- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Paddison, P.
- Articles by Kutter, E.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Paddison, P.
- Articles by Kutter, E.
The Roles of the Bacteriophage T4 r Genes in Lysis Inhibition and Fine-Structure Genetics: A New Perspective
Patrick Paddison1,a, Stephen T. Abedonb, Holly Kloos Dressmanc, Katherine Gailbreatha, Julia Tracya, Eric Mossera, James Neitzela, Burton Guttmana, and Elizabeth Kutteraa The Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington 98505
b Department of Microbiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 and
c National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Corresponding author: Elizabeth Kutter, The Evergreen State College, Olympia, WA 98505, kutterb{at}elwha.evergreen.edu (E-mail).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Seldom has the study of a set of genes contributed more to our understanding of molecular genetics than has the characterization of the rapid-lysis genes of bacteriophage T4. For example, T4 rII mutants were used to define gene structure and mutagen effects at the molecular level and to help unravel the genetic code. The large-plaque morphology of these mutants reflects a block in expressing lysis inhibition (LIN), the ability to delay lysis for several hours in response to sensing external related phages attacking the cell, which is a unique and highly adaptive attribute of the T4 family of phages. However, surprisingly little is known about the mechanism of LIN, or how the various r genes affect its expression. Here, we review the extensive old literature about the r genes and the lysis process and try to sort out the major players affecting lysis inhibition. We confirm that superinfection can induce lysis inhibition even while infected cells are lysing, suggesting that the signal response is virtually instantaneous and thus probably the result of post-translational regulation. We identify the rI gene as ORF tk.2, based on sequence analysis of canonical rI mutants. The rI gene encodes a peptide of 97 amino acids (Mr = 11.1 kD; pI = 4.8) that probably is secreted into the periplasmic space. This gene is widely conserved among T-even phage. We then present a model for LIN, postulating that rI is largely responsible for regulating the gpt holin protein in response to superinfection. The evidence suggests that the rIIA and B genes are not directly involved in lysis inhibition; rather, when they are absent, an alternate pathway for lysis develops which depends on the presence of genes from any of several possible prophages and is not sensitive to lysis inhibition.
ANY volume honoring JAN DRAKE or dedicated to the topics of mutation and recombination would be incomplete without a discussion of the rapid-lysis mutants of T4, whose role has been central in defining the recombinational and mutational units of heredity, the spectrum of changes caused by various mutagens, and the nature of mutational hotspots. We would further like to dedicate this article to ALFRED HERSHEY, discoverer of the rapid-lysis mutants half a century ago, who passed away last spring, and to GUS DOERMANN, who first described lysis inhibition after phage infection and who played key roles through many years in supporting our research at Evergreen.
Bacteriophage T4 and its relatives of the T-even family share a unique ability: they are able to control the timing of lysis in response to the relative availability of bacterial hosts in their environment. When E. coli are singly infected with T4, they lyse after 2530 min at 37° in rich media, releasing 100200 phage per cell. However, when additional T-even phages attack the cell 3 min or more after the initial infection, the cell does not lyse at the normal time (cf. ![]()
![]()
One consequence of lysis inhibition is that T-even phages normally form fairly small, rough-edged plaques. As a result of their more rapid lysis, mutants blocked in LIN form sharp-edged, generally larger "r-type" plaques. This makes them easy to identify when plated under appropriate conditions (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
. Revertants or wild-type recombinants can generally be detected to a frequency of 10-8. The factors blocking rII mutants from plating on
lysogens have been extensively studied, as reviewed by ![]()
lysogens remains unclear: this is discussed further below, with a rather surprising conclusion.
Benzer eventually used hundreds of independently isolated rII mutants to determine the fine structure of the gene to the nucleotide level (cf. ![]()
![]()
The spectrum of spontaneous mutations showed mutation frequencies varying by orders of magnitude, including two "hot spots" with very high mutation rates. The well-defined rII system was also used to look at the mutational spectra of various mutagens, demonstrating that different mutagens have very different patterns and, in many cases, identifying the specific kinds of changes. The power of the rII system in mutational studies is further reflected in the fact that T-even phage have been used to test over 300 substances for potential mutagenicity; ![]()
![]()
).
The rII proteins seem to have a wide and confusing range of functions. The rIIA and B genes both encode proteins found associated with the membrane (![]()
![]()
-lysogenic hosts, and may be involved in anchoring the replication/recombination complex to the membrane (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The suppression of ligase mutations by rII mutations may at least in part be related to less discriminate DNA packaging for rII phage in E. coli B (![]()
![]()
It is ironic that we do not yet have a better understanding of the process of lysis inhibition or of the ways in which the various T4 rapid-lysis mutants block its implementation, even though these mutants were among the first identified in T4. Furthermore, at the genetic level, the T4 rIIA and B genes are better understood than any other gene in any organism. Many would agree with SNYDER and KAUFMANN's (1994) statement that "the status of the rII genes of T4 in the history of genetics compares to that of the gene causing Mendel's rough and smooth peas," having played key roles in our understanding of the molecular basis of mutation and recombination (![]()
![]()
![]()
We know that the usual process of lysis of T4-infected cells involves a lysozyme encoded by gene e whose access to the peptidoglycan layer is normally blocked until ~2530 min after infection under standard lab conditions. Lysozyme egress is then mediated by the product of gene t ( ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Strains:
T4D, T2, and T6 and the rI mutants r 48, r 52, r 53, r 57, and r 58 are from the collection of A. H. DOERMANN, which was moved to Evergreen at his retirement. Proflavine-induced r mutants and the putative rI amber mutants are from LESLIE SMITH and JAN DRAKE, as are rII frameshift mutant FC0, amber mutants r EM64 and r EM84 and KRYLOV's original rV mutant; rII deletion mutants r18F, r 196, r H23, and r H88 are from HARRIS BERNSTEIN, as are ABEDON's T4D and amN91(37). The RB family of phages, described by ![]()
Bacterial strains:
The E. coli B and K-12 (Sup0) used by ABEDON for the lysis curves and the CR63 (supD) for growing phage stocks were gifts of JAN DRAKE, while ABEDON's E. coli S/6/5 came from HARRIS BERNSTEIN. At Evergreen State College amber mutants were grown on K803 (supE), received from LARRY SNYDER in 1975. Most experiments were carried out on B from our collection.
Media:
M9 medium, Hershey broth (HB), and phage diluent were made as described by ![]()
Complementation and recombination studies:
Complementation between various putative rI mutant phages was analyzed by mixing the two phages at equal concentrations in small flasks, adding 25 ml of exponential-phase E. coli B in HB to give a moi of 510 of each phage, incubating with aeration at 37°, and scoring the time of spontaneous lysis. Infection with the single mutants was used as the control. The test was considered to show no complementation for the r phenotype if spontaneous lysis still occurred between 30 and 35 min despite superinfection; in some cases, intermediate results were obtained that were hard to interpret, with lysis occurring gradually over 3050 min.
With some of the putative r mutants, we had difficulties seeing clear enough differences in plaque morphologies to carry out clear-cut recombination studies. Under our conditions, the putative rI amber mutants made very small though sharp-edged plaques; it was not easy to count with certainty a small number of fuzzy-edged, wild-type plaques among them that would have come from recombination. However, it appeared that the recombinant frequency was on the order of 12% between any two putative rI mutants.
PCR and DNA sequencing:
At Evergreen, DNA sequencing of various rI and t-amber mutants was carried out from PCR products generated in a Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) RoboCycler using purified phage stocks as the templates. Primers were selected using the sequence of the region that we had already determined (M. MZHAVIA, E. MARUSICH, T. DJARACHISHVILI and E. KUTTER, unpublished results), using the constraints of a genome that is two-thirds A-T. The resultant bands were purified for sequencing using the Promega (Madison, WI) Wizard gel extraction kit. Sequencing was carried out by hand using the Promega Femtomole Sequencing Kit. At NIEHS, DNA sequencing was carried out on an ABI 377 (for the rp mutants and rI-20) from PCR products purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit from Qiagen (Santa Clarita, CA). Each mutation was confirmed by sequence analysis in both directions, from multiple PCR products. The primer sequences used were as follows: rI 5' = GTTAAGGCCGTGCATCG; rI 3' = CCTAAGTATTCATCTGCCTTTC; r3 5' = GCTATTCCGTGTCTTTATAAGTC; rI 3' = CTTCAGTGTTACCACAAAGTGACG.
Lysis profile experiments:
Lysis experiments were carried out by infecting cells for one generation (moi = 5) or for two generations (moi = 0.1). For moi > 1, infections were synchronized by infecting washed E. coli in M9 salts solution in the absence of glucose; after a 15-min adsorption period, phage multiplication was initiated by the addition of glucose. Turbidity measurements were generally made using a Klett colorimeter (Klett Manufacturing Co., Inc., NY ). Superinfecting phage were added at appointed times in M9 salts; controls were given the same volume of M9 salts without superinfecting phage. At high cell densities, T-even phages from the first infected cells to lyse adsorb onto surrounding cells and induce LIN (![]()
![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
ORF tk.-2 is the rI gene:
While the rIIA and rIIB cistrons were mapped in detail early on and define the zero point of the circular T4 genomic map, the locations of rI and rIII proved more difficult to determine precisely. The rIII gene was identified as ORF 30.10 by RAUDONIKIENE and NIVINKAS (1992). The main keys to the location of rI were given by deletion mutants, because it lies in the middle of an 18-kb region that can be deleted without affecting viability of the phage under lab conditions. This region contains 39 open reading frames (ORFs) that are probably expressed, only eight of which have been characterized with regard to function. There were no nearby essential genes to facilitate precise positioning of rI. A set of deletion mutants isolated as being folate-analogue resistant due to their lack of a tk gene all showed a rapid-lysis phenotype generally attributed to an rI defect ( ![]()
![]()
We therefore sequenced the region between position 56.4 kb and tk (59.7 kb) in the canonical rI mutant, r48 (![]()
|
The newly-identified rI gene has no codons convertible by single-base transitions to an amber codon, and no mutations in tk.-2 (or in the entire 3.3-kb region sequenced) were found in either am47-22 or am48-23. This was surprising because both of these mutants have r plaque morphology, appeared to give less than 1% recombination with known rI mutants, and did not complement our known rI mutants or each other to give LIN in liquid-culture lysis tests. The explanation became obvious when liquid-culture lysis tests were carried out by coinfecting E. coli B with these putative rI amber mutants and wild type. Both mutants have a dominant phenotype; the infected cultures lysed 3040 min after infection, rather than showing extended lysis inhibition. Because they appear to map close to rI, we suggest that they may affect one of the unidentified ORFs lying between tk and the tRNA region. ![]()
The rI gene encodes a small protein that is predicted to be secreted to the periplasmic space:
The rI gene encodes a peptide of 97 amino acids with a molecular weight of 11.1 kD and pI of 4.8. The hydrophobicity predictions for gprI are shown in Figure 2, compared with those for gprIII, which is quite hydrophilic. Notably, the predicted rI peptide contains an N-terminal hydrophobic domain of 16 amino acids. Computational analyses kindly carried out by DANA BOYD, using a new method discussed by BOYD et al. (1998), predict that rI is secreted, rather than being a membrane protein. This prediction was also made by the Danish SignalP web site (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk.services/SignalP/), which predicts a signal-peptide cleavage site between position 24 and 25. The C terminus region appears to be important for function. For example, mutation rp10 involves the in-frame deletion of codon 92 (Ile), only five amino acids from the stop. Mutations rp19, rp28, rp31, and rp77 result in frameshifts within eight amino acids of the end. The only observed missense mutation (r57) changes 78 Arg to Gly.
|
rI and rIII served by both early and late promoters:
The rI gene is the second gene in a three-ORF transcription unit, defined by a canonical late promoter between tk and rI.1 and a terminator after rI.1 (Figure 3). The rI gene also lies 3.3 kb downstream of an early promoter, with no intervening terminator. Preliminary RT-PCR data confirm rI expression from both promoters (data not shown). Early expression is not surprising, because lysis inhibition can be induced when secondary phage adsorption occurs as early as 3 min after infection (![]()
![]()
|
The rIII gene is similarly regulated; it is the first gene in a two-ORF transcription unit flanked by a late promoter and a terminator (![]()
Most T4 late genes are transcribed in the clockwise direction of the genomic map, while all known genes expressed early in infection are transcribed counterclockwise. The few late genes transcribed counterclockwise are generally included on (extended) early, as well as (short) late transcripts. In the cases of lysozyme (e), a small outer-capsid protein (soc), and the intron-encoded homing endonucleases, an RNA stem-loop blocks translation of the early transcripts (![]()
Mutation of rl.-1 does not generate a rapid-lysis phenotype:
In T4, genes grouped together into transcription units often have related functions. Examples include clusters of DNA replication, host-shutoff, baseplate, head, tail, and tail-fiber genes. This raises the question of whether rI.1, rI.-1 and/or rIII.-1 might also be related to lysis and/or to lysis inhibition. During sequencing of the various mutants in the extended rI search, we found a mutation in our lab stock of T4D that inserted a G into the sequence GGT-GAG in tk.-3, resulting in GGG-TGA. Correcting this problem merged our original ORFs tk.-3 and tk.-4 (cf. ![]()
Conservation of the rI and rIII genes among the T-even family of phages:
The family of T-even phages is large and diverse, with members able to grow in all of the enteric bacteria and some of their more distant gram-negative relatives (cf. ![]()
The rIII gene also appears to be quite widely conserved. In this case, the primers used were within rIII. An appropriately sized band was seen for most of the phages tested (T2, T6, LZ4, LZ5, Poland, and RB69), but not for RB49. The latter has been classified as a "pseudo-T-even" phage, with the structural proteins in common but apparently vast changes in other regions; it also uses C rather than HMC in its DNA (![]()
Phage T7, used as a control, showed no band for rI or rIII, as was expected because T7 and its relatives show no lysis inhibition (![]()
Lysis profiles of cells infected with r mutants:
![]()
|
|
Induction of lysis inhibition after initiation of lysis in liquid cultures:
The data of ![]()
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
One of the longest standing mysteries of T4 biology is the mechanism of lysis inhibition and the function of the r genes (cf. ![]()
Virtually no insight, however, has been gained as to the nature of the signal for lysis inhibition and the functions of the genes mutations in which block expression of lysis inhibition. Much effort has been put into studying rIIA and B with few results relevant to LIN (![]()
What is the role of gene t in lysis and lysis inhibition?
The product of gene t probably forms the holin that conducts the lysozyme (gpe) into the periplasmic space, even though the protein looks very different from all the other known holins, as discussed by ![]()
S holin gene (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It has been suggested that rIV may be equivalent to a yet unidentified gene called spackle (sp), mutations of which accumulate in lysozyme mutants and allow them to release some phage (see ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Lysis inhibition requires a mechanism for determining the normal time of lysis, a signal for "phage excess," and a means of delaying lysis:
Any model of lysis inhibition needs to deal with the following questions and observation:
How does the lysis clock operate in the absence of lysis inhibition?
In trying to understand the regulation of the timing of lysis in T4, it is useful to consider the better understood lysis clock in bacteriophage
(cf. ![]()
, the time of lysis is determined by the production of inhibitory (S107) and active (S105) forms of the holin protein, S (![]()
![]()
T4 shares with
the ability to trigger early lysis in response to energy poisons in a holin-dependent manner, independent of r gene function (![]()
![]()
![]()
Normal lysis in T4, as in
and other phages, is precisely timed. We have no evidence as to the actual nature of the clock mechanism. There is potentially a strong stem-loop in the middle of the t gene that could possibly lead to a delay in completion of its translation until some other signal is received or to a truncated form of gpt. Furthermore, it appears that there may be more to the normal lysis clock than just allowing lysozyme access to the murein layer. Surprisingly, ![]()
What is the direct signal for "phage excess"? Several lines of evidence suggest that the lysis-inhibition signal must come from a stage later than the contact between the tail and the outer membrane or the penetration of the peptidoglycan layer:
- Lysis inhibition of T4-infected cells is induced by all other T-even phages tested and by UV-inactivated phage but not by phage ghosts, whose heads have broken open through osmotic shock (
RUTBERG and RUTBERG 1965 ). Ghosts can still attach to cells and penetrate the peptidoglycan layer, but they have no DNA or internal proteins to release into the periplasmic space.
- LIN is not induced by superinfection of T4-infected cells with other unrelated phages including T7, which has a very different DNA ejection mechanism and would not be likely to release the DNA into the periplasmic space (
RUTBERG and RUTBERG 1965 ).
These results make it appear likely that the DNA, the internal proteins IPI, IPII, and IPIII, internal peptides generated during cleavage of head proteins, and/or some other small DNA-binding molecule packaged in the head is responsible for signaling phage excess.
What is the receptor for the lysis-inhibition signal, and what response(s) does it mediate? On the basis of the work presented here, it appears very likely that the rI gene product is at least part of the receptor for the LIN signal. With the prediction (discussed above) that rI probably is secreted into the periplasmic space, the most logical suggestion is that it interacts directly with the signaling molecule there. We have looked for possible nucleic-acid- or nucleotide-binding motifs in the rI protein, but have not found any of the common ones, or any other suggestions as to what the specific mechanism of signal reception might be.
The triggering of the "external phage excess" signal has two obvious consequences. There is a major delay in the functional assembly or the opening of the holin pore that allows lysozyme to move out into the periplasmic space. Also, there is a delay in the loss of membrane potential and metabolic energy that occurs at the normal time of lysis, even in lysozyme mutants. For example, in t+e- infections, a single superinfecting phage extends respiration for just as long as the delay in lysis in a t+e+ infection under similar LIN conditions (![]()
![]()
The ability to induce lysis inhibition as early as 3 min suggests that triggering the response to superinfecting phage can occur in the absence of gpt, which is a late protein. Both the effects of energy poisons and the observation that superinfecting phage can induce LIN after some cells have already begun to lyse are most compatible with post-translational regulation, although translational regulation can not be ruled out.
Is rII really involved in lysis inhibition?
Several lines of evidence raise the interesting possibility that the rII genes may not actually play a role in lysis inhibition; rather, it appears likely that rII mutants simply trigger early lysis by an alternative pathway that is not subject to LIN. Evidence considered in building this alternative model includes the following:
- While rI is required for lysis inhibition on all host strains tested, rII is not. Only on B do rII mutants make large, sharp-edged plaques; the rII genes are not required for LIN on K strains (
BENZER 1957 ) or on the Bc variant of B (
RUTBERG and RUTBERG 1964 ), which differs from B in having lost a defective prophage related to P2.
- On E. coli B strain S/6/5, all rIIA and rIIB mutants tested gradually lyse about 5 min before cells infected with wild-type T4, as shown above.
- rII mutants partially suppress the constitutive lysis-inhibition phenotype of t mutants, thus suggesting that they are not operating in the same pathway.
Some of the other phenotypic effects of the rII mutations may in fact give us clues as to why these mutants are unable to establish lysis inhibition in response to superinfecting phage:
- The rII gene products seem to play a role related to cell energetics, which is apparently required at least in cells lysogenic for
. Infection is initiated normally in these lysogenic strains, but by ~12 min after infection, all energy-dependent processes come to an abrupt halt (PARMA et al. 1992 ;
SNYDER and KAUFMANN 1994 ). This includes gene expression, Mg2+ transport, and ATP biosynthesis.
- The substitution of Mg2+ and other divalent cations for monovalent cations leads to substantial rescue of rII mutant infections of K-12(
) (GAREN 1961 ).
This inhibition of rII mutants during infection of
lysogens depends on the
rexA and rexB genes (![]()
![]()
We suggest that on the common B strains, just as on K-12(
), the rII genes are required for maintaining membrane integrity and for sustaining energetics, but the membrane breakdown is slower and there is time for a substantial number of phage to be made before the cells break down. B is known to contain a cryptic prophage related to P2 which is required for the rII rapid-lysis phenotype (![]()
P2 does have its own complex set of lysis genes, including not only a holin and an endolysin but two nonessential genes that seem to affect the timing of lysis (![]()
![]()
lysogens.
This ability to generate an alternative way out of the cell, at least on some host strains, would explain why rII mutants can partially suppress the lysis defect in t mutants. If this model is correct, the rII genes (and the still uncharacterized rex-sensitivity genes of T5 and T7) give yet another example of the sophistication of the ongoing competition between bacteria and lytic phages, where the phage develop new modes of attack and the bacteria find ways to subvert them. A good deal of experimental work is clearly still needed to test this interpretation.
It would indeed be ironic if the rapid-lysis phenotype of rII mutants is at best tangentially related to lysis inhibition and primarily reflects a very fortuitous choice by MAX DELBRÜCK of the primary host strain to be used for phage studies. It seems to mean that both of the key phenotypes of rII mutants so crucial for those early genetic studiesthe large-plaque morphology on B, permitting easy identification of mutants, and the lethality on
lysogens, permitting selection of revertantsare in fact related to the same basic cellular functions of rII. It is to be hoped that this new way of thinking may facilitate the sorting out of the mechanisms of lysis inhibition and of the rII effects, independent of each other. However, we still have no specific clues beyond possible rII-protein sequestration of host ligase to explain those phenotypes of rII mutants related to DNA replication, recombination, and packaging discussed in the introduction, such as suppression of the lethality of DNA ligase and some gene 32 mutants and potentiation of gene 49 mutant effects.
rIII and lysis inhibition:
The arguments related to rII leave open the question of whether or not rIII is directly involved in LIN, at least on some strains. On some K strains, it reportedly is not required for LIN (![]()
![]()
lysogens. Relatively little physiological work has yet been done with rIII mutants; clearly, that is needed before further conclusions can be drawn.
The evolutionary significance of lysis inhibition has been explored in some detail (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The results on apparent conservation of rI and rIII for RB69 are of particular interest because RB69 appears not to sport any traditional large-plaque, r -type mutants, despite very extensive screening (![]()
In summary, the rapid-lysis phenotype seems to have at least two possible causes. It can reflect a direct block along the pathway leading to the lysis inhibition which results from superinfection; the evidence indicates that rI plays a key role in this pathway. In addition, rapid lysis can result from factors interfering with membrane integrity and energetics. Energy poisons late in the infection cycle initiate lysis in some way that still depends on t but cannot be prevented by superinfecting phage, even when that superinfection (and thus the triggering of lysis inhibition) occurred long before the energy poison. We propose here that rII mutants act via this second pathway, leading to truncated infections on B as they do on
lysogens, with the presence and size of the plaque reflecting the exact time at which this breakdown of membrane integrity occurs. It is not yet clear which of these two mechanisms is involved in the rIII rapid-lysis phenotype. While we cannot yet make a precise model either for the normal lysis clock or the method of induction of lysis inhibition, the parameters are much more clear, and testable predictions can be made.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Present address: Seattle Project, Program in Molecular Pharmacology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98104. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank JAN DRAKE, LESLIE SMITH, CAMERON THOMAS, JENNIFER LOEFFLER, KENA FOX-DOBBS, BARBARA ANDERSON, PIA ARONSSON, ELIZABETH THOMAS, MARA ESPOSITO, VICTOR SHCHERBAKOV, RY YOUNG, DANA BOYD, DWIGHT HALL, RICHARD CALENDAR and KARIN CARLSON for collaboration, support, discussion and criticism of the manuscript. The research at Evergreen was funded by the National Science Foundation CRUI (collaborative research at undergraduate institutions) Program; that at Ohio State and the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences was funded intramurally.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ABEDON, S. T., 1989 Selection for bacteriophage latent period length by bacterial density: a theoretical examination. Microb. Ecol. 18:79-88.
ABEDON, S. T., 1990 Selection for lysis-inhibition in bacteriophage. J. Theor. Biol. 146:501-511[Medline].
ABEDON, S. T., 1992 Lysis of lysis-inhibited bacteriophage T4-infected cells. J. Bacteriol. 174:8073-8080
ABEDON, S. T., 1994 Lysis and the interaction between free phages and infected cells, pp. 397405 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. American Society for Microbiology, Washingtion, DC.
ACKERMANN, H. and H. KRISCH, 1997 A catalogue of T4-type bacteriophages. Archives in Virology 142:2329-2345[Medline].
ALBERTS, B., 1994 Epilogue, pp. 485488 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
BENZER, S., 1955 Fine structure of a genetic region in bacteriophage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 41:344-355
BENZER, S., 1957 The elementary units of heredity, pp. 7093 in The Chemical Basis of Heredity, edited by W. D. MCELROY and B. GLASS. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
BENZER, S., 1966 Adventures in the rII Region, pp. 157165 in Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology, edited by J. CAIRNS, G. S. STENT and J. D. WATSON. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
BERGER, H. and A. W. KOZINSKI, 1969 Suppression of T4D ligase mutations by rIIA and rIIB mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 64:897-904
BLASI, U., C.-Y. CHANG, M. T. ZAGOTTA, K. NAM, and R. YOUNG, 1990 The lethal lambda S gene encodes its own inhibitor. EMBO J. 9:981-989[Medline].
BODE, W., 1967 Lysis inhibition of E. coli infected with T4. J. Virol. 1:948-955
BOYD, D., 1998 How many membrane proteins are there? Protein Sci. 7:201-205[Abstract].
CALENDAR, R., S. YU, H. MYUNG, V. BARRIERO, R. ODEGRIP et al., 1998 The lysogenic conversion genes of coliphage P2 have unusually high AT content, pp. 241252 in Horizontal Gene Transfer, edited by MICHAEL SYVANEN and CLARENCE KADO. Chapman and Hall, London.
CARLSON, K. and A. KOZINSKI, 1969 Parent to progeny transfer and recombination of TrrII bacteriophage. J. Virol. 6:344-352.
CARLSON, K., and E. S. MILLER, 1994 Working with T4, pp. 421426 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. American Society for Microbiology, Washingion, DC.
CARLSON, K., Z. LORKIEWICZ, and A. W. KOZINSKI, 1973 Host-mediated repair of discontinuities in DNA from T4 bacteriophage. J. Virol. 12:310-319
CRICK, F. H. C., L. BARNETT, S. BRENNER, and R. J. WATTS-TOBIN, 1961 General nature of the genetic code for proteins. Nature 177:473-475.
DOERMANN, A. H., 1948 Lysis and lysis inhibition with Escherichia coli bacteriophage. J. Bacteriol. 55:257-275
DOERMANN, A. H., 1952 The intracellular growth of bacteriophages. I. Liberation of intracellular phage T4 by premature lysis with another phage or with cyranide. J. Gen. Physiol. 35:645-656
DRAKE, J. W., and L. S. RIPLEY, 1994 Mutagenesis, pp. 98124 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
EBISUZAKI, K. and L. CAMPBELL, 1969 On the role of ligase in genetic recombination in bacteriophage T4. Virology 38:701-803[Medline].
EMRICH, J., 1968 Lysis of T4-infected bacteria in the absence of lysozyme. Virology 35:158-165[Medline].
ENNIS, H. L. and K. D. KIEVETT, 1973 Association of the rIIA protein with the bacterial membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70:1468-1472
FRASER, D., H. MAHLER, A. SHUG, and C. THOMAS, 1957 The infection of subcellular E. coli B with a DNA preparation from T2 bacteriophage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 43:939-946
GAREN, A., 1961 Physiological effects of rII mutants in bacteriophage T4. Virology 14:151-163.
HERSHEY, A. D., 1946 Mutation of bacteriophage with respect to type of plaque. Genetics 31:620-640
HERSHEY, A. D. and R. ROTMAN, 1948 Linkage among genes controlling inhibition of lysis in a bacterial virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 34:89-96
HUANG, W. M., 1975 Membrane-associated proteins of T4-infected Escherichia coli.. Virology 66:508-521[Medline].
JOHNSON, J. R. and D. H. HALL, 1973 Isolation and characerization of mutants of bacteriophage T4 resistant to folate analogs. Virology 53:413-426[Medline].
JOSSLIN, R., 1970 The lysis mechanism of phage T4: mutants affecting lysis. Virology 40:719-726[Medline].
JOSSLIN, R., 1971 Physiological studies on the t gene defect in T4 infected Escherichia coli.. Virology 44:101-107[Medline].
KAO, S. H. and W. H. MCCLAIN, 1980 Roles of bacteriophage T4 gene 5 and gene S products in cell lysis. J. Virol. 34:104-107
KARAM, J. D., 1969 DNA replication by phage T4 rII mutants without polynucleotide ligase (gene 30). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 37:416-422[Medline].
KRYLOV, V. N., 1973 Dual nature of the function of rII gene and the efficiency of suppression of DNA-ligase mutations of T4B phage induced by rII mutations. Genetika 9:105-111.
KRYLOV, V. N. and T. C. PLOTNICOVA, 1972 Genetic and physiological study of amber mutants of gene stII of T4B phage. Genetika 8:85-95.
KRYLOV, V. N. and N. K. YANKOVSKY, 1975 Mutations in the new gene stIII of bacteriophage T4B suppressing the lysis defect of mutations of gene stII and gene e mutants. J. Virol. 15:22-26
KRYLOV, V. N. and A. ZAPADNAYA, 1965 Bacteriophage T4B r mutations sensitive to temperature (rts). Genetika 1:7-11.
KUTTER, E. M., T. STIDHAM, B. GUTTMAN, E. KUTER, D. BATTS et al., 1994 Genomic map of bacteriophage T4, pp. 491519 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
LU, M. J. and U. HENNING, 1992 Lysis protein T of bacteriophage T4. Mol. Gen. Genet. 235:253-258[Medline].
MCPHEETERS, D. S., A. CHRISTENSEN, E. T. YOUNG, G. STORMO, and L. GOLD, 1986 Translation regulation of expression of the bacteriophage T4 lysozyme gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 14:5813-5826
MILLER, E. S., J. KARAM and E. SPICER, 1994 Control of translation initiation: mRNA structure and protein repressors, pp. 193204 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC
MONOD, C., F. REPOILA, M. KUTATELADZE, F. TÉTART, and H. M. KRISCH, 1996 The genome of the pseudo T-even bacteriophages, a diverse group that resembles T4. J. Mol. Biol. 267:237-249.
MOSIG, G., 1987 The essential role of recombination in phage T4 growth. Annu. Rev. Genet. 21:341-371.
MOSIG, G., 1994 Homologous recombination, pp. 5482 in Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4, edited by J. D. KARAM. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
MOSIG, G. and A. M. BRESCHKIN, 1975 Genetic evidence for an additional function of phage T4 gene 32 protein: interaction with ligase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:1226-30




) and with (
) superinfection, compared with gene 37 mutant amN91 (
), which shows the wild-type pattern in the absence of lysis inhibition.
