- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Nanassy, O. Z.
- Articles by Hughes, K. T.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Nanassy, O. Z.
- Articles by Hughes, K. T.
In Vivo Identification of Intermediate Stages of the DNA Inversion Reaction Catalyzed by the Salmonella Hin Recombinase
Oliver Z. Nanassya and Kelly T. Hughesaa Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Corresponding author: Kelly T. Hughes, Department of Microbiology, Box 357242, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195., hughes{at}u.washington.edu (E-mail).
Communicating editor: G. R. SMITH
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The Hin recombinase catalyzes a site-specific recombination reaction that results in the reversible inversion of a 1-kbp segment of the Salmonella chromosome. The DNA inversion reaction catalyzed by the Salmonella Hin recombinase is a dynamic process proceeding through many intermediate stages, requiring multiple DNA sites and the Fis accessory protein. Biochemical analysis of this reaction has identified intermediate steps in the inversion reaction but has not yet revealed the process by which transition from one step to another occurs. Because transition from one reaction step to another proceeds through interactions between specific amino acids, and between amino acids and DNA bases, it is possible to study these transitions through mutational analysis of the proteins involved. We isolated a large number of mutants in the Hin recombinase that failed to carry out the DNA exchange reaction. We generated genetic tools that allowed the assignment of these mutants to specific transition steps in the recombination reaction. This genetic analysis, combined with further biochemical analysis, allowed us to define contributions by specific amino acids to individual steps in the DNA inversion reaction. Evidence is also presented in support of a model that Fis protein enhances the binding of Hin to the hixR recombination site. These studies identified regions within the Hin recombinase involved in specific transition steps of the reaction and provided new insights into the molecular details of the reaction mechanism.
THE DNA strand exchange reaction is a fundamental process in nature. Such reactions are used to generate genetic diversity through allelic exchange via homologous recombination or by transposition. Furthermore, DNA rearrangements catalyzed by site-specific recombinases occur by a mechanism used by various organisms to affect gene expression. The Hin recombinase catalyzes a reversible, site-specific recombination reaction within the chromosome of Salmonella typhimurium and other closely related Salmonella spp. Strand exchange occurs between two homologous chromosomal sites, hixL and hixR, that flank an invertible promoter (![]()
![]()
|
The study of site-specific recombination in prokaryotes has yielded many discoveries, including the involvement of recombinational enhancer (RE) elements, the importance of the minor groove DNA-binding domain for protein-DNA interactions, homology of the minor groove-binding domain to minor groove recognition regions in eukaryotic homeodomain proteins, and mechanistic similarities between prokaryotic site-specific recombination and V(D)J recombination (variable (and sometimes diverse) gene segment joining) used to generate antibody diversity (![]()
![]()
![]()
The Hin-mediated DNA inversion reaction, diagrammed in Figure 1, requires the activity of Hin recombinase to catalyze cleavage of pairs of phosophodiester bonds in both hix sites and is stimulated by the binding of an accessory protein, Fis, to a third, recombinational enhancer site (![]()
![]()
![]()
Hin binds to each of the two hix sites as a dimer, making contacts in both the minor and major grooves of the substrate DNA (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In this study, we describe the isolation of Hin mutants that are defective in recombination. The catalytically inactive point mutants of Hin that retain their ability to bind DNA (B+ R-) were first separated from recombination-deficient mutants using the P22 challenge phage system (![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Bacteria and bacteriophage strains:
All S. typhimurium strains are derived from strain LT2. Isogenic strains MS1883 (leuA414 hsdSB supE40 Fels-) and MS1868 (leuA414 hsdSB Fels-) were used for phage growth and selections for the products of crosses between phage and plasmids (GRAÑA 1985). Strain TH2128 is hsdLT6 hsdSA29 hsdSB metA22 metE551 trpD2 ilv-452. Challenge phage assays were performed with isogenic strains LT2 and TH2285 (fis-3::Cam) (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The constructions of phages P22 hixL Kn6 arcH1605 and P22 RE-hixL Kn6 arcH1605 were as follows: plasmid pMS284 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Plasmid pKH419 was introduced into strain TH1901, which is lysogenic for phage P22 Ap521. P22 Ap521 is a derivative of P22 with a Tn1 insertion in the mnt gene. The presence of the Tn1 insertion in the mnt gene results in a phage that is too large to be packaged into a single phage particle. Induction of P22 Ap521 in the presence of pKH419 yielded viable phage because of recombination between pKH419 and P22 Ap521, in which the Tn1 insertion was removed by homologous recombination with pKH419 and replaced by the sieA - hixL - Kn6 - arcH1605 - ant segment from pKH419 to yield phage P22 hixL - Kn6 arcH1605. To screen for the presence of the arcH1605 mutation, recombinant phages were plated on MS1883, permissive for the arcH1605 (am) mutation because of the supE40 mutation in MS1883, and screened for restricted growth on MS1868. The arcH1605(am) mutation is not suppressed in MS1868, resulting in full derepression of the ant promoter, which is detrimental to phage growth. A single plaque was isolated and used to grow a high-titer lysate. DNA was isolated from this lysate, and both the hixL - Kn6 insert and the arcH1605 allele were verified by restriction analysis.
Challenge phages Tet-10G (P22 hixL Kn6 10G arcH1605) and Inv-10G (P22 RE-hixL Kn6 10G arcH1605) were constructed by crosses between either P22 hixL Kn6 arcH1605 or P22 RE-hixL Kn6 arcH1605, respectively, and plasmid pPY190, in which the symmetrically mutant hixC 10G site had been cloned in the place of the ant operator as described (![]()
Media:
Media conditions, concentrations of antibiotics and lactose indicators, transductional crosses, and transformations were as reported previously (![]()
![]()
Localized mutagenesis of the S. typhimurium chromosome and isolation of hin mutants:
A Mud-lac insertion in the fliC flagellin gene of S. typhimurium alternates between a Lac+ and Lac- state because of Hin-mediated inversion of a segment of the chromosome (![]()
![]()
Isolation of plasmid-encoded B+ R- mutants of hin:
Purified plasmid pKH66 was mutagenized as described previously (![]()
![]()
![]()
Strain LT2 or MS1883 carrying pKH66 hin mutant (R-) alleles were screened for the ability of the mutant Hin protein to be stably expressed and bind to the various wild-type (WT) and consensus hix sites using the hixC, hixL(I), hixL(II), and hixR(I) challenge phages whose constructions have been described elsewhere (![]()
![]()
![]()
DNA sequence analysis of B+ R- hin mutants:
Sequencing of B+ R- hin mutants was performed on plasmid DNA purified by CsCl gradient purification (![]()
![]()
P22 challenge phage assays:
Quantitative challenge phage assays were carried out in the TH437 (LT2) and TH2285 (fis-3::Cam) strains as described previously (![]()
![]()
Crude lysates containing overexpressed hin mutant proteins:
The following recA1 endA1 E. coli strains were used to overexpress Hin mutant and wild-type proteins: DH1, JM109, DH5
, and XL-1 Blue (Stratagene). The level of Fis protein in E. coli increases more than 500-fold during the initial lag phase that follows subculturing, reaching a peak as the cells enter the exponential growth phase (![]()
Strains containing pKH66 or derivatives with B+ R- mutations were subcultured at a 1:100 dilution from a fresh 5-ml overnight culture into 250 ml LB broth supplemented with antibiotic at 37° until reaching an OD600 between 0.2 and 0.4. For induction, the culture was diluted 1:4 with room temperature LB + antibiotic + IPTG at a final concentration of 1 mM, and was subcultured for 30 min at 30°. The final volume of these cultures was usually 1 liter. Cells were placed on ice for at least 20 min, pelleted at 4° at 8000 g in a GSA rotor, washed with 250 ml of ice-cold sterile ddH2O and pelleted as before, and resuspended in ~2.5 ml of ice-cold sterile 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. The cell suspension was then lysed by two passages through a French press at 20,000 p.s.i., and the resulting lysate was centrifuged at 16,000 x g in a tabletop centrifuge (Eppendorf) at 4° for 30 min. The resulting supernatants were used directly after quantification of protein content (Assay Kit; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). Typically, the crude lysates contained ~10 mg ml-1 total protein. At times, aliquots of these extracts were quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80° in the presence or absence of 50% glycerol. For WT Hin, the presence or absence of glycerol does not seem to qualitatively affect inversion activity after one freeze-thaw (at 4°) cycle. Frozen extracts were only used for subsequent DNA-binding studies and/or Western blot analyses.
In vitro Hin activity assays:
DNA cleavage and inversion reaction conditions were described previously (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
New challenge phage substrates to detect Hin recombination intermediatesTet-10G and Inv-10G:
The intermediate steps in the Hin recombination reaction revealed by molecular and biochemical characterization include (1) Hin dimer formation and Fis dimer formation; (2) Hin dimers bound to hix DNA sites and Fis dimers bound to the recombinational enhancer; (3) invertasome formation, which includes Hin tetramer formation and possibly Hin/Fis interactions; (4) DNA cleavage by Hin, resulting in covalent attachment of Hin to hix DNA; (5) DNA strand rotation, resulting in the loss of four negative supercoils; and (6) religation and release (![]()
We previously used the in vivo challenge phage assay (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

resolvase site-specific recombination system (![]()
|
The challenge phage designed to detect Hin tetramer formation, Tet-10G:
In various prokaryotic promoter regions, dimers of repressors or activators interact with each other to create a DNA loop between the bound DNA sites (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
The challenge phage designed for Hin-Fis invertasome formation, Inv-10G:
When purified Hin and Fis proteins were added to supercoiled DNA substrate, including the hix sites flanking the recombinational enhancer element, a stable protein-DNA complex called the invertasome was observed (![]()
![]()
Effect of Fis on Hin repression of ant in the hixL, hixR, hixC, 10G, Tet-10G, and Inv-10G challenge phages: binding of Hin to hixR, 10G, Tet-10G, and Inv-10G requires Fis:
We hypothesized that suppression of the defective hix site in the Tet-10G phage resulted from Hin dimers interacting to form tetramers, and suppression of the defective hix site in the Inv-10G phage resulted from interaction of Hin dimers as well as interactions between Hin and Fis to create the invertasome. Because tetramer formation can occur in the absence of Fis, but invertasome formation requires Fis (![]()
As expected, repression by Hin with either the hixC or hixL challenge phages were essentially the same in isogenic fis+ and fis- strains expressing Hin from pKH66. Also as expected, suppression by the presence of upstream hixL and RE sequences in the Inv-10G phage was dependent on a functional fis gene. In the fis mutant strain, the FOL for the Inv-10G phage was reduced up to 104-fold, compared to the fis+ strain, to the same FOL observed for the 10G phage in the fis- background.
Lysogeny by the 10G phage relative to hixC was down 105-fold in the fis- background compared to the more than 100-fold reduction in the isogenic fis+ strain. The binding of Hin to individual hix sites is thought to be independent of Fis (![]()
DNA binding-proficient, recombination-deficient (B+ R-) Hin mutants:
A large number of hin mutants were isolated and subjected to genetic classification using the various challenge phage screens devised above. Plasmid pKH66, containing the hin gene under an inducible promoter, was mutagenized, and 450 independent hin mutants were obtained that were no longer able to catalyze recombination (R-). The in vivo inversion assays that were used as a qualitative screen measured the ability of Hin expressed from pKH66 to invert a DNA fragment containing a promoter on the Salmonella chromosome in a hin- strain or on a lambda prophage in E. coli (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). For either assay, inversion activity caused by Hin expressed from pKH66 in the tester strain results in a Lac+ phenotype on MacConkey lactose plates after growth at 37° for at least 24 hr, whereas the R- hin mutants yield only Lac- colonies (tested up to 48 hr). Mutants that were not affected at the level of protein stability were first identified by Western blot with anti-Hin antibody on a subset of 154 R- mutants. Within this subset, 34 independent mutants had qualitatively wild-type or near wild-type, steady-state levels of Hin protein in extracts. DNA sequence analysis of these 34 mutants revealed 25 different single amino acid substitutions that resulted in the R- phenotype without affecting protein stability. Three of these substitutions, G139E, G139R, and A166V, are located in the DNA-binding domain (amino acids 138190) of the 190-amino-acid Hin protein (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The in vivo DNA-binding "challenge phage" assay was used to screen for Hin's DNA-binding activity independent of the recombination activity (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). Using the hixC challenge phage, the subset of 154 hin R- mutants were assayed for their ability to bind the hixC recombination site in vivo. 17/22 R- mutants that did not affect protein levels and had changes in amino acids of the catalytic domain were proficient in binding the hixC recombination site (B+). The remaining five mutants were not binding proficient. Thus, the challenge phage screen was able to identify binding-proficient, recombination-deficient (B+ R-) mutants directly using a simple in vivo plate assay. The R- mutants affecting amino acid positions 139 and 166 of the DNA-binding domain, which did not affect protein levels, were deficient in binding the hixC recombination site (B-). The ability of hin mutants to bind the hixC site in vivo is sufficient to identify hin mutants that do not affect protein stability and are specific to steps in the recombination reaction that occur after hix DNA recognition (steps 3, 4, 5, or 6 defined above). Of the remaining 296 R- hin mutants, 37 were found to be of the B+ R- phenotype in the challenge phage assay using the hixC and hixL phages. DNA sequence analysis of these B+ R- mutants identified an additional 10 single amino acids substitutions in the catalytic domain resulting in the B+ R- phenotype. This screen eliminated hin mutants defective in protein stability and DNA binding (78% of the original 154 screened) and allowed us to focus on the 27 hin mutants specific to the DNA recombination reaction (B+ R-). These 27 mutants were also proficient in binding the hixL and hixC sites in the challenge phage assay.
The challenge phage system detects Hin-mediated invertasome formation in vivo and segregates hin mutants into distinct genetic classes:
The 27 distinct B+ R- hin amino acid substitution mutants isolated above were tested for their ability to bind and repress the ant gene using the 10G, Tet-10G, and Inv-10G challenge phages. The results presented in Figure 4 show that the hin mutants of the B+ R- class fell into five genetic classes. A sixth class includes the G139R, G139E, and A166V B- R- mutants that are defective in the initial binding step and, therefore, also defective in recombination (B- R-).
|
One class (E) of mutant B+ R- Hin proteins binds the 10G site more efficiently than the wild-type Hin protein (Figure 4E vs. F). Therefore, they are designated as having an enhanced binding affinity in that they can bind the 10G mutant site as efficiently as a wild-type hix site, whereas WT Hin does not. These mutants may also have an additional downstream effect in recombination. The R43H and R69C substitutions had also been previously isolated by their ability to bind mutant hix sites, and a more extensive characterization of these mutants has been presented elsewhere (![]()
A second class (A and B) of B+ R- mutants showed increased suppression for the Inv-10G phage assays compared to 10G, similar to wild-type Hin (Figure 4A and Figure B). They are predicted to be capable of invertasome formation and have been designated the I+ class among the B+ R- hin mutants. The recombination defect for this class is predicted to be specific to the DNA cleavage, strand rotation, religation, and release steps in the reaction.
Within this I+ class are two subclasses. The first class (A) suppressed the defective 10G site equal to or better than WT Hin, when comparing the Inv-10G phage FOL to the 10G phage FOL (Figure 4A). It is important to note that some of the mutants in the larger I+ class exhibit a lower FOL by the 10G phage compared to WT Hin, which prompted the use of the ratio of FOL on the Inv-10G phage to the FOL on the 10G phage compared to this ratio for WT Hin as the main criterion for distinguishing the I+ class. The second I+ subclass (B) maintained a reduced capability (~20%) to form the invertasome in vivo by these same criteria, compared to WT Hin, and was designated I± (Figure 4B).
A third class of B+ R- mutants (C) showed some suppression only in the Tet-10G phage and not in the Inv-10G phage, and has been designated the T+ I- class (Figure 4C). The main criteria used to distinguish this class were the ratio of the Tet-10G FOL vs. the 10G FOL and the absence of better suppression on the Inv-10G phage vs. the Tet-10G phage. It is important to note that some of the mutants in the T+ I- class exhibit a lower FOL by the 10G phage compared to WT Hin, which prompted the use of the ratio of FOL on the Tet-10G phage to the FOL by the 10G phage, compared to this ratio for WT Hin, as one criterion for distinguishing the T+ I- class. Because they show suppression with the Tet-10G phage and not the Inv-10G phage, they are predicted to be proficient in tetramer formation through the pairing of Hin dimers, but unable to generate the invertasome. A negative effect by the addition of the enhancer on FOL for the R123Q mutant was observed with the Inv-10G construct compared to the Tet-10G construct (Figure 4C). This may indicate a disruption of a Hin/Fis interaction required for efficient formation of an invertasome-like structure on the Inv-10G phage that is not required for tetramer formation on the Tet-10G construct. This T+ I- class also falls into two subclasses. Because the hixR site was the only wild-type hix site where WT Hin exhibited a Fis- dependence for binding, we hypothesized that some interaction is required between Hin and Fis to bind hixR efficiently. It was expected that mutants in the T+ I- class may be disrupted for this type of putative interaction between Hin and Fis. The in vivo binding reflected by the FOL in the T124I mutant on the hixR challenge phage in fis+ strains resembled that seen for the wild-type Hin protein in a fis- background (Figure 5). The hixL data are included as a positive control to rule out a general binding defect for the T124I and A131V mutants. The R123Q and A126T mutants of the T+ I- class bound the hixR challenge phage about as well as WT Hin (Figure 5).
|
A fourth class (D) of B+ R- mutants showed no suppression by either hixL in the Tet-10G phage or hixL plus the RE in the Inv-10G phage compared to their respective FOL on the 10G phage (Figure 4D). If the Tet-10G phage does indeed detect tetramer formation, then these mutations are predicted to impair the ability of the protein to synapse the 10G and hixL sites, yielding a tetramer. Consequently, they are also predicted to be defective in invertasome formation. These are designated T- I-.
A final mutant, A131V, could not be specifically classified. Phenotypically, using the hixL, 10G, Tet-10G, and Inv-10G, it behaved like a T- I- mutant in the TH2128 background (data not shown). However, unlike all other mutants, A131V gave a B+ R- phenotype for one of the two orientations of hixL at the ant operator site of the phage, hixL(II). The (I) and (II) designations refer to the two possible orientations of the hixL site relative to the ant gene promoter in the challenge phage construct (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). Using the hixL(I) challenge phage, we obtained a FOL of 10-6. All other B+ R- mutants showed no preference for the orientation of the hixL site in the challenge phage (data not shown).
Biochemical characterization of B+ R- Hin mutant proteins:
Biochemical analysis was performed on the various B+ R- hin mutants to assess the correlation between the step in recombination that is blocked, as inferred by the in vivo challenge phage data, and the step in recombination that is blocked, as defined by standard biochemical assays (![]()
![]()
Cell extracts from E. coli recA1 endA1 strains overexpressing wild-type or B+ R- Hin mutant proteins from the low-copy-number (pKH66 parent) plasmid vector were screened for DNA inversion (Mg2+ present) and cleavage (Mg2+ absent, EDTA and ethylene glycol present) activities using a supercoiled plasmid containing two symmetrically oriented hixL sites and the enhancer as a substrate (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). All of the mutants tested with these cell extracts were qualitatively able to bind (as well as WT) either the hixC, hixL, or hixR sites in vitro by gel mobility shift assays when using 2040 µg of total protein per reaction (data not shown). No binding activity for either of these sites was discernible using 40 µg of an extract prepared with the vector only as a negative control (data not shown). This is in agreement with the in vivo B+ phenotype of the challenge phage assay. All but five B+ R- hin mutants failed to catalyze the DNA inversion reaction in vitro (Figure 6 and Table 1). These mutants were H87Y, S70G, S99G, V61I, and A131V. The H87Y and S70G mutants are from the I+ class of B+ R- alleles, the S99G and V61I mutants are from the I± class of B+ R- alleles, while the A131V mutant did not fit into a specific class. It was expected that only leaky mutants would be corrected for DNA inversion by changing the reaction conditions from in vivo to in vitro. The S99G and V61I mutants exhibited qualitatively lower inversion activities than the wild-type protein or the other in vitro inversion-proficient mutants. The H87Y, S70G, S99G, V61I, and A131V mutants were also proficient in the in vitro DNA cleavage reaction. Because DNA cleavage is required for inversion, this was the expected result for these mutants.
|
|
The N15Y mutant within the I± class exhibited qualitatively lower cleavage activity than the wild-type protein but no inversion activity. The A126T mutant within T+ class yielded only the linear product band in cleavage assays, presumably because double-strand cleavage, but not inversion, takes place at one hix site under the conditions tested (Figure 6 and Table 1).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Genetic classification of recombination-specific Hin mutants:
We had been successful in using the P22-based challenge phage system in combination with molecular and biochemical studies to characterize the binding of Hin to the hix DNA sites (![]()
![]()
Using a variety of mutagenic methods, hundreds of hin mutants defective in the recombination reaction were obtained (R-). Those able to bind in the hixC challenge phage system were labeled as binding proficient (B+). Because they are able to bind the hixC site, we presume that these mutants make normal levels of protein; this was confirmed by Western analysis (not shown).
These Hin mutants could be further classified in vivo using the Tet-10G and Inv-10G phage assays. At least six classes of R- hin mutants could be defined in vivo using the following challenge phages: (A) I+, presumably proficient in invertasome formation, (B) I±, (C) T+ I-, (D) T- I-, presumably deficient in tetramer and invertasome formation, (E) enhanced binders, and one other class of mutants disrupted in DNA binding. It is possible that any one mutation could affect more than one function, or that it may have more complex allosteric effects. These factors complicated the genetic classifications of the mutants, and some differences within classes have been presented. However, the Tet-10G and Inv-10G challenge phages allowed the in vivo identification and classification of recombination intermediates in the Hin/Fis catalyzed DNA inversion reaction that results in flagellar phase variation in Salmonella sp.
Binding of Hin to defective hix sites in vivo is dependent on Fis:
Unexpectedly, the suppression using the Tet-10G phage was found to be Fis dependent. Subsequent in vivo analysis of Hin binding in the hixC, hixL, hixR, and 10G challenge phages revealed that Hin binding in the hixC and hixL phage assays was Fis independent, while Hin binding in the hixR and 10G phages was Fis dependent. The relative binding affinity of purified Hin to the 10G site is only ~40% of the binding affinity to a hixC site, as measured in vitro using filter-binding assays (![]()
![]()
![]()
Another interpretation of these results is that these amino acid substitutions affect a Fis-dependent conformational change in Hin that normally enhances the ability of Hin to bind the 10G and hixR sites. The R8W mutant is able to bind the hixR(I) challenge phage efficiently, even in a fis- strain (data not shown). This gain of function property of the R8W mutant over WT Hin for binding hixR(I) in fis- strains is consistent with this alternative interpretation of our results.
Taken together, these data are also consistent with a model recently proposed for the Hin recombination reaction that holds that the primary rate-limiting step for assembling the invertasome may be a Fis-dependent conformational adjustment in Hin that is required to initiate concerted DNA cleavage (![]()
Homology between Hin and 
resolvasemodels for invertasome structure:
The Hin recombinase is a member of a large family of bacterial DNA invertases whose members include Gin from phage Mu (![]()
![]()
![]()

transposons (![]()
![]()

resolvase DNA binding domain are almost identical in their three-dimensional structure. Because of this homology, a hypothetical three-dimensional model of the Hin recombinase bound to the hix DNA sites has been constructed using the coordinates from the Hin-binding domain and hix half-site cocrystal structure for the Hin binding domain, as well as the 
resolvase "catalytic domain" coordinates (![]()
Localization of mutants onto the predicted Hin structure provides clues about the structure of the invertasome in vivo:
Mutants proficient in invertasome formation in vivo (I+ class) are hypothesized to be blocked at a step subsequent to invertasome formation. Such defects may affect one or more of the following: (1) DNA cleavage, (2) strand exchange, (3) religation, and (4) dissociation of the invertasome complex from DNA. Some mutants in this class localize to or are near the presumed active site in Hin. Based on data from the 
resolvase system, the Arg-8, Val-9, Asn-15, and Ser-70 positions identified here are candidates for being either part of the Hin active site or directly involved in catalysis (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We modeled our B+ R- mutants to a hypothetical Hin structure that is based on a crystal structure of the Hin DNA-binding domain and that of the homologous 
resolvase catalytic domain (![]()
|
The amino acid substitutions H87Y, S99G, R103Q, A111V, and A111T of the I+ subclass localize in areas of the protein distant from the presumed active site (Figure 7A and Figure C). The active site placement for Hin in this case was inferred from comparisons with the results from the 
resolvase system (![]()

Ser-89) is exposed at the amino end of ß-strand 4 in the structure of the 
resolvase catalytic domain (![]()

resolvase has been implicated in interactions between resolvase dimers bound to DNA within the resolvasome (![]()

resolvase system.
The T- I- class (T11I, Q14R, D65N, F104L, and E114G) is predicted to be defective in tetramer formation by our genetic data. Also, the I± subclass of the I+ mutants (R8Q, V9M, N15Y, V61I, T92I, D93N, and S99G) had a reduced capability (~20%) to form the invertasome in vivo, compared to wild-type Hin. The combination of the I± subclass and T- I- class localize to three distinct regions: one region from amino acids 815, one region including amino acids V61, D65, and H87, and a third region in the N-terminal portion of helix E including amino acids 92114 (Figure 7D). These two sets of mutants may have more complex allosteric effects on the recombination reaction after DNA binding. It is possible that the I- mutants are just more severe than the I± subclass and actually affect the same steps in the reaction.
Until now, evidence for the invertasome was obtained only from studies using the wild-type protein in vitro (![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant GM43149 from the National Institutes of Health and by National Science Foundation grant 9603585 to K.T.H. K.T.H. is a recipient of a Faculty Research Award from the American Cancer Society. We thank Dr. REID JOHNSON for the purified Fis and Hu proteins, various strains, and for sharing unpublished results during the course of many productive discussions; JOYCE KARLINSEY for her expert technical advice and for plasmid constructs; Dr. MIRIAM SUSSKIND for providing plasmids and expert advice; and members of the Hughes laboratory, as well as MICHAEL EHRMANN, STEVE MOSELEY, and PHIL YOUDERIAN for critically reading this manuscript.
Manuscript received January 12, 1998; Accepted for publication May 4, 1998.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ADAMS, C. W., O. NANASSY, R. C. JOHNSON, and K. T. HUGHES, 1997 Role of arginine-43 and arginine-69 of the Hin recombinase catalytic domain in the binding of Hin to the hix DNA recombination sites. Mol. Microbiol. 24:1235-1247[Medline].
BALL, C. A., R. OSUNA, K. C. FERGUSON, and R. C. JOHNSON, 1992 Dramatic changes in Fis levels upon nutrient upshift in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 174:8043-8056
BENSON, N., P. SUGIONO, S. BASS, L. V. MENDELMAN, and P. YOUDERIAN, 1986 General selection for DNA-binding activities. Genetics 118:21-29
BESSE, M., B. VON WILCKEN-BERGMANN, and B. MÜLLER-HILL, 1986 Synthetic lac operator mediates repression through lac repressor when introduced upstream and downstream from the lac promoter. EMBO J. 5:1377-1381[Medline].
BOOCOCK, M. R., Z. XUEWEI, and N. D. F. GRINDLEY, 1995 Catalytic residues of 
resolvase act in cis.. EMBO J. 14:5129-5140[Medline].
BOLIVAR, F., R. RODRIGUEZ, P. J. GREENE, M. BETLACH, and H. L. HEYNEKER et al., 1977 Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles, a multipurpose cloning system. Gene 2:95-113[Medline].
BRUIST, M. F. and M. I. SIMON, 1984 Phase variation and Hin protein: in vitro activity measurements, protein overproduction, and purification. J. Bacteriol. 114:1-14.
ECHOLS, H. C., C. LU, and P. M. J. BURGERS, 1983 Mutator strains of Escherichia coli, mutD and dnaQ, with defective exonucleolytic editing by DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:2189-2192
FENG, J.-A., R. E. DICKERSON, and R. C. JOHNSON, 1994a Proteins that promote DNA inversion and deletion. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 4:60-66.
FENG, J.-A., R. C. JOHNSON, and R. E. DICKERSON, 1994b Hin recombinase bound to DNA: the origin of specificity in major and minor groove interactions. Science 263:348-355
GILLEN, K. L. and K. T. HUGHES, 1991 Negative regulatory loci coupling flagellin synthesis to flagellar assembly in Salmonella typhimurium.. J. Bacteriol. 173:2301-2310
GLASGOW, A. C., K. T. HUGHES and M. I. SIMON, 1989 Bacterial DNA inversion systems, pp. 636659 in Mobile DNA, edited by D. E. BERG and M. M. HOWE. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
GRAÑA, D., P. YOUDERIAN, and M. M. SUSSKIND, 1985 Mutations that improve the ant promoter of Salmonella phage P22. Genetics 110:1-16
GRAÑA, D., T. GARDELLA, and M. M. SUSSKIND, 1988 The effects of mutations in the ant promoter of phage P22 depend on context. Genetics 120:319-327
HATFULL, G. F., and N. D. F. GRINDLEY, 1988 Resolvases and DNA-invertases: a family of enzymes active in site-specific recombination, pp. 357396 in Genetic Recombination, edited by R. KUCHERLAPATI and G. SMITH. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
HATFULL, G. F., S. M. NOBLE, and N. D. F. GRINDLEY, 1987 The 
resolvase induces an unusual DNA structure at the recombinational crossover point. Cell 49:103-110[Medline].
HAYKINSON, M. J., L. M. JOHNSON, J. SOONG, and R. C. JOHNSON, 1996 The Hin dimer interface is critical for Fis-mediated activation of the catalytic steps of site-specific DNA inversion. Curr. Biol. 6:163-177[Medline].
HEICHMAN, K. A. and R. C. JOHNSON, 1990 The Hin invertasome: protein-mediated joining of distant recombinational sites at the enhancer. Science 249:511-517
HEICHMAN, K. A., I. P. G. MOSKOWITZ, and R. C. JOHNSON, 1991 Configuration of DNA strands and mechanism of strand exchange in the Hin invertasome as revealed by analysis of recombinant knots. Genes Dev. 5:1622-1634
HUGHES, K. T., P. YOUDERIAN, and M. I. SIMON, 1988 Phase variation in Salmonella: analysis of Hin recombination and hix recombination site interaction in vivo.. Genes Dev. 2:937-948
HUGHES, R. E., G. F. HATFULL, P. A. RICE, T. A. STEITZ, and N. D. F. GRINDLEY, 1990 Cooperativity mutants of the 
resolvase identify an essential interdimer interaction. Cell 63:1331-1338[Medline].
HUGHES, K. T., P. C. W. GAINES, J. E. KARLINSEY, R. VINAYAK, and M. I. SIMON, 1992 Sequence-specific interaction of the Salmonella Hin recombinase in both major and minor grooves of DNA. EMBO J. 11:2695-2705[Medline].
HUGHES, R. E., P. A. RICE, T. A. STEITZ, and N. D. F. GRINDLEY, 1993 Protein-protein interactions directing resolvase site-specific recombination: a structure-function analysis. EMBO J. 12:1447-1458[Medline].
JOHNSON, R. C., 1991 Mechanism of site-specific DNA inversion in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1:404-411[Medline].
JOHNSON, R. C. and M. F. BRUIST, 1989 Intermediates in Hin-mediated DNA inversion: a role for Fis and the recombinational enhancer in the strand exchange reaction. EMBO J. 8:1581-1590[Medline].
JOHNSON, R. C. and M. I. SIMON, 1985 Hin-mediated site-specific recombination requires two 26 bp recombination sites and a 60 bp recombinational enhancer. Cell 41:781-789[Medline].
JOHNSON, R. C., M. F. BRUIST, and M. I. SIMON, 1986 Host protein requirements for in vitro site-specific DNA inversion. Cell 46:531-539[Medline].
JOHNSON, R. C., A. C. GLASGOW, and M. I. SIMON, 1987 Spatial relationship of the Fis binding sites for Hin recombinational enhancer activity. Nature 329:462-465[Medline].
KAMP, D. and R. KAHMANN, 1978 The relationship of two invertible segments in bacteriophage Mu and Salmonella typhimurium.. Nature 271:577-580[Medline].
KRAULIS, P. J., 1991 MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24:946-950.
KUTSUKAKE, K. and T. IINO, 1980 Inversions of specific DNA segments in flagellar phase variation of Salmonella and inversion systems of bacteriophages P1 and Mu. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:7338-7341
LEWIS, S. M. and G. E. WU, 1997 The origins of V(D)J recombination. Cell 88:159-162[Medline].
LIM, H. M., 1994 Analysis of subunit interaction by introducing disulfide bonds at the dimerization domain of Hin recombinase. J. Biol. Chem. 269:31134-31142
MARTIN, K., L. HUO, and R. F. SCHLEIF, 1986 The DNA loop model for ara repression: AraC protein occupies the proposed loop sites in vivo and repression-negative mutations lie in these same sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:3654-3658
NUMRYCH, T. E., R. I. GUMPORT, and J. F. GARDNER, 1991 A genetic analysis of Xis and Fis interactions with their binding sites in bacteriophage lambda. J. Bacteriol. 173:5954-5963
OSUNA, R., D. LINEAU, K. T. HUGHES, and R. C. JOHNSON, 1995 Sequence, regulation, and functions of fis in Salmonella typhimurium.. J. Bacteriol. 177:2021-2032
PLASTERK, R. H. A. and P. VAN DE PUTTE, 1985 The invertible P-DNA segment in the chromosome of Escherichia coli.. EMBO J. 4:237-242[Medline].
RICE, P. A. and T. A. STEITZ, 1994 Model for a DNA-mediated synaptic complex suggested by crystal packing of 
resolvase subunits. EMBO J. 13:1514-1524[Medline].
ROTH, J., 1970 Genetic techniques in studies of bacterial metabolism. Methods Enzymol. 17:1-35.
SAMBROOK, J., E. F. FRITSCH and T. MANIATIS, 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
SANDERSON, M. R., P. S. FREEMONT, P. A. RICE, A. GOLDMAN, and G. F. HATFULL et al., 1990 The crystal structure of the catalytic domain of the site-specific recombination enzyme 
resolvase at a 2.7Å resolution. Cell 63:1323-1329[Medline].
SANGER, F., S. NICKLEN, and A. R. COULSON, 1977 DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5463-5467
SCHLEIF, R., 1992 DNA looping. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61:199-223[Medline].
SIMON, M., J. ZEIG, M. SILVERMAN, G. MANDEL, and R. DOOLITTLE, 1980 Phase variation: evidence of a controlling element. Science 209:1370-1374
SLUKA, J. P., S. J. HORVATH, M. F. BRUIST, M. I. SIMON, and P. B. DERVAN, 1987 Synthesis of a sequence-specific DNA-cleaving peptide. Science 238:1129-1132
STOCKER, B. A. D., 1949 Measurement of the rate of mutation of flagellar antigenic phase in Salmonella typhimurium.. J. Hyg. 47:398-413.
TONEGAWA, S., 1983 Somatic generation of antibody diversity. Nature 302:575-581[Medline].
WU, T. H., S. M. LIAO, W. R. MCCLURE, and M. M. SUSSKIND, 1987 Control of gene expression in bacteriophage P22 by a small antisense RNA. II. Characterization of mutants defective in repression. Genes Dev. 1:204-221
YANG, W. and T. A. STEITZ, 1995 Crystal structure of the site-specific recombinase 
resolvase complexed with a 34 bp cleavage site. Cell 82:193-207[Medline].
YOUDERIAN, P., A. VERSHON, S. BOUVIER, R. T. SAUER, and M. M. SUSSKIND, 1983 Changing the DNA-binding specificity of a repressor. Cell 35:777-783[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. J. Olorunniji and W. M. Stark The catalytic residues of Tn3 resolvase Nucleic Acids Res., September 29, 2009; (2009) gkp797v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Suntharalingam, H. Spencer, C. V. Gallant, and N. L. Martin Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium rdoA Is Growth Phase Regulated and Involved in Relaying Cpx-Induced Signals J. Bacteriol., January 15, 2003; 185(2): 432 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Z. Nanassy and K. T. Hughes Hin Recombinase Mutants Functionally Disrupted in Interactions with Fis J. Bacteriol., January 1, 2001; 183(1): 28 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Nanassy, O. Z.
- Articles by Hughes, K. T.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Nanassy, O. Z.
- Articles by Hughes, K. T.










