- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by McGuffin, M. E.
- Articles by Mattox, W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by McGuffin, M. E.
- Articles by Mattox, W.
Autoregulation of transformer-2 Alternative Splicing Is Necessary for Normal Male Fertility in Drosophila
M. Elaine McGuffina, Dawn Chandlera, Darshna Somaiyaa, Brigitte Dauwaldera, and William Mattoxaa Department of Molecular Genetics, The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030
Corresponding author: William Mattox, Department of Molecular Genetics, Box 45, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, wmattox{at}mdacc.tmc.edu (E-mail).
Communicating editor: R. S. HAWLEY
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
In the male germline of Drosophila the transformer-2 protein is required for differential splicing of pre-mRNAs from the exuperantia and att genes and autoregulates alternative splicing of its own pre-mRNA. Autoregulation of TRA-2 splicing results in production of two mRNAs that differ by the splicing/retention of the M1 intron and encode functionally distinct protein isoforms. Splicing of the intron produces an mRNA encoding TRA-2226, which is necessary and sufficient for both male fertility and regulation of downstream target RNAs. When the intron is retained, an mRNA is produced encoding TRA-2179, a protein with no known function. We have previously shown that repression of M1 splicing is dependent on TRA-2226, suggesting that this protein quantitatively limits its own expression through a negative feedback mechanism at the level of splicing. Here we examine this idea, by testing the effect that variations in the level of tra-2 expression have on the splicing of M1 and on male fertility. Consistent with our hypothesis, we observe that as tra-2 gene dosage is increased, smaller proportions of TRA-2226 mRNA are produced, limiting expression of this isoform. Feedback regulation is critical for male fertility, since it is significantly decreased by a transgene in which repression of M1 splicing cannot occur and TRA-2226 mRNA is constitutively produced. The effect of this transgene becomes more severe as its dosage is increased, indicating that fertility is sensitive to an excess of TRA-2226. Our results suggest that autoregulation of TRA-2226 expression in male germ cells is necessary for normal spermatogenesis.
THE RNA-binding protein transformer-2 (tra-2) affects alternative splicing of RNAs from several genes with critical roles in Drosophila sexual differentiation. In somatic tissues TRA-2 is required, in combination with the TRA protein, for the sex-specific processing of pre-mRNAs from both the doublesex (dsx) and fruitless (fru) genes (![]()
![]()
In the male germline TRA-2 functions independently of TRA and is required for normal spermatogenesis. In the absence of functional TRA-2, male germ cells appear to initiate spermatogenesis normally but ultimately form spermatids with unelongated nuclei that are not motile (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Two distinct TRA-2 protein isoforms (TRA-2226 and TRA-2179) are expressed in the male germline (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Although the presence or absence of TRA-2226 clearly affects alternative splicing of the M1 intron, it is not known what biological role negative feedback regulation plays in tra-2+ males. Here we show that variations in tra-2+ gene dosage result in compensatory changes in the ratio of M1 splicing/retention, so as to maintain a constant level of TRA-2226 mRNA. Further, we find that feedback regulation of this mRNA in the male germline is required for nomal male fertility.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Drosophila RNA and low-cycle reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR:
Drosophila RNA was isolated and RT-PCR was carried out essentially as has been described (![]()
Construction of P[
M1] and P[tra-2+] transgenic strains:
P[tra-2+] was constructed by first generating a plasmid (pTZ3.9A
Sac) containing the entire tra-2 transcribed region, as well as flanking regions of 720 nt upstream and 523 nt downstream to it. This entire region was then inserted into the pCaSpeR P-element vector (![]()
M1], the ApaI-BsmI fragment from pTZ3.9A
Sac that encompasses the M1 intron was substituted by the analogous ApaI-BsmI fragment from a TRA-2226-encoding cDNA clone. The 3.4-kb EcoRI-BamHI insert from this plasmid was then inserted into pCaSpeR. These P elements were injected directly into Drosophila embryos of the genotype w1118/BsY; tra-2B/CyO. Transformed lines were identified in the G1 progeny of injectees by w+ eye pigmentation.
Fly strains and crosses:
The tra-2B mutation results from a nonsense codon within the RRM region (![]()
Male fertility was tested by culturing a single male with three w1118 virgin females. In the fertility tests presented in Table 1, these flies were maintained together for five days in a single vial, which was then cleared and all F1 progeny counted. In later fertility tests (Figure 5 and Figure 6), flies were twice transferred to fresh vials at three-day intervals, and all F1 progeny were counted from all vials. Vials in which any parents died before the final transfer were not counted. P values given in results for the hypothesis that experimental samples were identical to controls were calculated using the two-tailed t-test. For such pairwise comparisons, the fertility rates of P[
M1] genotypes were always compared to the P[tra-2+] control cross that gave mean value closest to the experimental.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Splicing reporter genes and X-gal staining of testes:
P[CZP-ORF3] is a transgene which expresses a TRA-2/ß-galactosidase fusion protein specifically from the TRA-2179 translation initiation codon present in M1-containing RNAs. The construction of this reporter has been described previously (![]()
![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
The ratio of alternative male-specific tra-2 mRNAs is affected by gene dosage:
If autoregulation of splicing serves to place an upper limit on the amount of TRA-2226 encoding mRNA produced, we expected that the ratio of TRA-2179 to TRA-2226 RNAs should increase as the number of transcribed copies of the tra-2+ gene is increased. To test this, we examined the relative levels of these RNAs in flies with one, two, and four doses of the wild-type tra-2 gene using low-cycle RT-PCR and the primers shown in Figure 1. Increased gene dosage led to an increase in the fraction of TRA-2179 (M1 unspliced) RNA relative to TRA-2226 (M1 spliced). Flies with a single dose of the tra-2+ gene had a unspliced/spliced (U/S) ratio of only 0.42 (Figure 2, lane 4), while flies with four doses of tra-2+ had an unspliced (U)/spliced (s) ration of 2.03 (Figure 2, lane 8). Overall levels of tra-2-derived PCR products were observed to increase in rough proportion to gene dosage. To control for the possibility that changes in the U/S ratio are due to artifactual changes in PCR efficiencies when different initial amounts of tra-2 RNA are amplified, we performed RT-PCR on RNA from two-dose flies in amounts that were 0.5x and 2x that used in the above experiment (mimicking the one-dose and four-dose samples). The U/S ratios of these reactions (Figure 2, lanes 9 and 10) were very similar to that of the experimental two-dose sample (1.21 and 1.15 vs. 1.05). We conclude that male germ cells respond to an increase in the level of tra-2 pre-mRNA by increasing repression of M1 splicing.
Since additional gene doses lead to an increase in the total amount of tra-2 RNA produced in the above experiment, the change in U/S ratios observed may be due to a limiting factor other than TRA-2226 protein that affects M1 splicing. Therefore, we tested how variations in the number of functional tra-2 gene doses affected M1 splicing when the total number of RNA-producing tra-2 genes was kept constant. In Figure 2, lanes 12 and 14, RT-PCR products from males of the genotype tra-2+/tra-2+;P[tra-2+]/P[tra-2+] are compared to males of the genotype tra-2B/tra-2+;P[CSP-ORF3]/P[CSP-ORF3] where P[tra-2+] is a P transposon containing an unaltered tra-2 gene (Figure 3), P[CSP-ORF3] a transposon containing a mutation that blocks translation of TRA-2226 (![]()
![]()
The above dosage experiments were carried out on RNA derived from whole male flies. To examine whether gene dosage affects the ratio of alternatively spliced TRA-2 RNAs produced in testes, we examined the effect of zero, one, and two doses of tra-2+ on the amount of ß-galactosidase activity produced from either of two different reporter genes that are responsive to splicing of the M1 intron (Figure 3). P[CZP-ORF3] produces RNAs that are translated to produce TRA-2/ß-galactosidase fusion proteins only when the M1 intron is retained (![]()
A tra-2 gene lacking the M1 intron is functional in both the female soma and male germline:
Since autoregulation of M1 splicing appears to limit the production of RNAs encoding TRA-2226 in the male germline, we hypothesized that unregulated expression of this protein would lead to deleterious effects on male fertility. To test this idea, we constructed a P-element transformation vector, P[
M1], containing an altered version of the tra-2 gene in which the M1 intron has been precisely deleted (Figure 3). Autoregulation of TRA-2226 expression by repression of M1 splicing is not possible in transcripts made from this construct. All other tra-2 sequences needed for expression were left unchanged in the inserted fragment, including the gene's promoter, protein coding regions, and introns and untranslated flanking regions.
Transgenic individuals carrying P[
M1] were initially recovered in the background genotype w1118/BsY; tra-2B/CyO (males) or w1118/w1118; tra-2B/CyO (females). In the presence of P[
M1], the endogenous tra-2+ allele is expected to down regulate expression of TRA-2226. In flies with only a single dose of P[
M1], such down regulation may be sufficient to maintain a near-normal level of TRA-2226 mRNA. Thus we found it was possible to maintain vigorously fertile strains that carry a single dose of the transgene (see below).
Given this, we tested the ability of P[
M1] to provide tra-2+ function sufficient to rescue tra-2 mutant phenotypes (Table 1). Each of the eight independent insertions tested restored fertility to homozygous tra-2B males in varying degrees. Several of these lines produced numbers of progeny similar to that of tra-2B/+ individuals. Seven out of eight of the insertions tested also provided tra-2+ function in the soma sufficient to restore varying degrees of female somatic sexual differentiation to diplo-X tra-2B homozygotes. Female differentiation was observed in a variety of cuticular structures including genitalia, sex combs, and the abdomen. Moreover, somatic rescue in four lines was sufficient to restore female fertility. The variation in the degree of rescue observed from line to line is probably due to differences in the position of P insertions and is similar to that obtained previously in experiments using P elements containing tra-2+ (M. E. MCGUFFIN and W. MATTOX, unpublished data; ![]()
![]()
M1] expresses functional products in both the male germline and the soma.
A single dose of P[
M1] increases the proportion of M1-containing RNAs produced by TRA-2 reporter genes in trans:
If the P[
M1] transgene constitutively produces TRA-2226, then it should have a greater effect on the proportion of M1-containing RNAs produced by a reporter than does tra-2+. To test this, we introduced a single dose of P[
M1] into tra-2B/tra-2B males that simultaneously carry P[CZP-ORF3]. As expected, we observed that X-gal staining of P[CZP-ORF3] testes was greater in these males than when a single dose of tra-2+ was present, indicating that a larger proportion of reporter RNA retains the M1 intron (see Figure 5). These results provide functional evidence that excess TRA-2226 is produced by P[
M1].
Males with multiple doses of P[
M1] have reduced fertility:
To test whether P[
M1] interfered with male fertility, we examined tra-2B/+ individuals carrying one or more doses of P[
M1]. As mentioned above, preliminary analysis indicated that males carrying a single dose of any of the transgene insertions are fertile. To determine if fertility is subtly effected in such males, the number of progeny produced by transgene-bearing tra-2B/+ males from several independent lines was determined (see Figure 6). Males bearing a single dose of P[
M1] produced progeny in numbers that did not differ significantly from control males carrying a single copy of the P[tra-2+] transgene. These data indicate that a single dose of P[
M1] does not substantially affect male fertility.
In contrast, tra-2B/+ males carrying two doses of P[
M1] showed a quantitative reduction in male fertility. In Figure 6, males carrying any of four different combinations of two P[
M1] insertions are compared to control males carrying two copies of P[tra-2+]. It is worth noting that in these controls the number of progeny produced per male was elevated relative to that observed in the above experiment with flies carrying a single dose of the P[tra-2+]. Since these experiments were done in parallel, this indicates that fertility is improved by additional doses of tra-2+.
Relative to these controls, males with any of four different combinations of P[
M1] insertions produced fewer progeny. Although the reductions in progeny observed were in each genotype statistically significant (P < 0.001 for each of the four P[
M1] combinations examined relative to either P[tra-2+] combination), the magnitude of this reduction varied considerably depending on the particular insertions present. In one case (P[
M1, 34-3]; P[
M1, 34-2]) males produced progeny in numbers that were only slightly less than that of males with a single dose of either transgene alone. On the other hand, in two of the combinations of insertions tested, males produced <30% as many progeny as did controls. In one of these genotypes three of the twelve males tested were completely sterile. Taken together these results demonstrate a significant reduction in the level of male fertility when two doses of P[
M1] are present.
If the effects on fertility observed with two doses of P[
M1] are due to excess tra-2226, then we would expect further increases in the dosage of P[
M1] to result in still lower levels of fertility. Therefore, we generated lines of flies carrying combinations of two insertions and crossed these to produce individuals with three or four doses of P[
M1] or P[tra-2+]. As shown in Figure 7A, males carrying three doses of P[
M1] produced reduced numbers of progeny. Parallel comparisons of individuals carrying either two or three doses of similar insertions revealed that males with three doses of P[
M1] were slightly less fertile than those with two doses (data not shown).
|
Dramatic effects were observed when dosage of P[
M1] was increased to four copies. Males of this type were found to be uniformly sterile in each of several combinations examined (Figure 7B and data not shown). In contrast, males carrying four doses of P[tra-2+] had nearly wild-type levels of fertility. These results strongly indicate that unregulated overexpression of P[
M1] leads to reduced male fertility.
Expression of tra-2 products from multiple doses of P[
M1] causes a defect in spermatogenesis:
Male sterility in P[
M1] males could result from either abnormal somatic sexual differentiation or a defect in spermatogenesis itself. To address the possibility that somatic structures in XY flies carrying four doses of this transgene are sexually transformed, we examined these flies for signs of female transformation. These individuals are clearly male in appearance. Close examination of a variety of sexually differentiated tissues (i.e., gonads, sex combs, genitalia, tergite pigmentation) revealed that they were morphologically indistinguishable from those of wild-type males (data not shown). We therefore examined differentiating germ cells within the testes of these males to determine if P[
M1] affected spermatogenesis. Examination of live testes preparations revealed no morphological abnormalities in gonial cells, spermatocytes, meiotic stages or mature spermatids, all of which were observed in roughly normal numbers. Unlike tra-2 loss-of-function mutants, which form spermatids with unelongated nuclei, the nuclear morphology of mature spermatids present in four-dose P[
M1] males was normal. However, it was observed that the bundles of mature spermatids, which are normally tightly aligned, were sometimes disarrayed in four-dose P[
M1] males. More dramatically, the coiled mature sperm that formed at the base of the testis in these males failed to migrate to the seminal vesicle, indicating that they were amotile (Figure 8, AC). Moreover, sperm were never observed in the spermatheca or seminal receptacles of females that had copulated with four-dose P[
M1] males (data not shown). These results suggest that sterility in these males results from the failure to form normal motile sperm.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Negative feedback mechanisms are important for a wide variety of biological processes, but only a few cases where feedback regulation occurs at the level of alternative pre-mRNA splicing have yet been described. Here we have examined the functional importance of a negative feedback mechanism affecting the ratio of alternative tra-2 mRNAs produced in the male germline of Drosophila. Our data support a model in which feedback control quantitatively limits the amount of mRNA expressed that encodes a functional TRA-2 isoform, TRA-2226. Increases or decreases in the overall level of tra-2 transcription caused compensatory changes in the ratio of the alternative mRNAs. For example, increased tra-2 gene dosage produced proportionally higher levels of mRNA encoding the nonfunctional TRA-2179 isoform and proportionally less mRNA encoding the functional isoform TRA-2226. Analysis of the response of TRA-2/ß-galactosidase fusion genes to increased dosage confirms that increased gene dosage affects the relative amounts of translated product generated by TRA-2179 and TRA-2226 mRNA in accord with the shift in the relative levels of these transcripts. These results support the model proposed in Figure 1 wherein expression of TRA-2226 above a certain basal level leads to a proportional increase in repression of M1 splicing and the accumulation of mRNAs encoding TRA-2179.
Although some of the above dosage studies employed flies with up to four doses of tra-2+, it should be noted that negative feedback regulation is not a mere oddity of flies with unnaturally high levels of tra-2 expression. Rather, this phenomenon is also observed in wild-type male flies where approximately 60% of germline-specific tra-2 mRNAs contain the M1 intron (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We previously hypothesized that this feedback mechanism functions to prevent expression of TRA-2226 at levels that are deleterious to male fertility. We have tested this idea in this study by generating transgenic males carrying P[
M1], a transgene from which the M1 intron had been deleted. Because the intron is missing, production of TRA-2226 mRNA in this case cannot be limited by M1 repression. Our results show that the unregulated transgene was clearly deleterious to male fertility in a dose-dependent manner. Males carrying four doses of the P[
M1] transgene were most severely affected, being uniformly sterile. Significant effects on fertility were also observed in males carrying only two or three doses of the transgene. Such males produced progeny, but in numbers that were significantly reduced relative to control males carrying a wild-type transgene. The observation that the level of fertility observed is dependent on the dose of P[
M1] is consistent with the idea that overexpression of TRA-2226 is deleterious to spermatogenesis.
Since TRA-2226 mRNA normally accounts for only about 40% of the total amount of poly A+ tra-2 mRNA that accumulates in the male germline we anticipated that down regulation of the endogenous tra-2+ genes would compensate for most if not all overexpression observed in flies with a single dose of the transgene. Consistent with this idea we found that such males had near normal fertility and produced significantly increased levels of M1-containing mRNA expressed from a reporter gene. These observations agree well with our model and further support the notion that the level of TRA-2226 mRNA produced is limited by negative feedback.
While it is apparent from these observations that unregulated expression of TRA-2226 reduces male fertility, the primary defect in spermatogenesis remains to be elucidated. Examination of the distribution of epitope-tagged TRA-2226 protein expressed within primary spermatocytes of flies carrying two doses of P[
M1] revealed that it is localized, as usual, to discrete sites in the nucleus (B. DAUWALDER and W. MATTOX, unpublished results). Thus, reduced fertility in such flies is probably not attributable to mislocalized TRA-2226 protein. Morphological examination of the testes from sterile males carrying four doses of the P[
M1] transgene revealed that although they produce mature spermatids without gross abnormalities, motile sperm are not produced in significant number. While this phenotype suggests that spermatogenesis is disrupted at a late stage, it may also result from secondary consequences of an earlier primary defect. For instance, it is known that null mutations in tra-2 manifest late defects in spermatid nuclear elongation although experimental data using temperature-sensitive tra-2 alleles indicate that the critical period for tra-2 function is earlier during a short, well-defined interval near the late primary spermatocyte/meiosis/early spermatid stages (![]()
In addition to the data presented here, the functional significance of feedback regulation of TRA-2226 expression is suggested by the observation that it is conserved in distantly-related Drosophilids. Recently, a homologue of tra-2 from Drosophila virilis, a species that diverged from Drosophila melanogaster over 60 million years ago, was described (![]()
A number of other genes encoding RNA-binding proteins are thought to autoregulate their expression by affecting the processing of their own pre-mRNAs (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Other functionally significant feedback mechanisms have been reported for both the yeast ribosomal protein L32 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank STEVE MARCUS and MITZI KURODA for their helpful comments on this manuscript. D.C. was supported by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) training grant (CA09299). This work was supported by an NIH First Award (GM50825) to W.M. W.M. is a Pew Biomedical Scholar.
Manuscript received October 20, 1997; Accepted for publication April 3, 1998.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AMREIN, H., T. MANIATIS, and R. NOTHIGER, 1990 Alternatively spliced transcripts of the sex-determining gene tra-2 of Drosophila encode functional proteins of different size. EMBO J. 9:3619-3629[Medline].
BELL, L. R., J. I. HORABIN, P. SCHEDL, and T. W. CLINE, 1991 Positive autoregulation of sex-lethal by alternative splicing maintains the female determined state in Drosophila. Cell 65:229-239[Medline].
BELOTE, J. M. and B. S. BAKER, 1983 The dual functions of a sex determination gene in Drosophila melanogaster.. Dev. Biol. 95:512-517[Medline].
BOELENS, W. C., E. J. JANSEN, W. J. VAN VENROOIJ, R. STRIPECKE, and I. W. MATTAJ et al., 1993 The human U1 snRNP-specific U1A protein inhibits polyadenylation of its own pre-mRNA. Cell 72:881-892[Medline].
CHABOT, B., M. BLANCHETTE, I. LAPIERRE, and H. LA BRANCHE, 1997 An intron element modulating 5' splice site selection in the hnRNP A1 pre-mRNA interacts with hnRNP A1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:1776-1786[Abstract].
CHANDLER, D., M. E. MCGUFFIN, J. PISKUR, J. YAO, and B. S. BAKER et al., 1997 Evolutionary conservation of regulatory strategies for the sex determination factor transformer-2.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2908-2919[Abstract].
CROWLEY, T. E. and T. HAZELRIGG, 1995 A male-specific 3'-UTR regulates the steady-state level of the exuperantia mRNA during spermatogenesis in Drosophila. Mol. Gen. Genet. 248:370-374[Medline].
DAUWALDER, B., F. AMAYA-MANZANARES, and W. MATTOX, 1996 A Human homologue of the Drosophila sex determination factor transformer-2 has conserved splicing regulatory functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:9004-9009
GORALSKI, T. J., J. E. EDSTROM, and B. S. BAKER, 1989 The sex determination locus transformer-2 of Drosophila encodes a polypeptide with similarity to RNA binding proteins. Cell 56:1011-1018[Medline].
HAZELRIGG, T. and C. TU, 1994 Sex-specific processing of the Drosophila exuperantia transcript is regulated in male germ cells by the tra-2 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10752-10756
HAZELRIGG, T., W. S. WATKINS, D. MARCEY, C. TU, and M. KAROW et al., 1990 The exuperantia gene is required for Drosophila spermatogenesis as well as anteroposterior polarity of the developing oocyte, and encodes overlapping sex-specific transcripts. Genetics 126:607-617[Abstract].
JUMAA, H. and P. J. NIELSEN, 1997 The splicing factor SRp20 modifies splicing of its own mRNA and ASF/SF2 antagonizes this regulation. EMBO J. 16:5077-5085[Medline].
LI, B., J. VILARDELL, and J. R. WARNER, 1996 An RNA structure involved in feedback regulation of splicing and of translation is critical for biological fitness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:1596-600
MADIGAN, S. J., P. EDEEN, J. ESNAYRA, and M. MCKEOWN, 1996 Att, a target for regulation by tra2 in the testes of Drosophila melanogaster, encodes alternative RNAs and alternative proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4222-4230[Abstract].
MATSUO, N., S. OGAWA, Y. IMAI, T. TAKAGI, and M. TOHYAMA et al., 1995 Cloning of a novel RNA binding polypeptide (RA301) induced by hypoxia/reoxygenation. J. Biol. Chem. 270:28216-128222
MATTOX, W. and B. S. BAKER, 1991 Autoregulation of the splicing of transcripts from the transformer-2 gene of Drosophila. Genes Dev. 5:786-796
MATTOX, W., M. J. PALMER, and B. S. BAKER, 1990 Alternative splicing of the sex determination gene transformer-2 is sex-specific in the germ line but not in the soma. Genes Dev. 4:789-805
MATTOX, W., M. E. MCGUFFIN, and B. S. BAKER, 1996 A negative feedback mechanism revealed by functional analysis of the alternative isoforms of the Drosophila splicing regulator transformer-2.. Genetics 143:303-314[Abstract].
NAGOSHI, R. N., M. MCKEOWN, K. C. BURTIS, J. M. BELOTE, and B. S. BAKER, 1988 The control of alternative splicing at genes regulating sexual differentiation in D. melanogaster.. Cell 53:229-236[Medline].
PIRROTTA, V., 1988 Vectors for P-mediated transformation in Drosophila, pp. 437456 in Vectors: A Survey of Molecular Cloning Vectors and Their Uses, edited by R. L. RODRIGUEZ and D. T. DENHARDT. Butterworths, Boston.
RYNER, L. C., S. F. GOODWIN, D. H. CASTRILLON, A. ANAND, and A. VILLELLA et al., 1996 Control of male sexual behavior and sexual orientation in drosophila by the fruitless gene. Cell 87:1079-1089[Medline].
SARKISSIAN, M., A. WINNE, and R. LAFYATIS, 1996 The mammalian homolog of suppressor-of-white-apricot regulates alternative mRNA splicing of CD45 exon 4 and fibronectin IIICS. J. Biol. Chem. 271:31106-31114
SEGADE, F., B. HURLE, E. CLAUDIO, S. RAMOS, and P. S. LAZO, 1996 Molecular cloning of a mouse homologue for the Drosophila splicing regulator Tra2.. FEBS Lett. 387:152-156[Medline].
SPIKES, D. A., J. KRAMER, P. M. BINGHAM, and K. VAN DOREN, 1994 SWAP pre-mRNA splicing regulators are a novel, ancient protein family sharing a highly conserved sequence motif with the prp21 family of constitutive splicing proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4510-4519
ZACHAR, Z., T.-B. CHOU, and P. M. BINGHAM, 1987 Evidence that a regulatory gene autoregulates splicing of its transcript. EMBO J. 6:4105-4111[Medline].
ZACHAR, Z., T. B. CHOU, J. KRAMER, I. P. MIMS, and P. M. BINGHAM, 1994 Analysis of autoregulation at the level of pre-mRNA splicing of the suppressor-of-white-apricot gene in Drosophila. Genetics 137:139-150[Abstract].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Qi, S. Su, and W. Mattox The doublesex Splicing Enhancer Components Tra2 and Rbp1 Also Repress Splicing through an Intronic Silencer Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2007; 27(2): 699 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Qi, S. Su, M. E. McGuffin, and W. Mattox Concentration dependent selection of targets by an SR splicing regulator results in tissue-specific RNA processing Nucleic Acids Res., December 4, 2006; 34(21): 6256 - 6263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.H. Westerveld, J. Gianotten, N.J. Leschot, F. van derVeen, S. Repping, and M.P. Lombardi Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein G-T (HNRNP G-T) mutations in men with impaired spermatogenesis Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 10(4): 265 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Stoilov, R. Daoud, O. Nayler, and S. Stamm Human tra2-beta1 autoregulates its protein concentration by influencing alternative splicing of its pre-mRNA Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2004; 13(5): 509 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Chandler, J. Qi, and W. Mattox Direct Repression of Splicing by transformer-2 Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2003; 23(15): 5174 - 5185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Dauwalder, S. Tsujimoto, J. Moss, and W. Mattox The Drosophila takeout gene is regulated by the somatic sex-determination pathway and affects male courtship behavior Genes & Dev., November 15, 2002; 16(22): 2879 - 2892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Chandler, M. E. McGuffin, and W. Mattox Functionally antagonistic sequences are required for normal autoregulation of Drosophila tra-2 pre-mRNA splicing Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2001; 29(14): 3012 - 3019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.P. Venables, D.J. Elliott, O.V. Makarova, E.M. Makarov, H.J. Cooke, and I.C. Eperon RBMY, a probable human spermatogenesis factor, and other hnRNP G proteins interact with Tra2{beta} and affect splicing Hum. Mol. Genet., March 22, 2000; 9(5): 685 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by McGuffin, M. E.
- Articles by Mattox, W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by McGuffin, M. E.
- Articles by Mattox, W.












