- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Andolfatto, P.
- Articles by Przeworski, M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Andolfatto, P.
- Articles by Przeworski, M.
Regions of Lower Crossing Over Harbor More Rare Variants in African Populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Peter Andolfattoa and Molly Przeworskiba Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, United Kingdom
b Department of Statistics, Oxford University, Oxford, OX1 3TG, United Kingdom
Corresponding author: Peter Andolfatto, Institute for Cell and Animal Population Biology, Ashworth Labs, Kings Bldgs., University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, United Kingdom., peter.andolfatto{at}ed.ac.uk (E-mail)
Communicating editor: N. TAKAHATA
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
A correlation between diversity levels and rates of recombination is predicted both by models of positive selection, such as hitchhiking associated with the rapid fixation of advantageous mutations, and by models of purifying selection against strongly deleterious mutations (commonly referred to as "background selection"). With parameter values appropriate for Drosophila populations, only the first class of models predicts a marked skew in the frequency spectrum of linked neutral variants, relative to a neutral model. Here, we consider 29 loci scattered throughout the Drosophila melanogaster genome. We show that, in African populations, a summary of the frequency spectrum of polymorphic mutations is positively correlated with the meiotic rate of crossing over. This pattern is demonstrated to be unlikely under a model of background selection. Models of weakly deleterious selection are not expected to produce both the observed correlation and the extent to which nucleotide diversity is reduced in regions of low (but nonzero) recombination. Thus, of existing models, hitchhiking due to the recurrent fixation of advantageous variants is the most plausible explanation for the data.
IT has been known for a decade that levels of nucleotide diversity in Drosophila melanogaster, but not levels of divergence with its sibling species, are correlated with crossing over rates, a pattern inconsistent with a strictly neutral model of molecular evolution (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Particular theoretical attention has been paid to a model of recurrent but nonoverlapping episodes of positive selection, in which neutral variants linked to a strongly favored mutation are swept to fixation in the population. This so-called "hitchhiking" model predicts that loci in regions of low recombination will harbor lower levels of variation and more low frequency polymorphisms than loci in regions of normal recombination (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
An alternative to positive selection models is purifying selection against strongly deleterious mutations, hereafter referred to as "background selection" (![]()
![]()
![]()
While purifying selection undoubtedly occurs, uncertainty about key parameters, such as the distribution of selection coefficients and the deleterious mutation rate, renders unclear its importance in reducing levels of variability. Similar uncertainty exists for positive selection models. As a result, considerable debate has revolved about the relative importance of background selection and hitchhiking in shaping patterns of variability.
While positive selection models predict an excess of rare alleles at linked neutral sites relative to a model of no selection (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The effects of background selection and hitchhiking on the frequency spectrum of linked neutral sites are known for a random-mating population of constant size. Demographic departures from these model assumptions can alter the signature of selection (e.g., see ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Data collection and previously published data:
We collected sequence polymorphism data for 10 loci distributed over a range of crossing over rates on the X chromosome. We concentrate on loci in regions with lower than average crossing over rates, which are underrepresented in published data. Primers used to PCR amplify and sequence these loci are listed in Table 1. Genomic DNA was prepared (Gentra Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC) from one male fly for each of 13 isofemale lines kindly provided by C.-I Wu. These lines are sampled from a Zimbabwe, Africa population (cf. ![]()
|
From published data, we include the 19 loci available for African populations with sample sizes greater than three. For the majority of these loci (12), population samples were drawn from a Zimbabwe population (as above) with the exceptions of Fbp2, Su(H), and Vha68, where samples are from an Ivory Coast population; Acp29AB, from a Malawi population; and Dras1, Dras2, and R, from a number of African populations. CecC was chosen as a representative from a cluster of closely related genes (cf. ![]()
For each locus, we include all polymorphisms at synonymous sites and in noncoding DNA (including both insertion- deletions and single nucleotide polymorphisms). Single nucleotide polymorphisms within deletions and overlapping deletions were excluded from analyses. Excluding insertion-deletion variation has no effect on the conclusions (results not shown). In situations where a nucleotide polymorphism occurs immediately adjacent to a deletion, and the two are in complete coupling, the two polymorphisms are treated as a single event. For these reasons, the numbers reported in tables may differ slightly from previously published values. DnaSP3.0 (![]()
Estimating rates of crossing over:
For each locus, we estimate r, the sex-averaged local rate of meiotic crossing over per kilobase per generation, following the approach of ![]()
![]()
![]()
Previous approaches have fit high-order polynomial curves to whole chromosome arms using standard map distances available in the databases (e.g., ![]()
![]()
![]()
10-4, 10-3, and 0.015 M, respectively) that are in good agreement with published measurements (cf. ![]()
![]()
For the white locus (cytological map 3C2, genetic map 1.5), the appropriate r estimate is less clear. ![]()
2.5-fold larger. The use of this r estimate for white has no effect on our conclusions (results not shown).
Summary of the frequency spectrum of mutations:
To summarize the frequency spectrum, we use the statistic D (![]()
:
, the mean number of pairwise differences in the sample, and
W, an estimate based on the number of segregating mutations in the sample (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We also report a second summary of the frequency spectrum, D*, proposed by ![]()
:
W and an estimate based on the number of mutations found only once in a sample of chromosomes (referred to as singletons). The expectation of D* is approximately zero under the neutral model; it is negative when there is an excess of singletons in the sample (![]()
Coalescent simulations:
To perform weighted regressions (see RESULTS), we estimated the variance of D under the null model for each locus. To do so, we ran 104 coalescent simulations for a random-mating population of constant size with no selection (cf. ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To estimate the variance of D under a model of background selection, we ran simulations as before, but conditional on C = f4Nr (or f3Nr for X-linked loci), where the f value for each locus is the expected local reduction in effective population size due to background selection, as estimated according to ![]()
![]()
We also ran coalescent simulations to estimate the distribution of the Pearson correlation coefficient R. For a model of a single population of constant size, simulations are implemented as above. We generated D values for the 29 loci 104 times, and calculated R each time. We then tabulated the number of runs with simulated R greater than or equal to the observed one. We also estimate the distribution of R for a model of population growth and a model of population structure. We model population growth as a constant population size of 105 until 105 generations ago, followed by an exponential increase to a present size of 107 (cf. ![]()
![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Summaries of diversity and of the frequency spectrum of mutations are positively correlated with rates of crossing over:
In Table 2, we summarize patterns of nucleotide variation at synonymous sites and noncoding DNA for 10 newly sequenced loci and 19 previously published data sets. To allow for comparisons between X and autosome diversity levels, a point of departure is to multiply X-linked diversities by 4/3 (e.g., ![]()
, the average number of pairwise differences per site, and the estimated rates of crossing over per physical distance. As expected (![]()
![]()
![]()
|
|
In Fig 2, we plot the values of Tajima's D and Fu and Li's D* against rates of crossing over for the 29 loci in Table 2. Values of D are sharply negative in areas of low crossing over and increase with increasing rates of crossing over (Pearson's R = 0.56, P = 0.002; Spearman's R = 0.54, P = 0.002). The correlation between crossing over and D* is even less likely to occur by chance (Pearson's R = 0.67, P < 0.001; Spearman's R = 0.64, P < 0.001). These patterns are expected under a model of hitchhiking associated with the rapid fixation of advantageous mutations (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
One concern is that loci in areas of very low crossing over may not represent independent data points. However, considering these loci as a single data point has no effect on our conclusions. As an illustration, if we replace the D values for the nine X-linked loci with a crossing over rate of
5 x 10-6/kb/generation by one value (either the average D or the total D), the correlation is still highly significant (P < 0.01).
Also relevant is the presence of inversion polymorphisms in African populations of D. melanogaster (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sensitivity to demographic assumptions:
Our null model assumes a random-mating population of constant size. Population structure will alter the distribution of D relative to panmixia, even if samples are drawn from a single deme (see ![]()
![]()
0.56 (the observed value). This model of population subdivision is a highly simplified one; nonetheless, the results suggest that our correlation is no less unusual in the presence of population structure.
Inequality of variance among samples and the background selection hypothesis:
Standard correlation tests are not entirely appropriate, since under the null model the expected variance in D values increases with decreasing recombination (![]()
![]()
![]()
Background selection against strongly deleterious alleles in large populations can be thought of as a simple reduction in effective population size (![]()
![]()
Effects of varying sample size:
We have shown that if we assume a random-mating population of constant size [where E(D)
0], the correlation between D and crossing over rates is highly unlikely. Next, we consider whether the correlation between D and r might reflect negative D values at all loci. This is a concern because when the population D is not zero, the sample estimate of D is no longer unbiased. In particular, small samples will yield estimates closer to zero than will large ones (cf. ![]()
Whether we even expect the negative correlation between n and r to produce a spurious correlation between D and r is unclear. While loci in areas of high crossing over tend to have smaller sample sizes, they also tend to have many more polymorphic sites. This follows from the strong correlation observed between diversity and rates of crossing over in our data (Fig 1). Also, the variance of D under the null model is much smaller for loci in regions of high recombination than it is for loci in regions of low recombination (![]()
-0.80, while for n = 50 and 50 segregating sites, the mean D is
-1.76 (as estimated from 10,000 simulations). The average R value in 104 simulations of the 29 loci was +0.08 (i.e., significantly greater than 0). However, the Pr(R
0.56) was estimated to be 0.001; in other words, the correlation that we observe is still highly unlikely. While this is only one model among many, it suggests that the effect of varying sample sizes on R is quite weak when other facets of the data are also taken into account.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Models of positive selection:
The positive correlation between D and crossing over rates is unlikely under a simple model of background selection but is expected under simple recurrent hitchhiking models (![]()
![]()
-1.5 for regions of no recombination and samples of 20 drawn from "large" populations (N
104). Thus, hitchhiking due to the rapid fixation of advantageous variants appears to be the best explanation for the data. Patterns of polymorphism may also be consistent with random-environment-selection models (![]()
Also of interest are models that incorporate both deleterious and favorable mutations, as both processes are likely to be occurring simultaneously (![]()
![]()
Alternative deleterious evolution models:
Next, we consider whether alternative models of deleterious evolution might also be consistent with the patterns reported in Fig 1 and Fig 2. A large class of deleterious mutations may have selection coefficients smaller than values typically used in models of background selection (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
When purifying selection is weak, linked deleterious alleles may persist long enough in a population to cosegregate. Selection at one site can then reduce the efficacy of selection at linked sites (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In addition, the effect of weak selection HRI is probably weaker than has been estimated in simulations, as published models (e.g., ![]()
![]()
The models described thus far have considered the effect of selection on linked neutral variation. However, sampled variation may not be neutral, but may itself be under very weak selection (i.e., on the order of 1/N). In this case, a negative D value is expected for all rates of recombination (![]()
![]()
In summary, existing models of deleterious evolution, weak or strong, are unlikely to account for both the reductions in diversity and the skew in D observed in small samples from regions of low crossing over. However, models with a distribution of selection coefficients have yet to be investigated. Recent work on the selective effects of deleterious mutations suggests a large class of deleterious mutations with minor effects in both Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans (![]()
![]()
![]()
The potential importance of demographic factors:
In this study, we focused on African samples of D. melanogaster. We did so because non-African populations are likely to have experienced a more complicated demographic history (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Species-specific demographic considerations are likely to be of relevance for evolutionary inferences from other species as well. A large quantity of polymorphism data will soon be available for humans. Like Drosophila, anatomically modern humans may have an African origin and have only recently become cosmopolitan (![]()
![]()
![]()
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
A decade of empirical work has been devoted to distinguishing between a simple model of background selection (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank J. Comeron, R. Hudson, T. Johnson, M. S. McPeek, and M. Stephens for helpful discussions and B. Charlesworth, D. Charlesworth, P. Donnelly, S. Otto, J. Pritchard, and J. Wall for comments on the manuscript. R. Hudson pointed out that standard correlation tests might not be appropriate in this context. F. Depaulis, C. Langley, and S.-C. Tsaur kindly shared data prior to its publication. P.A. is supported by a European Molecular Biology Organization postdoctoral fellowship. M.P. is supported by a National Science Foundation postdoctoral fellowship in Bioinformatics.
Manuscript received November 7, 2000; Accepted for publication February 3, 2001.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AGUADÉ, M., N. MIYASHITA, and C. H. LANGLEY, 1989 Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 122:607-615
AKASHI, H., 1999 Within- and between-species DNA sequence variation and the footprint of natural selection. Gene 238:39-51[Medline].
ANDOLFATTO, P., 2001 Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:279-290
ANDOLFATTO, P. and M. PRZEWORSKI, 2000 A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics 156:257-268
ANDOLFATTO, P., F. DEPAULIS, and A. NAVARRO, 2001 Inversion polymorphism and nucleotide variability in Drosophila.. Genet. Res. 77:1-8[Medline].
AQUADRO, C. F., D. J. BEGUN and E. C. KINDAHL, 1994 Selection, recombination, and DNA polymorphism in Drosophila, pp. 4656 in Non-Neutral Evolution: Theories and Molecular Data, edited by B. GOLDING. Chapman and Hall, New York.
ASHBURNER, M., 1989 Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster.. Nature 356:519-520[Medline].
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1993 African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature 365:548-550[Medline].
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1995 Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.. Genetics 140:1019-1032[Abstract].
BERRY, A. J., J. W. AJIOKA, and M. KREITMAN, 1991 Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics 129:1111-1117[Abstract].
BRAVERMAN, J. M., R. R. HUDSON, N. L. KAPLAN, C. H. LANGLEY, and W. STEPHAN, 1995 The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics 140:783-796[Abstract].
CABALLERO, A., 1995 On the effective size of populations with separate sexes, with particular reference to sex-linked genes. Genetics 139:1007-1011[Abstract].
CANN, R. L., M. STONEKING, and A. C. WILSON, 1987 Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature 325:31-36.
CHARLESWORTH, B., 1996 Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genet. Res. 68:131-149[Medline].
CHARLESWORTH, B., M. T. MORGAN, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1993 The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134:1289-1303[Abstract].
CHARLESWORTH, D., B. CHARLESWORTH, and M. T. MORGAN, 1995 The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics 141:1619-1632[Abstract].
CHEN, Y., B. J. MARSH, and W. STEPHAN, 2000 Joint effects of natural selection and recombination on gene flow between Drosophila ananassae populations. Genetics 155:1185-1194
CLARK, A. G. and L. WANG, 1997 Molecular population genetics of Drosophila immune system genes. Genetics 147:713-724[Abstract].
COMERON, J. M., M. KREITMAN, and M. AGUADE, 1999 Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. Genetics 151:239-249
DAVID, J. R. and P. CAPY, 1988 Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. Trends Genet. 4:106-111[Medline].
DAVIES, E. K., A. D. PETERS, and P. D. KEIGHTLEY, 1999 High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Science 285:1748-1751
DEPAULIS, F., L. BRAZIER, S. MOUSSET, A. TURBE, and M. VEUILLE, 2000 Selective sweep near the In(2L)t inversion breakpoint in an African population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 76:149-158[Medline].
FELSENSTEIN, J., 1974 The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78:737-756
FRY, J. D., P. D. KEIGHTLEY, S. L. HEINSOHN, and S. V. NUZHDIN, 1999 New estimates of the rates and effects of mildly deleterious mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:574-579
FU, Y. X. and W. H. LI, 1993 Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133:693-709[Abstract].
GASPERINI, R. and G. GIBSON, 1999 Absence of protein polymorphism in the Ras genes of Drosphila melanogaster. J. Mol. Evol. 49:583-590[Medline].
GILLESPIE, J. H., 1997 Junk ain't what junk does: neutral alleles in a selected context. Gene 205:291-299[Medline].
GILLESPIE, J. H., 2000 Genetic drift in an infinite population. The pseudohitchhiking model. Genetics 155:909-919
HALE, L. R. and R. S. SINGH, 1991 A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Mitochondrial DNA variation and the role of history vs. selection in the genetic structure of geographic populations. Genetics 129:103-117[Abstract].
HAMBLIN, M. T. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1997 Contrasting patterns of nucleotide sequence variation at the Glucose dehydrogenase (Gld) locus in different populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 145:1053-1062[Abstract].
HAMBLIN, M. T. and A. DI RIENZO, 2000 Detection of the signature of natural selection in humans: evidence from the Duffy blood group locus. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66:1669-1679[Medline].
HEINO, T. I., A. O. SAURA, and V. SORSA, 1994 Maps of the salivary gland chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Dros. Inf. Serv. 73:621-738.
HILL, W. G. and A. ROBERTSON, 1966 The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294[Medline].
HUDSON, R. R., 1983 Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 23:183-201[Medline].
HUDSON, R. R., 1990 Gene genealogies and the coalescent process, pp. 144 in Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 7, edited by D. FUTUYMA and J. ANTONOVICS. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
HUDSON, R. R., 1993 The how and why of generating gene genealogies, pp. 2336 in Mechanisms of Molecular Evolution, edited by N. TAKAHATA and A. G. CLARK. Japan Scientific Society, Tokyo.
HUDSON, R. R., 1994 How can the low levels of DNA sequence variation in regions of the Drosophila genome with low recombination rates be explained? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:6815-6818
HUDSON, R. R., and N. L. KAPLAN, 1994 Gene trees with background selection, pp. 140153 in Non-Neutral Evolution: Theories and Molecular Data, edited by B. GOLDING. Chapman & Hall, London.
HUDSON, R. R. and N. L. KAPLAN, 1995 The coalescent process and background selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 349:19-23[Medline].
IRVIN, S. D., K. A. WETTERSTRAND, C. M. HUTTER, and C. F. AQUADRO, 1998 Genetic variation and differentiation at microsatellite loci in Drosophila simulans. Evidence for founder effects in new world populations. Genetics 150:777-790
KAPLAN, N. L., R. R. HUDSON, and C. H. LANGLEY, 1989 The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics 123:887-899
KEIGHTLEY, P. D. and A. EYRE-WALKER, 1999 Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates. Genetics 153:515-523
KIM, Y. and W. STEPHAN, 2000 Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation. Genetics 155:1415-1427
LACHAISE, D., L. M. CARIOU, J. R. DAVID, F. LEMEUNIER, and L. TSACAS et al., 1988 Historical biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Evol. Biol. 22:159-225.
LANGLEY, C. H., B. P. LAZZARO, W. PHILIPS, E. HEIKINEN, and J. BRAVERMAN, 2000 Linkage disequilibria and the site frequency spectra in the su(s) and su(wa) regions of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Genetics 156:1837-1852
LEMEUNIER, F., and S. AULARD, 1992 Inversion polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster, pp. 339405 in Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism, edited by C. B. KRIMBAS and J. R. POWELL. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
LI, W. H., 1987 Models of nearly neutral mutations with particular implications for nonrandom usage of synonymous codons. J. Mol. Evol. 24:337-345[Medline].
LI, Y. J., Y. SATTA, and N. TAKAHATA, 1999 Paleo-demography of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup: application of the maximum likelihood method. Genes Genet. Syst. 74:117-127[Medline].
MARJORAM, P. and P. DONNELLY, 1994 Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in subdivided populations and implications for early human evolution. Genetics 136:673-683[Abstract].
MAYNARD SMITH, J. and J. HAIGH, 1974 The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet. Res. 23:23-35[Medline].
MCVEAN, G. A. T. and B. CHARLESWORTH, 2000 The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Genetics 155:929-944
MCVEAN, G. A. T. and J. VIEIRA, 2001 Inferring parameters of mutation, selection and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila. Genetics 157:245-257
NACHMAN, M. W., 1997 Patterns of DNA variability at X-linked loci in Mus domesticus. Genetics 147:1303-1316[Abstract].
NACHMAN, M. W. and S. L. CROWELL, 2000 Contrasting evolutionary histories of two introns of the duchenne muscular dystrophy gene, Dmd, in humans. Genetics 155:1855-1864
NACHMAN, M. W., V. L. BAUER, S. L. CROWELL, and C. F. AQUADRO, 1998 DNA variability and recombination rates at X-linked loci in humans. Genetics 150:1133-1141
NORDBORG, M., 1997 Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. Genetics 146:1501-1514[Abstract].
NORDBORG, M., B. CHARLESWORTH, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1996 The effect of recombination on background selection. Genet. Res. 67:159-174[Medline].
PRZEWORSKI, M., R. R. HUDSON, and A. DI RIENZO, 2000 Adjusting the focus on human variation. Trends Genet. 16:296-302[Medline].
PRZEWORSKI, M., J. D. WALL, and P. ANDOLFATTO, 2001 Recombination and the frequency spectrum in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:291-298
ROZAS, J. and R. ROZAS, 1999 DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15:174-175
SCHLÖTTERER, C., C. VOGL, and D. TAUTZ, 1997 Polymorphism and locus-specific effects on polymorphism at microsatellite loci in natural Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genetics 146:309-320[Abstract].
SCHULTZ, J. and H. REDFIELD, 1951 Interchromosomal effects on crossing-over in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 16:175-197.
SLATKIN, M. and T. WIEHE, 1998 Genetic hitch-hiking in a subdivided population. Genet. Res. 71:155-160[Medline].
SNIEGOWSKI, P. D., A. PRINGLE, and K. A. HUGHES, 1994 Effects of autosomal inversions on meiotic exchange in distal and proximal regions of the X-chromosome in a natural population of Drosophila-melanogaster. Genet. Res. 63:57-62[Medline].
STEPHAN, W., 1994 Effects of genetic recombination and population subdivision on nucleotide sequence variation in Drosophila annanasae, pp. 5766 in Non-Neutral Evolution: Theories and Molecular Data, edited by B. GOLDING. Chapman & Hall, London.
STEPHAN, W. and C. H. LANGLEY, 1998 DNA polymorphism in Lycopersicon and crossing-over per physical length. Genetics 150:1585-1593
TACHIDA, H., 2000 Molecular evolution in a multisite nearly neutral mutation model. J. Mol. Evol. 50:69-81[Medline].
TAJIMA, F., 1989a DNA polymorphism in a subdivided population: the expected number of segregating sites in the two-subpopulation model. Genetics 123:229-240
TAJIMA, F., 1989b The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:597-601
TAJIMA, F., 1989c Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585-595
TAKANO-SHIMIZU, T., 1999 Local recombination and mutation effects on molecular evolution in Drosophila. Genetics 153:1285-1296
WALL, J. D., 1999 Recombination and the power of statistical tests of neutrality. Genet. Res. 73:65-79.
WATTERSON, G. A., 1975 On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7:256-276[Medline].
YI, S. and B. CHARLESWORTH, 2000 A selective sweep associated with a recent gene transposition in Drosophila miranda. Genetics 156:1753-1763
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Hellmann, Y. Mang, Z. Gu, P. Li, F. M. de la Vega, A. G. Clark, and R. Nielsen Population genetic analysis of shotgun assemblies of genomic sequences from multiple individuals Genome Res., July 1, 2008; 18(7): 1020 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |



