- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Lai, Z.-C.
- Articles by Li, Y.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Lai, Z.-C.
- Articles by Li, Y.
Tramtrack69 Is Positively and Autonomously Required for Drosophila Photoreceptor Development
Zhi-Chun Laia and Ying Liaa Department of Biology and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Corresponding author: Zhi-Chun Lai, Department of Biology, 208 Mueller Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802., zcl1{at}psu.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: K. ANDERSON
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Cell-fate specification and cellular differentiation are tightly controlled by both positive and negative transcriptional factors during development. The Drosophila BTB/POZ (Bric-a-brac Tramtrack Broad complex/Pox virus and Zinc finger) domain-containing Tramtrack (Ttk) proteins have been previously shown to be transcriptional repressors and inhibitors of the neuronal fate of cells such as photoreceptors. Here we provide evidence that one of the Ttk proteins, Ttk69, also plays a positive and autonomous role in promoting or maintaining differentiation of photoreceptor neurons at the late stages of Drosophila eye development. Consistent with this notion, the Ttk69 protein, but not Ttk88, is expressed in all photoreceptor cells during pupal stage. Thus, Ttk69 appears to play a dual function by serving negative and positive regulatory roles at different stages of photoreceptor development.
DURING development of multicellular organisms, cells need to be properly specified to become highly specialized cell types such as light-sensitive photoreceptor neurons. Cell lineage and intercellular signaling are two important mechanisms required for initiating processes that lead to cell-fate commitment. Specified cells will then go through progressive steps to eventually become fully differentiated cells. Nuclear factors are required to regulate gene expression essential for cell-fate decisions and cellular differentiation.
The Drosophila compound eye provides a model system with which to study molecular genetic mechanisms of cell-fate determination and cellular differentiation. The adult eye consists of ~800 repeating units or ommatidia, each of which contains eight photoreceptor cells, four nonneuronal cone cells, and seven other accessory cells. On the basis of morphology and physiology, eight photoreceptor cells can be further divided into at least three classes: six outer photoreceptors (R1-6), one apical central photoreceptor (R7), and one basal central photoreceptor (R8; reviewed by ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ommatidial development begins during the third larval stage within the eye imaginal disc, a monolayer epithelium. Once the R8 cell is specified, photoreceptors R2/R5 are recruited to begin neural differentiation, followed by sequential differentiation of R3/R4, R1/R6, and finally R7. There are no lineage relationships among cells within an ommatidium, or among cells of different ommatidia. Cell-cell interactions appear to direct cell-fate decisions, with differentiating cells recruiting their uncommitted neighbors. Two receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), the Drosophila homologue of epidermal growth factor receptor (DER) and Sevenless (Sev), are required for photoreceptor cell specification. Ras1 appears to be a key component of RTK-mediated signaling pathway. A cascade of protein kinases is implied downstream of Ras. They include Draf, Dsor1 [the Drosophila homologue of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinase], and DmERK-A (the Drosophila homologue of MAP kinase encoded by the rolled gene). Ras1-mediated signaling needs to be ultimately transmitted into the nucleus to control activities of transcriptional regulators, which include Yan, Tramtrack (Ttk), Pointed (Pnt), D-Jun, Phyllopod (Phyl), Sina, and Prospero (Pros; for recent reviews, see ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This work focuses on the ttk gene. Through differential splicing, ttk encodes two sequence-specific transcriptional repressors, Ttk69 and Ttk88. These proteins share amino-terminal sequences containing a BTB/POZ domain, but differ in their carboxyl-terminal region where DNA-binding zinc fingers reside (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The function of ttk69 is less clearly understood because ttk69-specific mutations had not been previously recognized. However, gain-of-function experiments suggest that ttk69 is a transcriptional repressor and inhibitor of neuronal cell fate (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Fly strains:
Fly culture and crosses were carried out under standard conditions (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Generation of mitotic ttk- clones:
To generate ttk- clones in the adult eye, w hsFLP1; FRT82 P[ry+ w+]90E female flies were crossed to w; FRT82 ttk- males to obtain progeny flies with a w hsFLP1/w; FRT82 P[ry+ w+]90E/FRT82 ttk- genotype. The first-instar larvae were heat treated at 38° for 1 hr and then allowed to develop at 25° until eclosed (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Histology and immunocytochemistry:
SEM and adult eye section were carried out as described (![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
The ttk69 gene plays a positive and autonomous role in photoreceptor cell development:
We were interested in elucidating the role of the ttk69 gene in eye development. Using the FRT/FLP recombination system (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It is unlikely that ttk88 is responsible for this positive function, because previous work demonstrated that specific loss of ttk88 results in the formation of ectopic photoreceptor cells (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To resolve this issue, expression of Ttk69 and Ttk88 isoforms was examined in ttk- clones in third instar larval eye discs using isoform-specific antibodies. ttk- clones were marked with a cell-autonomous lacZ reporter that exhibits ubiquitous expression in all cells behind the morphogenetic furrow. Among the ttk mutations used in this clonal analysis, the ttkrM730 hypomorphic mutation was caused by a P-element insertion about 1.2 kb upstream of the first exon (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Clonal analysis of ttk mutations suggests that the positive role of ttk69 is not required during larval eye development:
To determine the time at which the positive function of ttk69 for photoreceptor development is required, expression of a neuronal-specific protein, Elav, was examined in ttk69- clones in third instar larval eye discs. Elav expression appeared normal in both ttkrM730 and ttk1e11 mutant cells (Figure 2E and Figure F). These Elav-positive ttk- cells were more basally located. No ectopic neurons could be found between or underneath the developing ommatidia in ttk- clones (Figure 2E and Figure F). However, ommatidial clusters were somewhat disorganized. Therefore, photoreceptors developed properly in the absence of ttk69 function, although loss of ttk69 might interfere with ommatidial assembly in larval eye discs. Our previous work demonstrated that Ttk proteins do not accumulate in larval photoreceptors (![]()
Because ttk69 and ttk88 are expressed in cone cells at the larval stage, we wanted to determine if there is a requirement for ttk function for cone-cell development. To address this issue, cone-cell-specific cut expression was examined in third instar eye discs. The cut gene is normally expressed in cone cells at this stage. cut expression appeared normal in ttk- ommatidia (Figure 2G and Figure H), suggesting that cone cells are properly specified in the absence of ttk69 function.
Ttk69 but not Ttk88 is expressed at high levels in all photoreceptor cells in the developing pupal eye:
Following larval development, it takes about 4 days to complete metamorphosis. To investigate how ttk might function during pupal eye development, it is essential to characterize its expression at this stage. Antibodies specific to Ttk69 and Ttk88 proteins were used to examine Ttk distribution in wild-type pupal eye tissues. Forty hours into the pupal stage, both ttk69 and ttk88 continue to be expressed in cone cells (Figure 3A and Figure E). Primary pigment cells (Figure 3B and Figure F) and secondary and tertiary pigment cells (Figure 3D and Figure H) are also positive for both ttk69 and ttk88 expression. Of the four cells composing the bristle group, we detected high levels of Ttk69 and Ttk88 proteins in one, while the other two expressed lower levels of Ttk proteins (Figure 3D and Figure H). One striking difference between ttk69 and ttk88 expression in the pupal eye was that ttk69, but not ttk88, was expressed at high levels in all eight photoreceptor cells (Figure 3C and Figure G). Expression of ttk69 protein in photoreceptors of pupal eyes was detected as early as 36 hr, and photoreceptors in 48-hr-old pupal eyes continued to express Ttk69 protein (data not shown). The expression of ttk69 in photoreceptor cells during pupal eye development provides corroborative evidence for an autonomous role of ttk69 in late differentiation events.
|
Expression of a ttk-lacZ reporter gene (from the ttk0219 line, ![]()
The positive function of ttk69 for photoreceptor cell development is likely required at late-pupal stage:
To directly examine whether ttk69 is required for photoreceptor cell development at pupal stage, ttk1e11 clones in the eye were analyzed at midpupal stage by examining the expression of the neuronal-specific Elav protein. Within the clone, where ttk69 function was abolished, photoreceptor cells continued to express Elav proteins (Figure 4, AC). Similarly, cone cells lacking ttk69 activity were still positive for cut expression. However, it is clear that some cone cells failed to develop in the absence of ttk69 function (Figure 4D and Figure E), suggesting that there is a partial requirement for ttk69 function for proper cone-cell differentiation. Because ttk69- photoreceptors appear normal even up to midpupal stage, the corneal structure defects and failure of photoreceptor cell development observed in the adult eye are likely to be initiated sometime during late-pupal stage, when expression of many photoreceptor cell-specific genes such as Rhodopsin (Rh) is activated.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Photoreceptor cell-fate decisions in the developing Drosophila eye are mainly mediated by an RTK signaling pathway that eventually leads to changes of activities of nuclear regulatory molecules. Inside the nucleus, transcriptional activation and repression provide important mechanisms for tight regulation of target gene expression. For instance, transcriptional activator Pnt is required to promote neuronal fate, whereas transcriptional repressor Yan acts to inhibit inappropriate commitment to a neuronal cell fate. Like Yan, Ttk88 and Ttk69 proteins are two inhibitors of neuronal cell fate. Through clonal analysis of loss-of-function mutations in ttk69, we demonstrated that ttk69 plays a critical role in promoting photoreceptor cell differentiation at the late stages of eye development. Therefore, it appears that Ttk69 plays a dual function by serving negative and positive regulatory roles at different stages of photoreceptor development.
As the early function of ttk69 in the developing eye is to inhibit photoreceptor cell fate, loss of ttk69 function would allow formation of extra photoreceptors in third instar larval eye discs. However, no ectopic photoreceptor cells can be found when ttk69 or both ttk69 and ttk88 functions are abolished. Similarly, extra photoreceptor cells are not observed in larval eye discs when ttk88 function is specifically removed, even though there are extra photoreceptor cells in adult retinal (![]()
Expression of Ttk69, but not Ttk88, in pupal photoreceptors provides strong supporting evidence for an autonomous role of Ttk69 in promoting photoreceptor differentiation at late stages of eye development. Although ttk69 and ttk88 are coexpressed in most tissues during development, differential expression of ttk isoforms has also been observed in the developing embryonic CNS where ttk69 but not ttk88 is expressed (![]()
![]()
![]()
It is unclear at this moment how ttk69 might act to promote photoreceptor differentiation at the late stages of eye development. One possible scenario is that ttk69 could be involved in activating expression of genes required for terminal differentiation of photoreceptors. Rh genes might be one of the targets of ttk69. Supporting this hypothesis, Ttk69 protein was found to bind specifically to the Rhodopsin upstream sequence 4A (RUS4A) element (Z.-C. LAI, M. E. FORTINI and G. M. RUBIN, unpublished data), which is essential for Rh4 gene expression in a subset of R7 photoreceptors (![]()
![]()
The conversion of ttk69 from a neural inhibitor into a factor positively required for development of photoreceptor neurons poses an intriguing developmental mechanism. It appears that Ttk69 acts intrinsically as a transcriptional repressor, mediating its neural inhibitory function. Many transcriptional repressors act by competing with activators for DNA sequences. They may also interact directly with activators or the transcriptional machinery to turn off transcription. A number of transcriptional repression systems utilize corepressors to prevent transcription. As a transcriptional repressor, Ttk69 may utilize such mechanisms to inhibit inappropriate photoreceptor cell fate in early eye development. Interestingly, Ttk69 is expressed in photoreceptor cells at later stages, where Ttk69 activity might be changed through protein modification, availability of cofactors, or changes in the context of the target gene promoter. Consequently, Ttk69 becomes a positive regulator critical for photoreceptor development.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank S. Harrison, C. Montell, D. Read, G. Rubin, and J. Treisman for fly strains and reagents, M. Price for help with the confocal images, R. Walsch for help with the SEM images, and D. Nguyen, R. Ordway, and M. Price for critical comments on this manuscript. Z.-C.L. was a recipient of a March of Dimes Basil O'Connor Starter Scholar Research Award. This work was supported in part by National Science Foundation grant IBN9511201 and National Institutes of Health grant R29-NS34784 to Z.-C.L.
Manuscript received September 18, 1998; Accepted for publication February 8, 1999.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ASHBURNER, M., 1989 Drosophila: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
BADENHORST, P., S. HARRISON, and A. TRAVERS, 1996 End of the line? Tramtrack and cell fate determination in Drosophila. Genes Cells 1:707-716[Abstract].
BROWN, J. L. and C. WU, 1993 Repression of Drosophila pair-rule segmentation genes by ectopic expression of tramtrack.. Development 117:45-58
BROWN, J. L., S. SONODA, H. UEDA, M. P. SCOTT, and C. WU, 1991 Repression of the Drosophila fushi tarazu (ftz) segmentation gene. EMBO J. 10:665-674[Medline].
BURKE, R. and K. BASLER, 1997 Hedgehog signaling in Drosophila eye and limb developmentconserved machinery, divergent roles? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7:55-61[Medline].
CUTFORTH, T. and U. GAUL, 1997 The genetics of visual system development in Drosophila: specification, connectivity and asymmetry. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7:48-54[Medline].
DICKSON, B. J., 1997 Photoreceptor development: breaking down the barriers. Curr. Biol. 8:R90-R92.
DICKSON, B., and E. HAFEN, 1993 Genetic dissection of eye development in Drosophila, pp. 13271362 in The Development of Drosophila melanogaster, edited by M. BATE and A. MARTINEZ-ARIAS. Cold Spring Habor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Habor, NY.
FORTINI, M. E. and G. M. RUBIN, 1990 Analysis of cis-acting requirements of the Rh3 and Rh4 genes reveals a bipartite organization to rhodopsin promoters in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genes Dev. 4:444-463
FREEMAN, M., 1997 Cell determination strategies in the Drosophila eye. Development 124:261-270[Abstract].
GIESEN, K., T. HUMMEL, A. STOLLEWERK, S. HARRISON, and A. TRAVERS et al., 1997 Glial development in the Drosophila CNS requires concomitant activation of glial and repression of neuronal differentiation genes. Development 124:2307-2316[Abstract].
GUO, M., E. BIER, L. Y. JAN, and Y. N. JAN, 1995 tramtrack acts downstream of numb to specify distinct daughter cell fates during asymmetric cell divisions in the Drosophila PNS. Neuron 14:913-925[Medline].
HARRISON, S. D. and A. A. TRAVERS, 1990 The tramtrack gene encodes a Drosophila finger protein that interacts with the ftz transcriptional regulatory region and shows a novel embryonic expression pattern. EMBO J. 9:207-216[Medline].
HEBERLEIN, U. and K. MOSES, 1995 Mechanisms of Drosophila retinal morphogenesis: the virtue of being progressive. Cell 81:987-990[Medline].
KLAMBT, C., 1997 Drosophila development: a receptor for ommatidial recruitment. Curr. Biol. 7:R132-R135[Medline].
KUMAR, J. and K. MOSES, 1997 Transcriptional factors in eye development: a gorgeous mosaic? Genes Dev. 11:2023-2028
KUMAR, J. and D. F. READY, 1995 Rhodopsin plays an essential structural role in Drosophila photoreceptor development. Development 121:4359-4370[Abstract].
LAI, Z.-C. and G. M. RUBIN, 1992 Negative control of photoreceptor development in Drosophila by the product of the yan gene, an ETS domain protein. Cell 70:609-620[Medline].
LAI, Z.-C., S. D. HARRISON, F. KARIM, Y. LI, and G. M. RUBIN, 1996 Loss of tramtrack gene activity results in ectopic R7 cell formation, even in a sina mutant background. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:5025-5030
LAI, Z.-C., M. FETCHKO, and Y. LI, 1997 Repression of Drosophila photoreceptor cell fate through cooperative action of two transcriptional repressors Yan and Tramtrack. Genetics 147:1131-1137[Abstract].
LI, S., Y. LI, R. W. CARTHEW, and Z.-C. LAI, 1997 Photoreceptor cell differentiation requires regulated proteolysis of the transcriptional repressor tramtrack. Cell 90:469-478[Medline].
RAMAEKERS, G., K. USUI, A. USUI-ISHIHARA, A. RAMAEKERS, and V. LEDENT et al., 1997 Lineage and fate in Drosophila: role of the gene tramtrack in sense organ development. Dev. Genes Evol. 207:97-106.
READ, D. and J. L. MANLEY, 1992 Alternatively spliced transcripts of the Drosophila tramtrack gene encode zinc finger proteins with distinct DNA binding specificities. EMBO J. 11:1035-1044[Medline].
READ, D., M. LEVINE, and J. L. MANLEY, 1992 Ectopic expression of the Drosophila tramtrack gene results in multiple embryonic defects, including repression of even-skipped and fushi tarazu.. Mech. Dev. 38:183-196[Medline].
SALZBERG, A., D. D'EVELYN, K. L. SCHULZE, J.-K. LEE, and D. STRUMPF et al., 1994 Mutations affecting the pattern of the PNS in Drosophila reveal novel aspects of neuronal development. Neuron 13:269-287[Medline].
TANG, A. H., T. P. NEUFELD, E. KWAN, and G. M. RUBIN, 1997 PHYL acts to down-regulate TTK88, a transcriptional repressor of neuronal cell fates, by a SINA-dependent mechanism. Cell 90:459-467[Medline].
TREISMAN, J. E. and U. HEBERLEIN, 1998 Eye development in Drosophila: formation of the eye field and control of differentiation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 39:119-158[Medline].
TREISMAN, J. E., A. LUK, G. M. RUBIN, and U. HEBERLEIN, 1997 eyelid antagonizes wingless signaling during Drosophila development and has homology to the Bright family of DNA-binding proteins. Genes Dev. 11:1949-1962
WASSARMAN, D. A. and M. THERRIEN, 1997 Ras1-mediated photoreceptor development in Drosophila. Adv. Dev. Biochem. 5:1-41.
WOLFF, T., and D. F. READY, 1993 Pattern formation in the Drosophila retina, pp. 12771325 in The Development of Drosophila melanogaster, edited by M. BATE and A. MARTINEZ-ARIAS. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
XIONG, W.-C. and C. MONTELL, 1993 tramtrack is a transcriptional repressor required for cell fate determination in the Drosophila eye. Genes Dev. 7:1085-1096
XU, T. and G. M. RUBIN, 1993 Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development 117:1223-1237[Abstract].
YAMAMOTO, D., I. NIHONMATSU, T. MATSUO, H. MIYAMOTO, and S. KONDO et al., 1996 Genetic interactions of pokkuri with seven in absentia, tramtrack and downstream components of the sevenless pathway in R7 photoreceptor induction in Drosophila melanogaster.. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 205:215-224.
ZIPURSKY, S. L. and G. M. RUBIN, 1994 Determination of neuronal cell fate: lessons from the R7 neuron of Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17:373-397[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. Araujo, C. Cela, and M. Llimargas Tramtrack regulates different morphogenetic events during Drosophila tracheal development Development, October 15, 2007; 134(20): 3665 - 3676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-Y. Wang, M. Iordanov, and Q. Zhang c-Jun NH2-terminal Kinase Promotes Apoptosis by Down-regulating the Transcriptional Co-repressor CtBP J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2006; 281(46): 34810 - 34815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Audibert, F. Simon, and M. Gho Cell cycle diversity involves differential regulation of Cyclin E activity in the Drosophila bristle cell lineage Development, May 15, 2005; 132(10): 2287 - 2297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pagans, D. Pineyro, A. Kosoy, J. Bernues, and F. Azorin Repression by TTK69 of GAGA-mediated Activation Occurs in the Absence of TTK69 Binding to DNA and Solely Requires the Contribution of the POZ/BTB Domain of TTK69 J. Biol. Chem., March 12, 2004; 279(11): 9725 - 9732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yuasa, M. Okabe, S. Yoshikawa, K. Tabuchi, W.-C. Xiong, Y. Hiromi, and H. Okano Drosophila homeodomain protein REPO controls glial differentiation by cooperating with ETS and BTB transcription factors Development, June 1, 2003; 130(11): 2419 - 2428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Melnick, G. Carlile, K. F. Ahmad, C.-L. Kiang, C. Corcoran, V. Bardwell, G. G. Prive, and J. D. Licht Critical Residues within the BTB Domain of PLZF and Bcl-6 Modulate Interaction with Corepressors Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2002; 22(6): 1804 - 1818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mitchelmore, K. M. Kjarulff, H. C. Pedersen, J. V. Nielsen, T. E. Rasmussen, M. F. Fisker, B. Finsen, K. M. Pedersen, and N. A. Jensen Characterization of Two Novel Nuclear BTB/POZ Domain Zinc Finger Isoforms. ASSOCIATION WITH DIFFERENTIATION OF HIPPOCAMPAL NEURONS, CEREBELLAR GRANULE CELLS, AND MACROGLIA J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2002; 277(9): 7598 - 7609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Pi, H.-J. Wu, and C.-T. Chien A dual function of phyllopod in Drosophila external sensory organ development: cell fate specification of sensory organ precursor and its progeny Development, July 15, 2001; 128(14): 2699 - 2710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wen, D. Nguyen, Y. Li, and Z.-C. Lai The N-terminal BTB/POZ Domain and C-Terminal Sequences Are Essential for Tramtrack69 to Specify Cell Fate in the Developing Drosophila Eye Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 195 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Lai, Z.-C.
- Articles by Li, Y.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Lai, Z.-C.
- Articles by Li, Y.







