- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Lackner, M. R.
- Articles by Kim, S. K.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Lackner, M. R.
- Articles by Kim, S. K.
Genetic Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans MAP Kinase Gene mpk-1
Mark R. Lackner1,a and Stuart K. Kimaa Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5329
Corresponding author: Stuart K. Kim, Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5329., kim{at}cmgm.stanford.edu (E-mail).
Communicating editor: R. K. HERMAN
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The Caenorhabditis elegans mpk-1 gene encodes a MAP kinase protein that plays an important role in Ras-mediated induction of vulval cell fates. We show that mutations that eliminate mpk-1 activity result in a highly penetrant, vulvaless phenotype. A double mutant containing a gain-of-function mpk-1 mutation and a gain-of-function mek mutation (MEK phosphorylates and activates MPK-1) exhibits a multivulva phenotype. These results suggest that mpk-1 may transduce most or all of the anchor cell signal. Epistasis analysis suggests that mpk-1 acts downstream of mek-2 (encodes a MEK homolog) and upstream of lin-1 (encodes an Ets transcription factor) in the anchor cell signaling pathway. Finally, mpk-1 may act together with let-60 ras in multiple developmental processes, as mpk-1 mutants exhibit nearly the same range of developmental phenotypes as let-60 ras mutants.
MAP kinases are key mediators of cellular differentiation and proliferation in all animals, and they function in receptor tyrosine kinase/Ras signaling pathways (reviewed in ![]()
![]()
MAP kinases are activated when they become phosphorylated by the protein kinase MEK (MAP or ERK kinase; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Vertebrates have two MAP kinases (Erk1 and Erk2) that have overlapping substrates (reviewed in ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In Caenorhabditis elegans, there is a single known MAP kinase that is encoded by the mpk-1/sur-1 gene (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Genetic studies have shown that the anchor cell signal activates a receptor tyrosine kinase/Ras pathway (reviewed in ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Previous studies have implicated mpk-1 in vulval induction. These studies showed that two mpk-1 alleles (n2521 and ku8) suppress the multivulva phenotype of the activated ras allele let-60(n1046) (![]()
![]()
Because the mpk-1null phenotype has not been established, an important but unanswered question is whether the vulval induction pathway is linear between let-23 RTK and mpk-1, such that mpk-1 transduces all of the signal from activated let-23. If the pathway is linear, then null mutations in mpk-1 should prevent vulval induction and result in a Vul phenotype. Alternatively, the signaling pathway might be branched in a way that other signaling molecules might act in parallel with mpk-1. For instance, mammalian EGF receptor and Ras are thought to transduce signals by activating targets in completely separate signaling branches (such as phospholipase C gamma or PI3 kinase; ![]()
In this article, we have further characterized the role of mpk-1 in let-60 ras signaling pathways during C. elegans development. First, we present evidence suggesting that mpk-1 transduces most if not all of the signal from let-23 receptor and let-60 ras. We used three genetic screens to recover new mpk-1 alleles (including three putative null alleles) and found that mpk-1null mutants exhibit a strong vulvaless phenotype. We also showed that activation of both MEK and MAP kinase activates the vulval signaling pathway, resulting in a multivulva phenotype. Thus, mpk-1 is necessary for vulval induction, and mek and mpk-1 together are sufficient to activate vulval induction. Second, genetic and molecular analyses suggest that mpk-1 acts downstream of all the signal transduction genes in the let-23 RTK vulval signaling pathway, but upstream of lin-1 Ets (a vulval repressor gene encoding a putative transcription factor). Finally, our results suggest that mpk-1 may act together with let-60 in many, but perhaps not all, of the tissues whose fates are determined by let-60 ras signaling.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
General methods:
Strain maintenance, genetic manipulation, and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis were performed as described by ![]()
![]()
LGI: mek-2(n2678) (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
LGIII: unc-79(e1068), mpk-1(ku8) (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
LGIV: lin-1(sy254) (![]()
![]()
![]()
LGV: him-5(e1490), lin-25(e1446) (![]()
LGX: lin-15(n309), lin-3(syIs1) (gift from R. HILL, Cal Tech), unc-7(e5).
Transgenic arrays (transgenes; cotransformation markers): gaEx36 {hs-mpk-1(gf); hs-D-mek(gf); rol-6(d)}, gaEx72 {lin-31-mpk-1(gf); lin-31-D-mek(gf); unc-119(+)}, gaIs17{hs-mpk-1(gf); hs-D-mek(gf); unc-30(+)}; gaIs36 {hs-mpk-1(+); EF1alpha-D-mek(gf); unc-30(+)}.
Genetic mapping:
The oz140 allele was initially mapped to the left arm of chromosome III (T. SCHEDL, personal communication). To determine if it mapped to the same interval as the mpk-1 locus, we mapped it relative to unc-79 and dpy-17. Briefly, we picked Dpy non-Unc and Unc non-Dpy recombinants from a strain of the genotype oz140/unc-79(e1068) dpy-17(e164). The progeny of these recombinant animals were screened for sterile (Ste) animals (the oz140 mutant phenotype). Eighteen out of 19 Dpy non-Unc animals segregated Ste animals, whereas 1 out of 17 Unc non-Dpy animals segregated Ste animals. These data suggest that oz140 maps to the left of dpy-17 and very close or to the right of unc-79. This is the approximate map position of the mpk-1 locus. The SD344 strain [+ mpk-1(oz140) dpy-17(e164)/unc-79(e1068) + dpy-17 (e164)] was constructed by picking Dpy non-Unc recombinant progeny of hermaphrodites of genotype mpk-1(oz140)/unc-79(e1068) dpy-17(e164). All other newly isolated mpk-1 alleles were shown to be linked to unc-79 and dpy-17 by allowing hermaphrodites of genotype mpk-1(rf)/unc-79 dpy-17 to self, picking 20 Unc Dpy progeny and confirming that these hermaphrodites did not segregate sterile mpk-1(rf) animals (this experiment was performed at 25° for ga111).
Three mutations isolated in a clonal screen for sterile and vulvaless animals were mapped using STS polymorphisms (data not shown; ![]()
Strain construction:
Double mutants containing mpk-1(ga117) and a Muv mutation (see Table 6) were all constructed using a common strategy, which is illustrated here for lin-15(n309). First, dpy-17(e164); lin-15(n309) was built. These dpy-17(e164); lin-15(n309) hermaphrodites were then mated with males of genotype mpk-1(ga117) dpy-17(e164); sDp3. sDp3 is a chromosomal duplication that complements mutations in mpk-1 and dpy-17. Non-Dpy cross-progeny of genotype ga117 e164/+ e164; sDp3; n309/+ were then allowed to self-fertilize. Muv non-Dpy progeny of this cross were then placed on individual plates and allowed to self-fertilize. Muv non-Dpy animals in which all the Dpy progeny were Ste were taken to be of genotype mpk-1(ga117) dpy-17(e164); lin-15(n309); sDp3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lin-45; gaEx36 strain was constructed by mating lin-45/+ males with gaEx36 (Rol) hermaphrodites. Cross-progeny hermaphrodites were cloned, and their self-progeny were screened for Vul Rol animals. Vul Rol animals were assumed to be of genotype lin-45; gaEx36. lin-25; gaEx36 and sur-2; gaEx36 strains were constructed similarly.
Gonad ablations:
Somatic gonad precursors Z1.aaa and Z4.ppp were ablated with a laser microbeam (Laser Science, Newton, MA) as described in ![]()
Mutant sequence determination:
We used oligonucleotide primers (mpk-1f and mpk-12r in Table 1) in polymerase chain reactions to amplify a 3.2-kb genomic DNA fragment containing the entire mpk-1-coding region for the SLX2 form from wild-type strains and each mutant strain. The DNA sequence of the mpk-1 gene (exons 16 and the exon/intron borders) from each mutant was then determined by direct sequencing of this fragment in low-melting-temperature agarose (![]()
|
Germ line transformation experiments:
Germ line transformation experiments were done according to the method of ![]()
![]()
Manipulation of DNA and RNA:
Molecular biological techniques were done essentially as described by ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Phenotypic characterization:
When examined with a dissecting microscope, worms homozygous for strong mpk-1 alleles have a characteristic appearance in which the gonad appears mostly clear and devoid of embryos, with several clumps of dark granular material present in the gonad. They do not produce progeny.
Pn.p cell lineages shown in Table 2 and Table 3 were determined by direct observation of cells or cell divisions using Nomarski optics, as described by ![]()
Male mating assays were conducting by mating 20 individual mpk-1(ga117) dpy-17 males with two unc-119 hermaphrodites each. None produced non-Unc cross-progeny. Nine out of 10 control matings of dpy-17 males with unc-119 hermaphrodites gave cross-progeny.
Western blotting:
Western blots were prepared essentially as described in ![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Isolation of new mpk-1 alleles:
We wanted to determine whether all of the anchor cell signal is transduced by mpk-1 (in which case elimination of mpk-1 activity should prevent all vulval induction caused by the anchor cell) or whether the anchor cell signaling pathway is branched (in which case elimination of mpk-1 activity should cause defects only in the mpk-1 branch of the signaling pathway). To accomplish this, we isolated new mpk-1 alleles in genetic screens, used molecular characterization to determine if any of them were likely to be null alleles, and then determined whether elimination of mpk-1 activity completely prevented the expression of vulval cell fates.
We used three approaches to isolate additional alleles of mpk-1. The first approach was to screen for mutations that failed to complement the egg-laying defective (Egl) phenotype of mpk-1(ku8). This screen should identify mpk-1 alleles that predominantly affect vulval development, but would miss null alleles if these alleles cause sterile or lethal phenotypes when heterozygous with ku8. Mutagenized N2 (wild-type) males were mated with mpk-1(ku8) dpy-17; unc-7 hermaphrodites, and the cross-progeny hermaphrodites were screened for an Egl phenotype. From a screen involving 7500 mutagenized haploid genomes, we recovered two mutations (ga110 and ga111) that mapped near to mpk-1 in the central region of chromosome III and failed to complement the mpk-1(ku8) Egl phenotype (data not shown). An additional allele, mpk-1(oz140), was provided to us by T. SHEDL and we subsequently showed that this allele results in the same DNA sequence change as mpk-1(ga110) (see Figure 1). Based on the molecular analyses described below, neither ga110, ga111, nor oz140 are likely to be null alleles.
Our second approach was to screen for mutations that failed to complement the sterile phenotype of mpk-1(oz140) (![]()
The third approach used to isolate new alleles was to perform a general screen to identify heterozygous animals that segregated approximately one-quarter sterile, vulvaless self-progeny, and then to determine which were new mpk-1 alleles. This screen could identify mutations that would be missed in the first screen (because it could identify mutations in any gene that cause a sterile, vulvaless phenotype), and it is simpler to perform than the second screen (because it does not require individual matings). Individual F1 progeny of mutagenized hermaphrodites were placed on plates and allowed to self-fertilize, and then these plates were screened for the presence of one-quarter sterile F2 progeny. We recovered three mutations from a screen involving 4020 mutagenized genomes. Two of these mutations are alleles of mek-2 because they map near to mek-2 on the left region of chromosome I and fail to complement the sterile phenotype caused by mek-2(n2678). One mutation (ga119) is a new allele of mpk-1 because it maps to the central region of chromosome III, fails to complement the sterile phenotype of mpk-1(oz140), and contains a DNA sequence change in the mpk-1 gene (see below).
Molecular characterization of mpk-1 alleles:
We used molecular analysis of the new mpk-1 alleles to determine if any were likely to be null mutations. (Figure 1). DNA from mpk-1(ga117) mutants had an AG to AA nucleotide substitution in the splice acceptor site upstream of exon 3 (Figure 1), and this G nucleotide is present in all known splice acceptor sites in C. elegans (![]()
![]()
|
DNA from mpk-1(ga118) mutants had a T to C transition that would change an arginine residue to a cysteine residue (R197C; Figure 1). This residue is conserved in all known MAP kinases and is in a region referred to as the phosphorylation loop, which contains the MEK phosphorylation site (TEY) and the kinase catalytic site (APE; ![]()
![]()
DNA from mpk-1(ga119) mutants had a G to A transition that would change the glutamic acid in the kinase catalytic site (APE) to a lysine (APK) (Figure 1). A glutamic acid at this site is conserved in all known protein kinases (![]()
![]()
![]()
DNA from mpk-1(ga110) and mpk-1(oz140) mutants had the identical DNA sequence alteration, a G to A transition predicted to change tryptophan at amino acid 351 to an amber stop codon (Figure 1). This substitution would result in truncation of the C-terminal 25 amino acids of the MPK-1 protein. These amino acids are not conserved in other MAP kinase proteins, suggesting that these mutations may reduce but not eliminate gene activity. Premature termination of translation often results in mRNA instability, so the oz140 phenotype might result from lower mRNA levels, decreased protein kinase activity, or both. smg-1 mutations increase the stability of nonsense messages (![]()
DNA from mpk-1(ga111) mutants has a T to C transition that would be predicted to alter amino acid 148 from valine to glycine (Figure 1). This valine is conserved in other MAP kinase proteins but not in other types of protein kinases (![]()
![]()
![]()
Vulval phenotypes of mpk-1 alleles:
Our first finding is that mpk-1 is required for vulval induction (Table 2). Using the putative null mutation ga117, we determined the cell lineages of the Pn.p cells in 20 mutant hermaphrodites and found that P5.p, P6.p, and P7.p expressed the uninduced 3° cell fate rather than induced 1° or 2° cell fates in every animal (Figure 3, Table 2 and Table 3). Next, we determined the number and types of cells that were present at the L4 stage of development in 20 homozygous mpk-1(ga117), mpk-1(ga118), and mpk-1(ga119) animals and found that all the vulval precursor cells had expressed uninduced 3° cell fates in each case (Table 2). These results show that mpk-1 null mutations cause a highly penetrant vulvaless phenotype.
|
mpk-1(ga110) and mpk-1(oz140) have the same DNA sequence alteration that results in a weak vulvaless phenotype that is partially temperature sensitive. At 25°, 84% of mpk-1(oz140) animals exhibited a Vul phenotype in which all six vulval precursor cells expressed 3° cell fates, and the remaining 16% showed a partial Vul phenotype (Table 2). At 20°, none of mpk-1(oz140) mutants showed a complete Vul phenotype, 60% showed partial vulval defects, and the remaining 40% had a wild-type pattern of vulval cell lineages (Figure 3 and Table 2). We determined the vulval cell lineage pattern of nine mpk-1(ga110) animals at 20°. Four animals showed defects in the expression of the 1° cell fate, and the remaining five animals showed wild-type cell lineage patterns (Table 3). Gene dosage experiments suggest that oz140 is a partial reduction-of-function mutation because oz140 homozygotes have a weaker phenotype than heterozygotes carrying oz140 in trans to a null allele, ga117 (Table 2).
mpk-1(ga111) results in vulval phenotypes similar to the phenotypes previously observed for mpk-1(n2521) (Table 2). Homozygous mpk-1(ga111) animals exhibit wild-type vulval development at all temperatures (Table 2). However, mpk-1(ga111) is a recessive suppressor of the multivulva phenotype caused by the gain-of-function ras allele let-60(n1046). Specifically, let-60(n1046) single mutants have a Muv phenotype, but mpk-1(ga111); let-60(n1046) double mutants have a wild-type vulval phenotype (data not shown).
Interestingly, mpk-1(ku8) might have a neomorphic activity in addition to partially reducing mpk-1 activity. We found that mpk-1(ga111)/mpk-1(ga117) heterozygotes are wild-type, but that mpk-1(ga111)/mpk-1(ku8) heterozygotes are Egl although they have a normal pattern of vulval cell fates (data not shown). The cause of the Egl phenotype in these heterozygotes has not yet been identified. These results indicate that mpk-1(ku8) can have a more severe phenotype than putative mpk-1(null) alleles in trans to mpk-1(ga111).
Activation of the vulval pathway with MEK and MAP kinase is sufficient to cause vulval differentiation:
Because MAP kinase is the primary substrate for MEK in vertebrate cells (![]()
All experiments with MEK were performed using a Drosophila MEK cDNA containing the gain-of-function Dsor1 mutation (referred to as D-mek(gf)) (![]()
![]()
The amino acid substitution D334N is a gain-of-function mutation of Drosophila MAP kinase (![]()
We next constructed transgenic lines containing both hs-mpk-1(gf) and hs-D-mek(gf) and found that heat shock expression of mpk-1(gf) and D-mek(gf) resulted in 90% of animals exhibiting a multivulva phenotype (Table 4). We followed the Pn.p cell lineages of seven animals transgenic for hs-mpk-1(gf) and hs-D-mek(gf) to determine the pattern of cell fates expressed by the Pn.p cells (Table 3). In these seven animals, there were 21 vulval precursor cells that would normally express the 3° cell fate (P3.p, P4.p, or P8.p in each animal), and we found that these cells expressed either the 1° cell fate or a hybrid 1°/2° cell fate in 13 cases.
We also constructed transgenic animals that express mpk-1(gf) and mek(gf) from the lin-31 promoter and found that 90% of these animals exhibited a Muv phenotype (Table 4). We then followed the Pn.p cell lineages of five such animals (Table 3). In four animals, all six vulval precursor cells expressed induced (1° and 2°) cell fates. In one animal, five out of six Pn.p cells expressed induced cell fates. We observed 12 cases in which adjacent Pn.p cells both expressed 1° cell fates (out of 25 possible cases). These results suggest that expression of mek(gf) and mpk-1(gf) is sufficient to induce vulval precursor cells to express the 1° cell fate in most cases.
mpk-1 acts downstream of signal transduction genes but upstream of transcription factor genes in the vulval signaling pathway:
We have used several complementary approaches to determine the position of mpk-1 in the genetic pathway specifying vulval development. Our results suggest that MPK-1 acts downstream of other conserved signal transduction molecules and upstream of transcription factors. The experiments are presented in the order in which the tested gene (or signaling event) is thought to act in the anchor cell signaling pathway.
To determine whether MEK and MAP kinase act downstream of the anchor cell signal, we used laser microsurgery to ablate the entire somatic gonad, including the anchor cell, and then induced expression of hs-D-mek(gf) and hs-mpk-1(gf). We observed that P3.p, P4.p, or P8.p expressed vulval cell fates leading to ectopic vulval tissue in L4 stage animals and a Muv phenotype in adults (Figure 4, Table 5). The vulval phenotype observed in these gonad-ablated animals was similar to that of mock-operated control animals. This result indicates that the Muv phenotype caused by activation of MEK and MAP kinase is independent of the anchor cell signal.
|
lin-3 encodes a protein similar to EGF that is likely to be the inductive signal produced by the anchor cell, and overexpression of lin-3 results in a Muv phenotype (![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Gain-of-function let-60 ras mutations result in a Muv phenotype. Previous work has shown that partial reduction-of-function alleles of mpk-1 suppress the Muv phenotype caused by a gain-of-function mutation of let-60. However, partial reduction-of-function alleles of mpk-1 do not block expression of the 1° cell fate in P6.p (![]()
![]()
lin-45 is a homolog of the proto-oncogene raf, and loss-of-function lin-45 mutations cause a Vul phenotype (![]()
To order the activity of mpk-1 relative to mek-2, we determined whether a mek-2 null mutation prevents phosphorylation of MPK-1. mpk-1 expresses two RNAs (1X2 and SLX2) predicted to encode proteins of 45 and 55 kD, respectively (![]()
Genetic epistasis experiments suggest that lin-25 and sur-2 may function at a step between let-60 ras and transcription factors such as lin-1 Ets (TUCK and GREEWALD 1995; ![]()
Next, we ordered the activity of mpk-1 relative to lin-1, which encodes a protein with a region of similarity to the Ets DNA-binding domain (![]()
In addition to the let-23 RTK/let-60 ras/mpk-1 signaling pathway, at least two other signaling pathways are involved in specifying the wild-type pattern of vulval cell fates. The first pathway is an inhibitory pathway postulated to arise from the surrounding hypodermis. lin-15 acts in this pathway and encodes two novel proteins that function to produce an inhibitory signal in the hypodermis (HEDGECOCK 1990; ![]()
The second pathway is a lateral signaling pathway in which a signal from the 1° cell induces adjacent Pn.p cells to adopt the 2° cell fate. lin-12 encodes a protein with significant homology to the Notch family of transmembrane receptors (![]()
![]()
Constitutive activation of the anchor cell signaling pathway does not cause precocious vulval induction:
The vulval cell divisions begin ~29 hr after egg laying when wild-type animals are raised at 25°. The timing of vulval induction might be controlled by the time at which the vulval signaling pathway is activated. For example, some component of the signaling pathway, such as the anchor cell signal, might not be expressed until 29 hr after egg laying. Alternatively, the vulval precursor cells might not be competent to respond to activation of the let-23/let-60/mpk-1 signaling pathway until 29 hr after egg laying. We have constitutively activated the anchor cell signaling pathway by using animals that ubiquitously express D-mek(gf) from the EF1a promoter and constitutively express hs-mpk-1(+) when grown at 25°. As shown above, constitutive activation of mek and mpk-1 should be sufficient to induce vulval cell fates even if upstream components of the signaling pathway are not expressed before 29 hr after egg laying. In these transgenic worms, the vulval cell divisions began ~2930 hr after the eggs were laid, as they do in wild-type worms (Table 8). The transgenes resulted in activation of the anchor cell signaling pathway because 90% of these animals exhibited a Muv phenotype. This result indicates that the vulval precursor cells are not competent to divide in response to MEK and MAP kinase signaling until at least 29 hr after egg laying.
|
mpk-1 acts in the let-60 ras signaling pathway in multiple cell types:
let-60 ras functions in at least six cell fate decisions because let-60 loss-of-function mutations affect at least six different cell types. An important question is whether let-60 signals through mpk-1 in all six cell types. If so, then mpk-1 mutants should show defects in all the cell types that are affected in let-60 mutants.
First, let-60 acts in the germ line, as loss-of-function mutations cause a sterile phenotype by preventing oocyte nuclei from exiting the pachytene stage of meiosis (![]()
![]()
Second, let-60 is required for larval viability, as let-60 null alleles cause developmental arrest in the L1 stage with a characteristic rod-like lethal phenotype. We have found that mpk-1 is also required for larval viability, but that maternal mpk-1(+) can rescue lethality in homozygous mutant larvae. We found that mpk-1(ga117) progeny segregated from mpk-1(ga117)/+ hermaphrodites do not exhibit lethality (Table 9). We reasoned that maternal mpk-1(+) might rescue larval lethality in these animals, so we asked whether larval lethality was observed in a strain with less maternal mpk-1(+) activity. We examined homozygous mpk-1(ga117) animals segregated from mothers heterozygous for a partial loss-of-function mpk-1 allele and a null allele, i.e., of genotype ga111/ga117. The heterozygous mpk-1(ga111)/mpk-1(ga117) mothers are not sterile, though they do show reduced fecundity (data not shown). We observed that 97% of mpk-1(ga117)/mpk-1(ga117) progeny segregated from mpk-1(ga111)/mpk-1(ga117) parents arrested in the L1 stage as rod-like larvae (Table 9). The remaining 3% of mpk-1(ga117)/mpk-1(ga117) animals were non-Let and grew into sterile, vulvaless adults. Similar results were obtained with another allele, mpk-1(ga119), which may strongly reduce mpk-1 function (Table 9). These results suggest that let-60 and mpk-1 may act in the same signaling pathway in early larval development.
|
Third, mutations in let-60 have been shown to affect cell fate decisions in the male tail (![]()
![]()
Fourth, let-60 mutants have defects in the migration of the sex myoblasts; the partial loss-of-function mutation mpk-1(ku1) causes weak defects in the migration of the sex myoblasts (![]()
Fifth, let-60 mutants have defects in the expression of the P12.p cell fate (![]()
Sixth, we have not observed mpk-1 phenotypes other than the ones mentioned above. This result suggests that mpk-1 may be required only in let-60 ras signaling pathways because all the mpk-1 phenotypes are also observed in let-60 ras mutants.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
The anchor cell signaling pathway may be linear:
Previously isolated mpk-1 alleles have weak vulval phenotypes, whereas loss-of-function alleles in other genes in the let-23 RTK/let-60 ras signaling pathway have a strong vulvaless phenotype. These results raised the possibility that the let-23 signaling pathway may branch in a way that another branch of the signaling pathway could transduce the anchor cell signal in mpk-1 mutants. We have tested this possibility and have shown that mpk-1 null mutations cause a highly penetrant, vulvaless phenotype. Thus, there is no evidence for a signaling branch acting in parallel to mpk-1, and our data are consistent with the idea that the anchor cell signaling pathway is linear through the mpk-1 step. However, our results do not rule out the possibility that the pathway may be branched in a way that mpk-1 transduces the majority of the anchor cell signal and another branch has a minor role. In the absence of mpk-1 activity, the minor branch may not be capable of mediating observable amounts of vulval induction.
The case for a linear signaling pathway is strengthened by our finding that coexpression of D-mek(gf) and mpk-1(gf) results in a strong multivulva phenotype. Both genes act at the end of the anchor cell signal transduction pathway, and the primary known function for MEK is to activate MAP kinase. These results indicate that the pathway is not branched upstream of mek and mpk-1, as mek-2 and mpk-1 are both required for vulval induction and coexpression of mek(gf) and mpk-1(gf) is sufficient for vulval induction.
However, expression of either gene alone [either mek(gf) or mpk-1(gf)] did not cause a Muv phenotype. One possibility is that these two genes act in one linear pathway and that gain-of-function mutations at two sequential steps are required to fully activate the pathway. It could be that full activation of MPK-1 requires both the D324N missense mutation (analogous to Drosophila Sevenmaker) and expression of D-MEK(gf). One finding that supports this idea is that a strong gain-of-function allele of mek-2 results in a Muv phenotype in single mutants (![]()
mpk-1 acts downstream of signal transduction genes but upstream of transcription factor genes:
We have found that the MAP kinase homolog mpk-1 acts downstream of the Ras homolog let-60, the Raf homolog lin-45, and the MEK homolog mek-2, consistent with the biochemical position of MAP kinase in vertebrate signaling pathways and the genetic position of the Drosophila rolled MAP kinase in the R7 photoreceptor signaling pathway (![]()
![]()
![]()
Furthermore, we show that mpk-1 acts upstream of lin-1, which encodes a putative DNA binding protein similar to mammalian Ets-1 and Drosophila Yan (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
An interesting point is that the anchor cell signaling pathway may be predominantly linear between lin-3 and mpk-1, but may branch downstream of mpk-1. mpk-1 null mutations have a highly penetrant vulvaless phenotype, but null mutations in genes that act downstream of mpk-1 (lin-1, lin-25, lin-31, and sur-2) neither completely activate nor completely prevent vulval induction. Specifically, null mutations in lin-25 and sur-2 result in a partial vulvaless phenotype (TUCK and GREEWALD 1995; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
mpk-1 and let-60 ras may act together in many developmental processes:
We have shown that mpk-1 may function with let-60 ras in one signaling pathway that regulates many developmental processes. One issue that has yet to be resolved regards signaling specificity of the let-23 RTK/let-60 ras/mpk-1 signaling pathway. How can activation of this signaling pathway in different cell types and times lead to different developmental outcomes? One possibility is that different levels of activation might lead to different cell fates. For example, it has been proposed that different levels of MPK-1 activity might cause vulval precursor cells to adopt either the 1° or 2° vulval cell fate. This graded signal hypothesis is consistent with some experiments (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Present address: Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank D. EISENMANN, A. HAJNAL, A. VILLENEUVE, and current members of the Kim lab for discussions and critical comments on the manuscript. We thank M. KOGA, R. HILL, M. MADURO, and T. SCHEDL for reagents and/or strains and K. KORNFELD for communicating unpublished data on mpk-1(oz140). Many of the strains used in this work were supplied by the Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics Center. This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) predoctoral training grant to M.L. and an NIH grant to S.K.K.
Manuscript received March 17, 1998; Accepted for publication May 26, 1998.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ADAMS, P. D. and P. J. PARKER, 1992 Activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase by a MAP kinase-kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 267:13135-13137
AROIAN, R. V., M. KOGA, J. E. MENDEL, Y. OHSHIMA, and P. W. STERNBERG, 1990 The let-23 gene necessary for Caenorhabditis elegans vulval induction encodes a tyrosine kinase of the EGF receptor subfamily. Nature 348:693-699[Medline].
AVERY, L. and H. R. HORVITZ, 1989 Pharyngeal pumping continues after laser killing of the pharyngeal nervous system of C. elegans. Neuron 4:473-485.
BEITEL, G. J., S. G. CLARK, and H. R. HORVITZ, 1990 Caenorhabditis elegans ras gene let-60 acts as a switch in the pathway of vulval induction. Nature 348:503-509[Medline].
BEITEL, G. J., S. TUCK, I. GREENWALD, and H. R. HORVITZ, 1995 The Caenorhabditis elegans gene lin-1 encodes an ETS-domain protein and defines a branch of the vulval induction pathway. Genes Dev. 9:3149-3162
BIGGS, W. H., III, K. H. ZAVITZ, B. DICKSON, A. VAN DER STRATEN, and D. BRUNNER et al., 1994 The Drosophila rolled locus encodes a MAP kinase required in the sevenless signal transduction pathway. EMBO J. 13:1628-1635[Medline].
BLUMENTHAL, T., and K. STEWARD, 1997 RNA processing and gene structure, pp. 117146 in C. elegans II, edited by D. RIDDLE, T. BLUMENTHAL, B. MEYER and J. PRIESS. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
BRENNER, S., 1974 The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77:71-94
BRUNET, A. and J. POUYSSEGUR, 1996 Identification of MAP kinase domains by redirecting stress signals into growth factor responses. Science 272:1652-1655[Abstract].
BRUNNER, D., N. OELLERS, J. SZABAD, W. H. I. BIGGS, and S. L. ZIPURSKY et al., 1994 A gain-of-function mutation in Drosophila MAP kinase activates multiple receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathways. Cell 76:875-888[Medline].
BUTCH, E. R. and K.-L. GUAN, 1996 Characterization of ERK1 activation site mutants and the effect on recognition by MEK1 and MEK2. J. Biol. Chem. 271:4230-4235
CHAMBERLIN, H. M. and P. W. STERNBERG, 1993 Multiple cell interactions are required for fate specification during male spicule development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 118:297-324[Abstract].
CHAMBERLIN, H. M. and P. W. STERNBERG, 1994 The lin-3-let-23 pathway mediates inductive signalling during male spicule development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 120:2713-2721[Abstract].
CHURCH, D. L., K.-L. GUAN, and E. J. LAMBIE, 1995 Three genes of the MAP kinase cascade, mek-2, mpk-1/sur-1 and let-60 ras, are required for meoitic cell cycle progression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development



