- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Brown, S. E.
- Articles by Knudson, D. L.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Brown, S. E.
- Articles by Knudson, D. L.
Integration of the Aedes aegypti Mosquito Genetic Linkage and Physical Maps
S. E. Browna, D. W. Severson1,b, L. A. Smithb, and D. L. Knudsonaa Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, College of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
b Department of Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Corresponding author: D. L. Knudson, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, College of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523., dennis.knudson{at}colostate.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: G. B. GOLDING
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Two approaches were used to correlate the Aedes aegypti genetic linkage map to the physical map. STS markers were developed for previously mapped RFLP-based genetic markers so that large genomic clones from cosmid libraries could be found and placed to the metaphase chromosome physical maps using standard FISH methods. Eight cosmids were identified that contained eight RFLP marker sequences, and these cosmids were located on the metaphase chromosomes. Twenty-one cDNAs were mapped directly to metaphase chromosomes using a FISH amplification procedure. The chromosome numbering schemes of the genetic linkage and physical maps corresponded directly and the orientations of the genetic linkage maps for chromosomes 2 and 3 were inverted relative to the physical maps. While the chromosome 2 linkage map represented essentially 100% of chromosome 2,
65% of the chromosome 1 linkage map mapped to only 36% of the short p-arm and 83% of the chromosome 3 physical map contained the complete genetic linkage map. Since the genetic linkage map is a RFLP cDNA-based map, these data also provide a minimal estimate for the size of the euchromatic regions. The implications of these findings on positional cloning in A. aegypti are discussed.
DISEASE causing, arboviral, filarial and malarial parasites are transmitted to humans by mosquitoes from the subfamilies Culicinae and Anophelinae. Malaria, filariasis, and dengue fever are the three major causes of morbidity and mortality in developing countries. In the past the most successful control of these diseases has been through mosquito control programs. Efforts to control these diseases have become more difficult because malarial parasites have become drug resistant, mosquitoes have become insecticide resistant, and mosquito control programs have been discontinued or poorly supported.
Since the inheritance of filarial vector competence as a sex-linked recessive trait was demonstrated (![]()
![]()
A. aegypti and An. gambiae are the two most studied mosquito species. Aedes belongs to the subfamily Culicinae and has a genomic organization more similar to humans, whereas Anopheles belongs to the subfamily Anophelinae and has a genomic organization similar to Drosophila (![]()
Progress has been reported in the map-based cloning of the three genes in An. gambiae that control the encapsulation of malaria parasites. The construction of a low-resolution map was completed in 1991, using microdissection techniques pioneered in Drosophila (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A. aegypti was the first mosquito species for which a detailed genetic linkage map was constructed. The initial genetic linkage map for A. aegypti (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The physical map for A. aegypti has been difficult to generate because A. aegypti does not yield usable polytene chromosomes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques that were pioneered in the human genome project provided a strategy to overcome the lack of mappable polytenes in A. aegypti. We initially placed 37 random probes to the chromosomes of A. aegypti and found that landmarks were needed to identify the chromosomes and orient the chromosome arms (![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Metaphase chromosome preparations:
The cell line used as a source of genomic DNA and metaphase chromosome preparations was the A. aegypti continuous cell line, ATC-10, which is available from the American Type Culture Collection, designated as ATCC CCL-125. The cell line was maintained in 150-cm2 flasks and grown in Leibovitz's L-15 media (GIBCO-BRL Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) with 100 units/ml of penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (GIBCO-BRL Life Technologies), and 20% fetal bovine serum. The cell cultures were split 1:2 once a week. Metaphase chromosomes were prepared from A. aegypti ATC-10 cell cultures using standard cytogenetic procedures as described previously (![]()
DNA and cosmid libraries:
A. aegypti genomic DNA was isolated from the ATC-10 cell line following procedures described elsewhere (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In situ hybridization, microscopy, and digital imaging:
Laboratory protocols for in situ hybridization reactions have been described in detail elsewhere (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ultrasensitive FISH techniques:
Prior to the denaturation step, slides were pretreated with RNAse (170 ng RNAse/1 µl 1x SSC) for 45 min at 37°. Denaturation and hybridization conditions were the same through the posthybridization washes. Amplification and detection procedures were as described in the tyramide signal amplification-indirect (ISH) manual [TSA-indirect (ISH), NEL730; New England Nuclear Life Science Products, Boston]. Slides were then blocked and detected with rhodamine, counterstained with DAPI, and mounted.
Sequencing, primer design, and sequence-tagged sites content mapping:
cDNA RFLP marker sequences were reported elsewhere (![]()
![]()
STS content mapping was accomplished through the PCR screens of pooled recombinant cosmids. Briefly, cosmid clones representing primary transfectants were grown in selective media and aliquots representing the individual clones were transferred to 96-well microtiter plates and stored at -80°. Additionally, equal aliquots of each clone in each plate were combined and subjected to standard cosmid DNA purification procedures. This provided us with individual DNA samples that contained all 96 clones (a plate pool) for each 96-well plate. Aliquots of DNA from the plate pool were then combined in a hierarchical manner that allowed us to conduct a primary screen of all cosmid clones for an RFLP marker sequence with only 510 PCR reactions. When one of these PCR reactions was positive for an STS marker, the 96-well plate containing the cosmid of interest was identified by PCR of the next hierarchical level of multiple plate pools. The specific cosmid was identified using two different approaches. In one approach, a 96-pin plate replicator was used to transfer and grow cosmids from the positive plate on a nylon membrane, which was then probed with the radiolabeled STS fragment. In the second approach, row and column pools were made from the plate of interest and these 20 pools were screened by PCR with the primers to identify the intersection of the row and column pools.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
We have taken two FISH approaches toward reconciling the A. aegypti genetic and physical maps and both approaches involved hybridization of genetic marker sequences to the chromosomes in the presence of a landmark probe. The landmark probe allowed the chromosomes and the chromosome arms to be identified so that the location of the genetic marker sequences could be determined accurately and quickly. The landmark probe produces the strongest signal on chromosome 1 at 71% FLpter, the next most intense signal on chromosome 2 at 96% FLpter, and the lightest signal on chromosome 3 at 86% FLpter (![]()
![]()
The first approach follows the well-accepted strategy of using an STS procedure to screen our cosmid libraries (![]()
![]()
|
In a second more direct approach, we attempted to FISH map cDNA clones representing RFLP markers directly to metaphase chromosomes. Generally, FISH using smaller probes such as cDNAs does not reliably produce signals. That is, cDNA-sized probes have not been useful as FISH probes unless there are multiple local copies of the gene or polytene chromosomes available. The problem is that, using standard FISH procedures, small probes (<5 kb) do not incorporate sufficient signal for detection even with the use of exquisitely sensitive CCD image capture systems. We were, however, able to successfully adapt a FISH amplification procedure (![]()
![]()
|
Three of the genetic markers were physically mapped by both approaches. LF198, LF178, and LF115 were mapped directly and by using cosmids that contained them. LF198 and LF178 were mapped to the same location using both techniques. The number of observations for each technique with these markers was in excess of five. LF115 hybridized to chromosome 2 with both approaches. However, standard deviations of their positions by the two techniques did not overlap. This discrepancy is probably due to the small sample size (two) using the TSA-indirect technique for LF115.
Of the 22 cDNA markers that were put to the physical map, 6 were known genes. The known genes that mapped to chromosome 2 were Rdl, cyclodiene resistance (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The integration of the genetic linkage map and the FISH physical map of metaphase chromosomes is depicted in Fig 2. Linear orders for loci on each chromosome are consistent between the two maps, with only some apparent local inversions in order. Such slight inconsistencies have commonly been observed with other organisms, with the correct order usually being reflected by the physical map data. That is, genetic linkage associations are based on statistical estimates of recombination and not all our RFLP markers have been tested directly in the same mapping population. In those instances where probe % FLpter standard deviations overlap, fine-scale FISH mapping may be used later to unequivocally confirm their order. This approach is best accomplished by using multiple probes, each tagged with a unique fluor that may be discriminated simultaneously in a single hybridization reaction (![]()
|
The chromosome numbering schemes of the genetic and physical maps correspond; that is, chromosome 1 is the same in both maps. The published graphical orientations of the linkage maps for chromosomes 2 and 3 were inverted when compared to the physical map. The linkage maps for these two chromosomes now follow the physical map orientation (Table 1 and Fig 2; see also AaeDB at Mosquito Genomics WWW Server, at http://klab.agsci.colostate.edu). Sixty-five percent of the chromosome 1 genetic linkage map is located physically within 36% on the short p-arm (Table 2). For chromosome 2, 100% of the genetic linkage map is found across both arms or within 97% of the physical length. For chromosome 3, 100% of the genetic linkage map is found across both arms as well, but 83% of the physical map contains the complete chromosome 3 genetic linkage map. Since the genetic linkage map is a RFLP cDNA-based map, these data also provide a minimal estimate for the size of the euchromatic regions (Table 2 and Fig 2). Since 35% of linkage group 1, or 24.3 cM from the distal end, was not represented in this study, it is unlikely that the q-arm of chromosome 1 is entirely heterochromatic (Fig 2) and there are observations in support of this perspective. For example, the ferritin gene was placed recently to chromosome 1 at 88% FLpter (![]()
![]()
|
Given the genome size estimate of 780 Mb (see Table 2) and these integration data, then the minimal euchromatic portion of the genome is at least 311 Mb in size and the maximal size for the heterochromatin would be 469 Mb. In addition, we would increase our estimate to include
41 Mb of euchromatin at the distal end of the q-arm of chromosome 1 (dotted line on chromosome 1 in Fig 2). Hence, the total minimal euchromatic region estimate would be 352 Mb and the maximal heterochromatin would be 428 Mb or 45 and 55%, respectively (Fig 2). Our overall estimate of megabases per centimorgan is 2.1 across the euchromatic regions identified in all three chromosomes (Table 2) and this number is within the range of those reported for other organisms.
The integrated genetic and physical maps for A. aegypti provide a sound platform for our efforts to use positional cloning to isolate genes determining vector competence for two parasite species. This study physically placed several anchor markers for each of these quantitative trait loci (QTL; Table 1). This includes marker loci for two QTL that affect susceptibility to the malarial parasite Plasmodium gallinaceum (![]()
![]()
![]()
We have presented the first integrated genetic linkage and physical map for A. aegypti. We have also provided evidence that the genetic linkage map is representative of the euchromatic region of the genome, demonstrated that large regions of the physical map likely represent heterochromatin, and located the euchromatin and heterochromatin on the physical map. This finding has implications for positional cloning as only 45% of the genome seems to be transcriptionally active. The integrated map will be the foundation for our ongoing map-based cloning studies of the QTL that affect vector competence of filarial and malarial parasites in A. aegypti.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The expert technical assistance of Susan H. Harris is acknowledged. John Harris is acknowledged for his assistance with digital imaging. The laboratory support services of P. Carlson, S. C. Deeney, L. A. Kempton, M. Kempton, and M. A. Lawrenz are also acknowledged. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease grant AI34337, in part by the MacArthur Foundation through their Research Network on the Biology of Parasite Vectors program, and in part by the Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station.
Manuscript received August 30, 2000; Accepted for publication December 1, 2000.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AUSUBEL, F. M., R. BRENT, R. E. KINGSTON, D. D. MOORE, J. G. SEIDMAN et al., (Editors), 1987 Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience, New York.
BEERNTSEN, B. T., D. W. SEVERSON, and B. M. CHRISTENSEN, 1994 Aedes aegypti: characterization of a hemolymph polypeptide expressed during melanotic encapsulation of filarial worms. Exp. Parasitol. 79:312-321[Medline].
BEERNTSEN, B. T., D. W. SEVERSON, J. A. KLINKHAMMER, V. A. KASSNER, and B. M. CHRISTENSEN, 1995 Aedes aegypti: a quantitative trait locus (QTL) influencing filarial worm intensity is linked to QTL for susceptibility to other mosquito-borne pathogens. Exp. Parasitol. 81:355-362[Medline].
BIRNBOIM, H. C. and J. DOLY, 1979 A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 7:1513-1523
BROWN, S. E. and D. L. KNUDSON, 1997 FISH landmarks for Aedes aegypti chromosomes. Insect Mol. Biol. 6:197-202[Medline].
BROWN, S. E., J. MENNINGER, M. DIFILLIPANTONIO, B. J. BEATY, and D. C. WARD et al., 1995 Toward a physical map of Aedes aegypti.. Insect Mol. Biol. 4:161-167[Medline].
CHAMPAGNE, D. E., C. T. SMARTT, J. M. RIBEIRO, and A. A. JAMES, 1995 The salivary gland-specific apyrase of the mosquito Aedes aegypti is a member of the 5'-nucleotidase family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:694-698
CRAIG, G. B., JR., and W. A. HICKEY, 1967 Genetics of Aedes aegypti, pp. 67131 in Genetics of Insect Vectors of Disease, edited by J. W. WRIGHT and R. PAL. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
DIMOPOULOS, G., L. ZHENG, V. KUMAR, A. DELLA TORRE, and F. C. KAFATOS et al., 1996 Integrated genetic map of Anopheles gambiae: use of RAPD polymorphisms for genetic, cytogenetic and STS landmarks. Genetics 143:953-960[Abstract].
FERDIG, M. T., J. LI, D. W. SEVERSON, and B. M. CHRISTENSEN, 1996 Mosquito dopa decarboxylase cDNA characterization and bloodmeal-induced ovarian expression. Insect Mol. Biol. 5:119-126[Medline].
GREEN, E. D. and P. GREEN, 1991 Sequence-tagged site (STS) content mapping of human chromosomes: theoretical considerations and early experiences. PCR Methods Appl. 1:77-90[Medline].
GROSSMAN, G. L. and A. A. JAMES, 1993 The salivary glands of the vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti, express a novel member of the amylase gene family. Insect Mol. Biol. 1:223-232[Medline].
JAMES, A. A., K. BLACKMER, and J. V. RACIOPPI, 1989 A salivary gland-specific, maltase-like gene of the vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti.. Gene 75:73-83[Medline].
JAMES, A. A., K. BLACKMER, O. MARINOTTI, C. R. GHOSN, and J. V. RACIOPPI, 1991 Isolation and characterization of the gene expressing the major salivary gland protein of the female mosquito, Aedes aegypti.. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 44:245-254[Medline].
KNUDSON, D. L., L. ZHENG, S. W. GORDON, S. E. BROWN and F. C. KAFATOS, 1996 Genome organization of vectors, pp. 175214 in The Biology of Disease Vectors, edited by B. J. BEATY and W. C. MARQUARDT. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, CO.
MACDONALD, W. W., 1962a The genetic basis of susceptibility to infection with semi-periodic Brugia malayi in Aedes aegypti.. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 56:373-382.
MACDONALD, W. W., 1962b The selection of a strain of Aëdes aegypti susceptible to infection with semi-periodic Brugia malayi.. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 56:368-372.
MUNSTERMANN, L. E. and G. B. CRAIG, JR., 1979 Genetics of Aedes aegypti: updating the linkage map. J. Hered. 70:291-296
PHAM, D. Q.-D., S. E. BROWN, D. L. KNUDSON, J. J. WINZERLING, and M. S. DODSON et al., 2000 Structure and location of the ferritin gene of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti.. Eur. J. Biochem. 267:1-7[Medline].
RAAP, A. K., M. P. C. VAN DE CORPUT, R. A. W. VERVENNE, R. P. M. VAN GIJLSWIJK, and H. J. TANKE et al., 1995 Ultra-sensitive FISH using peroxidase-mediated deposition of biotin- or fluorochrome tyramides. Hum. Mol. Genet. 4:529-534
SEVERSON, D. W., 1994 Applications of molecular marker analysis to mosquito vector competence. Parasitol. Today 10:336-340.
SEVERSON, D. W. and Y. ZHANG, 1996 Generation of expressed sequence tags and sequence-tagged sites as physical landmarks in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti, genome. Genome 39:224-229[Medline].
SEVERSON, D. W., A. MORI, Y. ZHANG, and B. M. CHRISTENSEN, 1993 Linkage map for Aedes aegypti using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. J. Hered. 84:241-247
SEVERSON, D. W., A. MORI, Y. ZHANG, and B. M. CHRISTENSEN, 1994 Chromosomal mapping of two loci affecting filarial worm susceptibility in Aedes aegypti.. Insect Mol. Biol. 3:67-72[Medline].
SEVERSON, D. W., A. MORI, V. A. KASSNER, and B. M. CHRISTENSEN, 1995a Comparative linkage maps for the mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus and Ae. aegypti based upon common RFLP loci. Insect Mol. Biol. 4:41-45[Medline].
SEVERSON, D. W., V. THATHY, A. MORI, Y. ZHANG, and B. M. CHRISTENSEN, 1995b Restriction fragment length polymorphism mapping of quantitative trait loci for malaria parasite susceptibility in the mosquito Aedes aegypti.. Genetics 139:1711-1717[Abstract].
SPEICHER, M. R., S. GWYN BALLARD, and D. C. WARD, 1996 Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nat. Genet. 12:368-375[Medline].
THATHY, V., D. W. SEVERSON, and B. M. CHRISTENSEN, 1994 Reinterpretation of the genetics of susceptibility of Aedes aegypti to Plasmodium gallinaceum.. J. Parasitol. 80:705-712[Medline].
THOMPSON, M., J. C. STEICHEN, and R. H. FFRENCH-CONSTANT, 1993 Conservation of cyclodiene insecticide resistance-associated mutations in insects. Insect Mol. Biol. 2:149-154[Medline].
WARREN, A. M. and J. M. CRAMPTON, 1991 The Aedes aegypti genome: complexity and organization. Genet. Res. 58:225-232[Medline].
ZHENG, L., R. D. C. SAUNDERS, D. FORTINI, A. DELLA TORRE, and M. COLUZZI et al., 1991 Low-resolution genome map of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:11187-11191
ZHENG, L., F. H. COLLINS, V. KUMAR, and F. C. KAFATOS, 1993 A detailed genetic map for the X chromosome of the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae.. Science 261:605-608
ZHENG, L., M. Q. BENEDICT, A. J. CORNEL, F. H. COLLINS, and F. C. KAFATOS, 1996 An integrated genetic map of the African human malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.. Genetics 143:941-952[Abstract].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Brackney, B. D. Foy, and K. E. Olson The Effects of Midgut Serine Proteases on Dengue Virus Type 2 Infectivity of Aedes aegypti Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 267 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Maragathavally, J. M. Kaminski, and C. J. Coates Chimeric Mos1 and piggyBac transposases result in site-directed integration FASEB J, September 1, 2006; 20(11): 1880 - 1882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Bennett, D. Flick, K. H. Fleming, R. Jochim, B. J. Beaty, and W. C. Black IV Quantitative Trait Loci That Control Dengue-2 Virus Dissemination in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti Genetics, May 1, 2005; 170(1): 185 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Severson, B. deBruyn, D. D. Lovin, S. E. Brown, D. L. Knudson, and I. Morlais Comparative Genome Analysis of the Yellow Fever Mosquito Aedes aegypti with Drosophila melanogaster and the Malaria Vector Mosquito Anopheles gambiae J. Hered., March 1, 2004; 95(2): 103 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Brown, S. E.
- Articles by Knudson, D. L.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Brown, S. E.
- Articles by Knudson, D. L.





