- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Leips, J.
- Articles by Mackay, T. F. C.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Leips, J.
- Articles by Mackay, T. F. C.
Quantitative Trait Loci for Life Span in Drosophila melanogaster: Interactions With Genetic Background and Larval Density
Jeff Leipsa and Trudy F. C. Mackayaa Department of Genetics, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
Corresponding author: Jeff Leips, Department of Genetics, Box 7614, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695., jwleips{at}unity.ncsu.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: A. G. CLARK
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The genetic architecture of variation in adult life span was examined for a population of recombinant inbred lines, each of which had been crossed to both inbred parental strains from which the lines were derived, after emergence from both high and low larval density. QTL affecting life span were mapped within each sex and larval density treatment by linkage to highly polymorphic roo-transposable element markers, using a composite interval mapping method. We detected a total of six QTL affecting life span; the additive effects and degrees of dominance for all were highly sex- and larval environment-specific. There were significant epistatic interactions between five of the life span QTL, the effects of which also differed according to genetic background, sex, and larval density. Five additional QTL were identified that contributed to differences among lines in their sensitivity to variation in larval density. Further fine-scale mapping is necessary to determine whether candidate genes within the regions to which the QTL map are actually responsible for the observed variation in life span.
MOST eukaryotic organisms have limited life spans. Despite this near universal property, the potential life span of individuals varies a great deal among species (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Two major, but not mutually exclusive, hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of aging that ultimately determines the maximum attainable life span: mutation accumulation and antagonistic pleiotropy. Both theories are based on the assumption that the strength of selection declines with increasing age following the onset of reproduction (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Recent studies have identified many genes involved in the aging process that all act to limit life span in many taxa. Candidate genes have been identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
While studies of candidate genes have begun to reveal many of the physiological mechanisms of aging and life span limitation, complete understanding of the evolution and variation in life span requires that we also study these correlated traits in a quantitative genetic context. One such approach involves studying genetic regions throughout the genome that act in concert to determine life span and evaluating their effects in a range of environments and different genetic backgrounds. This is necessary for two reasons. First, the effects of specific genes on aging and life span limitation are mediated by environmental variation (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A promising approach to address this complex question is to use polymorphic molecular markers to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) that contribute to the variation in life span among genetically distinct lines. This procedure can be used to confirm and evaluate the effects of genetic variation at previously identified candidate genes, as well as identify new genetic regions for further study. In addition, this procedure can be used to identify sex- and environment-specific effects of different QTL in a range of environments and genetic backgrounds.
Recent studies in our laboratory using 98 recombinant inbred (RI) lines of D. melanogaster identified a number of QTL that contribute to the variation in life span. Interestingly, many of these QTL have sex- (![]()
![]()
In this study, we extend our previous work on these lines to address three important questions. First, how are the effects of QTL that contribute to variation in life span influenced by the genetic background in which they occur? This question was addressed by monitoring the life span of virgin offspring from backcrosses of the 98 RI lines to the two parental strains used to initiate them. This design allows an estimation of the effects of QTL on life span in lines that are heterozygous over a proportion of the genome, a more "natural" genetic state for Drosophila. It also allows a comparison of heterozygous and homozygous effects, and hence degrees of dominance, of QTL affecting life span. Second, how are the effects of life span QTL influenced by variation in larval density? Larval density varies a great deal in natural populations and is known to affect life span (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
D. melanogaster stocks:
Two unrelated isogenic parental strains (Oregon, ![]()
![]()
![]()
Focal individuals for this experiment were the offspring of crosses of females of each of the 98 RI lines to males of each of the two inbred parental strains, Oregon (O) and 2b (B). RI females were mated to males of each parental strain so that QTL for life span on the X chromosome could be identified. In the resulting lines, all three genotypes (OO, OB, and BB) are expected at life span QTL, with OO and OB genotypes occurring in the offspring of the cross to Oregon, and BB and OB occurring in the offspring of the cross to 2b. This crossing scheme is, in essence, a modified North Carolina Design III (NC III; ![]()
![]()
Experimental treatments and life span assay:
To minimize the influence of nongenetic maternal effects on life span, the density of all lines was controlled for two generations prior to the start of the experiment by restricting egg laying of 20 pairs of flies per vial for a 7-day period. It should be noted here that this does not completely remove the possibility that some maternal effects may have contributed to life span differences among lines. Genetic differences in unmeasured traits (e.g., fecundity or larval viability) among lines may have produced differences in larval density among stocks in the parental and grandparental generations even though adult density was controlled. We are currently examining other traits in these lines to examine this possibility. Also, nongenetic paternal effects may have been present because the density of the Oregon and 2b lines was not controlled prior to allowing males of each stock to mate with females of the RI lines. However, in this case the paternal effects would not contribute to the genetic variance in life span among lines, and any contribution of the paternal effects to life span would contribute to the error variance of the analyses.
High and low larval densities in each cross were created by allowing either 2 or 20 mated females to oviposit for 24 hr in vials containing standard cornmeal-agar-molasses medium. In addition, a small amount of live yeast was added to each laying vial to stimulate oviposition. Two replicate breeding vials per cross and density were used, and virgin males and females were collected from each replicate over a 24-hr period from the day at which the first individuals from a vial began to emerge. Individuals of each sex from each replicate were kept separate during this procedure. Virgin males and females from each replicate breeding vial were housed separately in two replicate vials containing 5 ml standard medium for monitoring the life span (five single-sexed individuals per vial). No additional yeast was added to the vials used for determination of life span. Flies were maintained in a constant temperature room at 25° and transferred to new vials once a week. Although we had two replicate vials for each cross, sex, and density treatment combination, a few flies escaped during the course of the experiment, resulting in an unbalanced design. A total of 7733 flies were used in this experiment. Adult life span was monitored every other day. For logistic reasons, the density assays were initiated sequentially, 3 mo apart.
Additional crosses within and between the parental strains were carried out at each density to compare the effects of larval density on the life span of each parental strain and their F1 hybrids (Oregon
x 2b
, 2b
x Oregon
). Two replicate vials containing five single-sex individuals for each genotype, sex, and density treatment combination were used. The life spans of individuals within each treatment were monitored concurrently with individuals from the RI line crosses described above.
Statistical analyses:
In the first analysis, life span data from the crosses within and between the isogenic parental strains were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). We modeled the fixed effects of genotype (the two homozygote classes, Oregon and 2b, and two classes of F1 heterozygotes, Oregon 
x 2b
and 2b
x Oregon
), sex, and density on life span. Inspection of the residuals from the analysis on untransformed data indicated that no transformation was necessary to satisfy the assumptions of ANOVA. Post hoc comparisons of mean values were carried out using Tukey's "honestly significant difference test" (![]()
The second set of analyses was carried out on the life span of the offpsring from crosses between females of each RI line to males of the two isogenic lines. The experimental design allowed us to examine the genetic and environmental influences on life span variation of the RI line crosses at several levels. Data were analyzed hierarchically in five different ANOVAs, so that the variance attributable to the main effects and their interactions could be examined in subsets of the data as well as in the full data set.
A random effects model was first used to identify variance attributable to differences among lines within each cross (to Oregon or 2b), sex (male or female), and larval density (high or low) treatment. In the first of four mixed-model ANOVAs, the data were separated by cross and density treatments and the variance in life span due to line, sex, and their interaction was determined. Variance components from this analysis were used to evaluate the significance of any genotype (i.e., line within a parental cross)-by-sex interaction (GSI) and to calculate rGS, the correlation of the mean male and female life span of each line when crossed to the different parental strains and in the two densities. rGS was calculated as cov12/(
L1
L2) (![]()
L1 and
L2 are the square roots of the variance components for the RI line term from the reduced-model analysis within cross, density, and sex. The second mixed-model analysis estimated the effects of parental cross, RI line, and the cross-by-line interaction within each sex and density treatment. The interaction term from this analysis reveals how the genes that contribute to differences among RI lines are influenced by the genetic background in which they occur. The third mixed model included the effects of cross, line, density, and their interactions on life span within each sex. This analysis provided a measure of how life span was affected by the interaction between the genetic background and larval density. The fourth model investigated all main effects and their interactions in the entire data set. In each mixed-model analysis, the parental cross, sex, and density were treated as fixed effects and all others as random effects.
Because life span was measured on individuals sharing a vial within each replicate, vial effects were removed by including a term for replicate vials in each ANOVA model. Unlike the ANOVA, which compared the life span of the two parental lines and their F1 hybrids, all life span data from the RI line crosses to the parental lines were transformed to natural logs prior to analysis to satisfy assumptions of ANOVA (![]()
To compare the amount of genetic variance expressed among lines in the different crosses and larval density treatments, the coefficient of genetic variation was calculated separately for each sex within each cross and density treatment. The coefficient of variation was calculated as CVG = (VL,U)
x
, where
is the average life span among lines (![]()
![]()
Molecular marker map:
Cytological insertion sites (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
QTL mapping:
QTL contributing to the variation among lines in mean life span and in the sensitivity of mean life span to larval density were identified by composite interval mapping (![]()
![]()
2 with 2 d.f. under the null hypothesis and was evaluated every centimorgan.
The significance level for each analysis was determined by permutation. Empirical distributions of LR test statistics under the null hypothesis of no association between test intervals and trait values were obtained for each analysis by randomly permuting the trait data and calculating the maximum LR statistic across all intervals for each permutation. LR statistics calculated from the original data that were exceeded by the permutation maximum LR statistics <50 times are significant at
= 0.05 under the null hypothesis (![]()
![]()
The life span data used in the QTL analyses were the line means of males and females from each cross (to Oregon or 2b). Line means were not transformed to natural logs prior to QTL analyses because the untransformed data approximated a normal distribution. Four QTL analyses were carried out so that differences among lines crossed to each parental strain were compared. Analyses were carried out separately for each sex within each density treatment because software is not currently available to perform QTL analyses across different environments.
To identify QTL contributing to the variance among lines in the sensitivity of life span to high and low larval density, a sensitivity score (S) was calculated separately for males and females of each line within a given cross as S =
(![]()
Hi and
Li are the average life spans of line i (where i ranges from 1 to 98) within a cross after exposure to high and low larval densities, respectively. D is the difference between the average life span of all lines when reared in high and low larval density (within each cross and sex). QTL analyses were subsequently carried out on the sensitivity scores separately for males and females of each line as described above.
QTL effects on life span:
Estimates of the additive and dominance effects of each life span QTL within each sex and density are provided by the QTL mapping analyses. However, these analyses do not estimate the genotypic effects of these QTL on life span across densities and sexes (![]()
Epistatic effects of life span QTL:
Pairwise epistatic interactions were tested in ANOVA. We tested for epistasis only between nonadjacent life span QTL that were identified as significant on the basis of the permutation tests. Although a more sophisticated method has been developed to identify epistasis among QTL (![]()
For all ANOVAs in which we tested for epistasis, we also report the results after application of the sequential Bonferroni procedure (![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Effects of breeding density on larval density:
Although the density treatment was analyzed as a categorical variable, the actual number of larvae that were competing in each vial is unknown and so the effects of larval density on life span should be interpreted with caution. To estimate the relative differences in larval densities created by the different parental densities, we counted all individuals that eclosed during the first 5 days of emergence from a subset of the lines (109 lines from the low density cross to Oregon and 2b, and 181 lines from the high density cross to Oregon and 2b). We also obtained dry weights on the first five males and females that emerged from these vials to determine if the density treatments affected body mass at eclosion. On average, the high adult breeding density treatment produced 30% more individuals during this period than low breeding density treatments (Low density,
± SE = 78 ± 3.2 eclosing individuals; high density,
± SE = 111 ± 2.3 eclosing individuals). Visual inspection of the vials indicated that the majority of individuals from the low density treatment had eclosed by the 5th day. This was not true for the high density treatment. On average, newly eclosed male and female flies from the low density vials were 15 and 16% heavier, respectively, than those that emerged from the high density vials. On the basis of these data, it is clear that our treatments were effective in producing different larval densities. The consequence of the uncontrolled density is that the effects of the two treatments are less distinct than they would have been if we had been able to count eggs or larvae. Analytically, variation in larval density within treatments creates a bias against detecting life span differences between treatments, making any conclusion regarding the density effects conservative.
Life span phenotypes of the parental strains and F1 parental hybrids:
The average life span of the parental strains (Oregon
x Oregon
= 37.0 ± 2 days, 2b
x 2b
= 37.5 ± 2 days) was significantly shorter than that of their F1 hybrids (Oregon
x 2b
= 60.6 ± 2 days, 2b
x Oregon
= 55.3 ± 2 days; F3127 = 37.53, P < 0.0001). No other main effects (sex and density) or their interactions significantly affected life span. There was a nearly significant sex-by-density interaction (F1127 = 3.37, P = 0.07), with the trend being for increased larval density to increase the average male life span but have little if any effect on female life span (Table 1). It should be noted that the average male and female life spans of the Oregon and 2b lines in this experiment are in general agreement with those reported by ![]()
|
Life span phenotypes and genetic variation in life span in RI line crosses:
In the cross to Oregon, the average male life span ranged from 29.8 to 73.7 days among lines, and the average female life span ranged from 8.6 to 99.8 days. In the cross to 2b, the average male life span ranged from 24.7 to 73.6 days, and the average female life span ranged from 26.6 to 79.1 days.
Analyses within each cross, sex, and density using random effects models identified significant differences in life span among lines, but differences were cross-, density-, and sex-specific (Table 2). In the cross to Oregon, genetic variation for male and female life span was only significant in the high larval density treatment. In the cross to 2b, significant genetic variation for male and female life span was also found in high density; in contrast to results of the cross to Oregon, genetic variation for male life span was also found in the low density treatment. The proportion of the phenotypic variation explained by genetic differences among lines [see the VL/(VL + VR) column of Table 2] varied with cross, sex, and density and ranged from ~0 (RI x Oregon cross, females from low density) to 21% (RI x Oregon cross, females from high density). This is also reflected in the coefficient of genetic variation, CVG, which was generally larger in the high density treatments.
|
Genotype-by-sex and -environment interactions:
The first set of mixed-model analyses (within each cross and density) identified significant effects of sex, line, and line-by-sex interactions that were cross- and density-specific (Table 3). In the cross to Oregon, none of the main effects were significant when considered alone. In the cross to 2b, the main effect of sex was significant, and females lived ~20% longer than males in both densities. In this cross, line effects were also significant but only in high density. Line-by-sex interactions were significant in both crosses, but only in the high density environment (Table 3, Fig 1). In high density, the correlation between the sexes within lines, rGS, differed in sign and magnitude depending on the cross (Table 2). In the cross to Oregon, the correlation was slightly, but significantly, negative; in the cross to 2b the correlation was significant and positive.
|
|
In the second set of mixed-model analyses (within each sex and density treatment), the main effect of cross and the cross-by-line effects were sex- and density-specific (Table 4). For males, the only significant effect on life span was due to the cross-by-line interaction, which occurred in both density treatments. This interaction explained 9 and 11% of the total variation in life span in the low and high density treatments, respectively. In females, the direction of the cross significantly affected life span in both densities. The female offspring of lines crossed to 2b lived 1416% longer than those crossed to Oregon. There was also a significant cross-by-line interaction for female life span in high density that explained 15% of the variation. This interaction was not significant in low density.
|
In the third set of mixed-model analyses (within each sex), most of the variation in life span explained by the model was attributable to interactions between the main effects (Table 5). In males, the only significant effects on life span were due to the cross-by-line and the line-by-density interactions. For females, the main effect of cross was significant, as was the cross-by-line-by-density interaction.
|
In the full model, most of the variation in life span explained by the model resulted from differences between sexes and the cross-by-sex interaction terms (Table 6). The cross-by-line interaction was also significant.
|
QTL analyses for life span variation among lines:
Six QTL contributed to the variation in life span among lines, but different QTL were identified as important in each sex and larval density (Table 7, Fig 2 and Fig 3). On chromosome II, one QTL (35B38E, 43A) was found in two treatment combinations, males and females from low larval density. The remaining two QTL on chromosome II (46C49D and 50D) were found only in males from the high density treatment. On chromosome III, one QTL (67D68B, C) was detected in two of the four analyses (females in both densities). The remaining QTL on chromosome III (71E, 72A77A, and 69D87B) were found in each of two treatment combinations, males and females in low density. These QTL are close to, or share, regions of overlap in the different analyses and so it is not entirely clear whether these represent the same or different QTL. It should be noted that two other regions that did not quite exceed the significance threshold might harbor QTL affecting male life span. One region is on chromosome I, near cytological position 7D, and the other on chromosome II, near 34EF (Fig 2).
|
|
|
Within each sex and density treatment, the QTL exhibited a range of additive and dominance effects (Table 7). Strong overdominance was observed at one QTL (35B43A), but this effect occurred only in males from low density. Three other QTL exhibited weaker overdominance and these effects were also sex- and environment-specific (67D68C, females from high density; 69D87B, females from low density; and 71E, males from low density). The effects of the remaining QTL ranged from partial to complete dominance, depending on the sex and density in which they were found.
QTL for sensitivity of life span to larval density:
Five QTL affected the sensitivity of life span to variation in larval density, but none were common to both sexes (Table 8, Fig 4). Male sensitivity to density was affected by two QTL on chromosome III. Interestingly, these were not the same QTL that contributed to the among-line variation in males within a density treatment. Three sensitivity QTL were found for females, only one of which (67D68C) had previously been identified as a region contributing to variation in female life span among lines. The other two were on chromosome I (4F5D and 6E7E), where no significant life span QTL were identified.
|
|
The genotypic effects at these sensitivity QTL ranged from dominant to overdominant (Table 8). Overdominance was observed at one QTL region (6E7E), and the remaining QTL exhibited varying degrees of partial dominance.
Density and sex dependence of effects of QTL genotype on life span:
The genotypic effects on life span at many life span QTL depended on sex and larval density, particularly when lines were heterozygous or homozygous for the 2b strain at a particular QTL. QTL genotype-by-sex interactions occurred at markers 48D (F2671 = 3.12, P = 0.04; Fig 5A), 68B (F2671 = 3.18, P = 0.04; Fig 5B), and 76B (F2671 = 4.62, P = 0.03; Fig 5C). QTL genotype-by-larval-density interactions were significant for markers 38E (F2700 = 18.31, P < 0.0001; Fig 6A), 48D (F2740 = 21.03, P < 0.0001; Fig 6B), 50D (F2764 = 32.40, P < 0.0001; Fig 6C), 68B (F2756 = 44.80, P < 0.0001; Fig 6D), and 76B (F2740 = 31.93, P < 0.0001; Fig 6E). In no case was there a significant three-way interaction between marker genotype, sex, and density.
|
|
In general, most of the interactions with density resulted from changes in the rank order of the life span of marker genotypes across densities. This occurred in only one marker-by-sex interaction (Fig 5A). Of particular interest, genotypes that exhibited overdominance in one sex or density often exhibited additive or partially dominant effects on life span in the contrasting sex or environment. This intriguing result suggests that the degree of dominance of a particular QTL genotype is density- and also possibly sex-dependent.
Epistasis between life span QTL:
Five life span QTL exhibited significant epistatic interactions (Table 9) but their effects on life span varied, depending on sex (Fig 7A) and larval density (Fig 7B and Fig C). In the single significant marker-by-marker-by-sex interaction (Fig 7A), the genotypic effect of marker 48D on male life span depended on the genotype at marker 76B. No such interaction was seen in females. Fig 7B and Fig C, illustrates the range of effects that other marker interactions had on life span across densities. It is important to note that in some cases the lines that were heterozygous in both interacting regions were not the longest lived, a situation that might be expected under associative overdominance (![]()
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Genetic and environmental effects on life span:
Many genetic and environmental influences can act independently to influence the age at which an organism dies. Our results suggest that the interaction of these influences can also be especially important in determining the adult life span of Drosophila. Using offspring from backcrosses between a panel of 98 RI lines and their two isogenic parental strains, we identified significant genetic variation for adult life span, but this variation was largely influenced by the direction of the genetic cross, sex, and the larval density experienced. In general, genetic differences among RI lines were evident for both males and females after exposure to high larval densities; after exposure to low larval density, genetic differences were only apparent in the cross to the 2b parental genotype and only in males. The genetic correlation between male and female life span was highly sensitive to the genetic background and larval density experienced. This sex- and environment-dependent expression of genetic variation in life span is consistent with previous work on these lines (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Additive effects of life span QTL:
Six QTL were found to contribute to differences in life span among lines but no QTL were detected in all sex and larval density combinations. The QTL identified within each sex and larval density exhibited a range of additive and dominance effects on life span, and the relative magnitude of these effects depended on the sex in which they were detected and the larval density experienced. Even when the same QTL were identified in high and low larval densities or both sexes, their effects on life span were sex- and environment-dependent (Table 7). The additive effects of the 2b genes at the QTL in region 67D68C increased female life span compared to the effects of Oregon in low density, but reduced female life span relative to Oregon in high density. This indication of antagonistic pleiotropy was also seen between sexes for the QTL at 69D87B, in which the additive effects of the 2b genes increased male life span relative to the effects of Oregon, but had negative relative effects on female life span. The additive genetic effects were not always antagonistic, however. The genetic effects of 2b genes at the QTL at region 35B43A reduced the life span of both sexes relative to Oregon in low density, but the negative effects of the 2b genes affected female life span more than that of males.
Two previous QTL studies of life span using the same RI lines, but in a homozygous state, also found many of the same QTL identified in our study. ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Degrees of dominance of life span QTL:
An important result revealed by the use of the backcross design is that the degree of dominance of life span QTL is not a fixed property. Changes in the degree of dominance across environments (which may include the disparate physiological environments of males and females) have a sound theoretical basis (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Epistasis between life span QTL:
A critical assumption of Wright's theory is that the phenotype of the trait in question is the product of a number of interacting loci. Our analyses of pairwise interactions among the life span QTL clearly demonstrate a large degree of epistasis with dramatic effects on life span. That these interactions are often sensitive to larval density, sex, and the genetic background is consistent with the basic premise of Wright's theory on dominance discussed above. Other studies have also demonstrated the importance of gene interactions affecting life span. ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
QTL for the differential sensitivity of life span to larval density:
We found five QTL that affected the sensitivity of life span to variation in larval density. Only one of these also mapped to a region that contributed to the variation in life span among the lines (67D68C). While none of the other sensitivity QTL coincided with significant life span QTL, careful examination of the position of the likelihood peaks from all sets of analyses indicated congruence between the position of the sensitivity QTL and potential life span QTL that did not exceed the permutation threshold for significance. Thus our results provide weak support for the "allelic sensitivity" hypothesis of the genetic basis of plasticity (![]()
Life span QTL and candidate genes:
The QTL identified in our study contain many genes that have been previously identified as candidate genes affecting life span (Table 6). Adh and Pgm are important metabolic enzymes (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Insulin degrading metalloproteinase (Ide) is the primary enzyme responsible for the degradation of insulin (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sod and Cat are two genes involved in the elimination of reactive oxygen species (ROS), toxic byproducts of metabolism that are primarily generated from the mitochondrial respiratory chain (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The remaining two candidate genes are EF1
and Hsp70. EF1
is an essential protein for protein synthesis. ![]()
lived longer but laid fewer eggs early in life than did control females. However, enhanced expression of this gene had no effect on virgin male and female life span, which argues against its role in contributing to the variation in life span in our study. Hsp70 is a heat shock protein that has a variety of functions including autoregulation of the heat shock response and signal transduction (![]()
![]()
Future fine-mapping and quantitative complementation studies (e.g., ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Conclusions:
Our results have documented genetically based differences in life span among heterozygous lines, but these differences depended on the genetic background, sex, and larval density. A QTL mapping analysis indicated that much of this variation results from sex- and density-dependent effects of QTL genotypes on life span and the nature of genetic interactions among life span QTL. Many of the genetic regions identified in our QTL analysis contain candidate genes with known influences on life span and whose relative effects are modulated by interactions with modifier or regulatory loci in other parts of the genome (e.g., ![]()
![]()
Our finding that the effects of QTL genotypes on life span depend on genetic background, sex, and larval environment is surprising; if this is a general property of genes affecting all life-history traits, this has important implications for the maintenance of genetic variation in these traits. Life-history traits are the primary components of fitness and so (with the exception of life span) are thought to be under strong directional selection (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If the extreme environmental sensitivity of the QTL effects on life span can be extrapolated to true genetic effects, this may prove problematic for those studies attempting to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with complex traits, e.g., multifactorial human diseases (e.g., ![]()
![]()
![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank C. Dilda, T. D'Souza, B. Hackett, S. Heinsohn, F. Lawrence, and R. Anholt for help with the flies. Thanks to M. De Luca, R. Fuller, D. Houle, J. Travis, B. Weir, and Z-B. Zeng for discussion of various aspects of this experiment. We also thank A. Clarke, C. Dilda, L. Horth, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health NRSA grant GM18818-03 to J.L., and GM 45146 and GM 45344 to T.F.C.M. This is a publication of the W. M. Keck Program for Behavioral Biology.
Manuscript received December 22, 1999; Accepted for publication April 17, 2000.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ARKING, R., S. P. DUDAS, and G. T. BAKER, III, 1993 Genetic and environmental factors regulating the expression of an extended longevity phenotype in a long lived strain of Drosophila.. Genetica 91:127-142[Medline].
AUSTAD, S. N., 1996 The uses of intraspecific variation in aging research. Exp. Gerontol. 31:453-463[Medline].
AUSTAD, S. N., 1997 Comparative aging and life histories in mammals. Exp. Gerontol. 32:23-38[Medline].
BARKER, J. S. F. and R. N. PODGER, 1970 Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: effects of larval density on viability, developmental period and adult body weight. Ecology 51:170-189.
BENNETT, R. G., F. G. HAMEL, and W. C. DUCKWORTH, 1997 Characterization of the insulin inhibition of the peptidolytic activities of the insulin-degrading enzyme-proteosome complex. Diabetes 46:197-203[Abstract].
BOURGUET, D., M. PROUT, and M. RAYMOND, 1996 Dominance of insecticide resistance presents a plastic response. Genetics 143:407-416[Abstract].
BUCK, S., M. NICHOLSON, S. P. DUDAS, G. T. BAKER, III, and R. A






