- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Smith, N. G. C.
- Articles by Hurst, L. D.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Smith, N. G. C.
- Articles by Hurst, L. D.
Molecular Evolution of an Imprinted Gene: Repeatability of Patterns of Evolution Within the Mammalian Insulin-Like Growth Factor Type II Receptor
Nick G. C. Smitha and Laurence D. Hurstaa Centre for Mathematical Biology, School of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
Corresponding author: Nick G. C. Smith, Centre for Mathematical Biology, School of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK., n.smith{at}bath.ac.uk (E-mail).
Communicating editor: G. B. GOLDING
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The repeatability of patterns of variation in Ka/Ks and Ks is expected if such patterns are the result of deterministic forces. We have contrasted the molecular evolution of the mammalian insulin-like growth factor type II receptor (Igf2r) in the mouse-rat comparison with that in the human-cow comparison. In so doing, we investigate explanations for both the evolution of genomic imprinting and for Ks variation (and hence putatively for mutation rate evolution). Previous analysis of Igf2r, in the mouse-rat comparison, found Ka/Ks patterns that were suggested to be contrary to those expected under the conflict theory of imprinting. We find that Ka/Ks variation is repeatable and hence confirm these patterns. However, we also find that the molecular evolution of Igf2r signal sequences suggests that positive selection, and hence conflict, may be affecting this region. The variation in Ks across Igf2r is also repeatable. To the best of our knowledge this is the first demonstration of such repeatability. We consider three explanations for the variation in Ks across the gene: (1) that it is the result of mutational biases, (2) that it is the result of selection on the mutation rate, and (3) that it is the product of selection on codon usage. Explanations 2 and 3 predict a KaKs correlation, which is not found. Explanation 3 also predicts a negative correlation between codon bias and Ks, which is also not found. However, in support of explanation 1 we do find that in rodents the rate of silent C
T mutations at CpG sites does covary with Ks, suggesting that methylation-induced mutational patterns can explain some of the variation in Ks. We find evidence to suggest that this CpG effect is due to both variation in CpG density, and to variation in the frequency with which CpGs mutate. Interestingly, however, a GC4 analysis shows no covariance with Ks, suggesting that to eliminate methyl-associated effects CpG rates themselves must be analyzed. These results suggest that, in contrast to previous studies of intragenic variation, Ks patterns are not simply caused by the same forces responsible for Ka/Ks correlations.
IN mammals there exists much variation in synonymous substitution rates (Ks) and the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rates (Ka/Ks), both within (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Genomically imprinted genes are those for which expression is dependent upon the sex of the parent from which they are derived (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Aside from allowing us to ask whether patterns of Ka/Ks and of Ks within genes are repeatable and hence deterministically based, the patterns of molecular evolution in this gene are of interest for two reasons. First, the pattern of variation in Ks across the gene may shed light on the evolution of mutation rates or of codon usage patterns. Second, the variation in Ka/Ks is potentially informative as to the evolution of imprinting. One theory for the evolution of imprinting would find discriminating support from evidence for antagonistic coevolution between imprinted genes (see ![]()
![]()
![]()
| Ks variation, mutation rate evolution, and imprinted genes |
|---|
We consider four hypotheses to explain variation in Ks across Igf2r.
Hypothesis 1:
Ks variation may be caused by stochastic forces, in which case Ks will not be repeatable. The remaining three hypotheses suppose that Ks variation is the result of deterministic forces that would cause Ks repeatability.
Hypothesis 2:
If silent sites are considered neutral then Ks is an unbiased estimator of the mutation rate (![]()
Hypothesis 3:
Decreasing mutation rates is expensive both in time and energy, while the benefits of a lower mutation rate depend on the functional importance and mutational sensitivity of the region concerned. Such reasoning has been used to explain the constant per genome mutation rate across many unicellular organisms (![]()
From the same logic, one might expect that the most important parts of an imprinted gene should be provided with especially low mutation rates. Thus if silent sites in the mammalian Igf2r gene are neutral, then the variation in Ks (and hence mutation rate) across the gene may be the result of selection acting to optimize mutation rates. We term this explanation of Ks variation the "selected mutation rate" hypothesis.
Hypothesis 4:
![]()
Just as for the selected mutation rate argument, the common constraints hypothesis would predict that imprinted genes, due to their haploid expression, would be under greater selective pressures, and thus should have lower Ks values than nonimprinted genes. The empirical data on this point are equivocal. Previous analyses have found Igf2 to have one of the lowest Ks values in the rodent genome (![]()
![]()
![]()
| Ka/Ks variation and the evolution of genomic imprinting |
|---|
Numerous theories have been proposed for the evolution of genomic imprinting (for a review see ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Given that maternal and paternal genes have antagonistic interests, the conflict theory is unique in predicting that an arms race may develop between maternally and paternally derived genes for the control of fetal growth demands. Such antagonistic coevolution may be mediated through changes in the structure of the proteins concerned. Were one to find evidence for rapid evolution of imprinted genes (i.e., a high Ka/Ks ratio) this, it has been argued, could then reasonably be taken as evidence favoring the conflict hypothesis (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Comparable maternal-fetal conflict is a good candidate explanation for the rapid evolution of numerous genes, such as the placental lactogens (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Perhaps surprisingly then, an analysis of the molecular evolution of seven imprinted genes revealed them to be no faster evolving at the protein level (controlling for Ks, and hence possibly for mutation rate, variation) than ordinary receptors and significantly slower evolving than immune system genes (![]()
![]()
Neither of these peaks in the pattern of protein evolution rates are expected. Signal sequences direct protein transport within the cell, and possess the conserved structure of a hydrophobic core flanked by a polar basic region and a hydrophilic region (![]()
![]()
![]()
Here we ask whether the peaks and troughs in the Ka/Ks pattern across the gene revealed in the mouse-rat comparison are also observed in the human-cow comparison or whether they are statistical artifacts and hence not worth further investigation. That the mouse-rat patterns might be artifacts is possible since the sliding window used was small and hence the expected error in estimates of Ka/Ks per window is high.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Extraction and analysis of genes:
NCBI Entrez (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Entrez/) was used to search for complete coding mammalian Igf2r sequences. Four were obtained: human, cow, mouse, and rat (accession numbers J03528, J03527, U04710, and U59809, respectively). The orthologies of these sequences were confirmed using BLASTN (![]()
![]()
Sequence manipulation and alignment was performed using programs in the Wisconsin package (GENETICS COMPUTER GROUP 1994). All four mammalian Igf2r protein-coding DNA sequences were aligned using the default DNA alignment parameters of the program PILEUP. The program GAPFRAME was used to move gaps to codon boundaries, and the resultant alignment was very similar to the protein alignment obtained using the default protein alignment parameters of PILEUP. All four gapped sequences were then cut into 24 orthologous nonoverlapping sections each of 300 bp, or 74 orthologous overlapping sections (300 bp every 100 bp). Synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates (Ks and Ka) were estimated for all mouse-rat and human-cow orthologous pairs using the program KESTIM (![]()
A nonparametric statistical test of repeatability was used to avoid assumptions about possible distributions of rates of molecular evolution. For both comparisons each window was ranked across the gene. Then the two patterns of ranks across the gene were compared using a rank correlation test. Thus a statistic was obtained (Prank) to describe the probability of the ranking patterns being so similar through chance alone.
Analysis of similarity:
For all of the nonsynonymous substitutions in the two comparisons, we characterized the extent to which these changes were conservative. This provides an indication as to whether it is likely that the replacements seen might be owing to weak stabilizing selection (in which case conservative changes are likely) or due to positive selection (in which case nonconservative changes are more likely; cf. ![]()
Different PAM matrices are appropriate for genes of different levels of divergence. We obtained appropriate matrices from the Amino Acid Index Database (http://www.cbi.pku.edu.cn/srs5bin/cgi-bin/wgetz?-fun+Pagelibinfo+-info+AAINDEX/). As the mouse-rat protein comparison shows 93% identity, we employed the BENS940101 PAM6-8 matrix (![]()
![]()
Signal sequence evolution:
To ask whether the signal sequence of Igf2r has an unusual mode of evolution we compared its evolution with that of comparable signal sequences in other genes. We used NCBI Entrez (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Entrez/) and the HOVERGEN database (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The genes (accession numbers in brackets, mouse then rat) were as follows: interleukin 4 receptor (M29854, X69903), low density lipoprotein receptor (X64414, X13722), tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (M60468, M63122), calreticulin (X14926, X53363), cholesterol esterase (U33169, X16054), glutamate dehydrogenase (X57024, X14223), procathepsin E (X97399, D38104), immunoglobulin light chain V-
-1 (J00590, M17092), and oxytocin-neurophysin I (M88355, K01701).
| RESULTS |
|---|
Repeatability of Ka/Ks:
With the 24 nonoverlapping sections, Ka/Ks patterns across Igf2r are significantly repeatable (Prank < 0.01, see Figure 1). It appears that the large-scale fluctuations in Ka/Ks rather than the small-scale fluctuations are responsible for the observed repeatability (our unpublished results). Ka/Ks is an indicator of both the intensity and type of selection. Stronger stabilizing selection reduces Ka/Ks, while both weaker stabilizing selection and stronger positive selection increase Ka/Ks. A Ka/Ks ratio significantly above one is the strict requirement for evidence of positive selection, but Ka/Ks ratios less than one do not preclude positive selection because different sites within the same segment might be under different selection pressures. The repeatability of patterns of selection across Igf2r means that selection is able to respond differently to various small subdomains across the Igf2r protein. This result is consistent with the conservation of the various functions of the different parts of the Igf2r molecule across the cow, human, mouse, and rat species.
|
The significant repeatability of Ka/Ks across the Igf2r gene means that the unexpected Ka/Ks patterns are not artifacts, but are representative of Igf2r's molecular evolution. We therefore need to explain the low rate of protein evolution at the Igf2 binding site, and the high rates of protein evolution both at the signal sequence and at one of the M6P binding sites.
Similarity of amino acid substitutions: To examine the selection pressures acting on the fast-evolving signal sequence and M6P binding site, we compared the amino acids that had changed in each nonoverlapping window to ask how conservative the changes were, using data from the appropriate PAM matrices to ascribe similarity.
In the human-cow comparison the changes in the signal sequence were on average exceptionally nonconservative (see Figure 2). Indeed, none of the windows shows a lower level of similarity and the average level of similarity in the gene as a whole is significantly higher (P = 0.0017, two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test). This suggests that positive selection might be acting on this sequence. In the mouse-rat comparison the picture is not so clear. The signal sequence does show a low similarity but three other windows have lower values. Compared with the rest of the gene the signal sequence does have a lower value (P = 0.0387, two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test).
|
At the M6P binding site there appears to be nothing unusual about the amino acids being replaced in both mouse-rat and human-cow, suggesting that this region is under weak stabilizing selection (two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-tests between the M6P site and the rest of the gene give P = 0.6248 and P = 0.6829 for the human-cow and mouse-rat comparisons, respectively).
The signal sequence of Igf2r is unusually fast evolving:
One would expect signal sequences to be generally slow evolving (see Introduction), but is this actually true; i.e., Is the signal sequence of Igf2r unusually fast evolving? When signal sequence Ka/Ks is plotted against the entire coding sequence Ka/Ks for the nine genes and for Igf2r it becomes clear that Igf2r's signal sequence is evolving unusually fast (see Figure 3). The only gene with a comparable signal sequence rate is immunoglobulin light chain V-
-1. However, the rate of signal sequence evolution in this gene is comparable to the rate of evolution in the rest of the gene. Igf2r is hence unusual in that the signal sequence shows an unusually high ratio of Ka/Ks given the rate of evolution of the rest of the sequence. Compared with a large sample of genes (unpublished data) the Ka/Ks ratio of the majority of Igf2r is not unusual. The value in the signal sequence is high in these terms. Hence the discrepancy between the signal sequence and the rest of the gene is better understood as unusually fast evolution of the signal sequence rather than unusually slow evolution of the majority of the gene.
|
Signal sequence hydrophobicity:
Is the rapid evolution of the Igf2r signal sequence at the expense of its functionality? We examined the hydrophobicity plots of the four species' signal sequences using the Staden package (![]()
|
Repeatability of Ks:
With the 24 nonoverlapping sections, Ks variation is significantly repeatable (Prank = 0.05; see Figure 5). With the rank of size change between neighboring overlapping sections as a potentially more powerful test, Ks patterns remained significantly repeatable (Prank < 0.05). The repeatability of Ks across the Igf2r gene thus implies that the variation in Ks within the gene is being shaped by deterministic forces. We have performed several tests to attempt to distinguish between the potential deterministic forces described above (see Introduction). First, however, we ask whether the repeatability might be an artifact.
|
Ks repeatability is probably not a methodological artifact:
Unless multiple substitution correction methods take account of variation in sequence composition, nucleotide substitution rate estimates can be biased (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ks repeatability is not due to the majority of Igf2r consisting of repeated units:
The large extracellular domain of IGF2R consists almost entirely of 15 conserved repeat units, between which there is roughly 20% amino acid identity in the human gene (![]()
![]()
It was then determined for each repeat in both species comparisons which of the three sections in each repeat (first, second, or third) had the highest Ks. The null hypothesis that there is no link between repeats and mutation rates predicts that in any given repeat all three thirds of the sequence are equally likely to have the fastest rate of evolution. The alternative hypothesis that the repeat structure does influence Ks would suppose that repeatably one of the three sections will have the highest Ks. Thus for both species comparisons the null expectation was that of the 15 repeats, five sections should have the first third having the highest Ks, five should have the second with highest Ks, etc. The human-cow comparison gave (6, 5, 4) while the mouse-rat comparison gave (7, 3, 5). Neither result was significantly different from the null expectation (the chi-squared test gave P > 0.5 for both comparisons). Thus the null hypothesis of no link between repeats and Ks patterns cannot be rejected, and so we conclude that the repeatability of Ks patterns is probably not due to the repeatability of molecular evolution in repeats. We note, however, that this is a relatively weak test.
Having established that the repeatability in Ks is probably not an artifact, we now turn to the question of why this repeatability is found. We consider three hypotheses (see Introduction for details): either (1) the variation is due to differences in composition along the gene allied with some form of mutational bias, or (2) the variation is due to selection favoring important sites to have low mutation rates (selected mutation rate hypothesis), or (3) Ks variation is the result of varying selection on codon usage (common constraints hypothesis). Hypotheses 1 and 2 assume that silent site mutations are neutral. Hypotheses 2 and 3 propose that the repeatability is selection-driven rather than mutation-driven. We shall start with these.
Adaptive explanations for Ks repeatability:
Here we evaluate the extent to which adaptive explanations for Ks variability and repeatability can explain the data. The common constraints argument predicts that codon bias should be negatively correlated with Ks [because both depend on the strength of selection, for Drosophila and bacterial data see ![]()
Evidence from codon bias data:
To differentiate between the selected mutation rate and common constraints hypotheses, we looked for a relationship between codon bias and Ks within the Igf2r gene. We used the Moriyama package (![]()
![]()
0.1), but the human-cow comparison showed a negative correlation on the edge of significance (Prank = 0.05). A negative correlation between ENC and Ks is equivalent to a positive correlation between codon bias and Ks (the lower the effective number of codons the stronger the codon bias), and so both species comparisons rejected the prediction of the common constraints hypothesis. The codon bias data show us that silent sites do not appear to be affected by selection, and thus Ks can be taken as an indicator of mutation rate.
No correlation between Ks and Ka:
Both selective explanations of Ks repeatability predict a positive correlation between Ks and Ka. However, neither the mouse-rat nor the human-cow comparison give a significant positive correlation (Prank > 0.5 for both; see Figure 6). This result provides evidence against both adaptive explanations of Ks repeatability. We note additionally, that presence of a significant positive correlation between Ka and Ks could not have been taken as conclusive evidence in favor of the selected mutation rate argument because there are several other possible explanations for such a correlation (see ![]()
|
No correlation between Ks and functional importance: We separated the gene into sections according to predicted functional importance, and then examined whether regions likely a priori to be important (such as binding sites) showed a systematically lower Ks than the rest of the gene. Both the common constraints and selected mutation rate hypotheses would predict lower Ks values for more important sections of the gene because in such regions selection is likely to be more powerful. However, both the mouse-rat and human-cow comparisons gave a higher mean Ka/Ks for the extracellular ligand-binding regions than the extracellular regions not associated with ligand binding (0.27 vs. 0.17 and 0.20 vs. 0.11, respectively). This result contradicts the prediction of greater functional importance of binding sites (with stabilizing selection, the stronger the selection the lower the Ka/Ks values), and thus renders this test inapplicable. However, the observation that the Ks at the Igf2 binding site is not low despite the Ka/Ks being unusually low (see Figure 1 and Figure 5) provides further, albeit circumstantial, evidence against both the common constraints and selected mutation rate hypotheses.
Mutational explanations for Ks repeatability:
Here we consider two possible compositional correlates to Ks variation. First we ask whether GC composition might explain the patterns. Second we ask more particularly whether methylation at CpG sites might explain some of the variance.
GC composition:
If local base composition influences mutation rates (and hence Ks), then the repeatability of Ks between highly related (and hence compositionally similar) sequences follows. For example, a correlation between GC content and Ks has been proposed (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The influence of methylation:
Even though local GC content seems not to influence local Ks, more complicated compositional characters may well influence local Ks (for example, see ![]()
![]()
To test this possibility we examined the frequency of CpG
TpG mutations. For each segment we found the number of times a CpG was found in one of the two sequences and TpG was found in the other, where the C existed at a third site. This protocol gives all possible synonymous CpG
TpG changes (we assume all mutational changes to be in this direction). We find that the variation in Ks between segments is correlated to the frequency of such mutations (see Figure 7). The mouse-rat comparison shows a significant correlation (Prank = 0.02), while the human-cow comparison shows a tendency in the same direction (0.1 > Prank > 0.05). We also find that this class of mutations accounts for a reasonable proportion of all mutations (15% in the human-cow comparison, and 21% in the mouse-rat comparison). We conclude that methyl-induced mutations can account for some of the repeatability that we observe.
|
Two hypotheses might be considered to account for this pattern. At one extreme, all segments might have an equal number of CpG sites that might change, but these segments differ in the density of methylation. Alternatively, the segments might have the same density of methylation per CpG, but differ in the total number of CpG sites.
We find that variation in total number of mutable CpGs partially explains the pattern in Ks. We calculated the number of times CpG was found in both sequences (i.e., the CpG/CpG frequency) again with the C at the third site. Adding the CpG/CpG figure to the CpG/TpG figure we arrive at a figure for the total number of mutable or mutated silent CpG sites. This total correlates well with Ks (Prank < 0.05 for the mouse-rat comparison, though Prank > 0.1 for the human-cow comparison), indicating that the variance in Ks explained by methylation is to some extent a result of differences between segments in CpG content.
Conversely, we can ask whether segments also differ in their propensity to methylate CpG sites. The methylation of HpaII sites of the mouse E15 embryo Igf2r gene has been shown to vary from 50% to 90% throughout the locus (![]()
This finding contrasts with human polymorphism data. The M6P/IGF2R Information Core (http://www.radonc.duke.edu/~jirtle/homepage.html) provides a human mutation database for IGF2R. Six substitutional mutations resulting in disease symptoms are described, with no C to T mutations. However, this small dataset suffers from an ascertainment bias, in that not all substitutional mutations are equally likely to cause disease symptoms.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
The mammalian Igf2r gene is multifunctional, and plays an important role in glycoprotein transport via M6P binding (![]()
![]()
![]()
Ka/Ks variation and the conflict theory of imprinting:
A simple prediction of the conflict theory of imprinting is that the Igf2 binding site should exhibit a high rate of molecular evolution driven by positive selection (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The evolution of Igf2r's signal sequence might be a result of antagonistic coevolution, in which case we can speculate that the signal sequence might be coevolving with the gene product of an imprinted gene (or genes) expressed from the paternally derived genome. The antagonism might concern the location of Igf2r. The putative paternally derived product could, in theory, attempt to remove the protein to a cellular location where its effects on Igf2 levels are minimal. It would be interesting to see the effect of site-directed mutagenesis of the signal sequence on the cellular location of Igf2r (no mutations in the IGF2R signal sequence causing human disease are listed at the M6P/IGF2R Information Core at http://www.radonc.duke.edu/~jirtle/homepage.html). Alternatively, the unusual evolution at this site might be a property of Igf2r independent of imprinting. It would then be informative to analyze the molecular evolution of Igf2r in birds for example, assuming that avian Igf2r is not imprinted (as yet, chicken is the only bird for which the Igf2r gene has been sequenced).
Both this study and a previous analysis of the Ka/Ks values of imprinted genes (![]()
![]()
Ks variation and the evolution of mutation rates:
The result of Ks repeatability in mammalian Igf2r, along with evidence from codon bias data that the silent sites appear to be neutral, extends our understanding of mutation rate variation: to quote ![]()
![]()
![]()
We have tested various hypotheses to explain the Ks repeatability. Since the Ks repeatability does not appear to be a methodological artifact, the remaining hypotheses can be divided into two groups, mutational and adaptive explanations. The selected mutation rate argument holds that local mutation rates, given by Ks, are the results of conflicting selection pressures governing mutation rates (see Introduction). Alternatively, the common constraints argument proposes that silent sites may be under selection, and so Ks is not the mutation rate but instead depends on selective constraints (see Introduction). The lack of a negative correlation between codon bias and Ks provides evidence against the common constraints hypothesis, and the lack of a correlation between Ks and Ka provides evidence against both adaptive explanations. The comparison of local mutation rates and local functional importance provided further, but circumstantial, evidence against both adaptive hypotheses.
Repeatable composition of repeats does not cause the repeatable Ks patterns. We did, however, find that silent C
T mutations at CpG sites do covary with Ks, suggesting that the variation in Ks is somehow connected with methylation-induced mutational patterns. The variation in silent C
T mutations at CpG sites appears to be the result of variation both in the number of mutable sites, and in the density of methylation.
It has previously been reported that, at least for GC-rich genes, the variation in Ks does covary with the variation in Ka (![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Etsuko Moriyama and Josep Comeron for providing us with their programs for evolutionary analysis, Gil McVean for suggestions concerning methodology, David Haig for discussions on imprinting, Denise Barlow for advice on methylation data, and two anonymous referees for suggesting many improvements.
Manuscript received March 2, 1998; Accepted for publication June 30, 1998.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ALTSCHUL, S. F., W. GISH, W. MILLER, E. W. MYERS, and D. J. LIPMAN, 1990 Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410[Medline].
ALVAREZ-VALIN, F., K. JABBARI, and G. BERNARDI, 1998 Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in mammalian genes: intragenic correlations. J. Mol. Evol. 46:37-44[Medline].
BENNER, S. A., M. A. COHEN, and G. H. GONNET, 1994 Amino-acid substitution during functionally constrained divergent evolution of protein sequences. Prot. Eng. 7:1323-1332
BERNARDI, G., D. MOUCHIROUD and C. GAUTIER, 1997 Isochores and synonymous substitutions in mammalian genes, pp. 137168 in DNA and Protein Sequence Analysis, edited by M. J. BISHOP and C. J. RAWLINGS. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
CASANE, D., S. BOISSINOT, B. H. J. CHANG, L. C. SHIMMIN, and W. H. LI, 1997 Mutation pattern variation among regions of the primate genome. J. Mol. Evol. 45:216-226[Medline].
CHORNEY, M. J., K. CHORNEY, N. SEESE, M. J. OWEN, and J. DANIELS et al., 1998 A quantitative trait locus associated with cognitive ability in children. Psychol. Sci. 9:159-166.
COMERON, J. M., 1995 A method for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site. J. Mol. Evol. 41:1152-1159[Medline].
DENNIS, P. A. and D. B. RIFKIN, 1991 Cellular activation of latent transforming growth factor beta requires binding to the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor type II receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:580-584
DESOUZA, A. T., T. YAMADA, J. J. MILLS, and R. L. JIRTLE, 1997 Imprinted genes in liver carcinogenesis. FASEB J. 11:60-67[Abstract].
DRAKE, J. W., 1991 A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:7160-7164
DURET, L., D. MOUCHIROUD, and M. GOUY, 1994 HOVERGENa database of homologous vertebrate genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:2360-2365
EFSTRATIADIS, A., 1994 Parental imprinting of autosomal mammalian genes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4:265-280[Medline].
GENETICS COMPUTER GROUP, 1994 Program Manual for the Wisconsin Package, Version 8, September 1994, Genetics Computer Group, 575 Science Drive, Madison, WI.
HAIG, D., 1997 Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:1657-1662[Medline].
HUGHES, A. L., M. K. HUGHES, C. Y. HOWELL, and M. NEI, 1994 Natural-selection at the class-II major histocompatibility complex loci of mammals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 346:359-366[Medline].
HURST, L. D., 1997 Evolutionary theories of genomic imprinting, pp. 211237 in Frontiers in Molecular Biology: Genomic Imprinting in Mammals, edited by W. REIK and A. SURANI. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
HURST, L. D. and G. T. MCVEAN, 1997 Growth effects of uniparental disomies and the conflict theory of genomic imprinting. Trends Genet. 13:436-443[Medline].
HURST, L. D., G. T. MCVEAN, and T. MOORE, 1996 Imprinted genes have few and small introns. Nat. Genet. 12:234-237[Medline].
IZARD, J. W., S. L. RUSCH, and D. A. KENDALL, 1996 The amino-terminal charge and core region hydrophobicity interdependently contribute to the function of signal sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 271:21579-21582
KANG, J. K., Y. LI, and A. LEAF, 1998 Mannose-6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor-II receptor is a receptor for retinoic acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:13671-13676.
KENDREW, J. (Editor), 1994 The Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology. Blackwell, Oxford.
KIMURA, M., 1980 A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120[Medline].
KIMURA, M., 1983 The Neutral Theory of Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
KORNFELD, S., 1992 Structure and function of the mannose 6-phosphate insulin-like growth factor-II receptors. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61:307-330[Medline].
LI, W. H., 1993 Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36:96-99[Medline].
LI, W. H., 1997 Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
MCVEAN, G. T. and L. D. HURST, 1997a Evidence for a selectively favourable reduction in the mutation rate of the X chromosome. Nature 386:388-392[Medline].
MCVEAN, G. T. and L. D. HURST, 1997b Molecular evolution of imprinted genes: no evidence for antagonistic coevolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 264:739-746[Medline].
MILLS, J. J., J. G. FALLS, A. T. DESOUZA, and R. C. JIRTLE, 1998 Imprinted MGP/Igf2 receptor is mutated in rat liver tumours. Oncogene 16:2797-2802[Medline].
MOCHIZUKI, A., Y. TAKEDA, and Y. IWASA, 1996 The evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 144:1283-1295[Abstract].
MOORE, T. and D. HAIG, 1991 Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet. 7:45-49[Medline].
MORGAN, D. O., J. C. EDMAN, D. N. STANDRING, V. A. FRIED, and M. C. SMITH et al., 1987 Insulin-like growth factor-ii receptor as a multifunctional binding-protein. Nature 329:301-307[Medline].
MORIYAMA, E. N. and J. R. POWELL, 1997 Synonymous substitution rates in Drosophila: Mitochondrial versus nuclear genes. J. Mol. Evol. 45:378-391[Medline].
MORTON, B. R., V. M. OBERHOLZER, and M. T. CLEGG, 1997 The influence of specific neighboring bases on substitution bias in noncoding regions of the plant chloroplast genome. J. Mol. Evol. 45:227-231[Medline].
MOUCHIROUD, D., C. GAUTIER, and G. BERNARDI, 1995 Frequencies of synonymous substitutions in mammals are gene-specific and correlated with frequencies of nonsynonymous substitutions. J. Mol. Evol. 40:107-113[Medline].
NEUMANN, B., P. KUBICKA, and D. P. BARLOW, 1995 Characteristics of imprinted genes. Nat. Genet. 9:12-13[Medline].
OGAWA, O., D. M. BECROFT, I. M. MORISON, M. R. ECCLES, and J. E. SKEEN et al., 1993 Human insulin-like growth-factor type-I and type-II receptors are not imprinted. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2:2163-2165
PALDI, A., G. GYAPAY, and J. JAMI, 1995 Imprinted chromosomal regions of the human genome display sex-specific meiotic recombination frequencies. Curr. Biol. 5:1030-1035[Medline].
PESOLE, G., G. DELLISANTI, G. PREPARATA, and C. SACCONE, 1995 The importance of base composition in the correct assessment of genetic-distance. J. Mol. Evol. 41:1124-1127.
SMITH, N. G. C. and L. D. HURST, 1998 Sensitivity of patterns of molecular evolution to alterations in methodology. J. Mol. Evol. in press.
SPENCER, H. G., M. W. FELDMAN, and A. G. CLARK, 1998 Genetic conflicts, multiple paternity and the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 148:893-904
STADEN, R., 1996 The Staden sequence-analysis package. Mol. Biotech. 5:233-241








