Genetics, Vol. 157, 1481-1491, April 2001, Copyright © 2001

Efficient Incorporation of Large (>2 kb) Heterologies Into Heteroduplex DNA: Pms1/Msh2-Dependent and -Independent Large Loop Mismatch Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Jennifer A. Clikemana, Sarah L. Wheelera, and Jac A. Nickoloffa
a Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131

Corresponding author: Jac A. Nickoloff, Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87131., jnickoloff{at}salud.unm.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: L. S. SYMINGTON


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in yeast is effected primarily by gene conversion. Conversion can conceivably result from gap repair or from mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) in recombination intermediates. Mismatch repair is normally very efficient, but unrepaired mismatches segregate in the next cell division, producing sectored colonies. Conversion of small heterologies (single-base differences or insertions <15 bp) in meiosis and mitosis involves mismatch repair of hDNA. The repair of larger loop mismatches in plasmid substrates or arising by replication slippage is inefficient and/or independent of Pms1p/Msh2p-dependent mismatch repair. However, large insertions convert readily (without sectoring) during meiotic recombination, raising the question of whether large insertions convert by repair of large loop mismatches or by gap repair. We show that insertions of 2.2 and 2.6 kbp convert efficiently during DSB-induced mitotic recombination, primarily by Msh2p- and Pms1p-dependent repair of large loop mismatches. These results support models in which Rad51p readily incorporates large heterologies into hDNA. We also show that large heterologies convert more frequently than small heterologies located the same distance from an initiating DSB and propose that this reflects Msh2-independent large loop-specific mismatch repair biased toward loop loss.


IN Saccharomyces cerevisiae, most DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by recombination, principally gene conversion, with or without an associated crossover (PAQUES and HABER 1999 Down). Gene conversion also plays a significant role in the repair of chromosomal DSBs in mammalian cells (TAGHIAN and NICKOLOFF 1997 Down; LIANG et al. 1998 Down) and conversion from pseudogene donors has been implicated in human diseases (e.g., WATNICK et al. 1998 Down). Alleles suffering a DSB usually receive information from unbroken alleles, and most conversion tracts are continuous (PETES et al. 1991 Down; NICKOLOFF and HOEKSTRA 1998 Down). Although these features can be explained by a model in which conversion occurs in a double-strand gap (SZOSTAK et al. 1983 Down), most meiotic and mitotic conversion in yeast involves mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA (hDNA; PETES et al. 1991 Down; NICKOLOFF and HOEKSTRA 1998 Down; WENG and NICKOLOFF 1998 Down; NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down). When mismatches escape repair, markers in hDNA segregate in the next cell division, producing sectored colonies; this is termed postmeiotic segregation (PMS) for meiotic events; analogous events can occur in mitotic cells.

Gene conversion can be described in four steps: initiation, end-processing, hDNA formation, and resolution of intermediates. DSBs are potent initiators of gene conversion, and recent studies have clarified how broken ends are processed into 3' single-stranded tails (reviewed in PAQUES and HABER 1999 Down), but the subsequent hDNA formation step remains unclear. hDNA can form as a result of strand invasion (synapsis) and by branch migration of Holliday junctions. In yeast, strand exchange is presumed to be mediated by Rad51p, a homolog of Escherichia coli RecA (SHINOHARA et al. 1992 Down; OGAWA et al. 1993 Down; SUNG and STRATTON 1996 Down). RecA and Rad51p bind to processed ends (3' single-stranded tails), forming nucleoprotein filaments, and both display DNA-dependent ATPase activity and can pair or transfer complementary DNA strands in vitro.

Resolution of recombination intermediates includes mismatch repair of hDNA and/or resolution of Holliday junctions. Mismatch repair proteins are conserved from bacteria to higher eukaryotes. In E. coli, mutHLS mediates the dominant mismatch repair mechanism that involves excision and new synthesis of long DNA tracts that can extend >1 kb (MODRICH 1991 Down; RASMUSSEN et al. 1998 Down). MutS functions in mismatch recognition and MutL couples the mismatch-bound MutS to proteins involved in later steps. Yeast have several mutS homologs, including MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, and several mutL homologs, including PMS1 and MLH1 (CROUSE 1998 Down). Msh2p in complex with Msh6p or Msh3p binds to single-base or loop mismatches, respectively. Despite this conservation at the protein level, repair efficiencies of various types of mismatches differ markedly among different organisms. In E. coli most single-base mismatches and small loops (<4 bases) are repaired efficiently, but C-C and larger loop mismatches are repaired only as part of a tract initiated by another mismatch (CARRAWAY and MARINUS 1993 Down). In yeast most single-base mismatches are repaired efficiently; C-C and palindromic loop mismatches that form stable stem-loop structures are poorly repaired unless a well-repaired mismatch is nearby (NAG et al. 1989 Down; NAG and PETES 1991 Down; WENG and NICKOLOFF 1998 Down). Short loop mismatches (1–15 bases) are well repaired in yeast (BISHOP and KOLODNER 1986 Down; BISHOP et al. 1989 Down; KRAMER et al. 1989 Down), but studies of larger loop mismatches have led to conflicting conclusions. In transformation assays with artificial hDNA plasmid substrates, a 38-base loop was repaired with low efficiency (30–50%; KRAMER et al. 1989 Down; LUHR et al. 1998 Down). Two reports indicate that loops >15 bases formed by DNA polymerase slippage are not subject to Pms1p-, Msh2-, Msh3-, or Msh6-dependent mismatch repair (TRAN et al. 1996 Down; SIA et al. 1997 Down), but two other reports indicate a role for Msh3p in the repair of 94-base loops (HARFE and JINKS-ROBERTSON 1999 Down; HARFE et al. 2000 Down). Repair of relatively large loop mismatches (16–216 bases) in plasmid hDNA substrates has been demonstrated in vitro with yeast nuclear extracts; this activity is independent of MSH2, MSH3, MLH1, and PMS1 (CORRETTE-BENNETT et al. 1999 Down). In contrast, even very large insertion mutations (>1 kbp) are converted during meiosis (reviewed in PETES et al. 1991 Down); if these insertions convert as a result of inclusion in hDNA it would suggest that very large loop mismatches are efficiently repaired. It has been suggested that conversions of large insertions might be mediated by gap repair (SZOSTAK et al. 1983 Down; TRAN et al. 1996 Down) rather than by mismatch repair.

A related question concerns whether large loop mismatches form in vivo; i.e., can Rad51p incorporate very large insertions into hDNA? Studies of RecA provide insight into this question. RecA-mediated strand transfer in vitro is impeded by point mutations and blocked by a 2-kbp heterology (DASGUPTA and RADDING 1982 Down). However, heterologies >1 kbp are readily incorporated into hDNA when RecA is augmented by single-strand binding protein (SSB) and an ATP regeneration system (BIANCHI and RADDING 1983 Down), and 1.3-kb loop mismatches were detected in vivo during recA-dependent {lambda} recombination (LICHTEN and FOX 1984 Down). RecA mediates strand transfer between homologous DNAs without ATP hydrolysis, but incorporation of heterologies into hDNA requires ATP hydrolysis (ROSSELLI and STASIAK 1991 Down; KIM et al. 1992 Down); this reaction is also facilitated by RuvA and RuvB (IYPE et al. 1994 Down; ADAMS and WEST 1996 Down). In yeast, 32-base loop mismatches were detected during meiosis (NAG and PETES 1993 Down), but a similar analysis of larger loops has not been reported. Yeast Rad51p shares many biochemical properties with RecA, including strand transfer activity that is facilitated by the yeast SSB homolog, replication protein A (SUNG 1997 Down). Like RecA, Rad51p promotes strand transfer between homologous DNAs without ATP hydrolysis in vitro (SUNG and STRATTON 1996 Down).

In this study we analyzed mitotic gene conversion in diploid yeast in which events were initiated at a defined DSB created by HO nuclease. We demonstrate that a heterology of 2.6 kbp is converted even more often than an equidistant small heterology and that this large heterology frequently segregates in pms1 and msh2 mutants. These results indicate that large heterologies are readily incorporated into hDNA, that the resulting large loop mismatches are efficiently repaired, and that the majority of this repair involves Pms1p and Msh2p.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Plasmid DNA, plasmid rescue, PCR, and yeast strains:
Plasmid manipulation, plasmid rescue, PCR, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) mapping strategies, yeast culture, and strain construction were described previously (SWEETSER et al. 1994 Down; NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down). Strain genotypes are given in Table 1. Recombination substrate structures (Fig 1) were confirmed by Southern hybridization and by restriction mapping of rescued plasmids and/or PCR products. All strains carry an integrated copy of GAL1 promoter-driven HO nuclease (GALHO) and a copy of ura3 (recipient allele) with a 24-bp HO recognition sequence at position 432 (HO432) into which DSBs are introduced upon growth in medium with galactose. In some strains the second (donor) copy of ura3 was inactivated by the nonrevertible frameshift mutation X764 (SWEETSER et al. 1994 Down); in other strains the donor copy was wild type (URA3). ura3 alleles flanked by pUC19 and LEU2 were constructed by using derivatives of the RscRI transplacement vector; in some strains HIS3 was inserted ~8 kbp from the telomere on the same arm as ura3 (NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down). pms1 and msh2 knockout vectors were kindly provided by R. Kolodner and E. Alani. The msh2 knockout vector, pEAI99, replaces nearly all of the MSH2 sequence with TRP1. The pms1 knockout vector, pEAI93, replaces the PstI fragment in the PMS1 coding sequence with TRP1. Chromosomal modifications in pms1 and msh2 strains were confirmed by Southern analysis; these mutants also displayed strong mutator phenotypes, with spontaneous mutation to canavanine resistance increased by at least 120-fold (data not shown).



View larger version (38K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. Allelic recombination substrates with small and large heterologies. (A) DY3515-13 and JC3517-13 have 13 small heterologies, including HO432, X764, the flanking markers R5' and B3', and nine silent RFLP markers shown by shading within the 1.2-kbp HindIII fragment carrying ura3 (boxes). Sizes are given in kilobase pairs; segments are not to scale (for details, see NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down). JC3517-13 has HIS3-telV. (B) Four strains with small heterologies as above plus large heterologies of 2.2 kbp (pUC19) and 2.6 kbp (LEU2 + 0.4 kbp of pUC19) flanking ura3. JC3528 and JC3531 are pms1 and msh2 mutants, respectively, but are otherwise identical to SW3476. JC3525 has HIS3-telV. (C) Three strains with large heterologies as above but lacking the small heterologies (silent RFLPs and X764). The only small heterology in these strains is HO432, which converts independently of the Msh2p pathway via cleavage of nonhomologous tails by Rad1p/Rad10p endonuclease (FISHMAN-LOBELL and HABER 1992 Down).


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 1. Yeast strains

Recombination assays and statistical analysis:
Recombination frequencies of wild-type strains were measured in three to four independent populations of parent strains as described (SWEETSER et al. 1994 Down; NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down). Briefly, 2-day-old colonies were transferred to 1.5 ml rich medium with 2% glycerol (YPGly) for 24 hr to derepress GALHO. Cultures were divided in half, cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 1.5 ml of rich medium with either 2% galactose (YPGal) to induce GALHO or 2% glucose (YPD; uninduced controls), and incubated for 6 hr. Cells were counted and appropriate dilutions were spread on YPD plates. For strains carrying two inactive ura3 genes, the resulting YPD colonies were replica plated to appropriate omission media to identify Ura+, Leu-, and His- recombinants. Ura- recombinants were distinguished from Ura- parents by replica plating YPD colonies to YPGal for 24 hr, and then from YPGal to uracil omission medium. This procedure reinduces GALHO and stimulates recombination in parental (but not Ura- recombinant) colonies, producing Ura+ papillae in each parental colony (WENG et al. 1996 Down). All recombinant products were independent since only one product of a particular phenotype was isolated from a parent population. Recombinants that lost or retained pUC19 were distinguished by Southern hybridization. ura3 alleles in recombinants that retained pUC19 were rescued as described (NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down). ura3 alleles in Leu+ recombinants that lacked pUC19 were PCR amplified by using primers specific for sequences upstream of ura3 and in LEU2. In either case, conversion tracts were characterized by mapping silent RFLPs with established procedures (SWEETSER et al. 1994 Down). Leu- products that had lost pUC19 were assumed to have converted all markers in the recipient allele and were not characterized further.

In strains carrying a URA3 donor, recombination was induced and cells were seeded to YPD plates as above, but the resulting YPD colonies were replica plated only to leucine omission medium to score Leu- recombinants. Because the Ura phenotype was not informative for recombination in strains carrying a URA3 donor, we determined whether the Leu+ half of Leu+/- colonies was parental (retained HO432) or recombinant (lost HO432) in 30 Leu+/- products from each strain (wild type, pms1, msh2) as follows. Leu+ cells from Leu+/- colonies were dispersed to leucine omission plates, incubated for 2 days, and the resulting colonies were replica plated to YPGal to reinduce GALHO for 24 hr. Cells from YPGal colonies were then dispersed to semiselective leucine medium on which Leu+ colonies appear pink and Leu- colonies appear white in an ade2 background (MYERS and NICKOLOFF 1999 Down). If the Leu+ half of Leu+/- colonies was parental, reinduction of GALHO stimulated recombination and many Leu- colonies arose, whereas GALHO induction does not stimulate recombination in Leu+ recombinants, and few or no Leu- colonies arose. Leu+/- colonies with parental sectors were presumed to arise during G2 and were scored as nonsectored in calculations of sector rates.

In patch assays, pms1 and msh2 mutants show higher frequencies of spontaneous Ura+ products than wild type (our unpublished results). To avoid problems associated with jackpots, recombination assays in these mutants (and in wild-type controls done in parallel) were not performed with individual parent colonies. Instead, frozen stocks of subclones with low background levels of Ura+ cells were identified by spreading 1-cm2 patches on YPD plates, incubating for 2 days, and replica plating to uracil omission medium. Approximately 5–10 x 106 cells from each of several different areas of patches that exhibited a low level of Ura+ papillae were transferred to tubes with 1.5 ml of YPGly medium and treated as above, except that GALHO was induced using YPGal with 5% galactose for only 2 hr. The shorter induction period minimizes cell division prior to plating, providing a more accurate estimate of marker segregation rates. Statistical analyses were performed by using t-tests unless otherwise specified.


*  RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Experimental design:
We previously studied DSB-induced allelic recombination in multiply marked copies of ura3 (NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down). In that system, one copy of ura3 was inactivated by insertion of a 24-bp HO site (HO432) and the second copy by a +1 frameshift mutation (X764). There were nine additional phenotypically silent RFLP mutations present at ~100-bp intervals in ura3 to allow high resolution mapping of conversion tracts initiated by DSBs in HO432 following galactose induction of GALHO (Fig 1A). This system provided information about gene conversion tract lengths, directionality, and symmetry relative to a defined DSB. Products showing loss of heterozygosity at all markers centromere-distal to HO432 could result from gene conversion, break-induced replication (BIR), or G2 crossovers (Fig 2). Products showing loss of heterozygosity at all markers could have resulted from these three processes, as well as by chromosome loss. By using a telomere-proximal HIS3 gene (HIS3-telV) linked to ura3 (110 kbp from HO432), we showed that BIR and chromosome loss were rare, with most products resulting from gene conversion. Associated crossovers were seen in ~20% of conversions, and, as expected, ~25% of crossovers (5% of total events) led to loss of HIS3-telV.



View larger version (26K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. Types of DSB-induced recombination products. Symbols are as described in Fig 1. Short and long tract gene conversion (GC) produces Ura+ and Ura- products, respectively. Break-induced replication (lower left) and chromosome loss (not shown) lead to loss of HIS3-telV. Half of gene conversions associated with a G2 crossover result in HIS3-telV loss when homologs (marked by arrows) cosegregate in mitosis; the other half remain heterozygous.

Recombination was induced in liquid medium with galactose as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS, and cells were seeded to nonselective solid medium (YPD), which supports growth of parental cells and all types of recombinant products. DSBs in HO432 lead to conversion (loss) of HO432; if the conversion tract is short (i.e., does not also encompass X764), the product will be Ura+ and these were identified by replica plating YPD colonies to medium lacking uracil. Recombinants with longer conversion tracts that encompass X764 have the same Ura- phenotype as parents; Ura- recombinants were distinguished from Ura- parents by using a reinduction assay as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Because nearly all tracts are continuous, tracts in Ura+ recombinants usually terminate before X764, and tracts in Ura- recombinants extend past X764 (Fig 2). Thus the ratio of Ura+:Ura- products provides an estimate of tract lengths. Another class of products is sectored Ura+/-, which can arise from segregation of unrepaired hDNA that encompasses X764, or from independent events in G2. We believe the majority of Ura+/- sectors reflect independent events in G2 because X764 produces a 4/5 bubble mismatch that displayed low segregation rates in several studies of direct repeat and plasmid x chromosome recombination (SWEETSER et al. 1994 Down; CHO et al. 1998 Down; WENG and NICKOLOFF 1998 Down; NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down). To generate complete gene conversion tract spectra, we analyze tracts in sets of Ura+ and Ura- products, then combine the data in proportion to the measured Ura+ and Ura- frequencies; this produces spectra that are not biased by selection of a particular phenotype. Adjusting Ura+ and Ura- frequencies by adding half of the Ura+/- products to the Ura+ class and half to the Ura- class does not significantly alter product spectra (data not shown).

In the prior system (NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down), all heterologies were small, ranging from single-base substitutions to linker insertions (Fig 1A). In the present study we analyzed conversion of large heterologies flanking the 1.2-kbp fragment carrying ura3, including a 2.2-kbp heterology consisting of most of pUC19, and a 2.6-kbp heterology consisting of a 2.2-kbp LEU2 fragment and the remaining 0.4 kbp of pUC19. Beyond these large heterologies is essentially unlimited homology (>100 kbp; Fig 1B and Fig C). As described above, some strains were marked with HIS3-telV to monitor G2 crossovers and chromosome loss.

Large heterologies do not influence recombination frequencies, gene conversion tract spectra, or rates of chromosome loss:
Total induced recombination frequencies (including Ura+, Ura-, and sectored Ura+/- products) were similar for substrates with small heterologies or small and large heterologies (Table 2, experiments 1 and 2), indicating that large heterologies do not inhibit DSB-induced recombination. Total induced recombination was also similar in strains carrying the distant HIS3-telV marker (Table 2, experiments 3 and 4). In fact, none of these recombination frequencies are significantly different (all P > 0.15).


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 2. Recombination frequencies

We characterized conversion tracts in 91 independent recombinants of strain SW3476 (small and large heterologies). As expected, continuous tracts were predominant. Of the 91 products, 4 were Ura+ Leu-; i.e., they did not convert X764 but did convert the more distal LEU2 marker and therefore had discontinuous tracts; these were not characterized further. The conversion tract spectrum generated from the remaining 87 products shares several features with the spectrum obtained previously with strain DY3515-13 (small heterologies). In both cases, 79% of tracts were bidirectional, most tracts were long (the most common product converted all markers), and no crossovers were observed without an associated gene conversion (data not shown). Both spectra also displayed a bias toward conversion of markers promoter-proximal (5') to the DSB. In the presence or absence of large heterologies, 5' unidirectional tracts comprised 19 and 20% of products, respectively, but no 3' unidirectional tracts were recovered (Table 3). Analysis of individual marker conversion rates revealed a second 5' conversion bias: markers 5' of the DSB converted at significantly higher rates than equidistant 3' markers (Fig 3). Note that these biases are generally independent since individual marker conversion rates are derived from all products, while only ~20% of products have unidirectional tracts. The 5' conversion bias may reflect a transcriptional effect (WENG et al. 2000 Down).



View larger version (26K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 3. Percentage conversion of individual markers among recombinant products as a function of distance from the DSB. Conversion tract spectra from products with continuous tracts (not shown) were generated from 57 products of DY3515-13 with small heterologies (data from NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down) and 87 products of SW3476 with large heterologies (this study). The two large heterologies are shown by shaded symbols. P values are given for small and large heterologies at comparable distances from the DSB (Fisher exact tests).


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 3. Conversion tract directionality

All markers 5' of HO432 were lost in 99% of SW3476 products; these may have resulted from gene conversion, BIR, or G2 crossovers. In 79% of products, all markers were lost and these may have resulted from these processes, as well as from chromosome loss. To distinguish these possibilities we monitored recombination with large and small heterologies at ura3 in the presence of the HIS3-telV marker. Retention of HIS3-telV rules out chromosome loss and BIR for products showing partial or complete marker loss at ura3. We found that 90.8% of products retained HIS3-telV; this is similar to the level obtained with small heterologies (Table 4). As seen previously with small heterologies, substantial fractions of products that lost HIS3-telV retained other markers at ura3, or were expected to result from G2 crossovers (estimated in measurements of HIS3-telV gain among His+/- products), with at most 4% of products resulting from chromosome loss (data not shown). Together, these results indicate that large heterologies do not affect G2 crossover frequencies, nor do they enhance BIR or chromosome loss in lieu of gene conversion.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 4. Percentage of HIS3-telV retention, loss, and sectoring

Large heterologies are readily incorporated into hDNA, and they convert more efficiently than equidistant small heterologies:
Conversion of individual markers decreases with distance from an initiating DSB. In SW3476, the large pUC19 and LEU2 heterologies are located 432 and 738 bp from HO432, respectively. These distances are essentially the same as the small heterologies Ase20 and B3' in DY3515-13. Interestingly, the large LEU2 heterology converted at higher rates than the small equidistant B3' heterology; a similar trend is apparent for pUC19 and Ase20 (see DISCUSSION). In contrast, shared small heterologies converted at similar frequencies in the presence or absence of large heterologies (Fig 3). Thus, rather than being refractory to conversion, large heterologies converted as often, or more often, than equidistant small heterologies. This result might be easy to explain if conversion occurred by gap repair (SZOSTAK et al. 1983 Down), but several studies have shown that DSB-induced gene conversion of small heterologies is mediated by mismatch repair of hDNA (PETES et al. 1991 Down; RAY et al. 1991 Down; WENG and NICKOLOFF 1998 Down; NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down).

To determine whether conversion of large heterologies is mediated by mismatch repair of hDNA, we examined recombination in mismatch repair (MMR)-defective strains with small and large heterologies. For these experiments, run in parallel with the wild-type strain, GALHO induction was limited to 2 hr to minimize cell division prior to plating, since cell division in liquid reduces the number of observable segregation events (cells divide once per 3 hr in galactose medium; data not shown). DSB-induced recombination frequencies were very similar in wild-type and pms1 mutant cells (Table 2, experiments 5 and 6). DSB-induced recombination was slightly lower in the msh2 mutant (Table 2, experiments 5 and 7), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.06). Msh2p (but not Pms1p) plays a role with Rad1p/Rad10p in processing long nonhomologous tails during HO site conversion (SUGAWARA et al. 1997 Down). In the present crosses, the HO432 insertion is 39 bp in length (a 24-bp HO site plus an EcoRI linker); hence, each nonhomologous tail is ~20 nucleotides (nt) in length. The similar recombination frequencies in wild-type and msh2 strains are consistent with data indicating that Msh2p has little or no role in processing short (<30 nt) nonhomologous tails (SUGAWARA et al. 1997 Down). Interestingly, tract lengths (as estimated by ratios of Ura+ and Ura- products) were shorter in pms1 and msh2 mutants compared to wild type (Table 2, experiments 5–7). In contrast, meiotic tract lengths are increased by MMR defects (reviewed in NICOLAS and PETES 1994 Down). Our preliminary data indicate that MMR defects reduce mitotic tract lengths in crosses with large or small heterologies; the complete analysis of these conversion tract spectra will be described in a separate report.

Sectored Ura+/- colonies were rare in wild-type cells, and, as expected, pms1 and msh2 mutants had significantly increased percentages of sectored Ura+/- colonies, reflecting increased X764 segregation (Fig 4A). Typically, pms1 shows milder phenotypes than msh2 (e.g., CHEN and JINKS-ROBERTSON 1999 Down), as observed here. Interestingly, segregation of the 2.6-kbp LEU2 heterozygosity also increased significantly in both pms1 and msh2 mutants, and sector rates were similar for LEU2 and X764 (Fig 4A). We conclude that large heterologies are efficiently incorporated into hDNA, at least when present on the invading strand (see DISCUSSION). We further conclude that large loop mismatches are repaired as efficiently as small loop and single-base mismatches and that large loop mismatch repair involves Pms1p and, to a greater extent, Msh2p.



View larger version (40K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 4. (A) Segregation of small and large heterologies. For X764, values represent the percentage of sectored (Ura+/-) products among those with tracts extending at least as far as X764 (sum of Ura+/- and Ura- products). Ura+ products were omitted from this calculation because those tracts do not extend to X764 and there is no possibility for X764 segregation. Data for the LEU2 marker were treated analogously. Values represent averages (±SEM) for four determinations. Segregation rates for X764 and LEU2 were significantly higher in pms1 and msh2 compared to wild type (asterisks; all P <= 0.001). (B) Segregation of a large heterology in the absence of small heterologies. Values represent the percentage of Leu+/- sectors among total scored recombinants (sum of Leu+/- and Leu- products); this is analogous to the calculations in A above. Asterisks indicate statistically significant increases compared to wild type (both P <= 0.0006). All segregation data are from 2-hr GALHO inductions.

Poorly repaired mismatches in yeast and E. coli can be repaired efficiently when present near other well-repaired mismatches (NAG et al. 1989 Down; NAG and PETES 1991 Down; CARRAWAY and MARINUS 1993 Down; WENG and NICKOLOFF 1998 Down), so it was possible that the Pms1p- and Msh2p-dependent repair of the large LEU2 heterology reflected corepair directed from the many small heterologies (including X764) present in these strains. To test this we constructed wild-type and MMR-defective strains with only large heterologies (Fig 1C). Because this design required the use of a URA3 donor allele, only Leu- and Leu+/- recombinants were scored in these strains and this prevented us from directly measuring total recombination frequencies. However, frequencies of DSB-induced LEU2 conversion were similar in the presence and absence of small heterologies (data not shown). Although the URA3 donor also prevented us from screening patches of parental cells to avoid Leu- jackpots, background Leu- levels (Leu- + Leu+/-) were low (5- to 50-fold lower than induced levels; data not shown). Leu+/- sector rates in the absence of small heterologies were low in wild-type cells and were greatly increased in pms1 and msh2 mutants (Fig 4B). (As expected, glucose-grown cells very rarely produced Leu+/- sectors; the high frequencies of Leu+/- sectors from galactose-grown cells provide further evidence that most of these products were induced by DSBs.) Notably, Leu+/- sector rates were essentially the same in the presence and absence of small heterologies, indicating that the Pms1p- and Msh2p-dependent repair of large loop mismatches does not depend on corepair with small heterologies.


*  DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

This study provides new insight into the efficiency of incorporation of large heterologies into hDNA, the efficiency of large loop mismatch repair, and the proteins involved in this repair. Our analysis was performed in mitotic cells, but our conclusions also apply to meiotic conversion (see below). Numerous studies support the notion that conversion of small heterologies (single-base differences and insertions <40 bp in length) in both meiosis and mitosis is mediated by mismatch repair of hDNA (PETES et al. 1991 Down; NICKOLOFF and HOEKSTRA 1998 Down; WENG and NICKOLOFF 1998 Down; NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down). Furthermore, heterologies >1 kbp convert readily with little PMS in meiosis. Thus, one might conclude that meiotic cells are capable of incorporating large heterologies into hDNA and efficiently repairing large loop mismatches. However, this conclusion was inconsistent with plasmid transformation assays that indicated that small loop (1–12 bases) and most single-base mismatches are repaired with >90% efficiency, but 38-base loops were repaired with only 30–50% efficiency (BISHOP and KOLODNER 1986 Down; BISHOP et al. 1987 Down; KRAMER et al. 1989 Down; LUHR et al. 1998 Down). Furthermore, the repair of single-base mismatches and loop mismatches <=12 bases involved Pms1p and Msh2p, among other proteins, yet the low efficiency repair of a 38-base loop mismatch was independent of Pms1p and showed limited dependence on Msh2p (BISHOP et al. 1987 Down; KRAMER et al. 1989 Down; LUHR et al. 1998 Down). Similarly, the repair of 1- and 7-base loop mismatches arising by replication slippage was dependent on Pms1p and Msh2p (TRAN et al. 1996 Down), whereas repair of loop mismatches >15 bases was independent of these proteins (TRAN et al. 1996 Down; SIA et al. 1997 Down; HARFE and JINKS-ROBERTSON 1999 Down). The apparent lack or poor repair of loop mismatches >15 bases in length and the lack of involvement of key mismatch repair proteins led to the suggestion that meiotic conversion of very large insertions is not mediated by mismatch repair of hDNA, but instead by gap repair (SZOSTAK et al. 1983 Down; TRAN et al. 1996 Down). The high rates of segregation of the large LEU2 heterology in msh2 and pms1 mutants (Fig 4) indicate that most mitotic conversion of large heterologies involves mismatch repair of hDNA and that that this repair is largely dependent on Msh2p and, to a lesser extent, on Pms1p. This conclusion has recently been extended to meiotic conversion: 1.1-kbp heterologies convert during meiosis without PMS in wild-type cells, but PMS is increased in msh2 (but not pms1) mutants (H. KEARNEY and T. PETES, personal communication). Our data also indicate that heterologies as large as 2.6 kbp are readily incorporated into hDNA during mitotic gene conversion, at least when present in the recipient allele. Although the efficiency of incorporation may differ for large heterologies present in recipient and donor alleles, we believe that this is unlikely because meiotic conversion shows parity; i.e., conversion involving marker gain occurs at a similar rate to marker loss (reviewed in PETES et al. 1991 Down).

Recent results suggest overlap among mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair pathways. In addition to its role in nucleotide excision repair, Rad1p/Rad10p endonuclease cleaves nonhomologous 3' tails during single-strand annealing and during DSB-induced recombination when invading ends have 3' nonhomologous tails (PAQUES and HABER 1999 Down), as in the present system. In meiotic cells, about one-half of repair events at a 26-base loop mismatch involve Msh2p, Rad1p, and Rad10p; the remaining repair events are independent of these proteins, or less likely, involve gap repair (KIRKPATRICK and PETES 1997 Down). Thus, Rad1p/Rad10p is a structure-specific endonuclease that recognizes both 3' flaps and relatively large loop mismatches. It was recently shown that a 1.1-kbp heterology displayed even higher PMS in rad1 and rad10 than in msh2 (H. KEARNEY and T. PETES, personal communication). It is likely that Rad1p/Rad10p is also involved in large loop repair in mitosis; we could not test this because these proteins are required to cleave 3' nonhomologous tails produced by HO nuclease. Because Msh3p and Msh6p are involved in loop and single-base mismatch repair, respectively, it is also likely that large loops will segregate frequently in msh3, but not msh6, mutants.

Why are large loop mismatches repaired poorly in transformed plasmid substrates, with residual repair being largely independent of Pms1p and Msh2p, while these proteins have significant roles in the efficient repair of large loop mismatches during DSB-induced chromosomal gene conversion? This difference might reflect the substrate context (plasmid vs. chromosomal), although this explanation is inadequate because chromosomal loop mismatches >16 bases produced by replication slippage are not processed by Pms1p, Msh2p, or Msh6p (TRAN et al. 1996 Down; SIA et al. 1997 Down; HARFE and JINKS-ROBERTSON 1999 Down). We propose that these disparate results reflect the differential accessibility of one or more components of the Msh2-dependent repair system to mismatches present in artificial (plasmid) hDNA, arising by replication slippage, or arising by recombination. Different mismatch repair complexes may be active during these processes, some of which may or may not contain Msh2p and Msh2p-interacting proteins. Alternatively, there may be a single large loop mismatch repair complex, but its recognition or repair activities may be modulated by interactions with specific factors present at replication forks, such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), or at sites of DSB repair, such as Rad51p. In this regard it is interesting that human MSH2 and MLH1 were recently found in complex with a large number of proteins involved in recombinational repair and replication-associated repair, including BRCA1, ATM, BLM, the RAD50-MRE11-NBS1 complex, and PCNA (WANG et al. 2000 Down). Notably, BRCA1 associates with BRCA2, which in turn associates with RAD51 (WONG et al. 1997 Down; CHEN et al. 1998 Down; MOYNAHAN et al. 1999 Down).

Additional questions raised by our present study relate to the mechanism and efficiency of incorporation of large heterologies into hDNA. In vitro and in vivo strand transfer catalyzed by RecA can create loop mismatches >1 kb in length (BIANCHI and RADDING 1983 Down; LICHTEN and FOX 1984 Down), but incorporation of small or large heterologies requires ATP hydrolysis (ROSSELLI and STASIAK 1991 Down; KIM et al. 1992 Down). Our results suggest that Rad51p readily incorporates large heterologies into hDNA. Cells with a mutant Rad51p that cannot bind ATP show the same hypersensitivity to the radiomimetic agent methylmethane sulfonate as null rad51 mutants. In contrast, cells with Rad51p that can bind, but cannot hydrolyze, ATP (ATPase mutant), are as resistant to methylmethane sulfonate as wild type (SUNG and STRATTON 1996 Down). We recently found that a Rad51p ATPase mutant is capable of incorporating heterologies into hDNA in vivo, albeit at reduced efficiency (J. CLIKEMAN and J. NICKOLOFF, unpublished results).

How are large heterologies incorporated into hDNA? One model suggests that incorporation occurs in a processive manner, with homology tested along the entire length of the heterology. There is in vitro evidence that RecA searches processively (GONDA and RADDING 1983 Down). We can envision an alternative ("leap-frog") model in which large heterologies are bypassed in a single step (Fig 5). In this view, homology is identified discontinuously; once a heterology is encountered, Rad51p promotes a second synapsis event on the other side of the heterology. One can also imagine a hybrid model in which homology is tested at intervals. If heterologies are incorporated in a processive manner, a reduction in conversion may only be detectable once a certain threshold length of heterology is reached. If such a threshold exists, our data suggest that it is >2.6 kbp.



View larger version (14K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 5. Incorporation of large heterologies into hDNA. Arrowheads indicate 3' ends. A heterology may be encountered during strand invasion or branch migration. In the single step model, homology is then identified on the opposite side of the heterology (dashed lines). Alternatively, heterology may be incorporated in multiple steps, perhaps continuously.

We found that wild-type cells converted the 2.6-kbp LEU2 heterology more frequently than a small heterology at the same locus. This result could reflect either more efficient incorporation of large heterologies into hDNA or differential repair processing of these distinct mismatches. We and others have shown that additional heterologies increase gene conversion tract lengths (SCHULTES and SZOSTAK 1990 Down; NICKOLOFF et al. 1999 Down; VEDEL and NICOLAS 1999 Down), but we interpret these marker effects as a reflection of altered mismatch repair processing rather than more extensive hDNA formation. Large heterologies appear to be incorporated into hDNA at least as efficiently as small heterologies, but is it possible that large heterologies are actually incorporated more efficiently? Indirect evidence in favor of this idea comes from an in vitro study of RecA pairing activity showing increasing pairing between a 151-bp segment and its complement with increasing length of a linked heterologous segment (GONDA and RADDING 1983 Down). However, we favor an alternative explanation that is based on the large loop-specific Msh2p-independent repair system identified in yeast nuclear extracts; this system is nick independent and leads to preferential loss of loops (CORRETTE-BENNETT et al. 1999 Down). In our recombination assay, loop loss is scored as conversion and large loop-specific repair would enhance conversion of large heterologies. If the large loop-specific repair system operates independently of Msh2p in vivo, as it does in vitro (CORRETTE-BENNETT et al. 1999 Down), our msh2 results would suggest that 70% of conversions of the 2.6-kbp LEU2 heterology are mediated by the Msh2p system and 30% by the large loop-specific system. It is worth noting that this 30% value is similar to the difference in conversion frequencies of the large LEU2 heterology and small B3' heterology (23%; Fig 3). Although the conversion frequencies of the 2.2-kbp pUC19 and single-base Ase20 heterologies were not significantly different (P = 0.08; Fisher's exact test), a trend toward increased conversion of large heterologies is apparent. It is important to note that there is reduced sensitivity for detecting increased conversion of a large heterology located 5' of the DSB because even small heterologies at this position convert in >90% of products. Thus, at these distances from the DSB it is not possible for large loop-specific repair to enhance conversion as much for a 5' heterology as for a 3' heterology.

In conclusion, yeast has evolved systems that allow efficient incorporation of large heterologies into hDNA, and the resulting large loop mismatches appear to be processed by Msh2p/Pms1p-dependent and -independent repair systems. Loop-specific repair systems have also been identified in mammalian cells (TAGHIAN and NICKOLOFF 1998 Down; LITTMAN et al. 1999 Down); in the case of palindromic loops, repair favors loop retention (TAGHIAN and NICKOLOFF 1998 Down), but nonpalindromic loops are preferentially lost in plasmid substrates (WEISS and WILSON 1987 Down) and in recombination intermediates (BILL et al. 2001 Down). Why would cells require a large loop-specific mismatch repair system, and why would it evolve with a bias toward loop removal? A reasonable hypothesis is that it functions to eliminate insertion mutations produced by integration of stray DNA fragments via illegitimate recombination, or, perhaps more importantly, to remove integrated viral DNA. A large loop-specific repair system that is not 100% effective may create a balance between removal of potentially harmful DNA insertions and retention of foreign DNA to provide raw material to drive evolution.


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank E. Alani and R. Kolodner for kind gifts of plasmids, T. Petes and H. Kearney for communicating results prior to publication, T. Petes for helpful comments, and K. Spitz for expert technical assistance. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant CA55302 to J.A.N.

Manuscript received November 10, 2000; Accepted for publication January 2, 2001.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

ADAMS, D. E. and S. C. WEST, 1996  Bypass of DNA heterologies during RuvAB-mediated three- and four-strand branch migration. J. Mol. Biol. 263:582-596[Medline].

BIANCHI, M. E. and C. M. RADDING, 1983  Insertions, deletions and mismatches in heteroduplex DNA made by recA protein. Cell 35:511-520[Medline].

BILL, C. A., D. G. TAGHIAN, W. A. DURAN, and J. A. NICKOLOFF, 2001  Loop mismatch repair bias in mammalian cells depends on loop length and structure. Mutat. Res. in press.

BISHOP, D. K. and R. D. KOLODNER, 1986  Repair of heteroduplex plasmid DNA after transformation into Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3401-3409[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BISHOP, D. K., M. S. WILLIAMSON, S. FOGEL, and R. D. KOLODNER, 1987  The role of heteroduplex correction in gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisae.. Nature 328:362-364[Medline].

BISHOP, D. K., J. ANDERSEN, and R. D. KOLODNER, 1989  Specificity of mismatch repair following transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with heteroduplex plasmid DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:3713-3717[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CARRAWAY, M. and M. G. MARINUS, 1993  Repair of heteroduplex DNA molecules with multibase loops in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 175:3972-3980[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CHEN, W. and S. JINKS-ROBERTSON, 1999  The role of mismatch repair machinery in regulating mitotic and meiotic recombination between diverged sequences in yeast. Genetics 151:1299-1313[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CHEN, J., D. P. SILVER, D. WALPITA, S. B. CANTOR, and A. F. GAZDAR et al., 1998  Stable interaction between the products of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressor genes in mitotic and meiotic cells. Mol. Cell 2:317-328[Medline].

CHO, J. W., G. J. KHALSA, and J. A. NICKOLOFF, 1998  Gene conversion tract directionality is influenced by the chromosome environment. Curr. Genet. 34:269-279[Medline].

CORRETTE-BENNETT, S. E., B. O. PARKER, N. L. MOHLMAN, and R. S. LAHUE, 1999  Correction of large mispaired DNA loops by extracts of Saccharomyces cerevisae.. J. Biol. Chem. 274:17605-17611[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CROUSE, G. F., 1998 Mismatch repair systems in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, pp. 411–448 in DNA Damage and Repair, Vol I: DNA Repair in Prokaryotes and Lower Eukaryotes, edited by J. A. NICKOLOFF and M. F. HOEKSTRA. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.

DASGUPTA, C. and C. M. RADDING, 1982  Polar branch migration promoted by recA protein: effect of mismatched base pairs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:762-766[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FISHMAN-LOBELL, J. and J. E. HABER, 1992  Removal of nonhomologous DNA ends in double-strand break recombination: the role of the yeast ultraviolet repair gene RAD1.. Science 258:480-484[Abstract/Free Full Text].

GONDA, D. K. and C. M. RADDING, 1983  By searching processively RecA protein pairs DNA molecules that share a limited stretch of homology. Cell 34:647-654[Medline].

HARFE, B. D. and S. JINKS-ROBERTSON, 1999  Removal of frameshift intermediates by mismatch repair proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisae.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:4766-4773[Abstract/Free Full Text].

HARFE, B. D., B. K. MINESINGER, and S. JINKS-ROBERTSON, 2000  Discrete in vivo roles for the MutL homologs Mlh2p and Mlh3p in the removal of frameshift intermediates in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 10:145-148[Medline].

IYPE, L. E., E. A. WOOD, R. B. INMAN, and M. M. COX, 1994  RuvA and RuvB proteins facilitate the bypass of heterologous DNA insertions during RecA protein-mediated DNA strand exchange. J. Biol. Chem. 269:24967-24978[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KIM, J.-I., M. M. COX, and R. B. INMAN, 1992  On the role of ATP hydrolysis in RecA protein-mediated DNA strand exchange. I. Bypassing a short heterologous insert in one DNA substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 267:16438-16443[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KIRKPATRICK, D. T. and T. D. PETES, 1997  Repair of DNA loops involves DNA-mismatch and nucleotide-excision repair proteins. Nature 387:929-931[Medline].

KRAMER, B., W. KRAMER, M. S. WILLIAMSON, and S. FOGEL, 1989  Heteroduplex DNA correction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mismatch specific and requires functional PMS genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:4432-4440[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LIANG, F., M. G. HAN, P. J. ROMANIENKO, and M. JASIN, 1998  Homology-directed repair is a major double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:5172-5177[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LICHTEN, M. and M. S. FOX, 1984  Evidence for inclusion of regions of nonhomology in heteroduplex DNA products of bacteriophage {lambda} recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:7180-7184[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LITTMAN, S. J., W. H. FANG, and P. MODRICH, 1999  Repair of large insertion/deletion heterologies in human nuclear extracts is directed by a 5' single-strand break and is independent of the mismatch repair system. J. Biol. Chem. 274:7474-7481[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LUHR, B., J. SCHELLER, P. MEYER, and W. KRAMER, 1998  Analysis of in vivo correction of defined mismatches in the DNA mismatch repair mutants msh2, msh3 and msh6 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257:362-367[Medline].

MODRICH, P., 1991  Mechanisms and biological effects of mismatch repair. Annu. Rev. Genet. 25:229-253[Medline].

MOYNAHAN, M. E., J. W. CHIU, B. H. KOLLER, and M. JASIN, 1999  Brca1 controls homology-directed DNA repair. Mol. Cell 4:511-518[Medline].

MYERS, T. A. and J. A. NICKOLOFF, 1999  Nonselective colony-color assays for HIS3, LEU2, LYS2, TRP1, and URA3 in ade2 yeast strains using media with limiting nutrients. Biotechniques 26:850-854[Medline].

NAG, D. K. and T. D. PETES, 1991  Seven-base-pair inverted repeats in DNA form stable hairpins in vivo in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Genetics 129:669-673[Abstract].

NAG, D. K. and T. D. PETES, 1993  Physical detection of heteroduplexes during meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:2324-2331[Abstract/Free Full Text].

NAG, D. K., M. A. WHITE, and T. D. PETES, 1989  Palindromic sequences in heteroduplex DNA inhibit mismatch repair in yeast. Nature 340:318-320[Medline].

NICKOLOFF, J. A., and M. F. HOEKSTRA, 1998 Double-strand break and recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, pp. 335–362 in DNA Damage and Repair, Vol. 1: DNA Repair in Prokaryotes and Lower Eukaryotes, edited by J. A. NICKOLOFF and M. F. HOEKSTRA. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.

NICKOLOFF, J. A., D. B. SWEETSER, J. A. CLIKEMAN, G. J. KHALSA, and S. L. WHEELER, 1999  Multiple heterologies increase mitotic double-strand break-induced allelic gene conversion tract lengths in yeast. Genetics 153:665-679[Abstract/Free Full Text].

NICOLAS, A. and T. D. PETES, 1994  Polarity of meiotic gene conversion in fungi: contrasting views. Experientia 50:242-252[Medline].

OGAWA, T., X. YU, A. SHINOHARA, and E. H. EGELMAN, 1993  Similarity of the yeast Rad51 filament to the bacterial RecA filament. Science 259:1896-1899[Abstract/Free Full Text].

PAQUES, F. and J. E. HABER, 1999  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:349-404[Abstract/Free Full Text].

PETES, T. D., R. E. MALONE and L. S. SYMINGTON, 1991 Recombination in yeast, pp. 407–521 in The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Genome Dynamics, Protein Synthesis, and Energetics, edited by J. R. BROACH, J. R. PRINGLE and E. W. JONES. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

RASMUSSEN, L. J., L. SAMSON and M. G. MARINUS, 1998 Dam-directed DNA mismatch repair, pp. 205–228 in DNA Damage and Repair, edited by J. A. NICKOLOFF and M. F. HOEKSTRA. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.

RAY, B. L., C. I. WHITE, and J. E. HABER, 1991  Heteroduplex formation and mismatch repair of the "stuck" mutation during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:5372-5380[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ROSSELLI, W. and A. STASIAK, 1991  The ATPase activity of RecA is needed to push the DNA strand exchange through heterologous regions. EMBO J. 10:4391-4396[Medline].

SCHULTES, N. P. and J. W. SZOSTAK, 1990  Decreasing gradients of gene conversion on both sides of the initiation site for meiotic recombination at the ARG4 locus in yeast. Genetics 126:813-822[Abstract].

SHINOHARA, A., H. OGAWA, and T. OGAWA, 1992  Rad51 protein involved in repair and recombination in S. cerevisiae is a RecA-like protein. Cell 69:457-470. (Erratum. Cell 71(1): 180).[Medline].

SIA, E. A., R. J. KOKOSKA, M. DOMINSKA, P. GREENWELL, and T. D. PETES, 1997  Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on repeat unit size and DNA mismatch repair genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2851-2858[Abstract].

SUGAWARA, N., F. PAQUES, M. COLAIACOVO, and J. E. HABER, 1997  Role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 and Msh3 repair proteins in double-strand break-induced recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:9214-9219[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SUNG, P., 1997  Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev. 11:1111-1121[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SUNG, P. and S. A. STRATTON, 1996  Yeast Rad51 recombinase mediates polar DNA strand exchange in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 271:27983-27986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SWEETSER, D. B., H. HOUGH, J. F. WHELDEN, M. ARBUCKLE, and J. A. NICKOLOFF, 1994  Fine-resolution mapping of spontaneous and double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals reversible mitotic conversion polarity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:3863-3875[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SZOSTAK, J. W., T. L. ORR-WEAVER, R. J. ROTHSTEIN, and F. W. STAHL, 1983  The double-strand break repair model for recombination. Cell 33:25-35[Medline].

TAGHIAN, D. G. and J. A. NICKOLOFF, 1997  Chromosomal double-strand breaks induce gene conversion at high frequency in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6386-6393[Abstract].

TAGHIAN, D. G. and J. A. NICKOLOFF, 1998  Biased short tract repair of palindromic loop mismatches in mammalian cells. Genetics 148:1257-1268[Abstract/Free Full Text].

TRAN, H. P., D. A. GORDENIN, and M. A. RESNICK, 1996  The prevention of repeat-associated deletions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mismatch repair depends on size and origin of deletions. Genetics 143:1579-1587[Abstract].

VEDEL, M. and A. NICOLAS, 1999  CYS3, a hotspot of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects of heterozygosity and mismatch repair functions on gene conversion and recombination intermediates. Genetics 151:1245-1259[Abstract/Free Full Text].

WANG, Y., D. CORTEZ, Y. YAZDI, N. NEFF, and S. J. ELLEDGE et al., 2000  BASC, a super complex of BRCA1-associated proteins involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures. Genes Dev. 14:927-939[Abstract/Free Full Text].

WATNICK, T. J., M. A. GANDOLPH, H. WEBER, H. P. H. NEUMANN, and G. G. GERMINO, 1998  Gene conversion is a likely cause of mutation in PKD1.. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7:1239-1243[Abstract/Free Full Text].

WEISS, U. and J. H. WILSON, 1987  Repair of single-stranded loops in heteroduplex DNA transfected into mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:1619-1623[Abstract/Free Full Text].

WENG, Y.-S. and J. A. NICKOLOFF, 1998  Evidence for independent mismatch repair processing on opposite sides of a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Genetics 148:59-70[Abstract/Free Full Text].

WENG, Y.-S., J. WHELDEN, L. GUNN, and J. A. NICKOLOFF, 1996  Double-strand break-induced gene conversion: examination of tract polarity and products of multiple recombinational repair events. Curr. Genet. 29:335-343[Medline].

WENG, Y.-S., D. XING, J. A. CLIKEMAN, and J. A. NICKOLOFF, 2000  Transcriptional effects on double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts. Mutat. Res. 461:119-132[Medline].

WONG, A. K. C., R. PERO, P. A. ORMONDE, S. V. TAVTIGIAN, and P. L. BARTEL, 1997  Rad51 interacts with the evolutionarily conserved BRC motifs in the human breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. J. Biol. Chem. 272:31941-31944[Abstract/Free Full Text].




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. Sommer, C. M. Stith, P. M. J. Burgers, and R. S. Lahue
Partial reconstitution of DNA large loop repair with purified proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2008; 36(14): 4699 - 4707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. E. Jensen, P. A. Jauert, and D. T. Kirkpatrick
The Large Loop Repair and Mismatch Repair Pathways of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Act on Distinct Substrates During Meiosis
Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1033 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. E. Corrette-Bennett, C. Borgeson, D. Sommer, P. M. J. Burgers, and R. S. Lahue
DNA polymerase {delta}, RFC and PCNA are required for repair synthesis of large looped heteroduplexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2004; 32(21): 6268 - 6275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. J. Raynard and M. D. Baker
Incorporation of Large Heterologies Into Heteroduplex DNA During Double-Strand-Break Repair in Mouse Cells
Genetics, October 1, 2002; 162(2): 977 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. E. Corrette-Bennett, N. L. Mohlman, Z. Rosado, J. J. Miret, P. M. Hess, B. O. Parker, and R. S. Lahue
Efficient repair of large DNA loops in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Nucleic Acids Res., October 15, 2001; 29(20): 4134 - 4143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. M. Kearney, D. T. Kirkpatrick, J. L. Gerton, and T. D. Petes
Meiotic Recombination Involving Heterozygous Large Insertions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Formation and Repair of Large, Unpaired DNA Loops
Genetics, August 1, 2001; 158(4): 1457 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
F. Pâques, G.-F. Richard, and J. E. Haber
Expansions and Contractions in 36-bp Minisatellites by Gene Conversion in Yeast
Genetics, May 1, 2001; 158(1): 155 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text]