Genetics, Vol. 156, 1949-1958, December 2000, Copyright © 2000

Sequence Variation at Two Eosinophil-Associated Ribonuclease Loci in Humans

Jianzhi Zhanga and Helene F. Rosenberga
a Laboratory of Host Defenses, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Corresponding author: Helene F. Rosenberg, Laboratory of Host Defenses, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 10, Rm. 11N104, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892., hr2k{at}nih.gov (E-mail)

Communicating editor: S. YOKOYAMA


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Host defense against invading pathogens is of great importance to the survival of higher organisms. We have been studying the evolution of mammalian eosinophil-associated ribonucleases (EARs), which are members of the ribonuclease A superfamily with known antipathogen activities. Earlier studies showed that positive selection promoted rapid diversification of paralogous EAR genes in both primates and rodents. Intraspecifically, however, it is unknown whether these genes also have divergent alleles. The recent discovery that the gene repertoire of the EAR family is much larger in rodents than in primates has led us to consider the possibility that primates maintain a large number of polymorphic alleles to compensate for a smaller gene repertoire. Here we present sequences of 2417 nucleotides at the two EAR loci, the eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN, RNase 2) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP, RNase 3), from >50 human individuals. Our data demonstrate that the nucleotide diversities (0.06–0.11%) at these loci are typical for human nuclear genes, thus permitting us to reject this polymorphism hypothesis. No significant departure from neutrality is noted and no signs of overdominant selection are observed. Similar patterns were observed in a preliminary study of chimpanzees. In summary, our results suggest that the antipathogen functions of the primate EARs are conserved after they are established and that these proteins are not currently undergoing rapid diversification in response to challenge from invading microorganisms.


ORIGINS of host defense systems in various animal and plant groups have attracted increasing attention in recent years partly because pathogens are recognized as important ecological factors in shaping the evolution of higher organisms (e.g., GREENBERG et al. 1995 Down; ROSENBERG and DYER 1995 Down; MEYERS et al. 1998 Down; PALACIOS et al. 1998 Down; ZHANG et al. 1998 Down; STAHL et al. 1999 Down). The central issue here is to understand at the molecular level how proteins with microbicidal activity originate and evolve under the selective pressures provided by invading pathogens. The eosinophil-associated ribonuclease (EAR) gene family is a good system for studying this problem because most gene members emerged within the past 50 million years, and some appeared as recently as 5 mya (LARSON et al. 1996 Down; ZHANG et al. 1998 Down, ZHANG et al. 2000 Down), thus making it easier to study the evolutionary and molecular mechanisms underlying the functional specificity of individual genes. The primate EAR family includes only two functional members, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN or RNase 2) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP or RNase 3), generated from a gene duplication event that occurred ~30 mya in the evolutionary lineage of hominoids and Old World monkeys (HAMANN et al. 1990 Down; ROSENBERG et al. 1995 Down; ZHANG et al. 1998 Down). Only one EAR gene (named EDN) has been found to exist in the genomes of New World monkeys and prosimians examined so far (ROSENBERG et al. 1995 Down; H. F. ROSENBERG, unpublished results). In humans, the EDN and ECP genes are linked on chromosome 14q24–q31 (HAMANN et al. 1990 Down), and their protein products can be found in the large specific granules of eosinophilic leukocytes (reviewed in ROSENBERG and DOMACHOWSKE 1999 Down). ECP has a cell-membrane-disruptive function that is likely to be responsible for its activity against bacteria and parasites in vitro (YOUNG et al. 1986 Down; WATERS et al. 1987 Down; LEHRER et al. 1989 Down). EDN reduces the infectivity of both respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in vitro (DOMACHOWSKE et al. 1998C Down; LEE-HUANG et al. 1999 Down), an activity that is ribonuclease-dependent, at least in the case of RSV (DOMACHOWSKE et al. 1998C Down). Sequence analysis revealed rapid evolution of EDN and ECP (ROSENBERG et al. 1995 Down), and positive Darwinian selection was detected in ECP during a relatively short period of evolutionary time following gene duplication, ending prior to the divergence of the hominoids from the Old World monkeys (ZHANG et al. 1998 Down). The EAR genes of rodents have also been studied. In contrast to the small size of the EAR family in primates, a survey of seven species of the rodent family Muridae shows that the average gene number per species is ~8, with one species having as many as 17 distinct genes (LARSON et al. 1996 Down; BATTEN et al. 1997 Down; SINGHANIA et al. 1999 Down; ZHANG et al. 2000 Down). Furthermore, the rodent EAR family has undergone frequent gene duplications and massive gene deactivation, which has resulted in distinct or only partially overlapping gene inventories in several closely related species (ZHANG et al. 2000 Down). Positive selection was also detected in the diversification of the paralogous genes in these rodent species. Interestingly, these evolutionary patterns of rapid gene birth and death, gene sorting, and positive selection are shared by a number of mammalian immune system genes such as the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), immunoglobulin (Ig), and T cell receptor genes. With this connection in mind, one naturally wonders how variable individual EAR genes are within a species—are they more similar to the highly polymorphic MHC genes or to the largely monomorphic Ig genes? The dramatic difference in size between rodent and primate EAR families has also prompted us to consider the possibility that the relatively small gene repertoire in primates may be compensated by highly polymorphic alleles. To answer these questions, we conducted an investigation of the DNA sequence variation at the EDN and ECP loci of humans and chimpanzees.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Human genomic DNAs of normal individuals from different ethnic groups were purchased from Coriell Cell Repositories (Camden, NJ) or donated by Drs. David McDermott and Philip Murphy of the National Institutes of Health (MCDERMOTT et al. 1998 Down). Genomic DNAs of six chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) were purchased from BIOS Labs (New Haven, CT), Coriell Cell Repositories, or provided by Drs. Oliver Ryder and Leona Chemnick of San Diego Zoo. The EDN and ECP genes were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the primer sets EDN1f and EDN4r and ECP1f and ECP4r, respectively, which are derived from the published human sequences (Table 1). High-fidelity Taq was used to reduce the likelihood of PCR errors and the PCR reactions were performed under conditions recommended by the manufacturer (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD). PCR products were purified by the High Pure PCR product purification kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis) and were sequenced directly in both directions by the dideoxy chain termination method with dRhodamine dyes on Perkin-Elmer 377 automatic sequencers. The sequencing primers for the EDN gene were EDN1f-EDN4f and EDN1r-EDN4r, whereas those for the ECP genes were ECP1f-ECP4f and ECP1r-ECP4r (Table 1). Homozygotes and heterozygotes at individual sites were distinguished by their chromatographic patterns. Sequence variations that were found only in one chromosome (singletons) were reexamined so as to rule out the possibility of PCR errors. Most allelic haplotypes were determined by the approach of CLARK 1990 Down. For those individuals whose allelic haplotypes cannot be inferred by Clark's method, we subcloned PCR products into pCR4Blunt-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and then sequenced individual clones.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 1. Primers used in this study

Polymorphism data were analyzed according to NEI 1987 Down, HARTL and CLARK 1997 Down, and LI 1997 Down. Specifically, nucleotide diversity ({pi}) was estimated following formula 10.6 of NEI 1987 Down. The sampling variance of {pi}, which is the error generated at the allele frequency survey, was estimated by (10.7) of NEI 1987 Down. The stochastic variance of {pi} was estimated by (10.10) of NEI 1987 Down. Unless otherwise mentioned, the total variance is presented. TAJIMA's (1989) and FU and LI's (1993) tests as implemented in DnaSP3.0 (ROZAS and ROZAS 1999 Down) were used to test neutrality. MCDONALD and KREITMAN's (1991) test was used to examine the homogeneity in evolutionary pattern between within-species variation and between-species divergence. The modified Nei-Gojobori method (ZHANG et al. 1998 Down) was used to compute rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions.


*  RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Sequence variation at the EDN locus:
We sequenced 1214 nucleotides at the EDN locus from 67 humans, including 20 African Americans, 30 Caucasians, 12 Asians, and 5 Native Americans. In addition, orthologous sequences from six unrelated chimpanzees were examined. Sequence variations observed among human individuals and between human and chimpanzee are depicted in Fig 1, along with the gene structure annotations. Nine polymorphic sites were found among the 134 human chromosomes. All of these variations are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rather than insertions/deletions, and only two different nucleotides were observed at each of these sites. One commonly used parameter that measures the polymorphic level of a DNA region is nucleotide diversity ({pi}), which is defined as the average number of differences per site between two alleles randomly chosen from the population. For the EDN data, {pi} is estimated to be 0.00063 (Table 2 and Table 3), which is within the normal range of diversity observed in a number of nuclear gene loci in humans (0.0005–0.0020; LI and SADLER 1991 Down; NICKERSON et al. 1998 Down; CARGILL et al. 1999 Down; HALUSHKA et al. 1999 Down; RIEDER et al. 1999 Down). Among the five ethnic groups, African Americans have the highest diversity ({pi} = 0.00111, Table 2), followed by Asians (0.00063), Native Americans (0.00046), and Caucasians (0.00018). This pattern is generally consistent with observations from other genes, though the dramatically reduced diversity in Caucasians appears unusual. In fact, the nucleotide diversity in Caucasians is significantly smaller than any of the other three ethnic groups examined (P < 0.01).



View larger version (43K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. DNA sequence variation at the EDN locus. Shown here is the human haplotype 1 sequence, with human polymorphisms listed in capital letters under the main sequence. The translated amino acids are shown by capital boldface letters. *, stop codon. The chimpanzee sequence (majority haplotype) is presented with italicized letters (lowercase for DNA and capital for protein) at those sites that differ from the human haplotype 1. The sequences have been deposited in GenBank with the following accession numbers: human EDN haplotypes 1–9, AF294007, AF294008, AF294009, AF294010, AF294011, AF294012, AF294013, AF294014, AF294015; chimpanzee EDN haplotypes 1–3, AF294016, AF294017, AF294018.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 2. EDN haplotypes in humans


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 3. Sequence variation at the EDN locus

Nine haplotypes were found in humans, and their relationships can be inferred by the parsimony principle (Fig 2). Haplotype X, which links some of the observed haplotypes, is missing from the samples examined. This may be due to small sample size and/or low frequency of this haplotype. Assuming random sampling, we estimated that haplotype X has a frequency of no more than 0.022 (95% confidence interval) in humans. Of the nine haplotypes, haplotypes 1 and 2 are found in all four ethnic groups with haplotype 1 being the predominant one in every population. Haplotypes 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9 are found only in African Americans and haplotype 5 is restricted to Caucasians. Haplotype 7 is largely restricted to African Americans with only one copy found among the samples from Asians (Table 2). Recombination is not necessary to explain the observed haplotypes. That is, the minimal number of recombination events (Dm) is 0. Consistent with this result, no four-gametic types are found between any pairs of polymorphic sites, indicating that the polymorphisms are in complete linkage disequilibrium (HUDSON and KAPLAN 1985 Down). The recombination rate C (per site) can also be estimated by HUDSON's (1987) method from the variance in nucleotide difference among alleles, and it is estimated to be 8 x 10-7 for the EDN locus. With the limited number of polymorphisms as in the present data, the estimate of C may have a substantial variance (HUDSON 1987 Down). The relative rate of recombination to mutation per site is estimated to be 0.0013 for EDN.



View larger version (20K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. Parsimonious relationships of the EDN haplotypes. The most frequently observed haplotype is boxed. Nucleotide differences from haplotype 1 are underlined. Haplotype X is hypothetical and was not observed in the sample examined. The nine polymorphic sites are at the positions 96, 302, 405, 416, 504, 836, 980, 1011, and 1122 of the sequence in Fig 1.

Statistical tests of neutrality are applied to the above polymorphic data. Neither Tajima's test nor Fu and Li's test gives a significant result (Tajima's D = -1.28, P > 0.10; Fu and Li's D* = -1.72, P > 0.10; Fu and Li's F* = -1.82, 0.10 > P > 0.05). However, the negative values of these statistics suggest relatively low nucleotide diversity giving the observed number of polymorphic sites. If not entirely due to stochastic error, this may be an indicator of background purifying selection, recent rapid spread of advantageous alleles in population (selective sweeps), or reduction in population size (bottlenecks).

Six of the nine polymorphic sites involve transitional changes whereas the rest are transversions. Three polymorphisms are within the protein-coding sequence, with two representing synonymous changes and only one representing a nonsynonymous change. The other six polymorphisms are distributed in the promoter, intron, and untranslated mRNA (UTR) regions (Fig 1 and Table 3). Interestingly, the single nonsynonymous polymorphism is a C to A mutation (at site 1011) resulting in a His to Asn change at one of the three amino acid residues that form the catalytic site of the RNase. This change renders EDN nonfunctional as a ribonuclease, and therefore the mutant is presumably under strong purifying selection. Consistent with this prediction, only one copy of this allele is found among 134 chromosomes, suggesting that it may have been a recent mutation. The introns of EDN and ECP include transcriptional regulation sequences (EoTF and PU.1 sites) that are known to reduce gene expression when disrupted (TIFFANY et al. 1996 Down; HANDEN and ROSENBERG 1997 Down; VAN DIJK et al. 1998 Down), but none of the observed polymorphisms reside at these sites.

Among the 12 chromosomes of the six chimpanzees, only two polymorphisms were found (C -> T at site 408 and C -> T at site 828), and both are singletons. The nucleotide diversity is estimated to be 0.00027 ± 0.00030. One of the two polymorphisms is in the intron, while the other results in an Arg -> Cys change in the protein sequence. The mature protein of EDN has eight cysteines that form four disulfide bonds, which are of critical importance to the structure and function of EDN. An extra Cys in EDN could be harmful because it may interfere with protein folding.

Eight nucleotide differences are found between the most frequently observed haplotype sequences of chimpanzees and humans. Four of these substitutions occurred in the protein-coding region with three being synonymous and one nonsynonymous. Thus, the rate of nonsynonymous change per site is ~11% of that of synonymous change, suggesting that the gene is under purifying selection. Nevertheless, neutral evolution cannot be rejected statistically (P = 0.052, Fisher's test), apparently due to the small numbers of substitutions in this case. MCDONALD and KREITMAN's (1991) test suggests that the evolutionary patterns in synonymous and nonsynonymous changes revealed from intraspecific and interspecific variations are compatible (P > 0.50). Availability of the chimpanzee sequences also makes it possible to infer the ancestral and descendant nucleotides at each of the nine polymorphic sites in humans and it appears that haplotype 8 is the ancestral form with regard to these sites. At other sites, there might have been mutations that occurred in the human lineage and are now fixed in populations.

Sequence variation at the ECP locus:
We determined 1203 nucleotides at the ECP locus in 54 humans (21 African Americans, 16 Caucasians, 12 Asians, and 5 Native Americans) and six chimpanzees. Sequence variations observed are shown in Fig 3. Seven polymorphisms were found among the 108 human chromosomes, all of which are SNPs with two different nucleotides at each of these sites. The nucleotide diversity ({pi}) is estimated to be 0.00113 (Table 4 and Table 5). African Americans again have the highest diversity (0.00129, Table 4) among the four ethnic groups, followed by Caucasians (0.00101), Asians (0.00095), and Native Americans (0.00046).



View larger version (41K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 3. DNA sequence variation at the ECP locus. Shown here is the human haplotype 4 sequence, with human polymorphisms listed in capital letters under the main sequence. The translated amino acids are shown by capital boldface letters. *, stop codon; -, deletion. The chimpanzee sequence (majority haplotype) is presented with italicized letters (lowercase for DNA and capital for protein) at those sites that show differences from the human haplotype 4. The sequences have been deposited in GenBank with the following accession numbers: human ECP haplotypes 1–8, AF294019, AF294020, AF294021, AF294022, AF294023, AF294024, AF294025, AF294026; chimpanzee ECP haplotypes 1–2, AF294027, AF294028.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 4. ECP haplotypes in humans


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 5. Sequence variation at the ECP locus

Eight haplotypes were found in humans, and Fig 4 shows their parsimonious relationships. Haplotypes 2 and 4 are found in all four populations with haplotype 4 being the predominant one in the total population. Haplopytes 6, 7, and 8 are observed only in African Americans and haplotype 5 is restricted to African Americans and Asians. Haplotypes 1 and 3 are present in all populations except Native Americans (Table 4).



View larger version (19K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 4. Parsimonious relationships of the ECP haplotypes. The most frequently observed haplotype is boxed. Nucleotide differences from haplotype 4 are underlined. The seven polymorphic sites are at the positions 113, 119, 469, 474, 882, 1010, and 1088 of the sequence in Fig 2.

In the tests of neutrality, Tajima's test and Fu and Li's test give results in different directions (Tajima's D = 0.042, P > 0.10; Fu and Li's D* = -0.58, P > 0.10; Fu and Li's F* = -0.44, P > 0.10), but neither test rejects the null hypothesis of neutrality. Of the seven polymorphisms, three are transitions and four are transversions. Only one polymorphism resides in the coding region, and it results in an Arg/Thr polymorphism. Since the chimpanzee has Arg at this position, it can be inferred that Arg is the ancestral state and Thr appeared in humans after their separation from chimpanzees. Arginine residues have been considered to be important in ECP's antibacterial activity (ROSENBERG et al. 1989 Down; ZHANG et al. 1998 Down). However, the relatively high frequency (0.36) of Thr alleles (haplotypes 1, 3, and 7) in humans suggests that the difference in fitness between the Thr and Arg alleles is small. As the mature protein of ECP has 19 arginines, loss or gain of a few arginine residues will not have much impact on cationicity and thus may not ultimately alter function. Indeed, chimpanzee ECP has only 17 arginines.

Two copies of one polymorphism were found among the 12 chromosomes of six chimpanzees (T -> C at site 1194), and it resides in the nontranscribed region that is 3' to 3' UTR. The nucleotide diversity is estimated to be 0.00025 ± 0.00029.

Compared with the human sequence (haplotype 4), the chimpanzee sequence (the majority haplotype) has two deletions of 1 and 3 nucleotides, respectively. In addition, 15 nucleotide differences are observed. Three of these differences are in the protein-coding region, and all are nonsynonymous changes. No heterogeneity between within-species variation and between-species divergence is detected in terms of the synonymous to nonsynonymous ratio (P > 0.50; McDonald and Kreitman test). Using the chimpanzee sequence, we predict that haplotype 5 represents the ancestral allele in humans with regard to the observed seven polymorphisms.

As in the case of EDN, one need not invoke recombination to explain the observed human ECP haplotypes, and no four-gametic types are found between any pairs of polymorphic sites, indicating that the polymorphisms are in complete linkage disequilibrium. The recombination rate C (per site) is estimated to be 0.1, and the relative rate of recombination to mutation is 94. These values are substantially greater than those for EDN, but more data are needed to test the statistical significance of the differences. Recombination between EDN and ECP can also be investigated, because both loci have been sequenced in 53 human individuals and the EDN-ECP haplotypes can be inferred for those who are not heterozygous at both loci. Thus, we determined the EDN-ECP haplotypes of 36 individuals and this data set contains 7 and 5 polymorphisms in the EDN and ECP loci, respectively. Of the 35 pairs of polymorphic sites compared, 11 pairs have all four gametic types, and at least one recombination event (between sites 1122 of EDN and 474 of ECP) is required to explain the haplotypes. This demonstrates that while EDN and ECP may be closely linked, recombination between loci did happen, even in the relatively recent evolutionary history of humans.


*  DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

In this study, we examined intraspecific sequence variations at the human EDN and ECP loci. Our data showed that the nucleotide diversities at these loci are ~0.06–0.11%, which are typical for human nuclear genes (LI and SADLER 1991 Down; NICKERSON et al. 1998 Down; CARGILL et al. 1999 Down; HALUSHKA et al. 1999 Down; RIEDER et al. 1999 Down), and that several statistical tests fail to reject neutrality (KIMURA 1983 Down) for the sequences generated. These results clearly demonstrate that human EDN and ECP genes are no more polymorphic than the average human gene and that no overdominant selection is involved in maintaining the different alleles. At the interspecific level, we noted earlier that the evolutionary pattern of the rodent EAR gene family is similar to those of many immune system gene families such as MHC, T cell receptor, and Ig (ZHANG et al. 2000 Down) as all four gene families are subject to evolution via rapid gene sorting and positive Darwinian selection (ZHANG et al. 2000 Down). When examined within species, it appears that the polymorphic levels of EDN and ECP are more similar to those of Ig genes, which have been described as largely monomorphic (LI and HOOD 1995 Down; SASSO et al. 1995 Down). This is in contrast to what has been observed for some MHC loci, which are highly polymorphic ({pi} = 4–7%; NEI and HUGHES 1991 Down), with overdominant or frequency-dependent selection apparently active in maintaining the divergent alleles (HUGHES and NEI 1988 Down).

One unexpected result from this investigation was the observation that nucleotide diversity among EDN alleles of Caucasians was significantly lower than that observed in other ethnic groups (Table 2). There are several possible explanations for this phenomenon. The first possibility is that our sample of Caucasians is so biased that only a regional population of Caucasians is effectively sampled. This, however, is unlikely because the Caucasian ECP locus shows a normal level of polymorphism and the EDN and ECP genes are linked. Second, recent population bottlenecks may have reduced the polymorphism, but this is also unlikely because if this were the case, the diversity observed at the ECP locus would also be reduced in the Caucasian population. Third, background selection against deleterious mutations may reduce the gene diversity, but it is hard to imagine why background selection on the same genes could be so different in different human populations. Fourth, a recent selective sweep of an advantageous allele in Caucasians may have reduced the gene diversity by quickly replacing other alleles. However, Caucasian EDNs are mostly of haplotype 1, which is also the majority in other populations, suggesting that it is a relatively old allele. Caucasians and Asians are more closely related genetically than they are related to Africans (e.g., NEI and ROYCHOUDHURY 1993 Down). Comparing Asians with Caucasians, one can see that the frequency of haplotype 1 increases dramatically in Caucasians while that of haplotype 2 decreases. The difference between haplotypes 1 and 2 is an intronic G/C transversion at position 405, which is not in a region known to be involved in gene expression. According to Fig 2 and the prediction that haplotype 8 was the ancestral allele in humans, it follows that haplotype 2 appeared later than haplotype 1 (Fig 2). If this is the case, it is difficult to conceive of a mechanism whereby a selective sweep of haplotype 1 replaced haplotype 2. Of course, selection may not act directly at the EDN locus but at a closely linked site. In any case, although Tajima's D and Fu and Li's D* and F* statistics are all negative for the Caucasian EDN sequences, they are not significantly <0, suggesting that the present data are not sufficient for establishing either the background selection or the selective sweep hypothesis. As such, the cause of the reduced diversity at the EDN locus in Caucasians remains an open question.

Low nucleotide diversity ({pi} = 0.00025–0.00027) was also found at both EDN and ECP loci in the chimpanzees examined. Previous studies at a number of loci of wild populations of chimpanzees showed that the nucleotide diversity in chimpanzees is often greater than that in humans, though exceptions do exist (see KAESSMANN et al. 1999 Down and references therein). In the present case, the substantially lower nucleotide diversity in chimpanzees than in humans (P < 0.05; randomization test) may be due to the limited sample size. In addition, it is possible that the six chimpanzees studied here were originally captured from a small geographic region, although they are not known to be related to one another.

As mentioned earlier, EDN and ECP genes emerged from gene duplication ~30 mya, and their respective antipathogen activities, such as they are currently understood, either originated or were substantially enhanced in a relatively short period of time after gene duplication (ROSENBERG and DYER 1995 Down; ROSENBERG et al. 1995 Down; DOMACHOWSKE et al. 1998A Down, DOMACHOWSKE et al. 1998B Down, DOMACHOWSKE et al. 1998C Down; ZHANG et al. 1998 Down). In the case of ECP, directional Darwinian selection was detected after gene duplication, with the selection process resulting in a dramatic increase in the number of arginine residues (ZHANG et al. 1998 Down). These positively charged arginine residues provide ECP with its distinct cationicity (pI = 11.4) and are likely to be responsible for ECP's membrane lytic effect and antibacterial activity (YOUNG et al. 1986 Down; LEHRER et al. 1989 Down). Cation-mediated membrane lysis is a nonspecific mechanism, which suggests that no species-specific interactions between ECP and its targets are involved. Our result demonstrating that the nucleotide diversity at the ECP locus is no higher than average suggests that there is no fitness advantage for the population to maintain many variant forms of ECP, which is consistent with our understanding of ECP's membrane lytic mechanism. However, as our understanding of eosinophil physiology and, by extension, of ECP, remains incomplete, we may ultimately need to reconsider the meaning of these findings.

Our lab has recently explored a novel function of EDN, namely, its ability to reduce the infectivity of RNA viruses of the family Paramyxoviridae for its target epithelial cells in vitro (DOMACHOWSKE et al. 1998C Down). While this activity is directly dependent on EDN's ribonuclease activity, its detailed molecular mechanism is far from clear. Evolutionary analysis of the gene sequences may shed some light on this process. If EDN's primary interaction is with the viral envelope, then a high mutation rate of RNA viruses and the "red queen" process (VAN VALEN 1973 Down) would result in rapid evolution of EDN under positive selection. But, in fact, the ratio of the rates of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution (0.4) falls well below 1.0 in comparisons between sequences of Old World monkeys and hominoids, failing to support this hypothesis. Rather, the unremarkable level of polymorphism at the EDN locus suggests that either EDN targets at only one particular strain or family of viruses (already shown to be unlikely, DOMACHOWSKE et al. 1998C Down; LEE-HUANG et al. 1999 Down), or that somehow the variability of viral proteins has no effect on EDN's antiviral efficiency. Alternatively, EDN's antiviral activity may involve a primary interaction with one or more cellular targets, which remain more or less constant both within and among species; our most recent results stand in support of this latter hypothesis (J. B. DOMACHOWSKE and H. F. ROSENBERG, unpublished results).

As discussed earlier, the discovery of a dramatic difference in the size of the EAR family between rodents and primates has led to the hypothesis that the relatively small gene repertoire in primates may be compensated by highly polymorphic alleles. Our present study, however, rejects this hypothesis. Instead, our results imply that the ECPs and EDNs of primates use conservative mechanisms to fight against pathogens, and no extra variation is needed. In this respect, it is unclear what pathogens rodent EARs target and why rodents need more EAR genes than primates do. It is possible that somewhat different mechanisms are involved in the host-defense process of rodent EARs, and more work is certainly needed to explore this possibility.


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Drs. David McDermott, Philip Murphy, Leona Chemnick, and Oliver Ryder for providing some of the human and chimpanzee DNA samples used in this study and to Dr. Kimberly Dyer for excellent technical assistance and discussion.

Manuscript received May 30, 2000; Accepted for publication August 18, 2000.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

BATTEN, D., K. D. DYER, J. B. DOMACHOWSKE, and H. F. ROSENBERG, 1997  Molecular cloning of four novel murine ribonuclease genes: unusual expansion within the ribonuclease A gene family. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4235-4239[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CARGILL, M., D. ALTSHULER, J. IRELAND, P. SKLAR, and K. ARDLIE et al., 1999  Characterization of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions of human genes. Nat. Genet. 22:231-238[Medline].

CLARK, A. G., 1990  Inference of haplotypes from PCR-amplified samples of diploid populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7:111-122[Abstract].

DOMACHOWSKE, J. B., C. A. BONVILLE, K. D. DYER, and H. F. ROSENBERG, 1998a  Evolution of antiviral activity in the ribonuclease A gene superfamily: evidence for a specific interaction between eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN/RNase 2) and respiratory syncytial virus. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:5327-5332[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DOMACHOWSKE, J. B., K. D. DYER, A. G. ADAMS, T. L. LETO, and H. F. ROSENBERG, 1998b  Eosinophil cationic protein/RNase 3 is another RNase A-family ribonuclease with direct antiviral activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:3358-3363[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DOMACHOWSKE, J. B., K. D. DYER, C. A. BONVILLE, and H. F. ROSENBERG, 1998c  Recombinant human eosinophil-derived neurotoxin/RNase 2 functions as an effective antiviral agent against respiratory syncytial virus. J. Infect. Dis. 177:1458-1464[Medline].

FU, Y.-X. and W.-H. LI, 1993  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133:693-709[Abstract].

GREENBERG, A. S., D. AVILA, M. HUGHES, A. HUGHES, and E. C. MCKINNEY et al., 1995  A new antigen receptor gene family that undergoes rearrangement and extensive somatic diversification in sharks. Nature 374:168-173[Medline].

HALUSHKA, M. K., J. B. FAN, K. BENTLEY, L. HSIE, and N. SHEN et al., 1999  Patterns of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate genes for blood-pressure homeostasis. Nat. Genet. 22:239-247[Medline].

HAMANN, K. J., R. M. TEN, D. A. LOEGERING, R. B. JENKINS, and M. T. HEISE et al., 1990  Structure and chromosome localization of the human eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and eosinophil cationic protein genes: evidence for intronless coding sequences in the ribonuclease gene superfamily. Genomics 7:535-546[Medline].

HANDEN, J. S. and H. F. ROSENBERG, 1997  Intronic enhancer activity of the eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (RNS2) and eosinophil cationic protein (RNS3) genes is mediated by an NFAT-1 consensus binding sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1665-1669[Abstract/Free Full Text].

HARTL, D. L., and A. G. CLARK, 1997 Principles of Population Genetics, Ed. 3. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

HUDSON, R. R., 1987  Estimating the recombination parameter of a finite population model without selection. Genet. Res. 50:245-250[Medline].

HUDSON, R. R. and N. L. KAPLAN, 1985  Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111:147-164[Abstract/Free Full Text].

HUGHES, A. L. and M. NEI, 1988  Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature 335:167-170[Medline].

KAESSMANN, H., V. WIEBE, and S. PAABO, 1999  Extensive nuclear DNA sequence diversity among chimpanzees. Science 286:1159-1162[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KIMURA, M., 1983 The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, New York.

LARSON, K. A., E. V. OLSON, B. J. MADDEN, G. J. GLEICH, and N. A. LEE et al., 1996  Two highly homologous ribonuclease genes expressed in mouse eosinophils identify a larger subgroup of the mammalian ribonuclease superfamily. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:12370-12375[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LEE-HUANG, S., P. L. HUANG, Y. SUN, P. L. HUANG, and H. F. KUNG et al., 1999  Lysozyme and RNases as anti-HIV components in beta-core preparations of human chorionic gonadotropin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:2678-2681[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LEHRER, R. I., D. SZKLAREK, A. BARTON, T. GANZ, and K. J. HAMANN et al., 1989  Antibacterial properties of eosinophil major basic protein and eosinophil cationic protein. J. Immunol. 142:4428-4434[Abstract].

LI, H. and L. HOOD, 1995  Multiplex genotype determination at a DNA sequence polymorphism cluster in the human immunoglobulin heavy-chain region. Genomics 26:199-206[Medline].

LI, W. H., 1997 Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

LI, W.-H. and L. A. SADLER, 1991  Low nucleotide diversity in man. Genetics 129:513-523[Abstract].

MCDERMOTT, D. H., P. A. ZIMMERMAN, F. GUIGNARD, C. A. KLEEBERGER, and S. F. LEITMAN et al., 1998  CCR5 promoter polymorphism and HIV-1 disease progression. Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS). Lancet 352:866-870[Medline].

MCDONALD, J. H. and M. KREITMAN, 1991  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351:652-654[Medline].

MEYERS, B. C., K. A. SHEN, P. ROHANI, B. S. GAUT, and R. W. MICHELMORE, 1998  Receptor-like genes in the major resistance locus of lettuce are subject to divergent selection. Plant Cell 10:1833-1846[Abstract/Free Full Text].

NEI, M., 1987 Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.

NEI, M., and A. L. HUGHES, 1991 Polymorphism and evolution of the major histocompatibility complex loci in mammals, pp. 222–247 in Evolution at the Molecular Level, edited by R. SELANDER, A. CLARK and T. WHITTOM. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

NEI, M. and A. K. ROYCHOUDHURY, 1993  Evolutionary relationships of human populations on a global scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:927-943[Abstract].

NICKERSON, D. A., S. L. TAYLOR, K. M. WEISS, A. G. CLARK, and R. G. HUTCHINSON et al., 1998  DNA sequence diversity in a 9.7-kb region of the human lipoprotein lipase gene. Nat. Genet. 19:233-240[Medline].

PALACIOS, E., L. DIGILIO, H. M. MCCLURE, Z. CHEN, and P. A. MARX et al., 1998  Parallel evolution of CCR5-null phenotypes in humans and in a natural host of simian immunodeficiency virus. Curr. Biol. 8:943-946[Medline].

RIEDER, M. J., S. L. TAYLOR, A. G. CLARK, and D. A. NICKERSON, 1999  Sequence variation in the human angiotensin converting enzyme. Nat. Genet. 22:59-62[Medline].

ROSENBERG, H. F. and J. B. DOMACHOWSKE, 1999  Eosinophils, ribonucleases and host defense: solving the puzzle. Immunol. Res. 20:261-274[Medline].

ROSENBERG, H. F. and K. D. DYER, 1995  Eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin. Evolution of novel function in a primate ribonuclease gene family. J. Biol. Chem. 270:21539-21544[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ROSENBERG, H. F., S. J. ACKERMAN, and D. G. TENEN, 1989  Human eosinophil cationic protein. Molecular cloning of a cytotoxin and helminthotoxin with ribonuclease activity. J. Exp. Med. 170:163-176[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ROSENBERG, H. F., K. D. DYER, H. L. TIFFANY, and M. GONZALEZ, 1995  Rapid evolution of a unique family of primate ribonuclease genes. Nat. Genet. 10:219-223[Medline].

ROZAS, J. and R. ROZAS, 1999  DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15:174-175[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SASSO, E. H., J. H. BUCKNER, and L. A. SUZUKI, 1995  Ethnic differences of polymorphism of an immunoglobulin VH3 gene. J. Clin. Invest. 96:1591-1600.

SINGHANIA, N. A., K. D. DYER, J. ZHANG, M. S. DEMING, and C. A. BONVILLE et al., 1999  Rapid evolution of the ribonuclease A superfamily: adaptive expansion of independent gene clusters in rats and mice. J. Mol. Evol. 49:721-728[Medline].

STAHL, E. A., G. DWYER, R. MAURICIO, M. KREITMAN, and J. BERGELSON, 1999  Dynamics of disease resistance polymorphism at the Rpm1 locus of Arabidopsis. Nature 400:667-671[Medline].

TAJIMA, F., 1989  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585-595[Abstract/Free Full Text].

TIFFANY, H. L., J. S. HANDEN, and H. F. ROSENBERG, 1996  Enhanced expression of the eosinophil-derived neurotoxin ribonuclease (RNS2) gene requires interaction between the promoter and intron. J. Biol. Chem. 271:12387-12393[Abstract/Free Full Text].

VAN DIJK, T. B., E. CALDENHOVEN, J. A. RAAIJMAKERS, J. W. LAMMERS, and L. KOENDERMAN et al., 1998  The role of transcription factor PU.1 in the activity of the intronic enhancer of the eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (RNS2) gene. Blood 91:2126-2132[Abstract/Free Full Text].

VAN VALEN, L., 1973  A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory 1:1-30.

WATERS, L. S., J. TAVERNE, P. C. TAI, C. J. SPRY, and G. A. TARGETT et al., 1987  Killing of Plasmodium falciparum by eosinophil secretory products. Infect. Immun. 55:877-881[Abstract/Free Full Text].

YOUNG, J. D. E., C. G. B. PETERSON, P. VENGE, and G. J. COHN, 1986  Mechanism of membrane damage mediated by human eosinophil cationic protein. Nature 321:613-616[Medline].

ZHANG, J., H. F. ROSENBERG, and M. NEI, 1998  Positive Darwinian selection after gene duplication in primate ribonuclease genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3708-3713[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ZHANG, J., K. D. DYER, and H. F. ROSENBERG, 2000  Evolution of the rodent eosinophil-associated RNase gene family by rapid gene sorting and positive selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:4701-4706[Abstract/Free Full Text].




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Rubin, U. Zagai, K. Blom, A. Trulson, A. Engstrom, and P. Venge
The Coding ECP 434(G>C) Gene Polymorphism Determines the Cytotoxicity of ECP but Has Minor Effects on Fibroblast-Mediated Gel Contraction and No Effect on RNase Activity
J. Immunol., July 1, 2009; 183(1): 445 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
H. F. Rosenberg
RNase A ribonucleases and host defense: an evolving story
J. Leukoc. Biol., May 1, 2008; 83(5): 1079 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
J. Eriksson, C. Woschnagg, E. Fernvik, and P. Venge
A SELDI-TOF MS study of the genetic and post-translational molecular heterogeneity of eosinophil cationic protein
J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2007; 82(6): 1491 - 1500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. R. Rogers, S. Wooding, C. D. Huff, M. A. Batzer, and L. B. Jorde
Ancestral Alleles and Population Origins: Inferences Depend on Mutation Rate
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2007; 24(4): 990 - 997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
U.-B. Jonsson, J. Bystrom, G. Stalenheim, and P. Venge
A (G->C) transversion in the 3' UTR of the human ECP (eosinophil cationic protein) gene correlates to the cellular content of ECP
J. Leukoc. Biol., April 1, 2006; 79(4): 846 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. Hayakawa, I. Aki, A. Varki, Y. Satta, and N. Takahata
Fixation of the Human-Specific CMP-N-Acetylneuraminic Acid Hydroxylase Pseudogene and Implications of Haplotype Diversity for Human Evolution
Genetics, February 1, 2006; 172(2): 1139 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
Y.-J. KIM, V. KUMARASWAMI, E. CHOI, J. MU, D. A. FOLLMANN, P. ZIMMERMAN, and T. B. NUTMAN
GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS OF EOSINOPHIL-DERIVED NEUROTOXIN AND EOSINOPHIL CATIONIC PROTEIN IN TROPICAL PULMONARY EOSINOPHILIA
Am J Trop Med Hyg, July 1, 2005; 73(1): 125 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
L. O'Bryan, P. Pinkston, V. Kumaraswami, V. Vijayan, G. Yenokida, H. F. Rosenberg, R. Crystal, E. A. Ottesen, and T. B. Nutman
Localized Eosinophil Degranulation Mediates Disease in Tropical Pulmonary Eosinophilia
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2003; 71(3): 1337 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
E. Noguchi, A. Iwama, K. Takeda, T. Takeda, M. Kamioka, K. Ichikawa, T. Akiba, T. Arinami, and M. Shibasaki
The Promoter Polymorphism in the Eosinophil Cationic Protein Gene and Its Influence on the Serum Eosinophil Cationic Protein Level
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2003; 167(2): 180 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Zhang and H. F. Rosenberg
From the Cover: Complementary advantageous substitutions in the evolution of an antiviral RNase of higher primates
PNAS, April 16, 2002; 99(8): 5486 - 5491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Zhang and H. F. Rosenberg
Diversifying Selection of the Tumor-Growth Promoter Angiogenin in Primate Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2002; 19(4): 438 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Zhang and H. F. Rosenberg
From the Cover: Complementary advantageous substitutions in the evolution of an antiviral RNase of higher primates
PNAS, April 16, 2002; 99(8): 5486 - 5491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]