- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Takano, T. S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Takano, T. S.
Rate Variation of DNA Sequence Evolution in the Drosophila Lineages
Toshiyuki S. Takanoaa Department of Population Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka-ken 411-8540, Japan
Corresponding author: Toshiyuki S. Takano, Department of Population Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima Shizuoka-ken 411-8540, Japan, totakano{at}lab.nig.ac.jp (E-mail).
Communicating editor: A. G. CLARK
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Rate constancy of DNA sequence evolution was examined for three species of Drosophila, using two samples: the published sequences of eight genes from regions of the normal recombination rates and new data of the four AS-C (ac, sc, l'sc and ase) and ci genes. The AS-C and ci genes were chosen because these genes are located in the regions of very reduced recombination in Drosophila melanogaster and their locations remain unchanged throughout the entire lineages involved, yielding less effect of ancestral polymorphism in the study of rate constancy. The synonymous substitution pattern of the three lineages was found to be erratic in both samples. The dispersion index for replacement substitution was relatively high for the per, G6pd and ac genes. A significant heterogeneity was found in the number of synonymous substitutions in the three lineages between the two samples of genes with different recombination rates. This is partly due to a lack of the lineage effect in the D. melanogaster and Drosophila simulans lineages in the AS-C and ci genes in contrast to AKASHI's observation of genes in regions of normal recombination. The higher codon bias in Drosophila yakuba as compared with D. melanogaster and D. simulans was observed in the four AS-C genes, which suggests change(s) in action of natural selection involved in codon usage on these genes. Fluctuating selection intensity may also be responsible for the observed locus-lineage interaction effects in synonymous substitution.
THE constancy of the evolutionary rate across multiple lineages was first examined by ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The constancy of the rate has been examined using the variance-to-mean ratio of the number of substitutions among lineages (dispersion index) as a measure (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Among several methods used to examine the action of natural selection, the rate constancy test also has a couple of advantages. First, an excess of replacement substitutions compared with the number of synonymous substitutions is not necessarily required to get a significant result, meaning a higher detection power in certain situations. Second, independent analysis for replacement and synonymous substitutions can be made. The drawback of the necessity of assumptions of absolute divergence time is overcome in this study by the use of multiple-gene comparison.
Many of the previous analyses on rate-constancy have paid less attention to ancestral polymorphism, although ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Recently, ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
This article presents an analysis of the evolutionary rate variation among three species of Drosophila, D. melanogaster, D. simulans and D. yakuba, using the published sequences of eight genes from regions of normal recombination rates. At the same time, to exclude possible effects of ancestral polymorphism, we have taken advantage of the fact that the genes on the tip of the X chromosome and the fourth chromosome have very reduced levels of intraspecies variation and no structural changes were inferred in these regions among these three species (![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Sequence sources:
The number of sequences studied, their sources and GenBank accession numbers (release 98.0) are as follows: eleven alleles of D. melanogaster (excluding AdhFChD), six alleles of D. simulans and twelve strains of D. yakuba for the Adh from ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Fly stock, cloning, sequencing and cytological examination:
A strain of D. yakuba (stock no. 14021-0261.0) was provided by the National Drosophila Species Resource Center at Bowling Green, Ohio. A P1 phage clone, DS06327, covering a large portion of AS-C was gifted from the laboratory of T. YAMAZAKI (Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan). The genomic library of the D. yakuba strain was constructed in the
DASHII vector. The preparation of DNA probe consisted of the following: The fragments of the ac, sc, and l'sc genes were amplified by PCR from DS06327 and cloned into the pCRII vector by using the TA-cloning kit (Invitrogen, NV Leek, The Netherlands). The primers used for the amplification were derived from the published sequences as follows: 5'-TGTTTTTACTTGGCTCTGATGT-3', and 5'-GTGTTATGGTTGGGTGCGACTA-3' for the ac gene from the sequence in ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The DNA sequences of the sc and l'sc genes were also determined for a strain of D. simulans collected in the Congo, Sim-5(G20), which was established by half sib-mating for 20 generations. A 1.2-kb sc and a 0.9-kb l'sc fragment (the same primers as those in probe construction), and a 0.6-kb sc (primers: 5'-CTCAGGGCATAATACCTACTA-3' and 5'-AAACTGGTCTCGTGGTTCTTA-3') and a 0.7-kb l'sc (5'-CTGCCGAAGTCGCTGCCTCTG-3', and 5'-GCTCCCGTCAAGAACTGTTGC-3') fragment were amplified, purified through columns, and used as templates for direct sequencing. The nucleotide sequence data reported in this article will appear in the DNA Data Bank of Japan, European Molecular Biology Laboratory and GenBank nucleotide sequence databases with the following accession numbers: AB005751 and AB005797AB005802.
In situ hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled probes was performed on the salivary gland chromosomes of D. yakuba. The D. yakuba sc, l'sc and ci clones were labeled via PCR using the primers (5'-CTCATTCTTGTGTAAGGTGTC-3', and 5'-AGGCACTTGGTTCAACTCAAC-3') for the sc, and the same primers as in the screening probe construction for the l'sc (a 0.7kb fragment) and ci (![]()
Sequence analysis:
The numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous sites were calculated according to ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The number of substitutions was estimated by KIMURA's (1980) formulae, and the means for all the combinations were given when two or more sequences were available. In addition to this estimate, the numbers of substitutions were counted for each lineage on the basis of the following parsimonious assumptions without correction. The nucleotide at the node was estimated as one(s) to require the smallest number of total substitutions. When the nucleotide at the node could not determine uniquely, the same probability was given to each evolutionary pathway except for the following cases: There were 11 codons for 13 genes, in which two or more substitutions occurred and two different pathways to require different numbers of replacement substitutions were possible. The weight factors for each pathway were calculated according to ![]()
For segregating sites within species, first the probability that the ancestral nucleotide of that species was one of the segregating nucleotides was assumed to be given by their frequencies (![]()
These numbers of substitutions obtained without correction were employed for all the statistical tests except for the relative rate test (![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Evolutionary rate variation in eight genes from regions of normal recombination:
DNA sequences from D. melanogaster, D. simulans and D. yakuba were compared for eight genes: the Adh (cytological map position, 35B), per (3B), Amy (54A), sry (99D), nullo (6F), G6pd (18D), boss (96F) and Rh3 (92D). None of these genes are located in the regions of very reduced recombination rate such as the tip of the X and the proximal regions of the chromosomes. D. simulans is one of the most closely related species to D. melanogaster, and D. yakuba is distantly related to these two species (Species C in Figure 1). Thus, the D. yakuba lineage in this study represents the entire lineage from the common ancestor of D. melanogaster and D. simulans to D. yakuba. The main purpose of this study is to compare the substitution pattern in the three lineages among different genes and to know the degree of variation. With this aim, no information about direction of mutations in the D. yakuba lineage (either of occurrence of mutation in the lineage leading to D. yakuba or in the internal branch from the common ancestor of the three species through the common ancestor of D. melanogaster and D. simulans) does not affect the results. Table 1 and Table 2 show the estimates of the number of synonymous and replacement substitutions per site by KIMURA's two parameter method (1980) and the estimated numbers of substitutions in the three lineages on a basis of parsimony assumptions, respectively.
|
|
Nucleotide substitution pattern in the three lineages was examined for lineage effects and locus-lineage interaction effects. The lineage effect was clearly seen, both in the synonymous and replacement substitutions, as the higher evolutionary rate in the D. melanogaster in comparison with the D. simulans lineage as described in ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Besides the lineage-dependent pattern of evolution, the synonymous changes in the three lineages occurred irregularly among the eight genes (3 x 8 test of independence in ![]()
![]()
![]()
One possible explanation for the observed rate-irregularity is gene-dependent fluctuation of mutation rate. If the rate of mutation varies among lineages, then there will be a correlation between synonymous and replacement substitution rates. However, statistically significant heterogeneities were found in the numbers of synonymous and replacement substitutions for the per (a larger ratio of replacement to synonymous substitutions in the D. yakuba than the other two lineages: Fisher's exact test, P = 0.0006), and Rh3 (a larger ratio of replacement to synonymous substitutions in the D. melanogaster lineage as compared to the other lineages: Fisher's exact test, P = 0.017). Since any one of the three lineages could show a significant deviation from the other two lineages, we may take the significance level of 0.017 (= 1 - 0951/3) instead of 0.05. There is still a significant heterogeneity between the two types of substitutions in these two genes. Thus, it is suggested that fluctuation of mutation rate alone cannot explain the whole picture of the observed substitution patterns.
Cytological examination of AS-C genes and ci gene in D. yakuba:
![]()
![]()
|
Evolutionary rate variation in four genes of achaete-scute complex and ci gene sampled from regions of reduced recombination rates:
The four AS-C genes, ac, sc, l'sc and ase, and the ci gene were cloned from a genomic library of a D. yakuba strain, and their nucleotide sequences were determined. The length of sequence determined was 878 bp for the ac, 1314 bp for the sc, 924 bp for the l'sc, 1564 bp for the ase gene, all of which include the entire putative coding sequences. Because only partial sequences of the D. simulans ase were available, the corresponding coding regions of the ase genes were employed in the analysis. A 1293-bp fragment of the ci gene was sequenced, and this region contained the whole of the coding regions surveyed in ![]()
A few of the insertions/deletions in the coding regions among the three species were observed as follows: a two-amino-acid insertion in the D. yakuba sc sequence and a one-amino-acid deletion in the D. melanogaster sc; a one-amino-acid deletion in the D. yakuba l'sc; a two-amino-acid insertion in the D. melanogaster ase; one- and nine-amino-acid insertions and a two-amino-acid deletion in the D. yakuba ase; two two-amino-acid insertions in the D. yakuba ci; no length variation in the ac. A Gln-rich sequence was found in the ase gene of D. melanogaster [(Gln)5-Val-Gln], which is the same as in the ac and sc genes (![]()
|
The summary of DNA variation among the three species is given in Table 1 and Table 3. The ratio of replacement to synonymous substitutions for the pooled data varied significantly among the three lineages (G with Williams's correction = 11.6, P < 0.005). This is partly due to the accelerated protein sequence evolution in the D. melanogaster lineage (![]()
|
When we examined the pattern of substitution in the three lineages, there was a significant heterogeneity among the five genes for synonymous substitution as in the genes with normal recombination (G with Williams's correction = 19.6, P < 0.025). This result suggests that the presence of locus-lineage interaction for synonymous substitution rate does not simply come from effects of ancestral polymorphism. For replacement substitution, only the ac gene showed a significantly different substitution pattern from the other four genes (G with Williams's correction = 4.2, P < 0.05 for the numbers of substitutions between D. melanogaster + D. simulans and D. yakuba). Lower frequency of statistical significance for replacement substitution patterns is at least partly due to the small number of substitutions in each lineage, and it should not be simply compared to synonymous substitution.
The ratio of replacement to synonymous substitutions was significantly higher in the D. melanogaster for the ase (corrected G = 6.1, P < 0.025, for D. melanogaster vs. D. simulans + D. yakuba), and higher in the D. melanogaster and simulans lineages for the l'sc (corrected G = 4.9, P < 0.05, for D. melanogaster + D. simulans vs. D. yakuba). These results again suggest that the observed erratic substitution patterns are not entirely because of gene-dependent fluctuation of mutation rate.
Comparison of the four AS-C and ci genes with the remaining eight genes:
A comparison was made of the pooled number of the substitutions in the three lineages (Table 4). There was a significant heterogeneity between the AS-C and ci genes, and the remaining eight genes for synonymous substitution, but not for replacement substitution. One reason for the heterogeneity in synonymous substitution can be attributed to a lack of difference between the D. melanogaster and D. simulans lineages of the four AS-C and ci genes. This is most likely due to the low efficiency of natural selection in regions of reduced recombination, irrespective of the population size difference between the two species. Indeed, the codon bias for these genes is generally very low for the D. melanogaster genes as described in ![]()
|
![]()
![]()
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
While the dispersion index has been used as a parameter to test rate constancy in the previous studies (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-hemoglobin gene, and [(cow mouse) human] for the cytochrome oxidase 2 gene. The difference in phylogenies assumed among genes should be tested as well. High degrees of ancestral polymorphism would be required to explain the difference in the two genes. Although more careful examination of effects of sampling designs and assumptions is needed, the index can be a useful measure of rate variation in certain conditions.
The principal findings of this study were (1) erratic synonymous substitution patterns among the three lineages and (2) lineage effect in protein sequence evolution. The first finding was obtained independently from the published sequences of the eight genes from the regions of normal recombination and the five genes located in regions of greatly reduced recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Consequently, the erratic synonymous substitution patterns cannot be attributed to the effects of ancestral polymorphism. One possible cause is fluctuation of the mutation rate, but the high occurrence of significant heterogeneity of synonymous and replacement substitution patterns does not support this hypothesis. An alternative, and more plausible, explanation is the changes in degree of selective constraint involved in codon usage. Indeed, higher codon bias was observed in the four AS-C genes of D. yakuba as compared to D. melanogaster and D. simulans.
The estimated dispersion index for the replacement substitutions was generally low, and only the per, G6pd and ac genes showed an indication of erratic evolution among the three lineages. In contrast to this finding, previous reports on three orders of mammals show generally higher dispersion indices for replacement substitutions than for synonymous ones (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Besides these technical biases due to the different research designs employed in each study, the higher levels of overdispersion for the replacement substitutions in the mammals as compared to Drosophila may reflect differences in the degree of functional redundancy due to gene duplications. Accelerated protein sequence evolution has been observed during the limited periods following gene duplications in a number of genes (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Another factor which may affect relative degrees of rate variation for the synonymous and replacement substitutions is the efficiency of natural selection. As mentioned above, the higher rate variation in the Drosophila genes could be due to a combination of weak selection with fluctuating selection intensities and fluctuating population sizes. Lower selection efficiency on the synonymous substitutions due to smaller population sizes of the mammals and thus lower rate variation could partly explain the relatively higher dispersion index for the replacement substitutions.
![]()
![]()
The four AS-C genes, the proneural ac, sc and l'sc genes, and the neural precursor gene ase, encode the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) class of transcription regulators. Although these proteins are not completely interchangeable in several aspects such as the numerator function of the sc (sisterless b) in sex determination, a great deal of functional redundancy has been reported among these genes in the proneural function promoting neural development (e.g., ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Nonrandomness of distribution of intra- or interspecific variation along DNA sequences is often studied by window analysis. This analysis, coupled with knowledge of protein structure and its function, can be a powerful tool to detect the action of natural selection. Nonrandomness, however, does not necessarily come from variation in mutation rate or degree of selective constraint along the sequence alone. If we can infer which lineages have mutations (based on the parsimonious assumption or some other methods), nonrandom distribution of substitutions may be further divided into lineage-dependent/lineage-specific clustering and lineage-independent clustering. The former refers to a clustering of substitutions along sequences in individual lineages, and the occurrence of lineage-dependent clustering may be due to epistatic interaction among sites including compensatory mutations. The pattern observed in the G6pd gene is a good example of the lineage-specific clustering of substitutions. As mentioned above, ![]()
![]()
We now come to understand that, besides gene duplication and protein sequence variation, changes in tissue or developmental specificity and in expression levels have played crucial roles in the morphological and developmental evolution of organisms. It is certainly a necessary task to survey the kind of changes that have occurred during the course of evolution. Further DNA sequence analysis may detect even small changes in the action of natural selection, for instance, suggested by the codon usage change in the four AS-C genes with the redundant function. This information, in turn, may provide insights into evolutionary changes in expression levels and changes responsible for morphological evolution. Interspecific variation may also be useful as a source to study genetic interaction among sites in one molecule.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
I am grateful to TOMOKO OHTA, MASARU IIZUKA and YASUO INA for their suggestion and encouragement. I thank SHIGEO HAYASHI for permission to use sequencing facilities in his laboratory. I also thank YUMIKO YAMASHITA for her technical assistance with this project and LEAH GILNER and two anonymous reviewers for improving the manuscript. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.
Manuscript received September 19, 1997; Accepted for publication February 4, 1998.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AKASHI, H., 1995 Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics 139:1067-1076[Abstract].
AKASHI, H., 1996 Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster.. Genetics 144:1297-1307[Abstract].
ALONSO, M. C. and C. V. CABRERA, 1988 The achaete-scute gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster comprises four homologous genes. EMBO J. 7:2585-2591[Medline].
AYALA, F. J. and D. L. HARTL, 1993 Molecular drift of the bride of sevenless (boss) gene in Drosophila.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1030-1040[Abstract].
AYALA, F. J., B. S. W. CHANG, and D. L. HARTL, 1993 Molecular evolution of the Rh3 gene in Drosophila.. Genetica 92:23-32[Medline].
BALCELLS, L., J. MODOLELL, and M. RUIZ-GÓMEZ, 1988 A unitary basis for different Hairy-wing mutations of Drosophila melanogaster.. EMBO J. 7:3899-3906[Medline].
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1992 Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster.. Nature 356:519-520[Medline].
BERRY, A. J., J. W. AJIOKA, and M. KREITMAN, 1991 Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics 129:1111-1117[Abstract].
BULMER, M., 1989 Estimating the variability of substitution rates. Genetics 123:615-619
CACCONE, A., E. N. MORIYAMA, J. M. GLEASON, L. NIGRO, and J. R. POWELL, 1996 A molecular phylogeny for the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup and the problem of polymorphism data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1224-1232[Abstract].
CHARLESWORTH, B., M. T. MORGAN, and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1993 The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134:1289-1303[Abstract].
EANES, W. F., M. KIRCHNER, and J. YOON, 1993 Evidence for adaptive evolution of the G6pd gene in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans lineages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:7475-7479
EANES, W. F., M. KIRCHNER, J. YOON, C. H. BIERMANN, and I. WANG et al., 1996 Historical selection, amino acid polymorphism and lineage-specific divergence at the G6pd locus in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.. Genetics 144:1027-1041[Abstract].
GILLESPIE, J. H., 1989 Lineage effects and the index of dispersion of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:636-647[Abstract].
GILLESPIE, J. H., 1991 The Causes of Molecular Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
GILLESPIE, J. H. and C. H. LANGLEY, 1979 Are evolutionary rates really variable? J. Mol. Evol. 13:27-34[Medline].
GOLDMAN, N., 1994 Variance to mean ratio, R(t), for Poisson processes on phylogenetic trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3:230-239[Medline].
HAMBLIN, M. T. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1996 High nucleotide sequence variation in a region of low recombination in Drosophila simulans is consistent with the background selection model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1133-1140[Abstract].
HILTON, H., R. M. KLIMAN, and J. HEY, 1994 Using hitchhiking genes to study adaptation and divergence during speciation within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Evolution 48:1900-1913.
HORTON, I. H., 1939 A comparison of the salivary gland chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics 24:234-243
HUDSON, R. R., 1983 Testing the constant-rate neutral allele model with protein sequence data. Evolution 37:203-217.
INA, Y., 1995 New methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions. J. Mol. Evol. 40:190-226[Medline].
INOMATA, N., H. SHIBATA, E. OKUYAMA, and T. YAMAZAKI, 1995 Evolutionary relationships and sequence variation of
-amylase variants encoded by duplicated genes in the Amy locus of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 141:237-244[Abstract].
IWABE, N., K. KUMA, and T. MIYATA, 1996 Evolution of gene families and relationship with organismal evolution: rapid divergence of tissue-specific genes in the early evolution of chordates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:483-493[Abstract].
JIMÉNEZ, F. and J. A. CAMPOS-ORTEGA, 1990 Defective neuroblast commitment in mutants of the achaete-scute complex and adjacent genes of D. melanogaster. Neuron 5:81-89[Medline].
KAROTAM, J., T. M. BOYCE, and J. G. OAKESHOTT, 1995 Nucleotide variation at the hypervariable Esterase 6 isozyme locus of Drosophila simulans.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:113-122[Abstract].
KIMURA, M., 1980 A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120[Medline].
KLIMAN, R. M. and J. HEY, 1993a DNA sequence variation at the period locus within and among species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex. Genetics 133:375-387[Abstract].
KLIMAN, R. M. and J. HEY, 1993b Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1239-1258[Abstract].
LANGLEY, C. H. and W. M. FITCH, 1974 An examination of the constancy of the rate of molecular evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 3:161-177[Medline].
LEMEUNIER, F. and M. ASHBURNER, 1976 Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora). II. Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 193B:275-294[Medline].
LEWIN, B., 1997 Genes, VI. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
LI, W.-H., 1985 Accelerated evolution following gene duplication and its implication for the neutralist-selectionist controversy, pp. 333352 in Population Genetics and Molecular Evolution, edited by T. OHTA and K. AOKI. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo and Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
MARTÍN-CAMPOS, J. M., J. M. COMERÓN, N. MIYASHITA, and M. AGUADÉ, 1992 Intraspecific and interspecific variation at the y-ac-sc region of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 130:805-816[Abstract].
MCDONALD, J. H. and M. KREITMAN, 1991 Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.. Nature 351:652-654[Medline].
MIYATA, T. and T. YASUNAGA, 1980 Molecular evolution of mRNA: A method for estimating evolutionary rates of synonymous and amino acid substitutions from homologous nucleotide sequences and its application. J. Mol. Evol. 16:23-36[Medline].
MORIYAMA, E. N. and T. GOJOBORI, 1992 Rates of synonymous substitution and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics 130:855-864[Abstract].
MORIYAMA, E. N. and J. R. POWELL, 1996 Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:261-277[Abstract].
NEI, M. and F. TAJIMA, 1981 DNA polymorphism detectable by restriction endonucleases. Genetics 97:145-163
NIELSEN, R., 1997 Robustness of the estimator of the index of dispersion for DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:346-351[Medline].
OHNISHI, S. and R. A. VOELKER, 1979 Comparative studies of allozyme loci in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster. II. Gene arrangement on the third chromosome. Jpn. J. Genet. 54:203-209.
OHTA, T., 1994 Further examples of evolution by gene duplication revealed through DNA sequence comparisons. Genetics 138:1331-1337[Abstract].
OHTA, T., 1995 Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in mammalian genes and the nearly neutral theory. J. Mol. Evol. 40:56-63[Medline].
OHTA, T. and Y. INA, 1995 Variation in synonymous substitution rates among mammalian genes and the correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous divergences. J. Mol. Evol. 41:717-720[Medline].
OHTA, T. and M. KIMURA, 1971 On the constancy of the evolutionary rate of cistrons. J. Mol. Evol. 1:18-25[Medline].
ORENIC, T. V., D. C. SLUSARSKI, K. L. KROLL, and R. A. HOLMGREN, 1990 Cloning and characterization of the segment polarity gene cubitus interruptus Dominant of Drosophila.. Genes Dev. 4:1053-1067
PARKHURST, S. M., H. D. LIPSHITZ, and D. ISH-HOROWICZ, 1993 achaete-scute feminizing activities and Drosophila sex determination. Development 117:737-749[Abstract].
PARRAS, C., L. A. GARCIA-ALONSO, I. RODRÍGUEZ, and F. JIMÉNEZ, 1996 Control of neural precursor specification by proneural proteins in the CNS of Drosophila.. EMBO J. 15:6394-6399[Medline].
ROSE, L. S. and E. WIESCHAUS, 1992 The Drosophila cellularization gene nullo produces a blastoderm-specific transcript whose levels respond to the nucleocytoplasmic ratio. Genes Dev. 6:1255-1268
SHARP, P. M. and W.-H. LI, 1989 On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila.. J. Mol. Evol. 28:398-402[Medline].
SHIBATA, H. and T. YAMAZAKI, 1995 Molecular evolution of the duplicated Amy locus in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup: concerted evolution only in the coding region and an excess of nonsynonymous substitutions in speciation. Genetics 141:223-236[Abstract].
SOKAL, R. R., and F. J. ROHLF, 1995 Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
TAKAHATA, N., 1986 An attempt to estimate the effective size of the ancestral species common to two extant species from which homologous genes are sequenced. Genet. Res. 48:187-190[Medline].
TAKAHATA, N., 1987 On the overdispersed molecular clock. Genetics 116:169-179
THACKERAY, J. R. and C. P. KYRIACOU, 1990 Molecular evolution in the Drosophila yakuba period locus. J. Mol. Evol. 31:389-401[Medline].
TRUE, J. R., J. M. MERCER, and C. C. LAURIE, 1996 Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics 142:507-523[Abstract].
VILLARES, R. and C. V. CABRERA, 1987 The achaete-scute gene complex of D. melanogaster: conserved domains in a subset of genes required for neurogenesis and their homology to myc.. Cell 50:415-424[Medline].
VINCENT, A., H. V. COLOT, and M. ROSBASH, 1985 Sequence and structure of the serendipity locus of Drosophila melanogaster: a densely transcribed region including a blastoderm-specific gene. J. Mol. Biol. 186:149-166[Medline].
WATTERSON, G. A. and H. A. GUESS, 1977 Is the most frequent allele the oldest? Theor. Popul. Biol. 11:141-160[Medline].
WOLFE, K. H. and P. M. SHARP, 1993 Mammalian gene evolution: nucleotide sequence divergence between mouse and rat. J. Mol. Evol. 37:441-456[Medline].
WU, C.-I. and W.-H. LI, 1985 Evidence for higher rates of nucleotide substitution in rodents than in man. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:1741-1745


