- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Jensen, M. A.
- Articles by Lindquist, S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Jensen, M. A.
- Articles by Lindquist, S.
Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution of a Prion-like Protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mark A. Jensena, Heather L. Trueb, Yury O. Chernoffc, and Susan Lindquistba Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
b Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
c School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0230
Corresponding author: Mark A. Jensen, Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-8070., majensen{at}u.washington.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: W. STEPHAN
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The prion-like behavior of Sup35p, the eRF3 homolog in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mediates the activity of the cytoplasmic nonsense suppressor known as [PSI+]. Sup35p is divided into three regions of distinct function. The N-terminal and middle (M) regions are required for the induction and propagation of [PSI+] but are not necessary for translation termination or cell viability. The C-terminal region encompasses the termination function. The existence of the N-terminal region in SUP35 homologs of other fungi has led some to suggest that this region has an adaptive function separate from translation termination. To examine this hypothesis, we sequenced portions of SUP35 in 21 strains of S. cerevisiae, including 13 clinical isolates. We analyzed nucleotide polymorphism within this species and compared it to sequence divergence from a sister species, S. paradoxus. The N domain of Sup35p is highly conserved in amino acid sequence and is highly biased in codon usage toward preferred codons. Amino acid changes are under weak purifying selection based on a quantitative analysis of polymorphism and divergence. We also conclude that the clinical strains of S. cerevisiae are not recently derived and that outcrossing between strains in S. cerevisiae may be relatively rare in nature.
PRIONS are infectious agents responsible for a wide variety of debilitating diseases in humans and other mammals (![]()
![]()
The discovery of prion-like phenomena in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has led to a new model system for prion study (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The potentially deleterious effects of low-level translation termination disruption suggest that [PSI+] could be a disease of yeast, by analogy with the mammalian case. However, several authors (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
|
|
As a first step toward understanding the adaptive and other evolutionary properties of SUP35, we examined nucleotide polymorphism and divergence within a DNA fragment spanning the N and M domains among 23 S. cerevisiae alleles and a longer fragment containing N, M, and a portion of C for a set of 10 alleles (Fig 2). Clinical S. cerevisiae strains isolated from different immunocompromised patients worldwide (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Our analysis provides evidence that the prion-determining domain of Sup35p, if not an adaptation, is at worst only weakly deleterious. We find that the amino acid sequence of all three regions is constrained, presumably by purifying selection against nonsynonymous nucleotide variants. SUP35 is also biased in codon usage toward preferred codons, suggesting that selection can influence the frequency of weakly deleterious variants in this gene. It is possible that this purifying selection has relaxed in the NM region in the S. cerevisiae lineage. Purifying selection in the C region appears to be ongoing. Using recombination estimates based on linkage disequilibrium, we calculate a crude lower bound for the rate of outcrossing between clonal S. cerevisiae lineages.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Strains:
We sequenced alleles from 13 clinical isolates, seven laboratory strains, two commercial strains, and one wild vineyard strain of S. cerevisiae and one allele from a wild-caught S. paradoxus isolate. Details of the provenance of the strains are in Fig 2. We also included the GenBank sequence of ![]()
Most of the NM sequences were derived from SUP35 genes cloned during the course of ongoing studies of phenotypic variation in yeast strains carrying [PSI+] in the Lindquist lab. Sequences that include a portion of the C region were obtained as part of a preliminary study of polymorphism in a subset of these strains; industrial strain sequences and part of the S. paradoxus sequence were provided by the Chernoff lab.
The sample, although not intentionally assembled for a population genetics study, nevertheless represents a random worldwide sample of S. cerevisiae and as such provides a reasonable first approximation of species-wide nucleotide variation at this locus.
Gene regions:
For 23 alleles, we analyzed a 754-bp region spanning the N and M region of SUP35 [corresponding to coordinates 7441497 of GenBank accession no.
M21129 (![]()
DNA sequencing:
Strains were sequenced by one of two methods. For sequencing performed at Chicago, the desired region was amplified from genomic template using PCR and cloned into either pZERO-2.1 (Invitrogen, San Diego) or pmCNMG (Lindquist lab yeast vector, sequence available on request). Two or three clones were sequenced in both directions, with the consensus base among clones accepted. Sequences were run by the Genotyping and Sequencing Center of the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago. For sequencing performed at Georgia Tech, genomic PCR product was used directly in a cycle-sequencing reaction. Sequences were run by the Molecular Genetics Instrumentation Facility of the University System of Georgia, Athens. The differences reflect differences in standard laboratory protocol; no particular difficulty in sequencing any strain was encountered by either group.
For nine of the longer fragments, we obtained sequence by first amplifying genomic DNA using primers SUP35C725U and SUP35C2064L (see Fig 1 legend for primer sequences). PCR products were cloned into a derivative of plasmid pZERO-2.1 (Invitrogen). Clones were sequenced in both directions, using universal M13 primers M13-20 and M13rev and internal primers SUP35C1143L, SUP35C1144U, SUP35C1538L, and SUP35C1550U.
For the strains Red Star, Bass Ale, and SK-1, genomic DNA was amplified with primers SUP35C725U and SUP35C2064L and was gel purified and sequenced directly, using these primers plus internal primers as above.
The NM regions of the remaining S. cerevisiae alleles were cloned into Lindquist lab yeast vector pmCNMG at BamHI/SacII sites from genomic PCR products. Plasmid DNA was sequenced directly in both directions using 5CNMSEQ (5'-GTGCAATATCATATAGAAGTCATCG-3'), 3CNMSEQ (5'-CAACAAGAATTGGGACAACTCCAG-3'), and internal primers SUP35C1144U and SUP35-382Ls. 5CNMSEQ and 3CNMSEQ were designed from vector sequence, with 3' ends lying 51 and 26 bp from the ends of the insert, respectively.
The NM region of S. paradoxus was amplified with primers SUP35-741 and SUP35REV-1551, gel purified, and sequenced directly by using the same primers and internal primers SUP35C1143L and SUP35-741. To amplify the C region of S. paradoxus, we performed a first round amplification on genomic DNA with primers SUP35C725U and SUP35C2064L. This product was then amplified in second round reactions containing SUP35C2064L and either SUP35C725U or SUP35C1144U. Both long and short products were cloned and sequenced using universal primers.
Sequences were managed with Sequencher 3.0 software (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI). S. cerevisiae sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession nos. AY052599, AY052600, AY052601, AY052602, AY052603, AY052604, AY052605, AY052606, AY052607, AY052608, AY052609, AY052610, AY052611 and AY052613, AY052614, AY052615, AY052616, AY052617, AY052618, AY052619, AY052620, AY052621. S. paradoxus sequence is at accession no. AY052612.
Polymorphism and divergence analysis:
Sequence alignments were performed using Sequencher and MegAlign (DNASTAR, Madison, WI). Nucleotide polymorphism and divergence were analyzed using programs DNAsp 3.0 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Protein constraint and codon bias analysis:
Simulation estimates of the substitution rates Ka, Ks, and their distributions were obtained using a program of ![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Polymorphism and divergence:
We did not observe statistically significant differences between regions N and M for any of our parameter estimates. We therefore combine the two, referring to the NM region in the following analysis. For the NM region of 754 bp, we found 17 segregating sites in 23 alleles. For 534 bp of the C region, we found 1 singleton segregating site in 10 alleles. Polymorphic sites are displayed in Fig 2, and amino acid sequences between S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus are compared in Fig 3. Evolutionary parameters are summarized in Table 1. Tajima's D, a measure of the departure of the allelic frequency spectrum from neutrality (![]()
|
The overall divergence in the region between S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus is 0.10, using KIMURA's (1981) two-parameter model. The two species' sequences can be unambiguously aligned, without gaps, over the regions analyzed. Table 2 contains numbers of polymorphic sites and fixed differences for each of the regions, separated into synonymous and nonsynonymous changes. Independence tests performed on the 2 x 2 comparisons for each region constitute the McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test (![]()
|
Protein constraint:
We measure evolutionary constraint against amino acid change in SUP35, using the rates of nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution, Ka, and synonymous substitution, Ks. The program of ![]()
|
Strength of selection:
To assess the strength of purifying selection against amino acid changes, we applied the method of (![]()
![]()
Assuming free recombination among sites in a coding region in which replacement changes are under selection with constant selection coefficient s and synonymous changes are neutral, ![]()
![]()
![]()
Table 2 contains the median estimates and 95% confidence intervals for Ns, the product of the effective population size and the average selection coefficient. Limits of confidence intervals are the Ns values at the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the simulated distribution. The average amino acid replacement is under weak purifying selection across the two regions, with stronger selection against changes evident in the C-terminal region.
Codon bias:
The level of codon bias complements protein sequence constraint as a measure of the long-term importance of a gene to organism fitness. Amino acid conservation implies functional importance of the particular protein secondary structure. If the choice of codons encoding those constrained amino acids is highly biased, then selection for translational accuracy and efficiency is great enough to significantly constrain the nucleotide sequence of the gene at synonymous sites (see ![]()
We calculated the empirical distribution of the CAI (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Estimates of genetic exchange:
Polymorphism data allow us to make inferences concerning the rates of recombination and gene conversion, scaled to the population's effective size (![]()
![]()
![]()
SS is 1.24; this is comparable to that found in Drosophila (median for 24 Drosophila melanogaster loci,
1.5; ![]()
1.3; ![]()
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Amino acid constraint in Sup35p:
We can draw several conclusions of interest. First, the termination function is clearly very highly constrained. There are no nonsynonymous changes between species among the 178 codons of this region that we have analyzed. This is in spite of the fact that the synonymous rates of the two regions are the same; the distributions of Ks for the two regions overlap almost completely (Table 3). We can therefore assume that the intrinsic mutation rates for the two regions are the same. Although we consider only a portion of the termination function, the lack of divergence is still significant. Consider the following comparison with the NM region. Out of 534 sites, 415 are nonsynonymous in the C region (Table 2). Using the lowest rate of nonsynonymous substitution for the NM region, we expect to see at least (415)(0.019) = 7 nonsynonymous substitutions in the portion of the C region we examine, were the two regions evolving at the same rate. This suggests that the two regions are under different selective regimes and complements the functional analysis that distinguishes the two regions.
The NM region clearly has been under constraint, though it is more labile than the C region. We see this in two ways. First, Ka is less than Ks, and the distributions do not overlap (Table 3). If Ks is taken as an estimate of the neutral mutation rate, and selection is assumed to be the agent that causes substitution rates to vary, significantly slower replacement site evolution is evidence of purifying selection against replacement changes or "selective constraint" on the NM amino acid sequence (![]()
Note that this conclusion is conservative. SUP35 is highly codon biased, so that synonymous changes are also constrained; the actual neutral rate is likely to be higher than Ks. In other words, if synonymous changes are under purifying selection, then nonsynonymous changes must be as well, according to these results.
Second, we can compare the evolutionary rates at NM with rates at other loci. Ideally, we would compare the Ka of NM with the Ka values of a large set of genes having similar rates of synonymous substitution. We could then ask whether NM is relatively highly constrained, with respect not to a neutral model but to the average expressed coding sequence. At this time, only two S. paradoxus coding sequences encoding nonduplicated nuclear genes are currently available for such a comparison. The genes REC104 and REC114 are so-called "early exchange" genes, required for meiotic recombination and accurate meiotic division (![]()
Evolutionary conservation of the prion-determining domain:
Prions are proteins that can switch to different stable conformations that alter their function in a self-perpetuating way. If the protein in the prion state disrupts the function of the protein in wild-type conformation, as in the case of [PSI+], the presence of the prion may be deleterious. In such a case, one may expect natural selection to lead to elimination of the capacity of the protein to adopt the alternate conformation, if constraints on the wild-type function of the protein permit this. In this light, the results of this study are somewhat counterintuitive. In spite of its ability to foster prion formation and its apparent dispensability with respect to the termination function, the prion-determining NM region of Sup35p is significantly conserved in amino acid sequence. In addition, SUP35 is biased in codon usage across its length, which is evidence that translational accuracy and efficiency are important for both regions.
The biological function of the NM region is unknown. Deletion of the homologous region of eRF3 in the fungus Podospora anserina reduces reproductive efficiency (![]()
![]()
How deleterious is the prion state in yeast? If a prion is sufficiently deleterious, there will be selective pressure to eliminate it while preserving other functions of the prion-determining domain, if this is possible. Our study suggests that selection against the prion state need not be very strong to affect the sequence of SUP35. Codon bias results show that synonymous changes away from preferred codons have been eliminated over time. Such changes are under very weak selection (![]()
Single replacement changes in NM have been identified that prevent [PSI+] propagation (PNM mutations) or inhibit nonsense suppression [anti-suppressor (ASU) mutations; ![]()
![]()
![]()
Mode of selection on SUP35:
The significant McDonald-Kreitman test over the entire fragment indicates a deficiency of amino acid replacements relative to polymorphism. That is, weak purifying selection against replacement changes appears to be acting in the region (see, e.g., the discussion in ![]()
Origin of clinical isolates:
The neutral distribution of polymorphism in clinical isolates (see Table 1) suggests that these are not highly "clonal," confirming a study of genomic restriction fragment length polymorphism variation in these strains (![]()
Frequency of outcrossing:
We used HUDSON's (1987) method to estimate the scaled recombination rate C = 4NR in the NM region, where R is distance in centimorgans. Since the scaled neutral mutation rate
equals 4NU, where U is the mutation rate for the region, the estimated value of C/
SS would closely estimate the biological parameter c/u in a panmictic sexual population, where c is the coefficient of exchange, or R divided by the number of bases, and u is the mutation rate per base pair per generation.
Taking c for the SUP35 region to be 3.1 x 10-6 [estimated by comparing physical and genetic maps of chromosome IV (![]()
![]()
SS, 1.24. This discrepancy indicates an excess of linkage disequilibrium among variants compared to a neutrally evolving panmictic population (![]()
Several processes are known to increase linkage disequilibrium for a given rate of recombination, including population subdivision (see, e.g., ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If we make the simplifying assumption that population subdivision, inbreeding, and asexual reproduction are the principal causes of disequilibrium, we can make a crude estimate of the rate at which genetically divergent partially geographically isolated S. cerevisiae clones interbreed. Supposing that such outcrossing occurs once every m generations (meiosis or mitosis), we must replace c in the above ratio with c/m. Then C/
SS estimates c/mu; that is, the frequency of outcrossing is
=
= 8.79 x 10-5/generation. Outcrossing in nature, therefore, may be rare. Ignoring selective forces that increase disequilibrium, however, makes this rough calculation a lower bound.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to S. M. Belenkiy for help in some of the experiments. We thank C. Holm, J. H. McCusker, and S. W. Liebman for generous gifts of yeast strains, and T. Serio for the pmCNMG construct. We also thank P. Andolfatto, J. M. Comeron, M. Kreitman, M. Long, P. Sniegowski, and G. Wyckoff for insightful discussions and comments; B. Charlesworth and R. R. Hudson for their thorough critiques of the manuscript; and K. H. Jensen for support. This work was supported in part by a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant to M.A.J. and grants R21GM55091 and R01GM58763 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences to Y.O.C. H.L.T. is a fellow of the Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research.
Manuscript received January 20, 2000; Accepted for publication August 2, 2001.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AKASHI, H., 1995 Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics 139:1067-1076[Abstract].
ANDOLFATTO, P. and M. PRZEWORSKI, 2000 A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics 156:257-268
BAILLEUL, P. A., G. P. NEWNAM, J. N. STEENBERGEN, and Y. O. CHERNOFF, 1999 Genetic study of interactions between the cytoskeletal assembly protein Sla1 and prion-forming domain of the release factor Sup35 (eRF3) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 153:81-94
CHERNOFF, Y. O., M. V. PTYUSHKINA, M. G. SAMSONOVA, G. I. SIZONENCKO, and Y. I. PAVLOV et al., 1992 Conservative system for dosage-dependent modulation of translational fidelity in eukaryotes. Biochemie 74:455-461[Medline].
CHERNOFF, Y. O., I. L. DERKACH, and S. G. INGE-VECHTOMOV, 1993 Multicopy SUP35 gene induces de novo appearance of psi-like factors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 24:286-270.
CHERNOFF, Y. O., S. L. LINDQUIST, B. ONO, S. G. INGE-VECHTOMOV, and S. W. LIEBMAN, 1995 Role of the chaperone protein hsp104 in propagation of the yeast prion-like factor [PSI+]. Science 268:880-884
CHERNOFF, Y. O., G. P. NEWNAM, J. KUMAR, K. ALLEN, and A. D. ZINK, 1999 Evidence for a "protein mutator" in yeast: role of the Hsp70-related chaperone Ssb in formation, stability and toxicity of the [PSI] prion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:8103-8112
CHERRY, J. M., C. BALL, S. WENG, G. JUVIK, and R. SCHMIDT et al., 1997 Genetic and physical maps of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 387:67-73[Medline].
CLEMONS, K. V., P.-S. PARK, J. H. MCCUSKER, M. J. MCCULLOUGH, and R. W. DAVIS et al., 1997 Application of DNA typing methods and genetic analysis to epidemiology and taxonomy of Saccharomyces isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1822-1828[Abstract].
COGHLAN, A. and K. H. WOLFE, 2000 Relationship of codon bias to mRNA concentration and protein length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Yeast 16:1131-1145[Medline].
COMERON, J. M., 1999 K-Estimator: calculation of the number of nucleotide substitutions per site and the confidence intervals. Bioinformatics 15:763-764
COX, B. S., 1965
, a cytoplasmic suppressor of super-suppressor in yeast. Heredity 20:505-521.
DEPACE, A. H., A. SANTOSOS, P. HILLNER, and J. S. WEISSMAN, 1998 A critical role for amino-terminal glutamine/asparagine repeats in the formation and propagation of a yeast prion. Cell 93:1241-1252[Medline].
DERKATCH, I. L., Y. O. CHERNOFF, V. V. KUSHNIROV, S. G. INGE-VECHTOMOV, and S. W. LIEBMAN, 1996 Genesis and variability of [PSI] prion factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 144:1375-1386[Abstract].
DOEL, S. M., S. J. MCCREADY, C. R. NIERRAS, and B. S. COX, 1994 The dominant PNM- mutation which eliminates the psi factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the result of a missense mutation in the SUP35 gene. Genetics 137:659-670[Abstract].
DRAKE, J. W., B. CHARLESWORTH, D. CHARLESWORTH, and J. CROW, 1998 Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148:1667-1686
FU, Y.-X., 1997 Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147:915-925[Abstract].
GAGNY, B. and P. SILAR, 1998 Identification of the genes encoding the cytosolic translation release factors from Podospora anserina and analysis of their role during the life cycle. Genetics 149:1763-1775
GLOVER, J. R., A. S. KOWAL, E. C. SCHIRMER, M. M. PATINO, and J.-J. LIU et al., 1997 Self-seeded fibers formed by Sup35, the protein determinant of [PSI+], a heritable prion-like factor of S. cerevisiae. Cell 89:811-819[Medline].
HEY, J. and J. WAKELEY, 1997 A coalescent estimator of the population recombination rate. Genetics 145:833-846[Abstract].
HORWICH, A. L. and J. S. WEISSMAN, 1997 Deadly conformationsprotein misfolding in prion disease. Cell 89:499-510[Medline].
HUDSON, R. R., 1987 Estimating the recombination parameter of a finite population model without selection. Genet. Res. 50:245-250[Medline].
HUDSON, R. R. and N. L. KAPLAN, 1985 Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111:147-164
HUDSON, R. R., A. G. SAEZ, and F. J. AYALA, 1997 DNA variation at the Sod locus of Drosophila melanogaster: an unfolding story of natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7725-7728
JIAO, K., S. A. BULLARD, L. SALEM, and R. E. MALONE, 1999 Coordination of the initiation of recombination and reductional division in meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 152:117-128
KIMURA, M., 1981 Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:454-458
KIMURA, M., 1983 The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
KUSHNIROV, V. V., M. D. TER-AVANESYAN, M. V. TELCKOV, A. P. SURGUCHOV, and V. N. SMIRNOV et al., 1988 Nucleotide sequence of the SUP2 (SUP35) gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 66:45-54[Medline].
KUSHNIROV, V. V., M. D. TER-AVANESYAN, S. A. DIDICHENKO, V. N. SMIRNOV, and Y. O. CHERNOFF et al., 1990 Divergence and conservation of SUP2 (SUP35) gene of yeasts Pichia pinus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 6:461-472[Medline].
LIEBMAN, S. W. and I. L. DERKATCH, 1999 The yeast [PSI+] prion: making sense of nonsense. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1181-1184
MCCUSKER, J. H., K. V. CLEMONS, D. A. STEVENS, and R. W. DAVIS, 1994 Genetic characterization of pathogenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates. Genetics 136:1261-1269[Abstract].
MCDONALD, J. H. and M. KREITMAN, 1991 Adaptive protein evolution and the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351:652-654[Medline].
MONTROCHER, R., M.-C. VERNER, J. BRIOLAY, C. GAUTIER, and R. MARMEISSE, 1998 Phylogenetic analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae group based on polymorphisms of rDNA spacer sequences. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:295-303
MORIYAMA, E. N. and J. R. POWELL, 1998 Gene length and codon usage bias in Drosophila melanogaster, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:3188-3193
NACHMAN, M. W., 1998 Deleterious mutations in animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetica 102(103):61-69.
NEWNAM, G. P., R. D. WEGRZYN, S. L. LINDQUIST, and Y. O. CHERNOFF, 1999 Antagonistic interactions between yeast chaperones Hsp104 and Hsp70 in prion curing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1325-1333
NORDBORG, M., 2000 Linkage disequilibrium, gene trees and selfing: an ancestral recombination graph with partial self-fertilization. Genetics 154:923-929
OHTA, T., 1982 Linkage disequilibrium due to random genetic drift in finite subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:1940-1944
PATINO, M. M., J.-J. LIU, J. R. GLOVER, and S. LINDQUIST, 1996 Support for the prion hypothesis for inheritance of a phenotypic trait in yeast. Science 273:622-626[Abstract].
PAUSHKIN, S. V., V. V. KUSHNIROV, V. N. SMIRNOV, and M. D. TER-AVANESYAN, 1997 In vitro propagation of the prion-like state of yeast Sup35 protein. Science 277:381-383
PRUSINER, S. B., M. R. SCOTT, S. J. DEARMOND, and F. E. COHEN, 1998 Prion protein biology. Cell 93:337-348[Medline].
ROZAS, M. and R. ROZAS, 1999 DNASP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15:174-175
SAWYER, S., 1989 Statistical tests for detecting gene conversion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:526-538[Abstract].
SAWYER, S. A. and D. L. HARTL, 1992 Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics 132:1161-1176[Abstract].
SHARP, P. M. and W.-H. LI, 1987 The codon adaptation index: a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:1281-1295
SHARP, P. M., M. AVEROF, A. T. LLOYD, G. MATASSI, and J. PEDEN, 1995 DNA sequence evolution: the sounds of silence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 349:241-247[Medline].
STROBECK, C., 1987 Average number of nucleotide differences in a sample from a single subpopulation: a test for population subdivision. Genetics 117:149-153
TAJIMA, F., 1989 Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 129:753-762[Abstract].
TER-AVANESYAN, M. D., V. V. KUSHNIROV, A. R. DAGKESAMANSKAYA, S. A. DIDICHENKO, and Y. O. CHERNOFF et al., 1993 Deletion analysis of the SUP35 gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals two non-overlapping functional regions in the encoded protein. Mol. Microbiol. 7:683-692[Medline].
TER-AVANESYAN, M. D., A. R. DAGKESAMANSKAYA, V. V. KUSHNIROV, and V. N. SMIRNOV, 1994 The SUP35 omnipotent suppressor gene is involved in the maintenance of the non-Mendelian determinant [PSI+] in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 137:671-676[Abstract].
TRUE, H. L. and S. L. LINDQUIST, 2000 A yeast prion provides a mechanism for genetic variation and phenotypic diversity. Nature 407:477-483[Medline].
TUITE, M. F. and S. LINDQUIST, 1996 Maintenance and inheritance of yeast prions. Trends Genet. 12:467-471[Medline].
WAKELEY, J. and J. HEY, 1997 Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics 145:847-855[Abstract].
WATTERSON, G. A., 1975 On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7:256-276[Medline].
WICKNER, R. B., 1994 [URE3] as an altered URE2 protein: evidence for a prion analog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 264:566-568
WICKNER, R., and Y. O. CHERNOFF, 1999 Prions of fungi: [URE3], [PSI], and [Het-s] discovered as heritable traits, pp. 229272 in Prion Biology and Diseases, edited by S. B. PRUSINER. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
WODICKA, L., H. DONG, M. MITTMAN, M. H. HO, and D. J. LOCKHART, 1997 Genome-wide expression monitoring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol. 15:1359-1367[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. J. Tsai, D. Bensasson, A. Burt, and V. Koufopanou Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: Quantifying the life cycle PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4957 - 4962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chen, G. P. Newnam, and Y. O. Chernoff Prion species barrier between the closely related yeast proteins is detected despite coaggregation PNAS, February 20, 2007; 104(8): 2791 - 2796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Talarek, L. Maillet, C. Cullin, and M. Aigle The [URE3] Prion Is Not Conserved Among Saccharomyces Species Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 23 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Fay and J. A. Benavides Hypervariable Noncoding Sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1575 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakayashiki, C. P. Kurtzman, H. K. Edskes, and R. B. Wickner Yeast prions [URE3] and [PSI+] are diseases PNAS, July 26, 2005; 102(30): 10575 - 10580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Qin, W. B. Wu, J. M. Comeron, M. Kreitman, and W.-H. Li Intragenic Spatial Patterns of Codon Usage Bias in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Genomes Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 2245 - 2260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Baum, A. W. Thomas, and D. J. Conway Evidence for Diversifying Selection on Erythrocyte-Binding Antigens of Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1327 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Jensen, M. A.
- Articles by Lindquist, S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Jensen, M. A.
- Articles by Lindquist, S.




