- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Nielsen, R.
- Articles by Weinreich, D. M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Nielsen, R.
- Articles by Weinreich, D. M.
The Age of Nonsynonymous and Synonymous Mutations in Animal mtDNA and Implications for the Mildly Deleterious Theory
Rasmus Nielsena and Daniel M. Weinreich1,ba Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
b Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Corresponding author: Rasmus Nielsen, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 288 Biol. Labs., Cambridge, MA 02138., rnielsen{at}oeb.harvard.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: A. G. CLARK
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
McDonald/Kreitman tests performed on animal mtDNA consistently reveal significant deviations from strict neutrality in the direction of an excess number of polymorphic nonsynonymous sites, which is consistent with purifying selection acting on nonsynonymous sites. We show that under models of recurrent neutral and deleterious mutations, the mean age of segregating neutral mutations is greater than the mean age of segregating selected mutations, even in the absence of recombination. We develop a test of the hypothesis that the mean age of segregating synonymous mutations equals the mean age of segregating nonsynonymous mutations in a sample of DNA sequences. The power of this age-of-mutation test and the power of the McDonald/Kreitman test are explored by computer simulations. We apply the new test to 25 previously published mitochondrial data sets and find weak evidence for selection against nonsynonymous mutations.
ONE of the greatest standing controversies in evolutionary biology is the debate over the causes of molecular variation in natural populations (e.g., ![]()
![]()
![]()
The McDonald/Kreitman test (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We present a new method for testing the hypothesis that segregating nonsynonymous sites in animal mtDNA are mildly deleterious, based on a comparison of the age of segregating nonsynonymous and synonymous mutations. Throughout we assume that there is no recombination between adjacent nucleotide sites. This implies that nonsynonymous and synonymous sites share the same underlying gene genealogy. We first show that the mean age of a segregating deleterious mutation is less than the mean age of a segregating neutral mutation, even in the absence of recombination. Thus under the hypothesis that nonsynonymous mutations are mildly deleterious, the mean age of nonsynonymous segregating sites should be less than the mean age of synonymous segregating sites despite the fact that the underlying gene genealogy is identical for the two types of sites. We present a test for comparing the mean ages of two arbitrary classes of segregating sites (e.g., synonymous and nonsynonymous) in a sample and determine its power as a function of the strength of purifying selection. We then determine the power of the McDonald/Kreitman test to detect purifying selection. Finally we apply our test to a set of 25 previously published mtDNA data sets.
| METHODS |
|---|
Computer simulations:
Throughout, computer simulations were used to test theoretical predictions and to examine the properties of the suggested statistical tests. In these simulations a haploid population of size N chromosomes was simulated under the Wright-Fisher model. To model the mutational process an infinite sites model was used (![]()
![]() |
(1) |
where s is the selection coefficient of selected mutations and ni is the number of selected mutations carried by the ith chromosome. For the sake of simplicity we assume that s does not vary in time or among selected mutations and that there are no epistatic interactions. Selection together with genetic drift is simulated by sampling multinomially between generations among the k segregating chromosomes according to the probabilities specified by the wi, i = 1, 2, . . , k given by (1). In general, samples were taken from the population every 10N generations after the first 100N generations. For each sample, some function of the sample was evaluated, such as the mean age of selected or neutral segregating sites or the P value under one of the suggested tests. Denote the obtained value of the evaluated function in the ith sample by fi. Assuming that stationary distributions exist for these functions, the theorem of ergodicity ensures that

where E(f) is the expectation of the function f and n is the number of samples. To examine the power of the McDonald/Kreitman test, we also scored the number of fixed differences between the sequences in each sample and a single sequence sampled t generations in the past. Population sizes of N = 1000 chromosomes were used in the simulations throughout. Except where otherwise noted, the parameter values used in the simulations were chosen to fit the estimated values based on the analyzed data sets (see Data analysis); i.e., the number of sequences in a sample was set to n = 25,
= 10 (
= 4Nµ), and the level of intraspecific divergence was set to µt = 180. The ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous mutations was set to µn/µs = 1, corresponding to assuming that ~3/4 of all new nonsynonymous mutations are immediately lethal to the organism.
Test statistics:
We explored several tests of the hypothesis that the mean ages of segregating sites in two distinct classes of sites (e.g., neutral and selected) in a sample are equal. The basics of these tests are the same: a score is calculated for each segregating site. Denote the value of this score for the ith site by
i. Then, we define the test statistic
![]() |
(2) |
where Ii is an indicator function that returns 0 if site i is a neutral site and 1 if site i is selected. Thus
is the ratio of the average of
for selected sites to the average of
for neutral sites. The null distribution of
under the hypothesis that the value of
i is independent of the class of site i can be approximated by repeatedly recalculating
after random relabeling of sites such that the total number of selected sites remains constant and the total number of neutral sites remains constant. A total of 100,000 replicates of this resampling scheme were used to establish critical values of
. If we denote the ith value of
by
i and the observed value of
by
obs, then a test based on k resampled samples rejects at the 5% level if (
)
ki=1I(
obs
i) < 0.05, where I() is an indicator function that returns 1 if the Boolean condition is true and 0 otherwise. We refer to the statistic
as the age-of-mutation (AOM) statistic.
The power of such a test to detect differences in mean age between classes is obviously dependent on how strongly
i is correlated with the age of the mutation responsible for polymorphic site i. The power of the test using the different estimators for
was evaluated as described in Computer simulations. One obvious candidate for
is an estimator of the age of a mutation under a neutral equilibrium infinite sites model suggested by ![]()
![]()
![]()
Given only b, the observed number of chromosomes bearing a mutation in a sample of n chromosomes, the expected age (a) of the mutation under strict neutrality is given by
![]() |
(3) |
(![]()
![]()
![]()
This estimator (â) is applied in addition to E(T | X) because it can be calculated quickly, making it suitable for simulation purposes, and because it does not require the elimination of data when the assumptions of the infinite sites model are violated. However, we do not suggest that this heuristically derived estimator should be used for more general purposes. It was chosen here solely because it provided more power in the test than estimators based on the marginal site pattern such as estimators derived from Equation 3.
Power analysis:
The power of the test statistic given in Equation 2 and of the McDonald/Kreitman test to detect the presence of deleterious mutations was evaluated by computer simulations as described in Computer simulations for different values of the selection coefficient. The proportion of simulated data sets that gave significant test statistic values was tabulated for a range of values of Ns for
= 10 and for a range of values of
for Ns = -3.
McDonald/Kreitman tests (![]()
![]()
Data analysis:
The null hypothesis that we wish to test is that the average age of nonsynonymous mutations is the same as the average age of synonymous mutations. To analyze the data, all polymorphisms were partitioned into nonsynonymous and synonymous polymorphisms. To do this, the following heuristic approach was applied: the most common sequence was chosen as a reference sequence representing a hypothesized ancestral state. This was done only to establish an unambiguous criterion to determine if a mutation was synonymous or nonsynonymous. The identity of a variable site in a codon was determined by comparison to the homologous codon in the reference sequence. In this manner, all polymorphisms could be scored unambiguously as nonsynonymous or synonymous even when there are multiple segregating sites in a single codon. If three nucleotides were segregating in the same site, two mutations were inferred and represented as two variable sites. In most cases only one mutation was observed in each codon, suggesting that the effect of this heuristic approach does not seriously bias the analysis. Also, because the approach was applied blindly with regard to the class of the mutation, it should not inflate the chosen significance level in the resampling test.
For each data set, two resampling tests were performed, one using E(T | X) and one using the heuristically derived â as estimators of the age of a mutation. In each case, the data were resampled 100,000 times to provide a P value. When E(T | X) was applied, the ![]()
was used to drive the simulations, and 100,000 genealogies (runs of the Markov chain) were sampled to provide estimates of the age of each mutation (see ![]()
![]()
|
Amino acid saturation dynamics:
To examine the relative degree of mutational saturation in nonsynonymous and synonymous substitutions in mtDNA, the number of nonsynonymous and synonymous nucleotide differences between pairs of species was plotted for 13 mtDNA genes (NADH1, NADH2, NADH3, NADH4, NADH4L, NADH5, NADH6, ATPase 6, ATPase 8, COI, COII, COIII, Cyt. b). The species included in this analysis were Homo sapiens (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Expected ages of selected and linked neutral segregating mutations:
Several results regarding the ages of neutral mutations are known. For example, the age of a neutral mutation with frequency b in a sample of size n is given by Equation 3. However, selection will affect the underlying gene genealogy and thus the distribution of coalescence times in those genealogies (e.g., ![]()
![]()
We are interested in the ratio of the age of selected to the age of neutral mutations in models without recombination. We show that in the models of interest, selection tends to reduce this ratio below unity and that this property of models with selection can be used to test neutrality. First, consider a haploid model in which there is only one selected site in the population and assume that there are only two possible states for this site (A and a). A haplotype carrying state A has fitness 1 and a haplotype carrying state a has fitness 1 + s. Furthermore, assume that mutations occur from state A to state a at rate
and from state a to state A at rate
. Assume that neutral mutations occur according to an infinite sites model at rate µ and that there is no recombination. Following ![]()
is given by
![]() |
(4) |
(see, for example, ![]()
![]() |
(5) |
and the probability that an a allele arose by mutation in the previous generation is given by
![]() |
(6) |
Equation 5 and Equation 6 correspond to Equation 4 of ![]()
![]() |
(7) |
which can easily be solved for T(A, a), T(2A), and T(2a). Then the mean coalescence time can be found as
![]() |
(8) |
(![]()
![]() |
(9) |
We can therefore evaluate the ratio of the expected age of a detectable selected mutation to the expected age of a neutral mutation in a sample of size 2 (Figure 1). The absolute ratio of the ages in the figure does not approach 1.0 as Ns approaches 0 because it is a function of
. However, note that the ratio is a monotonically decreasing function of s. The reason is that selection has only a marginal effect on the distribution of coalescence times but has a strong effect on the age of the selected mutation. That selection has only little effect on the expected coalescence time in a diallelic model at equilibrium has previously been noted by ![]()
|
|
Power analyses:
The power of the McDonald/Kreitman test (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Having demonstrated that under purifying selection the mean age of segregating selected sites is less than the mean age of segregating neutral sites in a population (Figure 1 and Figure 2), we next turned to the problem of comparing mean ages of selected and neutral sites segregating in a sample of chromosomes drawn from a population. We examined the power of the AOM test (Equation 2) when using â as an estimator of the age of mutations by computer simulations as described in METHODS and found it to increase as Ns is reduced from 0 to -10 with a maximum in the range -10 > Ns > -50 (Figure 3A). Power analysis of the AOM test using E(T | X) as an estimator of age of mutations by simulation is computationally too expensive to perform.
Data analysis:
The hypothesis that the ages of nonsynonymous and synonymous polymorphisms are equal was tested for 25 previously published animal mtDNA data sets (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Application of the McDonald/Kreitman test (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
However, note that the selective removal of sites when E(T | X) is used will not lead to falsely significant results. To realize this, note that under the null hypothesis of strict neutrality, both nonsynonymous and synonymous mutations should be distributed according to a Poisson process on the underlying shared gene genealogy. Because the distribution of the times of events in a Poisson process is given by the order statistics of a uniform random variable, the expected age of a mutation in a site is independent of the number of mutations occurring at the site. Thus the expected age of mutations in a data set will not change by the removal of sites with many mutations nor will the ratio of the expected ages of nonsynonymous to synonymous mutations change.
On the basis of an analysis of the power of the McDonald/Kreitman test (Figure 3A), we conclude that if purifying selection alone is responsible for the observed deviations from neutrality in animal mtDNA, selection coefficients must be in the range -2 > Ns > -40. It was surprising to us that the McDonald/Kreitman test retains power over such a wide range and that such large (negative) values of Ns may be responsible for the observations. ![]()
![]()
The AOM test based on â has less power to reject the hypothesis of neutrality across most of the ranges of Ns examined (Figure 3B) than the McDonald/Kreitman test. Power rises as Ns is reduced from -1 to -10 after which it appears to reach a plateau of ~65%. It is not surprising that the McDonald/Kreitman test has more power in most of the parameter space because this test employs more data (interspecific comparisons in addition to intraspecific comparisons) than the test based on â. However, the new test based on â uses information in the data not employed by the McDonald/Kreitman test, and it is able to distinguish between hypotheses of balancing selection and selection on deleterious mutations. It should therefore provide additional information regarding selection coefficients when applied in addition to the McDonald/Kreitman test. Another advantage of the new test is that it is quite robust to the model assumptions. Under strict neutrality, the distribution of site patterns in nonsynonymous sites and in synonymous sites should be identical. If the weights assigned to different site patterns are poorly chosen, this will lead to a reduction in power but not to an inflation of the chosen significance level. This is also true even if the population is not at stationarity because of the decoupling of the mutational and the genealogical processes under neutrality.
Six out of 25 tests were significant using â as an estimator of the age of an allele (Table 2). The probability of randomly obtaining 6 or more significant results in 25 tests at the 5% significance level is P = 0.0012. One of the data sets (Mesomys) has a P value so low (P < 0.001) that the null hypothesis of no difference in age of synonymous and nonsynonymous mutations for all data sets can be rejected by a Bonferroni test. It is curious to note that all six significant data sets contain a relatively large number of segregating sites; indeed three of the six are the three largest data sets shown in Table 2 with respect to number of segregating sites. This may suggest that the small number of significant tests is caused by a lack of statistical power when only few polymorphic sites are available. In contrast there appears to be no bias among significant data sets with respect to number of chromosomes examined. Also, in 17/25 cases, the estimated mean age of nonsynonymous mutations is less than the estimated mean age of synonymous substitution (not shown). Together, these results provide weak support for the hypothesis that the average age of nonsynonymous mutations is less than the average age of synonymous mutations.
To test the hypothesis that the small number of significant AOM results in Table 2 could be the consequence of small sample size (polymorphic sites), additional power analyses of both the McDonald/Kreitman and the AOM tests were performed in which Ns was held constant and
varied (Figure 4). Indeed the reduction in power when
is small is somewhat more severe for the AOM test than for the McDonald/Kreitman test.
|
Supposing that purifying selection is acting on amino acid replacement mutations, the next question is which range of values of Ns are consistent with the observations from both the McDonald/Kreitman test and the AOM test presented here. Figure 5 (solid bars) shows the expected frequency distributions of P values for the test based on â derived from simulation with Ns = 3. Note that Ns = 3 is near the bottom of the power curve of the AOM test (Figure 3B); however, if Ns is larger, the expected distribution would be even more skewed toward low P values. In contrast the frequency distribution of P values observed in the 25 data sets is nearly uniform (Figure 5, hatched bars). It appears that Ns must be <3 to account for the distribution of P values obtained in the test based on â. However, if selection against deleterious mutations is to explain the many significant McDonald/Kreitman tests, Ns should be >2. There is therefore only a small window of values of Ns that are consistent with the findings in this article. Given the variability of population sizes in naturally occurring populations, it is difficult to explain why all values of Ns should fall in this range.
|
The model applied to describe selection against deleterious mutations is very simple in that it assumes that all nonlethal nonsynonymous mutations have the same selection coefficient and that this selection coefficient is constant in time. Likewise, it is assumed in the simulations that the populations are in stationarity, i.e., a constant population size and no population subdivision. Although there is no reason to assume that a more complex demographic model or a more complex distribution of negative selection coefficients would change the relative power of the McDonald/Kreitman test vs. the AOM test, we cannot rule out this possibility.
If purifying selection alone is not responsible for the repeated observations of deviation from neutrality, what other processes are consistent with the data? One obvious explanation is that the significant results partly are artifacts caused by the simple methods used to estimate the number of nonsynonymous and synonymous mutations (e.g., ![]()
![]()
|
Another problem is sequencing errors. Such errors could inflate the significance level of the McDonald/Kreitman test because they would tend preferentially to elevate the number of intraspecific nonsynonymous mutations. Likewise, sequencing errors could be of importance in explaining the significant results from the AOM test presented in this article. However, sequencing errors should also elevate the ratio of nonsynonymous mutations to synonymous mutations for small levels of divergence in interspecific data. Because no such pattern is observed in Figure 6, we do not believe that this explanation is likely. Moreover, elevated intraspecific nonsynonymous mutations have not been observed in nuclear data sets (![]()
Theoretically, balancing selection acting on mtDNA could maintain levels of nonsynonymous polymorphism within species above that seen between species (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Present address: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by a fellowship to R.N. from the Danish Research Council. David Rand and Michael Nachman provided several animal mtDNA data sets prior to publication.
Manuscript received December 20, 1998; Accepted for publication June 2, 1999.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AKASHI, H., 1999 Inferring the fitness effects of DNA mutations from polymorphism and divergence data: statistical power to detect directional selection under stationarity and free recombination. Genetics 151:221-238
ANDERSON, S., A. T. BANKIER, B. G. BARRELL, M. H. L. DEBRUIJN, and A. R. COULSON et al., 1981 Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature 290:457-465[Medline].
BABCOCK, D. S. and M. A. ASMUSSEN, 1996 Effects of differential selection in the sexes on cytonuclear polymorphism and disequilibria. Genetics 144:839-853[Abstract].
BAKER, R. J., R. A. VANDENBUSSCHE, A. J. WRIGHT, L. E. WIGGINS, and M. J. HAMILTON et al., 1996 High levels of genetic change on rodents of Chernobyl. Nature 380:707-708[Medline].
BALLARD, J. W. O. and M. KREITMAN, 1994 Unraveling selection in the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila.. Genetics 138:875-888.
BIBB, M. J., R. A. VAN ETTEN, C. T. WRIGHT, M. W. WALBERG, and D. A. CLAYTON, 1981 Sequence and gene organization of mouse mitochondrial DNA. Cell 26:167-180[Medline].
BRUNA, E. M., R. N. FISHER, and T. J. CASE, 1996 Morphological and genetic evolution is decoupled in Pacific skinks (Squamata: Scinidae: Emoia). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 263:681-688
DESJARDINS, P. and R. MORAIS, 1990 Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome. J. Mol. Biol. 212:599-634[Medline].
FITCH, W. M., 1971 Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20:406-416.
GARESSE, R., 1988 Drosophila melanogaster mitochondrial DNA: gene organization and evolutionary considerations. Genetics 118:649-663
GILLESPIE, J. H., 1991 The Causes of Molecular Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
GOODISMAN, M. A. D. and M. A. ASMUSSEN, 1997 Cytonuclear theory for haplodiploid species and X-linked genes. I. Hardy-Weinburg dynamics and continent-island, hybrid zone models. Genetics 147:321-338[Abstract].
GRIFFITHS, R. C. and S. TAVARÉ, 1995 Unrooted genealogical tree probabilities in the infinitely-many-sites model. Math. Biosci. 127:77-98[Medline].
GRIFFITHS, R. C. and S. TAVARÉ, 1998 The age of a mutation in a general coalescent tree. Stoch. Model. 14:273-295.
GRIFFITHS, R. C. and S. TAVARÉ, 1999 The ages of mutations in gene trees. Ann. Appl. Prob. in press.
HARDING, R. M., S. M. FULLERTON, R. C. GRIFFITHS, J. BOND, and M. J. COX et al., 1997 Archaic African and Asian lineages in the genetic ancestry of modern humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60:772-789[Medline].
HASEGAWA, M., Y. CAO, and Z. YANG, 1998 Preponderance of slightly deleterious polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio is much higher within species than between species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1499-1505
HILL, W. G. and A. ROBERTSON, 1966 The effect of linkage on the limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res 8:269-294[Medline].
HORAI, S., K. HAYASAKA, R. KONDO, K. TSUGANE, and N. TAKAHATA, 1995 Recent African origin of modern humans revealed by complete sequences of hominoid mitochondrial DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:532-536
HUDSON, R. R., and N. L. KAPLAN, 1994 Gene trees with background selection, pp. 140153 in Non-Neutral Evolution, edited by B. GOLDING. Chapman and Hall, New York.
KAPLAN, N. L., T. DARDEN, and R. R. HUDSON, 1988 The coalescent in models with selection. Genetics 120:819-829
KIMURA, M., 1983 The Neutral Theory of Molecular Revolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
MCDONALD, J. H. and M. KREITMAN, 1991 Adaptive evolution in the ADH locus in Drosophila. Nature 351:652-654[Medline].
MCRAE, A. F. and W. W. ANDERSON, 1988 Evidence for non-neutrality of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in Drosophila pseudoobscura.. Genetics 120:485-494
MORITZ, C., C. J. SCHNEIDER, and D. B. WAKE, 1992 Evolutionary relationships within the Ensatina eschscholtzii complex confirm the ring species interpretation. Syst. Biol. 41:273-291.
NACHMAN, M. W., 1998 Deleterious mutations in animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetica 102(103):61-69.
NACHMAN, M. W., S. N. BOYER, and C. F. AQUADRO, 1994 Non-neutral evolution at the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 gene in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:6364-6368
NACHMAN, M. W., W. M. BROWN, M. STONEKING, and C. F. AQUADRO, 1996 Nonneutral mitochondrial DNA variation in humans and chimpanzees. Genetics 142:953-963[Abstract].
NAGYLAKI, T., 1992 Introduction to Theoretical Population Genetics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
NEUHAUSER, C. and S. M. KRONE, 1997 The genealogy of samples in models with selection. Genetics 145:519-534[Abstract].
NIELSEN, R., 1997 The ratio of replacement to silent divergence and tests of neutrality. J. Evol. Biol. 10:217-231.
OHTA, T., 1973 Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature 246:96-98[Medline].
RAND, D. M. and L. KANN, 1996 Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice and humans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:735-748[Abstract].
RAND, D. M. and L. KANN, 1998 Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetica 102(103):393-407.
RAND, D. M., M. DORFSMAN, and L. M. KANN, 1994 Neutral and nonneutral evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 138:741-756[Abstract].
RUVOLO, M., D. PAN, S. ZEHR, T. GOLDBERG, and T. R. DISOTELL et al., 1994 Gene trees and hominoid phylogeny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:8900-8904
SOKAL, R. R. and C. D. MICHENER, 1958 A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationship. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 28:1409-1438.
SOKAL, R. R., and F. J. ROHLF, 1981 Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
SUMMERS, K., E. BERMINGHAM, L. WEIGT, S. MCCAFFERTY, and L. DAHLSTROM, 1997 Phenotypic and genetic divergence in three species of dart-poison frogs with contrasting parental behavior. J. Hered. 88:8-13
WATTERSON, G. A., 1975 On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7:256-276[Medline].
WISE, C. A., S. MICHEALA, and S. EASTEAL, 1998 Departure from neutrality at the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 gene in humans, but not in chimpanzees. Genetics 148:409-421
WOOD, T. C. and C. KRAJEWSKI, 1996 Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation among the subspecies of Sarus Crane (Grus antigone).. Auk 113:655-663.
ZINK, R. M. and R. C. BLACKWELL, 1996 Patterns of allozyme, mitochondrial DNA, and morphometric variation in four sparrow genera. Auk 113:59-67.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. C. Tully and M. A. Fares Shifts in the Selection-Drift Balance Drive the Evolution and Epidemiology of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus J. Virol., January 15, 2009; 83(2): 781 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Haddrill, D. Bachtrog, and P. Andolfatto Positive and Negative Selection on Noncoding DNA in Drosophila simulans Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2008; 25(9): 1825 - 1834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kryazhimskiy, G. A. Bazykin, and J. Dushoff Natural Selection for Nucleotide Usage at Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Sites in Influenza A Virus Genes J. Virol., May 15, 2008; 82(10): 4938 - 4945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Popadin, L. V. Polishchuk, L. Mamirova, D. Knorre, and K. Gunbin Accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations in mitochondrial protein-coding genes of large versus small mammals PNAS, August 14, 2007; 104(33): 13390 - 13395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. G. Pybus, A. Rambaut, R. Belshaw, R. P. Freckleton, A. J. Drummond, and E. C. Holmes Phylogenetic Evidence for Deleterious Mutation Load in RNA Viruses and Its Contribution to Viral Evolution Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 845 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. T. Edwards, E. C. Holmes, O. G. Pybus, D. J. Wilson, R. P. Viscidi, E. J. Abrams, R. E. Phillips, and A. J. Drummond Evolution of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Envelope Gene Is Dominated by Purifying Selection Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1441 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. W. Ho, M. J. Phillips, A. Cooper, and A. J. Drummond Time Dependency of Molecular Rate Estimates and Systematic Overestimation of Recent Divergence Times Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2005; 22(7): 1561 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Eyre-Walker, P. D. Keightley, N. G. C. Smith, and D. Gaffney Quantifying the Slightly Deleterious Mutation Model of Molecular Evolution Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2002; 19(12): 2142 - 2149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nielsen Mutations as Missing Data: Inferences on the Ages and Distributions of Nonsynonymous and Synonymous Mutations Genetics, September 1, 2001; 159(1): 401 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Verrelli and W. F. Eanes Clinal Variation for Amino Acid Polymorphisms at the Pgm Locus in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2001; 157(4): 1649 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Verrelli and W. F. Eanes Extensive Amino Acid Polymorphism at the Pgm Locus Is Consistent With Adaptive Protein Evolution in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, December 1, 2000; 156(4): 1737 - 1752. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Weinreich and D. M. Rand Contrasting Patterns of Nonneutral Evolution in Proteins Encoded in Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genomes Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 385 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Nielsen, R.
- Articles by Weinreich, D. M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Nielsen, R.
- Articles by Weinreich, D. M.













, McDonald/Kreitman test;
, AOM test) when Ns = 3 and 




