Multiple Regulators of Ty1 Transposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Have Conserved Roles in Genome Maintenance

Corresponding author: M. Joan Curcio, Molecular Genetics Program, SUNY, Wadsworth Ctr., P.O. Box 22002, Albany, NY 12201-2002., joan.curcio{at}wadsworth.org (E-mail)

Communicating editor: S. SANDMEYER

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Most Ty1 retrotransposons in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are transpositionally competent but rarely transpose. We screened yeast mutagenized by insertion of the mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 transposon for mutations that result in elevated Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility, which occurs by cDNA integration or recombination. Here, we describe the characterization of mTn3 insertions in 21 RTT (regulation of Ty1 transposition) genes that result in 5- to 111-fold increases in Ty1 mobility. These 21 RTT genes are EST2, RRM3, NUT2, RAD57, RRD2, RAD50, SGS1, TEL1, SAE2, MED1, MRE11, SCH9, KAP122, and 8 previously uncharacterized genes. Disruption of RTT genes did not significantly increase Ty1 RNA levels but did enhance Ty1 cDNA levels, suggesting that most RTT gene products act at a step after mRNA accumulation but before cDNA integration. The rtt mutations had widely varying effects on integration of Ty1 at preferred target sites. Mutations in RTT101 and NUT2 dramatically stimulated Ty1 integration upstream of tRNA genes. In contrast, a mutation in RRM3 increased Ty1 mobility >100-fold without increasing integration upstream of tRNA genes. The regulation of Ty1 transposition by components of fundamental pathways required for genome maintenance suggests that Ty1 and yeast have coevolved to link transpositional dormancy to the integrity of the genome.

LONG terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are eukaryotic mobile elements that resemble retroviral proviruses and transpose through an RNA intermediate. Integration of LTR retrotransposons into genomic DNA is a potential source of mutagenesis to the host cell. A selective advantage is therefore conferred upon a host that has evolved mechanisms to reduce the level of retrotransposition or its mutagenic effects. Ty1 retrotransposons in yeast exhibit transpositional dormancy, characterized by the collective inactivity of genetically functional elements. The majority of the 30 Ty1 elements in the haploid yeast genome is free of inactivating mutations and competent for transposition (CURCIO and GARFINKEL 1994 ; JORDAN and MCDONALD 1998 ; KIM et al. 1998 ). Moreover, Ty1 RNA is one of the most abundant mRNA species in yeast, contributing up to 0.8% of total RNA (CURCIO et al. 1990 ). Despite this, transposition occurs at a rate of only 10^-5–10^-7/element/generation (CURCIO and GARFINKEL 1991 ). Cytoplasmic virus-like particles (VLPs), in which Ty1 RNA is reverse-transcribed into cDNA, are difficult to detect in most laboratory strains, and there is less than one copy of Ty1 cDNA per cell (CONTE et al. 1998 ; LEE et al. 1998 ). These findings suggest that transpositional dormancy results from inhibition of one or more post-transcriptional steps in the Ty1 replication cycle. No intrinsic mechanisms of regulating Ty1 transposition have yet been described; however, host factors that inhibit Ty1 transposition at different post-transcriptional levels have been identified (PICOLOGLOU et al. 1990 ; CONTE et al. 1998 ; LEE et al. 1998 ; RATTRAY et al. 2000 ; BRYK et al. 2001 ).

The low levels of VLPs in normal yeast cells suggest that transposition may be regulated at the level of translation, protein processing, or protein stability. Regulation of Ty1 mRNA translation has not been described, but it is known that proteolytic processing of Ty1 proteins is extremely inefficient (CURCIO and GARFINKEL 1992 ). Instability of Ty1 proteins is regulated by the mitogen-activated protein kinase, Fus3, which inhibits Ty1 transposition 18- to 56-fold by stimulating the degradation of VLP-associated Ty1 proteins (CONTE et al. 1998 ). Fus3 regulates Ty1 transposition by negatively regulating the invasive growth pathway, which activates Ty1 transposition at both transcriptional and post-translational levels (CONTE and CURCIO 2000 ; MORILLON et al. 2000 ).

The characterization of two additional inhibitors of Ty1 transposition has shown that cDNA degradation is a critical step in the maintenance of transpositional dormancy. Certain mutations in SSL2 and RAD3, which encode components of the RNA Polymerase II general transcription factor, TFIIH, increase Ty1 transposition 100-fold or more (LEE et al. 1998 ). Moreover, unintegrated Ty1 cDNA is stabilized in ssl2-rtt and rad3-G595R mutants (LEE et al. 2000 ). Several other inhibitors of Ty1 transposition may act by promoting cDNA degradation, including members of the RAD52 recombinational repair pathway (RAD50, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, and RAD57) and CDC9, which encodes DNA ligase (RATTRAY et al. 2000 ).

We recently demonstrated that the RecQ-helicase, Sgs1, limits the mobility of Ty1 elements by altering the fate of Ty1 cDNA (BRYK et al. 2001 ). Although Ty1 cDNA levels are modestly elevated in sgs1 mutants, accumulation of cDNA is not the major cause of increased Ty1 mobility. Instead, recombination between extrachromosomal cDNA molecules is stimulated in sgs1 mutants, resulting in formation of multimeric Ty1 cDNA arrays that integrate into the genome. These findings indicate that cDNA can be directed into different pathways of integration, degradation, or recombination and suggest that the processing of Ty1 cDNA may be strongly influenced by host genes.

Inaccessibility of integration targets may also contribute to transpositional dormancy. Ty1 elements integrate primarily into regions upstream of RNA Pol III-transcribed genes or, more rarely, into the promoter regions of RNA Pol II-transcribed genes, but open reading frames (ORFs) are poor targets for integration (JI et al. 1993 ; DEVINE and BOEKE 1996 ). Mutations in host genes that increase transposition into Pol II-transcribed ORFs have been identified (PICOLOGLOU et al. 1990 ; LIEBMAN and NEWNAM 1993 ; QIAN et al. 1998 ; HUANG et al. 1999 ). These include mutations in RAD6, which encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating protein, and concurrent mutations in CAC3, which encodes a subunit of chromatin assembly factor-1, and HIR3, which encodes a regulator of histone gene transcription. Simultaneous inactivation of CAC3 and HIR3 also resulted in a three- to fivefold increase in the mobility of a chromosomal Ty1 element, suggesting that CAC3 and HIR3 may limit the accessibility of target sites for Ty1 integration (QIAN et al. 1998 ).

Most of the characterized regulators of Ty1 transposition described above were identified on the basis of their effect on the mobility of a Ty1 element marked with the retrotranscript indicator gene his3AI (CONTE et al. 1998 ; LEE et al. 1998 ; RATTRAY et al. 2000 ; BRYK et al. 2001 ). The cDNA-mediated mobility of a Ty1his3AI element can be quantified in a simple phenotypic assay, regardless of the target of cDNA integration or recombination (Fig 1). Thus, this approach can facilitate the identification of mutations that affect different steps of Ty1 transposition. Chemical mutagenesis in strains containing Ty1his3AI elements has previously been attempted to identify regulators of transpositional dormancy (CONTE et al. 1998 ; LEE et al. 1998 ; M. BRYK and M. J. CURCIO, unpublished results). While these screens yielded large numbers of Rtt^- mutants, none of the underlying mutations have been successfully identified by complementation. In this study, we used transposon-mediated mutagenesis (BURNS et al. 1994 ) to circumvent the problems associated with cloning by complementation. Chromosomal mutations tagged with a mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 transposon were generated, allowing rapid recovery of mutations and identification of the affected gene. Using this method, we characterized 21 genes that encode regulators of Ty1 transposition (RTT genes), 18 of which have not been previously shown to affect transposition. Most or all of the RTT gene products inhibit post-transcriptional steps in transposition, and most have a discernible effect on unintegrated Ty1 cDNA levels. Many RTT gene products have roles in genome maintenance, including telomere maintenance, DNA recombinational repair, suppression of DNA recombination, and DNA-damage response pathways. The finding that Ty1 transposition is regulated by a large number of proteins involved in DNA metabolism suggests that Ty1 transposition levels are modulated in response to changes in the integrity of the genome.

View larger version (24K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 1. Assay for Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility. A genomic Ty1 element is represented by LTRs (tripartite rectangles) surrounding a coding region (solid bar) within chromosomal DNA (two thin lines with a circle representing the centromere). The HIS3 gene (labeled box) has been introduced into the Ty1 element, with its coding sequence in the opposite orientation (indicated by arrow) to that of Ty1. The HIS3 gene is rendered nonfunctional by the presence of an artificial intron (AI; shaded bar) in the opposite orientation (indicated by arrow) to that of the HIS3 gene. AI is not recognized as an intron in the HIS3 transcript and therefore cannot be spliced out. However, AI is spliced out of the Ty1his3AI transcript (wavy line with spliced AI indicated by shaded bars between two vertical solid bars). Subsequent reverse transcription of the spliced Ty1 transcript generates a Ty1 cDNA containing a functional HIS3 gene. The Ty1HIS3 cDNA can enter the genome by integration of Ty1HIS3 cDNA into a de novo site, mediated by IN (arrow on left), or by recombination of the Ty1HIS3 cDNA with a genomic Ty1 element, mediated by Rad52 (arrow on right). Both pathways result in formation of a His+ prototroph.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Yeast strains and media:
Standard yeast culture media were prepared as described (ROSE and BROACH 1990 ). The following yeast strains are all derivatives of strain GRF167 (BOEKE et al. 1985 ). Strain JC2326 [MAT-ura3, cir⁰, ura3-167, leu2::hisG, his3200, Ty1his3AI-270, Ty1NEO-588, Ty1(tyb1::lacZ)-146] and strain JC2749 [MAT, trp1::hisG, cir⁰, ura3-167, leu2::hisG, his3200, Ty1his3AI-270, Ty1NEO-588, Ty1(tyb1::lacZ)-146] were constructed from strain JC344 [MAT, ura3-167, leu2::hisG, his3200, Ty1his3AI-270, Ty1NEO-588, Ty1(tyb1:: lacZ)-146; KAWAKAMI et al. 1993] as follows. Strain JC344 was cured of the endogenous 2µ plasmid (cir⁰) by introducing plasmid YEp351-GAL-FLP1 (ROSE and BROACH 1990 ) into the strain and overexpressing the FLP1 gene by growth in medium containing galactose. The MAT information was subsequently deleted by one-step transplacement of a fragment containing the MAT-URA3 allele [a plasmid carrying this fragment was a gift from J. Strathern, National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center (FCRD)]. A spontaneous Ura^- derivative of this strain was obtained by selection on 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) medium to construct strain JC2326. Strain JC2749 was constructed by transforming the cir⁰ derivative of strain JC344 with the trp1::hisG-URA3-hisG allele (ALANI et al. 1987 ), followed by selection for a trp1::hisG derivative on 5-FOA medium. Strain JC270 [MAT, ura3-167, his3200, Ty1his3AI-270, Ty1NEO-588, Ty1(tyb1::lacZ)-146] is an isogenic LEU2 derivative of strain JC344. Strain JC357 [MATa-URA3, leu2::hisG, ade2, his3200, Ty1NEO-588, Ty1his 3AI-270], which contains the URA3 gene integrated between the MATa and CRY1 loci, is an ascospore derived by crossing strain JC344 with strain GRY340 (CURCIO et al. 1988 ) and then backcrossing a selected ascospore to strain JC344 twice. Strains JC2148 (MAT, ura3-167, his3200, leu2::hisG, tec1::ura3 Ty1his3AI-270; CONTE and CURCIO 2000 ) and DG789 (MAT, his3200, ura3-167, spt3-101; CURCIO and GARFINKEL 1991 ) were described previously. Strain DG1722 (MAT, ura3-167, his3200, ssl2-rtt) is described in LEE et al. 1998 and was generously provided by D. Garfinkel (NCI-FCRDC). Strain JC384 (MAT, his3200, ura3-167 trp1::hisG) is a trp1::hisG derivative of GRF167 harboring plasmid pGTy1-H3mHIS3 (CURCIO and GARFINKEL 1991 ).

Strain BY4742 (MAT, his31, leu20, lys20, ura30; BRACHMANN et al. 1998 ) and derivatives, each containing the precise replacement of a specific ORF with the kanMX4 module (WINZELER et al. 1999 ), were obtained from Research Genetics (Birmingham, AL). A tlc1::LEU2 derivative of BY4742 was constructed by one-step transplacement using pBLUE61::LEU2 (SINGER and GOTTSCHLING 1994 ). A Ty1his3AI[1]-URA3 cassette was introduced into strain BY4742 and isogenic ORF deletion strains by transformation of plasmid pJC573 linearized with PacI. Strains in which plasmid pJC573 is integrated are JC3116 (BY4742), JC3118 (BY4742, rtt110::kanMX4), JC3122 (BY4742, rnr1::kanMX4), JC3134 (BY4742, rtt107::kanMX4), JC3138 (BY4742, rrm3::kanMX4), JC3142 (BY4742, mre11::kanMX4), JC3144, JC3493 (both BY4742, tel1::kanMX4), JC3198 (BY4742, rtt101::kanMX4), JC3199 (BY4742, rtt109::kanMX4), JC3200 (BY4742, kap122::kanMX4), JC3497 (est1::kanMX4), JC3503 (est2::kanMX4), JC3519 (rif1::kanMX4), JC3520 (rif2::kanMX4), JC3368 (xrs2::kanMX4), and JC3489 (BY4742, tlc1::LEU2).

Plasmids:
Plasmid pJC573 contains 1.2 kb of yeast genomic DNA from the BIK1-HIS4 intergenic region on chromosome III adjacent to a Ty1 element in the URA3-based integrating vector pRS406 (SIKORSKI and HIETER 1989 ). The modified retrotranscript indicator gene, his3AI[1], was cloned into the Ty1 element at the BglII site in TYB1, adjacent to the 3' LTR. The his3AI[1] gene contains the same 104-bp artificial intron (AI) as his3AI (CURCIO and GARFINKEL 1991 ) inserted at a different position (+440) in the HIS3 ORF. At this location, the AI is within the interval that is deleted in the his31 allele in strain BY4742, thereby eliminating the formation of a functional HIS3 gene by DNA recombination. Construction of plasmid pJC573 is described elsewhere (BRYK et al. 2001 ). Plasmid pJC525 contains a 934-bp HindIII-BglII fragment of Ty1-H3 (nucleotides 4627–5561; BOEKE et al. 1986 ) cloned into plasmid vector pSP70 (Promega, Madison, WI).

Mutagenesis screen:
A yeast genomic DNA library containing random insertions of the bacterial transposon mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 (BURNS et al. 1994 ) was generously provided by M. Snyder (Yale University). Strains JC2326 and JC2749 were transformed with 1 µg of library DNA digested with NotI. Leu⁺ transformants (50 per plate) and the LEU2 strain JC270 were grown in small patches on SC-Leu plates at 30° for 2 days. Subsequently, mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 transformants were replicated to YPD plates, grown at 20° for 3 days, and then replicated to SC-His medium and grown at 30° for 3 days. Patches of transformants with at least four His⁺ papillae were selected for further analysis. (Strain JC270 had 0 or 1 His⁺ papillae per patch.) Selected mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 transformants were single-colony purified on SC-Leu medium. Large patches of each Leu⁺ strain (12 per plate) and the isogenic wild-type strain (JC2326 or JC2749) were grown on YPD medium at 30°, replicated to YPD medium and grown at 20° for 3 days, and then replicated to SC-His and grown at 30° for 3 days. Transformants with elevated levels of His⁺ papillation (Rtt^- phenotype) relative to JC2326 or JC2749 were saved for further analysis. Following the identification of the mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 insertion site in 112 Rtt^- mutants (see below), a second screen for elevated His⁺ prototroph formation was performed by streaking each mutant and strain JC2326 or JC2749 for single colonies on one-quarter of a YPD plate and incubating at 20° for 6 days. Colonies were replicated to SC-His medium and grown for 3 days at 30° before scoring His⁺ prototrophs.

Identification of the mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 insertion sites:
Genomic DNA from rtt::mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 mutant strains was prepared from a saturated 10-ml YPD culture using the G'NOME kit (BIO 101, Vista, CA) and resuspended in 100 µl TE. DNA (15 µl) was digested with 10 units RsaI in a total volume of 100 µl, diluted 1:10, and ligated with 100 units T4 ligase. Using oligomers InPCR1 (5'-TAAGTTGGGTAACGCCAGGGTTTTC-3') and InPCR2 (5'-TTCCATGTTGCCACTCGCTTTAATG-3'), the 5' junction of mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 with genomic DNA was amplified. A 213-bp fragment of the Ty1(tyb1::lacZ)-146 allele in each strain was amplified by the same primers. The products of each PCR reaction were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. An aliquot of each PCR reaction that yielded the 213-bp control band was subject to DNA sequencing on an ABI sequencer using the oligomer mTn3-SEQ (5'-CCCCCTTAACGTGAGTTTTCGTTCCACT-3').

Tetrad analysis:
To perform tetrad analysis, the mating type of MAT strains was changed to MAT by two-step gene disruption using plasmid pSC9, a URA3-based integrating vector harboring the MAT allele (ADAMS et al. 1997 ). Alternatively, the rtt::mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 alleles in the MAT::URA3 strain JC2326 were transferred to the MAT strain JC2749 by "whole genome transformation." Approximately 50 µg of genomic DNA prepared from rtt::mTn3 mutants as described in CONTE et al. 1998 was transformed into strain JC2749 without carrier DNA, and Leu⁺ transformants were selected. Following single colony purification, Leu⁺ transformants with a hypermobility phenotype similar to that of the corresponding MAT strain were isolated. Southern analysis with a LEU2 probe was performed to confirm the presence of the rtt::mTn3 disruption allele. MAT rtt::mTn3 strains were crossed with MATa strain JC357. Sporulation of the resulting diploids was induced, and tetrads were dissected by standard methods (AUSUBEL et al. 1993 ). The level of His⁺ prototroph formation in each spore was determined by growing each spore as a patch on YPD plates at 30°, replicating to YPD and growing at 20° for 3 days, and then replicating to SC-His and growing for 3 days at 30°.

Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility assays:
The frequency of His⁺ prototroph formation in strains containing the chromosomal Ty1his3AI-270 or Ty1his3AI[1] element was determined as follows. Cultures of each yeast strain in 5 ml YPD broth were grown to saturation at 30°. Each culture was diluted 1:1000 in 2 ml YPD medium and grown to saturation at 20°. The number of cells per culture was determined by plating 0.002 µl on YPD medium (strains JC2326, JC2749, and derivatives) or SC-Ura medium (strain JC3116 and derivatives). A 400-µl aliquot of cultures of strains JC2326 and JC2749 and a 100-µl aliquot of cultures of each rtt::mTn3 derivative were plated on SC-His medium. A 400-µl aliquot of cultures of strain JC3116 and a 100-µl aliquot of cultures of each rtt derivative were spread on SC-Ura-His medium. The transposition frequency is the average number of His⁺ prototrophs per cell from three or four independent cultures (strains JC2326, JC2749, and derivatives) or of His⁺ Ura⁺ prototrophs per Ura⁺ cell from four, five, or six cultures (strain JC3116 and derivatives).

To determine the rate of His⁺ prototroph formation, 5-ml cultures of each strain were grown to saturation at 30° in liquid YPD medium. Eleven tubes containing 2 ml YPD medium were inoculated with 2 µ1 of the saturated culture and grown at 20° to saturation. A 100-µl aliquot of rtt mutant cultures and 400-µl aliquots of strain JC2326 and JC2749 cultures were plated on SC-His medium. The titer of four cultures of each strain was determined by plating 0.002 µl on YPD medium. The rate of His⁺ prototroph formation per cell per generation was evaluated by the method of LEA and COULSON 1949 .

Northern analysis:
By hot acidic phenol extraction (AUSUBEL et al. 1993 ), total RNA was isolated from 50-ml cultures of each strain grown in YPD broth at 20° to midexponential phase (OD₆₀₀ = 1.0). RNA samples denatured with glyoxal were subject to electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel and transferred to a Hybond-N membrane (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Ty1his3AI, Ty1, and PYK1 transcripts were detected using ³²P-labeled HIS3 sense-strand, Ty1 antisense-strand, and PYK1 antisense-strand riboprobes, respectively. Riboprobes were synthesized using plasmid pGEM-HIS3, plasmid pGEM-TyA1 (CURCIO et al. 1990 ), or plasmid pGEM-PYK1 (CURCIO and GARFINKEL 1992 ) as template DNA. Northern blot banding patterns were visualized by autoradiography. The ³²P activity in each band was quantitated using a STORM 860 phosphorimager and ImageQuant software.

cDNA analysis:
Single colonies of each strain grown at 20° were used to inoculate cultures of 15 ml YPD broth, and two or three cultures were grown at 20° to stationary phase. Total yeast genomic DNA was extracted as described in CONTE et al. 1998 and digested with PvuII. DNA samples were subject to electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and transferred to a Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham). The membrane was hybridized to a ³²P-labeled TYB1 antisense riboprobe prepared using plasmid pJC525 as a template. Southern blot bands were visualized by autoradiography, and the ³²P activity was quantitated using a STORM 860 phosphorimager and ImageQuant software.

Integration assay:
Single colonies grown at 20° were used to inoculate cultures of 15 ml of YPD broth, which were grown at 20° to stationary phase. Total genomic DNA was extracted as described in AUSUBEL et al. 1993 . To confirm that the genomic DNA samples were equivalently competent for PCR, fragments of single copy genes were amplified from genomic DNA, separated by agarose gel electrophoresis, and quantitated by ethidium staining. To detect Ty1 integration events at glycyl-tRNA genes, oligonucleotides TYBOUT-2 (5'-GTGATGACAAAACCTCTTCCG-3') and SUF16-2 (5'-GGCAACGTTGGATTTTACCAC-3') were used in 50-µl PCR reactions using the Failsafe PCR kit (Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI). Reactions contained 1x PreMix E, 0.4 µM oligonucleotide TYBOUT-2, 0.4 µM oligonucleotide SUF16-2, 1.25 units Failsafe enzyme mix, and 0.1 µg genomic DNA. Cycling conditions were 94° for 2 min; followed by 10 x (94° for 30 sec, 65° for 30 sec, 72° for 60 sec); followed by 20 x (94° for 30 sec, 60° for 30 sec, 72° for 60 sec); followed by 72° for 5 min; followed by cooling to 4°. PCR products were run on a 2% agarose gel and transferred on to a Hybond-N+ membrane. The membrane was probed with the oligonucleotide SUF16-START (5'-GGATTTTACCACTAAACCACTTGCGC-3') end labeled with [-³²P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). Southern blot bands were visualized by autoradiography.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

A genetic screen identifies 29 regulators of Ty1 transposition:
To identify novel genes involved in the maintenance of Ty1 transpositional dormancy, we performed a screen for host mutations that result in increased mobility of a chromosomal Ty1 element marked with his3AI (CURCIO and GARFINKEL 1991 ). The mobility of Ty1his3AI elements is detected phenotypically by the formation of His⁺ prototrophs (Fig 1). His⁺ colonies are indicative of cells that have sustained either nonhomologous integration of Ty1HIS3 cDNA into the genome or homologous recombination of Ty1HIS3 cDNA with preexisting genomic Ty1 elements or LTRs. Mutations in genes involved in the maintenance of Ty1 transpositional dormancy are expected to increase the formation of His⁺ prototrophs, which is referred to as a hypermobility or Rtt^- phenotype.

Transposon-mediated mutagenesis was performed by introducing a library of yeast genomic DNA fragments disrupted with mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 into congenic yeast strains JC2326 (MAT) and JC2749 (MAT). Approximately 10,000 Leu⁺ transformants were tested to determine their relative levels of His⁺ prototroph formation. A total of 274 (2.7%) Leu⁺ transformants had elevated levels of His⁺ papillation relative to a congenic wild-type strain (Fig 2). Genomic DNA was isolated from 85 of the Rtt^- strains and analyzed by Southern blotting with a LEU2 probe (data not shown). Eighty-two of the Rtt^- strains harbored a single mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 insertion at a random location, whereas the other 3 strains had two mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 insertions. Because almost all of the putative Rtt^- mutants sustained only one insertion, we determined the location of the mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 insertion by PCR amplification and sequencing of the junction between the 5' end of the mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 element and yeast genomic DNA. Thirty or more nucleotides of DNA sequence were obtained from 112 putative hypermobility mutants and compared to the sequence of the Saccharomyces genome. This analysis identified mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 insertion sites within or upstream of 77 different annotated ORFs (Fig 2). The other 162 Rtt^- mutants were not analyzed (122 strains), harbored multiple mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 inserts (3 strains), or failed to yield useful inverse PCR products or DNA sequence (37 strains).

View larger version (21K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 2. Identification of RTT genes. The flow chart shows the methodology of the genetic screen for hypermobility mutants and the identification of RTT genes.

Each of the 112 candidate rtt::mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 mutants was subject to a second qualitative test for His⁺ prototroph. Sixty-eight putative rtt mutants had a consistently elevated level of His⁺ prototroph formation. These 68 rtt mutants harbored mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 elements in or upstream of 46 different annotated ORFs (Fig 2). The Rtt^- phenotype of MAT/ diploids heterozygous for each of the 68 rtt mutations was tested, revealing that all 68 mutations were recessive.

Tetrad analysis was performed on at least one mTn3-disruption allele of each of the 46 candidate RTT genes to confirm that the hypermobility phenotype was a result of the mTn3 insertion. One exception was mTn3 insertions in SGS1, which were not analyzed here because an sgs1 allele has already been shown to cosegregate with a hypermobility phenotype in tetrad analysis (BRYK et al. 2001 ). MAT derivatives of MAT rtt::mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 strains were constructed, and then 49 MAT rtt::mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 strains were crossed to a congenic wild-type strain. Three diploids failed to yield tetrads with four viable spores. Tetrads from the other 46 diploids displayed 2:2 segregation of the Leu⁺ phenotype, confirming the presence of a single mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 insertion. One of the 46 strains showed independent segregation of the Rtt^- and Leu⁺ phenotypes, indicating that hypermobility was not caused by the mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 disruption. Of the 45 remaining strains, 15 failed to show consistent 2:2 segregation of the Rtt^- phenotype in tetrad analysis. These 15 rtt::mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 candidates included one mTn3-disruption allele of 12 different putative RTT genes and three independent mTn3-disruption alleles of YKU80, which encodes the 80-kD subunit of Ku. Mutations in YKU80 have previously been demonstrated to cause a small increase in the mobility of a Ty1his3AI element (DOWNS and JACKSON 1999 ). Our data suggest that the effect of YKU80 on Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility is strongly influenced by the genetic background in which it is tested. It was concluded that the effect of these 15 rtt::mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 alleles on Ty1 mobility was dependent on heterozygous alleles of other genes that segregated independently in tetrad analysis.

The remaining 30 candidate rtt::mTn3 strains tested by tetrad analysis showed an Rtt^- phenotype that cosegregated with the Leu⁺ phenotype. These 30 rtt::mTn3 alleles included mutations in 28 different RTT genes, demonstrating that these 28 RTT genes consistently inhibit the cDNA-mediated mobility of Ty1 elements. Including the previously characterized regulator of Ty1 transposition encoded by SGS1, a total of 29 different RTT genes were identified in the screen. Forty-seven rtt mutations, including the 30 that were tested by tetrad analysis and 17 additional mutations within one of the same 29 genes, were isolated in the screen (Fig 2). These 47 rtt mutants harbor independent mTn3 insertions in, or within 84 bp upstream of, one of the 29 RTT ORFs (Table 1 and Table 2). All 29 RTT genes are represented by at least one allele in which mTn3 is in the ORF, except NUT2 (Table 1) and MCM6 (Table 2), which are both essential.

Eight rtt mutants have a marginal increase in Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility:
To characterize the 29 RTT genes identified, we quantified the increase in mobility of the Ty1his3AI-270 element in rtt::mTn3 mutants by measuring the rate of His⁺ prototroph formation (Table 1 and Table 2). The relative rate of Ty1 mobility in 29 rtt mutants is indicated in Fig 3. In cases in which the relative mobility rate was determined for two different mTn3 disruption alleles of the same RTT gene, the strain with the higher value is reported in Fig 3. In eight rtt mutants tested, the relative mobility rate was less than threefold higher than that of the isogenic wild-type strain (Fig 3). Hence, strains harboring mTn3 disruption alleles of eight different RTT genes, which are listed in Table 1, caused a minor or indiscernible increase in Ty1 mobility when assayed quantitatively, even though they displayed a consistently elevated level of His⁺ prototroph formation in qualitative plate assays, even through tetrad analysis. This class of marginal RTT genes includes one essential gene, MCM6, and another gene that is essential in some strain backgrounds, RNR1 (Table 3). The mTn3 insertion is 35 bp upstream of the MCM6 ORF (Table 1), suggesting that it may affect but not abolish the level of MCM6 expression. In contrast, the mTn3 insertion in RNR1 is at nucleotide 895 of the 2666-nucleotide ORF, and therefore it may be a null mutation. The six other RTT genes in this class include RTT102, which was identified as the uncharacterized ORF YGR275W, as well as VAC8, HSP78, MLP2, TIF4632, and RFX1 (Table 1 and Table 3).

View larger version (42K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 3. Relative increase in Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility in 29 rtt mutants. The rate of His+ prototroph formation per cell per generation relative to the isogenic RTT strain evaluated in a parallel experiment (x-axis) is reported for each rtt::mTn3 allele (y-axis). The error bars represent ±standard error.

The mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 transposon is located within the ORF of seven of these eight RTT genes (Table 1), suggesting that the rtt::mTn3 alleles are null alleles. Therefore, their minor effects on Ty1 mobility may be due to suppression by secondary mutations in the original isolate or possibly to dependence of the hypermobility phenotype on growth conditions that are particular to the qualitative assay. These possibilities were investigated by quantifying the mobility of a Ty1his3AI element in strains containing complete deletions of the RNR1 and RTT102 ORFs, which were constructed in the systematic deletion project (WINZELER et al. 1999 ). A Ty1his3AI-URA3 cassette was integrated upstream of the HIS4 locus in each strain. The relative frequency of Ty1his3AI mobility was increased 156-fold when RNR1 was deleted (Table 4), which was dramatically higher than the twofold increase in His⁺ prototroph formation seen in the rnr1::mTn3 strain. These data indicate that a null mutation in RNR1 results in a tremendous increase in the mobility of Ty1 elements. Therefore, the rnr1::mTn3 allele may be partially functional, or the strain may harbor a secondary mutation that partially suppresses Ty1 mobility in the original isolate but that segregates independently in tetrad analysis. On the other hand, an rtt102 strain displayed no increase in Ty1his3AI mobility, suggesting that the apparent hypermobility phenotype of the rtt102::mTn3 mutant is restricted to certain assay conditions or is not quantitatively significant.

View this table: In this window In a new window   Table 4. Frequency of Ty1his3AI[I] mobility in rtt strains

Mutations in 21 RTT genes result in a significant increase in Ty1 mobility:
Disruption of the 21 RTT genes that were confirmed by tetrad analysis resulted in 5- to 111-fold increases in the relative rate of Ty1 mobility (Fig 3). These 21 RTT genes include three previously characterized regulators of Ty1 transposition: SGS1, RAD50, and RAD57. One mutation in an essential gene, NUT2, was isolated. The mTn3 insertion is 13 bp upstream of the NUT2 ORF and therefore probably alters the level of NUT2 expression. NUT2 encodes a component of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and mediator subcomplex. Another gene encoding a nonessential component of the mediator complex, MED1, was also isolated as an RTT gene (Table 2). In addition, the previously uncharacterized gene RTT105 (YER104W), which is essential in strain BY4742 but may not be essential in all strains, was isolated (SMITH et al. 1996 ; WINZELER et al. 1999 ).

Several genes with characterized roles in telomere maintenance and/or DNA-damage response were isolated as RTT genes, including EST2, TEL1, MRE11, RAD50, and SAE2 (Table 3). EST2 encodes the catalytic subunit of telomerase. TEL1 encodes a protein kinase that regulates telomere length and functions in a checkpoint response to DNA damage. RAD50 and MRE11 encode components of the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) complex, which has multiple roles in genome maintenance, including nonhomologous end-joining, DNA recombinational repair, telomere length regulation, and a DNA-damage checkpoint response. Strains with rad50, mre11, xrs2, or tel1 mutations exhibit similar telomere shortening phenotypes and are epistatic for telomere length regulation (RITCHIE and PETES 2000 ). The isolation of EST2, TEL1, MRE11, and RAD50 as RTT genes implies that Ty1 transposition and telomere maintenance may be regulated through a common pathway. Alternatively, the isolation of SAE2, which encodes a modulator of MRX complex activity in DNA repair, raises the possibility that TEL1, MRE11, RAD50, and SAE2 all regulate Ty1 transposition through the Tel1-Mre11 checkpoint pathway (USUI et al. 2001 ).

Another class of RTT genes encodes proteins that suppress DNA recombination between repeated sequences, including SGS1, RRM3, and RTT110 (Table 3). Sgs1 suppresses rDNA recombination, Y' subtelomeric repeat recombination, and extrachromosomal Ty1 cDNA recombination. Rrm3 is a superfamily I DNA helicase believed to be the replicative helicase for rDNA. Rrm3 inhibits recombination between rDNA repeats and promotes telomere replication. RTT110 has been identified by another group as EFD1, encoding a protein that inhibits direct repeat recombination between LTRs of a Ty1 element and repeats created by plasmid integration (S. BEN-AROYA, B. LIEFSHITZ and M. KUPIEC, personal communication).

Another RTT gene, RRD2, together with its homolog RRD1, encodes a putative phosphotyrosyl phosphatase activator (Table 3). Rrd2 interacts genetically with the high osmolarity pathway kinase Hog1, which was previously shown to inhibit Ty1 transposition (CONTE and CURCIO 2000 ). RTT101 is ORF YJL047C. It encodes one of four cullin homologs in yeast, which are components of the Skp1-Cullin-F-box complex (SCF) family of E3 ubiquitin ligases. It has recently been shown that Rtt101 is modified by covalent attachment to the ubiquitin-like protein Rub1, but Rub1 is not involved in regulation of Ty1 transposition (J. M. LAPLAZA, M. BOSTICK, D. T. SCHOLES, M. J. CURCIO and J. CALLIS, unpublished results). KAP122 encodes a nuclear transport factor and SCH9 encodes a kinase in a stress response and nutrient-sensing signaling pathway. Disruption of either KAP122 or SCH9 has a relatively modest effect on Ty1 mobility (Fig 3). Six additional genes with uncharacterized functions were demonstrated to regulate Ty1 transposition. RTT107 is ORF YHR154C, which belongs to a family of BRCT-domain proteins with characterized or putative roles in cell cycle checkpoint pathways responsive to DNA damage. RTT103 (YDR289C), RTT106 (YNL206C), RTT108 (YPR164W), and RTT109 (YLL002W) have no known homologs.

We determined whether increased Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility was the phenotype of null mutations in 11 of the 21 RTT genes, using strains that contain complete deletions of the RTT ORFs. The Ty1his3AI[1]-URA3 cassette was integrated into each rtt strain and the isogenic wild-type strain, BY4742. In 10 rtt strains tested, including est2, kap122, med1, mre11, rrm3, rtt107, rtt109, rtt110, sae2, and tel1, there was a 4- to 34-fold increase in Ty1his3AI mobility relative to the wild-type strain. Most of the rtt mutations result in equivalent or less severe hypermobility phenotypes than the corresponding rtt::mTn3 allele. This may be because the Ty1his3AI[] element integrated into BY4742 has a higher rate of mobility than the Ty1his3AI-270 element in strains JC2749 and JC2326. In contrast to other rtt strains, Ty1his3AI mobility was not significantly increased in an rrd2 strain. RRD2 is one of two functionally redundant homologs in yeast, and an rrd2 mutation results in only mild phenotypes except when combined with rrd1 (REMPOLA et al. 2000 ). This result may indicate that the function of RRD1 is compromised in the JC2749 strain, but not in the BY4742 strain in which the phenotype of deletion alleles was tested, resulting in a 43-fold increase in Ty1 mobility in the rrd2::mTn3 mutant.

RTT genes regulate post-transcriptional steps in Ty1 retrotransposition:
To determine whether RTT gene products affect the expression of Ty1 elements or the stability of Ty1 mRNA, the relative levels of Ty1 RNA and Ty1his3AI RNA in rtt mutants were determined. Strains harboring mTn3 disruptions of the 21 RTT genes that repress Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility more than fivefold were analyzed by Northern blotting. In the case of multiple insertion alleles of the same RTT gene, RNA was quantitated from the same strain that was used to determine the relative Ty1 mobility rate (Fig 3). The level of Ty1his3AI RNA in rtt mutants was between 0.4- and 2.8-fold that of the isogenic wild-type strain (Fig 4, top). Similarly, Ty1 RNA in rtt mutants was 0.4- to 2.0-fold the level in the corresponding wild-type strain (Fig 4, middle). As a control, Ty1 and Ty1his3AI transcripts were shown to be markedly reduced in a tec1 strain, which is defective for expression of Ty1 elements (LALOUX et al. 1990 ). Hence, the data suggest that increased Ty1 mobility is not due to elevated levels of Ty1 or Ty1his3AI RNA in the rtt::mTn3 strains. One exception may be the rtt103 mutant, which displayed a 2.8-fold increase in the ratio of Ty1his3AI/PYK1 RNA and a 1.8-fold increase in the ratio of Ty1/PYK1 RNA (Fig 4). These small increases in RNA are associated with a 13-fold increase in Ty1his3AI mobility (Fig 3). Hence, elevated Ty1 RNA levels may contribute to elevated Ty1 mobility in rtt103 mutants. In summary, the results of Northern analysis suggest that most or all of the 21 RTT gene products exert their primary effect on post-transcriptional steps in Ty1 retrotransposition.

View larger version (38K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 4. Ty1his3AI RNA and total Ty1 RNA levels in 21 rtt mutants. Northern analyses of three blots of total RNA from rtt mutant and control strains hybridized sequentially to 32P-riboprobes for Ty1his3AI, Ty1, and PYK1 RNA are shown. The relative levels of Ty1his3AI RNA and Ty1 RNA are the ratios of Ty1his3AI/PYK1 RNA and Ty1/PYK1 RNA, respectively, compared to the corresponding ratios of the isogenic wild-type strain analyzed on the same membrane.

Ty1 cDNA levels are elevated in most rtt mutants:
To determine whether the elevated rates of Ty1 mobility are correlated with increases in a physical intermediate in transposition in rtt::mTn3 mutants, we quantified unintegrated linear Ty1 cDNA in strains harboring mTn3 insertion alleles of all 29 RTT genes isolated in the screen using a quantitative Southern blot assay (BRYK et al. 2001 ). Total cellular DNA digested with PvuII was hybridized to a radiolabeled TYB1 probe (Fig 5A). The probe detects a 2.0-kb fragment of Ty1 cDNA from a conserved PvuII site in Ty1 to the 3' end of the linear extrachromosomal cDNA. In addition, the probe detects numerous PvuII fragments >2.0 kb, each of which represents a unique junction between the 3' end of a genomic Ty1 element and flanking DNA. Ty1 cDNA levels were determined by quantifying the intensity of the 2.0-kb Ty1 cDNA band (Fig 5B, band C) relative to the intensities of two genomic Ty1 junction bands (Fig 5B, bands G1 and G2) in two or three independent DNA samples from each rtt strain. Of the 8 rtt::mTn3 strains that displayed a 3-fold increase in Ty1 mobility (Table 1), 7 had Ty1 cDNA levels <2.0-fold greater that of the isogenic wild-type strain. The 8th strain, which harbors rnr1::mTn3, had a 2.3-fold increase in Ty1 cDNA. In addition, we measured relative cDNA levels in 34 rtt::mTn3 strains that displayed a 5-fold increase in Ty1 mobility (Table 2). Twenty-eight mTn3 disruptions in 19 RTT genes caused levels of Ty1 cDNA to be increased 2.0- to 11.7-fold. The results indicate that the increased Ty1 mobility in most rtt mutants is correlated with elevated Ty1 cDNA levels, suggesting that most Rtt proteins suppress cDNA levels. This may occur by direct inhibition of Ty1 cDNA synthesis or stability or by inhibition of an earlier step in retrotransposition that indirectly results in low cDNA levels.

View larger version (43K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 5. Relative levels of unintegrated Ty1 cDNA in rtt mutants. (A) Diagrams of unintegrated Ty1 cDNA and a genomic Ty1 element, indicating the location of the TYB1 hybridization probe (hatched box) and relevant PvuII cleavage sites. The TYB1 probe detects a 2.0-kb PvuII fragment of unintegrated Ty1 cDNA and variably sized >2.0-kb fragments containing the junction of Ty1 elements with chromosomal DNA at different locations. (B) Southern blot analysis of PvuII-digested total cellular DNA from cells grown at 20°. Each DNA sample was extracted from a culture inoculated with an independent colony. The ratio of 32P activity in the 2.0-kb cDNA band (band C) relative to the activity in two genomic Ty1 bands (bands G1 and G2) was calculated for each DNA sample, and the average of two to three DNA samples is reported in Table 1.

Six of the 34 rtt::mTn3 strains analyzed displayed an increase in Ty1 cDNA that was <2-fold (Table 2). These included the sch9-92::mTn3 and kap122-439::mTn3 mutants, in which the rate of Ty1 mobility is elevated only 7-fold and 6-fold, respectively (Fig 3). In addition, strains harboring mTn3 insertions in SGS1, TEL1, RTT103, and MRE11 displayed a <2.0-fold increase in Ty1 cDNA, but strains harboring different mTn3 insertions closer to the 5' end of each of these ORFs had Ty1 cDNA levels that were elevated 2.7- to 11.7-fold (Table 2). The location of mTn3 in these ORFs affected cDNA levels but did not significantly change the hypermobility phenotype (Table 2). Hence, modulation of Ty1 cDNA levels may not be the primary mechanism by which these proteins inhibit Ty1 mobility.

Mutations in RTT genes have varied effects on Ty1 integration:
Given that most rtt mutants have elevated levels of Ty1 cDNA, we tested the hypothesis that de novo integration events are also stimulated. We employed a PCR-based assay to detect de novo integration of Ty1 elements upstream of 16 glycyl-tRNA genes in rtt mutants. The targets were chosen because at least 1 glycyl-tRNA gene (the SUF16 locus on chromosome III) is a hotspot for Ty1 transposition (JI et al. 1993 ). PCR was performed using one primer containing TYB1 sequence and one primer containing glycyl-tRNA sequence. Ty1 transposition events 100–800 bp upstream of and in the same transcriptional orientation as glycyl-tRNA genes yielded PCR products ranging from 0.55 to 1.2 kb (Fig 6). The observed periodicity of Ty1 integration events may be attributable to phased nucleosomes or another chromatin feature specific to the vicinity of tRNA genes (VOYTAS and BOEKE 2002 ). An increase in the intensity and number of PCR products indicated that de novo integration events were elevated. Control DNA samples from a tec1 mutant, which has a hypotransposition phenotype, yielded low levels of PCR products, whereas those from an ssl2-rtt mutant, which has a strong hypertransposition phenotype (LEE et al. 1998 ), yielded high levels of PCR products.

View larger version (59K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 6. Detection of unselected Ty1 integration events upstream of glycyl-tRNA genes, a preferred integration target. (A) Diagram of a Ty1 transposition event upstream of 1 of 16 glycyl-tRNA genes in the same transcriptional orientation. Primer SUF16-2 anneals to the glycyl-tRNA gene, and primer TYBOUT-2 anneals to the 3' end of TYB1 (indicated by arrows). A PCR product of a de novo Ty1 insertion upstream of a glycyl-tRNA gene in the orientation shown is detected using a radiolabeled SUF16-26 probe. (B) Southern blot of PCR amplification of genomic DNA samples from independent cultures of each strain. A wild-type strain, ssl2-rtt mutant (positive control), tec1 mutant (negative control), and seven rtt mutants are shown.

Genomic DNA from four independent cultures of seven rtt::mTn3 mutants were analyzed. The nut2::mTn3 and rtt101::mTn3 mutants dramatically increased the level of Ty1 integration relative to the wild-type strain (Fig 6). These mutants have 82- and 60-fold higher levels of Ty1his3AI mobility and 6- and 3.2-fold higher levels of Ty1 cDNA, respectively, compared to the wild-type strain. Therefore, it is likely that these mutations affect the accumulation of an intermediate in Ty1 transposition, such as Ty1 cDNA or VLPs, which directly results in increased transposition. In contrast, no increase in integration upstream of glycyl-tRNA genes was detected in tel1::mTn3 or rrm3::mTn3 mutants. The PCR assay may be too insensitive to detect the 15-fold increase in cDNA mobility in the tel1::mTn3 mutant. However, the rrm3::mTn3 mutant showed a 110-fold increase in Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility (Fig 3). These results suggest that mutations in RRM3 cause Ty1 cDNA to be processed differently from that in wild-type cells. For example, high levels of Ty1 cDNA recombination or cDNA integration at novel target sites could explain the paradoxical increase in Ty1 mobility in the absence of integration upstream of glycyl-tRNA genes.

A modest increase in the level of integration, with variability between samples, was seen in est2::mTn3, rtt108::mTn3, and rad50::mTn3 mutants, which had 111-fold, 75-fold, and 29-fold increases in Ty1 mobility, respectively. The data suggest that an increase in cDNA integration at preferred target sites is probably a significant component of elevated cDNA mobility in these mutants. However, other pathways of cDNA mobility, such as integration at alternative target sites or recombination, may also be stimulated. In summary, these data suggest that some Rtt factors repress Ty1 mobility by reducing the amount of a physical intermediate in transposition, whereas others may alter the fate of Ty1 cDNA.

Inhibition of Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility by multiple regulators of telomere replication:
Since Est2, a subunit of telomerase, and the telomere length regulators, Tel1, Mre11, and Rad50, were found to inhibit the mobility of Ty1, we postulated that transpositional dormancy is linked to telomere maintenance. To explore this possibility, the Ty1his3AI[1]-URA3 cassette was introduced into derivatives of strain BY4742 harboring deletions of five additional ORFs required for telomere maintenance, and Ty1his3AI mobility was analyzed. TLC1, which encodes the RNA subunit of telomerase (SINGER and GOTTSCHLING 1994 ), and EST1, which encodes another component of the telomerase holoenzyme (LUNDBLAD and SZOSTAK 1989 ), are in the same epistasis group as EST2 for telomere maintenance (LENDVAY et al. 1996 ). Deletion of TLC1 or EST1 resulted in a significant increase in His⁺ prototroph formation, similar to that observed in an est2 strain (Fig 7). Deletion of XRS2, which encodes a third component of the MRX complex, also increased His⁺ prototroph formation. Interestingly, rif1 and rif2 mutant strains exhibited increased His⁺ prototroph formation as well. RIF1 and RIF2 encode Rap1-interacting proteins. In contrast to the other strains tested, strains lacking Rif1 or Rif2 have elongated telomeres (MARCAND et al. 1997 ; WOTTON and SHORE 1997 ). Taken together, these findings support the hypothesis that signaling pathways that sense and respond to telomere length also regulate Ty1 mobility.

View larger version (87K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 7. Genes encoding regulators of telomere length are required to repress Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility. Each strain harbors the integrated Ty1his3AI[1]-URA3 cassette and was grown as a patch on one-eighth of an SC-Ura plate at 30°, replicated to YPD and grown for 3 days at 20°, and then replicated to SC-Ura-His and grown for 3 days at 30°. The experiment was repeated four times, and one representative plate is shown here. His+ papillae are formed from individual cells that sustain a Ty1HIS3 cDNA mobility event.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Numerous yeast genes encode regulators of Ty1 transposition:
Here we describe the identification and preliminary characterization of 21 RTT genes. The use of transposon-mediated mutagenesis allowed RTT genes to be identified on the basis of their hypermobility phenotype for the first time. We assume that these 21 genes represent only a fraction of the RTT genes in yeast, because the 10,000 mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 transformants that we analyzed were only about one-third the number required to represent the entire genome (ROSS-MACDONALD et al. 1998 ). Furthermore, only 112 of the 274 mutants that we isolated were characterized. Accordingly, not all of the previously known regulators of Ty1 transposition were identified in our screen. Transposition-mediated mutational analysis is biased against the detection of essential genes, and therefore we did not expect to isolate mutations in genes encoding essential regulators of Ty1 transposition, including SSL2, RAD3, or CDC9. However, mutations in FUS3, HOG1, RAD51, RAD52, and RAD54 were expected but not isolated. Hence, our study, together with previous studies (CONTE et al. 1998 ; LEE et al. 1998 , LEE et al. 2000 ; CONTE and CURCIO 2000 ; RATTRAY et al. 2000 ), demonstrates that a very large number of host factors inhibit Ty1 transposition directly or indirectly. This finding reveals an interdependent and evolutionarily refined relationship between Ty1 and its host cell.

Because of the large number of genes that regulate transposition, secondary mutations that enhance the hypermobility phenotype of a mutation may arise at a high frequency. Hence, as our analysis has revealed, it is necessary to confirm that the hypermobility phenotype of a mutant is due to a single gene mutation. Approximately one-third of the rtt::mTn3 alleles that we isolated failed to show 2:2 segregation of the hypermobility phenotype in tetrad analysis. Instead, hypermobility was rare or completely absent among the progeny of these rtt::mTn3 mutants. The simplest interpretation is that preexisting mutations or mutations introduced during transformation contributed to the hypermobility associated with these rtt::mTn3 alleles in the original isolate.

The presence of secondary mutations that dampen the hypermobility phenotype of rtt mutations may also complicate the analysis of RTT genes. Eight different rtt mutants showed 2:2 segregation of a qualitative hypermobility phenotype in tetrad analysis, but the original isolate did not show elevated His⁺ prototroph formation in a quantitative assay (Table 1). These seemingly contradictory results could be attributable to partially functional rtt::mTn3 alleles or to the presence of a partially suppressing secondary mutation in the original rtt::mTn3 mutant. One of these explanations is likely to apply to the rnr1::mTn3 mutant phenotype, since an rnr1 mutant showed a dramatically higher level of Ty1 mobility in a quantitative assay (Table 4) than the rnr1::mTn3 mutant (Fig 3). Other rtt::mTn3 mutations may cause an increase in Ty1 mobility under particular environmental conditions that differ when cells are grown on agar as opposed to a liquid medium. These may include the availability of nutrients and proximity of cells to each other.

RTT genes act primarily at post-transcriptional steps in Ty1 mobility:
Of the 21 RTT genes whose products inhibit Ty1 mobility fivefold or more (Table 2), none caused an increase in Ty1 RNA levels of greater than twofold when disrupted. This finding indicates that Rtt factors exert their effect on Ty1 mobility primarily at steps following transcription or mRNA degradation. Our analysis does not rule out the possibility of transcriptional regulation of Ty1 elements, but does highlight the prevalence of post-transcriptional mechanisms in maintaining transpositional dormancy. The isolation of post-transcriptional regulators was anticipated, given the unusually high level of Ty1 mRNA and the paradoxically low levels of Ty1 VLPs, cDNA, and transposition. We propose the following model to explain why regulation of transposition at post-transcriptional levels may be predominant over transcriptional regulation. If the host represses Ty1 transposition by inhibiting Ty1 element expression or RNA stability, a selective advantage is conferred upon an individual Ty1 element that sustains genetic alterations that allow it to evade that repression. This element would transpose preferentially, because its RNA would represent a larger fraction of the total Ty1 RNA pool. Consequently, the proportion of elements that could evade transcriptional repression by the host would increase over time. In contrast, if the host regulates Ty1 mobility at a post-transcriptional level, for instance, by destabilizing a Ty1 protein, less advantage is conferred upon an individual Ty1 element that can evade this repression. This is because Ty1 proteins act efficiently in trans (XU and BOEKE 1990 ; CURCIO and GARFINKEL 1992 ; CURCIO and GARFINKEL 1994 ), so the stabilized protein would activate all Ty1 elements. There-fore, the altered Ty1 would not transpose preferentially relative to other elements. Consequently, there is less selective pressure on individual Ty1 elements to evade post-transcriptional repression than to evade transcriptional repression. It follows that regulation of Ty1 transposition at the post-transcriptional level is more likely to be successfully sustained by the host.

The increased cDNA levels in the absence of increased Ty1 RNA levels observed in most rtt mutants demonstrate that many RTT gene products inhibit Ty1 transposition at a post-transcriptional and preintegrational stage of the Ty1 retrotransposition cycle. In general, rtt mutants with higher levels of Ty1 cDNA exhibit higher levels of Ty1 mobility. For example, only a 3.3-fold average increase in cDNA was observed in 10 rtt mutants in which the Ty1 mobility rate was elevated 5- to 15-fold, whereas 11 rtt mutants with an 18- to 111-fold increase in Ty1 mobility rate had a 5.7-fold increase in cDNA. However, there are specific examples of rtt mutants in which this correlation is violated. For example, the rtt106::mTn3 mutant strain displayed an 8.4-fold increase in Ty1 cDNA but only a 5-fold increase in mobility. Perhaps inactivation of Rtt106, which has similarity to DNA structure-specific recognition proteins (SSRPs; Table 3), results in the accumulation of Ty1 cDNA that cannot be recognized by the Ty1 IN protein. On the other hand, some rtt mutants display a large increase in Ty1 mobility but do not have dramatically increased cDNA levels. For example, an rrm3 mutant exhibited a 110-fold increase in Ty1 mobility yet had only a 2.3-fold increase in Ty1 cDNA.

On the basis of Ty1 cDNA quantitation and analysis of de novo integration upstream of tRNA genes, the RTT genes isolated to date fall into at least two classes. The first class consists of genes whose products directly or indirectly reduce the levels of physical intermediates required in the transposition process. These intermediates may include Ty1 proteins, Ty1 cDNA, or host factors required for transposition. The previously characterized RTT genes SSL2, RAD3, and FUS3 fall into this class, and the newly identified genes NUT2 and RTT101 are both likely members. In nut2 and rtt101 mutants, significant increases in Ty1 cDNA levels were detected, and frequent integration upstream of glycyl-tRNAs was observed. These findings suggest that transposition occurs more efficiently in nut2 and rtt101 mutants. Given that Rtt101 encodes a component of an E3-ubiquitin ligase, it is possible that Ty1 proteins are modified by an Rtt101-containing complex, leading to their degradation or an alteration in their activity. Nut2, together with Med1, is a component of the Pol II transcription mediator complex. Hence, mutations in nut2::mTn3 and med1::mTn3 may cause a defect in the expression of a host factor required for Ty1 transposition. Alternatively, Nut2 and Med1 may have secondary roles outside of transcription regulation. Notably, the mediator complex strongly stimulates TFIIH to phosphorylate the C-terminal domain of the largest subunit of RNA Polymerase II (KIM et al. 1994 ; MYERS et al. 1998 ). Ssl2 and Rad3 are components of TFIIH and potent activators of Ty1 cDNA degradation. Perhaps the mediator complex also activates TFIIH, or a subcomplex containing Ssl2 and Rad3, to promote cDNA degradation, thereby repressing Ty1 transposition.

A second class of RTT genes includes those that inhibit alternative pathways of cDNA mobility, including homologous recombination or integration at novel target sites. This class is typified by mutations that cause an increase in cDNA mobility but do not show a corresponding increase in integration of Ty1 upstream of glycyl-tRNA genes. This class includes SGS1 and probably RRM3 as well. Notably, rrm3 and sgs1 mutants have similar hypermobility phenotypes, including significantly elevated levels of Ty1 mobility, allele-dependent variations in Ty1 cDNA levels (Table 2), and no effect on integration upstream of glycyl-tRNA genes (Fig 6; BRYK et al. 2001 ). Moreover, both genes encode helicases associated with DNA replication and both repress recombination between rDNA repeats and other directly repeated sequences. Hence, Rrm3 may repress transposition by the same mechanism as Sgs1.

Mutations in EST2, RTT108, and RAD50 result in an intermediate phenotype in the assay for integration upstream of tRNAs, despite the fact that these mutations cause 111-fold, 75-fold, and 29-fold increases in Ty1 mobility, respectively. Mutations in all three genes also result in a significant increase in Ty1 cDNA. At present, we cannot conclude whether the primary cause of the hypermobility in these mutants is the increase in Ty1 transposition intermediates, or an altered cDNA fate, or both. In the case of the est2::mTn3 mutant, it is possible that the cells grown to assay Ty1 mobility had a different telomere structure from those grown to quantify cDNA integration, and different telomere structures may have resulted in different levels of Ty1 transposition in each population. When EST2 is disrupted, cells show progressive shortening of telomeres and progressive loss of viability (LENDVAY et al. 1996 ). Cells with two distinct telomeric structures (type I and type II) arise rarely from the senescing populations (TENG and ZAKIAN 1999 ). We are presently investigating whether and how Ty1 mobility is affected by senescence and by the different growth characteristics of type I and type II est2 survivors.

Potential links between Ty1 transposition and the response to DNA damage:
We have shown that Est2, the catalytic subunit of telomerase, inhibits Ty1 mobility at a post-transcriptional level. Est2 may act directly or indirectly to repress Ty1 transposition. The latter possibility seems more likely because other genes involved in telomere maintenance were identified as putative or proven RTT genes. For example, mutations in other genes required for telomerase function, including TLC1 and EST1, result in Ty1 hypermobility (Fig 7). Furthermore, mutations in TEL1, which cause telomere shortening, and mutations in RIF1 and RIF2, which cause telomere lengthening, result in Ty1 hypermobility (Fig 3 and Fig 7). Taken together, these findings suggest that alterations in the normal telomere structure may act as signals that result in the activation of Ty1 transposition.

In addition to the RTT genes discussed above, several other genes that play roles in genome maintenance were identified, including MRE11, RAD50, RAD57, SAE2, RTT110, SGS1, RRM3 (Fig 3), XRS2 (Fig 7), and RNR1 (Table 4). Some of these RTT gene products may bind to Ty1 cDNA directly and influence its fate. For example, the MRX complex is known to bind and process DNA double-strand breaks. Perhaps the MRX complex binds to the free ends of Ty1 cDNA and prevents integration or gene conversion of genomic Ty1 elements by promoting cDNA degradation or altering cDNA structure. A second possibility is that some of these RTT gene products are involved in sensing unprotected Ty1 cDNA ends in the nucleus and generating a response. For example, recognition of Ty1 cDNA by the MRX complex could result in activation of the Tel1-Mre11 checkpoint pathway, and this pathway may activate an inhibitor of Ty1 mobility. If so, it is likely that Tel1 and Sae2, a modulator of the activity of the Tel1-Mre11 checkpoint pathway, inhibit transposition by the same mechanism.

Another way in which mutations of some RTT genes may affect transposition is by creating DNA lesions that activate a DNA-damage response pathway, which in turn activates Ty1 mobility. Ty1 transcript and transposi-tion levels are increased in response to some types of DNA damage (ROLFE and BANKS 1986 ; BRADSHAW and MCENTEE 1989 ; MORAWETZ and HAGEN 1990 ; STALEVA STALEVA and VENKOV 2001 ). Perhaps DNA-damage response pathways stimulate Ty1 transposition at post-transcriptional levels as well. One RTT gene that may act in this way is RNR1. The transcriptional profile of an rnr1 mutant is similar to that of cells exposed to hydroxyurea, suggesting that deletion of RNR1 mimics a stress response (HUGHES et al. 2000 ). Induction of this stress response pathway by deletion of RNR1 may derepress Ty1 transposition.

The regulation of Ty1 transposition by a large number of conserved proteins involved in genome maintenance and other cellular pathways suggests that yeast have adapted to the presence of Ty1 elements in the genome in such a way that their mutagenic potential is harnessed. Ty1 retrotransposition has several potentially deleterious effects, including gene disruption and gross chromosomal deletions and rearrangements resulting from recombination between elements at ectopic sites. Hence, Ty1 elements can be viewed as having a largely negative role in the genome. On the other hand, their ability to cause regulatory mutations that allow rapid adaptation to new environments suggests that Ty1 retrotransposons may also have a positive evolutionary role (reviewed in BOEKE and SANDMEYER 1991 ; WILKE and ADAMS 1992 ). MCCLINTOCK 1984 proposed that one role of transposons may be to promote genome reorganization at times when the cell is exposed to genomic shock or other types of stress, so that adaptively favorable mutations might arise. Our demonstration that Ty1 mobility is regulated by numerous conserved gene products required for stability of the genome suggests the hypothesis that Ty1 elements can be activated by certain types of injury to the genome through DNA-damage signaling pathways.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank David Garfinkel for providing plasmids and yeast strains; Karen Artiles for technical assistance; David Edgell, Steve Hanes, and Keith Derbyshire for critical review of the manuscript; and the Wadsworth Center Molecular Genetics Core Facility for oligonucleotide synthesis and DNA sequencing. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM52072.

Manuscript received July 12, 2001; Accepted for publication September 4, 2001.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

ADAMS, A., D. E. GOTTSCHLING, C. A. KAISER and T. STEARNS, 1997 Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

ALANI, E., L. CAO, and N. KLECKNER, 1987  A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics 116:541-545[Abstract/Free Full Text].

AUSUBEL, F. M., R. BRENT, R. E. KINGSTON, D. D. MOORE, J. G. SEIDMAN et al., 1993 Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

BALCIUNAS, D., C. GALMAN, H. RONNE, and S. BJORKLUND, 1999  The Med1 subunit of the yeast mediator complex is involved in both transcriptional activation and repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:376-381[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BOEKE, J. D., and S. B. SANDMEYER, 1991 Yeast transposable elements, pp. 193–262 in The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces, edited by J. R. BROACH, J. PRINGLE and E. JONES. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

BOEKE, J. D., D. J. GARFINKEL, C. A. STYLES, and G. R. FINK, 1985  Ty elements transpose through an RNA intermediate. Cell 40:491-500[Medline].

BOEKE, J. D., C. A. STYLES, and G. R. FINK, 1986  Saccharomyces cerevisiae SPT3 gene is required for transposition and transpositional recombination of chromosomal Ty elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3575-3581[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BORK, P., K. HOFMANN, P. BUCHER, A. F. NEUWALD, and S. F. ALTSCHUL et al., 1997  A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins. FASEB J. 11:68-76[Abstract].

BRACHMANN, C. B., A. DAVIES, G. J. COST, E. CAPUTO, and J. LI et al., 1998  Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14:115-132[Medline].

BRADSHAW, V. and K. MCENTEE, 1989  DNA damage activates transcription and transposition of yeast Ty retrotransposons. Mol. Gen. Genet. 218:465-474[Medline].

BRYK, M., M. BANERJEE, D. CONTE, and M. J. CURCIO, 2001  The Sgs1 helicase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae inhibits retrotransposition of Ty1 multimeric arrays. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:5374-5388[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BURNS, N., B. GRIMWADE, P. B. ROSS-MACDONALD, E.-Y. CHOI, and K. FINBERG et al., 1994  Large-scale analysis of gene expression, protein localization and gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 8:1087-1105[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CONTE, D. J. and M. J. CURCIO, 2000  Fus3 controls Ty1 transpositional dormancy through the invasive growth MAPK pathway. Mol. Microbiol. 35:415-427[Medline].

CONTE, D. J., E. BARBER, M. BANERJEE, D. J. GARFINKEL, and M. J. CURCIO, 1998  Posttranslational regulation of Ty1 retrotransposition by mitogen-activated protein kinase Fus3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2502-2513[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CURCIO, M. J. and D. J. GARFINKEL, 1991  Single-step selection for Ty1 element retrotransposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:936-940[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CURCIO, M. J. and D. J. GARFINKEL, 1992  Posttranslational control of Ty1 retrotransposition occurs at the level of protein processing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:2813-2825[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CURCIO, M. J. and D. J. GARFINKEL, 1994  Heterogeneous functional Ty1 elements are abundant in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Genetics 136:1245-1259[Abstract].

CURCIO, M. J., A. M. HEDGE, J. D. BOEKE, and D. J. GARFINKEL, 1990  Ty RNA levels determine the spectrum of retrotransposition events that activate gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Gen. Genet. 220:213-221[Medline].

CURCIO, M. J., N. J. SANDERS, and D. J. GARFINKEL, 1988  Transpositional competence and transcription of endogenous Ty elements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications for regulation of transposition. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:3571-3581[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DEVINE, S. E. and J. D. BOEKE, 1996  Integration of the yeast retrotransposon Ty1 is targeted to regions upstream of genes transcribed by RNA polymerase III. Genes Dev. 10:620-633[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DOWNS, J. A. and S. P. JACKSON, 1999  Involvement of DNA end-binding protein Ku in Ty element retrotransposition. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:6260-6268[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ELLEDGE, S. J. and R. W. DAVIS, 1990  Two genes differentially regulated in the cell cycle and by DNA-damaging agents encode alternative regulatory subunits of ribonucleotide reductase. Genes Dev. 4:740-751[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FABRIZIO, P., F. FABIOLA POZZA, S. D. PLETCHER, M. CHRISTI, and C. M. GENDRON et al., 2001  Regulation of longevity and stress resistance by Sch9 in yeast. Science 292:288-290[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FIORI, A., M. M. BIANCHI, L. FABIANI, C. FALCONE, and S. FRANCISCI et al., 2000  Disruption of six novel genes from chromosome VII of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals one essential gene and one gene which affects the growth rate. Yeast 16:377-386[Medline].

GALY, V., J. C. OLIVO-MARIN, H. SCHERTHAN, V. DOYE, and N. RASCALOU et al., 2000  Nuclear pore complexes in the organization of silent telomeric chromatin. Nature 403:108-112[Medline].

GANGLOFF, S., J. P. MCDONALD, C. BENDIXEN, L. ARTHUR, and R. ROTHSTEIN, 1994  The yeast type I topoisomerase Top3 interacts with Sgs1, a DNA helicase homolog: a potential eukaryotic reverse gyrase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:8391-8398[Abstract/Free Full Text].

GOYER, C., M. ALTMANN, H. S. LEE, A. BLANC, and M. DESHMUKH et al., 1993  TIF4631 and TIF4632: two yeast genes encoding the high-molecular-weight subunits of the cap-binding protein complex (eukaryotic initiation factor 4F) contain an RNA recognition motif-like sequence and carry out an essential function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:4860-4874[Abstract/Free Full Text].

GREENWELL, P. W., S. L. KRONMAL, S. E. PORTER, J. GASSENHUBER, and B. OBERMAIER et al., 1995  TEL1, a gene involved in controlling telomere length in S. cerevisiae, is homologous to the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell 82:823-829[Medline].

GUSTAFSSON, C. M., L. C. MYERS, J. BEVE, H. SPAHR, and M. LUI et al., 1998  Identification of new mediator subunits in the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 273:30851-30854[Abstract/Free Full Text].

HABER, J. E., 1998  The many interfaces of Mre11. Cell 95:583-586[Medline].

HUANG, H., J. Y. HONG, C. L. BURCK, and S. W. LIEBMAN, 1999  Host genes that affect the target-site distribution of the yeast retrotransposon Ty1. Genetics 151:1393-1407[Abstract/Free Full Text].

HUANG, M., Z. ZHOU, and S. J. ELLEDGE, 1998  The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor. Cell 94:595-605[Medline].

HUGHES, T. R., M. J. MARTON, A. R. JONES, C. J. ROBERTS, and R. STOUGHTON et al., 2000  Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102:109-126[Medline].

IVESSA, A. S., J. Q. ZHOU, and V. A. ZAKIAN, 2000  The Saccharomyces Pif1p DNA helicase and the highly related Rrm3p have opposite effects on replication fork progression in ribosomal DNA. Cell 100:479-489[Medline].

JI, H., D. P. MOORE, M. A. BLOMBERG, L. T. BRAITERMAN, and D. F. VOYTAS et al., 1993  Hotspots for unselected Ty1 transposition events on yeast chromosome III are near tRNA genes and LTR sequences. Cell 73:1007-1018[Medline].

JONNIAUX, J. L., F. COSTER, B. PURNELLE, and A. GOFFEAU, 1994  A 21.7 kb DNA segment on the left arm of yeast chromosome XIV carries WHI3, GCR2, SPX18, SPX19, an homologue to the heat shock gene SSB1 and 8 new open reading frames of unknown function. Yeast 10:1639-1645[Medline].

JORDAN, I. K. and J. F. MCDONALD, 1998  Evidence for the role of recombination in the regulatory evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ty elements. J. Mol. Evol. 47:14-20[Medline].

KAWAKAMI, K., S. PANDE, B. FAIOLA, D. P. MOORE, and J. D. BOEKE et al., 1993  A rare tRNA-Arg(CCU) that regulates Ty1 element ribosomal frameshifting is essential for Ty1 retrotransposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Genetics 135:309-320[Abstract].

KIM, J. M., S. VANGURI, J. D. BOEKE, A. GABRIEL, and D. F. VOYTAS, 1998  Transposable elements and genome organization: a comprehensive survey of retrotransposons revealed by the complete Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome sequence. Genet. Res. 8:464-478.

KIM, Y. J., S. BJORKLUND, Y. LI, M. H. SAYRE, and R. D. KORNBERG, 1994  A multiprotein mediator of transcriptional activation and its interaction with the C-terminal repeat domain of RNA polymerase II. Cell 77:599-608[Medline].

LALOUX, I., E. DUBOIS, M. DEWERCHIN, and E. JACOBS, 1990  TEC1, a gene involved in the activation of Ty1 and Ty1-mediated gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: cloning and molecular analysis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:3541-3550[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LEA, D. E. and C. A. COULSON, 1949  The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49:264-285.

LEE, B.-S., C. P. LICHTENSTEIN, B. FAIOLA, L. A. RINCKEL, and W. WYSOCK et al., 1998  Posttranslational inhibition of Ty1 retrotransposition by nucleotide excision repair/transcription factor TFIIH subunits Ssl2p and Rad3p. Genetics 148:1743-1761[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LEE, B.-S., B. LIU, D. J. GARFINKEL, and A. M. BAILIS, 2000  Nucleotide excision repair/TFIIH helicases Rad3 and Ssl2 inhibit short-sequence recombination and Ty1 retrotransposition by similar mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2436-2445[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LENDVAY, T. S., D. K. MORRIS, J. SAH, B. BALASUBRAMANIAN, and V. LUNDBLAD, 1996  Senescence mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a defect in telomere replication identify three additional EST genes. Genetics 144:1399-1412[Abstract].

LEONHARDT, S. A., K. FEARSON, P. N. DANESE, and T. L. MASON, 1993  HSP78 encodes a yeast mitochondrial heat shock protein in the Clp family of ATP-dependent proteases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:6304-6313[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LIEBMAN, S. W. and G. NEWNAM, 1993  A ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, RAD6, affects the distribution of Ty1 retrotransposon integration positions. Genetics 133:499-508[Abstract].

LUNDBLAD, V. and J. W. SZOSTAK, 1989  A mutant with a defect in telomere elongation leads to senescence in yeast. Cell 57:633-643[Medline].

MARCAND, S., E. GILSON, and D. SHORE, 1997  A protein-counting mechanism for telomere length regulation in yeast. Science 275:986-990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MCCLINTOCK, B., 1984  The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226:792-801[Free Full Text].

MORAWETZ, C. and U. HAGEN, 1990  Effect of irradiation and mutagenic chemicals on the generation of ADH2- and ADH4-constitutive mutants in yeast: the inducibility of Ty transposition by UV and ethyl methanesulfonate. Mutat. Res. 229:69-77[Medline].

MORILLON, A., M. SPRINGER, and P. LESAGE, 2000  Activation of the Kss1 invasive-filamentous growth pathway induces Ty1 transcription and retrotransposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5766-5776[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MORROW, D. M., D. A. TAGLE, Y. SHILOH, F. S. COLLINS, and P. HIETER, 1995  TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1. Cell 82:831-840[Medline].

MYERS, L. C., C. M. GUSTAFSSON, D. A. BUSHNELL, M. LUI, and H. ERDJUMENT-BROMAGE et al., 1998  The Med proteins of yeast and their function through the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain. Genes Dev. 12:45-54[Abstract/Free Full Text].

OHTA, T., J. J. MICHEL, A. J. SCHOTTELIUS, and Y. XIONG, 1999  ROC1, a homolog of APC11, represents a family of cullin partners with an associated ubiquitin ligase activity. Mol. Cell 3:535-541[Medline].

PICOLOGLOU, S., N. BROWN, and S. W. LIEBMAN, 1990  Mutations in RAD6, a yeast gene encoding a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, stimulate retrotransposition. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:1017-1022[Abstract/Free Full Text].

QIAN, Z., H. HUANG, J. Y. HONG, C. L. BURCK, and S. D. JOHNSTON et al., 1998  Yeast Ty1 retrotransposition is stimulated by a synergistic interaction between mutations in chromatin assembly factor I and histone regulatory proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:4783-4792[Abstract/Free Full Text].

RATTRAY, A. J., B. K. SHAFER, and D. J. GARFINKEL, 2000  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA recombination and repair functions of the RAD52 epistasis group inhibit Ty1 transposition. Genetics 154:543-556[Abstract/Free Full Text].

RATTRAY, A. J., C. B. MCGILL, B. K. SHAFER, and J. N. STRATHERN, 2001  Fidelity of mitotic double-strand-break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A role for SAE2/COM1. Genetics 158:109-122[Abstract/Free Full Text].

REMPOLA, B., A. KANIAK, A. MIGDALSKI, J. RYTKA, and P. P. SLONIMSKI et al., 2000  Functional analysis of RRD1 (YIL153W) and RRD2 (YPL152W), which encode two putative activators of the phosphotyrosyl phosphatase activity of PP2A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 262:1081-1092[Medline].

RITCHIE, K. B. and T. D. PETES, 2000  The Mre11p/Rad50p/Xrs2p complex and the Tel1p function in a single pathway for telomere maintenance in yeast. Genetics 155:475-479[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ROLFE, M. and G. BANKS, 1986  Induction of yeast Ty element transcription by ultraviolet light. Nature 319:499-508[Medline].

ROSE, A. and J. BROACH, 1990  Propagation and expression of cloned genes in yeast: 2-micron circle-based vectors. Methods Enzymol. 185:234-279[Medline].

ROSS-MACDONALD, P., A. SHEEHAN, C. FRIDDLE, G. S. ROEDER and M. SNYDER, 1998 Transposon tagging I: a novel system for monitoring protein production, function and localization, pp. 161–179 in Methods in Microbiology: Yeast Gene Analysis, edited by A. J. P. BROWN and M. F. TUITE. Academic Press, San Diego.

SCHMITT, M., W. NEUPERT, and T. LANGER, 1995  Hsp78, a Clp homologue within mitochondria, can substitute for chaperone functions of mt-hsp70. EMBO J. 14:3434-3444[Medline].

SIKORSKI, R. S. and P. HIETER, 1989  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19-27[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SINGER, M. S. and D. E. GOTTSCHLING, 1994  TLC1: template RNA component of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase. Science 266:404-409[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SMITH, V., K. N. CHOU, D. LASHKARI, D. BOTSTEIN, and P. O. BROWN, 1996  Functional analysis of the genes of yeast chromosome V by genetic footprinting. Science 274:2069-2074[Abstract/Free Full Text].

STALEVA STALEVA, L. and P. VENKOV, 2001  Activation of Ty transposition by mutagens. Mutat. Res. 474:93-103[Medline].

STRAMBIO-DE-CASTILLIA, C., G. BLOBEL, and M. P. ROUT, 1999  Proteins connecting the nuclear pore complex with the nuclear interior. J. Cell Biol. 144:839-855[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SUNG, P., 1997  Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev. 11:1111-1121[Abstract/Free Full Text].

TABTIANG, R. K. and I. HERSKOWITZ, 1998  Nuclear proteins Nut1p and Nut2p cooperate to negatively regulate a Swi4p-dependent lacZ reporter gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:4707-4718[Abstract/Free Full Text].

TENG, S. C. and V. A. ZAKIAN, 1999  Telomere-telomere recombination is an efficient bypass pathway for telomere maintenance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:8083-8093[Abstract/Free Full Text].

TITOV, A. A. and G. BLOBEL, 1999  The karyopherin Kap122p/Pdr6p imports both subunits of the transcription factor IIA into the nucleus. J. Cell Biol. 18:235-246.

TODA, T., S. CAMERON, P. SASS, and M. WIGLER, 1988  SCH9, a gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that encodes a protein distinct from, but functionally and structurally related to, cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunits. Genes Dev. 2:517-527[Abstract/Free Full Text].

TYE, B. K., 1999  MCM proteins in DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68:649-686[Medline].

USUI, T., H. OGAWA, and J. H. PETRINI, 2001  A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 7:1255-1266[Medline].

VOYTAS, D. F., and J. D. BOEKE, 2002 Ty1 and Ty5 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Mobile DNA II, edited by N. CRAIG, R. CRAIGIE, M. GELLERT and A. LAMBOWITZ. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC (in press).

WANG, Y. X., H. ZHAO, T. M. HARDING, D. S. GOMES DE MESQUITA, and C. L. WOLDRINGH et al., 1996  Multiple classes of yeast mutants are defective in vacuole partitioning yet target vacuole proteins correctly. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:1375-1389[Abstract].

WATT, P., I. D. HICKSON, R. H. BORTS, and E. J. LOUIS, 1996  SGS1, a homologue of the Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes, is required for maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 144:935-945[Abstract].

WILKE, C. M. and J. ADAMS, 1992  Fitness effects of Ty transposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 131:31-42[Abstract].

WINZELER, E. A., D. D. SHOEMAKER, A. ASTROMOFF, H. LIANG, and K. ANDERSON, 1999  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285:901-906[Abstract/Free Full Text].

WOTTON, D. and D. SHORE, 1997  A novel Rap1p-interacting factor, Rif2p, cooperates with Rif1p to regulate telomere length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 11:748-760[Abstract/Free Full Text].

XU, H. and J. D. BOEKE, 1990  Localization of sequences required in cis for yeast Ty1 element transposition near the long terminal repeats: analysis of mini-Ty1 elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:2695-2702[Abstract/Free Full Text].

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Fujii, M. Kitabatake, T. Sakata, A. Miyata, and M. Ohno A role for ubiquitin in the clearance of nonfunctional rRNAs Genes & Dev., April 15, 2009; 23(8): 963 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Coros, C. L. Piazza, V. R. Chalamcharla, and M. Belfort A mutant screen reveals RNase E as a silencer of group II intron retromobility in Escherichia coli RNA, December 1, 2008; 14(12): 2634 - 2644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Malagon and T. H. Jensen The T Body, a New Cytoplasmic RNA Granule in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2008; 28(19): 6022 - 6032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Stavropoulos, V. Nagy, G. Blobel, and A. Hoelz Molecular basis for the autoregulation of the protein acetyl transferase Rtt109 PNAS, August 26, 2008; 105(34): 12236 - 12241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Deem, K. Barker, K. VanHulle, B. Downing, A. Vayl, and A. Malkova Defective Break-Induced Replication Leads to Half-Crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 1845 - 1860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Nyswaner, M. A. Checkley, M. Yi, R. M. Stephens, and D. J. Garfinkel Chromatin-Associated Genes Protect the Yeast Genome From Ty1 Insertional Mutagenesis Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 197 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Roberts, I. W. Zaidi, J. A. Vaisica, M. Peter, and G. W. Brown Regulation of Rtt107 Recruitment to Stalled DNA Replication Forks by the Cullin Rtt101 and the Rtt109 Acetyltransferase Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2008; 19(1): 171 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Curcio, A. E. Kenny, S. Moore, D. J. Garfinkel, M. Weintraub, E. R. Gamache, and D. T. Scholes S-Phase Checkpoint Pathways Stimulate the Mobility of the Retrovirus-Like Transposon Ty1 Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2007; 27(24): 8874 - 8885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. Maxwell and M. J. Curcio Retrosequence formation restructures the yeast genome Genes & Dev., December 15, 2007; 21(24): 3308 - 3318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Omberg, G. H. Golub, and O. Alter A tensor higher-order singular value decomposition for integrative analysis of DNA microarray data from different studies PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18371 - 18376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Flott, C. Alabert, G. W. Toh, R. Toth, N. Sugawara, D. G. Campbell, J. E. Haber, P. Pasero, and J. Rouse Phosphorylation of Slx4 by Mec1 and Tel1 Regulates the Single-Strand Annealing Mode of DNA Repair in Budding Yeast Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2007; 27(18): 6433 - 6445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. Maxwell and M. J. Curcio Host Factors That Control Long Terminal Repeat Retrotransposons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Implications for Regulation of Mammalian Retroviruses Eukaryot. Cell, July 1, 2007; 6(7): 1069 - 1080. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Pena-Castillo and T. R. Hughes Why Are There Still Over 1000 Uncharacterized Yeast Genes? Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 7 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ni, J. M. Laplaza, and T. W. Jeffries Transposon Mutagenesis To Improve the Growth of Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae on D-Xylose Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 1, 2007; 73(7): 2061 - 2066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Driscoll, A. Hudson, and S. P. Jackson Yeast Rtt109 Promotes Genome Stability by Acetylating Histone H3 on Lysine 56 Science, February 2, 2007; 315(5812): 649 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Han, H. Zhou, B. Horazdovsky, K. Zhang, R.-M. Xu, and Z. Zhang Rtt109 Acetylates Histone H3 Lysine 56 and Functions in DNA Replication Science, February 2, 2007; 315(5812): 653 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ogiwara, A. Ui, T. Enomoto, and M. Seki Role of Elg1 protein in double strand break repair Nucleic Acids Res., January 28, 2007; 35(2): 353 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Garfinkel, K. M. Stefanisko, K. M. Nyswaner, S. P. Moore, J. Oh, and S. H. Hughes Retrotransposon Suicide: Formation of Ty1 Circles and Autointegration via a Central DNA Flap J. Virol., December 15, 2006; 80(24): 11920 - 11934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Blake, B. Luke, P. Kanellis, P. Jorgensen, T. Goh, S. Penfold, B.-J. Breitkreutz, D. Durocher, M. Peter, and M. Tyers The F-Box Protein Dia2 Overcomes Replication Impedance to Promote Genome Stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 1709 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. H. Schmidt and R. D. Kolodner Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants PNAS, November 28, 2006; 103(48): 18196 - 18201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Sawyer and H. S. Malik Eukaryotic Transposable Elements and Genome Evolution Special Feature: Positive selection of yeast nonhomologous end-joining genes and a retrotransposon conflict hypothesis PNAS, November 21, 2006; 103(47): 17614 - 17619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Azvolinsky, S. Dunaway, J. Z. Torres, J. B. Bessler, and V. A. Zakian The S. cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase moves with the replication fork and affects replication of all yeast chromosomes. Genes & Dev., November 15, 2006; 20(22): 3104 - 3116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. H. Schmidt, J. Wu, and R. D. Kolodner Control of Translocations between Highly Diverged Genes by Sgs1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Homolog of the Bloom's Syndrome Protein. Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(14): 5406 - 5420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Mou, A. E. Kenny, and M. J. Curcio Hos2 and Set3 Promote Integration of Ty1 Retrotransposons at tRNA Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2157 - 2167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Zhang, X. An, K. Yang, D. L. Perlstein, L. Hicks, N. Kelleher, J. Stubbe, and M. Huang Nuclear localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribonucleotide reductase small subunit requires a karyopherin and a WD40 repeat protein PNAS, January 31, 2006; 103(5): 1422 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Roberts, M. S. Kobor, S. A. Bastin-Shanower, M. Ii, S. A. Horte, J. W. Gin, A. Emili, J. Rine, S. J. Brill, and G. W. Brown Slx4 Regulates DNA Damage Checkpoint-dependent Phosphorylation of the BRCT Domain Protein Rtt107/Esc4 Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2006; 17(1): 539 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Ohya, J. Sese, M. Yukawa, F. Sano, Y. Nakatani, T. L. Saito, A. Saka, T. Fukuda, S. Ishihara, S. Oka, et al. High-dimensional and large-scale phenotyping of yeast mutants PNAS, December 27, 2005; 102(52): 19015 - 19020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. R. Havecker, X. Gao, and D. F. Voytas The Sireviruses, a Plant-Specific Lineage of the Ty1/copia Retrotransposons, Interact with a Family of Proteins Related to Dynein Light Chain 8 Plant Physiology, October 1, 2005; 139(2): 857 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Huang, H. Zhou, D. Katzmann, M. Hochstrasser, E. Atanasova, and Z. Zhang Rtt106p is a histone chaperone involved in heterochromatin-mediated silencing PNAS, September 20, 2005; 102(38): 13410 - 13415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.-L. Todeschini, A. Morillon, M. Springer, and P. Lesage Severe Adenine Starvation Activates Ty1 Transcription and Retrotransposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(17): 7459 - 7472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Franco, A. Canela, P. Klatt, and M. A. Blasco Effectors of mammalian telomere dysfunction: a comparative transcriptome analysis using mouse models Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2005; 26(9): 1613 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Putnam, V. Pennaneach, and R. D. Kolodner Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Model System To Define the Chromosomal Instability Phenotype Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2005; 25(16): 7226 - 7238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kim, K. Robertson, K. J. L. Mylonas, F. C. Gray, I. Charapitsa, and S. A. MacNeill Contrasting effects of Elg1-RFC and Ctf18-RFC inactivation in the absence of fully functional RFC in fission yeast Nucleic Acids Res., July 21, 2005; 33(13): 4078 - 4089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Liu, X. Zhang, R. L. Lester, and R. C. Dickson The Sphingoid Long Chain Base Phytosphingosine Activates AGC-type Protein Kinases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Including Ypk1, Ypk2, and Sch9 J. Biol. Chem., June 17, 2005; 280(24): 22679 - 22687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Irwin, M. Aye, P. Baldi, N. Beliakova-Bethell, H. Cheng, Y. Dou, W. Liou, and S. Sandmeyer Retroviruses and yeast retrotransposons use overlapping sets of host genes Genome Res., May 1, 2005; 15(5): 641 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Garfinkel, K. M. Nyswaner, K. M. Stefanisko, C. Chang, and S. P. Moore Ty1 Copy Number Dynamics in Saccharomyces Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 1845 - 1857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Baldwin, A. C. Berger, A. H. Corbett, and N. Osheroff Mms22p protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae from DNA damage induced by topoisomerase II Nucleic Acids Res., February 17, 2005; 33(3): 1021 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Banerjee and K. Myung Increased Genome Instability and Telomere Length in the elg1-Deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mutant Are Regulated by S-Phase Checkpoints Eukaryot. Cell, December 1, 2004; 3(6): 1557 - 1566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. Maxwell, C. Coombes, A. E. Kenny, J. F. Lawler, J. D. Boeke, and M. J. Curcio Ty1 Mobilizes Subtelomeric Y' Elements in Telomerase-Negative Saccharomyces cerevisiae Survivors Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2004; 24(22): 9887 - 9898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Aye, B. Irwin, N. Beliakova-Bethell, E. Chen, J. Garrus, and S. Sandmeyer Host Factors That Affect Ty3 Retrotransposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1159 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Bessler and V. A. Zakian The Amino Terminus of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA Helicase Rrm3p Modulates Protein Function Altering Replication and Checkpoint Activity Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1205 - 1218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Bachman, Y. Eby, and J. D. Boeke Local Definition of Ty1 Target Preference by Long Terminal Repeats and Clustered tRNA Genes Genome Res., July 1, 2004; 14(7): 1232 - 1247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Smith, J.-Y. Hwang, S. Banerjee, A. Majeed, A. Gupta, and K. Myung Mutator genes for suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements identified by a genome-wide screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae PNAS, June 15, 2004; 101(24): 9039 - 9044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Z. Torres, S. L. Schnakenberg, and V. A. Zakian Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA Helicase Promotes Genome Integrity by Preventing Replication Fork Stalling: Viability of rrm3 Cells Requires the Intra-S-Phase Checkpoint and Fork Restart Activities Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2004; 24(8): 3198 - 3212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. H. Schmidt and R. D. Kolodner Requirement of Rrm3 Helicase for Repair of Spontaneous DNA Lesions in Cells Lacking Srs2 or Sgs1 Helicase Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2004; 24(8): 3213 - 3226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Z. Torres, J. B. Bessler, and V. A. Zakian Local chromatin structure at the ribosomal DNA causes replication fork pausing and genome instability in the absence of the S. cerevisiae DNA helicase Rrm3p Genes & Dev., March 1, 2004; 18(5): 498 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Graumann, L. A. Dunipace, J. H. Seol, W. H. McDonald, J. R. Yates III, B. J. Wold, and R. J. Deshaies Applicability of Tandem Affinity Purification MudPIT to Pathway Proteomics in Yeast Mol. Cell. Proteomics, March 1, 2004; 3(3): 226 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. K. Baetz, N. J. Krogan, A. Emili, J. Greenblatt, and P. Hieter The ctf13-30/CTF13 Genomic Haploinsufficiency Modifier Screen Identifies the Yeast Chromatin Remodeling Complex RSC, Which Is Required for the Establishment of Sister Chromatid Cohesion Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2004; 24(3): 1232 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. Scholes, A. E. Kenny, E. R. Gamache, Z. Mou, and M. J. Curcio Activation of a LTR-retrotransposon by telomere erosion PNAS, December 23, 2003; 100(26): 15736 - 15741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Breitkreutz, L. Boucher, B.-J. Breitkreutz, M. Sultan, I. Jurisica, and M. Tyers Phenotypic and Transcriptional Plasticity Directed by a Yeast Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Network Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 997 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-E. Huang, A.-G. Rio, A. Nicolas, and R. D. Kolodner A genomewide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes that suppress the accumulation of mutations PNAS, September 30, 2003; 100(20): 11529 - 11534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Garfinkel, K. Nyswaner, J. Wang, and J.-Y. Cho Post-transcriptional Cosuppression of Ty1 Retrotransposition Genetics, September 1, 2003; 165(1): 83 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ben-Aroya, A. Koren, B. Liefshitz, R. Steinlauf, and M. Kupiec ELG1, a yeast gene required for genome stability, forms a complex related to replication factor C PNAS, August 19, 2003; 100(17): 9906 - 9911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Griffith, L. E. Coleman, A. S. Raymond, S. G. Goodson, W. S. Pittard, C. Tsui, and S. E. Devine Functional Genomics Reveals Relationships Between the Retrovirus-Like Ty1 Element and Its Host Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, July 1, 2003; 164(3): 867 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. H. Schmidt, K. L. Derry, and R. D. Kolodner Saccharomyces cerevisiae RRM3, a 5' to 3' DNA Helicase, Physically Interacts with Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen J. Biol. Chem., November 15, 2002; 277(47): 45331 - 45337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]