although aspects of dominance do apply to recombination controls in the diploid fusion nucleus that undergoes meiosis.
S. fimicola has overlapping generations, vegetative reproduction by haploid growth and fragmentation of colonies, and sexual reproduction by ascospores from selfed or crossed perithecia, being homothallic but capable of crossing with other strains. Because of its colonial nature, fragmentation, different survival bodies (ascospores, perithecia, and hyphae), and hyphal fusions between different colonies, one cannot easily define an individual or estimate the number of individuals in a population, with populations not being discrete. On dung, the fungus usually appears as part of a succession of different genera, not independently (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In the natural Evolution Canyon environment, there are large diurnal fluctuations in temperature, especially on the SFS, as well as seasonal fluctuations. The effects on recombination of fluctuating temperature, as opposed to different constant temperatures, have rarely been studied. ![]()
5° and
22° every 24 hr. The percentage of second DS and conversion frequencies for gray were within the range of those obtained by continuous incubation at 10° (the lowest continuous temperature for fertility) and 22.5°, but the conversion frequency for hyaline was the lowest recorded. Transfers of crosses at different stages of development between two constant temperatures sometimes gave percentages of second DS values significantly outside the range of the two constant values and also showed that recombination is sensitive to temperature at premeiotic stages, as well as during meiosis.
It could be argued that on the milder, more populated, and more uniform NFS, biological competition between species might be more intense than on the harsher, more variable SFS, where survival might be more of a struggle against extinction from physical factors, so that genetic variation might be valuable in both environments. Genetic variation is produced in both environments, from mutation and recombination, both of which produce loads on fitness if the parents are well adapted. It would be harder, however, to have a single ideal strain on the SFS, which is much more varied and patchy, than on the NFS. Our data do not distinguish between the effects of greater stress on the SFS than on the NFS and the effects of more patchiness and variability, but they do show very consistent differences between strains and slopes in inherited recombination controls, with more recombination in SFS strains.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
There was heritable genetic variation in recombination between the original S. fimicola wild strains, as shown by the observed differences in crossing over and gene conversion between selfed generation 1 and 2 strains derived from four of them, S2, S3, N5, and N7. There were differences within slopes and particularly between slopes, on which natural selection could act in adaptation. There were consistently higher recombination frequencies in strains from the harsher, more variable south-facing slope environment than in strains from the milder north-facing slope. Of the 20 recombination comparisons between SFS and NFS strains, 16 gave highly significant differences, always with higher values from the SFS strains. The consistency of the higher recombination from the SFS strains matched that found earlier (![]()
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Present address: Government College, Lahore, Pakistan. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank S. P. Wasser and I. Ellanskya for isolating the fungal strains, A. B. Korol for useful comments on the manuscript, D. A. Stephens for statistical help, and Z. Kozlakidis for making the crosses to Olive's strains. The work was partly supported by grants to E.N. from the Israeli Ministry of Science, the Israeli Discount Bank, and the Ancell-Teicher Research Foundation for Genetics and Molecular Evolution.
Manuscript received June 4, 2001; Accepted for publication September 10, 2001.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
BARRATT, R. W., D. NEWMEYER, D. D. PERKINS, and L. GARNJOBST, 1954 Map construction in Neurospora crassa.. Adv. Genet. 6:1-93[Medline].
BELL, G., 1982 The Masterpiece of Nature. The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. Croom Helm, London.
BUGROV, A. G., and L. V. VYSOTSKAYA, 1988 The frequency and localization of chiasmata as an index of species ecological specialization in locusts (Orthoptera, Acridae), pp. 5663, in Landscape Ecology of Insects, edited by G. S. ZOLOTARENKO. Nauka, Moscow.
CARLILE, M. J., and S. C. WATKINSON, 1994 The Fungi. Academic Press, London.
Fungal Genetics Stock Center. (1996) Fungal Genet. Newsl. 43(Suppl.):167-173.
CHARLESWORTH, B., 1993 Directional selection and the evolution of sex and recombination. Genet. Res. 61:205-224[Medline].
DERZHAVETS, E. M., A. B. KOROL, and E. NEVO, 1996 Increased male recombination rate in D. melanogaster correlated with population adaptation to stressful conditions. Dros. Inf. Serv. 77:1-2.
FISHER, R. A., 1930 The Genetic Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
HELMI, S. and B. C. LAMB, 1983 The interactions of three widely separated loci controlling conversion properties of w locus I in Ascobolus immersus. Genetics 104:23-40
HOFFMANN, A. A., and P. A. PARSONS, 1991 Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress. Oxford University Press, London.
HOSMER, D. W., and S. LEMESHOW, 2000 Applied Logistic Regression, Ed 2. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
HOULE, D., 1992 Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204[Abstract].
KITANI, Y. and L. S. OLIVE, 1967 Genetics of Sordaria fimicola. VI. Gene conversion at the g locus in mutant x wild-type crosses. Genetics 57:767-782
KOROL, A. B., I. A. PREYGEL and S. I. PREYGEL, 1994 Recombination Variability and Evolution. Chapman & Hall, London.
LAMB, B. C., 1966 Polarized segregation in Ascomycetes and the differential bursting of asci. Genet. Res. 7:169-183.
LAMB, B. C., 1967 The differential maturation of asci and its relevance to recombination studies of Neurospora, Sordaria and similar Ascomycetes. Genet. Res. 10:1-12[Medline].
LAMB, B. C., 1969a Related and unrelated changes in conversion and recombination frequencies with temperature in Sordaria fimicola, and their relevance to hybrid-DNA models of recombination. Genetics 62:67-78
LAMB, B. C., 1969b Evidence from Sordaria that recombination and conversion frequencies are partly determined before meiosis, and for a general model of the control of recombination frequencies. Genetics 63:807-820
LAMB, B. C., 1985a The relative importance of meiotic gene conversion, selection and mutation pressure, in population genetics and evolution. Genetica 67:39-49.
LAMB, B. C., 1985b The effects of mispair and non-pair correction in hybrid DNA on base ratios (G + C content) and total amounts of DNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2:39-49.
LAMB, B. C., 1986 Gene conversion disparity: factors influencing its direction and extent, with tests of assumptions and predictions in its evolutionary effects. Genetics 114:611-632
LAMB, B. C., 1988 The molecular origins of gene conversion disparity, and parameter interactions controlling its extent. Genet. (Life Sci. Adv.) 7:109-114.
LAMB, B. C., 1996 Ascomycete genetics: the part played by ascus segregation phenomena in our understanding of the mechanisms of recombination. Mycol. Res. 100:1025-1059.
LAMB, B. C., M. SALEEM, W. SCOTT, N. THAPA, and E. NEVO, 1998 Inherited and environmentally-induced differences in mutation frequencies between wild strains of Sordaria fimicola from "Evolution Canyon.". Genetics 149:87-99
LAMB, B. C., Z. KOZLAKIDIS, and M. SALEEM, 2000 Inter-strain cross-fertility tests on cultures from Israel, America and Canada in the homothallic fungus, Sordaria fimicola. Fungal Genet. Newsl. 47:69-71.
LANDE, R. and S. SHANNON, 1996 The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in a changing environment. Evolution 50:434-437.
NEVO, E., 1995 Asian, African and European biota meet at Evolution Canyon Israel: local tests of global biodiversity and genetic diversity patterns. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 262:149-155.
NEVO, E., 1997 Evolution in action across phylogeny caused by microclimatic stresses at Evolution Canyon. Theor. Popul. Biol. 52:231-243[Medline].
NEVO, E., A. P. TRAVLEEV, N. A. BELOVA, A. TSATSKIN, and T. PAVLI
et al., 1998 Edaphic interslope and valley bottom differences at Evolution Canyon, Lower Nahal Oren, Mount Carmel, Israel. Catena 33:241-254.
OLIVE, L. S., 1956 Genetics of Sordaria fimicola. I. Ascospore color mutants. Am. J. Bot. 43:97-107.
PARSONS, P. A., 1994 Habitats, stress and evolutionary rates. J. Evol. Biol. 7:387-397.
PERKINS, D. D., A. S. EL-ANI, L. S. OLIVE, and Y. KITANI, 1963 Interference between exchanges in tetrads of Sordaria fimicola.. Am. Nat. 47:249-252.
WEBSTER, J., 1980 Introduction to Fungi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
ZHUCHENKO, A. A., and A. B. KOROL, 1985 Recombination in Evolution and Breeding. Nuaka, Moscow.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|


