| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Corresponding author: Mikkel H. Schierup, Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, Bygn. 540, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark., mikkel.schierup{at}biology.au.dk (E-mail)
Communicating editor: M. K. UYENOYAMA
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
We study the segregation of variants of a putative self-incompatibility gene in Arabidopsis lyrata. This gene encodes a sequence that is homologous to the protein encoded by the SRK gene involved in self-incompatibility in Brassica species. We show by diallel pollinations of plants in several full-sib families that seven different sequences of the gene in A. lyrata are linked to different S-alleles, and segregation analysis in further sibships shows that four other sequences behave as allelic to these. The family data on incompatibility provide evidence for dominance classes among the S-alleles, as expected for a sporophytic SI system. We observe no division into pollen-dominant and pollen-recessive classes of alleles as has been found in Brassica, but our alleles fall into at least three dominance classes in both pollen and stigma expression. The diversity among sequences of the A. lyrata putative S-alleles is greater than among the published Brassica SRK sequences, and, unlike Brassica, the alleles do not cluster into groups with similar dominance.
THE hope of elucidating the complete molecular determination of a self-incompatibility (SI) system in plants has grown significantly with recent investigations of the sporophytic incompatibility system in the genus Brassica. Male (pollen) and female (stigma) components of the recognition/incompatibility reaction appear to be controlled by separate genes that reside in a small genomic region (the S-locus; see ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In Brassica, the SRK, SLG, and SCR genes are located close to one another in the physical map. All display very high levels of sequence diversity (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In sporophytic self-incompatibility systems, dominance is possible between pairs of alleles in the determination of the pollen phenotype. In Brassica, pollen-dominant and -recessive S-alleles are called class I and II, respectively. The SLG/SRK sequences of dominant and recessive alleles are very distinct (![]()
35% (![]()
20% differences within either class (![]()
![]()
![]()
Although understanding of the molecular control of SI in Brassica has progressed significantly in recent years, there are many unanswered questions that could benefit from characterization of additional sporophytic systems. Some of the most intriguing questions are how such high diversity at a multigene locus can be maintained and how coordinated changes in pollen and pistil specificity are possible (e.g., ![]()
In addition to the work on Brassica outlined above, the orthologue of SLG has been investigated in another cultivated plant, Raphanus sativus (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We recently began a search for orthologues of SRK and SLG in Arabidopsis lyrata (also called Cardaminopsis petraea, Arabis petraea, or Arabis lyrata). A. lyrata is one of the closest relatives of A. thaliana, but is self-incompatible. It is a perennial herb with a circumboreal distribution. The genus Arabidopsis is a member of the tribe Arabidae (![]()
![]()
![]()
Using a distantly related naturally occurring species not only allows evaluation of the nature of SI under noncultivated conditions (and thus allows study of the effects of population structure of the variants and comparison with reference loci that are not expected to be under balancing selection; e.g., see ![]()
![]()
![]()
We began this study with the following questions in mind:
Our strategy was based on starting with sequence information from the S-domains of Brassica SRK and SLG alleles and designing primers to their most conserved regions. Because of the large evolutionary distance between the species, this strategy led, as expected, to amplification of several members of the S gene family in A. lyrata (![]()
![]()
![]()
Here we present evidence that sequences from this putative locus (here referred to as Aly13) may represent the A. lyrata SLG and SRK orthologues. We describe diallel pollinations in full-sib families and segregation analyses, showing that at least 11 of these sequences segregate as alleles at the same locus and that their sequences have a similar structure to the Brassica SRK gene. One of the alleles at this putative S-locus is almost identical in sequence to a stigma-expressed cDNA (SRKa) independently isolated by J. B. NASRALLAH and M. E. NASRALLAH and shown by them to have a kinase domain (personal communication). Furthermore, this locus is highly polymorphic, with more variability than the SRK in Brassica.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Crossing and segregation analysis:
Full-sib families were raised from crosses between known individuals originating from populations in Michigan, North Carolina, Scotland, and Iceland. Details of the populations studied are given in ![]()
Six families were chosen for reciprocal diallel crosses. Plants to be pollinated were covered with net curtain fabric to exclude pollinators, and non-emasculated flowers were hand pollinated by rubbing dehisced anthers over their stigma. Each combination of parents tested was pollinated reciprocally with three replicate flowers. Compatibility was scored as fruit set about 710 days after pollination. Flowers where no fruits developed were classified as incompatible and flowers with full-sized fruits as compatible. In some cases, small fruits with one to two seeds developed; these were scored as small fruits because it is difficult to distinguish whether reduced fruit set is due to incompatibility at the pollen-stigma interaction level or whether it is due to incompatibility at a later stage in development that may be unrelated to S-locus specificity (e.g., ![]()
In five more families, progeny were raised but not used for crosses. Instead, segregation of the Aly13 subtypes present in the parents of the crosses was followed in the progeny to investigate whether different Aly13 subtypes segregated as expected from alleles belonging to the same genetic locus.
DNA extraction and PCR condition:
DNA was extracted from one to four fresh or frozen (-70°) leaves using a CTAB protocol (![]()
Identification and sequencing of Aly13 subtypes:
The strategy for identifying Aly13 sequence variants (subtypes) was outlined in ![]()
![]()
300 bp from the beginning of the S-domain: 5' ccgacggtaaccttgtcatcctc 3') and SLGR (
50 bp from the 3' end of the S-domain: 5' atcgacataaagatcttgacc 3'); precise locations of the primers cannot be specified because different alleles are of different lengths. However, due to high divergence between different Aly13 sequences, this primer set did not amplify all allelic sequences (i.e., plants in certain incompatibility groups in our crosses were predicted to be heterozygous for two different S-alleles but only one, or sometimes no, Aly13 sequence was found initially). We therefore used an alignment of the S-domain sequences from the Aly13 sequence variants to design two further degenerate forward primers (13seq1F: 5' tgg aaa aa/gc tca/c tat gat cc 3' and 13seq2: 5' gat gga c/atc cgg/a ttt ag/tc/t ggc at 3') located
300 bp downstream of 13F1. Using a combination of these primers and 13F1 (with the reverse primer, SLGR) we were able to amplify sequences corresponding to most of the SI phenotypes determined from our crossing data (see below). All Aly13 sequence subtypes were initially cloned from PCR products using TOPO TA cloning vectors (Invitrogen, San Diego). Subsequently, specific forward primers were designed for each sequence type, which aided identification of putative alleles. The subtype-specific primers were used for direct sequencing, whenever possible, to minimize possible errors due to misincorporation of bases in PCR prior to cloning. The sequence of these primers can be obtained from the authors by request.
The Aly13 subtypes that showed evidence of linkage with SI phenotypes in our families were subsequently tested for the presence of a kinase domain using the following strategy. The S-domain sequence of a stigma-expressed cDNA from A. lyrata (SRKa) obtained from J. B. NASRALLAH and M. E. NASRALLAH (personal communication) was compared with our Aly13 sequences and found to differ by only a single nonsynonomous change from the S-domain of one of our sequence types (Aly13-13). The Aly13-13 sequence was obtained from an individual collected from a population close to that from which the SRKa cDNA sequence was derived (Indiana Dunes). SRKa was then aligned with published Brassica SRK alleles and A. thaliana S-like receptor kinases, and several reverse primers from different exons of the kinase domain were designed based on regions conserved among these sequences (these primer sequences are available on request). These primers were used with either 13F1 or an Aly13 subtype-specific primer to amplify products from genomic DNA of individuals carrying known Aly13 subtypes. PCR bands resulting from these amplifications were subsequently cloned and sequenced. In some cases, initial amplification was weak due to the large size of products (23 kb), and reamplification from purified gel bands was necessary prior to cloning.
The resulting sequences were aligned with an alignment containing the full coding sequences of all 16 published Brassica SRK sequences, SRKa, and the S-domains from all previously identified Aly13 types. This was critical both in the assessment of homology of the kinase domains and in confirming that the correct Aly13 type had been amplified. It should be noted that while the procedure just described can confirm the presence of a kinase domain, negative results do not prove that the sequence types do not contain a kinase domain; it is possible that some sequences are too different to amplify using our primers. The large variation possible in the size of intron 1 (0.77 kb among Brassica SRKs (![]()
All sequencing was done on an ABI 377 automatic sequencing machine using either ThermosequenaseII (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) or BigDye (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) sequencing technology. Sequences were subsequently checked manually for accurate base calling using SeqEd (Applied Biosystems). Cloned PCR products were sequenced in both directions using universal M13 primers and with internal primers in cases of products in excess of 800 bp. To minimize the number of PCR errors incorporated in cloned sequences, three plasmids from each cloning reaction were sequenced. In the consensus sequence of these replicates, any differences were changed to the common base found in other sequences of the same Aly13 subtype from the same individual. In the alignment, we report the consensus sequence for a single individual per Aly13 subtype (based on sequencing three clones or on direct sequencing using primers specific for a given subtype); we have observed minor variation within subtypes, which will be reported in a future publication.
Typing of Aly13 subtypes in families:
Identification of Aly13 subtypes present in the progeny of the families used in the segregation analyses was based on the S-domain sequences, using a two-step procedure. First, the general primers described above were used to amplify any Aly13 subtypes present in the individual. Restriction digestion of the resulting products then allowed us to generate an hypothesis about which Aly13 subtypes were present in a particular individual through comparison with the restriction patterns for all known Aly13 subtypes. This hypothesis was then tested using the primers specific for the hypothesized subtype. Putative subtypes identified in this manner were confirmed by sequencing. This method allowed all progeny from the families to be genotyped for the Aly13 subtypes found in their parents.
Sequence analysis of Aly13 subtypes:
The Aly13 subtypes were aligned with one another and with Brassica SRK alleles using ClustalX (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
Crossing and segregation analysis
Evidence for linkage of Aly13 subtypes with SI phenotypes:
Fig 1, af, shows results from pollinations between full-sib progeny plants, which allowed us to score cross-incompatibility between siblings and to assign them to incompatibility groups within families. If a large majority of crosses involving several different progeny plants failed to produce fruits, the pollination was scored as incompatible. The Aly13 sequence types (subtypes in the terminology defined above) of all individuals were then determined. The figures group progeny with the same Aly13 sequence types, so that the correspondence between incompatibility reactions and Aly13 subtypes within each sibship can be seen. Self-pollinations are not included; self-pollination rarely succeeds, except when a plant is severely stressed (M. H. SCHIERUP, personal observation).
|
Fig 1A shows results from pollinations between 15 full-sib plants from a cross between two plants originating from the North Carolina seed collection. The pollination results show that this sibship contains three incompatibility groups (note that groups I and II are phenotypically indistinguishable in their incompatibility reactions with plants of other groups). Within group IV, 27 of 98 pollinations produced fruits. These were mainly due to a single individual (10/25 pollinations produced fruits when it was used as the pollen donor, and 11/27 pollinations produced fruits when it was the recipient). This suggests that the strength of the SI response was reduced in this individual. Despite this, we can conclude that four incompatibility alleles must be segregating in this sibship. With respect to the Aly13 sequences, the progeny fall into four groups, corresponding to those expected if the parental Aly13 sequences (13-1/13-13 and 13-3/13-23) are allelic; no progeny plant inherits both (or neither) of the Aly13 sequence types of either parent. Furthermore, the four genotypic classes based on the Aly13 sequences correspond with the incompatibility groups.
This interpretation of the crossing results, with three incompatibility groups and four Aly13 genotype groups, requires that some of the S-alleles are dominant to others, as is common in sporophytic SI systems (![]()
(13-1 and 13-13). From the pollinations between group I + II and group III + IV, we can say that 13-3 < 13-1 and/or 13-3 < 13-13. Note that the results are the same in both reciprocals of any pollinations; i.e., no sex-specific differences in dominance were found in this family.
The parents of the family shown in Fig 1B are also of North Carolina origin. Fourteen progeny plants were cross-pollinated in all combinations. There are four different incompatibility groups, corresponding exactly to the four genotypic classes expected from the Aly13 sequence types found in the two parents. In the combinations scored as incompatible, a few fruits were produced, but these were mainly small (see footnotes in Fig 1, ad and f). From this family, we further infer codominance of 13-23 with 13-20. The family in Fig 1C shares one parent (97F-13/5) with that in Fig 1A, while the other parent is from the Michigan population. Again, there are three incompatibility groups, again corresponding to the four genotypic classes. The dominance relationships can be reconciled with those deduced in the family in Fig 1A as follows: 13-19
(13-1 and 13-13) and (13-3 < 13-1) or (13-3 < 13-13). A cross between two progeny from the family in Fig 1A (from groups II and III) produced the sibship shown in Fig 1D. Some pollinations were not done, but the data suggest two incompatibility groups, corresponding to the four genotypic classes defined by the Aly13 sequences and suggesting the dominance relationships: 13-13
(13-1 and 13-3) and 13-23
(13-1 and 13-3). The family in Fig 1E is from a cross between an individual of Icelandic origin (98I-36/2) and an individual in group IV of the family in Fig 1A. There are only 10 progeny, and again the pollinations are incomplete. Two incompatibility groups were found, corresponding to four genotypic classes if we assume that 98I-36/2 carries a second Aly13 subtype, 13-X, which has not yet been identified. The inferred dominance relationships in this sibship are as follows:13-22
(13-3 and 13-13) and 13-X
(13-3 and 13-13).
The family in Fig 1F is derived from a cross between two individuals from Michigan, which were not genotyped for Aly13. The 20 progeny fall into two incompatibility groups, with some partial compatibility within the second group. All progeny carry the Aly13-1 subtype, suggesting that one parent was homozygous for this subtype (proposed genotypes are given in the figure). Half the individuals carry Aly13-13, suggesting that the other parent was either 13-13/13-Y (where 13-Y is an unidentified Aly13 subtype) or 13-1. With respect to dominance, this sibship suggests the relationships: (13-13 > 13-1) and/or (13-Y > 13-1).
Cross-pollination between two families: Fig 2 summarizes the results of cross-pollinations between progeny from the two families described in Fig 1, a and f. The incompatibility reaction between plants with the Aly13 genotype 13-13/13-1 from one family and 13-13/13-3 from the other family supports our conclusion that the Aly13-13 subtype is associated with the same SI specificity in these two families of independent origin (North Carolina and Michigan, respectively). This sibship provides the following conclusions about dominance:
|
13-13) and (13-3
13-13), with at least one of the inequalities being strict.
Segregation analysis: Given the high diversity of Aly13 subtype sequences, it is important to test each sequence to see whether it could originate from a different locus. We therefore genotyped the parents and all progeny in five more families for putative alleles of Aly13. Table 1 summarizes the parental Aly13 putative genotypes and the numbers of progeny with each possible Aly13 sequence type. For all but one family, we were able to identify two Aly13 subtypes in both parents. In all cases, each progeny plant inherited just one of the subtypes of each parent plant. In the remaining family, 00A4, Aly13 subtypes in one parent were not identified, but all progeny plants had just one of the two subtypes of the other parent. Thus, for these families, the evidence strongly suggests that the subtypes segregate as alleles at the same locus. Also, since some subtypes are present in more than one of our families, the analyses can be combined for some subtypes. The families in Fig 1 show that subtypes 13-22, 13-13, and 13-3 segregate with the incompatibility groups within families, and Table 1 shows these to be allelic to 13-4, 13-5, 13-9, and 13-16.
Finally, the S-domain of one of our Aly13 subtypes (Aly13-13) differs at just a single nonsynonymous site from that of the SRKa cDNA isolated by M. E. Nasrallah and J. B. Nasrallah and shown by them to be linked to SI in another independent family (![]()
![]()
Summary of results on dominance relationships:
Out of 11 different Aly13 subtypes that behave as allelic, we obtained some evidence about the dominance relations for 7 that segregate with the incompatibility phenotype. If we assume that dominance is transitive (i.e., that A > B and B > C implies that A > C), which conflicts with none of our crossing results, we can combine this evidence. We then have: (13-23 = 13-20, 13-19, 13-22) > (13-13) > (13-1, 13-3). There were no cases of differences in dominance in the stigma and pollen. Thus we have preliminary evidence for at least three dominance classes, but cannot resolve dominance within each class (except for codominance between 13-20 and 13-23). Furthermore, we cannot rule out the possibility of nontransitive relations, as observed in some cases in Brassica (![]()
Analysis of polymorphism:
Table 2 summarizes the sequence data from the 11 subtypes from which linkage has been established from either pollination results or segregation analysis (see above and Table 2). As already mentioned, the S-domain of one of our Aly13 subtypes (Aly13-13) differs at a single nonsynonymous site from that of a putative A. lyrata SRK allele (SRKa). This sequence was isolated from stigma cDNA. It has a kinase domain and is linked to SI (M. E. NASRALLAH and J. B. NASRALLAH, personal communication). A kinase domain was detected in 8 of the 11 subtypes analyzed here. For 1 of the remaining 3 subtypes (Aly13-1), a transcript without a kinase domain has been detected by rtPCR (M. H. SCHIERUP, unpublished results), suggesting that Aly13-1 could be an SLG orthologue. However, because alternative transcripts are common in the Brassica system (![]()
Polymorphism of the Aly13 S-domain sequences within A. lyrata:
The alignment of the Aly13 sequences to each other and to SRKa has six short indels in all, four of length three nucleotides and two of six nucleotides. There are no stop codons in any of the Aly13 subtypes. In the alignment, the 12 conserved cysteine residues are at the same positions as in the Brassica SRK alleles (![]()
![]()
![]()
|
The two subtypes that appear to be associated with recessive SI phenotypes (Aly13-1 and Aly13-3) are not particularly closely related (48% amino acid differences) and the distances from these subtypes to the other nine subtypes is on average 42%, very similar to the overall average. If the analysis is restricted to the eight linked Aly13 subtypes known to have a kinase domain, the average amino acid difference is 40% (in the S-domain). Thus, there is no evidence that the three subtypes where a kinase domain has not been established cluster separately from the eight subtypes with kinase domains.
Comparison of the Aly13 S-domain sequences with Brassica S-alleles: The S-domains from 16 SRK alleles from the two closely related species B. oleracea and B. rapa/campestris were aligned with the 11 Aly13 sequences discussed above. This introduces one more indel into the Aly13 alignment because the Brassica SRKs are polymorphic for an indel of 12 bp that is not found among the Aly13 sequences. Furthermore, one 3-bp insertion (AGG) at position 634 in the alignment is polymorphic in both Aly13 and Brassica SRK data sets. For further analysis of the S-domain, the joint alignment was shortened to include only the 972 bp over which the Aly13 subtypes were sequenced. An alignment of the Aly13 sequences can be retrieved from the PopSet section of GenBank (with accession nos. AF328990AF329000).
Fig 3 shows a gene tree reconstructed from the joint alignment of S-domain sequences and the Ats1 and SLR1 S-domain genes. Solid circles mark branches supported by >95% of bootstrap trials. The tree was not very well resolved (possibly due to recombination; see DISCUSSION) but illustrates the high diversity among alleles within and between the species. The Brassica class I and II SRK alleles form two distinct and well-supported groups, separated from all but one Aly13 subtype (Aly13-9). There is no such clear division of the Aly13 sequences into two clusters. This agrees with our crossing results (above) that showed no division of alleles into two distinct dominance classes. The Ats1 and SLR1 sequences form a well-supported outgroup. If these genes are indeed orthologues (![]()
|
Table 4 compares the mean pairwise nucleotide distances and amino acid differences within the 11 Aly13 sequences, within the 16 Brassica sequences, and between the species. For Brassica, the analysis was also done for 13 class I SRK alleles separately. The results show that diversity among the Aly13 subtype sequences is higher than among the Brassica SRKs, even when Brassica class I and II alleles are combined. Furthermore, the average pairwise difference within Aly13 subtypes is of similar magnitude to the average difference between sequences from A. lyrata and Brassica.
|
Fig 4 shows nucleotide diversity in a sliding window over the seven Aly13 subtypes from which the most complete sequences were obtained (solid line) and the 16 Brassica SRK alleles (dashed line). The pattern of diversity is similar in the two species, with peaks of diversity at similar positions as the three hypervariable regions in Brassica (![]()
![]()
|
Table 5 shows evidence that the kinase domain is also highly polymorphic and compares diversity in five Aly13 subtypes (13-3, 13-9, 13-13, 13-16, and 13-19) with the corresponding values for Brassica SRK sequences. This was done for each available intron and exon separately using the SRKa cDNA to locate putative splicing positions and confirmed using data from GenBank for Brassica SRK alleles. The sequences were of unequal lengths (Table 2), but at least five Aly13 subtypes were analyzed for each exon or intron. Because most Brassica SRK sequences are from cDNA, the Brassica intron values in Table 5 are based on four Class I sequences only. Table 5 shows that Aly13 subtypes have higher diversity than Brassica SRKs in the kinase domain, as well as in the S-domain (see above).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Our results suggest that the SI system of A. lyrata shares a common evolutionary origin with that in Brassica. This is not surprising. It is observed generally that the incompatibility genes in different members of the same family are homologous (see ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We cannot rule out the possibility that some of our subtypes are sequences of S-domain genes that are linked to the self-incompatibility genes, but not involved in determining the SI specificity. However, this is unlikely for most of the putative alleles, for the following reasons (in addition to the segregation data given above). First, primers specific for given subtypes never detect a subtype in a large proportion of individuals, as should happen if a sequence represents a separate locus (unless this locus is highly polymorphic). Second, except for Aly13-2, which is unlinked to the S-locus, we didn't find more than two subtypes in any given individual. It is therefore unlikely that other closely linked genes are often amplified and contribute to our sequences. If so, they must be present in only a small minority of individuals, or else be highly polymorphic, so that the primers often fail to amplify. Further evidence that all the Aly13 subtypes reported here represent allelic variants at a single SRK locus will require cloning of a large genomic region flanking the gene for each subtype, and expression studies will be needed to test expression in stigmas.
Among the 11 Aly13 subtypes for which we have evidence of linkage to the S-locus, our partial information on dominance relationships suggests at least three dominance levels with some codominance evident between members of the same level. We did not observe any sex differences in dominance among these 7 subtypes, but other crossing results have shown that such interactions do occur in A. lyrata (![]()
The phylogeny of S-domain sequences suggests that the polymorphism within Brassica classes I and II SRK alleles arose after the split of the two species. However, the opposite conclusion is suggested by the observation that an indel polymorphism is present in both species (although these nucleotides may have been inserted or deleted more than once). In addition, the Aly13 subtype 13-9 appears to be more closely related to the Brassica class II alleles than to any of the other sequence types. We do not yet have dominance information for this allele because its linkage to the S-locus was inferred from segregation analysis with respect to other putative alleles that are linked, and pollination data have not been obtained. It will be interesting to test whether this allele is recessive in pollen, like the Brassica class II alleles. However, the conclusions from phylogenetic analyses must be treated cautiously when using a locus such as SRK that is a member of a multi-gene family in which recombination or gene conversion between alleles at different loci may occur. If such exchanges occur within either species, the gene tree will not represent the ancestry of the alleles, but will have a complex network structure (![]()
![]()
![]()
Our analysis of the few Aly13 kinase domains so far sequenced shows that these domains are highly variable. This is surprising if the S-locus region undergoes recombination. If the amino acid residues that are involved in recognition, and subject to balancing selection, are in the hypervariable regions of the S-domain, one would expect no further peaks of diversity as far away as the kinase domain (![]()
![]()
![]()
Finally, our finding that most of the Aly13 subtypes contain a kinase domain suggests that A. lyrata may not have a haplotype structure of linked SRK and SLG alleles with similar S-domains. If there were haplotype structure similar to that of Brassica, we should find pairs of closely related sequences segregating with the different specificities, and three or four Aly13 subtypes might be observed in at least some individuals. This does not seem to be found, which raises several possibilities. First, it is possible that SLG is indeed not necessary for the determination of the SI phenotypes in A. lyrata and that it is absent from most or all haplotypes. Second, and alternatively, pairs of SRK/SLG genes may have (almost) identical S-domains, so that we are unable to distinguish the two loci by the methods used here. Third, it is possible that SRK and SLG orthologues in A. lyrata are so diverged that we are able to detect only the SRK and not the SLG orthologue by our PCR-based approach. Work is in progress to test between these possibilities.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Present address: Department of Botany, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are very grateful to M. E. Nasrallah and J. B. Nasrallah for sharing information about the sequences of putative S-alleles of A. lyrata. The first attempts at isolating S-domain genes were done in Chuck Langley's Lab, UC Davis, and we thank Chuck for his support and for discussions about SI. We thank the staff at the University of Edinburgh and Paaskehojgard Experimental Station for growing the plants, and the following people for seeds used in this work: T. E. Thorhallsdottir, C. H. Langley, and R. Mauricio. This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the United Kingdom, including support for B. K. Mable. M. H. Schierup was supported by the Danish Natural Sciences Research Council (grant nos. 9701412 and 1262), and wishes to thank Camilla Haakonsen for excellent lab work. D. Charlesworth was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council of Great Britain and Edinburgh University, and P. Awadalla by an Edinburgh University Faculty of Science and Engineering Scholarship.
Manuscript received October 16, 2000; Accepted for publication January 19, 2001.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ANDOLFATTO, P. and M. NORDBORG, 1998 The effect of gene conversion on intralocus associations. Genetics 148:1397-1399
AWADALLA, P. and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1999 Recombination and selection at Brassica self-incompatibility loci. Genetics 152:413-425
BERGSTROM, T. F., A. JOSEFSSON, H. A. ERLICH, and U. GYLLENSTEN, 1998 Recent origin of HLA-DRB1 alleles and implications for human evolution. Nat. Genet. 18:237-242[Medline].
BI, Y. M., N. BRUGIERE, Y. CUI, D. R. GORING, and S. J. ROTHSTEIN, 2000 Transformation of Arabidopsis with a Brassica SLG/SRK region and ARC1 gene is not sufficient to transfer the self-incompatibility phenotype. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263:648-654[Medline].
CHARLESWORTH, D., 2000 How can two-gene models of self-incompatibility generate new specificities? Plant Cell 12:309-310
CHARLESWORTH, D., P. AWADALLA, B. K. MABLE, and M. H. SCHIERUP, 2000 Population-level studies of multiallelic self-incompatibility loci, with particular reference to Brassicaceae. Ann. Bot. 85:227-239
CONNER, J. A., P. CONNER, M. E. NASRALLAH, and J. B. NASRALLAH, 1998 Comparative mapping of the Brassica S locus region and its homolog in Arabidopsis: implications for the evolution of mating systems in the Brassicaceae. Plant Cell 10:801-812
CUI, Y. H., Y. M. BI, N. BRUGIERE, M. A. ARNOLDO, and S. J. ROTHSTEIN, 2000 The S locus glycoprotein and the S receptor kinase are sufficient for self-pollen rejection in Brassica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:3713-3717
DWYER, K. G., M. A. BALENT, J. B. NASRALLAH, and M. E. NASRALLAH, 1991 DNA sequences of self-incompatibility genes from Brassica campestris and B. oleracea: polymorphism predating speciation. Plant Mol. Biol. 16:481-486[Medline].
HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, and T. YANO, 1985 Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174[Medline].
HATAKEYAMA, K., M. WATANABE, T. TAKASAKI, K. OJIMA, and K. HINATA, 1998 Dominance relationships between S-alleles in self-incompatible Brassica campestris L. Heredity 80:241-247.
HUDSON, R. R., 1990 Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:1-45.
HUGHES, A. L. and M. YEAGER, 1998 Natural selection at major histocompatibility complex loci of vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32:415-435[Medline].
JUNGHANS, H. and M. METZLAFF, 1990 A simple and rapid method for the preparation of total plant DNA. Biotechniques 8:176[Medline].
KARPECHENKO, G. D., 1927 Polyploid hybrids of Raphanus sativus X Brassica oleracea. Appl. Bot. Genet. Plant Breeding 17:305-410.
KUSABA, M., T. NISHIO, Y. SATTA, K. HINATA, and D. OCKENDON, 1997 Striking sequence similarity in inter- and intra-specific comparisons of class I SLG alleles from Brassica oleracea and Brassica campestris: implications for the evolution and recognition mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7673-7678
KUSABA, M., K. DWYER, J. HENDERSHOT, J. VREBALOV, and J. B. NASRALLAH et al., 2001 Self-incompatibility in the genus Arabidopsis. Characterization of the S locus in the outcrossing A. lyrata and its autogamous relative A. thaliana. Plant Cell 13:627-643
MAHY, G. and A. L. JACQUEMART, 1999 Early inbreeding depression and pollen competition in Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull. Ann. Bot. 83:697-704
MCNAUGHTON, I. H., 1973 Resistance of Raphanobrassica to clubroot disease. Nature 243:547-548.
NASRALLAH, J. B., T.-H. KAO, T.-H. CHEN, M. GOLDBERG, and M. E. NASRALLAH, 1987 Amino-acid sequence of glycoproteins encoded by three alleles of the S-locus of Brassica oleracea.. Nature 326:617-619.
NASRALLAH, J. B., S.-M. YU, and M. E. NASRALLAH, 1988 Self-incompatibility genes of Brassica oleracea: expression, isolation and structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5551-5555
NASRALLAH, J. B., T. NISHIO, and M. E. NASRALLAH, 1991 The self-incompatibility genes of Brassica: expression and use in genetic ablation of floral tissues. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42:393-422.
NISHIO, T. and M. KUSABA, 2000 Sequence diversity of SLG and SRK in Brassica oleracea L. Ann. Bot. 85(Suppl. A):141-146
NORDBORG, M., B. CHARLESWORTH, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1996 The effect of recombination on background selection. Genet. Res. 67:159-174[Medline].
RAMBAUT, A., 1998 Se-Al: Sequence Alignment Editor v1.0 alpha 1. Distributed over the World Wide Web (http://evolve.zps.ox.ac.uk).
RICHMAN, A. D., M. K. UYENOYAMA, and J. R. KOHN, 1996 Allelic diversity and gene genealogy at the self-incompatibility locus in the Solanaceae. Science 273:1212-1216[Abstract].
ROJAS, J. and R. ROJAS, 1999 DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15:174-175
ROLLINS, R. C., 1993 The Cruciferae of Continental North America. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
SAKAMOTO, K., M. KUSABA, and T. NISHIO, 1998 Polymorphism of the S-locus glycoprotein gene (SLG) and the S-locus related gene (SLR1) in Raphanus sativus L. and self-incompatible ornamental plants in the Brassicaceae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 258:397-403[Medline].
SCHIERUP, M. H., 1998 The effect of enzyme heterozygosity on growth in a strictly outcrossing species, the self-incompatible Arabis petraea (Brassicaceae). Hereditas 128:21-31.
SCHIERUP, M. H. and J. HEIN, 2000 Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis. Genetics 156:879-891
SCHIERUP, M. H., X. VEKEMANS, and F. B. CHRISTIANSEN, 1998 Allelic genealogies in sporophytic self-incompatibility systems in plants. Genetics 150:1187-1198
SCHIERUP, M. H., X. VEKEMANS, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 2000 The effect of subdivision on variation at multi-allelic loci under balancing selection. Genet. Res. 76:51-62[Medline].
SCHOPFER, C. R., M. E. NASRALLAH, and J. B. NASRALLAH, 1999 The male determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica. Science 286:1697-1700
SHIBA, H., N. KIMURA, S. TAKAYAMA, K. HINATA, and A. SUZUKI et al., 2000 Alteration of the self-incompatibility phenotype in Brassica by transformation of the antisense SLG gene. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 64:1016-1024[Medline].
SIMS, T. L., 1993 Genetic regulation of self-incompatibility. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12:129-167.
STEIN, J., B. HOWLETT, D. C. BOYES, M. E. NASRALLAH, and J. B. NASRALLAH, 1991 Molecular cloning of a putative receptor protein kinase gene encoded at the self-incompatibility locus of Brassica oleracea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:8816-8820
STROBECK, C., 1983 Expected linkage disequilibrium for a neutral locus linked to a chromosomal arrangement. Genetics 103:545-555
SWOFFORD, D. L., 2000 PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
TAKAHATA, N., 1990 A simple genealogical structure of strongly balanced allelic lines and trans-species evolution of polymorphism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:2419-2423
TAKAHATA, N. and Y. SATTA, 1998 Footprints of intragenic recombination at HLA loci. Immunogenetics 47:430-441[Medline].
TAKASAKI, T., K. HATAKEYAMA, G. SUZUKI, M. WATANABE, and A. ISOGAI et al., 2000 The S receptor kinase determines self-incompatibility in Brassica stigma. Nature 403:913-916[Medline].
TAKAYAMA, S., H. SHIBA, M. IWANO, H. SHIMOSATO, and F. S. CHE et al., 2000 The pollen determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica campestris. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:1920-1925
THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWNIAK, F. JEANMOUGIN, and D. G. HIGGINS, 1997 The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:4876-4882.
THOMPSON, K. F. and J. P. TAYLOR, 1966 Non-linear dominance relationships between S alleles. Heredity 21:345-362.
TOBIAS, C. M. and J. B. NASRALLAH, 1996 An S-locus-related gene in Arabidopsis encodes a functional kinase and produces two classes of transcripts. Plant J. 10:523-531[Medline].
UYENOYAMA, M. K., 1995 A generalized least-squares estimate for the origin of sporophytic self-incompatibility. Genetics 139:975-992