- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Hamblin, M. T.
- Articles by Veuille, M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Hamblin, M. T.
- Articles by Veuille, M.
Population Structure Among African and Derived Populations of Drosophila simulans: Evidence for Ancient Subdivision and Recent Admixture
Martha T. Hamblina and Michel Veuilleaa Laboratoire d'Ecologie-EPHE, Université Pierre-et-Marie Curie, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France
Corresponding author: Martha T. Hamblin, Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, 924 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL 60637., mhamblin{at}genetics.uchicago.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: W. F. EANES
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Previous studies based on allozyme variation have found little evidence for genetic differentiation in Drosophila simulans. On the basis of DNA sequence variation at two nuclear loci in four African populations of D. simulans, we show that there is significant structure to D. simulans populations within Africa. Variation at one of the loci, vermilion, appears to be neutral and supports an eastern African origin for European and American populations. Samples from the West Indies, Europe, and North America had a nucleotide diversity lower than that of African populations at vermilion and show nonequilibrium haplotype distributions at both vermilion and G6pd, consistent with a hypothesis of recent bottleneck and possibly also admixture in the history of these populations. Directional selection, previously documented at G6pd, appears to have occurred within the coalescence time of the species, obscuring deep population history.
THE closely related species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans are widely used in studies of evolution at the phenotypic, genetic, and molecular levels. In spite of many broad similarities, there are important differences between these species, the causes of which are not well understood (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A discordance between DNA-level and protein-level evolution is also observed in comparisons between these species: while allozyme variation is slightly higher in D. melanogaster (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Several nonexclusive hypotheses have been proposed to explain these different patterns of molecular variation: D. simulans has a different "adaptive strategy" than D. melanogaster and/or has become a cosmopolitan species more recently than D. melanogaster (![]()
![]()
![]()
Progress in elucidating population history and structure for these species has been hampered by a dearth of studies of DNA sequence variation from true population samples representing geographically diverse populations, especially African populations that are potentially ancestral. This is particularly true for D. simulans, for which DNA sequence variation has been examined almost exclusively in North American and European population samples or in worldwide collections of alleles that are inappropriate for many population genetic tests. There is only one published report of DNA sequence variation in more than one population sample of D. simulans, a study of the vermilion locus by ![]()
The North American vermilion dataset showed a strong haplotype structure (i.e., alleles fell into very divergent classes for which few intermediate haplotypes were observed), a pattern that has also been observed at a number of other unlinked loci in North American samples of D. simulans alleles (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The goal of this study was to use nuclear DNA sequence data to assess the level of population differentiation of African and non-African populations of D. simulans and to begin to reconstruct their evolutionary histories. In particular, we wanted to test the hypothesis that divergent alleles from derived populations reflect population structure in the ancestral populations from which they were founded. The possibility of population admixture has been raised before to explain divergent lineages in worldwide collections of alleles of D. simulans (e.g., ![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Population samples:
Table 1 shows the dates and locations of the collections of D. simulans used in this study. Samples were obtained using attractive baits. Wild-collected flies were used to establish isofemale lines (Kenya, Tanzania, Antilles, Zimbabwe) or extract chromosomes using attached-X lines (Cameroon) or were frozen immediately in the laboratory (Italy). Flies from isofemale lines were frozen within 3 mo after trapping, except for Kenya (8 mo) and Antilles (1 yr). For vermilion, we included the sequences from Raleigh, North Carolina (United States), published by ![]()
|
DNA methods:
DNA was prepared from single male flies by the method of ![]()
Data analysis:
The program DnaSP (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Tests of haplotype number and haplotype diversity were conducted using the method of ![]()
![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
DNA sequence variation:
For estimation of historical patterns of gene flow between populations of D. simulans, we collected DNA sequence data from two unlinked loci on the X chromosome in samples from four continental African, one West Indian, and one European population. We determined the sequence of 728 bp of the vermilion gene in 1013 individuals from each of the six populations. This 728-bp region spans three small introns, which total 186 bp in length. Haplotypes at vermilion, including the corresponding vermilion data for the United States (![]()
|
We also determined the sequence of 700 bp of the third exon of the G6pd gene in 1012 individuals from each of the four African populations. Due to problems with amplification in the Italian lines, we have data from only five sequences from Italy, which we combined with the four sequences from France published by ![]()
|
Summary statistics for both loci are presented in Table 2. Note that these data are not appropriate for comparing variation between loci nor are they appropriate for making inferences about absolute effective population size, because the regions sequenced were not chosen at random; the goal was to understand population structure, not to estimate 4Neµ. Nevertheless, these statistics are appropriate for use in comparing variation between populations at a particular locus. At vermilion, the samples from African populations, particularly Tanzania and Kenya, are the most variable. This pattern is consistent with the hypothesis of ![]()
|
Genetic differentiation between populations:
We tested the null hypothesis that our population samples were drawn from a single panmictic population using the method of ![]()
![]()
|
At the vermilion locus, FST is essentially zero between the samples from Tanzania and Kenya, which were collected only ~200 miles apart. The other distances, and most of the other FST's, are much larger: 13 of the 15 comparisons involving Antilles, Zimbabwe, and Cameroon have P values
0.01. P values for FST's involving Tanzania, the United States, and Italy are generally low (0.01 < P < 0.1) but probably not significant. Thus, our samples seem to fall into four genetically distinct groups: Zimbabwe, Cameroon, Lesser Antilles, and Tanzania/Kenya/Italy/United States. The Antilles sample, dominated by seven copies of a unique haplotype, is quite different from all other populations. Again, the relationships between populations at the G6pd locus are different from those at vermilion: Cameroon appears to be differentiated (P
0.005) from all other populations except Tanzania, but most other comparisons have much larger P values.
Haplotype tests:
Haplotypic diversity is quite high; at vermilion, there are 41 different haplotypes, of which 27 occur only once in the total of 82 sequences. At G6pd, there are 28 haplotypes, 16 of which are unique, in a total of 66 sequences. However, inspection of the data in Figure 1 and Figure 2 reveals that all the samples that do not come from Africa contain multiple copies of a few highly divergent haplotypes: Italy/Europe and Antilles for both loci and the U.S. sample of vermilion. One prediction of a hypothesis of recent population admixture is that the number of haplotypes will be smaller than expected in a population at mutation-drift equilibrium, given the observed number of segregating sites, similar to the pattern produced by an old balanced polymorphism. We tested the observed number of haplotypes in each of our samples against the expectation of a neutral, equilibrium model, conditioned on the number of segregating sites (S) and the number of sequences surveyed (n) (![]()
|
The significance of the haplotype tests for the vermilion data may be somewhat overestimated, because we chose to survey the 5' half of the gene because of its higher level of linkage disequilibrium. The entire region surveyed by ![]()
![]()
![]()
Because the hypothesis of population admixture predicts a similar pattern throughout the genome, we conducted the same tests of haplotype number and diversity for all the other surveys of DNA polymorphism that we could find in the literature for population samples of D. simulans; unfortunately there are very few (Table 4). A four-cutter restriction site survey of the phosphogluconate dehydrogenase region (Pgd ) from North Carolina (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Phylogeny of G6pd alleles:
Because the FST analysis pools all alleles in a sample to produce one statistic of distance, it is a poor reflection of the complexity of these particular samples, and the relationships of these populations are problematic (see DISCUSSION). We therefore wanted to estimate phylogenies of alleles using parsimony to see where these divergent alleles arose with respect to the potentially ancestral African populations. Because both loci are from recombining regions of the nuclear genome, simple bifurcating phylogenies cannot be reconstructed.
For G6pd, it was possible to construct a network (Figure 3) using all 22 segregating sites and all but two haplotypes (Cameroon 3 and 12). We also included the alleles from the United States and Mexico surveyed by ![]()
|
Informative site analysis:
Because of the large amount of recombination in the history of the vermilion alleles, we tried to construct phylogenies using short regions (![]()
Instead, we did a site-by-site analysis of what we call "informative segregating sites," i.e., those sites that are segregating in at least two populations, but not in all of them. There were a total of 35 informative sites. For each pair of populations, the number of times they shared one of these informative sites was counted. The resulting counts were then divided by the average total number of segregating sites in the two populations, giving the fraction of the polymorphism shared by the two populations that is not present in all populations. The results are presented in Table 5. There are six comparisons in which >30% of the polymorphism is shared and informative. One of these, not surprisingly, is Kenya/Tanzania. What is not obvious from the FST data is that Zimbabwe and Cameroon have the highest proportion of shared informative polymorphisms and that the other most similar pairs all involve comparisons among Italy, Antilles, the United States, and Zimbabwe.
|
At G6pd, there is also a high proportion of shared informative polymorphisms among Zimbabwe, Antilles, and Europe, none of which shares any informative sites with Tanzania. These associations can be seen in the network in Figure 3, where several derived haplotypes are shared among these populations.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
This study, the first to compare African populations of D. simulans at the DNA sequence level, has revealed substantial genetic differentiation among those populations at the vermilion locus. These findings contrast with patterns of allozyme and mitochondrial DNA variation, which show little geographic structure. Haplotype structure in the non-African population samples at both vermilion and G6pd departs significantly from the expectation under a neutral, equilibrium model, suggesting a history of bottleneck (i.e., founder effect) and possible admixture in these recently established populations. At the vermilion locus, the three non-African population samples also have lower genetic diversity (average
= 7.73 ± 0.692) than the four African samples (average
= 12.03 ± 2.656), consistent with the inference of a founder effect.
Variation at the G6pd locus is not lower in the non-African samples, and there is much less evidence for population structure among all the samples. If both loci were neutral indicators of population sizes and structure, we would expect relative distances and diversity among populations at the two loci to be the same. While such a discrepancy might be due to chance, we believe that it is due primarily to past episode(s) of positive selection at G6pd in D. simulans as discussed in ![]()
Reduced coalescence time at G6pd:
Of the 21 amino acid differences fixed between D. melanogaster and D. simulans at G6pd, 15 have become fixed in the D. simulans lineage, although only 1 has been fixed since the divergence of D. simulans and D. sechellia (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Variation at vermilion reflects population history:
In contrast to G6pd, the vermilion locus appears to have been evolving under purifying selection since the D. melanogaster-D. simulans split. There is only one amino acid difference (a serine to threonine change) between the genes in the two species (![]()
![]()
![]()
Relationships among African populations:
At vermilion, Tanzania and Kenya have the highest levels of polymorphism and haplotype diversity and are not significantly differentiated from each other. Collectively, they contain 18 polymorphisms that are not observed in any other population and have the lowest FST's in comparisons with the non-African populations. The other two African populations have lower levels of polymorphism and are genetically differentiated from Tanzania/Kenya and from each other. The accumulation of genetic differences between distant populations suggests that these populations have not been very recently established. These observations are consistent with the biogeographic hypothesis of ![]()
![]()
106 and 10 generations/year), far less than the time required to reach mutation-drift equilibrium.
The higher level of genetic variation in the Tanzania/Kenya samples suggests that the population in this region may be older and/or larger than the others. This interpretation, however, assumes that the observed differences in levels of polymorphism reflect real differences in long-term effective population size. Several issues need to be considered here; first is the variance associated with estimates of 4Neµ. While the stochastic variance of independent samples of a single, nonrecombining locus is very large, note that substantial recombination at vermilion results in estimates of 4Neµ that represent several partially independent evolutionary trajectories, substantially reducing the variance (![]()
Perhaps more importantly, the populations surveyed in this study share a recent common ancestry in a species with a very long coalescence time (4Ne generations, where Ne
106). Many alleles within these populations are likely to share a most recent common ancestor with an allele from another population, and much of the genealogy of these alleles probably took place prior to the divergences of these populations from the ancestral population(s). ![]()
among recently separated populations approaches the sampling variance of a single population.
Another issue is that, in populations recently descended from a common ancestral population, estimates of 4Neµ will predominately reflect ancestral population size and contain little information about the sizes of the descendant populations. This is particularly true if these populations have experienced rapid expansion, which slows down genetic drift (![]()
Inferences of gene flow based on shared informative sites:
As discussed above, biogeographical analysis suggests that continental African populations of D. simulans may have undergone an expansion on the order of 0.1Ne generations ago. ![]()
To try to separate foundation events from subsequent gene flow, we identified a subset of polymorphic sites that are segregating in more than one sample but not in all samples as informative segregating sites. We have not yet explored the expected properties of informative sites, so this analysis is only qualitative and suggestive, but it reveals some interesting properties of the dataset that are not revealed in any of the other analyses and may reflect underlying processes different than the FST analysis.
The FST statistics indicate rather similar levels of differentiation among all the African populations except between Kenya and Tanzania, presumably because all these populations share an ancestral set of polymorphisms that have been sorting for similar amounts of time. For example, FST at vermilion between Zimbabwe and Tanzania is 0.122 (P = 0.007) and FST at vermilion between Zimbabwe and Cameroon is 0.159 (P = 0.014). Yet Zimbabwe and Tanzania share only ~14% of their informative sites, while Zimbabwe and Cameroon share ~40%, the same proportion as Kenya and Tanzania (Table 5). The high proportion of informative sites shared by Zimbabwe and Cameroon suggests that gene flow between these populations has been significant. Similarly, FST is very high between Antilles and the United States (0.238; P < 0.000), but shared informative sites are high (30%).
Conversely, FST's at vermilion are much smaller in comparisons between Tanzania, Italy, and the United States than in comparisons between Zimbabwe, Italy, and the United States. However, there are more derived polymorphisms shared among Italy, the United States, and Zimbabwe than among Italy, the United States, and Tanzania (Table 5). This suggests that Zimbabwe is as likely as Tanzania to be ancestral to these recently established populations or that alleles from another population not sampled in this study have migrated differentially.
As we would expect, at G6pd, where much of the shared ancestral polymorphism appears to have been eliminated during episodes of directional selection, the FST and shared informative sites analyses are much more concordant. Both indicate a closer relationship among Zimbabwe, Europe, and Antilles than among Tanzania, Europe, and Antilles, in agreement with the informative sites analysis at vermilion.
Interaction of selection, migration, and recombination at G6pd:
If we did not have independent evidence of positive selection at G6pd (![]()
Positive selection at the G6pd locus has most likely reduced the coalescence time for this region such that it no longer reflects the early population history of D. simulans in Africa. In this case, the pattern observed at G6pd reflects the impact of directional selection on a recombining locus in a geographically structured species. A selectively favored mutation will go to fixation most quickly within the population in which it arises, in a process that may approximate a simple selective sweep model. Migration to distant populations will be slower and may allow opportunities for recombination during the fixation process, such that more variation may be preserved in those distant populations. Many different patterns of variation across populations could result from such a process, depending on the strength of selection, rate of recombination, rate of migration, and effective population size. The fact that variation at G6pd is lowest in Tanzania and is not reduced in the derived populations is one such outcome and is not inconsistent with the vermilion data, given that there is strong independent evidence for directional selection at this locus.
The hypothesis of population admixture:
Our data indicate that populations of D. simulans in Europe and America are young and far from equilibrium. At vermilion, Italy, Antilles, and the United States have about half as much variation as Tanzania and Kenya. The five samples of D. simulans from non-African populations all show a deficiency in haplotype number and/or diversity. None of the eight samples from Africa shows such a departure (although the P values for the Zimbabwe samples are low). At vermilion, the exact significance values of these haplotype tests are somewhat compromised by the fact that the region surveyed was not chosen at random (see RESULTS), but the difference in results between African and non-African populations is nevertheless real. Unlike the FST analysis, both vermilion and G6pd give the same results in these tests, suggesting that the phenomenon responsible for these unusual haplotype structures is more recent than any episode of selection at G6pd. The fact that we observe the same significant haplotype structure at three out of four unlinked loci (Table 4) also suggests that this is a population-level phenomenon rather than multiple instances of diversifying selection.
The unusual haplotype structure and reduced variation provide strong evidence for a founder event in non-African populations as was inferred from the microsatellite survey of ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Evidence of admixture should be reflected in patterns of haplotype structure throughout the genome, although this evidence will decay at different rates at different loci due to differences in recombination. Selection in a new environment could also eliminate evidence of admixture. At the two loci we have studied, as well as at Pgd, haplotype number and/or diversity are inconsistent with the equilibrium expectation; data from the Gld locus do not show such a departure. Clearly, more data from other loci are needed to test this hypothesis.
Conclusions and implications for population genetic studies:
- Populations of D. simulans in continental Africa are genetically differentiated and therefore not very young, although they are probably still not at equilibrium.
- Non-African populations of D. simulans are very young, far from equilibrium, and have experienced a bottleneck during their foundation.
- Compelling, although not conclusive, evidence suggests that there has been admixture among genetically differentiated lineages in population(s) ancestral to European and American populations.
Estimates of nucleotide diversity in non-African populations do not appear to be inflated but are nonetheless unlikely to reflect long-term effective population size due to the combined effects of bottleneck and possible admixture. Ratios of silent to replacement variation might also be affected by a bottleneck if frequency distributions of those variants are different (i.e., if one or both are not neutral). For these reasons, non-African population samples of D. simulans are unsuitable for testing models that assume mutation-drift equilibrium. African populations of both D. melanogaster and D. simulans are probably more suitable for testing population genetic models but may also violate assumptions of equilibrium. In addition, comparisons between the species will need to be put in the context of their evolutionary histories, which may be quite different.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Frantz Depaulis for providing the computer programs for the population subdivision test and the haplotype tests and for helpful discussions; Chip Aquadro for providing office space during preparation of the manuscript; the Aquadro lab group and two reviewers for comments on the manuscript; and Walt Eanes for editorial assistance. M.T.H. was supported by a Chateaubriand Fellowship from the French Embassy to the United States. M.V.'s research is supported by CNRS-Unité Mixte de Recherche 7625.
Manuscript received November 11, 1998; Accepted for publication May 24, 1999.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AKASHI, H., 1996 Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster.. Genetics 144:1297-1307[Abstract].
AQUADRO, C. F., K. M. LADO, and W. A. NOON, 1988 The rosy region of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Contrasting levels of naturally occurring DNA restriction map variation and divergence. Genetics 199:875-888.
BABA-AÏSSA, F. and M. SOLIGNAC, 1984 La plupart des populations de Drosophila simulans ont probablement pour ancêtre une femelle unique dans un passé récent. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 299:289-292.
BALLARD, J. W. O., J. HATZIDAKIS, T. L. KARR, and M. KREITMAN, 1996 Reduced variation in Drosophila simulans mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 144:1519-1528[Abstract].
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1991 Molecular population genetics of the distal portion of the X chromosome in Drosophila: evidence for genetic hitchhiking of the yellow-achaete region. Genetics 129:1147-1158[Abstract].
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1993 African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA sequence level. Nature 365:548-550[Medline].
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1994 Evolutionary inferences from DNA variation at the 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase locus in natural populations of Drosophila: selection and geographic differentiation. Genetics 136:155-171[Abstract].
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1995 Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.. Genetics 149:1019-1032
BENASSI, V. and M. VEUILLE, 1995 Comparative population structuring of molecular and allozyme variation of Drosophila melanogaster Adh between Europe, West Africa and East Africa. Genet. Res. 65:95-103[Medline].
CHOUDHARY, M. and R. S. SINGH, 1987 A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Variations in genetic structure and their causes between D. melanogaster and its sibling species D. simulans. Genetics 117:697-710
DEPAULIS, F. and M. VEUILLE, 1998 Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite site model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1788-1790[Medline].
EANES, W. F., M. KIRCHNER, and J. YOON, 1993 Evidence for adaptive evolution of the G6pd gene in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans lineages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:7475-7479
EANES, W. F., M. KIRCHNER, J. YOON, C. H. BIERMANN, and I-N. WANG et al., 1996 Historical selection, amino acid polymorphism and lineage-specific divergence at the G6pd locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.. Genetics 144:1027-1041[Abstract].
GLOOR, G. B., C. R. PRESTON, D. M. JOHNSON-SCHLITZ, N. A. NASSIF, and R. W. PHILLIS et al., 1993 Type I repressors of P element mobility. Genetics 135:81-95[Abstract].
HAMBLIN, M. T. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1996 High nucleotide variation in a region of low recombination in Drosophila simulans is consistent with the background selection model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1133-1140[Abstract].
HASSON, E., I. N. WANG, L. W. ZENG, M. KREITMAN, and W. F. EANES, 1998 Nucleotide variation in the triosephosphate isomerase (Tpi) locus of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:756-769[Abstract].
HUDSON, R. R., M. KREITMAN, and M. AGUADE, 1987 A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116:153-159
HUDSON, R. R., D. D. BOOS, and N. L. KAPLAN, 1992a A statistical test for detecting geographic subdivision. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:138-151[Abstract].
HUDSON, R. R., M. SLATKIN, and W. P. MADDISON, 1992b Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132:583-589[Abstract].
HYYTIA, P., P. CAPY, J. R. DAVID, and R. S. SINGH, 1985 Enzymatic and quantitative variation in European and African populations of Drosophila simulans.. Heredity 54:209-217.
IRVIN, S. D., K. A. WETTERSTRAND, C. M. HUTTER, and C. F. AQUADRO, 1998 Genetic variation and differentiation at microsatellite loci in Drosophila simulans: evidence for founder effects in New World populations. Genetics 150:777-790
KLIMAN, R. M. and J. HEY, 1993 DNA sequence variation at the period locus within and among species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex. Genetics 133:375-387[Abstract].
LACHAISE, D., M.-L. CARIOU, J. R. DAVID, F. LEMEUNIER, and L. TSACAS et al., 1988 Historical biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Evol. Biol. 22:159-255.
LANGLEY, C. H., J. MCDONALD, N. MIYASHITA, and M. AGUADE, 1993 Lack of correlation between interspecific divergence and intraspecific polymorphism at the supressor of forked region in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:1800-1803
MARTIN-CAMPOS, J. M., J. M. COMERON, N. MIYASHITA, and M. AGUADE, 1992 Intraspecific and interspecific variation at the y-ac-sc region of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 130:805-816[Abstract].
MCDONALD, J. H., 1998 Improved tests for heterogeneity across a region of DNA sequence in the ratio of polymorphism to divergence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:377-384[Abstract].
MORIYAMA, E. N. and J. R. POWELL, 1996 Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:261-277[Abstract].
NICHOLS, R. A., and M. A. BEAUMONT, 1996 Is it ancient or modern history that we can read in the genes? pp. 6987 in Aspects of the Genesis and Maintenance of Biological Diversity, edited by M. HOCHBERG, J. CLOBERT and R. BARBAULT. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
OHTA, T., 1992 The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:263-286.
PARSONS, P. A., 1975 The comparative evolutionary biology of the sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.. Quart. Rev. Biol. 50:151-169[Medline].
PLUZHNIKOV, A. and P. DONNELLY, 1996 Optimal sequencing strategies for surveying molecular genetic diversity. Genetics 144:1247-1262[Abstract].
RAND, D. M., M. DORFSMAN, and L. M. KANN, 1994 Neutral and non-neutral evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 138:741-756[Abstract].
ROZAS, J. and R. ROZAS, 1997 DnaSP version 2.0: a novel software package for extensive molecular population genetics analysis. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:307-311.
SATTA, Y. and N. TAKAHATA, 1990 Evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA and the history of the melanogaster subgroup. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:9558-9562
SEARLES, L. L., R. S. RUTH, A.-M. PRET, R. A. FRIDELL, and A. J. ALI, 1990 Structure and transcription of the Drosophila melanogaster vermilion gene and several mutant alleles. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:1423-1431
SOLIGNAC, M. and M. MONNEROT, 1986 Race formation, speciation, and introgression within Drosophila simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia inferred from mitochondrial DNA analysis. Evolution 40:531-539.
STURTEVANT, A. H., 1929 The genetics of Drosophila simulans.. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. No. 339:1-62.
TAJIMA, F., 1989 Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585-595
TEMPLETON, A. R., K. A. CRANDALL, and C. F. SING, 1992 A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619-633[Abstract].
WAKELEY, J., 1996 Distinguishing migration from isolation using the variance of pairwise differences. Theor. Popul. Biol. 49:369-386[Medline].
WATTERSON, G. A., 1975 On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7:256-276[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Nolte and C. Schlotterer African Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Populations Have Similar Levels of Sequence Variability, Suggesting Comparable Effective Population Sizes Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 405 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sanchez-Gracia and J. Rozas Unusual Pattern of Nucleotide Sequence Variation at the OS-E and OS-F Genomic Regions of Drosophila simulans Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1923 - 1935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Bauer DuMont, H. A. Flores, M. H. Wright, and C. F. Aquadro Recurrent Positive Selection at Bgcn, a Key Determinant of Germ Line Differentiation, Does Not Appear to be Driven by Simple Coevolution with Its Partner Protein Bam Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 182 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Quesada, S. E. Ramos-Onsins, J. Rozas, and M. Aguade Positive Selection Versus Demography: Evolutionary Inferences Based on an Unusual Haplotype Structure in Drosophila simulans Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2006; 23(9): 1643 - 1647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Baudry, N. Derome, M. Huet, and M. Veuille Contrasted Polymorphism Patterns in a Large Sample of Populations From the Evolutionary Genetics Model Drosophila simulans Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 759 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Welch Estimating the Genomewide Rate of Adaptive Protein Evolution in Drosophila Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 821 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Jiggins and K.-W. Kim The Evolution of Antifungal Peptides in Drosophila Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1847 - 1859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Braverman, B. P. Lazzaro, M. Aguade, and C. H. Langley DNA Sequence Polymorphism and Divergence at the erect wing and suppressor of sable Loci of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1153 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Schlenke and D. J. Begun Linkage Disequilibrium and Recent Selection at Three Immunity Receptor Loci in Drosophila simulans Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2013 - 2022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






