| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Corresponding author: Allan Bradley, Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030., abradley{at}bcm.tmc.edu (E-mail).
Communicating editor: N. A. JENKINS
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Chromosome engineering in mice enables the construction of models of human chromosomal diseases and provides key reagents for genetic studies. To begin to define functional information for a small portion of chromosome 11, deficiencies, duplications, and inversions were constructed in embryonic stem cells with sizes ranging from 1 Mb to 22 cM. Two deficiencies and three duplications were established in the mouse germline. Mice with a 1-Mb duplication developed corneal hyperplasia and thymic tumors, while two different 3- to 4-cM deficiencies were embryonically lethal in heterozygous mice. A duplication corresponding to one of these two deficiencies was able to rescue its haplolethality.
ONE of the most common causes of human developmental disorders and fetal loss are chromosomal abnormalities such as inversions, duplications, deficiencies, translocations, and nondisjunction. Chromosomal changes that result in gene dosage differences (deletions, duplications, and nondisjunction) can be particularly severe. Chromosomal aberrations that cause minor perturbations in an embryonic cell's capacity to fulfill a developmental program may initially result in subtle developmental defects; however, these can be rapidly amplified by the developmental hierarchy, ultimately resulting in major developmental abnormalities. Consequently, many chromosomal alterations are incompatible with full-term fetal development. Some rearrangements are tolerated, however, and individuals may be born with a variety of clinical symptoms. For example, duplication of regions of chromosomes 21 and 17 cause Down syndrome (![]()
![]()
![]()
Alterations in chromosomes also occur spontaneously in somatic cells during the life of the organism, and these alterations are usually less of a problem to the organism. In many cases, somatic cells that suffer chromosomal damage that is deleterious to a cell may simply cause that cell to be lost from the organism and be replaced by cells from the same lineage with intact genomes. The genome of a differentiated somatic cell is not challenged with the rigor of executing an appropriate developmental program; therefore, somatic cells can usually tolerate genetic changes that would be very deleterious to an embryonic cell. Occasionally, however, an alteration may occur that allows a cell to obtain a specific growth advantage and to escape the normal mechanisms that might otherwise result in cell death. Such a cell may continue to proliferate and become neoplastic. Chromosomal alterations that cause ectopic expression of oncogenes (![]()
![]()
![]()
Some chromosomal rearrangements, such as a simple translocation or an inversion, may affect just a few genes. For example, the inversions that disrupt the X-linked factor VIII gene cause severe hemophilia A (![]()
Chromosomal rearrangements have been used extensively as an experimental tool in model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosomes with inversions (Inv; ![]()
![]()
![]()
The similarity between humans and mice in many salient aspects of mammalian anatomy and physiology, coupled with the close genome homology between these two species, makes mice an excellent model for illustrating the function of human genes. In many chromosome domains, the gene order is conserved between the two species (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In the chromosome deficiencies induced by irradiation in mice, the induced breakpoints occur more or less randomly throughout the genome. Thus, the characterization of the size of a deficiency and identifying simple deficiencies from those that are associated with other rearrangements, such as translocations and inversions, can be labor intensive. Duplications can also be induced by X rays, although these are relatively rare events. This may be because this rearrangement is quite difficult to detect cytogenetically (especially when small), and also because the phenotypes of mice harboring DNA duplications can be subtle. Germline mutations are detected in X-irradiated mice at the rate of 1.53 x 10-4 per locus (![]()
![]()
Many germline modifications of single genes have been constructed by manipulating the genome in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To begin to derive some functional information for this portion of the genome, a series of deficiencies, duplications, and inversions were generated and transmitted into the mouse germline, and the resulting phenotypes were examined. It was found that duplications of a 1.0-Mb region caused corneal hyperplasia and thymic tumors. Deficiencies of the two adjacent 6- to 8-Mb regions around the Hsd17b1 (E2DH) locus caused early embryonic lethality in the heterozygous state, while the corresponding duplication of one region did not cause a detectable phenotype but was able to rescue the haplolethality of its deficiency counterpart.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Genomic clones for gene targeting:
Genomic clones for all the genetic loci in this study were isolated from a mouse 129/SvEv genomic library in lambda FIXII (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The hybridizations were routinely performed in 6x SSC, 0.1% nonfat dry milk at 65° overnight. Washes were usually performed in 1.0x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° for 20 min, and in 0.1x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° for 10 min, except for the human Hsd17b1 probe, which was performed in 1.0x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° for 20 min.
Targeting the Hprt
3' cassette to the Hsd17b1 locus:
The coding region of the mouse Hsd17b1 gene (5.5 kb) was replaced by the Hprt
3' cassette, which also contains the Neo gene and the 5' half of truncated Hprt minigene (see Figure 2A), in both orientations (A or B). The 5' diagnostic probe (PL16) hybridizes to a 15-kb EcoRI fragment from the wild-type allele. The fragments from the targeted alleles are 10.4 kb for A and 9.2 kb for B (Figure 1A). The targeted clones were confirmed with a 3' diagnostic probe (PL17). Two targeted ES cell clones, A2.2L2E11 (orientation A, EA) and B2.2LB8 (orientation B, EB), were expanded, and their totipotency was tested by generating and breeding chimeras. Both cell lines produced germline-transmitting chimeras at a high frequency. They were used for further targeting as described below.
|
|
Targeting the Hprt
5' cassette to the Gas locus:
The 3.5-kb sequence containing the entire mouse Gas-coding sequence was replaced by the Hprt
5' cassette, which contains puromycin-resistance gene (Puro) and the 3' half of the truncated Hprt minigene (Figure 2A), in both orientations (GA or GB). The two targeting vectors were separately transfected into the EA and EB cell lines. Targeted clones were detected using the 5' diagnostic probe (PG14), which detects a 12.5-kb PstI wild-type fragment or a 10.2-kb (GA orientation) or a 8.5-kb PstI (GB orientation) fragment from the targeted alleles (Figure 1B). The targeted clones were further confirmed using the 3' diagnostic probe (PG20).
Introducing the Hprt
5' cassette to the Wnt3 locus:
Two replacement vectors (PW13 and PW14) that contain the Hprt
5' cassette in both orientations replacing a 2.1-kb fragment (exon 3 and most of exon 4) of the Wnt3 locus were built. This deletion will presumably create a null allele for the mouse Wnt3 gene. The two targeting vectors were transfected into the EB cell line. DNA from the transfectants was digested with EcoRI and probed with a 0.75-kb fragment of PW15. The 20-kb wild-type fragment is altered to 8.5 or 10.8 kb in the PW13 and PW14 mutant alleles, respectively (Figure 1C).
Targeting the Hprt
5' cassette to the D11Mit199 and D11Mit69 loci:
D11Mit199 and D11Mit69 are anonymous microsatellite loci on mouse chromosome 11. The D11Mit199 locus is ~2 cM from the Hsd17b1 locus and 1 cM from the Wnt3. The D11Mit69 locus maps very close to the telomere of chromosome 11, ~22 cM from the Hsd17b1 locus. An arrayed mouse 129/SvEv genomic phage library was screened by PCR using primers specific for the D11Mit199 locus (5'ATC GTC AAT AGG TGG CCA AG3'; 5'AGG AAA GGA TTC GGT ATC ATA GG 3') and the D11Mit69 locus (5'AGT TGC TGC AAT ATG GAC CC 3'; 5'ATC TCA GTG CTG TTC TAA CAC TGC3'). The genomic inserts of the positive phages were subcloned and used to construct the targeting vectors. In both cases, insertion vectors were constructed. An 8.0-kb NotI/XhoI fragment from the D11Mit199 phage was used as the homology region for the two targeting vectors (m199
and m199ß). These vectors were linearized with SfiI (Figure 1D). Two insertion vectors were constructed from a 5.0-kb genomic fragment from the D11Mit69 phage. NheI was used to linearize the vectors (m69
and m69ß); one homology arm is 2.0 kb, and the other is 3.0 kb (Figure 1E).
ES cell culture and generation of chimeras:
AB2.2 ES cells were used for gene targeting in this study. This cell line was derived from Hprt-deficient 129/SvEv mice (![]()
![]()
![]()
Chimeras were generated by injecting ES cells into 3.5-day blastocysts from C57BL/6-cBrd/cBrd (a spontaneous albino mutant coisogenic C57BL/6 strain) females mated with C57BL/6-cBrd/cBrd males. The blastocysts were transplanted to the uterine horns of day-2.5 pseudopregnant foster mothers produced by mating F1 (C57BL/6 x CBA) females with the vasectomized F1 males (![]()
Southern analysis of genomic DNA:
Genomic DNA was digested with restriction enzymes, run on a 0.7% agarose gel in 1.0x TAE buffer, and blotted onto a nylon membrane filter in 0.4 N NaOH overnight. The blot was neutralized in 2.0x SSC, 0.2 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and baked at 80° for 30 min. The hybridization was performed in 1.5x SSC, 1.0% SDS, 0.5% fat-free milk, and 200 µg/ml denatured salmon testis DNA overnight at 65°. Washing was usually conducted in 1.0x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° for 20 min, and in 0.1x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° for 10 min. Probes were labeled with [
-32P]dCTP using the QuickPrime kit from Pharmacia (Piscataway, NJ). For probes that contain repetitive sequences, preassociation of these probes with mouse genomic DNA was performed. In brief, purified labeled probes (25 ng in 100 µl) were mixed with 2050 µg (50 µl) mouse genomic DNA and 100 µl hybridization solution. This probe mixture was heated at 100° for 5 min and then kept at 65° for 12 hr before it was added to a hybridization cylinder. Southern blots from such a hybridization were washed in regular stringency or washed at a higher temperature such as at 70°.
Fluorescent in situ hybridization:
A mouse BAC library was screened by PCR using primers for D11Mit199 for D11Mit11. Two positive BACs were identified: BAC 293C22 for the D11Mit199 locus and BAC 330P14 for the D11Mit11 locus (5'TAT TCT CTC CTT CCC CCC AC3'; 5'TAG AGT TGG GAC ACC CAA GC3'). BAC DNA was purified and used as probes for fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Chromosome spreads from ES cells were prepared as described (![]()
![]()
PCR genotyping embryos:
PCR was used to genotype embryos with the Df11(2) and Dp11(2) chromosomes. For detecting a chromosomal deficiency, primer 1 is from the human Hprt minigene exon 2, CCTCATGGACTAATTATGGAC; primer 2 is from the human Hprt minigene exon 9, CCAGTTTCACTAATGACACA. The product is 2.1 kb. To amplify the duplication allele, primer 1 was specific for the human Hprt minigene intron, 5'AGGATGTGATACGTGGAAGA3', while primer 2 is specific to the PolII promoter, 5'GCCGTTATTAGTGGAGAGGC3'. The PCR product is 770 bp.
Histological analysis:
Embryos were processed for histological studies as described (![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Generation of chromosomal deficiencies, inversions, and duplications:
The strategy to generate the chromosomal rearrangements is illustrated in Figure 2. In brief, two complementary truncated Hprt minigene cassettes with an embedded loxP site were successively targeted to two loci on mouse chromosome 11 in ES cells (Figure 2A). Transient expression of Cre recombinase induces recombination between the two loxP sites, resulting in either a Df, a Dp, or an Inv (Figure 1C), depending on the relative orientation of the two cassettes. The recombination between the loxP sites reconstructs a full-length Hprt minigene from the complementary cassettes, enabling cell lines with these recombinant chromosomes to be directly selected in HAT. All the alterations described here have the Hsd17b1 (E2DH) locus as one of the endpoints. Therefore, this locus was targeted first with the Hprt
3' vector in two different orientations (Figure 1A). The Hprt
5' cassette was subsequently targeted to the loci around the Hsd17b1 locus in these targeted cell lines. The targeting vectors and recombinant alleles generated with these vectors are summarized in Figure 1. The recombination endpoints included genes (Gas, HoxB9, and Wnt3) and microsatellite loci (D11Mit199 and D11Mit69), and the targeting efficiencies were very similar for these loci (Table 1). Both replacement and insertion types of vectors were used (Figure 1). Targeting frequencies for these vectors were in the range of 520% of the double-resistant clones (G418 and FIAU, or Puro and FIAU) for the replacement vectors, and 20 and 8% of the puromycin-resistant clones for the D11Mit199 and D11Mit69 insertion vectors, respectively.
|
Double-targeted clones were transiently transfected with a supercoiled Cre expression plasmid, and HAT-resistant clones were isolated. The frequency of recombination varied, depending on the specific interval, the cis or trans configuration of the cassettes, and the type of rearrangement induced by the recombination event (Table 2). Recombination between the two cassettes when they have been targeted in direct orientation in trans will generate an ES cell with a Df on one chromosome and the corresponding Dp on the other. The frequency of trans recombination was generally much lower than recombination in cis, and the frequency of generating duplications (cis) was lower than the corresponding Df and Inv (Table 2). This may reflect the fact that Dp cis recombination can only be generated at the sister chromatid stage, while Df and Inv can also arise from recombination within a single chromatid. The abbreviations for the recombinant chromosomes are detailed in Table 3.
|
|
HAT-resistant clones were not recovered when the cassettes were in inverted orientation in trans. This is because the trans recombination frequency is very low, and acentric and dicentric chromosomes are the products from such a recombination event. Acentric chromosomes will be lost during cell division, and this will likely be a cell-lethal event because loss of this acentric fragment is equivalent to a homozygous deficiency, in this case covering 25% of chromosome 11. If two inverted loxP sites are close to each other in cis, then two sister chromatids could theoretically recombine to form acentric and dicentric chromosomes at a high frequency, which would lead to loss of these cells. Although this has been observed in D. melanogaster (![]()
![]()
FISH analysis of chromosomal rearrangements:
To characterize some of the chromosomal rearrangements in more detail, we performed FISH using probes from the D11Mit199 and D11Mit11 loci. Two BACs corresponding to these loci were isolated: 293C22 (D11Mit199) and 330P14 (D11Mit11). Figure 3 (AD) shows the FISH analysis of wild-type control and a Df11(2)/Dp11(2) cell line that has a 3- to 4-cM deficiency and the same size duplication between the Hsd17b1 and Wnt3 loci. The FISH signals were artificially colored in red and yellow to distinguish the signals from the different BACs. In the case of the Df11(2)/Dp11(2) cell line, the deficiency chromosome domain can be identified in the interphase nucleus as a single red dot resulting from the D11Mit11 BAC, which lies outside the deficiency, while the corresponding duplication chromosome has one red dot, but also two yellow dots, which is the signal from the D11Mit199 BAC hybridization that is within the duplicated region. Because the duplicated region is relatively small, the duplicated signals could not be resolved as two discrete spots in a metaphase spread. However, the deficiency is clearly visible by the absence of a yellow spot corresponding to the D11Mit199 locus.
|
We attempted to generate a 22-cM deficiency and the same size inversion between the Hsd17b1 locus and the most distal microsattelite marker described for mouse chromosome 11, D11Mit69. Six double-targeted clones for each orientation of the D11Mit69 locus were generated and tested. Following cre transfection, a total of nine HAT-resistant clones were recovered from three double-targeted cell lines. Sib selection with puromycin and G418 indicated that these HAT-resistant clones had an inversion. This was confirmed by FISH analysis (Figure 3A and Figure E). Both probes (D11Mit199 and D11Mit11) lie within the inverted region, and metaphase analysis clearly shows that the order of these probes with respect to the centromere has been reversed in the inversion chromosome. HAT-resistant recombinants were not recovered from the other three double-targeted clones with the same orientation of the Hprt
5' cassette, indicating the two cassettes are likely to be in trans in these cell lines.
None of the six cell lines with the Hprt
5' cassette in the opposite orientation gave HAT-resistant clones. There are two possible explanations: either all of these were targeted in the trans configuration and the recombination frequency is below the threshold of detection, or the 22-cM deficiency induced by the cis recombination causes cell lethality in the heterozygote state.
Dp11(1) causes corneal hyperplasia and thymic neoplasia:
Using Df11(1)/Dp11(1) genetically balanced ES cells, chimeric mice were generated, and the Df and Dp chromosomes were segregated during germ line transmission, allowing them to be analyzed independently. Both Dp11(1)/+ and Df11(1)/+ mice were obtained and initially appeared overtly normal. However, the two genotypes were present at a 2:1 ratio (Dp:Df), rather than at the expected 1:1 ratio, when mice were genotyped at 3 wk of age (Table 4), but this ratio distortion was not observed in subsequent generations.
|
The Dp11(1)/+ and Df11(1)/+ mice initially appeared to be unremarkable and had normal fertility. As the Dp11(1)/+ animals aged, however, their eyes became opaque. Histological analysis of the eyes showed that this was caused by corneal hyperplasia (Figure 4, AC). The early changes in the corneal lesions consisted of epithelial hyperplasia and increased vascularity. More advanced lesions showed small aggregates of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, marked polypoid subepithelial and epithelial thickening, and ulceration. Intercrossing Dp11(1)/+ mice resulted in the generation of Dp11(1)/Dp11(1) homozygotes. These were recovered at the expected 25% frequency and appeared to be initially normal, though both males and females had reduced fertility. Like the Dp11(1)/+ heterozygous mice, these animals exhibited the same corneal defect, but with a shorter latency (Figure 4D). The Dp11(1)/Dp11(1) homozygotes and Dp11(1)/+ mice also developed thymic tumors. By 10 mo of age, ~20% of these mice (heterozygotes and homozygotes, n = 22) had these tumors. These tumors were characterized by massive enlargement of the thymus, and they showed enlarged nuclei with prominent nucleoli with an increased mitotic activity. Grossly enlarged spleens were also noted in some animals, and many of these exhibited lymphoid and myeloid hyperplasia (Figure 5). Some were accompanied by chronic inflammation of undetermined etiology in the liver and other organs.
|
|
Taken together, these data strongly suggest that there exists a dosage-sensitive gene (or genes) within this 1000-kb interval. Relatively modest increases in gene dosage (50%) in the case of the Dp11(1)/+ heterozygotes were sufficient to confer corneal hyperplasia and predisposition to thymic neoplasia.
The Df11(2) chromosome is haplo-insufficient during early embryogenesis:
Chimeras were generated from Df11(2)/Dp11(2) ES cells produced from the trans recombination event. Test breeding of these chimeras resulted in repeated transmission of the Dp11(2) chromosome (n = 33), but the corresponding Df11(2) chromosome was never recovered. It was therefore evident that the Df11(2) chromosome caused embryonic lethality in the heterozygotes.
While there are several possible explanations for this, such as imprinting or position effects, the most likely explanation is haploinsufficiency caused by the loss of specific genes. To distinguish between these hypotheses, Dp11(2)/+ females were backcrossed to the Df11(2)/Dp11(2) chimeric males. Mice that had the Df11(2) chromosome, but only in combination with the Dp11(2) chromosome, were recovered from these matings. These Dp11(2)/Df11(2) mice are overtly normal and fertile, allowing the Df11(2) chromosome to be maintained by intercrossing Df11(2)/Dp11(2) mice. From these crosses, 30/46 (67%) of the mice were Df11(2)/Dp11(2) compound heterozygotes, while 16/46 (33%) are homozygous for the Dp11(2) chromosome. These are the expected ratios because the Df11(2) is highly unlikely to be viable in the homozygous state, given that this 34-cM interval will contain an estimated 200300 genes. The loss of the Df11(2) heterozygotes and homozygotes occurs before birth because the average litter size in these crosses is reduced to 4.4 from 8 for wild-type matings. The Dp11(2)/+ and Dp11(2)/Dp11(2) mice are fertile and normal at the age of 1 yr.
To characterize the basis of the Df11(2)/+ embryonic lethality, timed matings were established between Df/Dp males and wild-type females so that half of the conceptuses would be Df11(2)/+. The resulting embryos were dissected from the decidua, and the yolk sac DNA was genotyped by PCR. Approximately half of the conceptuses recovered at E8.5 and E7.5 were abnormal, or the embryos were in the process of resorption. These abnormal embryos were much smaller at E7.5 days than the normal E7.5 embryos, and they overtly resembled E6.5 embryos. All the abnormal embryos (n = 36) had inherited the Df11(2) allele, while the morphologically normal embryos were Dp11(2)/+ heterozygotes. At 9.5 days, all the abnormal conceptuses were totally resorbed and could not be genotyped.
To further investigate the embryonic lethality, Df11(2)/+ embryos were examined histologically. Embryos were collected at E5.5 (n = 10), E6.5 (n = 20), and E7.5 (n = 22), processed, and transversely and sagittally serially sectioned. At E5.5, there was no obvious difference between the Df11(2)/+ embryos and their Dp11(2)/+ littermates. Coincident with the onset of gastrulation at E6.5, approximately half of the embryos could be distinguished from their Dp11(2)/+ littermates. Overall, these abnormal embryos were much smaller, there was no clear demarcation between the embryonic and extra-embryonic portions, and the embryonic ectoderm cells were packed loosely and lacked the typical elongated shape seen in the normal embryos (Figure 6A and Figure B).
|
By E7.5, wild-type embryos have progressed through gastrulation, there is extensive mesoderm present, and the embryos have formed the chorion, amnion, and visceral yolk sac. At the same gestational stage, the Df11(2)/+ embryos do not appear to have progressed much beyond 6.5 days of development (Figure 6C and Figure D). While the visceral endoderm appears to be overtly normal in the Df11(2)/+ embryos, there is no evidence of mesoderm formation, and the embryonic and extra-embryonic ectoderm layers appear to be markedly deficient. In particular, the embryonic ectoderm cells were restricted to the distal end of the embryos and were dying. In mice, gastrulation coincides with a period of exceedingly rapid cell proliferation as the embryo accumulates the minimum threshold number of 14001500 epiblast cells required to initiate gastrulation (![]()
To examine the possibility of a reduced cell cycle rate, we determined the mean cell cycle rate of Df11(2)/+ ES cells. A mean doubling time of 24 hr was measured, which is indistinguishable from that of the wild-type ES cells. To investigate the possible developmental specificity of this defect, Df11(2)/+ ES cells were used to generate chimeras by blastocyst injection into wild-type embryos. These chimeras had extensive contributions from the injected ES cells. This indicates that cells with this large deficiency are viable as terminally differentiated somatic cells when rescued through early embryogenesis by wild-type cells.
Df11(3) causes haplolethality:
Df11(3)/+ ES cells were used to generate chimeras. Out of 32 germline transmission pups, 31 inherited the wild-type chromosome 11, while 1 had the double-targeted chromosome 11 where the Hprt
3' and Hprt
5' cassettes are at the Hsd17b1 and HoxB9 loci, respectively (presumably derived from minor contamination of the parental double-targeted ES cells in the HATr clones with the deficiency as the result of cross-feeding among Hprt- and Hprt+ cells). The fact that the mice with the deficiency were not recovered indicated that the Df11(3) also leads to haplolethality. The availability of mice with the double-targeted chromosome 11 will make it possible to establish Df11(3) in somatic cells. The Cre-lox recombination efficiency for generating the Df11(3) was very low compared to that of Df11(2); consequently, to date, it has not been possible to derive the balanced trans-recombination product Df11(3)/Dp11(3) and study this haploinsufficiency further.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Large DNA rearrangements and their frequency:
With the development of high-resolution genetic maps of the mouse genome including >6500 microsatellite markers (![]()
If a deficiency is generated by recombination on the same chromatid or chromosome, then the reciprocal recombination product is a ring chromosome that will be lost in subsequent cell divisions. Such molecules have been detected as FLP-FRT recombination products in nondividing cells in D. melanogaster (![]()
Recombination between loxP sites with the same orientation in trans can generate ES cells with a deficiency accompanied by a duplication, regardless of the relative orientation of the two cassettes along a chromosome. The recombinant chromosomes will differ slightly, depending on the relative order of the Hprt cassettes. In one case, the chromosome with the deficiency will be tagged with the regenerated Hprt minigene, while the chromosome with the duplication will carry the neomycin- and puromycin-resistance cassettes. If the two cassettes are oppositely oriented, then the chromosome with the deficiency will carry the neomycin- and puromycin-resistance genes, and the chromosome with the duplication will carry the Hprt minigene.
The recombination frequency between loxP sites on the same chromosome appears to decrease as the distance between the loxP sites increases (Table 2). Similar observations have been reported in experiments in D. melanogaster using the FLP-FRT system (![]()
The frequency of recombination between loxP sites in trans is always 10-2- to 10-3-fold lower than the equivalent recombination event when the loxP sites are on the same chromosome. However, the frequency of recombination in trans does not exhibit significant distance dependence, at least over the 1 Mb to 3- to 4-cM intervals tested in this study. The fact that we were unable to recover translocations using the cassettes used in this study (data not shown) suggests that recombination between homologous chromosomes is more frequent than that between two nonhomologous chromosomes. This also suggests that interactions between nonhomologous chromosomes occur less frequently than those between the homologues.
In this study, we have examined recombination between loxP sites positioned 34 cM apart in two adjacent regions (HoxB-Hsd17b1 and Hsd17b1-Wnt3) on chromosome 11. Despite the similar size of these intervals, they yielded very different recombination frequencies (Table 2). The cis recombination frequency between the HoxB and Hsd17b1 loci is similar to the frequency of trans recombination between the Hsd17b1 and Wnt3 loci. Other recombination events in the HoxB cluster have also been quite low; e.g., the frequency of deleting a 90-kb fragment in the HoxB cluster was lower than obtaining a 1.0-Mb deficiency between the Gas and Hsd17b1 loci (![]()
![]()
It was not possible to obtain ES cells with a heterozygous 22-cM Df between the Hsd17b1 and D11Mit69 loci; however, clones with the corresponding inversion could be obtained, confirming that Cre could mediate recombination over this large distance. It is therefore likely that this specific deficiency results in slow growth or cell lethality in ES cells as a consequence of either the loss of a single highly dosage-sensitive gene or the cumulative effect of the simultaneous loss of one copy of many slightly dosage-sensitive genes. Although clones with the combination Df/Dp status over this 22-cM interval should have been recovered, the failure to recover such clones indicates that the trans recombination frequency is quite low in this instance. It is interesting to note that this region of the genome is frequently deleted in both human and mouse tumors, indicating that the survival/proliferation phenotype observed in ES cells may be specific to this cell type because these ES cells can develop into certain somatic cell types in chimeric mice, and cells with a corresponding deficiency have the ability to proliferate as tumor cells. Similar differences have been observed in some other genes; e.g., both Brca1 (![]()
![]()
Gene dosage effects:
Gene dosage plays an important role in diseases in humans and mice. There are several genes that are known to exhibit striking dosage effects. For example, heterozygous mutations in Pax6 cause the small eye phenotype in mice (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Of the hundreds of published knockouts in the mouse, only one has been reported to exhibit an embryonic haplolethality phenotype (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Dp11(1)/+ and Dp11(1)/Dp11(1) mice have various abnormalities, while the Dp11(2)/+ and Dp11(2)/Dp11(2) mice do not exhibit any phenotype. This confirms that the phenotypes seen in the Dp11(1)/+ mice are most likely caused by specific genes in this 1.0-Mb interval. The most penetrant of these is the corneal hyperplasia, which occurs in 80% of the Dp11(1)/Dp11(1) mice. Interestingly, the latency and penetrance of the eye phenotype is dosage dependent. The development of lymphoma also indicates that there exists a highly dosage sensitive gene(s) within this 1.0-Mb interval. It is not possible to determine if the eye and thymic tumor phenotypes are the consequence of an increased dosage of the same or different genes. Because this interval is relatively small, mouse BAC contigs are being assembled to span this region. The phenotypes associated with individual BAC clones will be assessed in transgenic mice. This will help to separate the phenotypes associated with the duplication of this region to different BACs, and these clones eventually can be used to identify the gene(s) that are causing these phenotypes.
With the increasing resolution of the regions of conservation between the mouse and human genomes, as well as a more detailed understanding of chromosomal diseases in the human genome, it is evident that similar deficiencies, duplications, and other chromosomal rearrangements can be recapitulated in the mouse. The construction of subrearrangements will also enable the identification of the genes responsible for specific phenotypes in patients. Equally important is that mice heterozygous for a deficiency are functionally hemizygous for this chromosomal region. This will be a very valuable resource for saturated genetic screens with a set of deficiencies covering the entire mouse genome. The power of such screens has been demonstrated in Drosophila (![]()
![]()
An alternative method for generating chromosomal deficiencies in the mouse has been reported recently (![]()
![]()
In summary, a series of large DNA rearrangements have been generated in ES cells and established in the mouse germline. Analysis of mice with these engineered chromosomes has identified a 1000-kb region that contains a gene(s) which causes tumorigenesis when overexpressed. A contiguous 12- to 16-cM region of the genome is dosage sensitive (HoxB-Wnt3), resulting in early embryonic lethality in the heterozygotes. Further studies will allow the isolation of genes responsible for these phenotypes. The data described here demonstrate that precise manipulation of chromosome segments in mice is possible. This will not only facilitate the modeling of various human "chromosomal diseases," but it will also provide rich resources for functional genomic studies in the mouse.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Antonio Baldini and Vesna Jurecic for assistance in FISH analysis; Eva Regal for blastocyst injection; Dr. Weiwen Cai for providing the two BACs for FISH analysis; Dr. Guangbin Luo, Dr. Alea Mills and Binhai Zheng for comments on this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health. P.L. has been supported by a predoctoral fellowship from the Markey Foundation. A.B. is an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Manuscript received March 6, 1998; Accepted for publication August 10, 1998.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AHMAD, K. and K. G. GOLIC, 1996 Somatic reversion of chromosomal position effects in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 144:657-670[Abstract].
ASHBURNER, M., 1989 Drosophila: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
BALDINI, A., and E. LINDSAY, 1994 Mapping human YAC clones by fluorescence in situ hybridization using Alu-PCR from single yeast colonies, pp. 7584 in In Situ Hybridization Protocols, edited by K. H. A. CHOO. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
BRADLEY, A., 1987 Production and analysis of chimeric mice, pp. 113151 in Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells - A Practical Approach, edited by E. J. ROBERTSON. IRL, Oxford.
BRADLEY, A. and P. LIU, 1996 Target practice in transgenics. Nat. Genet. 14:121-123[Medline].
BRIDGES, C. B., 1917 Deficiency. Genetics 2:445-465
BRIDGES, C. B., 1919 Duplications. Anat. Rec. 15:357-358.
CATTANACH, B. M., M. D. BURTENSHAW, C. RASBERRY, and E. P. EVANS, 1993 Large deletions and other gross forms of chromosome imbalance compatible with viability and fertility in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 3:56-61[Medline].
CHANCE, P. F., M. K. ALDERSON, K. A. LEPPIG, M. W. LENSCH, and N. MATSUNAMI et al., 1993 DNA deletion associated with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Cell 72:143-151[Medline].
CHEN, K.-S., P. MANIAN, T. KOEUTH, L. POTOCKI, and Q. ZHAO et al., 1997 Homologous recombination of a flanking repeat gene cluster is a mechanism for a common contiguous gene deletion syndrome. Nat. Genet. 17:154-163[Medline].
DIETRICH, W. F., J. MILLER, R. STEEN, M. A. MERCHANT, and D. DAMRON-BOLES et al., 1996 A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome. Nature 380:149-152[Medline].
DRISCOLL, D. A., 1994 Genetic basis of DiGeorge and velocardiofacial syndromes. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 6:702-706[Medline].
EPSTEIN, C. J., 1986 The Consequences of Chromosome Imbalance: Principles, Mechanism and Models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
EPSTEIN, D. J., M. VEKEMANS, and P. GROS, 1991 splotch (Sp2H), a mutation affecting development of the mouse neural tube, shows a deletion within the paired homeodomain of Pax-3.. Cell 67:767-774[Medline].
FERRARA, N., K. CARVER-MOORE, H. CHEN, M. DOWD, and L. LU et al., 1996 Heterozygous embryonic lethality induced by targeted inactivation of the VEGF gene. Nature 380:439-442[Medline].
FISHER, E. and P. SCAMBLER, 1994 Human haploinsufficiencyone for sorrow, two for joy. Nat. Genet. 7:5-7[Medline].
GESSLER, M., K. O. SIMOLA, and G. A. BRUNS, 1989 Cloning of breakpoints of a chromosome translocation identifies the AN2 locus. Science 244:1575-1578
GOLIC, K. G., 1994 Local transposition of P elements in Drosophila melanogaster and recombination between duplicated elements using a site-specific recombinase. Genetics 137:551-563[Abstract].
GOLIC, K. G. and M. M. GOLIC, 1996 Engineering the Drosophila genome: chromosome rearrangements by design. Genetics 144:1693-1711[Abstract].
HAKEM, R., J. L. DE LA POMPA, C. SIRARD, R. MO, and M. WOO et al., 1996 The tumor suppressor gene Brca1 is required for embryonic cellular proliferation in the mouse. Cell 85:1009-1023[Medline].
HILL, R. E., J. FAVOR, B. L. HOGAN, C. C. TON, and G. F. SAUNDERS et al., 1991 Mouse small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene. Nature 354:522-525[Medline].
HOLDENER-KENNY, B., S. K. SHARAN, and T. MAGNUSON, 1992 Mouse albino-deletions: from genetics to genes in development. Bioessays 14:831-839[Medline].
KAUFMAN, M. H., 1992 Atlas of Mouse Development. Academic Press, San Diego.
KHALIFA, M. M., P. M. MACLEOD, and A. M. DUNCAN, 1993 Additional case of de novo interstitial deletion del(17)(q21.3q23) and expansion of the phenotype. Clin. Genet. 44:258-261[Medline].
LAKICH, D., H. H. J. KAZAZIAN, S. E. ANTONARAKIS, and J. GITSCHIER, 1993 Inversions disrupting the factor VIII gene are a common cause of severe haemophilia A. Nat. Genet. 5:236-241[Medline].
LEVIN, M. L., L. G. SHAFFER, R. A. LEWIS, M. V. GRESIK, and J. R. LUPSKI, 1995 Unique de novo interstitial deletion of chromosome 17, del(17) (q23.2q24.3) in a female newborn with multiple congenital anomalies. Am. J. Med. Genet. 55:30-32[Medline].
LEWANDOSKI, M. and G. R. MARTIN, 1997 Cre-mediated chromosome loss in mice. Nat. Genet. 17:223-225[Medline].
LINDSLEY, D. L., L. SANDLER, B. S. BAKER, A. T. C. CARPENTER, and R. E. DENELL et al., 1972 Segmental aneuploidy and the genetic gross structure of the Drosophila genome. Genetics 71:157-184
LUPSKI, J. R., R. M. DE OCA-LUNA, S. SLAUGENHAUPT, L. PENTAO, and V. GUZZETTA et al., 1991 DNA duplication associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Cell 26:219-232.
MARSHALL, C. J., 1991 Tumor suppressor genes. Cell 64:313-332[Medline].
MATZUK, M. M., M. J. FINEGOLD, J. G. SU, A. J. HSUEH, and A. BRADLEY, 1992 Alpha-inhibin is a tumour-suppressor gene with gonadal specificity in mice. Nature 360:313-319[Medline].
MIKI, Y., J. J. SWENSEN, M. R. HOBBS, B. S. DEHOFF, and P. R. ROSTECK et al., 1995 A physical map encompassing GP2B, EPB3, D17S183, D17S78, D17S1183, and D17S1184. Genomics 25:295-297[Medline].
PARK, J. P., J. B. MOESCHLER, S. Z. BERG, R. M. BAUER, and D. H. WURSTER-HILL, 1992 A unique de novo interstitial deletion del(17)(q21.3q23) in a phenotypically abnormal infant. Clin. Genet. 41:54-56[Medline].
POWER, M. A. and P. P. L. TAM, 1993 Onset of gastrulation, morphogenesis and somitogenesis in mouse embryos displaying compensatory growth. Anat. Embryol. 187:493-504[Medline].
RABBITTS, T. H., 1994 Chromosomal translocations in human cancer. Nature 372:143-149[Medline].
RAMIREZ-SOLIS, R., A. C. DAVIS, and A. BRADLEY, 1993 Gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Methods Enzymol. 225:855-878[Medline].
RAMIREZ-SOLIS, R., P. LIU, and A. BRADLEY, 1995 Chromosome engineering in mice. Nature 378:720-724[Medline].
RINCHIK, E. M., 1991 Chemical mutagenesis and fine-structure functional analysis of the mouse genome. Trends Genet. 7:15-21[Medline].
RINCHIK, E. M., and L. B. RUSSELL, 1990 Germ-line deletion mutations in the mouse: Tools for intensive functional and physical mapping of regions of the mammalian genome, pp. 121159 in Genome Analysis, edited by K. E. DAVIES and S. M. TILGHMAN. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
RINCHIK, E., L. FLAHERTY, and L. B. RUSSELL, 1993 High-frequency induction of chromosomal rearrangements in mouse germ cells by the chemotherapeutic agent chlorambucil. Bioessays 15:831-836[Medline].
ROBERTSON, E. J., 1987 Embryo-derived stem cell lines, pp. 71112 in Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem CellsA Practical Approach, edited by E. J. ROBERTSON. IRL, Oxford.
SAUER, B. and N. HENDERSON, 1988 Site-specific DNA recombination in mammalian cells by the Cre recombinase of bacteriophage P1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5166-5170
SCHULER, G. D., M. S. BOGUSKI, E. A. STEWART, L. D. STEIN, and G. GYAPAY et al., 1996 A gene map of the human genome. Science 274:540-546
SHARAN, S. K., M. MORIMATSU, U. ALBRECHT, D. S. LIM, and E. REGEL et al., 1997 Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by Rad51 in mice lacking Brca2. Nature 386:804-810[Medline].
SHUMACHER, A., C. FAUST, and T. MAGNUSON, 1996 Positional cloning of a global regulator of anterior-posterior patterning in mice. Nature 383:250-253[Medline].
STURTEVANT, A. H., 1926 A crossover reducer in Drosophila melanogaster due to inversion of a section of the third chromosome. Biol. Zentralbl 46:697-702.
TASSABEHJI, M., A. P. READ, V. E. NEWTON, R. HARRIS, and R. BALLING et al., 1992 Waardenburg's syndrome patients have mutations in the human homologue of the Pax-3 paired box gene. Nature 355:635-636[Medline].
THOMAS, J. W., C. LAMANTIA, and T. MAGNUSON, 1998 X-ray-induced mutations in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1114-1119
WATKINS-CHOW, D., M. ROLLER, M. M. NEWHOUSE, A. M. BUCHBERG, and S. A. CAMPER, 1996 Mouse chromosome 11.. Mamm. Genome 6:201-220.
WEINBERG, R. A., 1991 Tumor suppressor genes. Science 254:1138-1146
YOU, Y., R. BERGSTROM, M. KLEMM, B. LEDERMAN, and H. NELSON et al., 1997 Chromosomal deletion complexes in mice by radiation of embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 15:285-288[Medline].
ZHANG, H., P. HASTY, and A. BRADLEY, 1994 Targeting frequency for deletion vectors in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:2404-2410
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Li, T. Yu, M. Morishima, A. Pao, J. LaDuca, J. Conroy, N. Nowak, S.-I. Matsui, I. Shiraishi, and Y. E. Yu Duplication of the entire 22.9 Mb human chromosome 21 syntenic region on mouse chromosome 16 causes cardiovascular and gastrointestinal abnormalities Hum. Mol. Genet., June 1, 2007; 16(11): 1359 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wang, M. Warren, and A. Bradley From the Cover: Induced mitotic recombination of p53 in vivo PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4501 - 4505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. E. Yu, M. Morishima, A. Pao, D.-Y. Wang, X.-Y. Wen, A. Baldini, and A. Bradley A Deficiency in the Region Homologous to Human 17q21.33-q23.2 Causes Heart Defects in Mice Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 297 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] |