- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Foster, P. L.
- Articles by Rosche, W. A.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Foster, P. L.
- Articles by Rosche, W. A.
Increased Episomal Replication Accounts for the High Rate of Adaptive Mutation in recD Mutants of Escherichia coli
Patricia L. Fostera and William A. Roscheaa Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02118
Corresponding author: Patricia L. Foster, S107, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118-2394., pfoster{at}bu.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: R. MAURER
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Adaptive mutation has been studied extensively in FC40, a strain of Escherichia coli that cannot metabolize lactose (Lac-) because of a frameshift mutation affecting the lacZ gene on its episome. recD mutants of FC40, in which the exonuclease activity of RecBCD (ExoV) is abolished but its helicase activity is retained, have an increased rate of adaptive mutation. The results presented here show that, in several respects, adaptive mutation to Lac+ involves different mechanisms in recD mutant cells than in wild-type cells. About half of the apparent increase in the adaptive mutation rate of recD mutant cells is due to a RecA-dependent increase in episomal copy number and to growth of the Lac- cells on the lactose plates. The remaining increase appears to be due to continued replication of the episome, with the extra copies being degraded or passed to recD+ recipients. In addition, the increase in adaptive mutation rate in recD mutant cells is (i) dependent on activities of the single-stranded exonucleases, RecJ and ExoI, which are not required for (in fact, slightly inhibit) adaptive mutation in wild-type cells, and (ii) enhanced by RecG, which opposes adaptive mutation in wild-type cells.
MOST spontaneous mutations are assumed to be the result of random errors made by DNA polymerases during genomic replication. However, spontaneous mutations also arise in static populations exposed to nonlethal selection (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
FC40 is deleted for the lac-pro region on its chromosome but carries the lac-pro region on an F' episome. The Lac- allele,
(lacI33-lacZ), has a +1 bp frameshift affecting the lacZ gene. Mutation to Lac+ during lactose selection has the following characteristics:
- i. While deletions, duplications, and frameshifts revert the Lac- allele during growth, adaptive Lac+ mutations are mainly -1 bp frameshifts in runs of iterated bases (
FOSTER and TRIMARCHI 1994 ;
ROSENBERG et al. 1994 ).
- ii. Adaptive but not growth-dependent reversion to Lac+ requires recombination functions, specifically the RecABCD pathway for double-strand break (DSB) repair (
CAIRNS and FOSTER 1991 ;
FOSTER 1993 ;
HARRIS et al. 1994 ).
- iii. E. coli's two enzyme systems that catalyze the branch migration of recombination intermediates, RuvAB and RecG, both contribute to normal recombination (
WEST 1997 ), but RuvAB promotes and RecG opposes adaptive Lac+ mutation (
FOSTER et al. 1996 ;
HARRIS et al. 1996 ).
- iv. The high level of adaptive reversion to Lac+ in FC40 requires that the Lac- allele be on the episome; if the same allele is at its normal position on the chromosome, adaptive reversion to Lac+ occurs at about 1/100 the rate and is no longer recA-dependent (
FOSTER and TRIMARCHI 1995A ;
RADICELLA et al. 1995 ).
- v. Defects in conjugal functions cause a 10-fold reduction in adaptive mutation (
FOSTER and TRIMARCHI 1995A ;
GALITSKI and ROTH 1995 ), although in this case most of the remaining mutations are recA-dependent (
FOSTER and TRIMARCHI 1995A ). However, actual episome transfer is not required for adaptive mutation (
FOSTER and TRIMARCHI 1995A ,
FOSTER and TRIMARCHI 1995B ).
In two respects adaptive mutation in FC40 is similar to normal growth-dependent mutation: (i) Adaptive Lac+ mutations are produced by DNA polymerase III, E. coli's replicative polymerase (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Because of the involvement of the RecABCD pathway, models of adaptive mutation in FC40 have centered on DSB repair. Conjugal DNA replication is initiated by a nick at oriT, the conjugal origin, but this nick occurs even in the absence of a conjugal signal and persists in stationary-phase cells (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Other models for adaptive mutation in FC40 have postulated that conjugal DNA synthesis, which occurs by unidirectional strand-displacement replication of the episome, gives rise to the mutations (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
An alternative model is that during lactose selection the Lac- allele is amplified in tandem by RecA-dependent unequal recombination of an initial duplication (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
RecBCD, also known as exonuclease V (ExoV), is a multifunctional enzyme with helicase and nuclease activities (![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Bacterial strains:
The strains used are derivatives of FC36, a rifampicin-resistant (RifR) isolate of P90C [=F- ara
(lac-proB)X111 thi; ![]()
![]()
![]()
(lacI33-lacZ) proAB+ episome was then mated into the various backgrounds by selecting for proline prototrophy. Finally, if required, the episome-carrying strains were transformed with plasmid DNA. Standard techniques were used (![]()
![]()
|
recD mutant strains were confirmed by their ability to give large plaques when used as an indicator for red gam Chio
bacteriophage (![]()
![]()
Adaptive mutation experiments:
The media and protocols used for the large-scale adaptive mutation experiments were as previously described (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Incubation in lactose:
Aliquots (1 ml) containing about 4 x 108 cells from three independent cultures of FC40 and FC973 grown in M9-0.1% glycerol medium were each embedded in low-melt agarose microbeads (![]()
Amplification and episome transfer:
To determine if Lac+ phenotypes were the result of amplification of the Lac- allele, Lac+ colonies were gridded onto M9-lactose plates, replicated onto Luria-Bertani (LB) plates, grown overnight, replicated again onto LB plates, grown 6 hr, and then replicated onto lactose-MacConkey plates (on which medium Lac+ colonies are red). This procedure allows amplified Lac- alleles to deamplify, giving white patches on lactose-MacConkey plates (![]()
![]()
DNA manipulations:
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed with a CHEF-DR II PFGE system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Cells were embedded in agarose microbeads and the DNA was purified as described (![]()
![]()
For other procedures, genomic DNA was extracted with Isoquick kits (Orca Research Inc.) and plasmid DNA was extracted with Wizard kits (Promega, Madison, WI). Probes for Southern blots were generated from plasmids carrying
(lacI33-lacZ) or dnaQ+. The lac probe was either a 1320-bp EcoRV fragment (which hybridizes to one EcoRV band) or a 1482-bp fragment amplified using the primers 5' TGAATTACATTCCCAACCGCGT 3' and 5' CGCTCATCCGCCACATATCC 3' (which hybridizes to two EcoRV bands); the dnaQ probe was a 667-bp fragment amplified with the primers 5' AGTCTGACATAAATGACCGCT 3' and 5' ACGCGTAACTTACTTGCCTGA 3' (which hybridizes to one EcoRV band). The probes were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis, extracted with Qiaex beads (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA), and labeled with [
-32P]dCTP using the NEBlot kit (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). Southern transfers were by capillary action onto Zeta-Probe membranes (Bio-Rad), following the manufacturer's instructions for transfer and DNA hybridization. Autoradiographs of Southern hybridizations and photographs of ethidium bromine-stained agarose gels were digitalized and the bands were quantified using the Scion image program (Scion Corp., Frederick, MD).
ß-Galactosidase assays:
Assays were performed as described (![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
The rate of adaptive mutation to Lac+ of recD mutant cells increases with time:
During incubation in lactose medium, Lac+ revertants of the wild-type strain, FC40, accumulate at a fairly constant rate. This is true on agar plates [if contaminants in the agar are consumed by nonreverting Lac- scavenger cells (![]()
![]()
|
To determine if this increase was due to cell growth, plugs were taken from the lactose plates and the number of viable Lac- cells was determined. Figure 1B shows that, as previously reported (![]()
![]()
Most Lac+ revertants take about 2 days to make colonies (![]()
![]()
![]()
For Figure 1C, the number of Lac+ colonies appearing each day was divided by the number of Lac- cells on the plates two days earlier to give the mutation rate per 108 cells per day. As discussed above, this rate is fairly constant in wild-type cells. In contrast, after day 3, the mutation rate per cell per day increased linearly in the recD mutant. Although the error bars are wide (reflecting variation in both the numbers of Lac+ colonies and the numbers of Lac- cells), by day 6 the mutation rate to Lac+ of the recD mutant was nearly 30-fold greater than that of the wild-type strain.
The copy number of the episome is increased in recD mutant cells:
Many plasmids, including a derivative of F (miniF), amplify in recD mutants (![]()
![]()
![]()
The F episome is normally maintained at one to two copies per cell (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
(lacI33-lacZ) allele is on the chromosome, Lac- cells have about one Miller unit of ß-galactosidase (W. A. ROSCHE and P. L. FOSTER, unpublished results). Assuming the level of ß-galactosidase reflects the number of Lac- alleles, the results in Table 2 indicate that FC40 cells have two copies, which corresponds well to the estimated number of episomes per cell. In contrast, recD mutant cells have about eight copies of the Lac- allele. recG mutant cells have a 100-fold higher adaptive mutation rate than wild-type cells, but unlike recD mutants, Lac- recG mutant cells do not grow or show an increasing mutation rate to Lac+ during lactose selection (![]()
![]()
|
Most Lac+ revertants of FC40 produce about 200 Miller units of ß-galactosidase (![]()
We also quantified with Southern blots the number of copies of the lac allele in wild-type and recD mutant cells. A blot of several dilutions of total cellular DNA cut with the restriction endonuclease EcoRV (which cuts within the lac allele) was hybridized with probes to the episomal lac allele and to the chromosomal dnaQ gene. dnaQ was used to normalize for the amount of DNA because, after growth in minimal medium, most of these cells will contain only one chromosome (![]()
PFGE revealed that the copy number of the entire episome is higher in recD mutant cells than in wild-type cells (Figure 2). The episome present in these cells, F'128, carries two recognition sites for the SfiI restriction endonuclease, one in the Tra region (GenBank accession no. U01159) and one near the codBA operon (GenBank accession no. AE000140 U00096). From PFGE of a limited S1 nuclease digest (to linearize the episome) we determined that F'128 is about 200 kb in size (data not shown). A SfiI digest of total cellular DNA gave episomal fragments of approximately 70 and 130 kb (Figure 2), the larger of which carries the lac allele. Figure 2 shows that both these bands were more intense than monomer chromosomal fragments in wild-type cells, and even more intense in recD mutant cells. recG cells had an intermediate level of intensity, and recG recD double mutant cells were indistinguishable from recD mutant cells by this technique. In all backgrounds the intensities of the two episomal bands are the same, indicating that the increases in the copy number of the lac allele that we detected by the methods described above are due to increases in the numbers of episomes in the mutant backgrounds.
|
We quantified the intensity of ethidium bromide staining with a PFGE gel that better separated the middle-sized bands. The intensity of the 130-kb episomal band relative to the nearest larger chromosomal band was 2.0 for wild-type cells and 3.9 for recD mutant cells, again in reasonable agreement with the ß-galactosidase results.
The copy number of the episome increases further during lactose selection:
It is difficult to do biochemical or molecular analyses of Lac- cells during incubation in lactose because Lac+ revertants arise and take over the culture. However, we enriched for Lac- and Lac+ cells by first embedding Lac- cells in low-melt agarose microbeads, incubating them for 3 days in minimal lactose medium plus Xgal, and separating white and blue microbeads enriched for Lac- and Lac+ cells, respectively (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). The DNA was prepared for PFGE as usual, and after PFGE (Figure 3A), a Southern blot of the gel was hybridized to the lac and dnaQ probes (Figure 3B). The degree of hybridization was quantified (using a darker exposure than shown for lanes 3 and 4) and the ranges of four separate determinations of the comparative intensities of the lac and dnaQ bands are given in Table 3. These results indicate that during incubation in lactose the copy number of the lac allele relative to the chromosomal dnaQ gene does not detectably change in wild-type cells, but increases two- to threefold in recD mutant cells. As mentioned above, because of the intense background in the recD lanes this may be an underestimate. The two episomal bands did not differ in their intensity by ethidium bromide staining (Figure 3A); thus in recD mutant cells the copy number of the entire episome, not just the lac allele, increases during lactose selection.
|
|
During lactose selection, DNA segments containing the lac allele can be amplified in tandem in some cells, producing heterogeneously sized arrays (![]()
![]()
The copy number of the episome or of the Lac- allele does not increase to the extent that recD mutant cells become phenotypically Lac+. Amplified Lac- alleles giving a Lac+ phenotype are unstable when lactose selection is relieved (![]()
![]()
![]()
The results so far can be summarized as follows. recD mutant cells normally have two- to fourfold more copies of the episome than wild-type cells (Table 2 and Figure 2). When incubated in lactose, the copy number of the episome further increases, at least doubling by day 3 (Table 3 and Figure 3). The increase in ß-galactosidase from each or both of these factors allows Lac- recD mutant cells to grow slowly on lactose minimal medium, achieving a twofold increase in cell number by day 3 (Figure 1B). Thus, 3 days after plating the same number of cells on a lactose plate, the recD mutant population will have 816 more copies of the Lac- allele than will the wild-type population, accounting for much, but not all, of the apparent increase in the accumulation of Lac+ revertants (Figure 1A). And, these factors appear insufficient to account for the steady increase in mutation rate per cell with time (Figure 1C).
Genetic requirements for the increased rate of adaptive mutation of recD mutant cells:
To screen a large number of different gene functions for their effects on adaptive mutation, we routinely use a semiquantitative assay (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). In these experiments, no nonreverting scavenger cells are used, and wild-type Lac- cells produce a light lawn of background growth during the 5 days of the experiment. In contrast, recD mutants produce a lawn that is so heavy by day 5 that new Lac+ colonies can barely be seen (in which case the counts from day 5 are not included in the results). However, the semiquantitative test has two advantages over a large-scale test. First, the appearance of the lawn allows visible assessment of how different genetic backgrounds affect the ability of Lac- cells to grow on lactose, which, barring growth defects, may indicate their numbers of episomes. Second, unlike recD+ strains, if certain recD mutant derivatives are plated with scavengers, the genotype of the scavenger strain influences the apparent mutation rate to Lac+ (further discussed below). Because no scavengers are used in the semiquantitative test, this complication is avoided. The results presented below were obtained with this semiquantitative test.
Recombination functions:
Adaptive mutation to Lac+ in FC40 and in recD mutant cells is dependent on RecA and RecB (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Single-stranded DNA exonucleases:
Mutations in recD result in hyperrecombination of
-phage (in the absence of chi sites) and plasmids, but have only a modest effect on transductional and conjugational recombination of the chromosome (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Exonuclease I, encoded by the xonA gene (also known as sbcB), is a single-stranded exonuclease with 3' to 5' polarity. Loss of ExoI activity reduces conjugal recombination two- to threefold (![]()
xonA derivative of FC40 had a slightly enhanced adaptive mutation rate (Table 5) although, in contrast to recJ mutant cells, xonA mutant cells appear to acquire additional mutations that decrease their adaptive mutation rate. In recD mutant cells, however, loss of ExoI activity was similar to loss of RecJ activity, reducing adaptive mutation to below wild-type levels (Table 5).
Conjugal functions:
Mutations in genes required for F conjugation reduce the rate of adaptive mutation of FC40 about 10-fold (![]()
Genetic requirements for episome amplification in recD mutant cells:
Unless a genetic defect also confers a growth defect, the lawn produced on lactose plates by recD mutant derivatives probably reflects their episome copy number. By this visual assay, episome amplification in recD mutant cells is independent of ExoI, but dependent on RecA, RuvABC, RecJ (Table 4 and Table 5), and TraD (see above). Southern blots of EcoRV-digested DNA confirmed that the increased number of lac alleles in recD mutant cells was eliminated in recA and recJ derivatives and reduced by the traD mutant (ruv mutants were not tested). Figure 4 shows one such Southern blot of DNA from recJ and recD recJ strains. (The lac probe used hybridizes to two EcoRV fragments, each carrying a part of the lac allele.) The densities of the lac bands compared to the dnaQ bands confirms that RecJ does not affect the episomal copy number in wild-type cells, but episome amplification in recD mutant cells is dependent on RecJ.
|
recD mutant cells have an increased rate of mutation at another episomal gene during lactose selection:
When wild-type cells carry a revertible TetS allele on their episome, nonselected TetR mutants appear during lactose selection at about 70% of the rate at which Lac+ revertants appear (![]()
![]()
(lacI33-lacZ) episome were plated on minimal lactose plates (with scavengers) in triplicate. One set of five was overlaid with tetracycline plus glycerol and Xgal on day 0, one set of five was likewise overlaid on day 3, and one set of five was not overlaid. The mean number of Lac+ mutants per 108 cells plated (±SEM) was 0 on day 2 and 3037 ± 87 by day 5, in close agreement with the results obtained with recD1903 (Figure 1A). The mean number of TetR mutants per 108 cells plated (±SEM) was 6 ± 3 on day 0 and 2743 ± 232 on day 3. Thus, while recD mutant cells are accumulating Lac+ revertants at a high rate, they are also accumulating revertants of a nonselected gene on the episome at a nearly equivalent rate.
Transfer of episome DNA increases the apparent rate of adaptive mutation to Lac+ in recD mutant derivatives:
As mentioned above, the results presented in Table 4 and Table 5 were obtained in semiquantitative experiments without scavenger cells, in contrast to our typical large quantitative experiments. With most derivatives of FC40, the two assays give equivalent results (e.g. see ![]()
Although all the cells are male, a low level of episome transfer takes place during lactose selection, which can be detected by the appearance of Lac+ episomes in the scavenger population (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
These results could mean that recD and recD recG mutant cells are more likely to transfer their episomes, or that the recovery of Lac+ mutants is poor unless the Lac+ episome (or some form of it) is transferred into the scavenger. To help distinguish between these possibilities, we repeated the experiment but with preexisting Lac+ cells (described above) plated with scavengers on lactose plates. In this case, <3% (0/36) of the Lac+ colonies of the wild-type strain were RifS; 8% (3/36) of the Lac+ colonies of the recD mutant strain were RifS; and 97% (35/36) of the Lac+ colonies of the recD recG double mutant strain were RifS and one colony was mixed. Thus, it appears that a high rate of episome transfer is intrinsic to recD mutants, particularly when they are also defective in recG, which may indicate that the episome (or some form of it) is unstable in these mutant cells (see DISCUSSION).
Table 6 gives the result for a semiquantitative test in which about 107 cells of each revertible strain were spread on a quadrant of a lactose plate that had been prespread with 109 cells of nonrevertible strains with various genotypes. For both recD mutant and recD recG mutant revertible strains, the apparent adaptive mutation rate to Lac+ was reduced slightly if the scavengers were recG mutants. If the scavengers were recD recG double mutants, the adaptive mutation rate of the recD recG double mutant dropped to the level observed when no scavengers were used.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
The results presented here indicate that, in several respects, adaptive mutation to Lac+ involves different mechanisms in recD mutant cells than in wild-type cells. About half of the apparent increase in the adaptive mutation rate of recD mutant cells can be attributed to a RecA-dependent increase in episomal copy number and growth of the Lac- cells on the lactose plates. However, these factors appear insufficient to account for the continuing increase in mutation rate with time during lactose selection (Figure 1C). In addition, the increase in adaptive mutation rate in recD mutant cells is (i) dependent on activities of the single-stranded exonucleases, RecJ and ExoI, which are not required for (in fact, slightly inhibit) adaptive mutation in wild-type cells and (ii) enhanced by RecG activity, which opposes adaptive mutation in wild-type cells.
Loss of ExoV activity affects the replication and stability of certain nonconjugal plasmids (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-form) replication is initiated, resulting in the accumulation of linear multimers of the plasmid. If the plasmid has a site-specific recombination activity, linears are resolved into covalently closed circular (CCC) forms. Plasmid amplification is inhibited by exonucleases I and III in recBC mutants, but occurs in the presence of these exonucleases in recD mutants.
With a few modifications, a similar model can explain many of the results presented here. Normal
-form DNA replication of F is initiated at the vegetative origins (oriS and oriV), whereas
-form DNA synthesis is initiated by a TraI-catalyzed nick at the conjugal origin, oriT (![]()
![]()
![]()
In recD mutant cells, the nick at oriT would frequently initiate the same sequence of events postulated for nonconjugal plasmids. The helicase activity of RecBC(D-) on the collapsed arm of the replication fork would produce a long 3' single-stranded end that could invade a different episome molecule and initiate rolling-circle replication. However, the consequences of this replication appear to be different from that observed with nonconjugal plasmids. We did not detect linears by PFGE of undigested DNA. After the episome was linearized with limited S1 nuclease digestion, there was no detectable difference between wild-type and recD mutants in the amount of episome multimers (although we would not have resolved multimers greater than 3x). And, in contrast to other plasmids, which seem to amplify out of control in recD mutants, the steady-state copy number of the episome did not appear to increase beyond about eight in recD mutant cells (Table 2 and Table 3). These differences can be explained by characteristics specific to the F episome.
Two mechanisms would tend to produce monomers from rolling-circle replication of the episome. First, F has a site-specific recombination system at oriV (![]()
![]()
![]()
Like other low-copy plasmids, the copy number of F is controlled by interactions between a required replication protein (Rep) and structural components of the vegetative origin (iterons; ![]()
-form replication initiated from a copy-controlled vegetative origin. However, the increase with time in the adaptive mutation rate in recD mutants (Figure 1C) implies that, despite the limits on the steady-state copy number, episomal replication continues at an ever increasing rate during lactose selection. If that is so, the additional copies must be removed from the cells.
Extra episome copies could be removed from recD mutant cells by degradation by nucleases other than ExoV. As can be seen in Figure 3 and Figure 4, DNA extracted from recD mutant cells contains a large amount of degraded DNA (to which both the lac and dnaQ probes hybridize, either specifically or nonspecifically). Similar degradation has been seen by others (![]()
![]()
-form replication would provide a ready substrate for single-strand exonucleases. In addition, after second-strand DNA synthesis, the helicase activity of RecBCD- or other helicases on linear duplex DNA would produce substrates for single-strand exonucleases. RecJ and ExoI have been shown to be active in such circumstances (![]()
Extra episomal copies could also be removed by conjugation, which would not only allow the maintenance of a steady state number per cell, but would also allow for their ever-increasing rate of replication. Invasion of a second episome by a 3' end close to oriT is similar to the initiation of conjugal replication. Our results, and those of others (![]()
-form replication. Because scavenger cells are in excess, this process could continue and accelerate during the course of a typical experiment. If the displaced strand carries a Lac+ mutation (produced during a previous round of replication), the recipient would become Lac+. The genotype of the scavenger cells would then determine the rate of appearance of Lac+ revertants, e.g., when the scavenger cells are recD recG mutants they have more copies of their own episome and would be less likely to serve as recipients, or less likely to retain the transferred episome, and fewer Lac+ revertants would appear (Table 6).
The recD mutant cells may be heterogeneous in their number of episomes, so in the absence of scavengers episome transfer could still occur to neighbors with fewer episomes. Note, we typically observed in semiquantitative tests that the mutation rate to Lac+ appeared to decline in the last two days of the experiments, when fewer recipients may be available.
Although it is appealing to assume that rolling-circle replication accounts for the high rate of Lac+ mutation in recD mutant cells, the genetic requirements indicate that the situation is more complex. In particular, as in wild-type cells, adaptive mutation to Lac+ in recD mutant cells is dependent on RuvABC, enzymes that catalyze the branch migration and resolution of four-stranded recombination intermediates (Holliday junctions; Table 4). If Lac+ mutations were being produced by rolling-circle replication, site-specific recombination and the activity of TraI should insure the stable retention of at least some of the Lac+ episomes without the need for homologous recombination. In addition, in contrast to wild-type cells, adaptive mutation to Lac+ in recD mutant cells requires RecG, but only in the absence of recipient scavengers. These requirements can be accommodated by the following model, illustrated in Figure 5, which is based on ![]()
|
As discussed above, after replication-fork collapse in wild-type cells, RecBCD's nuclease and helicase activities produce an unpaired 3' end that can invade the homologous duplex region of the same episome distal to the lac region. But, in recD mutant cells, RecBCD- helicase activity (Figure 5B) plus RecJ's 5' to 3' exonuclease activity (Figure 5C) produce a long unpaired 3' end that is homologous to the proximal region between oriT and lac (Figure 5D). This 3' end can invade another episome, forming a D-loop (Figure 5D). D-loops are recognized by RecG and by PriA, an essential primosome component. Both of these proteins have helicase activities, but they have antagonistic roles in recombination (![]()
![]()
![]()
In this model, Lac+ mutations would be produced as the new lagging-strand synthesis traverses lac. Indeed, DNA synthesis initiated by PriA in vitro can proceed in the absence of the proofreading subunit of DNA polymerase III (![]()
![]()
In recD recG mutants, PriA's helicase activity is unimpeded by RecG, so the 3' invasion would initiate rolling-circle replication. This replication would also produce mutations, but, for the reasons given above, the amount of new synthesis is limited by the episome's copy-number control system. However, in the presence of wild-type scavengers, the recD recG cells could overcome mating inhibition and pass extra episomal copies to the cells that surround them. Given repeated rounds of rolling-circle replication, these passed episomes eventually would have Lac+ mutations. That 40% of the Lac+ mutants of recD- recG+ cells were also in the scavengers suggests that this type of replication may frequently occur even in the presence of RecG.
As mentioned above, the roles of ExoI and RecJ in this process may be to degrade extra episomal copies, allowing more replication to proceed. However, unlike ExoI, RecJ is required both for amplification and for mutation (Table 5; Figure 4). This implies that RecJ is required at an early stage, e.g., to resect the 5' end after RecBCD- helicase activity (Figure 5C). ExoI could also have a more direct role in mutation by occasionally resecting the 3' end past the lac region, which would essentially recreate the situation pertaining in wild-type cells (see ![]()
The model in Figure 5 predicts that PriA is essential for adaptive mutation in recD mutants. Although not included in previous models, PriA is presumably also required in wild-type cells to initiate lagging-strand synthesis during recombination. A priA null derivative of FC40 (obtained from T. KOGOMA) was, as predicted, defective for adaptive mutation (P. L. FOSTER, unpublished results). However, priA mutants are defective for all forms of recombination, are SOS induced, and are enfeebled for growth (![]()
![]()
![]()
As mentioned in the Introduction, tandem amplification of the lac allele is an alternative to recombination-initiated replication as the source of the DNA synthesis that gives rise to adaptive Lac+ mutations (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In summary, the results presented here indicate that, as proposed for other plasmids, RecD plays an important role in controlling replication of the F episome and maintaining its proper copy number. RecD most likely does this by insuring that DSBs are repaired by intramolecular, not intermolecular, recombination. RecD mutant cells differ from wild-type cells not only in their high rate of adaptive mutation, but also in that their adaptive mutation rate continuously increases with time. Our results indicate that this increase is due to growth of the cells, episome amplification, and continued episome replication.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Recent results indicate that during recombination RecJ and ExoI act postsynaptically, probably by degrading the strands displaced during branch migration (![]()
![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank J. H. Miller and the people listed in Table 1 for bacteriophage and bacterial strains and J. Cairns, J. W. Drake, A. Kuzminov, R. G. Lloyd, and F. W. Stahl for useful discussions. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for improvements to this article. This work was supported by National Science Foundation grant no. MCB97838315.
Manuscript received November 13, 1998; Accepted for publication February 8, 1999.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AKERLUND, T., K. NORDSTROM, and R. BERNANDER, 1995 Analysis of cell size and DNA content in exponentially growing and stationary-phase batch cultures of Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 177:6791-6797
AL-DIEB, A. A., A. A. MAHDI, and R. G. LLOYD, 1996 Modulation of recombination and DNA repair by the RecG and PriA helicases of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 178:6782-6789
ANDERSSON, D. I., E. S. SLECHTA, and J. R. ROTH, 1998 Evidence that gene amplification underlies adaptive mutability of the bacterial lac operon. Science 282:1133-1135
ASAI, T., D. B. BATES, and T. KOGOMA, 1994 DNA replication triggered by double-stranded breaks in E. coli: dependence on homologous recombination functions. Cell 78:1051-1061[Medline].
AUSUBEL, F. M., R. BRENT, R. E. KINGSTON, D. D. MOORE, J. G. SEIDMAN et al. (Editors), 1988 Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
BARTON, B. M., G. P. HARDING, and A. J. ZUCCARELLI, 1995 A general method for detecting and sizing large plasmids. Anal. Biochem. 226:235-240[Medline].
BASSETT, C. L. and S. R. KUSHNER, 1984 Exonucleases I, III, and V are required for stability of ColE1-related plasmids in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 157:661-664
BIEK, D. P. and S. N. COHEN, 1986 Identification and characterization of recD, a gene affecting plasmid maintenance and recombination in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 167:594-603
BRIDGES, B. A., 1998 The role of DNA damage in stationary phase ('adaptive') mutation. Mutat. Res. 408:1-9[Medline].
BULMER, M. G., 1979 Principles of Statistics. Dover Publications, New York.
CAIRNS, J. and P. L. FOSTER, 1991 Adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli.. Genetics 128:695-701[Abstract].
CAIRNS, J., J. OVERBAUGH, and S. MILLER, 1988 The origin of mutants. Nature 335:142-145[Medline].
CHAUDHURY, A. M. and G. R. SMITH, 1984 A new class of Escherichia coli recBC mutants: implications for the role of RecBC enzyme in homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:7850-7854
COHEN, A. and A. J. CLARK, 1986 Synthesis of linear plasmid multimers in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 167:327-335
COOPER, S. and J. D. KEASLING, 1998 Cycle-specific replication of chromosomal and F-plasmid origins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 163:217-222[Medline].
COULONDRE, C. and J. H. MILLER, 1977 Genetic studies of the lac repressor. III. Additional correlation of mutational sites with specific amino acid residues. J. Mol. Biol. 117:525-575[Medline].
FIRTH, N., K. IPPEN-IHLER and R. A. SKURRAY, 1996 Structure and function of the F factor and mechanism of conjugation, pp. 23772412 in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, edited by F. C. NEIDHARDT, R. CURTISS, III, J. L. INGRAHAM, E. C. C. LIN, K. B. LOW et al. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
FOSTER, P. L., 1993 Adaptive mutation: the uses of adversity. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47:467-504[Medline].
FOSTER, P. L., 1994 Population dynamics of a Lac- strain of Escherichia coli during selection for lactose utilization. Genetics 138:253-261[Abstract].
FOSTER, P. L., 1997 Nonadaptive mutations occur on the F' episome during adaptive mutation conditions in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 179:1550-1554
FOSTER, P. L., 1998 Adaptive mutation: has the unicorn landed? Genetics 148:1453-1459
FOSTER, P. L., 1999 Are adaptive mutations due to a decline in mismatch repair? The evidence is lacking. Rev. Mutat. Res. in Press.
FOSTER, P. L. and J. CAIRNS, 1992 Mechanisms of directed mutation. Genetics 131:783-789[Abstract].
FOSTER, P. L. and J. M. TRIMARCHI, 1994 Adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli by simple base deletions in homopolymeric runs. Science 265:407-409
FOSTER, P. L. and J. M. TRIMARCHI, 1995a Adaptive reversion of an episomal frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli requires conjugal functions but not actual conjugation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5487-5490
FOSTER, P. L. and J. M. TRIMARCHI, 1995b Conjugation is not required for adaptive reversion of an episomal frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 177:6670-6671
FOSTER, P. L., G. GUDMUNDSSON, J. M. TRIMARCHI, H. CAI, and M. F. GOODMAN, 1995 Proofreading-defective DNA polymerase II increases adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:7951-7955
FOSTER, P. L., J. M. TRIMARCHI, and R. A. MAURER, 1996 Two enzymes, both of which process recombination intermediates, have opposite effects on adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.. Genetics 142:25-37[Abstract].
FRAME, R. and J. O. BISHOP, 1971 The number of sex-factors per chromosome in Escherichia coli.. Biochem. J. 121:93-103[Medline].
FRIEDMAN-OHANA, R. and A. COHEN, 1998 Heteroduplex joint formation in Escherichia coli recombination is initiated by pairing of a 3'-ending strand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:6909-6914
FROST, L. S. and J. MANCHAK, 1998 F-phenocopies: characterization of expression of the F transfer region in stationary phase. Microbiology 144:2579-2587
GALITSKI, T. and J. R. ROTH, 1995 Evidence that F plasmid transfer replication underlies apparent adaptive mutation. Science 268:421-423
GORDON, G. S., D. SITNIKOV, C. D. WEBB, A. TELEMAN, and A. STRAIGHT et al., 1997 Chromosome and low copy plasmid segregation in E. coli: visual evidence for distinct mechanisms. Cell 90:1113-1121[Medline].
HARRIS, R. S., S. LONGERICH, and S. M. ROSENBERG, 1994 Recombination in adaptive mutation. Science 264:258-260
HARRIS, R. S., K. J. ROSS, and S. M. ROSENBERG, 1996 Opposing roles of the Holliday junction processing systems of Escherichia coli in recombination-dependent adaptive mutation. Genetics 142:681-691[Abstract].
HARRIS, R. S., H. J. BULL, and S. M. ROSENBERG, 1997a A direct role for DNA polymerase III in adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli.. Mutat. Res. 375:19-25[Medline].
HARRIS, R. S., G. FENG, K. J. ROSS, R. SIDHU, and C. THULIN et al., 1997b Mismatch repair protein MutL becomes limiting during stationary-phase mutation. Genes Dev. 11:2426-2437
HELINSKI, E. R., A. E. TOUKDARIAN and R. P. NOVICK, 1996 Replication control and other stable maintenance mechanisms of plasmids, pp. 22952324 in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, edited by F. C. NEIDHARDT, R. CURTISS, III, J. L. INGRAHAM, E. C. C. LIN, K. B. LOW et al. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
KOGOMA, T., G. W. CADWELL, K. G. BARNARD, and T. ASAI, 1996 The DNA replication priming protein, PriA, is required for homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. J. Bacteriol. 178:1258-1264
KOOB, M. and W. SZYBALSKI, 1992 Preparing and using agarose microbeads. Methods Enzymol. 216:13-20[Medline].
KOWALCZYKOWSKI, S. D., D. A. DIXON, A. K. EGGLESTON, S. C. LAUDER, and W. M. REHRAUER, 1994 Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli.. Microbiol. Rev. 58:401-465
KUZMINOV, A., 1995a Collapse and repair of replication forks in Escherichia coli.. Mol. Microbiol. 16:373-384[Medline].
KUZMINOV, A., 1995b Instability of inhibited replication forks in E. coli.. Bioessays 17:733-741[Medline].
LANKA, E. and B. M. WILKINS, 1995 DNA processing reactions in bacterial conjugation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64:141-169[Medline].
LLOYD, R. G., M. C. PORTON, and C. BUCKMAN, 1988 Effect of recF, recJ, recN, recO and ruv mutations on ultraviolet survival and genetic recombination in a recD strain of Escherichia coli K12. Mol. Gen. Genet. 212:317-324[Medline].
LOVETT, S. T. and A. J. CLARK, 1984 Genetic analysis of the recJ gene of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 157:190-196
LOVETT, S. T. and A. J. CLARK, 1985 Cloning of the Escherichia coli recJ chromosomal region and identification of its encoded proteins. J. Bacteriol. 162:280-285
LOVETT, S. T. and R. D. KOLODNER, 1989 Identification and purification of a single-stranded-DNA-specific exonuclease encoded by the recJ gene of Escherichia coli.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 36:2627-2631.
LOVETT, S. T. and V. A. SUTERA, JR., 1995 Suppression of RecJ exonuclease mutants of Escherichia coli by alterations in DNA helicases II (uvrD) and IV (helD). Genetics 140:27-45[Abstract].
LOVETT, S. T., C. LUISI-DELUCA, and R. D. KOLODNER, 1988 The genetic dependence of recombination in recD mutants of Escherichia coli.. Genetics 120:37-45
MANDAL, T. N., A. A. MAHDI, G. J. SHARPLES, and R. G. LLOYD, 1993 Resolution of Holliday intermediates in recombination and DNA repair: indirect suppression of ruvA, ruvB, and ruvC mutations. J. Bacteriol. 175:4325-4332
MARIANS, K. J., H. HIASA, D. R. KIM, and C. S. MCHENRY, 1998 Role of the core DNA polymerase III subunits at the replication fork:
is the only subunit required for processive replication. J. Biol. Chem. 273:2452-2457
MCGLYNN, P., A. A. AL-DIEB, J. LIU, K. J. MARIANS, and R. G. LLOYD, 1997 The DNA replication protein PriA and the recombination protein RecG bind D-loops. J. Mol. Biol. 270:212-221[Medline].
MICHEL, B., S. D. EHRLICH, and M. UZEST, 1997 DNA double-strand breaks caused by replication arrest. EMBO J. 16:430-438[Medline].
MILLER, J. H., 1972 Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
MODRICH, P. and R. LAHUE, 1996 Mismatch repair in replication fidelity, genetic recombination, and cancer biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65:101-133[Medline].
MOUNT, D. W., 1977 A mutant of Escherichia coli showing constitutive expression of the lysogenic induction and error-prone DNA repair pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:300-304
MOVVA, N. R., E. KATZ, P. L. ASDOURIAN, Y. HIROTA, and M. INOUYE, 1978 Gene dosage effects of the structural gene for a lipoprotein of the Escherichia coli outer membrane. J. Bacteriol. 133:81-84
NIKI, H., T. OGURA, and S. HIRAGA, 1990 Linear multimer formation of plasmid DNA in Escherichia coli hopE (recD) mutants. Mol. Gen. Genet. 224:1-9[Medline].
NURSE, P., K. H. ZAVITZ, and K. J. MARIANS, 1991 Inactivation of the Escherichia coli PriA DNA replication protein induces the SOS response. J. Bacteriol. 173:6686-6693
PETERS, J. E., I. M. BARTOSZYK, S. DHEER, and S. A. BENSON, 1996 Redundant homosexual F transfer facilitates selection-induced reversion of plasmid mutations. J. Bacteriol. 178:3037-3043
RADICELLA, J. P., P. U. PARK, and M. S. FOX, 1995 Adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli: a role for conjugation. Science 268:418-420
RAZAVY, H., S. K. SZIGETY, and S. M. ROSENBERG, 1996 Evidence for both 3' and 5' single-strand DNA ends in intermediates in chi-stimulated recombination in vivo.. Genetics 142:333-339[Abstract].
RINKEN, R., B. THOMS, and W. WACKERNAGEL, 1992 Evidence that recBC-dependent degradation of duplex DNA in Escherichia coli recD mutants involves DNA unwinding. J. Bacteriol. 174:5424-5429
ROSENBERG, S. M., S. LONGERICH, P. GEE, and R. S. HARRIS, 1994 Adaptive mutation by deletions in small mononucleotide repeats. Science 265:405-407
ROTH, J. R., N. BENSON, T. GALITSKI, K. HAACK, J. G. LAWRENCE et al., 1996 Rearrangements of the bacterial chromosome: formation and applications, pp. 22562276 in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, edited by F. C. NEIDHARDT, R. CURTISS, III, J. L. INGRAHAM, E. C. C. LIN, K. B. LOW et al. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
SANDLER, S. J., H. S. SAMRA, and A. J. CLARK, 1996 Differential suppression of priA2::kan phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12 by mutations in priA, lexA, and dnaC.. Genetics 143:5-13[Abstract].
SEELKE, R., B. KLINE, R. ALEFF, R. D. PORTER, and M. S. SHIELDS, 1987 Mutations in the recD gene of Escherichia coli that raise the copy number of certain plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 169:4841-4844
SEIGNEUR, M., V. BIDNENKO, S. D. EHRLICH, and B. MICHEL, 1998 RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks. Cell 95:419-430[Medline].
SHURVINTON, C. E., R. G. LLOYD, F. E. BENSON, and P. V. ATTFIELD, 1984 Genetic analysis and molecular cloning of the Escherichia coli ruv gene. Mol. Gen. Genet. 194:322-329[Medline].
STETSON, H. and R. L. SOMERVILLE, 1971 Expression of the tryptophan operon in merodiploids of Escherichia coli. I. Gene dosage, gene position and marker effects. Mol. Gen. Genet 111:342-351[Medline].
TLSTY, D. T., A. M. ALBERTINI, and J. H. MILLER, 1984 Gene amplification in the lac region of E. coli.. Cell 37:217-224[Medline].
TORKELSON, J., R. S. HARRIS, M.-J. LOMBARDO, J. NAGENDRAN, and C. THULIN et al., 1997 Genome-wide hypermutation in a subpopulation of stationary-phase cells underlies recombination-dependent adaptive mutation. EMBO J. 16:3303-3311[Medline].
VISWANATHAN, M. and S. T. LOVETT, 1998 Single-strand DNA-specific exonucleases in Escherichia coli: roles in repair and mutation avoidance. Genetics 149:7-16
WEST, S. C., 1997 Processing of recombination intermediates by the RuvABC proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 31:213-244[Medline].
WILLETTS, N., and R. SKURRAY, 1987 Structure and function of the F factor and mechanism of conjugation, pp. 11101133 in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, edited by F. C. NEIDHARDT, J. L. INGRAHAM, K. B. LOW, B. MAGASANIK, M. SCHAECHTER et al. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
ZAR, J. H., 1984 Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Stumpf, A. R. Poteete, and P. L. Foster Amplification of lac Cannot Account for Adaptive Mutation to Lac+ in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2007; 189(6): 2291 - 2299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Foster Adaptive Mutation in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2004; 186(15): 4846 - 4852. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Foster Rebuttal: Growth under Selection Stimulates Lac+ Reversion (Roth and Andersson) J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2004; 186(15): 4861 - 4861. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Budzik, W. A. Rosche, A. Rietsch, and G. A. O'Toole Isolation and Characterization of a Generalized Transducing Phage for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains PAO1 and PA14 J. Bacteriol., May 15, 2004; 186(10): 3270 - 3273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rodriguez, J. Tompkin, J. Hazel, and P. L. Foster Induction of a DNA Nickase in the Presence of Its Target Site Stimulates Adaptive Mutation in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol., October 15, 2002; 184(20): 5599 - 5608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Slechta, J. Liu, D. I. Andersson, and J. R. Roth Evidence That Selected Amplification of a Bacterial lac Frameshift Allele Stimulates Lac+ Reversion (Adaptive Mutation) With or Without General Hypermutability Genetics, July 1, 2002; 161(3): 945 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhao, H.-C. E. Leung, and M. E. Winkler The miaA Mutator Phenotype of Escherichia coli K-12 Requires Recombination Functions J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2001; 183(5): 1796 - 1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Bull, G. J. McKenzie, P. J. Hastings, and S. M. Rosenberg Evidence That Stationary-Phase Hypermutation in the Escherichia coli Chromosome Is Promoted by Recombination Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1427 - 1437. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ren, A. A. M. A. Mamun, and M. Z. Humayun Requirement for Homologous Recombination Functions for Expression of the mutA Mistranslator tRNA-Induced Mutator Phenotype in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2000; 182(5): 1427 - 1431. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P.L. FOSTER Adaptive Mutation in Escherichia coli Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2000; 65(0): 21 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Foster, P. L.
- Articles by Rosche, W. A.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Foster, P. L.
- Articles by Rosche, W. A.







