Genetics, Vol. 156, 1363-1377, November 2000, Copyright © 2000

Genetic Analysis of incurvata Mutants Reveals Three Independent Genetic Operations at Work in Arabidopsis Leaf Morphogenesis

José Serrano-Cartagenaa, Héctor Candelaa, Pedro Roblesa, María Rosa Poncea, José Manuel Pérez-Péreza, Pedro Piquerasa, and José Luis Micola
a División de Genética, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Campus de San Juan, 03550 Alicante, Spain

Corresponding author: José Luis Micol, División de Genética, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Campus de San Juan, 03550 Alicante, Spain., jlmicol{at}umh.es (E-mail)

Communicating editor: V. SUNDARESAN


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

In an attempt to identify genes involved in the control of leaf morphogenesis, we have studied 13 Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with curled, involute leaves, a phenotype herein referred to as Incurvata (Icu), which were isolated by G. Röbbelen and belong to the Arabidopsis Information Service Form Mutants collection. The Icu phenotype was inherited as a single recessive trait in 10 mutants, with semidominance in 2 mutants and with complete dominance in the remaining 1. Complementation analyses indicated that the studied mutations correspond to five genes, representative alleles of which were mapped relative to polymorphic microsatellites. Although most double-mutant combinations displayed additivity of the Icu phenotypes, those of icu1 icu2 and icu3 icu4 double mutants were interpreted as synergistic, which suggests that the five genes studied represent three independent genetic operations that are at work for the leaf to acquire its final form at full expansion. We have shown that icu1 mutations are alleles of the Polycomb group gene CURLY LEAF (CLF) and that the leaf phenotype of the icu2 mutant is suppressed in an agamous background, as is known for clf mutants. In addition, we have tested by means of multiplex RT-PCR the transcription of several floral genes in Icu leaves. Ectopic expression of AGAMOUS and APETALA3 was observed in clf and icu2, but not in icu3, icu4, and icu5 mutants. Taken together, these results suggest that CLF and ICU2 play related roles, the latter being a candidate to belong to the Polycomb group of regulatory genes. We propose that, as flowers evolved, a new major class of genes, including CLF and ICU2, may have been recruited to prevent the expression of floral homeotic genes in the leaves.


THE question of how plant leaves develop is far from being answered at the genetic level even though Bateson realized the existence of inherited leaf shape variants as early as 1913 (BATESON 1913 Down). During the ensuing 60 years, genetic investigations did not provide major insights into the dissection of leaf morphogenesis. In more recent decades, however, a large number of mutants with abnormally shaped leaves, most of them yet to be characterized, have been isolated in model systems such as Arabidopsis thaliana (BURGER 1971 Down; RELICHOVA 1976 Down; KRANZ 1978 Down; KRANZ and KIRCHHEIM 1987 Down). Nowadays, an expanding number of studies on leaf variants, including analyses of genetic interactions between mutations, are being published for several plant species, some examples being those of MCHALE 1993 Down, TSUGE et al. 1996 Down, VILLANI and DEMASON 1997 Down, and TELFER and POETHIG 1998 Down.

In spite of the fact that most plant leaves are simple structures, many developmental processes are involved in leaf ontogeny. They include, among others, the positioning and initiation of leaf primordia at the flanks of the shoot meristem; the specification of leaf identity as opposed to that of other organs that are assumed to be modified leaves; the establishment of dorsal and ventral identities within the organ; the definition of domains such as ligule, sheath, and blade in some monocotyledonous plants, as well as petiole and lamina in dicots; the control of cell division and expansion; the formation of patterns such as those of venation, trichomes, or stomata; and the mechanisms responsible for the diversity of compound and simple leaves and those that specify heteroblastic differences among different leaves within a plant. A large body of detailed information on what actually happens at a morphological level is available for most, if not all, such processes but only a few studies have focused on the nature, action, and interactions of the genes driving the sequence of developmental events that contribute to the making of a leaf (reviewed in HAKE and SINHA 1991 Down; SMITH and HAKE 1992 Down; SINHA et al. 1993 Down; TELFER and POETHIG 1994 Down; TSUKAYA 1995 Down; HALL and LANGDALE 1996 Down; POETHIG 1997 Down; BRUTNELL and LANGDALE 1998 Down; TSIANTIS and LANGDALE 1998 Down; VAN LIJSEBETTENS and CLARKE 1998 Down; POZZI et al. 1999 Down).

As a consequence of differential balances between anticlinal and periclinal division patterns of the cells that contribute to their final architecture, most leaves are characteristically flattened, displaying bilateral symmetry and dorsoventrality, while other plant organs have radial symmetry. A coordination mechanism has to be invoked to account for the matching areas of the adaxial (dorsal) and abaxial (ventral) leaf sides, notwithstanding that they display dorsoventral asymmetry, being unlike in the number, size, spatial arrangement, and differentiation state of their cells. Under the above hypothesis, mutants displaying deviations from the planar blades that characterize wild-type leaves can be regarded as defective in putative mechanisms coordinating the growth of the dorsal and ventral tissues of the leaf. We decided to study A. thaliana mutants displaying leaf curling to identify genes that coordinate growth of the abaxial and adaxial sides of the leaf. To this end, we have followed two complementary approaches: the isolation and study of new mutants, induced by ethyl methanesulfonate (BERNA et al. 1999 Down) and fast neutrons (P. ROBLES and J. L. MICOL, unpublished results), and the study of mutants obtained by previous authors (this work; SERRANO-CARTAGENA et al. 1999 Down).

In this work, we took advantage of the availability of the large collection of A. thaliana variants stored at the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC), which we have found to be instrumental for developmental studies such as the identification of lines displaying perturbations in leaf venation pattern formation (CANDELA et al. 1999 Down). We grew 152 mutant lines already known to display abnormally shaped leaves, finding 22 that exhibited involute (curled up) vegetative leaves, a phenotype that we have named Incurvata (Icu). Our genetic analyses of 13 of such icu strains showed that most of them carried recessive mutations and that they corresponded to five genes, whose map positions were determined. Comparison of double mutants involving representative alleles at the ICU loci was also made, allowing the classification of these genes in three different groups depending on the genetic interactions detected. On the basis of these interactions and those observed in double-mutant combinations, including a mutant allele of the AGAMOUS (AG) gene, a model is proposed for the role of the studied genes in leaf morphogenesis.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Plant culture:
A. thaliana (L.) Heyhn. seeds from mutant and wild-type strains were obtained from the NASC. Their stock numbers are the following: N313, N314, N328, N329, N345, N346, N347, N348, N350, N351, N379, N400, N401, and N419. All these mutant strains were isolated by G. Röbbelen from the Enkheim-2 (En-2) ecotype (BURGER 1971 Down). Plants were grown as described by PONCE et al. 1998 Down on petri dishes in Conviron TC16 culture chambers at 20° ± 1° and 60–70% relative humidity under continuous fluorescent light (7000 lux).

Genetic analysis:
We chose the Latin word incurvata to designate the mutants studied in this work. In accordance with the nomenclature of MEINKE and KOORNNEEF 1997 Down, the mutant phenotype is referred to as Incurvata (Icu), the wild-type allele as INCURVATA (ICU), and the mutant alleles as incurvata (icu).

Dominance relationships were established in the F1 progeny of crosses between mutant and En-2 wild-type plants and further confirmed in the inbred F2 generation.

Complementation groups were defined after the observation of the F1 progeny of crosses between homozygous recessive mutant lines. In those cases where one of the mutant lines crossed was homozygous for a dominant or semidominant mutation, allelism was discarded when phenotypically wild-type individuals were found in the inbred F2 generation. As a general rule, recessive mutants were used as female parents to easily distinguish any self-pollination.

At least one mutant line from each complementation group was outcrossed to the Landsberg erecta (Ler) ecotype so that linkage to polymorphic simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) markers could be assessed. DNA of F2 plants showing the recessive phenotype was isolated by the method of EDWARDS et al. 1991 Down. PCR amplification products were obtained by utilizing Arabidopsis SSLP specific primers (Mappairs; Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) and scored for polymorphisms. Oligonucleotide sequences were as described by BELL and ECKER 1994 Down, with the sole exception of the primers used to amplify the T27K12-Sp6 and MBK5 markers, whose sequences were taken from http://genome.bio.upenn.edu/SSLP_info/coming-soon.html. Amplifications and gel electrophoresis were undertaken as described in BELL and ECKER 1994 Down although modified as follows: regular agarose (4 to 6%) was used instead of acrylamide or low-melting-point agarose to visualize all polymorphisms, each PCR amplification included only 0.025 units/µl of BioTaq polymerase (BioLine), and no hot start was performed. Unlike other genes, the mapping of ICU4 was carried out using the multiplex PCR fluorescence-based procedure of PONCE et al. 1999 Down. Map distances were calculated using the map function of KOSAMBI 1944 Down.

We obtained all the possible double-mutant combinations involving representative alleles from each of the five complementation groups studied in this work. Some of them were unequivocally identified by their conspicuous phenotypes in the F2 progeny of crosses between homozygous single mutants. In most cases, however, doubly homozygous individuals for two recessive mutations had to be identified as those plants displaying a mutant phenotype present only in one-fourth of the F3 siblings obtained by selfing F2 mutant plants.

As expected, double mutants involving dominant or semidominant mutations appeared in the corresponding F2 progenies more frequently than double mutants bearing two recessive mutations. Furthermore, the genotype of such F2 putative double mutants was tested by isolating several of them from each cross and studying their F3 inbred progenies separately. The absence of phenotypic segregation in an F3 family was considered evidence of its double-mutant nature. Exceptions were those few double-mutant combinations that resulted in sterility.

Since plants homozygous for the ag-1 allele are sterile, heterozygous AG/ag-1;er/er individuals from the NW25 line were used to pollinate plants homozygous for a given icu mutation. One-half of the resulting wild-type F1 individuals carried the ag-1 allele, so that the Ag phenotype reappeared in their F2 progenies. Again, F3 families were derived from individual F2 plants displaying either wild-type or Icu phenotype to identify segregating double mutants.

Multiplex RT-PCR amplification and fluorescence-based semiautomated detection of gene expression:
Transcription of floral genes in leaf tissues was tested as described in PONCE et al. 2000 Down. Total RNA was isolated from excised rosette leaves or flowers, reverse transcribed, and multiplex RT-PCR amplified. Fluorescence-based semiautomated detection of the amplification products was carried out in a Perkin-Elmer (Norwalk, CT) ABI PRISM 377 DNA sequencer using the GENESCAN 2.1 DNA fragment analysis software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Each pair of primers was intron spanning, to differentiate between cDNA and contaminating genomic DNA amplifications, and included one oligonucleotide labeled with 6-hexachlorofluorescein phosphoramidite.

Light and scanning electron microscopy:
For scanning electron microscopy observation, plants were fixed overnight with 3% glutaraldehyde in 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). After being washed twice with phosphate buffer for 30 min, plant material was postfixed with a 1% OsO4 solution in 25 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) for 2 hr and washed again with phosphate buffer before being dehydrated through an ethanol series of increasing concentration (70, 80, 90, 95, and 100%). Plant tissue was then critical point dried with CO2 and covered with gold using a Balzers SCD 004 sputter coater. Micrographs of samples were taken in a JSM-840 Jeol (Tokyo) scanning electron microscope.

For light microscopy, plant material was fixed with FAA/Triton (1.85% formaldehyde, 45% ethanol, 5% acetic acid, and 1% Triton X-100). Samples were fixed overnight at room temperature after having had a vacuum treatment (400 mbar) applied for 30 min when in the fixative. Dehydration was carried out through a graded ethanol series (70, 80, 90, and 95%) at room temperature. After dehydration, the tissue was preincubated overnight at 4° in a solution containing 50% (v/v) JB-4 resin (Polysciences, Inc., Niles, IL) and 50% ethanol. The samples were then dipped at least twice in 100% JB-4 resin at 4° for 2 hr each time. Polymerization and embedding of the samples in 100% JB-4 resin were carried out following the instructions of the manufacturer. Sections of 4-µm thickness were cut using histoknives (Heraeus Kulzer GmbH) on a 2050 Supercut microtome (Reichert-Jung, Cambridge Instruments GmbH) and stained with 0.1% (w/v) toluidine blue. Photographs were taken in a Leica DMR microscope under bright-field illumination.


*  RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Determination of inheritance patterns of icu mutants:
We began our study by requesting 152 A. thaliana mutant lines from the NASC, all of them belonging to an already existing collection, the Arabidopsis Information Service (AIS) collection of Form Mutants, which was initially maintained by Kranz and includes mutants obtained by either Röbbelen or Kranz (KRANZ and KIRCHHEIM 1987 Down). These 152 mutant lines were first classified into several phenotypic classes in accordance with their leaf morphology as observed under our growth conditions. One such phenotypic class included 22 mutants that consistently presented leaves curling toward their adaxial side, a phenotype that we named Incurvata (Icu). Fourteen icu mutants have been considered for this study (see MATERIALS AND METHODS), whose leaf and rosette phenotypes are shown in Fig 1B–F, and Fig 2B–F, compared to their wild-type ancestor, the ecotype Enkheim-2 (En-2; Fig 1A and Fig 2A). Phenotypic and genetic analyses of AIS Form Mutants belonging to other phenotypic classes have been presented in SERRANO-CARTAGENA et al. 1999 Down. A study of the remaining 8 icu mutants will be presented elsewhere.



View larger version (27K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. Leaf phenotypes of incurvata mutants. The gross morphology of nine rosette leaves from wild-type En-2 and icu mutant plants is shown. From left to right, leaves in each row are ordered from early to late appearance. Pictures were taken immediately after the excision of leaves 32 days after sowing. Bar, 1 cm.



View larger version (110K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. Rosette phenotypes of single and double incurvata mutants. (A) Wild-type En-2 rosette. (B) clf-18/clf-18 mutant showing a flowering stem only 20 days after sowing, as well as Incurvata leaves. (C) icu2/icu2 mutant as early flowering as the clf-18/clf-18 mutant in Fig 1B, although its leaves curl up to a lesser extent. (D) hst-5/hst-5 mutant displaying strong curling in all its leaves. (E) icu4-1/icu4-1 mutant showing the strongest effects of the mutation in the first pair of leaves. (F) icu5/icu5 mutant rosette showing its characteristic weak Incurvata leaf phenotype. (G) clf-18/clf-18;icu2/icu2 double mutant displaying strongly involute leaves and a very small rosette as compared to each single mutant. (H) clf-18/clf-18;hst-5/hst-5, (I) clf-18/clf-18;icu4-1/icu4-1, and (J) clf-18/clf-18;icu5/icu5 double-mutant plants showing additive phenotypes consisting of early flowering and leaf curling slightly stronger than that of the single mutants. (K) icu2/icu2;hst-5/hst-5 double mutant. (L) icu2/icu2;icu4/icu4 and (M) icu2/icu2;icu5/icu5 double-mutant plants showing additive phenotypes consisting of uneven leaf surface and early flowering. (N) hst-5/hst-5;icu4-1/icu4-1 double mutant showing an extremely reduced rosette and strong curling both in the leaves and cotyledons. (O) hst-5/hst-5;icu5/icu5 and (P) icu4-1icu5/icu4-1 icu5 plants displaying similar phenotypes with a rosette similar to that of icu5/icu5 individuals but with stronger Incurvata leaf phenotype. Bars, 5 mm. Pictures were taken 20 days after sowing.

To determine the mode of inheritance of their phenotypes, mutants were crossed to the wild type. Differences were not found either between reciprocal crosses or between crosses involving a given mutant strain and Ler or En-2 ecotypes. The analysis of the corresponding F1 and inbred F2 progenies revealed that the Icu phenotype is caused by two semidominant (in lines N400 and N401) and one completely dominant (in N379) mutation, the remaining 10 being recessive (data not shown).

Complementation and linkage analyses:
Crosses to assess allelism were performed as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. The results of such a complementation analysis, shown in Table 1, indicated that five genes are represented among the icu mutants studied. The map positions of the ICU loci were determined after testing for linkage polymorphic SSLP markers in a population consisting of phenotypically recessive F2 individuals (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). The complementation groups were defined as follows.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 1. Complementation testing of incurvata mutants

INCURVATA1 (ICU1): This group consists of eight recessive alleles, carried by the N313, N328, N345, N346, N347, N350, N351, and N419 strains, respectively. Their mutant phenotype included involute leaves, small rosette size, early flowering (~15 days after sowing in mutant plants compared to 30 days after sowing in En-2 wild-type individuals), and a short, thin flowering stem (Fig 2B). In addition, the flowers displayed a phenotype reminiscent of some apetala2 (ap2) mutants (BOWMAN et al. 1989 Down; Fig 3B), and homeotic transformations of sepals into carpels and petals into stamens were observed mainly in the latest flowers. As three of these strains (N313, N328, and N350) had been reported to be the clf-1, clf-17, and clf-19 alleles of the CURLY LEAF (CLF) gene (GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down), we concluded that icu1 mutations are alleles of the CLF gene, five of which were first reported here. Additional support for this finding came from the allelism tests performed with pif-1 and pif-2 (photoperiod insensitive flowering; Table 1), mutations that were already known to be alleles of CLF (J. M. MARTÍNEZ-ZAPATER, personal communication). We were not able to get seeds from crosses involving N348, a line that was considered a putative allele of the ICU1 (CLF) gene solely on the basis of its phenotype. The N313, N328, N345, and N419 lines showed the most extreme Icu leaf phenotype, while N351 displayed the weakest (data not shown). Since our results coincided with those of other laboratories, we agreed to use the same allele numbering scheme (J. GOODRICH, personal communication), N345, N346, N347, N351, and N419 becoming, respectively, clf-18, clf-21, clf-22, clf-24, and clf-25.



View larger version (27K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 3. Flower phenotypes of single and double incurvata mutants. (A) Wild-type Enkheim-2 flower. (B) clf-18/clf-18 and (C) icu2/icu2 mutant flowers displaying partial absence of petals. (D) clf-18/clf-18;icu2/icu2 double-mutant flower showing extreme homeotic transformations similar to those of strong apetala2 mutant alleles lacking petals and most stamens. *, sepal displaying carpelloid features. Bar, 1 mm.

INCURVATA2 (ICU2): Only one recessive allele, carried by N329, was identified, which maps near the lower telomere of chromosome 5, 30.8 ± 7.0 cM away from nga129, and is 8.6 ± 3.2 cM distal to MBK5, with no linkage to nga76 detected. Involute leaves (Fig 1C and Fig 2C), early flowering (~15 days after sowing), and Apetala flowers (Fig 3C) were pleiotropic traits that icu2 individuals shared with clf mutants. However, not all the leaves of a given icu2 plant curled up (Fig 1C and Fig 2C) and not as strongly as those of clf mutants (Fig 1B and Fig 2B). Patches of epidermal tissue with a reduced cell size (Fig 4E), resulting in an uneven leaf surface, were consistently present as a regular feature of the Icu2 phenotype. Apparently, such patches were randomly distributed on the adaxial side of the leaves. Similar to clf plants, icu2 mutants showed low fertility and a thin flowering stem when compared to the wild type (data not shown).



View larger version (141K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 4. Scanning electron micrographs of the adaxial epidermis of wild-type and incurvata mutant leaves. (A) Leaf tissue of the Enkheim-2 ecotype displaying wild-type cell size and shape. (B) clf-18/clf-18 leaf. (C) icu2/icu2 leaf. (D) clf-18/clf-18;icu2/icu2 double-mutant leaf displaying reduced and abnormally shaped pavement cells and stomata. (E) icu2/icu2 leaf showing a patch of different cell size. Bars, 50 µm. Magnification is the same for A to D. Plant tissue was collected 20 days after sowing.

INCURVATA3 (ICU3): The only mutant allele of this locus, carried by N314, is recessive. This mutant displayed involute leaves (Fig 1D and Fig 2D) and early flowering, although less than clf and icu2 mutants (~20 days after sowing). In addition, the fertility of icu3 mutants was reduced due to morphological abnormalities in the gynoecium, where carpels were often badly fused (data not shown). The ICU3 gene locates on chromosome 3 at a very short distance from nga172, since no recombination events were found between these loci after studying 50 chromosomes. The mutant allele carried by N314 was named hasty-5 (hst-5) by TELFER and POETHIG 1998 Down, a designation that will be followed from here on.

INCURVATA4 (ICU4): The two alleles of this locus, carried by N400 and N401, were found to be semidominant since leaves from heterozygous plants differed from those of homozygous individuals in their weaker phenotype. The Icu phenotype of heterozygous ICU4/icu4-1 plants was more easily seen in the early stages of leaf expansion, when leaf curling was most conspicuous. Later in development, these leaves were more similar to those of the wild type. Interestingly, leaf curling in the first two leaves of the icu4-1/icu4-1 plants was more extreme than in adult vegetative leaves (Fig 1E and Fig 2E). Neither early flowering nor flower aberrations were observed in these mutants. The ICU4 gene has been mapped to chromosome 1, 31.5 ± 7.0 cM below T27K12-Sp6 and 16.9 ± 4.5 cM above nga128.

INCURVATA5 (ICU5): This complementation group is defined by a completely dominant mutation, carried by the N379 line, which did not display any flower abnormality. This gene also maps to chromosome 1, 8.2 ± 3.0 cM away from the AthACS telomeric marker. Leaves of icu5 individuals (Fig 1F and Fig 2F) were dark green and slightly curled up when compared to clf, hst-5, and icu4 mutants, with no phenotypic differences being observed between homozygous and heterozygous mutant plants. This strain was subjected to morphological analysis by RUFFER-TURNER and NAPP-ZINN 1980 Down, who found that the numbers of stomata and epidermal cells per surface unit were considerably higher than in its En-2 wild-type ancestor. Due to its compact rosette, we previously assigned this mutant to the Compact rosette (Cro) phenotypic class, which included AIS Form Mutant lines that were found to show an altered photomorphogenic response (SERRANO-CARTAGENA et al. 1999 Down). All the mutants studied in this work were grown in the dark, which revealed that the hypocotyl length was reduced only in icu5 in comparison to the wild type (data not shown).

Double-mutant analysis:
All the possible double-mutant combinations involving a representative allele from each of the above-described complementation groups were obtained in an attempt to identify genetic interactions between ICU loci (Fig 2, G–P). clf-18 was selected from the alleles of CLF because of its extreme leaf phenotype. Whereas clf-18/clf-18 and icu2/icu2 leaves and rosettes were similar in size (Fig 1B and Fig C, and Fig 2B and Fig C), those of clf-18/clf-18;icu2/icu2 double mutants were much smaller (Fig 2G). Observation under a scanning electron microscope revealed that the pavement cells in the adaxial epidermal tissue were smaller and more rounded in clf-18/clf-18;icu2/icu2 leaves (Fig 4D) than in both single mutants (Fig 4B and Fig C) and the wild type (Fig 4A). Interestingly, the vegetative leaves of a single plant displayed carpelloid features such as stigmatic papillae, suggesting that a shift from vegetative to reproductive fate had taken place (data not shown). Double-mutant flowers displayed a phenotype similar to that of strong ap2 alleles (BOWMAN et al. 1989 Down), that is, lacking petals and most stamens (Fig 3D). In these plants, some sepals showed homeotic transformations to carpels, becoming fused and presenting ovules and stigmatic papillae. All such abnormalities were stronger in the latest flowers. The phenotype of these double-mutant individuals was considered to be synergistic, suggesting that the wild-type functions of both genes may overlap in controlling the expression of AG in both leaves and floral organs. Other clf icu2 double mutants involving different clf alleles were also obtained, which showed similar synergistic phenotypes (data not shown).

hst-5/hst-5;icu4-1/icu4-1 rosettes (Fig 2N) appeared to be very small when compared to either the single mutants or the wild type. In contrast to hst-5 and icu4-1 mutants, cotyledons of double-mutant seedlings were strongly curled up and often showed a darker color (Fig 2N). These double mutants were late flowering and produced a large number of abnormal vegetative leaves before bolting. One out of three putative double mutants that were transferred to soil developed a fasciated stem and a structure similar to an aerial rosette (data not shown). Thus, the double-mutant phenotype was also interpreted as synergistic, since double-mutant plants showed properties that could not be predicted from the study of either single mutant.

The leaf phenotype of the remaining double-mutant combinations could be explained by mere additivity, suggesting that several independent pathways are necessary for a proper leaf expansion. For instance, clf-18/clf-18;icu5/icu5 and icu2/icu2;icu5/icu5 double mutants were early flowering and showed homeotic transformations of floral organs and their leaves were altered as in both recessive mutants, but their basal rosettes were reminiscent of those of icu5 mutants (Fig 2J and Fig M). The presence of patches of small cells in double mutants involving icu2, such as the icu2/icu2;icu4-1/icu4-1 and icu2/icu2;icu5/icu5 double mutants, may also be interpreted as a result of additivity (data not shown).

Histological analysis:
The Incurvata phenotype as seen in transverse section is illustrated in Fig 5 and Fig 6. Transverse sections cut across the entire leaf width provide an alternative view of the additivity of the Icu phenotypes, as shown by the more pronounced degree of leaf curling in double mutants such as icu4-1 icu5/icu4-1 icu5 (Fig 5D) when compared to their corresponding single mutants (Fig 5B and Fig C).



View larger version (38K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 5. Additivity of the Icu4 and Icu5 phenotypes as shown in transverse sections. (A) Wild-type Enkheim-2 leaf showing its characteristic flattened appearance. (B) icu5/icu5 and (C) icu4-1/icu4-1 mutant leaves displaying weak and intermediate Incurvata phenotypes, respectively. Since the midvein (indicated by an arrowhead) is at the center of the images it is clearly shown that the leaves curl toward their adaxial surface. (D) icu4-1 icu5/icu4-1 icu5 leaf showing the severe phenotype found in the double mutant. ad, adaxial surface. ab, abaxial surface. The genotypes of leaf sections in A, B, C, and D are the same as those of plants shown in Fig 2A, Fig 2F, Fig 2E, and Fig 2P, respectively.



View larger version (50K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 6. Transverse sections of icu mutant leaves. Transverse sections were cut through the leaf at the middle of the lamina. Photographs of transects were taken between the midvein and leaf margin. Sectioned rosette leaves are as follows: (A) First En-2 leaf. (B) Fifth clf-18 leaf. (C) First icu2 leaf. (D) Seventh icu2 leaf. (E) Seventh hst-5 leaf. (F) First icu4-1 leaf. (G) Fifth icu5 leaf. Bar, 50 µm.

Fully expanded Incurvata leaves were expected to reveal obvious differences from the wild type, allowing us to ascertain the nature of the cell defects responsible for the mutant phenotype. With this aim, photographs were taken of transverse sections through the leaf lamina, between the midvein and the leaf margin, at approximately the same distance from the leaf base as the leaf tip. However, tissue sectioning revealed no obvious perturbations that could easily explain the curvature of these leaves (Fig 6). Internal structure of icu4-1 and icu5 leaves was very similar to the wild-type En-2, in spite of the fact that icu4-1 leaf sections showed a noticeable Icu phenotype. The similarity between En-2 and icu5 could be explained by the weak Icu phenotype of the latter. All adaxial and abaxial epidermal cells, palisade and spongy mesophyll cells, and airspaces were found to be smaller in clf-18, icu2, and hst-5 mutant leaves than in those of En-2. Given that icu2 individuals have some leaves that display a strong Icu phenotype and others without curling, we analyzed both leaf types and found that cell size was only slightly reduced in noncurled icu2 leaves. However, icu2 leaves with strong involute phenotype had clearly smaller cells in all their leaf tissues, as did all clf-18 leaves. Transects of hst-5 leaves displayed a slight reduction in cell size. KIM et al. 1998 Down have determined that the clf-25 mutant shows a reduction in both the size and number of cells in vegetative leaves, concluding that the CLF gene affects both cell elongation and cell division. Although we have not performed any quantitative analysis, the number of cells in icu2 and hst-5 mutants may also be lower than in the wild type. However, a generalized reduction in the number and the expansion of cells would not be sufficient to explain the Icu phenotype.

Genetic interactions between the AGAMOUS gene and INCURVATA genes:
As mentioned above, clf and icu2 homozygous individuals displayed flowers similar to those of ap2 mutants, so that sepals and petals were often homeotically transformed into carpels and stamens or staminoid petals, respectively, abnormalities that were extreme in clf-18/clf-18;icu2/icu2 double mutants (Fig 3D). These transformations are known to appear as a result of the ectopic expression of the floral homeotic gene AG in the first two floral whorls, as was observed in transgenic plants constitutively expressing AG, which presented in addition leaves that were curled up (MIZUKAMI and MA 1992 Down). The above observation led GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down to test whether the Clf leaf phenotype was a consequence of the ectopic expression of AG in the leaves, where this gene is not expressed in wild-type plants (YANOFSKY et al. 1990 Down).

We aimed to test if not only CLF but also ICU2 played a role as repressors of AG both in wild-type leaves and flowers. Expecting that the Icu2 mutant phenotype would be suppressed in an ag background, we obtained icu2/icu2;ag-1/ag-1 double mutants in crosses performed in parallel with others aimed to isolate clf-18/clf-18;ag-1/ag-1 and clf-22/clf-22;ag-1/ag-1 double mutants. clf-18/clf-18 plants were crossed by NW25 individuals, which bear the recessive mutation ag-1, and F2 and F3 families (Table 2 and Table 3) as well as F4 families (data not shown) were studied. The leaf lamina normalized while the flowers displayed a clear Ag phenotype in double-mutant individuals. As expected, the leaf phenotype of clf-18 individuals was considered to be mainly a result of the ectopic expression of AG, as was found in the case of clf mutants by GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down. In spite of the similarity between clf-18/clf-18;ag-1/ag-1 and CLF/CLF;ag-1/ag-1 individuals, the double mutants could be distinguished due to their flowering time, which was intermediate between those of the wild-type and clf-18 plants (data not shown). In addition, double-mutant leaves showed a marginal configuration slightly different from that of the wild type, with more prominent teeth. Both the marginal teeth and the remnant early flowering characteristic of the clf-18 ag-1 double mutant are likely to result from the clf-18 mutation, independently of the ectopic expression of AG. However, we cannot exclude the existence of a residual AG expression in the ag-1 mutant, as indicated by GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down. No differences were observed in the interactions of clf-18 and clf-22 with ag-1 (Table 3), which excludes allele specificity as an explanation for the observed double-mutant phenotypes.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 2. Analysis of F2 families studied in a search for clf ag-1 and icu2 ag-1 double mutants


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 3. Analysis of F3 families studied in a search for clf ag-1 and icu2 ag-1 double mutants

A similar approach was followed to test if there was a role for AG derepression in the icu2 mutant. After selfing of F1 ICU2/icu2;AG/ag-1 individuals, their F2 inbred progeny could be classified in accordance with their leaf morphology, finding a 13:3 phenotypic segregation (wild type:Icu, {chi}2 = 0.55; n = 144) more likely than a 3:1 ({chi}2 = 5.78) (Table 3). Sixteen out of 31 F3 families established from icu2 homozygous plants segregated one-fourth of plants displaying both almost-wild-type leaves (Fig 7) and Ag flowers (Table 3), clearly indicating that ag-1 was also epistatic to icu2, the Icu2 leaf phenotype being suppressed by the ag-1 mutation. Similar to the clf-18/clf-18;ag-1/ag-1 and clf-22/clf-22;ag-1/ag-1 double mutants, icu2/icu2;ag-1/ag-1 plants also displayed a leaf marginal configuration slightly different from that of the wild type and a flowering time intermediate between those of wild-type and icu2/icu2 individuals.



View larger version (114K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 7. Suppression of the Incurvata2 leaf and rosette phenotypes. (A) Wild-type En-2 rosette leaf showing its characteristically flattened morphology. (B and C) icu2/icu2 mutant leaves. Although not every icu2 leaf displays curling, all of them show an uneven leaf surface. (D) icu2/icu2;ag-1/ag-1 double-mutant leaf displaying its wild-type phenotype. (E) Wild-type Ler, (F) icu2/icu2;er/er, and (G) icu2/icu2; ag-1/ag-1 rosettes. The latter double mutant displays a wild-type phenotype because of the suppression by ag-1 of the Icu2 phenotype. Bars, 1 mm (A–D) and 5 mm (E–G). Pictures were taken 20 days after sowing.

Ectopic expression of floral genes in Icu leaves:
Transcription of several floral homeotic genes was analyzed, including members of the MADS-box [AGAMOUS (AG), APETALA1 (AP1), APETALA3 (AP3), and PISTILLATA (PI); reviewed in RIECHMANN and MEYEROWITZ 1997 Down], and AP2/EREBP [APETALA2 (AP2); reviewed in RIECHMANN and MEYEROWITZ 1998 Down] families, together with that of the Polycomb group gene CLF (GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down). As shown in Fig 8, A. thaliana flowers and leaves were tested for the presence of transcripts of the above-mentioned genes (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). By using multiplex reaction mixes including six primer pairs (PONCE et al. 2000 Down), we obtained all the six possible amplification products from wild-type flower RNA (Fig 8A), whereas only AP2 and CLF transcripts were shown to be present in wild-type leaf RNA samples (Fig 8B). As regards mutant leaves, no differences were found between the wild-type pattern and those of hst-5, icu4-1, and icu5, all of which displayed noticeable amounts of AP2 and CLF messages (Fig 8, E–G). By contrast, clf-18 and icu2 leaves were shown to contain not only AP2 and CLF transcripts but also those from AG and AP3 floral genes (Fig 8C and Fig D). Ectopic transcription of AP1 was detected in icu2 and in the EMS-induced clf-61 allele (data not shown; this mutation was initially named icu1-10 in BERNA et al. 1999 Down), but not in clf-18.



View larger version (14K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 8. Electrophoregrams illustrating results of multiplex RT-PCR amplifications performed on total RNA from wild-type and mutant A. thaliana plants. (A) Ler flowers (a mixed sample of flower buds and mature flowers). (B) Ler vegetative leaves. (C–G) clf-18, icu2, hst-5, icu4-1, and icu5 vegetative leaves, respectively. Multiplex PCR products were obtained from reaction mixes including six primer pairs, designed to amplify segments of the genes AG, AP1, AP2, AP3, PI, and CLF. The horizontal and vertical axes indicate, respectively, the size of the electrophoresed molecules (in nucleotides) and the intensity of fluorophore emission (in arbitrary units of fluorescent signal strength). Each electrophoregram corresponds to a single gel lane and contains peaks that represent the molecules obtained from the multiplex PCR amplification of cDNA samples from leaves or flowers excised from individual plants at 21 days and 5 weeks after sowing, respectively. In the electrophoregram, produced by the GENESCAN 2.1 software, every peak is denoted with the name of the corresponding gene. The open peaks in the background correspond to internal molecular weight standards and the black peaks correspond to cDNA from the genes under study.

The Clf and Icu2 leaf phenotypes are modified by a locus on chromosome 2:
As indicated before, both the Clf and Icu2 pleiotropic phenotypes were found to comprise at least three different traits: involute leaves, early flowering, and Apetala flowers. Some observations, made among the F2 and F3 families studied to obtain the clf-18 ag-1, clf-22 ag-1, and icu2 ag-1 double mutants, suggested that some other gene may be modifying both leaf curling and flowering time in plants homozygous for either clf or icu2 mutant alleles. On the one hand, leaf phenotype and flowering time of clf/clf;er/er, as well as flowering time of icu2/icu2;er/er plants, were intermediate between those of wild-type and clf/clf;ER/ER or icu2/icu2;ER/ER individuals. On the other hand, the icu2/icu2;er/er individuals displayed a subtle leaf phenotype, sometimes difficult to distinguish from that of the wild type (Table 3). This may be one of the reasons why no mutant alleles of ICU2 have been found in a Ler genetic background (BERNA et al. 1999 Down). These results suggest that an allele modifying both the flowering time and leaf curling characteristic of clf and icu2 mutants exists in the Ler background but not in that of En-2. The corresponding gene must be tightly linked to ER or be this gene itself.


*  DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Most plant leaves are flattened structures exhibiting two sides that are similar in area despite their dissimilar dorsoventral identities and differences in the number, size, spatial arrangement, and differentiation of their cells. Hence, mutants deviating from the planarity that characterizes wild-type leaves can be regarded as impaired in putative mechanisms coordinating the growth of the dorsal and ventral tissues of the leaf and as such can be used for testing the existence of such mechanisms. In this article we report the genetic and phenotypic studies performed on several mutants from the AIS collection whose leaf laminae curl toward the adaxial side, a phenotype that we have called Incurvata. Our qualitative analyses, based on the study of transverse sections and scanning electron microscopy images of mutant leaves, show a general reduction in cell size, noticeable in the dorsal and ventral tissues of clf-18, icu2, and hst-5 mutants. In these mutants, the adaxial cells were always bigger than the abaxial ones, as happens in the wild-type strain. We have not quantitatively analyzed cell size and number in mutant leaves, a kind of study that may not be conclusive to ascertain changes in dorsoventrality. Indeed, KIM et al. 1998 Down were unable to explain leaf curling in clf-25 after performing a detailed study of cell size and number. While both parameters were reduced in clf-25, the ratio between the adaxial and abaxial epidermal cell surfaces was the same as in the wild type. Hence, no obvious relationship between leaf curling and changes in dorsoventrality could be established from our observations, the only exception being the patches of small cells on the adaxial epidermis of icu2 mutants, which suggest but do not demonstrate a shift to ventral fate. As a future perspective, the use of specific molecular markers for the adaxial and abaxial cell identities will help to elucidate whether fate changes actually occur in the mutants studied here.

The Icu phenotype may result from the disruption of different developmental phenomena, some of which have already been discussed by previous authors. One such process may be the establishment and/or maintenance of leaf dorsoventral asymmetry, whose perturbation may give rise to uncoordinated growth of the dorsal and ventral tissues of this organ. The PHANTASTICA (PHAN) gene of Antirrhinum majus is the first one reported to be necessary for the early discrimination of dorsal and ventral leaf identities, its mutations causing ventralization of dorsal tissues (WAITES and HUDSON 1995 Down; WAITES et al. 1998 Down). A second possibility is that represented by the Arabidopsis CLF gene, which seems to be instrumental in the restriction of floral homeotic gene expression domains, as suggested by the phenotype of clf mutants, whose leaves curl up as a result of the ectopic expression of AG (GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down).

When speculating on the molecular nature of mutations carried by the AIS mutants, it must be noted that a major disadvantage is the lack of information on how they were induced (BURGER 1971 Down). Moreover, as we do not know how the screening was performed, we cannot exclude that different mutations are actually identical by descent, being derived of a single M1 plant. Since most icu mutations have been found to be recessive, they probably correspond to hypomorphic or null mutations, the only exceptions being those of semidominant icu4-1 and icu4-2 and dominant icu5 alleles. If the latter were neomorphic, antimorphic, or ectopic derepression mutations, the corresponding genes might not necessarily be required for wild-type leaf development. A role for these genes in leaf development could be accepted, however, if they were hypermorphic alleles or mutations in haplo-insufficient loci. Genetic analysis involving triploid plants with a different dosage of dominant or semidominant alleles (TIMPTE et al. 1994 Down) will help to discriminate among some of the alternatives above.

Several floral genes are ectopically expressed in icu2 mutant leaves:
Our finding that the Icu2 phenotype is almost completely suppressed in an ag-1 mutant background suggests that ICU2 is also required to repress AG in the leaves. In addition, the synergistic interaction between icu2 and clf-18 suggests that ICU2 may be a member of the multimeric complexes involving Polycomb group proteins.

We have demonstrated the ectopic expression of AG and AP3 floral genes in the leaves of clf-18, clf-61, and icu2, but not in hst-5, icu4-1, and icu5 mutants. icu2 leaves in addition contained AP1 transcripts. AP1 and PI gene products were not detected in clf-18 mutant leaves, as described for clf-2 mutants by means of Northern blots (GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down). Hence, the expression patterns revealed by our multiplex RT-PCR method coincide with those obtained previously.

Our multiplex RT-PCR analyses of the ectopic expression of MADS-box genes in icu2 mutant leaves have allowed visualization and thus confirmation of the proposed interactions between AG and ICU2. Gene expression patterns were therefore correlated with genetic interactions revealed by the epistatic effect of ag-1 on icu2 and by the synergism between icu2 and clf-18. In addition, we have shown that not only AG but also AP1 and AP3 are misexpressed in icu2 leaves. Taken together, these observations demonstrate that the icu2 mutation causes ectopic expression of several floral organ identity genes outside their normal realm of action and indicate that the activity of ICU2 is required to repress AP1, AP3, and AG expression in wild-type leaves. The genetic and molecular evidences provided in this work clearly indicate that CLF and ICU2 play related roles, making the latter a candidate to belong to the Polycomb group of regulatory genes.

Three independent genetic operations at work in Arabidopsis vegetative leaf development:
The observation of phenotypic synergism between nonallelic mutations, as opposed to additivity, might be used as a criterion to identify genetic operations at work in a developmental process, as it has been done in a genetic analysis of Drosophila wing venation pattern formation (DIAZ-BENJUMEA et al. 1989 Down; DIAZ-BENJUMEA and GARCIA-BELLIDO 1990 Down). Regarding the lines studied in this work, double-mutant genotypes involving mutations belonging to different groups of synergism gave rise to additive phenotypes, as would be expected if their gene products act in an independent manner. By contrast, synergistic phenotypes may arise not only as a result of defective overlapping or redundant functions but also as the cumulative result of leaky mutations in genes acting on common targets or along the same pathway. Hence, the functions of the genes damaged in such double mutants displaying synergistic phenotypes are related. Three independent genetic operations at work in vegetative leaf development can be proposed, as suggested by the groups of synergism found in this work. It must be emphasized, however, that the three genetic operations mentioned above, which refer only to the five genes affected by the mutants studied here, represent only a subset of the spectrum of processes contributing to the making of a leaf. In fact, in a large scale screening for viable EMS-induced mutants that approached but did not reach saturation of the genome, 94 different genes were found to yield mutations causing abnormal leaf morphology (BERNA et al. 1999 Down).

The first genetic operation identified in this work is defined by mutations at two genes, CLF and ICU2, which contribute to the regulation of the expression of the floral homeotic gene AG both in leaves and flowers. We suggest that one of the functions of this group of genes is to act as "leaf identity safeguard genes" since they contribute to the restriction of the expression of floral organ identity genes in vegetative leaves. The cloning of CLF has shed light on how the expression of AG is silenced in wild-type leaves (GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down). The similarity of CLF to Enhancer of zeste, a member of the Polycomb group (Pc-G) of genes of Drosophila melanogaster (JONES and GELBART 1993 Down), suggests a role for this gene in maintaining the repressed state of the homeotic genes through cell divisions (MULLER 1995 Down) and highlights the similarity between the mechanisms involved in the control of homeotic functions in animals and plants, which appeared as a result of independent evolution. The Polycomb and trithorax groups were initially defined in animals on the basis of mutant phenotypes and later found to include genes encoding proteins that can bind to DNA forming part of multimeric complexes and participate in the maintenance of the transcriptional status of homeotic genes (KENNISON 1995 Down).

As far as we know, a patchy distribution of groups of small epidermal cells has been found only in transgenic lines overexpressing FILAMENTOUS FLOWER (FIL; SAWA et al. 1999 Down) but has not been previously reported for any A. thaliana leaf mutant, icu2 being the first one. A similar variegated pattern was found for a trithorax allele of D. melanogaster, originally named Regulator of bithorax (Rg-bx), which showed patches of mesothoracic structures in the metathorax (GARCIA-BELLIDO and CAPDEVILA 1978 Down). The patchy phenotype of icu2 plants may be presumed to arise from a failure in some mechanism of transcriptional memory, which could be clonally inherited throughout leaf expansion. Given that abaxial cells are smaller than the adaxial ones, the above-mentioned patches can alternatively be seen as a consequence of a change from dorsal to ventral cell fate.

The second genetic operation revealed by our analyses is defined by the synergistic interaction found between mutations at the HST (ICU3) and ICU4 loci. Although HST has been proposed to play a role in regulating phase change (TELFER and POETHIG 1998 Down), several facts point to an additional role for these genes in the regulation of meristem cell division and/or expansion. In the double mutants, development was delayed, producing an increased number of abnormally shaped leaves in an unordered manner, the epidermal cell size in the leaves was found to be reduced, and in some cases a fasciated stem developed. Further data sustaining our conclusion that the HST gene plays a role in a genetic operation different from that involving CLF and ICU2 come from the similar leaf phenotypes of hst ag and hst individuals that indicate that the Hst mutant phenotype is not due to ectopic expression of AG (TELFER and POETHIG 1998 Down). The genetic conclusions made by these authors on the basis of the phenotype of hst ag double mutants are reinforced in this work, given that we provide molecular evidence for the absence of AG transcripts in hst-5 leaves. The morphogenetic functions of HST and ICU4 in wild-type leaf organogenesis, however, are yet to be established.

The third genetic operation identified is represented by ICU5, whose only mutant allele does not interact with those affecting the remaining genes studied here. Since we have found that icu5/icu5 individuals present a disrupted photomorphogenetic response, one of the possible causes yielding an Icu phenotype is the perturbation of photomorphogenetic processes or those related to the synthesis, perception, or transduction of hormonal signals. Mutations at the SHORT HYPOCOTYL2 (SHY2) locus, originally identified during a screening for suppressors of the long hypocotyl phenotype of phyB, have also been reported to cause an Incurvata phenotype in rosette leaves (KIM et al. 1996 Down; REED et al. 1998 Down). In addition, mutations in the AUXIN RESISTANT3 (AXR3) gene also result in an Incurvata phenotype (ROUSE et al. 1998 Down). Both genes, SHY2 and AXR3, map on top of chromosome 1 and are obvious candidates for being allelic to ICU5.

Leaf identity safeguard genes:
Although a common evolutionary origin for leaves and floral organs is generally accepted, based mainly on the phenotype that results from removal of the three A, B, and C homeotic functions from floral organs (BOWMAN et al. 1991 Down), current evidence indicates that the expression of floral homeotic genes is not sufficient to determine a reproductive fate for leaves. For instance, the ectopic expression of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene AG in transgenic plants (MIZUKAMI and MA 1992 Down), clf mutants (GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down), or the icu2 mutant (this work) changes the reproductive fate of the first two floral whorls, but only affects leaves by producing a curled phenotype. Similar results have been obtained when the AG homologues from petunia (pMADS3; TSUCHIMOTO et al. 1993 Down), tomato (TAG1; PNUELI et al. 1994 Down), and cucumber (CUM1; KATER et al. 1998 Down) were expressed in leaves and flowers. The ovulata mutations of A. majus, which are ectopic expression alleles of the AG homolog plena, do not normally lead to floral organ development in bracts and vegetative organs, although in exceptional cases they may cause the presence of stigma-like cells at the leaf tips (BRADLEY et al. 1993 Down). Similarly, the blind mutation of Petunia hybrida is phenocopied by the constitutive expression of pMADS3 (TSUCHIMOTO et al. 1993 Down), and a transposition event at the pMADS3 gene has been reported to cause the same overexpression phenotype (KATER et al. 1998 Down). The blind mutant was originally suggested to be affected in a negative regulator of pMADS3 since its leaves and sepals curled up and its flowers were similar to those of ap2 mutants, although, once again, no transformations of vegetative into reproductive organs were reported (TSUCHIMOTO et al. 1993 Down). All the above-mentioned difficulties in inducing a reproductive fate in leaves by expressing floral homeotic genes gave support to the suggestion that additional factors are needed to specify such a fate in the inflorescence. An alternative explanation could be that the expression of floral homeotic genes in the leaves is restricted by controls that preserve the leaf organ identity. As such, the regulatory pathway involving CLF and ICU2 genes accounts for the absence of expression of AG and other floral genes in wild-type Arabidopsis leaves. Mutations in genes such as CLF and ICU2 would cause the ectopic expression of one or more floral genes in the leaves, which in turn would coerce leaf cells to divide and expand abnormally. Under the above hypothesis, a visible homeotic transformation of a leaf into any of the floral organs would be obtained only when there was failure of the genes preserving both the initiation and the maintenance states of the organ identity of the leaf. In our view, these so-called leaf identity safeguard genes might operate by repressing floral genes not only in the leaves but also in some floral organs as well as in other plant organs and developmental stages.

Even though transgenic plants expressing the floral homeotic genes APETALA3 (AP3) or PISTILLATA (PI) alone did not show any alteration in their vegetative leaves (JACK et al. 1994 Down; KRIZEK and MEYEROWITZ 1996 Down; GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down), doubly transgenic plants expressing both genes became early flowering and their leaves curled up (KRIZEK and MEYEROWITZ 1996 Down), as happens in clf mutants (GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down). Some cauline leaves were partially transformed to petalloid organs in these plants, a situation similar to that found in the bracts of transgenic plants expressing NAG1, the tobacco homolog of AG, which developed as carpelloid organs (MANDEL et al. 1992 Down). Following from this, KRIZEK and MEYEROWITZ 1996 Down proposed the existence of a floral character gradient throughout the plant, so that cauline leaves would have more floral character than the vegetative ones, thereby explaining why transformations occur only late in development. Additional support for the idea of Icu leaf phenotypes being caused by the deregulation of MADS-box genes comes from plants expressing an antisense methyltransferase construct. Apart from displaying an Icu phenotype, these transgenic plants showed reduced DNA methylation levels and ectopic expression of AG and AP3 in their leaves (FINNEGAN et al. 1996 Down).

Together with those that we have named leaf identity safeguard genes, other repressor genes are required for a proper leaf organogenesis. Such is the case of rough sheath2 (rs2), the maize ortholog of PHAN, which operates repressing KNOX genes in the leaves (TIMMERMANS et al. 1999 Down; TSIANTIS et al. 1999 Down). Ectopic expression of KNOX genes in rs2 maize mutants causes leaf cells to adopt a proximal fate, an observation that has been used to reinterpret the Phan phenotype as a proximalization of leaf distal tissues, making them unifacial such as those of the petiole (TSIANTIS et al. 1999 Down). Taken together, molecular evidence for the rs2 maize mutant phenotype, the reinterpreted Phan phenotype, and the results presented in this work indicate that several genetic operations have evolved to repress in the leaves genes whose activity is required in other developmental stages or domains.

Partial suppression of the Incurvata phenotype in a Ler genetic background:
A role for AG in determining flowering time has been proposed on the basis of the early flowering phenotype seen in transgenic plants constitutively expressing the gene (MIZUKAMI and MA 1997 Down), raising the possibility that the early flowering phenotype of the clf and icu2 mutants is caused by the ectopic expression of AG. As previously reported for clf mutants (GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down), we have found that the early flowering conferred by the icu2 mutation was only partially suppressed in an ag-1 genetic background, raising the possibility of a role for the ICU2 gene in regulating flowering time independently of AG. Nevertheless, as indicated for clf mutants by GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down, this may be merely a consequence of residual AG expression of the ag-1 allele.

In addition, we have found that the effect of clf and icu2 mutations on flowering time and leaf shape was reduced in lines bearing the er mutation. Thus, it is suggested that an allele of ER or other closely linked genes present in the Ler background might modulate the effects in the CLF and ICU2 genes. Actually, flowering time under long-day conditions was reported to differ by only 2 days between the clf-2 mutant and Ler, its wild-type ancestor (GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down), whereas we found a difference of 2 wk for clf alleles compared to the En-2 ecotype under continuous lighting. A likely explanation for this observation would be that the presence of the modifier in the Ler background delays the flowering time of clf and icu2 mutants at least under long-day conditions. In agreement with this, GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down observed minimum differences in leaf shape and flowering time between the wild type and the clf-2 ag-1 double mutant under long-day conditions with a Ler background. Such a modifier would explain why the differences in flowering time are more conspicuous in the En-2 ecotype and why no mutant allele of ICU2 was found in a screening for leaf mutants performed in a Ler background (BERNA et al. 1999 Down).

Role of ICU genes in regulating phase change:
Leaf phenotypes such as those of the icu mutants studied in this work are displayed by Arabidopsis transgenic lines simultaneously overexpressing two of the genes that regulate the competence to flowering. This is the case of a 35S::LFY 35S::FPF1 strain, whose leaves are similar to those of hst mutants (MELZER et al. 1999 Down). Constitutive expression of FPF1 (FLOWERING PROMOTING FACTOR1; KANIA et al. 1997 Down) causes early flowering and shortening of the juvenile phase, as inferred from the presence of abaxial trichomes in the earlier vegetative leaves (MELZER et al. 1999 Down), a trait shared by hst mutants (TELFER and POETHIG 1998 Down). In addition, lfy mutations do not modify flowering time in either hst or 35S::FPF1 plants, indicating that HST and FPF1 behave similarly (MELZER et al. 1999 Down). The synergistic nature of the phenotype of the hst-5 icu4-1 double mutant suggests that ICU4 is a novel component of the developmental pathway that involves HST and FPF1.


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the NASC for providing seeds of mutants, S. Gerber and J. M. Serrano for their technical help, J. M. Martínez-Zapater for kindly providing the pif mutants, and J. Goodrich, A. Martínez-Laborda, V. Quesada, A. Vera, and two anonymous referees for comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by PB91-0749, APC95-019, and PB95-0685 grants from the Ministerio de Educación y Cultura of Spain. H. Candela, J. M. Pérez-Pérez, P. Piqueras, and J. Serrano-Cartagena were fellows of the Conselleria de Cultura, Educació i Ciència of the Generalitat Valenciana. P. Robles was fellow of the Dirección General de Enseñanza Superior e Investigación Científica of Spain.

Manuscript received February 14, 2000; Accepted for publication July 21, 2000.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

BATESON, W., 1913 Problems of Genetics. Mrs. Hepsa Ely Silliman Memorial Lectures. Yale University, New Haven, CT.

BELL, C. J. and J. R. ECKER, 1994  Assignment of 30 microsatellite loci to the linkage map of Arabidopsis. Genomics 19:137-144[Medline].

BERNÁ, G., P. ROBLES, and J. L. MICOL, 1999  A mutational analysis of leaf morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana.. Genetics 152:729-742[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BOWMAN, J. L., D. R. SMYTH, and E. M. MEYEROWITZ, 1989  Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1:37-52[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BOWMAN, J. L., D. R. SMYTH, and E. M. MEYEROWITZ, 1991  Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 112:1-20[Abstract].

BRADLEY, D., R. CARPENTER, H. SOMMER, N. HARTLEY, and E. COEN, 1993  Complementary floral homeotic phenotypes result from opposite orientations of a transposon at the plena locus of Antirrhinum. Cell 72:85-95[Medline].

BRUTNELL, T. P. and J. A. LANGDALE, 1998  Signals in leaf development. Adv. Bot. Res. 28:36-42.

RGER, D., 1971  Die morphologischen mutanten des Göttinger Arabidopsis-sortiments, einschlieslich der mutanten mit abweichender samenfarbe. Arabidopsis Inf. Serv. 8:36-42.

CANDELA, H., A. MARTÍNEZ-LABORDA, and J. L. MICOL, 1999  Venation pattern formation in Arabidopsis thaliana vegetative leaves. Dev. Biol. 205:205-216[Medline].

AZ-BENJUMEA, F. J. and A. GARCÍA-BELLIDO, 1990  Genetic analysis of the wing vein pattern of Drosophila. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 198:336-354.

AZ-BENJUMEA, J., M. A. F. GAITÁN, and A. GARCÍA-BELLIDO, 1989  Developmental genetics of the wing vein pattern of Drosophila. Genome 31:612-619.

EDWARDS, K., C. JOHNSTONE, and C. THOMPSON, 1991  A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:1349[Free Full Text].

FINNEGAN, E. J., W. J. PEACOCK, and E. S. DENNIS, 1996  Reduced DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana results in abnormal plant development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:8449-8454[Abstract/Free Full Text].

GARCÍA-BELLIDO, A., and M. P. CAPDEVILA, 1978 The initiation and maintenance of gene activity in a developmental pathway of Drosophila, pp. 3–21 in The Clonal Basis of Development, edited by S. SUBTELNY and I. M. SUSSEX. Academic Press, New York.

GOODRICH, J., P. PUANGSOMLEE, M. MARTIN, D. LONG, and E. M. MEYEROWITZ et al., 1997  A Polycomb-group gene regulates homeotic gene expression in Arabidopsis. Nature 386:44-51[Medline].

HAKE, S., and N. SINHA, 1991 Genetic analysis of leaf development, pp. 187–222 in Oxford Surveys of Plant Molecular and Cell Biology, edited by B. J. MIFLIN. Oxford University Press, London.

HALL, L. N. and J. A. LANGDALE, 1996  Molecular genetics of cellular differentiation in leaves. New Phytol. 132:533-553.

JACK, T., G. L. FOX, and E. M. MEYEROWITZ, 1994  Arabidopsis homeotic gene APETALA3 ectopic expression: transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation determine floral organ identity. Cell 76:703-716[Medline].

JONES, R. S. and W. M. GELBART, 1993  The Drosophila Polycomb-group gene Enhancer of zeste contains a region with a sequence similarity to trithorax.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:6357-6366[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KANIA, T., D. RUSSENBERGER, S. PENG, K. APEL, and S. MELZER, 1997  FPF1 promotes flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 9:1327-1338[Abstract].

KATER, M. M., L. COLOMBO, J. FRANKEN, M. BUSSCHER, and S. MASIERO et al., 1998  Multiple AGAMOUS homologs from Cucumber and Petunia differ in their ability to induce reproductive organ fate. Plant Cell 10:171-182[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KENNISON, J. A., 1995  The Polycomb and trithorax group proteins of Drosophila: trans-regulators of homeotic gene function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29:289-303[Medline].

KIM, B. C., M. S. SOH, B. J. KANG, M. FURUYA, and H. G. NAM, 1996  Two dominant photomorphogenic mutations of Arabidopsis thaliana identified as suppressor mutations of hy2.. Plant J. 9:441-456[Medline].

KIM, G., H. TSUKAYA, and H. UCHIMIYA, 1998  The CURLY LEAF gene controls both division and elongation of cells during the expansion of the leaf blade in Arabidopsis thaliana.. Planta 206:175-183[Medline].

KOSAMBI, D. D., 1944  The estimation of map distance from recombination values. Ann. Eugen. 12:172-175.

KRANZ, A. R., 1978  Demonstration of new and additional population samples and mutant lines of the AIS-seed bank. Arabidopsis Inf. Serv. 15:118-139.

KRANZ, A. R., and B. KIRCHHEIM, 1987 Genetic resources in Arabidopsis. Arabidopsis Inf. Serv. 24.

KRIZEK, B. A. and E. M. MEYEROWITZ, 1996  The Arabidopsis homeotic genes APETALA3 and PISTILLATA are sufficient to provide the B class organ identity function. Development 122:11-22[Abstract].

MANDEL, M. A., J. L. BOWMAN, S. A. KEMPIN, H. MA, and E. M. MEYEROWITZ et al., 1992  Manipulation of flower structure in transgenic tobacco. Cell 71:133-143[Medline].

MCHALE, N. A., 1993  LAM-1 and FAT genes control development of the leaf blade in Nicotiana sylvestris.. Plant Cell 5:1029-1038[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MEINKE, D. and M. KOORNNEEF, 1997  Community standards for Arabidopsis genetics. Plant J. 12:247-253.

MELZER, S., G. KAMPMANN, J. CHANDLER, and K. APEL, 1999  FPF1 modulates the competence to flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 18:395-405[Medline].

MIZUKAMI, Y. and H. MA, 1992  Ectopic expression of the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS in transgenic Arabidopsis plants alters floral organ identity. Cell 71:119-131[Medline].

MIZUKAMI, Y. and H. MA, 1997  Determination of Arabidopsis floral meristem identity by AGAMOUS.. Plant Cell 9:393-408[Abstract].

MULLER, J., 1995  Transcriptional silencing by the Polycomb protein in Drosophila embryos. EMBO J. 14:1209-1220[Medline].

PNUELI, L., D. HAREVEN, S. D. ROUNSLEY, M. F. YANOFSKI, and E. LISFSCHITZ, 1994  Isolation of the tomato AGAMOUS gene TAG1 and analysis of its homeotic role in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 6:163-173[Abstract].

POETHIG, R. S., 1997  Leaf morphogenesis in flowering plants. Plant Cell 9:1077-1087[Medline].

PONCE, M. R., V. QUESADA, and J. L. MICOL, 1998  Rapid discrimination of sequences flanking and within T-DNA insertions in the Arabidopsis genome. Plant J. 14:497-501[Medline].

PONCE, M. R., P. ROBLES, and J. L. MICOL, 1999  High-throughput genetic mapping in Arabidopsis thaliana.. Mol. Gen. Genet. 261:408-415[Medline].

PONCE, M. R., J. M. PÉREZ-PÉREZ, P. PIQUERAS, and J. L. MICOL, 2000  A multiplex RT-PCR method for fluorescence-based semiautomated detection of gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana.. Planta 211:606-608[Medline].

POZZI, C., K. J. MÜLLER, W. ROHDE and F. SALAMINI, 1999 Leaf development, pp. 145–165 in Development: Genetics, Epigenetics and Environmental Regulation, edited by V. E. A. RUSSO, D. J. COVE, L. G. EDGAR, R. JAENISCH and F. SALAMINI. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.

REED, J. W., R. P. ELUMALAI, and J. CHORY, 1998  Suppressors of an Arabidopsis thaliana phyB mutation identify genes that control light signalling and hypocotyl elongation. Genetics 148:1295-1310[Abstract/Free Full Text].

RELICHOVA, J., 1976  Some new mutants. Arabidopsis Inf. Serv. 13:25-28.

RIECHMANN, J. L. and E. M. MEYEROWITZ, 1997  MADS domain proteins in plant development. Biol. Chem. 378:1079-1101[Medline].

RIECHMANN, J. L. and E. M. MEYEROWITZ, 1998  The AP2/EREBP family of plant transcription factors. Biol. Chem. 379:633-646[Medline].

ROUSE, D., P. MACKAY, P. STIRNBERG, M. ESTELLE, and O. LEYSER, 1998  Changes in auxin response from mutations in an AUX/IAA gene. Science 279:1371-1373[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FFER-TURNER, M. and K. NAPP-ZINN, 1980  Investigations on leaf structure in several genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Arabidopsis Inf. Serv. 16:94-98.

SAWA, S., K. WATANABE, K. GOTO, E. KANAYA, and E. H. MORITA et al., 1999  FILAMENTOUS FLOWER, a meristem and organ identity gene of Arabidopsis, encodes a protein with a zinc finger and HMG-related domains. Genes Dev. 13:1079-1088[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SERRANO-CARTAGENA, J., P. ROBLES, M. R. PONCE, and J. L. MICOL, 1999  Genetic analysis of leaf form mutants from the Arabidopsis Information Service collection. Mol. Gen. Genet. 261:725-739[Medline].

SINHA, N., S. HAKE, and M. FREELING, 1993  Genetic and molecular analysis of leaf development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 28:47-80[Medline].

SMITH, L. G. and S. HAKE, 1992  The initiation and determination of leaves. Plant Cell 4:1017-1027[Free Full Text].

TELFER, A., and R. S. POETHIG, 1994 Leaf development in Arabidopsis, pp. 379–401 in Arabidopsis, edited by E. M. MEYEROWITZ and C. R. SOMMERVILLE. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

TELFER, A. and R. S. POETHIG, 1998  HASTY: a gene that regulates the timing of shoot maturation in Arabidopsis thaliana.. Development 125:1889-1898[Abstract].

TIMMERMANS, M. C., A. HUDSON, P. W. BECRAFT, and T. NELSON, 1999  ROUGH SHEATH2: a Myb protein that represses knox homeobox genes in maize lateral organ primordia. Science 284:151-153[Abstract/Free Full Text].

TIMPTE, C., A. K. WILSON, and M. ESTELLE, 1994  The axr2-1 mutation of Arabidopsis thaliana is a gain-of-function mutation that disrupts an early step in auxin response. Genetics 138:1239-1249[Abstract].

TSIANTIS, M. and J. A. LANGDALE, 1998  The formation of leaves. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1:43-48[Medline].

TSIANTIS, M., R. SCHNEEBERGER, J. F. GOLZ, M. FREELING, and J. A. LANGDALE, 1999  The maize rough sheath2 gene and leaf development programs in monocot and dicot plants. Science 284:154-156[Abstract/Free Full Text].

TSUCHIMOTO, S., A. R. VAN DER KROL, and N-H. CHUA, 1993  Ectopic expression of pMADS3 in transgenic petunia phenocopies the petunia blind mutant. Plant Cell 5:843-853[Abstract/Free Full Text].

TSUGE, T., H. TSUKAYA, and H. UCHIMIYA, 1996  Two independent and polarized processes of cell elongation regulate leaf blade expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Development 122:1589-1600[Abstract].

TSUKAYA, H., 1995  Developmental genetics of leaf morphogenesis in dicotyledoneous plants. J. Plant Res. 108:407-416.

VAN LIJSEBETTENS, M. and J. CLARKE, 1998  Leaf development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 36:47-60.

VILLANI, P. J. and D. A. DEMASON, 1997  Roles of the AF and TL genes in pea leaf morphogenesis: characterization of the double mutant (af af tl tl). Am. J. Bot. 84:1323-1336[Abstract].

WAITES, R. and A. HUDSON, 1995  phantastica: a gene required for dorsoventrality of leaves in Antirrhinum majus.. Development 121:2143-2154[Abstract].

WAITES, R., H. R. N. SELVADURAI, I. R. OLIVER, and A. HUDSON, 1998  The PHANTASTICA gene encodes a MYB transcription factor involved in growth and dorsoventrality of lateral organs in Antirrhinum. Cell 93:779-789[Medline].

YANOFSKY, M. F., H. MA, J. L. BOWMAN, G. N. DREWS, and K. A. FELDMANN et al., 1990  The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene AGAMOUS resembles transcription factors. Nature 346:35-39[Medline].




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
H. Candela, R. Johnston, A. Gerhold, T. Foster, and S. Hake
The milkweed pod1 Gene Encodes a KANADI Protein That Is Required for Abaxial/Adaxial Patterning in Maize Leaves
PLANT CELL, August 1, 2008; 20(8): 2073 - 2087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
J. M. Barrero, R. Gonzalez-Bayon, J. C. del Pozo, M. R. Ponce, and J. L. Micol
INCURVATA2 Encodes the Catalytic Subunit of DNA Polymerase {alpha} and Interacts with Genes Involved in Chromatin-Mediated Cellular Memory in Arabidopsis thaliana
PLANT CELL, September 1, 2007; 19(9): 2822 - 2838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. M. Alonso-Peral, H. Candela, J. C. del Pozo, A. Martinez-Laborda, M. R. Ponce, and J. L. Micol
The HVE/CAND1 gene is required for the early patterning of leaf venation in Arabidopsis
Development, October 1, 2006; 133(19): 3755 - 3766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. Gonzalez-Bayon, E. A. Kinsman, V. Quesada, A. Vera, P. Robles, M. R. Ponce, K. A. Pyke, and J. L. Micol
Mutations in the RETICULATA gene dramatically alter internal architecture but have little effect on overall organ shape in Arabidopsis leaves
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2006; 57(12): 3019 - 3031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. Hricova, V. Quesada, and J. L. Micol
The SCABRA3 Nuclear Gene Encodes the Plastid RpoTp RNA Polymerase, Which Is Required for Chloroplast Biogenesis and Mesophyll Cell Proliferation in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2006; 141(3): 942 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Guyomarc'h, M. Benhamed, G. Lemonnier, J.-P. Renou, D.-X. Zhou, and M. Delarue
MGOUN3: evidence for chromatin-mediated regulation of FLC expression
J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2006; 57(9): 2111 - 2119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
I. Ochando, S. Jover-Gil, J. J. Ripoll, H. Candela, A. Vera, M. R. Ponce, A. Martinez-Laborda, and J. L. Micol
Mutations in the MicroRNA Complementarity Site of the INCURVATA4 Gene Perturb Meristem Function and Adaxialize Lateral Organs in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2006; 141(2): 607 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
Y. Chanvivattana, A. Bishopp, D. Schubert, C. Stock, Y.-H. Moon, Z. R. Sung, and J. Goodrich
Interaction of Polycomb-group proteins controlling flowering in Arabidopsis
Development, November 1, 2004; 131(21): 5263 - 5276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
G. Cnops, S. Jover-Gil, J. L. Peters, P. Neyt, S. De Block, P. Robles, M. R. Ponce, T. Gerats, J. L. Micol, and M. Van Lijsebettens
The rotunda2 mutants identify a role for the LEUNIG gene in vegetative leaf morphogenesis
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2004; 55(402): 1529 - 1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
W. Ni, D. Xie, L. Hobbie, B. Feng, D. Zhao, J. Akkara, and H. Ma
Regulation of Flower Development in Arabidopsis by SCF Complexes
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2004; 134(4): 1574 - 1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. M. Perez-Perez, M. R. Ponce, and J. L. Micol
The ULTRACURVATA2 Gene of Arabidopsis Encodes an FK506-Binding Protein Involved in Auxin and Brassinosteroid Signaling
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2004; 134(1): 101 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. M. Bollman, M. J. Aukerman, M.-Y. Park, C. Hunter, T. Z. Berardini, and R. S. Poethig
HASTY, the Arabidopsis ortholog of exportin 5/MSN5, regulates phase change and morphogenesis
Development, April 15, 2003; 130(8): 1493 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Perez-Perez, J. Serrano-Cartagena, and J. L. Micol
Genetic Analysis of Natural Variations in the Architecture of Arabidopsis thaliana Vegetative Leaves
Genetics, October 1, 2002; 162(2): 893 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. SKIPPER
Genes from the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA Lineages are Expressed in Developing Vascular Bundles of the Tuberous Rhizome, Flowering Stem and Flower Primordia of Eranthis hyemalis
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2002; 89(1): 83 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]