Double-Strand Break Repair in Tandem Repeats During Bacteriophage T4 Infection

Corresponding author: Kenneth N. Kreuzer, Box 3020, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710., kenneth.kreuzer{at}duke.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. MAURER

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Recombinational repair of double-strand breaks in tandemly repeated sequences often results in the loss of one or more copies of the repeat. The single-strand annealing (SSA) model for repair has been proposed to account for this nonconservative recombination. In this study we present a plasmid-based physical assay that measures SSA during bacteriophage T4 infection and apply this assay to the genetic analysis of break repair. SSA occurs readily in broken plasmid DNA and is independent of the strand exchange protein UvsX and its accessory factor UvsY. We use the unique features of T4 DNA metabolism to examine the link between SSA repair and DNA replication and demonstrate directly that the DNA polymerase and the major replicative helicase of the phage are not required for SSA repair. We also show that the Escherichia coli RecBCD enzyme can mediate the degradation of broken DNA during early, but not late, times of infection. Finally, we consider the status of broken ends during the course of the infection and propose a model for SSA during T4 infections.

THE efficient repair of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) is of vital importance in virtually every organism. Multiple mechanisms of repair have been described and grouped into pathways that differ in key features, such as the nature of the DNA substrates, the types of proteins that catalyze repair, and the conformation of product DNA. Except for pathways that depend on nonhomologous end joining, double-strand break repair (DSBR) requires the interaction of homologous DNA sequences. Repair mechanisms that require homology are closely associated with recombination and typically use a second copy of the damaged sequence to restore information lost at the site of the break.

Homologous recombination is often dependent on strand exchange proteins (e.g., RecA in Escherichia coli) that catalyze the invasion of a single-stranded DNA into a homologous duplex. However, a major pathway of homologous DSBR in a variety of organisms is independent of known strand exchange proteins. This pathway, called single-strand annealing (SSA), has been proposed to operate in bacteria, phage, yeast, higher plants, Xenopus oocytes, and mammalian cells (LIN et al. 1984 ; MARYON and CARROLL 1991 ; PUCHTA and HOHN 1991 ; DE GROOT et al. 1992 ; LUISI-DELUCA and KOLODNER 1992 ; DALY and MINTON 1996 ; IVANOV et al. 1996 ; STAHL et al. 1997 ; LAI and MASKER 1998 ; PAQUES and HABER 1999 ). Generally, SSA was proposed when the DSB was positioned between tandem (direct) repeats or when complementary sequences could be exposed at two broken ends. Transformation of linear dimer plasmids into E. coli can result in monomer circular recombinants by a RecA-independent pathway, which may involve SSA (LUISI-DELUCA and KOLODNER 1992 ). Intermolecular SSA between two broken phage chromosomes was catalyzed by the Red recombination system when replication was blocked and the host RecA protein was absent (STAHL et al. 1997 ). In the yeast system, SSA was independent of Rad51, a known homologue of the bacterial RecA protein (IVANOV et al. 1996 ).

The defining feature of SSA repair is the annealing of two single-stranded homologues of opposite polarity; this single-stranded DNA could potentially be generated from double-strand breaks through the action of nucleases or helicases. The complementary strands can arise from opposite sides of a break, in the case of tandemly repeated DNA sequences, or from separate molecules that have terminal homology. An important consequence of SSA repair is the loss of at least one copy of the homologous DNA, along with any intervening sequence that flanks the break site. Thus, SSA is inherently nonconservative, a feature that distinguishes it from many other homologous DSBR mechanisms.

Several features of T4 biology suggest that SSA repair plays an important role in the phage life cycle. Almost 30 years ago, Broker and Lehman observed structures under the electron microscope that were suggestive of annealed single strands (BROKER and LEHMAN 1971 ; BROKER 1973 ). They analyzed infections in which DNA replication was severely impaired; consequently, the role of the annealed structures in a normal infection or in the context of break repair was not established. Furthermore, mutations in the bacteriophage T4 UvsX protein, a RecA homologue, reduce phage recombination by only a fewfold, even in a recA mutant host (HAMLETT and BERGER 1975 ; CUNNINGHAM and BERGER 1977 ; YONESAKI et al. 1984 ; KREUZER and KREUZER 1994 ). This robust recombination in the absence of a known strand exchange protein, coupled with the ability to study mutations in essential genes, makes T4 an excellent model system in which to investigate SSA. Indeed, MOSIG 1988 and others (KOZINSKI and FELGENHAUER 1967 ; BROKER 1973 ) have suggested that SSA contributes to phage chromosomal recombination during infections.

Plasmid model systems have been used for the physical characterization of DSBR in several systems. Haber and colleagues developed plasmid-based assays for repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and used them to describe SSA in that organism (HABER 1995 ; PAQUES and HABER 1999 ). Using similar methodology, GEORGE and KREUZER 1996 used an inverted-repeat plasmid to measure DSBR during T4 infections. In both cases, plasmid DNA was monitored by Southern blotting after a DSB was introduced in a controlled fashion. This type of physical analysis has two significant advantages over traditional genetic approaches. First, the repair reaction can be tracked in various stages by assaying the status of the plasmid DNA, and plasmids that are not repaired (or incompletely so) can be identified and characterized. Second, a wide variety of mutants, including conditional lethals, can be studied, since the approach does not demand the production of viable progeny. This is particularly appealing in the T4 system because virtually every gene involved in recombination, replication, and repair has been identified, and mutations are available in most of these. An additional advantage of the T4 system is that the phage encodes a highly site-specific endonuclease, I-TevI, which efficiently generates DSBs at its cognate sequence during phage infections. I-TevI is encoded by an open reading frame within the mobile intron of the td gene of T4 and is normally involved in intron homing, a process that operates through a DSBR mechanism (BELFORT 1990 ). I-TevI makes a staggered DSB at an asymmetric recognition sequence, which can be cloned into any desired location to create a substrate for DSBR. In this study, we present a novel plasmid-based physical assay for DSBR in repeated DNA and use the well-developed genetic system of bacteriophage T4 to characterize SSA repair.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

Materials:
T4 DNA ligase, E. coli exonuclease III, and restriction enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA), Nytran nylon transfer membranes from Schleicher and Schuell (Keene, NH), sequencing kits from National Diagnostics (Atlanta, GA), random-primed labeling kits from Boehringer-Mannheim Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN), [-³²P]dATP from Amersham (Piscataway, NJ) and Dupont-NEN (Wilmington, DE), oligonucleotides from National Biosciences Inc. (Plymouth, MN) and the Duke University Oligonucleotide Synthesis Facility, and frozen electrocompetent cells (ElectroMAX DH10B) from Gibco-BRL (Gaithersburg, MD). Growth media were formulated as follows: L-broth: 10 g/liter sodium chloride, 10 g/liter Bacto Tryptone, and 5 g/liter yeast extract; EHA top agar: 8 g/liter sodium chloride, 13 g/liter Bacto Tryptone, 2 g/liter sodium citrate, 1.3 g/liter glucose, and 6.5 g/liter agar.

Strains:
E. coli strain JG99S (recA1 relA spoT1 thi-1 deoB13 rpsL) has been previously described (GEORGE and KREUZER 1996 ). Strains KL185 [galK35 ^- pyrD34 trpC45 his-68 rpsL118(Str^R) malT1(^R) xylA7 mtlA2 thi-1] and KL186 [galK35 ^- pyrD34 trpC45 his-68 rpsL118(str^R) malT1(^R) xylA7 mtlA2 thi-1 recB21] were obtained from the E. coli Genetic Stock Center at Yale University. T4 strains are described in Table 1. Phage denA and denB mutations prevent breakdown of host chromosomal and plasmid DNA, and the amber mutations in genes 38 and 51 prevent phage assembly when not suppressed, but do not affect DNA metabolism (KARAM 1994 ).

Plasmids:
Plasmid pSTL55, a pBR322 derivative with a duplication of part of the tet gene, was a generous gift from Dr. Susan Lovett (Brandeis University; LOVETT et al. 1993 ). A duplex oligonucleotide encoding the I-TevI recognition sequence was generated by annealing the following single-strand oligonucleotides: 5'-CTAGAGAATTCAACGCTCAGTAGATGTTTTCTTGGGTCTACCGTTTAATATTGCGTCAGAATTCT-3' and 5'-CTAGAGAATTCTGACGCAATATTAAACGGTAGACCCAAGAAAACATCTACTGAGCGTTGAATTCT-3'. This duplex was ligated into pSTL55 that had been partially digested with NheI. A clone containing the oligonucleotide insert at the NheI site near the junction of the repeats was selected by restriction analysis, and the identity of the insert was confirmed by sequencing with the Sequenase kit.

Construction of the ITM strain:
A T4 strain with a consensus middle-mode promoter in place of the native late promoter of the I-TevI gene was constructed using the T4 insertion/substitution protocol (SELICK et al. 1988 ; KREUZER and SELICK 1994 ). A duplex oligonucleotide was generated by annealing single-stranded oligonucleotides (5'-GCGCGAATTCTAAACGGGGAACCTCTCTAGTAGACAATCCCGTGCTAAATTGTAGGACTGCCCTATCAAATAATGCTTC-3' and 5'-GCGCCTCGAGTATTTTTAATCTGATAAATTCCGCTTTTCATAAATACCTCTTTAAATATAGAAGTATTTATTTTATCACTAGTTTTTGAAGCATTATTTGATAGGGC-3') and extending them with Taq DNA polymerase. This duplex was digested with EcoRI and XhoI and cloned into the polylinker of plasmid pBSPLO+. Identity of the insert in the plasmid was confirmed by automated sequencing at the Duke University Sequencing Facility. The phage substitution mutant (T4 ITM) was obtained via homologous recombination using the insertion/substitution system, resulting in a phage with the desired promoter substitution and no plasmid sequences.

Sample collection and Southern blots:
Aliquots of frozen log-phase JG99S, KL185, or KL186 cells harboring the appropriate plasmid were diluted 1:200 in fresh L-broth and grown with vigorous shaking at 37° to a density of 4 x 10⁸ cells/ml. Phage were added at a multiplicity of 3 pfu/cell and incubated at 37° for 4 min to allow phage adsorption. Cultures were returned to vigorous shaking at 37° and aliquots were removed at the times indicated. The infected cells were collected by brief centrifugation and frozen in a dry ice/ethanol slurry, and total nucleic acids were then prepared as previously described (GEORGE and KREUZER 1996 ). Aliquots of prepared nucleic acids were digested for 4–6 hr with the indicated restriction enzymes, and the resulting fragments were separated by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel (13 x 25-cm or 20 x 25-cm gel) in 0.5x TBE buffer (44.5 mM Tris base, 44.5 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA) at 3 V/cm for 16 hr. Gels were prepared for Southern blotting using the rapid alkaline protocol of Schleicher and Schuell and transferred to Nytran membranes. Probe DNA (pBR322) was prepared using [-³²P]dATP and the random-primed labeling kit.

Transformation assay:
Prior to transformation, purified nucleic acid samples (described above) were diluted 1:10 in deionized water to reduce salt concentration. Samples (5 µl per 20 µl of cells) were transformed into DH10B cells using a BioRad E. coli Gene Pulser and 0.1-cm cuvettes at the recommended settings. Cells were incubated in L-broth at 37° for 30 min with vigorous shaking, then plated in 3 ml of EHA top agar on plates containing carbenicillin (50 µg/ml). Plates were incubated at 37° and a subset was removed after 2 hr and overlayed with 3 ml of EHA top agar containing tetracycline (150 µg/ml). The top agar layering and long outgrowth were required to overcome the expression lag for tetracycline resistance while maintaining an accurate count of the original transformants. All plates were then incubated for an additional 20–24 hr at 37°.

Two-dimensional gel analysis:
Purified samples were digested with the indicated restriction enzymes, loaded onto a 1% agarose TBE gel (13 x 25 cm) containing ethidium bromide (0.25 µg/ml), and electrophoresed at 2.1 V/cm for 24 hr. Lanes of interest were cut from the gel and soaked in alkaline running buffer (40 mM NaOH, 2 mM NaEDTA) for 2 x 15 min. A second dimension gel (1% agarose in 40 mM NaOH, 2 mM NaEDTA) was cast around the slices and then run at 2.1 V/cm for 48 hr at 4° in alkaline running buffer with recirculation. Gels were analyzed by Southern blot as described above.

Imaging:
Autoradiograms of Southern blots were scanned using a Microtek ScanMaker E6 flatbed scanner with a transparency adapter. Images were acquired with Microtek Scan Wizard for Windows 95 and transferred to Ulead PhotoImpact v. 3.1, where they were cropped, resized, and exported as JPEG images prior to labeling and presentation.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

DSBR in tandem repeats during bacteriophage T4 infection produces two distinct products:
We have developed a plasmid assay to monitor the repair of DSBs during phage infection, primarily through direct physical analysis of plasmid DNA isolated from infected cells. The relevant plasmids are maintained in E. coli, and the analysis is initiated by infecting with T4. Plasmid pTD001 is a modified version of pSTL55 (LOVETT et al. 1993 ), which was originally derived from pBR322. pTD001 contains a recognition sequence for the phage-encoded endonuclease I-TevI, which creates a DSB at a defined site in the plasmid during the phage infection (Fig 1). The DNA sequences adjacent to the I-TevI cleavage site in pTD001 are arranged as tandem (direct) repeats (787 bp long), with the cleavage site centered between the repeats. This repeated DNA sequence disrupts the coding region of the tetracycline resistance gene of the plasmid; therefore, pTD001 does not confer tetracycline resistance. A DSBR event that deletes one of the two tandem repeats will regenerate pBR322, a smaller plasmid (4361 bp) that confers tetracycline resistance. pTD001 is maintained in E. coli host cells, which are infected with phage to initiate the analysis.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 1. Schematic of plasmids used in the DSBR assay. pTD001 contains a 787-bp duplication in the tetracycline resistance gene and an I-TevI cleavage site near the junction of the repeats. Cleavage generates a staggered DSB flanked by 53 and 51 bp of nonhomology on the left and right sides of the break, respectively. Nonconservative but precise repair of the break eliminates the duplicated sequence and regenerates pBR322.

The interaction of the repair and replication systems in T4-infected cells increases the complexity of our analysis. Bacteriophage T4 is known to initiate DNA replication from DSBs, and break-directed plasmid DNA replication has been shown to accompany DSBR in an inverted-repeat plasmid (GEORGE and KREUZER 1996 ). Replication by phage enzymes incorporates hydroxymethylcytosine (hmdC) into the DNA chain in place of cytosine; the replicated DNA is further modified by the addition of glucose residues to the hmdC-DNA. Consequently, DNA that has been replicated by the phage becomes resistant to most restriction enzymes (including AflIII and HaeIII). Phage-replicated plasmid DNA is typically recovered as long concatemers that have a low mobility in agarose gels (MATTSON et al. 1983 ; KREUZER and ALBERTS 1986 ; KREUZER et al. 1988A ). We therefore anticipated that some repaired DNA might be in the form of replicated concatemers that would not be cut by AflIII. The starting pTD001 plasmid, along with any cleaved or repaired DNA that has not undergone extensive replication, should be cut normally by AflIII.

The generation and repair of DSBs were detected in the plasmid DNA soon after the T4 infection began. In vivo cleavage by I-TevI, followed by in vitro restriction with AflIII, generated the expected plasmid DNA fragments of ~2295 and 2913 bp. These cleaved bands were evident 10 min into the infection but quickly faded thereafter (Fig 2A, Fig D bands). Concomitant with the appearance of these cleavage bands, another band appeared at the position expected for the deletion repair product, in which one copy of the tandem repeat has been precisely removed (Fig 2A, band c). The expected position of the I-TevI cleavage in the d bands and the expected nature of the deletion in band c have both been confirmed by extensive restriction mapping (data not shown). A short time after the appearance of the cleaved DNA and the deletion product, a band containing high-molecular-weight plasmid DNA begins to accumulate (Fig 2A, band a). This band is presumably composed of replicated plasmid concatemers that are resistant to AflIII digestion.

View larger version (59K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 2. Cleavage and repair of plasmid DNA in T4-infected cells. Total nucleic acids were prepared from T4-infected cells that harbored pTD001 or pSTL55. Samples were digested with restriction nucleases as indicated and analyzed by Southern blot using a pBR322 probe. In this and the remaining figures, band a represents replicated concatemeric plasmid DNA, band b represents full-length pTD001, band c represents repaired, deleted plasmid that has not been replicated, band c* represents repaired, deleted plasmid that has been fully replicated, and d bands represent pTD001 cleaved by I-TevI in vivo. The molecular weight scales in this and subsequent figures were generated by measuring the migration of -BstEII size standards in the original agarose gels. In A, cells carrying pTD001 (lanes 1–6) or pSTL55 (lanes 7 and 8) were uninfected (lanes 1 and 7) or infected for 5, 10, 20, 30 (lanes 2–5, respectively), or 40 min (lanes 6 and 8) with T4 K10. The samples were digested with AflIII. The intensity of band a was variable in repeated experiments (compare to Fig 3, lane 3), presumably because of inconsistent transfer of very large DNA in the Southern blots (intensity of the AseI-digested material in B is a better measure of the relative quantities of the repaired products). The restriction analysis in B reveals replicated DNA after infection of cells carrying plasmids pTD001 (lanes 1 and 3) or pSTL55 (lanes 2 and 4). The AseI digestion (lanes 1 and 2) reveals both T4-replicated and unreplicated DNA, while the AseI-HaeIII double digest (lanes 3 and 4) eliminates unreplicated DNA and shows only T4-replicated products.

A control plasmid, pSTL55, that does not contain an I-TevI cleavage site but is otherwise identical to pTD001, was analyzed to test the importance of the introduced DSB. This plasmid produced no cleaved DNA, no deletion products, and no replicated concatemers at 10 or 40 min (Fig 2A, lane 8; data not shown). We conclude that the cleavage and deletion formation we observe in plasmid pTD001 are specifically induced by I-TevI cleavage and that the deletion represents a bona fide DSBR event.

We used the unique characteristics of T4-replicated DNA to further analyze the products of DSBR in this system. The restriction enzyme AseI is able to cut glucosylated hmdC-DNA efficiently. After AseI digestion, product DNA was liberated from the concatemeric forms that were evident in the AflIII-digested sample (compare Fig 2B, lane 1, and Fig 2A, lane 6). Significantly, this liberated material is in the form of deletion product, which migrates more quickly than the starting pTD001 plasmid. Its position in the gel just above the unreplicated deletion product is caused by a small reduction in mobility imparted by the glucosyl modifications. The relatively low intensity of the replicated concatemer band (AflIII digests) vs. the replicated monomer band (AseI digests) is presumably caused by poor transfer of large molecules during the Southern blot procedure.

Restriction enzyme HaeIII cleaves unmodified plasmid DNA into very small fragments but cannot cleave modified DNA. Adding HaeIII to the AseI digests effectively removes any unreplicated DNA, since the small HaeIII-cleaved fragments run off the bottom of the gel. As expected, only the replicated deletion product remains intact after HaeIII digestion (Fig 2B, lanes 3 and 4). These results imply that replication of this product is complete, with no HaeIII-sensitive sites remaining in the entire plasmid. These results also demonstrate that replication only occurs in tight association with DSBR, since the control plasmid lacking the I-TevI site produced neither replicated material nor repair products.

In this study, we will focus mainly on the repair pathway that results in unreplicated deletion product. This pathway potentially involves an SSA mechanism of DSBR, which was not detected in a similar system using inverted repeats (GEORGE and KREUZER 1996 ).

DSBR in tandem repeats occurs in the absence of strand exchange proteins:
T4 recombination proteins are well characterized in vitro, and many have homologues in both bacterial and eukaryotic systems (for reviews see KREUZER and MORRICAL 1994 ; MOSIG 1994 ). To test the possible roles of these proteins in DSBR, E. coli cells harboring plasmid pTD001 were infected with mutant phage, and DNA from infected cells was digested with AflIII to reveal the repaired but unreplicated DNA. In each case, samples were collected at 10 and 40 min after infection, to reveal both the initial and final accumulated levels of repair and cleavage products.

Of particular interest in the context of SSA are the phage protein UvsX, a DNA strand exchange protein (a functional and structural homologue of RecA in E. coli and Rad51 in both yeast and mammalian cells; BIANCO et al. 1998 ), and its accessory factor UvsY (a functional analogue of Rad52; BENSON et al. 1998 ). Eliminating these activities by mutation had no impact on the level of unreplicated deletion product (Fig 3, lanes 4–7, band c; E. coli strain JG99S, the host for these experiments, is recA^-). Interestingly, production of the replicated concatemer product is greatly reduced, but not abolished, by these mutations (see DISCUSSION).

View larger version (63K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 3. Cleavage and repair of plasmid DNA in T4 recombination mutant infections. Samples were prepared from infected cells carrying plasmid pTD001. Plasmid DNA was digested with AflIII and analyzed by Southern blotting using a pBR322 probe. The uninfected control (UI) is in lane 1, and all other lanes are loaded in pairs, representing 10-min (even-numbered lanes) and 40-min (odd-numbered lanes) infections. The infecting phages were K10 (WT), K10-uvsX- (uvsX), K10-uvsY- (uvsY), K10-32- (32), and K10-46- (46).

Other phage mutations significantly affected the production of the unreplicated deletion product. An amber mutation in gene 32, which encodes the single-strand DNA binding protein of the phage, completely abolished the reaction (Fig 3, lanes 8 and 9). Phage gene 46 encodes one subunit of a putative exonuclease that is thought to be directly involved in recombination and recombinational repair (MICKELSON and WIBERG 1981 ). Mutations in this gene also had a dramatic effect on the fate of the DSB. I-TevI cleaved DNA accumulated to very high levels during the 46-mutant infection (Fig 3, lanes 10 and 11, d bands), arguing that gp46 is normally involved in processing the DNA ends. Furthermore, accumulation of the unreplicated deletion product was reduced and delayed (Fig 3, lanes 10 and 11, band c). We conclude that gp32 and gp46 are necessary for the normal production of the unreplicated deletion product.

Construction of a mutant phage with altered I-TevI expression:
The link between DSBR and DNA replication was of particular interest to us, but the programmed nature of T4 gene expression initially prevented us from applying the DSBR assay to phage replication mutants. The endonuclease I-TevI, used to generate DSBs in pTD001, is normally expressed during the late phase of T4 gene expression (CLYMAN et al. 1994 ). However, T4 late gene expression requires simultaneous DNA replication (WILLIAMS et al. 1994 ), and thus mutations that abolish phage DNA replication also abolish expression of I-TevI (data not shown). To avoid this problem and to allow a direct investigation of T4 replication mutants, we created a phage mutant that expresses I-TevI even in the absence of DNA replication.

We replaced the native late promoter of I-TevI with an artificial sequence that contained consensus elements for a T4 middle-mode promoter (for review see STITT and HINTON 1994 ). Middle-mode gene expression requires the host RNA polymerase in conjunction with several T4 proteins, but does not require concurrent phage DNA replication. We moved the artificial promoter sequence into the phage genome by using the T4 insertion/substitution system (SELICK et al. 1988 ) and identified positive clones by PCR analysis. We then tested the efficacy of the middle-mode promoter substitution by crossing in additional mutations in phage genes 33 and 55 that block late gene expression. T4 33^- 55^- mutants with the native I-TevI late promoter did not produce I-TevI, as judged by in vivo cleavage of pTD001, but the middle-mode promoter substitution mutant produced copious amounts of cleaved plasmid (data not shown). We named the promoter substitution mutant T4 ITM (I-TevI Middle; strain lacks the 33^- 55^- mutations) and used it as a basis for additional experiments.

Our initial attempts to measure DSBR during ITM infections revealed a profound difference in the nature of the cleavage and repair reactions. Although a small amount of I-TevI-cleaved DNA was evident, almost no deletion product was observed after 30 min of infection (Fig 4A, lane 2). We then crossed the 46^- mutation into the ITM background, but this double mutant showed only a slight increase in cleaved DNA and no measurable deletion product formation above background (Fig 4A, lane 3; compare to Fig 3, lane 11). Thus, the accumulation of cleaved plasmid DNA was greatly diminished in the ITM background, even when gene 46 was mutated, a condition that normally favors such accumulation.

View larger version (65K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 4. Altered timing of I-TevI expression and impact of recB mutation on DSBR. Plasmid DNA from infected cells was digested with AflIII and analyzed by Southern blotting with a pBR322 probe. In A, the accumulations of broken DNA and repaired product are analyzed. Samples from recB+ (lanes 1–3) and recB- (lanes 4–6) cells with no infection (lanes 1 and 4), infected by T4 ITM for 40 min (lanes 2 and 5), or infected by T4 ITM-46- for 40 min (lanes 3 and 6) are shown. In B, time courses of cleavage and repair are analyzed after infection of the recB- cells with T4 K10 (normal I-TevI production; WT, lanes 2–5) or with T4 ITM (ITM, lanes 7–10). Samples were analyzed from uninfected cells (lanes 1 and 6) or after 5, 10, 20, or 30 min of infection (lanes 2–5 and lanes 7–10, respectively).

We reasoned that a host nuclease might be degrading the cleaved plasmid DNA, which was being produced earlier than normal in the phage infection. E. coli exonuclease V (RecBCD) is known to be highly active on double-stranded ends and is thought to be active during the early part of T4 infections (LIPINSKA et al. 1989 ; APPASANI et al. 1999 ). We moved plasmid pTD001 into a host strain that carried the recB21 mutation, which inactivates exonuclease V, and repeated the assay with phage ITM. Under these conditions, cleaved plasmid DNA accumulated to high levels and both types of deletion product were evident (Fig 4A, lane 5). Infection with the double mutant ITM-46^- resulted in a large accumulation of cleaved plasmid DNA, as well as the production of a significant amount of unreplicated deletion product at late times (Fig 4A, lane 6). For both the 46⁺ and 46^- phage, the amount of cleaved plasmid DNA was increased relative to comparable infections in the recB⁺ host (Fig 4A, compare lanes 5 and 6 to 2 and 3). We conclude that E. coli exonuclease V activity avidly degrades broken DNA early during T4 infection. DSBR still occurs in the absence of exonuclease V, however, so we adopted this host for the remaining experiments.

We next compared the time course of DSB processing and repair in an ITM phage infection vs. a wild-type (K10) infection in a recB^- host (Fig 4B). As expected, cleavage of the plasmid DNA occurred earlier in the ITM infection than in the K10 infection (Fig 4B, compare lane 7 to 2). Repaired unreplicated product was also visible sooner in the ITM samples, although the amount of product was somewhat lower than in the wild-type infection (Fig 4B, lane 7). The ITM infection was much like the K10 infection, although the reduced intensity of the unreplicated product led us to develop a transformation assay (described below) to supplement the physical assay.

DSBR during infections by T4 DNA replication mutants:
In some models for SSA, localized DNA synthesis is proposed to fill in missing sequence information in the region of the break (LIN et al. 1990 ; PUCHTA and HOHN 1991 ; LAI and MASKER 1998 ; PAQUES and HABER 1999 ). Alternative models suggest that the combination of annealing and a supporting nuclease activity is sufficient to repair the break (MARYON and CARROLL 1991 ; DORNFELD and LIVINGSTON 1992 ). The behavior of phage DNA replication mutants should be particularly informative with regard to the mechanism of single-strand annealing, and so we moved appropriate mutations into the ITM background. Host cells carrying plasmid pTD001 were infected with ITM phage deficient in one of several important DNA replication or recombination activities, and DNA was collected and analyzed as above.

Although the amounts of unreplicated deletion product were lower in the ITM background, significant effects of the replication and recombination mutations could still be detected (Fig 5, band c). A gene 32 amber mutation that inactivates the phage single-strand DNA binding protein reduced product formation to background levels, even though cleaved plasmid was readily detectable (Fig 5, lanes 4 and 5). The ITM-46^- mutant infection showed reduced levels of product at early times, but significant amounts were evident by 30 min (Fig 5, lanes 6 and 7). As in the experiment above (Fig 4A), this mutant accumulated high levels of cleaved plasmid DNA, revealed as pronounced bands and smears (Fig 5, lanes 6 and 7, d bands). These results are consistent with those described above for phage infections with the normal I-TevI gene and support a role for these two proteins in DSBR between tandem repeats.

View larger version (79K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 5. Physical analysis of plasmid DNA recovered from ITM replication and recombination mutant infections. The recB- host cells carried plasmid pTD001 and were uninfected (UI) or infected with T4 ITM (WT), ITM-32- (32), ITM-46- (46), ITM-43- (43), ITM-41- (41), or ITM-59- (59). Plasmid DNA was digested with AflIII and analyzed by Southern blotting using a pBR322 probe. DNA samples from infected cells are loaded in pairs, representing 10-min (even-numbered lanes) or 30-min (odd-numbered lanes) infections.

T4 gene 43 encodes the phage DNA polymerase, which is directly responsible for all DNA synthesis during the phage infection (NOSSAL 1994 ). When gene 43 was mutated, DSBR in pTD001 was reduced but not abolished (Fig 5, lanes 8 and 9, band c). As expected, the replicated deletion product (band a) was completely absent, confirming the efficacy of the polymerase mutation. Two other important phage replication proteins are gp41, a processive helicase normally associated with the replication fork, and gp59, a DNA replication factor that loads gp41 at replication forks (NOSSAL 1994 ). A mutation in gene 41 totally eliminated the replicated concatemer product. However, mutations in either 41 or 59 had little or no effect on the unreplicated deletion product (Fig 5, lanes 10–13, band c). A small amount of replicated deletion product was still produced during the 59^- infection, similar to the result seen in the uvsX^- and uvsY^- infections above (see DISCUSSION).

Plasmid transformation measures DSBR in pTD001:
The reduced intensity of the unreplicated deletion product in ITM infections made accurate quantitation difficult. We therefore developed a companion assay that provides an alternative estimate of break repair. Precise deletion of one copy of the tandem repeat in pTD001 restores the tetracycline resistance gene of the plasmid (LOVETT et al. 1993 ). By transforming DNA isolated from infected cells into competent E. coli, we measured the number of plasmids that had acquired an intact tet gene. This transformable signal is almost entirely sensitive (>90%) to HaeIII digestion (data not shown), demonstrating that replicated plasmid concatemers do not contribute appreciably and that the assay measures only unreplicated deletion product. Unlike the physical assay, which is insensitive to small sequence alterations or subtle repair defects, the transformation assay demands perfect restoration of the original tet reading frame.

We transformed DH10B cells with DNA from infected cells and plated the transformed cells on carbenicillin alone (all plasmids support growth) and on carbenicillin plus tetracycline (only repaired deletion plasmids support growth). The proportion of recombinant plasmids in each sample was then estimated by comparing the two numbers. A low frequency of recombinants was observed prior to phage infection, and a wild-type phage infection stimulated recombination ~11-fold (Fig 6). Mutations in genes 32 and 46 significantly inhibited break repair, with the former mutation having the most pronounced effect. Gene 41 and gene 43 mutants showed an intermediate level of break repair in this assay, reducing the amount of transformable signal roughly 2-fold. Since gp41 and gp43 are not strictly required for repair, phage-directed DNA replication is presumably not obligatory in this pathway. The mutation in gene 59 did not affect the reaction, which is surprising because this protein is thought to interact with gp41 during replication initiation (see DISCUSSION).

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 6. Plasmid transformation measures DSBR. DNA from infected cells was transformed into recA- E. coli cells. Cells were plated on carbenicillin alone (all plasmids support growth; CarbR) or on carbenicillin plus tetracycline (only deletion products support growth; TetRCarbR). Frequency of repair was calculated by dividing the number of colonies on carbenicillin plus tetracycline by the number on carbenicillin alone. The data represent a typical transformation of the DNA samples in Fig 5. Samples were collected from recB- host cells, uninfected (UI) or infected for 10 or 30 min with T4 ITM (WT), ITM-32- (32), ITM-46- (46), ITM-43- (43), ITM-41- (41), or ITM-59- (59).

Two-dimensional gel analysis of cleaved DNA reveals degradation of both strands:
The bands corresponding to I-TevI-cleaved DNA were visibly smeared in most samples analyzed above. In a yeast model system, cleaved DNA was shown to be progressively resected on one strand, presumably as a key intermediate in SSA repair (HABER 1995 ). We therefore analyzed the smeared DNA bands generated after I-TevI cleavage to determine if they contained resected DNA. Samples were run on agarose gels under conditions comparable to those used in Fig 2 Fig 3 Fig 4 Fig 5, except that ethidium bromide was added to accentuate the difference in mobility between fully duplex and partially single-stranded molecules. Lanes from these first-dimension gels were cut out and soaked in NaOH to denature DNA and then run on a second-dimension gel in the presence of NaOH along the perpendicular axis.

In this type of two-dimensional gel, linear fragments with resection on one strand produce a characteristic "caret" pattern (MARYON and CARROLL 1991 ). This caret pattern develops because, upon denaturation between dimensions, resected molecules release one full-length strand and one strand of variable, shorter length. All full-length strands comigrate during the second dimension, producing the horizontal arm of the caret, while the ever-shorter resected strands migrate faster and thus produce the sloping arm. This assay would not detect molecules in which resection has proceeded past the AflIII site (used to linearize the plasmids prior to analysis) or molecules that have been rendered fully single stranded, but it should readily detect plasmids with limited resection at one or both ends. As a control, linear plasmid DNA with one end resected in vitro by E. coli exonuclease III produced a prominent caret pattern (Fig 7A). In contrast, every in vivo sample we analyzed produced a contrasting pattern—a diagonal smear with no hint of a caret (Fig 7B). This diagonal smear represents uniform degradation of both strands, since the mobility of the unpaired strands remains constant after denaturation. We obtained this result with DNA from the wild-type infection (Fig 7B), as well as DNA from a variety of mutant infections (K10, K10-32^-, K10-46^-, ITM, ITM-41^-, ITM-43^-, and ITM-46^-) collected from several E. coli backgrounds (data not shown). Numerous time points were analyzed, both early and late in the infection, including a series from a low-temperature infection in which the reaction is much slower (presumably extending the life span of any intermediates). In each case, no resection was detected and the pattern was consistent with double-stranded degradation (data not shown). We conclude that the smeared DNA is generated by double-strand degradation after I-TevI cleavage.

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 7. Southern blot of cleaved DNA analyzed by two-dimensional neutral/alkaline gel electrophoresis. The first-dimension gel was a neutral gel run in the presence of ethidium bromide. Each gel lane was cut out and DNA was denatured by soaking in NaOH. The slice was then cast and run in the second-dimension gel in the presence of NaOH, and the DNA was visualized by Southern blotting with a pBR322 probe. A control with a linear plasmid DNA fragment (2713 bp), resected from one end by E. coli exonuclease III in vitro, is shown in A. B shows a sample collected from recB- E. coli carrying plasmid pTD001, infected with T4 K10 phage for 10 min, and digested with AflIII prior to electrophoresis. The heavy spot in the top left is AflIII-linearized full-length pTD001. Other spots along the diagonal are repaired, deleted pTD001 and the 2913- and 2295-bp I-TevI-cleaved fragments of pTD001 (spots from upper left to lower right, respectively).

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

We have found that double-strand breaks between tandem repeats are repaired efficiently during bacteriophage T4 infection. Three distinct repair pathways were uncovered, differing in their genetic requirements, their time of occurrence during the infection, and the nature of the repaired products that are produced. The predominant repair products late in the infection are long, replicated concatemers that have lost one copy of the tandem repeat. Production of this material is largely dependent on the UvsX and UvsY proteins of the phage and as such probably requires one or more strand invasion events. We propose that this product is generated by an extensive chromosomal replication (ECR) mechanism (GEORGE and KREUZER 1996 ) in which an initial strand invasion establishes one or more replication forks that subsequently generate multiple copies of the repaired plasmid. Although this is the predominant repair product, this pathway need not be the predominant mechanism for repairing the DSB; the extensive replication of the repaired molecules leads to overrepresentation of these products. A small amount of replicated deletion product is produced during infections by uvsX, uvsY, or 59 mutants, suggesting one or more additional pathways for replication-coupled repair.

An unreplicated deletion product is also generated during phage infections and is present early during the infection with reasonable abundance. This product is produced at wild-type levels in the absence of the phage strand invasion proteins UvsX and UvsY (even in the absence of host RecA) and appears to be stable throughout the infection. Restriction mapping has confirmed that this product has lost one copy of the tandem repeat, thus regenerating native pBR322 sequence. Furthermore, transformation of this repaired DNA into competent cells confers tetracycline resistance, indicating that the reading frame in the repaired region has been precisely restored. On the basis of its independence from strand exchange proteins and its lack of extensive DNA replication, this product is very likely generated by a single-strand annealing mechanism.

UvsX protein is homologous to strand exchange proteins from other organisms, including bacterial RecA and S. cerevisiae Rad51. Genetic data in yeast show that SSA repair is not dependent on Rad51 (IVANOV et al. 1996 ), and similarly, SSA between broken phage chromosomes is independent of RecA (STAHL et al. 1997 ). In Deinococcus radiodurans, a gram-positive bacterium, recircularization of plasmids bearing direct repeats, but not inverted repeats, was found to occur after massive radiation damage in recA mutants (DALY and MINTON 1996 ). We see comparable results with our plasmid model system; direct repeats can be repaired by SSA in a UvsX-independent manner (this study), while inverted repeats cannot (GEORGE and KREUZER 1996 ). In our studies, uvsY mutants were indistinguishable from uvsX mutants. Recent reports suggest that yeast Rad52 protein is a functional analogue of UvsY (BENSON et al. 1998 ), and several studies show that Rad52 is not required for SSA repair of large homologies in yeast (DORNFELD and LIVINGSTON 1992 ; PRADO and AGUILERA 1995 ; PAQUES and HABER 1999 ). Additional evidence for SSA has been reported in several higher eukaryotes, although in general the protein requirements in those systems are not known (LIN et al. 1984 ; MARYON and CARROLL 1991 ; PUCHTA and HOHN 1991 ). We infer that T4 can repair double-strand breaks by an SSA pathway that seems to be highly conserved in many diverse organisms.

Early efforts to characterize recombination during T4 infections led to a model with features similar to the SSA mechanism. BROKER and LEHMAN 1971 proposed that the early stages of recombination involved resection of nicked DNA by an exonuclease, followed by annealing of complementary strands promoted by the phage gp32 protein. Using electron microscopy, they examined recombination during infections that lacked both DNA polymerase (gp43) and polynucleotide ligase (gp30). In their system, gp32 mutants were 10-fold less proficient at generating branched DNA structures. Our results indicate that recombination in a tandem-repeat substrate is totally dependent on gp32. The involvement of single-stranded DNA binding proteins may be general, because a mutation in the RPA protein caused a significant defect in SSA repair after induction of a double-strand break in tandem repeats in the yeast system (UMEZU et al. 1998 ). Both T4 studies indicate that gp32 plays a key role during SSA, presumably by promoting the efficient annealing of complementary single strands, which it does in vitro (KONG et al. 1997 ).

Of the proteins investigated in this study, only gp46 and its accessory factor gp47 have not been purified and characterized in vitro. Several studies indicate that gp46/47 either encodes or modulates an exonuclease activity (MICKELSON and WIBERG 1981 ; MOSIG 1998 ). Furthermore, gp47 carries a phosphoesterase motif also found in E. coli SbcD (subunit of the SbcCD nuclease) and S. cerevisiae Mre11 protein (SHARPLES and LEACH 1995 ). Our data support the assignment of gp46/47 as a recombination nuclease, in that gp46 mutants accumulate broken DNA to much higher levels than wild-type phage. Sequence analysis of gp46 reveals several motifs common among helicases, suggesting that the gp46/47 enzyme may have helicase as well as nuclease functions (SHARPLES and LEACH 1995 ). Our data are also consistent with an involvement of the putative helicase activity in repair of DSBs in the T4 infection, since we were unable to detect resected DNA in a wild-type infection (see below). Gene 46 mutants are significantly impaired for SSA repair at early times of infection, although these mutants appear by Southern blot analysis to accumulate some repaired product at late times. In contrast to samples from other mutants, this accumulated material is not represented proportionately in the transformation assay. As the transformation assay demands strict restoration of the original reading frame in the repaired region, this suggests that the observed band represents incompletely or improperly repaired plasmid. We surmise that gp46, acting as either a helicase or a nuclease, is important in generating single-stranded DNA prior to strand annealing. Additionally, we propose that a substantial fraction of the unreplicated product band produced during 46^- infections is not fully repaired and may represent an intermediate or abortive side-product of repair.

The importance of DNA degradation was particularly evident in our studies of the ITM mutation, which altered the timing of the DSB and had an immense impact on the overall character of the repair reactions. A simple change in the timing of the break from late to middle times of infection (from ~10 min to 4 min into the infection) revealed the profound influence of the host RecBCD nuclease. The RecBCD complex of E. coli is exonuclease V, which is known to play a pivotal role in a major recombination and repair pathway in the bacteria (MYERS and STAHL 1994 ). This nuclease modulates recombination via its interaction with double-strand ends, and in the ITM infections, I-TevI-broken DNA was greatly stabilized when RecBCD was mutated. Specific inactivation of the proposed nucleolytic subunit of the complex, RecD, was also sufficient to stabilize the cleaved DNA in our assay and to allow the generation of complete repair products (D. TOMSO and K. KREUZER, unpublished data). The apparent insensitivity of wild-type (K10; late I-TevI promoter) infections to RecBCD suggests that host exonuclease V activity is irrelevant by late times of infection. Indeed, the late T4 protein gp2 has been shown to protect against exonuclease V degradation and plays a key role in protecting the ends of infecting phage DNA (LIPINSKA et al. 1989 ; APPASANI et al. 1999 ). Protection by gp2 at late but not early times could account for the differential degradation of broken plasmid DNA in K10 vs. ITM infections.

Another possible explanation for the altered processing of broken DNA in the ITM infections is that the phage may require a fairly long period of infection to generate sufficient quantities of proteins (e.g., gp32 and gp46/47) to catalyze the efficient repair of DSBs. Several important repair proteins, including gp32 and gp46/47, do not reach peak levels until at least 7–9 min into the infection (COWAN et al. 1994 ). According to this view, I-TevI cuts generated at late times would be repaired quickly, whereas those produced prematurely in the ITM infections would not be repaired efficiently and thus would become susceptible to degradation by RecBCD. Insufficient quantities of gp32 and/or gp46/47 at early times could also explain the relatively low level of repaired plasmid generated during ITM infections of the recB^- host.

The ITM mutant strain allowed us to investigate directly the role of several DNA replication proteins, including the DNA polymerase (gp43), the replicative helicase (gp41), and the helicase loading factor (gp59). Unlike gene conversion and other similar conservative repair processes, SSA is nonconservative and does not have an inherent requirement for new DNA synthesis. However, several models for SSA have suggested that synthesis may play a role in filling in gaps formed by extensive nuclease degradation (LIN et al. 1990 ; PUCHTA and HOHN 1991 ; LAI and MASKER 1998 ; PAQUES and HABER 1999 ). In our experiments, gp43- and gp41-deficient mutants both displayed measurable levels of SSA repair above background, implying that SSA can in fact operate without any phage-directed DNA synthesis. In this case, repair may depend on precise nuclease cleavage of annealed structures to generate nicked (i.e., gap-free) intermediates or may involve gap filling by a host polymerase. Nonetheless, a significant reduction in repair compared to wild-type infections was also observed. These results suggest that a subset of SSA repair events requires some localized synthesis to restore gaps in the plasmid, although we have thus far been unable to detect any replicated patches in the repaired DNA (data not shown). Mutations in the DNA synthesis machinery of the phage may also cause a generalized disruption in the physiology of the infection, for example, by altering late gene expression (WILLIAMS et al. 1994 ), and thereby exert an indirect effect on repair.

In contrast to the gene 41 and gene 43 mutations, the gene 59 mutation had no effect on SSA and appeared phenotypically similar to the uvsX and uvsY mutants. Importantly, the gene 59 mutant produced a small amount of replicated concatemer, just like the uvsX and uvsY mutants. One interpretation is that UvsX, UvsY, and gp59 all operate in a single pathway to produce the bulk of the replicated concatemer product and that a small amount of concatemer product is produced by an alternative pathway in the absence of any one of these proteins. In this model, gp59 is required to load gp41 onto recombination intermediates generated by UvsX/UvsY-promoted strand invasion, but is not required to load gp41 in the alternative pathway. A different interpretation is that elimination of gp59 or UvsX/UvsY causes a quantitatively similar but mechanistically unrelated decrease in the amount of concatemer product.

In an attempt to delineate the steps of break repair, we used two-dimensional neutral/alkaline gel electrophoresis to analyze the cleaved DNA generated by I-TevI. MARYON and CARROLL 1991 used a similar technique to track the fate of cleaved DNA injected into Xenopus oocytes and were able to document single-strand resection. Research in yeast has also revealed extensive single-strand resection following cleavage by the HO endonuclease (HABER 1995 ). However, we were not able to observe similar resection in any of a number of wild-type and mutant infections. The overall reaction in T4-infected cells is much faster than that in eukaryotic systems, so it is possible that transient resected intermediates do exist but are repaired or degraded too quickly to be detected. Alternatively, repair in T4 may be initiated by substrates that have been rendered single stranded by helicases rather than nucleases. Partial denaturation at the ends of broken DNA has been proposed as an early step in recombination (ROSENBERG and HASTINGS 1991 ; see also LOVETT et al. 1988 ), but these denatured structures would be expected to reanneal during preparation and thus appear as intact duplexes in our analysis.

Fig 8 depicts two models for SSA repair during bacteriophage T4 infections. The first (Fig 8A) is an adaptation of models proposed by other investigators (LIN et al. 1984 ; MARYON and CARROLL 1991 ) in which repair is nuclease driven, in that the homologous regions required for annealing are exposed by nuclease degradation. As an alternative, we propose that SSA may occur by a helicase-driven mechanism, in which the homologous regions are revealed partially or entirely by helicases, without resection (Fig 8B). At this stage we cannot distinguish between these models, although we have consistently detected homogenous degradation of both strands at broken ends, rather than single-strand resection, in spite of a sensitive assay that readily detects resection in in vitro-generated samples.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 8. Models for SSA repair during T4 infection. Homologous DNA is indicated by heavy unbroken lines, with the arrows indicating polarity. In both models, DNA synthesis is not required to complete the repair reaction. In A, nuclease resection of broken ends drives SSA. Exonuclease resection, potentially catalyzed by gp46/47, exposes complementary sequences in step i. Measurements of intron homing during T4 infections have also suggested roles for other phage-encoded exonucleases in the processing of I-TevI-cleaved ends (HUANG et al. 1999 ). gp32-facilitated annealing of the complementary strands from adjacent repeats deletes one copy of the repeat in step ii. Additional nuclease processing and ligation precisely restore one copy of the repeat in step iii. gp46/47 may also function at this step by eliminating extruded DNA flaps from the annealed intermediate. In B, helicase action drives SSA. In step i, single-stranded DNA is produced by helicase activity, perhaps of the gp46/47 complex. Plasmids with separated ends as depicted here would reanneal during preparation and behave as intact duplexes in our assays. gp32 would presumably facilitate annealing of the complementary strands, although there may be a competition between simple annealing within each repeat vs. annealing between adjacent repeats as depicted in step ii. Additional nuclease processing removes flaps, and ligation seals the repaired duplex in step iii.

In summary, phage T4 can repair broken DNA by an efficient SSA mechanism. This mechanism is independent of strand exchange proteins, but requires single-strand DNA binding protein and the putative exonuclease/helicase gp46/47. Although replication is not required for this SSA repair pathway, break repair within the tandem-repeat substrate triggers extensive DNA replication in two other pathways, one dependent and one independent of strand exchange protein UvsX. Because these repair pathways can be studied by a direct physical assay, this system has the potential to provide key insights into recombination intermediates and will potentially allow us to track the fate of intermediates as they proceed through repair and replication.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Susan T. Lovett for helpful discussion and the donation of the tandem-repeat plasmid. This work was supported by grant GM34622 from the National Institutes of Health. D.J.T. was supported in part by National Research Service Award 5T32 GM07184.

Manuscript received November 8, 1999; Accepted for publication April 14, 2000.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION LITERATURE CITED

APPASANI, K., D. S. THALER, and E. B. GOLDBERG, 1999  Bacteriophage T4 gp2 interferes with cell viability and with bacteriophage lambda red recombination. J. Bacteriol. 181:1352-1355[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BELFORT, M., 1990  Phage T4 introns: self-splicing and mobility. Annu. Rev. Genet. 24:363-385[Medline].

BENSON, F. E., P. BAUMANN, and S. C. WEST, 1998  Synergistic actions of Rad51 and Rad52 in recombination and DNA repair. Nature 391:401-404[Medline].

BENSON, K. H. and K. N. KREUZER, 1992  Plasmid models for bacteriophage T4 DNA replication: requirements for fork proteins. J. Virol. 66:6960-6968[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BIANCO, P. R., R. B. TRACY, and S. C. KOWALCZYKOWSKI, 1998  DNA strand exchange proteins: a biochemical and physical comparison. Front. Biosci. 3:570-603.

BROKER, T. R., 1973  An electron microscopic analysis of pathways for bacteriophage T4 DNA recombination. J. Mol. Biol. 81:1-16[Medline].

BROKER, T. R. and I. R. LEHMAN, 1971  Branched DNA molecules: intermediates in T4 recombination. J. Mol. Biol. 60:131-149[Medline].

CLYMAN, J., S. QUIRK and M. BELFORT, 1994 Mobile introns in the T-even phages, pp. 83–88 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. ASM Press, Washington, DC.

COWAN, J., K. D'ACCI, B. GUTTMAN and E. KUTTER, 1994 Gel analysis of T4 prereplicative proteins, pp. 520–527 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. ASM Press, Washington, DC.

CUNNINGHAM, R. P. and H. BERGER, 1977  Mutations affecting genetic recombination in bacteriophage T4D. I. Pathway analysis. Virology 80:67-82[Medline].

DALY, M. J. and K. W. MINTON, 1996  An alternative pathway of recombination of chromosomal fragments precedes recA-dependent recombination in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. J. Bacteriol. 178:4461-4471[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DE GROOT, M. J., R. OFFRINGA, M. P. DOES, P. J. HOOYKAAS, and P. J. VAN DEN ELZEN, 1992  Mechanisms of intermolecular homologous recombination in plants as studied with single- and double-stranded DNA molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:2785-2794[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DERR, L. K. and K. N. KREUZER, 1990  Expression and function of the uvsW gene of bacteriophage T4. J. Mol. Biol. 214:643-656[Medline].

DORNFELD, K. J. and D. M. LIVINGSTON, 1992  Plasmid recombination in a rad52 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Genetics 131:261-276[Abstract].

GEORGE, J. W. and K. N. KREUZER, 1996  Repair of double-strand breaks in bacteriophage T4 by a mechanism that involves extensive DNA replication. Genetics 143:1507-1520[Abstract].

HABER, J. E., 1995  In vivo biochemistry: physical monitoring of recombination induced by site-specific endonucleases. Bioessays 17:609-620[Medline].

HAMLETT, N. V. and H. BERGER, 1975  Mutations altering genetic recombination and repair of DNA in bacteriophage T4. Virology 63:539-567[Medline].

HUANG, Y. J., M. M. PARKER, and M. BELFORT, 1999  Role of exonucleolytic degradation in group I intron homing in phage T4. Genetics 153:1501-1512[Abstract/Free Full Text].

IVANOV, E. L., N. SUGAWARA, J. FISHMAN-LOBELL, and J. E. HABER, 1996  Genetic requirements for the single-strand annealing pathway of double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Genetics 142:693-704[Abstract].

KARAM, J. D., 1994 Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4. ASM Press, Washington, DC.

KONG, D. C., N. G. NOSSAL, and C. C. RICHARDSON, 1997  Role of the bacteriophage T7 and T4 single-stranded DNA-binding proteins in the formation of joint molecules and DNA helicase-catalyzed polar branch migration. J. Biol. Chem. 272:8380-8387[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KOZINSKI, A. W. and Z. Z. FELGENHAUER, 1967  Molecular recombination in T4 bacteriophage deoxyribonucleic acid. II. Single-strand breaks and exposure of uncomplemented areas as a prerequisite for recombination. J. Virol. 1:1193-1202[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KREUZER, H. W. E. and K. N. KREUZER, 1994  Integration of plasmids into the bacteriophage T4 genome. Genetics 138:983-992[Abstract].

KREUZER, K. N. and B. M. ALBERTS, 1986  Characterization of a defective phage system for the analysis of bacteriophage T4 DNA replication origins. J. Mol. Biol. 188:185-198[Medline].

KREUZER, K. N., and S. W. MORRICAL, 1994 Initiation of DNA replication, pp. 28–42 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. ASM Press, Washington, DC.

KREUZER, K. N., and H. E. SELICK, 1994 Directed insertion/substitution mutagenesis, pp. 452–454 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. ASM Press, Washington, DC.

KREUZER, K. N., W. Y. YAP, A. E. MENKENS, and H. W. ENGMAN, 1988a  Recombination-dependent replication of plasmids during bacteriophage T4 infection. J. Biol. Chem. 263:11366-11373[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KREUZER, K. N., H. W. ENGMAN, and W. Y. YAP, 1988b  Tertiary initiation of replication in bacteriophage T4. Deletion of the overlapping uvsY promoter/replication origin from the phage genome. J. Biol. Chem. 263:11348-11357[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LAI, Y. T. and W. MASKER, 1998  In vitro repair of gaps in bacteriophage T7 DNA. J. Bacteriol. 180:6193-6202[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LIN, F.-L. M., K. SPERLE, and N. STERNBERG, 1984  Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:1020-1034[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LIN, F.-L. M., K. SPERLE, and N. STERNBERG, 1990  Intermolecular recombination between DNAs introduced into mouse L cells is mediated by a nonconservative pathway that leads to crossover products. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:103-112[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LIPINSKA, B., A. S. M. KRISHNA RAO, B. M. BOLTEN, R. BALAKRISHNAN, and E. B. GOLDBERG, 1989  Cloning and identification of bacteriophage T4 gene 2 product gp2 and action of gp2 on infecting DNA in vivo. J. Bacteriol. 171:488-497[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LOVETT, S. T., C. LUISI-DELUCA, and R. D. KOLODNER, 1988  The genetic dependence of recombination in recD mutants of Escherichia coli.. Genetics 120:37-45[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LOVETT, S. T., P. T. DRAPKIN, V. A. SUTERA, JR., and T. J. GLUCKMAN-PESKIND, 1993  A sister-strand exchange mechanism for recA-independent deletion of repeated DNA sequences in Escherichia coli.. Genetics 135:631-642[Abstract].

LUISI-DELUCA, C. and R. D. KOLODNER, 1992  Effect of terminal non-homology on intramolecular recombination of linear plasmid substrates in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 227:72-80[Medline].

MARYON, E. and D. CARROLL, 1991  Characterization of recombination intermediates from DNA injected into Xenopus laevis oocytes: evidence for a nonconservative mechanism of homologous recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:3278-3287[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MATTSON, T., G. VAN HOUWE, and R. EPSTEIN, 1983  Recombination between bacteriophage T4 and plasmid pBR322 molecules containing cloned T4 DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 169:357-379.

MICKELSON, C. and J. S. WIBERG, 1981  Membrane-associated DNase activity controlled by genes 46 and 47 of bacteriophage T4D and elevated DNase activity associated with the T4 das mutation. J. Virol. 40:65-77[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MOSIG, G., 1988 Mapping and map distortions in bacteriophage crosses, pp. 141–167 in Genetic Recombination, edited by R. KUCHERLAPATI and G. R. SMITH. ASM Press, Washington, DC.

MOSIG, G., 1994 Homologous recombination, pp. 54–82 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. ASM Press, Washington, DC.

MOSIG, G., 1998  Recombination and recombination-dependent DNA replication in bacteriophage T4. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32:379-413[Medline].

MYERS, R. S. and F. W. STAHL, 1994  chi and the RecBCD enzyme of Escherichia coli.. Annu. Rev. Genet. 28:49-70