| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Corresponding author: Ruth G. Shaw, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, 100 Ecology, St. Paul, MN 55108., rshaw{at}superb.ecology.umn.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: P. D. KEIGHTLEY
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
A study of spontaneous mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana was initiated from a single inbred Columbia founder; 120 lines were established and advanced 17 generations by single-seed descent. Here, we report an assay of reproductive traits in a random set of 40 lines from generations 8 and 17, grown together at the same time with plants representing generation 0. For three reproductive traits, mean number of seeds per fruit, number of fruits, and dry mass of the infructescence, the means did not differ significantly among generations. Nevertheless, by generation 17, significant divergence among lines was detected for each trait, indicating accumulation of mutations in some lines. Standardized measures of mutational variance accord with those obtained for other organisms. These findings suggest that the distribution of mutational effects for these traits is approximately symmetric, in contrast to the usual assumption that mutations have predominantly negative effects on traits directly related to fitness. Because distinct generations were grown contemporaneously, each line was represented by three sublines, and seeds were equal in age, these estimates are free of potentially substantial sources of bias. The finding of an approximately symmetric distribution of mutational effects invalidates the standard approach for inferring properties of spontaneous mutation and necessitates further development of more general approaches that avoid restrictions on the distribution of mutational effects.
SPONTANEOUS mutation ceaselessly contributes new alleles to a population's pool of genetic variation. Potential evolutionary consequences of this process are increasingly well understood as a result of extensive theoretical study. Much of the standing genetic variance in quantitative traits could be due to a balance between the influx of variation through mutation and reduction of variation by selection (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The primary approach developed for study of influences of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits involves establishing numerous lines from a single founder individual, such that the lines are as nearly genetically identical as possible at the outset (i.e., they are in mutation-drift equilibrium; ![]()
![]()
The M-A approach was pioneered by Mukai and his colleagues in massive studies of egg-to-adult viability in Drosophila melanogaster (![]()
![]()
![]()
Recently, however, ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Empirical studies over the past five years have extended inference of mutational properties to a broader range of organisms, including the bacterium E. coli (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We are studying properties of spontaneous mutation affecting quantitative traits of the annual crucifer, Arabidopsis thaliana. A set of 120 lines established from a single, highly inbred founder were advanced under minimal selection to generation 17. This article reports a contemporaneous comparison of lines sampled at generations 0, 8, and 17 of mutation accumulation. By generation 17, the lines had diverged significantly with respect to several reproductive traits, yet no overall change in the mean of these traits was detectable. We discuss implications of these results for inference of mutation rates and distributions of mutational effects.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Experimental material:
Aspects of A. thaliana that suit it particularly well to studies of spontaneous mutation include its short life cycle (10 wk) and its high fecundity (commonly over 500 seeds per plant). Of profound importance in ensuring accuracy of estimates of mutational variation is the lasting viability of seeds (see below). Simultaneous rearing of individuals sampled from distinct generations avoids confounding of temporal changes in environment with changes due to accumulated mutation. Stored seed may also be used for retrospective tracking of mutation events.
A. thaliana is highly self-pollinating. Anthers normally dehisce prior to anthesis, and flowers regularly self and set seeds in bud. In outdoor conditions designed to maximize the chance of outcrossing, ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In advance of M-A line initiation, 15 laboratory accessions of A. thaliana were screened to eliminate lines exhibiting visible segregation and poor fertility. A screen of molecular variation was also conducted to assess variablity within and among the source lines. On the basis of these assays, 3 accessions that showed no segregation but that differed from one another in height, flowering time, and RFLP phenotype were chosen as inbred sources for the M-A lines. These sources were maintained by selfing and single-seed descent for several generations and are therefore expected to have reached mutation-drift equilibrium, a condition that simplifies interpretation of the evolutionary dynamics of the change in mean phenotypes due to mutation (![]()
The M-A lines were established in 1991 by planting 120 seeds from a single founder individual, each seed establishing a single line. Each line was propagated each generation by a single individual randomly chosen from 5 seeds sown, with remaining seeds from each line stored in microfuge tubes. This single-seed descent method of advancing lines limits effective population size (Ne) to 1 and thus allows genetic drift to dominate changes in allele frequencies, minimizing selection. In this respect, the single-seed descent method of M-A is intermediate between using balancer stocks to allow mutations to accumulate on a single chromosome (e.g., ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
In preparation for a series of assays of generations 0, 8, and 17, sublines were developed for each line in each generation so that environmentally induced maternal effects would not be confounded with differences among lines. Among-line genetic differences that are maternally inherited, for example, mutations in organelle genomes, would contribute to our estimates of mutational effects, as is true of other M-A studies (e.g., of C. elegans, ![]()
![]()
Experimental design of assay:
Forty M-A lines were chosen at random for this assay of reproductive traits. The same 40 lines were grown for Gens 8 and 17, and each was represented by three sublines in each generation. One representative for each line-generation (line-gen) subline was grown in each of four blocks for generations 8 and 17. The founder generation (Gen 0) was represented by 13 lines with two replicate individuals from each of four sublines within each of the four blocks. The plants were grown in 6 x 6 x 8.5-cm pots two-thirds filled with coarse vermiculite and topped with a mixture of African violet soil and fine vermiculite. Four seeds were sown per pot and thinned to a single plant nearest the center. Within each block, plants representing all line-gens were randomized together.
Of the planned design, 9395% of plants were available for measurement of reproductive traits (Gen 0: 388 out of 416 planned; Gen 8: 459 of 480; Gen 17: 467 of 480). We determined the number of seeds per fruit, the total number of fruits produced, and dry mass of the infructescence for each plant. The seeds of four fruits were counted for each plant. Usually the third, fifth, seventh, and ninth fruits produced were collected for counting unless very few fruits were produced. Counting the large number of tiny seeds was facilitated by digital imaging. Seeds were taped to file cards and scanned (NIH Image). Fruits were counted when the plants had fully senesced. Thereafter, the infructescence was oven-dried and weighed to 10-5 x g.
Analysis:
Composite effects of mutations that have accumulated within lines are evidenced by comparison of overall trait means expressed in different M-A generations and by variance accruing among lines with advancing generations. In particular, a trend in trait means with generations indicates a bias in the direction of mutational effects. Directional trends over generations were quantified as the regression coefficient, ß, in a linear regression of trait values on generation number. This regression model also included the design factors, planting flat, and maternal parent, as well as a covariate, germination date. None of the traits were transformed for this or any of the analyses outlined below, since each trait satisfied normality assumptions.
In inferring the variance among M-A lines for each trait, VL, influences on the expression of each trait were formulated according to a mixed model. Specifically, each observation was modeled as the sum of random effects of the ith M-A line in the jth generation of assay (lij) and the kth maternal parent within M-A line-generation (mk(lij)), as well as fixed effects of the flat in which the plant grew (fs) and of a linear covariate, germination date (gt):

The distributional assumption required for the maximum-likelihood analysis was that the effects of a given line in the two assayed generations, li8, li17, are drawn from a bivariate normal distribution, with mean zero and variance-covariance matrix

Components of this model were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood (REML) in a bivariate analysis treating the trait in generation 8 as trait 1 and the same trait in generation 17 as trait 2. This analysis provides an estimate of a component of variance of line effects for each trait in generations 8 and 17, VL8, and VL17. Because observations are available for the same lines sampled in generations 8 and 17, the covariance between trait values expressed in a particular line in Gen 8 and that line in Gen 17, covL8,17, can also be obtained. Components of variance due to maternal parent, VMat, and to environmental effects unique to individuals, VE, were also estimated in this analysis. Because a single maternal plant is represented in only one generation, the maternal covariance between generations is zero; the environmental covariance is also zero, because each individual represents a single generation.
For M-A lines advanced by a single diploid individual each generation, VL, has the expectation, 2tVM, where t is the number of generations since the common founder (![]()
![]()
A second joint analysis of the observations from generations 8 and 17 was developed to estimate VM for each trait directly and, therefore, more precisely. In this case, each observation was modeled as above, with the exception that the variance-covariance matrix of li8, li17, was parameterized in terms of VM:

To assess the contribution of mutation to the covariances between the reproductive traits, a multivariate REML analysis was used to obtain estimates of among-line variance and covariance components, as well as estimates of environmental components. This analysis was restricted to Gen 17, because significant variation among lines was not detected for Gen 8.
For all analyses, likelihood ratio tests (![]()
![]()
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
In over 96% of the pots planted, at least one plant germinated from the four seeds sown, and the plant that was retained after thinning survived to reproduction. The three reproductive traits showed sensitivity to environmental variation; each varied significantly among the planting flats. Moreover, germination date was a significant predictor of number of seeds per fruit (ß = -0.96; P < 0.0001) and the number of fruits per plant (ß = 1.67; P < 0.03). Because germination date did not vary significantly among the lines in any generation (Gen 0, P = 0.94; Gen 8, P = 0.13; Gen 17, P = 0.64), it likely also reflects environmental variation in the greenhouse. The factors flat and germination date were included in all further analyses.
Generation means:
Means for each reproductive trait differed negligibly among the three assayed generations (Table 1; Fig 1 and Fig 2). For seed number per fruit, though the regression estimate of per generation change in the trait was negative (estimate: -0.004, P > 0.7, -0.01%; 95% confidence interval (C.I.) lower bound, -0.25%), the mean was slightly higher in generation 8 than in generation 0 or 17. Both the mean number of fruits per plant and reproductive biomass (not shown) declined very weakly but consistently [estimates of per-generation change in the mean: -0.11 fruit (-0.2%; 95% C.I. lower bound, -0.68%) and -0.06 mg (-0.1%; 95% C.I. lower bound, -0.61%), respectively, both P > 0.45]. Total reproductive fitness for each plant was estimated as the product of number of fruits per plant and the mean number of seeds per fruit. Mean reproductive fitness was slightly greater for generations 8 and 17 than for generation 0 (not shown); these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.5). Thus, these data do not reject the null hypothesis that there is no composite effect of accumulating mutations on overall means of these reproductive traits. This outcome would arise if mutations affecting these traits had not accumulated in the 17 generations of this study or if the mutations that accumulated were not consistent in the direction of their effects.
|
Variance partitioning:
For all three reproductive traits, divergence among the lines was evident in analyses of generation 17 alone. Analysis of variance (not shown) demonstrated significant variance among lines for each trait considered singly (for each, P < 0.03), as well as in the multivariate sense (P < 0.04).
Bivariate analysis of the two M-A generations (Table 1) confirmed that variance among lines, VL, was greater at generation 17 than at generation 8, as expected for divergence with accumulating mutations. For each of the three traits, VL was significantly greater than zero only at generation 17. For the trait seed number per fruit the increase in VL appeared to be approximately constant, whereas VL for fruit number and reproductive mass appeared to increase faster between generations 8 and 17 than in the first eight generations. For seed number per fruit, the correlation among lines between traits expressed in generations 8 and 17 closely approximated the expectation of 0.68 [i.e., t1/(t1t2)1/2] based on considering divergence of a line from an ancestral, genetically identical sample (![]()
This analysis also revealed substantial contributions of environmentally induced maternal effects to variance in generations 0 and 8. For generation 8, the maternal component of variance, VMat8, dwarfed VL8 for each trait, although none of the VMat8 differed significantly from zero. Analyses eliminating this component from the model led to estimates of VL8 (not shown) that were higher by factors of 1.7 (for number of seeds per fruit) and 5.7 (for reproductive mass). In contrast, no evidence of maternal effects was found for generation 17. Negative values for VMat17 were obtained initially for each trait, but in no case were these values as large as their asymptotic standard errors. They were judged to be due to sampling error and were set to zero in subsequent analyses.
Mutational variance, VM, was estimated directly for each trait by REML analyses of generations 8 and 17 jointly (Table 2). For all three traits, VM differed significantly from zero by likelihood ratio tests. Estimates of VM scaled by VE (h2M) fall well within range of estimates for numerous traits, particularly life history characters, in other organisms (![]()
![]()
|
Covariances between traits:
Multivariate analysis of the three traits measured on plants representing generation 17 demonstrated strong positive among-line components of covariance for each pair of reproductive traits (Table 3); among-line correlations (rL) exceeded 0.7 in each case, suggesting that individual mutations tend either to increase all three traits or to decrease all three. Environmental contributions to correlations between traits (rE) were also positive and statistically significant, although rE of seed number per fruit with each of the remaining reproductive traits was substantially weaker than the corresponding rL. This analysis confirmed the finding of significant divergence among the lines; the likelihood ratio test strongly rejected (P < 0.0001) the null hypothesis that all of the among-line components of (co)variance are zero.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
For each of the three reproductive traits, the A. thaliana M-A lines diverged rapidly; the lines differed significantly for each trait by Gen 17. The mutational variance VM was comparable to that found in studies of diverse traits in other organisms (![]()
![]()
Our study is most directly comparable to a recent mutation accumulation study of the Landsberg erecta strain of A. thaliana (![]()
Recent M-A studies of other organisms have generally demonstrated significant divergence among M-A lines, whereas mutation-induced declines in means of fitness characters have not been detected in several instances. In the nematode C. elegans, the overall mean intrinsic growth rate, r, did not demonstrably decline even with up to 60 M-A generations (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Among possible explanations for our failure to detect a change in the mean of several fitness traits, four seem particularly noteworthy.
A major difficulty in assessing mutation rates and effects of mutations is that the estimation method originally devised and still in common use assumes that all mutations have the same effect on the trait under consideration (![]()
![]()

where R is the per-generation change in trait mean and VM is the per-generation mutational contribution to variance, would be zero. The corresponding estimate of mean mutational effect,

is infinitely large. With our results, the Bateman method leads to the following minimum estimates of mutation rate per diploid genome per generation: 3 x 10-4 for seed number per fruit, 8 x 10-3 for fruit number, and 2 x 10-3 for reproductive mass. The corresponding estimates for maximum mean mutational effect are 14.9 (46%), 16.3 (27%), and 30.8 (68%).
![]()
![]()
![]()
-distribution for the mutational effects. The
-encompasses a wide range of distributional shapes. Under the conditions that the mutation rate is low and the distribution of mutational effects is not leptokurtic, no clear indication of bias is found (![]()
-distribution is unidirectional and undefined at zero, however; this singularity leads to upwardly biased estimates of mutation rate if the true distribution of effects is leptokurtic, with most mutations having effects very near zero (![]()
![]()
![]()
In summary, even at Gen 17, early in M-A compared to other studies, the statistical power of our study is sufficient to detect VM. We, like some others in recent M-A work, have not detected systematic changes in trait means over generations. Instead, we have found approximately symmetric spread of M-A line means about the mean of the founding generation. This result challenges the assumption that mutations reducing components of fitness overwhelmingly outnumber mutations that increase these traits. Precise and general estimation of the fundamental mutational properties thus requires an approach that allows for bidirectional mutational effects.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790. ![]()
2 Present address: Carolina Biological Supply Co., 2700 York Rd., Burlington, NC 27215. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Frank Enfield encouraged E.D. to initiate this work and provided facilities. R.G.S. thanks Peter Keightley, Armando Caballero, and Bill Hill for helpful discussions in early stages of this study. We thank Jen Larson, Christy Olsen, Lorelle Berkeley, and Deb Theissen for care and dedication in growing and measuring the plants; Frank Shaw for invaluable computational efforts; and Chris Kavanaugh for the figures. We are grateful to Julie Etterson, Scott Pletcher, Peter Keightley, Mike Simmons, Shu-Mei Chang, Jason Hill, and two anonymous reviewers for thoughtful comments on the manuscript. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. and the National Science Foundation provided funding.
Manuscript received August 19, 1999; Accepted for publication February 7, 2000.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ABBOTT, R. J. and M. F. GOMES, 1989 Population genetic structure and outcrossing rate of Arabidopsis thaliana.. Heredity 62:411-418.
ANTOLIN, M. F. and C. STROBECK, 1985 The population genetics of somatic mutation in plants. Am. Nat. 126:52-62.
BATEMAN, A. J., 1959 The viability of near-normal irradiated chromosomes. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1:170-180.
BENNETT, A. G., R. E. LENSKI, and J. E. MITTLER, 1992 Evolutionary adaptation to temperature. I. Fitness responses of Escherichia coli to changes in its thermal environment. Evolution 46:16-30.
BERGELSON, J., E. STAHL, S. DUDEK, and M. KREITMAN, 1998 Genetic variation within and among populations of Arabidopsis thaliana.. Genetics 148:1311-1323
BURCH, C. L. and L. CHAO, 1999 Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA Virus
6. Genetics 151:921-927
CABALLERO, A. M. and P. D. KEIGHTLEY, 1994 A pleiotropic nonadditive model of variation in quantitative traits. Genetics 138:883-900[Abstract].
CHARLESWORTH, B., M. T. MORGAN, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1990 Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44:1469-1489.
CHARLESWORTH, B., M. T. MORGAN, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1991 Multilocus models of inbreeding depression with synergistic selection and partial self-fertilization. Genet. Res. 57:177-194.
CHARLESWORTH, B., M. T. MORGAN, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1993 The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134:1289-1303[Abstract].
CROW, J. F., 1997 The high spontaneous mutation rate: Is it a health risk? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:8380-8386
DAVIES, E. K., A. D. PETERS, and P. D. KEIGHTLEY, 1999 High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Science 285:1748-1751
EYRE-WALKER, A. and P. D. KEIGHTLEY, 1999 High genomic deleterious mutation rates in hominids. Nature 397:344-347[Medline].
FERNANDEZ, J. and C. LOPEZ-FANJUL, 1996 Spontaneous mutational variances and covariances for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 143:829-837[Abstract].
FRY, J. D., P. D. KEIGHTLEY, S. L. HEINSOHN, and S. V. NUZHDIN, 1999 New estimates of the rates and effects of mildly deleterious mutation in Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:574-579
GARCIA-DORADO, A., 1997 The rate and effects distribution of viability mutation in Drosophila: minimum distance estimation. Evolution 51:1130-1139.
GILL, D. E., L. CHAO, S. L. PERKINS, and J. B. WOLF, 1995 Genetic mosaicism in plants and clonal animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:423-444.
GILLESPIE, J., 1981 Mutation modification in a random environment. Evolution 35:468-476.
GILLESPIE, J., 1994 Substitution processes in molecular evolution. III. Deleterious alleles. Genetics 138:943-952[Abstract].
HOLSINGER, K. E. and M. W. FELDMAN, 1983 Modifiers of mutation rate: evolutionary optimum with complete selfing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:6732-6734
HOULE, D., D. K. HOFFMASTER, S. ASSIMACOPOULOS, and B. CHARLESWORTH, 1992 The genomic mutation rate for fitness in Drosophila.. Nature 359:58-60[Medline].
HOULE, D., K. A. HUGHES, D. K. HOFFMASTER, J. IHARA, and S. ASSIMACOPOULOS et al., 1994 The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. I. Variances and covariances of life history traits. Genetics 138:773-785[Abstract].
HOULE, D., B. MORIKAWA, and M. LYNCH, 1996 Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics 143:1467-1483[Abstract].
ISHII, K., H. MATSUDA, T. IWASA, and A. SASAKI, 1989 Evolutionarily stable mutation rate in a periodically changing environment. Genetics 121:163-174
JOHNSON, T., 1999 Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking, and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations. Genetics 151:1621-1631
KAWECKI, T. J., N. H. BARTON, and J. D. FRY, 1997 Mutational collapse of fitness in marginal habitats and the evolution of ecological specialization. J. Evol. Biol. 10:407-429.
KEIGHTLEY, P. D., 1994 The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 138:1315-1322[Abstract].
KEIGHTLEY, P. D., 1996 Nature of deleterious mutation load in Drosophila. Genetics 144:1993-1999[Abstract].
KEIGHTLEY, P. D., 1998 Inference of genome-wide mutation rates and distribution of mutation effects for fitness traits: a simulation study. Genetics 150:1283-1293
KEIGHTLEY, P. D. and A. CABALLERO, 1997 Genomic mutation rates for lifetime reproductive output and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:3823-3827
KEIGHTLEY, P. D. and A. EYRE-WALKER, 1999 Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates. Genetics 153:515-523
KEIGHTLEY, P. D. and W. G. HILL, 1988 Quantitative genetic variability maintained by mutation-stabilizing selection balance in finite populations. Genet. Res. 52:33-43[Medline].
KEIGHTLEY, P. D., A. CABALLERO, and A. GARCIA-DORADO, 1998 Population genetics: surviving under mutation pressure. Curr. Biol. 8:R235-R237[Medline].
KIBOTA, T. T. and M. LYNCH, 1996 Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. col.. Nature 381:694-696[Medline].
KLEKOWSKI, E. J., JR., 1992 Review: mutation rates in diploid annualsAre they immutable? Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:462-465.
KLEKOWSKI, E. J., JR. and N. KAZARINOVA-FUKSHANSKY, 1984 Shoot apical meristems and mutation: selective loss of disadvantageous cell genotypes. Am. J. Bot. 71:28-34.
KONDRASHOV, A. S., 1994 Mutation load under vegetative reproduction and cytoplasmic inheritance. Genetics 137:311-318[Abstract].
KONDRASHOV, A. S., 1995 Modifiers of mutation-selection balance: general approach and the evolution of mutation rates. Genet. Res. 66:53-69.
KONDRASHOV, A. S. and D. HOULE, 1994 Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 258:221-227[Medline].
LANDE, R., 1976 The maintenance of genetic variablity by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet. Res. 26:221-235.
LANDE, R., 1994 Risk of population extinction from fixation of new deleterious mutations. Evolution 48:1460-1469.
LYNCH, M., 1994 The neutral theory of phenotypic evolution, pp. 86108 in Ecological Genetics, edited by L. REAL. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
LYNCH, M. and W. G. HILL, 1986 Phenotypic evolution by neutral mutation. Evolution 40:915-935.
LYNCH, M., J. CONERY, and R. BURGER, 1995 Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146:489-518.
LYNCH, M., L. LATTA, J. HICKS, and M. GIORGIANNI, 1998 Mutation, selection, and the maintenance of life-history variation in a natural population. Evolution 52:727-733.
LYNCH, M., J. BLANCHARD, D. HOULE, T. KIBOTA, and S. SCHULTZ et al., 1999 Perspective: spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53:1-19.
MACKAY, T. F. C., R. F. LYMAN, M. S. JACKSON, C. TERZIAN, and W. G. HILL, 1992 Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: estimates from divergence among inbred strains. Evolution 46:300-316.
MAYNARD SMITH, J. and J. HAIGH, 1974 The hitch-hiking effect of a favorable gene. Genet. Res. 23:23-35[Medline].
MUKAI, T., 1964 The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Spontaneous mutation rate of polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 50:1-19
MUKAI, T., 1969 The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VII. Synergistic interaction of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 61:749-761
OTTO, S. P. and M. E. ORIVE, 1995 Evolutionary consequences of mutation and selection within an individual. Genetics 141:1173-1187[Abstract].
PLETCHER, S. D., D. HOULE, and J. W. CURTSINGER, 1998 Age-specific properties of spontaneous mutations affecting mortality in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 148:287-303
SCHULTZ, S., M. LYNCH, and J. WILLIS, 1999 Spontaneous deleterious mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:11393-11398
SELF, S. G. and K.-Y. LIANG, 1987 Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82:605-610.
SHABALINA, S. A., L. Y. YAMPOLSKY, and A. S. KONDRASHOV, 1997 Rapid decline of fitness in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under relaxed natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:13034-13039
SHAW, R. G., 1987 Maximum likelihood approaches applied to quantitative genetics of natural populations. Evolution 41:812-826.
SIMMONS, M. J. and J. F. CROW, 1977 Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu. Rev. Genet. 11:49-78[Medline].
SNAPE, J. W. and M. J. LAWRENCE, 1971 The breeding system of Arabidopsis thaliana.. Heredity 27:299-302.
SNIEGOWSKI, P. D., P. J. GERRISH, and R. E. LENSKI, 1997 Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli.. Nature 387:703-705[Medline].
TURELLI, M., 1984 Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's Zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25:138-193[Medline].
UYENOYAMA, M. K., K. E. HOLSINGER and D. M. WALLER, 1992 Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization, pp. 327381 in Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 8, edited by D. FUTUYMA and J. ANTONOVICS. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
VASSILIEVA, L. L. and M. LYNCH, 1999 The rate of spontaneous mutation for life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Genetics 151:119-129
WRAY, N. R., 1990 Accounting for mutation effects in the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix and its inverse. Biometrics 46:177-186.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. J. Dickinson Synergistic Fitness Interactions and a High Frequency of Beneficial Changes Among Mutations Accumulated Under Relaxed Selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1571 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Perfeito, L. Fernandes, C. Mota, and I. Gordo Adaptive Mutations in Bacteria: High Rate and Small Effects Science, August 10, 2007; 317(5839): 813 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Baer, N. Phillips, D. Ostrow, A. Avalos, D. Blanton, A. Boggs, T. Keller, L. Levy, and E. Mezerhane Cumulative Effects of Spontaneous Mutations for Fitness in Caenorhabditis: Role of Genotype, Environment and Stress Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1387 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C-A Whittle and M. Johnston Moving forward in determining the causes of mutations: the features of plants that make them suitable for assessing the impact of environmental factors and cell age J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2006; 57(9): 1847 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Shaw and S.-M. Chang Gene Action of New Mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1855 - 1865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. MacKenzie, F. E. Saade, Q. H. Le, T. E. Bureau, and D. J. Schoen Genomic Mutation in Lines of Arabidopsis thaliana Exposed to Ultraviolet-B Radiation Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 715 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Callahan Using Artificial Selection to Understand Plastic Plant Phenotypes Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2005; 45(3): 475 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Baer, F. Shaw, C. Steding, M. Baumgartner, A. Hawkins, A. Houppert, N. Mason, M. Reed, K. Simonelic, W. Woodard, et al. Comparative evolutionary genetics of spontaneous mutations affecting fitness in rhabditid nematodes PNAS, April 19, 2005; 102(16): 5785 - 5790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Estes, P. C. Phillips, D. R. Denver, W. K. Thomas, and M. Lynch Mutation Accumulation in Populations of Varying Size: The Distribution of Mutational Effects for Fitness Correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, March 1, 2004; 166(3): 1269 - 1279. [Abstract] |