P-Element Repression in Drosophila melanogaster by a Naturally Occurring Defective Telomeric P Copy

Corresponding author: Stéphane Ronsseray, Département Dynamique du Génome et Evolution, Institut Jacques Monod, Université Paris 7, 2 place Jussieu, 75251 Paris Cedex 05, France., ronsseray{at}ijm.jussieu.fr (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. J. SIMMONS

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

In Drosophila melanogaster, hybrid dysgenesis occurs in progeny from crosses between females lacking P elements and males carrying P elements scattered throughout the genome. We have genetically isolated a naturally occurring P insertion at cytological location 1A, from a Tunisian population. The Nasr'Allah-P(1A) element [NA-P(1A)] has a deletion of the first 871 bp including the P promoter. It is flanked at the 3' end by telomeric associated sequences and at the 5' end by a HeT-A element sequence. The NA-P(1A) element strongly represses dysgenic sterility and P transposition. However, when testing P-promoter repression, NA-P(1A) was unable to repress a germinally expressed P-lacZ construct bearing no 5'-homology with it. Conversely, a second P-lacZ construct, in which the fusion with lacZ takes place in exon 3 of P, was successfully repressed by NA-P(1A). This suggests that NA-P(1A) repression involves a homology-dependent component.

THE P-transposable element is a recent invader of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. It is thought to have entered the genome of this species within the last 50 years (KIDWELL 1983 ). Strains that possess P elements are called P strains; strains that do not are called M strains. When P males are crossed to M females, the resulting progeny exhibit a syndrome of germline abnormalities (KIDWELL et al. 1977 ) due to P-element activity. This syndrome, called hybrid dysgenesis, is repressed by various mechanisms (ENGELS 1989 ). In some populations, repression is maternally inherited—a condition called P cytotype (ENGELS 1979 ). In others, it is biparentally transmitted (KIDWELL 1985 ; BLACK et al. 1987 ; SIMMONS et al. 1990 ). Of the 30–60 P copies present in a P-strain genome, one-third are complete P elements (BINGHAM et al. 1982 ; O'HARE and RUBIN 1983 ; O'HARE et al. 1992 ). These elements can produce the transposase required for their mobility (KARESS and RUBIN 1984 ; RIO et al. 1986 ) and are therefore autonomous. The other two-thirds of the P elements in a P-strain genome are nonautonomous because they are structurally incomplete; however, many of these defective elements can be mobilized in trans by complete P elements (ENGELS 1984 , ENGELS 1989 ) because they possess the sequences recognized by the P transposase.

P cytotype represses transcription from the P promoter (LEMAITRE and COEN 1991 ; LEMAITRE et al. 1993 ; COEN et al. 1994 ). Although in the short term the cytotype is maternally determined, in the long term, it is chromosomally determined by the P elements themselves (ENGELS 1979 , ENGELS 1989 ). Transformation of an M genome with P elements can induce the development of P repression over generations (PRESTON and ENGELS 1989 ). Conversely, the removal by segregation of the P elements of a P strain leads to the loss of repression capacities in the progeny (SVED 1987 ). The repression ability of a P element depends on its structure and its insertion site (ROBERTSON and ENGELS 1989 ; MISRA and RIO 1990 ; HIGUET et al. 1992 ; GLOOR et al. 1993 ; MISRA et al. 1993 ; RASMUSSON et al. 1993 ). We have previously sought to identify regulatory P elements in the chromosomes of natural populations (RONSSERAY et al. 1989 ; BIEMONT et al. 1990 ) because selection has probably favored their retention. We isolated, in a genomic context devoid of other P elements, a pair of autonomous P elements inserted near the telomere of an X chromosome (cytological site 1A on the polytene chromosomes) from a Russian natural population (RONSSERAY et al. 1991 ). The resulting line, called Lk-P(1A), can completely repress P-induced hybrid dysgenesis, P transposition, and transcription from the P-element promoter in germline cells (RONSSERAY et al. 1991 ; RONSSERAY et al. 1996 ; LEMAITRE et al. 1993 ). Furthermore, this repression is maternally transmitted but is lost if the P elements at 1A are removed by segregation (RONSSERAY et al. 1993 ). The Lk-P(1A) P elements are inserted in telomeric associated sequences (TAS; KARPEN and SPRADLING 1992 ; RONSSERAY et al. 1996 ), which have some properties of heterochromatin, including the ability to silence transgenes inserted within them (WALLRATH and ELGIN 1995 ; CRYDERMAN et al. 1999 ). In addition, the repression ability of the P(1A) elements is sensitive to the dosage of HP1, a nonhistone heterochromatin protein (JAMES and ELGIN 1986 ; WUSTMANN et al. 1989 ), which binds mostly to centromeres and telomeres (JAMES and ELGIN 1986 ; JAMES et al. 1989 ; FANTI et al. 1998 ); heterozygosity for a null allele of Su(var)205, the gene that encodes this protein, strongly impairs the repression ability of the Lk-P(1A) P elements (RONSSERAY et al. 1996 , RONSSERAY et al. 1997 ). Genetic and molecular studies show that the P(1A) elements are expressed (RONSSERAY et al. 1991 , RONSSERAY et al. 1996 ; ROCHE et al. 1995 ). This expression is thought to be important for the repression ability of the Lk-P(1A) stock because genetic analysis has revealed the existence of a maternally transmitted component of repression termed the "pre-P cytotype" (RONSSERAY et al. 1993 ). Indeed, females heterozygous for the Lk-P(1A) P elements produce oocytes that do not carry the Lk-P(1A) elements; however, they transmit in their oocytes a condition that stimulates P repression in their progeny.

It is possible that the regulatory properties of the P(1A) elements do not depend solely on the expression of these elements. P-lacZ insertions at cytological site 1A and a P-w-ry insertion at an autosomal telomere (100F) have been shown to prevent the germline expression of a euchromatic P-lacZ insertion, a phenomenon termed trans-silencing (ROCHE and RIO 1998 ), and to stimulate the regulatory properties of other P elements in a P-strain genome (RONSSERAY et al. 1998 ). These phenomena are strongly associated and have been interpreted to result from chromatin-chromatin interactions involving the telomeric P reporter and the euchromatic P insertions. However, the telomeric P-transgene insertions do not by themselves repress P-induced hybrid dysgenesis (RONSSERAY et al. 1998 ), probably because of their inability to encode a P polypeptide. The regulatory properties of the P elements at cytological site 1A are therefore thought to involve both P-encoded product(s) and chromatin-chromatin interactions.

In this article, we report the genetic and molecular characterization of a naturally occurring P insertion at the 1A site that is derived from a Tunisian population (Nasr'Allah). Unlike previous naturally occurring P insertions at 1A, this element [NA-P(1A)] has a large deletion at its 5' end, encompassing both the 31-bp terminal repeat and the P promoter. The properties of this new P(1A) element are investigated.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Drosophila stocks:
Canton^y is a typical M line (KIDWELL et al. 1977 ) containing no P elements and marked with a spontaneously occurring allele of yellow.

Muller-5 is an M line carrying the Muller-5 (Basc) balancer X chromosome marked with Bar and w^a (LINDSLEY and ZIMM 1992 ).

Harwich-2 is a P line. The subline used here shows >80 P labels by in situ hybridization on polytene chromosomes. It has an unidentified autosomal recessive marker (sepia-colored eye), which appeared spontaneously in the stock.

M5/sn^w; ₂ is a P line with the genetic background of the P strain ₂. It carries numerous autonomous P elements (ENGELS 1984 ) and has both the Muller-5 balancer chromosome and an X chromosome marked with the hypermutable allele sn^w, which causes a slight malformation of the bristles (ENGELS 1984 ). This allele is the result of two defective P elements inserted at the singed locus. In the M cytotype (absence of P regulation), sn^w is unstable in the presence of transposase, mutating to sn^e (with a more extreme phenotype) or to sn⁺ (wild type). In each case, the change of phenotype is due to the excision of one of the two P elements. The excision rate of these P elements can be quantified by measuring the instability of sn^w in appropriate crosses.

w cv sn³ (Umea-30200) is a stock containing an extreme sn allele. When made heterozygous with the various derivatives of sn^w, the sn³ allele enhances their expression and makes scoring easier. The dominance relations of the singed alleles are sn⁺ > sn^w > sn^e = sn³ (SIMMONS 1987 ).

ry⁵⁰⁶ Sb P[ry⁺ 2-3] (99B)/TM6 Ubx (abbreviated Sb 2-3) is a line with the 2-3(99B) P element linked to a dominant bristle marker (Stubble, abbreviated Sb).

Birmingham 2/CyO (abbreviated Birm2/CyO) is a strain with numerous defective P elements on the Birm2 second chromosome. It is devoid of repression abilities.

w^m4 ; Su(var)2-5⁰⁴/Cy Roi is a stock with a Su(var)205 allele that encodes a truncated nonfunctional HP1 protein (EISSENBERG et al. 1992 ). This allele strongly impairs the repression ability of Lk-P(1A) (RONSSERAY et al. 1996 , RONSSERAY et al. 1997 ).

Nasr'Allah31 ("N31") is an inbred line that was collected at Nasr'Allah, Tunisia in 1985 (IZAABEL et al. 1987 ). The N31 line had ~30–40 P elements, including a defective copy at the cytological site 1A (IZAABEL 1988 ), and it possessed a maternally inherited P regulatory ability that appeared to be correlated with the P element at 1A (IZAABEL 1988 ).

P-1152: P[ry^+t7.2 = IArB]A171.1F1; ry⁵⁰⁶ (synonym WG-1152) is a line, from Walter Gehring, which carries a P-lacZ-ry-adh construct at the cytological site 1A. It is inserted in TAS (ROCHE and RIO 1998 ). No expression is detected in the female germline, even after an overnight staining.

Gonadal dysgenesis assay:
The ability of lines to repress the occurrence of gonadal dysgenic (GD) sterility was measured by the "A* assay" (KIDWELL et al. 1977 ). Females of the tested line were crossed with strong P males (Harwich-2). For each test cross, 3–10 pairs were mated en masse and immediately placed at 29°. Parents were discarded after 3 days of egg laying. Approximately 2 days after the onset of eclosion, G₁ progeny were collected and allowed to mature for 2 days at room temperature. Twenty-five to 50 G₁ females were then taken at random for dissection. Dissected ovaries were scored as unilaterally dysgenic (S1 type) or bilaterally dysgenic (S0 type; SCHAEFFER et al. 1979 ). The frequency of gonadal dysgenesis was calculated as %GD = %S0 + ¹/₂ %S1 and is referred to as percentage of GD A* (%GD A*). The M cytotype, which allows P elements to be active, results in a high percentage of GD A*, whereas the P cytotype, which represses P-element activity, results in a low percentage of GD A* (<5%). An intermediate percentage indicates incomplete repression.

P-excision assay:
sn^w hypermutability was used to assay the capacity of lines to regulate P-element excision in the germline. In the P cytotype, sn^w is almost completely stable even in the presence of transposase. Tested females (10–15) were crossed en masse with 15 sn^w; ₂ males at 20°. Fifteen G₁ virgin females were crossed en masse with 15 w cv sn³ males at 25° and allowed to lay eggs in successive bottles for 10 days. Among the G₂ females, sn^e and sn^w individuals were scored. The mutation rate is equal to u = () x 100. The absence of regulation results in a high mutation rate, whereas strong regulation results in a low or null mutation rate.

Assay for repression of pupal lethality in the soma:
P-element transposition is naturally restricted to the germline due to an inhibition of the splicing of the last intron of the transposase gene in the somatic tissues (LASKI et al. 1986 ; SIEBEL and RIO 1990 ). The 2-3 P element is an in vitro-modified P element from which the last intron has been removed. Consequently, this element produces transposase in both the somatic and germline tissues (ROBERTSON et al. 1988 ). 2-3 has been inserted at cytological location 99B on chromosome 3, where it is immobile. In the absence of P regulation, 2-3 combined with numerous defective P elements results in pupal lethality, most likely because of somatic chromosome breakage (ENGELS et al. 1987 ). In the presence of P regulation, this combination does not produce pupal lethality. Twenty females from the line under test were crossed at 18° with 20 Sb 2-3 males. Twenty G₁ males carrying the 2-3 element were crossed with 20 Birm 2/CyO females. The G₂ progeny were allowed to develop at 25° and the Sb⁺ and Sb phenotypes were scored among the G₂ females that were not Cy. The Sb individuals, which carry 2-3, normally die at the pupal stage in the absence of P repression, whereas in the presence of P repression, they survive. The Sb⁺ individuals, which lack 2-3, survive in the presence or absence of P repression and serve as a viability control. Thus among the non-Cy progeny, a percentage of Sb ~50% indicates complete repression of pupal lethality.

Repression of P-lacZ expression in ovaries:
G₁ females derived from a cross between tested line females and males from a line bearing a transgenic P-lacZ element were examined for their capacity to repress the P promoter in ovaries by staining or by a quantitative assay for enzyme activity. Two 5'P-lacZ constructs were used. The structures of these constructs are diagrammed along with the results (see Fig 4). In the first one, P[lac, ry⁺]A, lacZ is fused in frame with the first 587 bp of P, which include exon 0 and part of exon 1. The BQ16 insertion of this construct was isolated in a screen for female sterile mutations. It is located on the second chromosome and expresses the P-lacZ transgene in the germline tissues of the ovaries and testes (J. L. COUDERC and F. A. LASKI, personal communication). However, the genes adjacent to this insertion are still unidentified. In the second construct, PLH, lacZ is fused in frame with the first 2410 bp of P, which span from exon 0 to part of exon 3 (KOBAYASHI et al. 1993 ). This construct is driven by the hsp70 promoter. Without heat shock, no staining is detected in the female germline even after an overnight staining. When heat-shock induced, the PLH3 insertion of this construct is expressed in the nurse cells and in the mature oocyte. Staining of ovaries and enzyme assays to measure lacZ expression was performed as described in LEMAITRE et al. 1993 . The results of the enzyme assays are given in nanomoles per minute per milligram of protein. High activity indicates an absence of P repression and low activity indicates strong P repression (LEMAITRE et al. 1993 ).

View larger version (14K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 1. Structure of the P element of NA-P(1A). (Top) The restriction map is shown with the probes (S1, S2, S3) used for Southern blot analysis and the primers (solid arrows) used for PCR. All sites from SspI (160) to XhoI (729) were found to be absent in the NA-P(1A) element but the sites from AvaII (1045) to AvaII (2883) were found to be present. (Bottom) The deleted part of NA-P(1A) is shown (dashed box) on a canonical P-element map (RIO et al. 1986 ). Positions of exons are given below the map with the position of the first nucleotide present in the NA-P(1A) element in parentheses. The arrowheads indicate the 31-bp inverted terminal repeats of the P element.

View larger version (45K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 2. Sequences flanking the NA-P(1A) P element. Boldface italic, HeT-A homologous sequence; small caps, P-homologous sequence; boldface, TAS-homologous sequence. The first nucleotide at the 5' end of the P element corresponds to nucleotide 872 in the canonical P-element sequence (O'HARE and RUBIN 1983 ).

View larger version (78K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 3. Northern blot analysis of poly(A)+ RNA in ovaries: Autoradiography was carried out for 26 hr (A) and for 7 days (B). The 2.5-kb P transcript is indicated. To check for relative quantities of RNA (C), the same filter was rehybridized with a riboprobe from RP49, a ribosomal protein cDNA (VASLET et al. 1980 ). Lanes: 1, Harwich-2; 2, Lk-P(1A); 3, NA-P(1A); 4, Cantony (M).

View larger version (16K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 4. P-lacZ structures used in repression assays. The NA-P(1A) element is also shown to allow easier comparisons with the P-lacZ structures. BQ16 and PLH3 are P[lac, ry+]A and PLH constructs, respectively. Numbers below the constructs correspond to nucleotide positions in the 2097-bp P-element sequence. tr.m., transformation markers.The fragment with the hsp70 promoter in the construct in PLH3 is 344 bp long. For a detailed structure of PLH3, see KOBAYASHI et al. 1993 .

Sensitivity of repression to Su(var)205:
NA-P(1A) females were crossed at 20° with heterozygous males, which had a wild-type allele of Su(var)205 on a balancer chromosome (Cy) and a mutant allele (Su(var)2-5⁰⁴) on a Cy⁺ chromosome. The regulatory properties of the two kinds of G₁ females, which had paternally inherited a mutant or a wild-type Su(var)205 allele, were tested by crossing sets of 5–10 females with P-strain (Harwich-2) males at 29°. For each replicate cross, the GD sterility percentage was determined by the dissection of 25–50 daughters.

Pre-P cytotype assay:
The ability of the NA-P(1A) line to elicit the pre-P cytotype, a maternally transmitted component of P repression (RONSSERAY et al. 1993 ), was also tested. The mating scheme is presented along with the results.

Sequences around the P elements at 1A:
Primers: For the primers deriving from the P sequence (denoted by the letter P), the number indicates the position in the P element (O'HARE and RUBIN 1983 ). Orientations are shown in Fig 1.

• P1118: 5'-TTGGTTTCCGGTACCTAAATCG-3'

• P1282: 5'-GCGGGGTGTCCGAAAAAACG-3'

• P1950: 5'-ACGCATTCTTTTAAATTTGTCATAC-3'

• P2751: 5'-CCACGGACATGCTAAGGGTTAA-3'

• M13 forward: 5'-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3'

• T7: 5'-TACGACTCACTATAGGGCG-3'.

Inverse PCR: The DNA adjacent to the 3' end of the P element was amplified by inverse PCR performed on a PstI digest of genomic DNA from NA-P(1A), using primers P1950 and P2751 and annealing temperature of 51°.

PCR with an adaptator: The DNA adjacent to the 5' end of the P element was obtained using the rapid amplification of genomic DNA end method developed by MIZOBUCHI and FROHMAN 1993 , in which the Bluescript SK plasmid was used as an adaptator. NA-P(1A) genomic DNA and Bluescript SK plasmid DNA (5 µg each) were digested overnight with SspI plus EcoRI and with HincII plus BamHI, respectively, to direct the ligation. PCR was performed on the ligation products using the M13 forward and P1282 primers and an annealing temperature of 53°. A nested PCR was then performed using internal primers M13 and P1118 at an annealing temperature of 56°.

RNA blot hybridization:
Total RNA was isolated from sets of 360 pairs of ovaries using the RNAzol reagent (Bioprobe Systems, Montreuil Sous Bois, France). Poly(A)⁺ RNA was purified by chromatography through an oligo(dT) column, separated by electrophoresis in a 1.3% agarose/formaldehyde gel, and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane under conditions recommended by the supplier (Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH).

Statistical analysis: The repression capacities as measured by GD sterility percentages were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test performed on A* assay replicates.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Synthesis of a line with a single P-hybridization site at 1A:
A line carrying the tip of the X chromosome from the inbred N31 line (IZAABEL 1988 ) in an M-type chromosomal background was synthesized as described previously for the synthesis of the Lk-P(1A) line (RONSSERAY et al. 1991 ), except that an M line with autosomal balancers was used to substitute the autosomal complement. The resulting Nasr'Allah-P(1A) line [NA-P(1A)] was labeled only at 1A by in situ hybridization with a P-element probe (data not shown). This line is genetically marked with a w^sp allele.

Molecular analysis of the structure of the P element of NA-P(1A) and characterization of the adjacent sequences:
Fig 1 shows the structure of the canonical P element, the probes and primers used in the analysis, and the map of the NA-P(1A) P element derived from Southern blot analysis and DNA sequencing. Southern blotting has shown that the NA-P(1A) P element is deleted at its 5' end. The deletion breakpoint maps between the XhoI site (coordinate 729) and the AvaII site (1045). To determine the precise structure of its 5' and 3' ends, the NA-P(1A) P element was partially sequenced using PCR products (Fig 2). The 3' end was found to be similar to that of the canonical P element. At the 5' end, the first 871 bp of the canonical P sequence (O'HARE and RUBIN 1983 ) are missing. The NA-P(1A) P element therefore lacks the 31-bp 5' terminal inverted repeat, the P promoter (53–103; KAUFMANN et al. 1989), and the transposase 5' binding site (48–68; KAUFMANN et al. 1989). Consequently, it cannot be mobilized by the transposase (MULLINS et al. 1989 ; BEALL and RIO 1997 ). Furthermore, this element cannot be transcribed unless transcription is initiated at an external promoter.

Inverse PCR was carried out to analyze the sequences adjacent to the NA-P(1A) P element (Fig 2). At the 5' end, the P element is flanked by a sequence homologous to the HeT-A transposable element (BIESSMANN et al. 1990 , BIESSMANN et al. 1992A , BIESSMANN et al. 1992B ; VALGEIRSDOTTIR et al. 1990 ). This LINE-like element is specific to Drosophila telomeres (BIESSMANN et al. 1990 , BIESSMANN et al. 1992A , BIESSMANN et al. 1992B ; LEVIS et al. 1993 ) and to the Y chromosome (DANILEVSKAYA et al. 1992 ). HeT-A elements are known to transpose to the termini of the chromosomes (BIESSMANN et al. 1990 , BIESSMANN et al. 1992A , BIESSMANN et al. 1992B ). They are distal to the TAS elements and constitute the terminal sequences of the chromosomes. At the 3' end of the NA-P(1A), the flanking sequence was found to be homologous to X-linked TAS elements (KARPEN and SPRADLING 1992 ). The adjacent sequence corresponds to a 173-bp internal subrepeat of the TAS elements. The maximum level of identity (100%) between the NA-P(1A) 3' adjacent sequence and the TAS of KARPEN and SPRADLING 1992 is found in the second internal 173-bp subrepeat of the TAS element.

Expression of the NA-P(1A) P copy:
Northern blot analysis was performed on poly(A)⁺ RNA extracted from the ovaries of the Lk-P(1A) and NA-P(1A) lines, the P strain Harwich-2, and the M strain Canton^y. A riboprobe from pS2-KS, which contains the HindIII-SalI fragment of the P element in the genomic DNA clone p25.1 (O'HARE and RUBIN 1983 ) inserted in the Bluescript SK+ vector, was hybridized to the blot. Fig 3A shows that, as expected, the M strain Canton^y produced no detectable P transcripts. Harwich-2, however, produced two different transcripts, a 2.5-kb transcript corresponding to the product of complete P elements and another transcript that was longer (KARESS and RUBIN 1984 ). With both Lk-P(1A) and NA-P(1A), no hybridizing signal was detected after 7 days of exposure (Fig 3B), or even after 26 days (data not shown). However, genetic analysis has shown that the P elements of Lk-P(1A) are expressed in the germline since this line exhibits a weak but significant transposase activity (RONSSERAY et al. 1996 ). Therefore, we cannot exclude that the NA-P(1A) element is also expressed at a low level.

Regulatory properties of the NA-P(1A) line:
The ability of the NA-P(1A) line to repress P-element activity was tested with four different assays.

Repression of GD A* sterility (Table 1, column 1): G₁ females reared at 29° from the cross of M females (Canton^y) with P males (Harwich-2) are sterile due to atrophy of the gonads (100% gonadal dysgenesis). Conversely, P females [Harwich-2 or Lk-P(1A)] crossed with P males produce G₁ females with trivial percentages of GD sterility (0.3 and 1.1%, respectively) due to a repressive component transmitted by the P females. With NA-P(1A) females, there is also nearly complete repression of GD sterility (1.9%). The level of repression of this line is as strong as that of Lk-P(1A).

Repression of excision of the defective P elements in the unstable singed-weak allele (Table 1, column 2): Both the sn^w allele and autonomous P elements, which supply transposase, were paternally introduced in the G₀. Daughters of M females produce 4% of sn^e in their progeny whereas daughters of P females [Harwich-2 or Lk-P(1A)] produce no sn^e in their progeny. The daughters of NA-P(1A) females produce only 0.1% sn^e in their progeny. Thus, the NA-P(1A) strain is a strong repressor of P-element excision.

Repression of P activity in the soma (Table 1, column 3): The combination of the somatically expressed transposase source 2-3 and defective P elements that lack P repression ability causes pupal lethality, probably because of somatic chromosome breakage (ROBERTSON et al. 1988 ). In the absence of P regulation, the Sb individuals, which carry 2-3, are therefore expected to die whereas in the presence of P regulation they are expected to live. There are no surviving Sb adult flies in the progeny from the M strain Canton^y (Table 1, column 3), whereas half of the adult progeny are Sb (50.3%) in the progeny of the P strain Harwich-2. Lk-P(1A) and NA-P(1A) fail to rescue pupal lethality since 1.2 and 0.4% of Sb flies are produced, respectively. These data are consistent with previous results showing that P(1A) lines are almost devoid of somatic repression capacities (RONSSERAY et al. 1996 ).

Repression of a P-lacZ element in the germline ( Fig 4 Fig 5 Fig 6; Table 1, column 4): The BQ16 P-lacZ insertion was used initially in this assay. The structure of this P reporter is shown in Fig 4; 587 bp of P are present upstream of the lacZ fusion. In M strains, this insertion is strongly expressed in the nurse cells and in the mature oocyte (Fig 5A). By contrast, G₁ females from the cross of Lk-P(1A) females with BQ16 males strongly repress lacZ activity in the germline (Fig 5B). P-1152 is an insertion of a P-lacZ construct at 1A in TAS (see MATERIALS AND METHODS) with the first 587 bp of P present upstream of the lacZ fusion. Females carrying the P-1152 transgene also strongly repress BQ16 expression (Fig 5C), thereby demonstrating that the trans-silencing effect previously described with a P-vasa-lacZ target (ROCHE and RIO 1998 ) also works on a P-lacZ target. Surprisingly, G₁ females from the cross between NA-P(1A) females and BQ16 males show strong lacZ staining (Fig 5D). Assays of lacZ activity were also performed on the ovaries of G₁ progeny from test crosses (tested line females x BQ16 males). According to these assays, NA-P(1A) fails to repress the lacZ activity of BQ16 (Table 1, column 4).

View larger version (119K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 5. Repression assay of the P-lacZ in BQ16. Each picture shows the staining of ovaries of G1 females from the cross of tested females with BQ16 males, reared at 20°. Tested females: (A) Cantony; (B) Lk-P(1A); (C) P-1152; (D) NA-P(1A). Staining reactions were performed overnight in the same experiment to allow a visual comparison. The BQ16 insertion expresses ß-galactosidase only in the ovarian germline tissues (nurse cells and mature oocyte).

View larger version (107K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 6. Repression assay of the P-lacZ in PLH3. Each picture shows the staining of ovaries of G1 females from the cross of tested females with PLH3 males, reared at 20°. Tested females: (A) Cantony; (B) Lk-P(1A); (C) P-1152; (D) NA-P(1A). Staining was performed as in Fig 5. The PLH3 reporter construct is driven by the hsp70 promoter (see Fig 4) and expression was induced by a 1-hr-30-min heat shock at 31° followed by 1 hr at 25° performed on adults. Without heat shock, the progeny of all crosses failed to show any staining (data not shown). The cytoplasmic staining observed with PLH3 might result from the increased size of the fusion protein or from a conformational change that affects nuclear localization.

The failure of NA-P(1A) to repress P-lacZ expression was also tested by staining assays with two other euchromatic insertions of the same P-lacZ construct as in BQ16, called ABOO and BA37 (J. L. COUDERC and F. LASKI, personal communication). Both are located on the second chromosome, at different genomic locations from BQ16. ABOO is expressed in nurse cells and mature oocytes. Here again, Lk-P(1A) repressed the ABOO P-lacZ insertion in the germline, whereas NA-P(1A) did not (data not shown). This shows that the inability of NA-P(1A) to repress is not restricted to the BQ16 genomic insertion site. BA37 is expressed in the follicle cells. It is repressed by Harwich but not by Lk-P(1A), P-1152, or NA-P(1A) (data not shown). This result is consistent with the fact that the repression ability of P(1A) lines is restricted to the germline (RONSSERAY et al. 1996 ).

Because of these results, the repression capacities of NA-P(1A) were tested with another P-lacZ structure in which the lacZ fusion is in exon 3 of the P element (PLH3, see Fig 4). By contrast to BQ16, which shares no 5' homology with NA-P(1A), the PLH3 construct has >1.5 kb of homology with NA-P(1A) upstream of the lacZ fusion. Fig 6A&NDASH;C, shows that, after a heat shock, the PLH3 transgene is strongly expressed in the germline and is repressed by both Lk-P(1A) and P-1152. Furthermore, it is also strongly repressed by NA-P(1A) (Fig 6D). This indicates that although NA-P(1A) is unable to repress the P promoter of the P-lacZ construct in BQ16, it can repress the P-lacZ construct in PLH3, suggesting that the homology between the 5' sequence of the telomeric P element and the P-lacZ transgene is important.

From the above tests, it appears that NA-P(1A) parallels the Lk-P(1A) line except for the ability to repress P-lacZ expression in the germline of different transgenic strains. The repression capacities as inferred from the different tests are therefore not strictly correlated.

Maternal inheritance assay of repression of GD sterility:
Depending on the strains, the regulatory properties in the P-M system can be maternally inherited ("P cytotype"; ENGELS 1979 ) or biparentally transmitted ("P susceptibility"; KIDWELL 1985 ). The repression ability of Lk-P(1A) has been shown to be maternally inherited (RONSSERAY et al. 1991 ). Consequently, we tested the inheritance of the NA-P(1A) repression ability. M females (Canton^y) were crossed to NA-P(1A) males (cross termed "M-MI" for M maternal inheritance) and reciprocally, NA-P(1A) females were crossed to Canton^y males (cross termed "P-MI" for P maternal inheritance) at 20°. In both cases, G₁ females were tested for their regulatory properties by the A* assay and the percentage of GD sterility was determined for G₂ females (Table 2, columns 1 and 2). Data from a similar experiment performed with Lk-P(1A) individuals instead of NA-P(1A) are also presented. With Lk-P(1A), P-MI G₁ females show strong repression ability because they have inherited the P cytotype from their Lk-P(1A) mothers; conversely, M-MI G₁ females show almost no repression ability because of the M cytotype inherited from their Canton^y mothers. With NA-P(1A), the two types of females also differed in their repression abilities (Table 2, columns 1 and 2; P < 0.01 by the Mann-Whitney test) but the level of repression found with the P-MI G₁ females from NA-P(1A) was weaker than that found with the corresponding females from Lk-P(1A) (74.4 vs. 2.2%). Nonetheless, these experimental results indicate that NA-P(1A) has a maternally transmitted repression ability similar to the P cytotype but much weaker than that of Lk-P(1A).

Sensitivity of NA-P(1A) repression ability to a mutation in Su(var)205:
The repression ability of Lk-P(1A) is strongly sensitive to mutations in Su(var)205, a gene that encodes HP1 (RONSSERAY et al. 1996 ). The presence of a null allele of Su(var)205 abolishes the ability of the Lk-P(1A) P elements to repress GD sterility. We tested the sensitivity of the repression capacities of NA-P(1A) to Su(var)205 by comparing females carrying two wild-type alleles of Su(var)205 with their sisters carrying a wild-type and a mutant allele (Table 2, columns 3 and 4). We detected a strong effect. Females that inherit the NA-P(1A) P element maternally and that carry two wild-type alleles of Su(var)205 repress GD sterility at a level (70.0%) close to that of the P-MI group in the maternal inheritance assay (74.4%, column 1). However, their sisters, which differ only by the presence of a mutated allele of Su(var)205, showed little or no repression capacity (95.2% sterility). This difference is highly significant (P < 0.01) by the Mann-Whitney test. NA-P(1A) repression ability is therefore sensitive to Su(var)205.

Thermosensitivity of NA-P(1A) repression ability:
The determination of P-repression capacities in G₁ females from crosses between P and M individuals is strongly thermosensitive (RONSSERAY et al. 1984 ; RONSSERAY 1986 ). During imaginal life, an 18° treatment results in a decrease of repression capacities whereas a treatment at temperatures >25° results in an enhancement of repression capacities. These modifications can be at least partially reversible. Lk-P(1A) repression is also thermosensitive (RONSSERAY et al. 1991 ; data reproduced here in Table 2, columns 5–7). The thermosensitivity of repression ability in G₁ females resulting from crosses between NA-P(1A) females and Canton^y males was investigated by aging sets of virgin G₁ females at different temperatures. Table 2 (columns 5–7) shows that the G₁ females, which have partial repression ability (58.3% sterility) at emergence, evolve toward a lack of repression capacities (81.0%) after 15 days at 18° and toward nearly complete repression ability (3.1%) after 10 days at 28.5°. Thus G₁ females from crosses between M and NA-P(1A) individuals show strong thermosensitivity in the determination of their repression ability.

Ability of NA-P(1A) to transmit a pre-P cytotype:
Genetic experiments have previously shown that the Lk-P(1A) line is able to transmit a maternally inherited component, not linked to the presence of any P element, called pre-P cytotype (RONSSERAY et al. 1993 ). We tested the ability of NA-P(1A) to produce such a component (Fig 7). The two reciprocal crosses between individuals from NA-P(1A) and an M line [Muller-5 (M5)] were performed at 20°. The M5 line has a balancer of the X chromosome marked with a semidominant mutation (Bar). The G₀ cross with NA-P(1A) females is referred to as the "P-grandmother" (P-GM) cross and the reciprocal cross is referred to as the "M-grandmother" (M-GM) cross. G₁ females from the P-GM cross are expected to have significant repression ability due to maternal inheritance (see Table 2, column 1) but G₁ females from the M-GM cross are expected to have weak repression ability. This was confirmed by the A* assay performed on G₁ females (data not shown). We have tested whether the M5 gamete produced by P-GM G₁ females can transmit a "memory" of this repression ability although this gamete does not carry any P element. G₁ females were crossed to Lk-P(1A) males and the repression ability of G₂ females that inherited the M5 chromosome was tested with the A* assay. Such a memory is expected to stimulate the repression ability of the paternally introduced Lk-P(1A) chromosome. As a control, the M5-bearing gamete from M-GM G₁ females was similarly analyzed. Fig 7 shows that G₂ females that inherit the M5 chromosome from P-GM G₁ females have significantly stronger repression ability than corresponding females produced by M-GM G₁ females. The difference is highly significant as determined by the Mann-Whitney test (P < 0.01). The two M5-bearing oocytes (although devoid of P elements in both cases) do not have the same capacity to stimulate P repression when regulatory P elements are introduced by the spermatozoid. This illustrates the capacity of the P-GM G₁ females to transmit the pre-P cytotype. The same experiment with Lk-P(1A) in G₀ [instead of NA-P(1A)] produced a weaker percentage of GD sterility (P-GM = 4.2%, s = 3.3, n = 13; M-GM = 40.4%, s = 19.1, n = 15; RONSSERAY et al. 1993 ). These results therefore show that NA-P(1A) is able to elicit the strictly maternally transmitted component of P repression termed the pre-P cytotype.

View larger version (22K): In this window In a new window Download PPT slide   Figure 7. Pre-P cytotype assay. M5, the Muller-5 balancer chromosome from an M strain; P-GM, P grandmother; M-GM, M grandmother. The regulatory properties of the G2 females were tested by crossing sets of these females with P strain males (Harwich-2) at 29°; m, s, and n are the mean percentage of GD sterility, the standard deviation over replicates, and the number of replicates performed, respectively.

The foregoing genetic analysis shows that the repression ability of NA-P(1A) resembles that of Lk-P(1A) but is weaker. Furthermore, the NA-P(1A) and Lk-P(1A) strains differ in their effects on P-lacZ repression in the germline.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

NA-P(1A), a new P-element structure at the site 1A, exerts unusual P-repression capacities:
The naturally occurring P element NA-P(1A) located at 1A, isolated from a Tunisian population, is a nonautonomous 5'-truncated P-element variant. Like the autonomous regulatory P elements at 1A previously isolated from French and Russian populations, NA-P(1A) (i) strongly represses dysgenic sterility, (ii) is capable of eliciting the pre-P cytotype, and (iii) has a repression ability apparently restricted to the germline. Furthermore, NA-P(1A) strongly represses P-element excision and its ability to repress dysgenic sterility is maternally transmitted. However, repression by NA-P(1A) is impaired by a mutant allele of Su(var)205. Unlike the autonomous regulatory P elements studied previously, the ability of NA-P(1A) to repress a P-lacZ transgene depends on the structure of the transgene. NA-P(1A) acts as a strong repressor of lacZ reporter expression in the PLH3 strain. As shown in Fig 4, this construct consists of a large P sequence upstream of the lacZ fusion. Conversely, NA-P(1A) does not repress a typical P-lacZ construct in line BQ16, composed only of a 5' section of the canonical P element absent from the NA-P(1A) element. Apparently, the NA-P(1A) repression capacity appears to depend on homology between itself and the euchromatic P-lacZ target.

Is the P-element repression ability observed in the NA-P(1A) line caused by the expression of a putative HeT-A-P fusion protein?
The P element of NA-P(1A) has not been completely sequenced but restriction enzyme mapping allowed us to localize sites at the positions corresponding to the canonical P element for all enzymatic sites tested downstream of the AvaII site at nt 1045 (Fig 1). This suggests that the remaining P sequence in NA-P(1A) is similar to the corresponding sequence in the canonical P element. In spite of the fact that the telomeric NA-P(1A) P element is devoid of sequences homologous to the canonical P promoter, this element might be transcriptionally active. NA-P(1A) expression could be driven from an external flanking promoter in the adjacent HeT-A element (Fig 2). Using promoter mapping studies, DANILEVSKAYA et al. 1997 have shown that the 3' section of a HeT-A sequence acts as a promoter when fused to a lacZ reporter gene. In addition, primer extension analysis has indicated that the transcripts extended to a position 62 nt upstream of the 3' end of the HeT-A element. A homologous sequence is found in the HeT-A segment located just upstream of the NA-P(1A) P element. A potential ATG start codon for translational initiation is also found between this position (62 nt upstream) and the P sequence, which can give rise to an in-frame fusion open reading frame (ORF). This ORF has 18 amino acids (aa) belonging to the HeT-A sequence fused with half of P-element exon 1. It is followed by exon 2 of P (and exon 3 if the last P intron is removed). NA-P(1A) could have the coding capacity for a 43-kD (or a 64-kD) protein, similar to an N-terminal truncated P polypeptide devoid of the first 221 aa encoded by exon 0 and part of exon 1. Thus, the deduced P protein of NA-P(1A) lacks the DNA-binding domain of the P polypeptides that resides in the 88 N-terminal amino acids (LEE et al. 1996 ; LEE and RIO 1998 ). This amino acid segment includes a CCHC putative metal-binding motif that is required for site-specific DNA binding (MILLER et al. 1995 ; LEE and RIO 1998 ). The NA-P(1A) deduced protein also lacks the coiled-coil domain within the first leucine zipper (ANDREWS and GLOOR 1995 ; MILLER et al. 1995 ; BELENKAYA et al. 1998 ). Hence it seems reasonable that the putative polypeptide of the NA-P(1A) element would not be able to recognize and block a canonical P promoter. However, the putative NA-P(1A) protein still retains two additional leucine zippers located in exons 1 and 2 of the canonical P (RIO 1990 ). In addition, the fusion of HeT-A with P results in the formation of a presumptive new leucine zipper (data not shown). Following this line of argument, the deduced NA-P(1A) protein might still be capable of repressing P-element mobility via protein-protein interaction, e.g., by heterodimer formation with the P transposase (RIO 1990 ).

The ability of NA-P(1A) to elicit the pre-P cytotype suggests that a diffusible product plays a role in its repression capacity. It was first postulated that the pre-P cytotype in Lk-P(1A) corresponds to a deposit of a polypeptide repressor in the mature oocyte (RONSSERAY et al. 1993 ). The P elements of Lk-P(1A) are expressed since transposase activity is genetically detectable using the sn^w excision assay (RONSSERAY et al. 1991 , RONSSERAY et al. 1996 ). However, the Lk-P(1A) expression is undetectable by Western analysis using an antibody against P proteins (S. E. ROCHE, S. MISRA and D. C. RIO, personal communication). This suggests that such a low level of protein cannot be detected easily by immunological analyses and thus we cannot exclude that NA-P(1A) females produce and deposit a P-encoded polypeptide in oocytes.

Does a trans-silencing effect play a role in the P-repression ability of NA-P(1A)?
A case of homology-dependent transgene silencing, induced by telomeric transgenes, has been previously reported in tobacco (VAUCHERET 1993 , VAUCHERET 1994 ). In this study, a plant numbered "271" carried a telomeric silencer locus that has multiple copies of a chimeric transgene: an antisense nitrite reductase cDNA (RiN) under the control of the 35S promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus. This telomeric silencing locus is highly methylated and is able to silence any euchromatic gene under the control of the same promoter (VAUCHERET 1993 , VAUCHERET 1994 ). The authors hypothesized that the silencing capacity of the telomeric 271 locus is due to the location of this locus. The telomeric position could allow a rapid scanning of the genome; the silencer locus could then recognize a homologous target and inactivate it (MATZKE et al. 1994 ). This transcriptional silencing is correlated to the methylation of the target transgene (VAUCHERET 1993 ). As the genome of D. melanogaster was not found to be methylated at a detectable level, the structural modifications of chromatin involved in such a model for a trans-silencing effect in Drosophila could be mediated by trans-heterochromatinization (ROCHE and RIO 1998 ).

Alternatively, transgene silencing in tobacco can also involve a post-transcriptional repression component (PARK et al. 1996 ; VAUCHERET et al. 1996 ). It is proposed that the telomeric transgene produces RNAs that lead to the degradation of the homologous RNAs. In Drosophila, it is also possible that the pre-P cytotype is caused by a similar RNA-mediated mechanism. P-RNAs produced by the telomeric P insertion could be aberrant RNA or double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecules, which could induce cosuppression. In fact, post-transcriptional RNA-mediated cosuppression has been recently shown to regulate transposable element activity in Drosophila. As shown by JENSEN et al. 1999A , JENSEN et al. 1999B , noncoding RNAs of the D. melanogaster retrotransposon I can efficiently repress I-element activity in vivo. This effect is inducible by introducing modified I elements, which produce either noncoding or antisense RNAs. In addition, KENNERDELL and CARTHEW 1998 have shown that dsRNA in Drosophila is capable of causing a null phenotype of the frizzled gene. Regarding P repression, SIMMONS et al. 1996 have shown that expression of antisense RNAs can lead to partial P repression. Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCRs in Lk-P(1A) adults allowed detection of P transcripts (ROCHE et al. 1995 ). In our survey, we were unable to detect P-element transcription via Northern analysis for both Lk-P(1A) and NA-P(1A). Hence, we cannot exclude the possibility that the P element of NA-P(1A) is transcribed at a very low level in some tissues or developmental stages and the sensitivity of the method used in our study is insufficient for detecting such a weak expression level.

Under these two nonmutually exclusive models, i.e., transcriptional and post-transcriptional silencing, target sequence homology seems to play a crucial role. The NA-P(1A) transgene repression capacities, which depend on homology with the target transgene, evoke such trans-silencing phenomena. Further experiments will be necessary to determine the nature of the molecular support implied here.

The molecular genesis of the telomeric NA-P(1A) P-element insertion:
At its 3' end, the NA-P(1A) element is flanked by a TAS element, a structural feature resembling the insertion sites of the P elements of Lk-P(1A) and of Ch-P(1A) (RONSSERAY et al. 1996 ). In general, P elements are known to insert preferentially inside TAS elements, thus providing a hotspot for P insertions (KARPEN and SPRADLING 1992 ). The molecular position of NA-P(1A) within a TAS repeat differs from those of Lk-P(1A) and Ch-P(1A) (RONSSERAY et al. 1996 ). This shows that the different naturally occurring P(1A) insertions sampled in natural populations are not identical by descent, but come from independent transpositional events. In the NA-P(1A) line, the P element lacks the first 871 bp. The HeT-A-P fusion observed here can therefore be explained by the following scenario: a full-sized P element is first inserted inside TAS, then a terminal deletion occurs, removing the upstream TAS section and the 5' end of the P element (5' inverted repeat, exon 0 and half of exon 1); an incomplete replication of the chromosome over generations may have helped to achieve this. Finally, a HeT-A copy transposes at the telomere, thus healing the broken X chromosome. In situ hybridization on polytene chromosomes with a TAS probe showed signals at 1A in all three P(1A) lines tested [i.e., Lk-P(1A), Ch-P(1A), and NA-P(1A)], but the signal intensity obtained on the tip of the X chromosome for NA-P(1A) was significantly weaker compared to those of Lk-P(1A) and Ch-P(1A) (data not shown), suggesting that the 1A TAS cluster of NA-P(1A) is shorter than those of the two other P(1A) lines. This observation is consistent with our terminal deletion model. Furthermore, the genomic organization of the telomeric NA-P(1A) element, derived from a natural sample, resembles that of some telomeric P-reporter insertions that originated in the laboratory. The P-w^var line harbors a P-w⁺ transgene in one of the telomeres of the second chromosome (2L). This transgene was found to be truncated at its 5' end. Like NA-P(1A), it is flanked in 3' by a TAS and in 5' by a HeT-A sequence (H. BIESSMANN and J. MASON, personal communication). Furthermore, in the P-833 line harboring a P-w⁺ transgene in the telomere of the third chromosome (3R), SHEEN and LEVIS 1994 showed that spontaneous terminal deletions and incomplete replication removed a part of the transgene and the flanking distal DNA; the telomere was then rescued by a terminal TART insertion.

From an evolutionary point of view, the NA-P(1A) insertion is an immobile regulatory P element since it lacks the 5' terminal repeat: such a copy could confer a selective advantage by suppressing the deleterious effects caused by P-induced hybrid dysgenesis. Furthermore, a molecular structure like the one described in the present study could thus serve as a starting point for an evolutionary process termed "molecular domestication" (MILLER et al. 1992 ): independent molecular transitions of formerly active P elements into chromosomal neogenes have indeed been described earlier in other Drosophila species (PARICIO et al. 1991 ; MILLER et al. 1992 , MILLER et al. 1995 ; NOUAUD and ANXOLABEHERE 1997 ; NOUAUD et al. 1999 ; for recent review, see MILLER et al. 2000 ).

	FOOTNOTES

All the members of the laboratory render homage to the first author of this article, Laurent Marin, who died in a tragic accident in December 1998.
¹ Deceased.
² Present address: Université Ibnou-Zohr, Faculté des Sciences. BP28/S, 80000, Agadir, Morocco.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Agnès Audibert and François Juge for their help and Wolfgang Miller and Antoine Boivin for helpful comments. We thank Caroline Lemerle and Myriam Barre for their help in the preparation of the manuscript. We thank J. L. Couderc and S. Kobayashi for providing P-lacZ lines and S. E. Roche, S. Misra, D. C. Rio, Robert Levis, Harald Biessmann, and Jim Mason for personal communications. We thank the Bloomington and Umea Stock centers for providing stocks and Flybase for helpful information. We thank the communicating editor M. J. Simmons for his valuable comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique by the programme Génome and by the Universités Paris 6—Pierre et Marie Curie and Paris 7—Denis Diderot (UMR7592, Institut Jacques Monod, Dynamique du Génome et Evolution).

Manuscript received September 14, 1999; Accepted for publication April 27, 2000.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

ANDREWS, J. D. and G. B. GLOOR, 1995  A role for the KP leucine zipper in regulating P element transposition in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 141:587-594[Abstract].

BEALL, E. L. and D. C. RIO, 1997  Drosophila P-element transposase is a novel site-specific endonuclease. Genes Dev. 11:2137-2151[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BELENKAYA, T., A. SOLDATOV, E. NABIROCHKINA, I. BIRJUKOVAZ, and S. GEORGIEVA et al., 1998  P-element insertion at the polyhomeotic gene leads to formation of a novel chimeric protein that negatively regulates yellow gene expression in P-element-induced alleles of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 150:687-697[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BIÉMONT, C., S. RONSSERAY, D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, H. IZAABEL, and G. GAUTIER, 1990  Localisation of P elements, copy number regulation and cytotype determination in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genet. Res. 56:3-14[Medline].

BIESSMANN, H., J. M. MASON, J. M. FERRY, M. D'HULST, and K. VALGEIRSDOTTIR et al., 1990  Addition of telomere associated Het DNA sequences "heals" broken chromosome ends in Drosophila. Cell 61:663-673[Medline].

BIESSMANN, H., L. E. CHAMPION, M. O'HAIR, K. IKENAGA, and B. KRASAVI et al., 1992a  Frequent transposition of Drosophila melanogaster HeT-A transposable elements to receding chromosome ends. EMBO J. 11:4459-4469[Medline].

BIESSMANN, H., K. VALGEIRSDOTTIR, K. LOFSKY, T. BUI, and K. IKENAGA et al., 1992b  HeT-A, a transposable element specifically involved in "healing" broken chromosome ends in Drosophila melanogaster.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:3910-3918[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BINGHAM, P. M., M. G. KIDWELL, and G. M. RUBIN, 1982  The molecular basis of P-M hybrid dysgenesis: the role of the P element, a P strain-specific transposon family. Cell 29:995-1004[Medline].

BLACK, D. M., M. S. JACKSON, M. G. KIDWELL, and G. A. DOVER, 1987  KP elements repress P-induced hybrid dysgenesis in D. melanogaster.. EMBO J. 6:4125-4135[Medline].

COEN, D., B. LEMAITRE, M. DELATTRE, H. QUESNEVILLE, and S. RONSSERAY et al., 1994  Drosophila P element: transposition, regulation and evolution. Genetica 93:61-78[Medline].

CRYDERMAN, D. E, E. J. MORRIS, H. BIESSMANN, S. C. ELGIN, and L. L. WALLRATH, 1999  Silencing at Drosophila telomeres: nuclear organization and chromatin structure play critical roles. EMBO J. 18:3724-3735[Medline].

DANILEVSKAYA, O. N., D. A. PETROV, M. N. PAVLOVA, A. KOGA, and E. V. KURENOVA et al., 1992  A repetitive DNA element, associated with telomeric sequences in Drosophila melanogaster, contains open reading frames. Chromosoma 102:32-40[Medline].

DANILEVSKAYA, O. N., I. R. ARKHIPOVA, K. L. TRAVERSE, and M. L. PARDUE, 1997  Promoting in tandem: the promoter for telomere transposon HeT-A and implications for the evolution of retroviral LTRs. Cell 88:647-655[Medline].

EISSENBERG, J. C., G. D. MORRIS, G. REUTER, and T. HARTNETT, 1992  The heterochromatin-associated protein HP-1 is an essential protein in Drosophila with dosage effects on Position-Effect Variegation. Genetics 131:345-352[Abstract].

ENGELS, W. R., 1979  Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: rules of inheritance of female sterility. Genet. Res. 33:219-236.

ENGELS, W. R., 1984  A trans-acting product needed for P factor transposition in Drosophila. Science 226:1194-1196[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ENGELS, W. R., 1989 P elements in Drosophila, pp. 437–484 in Mobile DNA, edited by D. E. BERG and M. M. HOWE. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.

ENGELS, W. R., W. K. BENZ, C. R. PRESTON, P. L. GRAHAM, and R. W. PHILLIS et al., 1987  Somatic effects of P element activity in Drosophila melanogaster: pupal lethality. Genetics 117:745-757[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FANTI, L., G. GIOVINAZZO, M. BERLOCO, and S. PIMPINELLI, 1998  The Heterochromatin Protein 1 prevents telomere fusion in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 2:527-538[Medline].

GLOOR, G. B., C. R. PRESTON, D. M. JOHNSON-SCHLITZ, N. A. NASSIF, and R. W. PHILLIS et al., 1993  Type I repressors of P element mobility. Genetics 135:81-95[Abstract].

HIGUET, D., D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, and D. NOUAUD, 1992  A particular P-element insertion is correlated to the P-induced hybrid dysgenesis repression in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genet. Res. 60:15-24[Medline].

IZAABEL, H., 1988 Contribution à l'étude du déterminisme génétique de la susceptibilité aux éléments transposables P dans les populations naturelles de Drosophila melanogaster. Thèse de doctorat d'Université, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris.

IZAABEL, H., S. RONSSERAY, and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1987  Temporal stability of P-M cytotype in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genet. Res. 50:99-103.

JAMES, T. C. and S. C. R. ELGIN, 1986  Identification of a non-histone chromosomal protein associated with heterochromatin in Drosophila and its gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3862-3872[Abstract/Free Full Text].

JAMES, T. C., J. C. EISSENBERG, C. CRAIG, V. DIETRICH, and A. HOBSON et al., 1989  Distribution patterns of HP1, a heterochromatin-associated nonhistone chromosomal protein of Drosophila. Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 50:170-180[Medline].

JENSEN, S., M. P. GASSAMA, and T. HEIDMANN, 1999a  Taming of transposable element by homology-dependent gene silencing. Nat. Genet. 21:209-212[Medline].

JENSEN, S., M. P. GASSAMA, and T. HEIDMANN, 1999b  Cosuppression of I transposon activity in Drosophila by I-containing sense and antisense transgenes. Genetics 153:1767-1774[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KARESS, R. E. and G. M. RUBIN, 1984  Analysis of P transposable element functions in Drosophila. Cell 38:135-146[Medline].

KARPEN, G. H. and A. C. SPRADLING, 1992  Analysis of subtelomeric heterochromatin in the Drosophila minichromosome Dp1187 by single P element insertional mutagenesis. Genetics 132:737-753[Abstract].

KAUFMAN, P. D., R. F. DOLL, and D. C. RIO, 1989  Drosophila P element tranposase recognizes internal P element DNA sequences. Cell 59:359-371[Medline].

KENNERDELL, J. R. and R. W. CARTHEW, 1998  Use of dsRNA-mediated genetic interference to demonstrate that frizzled and frizzled 2 act in the wingless pathway. Cell 95:1017-1026[Medline].

KIDWELL, M. G., 1983  Evolution of hybrid dysgenesis determinants in Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:1655-1659[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KIDWELL, M. G., 1985  Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: nature and inheritance of P element regulation. Genetics 111:337-350[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KIDWELL, M. G., J. F. KIDWELL, and J. A. SVED, 1977  Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: a syndrome of aberrant traits including mutation, sterility, and male recombination. Genetics 86:813-833[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KOBAYASHI, S., T. KITAMURA, H. SASAKI, and M. OKADA, 1993  Two types of pole cells are present in the Drosophila embryo, one with and one without splicing activity for the third P element intron. Development 117:885-893[Abstract].

LASKI, F. A., D. C. RIO, and G. M. RUBIN, 1986  Tissue specificity of Drosophila P element transposition is regulated at the level of mRNA splicing. Cell 44:7-19[Medline].

LEE, C. C. and D. C. RIO, 1998  DNA binding by the KP repressor protein inhibits P-element transposase activity in vitro.. EMBO J. 17:4166-4174[Medline].

LEE, C. C., Y. M. MUL, and D. C. RIO, 1996  The drosophila P-element KP repressor protein dimerizes and interacts with multiple sites on P-element DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5616-5622[Abstract].

LEMAITRE, B. and D. COEN, 1991  P regulatory products repress in vivo the P promoter activity in P-lacZ fusion genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:4419-4423[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LEMAITRE, B., S. RONSSERAY, and D. COEN, 1993  P cytotype repression of the P promoter is exclusively maternal in the germline: a model for P cytotype. Genetics 135:149-160[Abstract].

LEVIS, R., R. GANESAN, K. HOUTCHENS, L. A. TOLAR, and F. M. SHEEN, 1993  Transposons in place of telomeric repeats at a Drosophila telomere. Cell 75:1083-1093[Medline].

LINDSLEY, D. L., and G. G. ZIMM, 1992 The genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Acadamic Press, San Diego, CA.

MATZKE, A. J. M., F. NEUHUBER, Y.-D. PARK, P. F. AMBROS, and M. A. MATZKE, 1994  Homology-dependent gene silencing in transgenic plants: epistatic silencing loci contain multiple copies of methylated transgenes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 244:219-229[Medline].

MILLER, W. J., S. HAGEMAN, E. REITER, and W. PINSKER, 1992  P element homologous sequences are tandemly repeated in the genome of D. guanche.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:4018-4022[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MILLER, W. J., N. PARICIO, S. HAGEMAN, M. J. MARTINEZ-SEBASTIAN, and W. PINSKER et al., 1995  Structure and expression of the clustered P element homologues in D. subobscura and D. guanche.. Gene 156:167-174[Medline].

MILLER, W. J., J. F. MCDONALD, D. NOUAUD, and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 2000  Molecular domestication—more than a sporadic episode in evolution. Genetica in press.

MISRA, S. and D. C. RIO, 1990  Cytotype control of Drosophila P element transcription: the 66 kD is a repressor of transposase activity. Cell 62:269-284[Medline].

MISRA, S., R. M. BURATOWSKI, T. OHKAWA, and D. C. RIO, 1993  Cytotype control of Drosophila melanogaster P element transposition: genomic position determines maternal repression. Genetics 135:785-800[Abstract].

MIZOBUCHI, M. and L. A. FROHMAN, 1993  Rapid amplification of genomic DNA ends. Biotechniques 15:214-216[Medline].

MULLINS, M. C., D. C. RIO, and G. M. RUBIN, 1989  Cis-acting sequences requirements for P element transposition. Genes Dev. 3:729-738[Abstract/Free Full Text].

NOUAUD, D. and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1997  P element domestication: a stationary truncated P element may encode a 66-kD repressor-like protein in the Drosophila montium species subgroup. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1132-1144[Abstract].

NOUAUD, D., B. BOEDA, L. LEVY, and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1999  A P element has induced intron formation in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1503-1510[Abstract].

O'HARE, K. and G. M. RUBIN, 1983  Structure of P transposable elements and their sites of insertion and excision in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Cell 34:25-35[Medline].

O'HARE, K., A. DRIVER, S. MCGRATH, and D. M. JOHNSON-SCHLITZ, 1992  Distribution and structure of P elements from the Drosophila melanogaster P strain 2. Genet. Res. 60:33-41[Medline].

PARICIO, N. M., M. PEREZ-ALONZO, M. J. MARTINEZ-SEBASTIAN, and R. DE FRUTOS, 1991  P sequences of D. subobscura lack exon 3 and may encode a 66kd repressor-like protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:6713-6718[Abstract/Free Full Text].

PARK, Y. D., I. PAPP, E. A. MOSCONE, V. A. IGLESIAS, and H. VAUCHERET et al., 1996  Gene silencing mediated by promoter homology occurs at the level of transcription and results in meiotically heritable alterations in methylation and gene activity. Plant J. 9:183-194[Medline].

PRESTON, C. R. and W. R. ENGELS, 1989  Spread of P transposable element in inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster.. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 36:71-85[Medline].

RASMUSSON, K. E., J. D. RAYMOND, and M. J. SIMMONS, 1993  Repression of hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster by individual naturally occurring P elements. Genetics 133:605-622[Abstract].

RIO, D. C., 1990  Molecular mechanisms regulating P element transposition. Annu. Rev. Genet. 24:543-578[Medline].

RIO, D. C., F. A. LASKI, and G. M. RUBIN, 1986  Identification and immunochemical analysis of biologically active Drosophila P element transposase. Cell 44:21-32[Medline].

ROBERTSON, H. M. and W. R. ENGELS, 1989  Modified P elements that mimic the P cytotype in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 123:815-824[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ROBERTSON, H. M., C. R. PRESTON, R. W. PHILLIS, D. JOHNSON-SCHLITZ, and W. K. BENZ et al., 1988  A stable genomic source of P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 118:461-470[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ROCHE, S. E. and D. C. RIO, 1998  Trans-silencing by P elements inserted in subtelomeric heterochromatin involves the Polycomb-group gene, Enhancer of zeste.. Genetics 149:1839-1855[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ROCHE, S. E., M. SCHIFF, and D. C. RIO, 1995  P-element repressor autoregulation involves germ-line transcriptional repression and reduction of third intron splicing. Genes Dev. 9:1278-1288[Abstract/Free Full Text].

RONSSERAY, S., 1986  P-M system of hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: thermic modifications of the cytotype can be detected for several generations. Mol. Gen. Genet. 205:23-27.

RONSSERAY, S., D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, and G. PERIQUET, 1984  Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: influence of temperature on cytotype determination in the P-M system. Mol. Gen. Genet. 196:17-23[Medline].

RONSSERAY, S., M. LEHMANN, and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1989  Copy number and distribution of P and I mobile elements in Drosophila melanogaster populations. Chromosoma 98:207-214[Medline].

RONSSERAY, S., M. LEHMANN, and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1991  The maternally inherited regulation of P elements in Drosophila melanogaster can be elicited by two P copies at cytological site 1A on the X chromosome. Genetics 129:501-512[Abstract].

RONSSERAY, S., B. LEMAITRE, and D. COEN, 1993  Maternal inheritance of P cytotype in Drosophila melanogaster: a "pre-P cytotype" is strictly extra-chromosomally transmitted. Mol. Gen. Genet. 241:115-123[Medline].

RONSSERAY, S., M. LEHMANN, D. NOUAUD, and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1996  The regulatory properties of autonomous subtelomeric P elements are sensitive to a Suppressor of variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 143:1663-1674[Abstract].

RONSSERAY, S., M. LEHMANN, D. NOUAUD, and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1997  P element regulation and X-chromosome subtelomeric heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetica 100:95-107[Medline].

RONSSERAY, S., L. MARIN, M. LEHMANN, and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1998  Repression of hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster by combinations of telomeric P element reporters and naturally occurring P elements. Genetics 149:1857-1866[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SCHAEFFER, R. E., M. G. KIDWELL, and A. FAUSTO-STERLING, 1979  Hybrid Dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: morphological and cytological studies of ovarian dysgenesis. Genetics 92:1141-1152[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SHEEN, F. M. and R. W. LEVIS, 1994  Transposition of the LINE-like retrotransposon TART to Drosophila chromosome termini. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:12510-12514[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SIEBEL, C. W. and D. C. RIO, 1990  Regulated splicing of the Drosophila P transposable element third intron in vitro: somatic repression. Science 248:1200-1248[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SIMMONS, G., 1987  Sterility-mutability correlation. Genet. Res. 50:73-76[Medline].

SIMMONS, M. J., J. D. RAYMOND, K. E. RASMUSSON, L. M. MILLER, and C. F. MCLARNON et al., 1990  Repression of P element mediated hybrid-dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 124:663-673[Abstract].

SIMMONS, M. J., J. D. RAYMOND, C. D. GRIMES, C. BELINCO, and B. C. HAAKE et al., 1996  Repression of hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster by heat-shock-inducible sense and anti-sense P element constructs. Genetics 144:1529-1544[Abstract].

SVED, J. A., 1987  Hybrid dysgenesis in Drsosphila melanogaster: evidence from sterility and Southern hybridization tests that P cytotype is not maintained in the absence of chromosomal P factors. Genetics 115:121-127[Abstract/Free Full Text].

VALGEIRSDOTTIR, K., K. TRAVERSE-LAHEY, and M. L. PARDUE, 1990  HeT NA: a family of mosaic repeated sequences specific for heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:7998-8002[Abstract/Free Full Text].

VASLET, C. A., P. O'CONNEL, M. IZQUIERDO, and M. ROSBACH, 1980  Isolation and mapping of a cloned ribosomal protein gene of Drosophila melanogaster.. Nature 285:674-676[Medline].

VAUCHERET, H., 1993  Identification of a general silencer for 19S and 35S promoters in a transgenic tobacco plant: 90 bp of homology in the promoter sequence are sufficient for a trans-inactivation. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 316:1471-1483.

VAUCHERET, H., 1994  Promoter dependant trans-inactivation in transgenic tobacco plant: kinetic aspects of gene silencing and gene reactivation. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 317:310-323.

VAUCHERET, H., T. ELMAYAN, PH. MOURRAIN and J. C. PALAUQUI, 1996 Analysis of Tobacco transgene locus that triggers both transcriptional and posttransciptional silencing, pp. 403–414 in Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation edited by V. E. A. RUSSO, R. A. MARTIENSSEN and A. D. RIGGS. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

WALLRATH, L. L. and S. C. R. ELGIN, 1995  Position effect variegation in Drosophila is associated with an altered chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 9:1263-1277[Abstract/Free Full Text].

WUSTMANN, G., J. SZIDONYA, H. TAUBERT, and G. REUTER, 1989  The genetics of position-effect variegation modifying loci in Drosophila melanogaster.. Mol. Gen. Genet. 217:520-527[Medline].

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Brennecke, C. D. Malone, A. A. Aravin, R. Sachidanandam, A. Stark, and G. J. Hannon An Epigenetic Role for Maternally Inherited piRNAs in Transposon Silencing Science, November 28, 2008; 322(5906): 1387 - 1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Jensen, J. R. Stuart, M. P. Goodpaster, J. W. Goodman, and M. J. Simmons Cytotype Regulation of P Transposable Elements in Drosophila melanogaster: Repressor Polypeptides or piRNAs? Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 1785 - 1793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Simmons, J. B. Niemi, D.-F. Ryzek, C. Lamour, J. W. Goodman, W. Kraszkiewicz, and R. Wolff Cytotype Regulation by Telomeric P Elements in Drosophila melanogaster: Interactions With P Elements From M' Strains Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 1957 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Simmons, D.-F. Ryzek, C. Lamour, J. W. Goodman, N. E. Kummer, and P. J. Merriman Cytotype Regulation by Telomeric P Elements in Drosophila melanogaster: Evidence for Involvement of an RNA Interference Gene Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 1945 - 1955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Blumenstiel and D. L. Hartl Evidence for maternally transmitted small interfering RNA in the repression of transposition in Drosophila virilis PNAS, November 1, 2005; 102(44): 15965 - 15970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Haley, J. R. Stuart, J. D. Raymond, J. B. Niemi, and M. J. Simmons Impairment of Cytotype Regulation of P-Element Activity in Drosophila melanogaster by Mutations in the Su(var)205 Gene Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 583 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Mason, J. Ransom, and A. Y. Konev A Deficiency Screen for Dominant Suppressors of Telomeric Silencing in Drosophila Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1353 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Bushey and J. Locke Mutations in Su(var)205 and Su(var)3-7 Suppress P-Element-Dependent Silencing in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1395 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Simmons, J. D. Raymond, J. B. Niemi, J. R. Stuart, and P. J. Merriman The P Cytotype in Drosophila melanogaster: A Maternally Transmitted Regulatory State of the Germ Line Associated With Telomeric P Elements Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 243 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Niemi, J. D. Raymond, R. Patrek, and M. J. Simmons Establishment and Maintenance of the P Cytotype Associated With Telomeric P Elements in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 255 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Robin, S. Chambeyron, A. Bucheton, and I. Busseau Gene Silencing Triggered by Non-LTR Retrotransposons in the Female Germline of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, June 1, 2003; 164(2): 521 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Stuart, K. J. Haley, D. Swedzinski, S. Lockner, P. E. Kocian, P. J. Merriman, and M. J. Simmons Telomeric P elements Associated With Cytotype Regulation of the P Transposon Family in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 1641 - 1654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ronsseray, A. Boivin, and D. Anxolabehere P-Element Repression in Drosophila melanogaster by Variegating Clusters of P-lacZ-white Transgenes Genetics, December 1, 2001; 159(4): 1631 - 1642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Golubovsky, A. Y. Konev, M. F. Walter, H. Biessmann, and J. M. Mason Terminal Retrotransposons Activate a Subtelomeric white Transgene at the 2L Telomere in Drosophila Genetics, July 1, 2001; 158(3): 1111 - 1123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]