- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Bielawski, J. P.
- Articles by Yang, Z.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Bielawski, J. P.
- Articles by Yang, Z.
Rates of Nucleotide Substitution and Mammalian Nuclear Gene Evolution: Approximate and Maximum-Likelihood Methods Lead to Different Conclusions
Joseph P. Bielawskia, Katherine A. Dunna, and Ziheng Yangaa Department of Biology, University College London, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom
Corresponding author: Joseph P. Bielawski, Department of Biology, University College London, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom., j.bielawski{at}ucl.ac.uk (E-mail)
Communicating editor: M. K. UYENOYAMA
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Rates and patterns of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions have important implications for the origin and maintenance of mammalian isochores and the effectiveness of selection at synonymous sites. Previous studies of mammalian nuclear genes largely employed approximate methods to estimate rates of nonsynonymous and synonymous substitutions. Because these methods did not account for major features of DNA sequence evolution such as transition/transversion rate bias and unequal codon usage, they might not have produced reliable results. To evaluate the impact of the estimation method, we analyzed a sample of 82 nuclear genes from the mammalian orders Artiodactyla, Primates, and Rodentia using both approximate and maximum-likelihood methods. Maximum-likelihood analysis indicated that synonymous substitution rates were positively correlated with GC content at the third codon positions, but independent of nonsynonymous substitution rates. Approximate methods, however, indicated that synonymous substitution rates were independent of GC content at the third codon positions, but were positively correlated with nonsynonymous rates. Failure to properly account for transition/transversion rate bias and unequal codon usage appears to have caused substantial biases in approximate estimates of substitution rates.
IT is well known that synonymous substitution rates vary among mammalian nuclear genes (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Most studies report that genes with high GC content have lower silent substitution rates than genes with intermediate GC content (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A number of authors have reported that synonymous and nonsynonymous rates are positively correlated in mammalian genes (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To date, most studies of mammalian genes have employed approximate methods of estimating substitution rates. Although such studies intended to examine the effect of nucleotide content, their estimation procedures ignored unequal nucleotide frequencies. Most approximate methods also ignored the transition/transversion rate bias. Recent studies suggest that ignoring the transition/transversion rate bias or codon usage bias could lead to systematically biased estimates of substitution rates (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The objective of this study was to evaluate differences between ML and approximate methods and to evaluate their impacts on hypothesis testing. We compiled a sample of 82 homologous genes from three mammalian orders and estimated the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution for each gene using the ML method and two popular approximate methods (![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Sequence data:
We analyzed the aligned sequences of 82 nuclear genes from the mammalian orders Artiodactyla, Primates, and Rodentia. The data set is a composite of 49 genes analyzed by ![]()
![]()
Nucleotide composition and synonymous codon usage:
G + C content at third codon positions (GC3) and codon usage bias, measured using the effective number of codons (ENC; ![]()
Estimation of the numbers of synonymous (dS) and nonsynonymous (dN) substitutions per site:
ML analysis was performed using the PAML package (![]()
) and codon usage bias (see ![]()
Likelihood ratio tests of the assumption that the nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio (
=
) is homogeneous for all three mammalian lineages were performed by comparing two models of dN/dS ratios (![]()
0) for all three branches of the artiodactyl, primate, and rodent tree, whereas model 1 allowed independent dN/dS ratios (
A,
P,
R) for the three branches. Twice the log-likelihood difference under these two models was compared to a
2 distribution with d.f. = 2. This constitutes a likelihood ratio test of the strict neutral hypothesis. Model 1 also was used to obtain lineage-specific estimates of dS and dN for each gene.
Estimates of dS and dN also were computed pairwise between sequences using the approximate methods of ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
ML estimation can be performed under different model assumptions. We thus changed the models to investigate the effects of nucleotide (codon) frequencies and transition/transversion rate bias on estimation of dS and dN. If one compares a model in which
is fixed to 1 (the rate of transition is set equal to the rate of transversion) to a model without such a constraint, the difference in dS and dN indicates the bias that arises from failure to account for the transition/transversion ratio. Likewise, if one compares a model in which codon frequencies are assumed to be equal (1/61) to a model where codon frequencies are free parameters, the difference in dS and dN indicates the bias that arises from failure to account for unequal codon usage.
| RESULTS |
|---|
Nucleotide (codon) usage bias and transition/transversion bias are common features of mammalian DNA sequence evolution:
GC content at third codon positions (GC3) varied greatly among genes, ranging from 29 to 96%. Consistent with the suggestion that most mammalian genes are located in GC-rich isochores (![]()
Consistent with patterns of nucleotide bias, codon usage also varied greatly among genes, with ENC ranging from small values indicating highly biased codon usage (e.g., primate neurophysin 1 = 30.8) to large values indicating unbiased codon usage (e.g., rodent transforming growth factor ß1 = 60.4). Mean values of ENC were 46.8, 47.6, and 49.6 in artiodactyls, primates, and rodents, respectively. ML estimates of the transition/transversion rate ratio,
, indicated that a transition bias was also present in all the sampled genes (Table 1). Collectively, these data show that transition/transversion bias and biased nucleotide (codon) frequencies are common features of DNA sequence evolution in mammalian genes.
|
Lineage-specific estimation of substitution rates by maximum likelihood:
Results of ML analyses using model 0 (one dN/dS ratio) and model 1 (lineage-specific dN/dS ratios) are presented in Table 1. Using a likelihood ratio test, homogeneity of dN/dS ratio was rejected for 33 (40%) of the sampled genes (Table 1). Furthermore, there were 6 genes in the primate lineage (CD3
antigen, growth hormone receptor, insulin-like growth factor 1, interleukin 6 receptor, interleukin 7, osteopontin) and one gene in the artiodactyl lineage (interleukin 2) for which dN/dS ratios were >1.0. Because positive selection could adversely affect our investigation (![]()
Values of dN and dS were estimated separately for the artiodactyl, primate, and rodent lineages using model 1 (Table 1). Estimates of dS for these lineages were positively correlated (artiodactyl vs. primate, r2 = 0.1343, P = 0.0013; artiodactyl vs. rodent, r2 = 0.2993, P < 0.0001; primate vs. rodent, r2 = 0.2632, P < 0.0001). Similarly, estimates of dN were correlated between lineages (artiodactyl vs. primate, r2 = 0.5758, P < 0.0001; artiodactyl vs. rodent, r2 = 0.6401, P < 0.0001; primate vs. rodent, r2 = 0.5763, P < 0.0001). These findings are consistent with previous reports that substitution rates were variable among genes, and genes with higher substitution rates in one lineage tended to have higher rates in other lineages as well (![]()
![]()
Hypothesis testing using maximum-likelihood estimates of substitution rates:
The null hypothesis that the rate of synonymous substitution is independent of nucleotide composition was evaluated by linear regression of lineage-specific estimates of dS and GC3. There was a significant positive correlation between dS and GC3, with r2 = 0.45, 0.27, and 0.26 in artiodactyls, primates, and rodents, respectively. Because results were similar for all three lineages, only results for artiodactyl genes are presented in Fig 1.
|
Because nonstationary genes could have negative impacts on analyses of substitution rates (![]()
![]()
![]()
The null hypothesis that synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates are independent was evaluated by linear regression of lineage-specific estimates of dS and dN. In the artiodactyl and rodent lineages, the correlation between dS and dN did not differ significantly from zero (Fig 2, a and b). Primate genes, however, exhibited a significant positive correlation between dS and dN (Fig 2C). This plot has an outlier gene (growth hormone), and ![]()
![]()
![]()
|
The null hypothesis that synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates are independent was retested by using dS and dN estimated from the subset of genes defined by homogeneous dN/dS ratios. None of the comparisons exhibited a significant correlation (artiodactyls, r2 = 0.0297, P = 0.2367; primates, r2 = 0.0304, P = 0.2413; rodents, r2 = 0.0025, P = 0.7318). Similar results also were obtained from reanalysis of the subset of genes defined by stationary nucleotide frequencies (artiodactyls, r2 = 0.0003, P = 0.9074; primates, r2 = 0.0284, P = 0.2525; rodents, r2 = 0.0013, P = 0.7919). These results indicate that lack of a correlation between dS and dN was not a consequence of including genes with nonstationary nucleotide frequencies or with variable dN/dS ratios among lineages.
Hypothesis testing using approximate estimates of substitution rates:
The two null hypotheses were tested using two approximate methods (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Pairwise estimation of dS and dN using maximum likelihood is consistent with lineage-specific estimation of dS and dN:
Approximate methods are applicable only to pairwise sequence comparisons, whereas ML results discussed above were obtained from joint analysis of all sequences on a phylogeny. To facilitate direct comparison of approximate and ML methods, dS and dN were re-estimated in a pairwise fashion between the sampled lineages using ML (![]()
Reconciling differences between methods:
We have shown that transition/transversion bias is a common feature of DNA sequence evolution in these genes. The approximate method of ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
We also have shown that biased nucleotide (codon) frequencies were characteristic of the sampled genes. Both the methods of ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To understand why different methods produced different results concerning the correlation of dS with GC3 or dN, we examined the following two summary statistics: (i) the ratio of the approximate estimate of dS to the ML estimate of dS (dS ratio) and (ii) the ratio of the approximate estimate of dN to the ML estimate of dN (dN ratio). Plots of the dS ratio and dN ratio against GC3 illustrate the complexity of the biases involved in approximate estimation of dS and dN (Fig 5). For genes with highly biased nucleotide (codon) usage (GC3 > 60%), both approximate methods were consistent with our earlier analysis of codon models that ignored nucleotide (codon) frequencies (Fig 4B) in that dS was underestimated and dN was overestimated (Fig 5). However, when nucleotide (codon) bias was weak (GC3 < 60%), the two approximate methods differed in the direction of bias, with the method of ![]()
![]()
|
Estimates of dS and dN by the method of ![]()
![]()
![]()
To understand the difference between methods concerning the dS and dN correlation, we examined the relationship between dS ratios and ML estimates of dN and the relationship between dN ratios and ML estimates of dS. Although approximate methods produced highly biased estimates of dS (Fig 5), there was no significant correlation between this bias (dS ratio) and dN (e.g., artiodactyl vs. primate: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The preceding analyses suggested that failure of the approximate methods to properly account for the transition/transversion rate bias and unequal codon usage has resulted in seriously biased estimates of substitution rates. These biases appear to be the source of conflict between the methods. To test this prediction, we retested the two null hypotheses using substitution rates estimated from a codon model that was modified to ignore biased nucleotide (codon) frequencies and transition/transversion ratio. Linear regression of substitution rates estimated using this codon model yielded results that fit the prediction, i.e., there was no significant correlation between dS and GC3 (e.g., artiodactyl vs. primate: r2 = 0.027, P = 0.137), and there was a significant positive correlation between dS and dN (e.g., artiodactyl vs. primate: r2 = 0.124; P = 0.001).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Synonymous substitution rate is positively correlated with nucleotide composition:
Mammalian genomes exhibit a degree of structure in the form of long (>300 kb) compositionally homogenous regions of DNA known as isochores (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The hypothesis that synonymous substitution rates vary among different isochores was originally proposed by ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Our results have important implications for the hypothesis of ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The results of this study do not preclude a role for selection in the maintenance of mammalian isochores. It has been suggested that selection might be acting regionally to elevate GC content (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Synonymous substitution rate is independent of nonsynonymous substitution rate:
![]()
![]()
![]()
A potential source of correlation between dS and dN is variation among loci in codon usage and base frequencies. The significant correlation between dS and dN indicated by the approximate methods, which ignore codon usage bias, disappeared after we corrected for codon usage and base frequencies. Results of simulation studies (![]()
![]()
What is clear from both this study and the study of ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council grant (31/G10434) to Z.Y.
Manuscript received December 9, 1999; Accepted for publication July 20, 2000.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AKASHI, H., 1994 Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics 136:927-935[Abstract].
ALVAREZ-VALIN, F., K. JABBARI, and G. BERNARDI, 1998 Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in mammalian genes: intragenic correlations. J. Mol. Evol. 46:37-44[Medline].
BERNARDI, G., 1993 The vertebrate genome: isochores and evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:186-204[Abstract].
BERNARDI, G., 1995 The human genome: organization and evolutionary history. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29:445-476[Medline].
BERNARDI, G. and G. BERNARDI, 1986 Compositional constraints and genome evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 24:1-11[Medline].
BERNARDI, G., B. OLOFFSON, J. FILIPSKI, M. ZERIAL, and J. SALINAS et al., 1985 The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. Science 228:953-958
BERNARDI, G., D. MOUCHIROUD, C. GAUTIER, and G. BERNARDI, 1988 Compositional patterns in vertebrate genomes: conservation and change in evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 28:7-18[Medline].
BERNARDI, G., D. MOUCHIROUD, and C. GAUTIER, 1993 Silent substitutions in mammalian genomes and their evolutionary implications. J. Mol. Evol. 37:583-589[Medline].
BULMER, M., K. H. WOLFE, and P. M. SHARP, 1991 Synonymous nucleotide substitution rates in mammalian genes: implications for the molecular clock and the relationships of mammalian orders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:5974-5978
CLAY, O., S. CACCIÖ, S. ZOUBAK, D. MOUCHIROUD, and G. BERNARDI, 1996 Human coding and noncoding DNA: compositional correlations. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5:2-12[Medline].
EYRE-WALKER, A., 1991 An analysis of codon usage in mammals: selection or mutation bias. J. Mol. Evol. 33:442-449[Medline].
EYRE-WALKER, A., 1994 DNA mismatch repair and synonymous codon evolution in mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:88-98[Abstract].
EYRE-WALKER, A., 1999 Evidence for selection on silent site base composition in mammals: potential implications for the evolution of isochores and junk DNA. Genetics 152:657-683.
FILIPSKI, J., 1988 Why the rate of silent codon substitution is variable within a vertebrate's genome. J. Theor. Biol. 134:159-164[Medline].
FRANCINO, M. P. and H. OCHMAN, 1999 Isochores result from mutation not selection. Nature 400:30-31[Medline].
GAUTIER, N. and D. MOUCHIROUD, 1998 Isochore evolution in mammals: a human-like ancestral sequence. Genetics 150:1577-1584
GOLDMAN, N. and Z. YANG, 1994 A codon based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:725-736[Abstract].
GRAUR, D., 1985 Amino acid composition and the evolutionary rates of protein coding genes. J. Mol. Evol. 22:53-62[Medline].
INA, Y., 1995 New methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions. J. Mol. Evol. 40:190-226[Medline].
LANAVE, C., G. PREPARATA, C. SACCONE, and G. SERIO, 1984 A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 20:86-93[Medline].
LI, W.-H., 1993 Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36:96-99[Medline].
LI, W.-H., C.-I. WU, and C.-C. LUO, 1985 A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2:150-174[Abstract].
MAKALOWSKI, W. and M. S. BOGUSKI, 1998 Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution distances are correlated in mouse and rat genes. J. Mol. Evol. 47:119-121[Medline].
MATASSI, G., P. M. SHARP, and C. GAUTIER, 1999 Chromosomal location effects on gene sequence evolution in mammals. Curr. Biol. 9:786-791[Medline].
MIYATA, T., H. HAYASHIDA, R. KIKUNO, M. HASAGAWA, and M. KOBAYASHI et al., 1982 Molecular clock of silent substitution: at least six fold preponderance of silent changes in mitochondrial genes over those of nuclear genes. J. Mol. Evol. 19:28-35[Medline].
MORIYAMA, E. N. and T. GOJOBORI, 1992 Rates of synonymous substitution and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics 143:847-858.
MOUCHIROUD, D. and C. GAUTIER, 1990 Codon usage changes and sequence dissimilarity between human and rat. J. Mol. Evol. 31:81-91[Medline].
MOUCHIROUD, D., G. D'ONOFRIO, G. AISSANI, G. MACAYA, and C. GAUTIER et al., 1991 The distribution of genes in the human genome. Gene 100:181-187[Medline].
MOUCHIROUD, D., C. GAUTIER, and G. BERNARDI, 1995 Frequencies of synonymous substitutions in mammals are gene-specific and correlated with frequencies of nonsynonymous substitutions. J. Mol. Evol. 40:107-113[Medline].
MUSE, S. V. and B. S. GAUT, 1994 A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:715-724[Abstract].
NEI, M. and T. GOJOBORI, 1986 Simple methods for estimating the number of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:418-426[Abstract].
OHTA, T., 1993 Pattern of nucleotide substitution in growth hormone-prolactin gene family: a paradigm for evolution by gene duplication. Genetics 134:1271-1276[Abstract].
OHTA, T., 1995 Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in mammalian genes and the nearly neutral theory. J. Mol. Evol. 40:56-63[Medline].
OHTA, T. and Y. INA, 1995 Variation in synonymous substitution rates among mammalian genes and the correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous divergences. J. Mol. Evol. 41:717-720[Medline].
PAMILO, P. and N. O. BIANCHI, 1993 Evolution of the Zfx and Zfy genesrates and interdependence between genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:271-281[Abstract].
POWELL, J. R. and E. N. MORIYAMA, 1997 Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7784-7790
SACCONE, C., G. PESOLE, and G. PREPARATA, 1989 DNA microenvironments and the molecular clock. J. Mol. Evol. 29:407-411[Medline].
SHARP, P. M. and W.-H. LI, 1987 The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:222-230[Abstract].
SHARP, P. M. and W.-H. LI, 1989 On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 28:3398-3402.
SHIELDS, D. C., P. M. SHARP, D. G. HIGGINS, and F. WRIGHT, 1988 "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence for selection among synonymous codons. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:704-716[Abstract].
SMITH, N. G. C. and L. D. HURST, 1999 The effect of tandem substitutions on the correlation of synonymous and nonsynonymous rates in rodents. Genetics 153:1395-1402
TICHER, A. and D. GRAUR, 1989 Nucleic acid composition, codon usage, and the rate of synonymous substitution in protein-coding genes. J. Mol. Evol. 28:286-298[Medline].
WALLIS, M., 1996 The molecular evolution of vertebrate growth hormones: a pattern of near-stasis interrupted by sustained bursts of rapid change. J. Mol. Evol. 43:93-100[Medline].
WOLFE, K. H. and P. M. SHARP, 1993 Mammalian gene evolution: nucleotide sequence divergence between mouse and rat. J. Mol. Evol. 37:441-456[Medline].
WOLFE, K. H., P. M. SHARP, and W.-H. LI, 1989 Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Nature 337:283-285[Medline].
WRIGHT, F., 1990 The `effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene 87:23-29[Medline].
YANG, Z., 1999 Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML), Version 2. University College London, England.
YANG, Z. and R. NIELSEN, 1998 Synonymous and nonsynonymous rate variation in nuclear genes of mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 46:409-418[Medline].
YANG, Z. and R. NIELSEN, 2000 Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:32-43
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Andres, C. de Hemptinne, and J. Bertranpetit Heterogeneous Rate of Protein Evolution in Serotonin Genes Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2707 - 2715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Hurle, W. Swanson, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, and E. D. Green Comparative sequence analyses reveal rapid and divergent evolutionary changes of the WFDC locus in the primate lineage Genome Res., March 1, 2007; 17(3): 276 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Backstrom, H. Ceplitis, S. Berlin, and H. Ellegren Gene Conversion Drives the Evolution of HINTW, an Ampliconic Gene on the Female-Specific Avian W Chromosome Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 1992 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wu Comparative Genomics and Diversifying Selection of the Clustered Vertebrate Protocadherin Genes Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2179 - 2188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Axelsson, M. T. Webster, N. G.C. Smith, D. W. Burt, and H. Ellegren Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes Genome Res., January 1, 2005; 15(1): 120 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kudla, A. Helwak, and L. Lipinski Gene Conversion and GC-Content Evolution in Mammalian Hsp70 Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2004; 21(7): 1438 - 1444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Lercher, J.-V. Chamary, and L. D. Hurst Genomic Regionality in Rates of Evolution Is Not Explained by Clustering of Genes of Comparable Expression Profile Genome Res., June 1, 2004; 14(6): 1002 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Johannesson, P. Vidal, J. Guarro, R. A. Herr, G. T. Cole, and J. W. Taylor Positive Directional Selection in the Proline-Rich Antigen (PRA) Gene Among the Human Pathogenic Fungi Coccidioides immitis, C. posadasii and Their Closest Relatives Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2004; 21(6): 1134 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Filatov A Gradient of Silent Substitution Rate in the Human Pseudoautosomal Region Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2004; 21(2): 410 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Bierne and A. Eyre-Walker The Problem of Counting Sites in the Estimation of the Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Substitution Rates: Implications for the Correlation Between the Synonymous Substitution Rate and Codon Usage Bias Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1587 - 1597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|







