- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Willis, J. H.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Willis, J. H.
Inbreeding Load, Average Dominance and the Mutation Rate for Mildly Deleterious Alleles in Mimulus guttatus
John H. Willisaa Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403
Corresponding author: John H. Willis, 1210 Pacific Hall, Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1210., jwillis{at}oregon.uoregon.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: R. G. SHAW
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The goal of this study is to provide information on the genetics of inbreeding depression in a primarily outcrossing population of Mimulus guttatus. Previous studies of this population indicate that there is tremendous inbreeding depression for nearly every fitness component and that almost all of this inbreeding depression is due to mildly deleterious alleles rather than recessive lethals or steriles. In this article I assayed the homozygous and heterozygous fitnesses of 184 highly inbred lines extracted from a natural population. Natural selection during the five generations of selfing involved in line formation essentially eliminated major deleterious alleles but was ineffective in purging alleles with minor fitness effects and did not appreciably diminish overall levels of inbreeding depression. Estimates of the average degree of dominance of these mildly deleterious alleles, obtained from the regression of heterozygous fitness on the sum of parental homozygous fitness, indicate that the detrimental alleles are partially recessive for most fitness traits, with
~ 0.15 for cumulative measures of fitness. The inbreeding load, B, for total fitness is ~1.0 in this experiment. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that spontaneous mildly deleterious mutations occur at a rate >0.1 mutation per genome per generation.
THE offspring of consanguineous matings have reduced fitness in most outcrossing species of plants and animals (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The best data on the genetic properties of deleterious alleles in natural populations come from over 60 years of studies of inbreeding load in several species of Drosophila (reviewed by ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In principle, similar analyses of inbreeding load can be conducted in any outcrossed species that can be bred in captivity by rapidly inbreeding lines initiated from a randomly mated ancestral population. The rapid formation of highly inbred lines is especially easy in plants that can be self-fertilized, because with selfing heterozygosity at neutral loci decreases by 50% each generation. Nearly complete homozygosity can be achieved in several generations. Because each selfed line has an effective population size of approximately one, natural selection during the process of inbreeding quickly eliminates lethals or steriles, while the dynamics of mildly deleterious alleles approximate effective neutrality. The performance of many of these lines can then be studied in the nearly homozygous state, or the lines can be crossed to study the performance of the heterozygotes. The use of inbred lines for the analysis of mildly deleterious alleles has advantages over the use of single-chromosome extractions in Drosophila, because inbred lines are asymptotically homozygous for all nuclear loci. Properties of the whole genome, such as total inbreeding load and other related quantities, must be estimated by extrapolation in chromosomal studies in Drosophila.
Here I report on an experiment that makes use of highly inbred lines to examine the nature of inbreeding load due to mildly deleterious alleles in a mainly outcrossing wild population of the common yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. Previous studies of this population have demonstrated that there is substantial inbreeding depression for fitness components expressed at nearly every stage of the plant's annual life-cycle (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Study species and population:
M. guttatus is a common, self-compatible wildflower native to western North America that exhibits tremendous differentiation among populations in terms of life history, floral and vegetative morphology, genetic variability, degree of self-fertilization, and inbreeding depression (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Formation of inbred lines:
To study in detail the genetic properties of the alleles that cause inbreeding depression in this population, I formed from it a large number of highly inbred lines using a simple method described in ![]()
![]()
![]()
Crossing design and estimation of the degree of homozygosity in the inbred lines:
At the start of this experiment, a random sample of 184 of the fifth generation inbred lines were selected for further genetic analysis. Seed from these lines were sown, and a randomly selected seedling from each line was chosen to initiate this experiment. The seedlings were raised to flowering as described above and then were randomly paired. Each plant was self-fertilized to produce generation six inbred lines, and the paired plants were crossed to form 92 outbred lines. One plant from each pair was randomly chosen to serve as the maternal parent for the outcrossed progeny. Because some crosses were unsuccessful in producing seed due to culturing accidents, the actual number of inbred lines formed was 176, and the number of outbred lines formed was 88. A total of 84 pairs of parental plants successfully produced complete sets of the two sixth generation inbred lines and 1 outbred line per pair.
The six generations of self-fertilization should produce inbred lines that are homozygous at most loci. More specifically, the inbreeding coefficient, F, for the set of inbred lines after six generations of selfing is expected to be F = 1 - (
)6 = 0.984 for neutral alleles. To determine the actual extent of inbreeding in the set of inbred lines, we estimated the inbreeding coefficient by genotyping a single plant from 80 of the generation six inbred lines at two highly polymorphic microsatellite loci, AAT9 and AAT356. The expected heterozygosities of these markers in the Iron Mountain population are in excess of 0.8, so they are particularly suitable for estimating the reduction in heterozygosity due to selfing. These microsatellite markers and the methods of DNA extraction, PCR, and electrophoretic detection and sizing of PCR products are identical to those described elsewhere (![]()
![]()
The inbreeding coefficient for the population of inbred lines was estimated for each marker as F = 1 - (
), where Hobs is the observed frequency of heterozygote and Hexp is the heterozygosity expected for that locus with random mating. The expected heterozygosity was calculated as Hexp = 1 -
ip2i, where pi is the observed frequency of the ith allele. Variances and standard errors of these estimates were obtained via bootstrapping by resampling individual plants with replacement. The bootstrap method was applied to each locus, with 1000 resamplings. A weighted average F and its standard error were calculated from the two single-locus estimates by using the two bootstrapped variances as the weights.
Measurement of fitness in the inbred and outbred lines:
To compare measures of fitness between the inbred and outbred plants, I raised replicates from each line under common greenhouse conditions and measured fitness components expressed throughout the life cycle on all plants. Six seeds from a line were sown in 2.25-in. plastic pots filled with soil-less potting mix, with 5 replicate pots planted per line. A few families had <30 seeds, and in these cases all seeds were evenly divided among the 5 pots and the number of seeds planted in each pot was noted. A total of 1320 pots [(176 inbred lines + 88 outbred lines) x 5 pots per line] and ~7900 seeds were planted. Pots were placed in a completely randomized order on a single greenhouse bench under 230-W sodium lights (16-hr days) and were watered regularly without additional fertilizer to maintain soil moisture. The positions on the greenhouse bench of the flats containing the pots were rotated weekly. Pots were censused for all seedlings 14 days after planting, as germination had essentially ceased. One seedling per pot was randomly selected to be allowed to grow to maturity, and the rest of the seedlings were removed from the pot. Whenever seedlings failed to emerge in a given pot, a randomly selected seedling was transplanted, with minimal disruption of soil and roots, from another replicate pot for that line if possible. The fraction of seeds germinated for a given line was calculated as the total seedlings that emerged in all replicate pots divided by the total number of seeds planted.
The majority of seedlings began to flower within 45 wk of planting, and many had started to senesce by 6 or 7 wk. Each plant that flowered within 8 wk of planting was scored for measures of male and female fertility per flower and for the number of flowers produced at the end of 8 wk. Plants that had not flowered within 8 wk or had died without flowering were scored as having produced zero flowers, and had unknown values of male and female fertility per flower. Therefore the fitness component flower number includes post-germination survival.
I estimated female fertility per flower on the first flower produced on each flowering plant as the number of seeds produced following hand-pollination with excess viable pollen. On the day that the first flower of each plant opened, excess pollen from a highly male-fertile inbred line (reference number IM62, inbreeding coefficient >0.98) was applied to the receptive stigma. In this assay of female fertility, seed production should not be limited by viable pollen, so seed counts should be approximately equal to the number of viable ovules per flower. A uniform pollen source was used to pollinate all plants to ensure that differences in seed production were not due to variation in pollen quality. Variation in seed number could not have been influenced by self-incompatibility, because M. guttatus lacks such a system. The resulting outcrossed fruits were monitored until the seeds were ripe, and then the fruits were harvested and the seeds counted. These seed counts are referred to as the number of ovules per flower.
Male fertility per flower was estimated by counting viable and inviable pollen grains from the first two flowers produced on each flowering plant. On the day that a first or second flower opened, all four anthers were removed from the corolla and placed in an Eppendorf tube containing 60 µl of aniline blue in lactophenol (![]()
![]()
In total six fitness components were measured in this study: the proportion of seeds that germinated, the number of flowers produced per seedling, the number of viable pollen grains per flower, the fraction of pollen grains that were viable, the total number of pollen grains per flower, and the number of ovules per flower. Cumulative measures of fitness were calculated in three ways. Cumulative measures estimating fitness through either male or female function are referred to as "germination to viable pollen" or "germination to ovules," respectively. These were obtained for each line by multiplying the fraction of seed germinated in each line by the average of the total number of pollen grains (flower number x viable pollen grains per flower) or ovules (number of flowers x number of ovules per flower) produced by each of five replicates per line.
The third estimate of fitness is a measure of total lifetime fitness through both male and female function. To combine male and female gamete production into a single measure of fitness, I first equalized the average outcrossed fitness through male and female function. This standardization of male and female gamete production implies that on average each outcrossed plant in the ancestral population successfully reproduces itself. This is reasonable, because the Iron Mountain population is roughly constant in population size from year to year and is primarily outcrossing. I divided each plant's total number of viable pollen by the mean total number of viable pollen for the outcrossed plants. I also divided each plant's total number of ovules by the mean total number of ovules of the outcrossed plants. To compute, for each line, a measure of cumulative fitness through lifetime gamete production, I simply summed each plant's standardized male and female gamete production and averaged these values across the five replicates for each line. I then multiplied this average total gamete production by the fraction of seeds that germinated in that line. This measure of total lifetime fitness is referred to as "germination to total gametes."
Estimation of the inbreeding load:
To compare the average fitness of outbred and the inbred plants, I first calculated the means of each line for all the fitness components and the cumulative measures of fitness. All subsequent analysis of inbreeding load was done using these line means. The mean and standard error for each fitness trait was then estimated from the values of all inbred and outbred lines for which there were data. For statistical comparisons of the inbred and outbred line means, I averaged the mean fitnesses for the two inbred lines derived from a pair of parental inbred lines and compared it to the mean of the corresponding outbred line for that parental pair using paired t-tests. Only those parental pairs that had mean fitness estimates for the two inbred lines and the outbred line were included in the paired t-tests. Apparently there is little bias in excluding the several parental pairs that lacked complete inbred and outbred data, because the means for the two classes of lines included in the paired t-test were nearly identical to the means obtained from all the lines.
The reduction of fitness caused by inbreeding was estimated in two ways. The first was simply the average fitness of the inbred lines,
I, divided by the average fitness of the outbred lines,
O. This ratio,
, was calculated from all of the line means for each fitness component and for the cumulative measures of fitness. Uncertainty in both the numerator and the denominator causes the expected value of the ratio to not be equal to the ratio of the expected values, although the bias should be small, and there is no simple expression for the standard error of this ratio. For these reasons, the standard errors for the estimates of
were obtained by using a delete-one jackknife procedure. First, for each pair of parental plants, I calculated the mean fitness for the outbred line and the mean fitness of the two inbred lines as described above for the paired t-tests. For each run, the outbred and inbred means for a different parental pair were deleted from the data set, and a pseudovalue of ratio of inbred mean fitness to outbred mean fitness was recalculated. The standard deviation of the distribution of these pseudovalues was taken to be the standard error of the population estimate of inbred relative fitness,
(![]()
The second measure of the effects of inbreeding on fitness is the inbreeding load, B, defined as minus the regression coefficient of ln (mean fitness) on the inbreeding coefficient, F (![]()
![]()
![]()
1), I estimated the inbreeding load in this study for every component of fitness and cumulative measure of fitness as B = -ln(
). Standard errors for B were obtained by the delete-one jackknife procedure as described above.
Genotypic variances for fitness in the inbred and outbred lines:
To determine the extent to which variation in the fitness traits is due to genotypic differences among the lines, I conducted one-way analyses of variance with line as the main effect. These ANOVAs were done separately for the outbred and inbred lines for all fitness components and cumulative measures of fitness. Because these ANOVAs require replicates within lines, some trait values were calculated differently for these analyses than as described above. For the ANOVAs, seed germination was calculated separately for each replicate pot. Cumulative measures of fitness were calculated separately for each replicate pot by multiplying its seed germination by its post-germination male, female, or total gamete production. The model II among line components of variance provided estimates of the genotypic variance, VG, while the mean squares within lines provided estimates of the environmental variances, VE. Genotypic coefficients of variation, CVG, for the outbred and inbred lines were calculated as the genotypic standard deviation divided by the means of the outbred and inbred lines, respectively, multiplied by 100 (![]()
, where the phenotypic variance, VP, is VG + VE.
Estimation of the average degree of dominance:
The relationship between the homozygous and heterozygous fitnesses of inbred lines can provide information on the degree of dominance of deleterious alleles segregating in a natural population (![]()
![]()

If the deleterious alleles are rare, so that two inbred lines homozygous for the same deleterious allele essentially never are crossed to produce an outbred line (q2
0), then Mukai and colleagues showed that the regression coefficient is equal to a weighted average degree of dominance over loci,

where the weights are proportional to the contribution that a locus makes to the genotypic variance in the collection of homozygous lines. This average degree of dominance also is interpreted to be equal to the harmonic mean degree of dominance of newly arising mutations weighted by the selective effect and mutation rate of the deleterious mutations (![]()
![]()
I estimated the average degree of dominance,
, in this study by linear regression of the outbred line mean fitness on the sum of the parental inbred line mean fitnesses. Because the sums of the genotypic values for the parental inbred line fitnesses are estimated with some uncertainty, the regression coefficient is biased downward by the reliability ratio, k. I estimated this reliability ratio as k =
, where VG is the estimate of the genotypic variance among inbred lines and Vu is the error variance for the individual estimates of the inbred line means (![]()
![]()
![]()
Researchers typically estimate
by regression using raw values of fitness components (![]()
from regressions using ln-transformed line means (![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Degree of homozygosity in the inbred lines:
The results from the microsatellite genotypic data for a subset of the generation six inbred lines are presented in Table 1. We observed the large numbers of alleles that are typical for both markers in the Iron Mountain population. Because of this considerable allelic variation, the expected heterozygosity was very high for both markers: it was ~0.93 for AAT9 and 0.83 for AAT356. These values are almost identical to those obtained from a sample of naturally occurring plants from this population (![]()
)6
0.984.
|
Inbreeding load:
The means and standard errors of all fitness components and cumulative measures of fitness are presented in Table 2. Inbred lines had substantially lower mean values for all traits measured than the outbred lines, and this inbreeding depression was highly statistically significant for all traits. Two measures of the decline in fitness with inbreeding are presented in Table 3. The first, the mean fitness of inbred lines relative to the mean of outbred lines, ranged for fitness components from 0.83 for seed germination to 0.51 for the number of viable pollen grains per flower. The average relative inbred fitness for the four independent fitness components (germination, number of flowers, number of viable pollen per flower, and number of ovules per flower) is about 0.66. Inbred lines had even lower average cumulative measures of fitness relative to outbred lines: inbred lines had only ~33 to 40% of the cumulative fitness of outbred lines (Table 3). The second measure of inbreeding's effect on fitness, the inbreeding load, B, is also presented in Table 3. The inbreeding load for the fitness components ranges from ~0.19 for germination to 0.67 for viable pollen per flower, with a mean for the four independent fitness components of 0.44. Inbreeding load was much larger for the cumulative measures of fitness, ranging from ~0.90 to 1.09 (Table 3).
|
|
Genotypic variances:
The results for the one-way analyses of variance on the inbred lines are presented in Table 4, while those for the outbred lines are presented in Table 5. The variation among lines is highly significant for all fitness components and cumulative measures of fitness for both the inbred and outbred lines. Table 4 and Table 5 also present the inbred and outbred genotypic components of variance, VG, as well as the genotypic coefficients of variation, CVG, and the broad-sense heritabilities, H2. For the inbred lines, the CVG for fitness components range from 28% for the number of pollen grains per flower to 46% for the number of viable pollen grains per flower, while those for the cumulative measures of fitness are between ~8596% (Table 4). The values for the CVG for inbred lines are all larger than those for the outbred lines, which range from 11 to 26% for the fitness components and from 44 to 49% for the cumulative measures of fitness. A similar pattern of greater genotypic variance in the inbred lines than the outbred lines is apparent in the broad-sense heritabilities, H2: the values for all but one trait are larger in the inbred lines. H2's for the inbred line fitness components range from 0.35 to 0.53, with values of 0.34 to 0.45 for the cumulative measures of fitness. Those for the outbred fitness components range from 0.12 to 0.45, while the H2's for the cumulative measures of fitness range from 0.22 to 0.26. Increases of genotypic variances are expected with inbreeding (![]()
|
|
Average degree of dominance:
To obtain unbiased estimates of the regression coefficient of outbred line fitness on the sum of the parental inbred line fitnesses, I first calculated the reliability ratio, k =
, as described above. This ratio was estimated from the inbred line ANOVA results presented in Table 4. In particular, k > 0.7 for all traits, indicating that this experiment provided relatively reliable estimates of the parental fitnesses (Table 6). Because some replicates within lines had values of zero for nearly every fitness component, k was not calculated separately for ln-transformed data. Comparisons of k obtained from subsets of the data that lacked zeroes indicated that k's obtained from ln-transformed data were nearly identical to those obtained from raw fitness data (results not shown). For these reasons, the k's presented above were used to correct the bias in the estimate of the regression coefficient for regressions with both untransformed fitness values and ln-transformed line mean fitness values.
|
The relationship between raw fitness for outbred lines and the sum of the raw fitnesses for their parental inbred lines is presented in Table 6. Most of the regression coefficients are significantly >0, except for that for the number of flowers, germination to ovules, and germination to total gametes. The significant estimates of the coefficients for the fitness components range from 0.109 for proportion germination to 0.329 for viable pollen per flower. For the cumulative measures of fitness, the coefficients range from 0.23 to 0.30. Regression coefficients based on raw fitness values, such as these, have traditionally been interpreted as a weighted average degree of dominance (![]()
Unfortunately, it is doubtful that the regression on raw fitness should be interpreted as the average degree of dominance. Inspection of the equation for
presented above indicates that the regressions should be conducted on a scale in which the fitness effects of each locus combine additively. For example, if the fitnesses of different loci actually combine multiplicatively, then loci are additive on ln-scale and the regression should be conducted with ln-transformed data. Deng and Fu (![]()
![]()
in outcrossing populations using raw fitnesses are severely biased upward, sometimes considerably above the biologically plausible upper limit of 0.5, and they have large sampling variance. In contrast, estimates of
using ln-transformed fitnesses are unbiased, with smaller variance.
In a previous study of this population, I showed that the relationship between fitness and inbreeding coefficient for traits such as seed germination and number of flowers was consistent with multiplicative fitnesses, while pollen viability showed significant synergistic epistasis (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
using ln-transformed fitnesses is that the inbreeding load, B, is also estimated using ln-transformed fitnesses. Because B and
can be used to estimate the genomic deleterious mutation rate (i.e., ![]()
with the regression coefficient obtained from regression using ln fitness.
Estimates of
from regressions of ln(mean outbred fitness) on ln(sum of means for the parental inbred lines) are presented in Table 7. In contrast to the regression coefficients obtained from raw fitness data, most of the estimates of
are quite small and are roughly consistent among traits. Nonetheless, all estimates of
are significantly >0, except for number of flowers, owing to the uniformly small standard errors of the estimates. The estimates of
for the fitness components that are significantly >0 range from 0.09 for viable pollen per flower to 0.21 for proportion seed germination. The average of the estimates of
for the four independent fitness components (germination, number of flowers, viable pollen, and ovules per flower) is 0.13. Similar results are obtained for the cumulative measures of fitness, with estimates of
ranging from 0.10 to 0.14. The upper 95% confidence limits on the estimates of
for all but one trait, germination, are <0.26. These results strongly suggest that the deleterious alleles affecting the individual fitness components are quite recessive on the average.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
In the last 15 years, numerous studies have quantified the effects of inbreeding on fitness in natural populations of plants (reviewed by ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The purpose of the study described here is to provide a more complete picture of the genetics of inbreeding depression in a primarily outcrossing population of M. guttatus, in the hope that such information will provide insight into the evolution of self-fertilization in this species. Previous studies of this population indicate that there is tremendous inbreeding depression for nearly every fitness component, and that almost all of this inbreeding depression is due to mildly deleterious alleles (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
near 0.1 for cumulative measures of fitness.
The nature of inbreeding load in Mimulus:
The results from this experiment and others (![]()
![]()
![]()
are significantly greater than zero therefore is strong evidence that overdominance makes little if any contribution to inbreeding load in this population.
While it is clear that
> 0 for all traits except flower number, there is some possibility that the estimates of
are biased downward. The regression method for estimating
weights the dominance of alleles with more severe effects on fitness more heavily than those of mildly deleterious alleles, and it assumes no correlation between the dominance and selective effect of alleles (![]()
![]()
will be underestimated. This potential problem is not unique to the regression method: it also applies to the variance component method of ![]()
![]()
![]()
I examined the possibility that such alleles biased the estimates of
for each trait presented in Table 7 by excluding 10% of the inbred lines with lowest mean value for that trait from the regressions. These lines were especially likely to contain major deleterious alleles. I then reestimated
, after correcting the regression coefficients by the reliability ratio, k, as described above. Typically, the sample sizes for the regressions were reduced by ~13 families, because most of the low fitness lines happened to have been paired with higher fitness lines. The results from these regressions, labeled
excl, are presented in Table 8. The average degree of dominance remained essentially unchanged for the fitness components number of flowers, pollen grains per flower, ovules per flower, and for the cumulative measures of fitness germination to ovules and germination to total gametes. Surprisingly, the estimate of
excl for proportion germination actually decreased. The most interesting results, however, come from the traits that are strongly related to pollen viability. Estimates of
excl were more than double the corresponding estimates of
for the number of viable pollen per flower (
excl = 0.21), the fraction of viable pollen (
excl = 0.14), and germination to viable pollen (
excl = 0.22). These results suggest that the estimates of
for these traits are biased by a few recessive alleles of large effect, and that mildly deleterious alleles have more intermediate degrees of dominance for these traits.
|
Recently there have been two other attempts to estimate the dominance of genes causing inbreeding depression in M. guttatus. In the first study, ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
More recently ![]()
(![]()
![]()
indicated that the deleterious alleles were partially recessive. Their estimates of
can be converted into estimates of
, because
=
. When one does this, their estimates of
, averaged over their two M. guttatus populations, are ~0.12 for number of flowers, 0.04 for fraction of viable pollen, 0.41 for pollen per flower (one population only), and 0.20 for ovules per flower. Only the value for pollen per flower is substantially different from the estimates reported here: all the rest are remarkably consistent (Table 7 and Table 8). Unfortunately, the authors did not present data for either germination or cumulative measures of fitness.
There are two possible sources of bias in DUDASH and CARR's (1998) results that were not mentioned in their article. First, it is not clear to what extent their intentional inclusion of low fitness lines biased their estimates of the average degree of dominance. As discussed above, such lines can lead to upwardly (downwardly) biased estimates of
(or
) if they contain highly deleterious alleles that are more recessive on the average than mildly deleterious alleles (![]()
![]()
(or
) should be conducted using ln-transformed data, as discussed above. The results presented here and elsewhere (![]()
![]()
The overall picture that emerges from this study and the others discussed above is that inbreeding load in populations of M. guttatus largely is due to mildly deleterious alleles, and that these alleles tend to be partially recessive. The estimates of the degree of dominance are remarkably similar to the results from studies of natural populations of Drosophila (reviewed by ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
for fitness components and cumulative fitness. While some estimates of
were not significantly different from zero, the remaining estimates strongly indicate that deleterious alleles are partially recessive, with
ranging from ~0.2 to 0.4. While we clearly need more studies from diverse organisms, the results from the few studies published to date suggest that inbreeding depression may have a common genetic basis across widely divergent taxa.
Indirect estimates of the genomic deleterious mutation rate in Mimulus:
If the alleles causing inbreeding depression in an outcrossing population are maintained by mutation-selection balance and fitnesses combine multiplicatively across loci, then the magnitude of inbreeding load in an equilibrium population is a simple function of the degree of dominance and the rate of mutation to deleterious alleles (![]()
iui(
), where ui is the deleterious mutation rate at the ith locus. This equation suggests that we can use estimates of B and
from outcrossing populations to obtain indirect estimates of the genomic deleterious mutation rate, U, given the assumptions listed above. This argument recently has been extended to the case of highly inbred populations (![]()
Here I use the estimates of B and
obtained in this study to estimate the genomic deleterious mutation rate for the fitness components and cumulative measures of fitness in the Iron Mountain population of M. guttatus. Table 8 presents two sets of estimates of U: the first set is based on the average degree of dominance,
, from the entire collection of inbred lines (Table 7), while the second is based on the average degree of dominance when low fitness lines are excluded,
excl. As expected, the two estimates of U for each trait are quite similar for most traits except for measures of male fertility, which are larger when
excl is used to calculate U. Focusing on the estimates based on
excl, U for fitness components ranges from ~0.02 for proportion germination and number of flowers to ~0.23 for viable pollen per flower. The average U for the four nonoverlapping fitness components (germination, number of flowers, and viable pollen and ovule per flower) is ~0.11. Estimates of U are somewhat larger for the cumulative measures of fitness, ranging from ~0.12 for germination to ovules or total gametes to 0.42 for germination to viable pollen. These results therefore suggest that deleterious mutation rates are quite high in M. guttatus, exceeding 0.1 deleterious mutations per genome per generation.
The indirect estimates of U presented in Table 8 are likely to be underestimates of the true genomic mutation rate for at least three reasons. First, the estimates of U are extremely sensitive to estimates of
, such that small values of
lead to small values of U. As pointed out above, our estimates of
are likely to be underestimated if there is a positive correlation between the selective effect of a mutation and its degree of dominance. Second, the method used for estimating U assumes that the population is completely outcrossing. We know that the Iron Mountain population of M. guttatus is partially inbred: estimated selfing rates ranged from 0.09 in 1989 to 0.24 in 1990 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For all of these reasons, the data presented here suggest that the true U may lie somewhere between 0.1 and perhaps 1.0. This range of values is strikingly similar to direct estimates of the deleterious mutation rate in several species, including D. melanogaster (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A critical assumption underlying the use of the ![]()
, because the regression method assumes that deleterious alleles are rare. Overdominant loci at equilibrium would tend to bias
downward, because the regression method yields h = 0 for such loci (![]()
![]()
![]()
upward, because crosses between inbred lines could generate unfit homozygotes at that locus in the outbred lines. For these reasons, the estimates of U presented in Table 8 must be regarded as hypotheses that should ultimately be tested directly through mutation-accumulation studies. Nonetheless, the fact that these estimates of U are so similar to direct estimates of the genomic deleterious mutation rate in other organisms suggests that the inbreeding load in M. guttatus is largely due to deleterious, partially recessive alleles maintained by mutation-selection balance.
It should be pointed out that the potential problems outlined above apply equally to the indirect method for estimating U in highly selfing species (![]()
, and the inbreeding load, B = -ln(