- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Johnston, L. A.
- Articles by Blochlinger, K.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Johnston, L. A.
- Articles by Blochlinger, K.
The Homeobox Gene cut Interacts Genetically With the Homeotic Genes proboscipedia and Antennapedia
Laura A. Johnston1,a, Bruce D. Ostrow1,a, Christine Jasonia, and Karen Blochlingeraa Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024
Corresponding author: Karen Blochlinger, Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Mailstop A2-025, P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, kblochli{at}fred.fhcrc.org (E-mail).
Communicating editor: T. W. CLINE
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The cut locus (ct) codes for a homeodomain protein (Cut) and controls the identity of a subset of cells in the peripheral nervous system in Drosophila. During a screen to identify ct-interacting genes, we observed that flies containing a hypomorphic ct mutation and a heterozygous deletion of the Antennapedia complex exhibit a transformation of mouthparts into leg and antennal structures similar to that seen in homozygous proboscipedia (pb) mutants. The same phenotype is produced with all heterozygous pb alleles tested and is fully penetrant in two different ct mutant backgrounds. We show that this phenotype is accompanied by pronounced changes in the expression patterns of both ct and pb in labial discs. Furthermore, a significant proportion of ct mutant flies that are heterozygous for certain Antennapedia (Antp) alleles have thoracic defects that mimic loss-of-function Antp phenotypes, and ectopic expression of Cut in antennal discs results in ectopic Antp expression and a dominant Antp-like phenotype. Our results implicate ct in the regulation of expression and/or function of two homeotic genes and document a new role of ct in the control of segmental identity.
THE creation of stable cell fates relies on the initial specification of cellular identities and the subsequent persistence of committed cell states through cell divisions and other developmental processes. In the peripheral nervous system of Drosophila, the cut gene (ct) has been shown to be necessary for establishing the fates of external sensory organs (es organs, chemosensory and mechanosensory): in the absence of ct activity all es organs develop morphologically and antigenically as internal chordotonal organs (ch organs, proprioceptive), whereas the reciprocal effect is observed after ectopic expression of ct in ch organs (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The ct locus codes for a nuclear protein (Cut) containing a homeodomain and three dispersed copies of a motif (cut repeat; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The homeotic genes are responsible for defining segmental identities in Drosophila (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In our screen for dose-sensitive genes that interact with ct, we found that ANT-C deletions identified a candidate gene, which we then mapped to pb. We subsequently found that ct also interacts genetically with Antp. Corresponding changes in expression of these homeotic genes were observed as a consequence of altered ct expression. We therefore speculate that ct is involved, directly or indirectly, in the control of expression and/or function of at least two homeotic genes. This provides the first line of evidence for the involvement of ct in pathways regulating segment identity.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Fly stocks:
Table 1 lists the stocks used in this study. Stocks were maintained on standard cornmeal/yeast/molasses/agar food at 20°. ctL188, ct6, ctK, ctC145, hsCut and UCut25-9 have been described (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
In our screen, ctL188 virgins were crossed to males containing heterozygous deficiencies of the second or third chromosomes over marked balancers. ctL188; Df/+ progeny males were examined for morphological defects and/or lethality compared to their siblings containing the balancer chromosome. To examine the pb and Antp phenotypes in ctL188 or ctL188/ctC145 females, ctL188; D/TM3 Sb virgins were crossed to males containing heterozygous pb or Antp alleles over marked balancers and ctL188; Antp(pb)/D(TM3 Sb) progeny males were subsequently crossed to either ctL188 or ctC145/FM6 virgins.
Flies of genotype w P[mini-w+; hs-NM]8A,P[ry+; neoR; FRT] 18A(18 NM) and w P[ry+; neoR; FRT] 18A; MKRS P[mini-w+; hsp70-FLP] (18-1F) were gifts from G. RUBIN (![]()
![]()
Morphological analysis:
To characterize mutant cuticular phenotypes, adult flies were immersed in 5 M KOH at 95° for 510 min, mounted in Faure mounting medium (![]()
To examine thoracic outgrowths, 20 nm of gold/palladium alloy was deposited on headless flies and preparations were viewed and their images recorded using a JEOL 5800 scanning electron microscope (JEDL, Boston, MA).
Mosaic analysis:
Cell clones lacking ct function were generated using the FLP-FRT system (![]()
Immunocytochemistry:
Embryos were fixed and processed for immunocytochemistry according to ![]()
![]()
The antibodies, their concentrations used and sources were: rat polyclonal (1:250) or mouse monoclonal (1:10) anti-Cut F2 (![]()
![]()
![]()
Preparations were viewed on a MRC-600 confocal microscope (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) and processed using Adobe Photoshop.
Ectopic expression of Cut:
Ectopic Cut expression was induced in an overnight collection of y w; C2/CyO embryos (Cut coding sequences inserted between hsp70 regulatory sequences; ![]()
Ectopic expression of Cut during postembryonic stages was induced by crossing either of two GAL4 lines, 4A.3dpp.GAL4 or 40C.6dpp.GAL4 to UCut25-9 (Cut coding sequences downstream of five GAL4 binding sites) flies.
| RESULTS |
|---|
Genetic interaction of ct with pb:
To identify genes that interact with ct, we screened for lethality or morphological defects in males containing heterozygous deficiencies (Df) of the second and third chromosome and a hypomorphic ct allele, ctL188, on the X chromosome. ctL188 is a homozygous viable, temperature-sensitive allele discovered in a hybrid dysgenesis screen (![]()
![]()
Only 1 of 150 initial deficiencies spanning ~70% of the genome produced a fully penetrant phenotype in combination with ctL188: in all flies with the genotype ctL188/Y; Df(3R)Scr/+ the mouthparts were morphologically abnormal. There are two labial palps at the distal end of wild-type mouthparts, each with six pseudotracheal rows (e.g., Figure 1A) (![]()
![]()
|
|
Two lines of genetic evidence indicate that the mutation in the ct locus (rather than elsewhere on the chromosome) is causally related to the dominant mouthpart phenotype in heterozygous pb flies (summarized in Table 2). First, the phenotype is observed in ctL188/ctL188; pb/+ and ctL188/ctC145; pb/+ flies but not ctL188/+; pb/+ or in ctC145/+; pb/+ flies, indicating that recessive alleles at the ct locus are required. Also, there is no phenotype in heterozygous pb flies combined with two alleles of ct that specifically affect the Cut expression pattern in the wing imaginal disc (ct6 and ctK), but not during embryogenesis or in other imaginal discs. Secondly, we found that the labial phenotype invariably is associated with the presence of the ctL188 allele in six individual recombinants between the chromosomes ctL188 and y w ct6 sn3 in combination with pb/+. Therefore, the locus responsible for this interaction maps to a region between w (3C2) and sn (7D2). These results strongly suggest that the labial phenotype in ctL188/Y; Df(3R)Scr/+ flies documents a specific interaction between pb and ct.
Complete loss of pb function transforms labium to leg, while partial loss of function results in a transformation of labium to antenna (![]()
![]()
![]()
We also tested the interaction of ctL188 with pb5 at 18°, but found no difference in either the penetrance or the severity of the labial phenotype compared to that obtained at 24° (data not shown).
ct and pb expression is altered in ct; pb/+ discs:
The adult mouthparts are produced from the labial imaginal discs (reviewed in ![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Loss of ct activity and ectopic Cut expression do not affect Pb expression:
To determine whether complete loss of ct function in labial disc cells changes Pb expression, we used FLP-mediated mitotic recombination to generate ct null mutant patches in labial discs, marked by the presence of a myc epitope (Figure 3). Surprisingly, the level of Pb expression in ct mutant cells appears to be unaltered in all (n = 150) of the clones examined (Figure 3). To address the possibility that the effect of ct on pb is restricted to a defined period in development, we induced clones during all three larval instars and obtained similar results. The mutant clones contained between 4 to 30 cells each depending on their time of induction and were similar in size to their corresponding wild-type twin clones.
|
In a reciprocal experiment, we expressed Cut ectopically in imaginal discs using the GAL4 system (![]()
![]()
![]()
We also tested whether the expression of Pb is affected by changes in Cut expression during embryogenesis. In embryos, both Cut and Pb are expressed in the labial lobes (![]()
![]()
Ectopic Cut expression results in a dominant Antp phenotype:
As described above, we did not observe any effects of ectopic Cut expression under dpp regulatory control on the pattern of Pb expression and the development of the labial discs. However, UCut/+; dppGAL4/+ flies are severely malformed because of the loss of structures that normally arise in the dpp expression domain in the eyes, legs and wings (data not shown). In addition, we noticed that in 43% of the flies that were transheterozygous for dppGAL4 and UCut, the antenna is transformed to leg. Specifically, structures such as claws and bracted bristles are present either at the distal end of the arista or entirely replace the arista (Figure 4A and Figure B). This phenotype resembles that produced by dominant Antp alleles as a result of ectopic Antp expression in antennal discs (![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Genetic interaction between ct and Antp:
Since ectopic Cut expression results in a dominant Antp phenotype, we tested for genetic interactions between ct and Antp by examining the external morphology of flies that were heterozygous for dominant or recessive Antp mutations in a ct mutant background.
Antp11 is an ethyl methanesulfonate-induced, recessive-lethal, loss-of-function allele. The molecular nature of the mutation is unknown. In 22% of ctL188 males in heterozygous combination with Antp11, we observed ectopic structures projecting from the position of the anterior spiracle on the dorsal prothorax (Figure 5B and C; Table 3). These dorsal prothoracic outgrowths are sometimes bilateral (0.4%) but mostly unilateral (21%) and are typically associated with malformations or absence of the two macrochaetes on the humeral callus. A similar phenotype was described in flies with heterozygous combinations of Antp alleles, as an inferred consequence of loss of Antp activity during the development of the adult thorax (![]()
![]()
|
|
We tested whether the expression of the dorsal prothoracic phenotype is cold sensitive. An increase in the incidence of both unilateral and bilateral outgrowth in ctL188; Antp11/+ males is observed at 18° (to 37% and 3%, respectively), providing further evidence that the activity of ctL188 is cold sensitive. Thoracic outgrowths also occur in ctC145/+; Antp11/+ females, at a frequency intermediate to that of ctL188; Antp11/+ males at 24° and at 18°. The highest incidence is observed in flies of the genotype ctL188/ctC145; Antp11/+ at 24°, of which 63% have either unilateral or bilateral outgrowths.
Thoracic outgrowths are also observed when other heterozygous Antp alleles, both dominant and recessive, are combined with ct mutations (Table 4), however, at a lower frequency compared to Antp11.
|
Antp and pb expression in ct mutant dorsal prothoracic discs:
Dominant defects in the dorsal prothoracic region, particularly the absence or malformation of the two large bristles on the humeral callus, have been previously observed in flies containing a mutant chromosome, Df(3R)SCBXL2, in which most of the ANT-C is deleted. This phenotype was shown to be because of the ectopic expression of pb in prothoracic discs with the concomitant reduction in Antp expression (![]()
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
The first ct mutant isolated was viable with scalloped wing margins (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
cut interacts with pb:
The phenotype of homozygous mutant pb flies is dose sensitive: complete absence of pb activity leads to transformation of mouthparts to prothoracic leg identity, whereas partial loss of pb function causes transformation to antenna or a mixture of leg and antennal identities (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The patterns of expression of both Pb and Cut are substantially altered in ctL188; pb/+ labial discs, suggesting a cross-regulatory relationship between ct and pb. It was therefore surprising that no changes in Pb expression were seen in ctC145 mutant clones in mosaic flies. It is possible that the effect of ct on pb expression is restricted to a specific developmental time, earlier than the induction of recombination and the creation of mosaicism. However, we also did not detect any changes in Pb expression in ctC145 mutant embryos, although these results could be explained by perdurance of Pb initiated by regulators other than ct. The absence of detectable alterations in the embryonic Pb expression in ct mutants or after ectopic Cut expression may indicate that the ct/pb interaction is limited to imaginal discs. Although it cannot be rigorously excluded at this point that the interaction between ct and pb is specific to ctL188, the absence of allele-specificity in the interaction between ct and Antp (see below) does not support this hypothesis. Alternately, the effect of ct on pb expression could be nonautonomous, involving cell interactions or long-range signaling. In contrast to the autonomous role of ct in specifying cell fate in the peripheral nervous system (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
ct interacts with Antp:
Evidence for nonautonomous functions of ct can also be found in its interaction with Antp, since ectopic Cut expression in a stripe along the anterior-posterior compartment boundary of both portions of the eye-antennal disc results in uniform activation of Antp throughout the disc.
The incidence of outgrowths in the dorsal prothoracic region of flies that are mutant for ct and heterozygous for Antp is highest in the presence of the recessive allele Antp11, which is an EMS-induced null allele with normal cytology (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It has been speculated that the outgrowths may be the product of a homeotic change (![]()
Curiously, the incidence of dorsal thoracic outgrowths observed with ct mutations in combination with null alleles other than Antp11 is generally low or nonexistent, even in the presence of a deficiency that removes most of the ANT-C (Df(3R)Scr). Similarly, somatic clones of two different null alleles (Antp4 and Antp25) and a hypomorphic allele (Antp20) were associated with alterations of the cuticular morphology and loss of bristles in the region of the anterior mesonotum and humeral callus, but no outgrowths were observed (![]()
Thoracic defects, including malformation of the spiracle and loss of bristles, have also been observed in flies containing the Df(3R)SCBXL2 chromosome (![]()
![]()
A role for ct in the control of segmental identity?
Given the importance of homeotic genes in controlling segmental identity, it is intuitively pleasing to speculate that the role of ct in the processes regulated by pb and Antp is mechanistically similar to its role in the peripheral nervous system, where it acts as a switch between alternative cell fate choices. However, we have no experimental evidence to support this theory. The abnormalities observed as a consequence of the mutant interactions closely resemble pb and Antp loss-of-function phenotypes, from which we infer that ct acts as a positive regulator of the activity of these two homeotic genes. As the level of pb expression in labial discs is clearly reduced when ct activity is lowered, we further speculate that ct is directly or indirectly involved in maintaining the expression of pb, and perhaps also Antp. It is also possible that Cut has a role as a co-factor and that it interacts cooperatively with Antp and Pb to refine their target specifities, as has been shown for other homeodomain proteins, for example the product of the extradenticle locus (![]()
We did not observe any genetic interactions between ct and other homeotic loci in our screen, however, such interactions may have been missed because of incomplete penetrance or subtlety of the phenotype. In fact, the interaction between ct and Antp was only apparent following a careful study using a panel of Antp alleles, which was prompted by the unexpected Antp-like phenotype observed after ectopic expression of Cut in imaginal discs. Therefore, we cannot exclude that ct also interacts with other homeotic genes, in addition to pb and Antp.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 The order of these authors is alphabetical. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank GEROLD SCHUBIGER for pointing out the bracted bristles, PAUL TALBERT for identifying the dorsal prothoracic outgrowths, DAVID L. CRIBBS and THOMAS C. KAUFMAN for providing the Pb antibodies, DANNY BROWER for the Antp antibodies, STEPHEN M. JACKSON for performing the hsCut experiment, LIZ CALDWELL for the scanning electron micrograph images, the Image Analysis Lab (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center) and the W.M. Keck Center for Advanced Studies in Neural Signaling (University of Washington) for the use of confocal microscopes, and DAVID L. CRIBBS and BARBARA WAKIMOTO for their critical comments on this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the American Cancer Society (#DB-108), the Muscular Dystrophy Association and the Human Frontiers Science Program to K.B. and from the National Institutes of Health (F32 GM 17373) to L.A.J.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ABBOTT, M. K. and T. C. KAUFMAN, 1986 The relationship between the functional complexity and the molecular organization of the Antennapedia locus of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 114:919-942
ANDRES, V., M. D. CHIARA, and V. MAHDAVI, 1994 A new bipartite DNA-binding domain: cooperative interaction between the cut repeat and the homeodomain of the cut homeo proteins. Genes Dev. 8:245-257
ANDRES, V., B. NADAL-GINARD, and V. MAHDAVI, 1992 Clox, a mammalian homeobox gene related to Drosophila cut, encodes DNA-binding regulatory proteins differentially expressed during development. Development 116:321-334[Medline].
ASHBURNER, M., 1989 Mounting and embedding media, p. 337 in Drosophila, A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
AUFIERO, B., E. J. NEUFELD, and S. H. ORKIN, 1994 Sequence-specific DNA binding of individual cut repeats of the human CCAAT displacement/cut homeodomain protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91:7757-7761
BLOCHLINGER, K., R. BODMER, J. JACK, L. Y. JAN, and Y. N. JAN, 1988 Primary structure and expression of a product from cut, a locus involved in specifying sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Nature 333:629-635[Medline].
BLOCHLINGER, K., R. BODMER, L. Y. JAN, and Y. N. JAN, 1990 Patterns of expression of Cut, a protein required for external sensory organ development, in wild-type and cut mutant Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 4:1322-1331
BLOCHLINGER, K., L. Y. JAN, and Y. N. JAN, 1991 Transformation of sensory organ identity by ectopic expression of Cut in Drosophila.. Genes Dev. 5:1124-1135
BLOCHLINGER, K., L. Y. JAN, and Y. N. JAN, 1993 Postembryonic patterns of expression of cut, a locus regulating sensory organ identity in Drosophila.. Development 117:441-450[Abstract].
BODMER, R., S. BARBEL, S. SHEPHERD, J. W. JACK, and L. Y. JAN et al., 1987 Transformation of sensory organs by mutations of the cut locus of D. melanogaster.. Cell 51:293-307[Medline].
BOUBE, M., C. BENASSAYAG, L. SEROUDE, and D. L. CRIBBS, 1997 Ras1-mediated modulation of Drosophila homeotic function in cell and segment identity. Genetics 146:619-628[Abstract].
BRAND, A. and N. PERRIMON, 1993 Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118:401-415[Abstract].
BRIDGES, C. and T. DOBZHANSKI, 1933 The mutant proboscipedia in Drosophila melanogastera case of hereditary homoeosis. Willhelm Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 127:575-590.
BRYANT, P. J., 1978 Pattern formation in imaginal discs, pp. 230235 in Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 2C, edited by M. ASHBURNER and T. R. F. WRIGHT. Academic Press, New York.
CRIBBS, D. L., C. BENASSAYAG, F. M. RANDAZZO, and T. C. KAUFMAN, 1995 Levels of homeotic protein function can determine developmental identity: evidence from low-level expression of the Drosophila homeotic gene proboscipedia under Hsp70 control. EMBO J 14:767-778[Medline].
CRIBBS, D. L., A. M. PATTATUCCI, M. A. PULTZ, and T. C. KAUFMAN, 1992a Ectopic expression of the Drosophila homeotic gene proboscipedia under Antennapedia P1 control causes dominant thoracic defects. Genetics 132:699-711[Abstract].
CRIBBS, D. L., M. A. PULTZ, D. JOHNSON, M. MAZZULLA, and T. C. KAUFMAN, 1992b Structural complexity and evolutionary conservation of the Drosophila homeotic gene proboscipedia.. EMBO J 11:1437-1449[Medline].
DE CELIS, J. F., A. GARCIA-BELLIDO, and S. J. BRAY, 1996 Activation and function of Notch at the dorso-ventral boundary of the wing margin. Development 122:359-369[Abstract].
DENELL, R. E., 1973 Homoeosis in Drosophila. I. Complementation studies with revertants of Nasobemia. Genetics 75:279-297
DOHERTY, D., G. FEGER, S. YOUNGER-SHEPHERD, L. Y. JAN, and Y. N. JAN, 1996 Delta is a ventral to dorsal signal complementary to Serrate, another Notch ligand, in Drosophila wing formation. Genes Dev. 10:421-434
DUNCAN, I. W. and T. C. KAUFMAN, 1975 Cytogenetic analysis of chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster: mapping of the proximal portion of the right arm. Genetics 80:733-752
GLICKSMAN, M. A. and D. L. BROWER, 1988 Misregulation of homeotic gene expression in Drosophila larvae resulting from mutations at the extra sex combs locus. Dev. Biol. 126:219-227[Medline].
HARADA, R., D. DUFORT, C. DENIS-LAROSES, and A. NEPVEU, 1994 Conserved cut repeats in the human cut homeodomain protein function as DNA binding domains. J. Biol. Chem. 269:2062-2067
JACK, J. and Y. DELOTTO, 1992 Effect of wing scalloping mutations on cut expression and sense organ differentiation in the Drosophila wing margin. Genetics 131:353-363[Abstract].
JACK, J. W., 1985 Molecular organization of the cut locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 42:869-876[Medline].
JACKSON, S. M. and K. BLOCHLINGER, 1997 cut interacts with Notch and Protein kinase A to regulate egg chamber formation and to maintain germline cyst integrity during Drosophila oogenesis. Development 124:3663-3672[Abstract].
JOHNSON, T. K. and B. H. JUDD, 1979 Analysis of the cut locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 92:485-502
JOHNSTON, L. A. and G. SCHUBIGER, 1996 Ectopic expression of wingless in imaginal discs interferes with decapentaplegic expression and alters cell determination. Development 122:3519-3529[Abstract].
JOLIOT, A., C. PERNELLE, H. DEAGOSTINI-BAZIN, and A. PROCHIANTZ, 1991 Antennapedia homeobox peptide regulates neural morphogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88:1864-1868
JORGENSON, E. M. and R. L. GARBER, 1987 Function and misfunction of the two promoters of the Drosophila Antennapedia gene. Genes Dev. 1:544-555
KAUFMAN, T. C., 1978 Cytogenetic analysis of chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster: isolation and characterization of four new alleles of the proboscipedia (pb) locus. Genetics 90:579-596
KAUFMAN, T. C., R. LEWIS, and B. WAKIMOTO, 1980 Cytogenetic analysis of chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster: the homoetic gene complex in polytene chromosome interval 84A-B. Genetics 94:115-133
LAWRENCE, P. A. and G. MORATA, 1994 Homeobox genes: their function in Drosophila segmentation and pattern formation. Cell 78:181-189[Medline].
LEWIS, E. B., 1978 A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila.. Nature 276:565-570[Medline].
LEWIS, R. A., B. T. WAKIMOTO, R. E. DENELL, and T. C. KAUFMAN, 1980 Genetic analysis of the Antennapedia Complex (ANT-C) and adjacent chromosomal regions of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Polytene chromosome segments 84A-84B1,2. Genetics 95:383-397
LIEVENS, P. M. J., J. J. DONADY, C. TUFARELLI, and E. J. NEUFELD, 1995 Repressor activity of CCAAT displacement protein in H-L 60 myeloid cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270:12745-12750
LINDSLEY, D. L., and G. G. ZIMM, 1992 The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego.
LIU, S., E. MCLEOD, and J. JACK, 1991 Four distinct regulatory regions of the cut locus and their effect on cell type specification in Drosophila. Genetics 127:151-159[Abstract].
LUDLOW, C., R. CHOY, and K. BLOCHLINGER, 1996 Functional analysis of Drosophila and mammalian Cut protein in flies. Dev. Biol. 178:149-159[Medline].
MICCHELLI, C. A., E. J. RULIFSON, and S. S. BLAIR, 1997 The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of Drosophila: Notch, wingless, and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate.. Development 124:1485-1495[Abstract].
MORGAN, T. H., C. B. BRIDGES, and A. H. STURTEVANT, 1925 The genetics of Drosophila.. Bibliogr. Genet. 2:1-262.
NEUFELD, E. J., D. G. SKALNIK, P. M.-J. LIEVENS, and S. H. ORKIN, 1992 Human CCAAT displacement protein is homologous to the Drosophila homeoprotein, cut. Nat. Genet. 1:50-55[Medline].
NEUMANN, C. J. and S. M. COHEN, 1996 A hierarchy of cross-regulation involving Notch, wingless, vestigial and cut organizes the dorsal/ventral axis of the Drosophila wing. Development 122:3477-3485[Abstract].
PULTZ, M. A., R. J. DIEDERICH, D. L. CRIBBS, and T. C. KAUFMAN, 1988 The proboscipedia locus of the Antennapedia complex: a molecular and genetic analysis. Genes Dev. 2:901-920
RANDAZZO, F. M., D. L. CRIBBS, and T. C. KAUFMAN, 1991 Rescue and regulation of proboscipedia: a homeotic gene of the Antennapedia Complex. Development 113:257-271[Abstract].
ROUX, I. L., S. DUHARCOURT, M. VOLOVITCH, A. PROCHIANTZ, and E. RONCHI, 1995 Promoter-specific regulation of gene expression by an exogenously added homeodomain that promotes neurite growth. Febs. Lett. 368:311-314[Medline].
SANTAMARIA, P. and A. GARCIA-BELLIDO, 1975 Developmental analysis of two wing scalloping mutants ct6 and Bx1 of Drosophila melanogaster.. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 178:233-245.
SCHNEUWLY, S. and W. J. GEHRING, 1985 Homeotic transformation of thorax into head: developmental analysis of a new Antennapedia allele in Drosophila melanogaster.. Dev. Biol. 108:377-386.
SCHNEUWLY, S., R. KLEMENZ, and W. J. GEHRING, 1987 Redesigning the body plan of Drosophila by ectopic expression of the homeotic gene Antennapedia.. Nature 325:816-818[Medline].
STAEHLING-HAMPTON, K., P. D. JACKSON, M. J. CLARK, A. H. BRAND, and F. M. HOFFMANN, 1994 Specificity of bone morphogenetic protein-related factors: cell fate and gene expression changes in Drosophila embryos induced by decapentaplegic but not 60A. Cell Growth Differ. 5:585-593[Abstract].
STRUHL, G., 1981 A homeotic mutation transforming leg to antenna in Drosophila.. Nature 292:635-638[Medline].
VALARCHE, I., J.-P. TISSIER-SETA, M.-R. HIRSCH, S. MARTINEZ, and C. GORIDIS et al., 1993 The mouse homeodomain protein Phox2 regulates Ncam promoter activity in concert with Cux/CDP and is a putative determinant of neurotransmitter phenotype. Development 119:881-896[Abstract].
WAKIMOTO, B. T. and T. C. KAUFMAN, 1981 Analysis of larval segmentation in lethal genotypes associated with the Antennapedia gene complex (ANT-C) in Drosophila melanogaster.. Dev. Biol. 81:51-64[Medline].
WIESCHAUS, E., C. NUSSLEIN-VOLHARD, and G. JURGENS, 1984 Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Zygotic loci on the X-chromosome and fourth chromosome. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 193:296-307.
WILSON, D. S. and C. DESPLAN, 1995 Cooperating to be different. Current Biology 5:32-34[Medline].
WOHLBERGER, C., 1996 Homeodomain interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6:62-68[Medline].
XU, T. and G. M. RUBIN, 1993 Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development 117:1223-1237[Abstract].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. I. z. Lage, D. R. A. Prentice, E. E. Holohan, and A. P. Jarman The Drosophila proneural gene amos promotes olfactory sensillum formation and suppresses bristle formation Development, October 1, 2003; 130(19): 4683 - 4693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






