Genetics, Vol. 157, 1015-1020, March 2001, Copyright © 2001

Hybridization-Based Mapping of Neurospora crassa Linkage Groups II and V

Verena Aigna, Ulrich Schulteb, and Jörg D. Hoheisela
a Functional Genome Analysis, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, D-69121 Heidelberg, Germany
b Institute of Biochemistry, Heinrich-Heine Universität, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

Corresponding author: Verena Aign, Functional Genome Analysis, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 506, D-69121 Heidelberg, Germany., v.aign{at}dkfz-heidelberg.de (E-mail)

Communicating editor: J. ARNOLD


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

As part of the German Neurospora crassa genome project, physical clone maps of linkage groups II and V of N. crassa were generated by hybridization-based mapping. To this end, two different types of clone library were used: (1) a bacterial artificial clone library of 15-fold genome coverage and an average insert size of 69 kb, and (2) three cosmid libraries—each cloned in a different vector—with 17-fold coverage and 34 kb average insert size. For analysis, the libraries were arrayed on filters. At the first stage, chromosome-specific sublibraries were selected by hybridization of the respective chromosomal DNA fragments isolated from pulsed-field electrophoresis gels. Subsequently, the sublibraries were exhaustively ordered by single clone hybridizations. Eventually, the global libraries were used again for gap filling. By this means, physical maps were generated that consist of 13 and 21 contigs, respectively, and form the basis of the current sequencing effort on the two chromosomes.


THE filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa has been used as a model organism in basic science for more than 50 years. It was instrumental in the work resulting in the development of the one-gene-one-enzyme hypothesis (BEADLE and TATUM 1941 Down) and served in many other fields of basic research. This work has accumulated a large body of knowledge witnessed by more than 5000 published articles. A detailed genetic map was developed that includes >800 genes (PERKINS et al. 1982 Down; PERKINS 1992 Down), and >300 genes were cloned. A large collection of strains and mutants is maintained at the Fungal Genetic Stock Center in Kansas City, MO. Two cDNA sequencing projects at the University of New Mexico and the Oklahoma State University created >20,000 expressed sequence tags (ESTs; http://molbio.ahpcc.unm.edu/search/ngp.html; http://www.genome.ou.edu/fungal.html). Blast analysis of this data indicated that a large portion of all identified genes have no clear homologue elsewhere (NELSON et al. 1997 Down).

All these efforts combined, however, characterized only a portion of the estimated 10,000–13,000 genes of N. crassa. To overcome this limitation to the understanding of the fungus's biology, a genome initiative was established (BENNETT 1997 Down). The entire genomic sequence of N. crassa will be analyzed in a collaboration between laboratories in Germany and the United States. It has a length of ~43 Mb split among seven chromosomes. The content of G:C base pairs of 52% and low number of repetitive sequences make the Neurospora genome amenable to normal large-scale sequencing procedures (RADFORD and PARISH 1997 Down). Because of the ability to separate the chromosomes physically by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE; ORBACH et al. 1988 Down), a chromosome-oriented approach is possible. The German project aims at the sequencing of the two chromosomes that correspond to linkage groups II and V, estimated to be 4.6 and 9.2 Mb in length (ORBACH et al. 1988 Down). The first step in this project was the creation of physical maps. This was accomplished by hybridization-based mapping, which had been established as an efficient method to such end (e.g., HOHEISEL et al. 1993 Down; JOHNSTON et al. 1997 Down; HANKE et al. 1998 Down; FROHME et al. 2000 Down). Prior to the start of this project, a cosmid library of 13-fold genome coverage (ORBACH 1994 Down; KELKAR et al. 2001 Down, this issue) was already available. An additional cosmid library of some four genome equivalents and a library of bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) of 15-fold coverage were constructed to complement this resource. Using clone hybridization procedures on these libraries, physical clone maps were produced that correspond to linkage groups II and V and form the basis of the currently ongoing sequencing of the two chromosomes.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

DNA preparation:
For the production of clone libraries, DNA from N. crassa strain 74-OR23-1A was used. High molecular weight genomic DNA was isolated as described (HERRMANN and FRISCHAUF 1987 Down). For preparation of intact chromosomal DNA (ORBACH et al. 1988 Down), 1 x 109 conidia were inoculated in 150 ml Vogel's medium and grown at 30° and 200 rpm until nearly all conidia germinated, usually 3–4 hr. They were harvested, pelleted, washed twice with 30 ml ice-cold water, and taken up in 0.5 ml 50 mM EDTA. The cells were mixed with 1.7 ml of molten 1.7% low-melting-point agarose in 125 mM EDTA and 50 mM sodium-citrate, pH 4.0. To this, 333 µl Novozym-234 (20 mg/ml in 1 M sorbitol) were added, and the mixture was pipetted into a plug former. Solidified plugs were placed in 0.4 M EDTA, 50 mM sodium-citrate, pH 4.0, 7.5% 2-mercaptoethanol, and incubated 24 hr at 37°. Subsequently, they were washed extensively with 50 mM EDTA at 50°. For protein removal, plugs were incubated 24 hr at 50° in NDS buffer (0.4 M EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.5, 1% N-lauroylsarcosine) containing 2 mg/ml proteinase K. The plugs were washed as before and stored in 50 mM EDTA at 4°.

Clone libraries:
A cosmid library of 16,800 individual clones with an average insert size of 34 kb in the vectors pMOcosX (ORBACH 1994 Down) and pLORIST6Xh (KELKAR et al. 2001 Down) was obtained from the Fungal Genomic Stock Center (University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, MO). For the construction of an additional cosmid library, the vector Lawrist-4 was used as previously described (HANKE and HOHEISEL 1999 Down). High-density clone filter grids (Hybond-N+; Amersham, Braunschweig, Germany) were arrayed using a commercial robotic device (BioGrid; BioRobotics, Cambridge, UK); filter processing was as described in detail elsewhere (HOHEISEL et al. 1995 Down).

A BAC library with 15-fold coverage and an average insert size of 69 kb was constructed in cooperation with LION Bioscience AG (Heidelberg, Germany) using the pBeloBAC-Kan vector (MOZO et al. 1998 Down). A total of 9216 individual clones were picked into microtiter dishes and arrayed on nylon filters.

Sublibrary selection:
Specific cosmid sublibraries of linkage groups II and V were selected as described (FROHME et al. 1998 Down). Intact chromosomal DNA (provided by Jonathan Arnold, University of Georgia, Athens, GA) was separated by PFGE, and the individual chromosomal fragments were isolated from the gel. About 70 ng of DNA of each fragment was directly used for labeling by random hexamer priming (FEINBERG and VOGELSTEIN 1983 Down). Hybridization to the clone filters and detection of positive clones followed standard protocols (HOHEISEL et al. 1995 Down). Positive clones were rearrayed into new microtiter dishes. A BAC sublibrary of linkage group II was selected by hybridizing 190 cosmids to the BAC-library filters—in pools of up to six clones at a time—which themselves had been positive in hybridizations with chromosome II.

Mapping procedures:
Cosmid DNA was isolated by alkaline lysis and phenol/chloroform extraction (SAMBROOK et al. 1989 Down). One-third of each preparation was labeled by random hexamer priming (FEINBERG and VOGELSTEIN 1983 Down) in the presence of digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Roche, Germany). BAC DNA was isolated using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Germany) as recommended by the manufacturer except for some modifications. About 7 ml of overnight culture was pelleted and resuspended in 250 µl P1 buffer supplemented with 200 µg/ml RNaseA. After adding 250 µl P2 buffer and incubation at room temperature for <5 min, 350 µl P3 buffer was added instead of the recommended N3 buffer. This proved to be more successful for BAC DNA isolation, since P3 contains no chaotropic salts as does N3, thus improving the elution efficiency of large DNA. After cell lysis, the DNA was precipitated with isopropanol and digested with 5 units EcoRI (New England Biolabs, Germany) for 1 hr at 37°. Five volumes of PB buffer were added to 1 volume of DNA solution, mixed, and applied to the column. Washing was as recommended. Elution of DNA was with 30 µl 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, prewarmed to 65°. With this modified protocol, a sufficient amount of high quality BAC DNA was obtained with minimal effort. For introduction of a label, 22 µl of the eluate was subjected to random hexamer priming in the presence of digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Roche). Hybridization was done as reported (HOHEISEL et al. 1995 Down). Detection was by anti-digoxigenin antibody-alkaline phosphatase conjugate using the chemiluminescent alkaline substrate CSPD (Roche). Results were scored manually and analyzed with an established software package (MOTT et al. 1993 Down).


*  RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Although an older cosmid library of N. crassa existed and was available, a complementary library of four genome-equivalents was constructed to assure the colinearity of the earlier library with the DNA used in construction of the BAC library. Thus, 21,800 clones were used in the experiments, equivalent to ~17-fold coverage of the N. crassa genome. From this total, 2163 cosmids belonging to chromosome V were identified by hybridizing radioactively labeled chromosomal DNA to the clone arrays. This sublibrary statistically represented an 8.5-fold coverage, which is about half the redundancy of the global library. Therefore, it could be concluded that only one-half of the clones deriving from this chromosome were actually identified by this procedure, and gap closure had to be performed on the total genomic library at a later stage. Hybridization-based mapping of chromosome V started with the cosmid sublibrary only, since the BAC clones were not available at the time. Probe labeling was performed by incorporation of digoxigenin-11-dUTP and detection via a chemiluminescent substrate, since this procedure proved to be as sensitive as radioactive labeling. First, individual cosmid clones were picked at random and used as probes following an iterative process of sampling without replacement (MOTT et al. 1993 Down). Probes were picked at random from the ever decreasing number of library clones that were not positive in any prior hybridization and should, by definition, originate from still unmapped areas. By this strategy, the probes should also be spaced relatively evenly. This process was continued until essentially all clones had been positive at least once. Then, cosmid clones located at contig ends were chosen as probes for gap closure but, as expected, little improvement of the map was made using the sublibrary filters. Therefore, hybridizations of cosmids from contig ends were carried out on the global genomic cosmid and BAC libraries. This proved to be more successful in reducing the initially >100 contigs to a final number of 21 contigs. This number could not be reduced further, although eventually a total of 1192 cosmids and 82 BACs were used as probes, which is 55% more than anticipated. During about the last couple of hundred hybridization experiments, no new data was produced; only existing contigs were confirmed, indicating an exhausting mapping of the library. The resulting physical map is shown in Fig 1; probes that yielded redundant data were mostly omitted for clarity. The majority of the signals are located along the diagonal of the two-dimensional presentation of clones and probes, representing the best correlation between the ordered probes and the fitting clone order. The background of false positive hybridization results was low with <3% of the scored signals being located outside of the diagonal.



View larger version (112K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. Physical clone map of chromosome V. The hybridization results are shown in the form of a two-dimensional matrix. Probes correspond to rows and clones to columns. Positive hybridization is indicated by a solid bar at the respective intersection. A subset of 203 probes is shown covering the entire chromosome, which is represented by 2978 cosmid and BAC clones. The arrows mark two chimeric probes. Upon request, the authors will provide a detailed version of the map containing all the probes used in experimentation.

For the mapping of chromosome II, a slightly different strategy was followed. A total of 1369 cosmid clones—equivalent to a 10-fold coverage—were identified in the global library by hybridizing the chromosomal band. Since hybridization of the chromosomal DNA to the BAC-library filter yielded only very weak signals, which were difficult to impossible to analyze, a BAC sublibrary was selected by hybridizing a random set of 190 of the chromosome-specific cosmid clones. This process resulted in 751 BAC clones, statistically an 11-fold coverage. Physical mapping was started in parallel on both the cosmid and BAC library, applying the same strategy reported above on chromosome V. Again, gap closure was performed on the two global libraries. Altogether, 191 BACs and 273 cosmids were used as probes, resulting in the map of 13 contigs presented in Fig 2; as before, probes that yielded redundant data were omitted for the purpose of presentation.



View larger version (91K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. Physical clone map of chromosome II. Map presentation is as described for Fig 1 but shows 104 probes and 2219 clones.

Close analysis of the hybridization data revealed that some 10% of the cosmid clones were probably chimeras, which for cosmids is an unusually high percentage. In other libraries made from genomic DNA of similar base composition and complexity (HOHEISEL et al. 1993 Down; JOHNSTON et al. 1997 Down), a rate of <1% was found. However, for the preparation of these libraries, partial digests of the genomic DNA had been used whose average fragment sizes were much bigger than the maximally possible insert size. Although this led to a sharp drop in the efficiency of packaging and thus transfection, it simultaneously reduced the probability that two linked genomic fragments would fit into a single phage head and thus could be transfected into a host cell (HOHEISEL et al. 1995 Down). In the analysis, chimeric clones were identified by their specific hybridization pattern when being used as probes. They uniquely hybridized to clones that on the basis of all other, always redundant, results belonged to two different regions. While most chimeric clones were removed from the map, two typical ones were left in the map of chromosome V (Fig 1) and are indicated by arrows. Because of the high redundancy of the information acquired during the mapping process and the fact that no apparently overlapping regions were accepted as such unless confirmed by more than two independent clones, it is unlikely that the map was significantly disturbed by chimeras.

As expected, there is no indication for the presence of large repetitive areas. They would be seen in the map as clusters of signals outside the main diagonal, similar to the signals that chimeric clones produce but more pronounced since occurring in more than a single clone. Few probes exhibit signals of that sort in numbers above the average background noise, but none is sufficiently confirmed by other probes to point with any significance to the presence of repeats.


*  DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Construction of the physical clone maps of chromosomes II and V of N. crassa was carried out by hybridization procedures. Earlier mapping projects had demonstrated that a 10-fold clone representation is usually sufficient for continuous coverage of a genome. Since for various reasons the actual coverage fluctuates strongly along a chromosome (HOHEISEL et al. 1995 Down; FROHME et al. 2000 Down), a lower overall redundancy could be insufficient for the generation of an unambiguous map in some regions. Employing more than one type of library for contig assembly should also increase the degree of uniformity in representation. Therefore, cosmid and BAC libraries of high coverage were used in this project. Not only did the cloning vectors differ, but the fragmentation of the insert DNA was performed with two different restriction endonucleases: MboI was used for construction of the cosmid libraries and EcoRI for the BAC library.

The mapping procedure started with the selection of chromosomal sublibraries, thereby increasing the efficiency of the mapping procedure. During the initial phase, only clones with a high probability of containing DNA of chromosomes II and V, respectively, were chosen. Gap closure was then performed on the global libraries. From practical experience (e.g., HOHEISEL et al. 1993 Down) as well as theoretical prediction (GRIGORIEV 1993 Down), a probe number that is three times the clone number of a minimal clone coverage should be sufficient for completing a map. Nevertheless, a large number of extra hybridizations—up to an eventual excess of 55% in the case of chromosome V—were carried out during the final stages in an attempt to bridge gaps. Still, the remaining ones could not be closed in either library type, and only redundant information was produced in the end. This and the fact that independently produced libraries of high clone coverage were analyzed suggest that the relevant genomic regions were actually missing in the libraries. As has been done before for other genomes (e.g., FROHME et al. 2000 Down), upon the availability of the final sequence, the gene content of these regions will be analyzed in an attempt to correlate potential gene function with the lack of clonability in large-insert vector systems of the Escherichia coli host.

The map is very likely to be accurate for most of the two chromosomes, since data redundancy is high and only a few false positive or negative hybridization events were recorded. Still, some very local disorder can be expected. In a few cases, individual clones could have been placed at homologous regions instead of their real map position because of cross-hybridization of the corresponding sequences. Mixing clone libraries of significant length difference—34 and 69 kb average insert size for the cosmids and BACs, respectively—led to a slight perturbation of the graphical representation of the maps. However, the data produced on the different clone types were studied separately as well as combined to exclude any potential local disturbance caused by this fact. Overall, a combined analysis is based on better statistics. Novel computational tools for physical mapping (e.g., HEBER et al. 2000 Down; BHANDARKAR et al. 2001 Down, this issue) allow an evaluation of the map quality by algorithms different from the ones used in its production. Experimentally, there will be independent data originating from another mapping effort (http://gene.genetics.uga.edu). The ultimate quality test, however, will be a comparison to the final DNA sequence.

The maps described here are the basis of the ongoing German sequencing project (http://www.mips.biochem.mpg.de/proj/neurospora/). Because of this, a comparison to the genetic maps was not performed; this will be done upon completion of the sequence, since this will be more informative with respect to the presence and structural organization of markers. Although not all gaps in the maps could be bridged as yet, the number of base pairs sequenced to date clearly indicates that most of the two chromosomes are represented in the clone maps. Therefore, most stretches lacking DNA should be small enough to be sequenced on the basis of PCR fragments or sequence walking approaches. An exception could be the rDNA repeat region located on chromosome V. It consists of several individual units. A complete unit is generally difficult to impossible to clone (JOHNSTON et al. 1997 Down; FROHME et al. 2000 Down), so the rDNA is likely to be missing except for peripheral parts (KELKAR et al. 2001 Down). Also, the centromere could be absent, although two out of three centromeres of Schizosaccharomyces pombe were covered in a similar project (HOHEISEL et al. 1993 Down). The very ends of the telomeres are definitely missing from the map. This is not surprising, since the clone libraries used for mapping contained only genomic fragments that were isolated by restriction digestion of genomic DNA. At least, the DNA beyond the most telomeric restriction sites cannot therefore be present in the libraries. Sequencing these very telomeric ends of the chromosomes will require a special effort as demonstrated in other projects (GOFFEAU et al. 1996 Down).


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The technical assistance of Mareike Grees and help by Carmen Fischer is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Jonathan Arnold and James Griffith for providing material and information, and Berthold Fartmann (MWG Biotech) for helpful discussions. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Manuscript received October 6, 2000; Accepted for publication November 30, 2000.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

BEADLE, G. W. and E. L. TATUM, 1941  Genetic control of biochemical reactions in Neurospora. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 27:499-506[Free Full Text].

BENNETT, J. W., 1997  White paper: genomics for filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 21:3-7[Medline].

BHANDARKAR, S. M., S. A. MACHAKA, S. S. SHETE, and R. N. KOTA, 2001  Parallel computation of a maximum likelihood model for chromosome reconstruction. Genetics 157:1021-1043[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FEINBERG, A. and B. VOGELSTEIN, 1983  A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal. Biochem. 132:6-13[Medline].

FROHME, M., J. HANKE, L. ÅSLUND, U. PETTERSSON, and J. D. HOHEISEL, 1998  Selective generation of chromosomal cosmid libraries within the Trypanosoma cruzi genome project. Electrophoresis 19:478-481[Medline].

FROHME, M., A. A. CAMARGO, S. HEBER, C. CZINK, and A. D. J. SIMPSON et al., 2000  Mapping analysis of the Xylella fastidiosa genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:3100-3104[Abstract/Free Full Text].

GOFFEAU, A., B. G. BARRELL, H. BUSSEY, R. W. DAVIS, and B. DUJON et al., 1996  Life with 6000 genes. Science 274:546-567[Abstract/Free Full Text].

GRIGORIEV, A. V., 1993  Theoretical predictions and experimental observations of genomic mapping by anchoring random clones. Genomics 15:311-316[Medline].

HANKE, J., and J. D. HOHEISEL, 1999 Construction and screening of cosmid libraries, pp. 405–414 in The Nucleic Acid Protocols Handbook, edited by R. R. RAPLEY. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.

HANKE, J., M. FROHME, J. P. LAURENT, J. SWINDLE, and J. D. HOHEISEL, 1998  Hybridization mapping of Trypanosoma cruzi chromosomes III and IV. Electrophoresis 19:482-485[Medline].

HEBER, S., J. D. HOHEISEL, and M. VINGRON, 2000  Application of bootstrap-techniques to physical mapping. Genomics 69:235-241[Medline].

HERRMANN, B. G. and A. FRISCHAUF, 1987  Isolation of genomic DNA. Methods Enzymol. 152:180-183[Medline].

HOHEISEL, J. D., E. MAIER, R. MOTT, L. MCCARTHY, and A. V. GRIGORIEV et al., 1993  High resolution cosmid and P1 maps spanning the 14 Mb genome of the fission yeast S. pombe.. Cell 73:109-120[Medline].

HOHEISEL, J. D., E. MAIER, R. MOTT and H. LEHRACH, 1995 Integrated genome mapping by hybridization techniques, pp. 319–346 in Analysis of Non-mammalian Genomes: A Practical Guide, edited by B. BIRREN and E. LAI. Academic Press, San Diego.

JOHNSTON, M., L. HILLIER, L. RILES, K. ALBERMANN, and B. ANDRE et al., 1997  The complete sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome XII. Nature 387(Suppl.):87-90[Medline].

KELKAR, H. S., J. GRIFFITH, M. E. CASE, F. COVERT, and R. D. HALL et al., 2001  The Neurospora crassa genome: cosmid libraries sorted by chromosome. Genetics 157:979-990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MOTT, R., A. GRIGORIEV, E. MAIER, J. D. HOHEISEL, and H. LEHRACH, 1993  Algorithms and software tools for ordering clone libraries: application to the mapping of the genome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:1965-1974[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MOZO, T., S. FISCHER, H. SHIZUYA, and T. ALTMANN, 1998  Construction and characterization of the IGF Arabidopsis BAC library. Mol. Gen. Genet. 258:562-570[Medline].

NELSON, M. A., S. KANG, E. L. BRAUN, M. E. CRAWFORD, and P. L. DOLAN et al., 1997  Expressed sequences from conidial, mycelial, and sexual stages of Neurospora crassa.. Fungal Genet. Biol. 21:348-363[Medline].

ORBACH, M. J., 1994  A cosmid with a HyR marker for fungal library construction and screening. Gene 150:159-162[Medline].

ORBACH, M. J., D. VOLLRATH, R. W. DAVIS, and C. YANOFSKY, 1988  An electrophoretic karyotype of Neurospora crassa.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1469-1473[Abstract/Free Full Text].

PERKINS, D. D., 1992  Neurospora crassa genetic maps. Fungal Genet. Newsl. 39:61-70.

PERKINS, D. D., A. RADFORD, D. NEWMEYER, and M. BJORKMAN, 1982  Chromosomal loci of Neurospora crassa.. Microbiol. Rev. 46:426-570[Free Full Text].

RADFORD, A. and J. H. PARISH, 1997  The genome and genes of Neurospora crassa.. Fungal Genet. Biol. 21:258-266[Medline].

SAMBROOK, J., E. F. FRITSCH and T. MANIATIS, 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Ed. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
K. A. Borkovich, L. A. Alex, O. Yarden, M. Freitag, G. E. Turner, N. D. Read, S. Seiler, D. Bell-Pedersen, J. Paietta, N. Plesofsky, et al.
Lessons from the Genome Sequence of Neurospora crassa: Tracing the Path from Genomic Blueprint to Multicellular Organism
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2004; 68(1): 1 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
G. Mannhaupt, C. Montrone, D. Haase, H. W. Mewes, V. Aign, J. D. Hoheisel, B. Fartmann, G. Nyakatura, F. Kempken, J. Maier, et al.
What's in the genome of a filamentous fungus? Analysis of the Neurospora genome sequence
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2003; 31(7): 1944 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Z. Xu, B. Lance, C. Vargas, B. Arpinar, S. Bhandarkar, E. Kraemer, K. J. Kochut, J. A. Miller, J. R. Wagner, M. J. Weise, et al.
Mapping by Sequencing the Pneumocystis Genome Using the Ordering DNA Sequences V3 Tool
Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1299 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. S. Kelkar, J. Griffith, M. E. Case, S. F. Covert, R. D. Hall, C. H. Keith, J. S. Oliver, M. J. Orbach, M. S. Sachs, J. R. Wagner, et al.
The Neurospora crassa Genome: Cosmid Libraries Sorted by Chromosome
Genetics, March 1, 2001; 157(3): 979 - 990.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. M. Bhandarkar, S. A. Machaka, S. S. Shete, and R. N. Kota
Parallel Computation of a Maximum-Likelihood Estimator of a Physical Map
Genetics, March 1, 2001; 157(3): 1021 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Hall, S. M. Bhandarkar, and J. Wang
ODS2: A Multiplatform Software Application for Creating Integrated Physical and Genetic Maps
Genetics, March 1, 2001; 157(3): 1045 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text]