Genetics, Vol. 156, 645-663, October 2000, Copyright © 2000

A Screen for New Trithorax Group Genes Identified little imaginal discs, the Drosophila melanogaster Homologue of Human Retinoblastoma Binding Protein 2

John J. Gildea1,a, Rocio Lopez2,a, and Allen Shearna
a Department of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218

Corresponding author: Allen Shearn, Department of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218., bio_cals{at}jhu.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: V. G. FINNERTY


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

The proteins encoded by two groups of conserved genes, the Polycomb and trithorax groups, have been proposed to maintain, at the level of chromatin structure, the expression pattern of homeotic genes during Drosophila development. To identify new members of the trithorax group, we screened a collection of deficiencies for intergenic noncomplementation with a mutation in ash1, a trithorax group gene. Five of the noncomplementing deletions uncover genes previously classified as members of the Polycomb group. This evidence suggests that there are actually three groups of genes that maintain the expression pattern of homeotic genes during Drosophila development. The products of the third group appear to be required to maintain chromatin in both transcriptionally inactive and active states. Six of the noncomplementing deficiencies uncover previously unidentified trithorax group genes. One of these deficiencies removes 25D2-3 to 26B2-5. Within this region, there are two, allelic, lethal P-insertion mutations that identify one of these new trithorax group genes. The gene has been called little imaginal discs based on the phenotype of mutant larvae. The protein encoded by the little imaginal discs gene is the Drosophila homologue of human retinoblastoma binding protein 2.


CELL determination can be defined as the process by which cells become committed to differentiate into the structures characteristic of specific tissues. In Drosophila the determination of imaginal disc cells is initiated during embryogenesis but terminal differentiation does not begin until the pupal stage (reviewed by COHEN 1993 Down). The determined state must be maintained throughout the multiple rounds of cell proliferation that imaginal disc cells undergo during larval stages. At the molecular level, imaginal disc determination depends upon segment-specific expression of the homeotic genes of the bithorax and Antennapedia complexes. These genes encode homeobox containing transcription factors that are responsible for expression of specific target genes (e.g., GOULD and WHITE 1992 Down; reviewed by WHITE et al. 1992 Down). The initial pattern of expression of homeotic genes during early embryogenesis, i.e., the initiation of determination, depends upon the products of the gap and pair rule genes (AKAM 1987 Down). However, maintenance of segment-specific expression of homeotic genes must depend on some other mechanisms since the gap and pair rule genes are not expressed late in embyrogenesis or during larval development (AKAM 1987 Down). This maintenance function has been ascribed to cross-regulation among homeotic genes themselves (HAFEN et al. 1984 Down; CARROLL et al. 1986 Down), to auto-regulation (BERGSON and MCGINNIS 1990 Down), and to two other groups of genes, the Polycomb group (reviewed in SIMON 1995 Down) and the trithorax group (reviewed in KENNISON and TAMKUN 1992 Down). The proteins encoded by the Polycomb group are postulated to prevent transcription of homeotic genes outside of their normal expression domain and the proteins encoded by the trithorax group are postulated to allow transcription of homeotic genes within their normal expression domain. This paradigm is based primarily on the analysis of mutant phenotypes but also on some biochemical studies.

The Polycomb (Pc) gene was originally identified by P. Lewis (LINDSLEY and ZIMM 1992 Down) as a dominant mutation that causes sex comb teeth to form on the second and third legs of male Drosophila melanogaster (PURO and NYGREN 1975 Down). E. B. LEWIS 1978 Down studied the phenotype of embryonic lethal Pc homozygotes and recognized that Polycomb encodes a negative trans-regulatory factor of the bithorax complex. Indeed, Polycomb mutations cause ectopic expression of genes of both the bithorax and Antennapedia complexes (WEDEEN et al. 1986 Down; BUSTURIA and MORATA 1988 Down). E. B. LEWIS 1968 Down identified a dominant enhancer of bithorax complex mutations and suggested that this gene encodes a positive trans-regulatory factor of the bithorax complex. It was subsequently discovered that this mutation originally called Rg-bx and now called trxD is an allele of a gene now know as trithorax (INGHAM and WHITTLE 1980 Down). BREEN and HARTE 1991 Down, BREEN and HARTE 1993 Down showed that trithorax mutations cause reduced expression of genes of both the bithorax and Antennapedia complexes. The antagonistic action between the products of Polycomb and trithorax and their sensitivity to gene dosage was first reported by CAPDEVILA and GARCIA-BELLIDO 1981 Down. Subsequently, mutations were recovered in other genes that cause phenotypes like mutations in Polycomb or trithorax.

When heterozygous, Polycomb null mutations cause transformations of the second and third legs of adult flies to the morphology of first legs. In males this includes the presence of sex combs, which gave rise to the name of the gene. When homozygous, Polycomb null mutations cause transformations of the thoracic and abdominal segments to the morphology of the eighth abdominal segment (LEWIS 1978 Down). The Polycomb group was defined by JURGENS 1985 Down as genes in which mutations cause phenotypes that "resemble weak Polycomb mutations in both their dominant adult and recessive embryonic phenotypes." He observed that homozygosis for mutations in pairs of Polycomb group genes caused an enhanced phenotype and used this observation as an assay to screen deficiencies that were then available for ones that enhance the phenotype of Polycomb group mutations. He estimated that there are ~40 Polycomb group genes in the genome. This estimate is based on the assumption that such enhancement indicates a Polycomb group gene uncovered by the deletion. Deficiencies that enhance the Polycomb phenotype but do not by themselves express a phenotype like Polycomb would inflate the estimate of Polycomb group genes. Another property shared by Polycomb group genes is that mutations in these genes show intergenic noncomplementation, i.e., the phenotype caused by heterozygosis for a Polycomb mutation is enhanced by heterozygosis for a mutation in another Polycomb group gene (CAMPBELL et al. 1995 Down). The similar phenotypes of mutations in Polycomb group genes and their intergenic noncomplementation has suggested that the products of these genes act via a multimeric protein complex. Such a complex has been detected in embryos (FRANKE et al. 1992 Down). It contains 10 to 15 proteins including the products of at least two Polycomb group genes, Polycomb and Polyhomeotic. As expected for components of a multimeric complex, the products of Polycomb, PC, and Polyhomeotic, PH, are localized at identical positions on polytene chromosomes (FRANKE et al. 1992 Down). Neither PC nor PH demonstrates sequence-specific DNA binding; however, PHO, the product of the pleiohomeotic gene, may be responsible for sequence-specific DNA binding of the Polycomb multimeric complex (BROWN et al. 1998 Down). It has been postulated that the products of Polycomb group genes repress transcription at the level of chromatin structure. Indeed the Polycomb protein has been detected in inactive chromatin isolated from the bithorax complex (ORLANDO and PARO 1993 Down; STRUTT and PARO 1997 Down).

The product of posterior sex combs (PSC) also binds to polytene chromosomes (BRUNK et al. 1991 Down). RASTELLI et al. 1993 Down found that many of the PSC binding sites are similar to PC and PH sites. Moreover, they found that PSC binding to polytene chromosomes was normal in larvae homozygous for a temperature-sensitive allele of Enhancer of zeste, [E(z)], when raised at a permissive temperature, but dramatically reduced when these larvae were raised at a nonpermissive temperature. This result indicates that E(z) function is required for normal PSC binding and is consistent with the hypothesis that PSC and E(Z) are also involved in the Polycomb multimeric protein complex. E(Z) is a nuclear protein that is bound to salivary gland polytene chromosomes (CARRINGTON and JONES 1996 Down). Direct protein:protein interactions of some Polycomb group gene products have been documented, as examples, PSC, PH, and PC (KYBA and BROCK 1998A Down), PH and SCM, the product of Sex combs on midleg (KYBA and BROCK 1998B Down), and ESC, the product of extra sex combs, and E(Z) (JONES et al. 1998 Down; TIE et al. 1998 Down). However, PSC, SCM, ESC, and E(Z) have not been shown to be components of the purified Polycomb multimeric protein complex. KYBA and BROCK 1998A Down have suggested that Polycomb group gene products may actually be components of several different multimeric complexes. If so, that would make them analogous to the trithorax group gene products that have now been shown to be components of several different multimeric complexes (PAPOULAS et al. 1998 Down) as described below.

When heterozygous, trithorax mutations cause either no transformations or an extremely low frequency of transformations of the third thoracic segment to the second segment (CAPDEVILA and GARCIA-BELLIDO 1981 Down). However, when homozygous, trithorax mutations cause transformations of the first and third thoracic segments to the second segment and anterior transformations of the abdominal segments (INGHAM and WHITTLE 1980 Down). Other genes in which mutations cause similar phenotypes have been classified as members of the trithorax group (SHEARN 1989 Down). Trithorax group genes have been identified by several approaches. Two of the trithorax group genes, ash1 and ash2, were identified as pupal lethal mutations that disrupt imaginal disc development (SHEARN et al. 1971 Down). Most of the other trithorax group genes were identified in a genetic screen for dominant suppressors of the adult phenotypes of dominant Polycomb or Antennapedia mutations (KENNISON and TAMKUN 1988 Down). Like mutations in Polycomb group genes, mutations in trithorax group genes show intergenic noncomplementation, i.e., heterozygosis for recessive mutations in two different trithorax group genes can cause an adult mutant phenotype (SHEARN 1989 Down). The phenotype can include partial transformations of the first and third thoracic segments to the second thoracic segment and partial anterior transformations of the abdominal segments. The similar phenotypes of mutations in trithorax group genes and their intergenic noncomplementation has suggested that the products of these genes also act via multimeric protein complexes. Indeed, a 2-MD complex has been detected in embryos that contains the products of the trithorax group genes, brahma (DINGWALL et al. 1995 Down), snr1 (DINGWALL et al. 1995 Down), and moira (PAPOULAS et al. 1998 Down; CROSBY et al. 1998 Down). However, this complex does not contain the products of the trithorax group gene ash1, which is in a different 2-MD complex (PAPOULAS et al. 1998 Down) that also contains the product of the trithorax gene (ROZOVSKAIA et al. 1999 Down) nor does it contain the product of ash2, which is in a 0.5-MD complex (PAPOULAS et al. 1998 Down).

Taking advantage of the phenomenon of intergenic noncomplementation, we have screened a large fraction of the Drosophila genome to look for new trithorax group genes. We crossed females heterozygous for an ash1 mutation to males heterozygous for one of 133 deficiencies and examined the progeny doubly heterozygous for the ash1 mutation and the deficiency for homeotic transformations. In this way we identified regions of the genome with candidate trithorax group genes.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Fly culture:
All crosses were performed at 20° in shell vials with yeast, cornmeal, molasses, and agar medium containing tegosept and proprionic acid as mold inhibitors.

Assay for ash1 complementation:
Five females heterozygous for an ash1 (brahma or trithorax) mutation were mated to five males heterozygous for a deletion, insertion, or other mutation, incubated in vials containing a small piece of paper, and transferred daily. Special care was taken to prevent overcrowding since conditions that slow development can increase the penetrance and expressivity of the homeotic transformations being scored. Adult flies were examined within 24 hr of eclosion. Papering the vials and examining the flies as they eclose were essential for reproducible results since flies with transformations preferentially get stuck in the food. Individual flies of the correct genotype were examined under the dissecting scope for thoracic homeotic transformations including apical and preapical bristles on metathoracic legs, sternopleural bristles on the proximal lateral metathorax, bristles and wing blade on halteres, bristles on the metanotum, preapical and apical bristles on the prothoracic legs, and sternopleural bristles on the proximal lateral prothorax. The statistical significance of differences in penetrance were evaluated by the G-test (SOKAL and ROHLF 1969 Down). Only in cases with a high penetrance of third leg to second leg transformations was a low penetrance of haltere to wing and first leg to second leg transformations also observed. A similar result was previously reported for ash1 and trithorax double heterozygotes (SHEARN 1989 Down) and ash1 and brahma double heterozygotes (TRIPOULAS et al. 1994 Down). Although differences in expressivity were not quantitated, the expressivity was more extreme in cases where the penetrance was higher and more extreme in triple heterozygotes than double heterozygotes.

Assay for suppression of Polycomb:
Five females with the genotype Df(3L)Asc/TM3 were placed in shell vials with five males of a candidate deficiency or mutation balanced over CyO or TM3 and transferred daily. Progeny heterozygous for Df(3L)Asc, which deletes Polycomb, and heterozygous for a candidate deficiency or mutation were scored for the presence of sex comb teeth on the mesothoracic and metathoracic legs. The control flies, Df(3L)Asc/+, were progeny of Df(3L)Asc/TM3 females mated to Canton-S wild-type males.

Stage of lethality:
To identify mutant larvae, stocks were constructed in which the X chromosomes are mutant for yellow and the mutant l(2)10424, l(2)k06801, or Df(2L)cl-h3 chromosomes are heterozygous with a CyO balancer that carries the wild-type allele of yellow (TIMMONS et al. 1993 Down). This allows mutant larvae to be identified by the yellow mutant phenotype. Five females heterozygous for l(2)10424 or l(2)k06801 were mated to five males heterozygous for l(2)10424, l(2)k06801, or Df(2L)cl-h3, incubated in vials containing a small piece of paper, and transferred daily. Homozygous or trans-heterozygous larvae were separated from nonmutant larvae, counted, and allowed to continue development. The stage of lethality is given as the stage when half of the mutant larvae ceased to develop.

P-element excision:
l(2)10424 is a ry+ lethal P-element insertion on the second chromosome with the genotype, p[ry+]/CyO ; ry-/ry-. Males from this stock were mass mated to females that have a source of transposase, Sp/CyO ; {Delta}2-3 Sb ry-/TM6. Male progeny of this cross with the genotype p[ry+]/CyO ; {Delta}2-3 Sb ry-/ry- were mated to female progeny with the genotype Sp/CyO ; {Delta}2-3 Sb ry-/ry-. Individual male ry- progeny with genotype p[ry+]rev/CyO ; ry-/ry- were mated to females of the original P-element stock, and males and females of the genotype p[ry+]rev/CyO ; ry-/ry- were mated to each other. The presence of Cy+, ry- progeny from this cross indicates that the lethal P-element insertion was precisely excised. Five males from each of these revertant stocks were mated to five ash1/TM3 females, and the p[ry+]rev/+ ; +/ash1 progeny were examined for the presence of transformations.

Mounting and photography:
Adults were dissected in PBS, transferred to a drop of Faure's medium on a glass slide, and covered with a coverslip. A small weight was placed on the coverslip for at least 24 hr to assure proper spreading. Third instar larvae were dissected in PBS, brains and imaginal disks were transferred to a drop of Permount on a glass slide, covered with a coverslip, and sealed. All photographs were taken with TMAX 100 film using a Zeiss Axioplan microscope.

Genomic DNA purification and plasmid rescue:
Plasmid rescue of DNA flanking a P-element insertion was performed essentially by the method of PIRROTTA 1986 Down.

Plasmid DNA purification and sequencing:
All plasmid DNA purifications were performed using a QIAGEN (Chatsworth, CA) plasmid purification kit as suggested in the supplied handbook. DNA sequencing was performed on a Perkin-Elmer (Norwalk, CT) 310 fluorescent sequencer using dye-terminator chemistries according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sequence assembly and comparison to genomic DNA from the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project was performed using the AutoAssembler program from Perkin-Elmer. Amino acid motifs were determined using the Profilescan program and PsortII programs. Protein alignments were performed on the Blast server at the National Center for Biotechnology Information.


*  RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Deficiency screen:
The transformations of the third thoracic segment to the second thoracic segment in ash1 mutant homozygotes are caused by loss of Ultrabithorax expression and ectopic expression of Antennapedia in halteres and loss of Ultrabithorax expression and increased expression of Antennapedia in third legs (LAJEUNESSE and SHEARN 1995 Down). Recessive mutations in other genes of the trithorax group show intergenic noncomplementation with recessive mutations in ash1 (SHEARN 1989 Down). The most common feature of the mutant phenotype is a partial transformation of the third leg to the second leg, as illustrated in Fig 1. The presence of an ectopic apical bristle on the third leg is an example of lesser expressivity (Fig 1A). The presence of ectopic apical, preapical, and sternopleural bristles is an example of greater expressivity (Fig 1B and Fig C). The penetrance of this transformation depends upon the alleles examined. To identify additional members of the trithorax group, we screened Drosophila deficiencies for intergenic noncomplementation with ash1RE418, also know as ash14, an antimorphic mutation in ash1 (TRIPOULAS et al. 1996 Down). The 133 deficiencies tested represent 70% of the D. melanogaster genome. We found that 107 of the deficiencies fully complemented ash1RE418. The data for just 4 of them, Df(2R)eve1.27, Df(2R)en30, Df(2R)JP1, and Df(3R)Kx1, are presented in Table 1. The 26 other deficiencies, representing 21 different cytogenetic regions, showed intergenic noncomplementation.



View larger version (31K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. Expressivity of third leg transformations. (A) Minimal transformation caused by intergenic noncomplementation. One of two third legs has an apical bristle (arrow) on the distal tibia, which is characteristic of second legs (genotype is +/SceD1 ; brm2/+); the other third leg appears normal. Neither leg has sternopleural bristles that are characteristic of normal second legs. (B and C) More extreme transformations caused by enhancement of double mutant phenotype. (B) Both third legs have apical (arrows) and preapical (arrowheads) bristles on the distal tibia, which are characteristic of second legs. The second leg (2L) serves as a positive control showing both an apical and preapical bristle (genotype is +/SceD1 ; brm2 trxe2/++). (C) One of the third legs has sternopleural bristles (arrow), which are characteristic of second legs (arrowhead). The same leg has both apical and preapical bristles (not shown; genotype is +/SceD1 ; brm2 trxe2/++).


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 1. Some deficiencies that fail to complement mutations in trithorax group genes uncover Polycomb group genes

Two of the noncomplementing deficiencies were expected not to complement ash1 mutations because they uncover the homeotic selector genes (Fig 2). Df(3R)p115 (89B7-8;89E7-8) uncovers the bithorax complex and the trithorax group gene moira, and Df(3R)Scr (84A1-2;84B1-2) uncovers the Antennapedia complex. Three of the noncomplementing deficiencies uncover known trithorax group genes (Fig 2). Df(3L)brm11 (71F1-4;72D1-10) uncovers brahma; brahma loss-of-function mutations have previously been shown to not complement ash1 mutations (TRIPOULAS et al. 1994 Down). Df(3R)red1 (88B1;88D3-4) uncovers trithorax; trithorax loss-of-function mutations have previously been shown to not complement ash1 mutations (SHEARN 1989 Down). Df(3R)e-n19 (93B;94) uncovers modifier of mdg4 also known as E(var)3-93D (DORN et al. 1993 Down); loss-of-function mutations in this gene have been shown to not complement ash1 mutations (GERASIMOVA and CORCES 1998 Down). Finding intergenic noncomplementation of ash1 mutations among deficiencies that uncover known homeotic selector genes and trithorax group genes suggested that the screen was working as expected and that some of the other noncomplementing deficiencies might uncover new trithorax group genes.



View larger version (30K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. A collection of 133 deficiencies were crossed to an antimorphic allele of ash1RE418 (also known as ash14) and scored for the penetrance of homeotic transformations. Open bars indicate complementation, i.e., no homeotic transformations. Solid bars indicate intergenic noncomplementation with ash1RE418.

Five of the noncomplementing deficiencies Df(1)C52 (8E-9C-D), Df(2R)m41A4 (41A), Df(2R)X58-7 (58A1-2; 58E4-10), Df(2R)M60E (60E2-3;60E11-12), and Df(3R) XTA1 (96B;96D) uncover Minute genes (Fig 2). This was verified by crossing to smaller deficiencies of each of these regions and/or by crossing to the corresponding Minute mutations (data not shown). We had previously observed that some Minute mutations show intergenic noncomplementation with ash1 mutations (A. SHEARN, unpublished observation); however, the significance of these observations is not clear.

Mutations in some Polycomb group genes fail to complement mutations in trithorax group genes:
Six of the 26 noncomplementing deficiencies in 5 distinct regions, Df(2R)en-A (47D3;48B2-5), Df(2R)CX1 (49C1-4;50C23-D2), Df(2R)vg-B (49B2-3;49E7-F1), Df(2R)trix (51A1-2; 51B6), Df(3L)lxd6 (67E1-2;68C1-2), and Df(3R)by62 (85D11-14;85F6) delete regions that contain genes of the Polycomb group (Fig 2; Table 1). This result was surprising because loss of Polycomb group gene function is expected to suppress, not enhance, the phenotype of a loss-of-function or antimorphic mutation in a trithorax group gene. Df(3L)lxd6 (67E1-2;68C1-2) uncovers the Enhancer of zeste (also known as polycombeotic) gene. We have already reported that amorphic mutations in Enhancer of zeste show intergenic noncomplementation with ash1 mutations (LAJEUNESSE and SHEARN 1996 Down). We tested mutations in the Polycomb group genes uncovered by the others of these 5 deficiencies for intergenic noncomplementation with the antimorphic mutation, ash1RE418, and with an amorphic mutation, ash1VV183 (also known as ash122; Table 1). Df(2R)en-A uncovers the E(Pc) gene (SATO et al. 1984 Down). The penetrance of third leg to second leg transformations in Df(2R)en-A/+ ; +/ash1RE418 double heterozygotes (34.7%) is indistinguishable from the penetrance in E(Pc)1/+ ; +/ash1RE418 double heterozygotes (43.7%). The penetrance of third leg to second leg transformations in both E(Pc)1/+ ; +/ash1VV183 double heterozygotes (29.0%) and E(Pc)2/+ ; +/ash1VV183 double heterozygotes (9.4%) is highly significantly greater than that of ash1VV183 single heterozygotes (1.0%). Df(2R)CX1 (and Df(2R)vg-B) uncovers both the Su(z)2 and Psc genes (ADLER et al. 1989 Down). The penetrance of third leg to second leg transformations in Df(2R)CX1/+ ; +/ash1RE418 double heterozygotes (53.5%) is indistinguishable from the sum of the penetrances of Su(z)21/+ ; +/ash1RE418 double heterozygotes (18.5%) and Psc1/+ ; +/ash1RE418 double heterozygotes (36.7%). The penetrance of third leg to second leg transformations in both Su(z)21/+ ; +/ash1VV183 double heterozygotes (8.8%) and Psc1/+ ; +/ash1VV183 double heterozygotes (27.8%) is highly significantly greater than that of ash1VV183 single heterozygotes (1.0%). Df(2R)trix uncovers the Additional sex combs, Asx, gene (JURGENS 1985 Down; SINCLAIR et al. 1992 Down). The penetrance of third leg to second leg transformations in Df(2R) trix/+ ; +/ash1RE418 double heterozygotes (18.6%) is actually lower than the penetrance in AsxXF23/+ ; +/ash1RE418 double heterozygotes (39.1%). The penetrance of third leg to second leg transformations in AsxXF23/+ ; +/ash1VV183 double heterozygotes (13.6%), Asx3/+ ; +/ash1VV183 double heterozygotes (66.6%), and Asx13/+ ; +/ash1VV183 double heterozygotes (29.3%) is each highly significantly greater than that of ash1VV183 single heterozygotes (1.0%). Df(3R)by62 uncovers the Scm gene (BREEN and DUNCAN 1986 Down). The penetrance of third leg to second leg transformations in Df(3R)by62/ash1RE418 double heterozygotes (60.0%) is significantly greater than the penetrance in ScmD1/ash1RE418 double heterozygotes (22.1%). This deficiency uncovers the hyperplastic discs gene (MANSFIELD et al. 1994 Down), which also shows intergenic noncomplementation with ash1 mutations (K. AMANAI and A. SHEARN, unpublished data). So, in this case as with Df(2R)CX1, intergenic noncomplementation with the deficiency is likely to be the consequence of the loss of two different genes. The penetrance of third leg to second leg transformations in ScmD1/ash1VV183 double heterozygotes (12.6%) is highly significantly greater, the penetrance of Scmm56/ash1VV183 double heterozygotes (5.1%) is significantly greater, but the penetrance of Scm302/ash1VV183 double heterozygotes (0%) is not significantly different than that of ash1VV183 single heterozygotes (1.0%).

In each case, we found that intergenic noncomplementation of the deficiency could be accounted for, at least in part, by deletion of the uncovered Polycomb group gene. To analyze whether this intergenic noncomplementation was specific for ash1 mutations or was general for mutations in trithorax group genes, we also tested these mutations in Polycomb group genes for intergenic noncomplementation with mutant alleles of the trithorax group genes, trithorax (trxb11) and Brahma (brm2), and for increased penetrance of the phenotype of two different double mutants, ash1VF101 trxb11 (ash1VF101 is also known as ash117) and brm2 trxe2. Mutations in four of the five genes [E(Pc), Psc, Su(z)2, and Asx] showed significant intergenic noncomplementation with one or the other or both of trithorax or brahma mutations and significant enhancement of the penetrance of both double mutants (Table 1). However, the Scm mutations only showed intergenic noncomplementation with ash1 mutations and only increased the penetrance of the double mutant that included an ash1 mutation, ash1VF101 trxb11 (Table 1), suggesting a specific interaction between Scm and ash1.

Complementation with mutations in other Polycomb group genes:
Finding intergenic noncomplementation between mutations in trithorax and Polycomb group genes was unexpected. So we set out to find how general a phenomenon these results represented. Loss-of-function mutations in nine other previously identified Polycomb group genes were analyzed for intergenic noncomplementation with amorphic mutations in ash1, trithorax, and brahma and for enhancement or suppression of the double mutant phenotypes. Polycomb is the archetypal Polycomb group gene (PURO and NYGREN 1975 Down). An amorphic Polycomb mutation (Pc3) showed no intergenic complementation with ash1VV183, trxb11, or brm2 mutations and significantly suppressed the penetrance of both double mutants (Table 2). This is the result expected for a loss-of-function mutation in a Polycomb group gene. Such mutations are expected to antagonize the phenotype caused by mutations in trithorax group genes. Similar results were obtained for most of the mutations tested in six of the other eight genes polyhomeotic (Phd503; DURA et al. 1987 Down), Polycomb-like (Pcl7; DUNCAN 1982 Down), pleiohomeotic (phob; GIRTON and JEON 1994 Down), multi sex combs (mxcm1 and mxcmbn; SANTAMARIA and RANDSHOLT 1995 Down; DOCQUIER et al. 1996 Down), extra sex combs (esc5, esc9, esc10, and esc21; STRUHL 1981 Down, STRUHL 1983 Down), and super sex combs (sxc4 and sxc5; INGHAM 1984 Down). Some mutations in these genes behave anomalously. As examples, mxcG48 significantly enhances the penetrance of ash1VF101 trxb11 but neither suppressed nor enhanced the penetrance of brm2 trxe2; esc6 did not suppress the penetrance of ash1VF101 trxb11; and sxc1 significantly enhanced the penetrance of both ash1VF101 trxb11 and brm2 trxe2. These specific mutations may be causing partial gain-of-function phenotypes or there may be additional unknown mutations on the chromosomes that contain the mutations tested.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 2. Mutations in some genes classified as members of the Polycomb group or classified as Suppressors of zeste fail to complement mutations in trithorax group genes

Mutations in the two other genes tested, Sex combs extra (SceD1; BREEN and DUNCAN 1986 Down) and Enhancer of zeste (E(z)5; PHILLIPS and SHEARN 1990; JONES and GELBART 1990), showed intergenic noncomplementation with mutations in one or more of the three single trithorax group genes and enhanced the penetrance of both double mutants. These are the results expected for mutations in trithorax group genes. For Sex combs extra no deficiencies and no other alleles are available, so it is unclear whether the results with this allele represent a loss-of-function phenotype. However, for Enhancer of zeste, these data extend previously reported results (LAJEUNESSE and SHEARN 1996 Down). So, we have identified at least six genes, Enhancer of zeste, Enhancer of Polycomb, Posterior sex combs, Suppressor of zeste-2, Additional sex combs, and Sex comb on midleg, that behave as if they are both Polycomb and trithorax group genes. We also tested a null mutation in Trithorax-like for intergenic noncomplementation. Mutations in Trithorax-like give a phenotype like trithorax (FARKAS et al. 1994 Down), hence the name, and enhance the phenotype of Ultrabithorax mutations as do mutations in other trithorax group genes (SHEARN 1989 Down). However, the same Trithorax-like mutations enhance the extra sex combs phenotype of Polycomb mutations as if Trithorax-like were a Polycomb group gene (STRUTT et al. 1997 Down). We observed that TrlR85 showed intergenic noncomplementation with all three single mutations and enhanced the phenotype of both double mutants (Table 2). So Trithorax-like also behaves as if it is both a Polycomb and trithorax group gene.

Complementation with Suppressors of zeste:
Specific mutations in the zeste gene cause reduced expression of the white gene leading to yellow eye color (GANS 1953 Down). Mutations in four of the six genes that behave as if they are both Polycomb and trithorax group genes have also been recovered as dominant suppressors of this zeste-white interaction: Psc (KALISCH and RASMUSON 1974 Down; WU et al. 1989 Down), Scm (KALISCH and RASMUSON 1974 Down; WU et al. 1989 Down), and E(z) (KALISCH and RASMUSON 1974 Down; WU et al. 1989 Down; PHILLIPS and SHEARN 1990 Down; JONES and GELBART 1990 Down). We have examined mutations in six other genes identified as dominant suppressors of the zeste-white interaction for intergenic noncomplementation with mutations in trithorax group genes. Three of these mutations, Su(z)31, Su(z)51, and Su(z)121 did not show intergenic noncomplementation with any of the three single mutations; one of these three, Su(z)51, suppressed the phenotype of brm2 trxe2 (Table 2). However, we found that two of these mutations, Su(z)61 and Su(z)71, show intergenic noncomplementation with all three single mutations and enhanced the phenotype of both double mutants; one of these mutations, Su(z)41, enhanced the phenotype of both double mutants. No other alleles of these genes were available and no deficiencies are known to uncover these genes. So, at this point it is not possible to confirm that the observed intergenic noncomplementation is due to these Su(z) mutations rather than to other mutations on the chromosomes.

Assay for suppression of zeste:
Finding that mutations in some of the genes identified as Suppressors of zeste behave as if they are both Polycomb and trithorax group genes led us to examine mutations in genes identified as Polycomb group genes for their ability to suppress the zeste-white interaction. We found that mutations in none of six genes (Polycomb, polyhomeotic, Polycomb-like, pleiohomeotic, extra sex combs, and super sex combs) that suppress the penetrance of the two different double mutants, ash1VF101 trxb11 and brm2 trxe2, affect the zeste-white interaction (data not shown). Mutations in Su(z)2 (KALISCH and RASMUSON 1974 Down), Scm (WU et al. 1989 Down), Psc (WU et al. 1989 Down), and mxc (SANTAMARIA and RANDSHOLT 1995 Down) have already been reported to suppress the zeste-white interaction. We confirmed those results and observed in addition that mutations in E(Pc) suppress the zeste-white interaction and the SceD1 mutation enhances the zeste-white interaction (data not shown).

lid is a new trithorax group gene:
The 10 other noncomplementing deficiencies are located in six different cytogenetic regions that do not contain homeotic selector genes or known Polycomb or trithorax group genes (Fig 2). Two of these deficiencies uncover Minute genes, but noncomplementing regions were separated from the Minute genes by using smaller deficiencies. The original screening of the deficiencies utilized the ash1RE418 (also known as ash14) allele because it causes the most extreme phenotype and was therefore believed to be an amorphic allele. However, a substantial amount of synthetic lethality occurs among flies doubly heterozygous for ash1RE418 and these 10 noncomplementing deletions, making it difficult to obtain adequate numbers of progeny. Subsequently, we discovered that ash1RE418 is actually an antimorphic allele (TRIPOULAS et al. 1996 Down; J. J. GILDEA, unpublished observation), so all further work was done with ash1VV183 (also known as ash122), which we believe to be an amorphic allele because it is predicted to stop translation after the 47th of 2144 amino acids (TRIPOULAS et al. 1996 Down). Each of these deficiencies was also crossed to amorphic alleles of two other trithorax group genes, brahma, brm2 (KENNISON and TAMKUN 1988 Down), and trithorax, trxB11 (MAZO et al. 1990 Down), and to a deficiency of Polycomb, Df(3L)Asc, to determine if these deficiencies fail to complement mutations in trithorax group genes and suppress loss of Polycomb function as expected for loss of function of trithorax group genes.

Four of the six noncomplementing deficiencies, Df(2L)MdhA (30D1-F6;31F1-5), Df(2R)vw (59D6-E1; 60C1-8), Df(3L)Ar14.8 (61C5-8;62A8), and Df(3L)vin7 (68C8;69B4-5), fail to complement mutations in all three of the trithorax group genes tested, ash1, brahma, and trithorax, as expected for deficiencies that uncover trithorax group genes (Fig 2; Table 3). However, none of these four deficiencies suppress loss of Polycomb function as expected for deficiencies that uncover trithorax group genes (Table 3). These deficiencies may uncover genes that represent a group undefined until now. Further work will be necessary to investigate this issue.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 3. Some deficiencies that fail to complement mutations in trithorax group genes do not suppress the extra sex comb phenotype of a deficiency of Polycomb

Two of the six noncomplementing deficiencies, Df(2L)cl-h3 (25D2-3;26B2-5) and Df(2R)PuD17 (57B5; 58B1-2), fail to complement mutations in all three of the trithorax group genes tested, ash1, brahma, and trithorax, and suppress loss of Polycomb function as expected for deficiencies that uncover trithorax group genes (Fig 2; Table 3). As a first step toward identifying the trithorax group gene uncovered by Df(2L)cl-h3, we more precisely determined its cytogenetic location by assaying the ability of deficiencies that overlap Df(2L)cl-h3 to complement the ash1 mutant phenotype. We found that Df(2L)GpdhA (25E1;26A8-9), DF(2L)cl-h4 (25E1;25E5), DF(2L)cl-h1 (25D4;25F1-2), and Df(2L)E110 (25F3-26A1; 26D3-11) all significantly fail to complement ash1VV183, but Df(2L)2802 (25F2-3;25F4-5) does complement (Table 4). The complementation of Df(2L)2802 and failure of complementation both by deficiencies distal to Df(2L)2802, such as Df(2L)cl-h4 and Df(2L)cl-h1, and proximal, such as Df(2L)E110, suggest that there are two different genes uncovered by Df(2L)cl-h3 that are responsible for the noncomplementation originally observed. This interpretation is strongly supported by the fact that for both distal deficiencies and for the proximal deficiency, the penetrance is significantly less than the penetrance of Df(2L)cl-h3 (Table 4). Based on the breakpoints of these deletions it appears that the distal gene uncovered by Df(2L)cl-h3 is at least partially within 25E1-5 because it is uncovered by Df(2L)cl-h4 (Fig 3). However, the penetrance of Df(2L)cl-h1 is significantly greater than that of Df(2L)cl-h4 (P < 0.01), suggesting that Df(2L)cl-h4 causes only a partial loss of function of the distal gene. So, based on this data, the distal gene is within 25D4;25F1-2. The proximal gene uncovered by Df(2L)cl-h3 must be within 25F4-5;26B2-5 because it is not uncovered by Df(2L)2802 (Fig 3).



View larger version (16K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 3. Smaller deficiencies that overlap Df(2L)cl-h3 were crossed to ash1 and tested for intergenic noncomplementation. No shading indicates complementation. Dark shading indicates intergenic noncomplementation with ash1. Light shading indicates uncertainty as to the endpoint(s) of deficiencies. Areas labeled distal and proximal indicate deduced localization of two noncomplementing regions.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 4. Penetrance of T3 to T2 transformations in flies doubly heterozygous for ash1vv183, an amorphic mutation, and deficiencies that overlap Df(2L)cI-h3

As the next step toward identifying the two trithorax group genes uncovered by Df(2L)cl-h3, we assayed five P-element insertion lethal mutations that had been localized to the interval of 25D4 to 26B2-5 for failure to complement ash1VV183. Two of the five, l(2)10424 and l(2)k06801, failed to complement (Table 5). We found that these mutations are allelic to each other and are lethal in combination with Df(2L)cl-h3, Df(2L)GpdhA, and Df(2L)E110 (data not shown). As might be expected for allelic mutations, the insertion sites of the P elements in l(2)10424 and l(2)k06801 are essentially identical, 26A8-9 and 26B1-2, respectively (Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project; http://www.fruitfly.org). The l(2)k06801 allele exhibits intergenic noncomplementation with brahma and trithorax mutations, enhances the phenotype of ash1VF101 trxb11 and brm2 trxe2 double mutations, and suppresses the phenotype of a Polycomb deletion (Table 5). These data suggest that l(2)10424 and l(2)k06801 identify the proximal trithorax group gene uncovered by Df(2L)cl-h3. This interpretation is supported by the fact that the penetrance of either l(2)10424 ; ash1 or l(2)k06801 ; ash1 double heterozygotes is not significantly different from Df(2L)E110; ash1VV183 or Df(2L) GpdhA ; ash1VV183 double heterozygotes. Since the lack of complementation caused by Df(2L)GpdhA can be fully accounted for by uncovering this proximal gene (Table 4), the distal gene uncovered by Df(2L)cl-h3 must be within 25D4;25E1, i.e., distal of the distal breakpoint of Df(2L)GpdhA as indicated in Fig 3.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 5. Effect of mutations in the 25D-26B region on the T3 to T2 phenotype of mutations in trithorax group genes and on the extra sex comb phenotype of a deficiency of Polycomb

To examine whether the mutation in the proximal trithorax group gene found on the chromosome that contains l(2)10424 was indeed caused by a P-element insertion, excisions of the l(2)10424 insertion were generated. Nine different, apparently precise, excisions were recovered. In each case both the homozygous lethality and noncomplementation with ash1 was fully reverted. These data demonstrate that the insertion of the P element in l(2)10424 is responsible for the mutant phenotype and that l(2)10424 is a mutation in the proximal trithorax group gene uncovered by Df(2L)cl-h3.

Mutant homozygotes of l(2)10424 and trans-heterozygotes of l(2)10424/l(2)k06801 are lethal at a number of different stages of development. Some homozygotes and trans-heterozygotes appear to die before hatching although no obvious defects in the larval cuticle could be observed. Most of the homozygotes appear to die at the early pupal stage. Of 10 late third instar homozygous l(2)10424 larvae, 7 displayed a small optic brain lobe phenotype (Fig 4A and Fig B) and small imaginal discs (Fig 4D and Fig E). So, we named this gene little imaginal discs (lid). A small percentage of mutant larvae complete metamorphosis and die either as pharate adults or newly eclosed adults. These adult escapers often have duplicated thoracic macrochaetae (Fig 4C). Most hemizygous mutants die as late embryos, with rare escapers showing only minor disk proliferation defects as late third instar larvae.



View larger version (136K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 4. The phenotype of homozygous lid mutants. (A) Brain dissected from wild-type, late third instar larva. (B) Brain from a homozygous lid mutant. Note the reduction in the size of the optic lobes and the absence of imaginal discs that are normally associated with the brain. (C) Two duplications of thoracic macrochete bristles in rare homozygous lid pharate adult escaper. (D) Wing imaginal disc dissected from wild-type, late third instar larva. (E) Wing imaginal disc dissected from homozygous lid mutant.

To clone the little imaginal discs gene, genomic DNA was prepared from both lid1 [l(2)10424] and lid2 [l(2)k06801] heterozygous flies, and DNA flanking the insertions was isolated by plasmid rescue. The sequence of the flanking DNA was used to search the Drosophila genomic DNA sequence database generated by the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project using the BlastN program. DNA flanking both P-element insertions matched genomic sequence from the P1 clone DS05973. Expressed sequence tags from the 5' end of eight different cDNAs (LD08387, LD14429, LD06125, LD17452, LD19310, LD12254, LD12410, and CK01604) were found to match genomic sequence from this region. The longest cDNA, LD19310, was sequenced on both strands by primer walking; it was found to be 5947 bp long with a single open reading frame of 5516 bp. Comparison of this cDNA sequence to that of the genomic sequence revealed four introns of 2767, 143, 127, and 65 bp. The exon assembly program Genie (http://www.fruitfly.org/) precisely predicted the exon structure and open reading frame of this gene. The sequence of the cDNA matched exactly the DNA sequenced by the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project. Both P-element insertions map very close to each other within the large first intron of lid (Fig 5). The LD19310 cDNA detects a transcript of approximately 8 kb on blots of RNA from Canton-S third instar larvae. The amount of this transcript is dramatically decreased in RNA from mutant third instar larvae (data not shown). This indicates that LD19310 cDNA is derived from the lid transcript.



View larger version (18K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 5. (A) The intron-exon structure of lid. The P elements in l(2)k06801 and l(2) 10424 are located in the first large intron. The solid boxed areas indicate the open reading frame. (B) The motif structure of the conceptually translated LID protein along with that of human RBP-2. Note the overall similarity in size and arrangement of motifs. Four areas with a high degree of identity are indicated. LEU ZIP, leucine zipper motif; BP-NLS, bipartite nuclear localization motif.

Multiple stop codons are found upstream of the first methionine codon in the sequence of LD19310, suggesting that this cDNA contains the entire open reading frame. This open reading frame codes for a conceptually translated protein of 1838 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 203 kD and pI of 6.2. The protein contains a number of amino acid motifs found in both trithorax and Polycomb group genes. It contains an N-terminal RING double zinc finger at amino acids 451–495, which also matches the consensus for a PHD double zinc finger (SCHINDLER et al. 1993 Down; AASLAND et al. 1995 Down), one centrally located PHD double zinc finger at amino acids 1293–1354, and a C-terminal PHD double zinc finger at 1753–1808. A predicted leucine zipper domain is found at amino acids 1033–1056; a bipartite nuclear localization signal is found at amino acids 1599–1616. Each of these amino acid motifs is found in human retinoblastoma binding protein 2 (RBP-2) in the same order (Fig 5), suggesting that LID may be the orthologue of human RBP-2. Overall, these two proteins share 47% identity; smaller regions contain substantially higher identity (Fig 5). It had been appreciated before that human RBP-2 has multiple novel zinc finger motifs that are very similar to those in trx and Pcl (STASSEN et al. 1995 Down).

When alignments of these two proteins were performed, it became apparent that there is a domain N-terminal to the RING finger that also has a high degree of identity. This domain has a previously described amino acid motif called ARID (AT-rich interaction domain; HERRSCHER et al. 1995 Down). Among the proteins that contain this motif is SWI1/ADR6, a component of the yeast SWI/SNF multiprotein complex (CAIRNS et al. 1994 Down); OSA, a component of the Drosophila BRM chromatin remodeling complex (COLLINS et al. 1999 Down; VAZQUEZ et al. 1999 Down); and another Drosophila protein, DEADRINGER (SHANDALA et al. 1999 Down).


*  DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

It has generally been observed that heterozygosis for recessive loss-of-function mutations in trithorax group genes can suppress the adult phenotype caused by heterozygosis for dominant mutations in Polycomb. Indeed, KENNISON and TAMKUN 1988 Down screened for suppressors of the dominant Polycomb mutant phenotype and recovered mutations in trithorax and 10 other genes considered to be members of the trithorax group including brahma. We used a different strategy to identify additional genes of the trithorax group. On the basis of the observation that mutations in trithorax group genes show intergenic noncomplementation (SHEARN 1989 Down), we tested 133 large deficiencies and found 26 that showed intergenic noncomplementation with an antimorphic ash1 allele, ash1RE418. Each of the noncomplementing deficiencies was subsequently tested for complementation with mutations in two other trithorax group genes, brahma and trithorax, and for suppression of a Polycomb deletion. The implicit assumption of our approach was that mutations in trithorax group genes fail to complement mutations in other trithorax group genes and suppress the dominant phenotype of amorphic mutations in the Polycomb gene (SHEARN 1989 Down). Five of the noncomplementing deficiencies uncovered homeotic selector genes and/or previously identified trithorax group genes. This result validated the rationale of our screen.

Five noncomplementing deficiencies identify Minute genes:
Among the noncomplementing deficiencies, we recovered two groups that were not expected. Five of the deficiencies uncovered Minute genes. The Minute genes that have been analyzed to date encode ribosomal proteins, ribosomal RNAs, or are otherwise involved in the mechanism of protein synthesis, like aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (LAMBERTSSON 1998 Down). Therefore Minute mutations most likely cause a general decrease in translation rate or efficiency. The noncomplementation of the ash1 mutant phenotype observed in this screen by Minute mutations is most likely due to the additive effects of decreased transcription of the Ultrabithorax gene caused by the ash1 mutation (LAJEUNESSE and SHEARN 1995 Down) and decreased translation of the Ultrabithorax transcript caused by the Minute mutations.

Six noncomplementing deficiencies identify genes previously classified as members of the Polycomb group:
Six of the deficiencies uncovered genes that were previously classified in the Polycomb group. They were so classified, because they either enhanced the Polycomb mutant phenotype or caused a phenotype like Polycomb mutants. This result was quite unexpected because the antagonism between trithorax and Polycomb group genes suggested that loss of function of Polycomb group genes should suppress trithorax mutant phenotypes. Nevertheless, as shown in Table 1, it is likely that the Polycomb group genes uncovered by these deficiencies are responsible for the observed intergenic noncomplementation with ash1RE418. Another possibility is that each of the chromosomes with Polycomb group mutations we tested, E(Pc)1, Psc1, Su(z)21, AsxXF23, and ScmD1, also contains a mutation in some other gene that is responsible for the observed intergenic noncomplementation. This possibility is remote because it is unlikely that each of the deficiencies that uncover these Polycomb group genes also uncover mutations in the same other genes that fail to complement. Nevertheless, we have directly examined this possibility by testing other mutations in these five genes. We observed that E(Pc)2, Asx3, Asx13, and Scmm56 all show intergenic noncomplementation with ash1VV183 (Table 1). It was possible that the observed intergenic noncomplementation was specific for ash1 mutations rather than general for mutations in trithorax group genes. This possibility was excluded for four of the five genes by showing that E(Pc)1, Psc1, Su(z)21, AsxXF23, Asx3, and Asx13 also show intergenic noncomplementation with trxb11 and/or brm2 and increase the penetrance of two different double mutants, ash1VF101 trxb11 and brm2 trxe2 (Table 1). Recently, another group has also reported that Asx mutations show intergenic noncomplementation with mutations in trithorax group genes (cited in SINCLAIR et al. 1998 Down). In some of these cases, the different mutant alleles tested gave inconsistent results. For example, both ScmD1 and Scmm56 show intergenic noncomplementation with ash1VV183 and enhance the phenotype of the ash1VF101 trxb11 double mutant, whereas Scm302 does not enhance the phenotype of ash1VV183 and suppresses the phenotype of ash1VF101 trxb11. We suppose that this difference is due to differences in the specific alterations of the SCM protein caused by these mutations.

Until now the antagonism of function between the products of Polycomb group genes and trithorax group genes has been demonstrated unidirectionally by the suppression of Polycomb group mutant phenotypes by mutations in trithorax group genes. We have taken advantage of the intergenic noncomplementation of mutations in trithorax group genes to assay suppression of trithorax group mutant phenotypes by mutations in genes previously classified as Polycomb group genes. Among ash1VF101 trxb11 and brm2 trxe2 heterozygotes, 52 and 35%, respectively, of adult flies express transformations of the third thoracic segment to the second thoracic segment. We observed that most mutations in seven of the genes that have been classified as members of the Polycomb group, Polycomb, polyhomeotic, pleiohomeotic, Polycomb-like, multi sex combs, extra sex combs, and Super sex combs suppress the penetrance of these transformations, in both of these double heterozygotes. Moreover, most mutations in these genes do not show intergenic noncomplementation with mutations in any of the three trithorax group genes that we have tested. We suggest that these genes represent the Polycomb group (Table 6) defined here as genes in which loss-of-function mutations enhance the dominant phenotype caused by Polycomb mutations and suppress the phenotype caused by heterozygosity for double mutations in trithorax group genes such as ash1VF101 trxb11 and brm2 trxe2.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 6. Genes formerly classified as Polycomb group genes and/or Suppressors of zeste, reclassified according to the data presented herein

The zeste (z) gene encodes a transcription factor that binds DNA in a sequence-specific manner (BIGGIN et al. 1988 Down). The z1 mutation causes reduced white gene transcription (JACK and JUDD 1979 Down). It was first recognized by WU et al. 1989 Down that mutations in three genes identified as dominant modifiers of the zeste-white interaction, Enhancer of zeste, Suppressor of zeste-2, and Sex comb on midleg, can also cause phenotypes like mutations in Polycomb group genes. We have shown that mutations in these three genes also behave as mutations in trithorax group genes: they show intergenic noncomplementation with mutations in trithorax group genes and/or increase the penetrance of ash1VF101 trxb11 and/or brm2 trxe2 heterozygotes. Moreover, we have shown that mutations in three other genes identified as suppressors of the zeste-white interaction, Suppressor of zeste-4, Suppressor of zeste-6, and Suppressor of zeste-7, may show intergenic noncomplementation with mutations in trithorax group genes and/or increase the penetrance of ash1VF101 trxb11 heterozygotes. The biochemical mechanism by which mutations in these genes modify the zeste-white interaction is not known. However, we think it is significant that many of the genes identified as Suppressors of zeste behave as if they are both trithorax and Polycomb group genes, that Enhancer of Polycomb is a suppressor of zeste, and that sex combs extra is an enhancer of zeste.

We propose that the six genes previously classified as Polycomb group genes in which loss-of-function or antimorphic mutations show intergenic noncomplementation with mutations in trithorax group genes and increase the penetrance caused by double heterozygosis of mutations in trithorax group genes belong in a distinct group (Table 6). We propose that this group be called the ETP (Enhancers of trithorax and Polycomb mutations) group. Loss-of-function mutations in this group of genes enhance the dominant phenotype caused by Polycomb mutations like mutations in Polycomb group genes but also enhance the phenotype caused by heterozygosity for double mutations in trithorax group genes such as ash1VF101 trxb11 and brm2 trxe2 like mutations in trithorax group genes. JURGENS 1985 Down estimated that there were ~40 genes in the Polycomb group based on the enhancement of the Polycomb mutant phenotype by a sample of deficiencies. We suggest that this number may be an overestimate. Many of the genes in which mutations enhance the Polycomb mutant phenotype, according to our data, would also be expected to enhance the trithorax group mutant phenotype and hence should not be classified as Polycomb group genes.

Several studies have documented that mutations in many of the genes we have classified in the ETP group lead to ectopic expression of homeotic genes in embryos (e.g., SIMON et al. 1992 Down; reviewed in SIMON 1995 Down). It has been inferred from such results that the normal function of the products of these genes is to repress transcription. However, a recent study of the consequences of mutations in one of these genes, Enhancer of zeste, demonstrated both ectopic expression and loss of expression of the same homeotic genes (LAJEUNESSE and SHEARN 1995 Down). That study was made possible by the availability of a strong temperature-sensitive allele. Without such alleles it would be very difficult to directly assay other members of the group for loss of homeotic gene expression. Nevertheless, we interpret the enhancement of the phenotype of mutations in both Polycomb and trithorax group genes by loss-of-function mutations in genes of the ETP group as an indication that the products of these genes are required for both activation and repression of transcription. It has recently been proposed that the product of the zeste gene itself is also involved in both activation and repression of transcription (ROSEN et al. 1998 Down). We have little information on the biochemical mechanism of action of any of these genes. There is evidence of a multimeric protein complex containing the products of the Polycomb group genes, Polycomb and Polyhomeotic, and of three different complexes containing the products of the trithorax group genes, brahma, ash1, and ash2. One way of rationalizing how mutations in the ETP group of genes could behave as both Polycomb and trithorax group mutations would be to suggest that the products of the ETP genes are components of complexes required for both repression and activation. Perhaps they are responsible for the structure of these complexes or different protein variants encoded by these genes are components of different complexes. Although Polycomb and trithorax group genes were first identified in Drosophila, homologous genes exist in mammals (reviewed in SCHUMACHER and MAGNUSON 1997 Down), Caenorhabditis elegans (GARVIN et al. 1998 Down), and plants (GOODRICH et al. 1997 Down). Until now, most interpretations of the functions of the products of such genes have been based on the idea that the products of Polycomb group genes repress gene transcription and the products of trithorax group genes activate gene transcription. The data presented here together with earlier data (LAJEUNESSE and SHEARN 1995 Down) suggest that some of the genes previously classified as Polycomb group genes and at least some of the genes identified as suppressors or enhancers of zeste belong to a group of genes whose products play a role in both the repression and activation of gene transcription. These data will require new interpretations of the functions of such genes.

Six noncomplementing deficiencies may identify new trithorax group genes:
The 133 deficiencies examined collectively uncover ~70% of the genome. Of these, only 6 exhibited intergenic noncomplementation with mutations in all 3 of the trithorax group genes tested and do not uncover previously identified trithorax group genes. Either there must be only a small number (i.e., closer to 10 than to 100) of genes in the entire genome in which mutations fail to complement mutations in the trithorax group genes tested or only deficiencies that uncover 2 or more such genes are detected in our assay. Four of the deficiencies failed to complement mutations in all 3 trithorax group genes but did not suppress the Polycomb mutant phenotype. Perhaps these deficiencies uncover genes whose products act downstream of the homeotic selector genes, for example, as cofactors necessary for the activity or stability of homeotic selector gene products.

Two of these six deficiencies suppressed the Polycomb mutant phenotype and did not uncover a known trithorax group gene. We have provided evidence that one of these six deficiencies, Df(2L)cl-h3 (25D2-3;26B2-5), uncovers two different trithorax group genes. The distal gene is within 25D4 ; 25E1. It may be identical to E(var)2-25E, which was recovered in a screen for enhancers of position-effect variegation (DORN et al. 1993 Down). Several of the mutations recovered in that screen proved to be allelic to trithorax group genes. The proximal gene is within 25F4-4;26B2-5. We have presented three lines of evidence that the allelic mutations l(2)10424 (now known as lid1) and l(2)k06801 (now known as lid2) represent P-element insertion mutations within this proximal gene that we have named little imaginal discs. First, both alleles are lethal in combination with deficiencies that remove 25F4-4;26B2-5. Second, lid2 enhances the phenotype of ash1, brahma, and trithorax mutations and suppresses the phenotype of a Polycomb deletion. Third, precise revertants of lid1 are homozygous viable and fail to enhance the phenotype of ash1, brahma, or trithorax mutations and fail to suppress the phenotype of a Polycomb deficiency.

Despite the fact that lid mutations satisfy the criteria we used for mutations in trithorax group genes, we did not observe homeotic transformations in homozygous or trans-heterozygous mutant embryos or larvae. Instead, we observed a small disc phenotype (SHEARN et al. 1971 Down). Certain allelic combinations of ash1 mutations also cause a small disc phenotype (SHEARN et al. 1987 Down). The few lid mutants that survived the pupal stage expressed bristle phenotypes like mutations in the trithorax group genes ash2 (ADAMSON and SHEARN 1996 Down) and brahma (ELFRING et al. 1998 Down). So, lid mutations do cause phenotypes like those caused by mutations in other trithorax group genes. We interpret the failure to detect a high frequency of homeotic transformations in the two lid mutants as a consequence of the nature of the mutations caused by the P-element insertions in these alleles.

The predicted lid gene product is extremely similar to the human retinoblastoma binding protein 2 gene product (RBP-2). RBP-2 was discovered in a screen for proteins that interact with the pocket domain of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB; DEFEO-JONES et al. 1991 Down). The full-length sequence of RBP-2 was later determined and found to contain nuclear localization motifs as well as sequence motifs characteristic of transcriptional regulators (FATTAEY et al. 1993 Down). RBP-2 has been shown to physically interact with mammalian TATA-binding protein as well as with p107 and Rb (also known as p110; KIM et al. 1994 Down). We have no information about the molecular mechanism of LID function. However, given the similarity of LID to RBP-2 and the binding of RBP-2 to pRB there are several intriguing possibilities.

The role of pRB in cell cycle regulation and proliferation is mediated, at least in part, by its interaction with the transcription factor E2F. It interacts physically with E2F to repress transcription and cell cycle progression. Overexpression of RBP-2 in cultured cells was shown to overcome the pRB-mediated suppression of E2F activity (KIM et al. 1994 Down). A Drosophila mutant of E2F, E(var)3-95E, was discovered as a dominant enhancer of variegation (SEUM et al. 1996 Down). E2F is necessary for proliferation and differentiation in the Drosophila eye (BROOK et al. 1996 Down; DU et al. 1996A Down) and interacts genetically with a Drosophila homologue of Rb, RBF (DU et al. 1996B Down). Finding that lid mutations cause defects in imaginal disc cell proliferation may be due to the loss of negative regulation of RBF leading to increased E2F repression of cyclin E.

Histone acetylation has profound effects on transcriptional regulation and both global and local chromatin structure (LUGER and RICHMOND 1998 Down). The Rb protein has recently been found to physically associate with a histone deacetylase, HDAC1, and to repress transcription (BREHM et al. 1998 Down; LUO et al. 1998 Down; MAGNAGHI-JAULIN et al. 1998 Down). The function of LID could be to counteract the repressive activity that histone deacetylation has on chromatin. Two multiprotein complexes from yeast, ADA and SAGA, function as nucleosome acetyltransferases, with GCN5 as the catalytic subunit (GRANT et al. 1997 Down); GCN5 mutations display synthetic lethality with SWI/SNF mutations. This is especially interesting in that brahma is a Drosophila homologue of yeast SWI2/SNF2 (DINGWALL et al. 1995 Down), and lid interacts genetically with brahma. Further evidence for an association of trithorax group gene products and pRB is that by both two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation studies, Hbrm and Brg1, two human homologues of brahma, are associated with pRB family members (DUNAIEF et al. 1994 Down; SINGH et al. 1995 Down). The balance between acetylation and deacetylation is clearly implicated in the function of trithorax group genes. Though the role RBP-2 plays in chromatin regulation is not known, the fact that it could be involved in the inactivation or relocation of a histone deacetylase fits well with how we think trithorax group genes help to maintain an open chromatin conformation.

In addition to the connections of pRB with E2F, cyclin E, and the cell cycle and to the connections of pRB with histone deacetylation and repression of transcription, there is a connection of pRB with the nuclear matrix and nuclear matrix-associated proteins. p110Rb is associated with the nuclear matrix in a cell cycle-dependent manner (MANCINI et al. 1994 Down). Many p110Rb-associated factors have been previously found to be associated with the nuclear matrix, including SV40 large T antigen, adenovirus E1a, human papilloma E7 protein, lamin A, p84, and NRP/B (DURFEE et al. 1994 Down). One model is that functions within the nucleus occur at specific sites, and this functional compartmentalization of the nucleus is accomplished by localizing the machinery for each task to a specific site. For example, a hypothetical scenario consistent with this model would be that once activated, a homeotic selector gene may be bound by one or more trithorax group protein complexes that maintain the activated state by creating a site on the nuclear matrix for the transcription machinery itself and for proteins involved in acetylation and/or nucleosome remodeling and/or phosphorylation that are necessary for optimal expression. In this context, the change in subnuclear localization of the modifier of mdg-4 gene product may be relevant. Modifier of mdg4, also known as E(var)3-93D, is a trithorax group gene. Loss-of-function mutations enhance the phenotype of ash1 trithorax and brahma trithorax double mutations and suppress the phenotype of Polycomb mutations (GERASIMOVA and CORCES 1998 Down). The product of this gene, MOD, is normally associated with the nuclear matrix. However, the subnuclear localization of MOD is dramatically altered in both trithorax group and Polycomb group mutant backgrounds. In trithorax group mutants MOD is primarily cytoplasmic; in Polycomb group mutants MOD is present in the central region of the nucleus rather than the nuclear matrix (GERASIMOVA and CORCES 1998 Down). Many of the models for the organization of higher order chromatin structures are based on associations with nuclear matrix components. It will be interesting to determine the subnuclear localization of LID and observe whether there are changes in this localization during the cell cycle and/or in trithorax group and Polycomb group mutant backgrounds.


*  FOOTNOTES

1 Present address: Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908. Back
2 Present address: Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027. Back


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Paul Adler, Hugh Brock, Peter Harte, James Kennison, Pedro Santamaria, Jeffrey Simon, Gary Struhl, Anna Birve, and the Bloomington and Umea stock centers for sending mutant stocks and Evelyn Hersperger for dissecting and photographing imaginal discs and leg specimens. We are grateful to the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project for P-element insertion lines, lid cDNAs, and genomic DNA sequence. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM-53058).

Note added in proof: The lid gene corresponds to CG9088 of the annotated Drosophila genome.

Manuscript received January 27, 2000; Accepted for publication May 30, 2000.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

AASLAND, R. T., T. J. GIBSON, and A. F. STEWART, 1995  The PHD finger: implications for chromatin mediated transcriptional regulation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:56-59[Medline].

ADAMSON, A. and A. SHEARN, 1996  Molecular genetic analysis of the absent, small or homeotic imaginal discs2 (ash2) gene of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 144:621-633[Abstract].

ADLER, P. N., J. CHARLTON, and B. BRUNK, 1989  Genetic interactions of the Suppressor 2 of zeste region genes. Dev. Genet. 10:249-260[Medline].

AKAM, M., 1987  The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Development 101:1-22[Abstract].

BERGSON, C. and W. MCGINNIS, 1990  An autoregulatory enhancer element of Drosophila homeotic gene Deformed.. EMBO J. 9:4287-4297[Medline].

BIGGIN, M. D., S. BICKEL, M. BENSON, V. PIROTTA, and R. TIJIAN, 1988  Maternal expression of genes that regulate the Bithorax complex of Drosophila melanogaster.. Cell 53:713-722[Medline].

BREEN, T. R. and I. M. DUNCAN, 1986  Maternal expression of genes that regulate the Bithorax complex of Drosophila melanogaster.. Dev. Biol. 118:442-456[Medline].

BREEN, T. R. and P. J. HARTE, 1991  Trithorax regulates multiple homeotic genes in the bithorax and Antennapedia complexes and exerts different tissue-specific, parasegment-specific and promoter-specific effects on each. Development 117:119-134[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BREEN, T. R. and P. J. HARTE, 1993  Molecular characterization of the trithorax gene, a positive regulator of homeotic gene expression in Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 35:113-127.

BREHM, A., E. A. MISKA, D. J. MCCANCE, J. L. REID, and A. J. BANNISTER et al., 1998  Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nature 391:597-601[Medline].

BROOK, A., J. E. XIE, W. DU, and N. DYSON, 1996  Requirements for dE2F function in proliferating cells and in post-mitotic differentiating cells. EMBO J. 15:3676-3683[Medline].

BROWN, J. L., D. MUCCI, M. WHITELEY, M. L. DIRKSEN, and J. A. KASSIS, 1998  The Drosophila Polycomb group gene pleiohomeotic encodes a DNA binding protein with homology to the transcription factor YY1. Mol. Cell 1:1057-1064[Medline].

BRUNK, B. P., E. C. MARTIN, and P. N. ADLER, 1991  Drosophila genes Posterior Sex Combx and Suppressor two of zeste encode proteins with homology to the murine bmi-1 oncogene. Nature 353:351-353[Medline].

BUSTURIA, A. and G. MORATA, 1988  Ectopic expression of homeotic genes caused by the elimination of the Polycomb gene in Drosophila imaginal epidermis. Development 104:713-720[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CAIRNS, B. R., Y. J. KIM, M. H. SAYRE, B. C. LAURENT, and R. D. KORNBERG, 1994  A multisubunit complex containing the SWI1/ADR6, SWI2/SNF2, SWI3, SNF5, and SNF6 gene products isolated from yeast. Procl. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1950-1954[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CAMPBELL, R. B., D. A. R. SINCLAIR, M. COULING, and H. W. BROCK, 1995  Genetic interactions and dosage effects of Polycomb group genes of Drosophila. Mol. Gen. Genet. 246:291-300[Medline].

CAPDEVILA, M. P. and A. GARCIA-BELLIDO, 1981  Genes involved in the activation of the bithorax complex of Drosophila. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 190:339-350.

CARRINGTON, E. A. and R. S. JONES, 1996  The Drosophila Enhancer of zeste gene encodes a chromosomal protein: examination of wild-type and mutant protein distribution. Development 122:4073-4083[Abstract].

CARROLL, S. B., R. A. LAYMON, M. A. MCCUTCHEON, P. D. RILEY, and M. P. SCOTT, 1986  The localization and regulation of Antennapedia protein expression in Drosophila embryos. Cell 47:113-122[Medline].

COHEN, S. M., 1993 Imaginal disc development, pp. 747–842 in The Development of Drosophila melanogaster, edited by M. BATE and A. M. ARIAS. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

COLLINS, R. T., T. FURUKAWA, N. TANESE, and J. E. TREISMAN, 1999  Osa associates with the Brahma chromatin remodeling complex and promotes the activation of some target genes. EMBO J. 18:7029-7040[Medline].

CROSBY, M. A., C. MILLER, T. ALON, K. L. WATSON, and C. P. VERRIJZER et al., 1998  The trithorax group gene moira encodes a Brahma-associated putative chromatin remodeling factor in Drosophila. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1159-1170[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DEFEO-JONES, D., P. S. HUANG, R. E. JONES, K. M. HASKELL, and G. A. VUOCOLO et al., 1991  Cloning of cDNAs for cellular proteins that bind to the retinoblastoma gene product. Nature 352:251-254[Medline].

DINGWALL, A. K., S. J. BEEK, C. M. MCCALLUM, J. W. TAMKUN, and G. V. KALPANA et al., 1995  The Drosophila snr1 and brm proteins are related to yeast SWI/SNF proteins and are components of a large protein complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 6:777-791[Abstract].

DOCQUIER, F., O. SAGET, F. FORQUIGNON, N. B. RANDSHOLT, and P. SANTAMARIA, 1996  The localization and regulation of Antennapedia protein expression in Drosophila embryos. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 205:203-214.

DORN, R., J. SZIDONYA, G. KORGE, M. SEHNERT, and H. TAUBERT et al., 1993  P transposon-induced dominant enhancer mutations of position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 133:279-290[Abstract].

DU, W., M. VIDAL, J. E. XIE, and N. DYSON, 1996a  RBF, a novel RB-related gene that regulates E2F activity and interacts with cyclin E in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 10:1206-1218[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DU, W., J. E. XIE, and N. DYSON, 1996b  Ectopic expression of dE2F and dDP induces cell proliferation and death in the Drosophila eye. EMBO J. 15:3684-3692[Medline].

DUNAIEF, J. L., B. E. STROBER, S. GUHA, P. A. KHAVARI, and K. ALIN et al., 1994  The retinoblastoma protein and BRG1 form a complex and cooperate to induce cell cycle arrest. Cell 79:119-130[Medline].

DUNCAN, I. M., 1982  Polycomblike: a gene that appears to be required for the normal expression of the bithorax and Antennapedia gene complexes of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 102:49-70[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DURA, J. M., N. B. RANDSHOLT, J. DEATRICK, I. ERK, and P. SANTAMARIA et al., 1987  A complex genetic locus, polyhomeotic, is required for segmental specification and epidermal development in D. melanogaster. Cell 51:829-839[Medline].

DURFEE, T., M. A. MANCINI, D. JONES, S. J. ELLEDGE, and W. H. LEE, 1994  The amino-terminal region of the retinoblastoma gene product binds a novel nuclear matrix protein that co-localizes to centers for RNA processing. J. Cell Biol. 127:609-622[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ELFRING, L. K., C. DANIEL, O. PAPOULAS, R. DEURING, and M. SARTE et al., 1998  Genetic analysis of brahma: the Drosophila homolog of the yeast chromatin remodeling factor SWI2/SNF2. Genetics 148:251-265[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FARKAS, G., J. GAUSZ, M. GALLONI, G. REUTER, and H. GYURKOVICS et al., 1994  The trithorax-like gene encodes the Drosophila GAGA factor. Nature 371:806-808[Medline].

FATTAEY, A. R., K. HELIN, M. S. DEMBSKI, N. DYSON, and E. HARLOW et al., 1993  Characterization of the retinoblastoma binding proteins RBP1 and RBP2. Oncogene 8:3149-3156[Medline].

FRANKE, A., M. DECAMILLIS, D. ZINK, N. CHENG, and H. W. BROCK et al., 1992  Polycomb and polyhomeotic are constituents of a multimeric protein complex in chromatin of Drosophila. EMBO J. 11:2941-2950[Medline].

GANS, M., 1953  Etude genetique et physiologique du mutant z de Drosophila melanogaster. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 38:1-90.

GARVIN, R., C. HOLDEMAN, and S. STROME, 1998  The phenotype of mes-2, mes-3, mes-4 and mes-6, maternal-effect genes required for survival of the germline in Caenorhabditis elegans, is sensitive to chromosome dosage. Genetics 148:167-185[Abstract/Free Full Text].

GERASIMOVA, T. I. and V. G. CORCES, 1998  Polycomb and trithorax group proteins mediate the function of a chromatin insulator. Cell 92:511-521[Medline].

GIRTON, J. R. and S. H. JEON, 1994  Novel embryonic and adult homeotic phenotypes are produced by pleiohomeotic mutations in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 161:393-407[Medline].

GOODRICH, J., P. PUANGSOMLEE, M. MARTIN, D. LONG, and E. M. MEYEROWITZ et al., 1997  A Polycomb-group gene regulates homeotic gene expression in Arabidopsis. Nature 386:44-51[Medline].

GOULD, A. P. and R. WHITE, 1992  Connectin, a target of homeotic gene control in Drosophila. Development 116:1163-1174[Abstract].

GRANT, P. A., L. DUGGAN, J. COTE, S. M. ROBERTS, and J. E. BROWNELL et al., 1997  Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: characterization of an Ada complex and the SAGA (Spt/Ada) complex. Genes Dev. 11:1640-1650[Abstract/Free Full Text].

HAFEN, E., M. LEVINE, and W. J. GEHRING, 1984  Regulation of Antennapedia transcript distribution by the bithorax complex in Drosophila. Nature 307:287-289[Medline].

HERRSCHER, R. F., M. H. KAPLAN, D. L. LELSZ, C. DAS, and R. SCHEUERMANN et al., 1995  The immunoglobulin heavy-chain matrix-associating regions are bound by Bright: a B cell-specific trans-activator that describes a new DNA-binding protein family. Genes Dev. 9:3067-3082[Abstract/Free Full Text].

INGHAM, P. W., 1984  A gene that regulates the bithorax complex differentially in larval and adult cells of Drosophila. Cell 37:815-823[Medline].

INGHAM, P. W. and R. WHITTLE, 1980  trithorax: a new homeotic mutation of Drosophila melanogaster causing transformation of abdominal and thoracic imaginal segments. I. Putative role during embryogenesis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 179:607-614.

JACK, J. W. and B. H. JUDD, 1979  Allelic pairing and gene regulation: a model for the zeste-white interaction in Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:1368-1372[Abstract/Free Full Text].

JONES, R. S. and W. M. GELBART, 1990  Genetic analysis of the Enhancer of zeste locus and its role in gene regulation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 126:185-199[Abstract].

JONES, R. S. and W. M. GELBART, 1993  The Drosophila Polycomb-group gene Enhancer of zeste shares a domain of sequence similarity with trithorax.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:6357-6366[Abstract/Free Full Text].

JONES, C. A., J. NG, A. J. PETERSON, K. MORGAN, and J. SIMON et al., 1998  The Drosophila esc and E(z) proteins are direct partners in Polycomb group-mediated repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2825-2834[Abstract/Free Full Text].

RGENS, G., 1985  A group of genes controlling the spatial expression of the bithorax complex in Drosophila. Nature 316:153-155.

KALISCH, W. E. and B. RASMUSON, 1974  Changes of zeste phenotype induced by autosomal mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.. Hereditas 78:97-103[Medline].

KENNISON, J. A. and J. W. TAMKUN, 1988  Dosage-dependent modifiers of Polycomb and Antennapedia mutations in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:8136-8140[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KENNISON, J. A. and J. W. TAMKUN, 1992  Trans-regulation of homeotic genes in Drosophila. New Biol. 4:91-96[Medline].

KIM, Y. W., G. A. OTTERSON, R. A. KRATZKE, A. B. COXON, and F. J. KAYE, 1994  Differential specificity for binding of retinoblastoma binding protein 2 to RB, p107, and TATA-binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:7256-7264[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KYBA, M. and H. W. BROCK, 1998a  The Drosophila Polycomb group protein Psc contacts ph and Pc through specific conserved domains. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2712-2720[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KYBA, M. and H. W. BROCK, 1998b  The SAM domain of polyhomeotic, RAE28, and Scm mediates specific interactions through conserved residues. Dev. Genet. 22:74-84[Medline].

LAJEUNESSE, D. and A. SHEARN, 1995  Trans-regulation of thoracic homeotic selector genes of the Antennapedia and bithorax complexes by the trithorax group genes: absent, small, and homeotic discs 1 and 2.. Mech. Dev. 53:123-139[Medline].

LAJEUNESSE, D. and A. SHEARN, 1996  E(z): a polycomb group gene or a trithorax group gene? Development 122:2189-2197[Abstract].

LAMBERTSSON, A., 1998  The Minute genes in Drosophila and their molecular functions. Adv. Genet. 38:69-134[Medline].

LEWIS, E. B., 1968  Genetic control of developmental pathways in Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Int. Congr. Genet. 2:96-97.

LEWIS, E. B., 1978  A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276:565-570[Medline].

LINDSLEY, D. L., and G. G. ZIMM, 1992 The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, San Diego.

LUGER, K. and T. J. RICHMOND, 1998  DNA binding within the nucleosome core. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8:33-40[Medline].

LUO, R. X., A. A. POSTIGO, and D. C. DEAN, 1998  Rb interacts with histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Cell 92:463-473[Medline].

MAGNAGHI-JAULIN, L., R. GROISMAN, I. NAGUIBNEVA, P. ROBIN, and S. LORAIN et al., 1998  Retinoblastoma protein represses transcription by recruiting a histone deacetylase. Nature 391:601-605[Medline].

MANCINI, M. A., B. SHAN, J. A. NICKERSON, S. PENMAN, and W. H. LEE, 1994  The retinoblastoma gene product is a cell cycle-dependent, nuclear matrix-associated protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:418-422[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MANSFIELD, E., E. HERSPERGER, J. BIGGS, and A. SHEARN, 1994  Genetic and molecular analysis of hyperplastic discs, a gene whose product is required for regulation of cell proliferation in Drosophila melanogaster imaginal discs and germ cells. Dev. Biol. 165:507-526[Medline].

MAZO, A. M., D. H. HUANG, B. A. MOZER, and I. B. DAWID, 1990  The trithorax gene, a trans-acting regulator of the bithorax complex in Drosophila, encodes a protein with zinc-binding domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:2112-2116[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ORLANDO, V. and R. PARO, 1993  Mapping Polycomb-repressed domains in the bithorax complex using in vivo formaldehyde cross-linked chromatin. Cell 75:1187-1198[Medline].

PAPOULAS, O. S., J. BEEK, S. MOSELEY, C. M. MCCALLUM, and M. SARTE et al., 1998  The Drosophila trithorax group proteins BRM, ASH1, and ASH2 are subunits of distinct protein complexes. Development 125:3955-3966[Abstract].

PHILLIPS, M. and A. SHEARN, 1990  Mutations in polycombeotic, a gene of the Polycomb set of Drosophila melanogaster, cause a wide range of maternal and zygotic phenotypes. Genetics 125:91-101[Abstract].

PIRROTTA, V., 1986 Cloning Drosophila genes, pp. 83–110 in Drosophila: A Practical Approach, edited by D. B. ROBERTS. IRL Press, Oxford.

PURO, J. and T. NYGREN, 1975  Mode of action of a homoeotic gene in Drosophila melanogaster: localization and dosage effects of Polycomb.. Hereditas 81:237-248[Medline].

RASTELLI, L., C. S. CHAN, and V. PIROTTA, 1993  Related chromosome binding sites for zeste, suppressors of zeste and Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila and their dependence on Enhancer of zeste function. EMBO J. 12:1513-1522[Medline].

ROSEN, C., D. DORSETT, and J. JACK, 1998  A proline-rich region in the Zeste protein is essential for transvection and white repression by Zeste. Genetics 148:1865-1874[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ROZOVSKAIA, T., S. TILLIB, S. D. SMITH, Y. SEDKOV, and O. ROZENBLATT-ROSEN et al., 1999  Trithorax and ASH1 interact directly and associate with the trithorax group responsive bxd region of the Ultrabithorax promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:6441-6447[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SANTAMARIA, P. and N. B. RANDSHOLT, 1995  Characterization of a region of the X chromosome of Drosophila including multi sex combs (mxc), a Polycomb group gene which also functions as a tumor suppressor. Mol. Gen. Genet. 246:282-290[Medline].

SATO, T., P. H. HAYES, and R. E. DENELL, 1984  Homeosis in Drosophila: maternal effect of the Enhancer of Polycomb locus and its interaction with Polycomb and related loci. Dev. Genet. 4:185-198.

SCHINDLER, U., H. BECKMANN, and A. CASHMORE, 1993  HAT3.1, a novel Arabidopsis homeodomain protein containing a conserved cysteine-rich region. Plant J. 4:137-150[Medline].

SCHUMACHER, A. and T. MAGNUSON, 1997  Murine Polycomb- and trithorax-group genes regulate homeotic pathways and beyond. Trends Genet. 13:167-170.

SEUM, C., A. SPIERER, D. PAULI, J. SZIDONYA, and G. REUTER et al., 1996  Position-effect variegation in Drosophila depends on dose of the gene encoding the E2F transcriptional activator and cell cycle regulator. Development 122:1949-1956[Abstract].

SHANDALA, T., R. D. KORTSCHAK, S. GREGORY, and R. SAINT, 1999  The Drosophila dead ringer gene is required for early embryonic patterning through regulation of argos and buttonhead expression. Development 126:4341-4349[Abstract].

SHEARN, A., 1989  The ash1, ash2 and trithorax genes of Drosophila melanogaster are functionally related. Genetics 121:517-525[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SHEARN, A., T. RICE, A. GAREN, and W. GEHRING, 1971  Imaginal disc abnormalities in lethal mutants of Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 68:2695-2698.

SHEARN, A., E. HERSPERGER, and G. HERPERGER, 1987  Genetic studies of mutations at two loci of Drosophila melanogaster which cause a wide variety of homeotic transformations. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 196:231-242.

SIMON, J., 1995  Locking in stable states of gene expression: transcriptional control during Drosophila development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7:376-385[Medline].

SIMON, J., A. CHIANG, and W. BENDER, 1992  Ten different Polycomb group genes are required for spatial control of the abdA and AbdB homeotic products. Development 114:493-505[Abstract].

SINCLAIR, D. A., T. A. MILNE, J. W. HODGSON, J. SHELLARD, and C. A. SALINAS et al., 1998  The Additional sex combs gene of Drosophila encodes a chromatin protein that binds to shared and unique Polycomb group sites on polytene chromosomes. Development 125:1207-1216[Abstract].

SINCLAIR, D. A. R., R. B. CAMPBELL, F. NICHOLLS, E. SLADE, and H. W. BROCK, 1992  Genetic analysis of the additional sex combs locus of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 130:817-825[Abstract].

SINGH, P., J. COE, and W. HONG, 1995  A role for retinoblastoma protein in potentiating transcriptional activation by the glucocorticoid receptor. Nature 374:562-565[Medline].

SOKAL, R. R., and F. J. ROHLF, 1969 Biometry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

STASSEN, M. J., D. BAILEY, S. NELSON, V. CHINWALLA, and P. J. HARTE, 1995  The Drosophila trithorax proteins contain a novel variant of the nuclear receptor type DNA binding domain and an ancient conserved motif found in other chromosomal proteins. Mech. Dev. 52:209-223[Medline].

STRUHL, G., 1981  A gene product required for correct initiation of segmental determination in Drosophila. Nature 293:36-41[Medline].

STRUHL, G., 1983  Role of the esc+ gene product in ensuring the selective expression of segment specific homeotic genes in Drosophila. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 76:297-331[Medline].

STRUTT, H. and R. PARO, 1997  The Polycomb group protein complex of Drosophila melanogaster has different compositions at different target genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6773-6783[Abstract].

STRUTT, H., G. CAVALLI, and R. PARO, 1997  Co-localization of Polycomb protein and GAGA factor on regulatory elements responsible for the maintenance of homeotic gene expression. EMBO J. 16:3621-3632[Medline].

TIE, F., T. FURUYAMA, and P. HARTE, 1998  The Drosophila Polycomb group proteins ESC and E(Z) bind directly to each other and co-localize at multiple chromosomal sites. Development 125:3483-3496[Abstract].

TIMMONS, L., E. HERSPERGER, E. WOODHOUSE, J. XU, and L.-Z. LIU et al., 1993  The expression of the Drosophila awd gene during normal development and in neoplastic brain tumors caused by lgl mutations. Dev. Biol. 158:364-379[Medline].

TRIPOULAS, N. A., E. HERSPERGER, D. LAJEUNESSE, and A. SHEARN, 1994  Molecular genetic analysis of the Drosophila melanogaster gene absent, small or homeotic discs1 (ash1). Genetics 137:1027-1038[Abstract].

TRIPOULAS, N. A., D. LAJEUNESSE, J. GILDEA, and A. SHEARN, 1996  The Drosophila ash1 gene gene product which is localized at specific sites on polytene chromosome contains a SET domain and a PHD finger. Genetics 143:913-928[Abstract].

VAZQUEZ, M., L. MOORE, and J. A. KENNISON, 1999  The trithorax group gene osa encodes an ARID-domain protein that genetically interacts with the brahma chromatin-remodeling factor to regulate transcription. Development 126:733-742[Abstract].

WEDEEN, C., K. HARDING, and M. LEVINE, 1986  Spatial regulation of Antennapedia and bithorax gene expression by the Polycomb locus of Drosophila. Cell 44:739-748[Medline].

WHITE, R. A., J. J. BROOKMAN, A. P. GOULD, L. A. MEADOWS, and L. S. SHASHIDHARA et al., 1992  J. Cell Sci. Suppl. 16:53-60[Medline].

WU, C. T., R. S. JONES, P. F. LASKO, and W. M. GELBART, 1989  Homeosis and the interaction of zeste and white in Drosophila. Mol. Gen. Genet. 218:559-564[Medline].




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
N. Lee, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, R. S. Jones, and Y. Zhang
The H3K4 Demethylase Lid Associates with and Inhibits Histone Deacetylase Rpd3
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2009; 29(6): 1401 - 1410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Matyash, N. Singh, S. D. Hanes, H. Urlaub, and H. Jackle
SAP18 Promotes Kruppel-dependent Transcriptional Repression by Enhancer-specific Histone Deacetylation
J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2009; 284(5): 3012 - 3020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
S. Petruk, S. T. Smith, Y. Sedkov, and A. Mazo
Association of trxG and PcG proteins with the bxd maintenance element depends on transcriptional activity
Development, July 15, 2008; 135(14): 2383 - 2390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
D. Pasini, K. H. Hansen, J. Christensen, K. Agger, P. A.C. Cloos, and K. Helin
Coordinated regulation of transcriptional repression by the RBP2 H3K4 demethylase and Polycomb-Repressive Complex 2
Genes & Dev., May 15, 2008; 22(10): 1345 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Lloret-Llinares, C. Carre, A. Vaquero, N. de Olano, and F. Azorin
Characterization of Drosophila melanogaster JmjC+N histone demethylases
Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2008; 36(9): 2852 - 2863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
P. A.C. Cloos, J. Christensen, K. Agger, and K. Helin
Erasing the methyl mark: histone demethylases at the center of cellular differentiation and disease
Genes & Dev., May 1, 2008; 22(9): 1115 - 1140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
J. Secombe, L. Li, L. Carlos, and R. N. Eisenman
The Trithorax group protein Lid is a trimethyl histone H3K4 demethylase required for dMyc-induced cell growth
Genes & Dev., March 1, 2007; 21(5): 537 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P.-M. Dehe, B. Dichtl, D. Schaft, A. Roguev, M. Pamblanco, R. Lebrun, A. Rodriguez-Gil, M. Mkandawire, K. Landsberg, A. Shevchenko, et al.
Protein Interactions within the Set1 Complex and Their Roles in the Regulation of Histone 3 Lysine 4 Methylation
J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2006; 281(46): 35404 - 35412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
B. D. Fodor, S. Kubicek, M. Yonezawa, R. J. O'Sullivan, R. Sengupta, L. Perez-Burgos, S. Opravil, K. Mechtler, G. Schotta, and T. Jenuwein
Jmjd2b antagonizes H3K9 trimethylation at pericentric heterochromatin in mammalian cells
Genes & Dev., June 15, 2006; 20(12): 1557 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
C. Baroux, V. Gagliardini, D. R. Page, and U. Grossniklaus
Dynamic regulatory interactions of Polycomb group genes: MEDEA autoregulation is required for imprinted gene expression in Arabidopsis.
Genes & Dev., May 1, 2006; 20(9): 1081 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A. Klebes, A. Sustar, K. Kechris, H. Li, G. Schubiger, and T. B. Kornberg
Regulation of cellular plasticity in Drosophila imaginal disc cells by the Polycomb group, trithorax group and lama genes
Development, August 15, 2005; 132(16): 3753 - 3765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Attwooll, S. Oddi, P. Cartwright, E. Prosperini, K. Agger, P. Steensgaard, C. Wagener, C. Sardet, M. C. Moroni, and K. Helin
A Novel Repressive E2F6 Complex Containing the Polycomb Group Protein, EPC1, That Interacts with EZH2 in a Proliferation-specific Manner
J. Biol. Chem., January 14, 2005; 280(2): 1199 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
A. Kirmizis and P. J. Farnham
Genomic Approaches That Aid in the Identification of Transcription Factor Target Genes
Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2004; 229(8): 705 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. K. Cheng and A. Shearn
The Direct Interaction Between ASH2, a Drosophila Trithorax Group Protein, and SKTL, a Nuclear Phosphatidylinositol 4-Phosphate 5-Kinase, Implies a Role for Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate in Maintaining Transcriptionally Active Chromatin
Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1213 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
A. Roguev, A. Shevchenko, D. Schaft, H. Thomas, A. F. Stewart, and A. Shevchenko
A Comparative Analysis of an Orthologous Proteomic Environment in the Yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, February 1, 2004; 3(2): 125 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
D. V. Fyodorov, M. D. Blower, G. H. Karpen, and J. T. Kadonaga
Acf1 confers unique activities to ACF/CHRAC and promotes the formation rather than disruption of chromatin in vivo
Genes & Dev., January 15, 2004; 18(2): 170 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
F. Janody, J. D. Lee, N. Jahren, D. J. Hazelett, A. Benlali, G. I. Miura, I. Draskovic, and J. E. Treisman
A Mosaic Genetic Screen Reveals Distinct Roles for trithorax and Polycomb Group Genes in Drosophila Eye Development
Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 187 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
A. A. Boudreault, D. Cronier, W. Selleck, N. Lacoste, R. T. Utley, S. Allard, J. Savard, W. S. Lane, S. Tan, and J. Cote
Yeast Enhancer of Polycomb defines global Esa1-dependent acetylation of chromatin
Genes & Dev., June 1, 2003; 17(11): 1415 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Tan, A. L. Shaw, B. Madsen, K. Jensen, J. Taylor-Papadimitriou, and P. S. Freemont
Human PLU-1 Has Transcriptional Repression Properties and Interacts with the Developmental Transcription Factors BF-1 and PAX9
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2003; 278(23): 20507 - 20513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. S. Lee, S. Kennedy, A. C. Tolonen, and G. Ruvkun
DAF-16 Target Genes That Control C. elegans Life-Span and Metabolism
Science, April 25, 2003; 300(5619): 644 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M.-W. Hur, J. D. Laney, S.-H. Jeon, J. Ali, and M. D. Biggin
Zeste maintains repression of Ubx transgenes: support for a new model of Polycomb repression
Development, March 5, 2003; 129(6): 1339 - 1343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Roguev, D. Schaft, A. Shevchenko, R. Aasland, A. Shevchenko, and A. F. Stewart
High Conservation of the Set1/Rad6 Axis of Histone 3 Lysine 4 Methylation in Budding and Fission Yeasts
J. Biol. Chem., February 28, 2003; 278(10): 8487 - 8493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Faucheux, J.-Y. Roignant, S. Netter, J. Charollais, C. Antoniewski, and L. Theodore
batman Interacts with Polycomb and trithorax Group Genes and Encodes a BTB/POZ Protein That Is Included in a Complex Containing GAGA Factor
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2003; 23(4): 1181 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cell Growth Differ.Home page
D. Wilsker, A. Patsialou, P. B. Dallas, and E. Moran
ARID Proteins: A Diverse Family of DNA Binding Proteins Implicated in the Control of Cell Growth, Differentiation, and Development
Cell Growth Differ., March 1, 2002; 13(3): 95 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. Calgaro, M. Boube, D. L. Cribbs, and H.-M. Bourbon
The Drosophila Gene taranis Encodes a Novel Trithorax Group Member Potentially Linked to the Cell Cycle Regulatory Apparatus
Genetics, February 1, 2002; 160(2): 547 - 560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. O'Connell, L. Wang, S. Robert, C. A. Jones, R. Saint, and R. S. Jones
Polycomblike PHD Fingers Mediate Conserved Interaction with Enhancer of Zeste Protein
J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2001; 276(46): 43065 - 43073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
I. Bajusz, L. Sipos, Z. Gyorgypal, E. A. Carrington, R. S. Jones, J. Gausz, and H. Gyurkovics
The Trithorax-mimic Allele of Enhancer of zeste Renders Active Domains of Target Genes Accessible to Polycomb-Group-Dependent Silencing in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, November 1, 2001; 159(3): 1135 - 1150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A. Busturia, A. Lloyd, F. Bejarano, M. Zavortink, H. Xin, and S. Sakonju
The MCP silencer of the Drosophila Abd-B gene requires both Pleiohomeotic and GAGA factor for the maintenance of repression
Development, June 1, 2001; 128(11): 2163 - 2173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]