help button home button Genetics J Gen Phys
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hata, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hata, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, A.
Genetics, Vol. 148, 571-580, February 1998, Copyright © 1998, Genetics Society of America

Dhh1p, a Putative RNA Helicase, Associates with the General Transcription Factors Pop2p and Ccr4p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Hiroaki Hata1,a, Hisayuki Mitsui2,a, Hong Liu3,a, Yongli Bai4,a, Clyde L. Denis4,a, Yuki Shimizua, and Akira Sakaia
a Cellular Signaling Group, Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences, Tokyo 194, Japan

Corresponding author: Akira Sakai, Cellular Signaling Group, Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences, 11 Minamiooya, Machida-shi, Tokyo 194, Japan, sakai{at}libra.ls.m-kagaku.co.jp (E-mail).

Communicating editor: M. JOHNSTON


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

The POP2 (Caf1) protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae affects a variety of transcriptional processes and is a component of the Ccr4p complex. We have isolated five multicopy suppressor genes of a pop2 deletion mutation: CCR4, DHH1 (a putative RNA helicase), PKC1, STM1, and MPT5 (multicopy suppressor of pop two). Overexpression of either the CCR4 or DHH1 genes effectively suppressed phenotypes associated with pop2 mutant cells; overexpression of PKC1, STM1, or MPT5 genes produced only partial suppression. Disruption of the CCR4 or DHH1 genes resulted in phenotypes similar to those observed for pop2 cells. In addition, overexpression of the DHH1 gene also suppressed the ccr4 mutation, suggesting a close relationship between the POP2, CCR4, and DHH1 genes. Two-hybrid analysis and coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Pop2p and Dhh1p interact physically, and these and other data suggest that Dhh1p is also a component of the Ccr4p complex. Finally, we investigated the genetic interaction between factors associated with POP2 and the PKC1 pathway. The temperature-sensitive growth defect of dhh1 or mpt5 cells was suppressed by overexpression of PKC1, and the defect of mpk1 cells was suppressed by overexpression of MPT5. These results and phenotypic analysis of double mutants from the POP2 and PKC1 pathways suggested that the POP2 and the PKC1 pathways are independent but have some overlapping functions.


THE POP2 (CAF1) gene is required for glucose derepression of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SAKAI et al. 1992 Down; DRAPER et al. 1995 Down). The pop2 mutant cells exhibit many defects, including reduced levels of reserve carbohydrates, resistance to glucose derepression, temperature sensitivity for growth, increased PGK1 transcription during stationary phase, and reduced levels of alcohol dehydrogenase II, isocitrate lyase, and invertase (SAKAI et al. 1992 Down; DRAPER et al. 1995 Down). Pop2p has been shown to be part of the Ccr4p complex (DRAPER et al. 1995 Down; LIU et al. 1997 Down). Ccr4p, a general transcription factor, is required for the transcription of many genes, including glucose-repressible ADH2, and the pleiotropic nature of defects in CCR4 is similar to that in POP2 (DENIS and MALVAR 1990 Down; MALVAR et al. 1992 Down; SAKAI et al. 1992 Down). Homologs of the POP2 gene have been identified from humans, mice, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Arabidopsis thaliana (DRAPER et al. 1995 Down). The high degree of evolutionary conservation and their functional interchangeability suggest that the POP2 gene plays an important functional role in cells.

We have identified several new phenotypes of pop2 mutants. First, pop2 cells are sensitive to staurosporine, a potent inhibitor of protein kinase C that is encoded by PKC1. Second, pop2 cells are also sensitive to caffeine (LIU et al. 1997 Down). In addition, the temperature-sensitive phenotype of pop2 is suppressed by the addition of 1 M sorbitol to the medium. These phenotypes are characteristic of mutants involved in the PKC1-MPK1 pathway (THEVELEIN 1994 Down), which controls cell wall integrity. Cells carrying pkc1{Delta} or mpk1{Delta} cannot use glycerol as a sole carbon source (COSTIGAN et al. 1994 Down), and this suggests the involvement of the PKC1-MPK1 pathway in the transcription of genes required for glycerol utilization. To understand the functions of Pop2p, we have searched for multicopy suppressor genes of a pop2 deletion mutation. This approach has proved to be quite useful for analyzing many cellular processes such as the SNF1 kinase pathway (ESTRUCH and CARLSON 1993 Down; HUBBARD et al. 1994 Down) and the PKC1-MPK1 protein kinase pathway (LEE et al. 1993A Down; NICKAS and YAFFE 1996 Down). Using this approach, we hoped to obtain genes encoding proteins with functional relationships to POP2: negative regulators of an antagonistic pathway or positive regulators of a downstream pathway. We report here the isolation of five multicopy suppressor genes of the pop2 deletion mutation in S. cerevisiae. We also present genetic and biochemical evidence indicating that Pop2p, Ccr4p, and Dhh1p are part of the same complex of proteins. A possible interaction between the POP2 and PKC1-MPK1 pathways is discussed.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Strains and genetic methods:
The strains of S. cerevisiae used in this study are listed in Table 1. Crossing, sporulation, and tetrad analyses were carried out by standard genetic methods (SHERMAN et al. 1986 Down). Unless otherwise specified, the permissive and restrictive temperatures were 24° and 36°, respectively. The transformation of yeast was performed by the LiOAc method (ITO et al. 1983 Down). Escherichia coli strains HB101 and JM109 were used as hosts for constructing and propagating plasmids. The transformation of E. coli was performed as described (HANAHAN 1983 Down). The basic culture medium used for S. cerevisiae was YPD medium containing 1% Bacto-yeast extract, 2% Bacto-peptone, and 2% dextrose (SHERMAN et al. 1986 Down). The synthetic medium was CSM medium containing 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% dextrose, and amino acids as required (SHERMAN et al. 1986 Down). The media were solidified with 2% Bacto-agar for plates. To test the sensitivity of various mutants to staurosporine (Kyowa Medix, Tokyo, Japan), the drug was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and added to YPD media to a final concentration of up to 5 µg/ml (TAMAOKI et al. 1986 Down; YOSHIDA et al. 1992 Down). Tetrad dissection of heterozygous diploids carrying pkc1{Delta} was performed on a YPD plate containing 1 M sorbitol. Luria broth was supplemented with ampicillin for selection of the E. coli transformants as described (MANIATIS et al. 1982 Down).


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. List of yeast strains

Preparation of DNA and RNA:
Preparation of E. coli DNA, Southern hybridization, and Northern hybridization were performed as described (MANIATIS et al. 1982 Down). The preparation of yeast DNAs and Northern analysis were performed as described (SHERMAN et al. 1986 Down).

ADH II assay:
Yeast cells were grown in YEP medium supplemented with either 8% glucose or 3% ethanol, and the activity of ADH II was measured as described previously (COOK et al. 1994 Down).

Isolation of multicopy suppressors of pop2-{Delta}4:
A yeast genomic DNA library (in YEp13, LEU2 marker) was transformed to an A880 strain carrying the pop2-{Delta}4 mutation (SAKAI et al. 1992 Down), and transformants were selected on CSM lacking leucine at 24° for 5 days. To isolate suppressors for the temperature-sensitive phenotype of pop2 cells, transformants were replica plated on YPD, and the plates were further incubated at 36°. To isolate suppressors for the staurosporine-sensitive phenotype of pop2 cells, the transformants were replica plated on YPD containing 1 µg/ml staurosporine. Of 25,000 transformants, 85 colonies were selected. The 85 suppressor plasmids were recovered, analyzed by Southern hybridization and restriction mapping, and divided into six classes. The largest class (containing 65 plasmids) was identified as POP2 itself. The remaining five classes were tentatively called MPTs (multicopy suppressor of pop two). The classes of MPT1, MPT2, MPT3, MPT4, and MPT5 contained 13, 3, 2, 1, and 1 plasmids, respectively. To localize the suppressor activities for these plasmids, individual restriction fragments were subcloned into the YEp213 vector and tested for their abilities to grow on YPD plates at the restriction temperature or YPD plates containing staurosporine. These MPT genes were further subcloned into pUC18, and the nucleotide sequences were determined by the Sanger method using a Sequenase Kit (United States Biochemical, Cleveland, OH). Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that three genes had been identified previously. MPT1 is DHH1, which encodes a putative RNA helicase (STRAHL-BOLSINGER and TANNER 1993 Down), MPT2 is identical to CCR4, which is required for the full expression of the glucose-repressible ADH2 gene (DENIS and MALVAR 1990 Down; MALVAR et al. 1992 Down), and MPT3 turned out to be PKC1, a yeast homolog of mammalian protein kinase C (LEVIN et al. 1990 Down). MPT4 is STM1, a guanine quartet–binding protein (FRANTZ and GILBERT 1995 Down). MPT5 is identical to HTR1. The name HTR1 had been used for a different gene (OZCAN et al. 1993 Down); we refer to this gene as MPT5.

Disruption of DHH1, CCR4, PKC1, MPT4, and MPT5:
The dhh1{Delta}::URA3, ccr4{Delta}::HIS3, pkc1{Delta}::HIS3, stm1{Delta}::ADE8, and mpt5{Delta}::HIS3 alleles were constructed by the standard method and transformed into diploid (D40) cells to replace the chromosomal loci by the one-step gene disruption method (ROTHSTEIN 1983 Down).

Construction of dhh1{Delta}::URA3:
A 2.5-kbp DNA fragment (PmaCI-ApaLI) bearing the DHH1 gene (ORF: 1518 bp) was filled in with Klenow enzyme and subcloned into the SmaI site of pBluescript II. The resulting plasmid DNA was digested with BstEII and Bgl II. This step deleted 115 bp within the coding region (+438 to + 552). After the ends were filled in with Klenow enzyme, a 1.2-kbp URA3 fragment, isolated by digestion of YEp24 plasmid DNA with HindIII and filled in, was inserted. The resulting plasmid was digested with PvuI and KpnI and used for transformation. After heterozygous disruption was confirmed by Southern blotting, the transformants were subjected to sporulation followed by micromanipulation to generate haploid cells carrying the dhh1 deletion mutation.

Construction of ccr4{Delta}::HIS3:
The ccr4{Delta}::HIS3 allele was introduced in our background and L40 strain using the TM1 plasmid as described (MALVAR et al. 1992 Down).

Construction of pkc1{Delta}::HIS3:
A 4.3-kbp SphI-SphI fragment bearing the PKC1 gene was recovered from the original MPT3 plasmid. Disruption of the PKC1 gene was performed by the replacement of a 0.6-kbp BamHI fragment of the PKC1 gene with the HIS3 gene from pJJ216 as described (YOSHIDA et al. 1992 Down).

Construction of stm1{Delta}::ADE8:
A 1600-bp DNA fragment (PmaCI-ClaI) bearing the MPT4 gene (ORF: 819 bp) was filled in with Klenow enzyme and subcloned into the SmaI site of the pUC18 plasmid whose PstI site was disrupted. The resulting plasmid was digested with XbaI and HpaI to remove 33 bp within the MPT4 gene (+283 to +316) and a 1152 bp ADE8 DNA whose ends were XbaI and SmaI. The resulting plasmid was digested with EcoRV and Afl II, and was used for transformation.

Construction of mpt5{Delta}::HIS3:
A 5-kbp AatI-AatI DNA fragment bearing the MPT5 gene was isolated from the original MPT5 plasmid DNA, whose ends were changed to Sal I by linker ligation, and subcloned into the Sal I sited of pUC18. The plasmid DNA was digested with NspV to remove -420 to +3700 of the MPT5 DNA. After the ends were filled in with Klenow enzyme, a 1.8-kbp HIS3 DNA whose ends were filled in with Klenow enzyme was inserted. The resulting plasmid was digested with EcoRI and EcoRV, and was used for transformation.

All disruptions were introduced into D40 cells, and the disruptions were confirmed by Southern blot analysis. Haploid cells carrying the disruption were recovered by standard microdissection.

Two-hybrid analysis:
Plasmid pBTM116 (kindly provided by KATSUNORI TANAKA, Shimane University) was used to construct LexA-Pop2p. BamHI sites were introduced into the DNA encoding the POP2 protein by PCR, and the resulting DNA fragment was subcloned into the BamHI site of pBMT116 in-frame to LexA. Plasmid pGADGH was purchased from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA) and was used to construct Gal4 activation domain fusion plasmids (Gal4AD-Ccr4 and Gal4AD-Dhh1). Yeast strain L40 was used as the two-hybrid host (Table 1). The activity of ß-galacto-sidase was determined as described (MILLER 1972 Down). The LexA-Vpu plasmid contains the hydrophilic segment of Vpu (residues 33–81) fused to full-length LexA (CHIANG et al. 1996 Down). B42-Pop2p contains residues 149–441 of Pop2p fused in frame to the E. coli–derived B42 transcriptional activator (ZERVOS et al. 1993 Down). This segment of Pop2p interacts with Ccr4p in the two-hybrid assay and coimmunoprecipitates with Ccr4p (DRAPER et al. 1995 Down; data not shown). B42-Sip1p contains residues 243–500 of Sip1p (YANG et al. 1992 Down) fused to B42. LexA-Dhh1 was constructed by removing the complete DHH1 sequence from the Gal4AD-Dhh1AD fusion using BamHI and Sal I and cloning into the BamHI and Sal I sites of LexA-202-1 (COOK et al. 1994 Down).

Immunoprecipitation:
Preparation of protein extracts and immunoprecipitation were performed as described (DRAPER et al. 1995 Down). The polyclonal antibody against the Gal4 activation domain was a kind gift from KOUICHI ISHIGURO, Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences. The Ccr4p antibody was described previously (DRAPER et al. 1995 Down). Antibodies against the HA1 epitope were commercially obtained. The sequence data presented in this paper have been submitted to the GenBank Data Libraries under the following accession numbers: MPT4, D26183; MPT5, D26184.


*  RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Isolation of multicopy suppressors of pop2:
The temperature-sensitive phenotype of pop2 mutants suppressed by the addition of 1 M sorbitol in the medium (Figure 1A). At the restrictive temperature, the pop2 cells become enlarged and swollen, showing a cell lysis phenotype (data not shown). Furthermore, the pop2 cells are also sensitive to staurosporine (1 µg/ml; Figure 1B), a potent inhibitor of the yeast protein kinase C homolog (PKC1; TAMAOKI et al. 1986 Down; LEVIN et al. 1990 Down; YOSHIDA et al. 1992 Down). Finally, the growth of pop2 cells is inhibited by low levels of caffeine (8 mM; Table 2). pop2 cells also exhibited a weak cold-sensitive growth phenotype that is suppressible by 1 M sorbitol (LIU et al. 1997 Down). These phenotypes are similar to those caused by mutations in the PKC1 pathway, and they suggest that POP2 plays a role in maintenance of cell wall integrity in addition to its other known phenotypic defects. Since the pop2 mutant affects such varied processes, it was of interest to us to know the multifunctional roles of Pop2p in cells.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Newly found phenotypes of pop2 cells. (a) Sorbitol-suppressible, temperature-sensitive growth defect of pop2 deletion cells. (1) A1123 (wild-type), (2) A1152 (stt1-1/pkc1ts), (3) A475 (rgr1-{Delta}2::URA3), (4) A880 (pop2-{Delta}4::URA3). Cells were streaked on YPD or YPD+1 M sorbitol plates and were incubated at 24° and 37° for 4 days. (b) Staurosporine sensitivity. A1123 (wild-type) and A880 (pop2-{Delta}4::URA3) cells were resuspended with YPD media, spread on the YPD plate containing staurosporine, and incubated at 24° for 4 days.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Phenotypes of the deletion mutants

We searched for multicopy suppressors of the temperature- and staurosporine-sensitive growth defects of pop2 mutation (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). We identified five gene products that suppressed the pop2 phenotypes either completely or partially (Table 3). Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that these genes are DHH1, which encodes a putative RNA helicase (STRAHL-BOLSINGER and TANNER 1993 Down), CCR4, which is required for the full expression of the glucose-repressible ADH2 gene (DENIS and MALVAR 1990 Down; MALVAR et al. 1992 Down), PKC1, a yeast homolog of mammalian protein kinase C (LEVIN et al. 1990 Down), STM1, a guanine quartet–binding protein (FRANTZ and GILBERT 1995 Down), and MPT5 (KIKUCHI et al. 1994 Down; KENNEDY et al. 1997 Down). Mpt5p contains eight tandem copies of an ~38 amino acid–repeat, including a strong consensus sequence of 13 amino acids (LxxDxFGxxFLQK). This repeat is also found in YGL023 (CHEN et al. 1991 Down) and in the Drosophila pumilio gene (BARKER et al. 1992 Down; MACDONALD 1992 Down). The biological function of this region remains to be identified.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Summary of multicopy suppression

Overexpression of either CCR4 or DHH1 suppressed all the pop2 phenotypes. In contrast, overexpression of MPT5, PKC1, and STM only suppressed some of these phenotypes (Table 3). These results suggested a close genetic relationship among POP2, CCR4, and DHH1, while the interaction between POP2 and PKC1, STM1, or MPT5 might be relatively weak.

Northern analysis:
It is possible that the overexpression of these genes in pop2 cells suppressed the phenotypic defects if their transcription were being positively regulated by the Pop2. To examine this possibility, we measured the mRNA levels of each suppressor gene in wild-type and pop2 deletion cells. No significant differences in the mRNA amounts were observed between wild-type and pop2 deletion cells for any of the suppressor genes (data not shown).

Genetic interactions among POP2, CCR4, and DHH1:
Disruptions of POP2, CCR4, and DHH1 were constructed (see MATERIALS AND METHODS), and the resulting phenotypes were examined. In addition to the phenotypes previously observed for a CCR4 disruption (MALVAR et al. 1992 Down; DRAPER et al. 1995 Down; Table 2), we found that in-strain backgrounds other than those of the originally reported, ccr4{Delta} cells are also temperature sensitive for growth, which is suppressed by addition of 1 M sorbitol to the medium. Furthermore, the ccr4{Delta} cells are sensitive to staurosporine and caffeine. While it has been reported that the disruption of DHH1 does not cause any phenotype (STRAHL-BOLSINGER and TANNER 1993 Down), we found that dhh1{Delta} cells in our genetic background show a temperature-sensitive cell lysis phenotype that is suppressed by 1 M sorbitol (Table 2). Proteins with RNA helicase activity are often involved in mRNA transport or RNA processing (MARGOSSIAN and BUTOW 1996 Down; DALBADIE-MCFARLAND and ABELSON 1990 Down). To examine dhh1 effects on mRNA transport, dhh1 cells were shifted to 37° for 1 hr, and mRNA accumulation in the nucleus was measured by in situ hybridization with an oligo dT probe. No significant difference was detected between dhh1 and wild-type cells (data not shown). We also failed to detect pre-mRNA accumulation of the intron-containing CYH2 gene in dhh1 cells (T. TANI, personal communication). These observations suggest that the dhh1 mutation did not affect RNA processing. Cells carrying the dhh1 mutation also showed cold-sensitive growth at 15°, do not grow on a CSMGlycerol plate, and grow slowly on a YPGlycerol plate. Furthermore, dhh1{Delta} cells are sensitive to staurosporine and caffeine (Table 2, data not shown). Table 4 also shows that DHH1 is required for the full expression of the ADH2 gene, a phenotype previously observed with ccr4 (DENIS 1984 Down) or pop2/caf1–deleted cells (DRAPER et al. 1995 Down). These phenotypic analyses confirm a close functional link between POP2, CCR4, and DHH1. In contrast, disruption of PKC1, STM1, and MPT5 displays only some phenotypic similarities to pop2, ccr4, and dhh1 (Table 2) and their mutant phenotypes were consistent with those observed previously (LEVIN and BARTLETT-HEUBSH 1992 Down; FRANTZ and GILBERT 1995 Down; KIKUCHI et al. 1994 Down; CHEN and KURJAN 1997 Down). It is noteworthy that temperature-sensitive growth of mpt5 cells was suppressed by 1 M sorbitol.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. DHH1 is required for ADH II expression

Multicopy plasmids carrying POP2, CCR4, and DHH1 were introduced into each mutant in different combinations, and the effects on their growth defects were tested. The pop2 mutation was suppressed by CCR4 or DHH1, and the ccr4 mutation was also suppressed by DHH1 (Table 3); however, the growth defects in dhh1 cells were not suppressed by either POP2 or CCR4. To further test the epistasis among these genes, cells carrying double mutations were constructed and the phenotypic additivity was tested. We did not find any additive phenotypes in the double-mutant cells, suggesting that POP2, CCR4, and DHH1 function in the same pathway, and that CCR4 and DHH1 genetically function downstream of POP2.

Dhh1p physically interacts with Pop2p:
The physical association of Dhh1p with Pop2p and Ccr4p was analyzed by two-hybrid analysis and coimmunoprecipitation experiments. The combination of LexA-Pop2 and Gal4AD-Dhh1AD in the two-hybrid system resulted in a significant increase in ß-galactosidase activity beyond that obtained with LexA-Pop2p alone (Figure 2, Table 5). LexA-Dhh1p also was observed to interact specifically with a B42-Pop2 fusion, resulting in 18 U/mg of ß-galactosidase activity as compared to 2.5 U/mg activity for the interaction of LexA-Dhh1 with B42 alone. Figure 2 shows that residues 147–171 of Pop2p are necessary for the interaction. This region is similar to that which was observed to be necessary for the Pop2p and Ccr4p interaction (DRAPER et al. 1995 Down). Also, disruption of CCR4 did not abrogate the interaction between LexA-Pop2 and Gal4AD-Dhh1 (Table 5). It should be noted that a ccr4 disruption reduced the transcriptional activity of LexA-Pop2, which is a general effect that ccr4 has on LexA activators (DRAPER et al. 1995 Down). We further tested the possibility of an interaction in the two-hybrid system between LexA-Ccr4 and Gal4AD-Dhh1 or B42-Dhh1, and between LexA-Dhh1 and B42-Ccr4, but we were unable to detect any interaction between Ccr4p and Dhh1p, although each of these proteins was expressed in yeast (data not shown). These results suggest that Ccr4p and Dhh1p do not interact directly.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Region of Pop2p responsible for the interaction with Dhh1p. ß-Galactosidase assays and interactions with Gal4p-Dhh1p were conducted as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Amino acid residues of each segment of Pop2p are indicated. All assays and interactions were done in strain L40. All LexA-Pop2p derivatives were expressed at equivalent levels as assessed by Western analysis (data not shown). Schematic illustration shows location of the characteristic domains. Q1, polyglutamine stretch (residues 81–91); Q2, polyglutamine stretch (residues 112–126); Q3, glutamine-rich region (residues 364–371); P, proline-rich region (residues 139–155); S/T, serine/threonine-rich region (residues 375–391). All the values were the average of at least five independent experiments. Standard errors were <15%.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Pop2p interacts with both Ccr4p and Dhh1p in the two-hybrid system

To confirm the physical interaction between Pop2p and Dhh1p, a coimmunoprecipitation experiment was carried out using transformants carrying LexA-Dhh1 and B42-Pop2 that was tagged with the HA1 epitope (designated HA1-Pop2 in Figure 3). Immunoprecipitating LexA-Dhh1 with anti-LexA antibody resulted in the coimmunoprecipitation of B42-Pop2 (Figure 3, lane 5). The presence of the B42-Pop2 fusion in the immunoprecipitated materials was dependent on LexA-Dhh1 (Figure 3, lane 6). Sip1p, a protein (YANG et al. 1992 Down) that is not part of the Ccr4p complex (LIU et al. 1997 Down), did not coimmunoprecipitate with the LexA-Dhh1 fusion (Figure 3, lane 4). These results suggest that Dhh1p is physically associated with the CCR4 complex, and that Pop2p can physically interact with both Ccr4p and Dhh1p.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. LexA-Dhh1p coimmuneprecipitates with Pop2p. Crude extracts (lanes 1–3) were prepared from diploid EGY188/EGY191 containing the LexA and B42 (HA1) fusion proteins as indicated. Immunoprecipitations (lanes 4–6) were conducted from these extracts using an antibody directed against LexA. Extracts and immunoprecipitated samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, and proteins were identified by using an antibody directed against the HA1 epitope. LexA-Dhh1p and LexA-Vpu were expressed to comparable extents (data not shown). The protein that comigrates with HA1-Pop2p in lane 1 is a degradation product of HA1-Sip1p and does not coimmunoprecipitate with LexA-Dhh1p (see lane 4).

Genetic interaction between POP2 and PKC1-MPK1 pathways:
Because PKC1 was isolated as a weak multicopy suppressor of the pop2 mutation, and the phenotypes of pop2 cells and mpt cells are similar to cells carrying mutations involved in the PKC1-MPK1 pathway, we determined the epistatic relationship among these genes. Overexpression of POP2, CCR4, or DHH1 in pkc1{Delta}, bck1{Delta}, mkk1{Delta} mkk2{Delta}, and mpk1{Delta} mutant cells did not suppress any of their phenotypes, including temperature-sensitive growth and caffeine sensitivity. PKC1 suppressed the temperature-sensitive growth of mpk1 deletion cells at 35° (Figure 4). Overexpression of STM1 suppressed the staurosporine- and caffeine-sensitive growth, not only of pop2{Delta} mutants, but also of pkc1{Delta}, bck1{Delta}, mkk1{Delta} mkk2{Delta}, or mpk1{Delta} mutants. Thus, STM1 may function downstream of these genes. MPT5 overexpression suppressed temperature-sensitive growth defect of mpk1{Delta} deletion cells at 35° (Figure 4), but no other phenotype of this mutant. These results suggest an interaction between the POP2 and PKC1-MPK1 pathways, and that Ccr4 and Dhh1 may function downstream of both the POP2 and PKC1-MPK1 pathways.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. PKC1 and MPT5 suppressed the mpk1 mutation. Homozygous diploid cells carrying the mpk1 deletion mutation (DL456) were transformed with YEp213 bearing various genes indicated. The transformants were suspended in water and spotted on YPD plates and a YPD plate containing 2 µg/ml staurosporine. The plates were incubated at 24° or 35° for 4 days. MKK1-6 encodes a dominant active form of Mkk1p kinase (LEE et al. 1993B Down).

POP2 and PKC1 pathways may function independently but have overlapping functions. To examine these possibilities, double-mutants carrying pop2{Delta} dhh1{Delta}, pop2{Delta} mpt5{Delta}, and dhh1{Delta} mpt5{Delta} were constructed. They all showed temperature-sensitive phenotypes. No phenotypic additivity was observed, except that the temperature-sensitive growth of dhh1{Delta} mpt5{Delta} double-mutant cells was not suppressed by 1 M sorbitol (data not shown). On the other hand, haploid cells carrying pkc1{Delta} pop2{Delta}, pkc1{Delta} dhh1{Delta}, or pkc1{Delta} mpt5{Delta} were not recovered. Among the tetrads analyzed (10 for pop2{Delta} and pkc1{Delta}, eight for dhh1{Delta} and pkc1{Delta}, and eight for mpt5{Delta} and pkc1{Delta}), most tetrads contained less than three viable spores, even on the YPD plate containing 1 M sorbitol (data not shown). Judging from the disruption markers, all the dead cells were found to carry either pop2{Delta} pkc1{Delta}, dhh1{Delta} pkc1{Delta}, or mpt5{Delta} pkc1{Delta}. This synthetic lethality displayed phenotypic additivity and suggested that the POP2 pathway and PKC1 function independently. Taken together, the phenotypic similarity and genetic suppression among these mutants suggest that POP2 and PKC1 pathways function independently but have some overlapping functions.


*  DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Dhh1p, a putative RNA helicase, associates with Pop2p and Ccr4p physically and functionally:
We identified five multicopy suppressor genes of the pop2 deletion mutation. Two of these, CCR4 and DHH1, appear functionally related to POP2. The overexpression of DHH1 or CCR4 rescues all the pop2 defects tested, including high-temperature–sensitive growth, cold-sensitive growth, the inability to use glycerol, and staurosporine and caffeine sensitivity (Table 2 and Table 3). Overexpression of DHH1 also suppresses the growth defects in ccr4 cells. In addition, dhh1{Delta} cells display a spectrum of phenotypes similar to pop2{Delta} or ccr4{Delta} cells. Importantly, DHH1 was required for the full expression of the ADH2 gene (Table 4), another phenotype shared by pop2 and ccr4 cells. Furthermore, cells carrying the double mutations pop2{Delta} ccr4{Delta}, pop2{Delta} dhh1{Delta}, or ccr4{Delta} dhh1{Delta} showed no phenotypic additivity (data not shown; DRAPER et al. 1995 Down). These results suggest that there exists a close genetic interaction among the POP2, CCR4, and DHH1 genes, and that these three proteins function together to control transcriptional processes. Because Dhh1p is a putative RNA helicase but no defect in RNA processing was apparent in dhh1 cells, we think that Dhh1p is involved in a novel aspect of gene expression.

Pop2p and Dhh1p were found to interact physically (Table 5, Figure 3), suggesting that Dhh1p is associated with the Ccr4p regulatory complex. Because we have no evidence to suggest an interaction between Ccr4p and Dhh1p by two-hybrid analysis, it cannot be excluded that Dhh1p interacts with Pop2p in a complex separate from that which associates with Ccr4p. This seems unlikely, however, since Dhh1p has also been found to coimmunoprecipitate with Dbf2p and Caf17p, two other Ccr4p complex components (unpublished observations; LIU et al. 1997 Down). More importantly, nearly all the Ccr4p in the cells copurifed with Pop2p (Caf1p; M. LIU, personal communication), suggesting that there is no separate complex. Because there are multiple components of the Ccr4p complex, it is difficult at this point to clearly determine the order and directness of the interactions between these proteins.

Because overexpression of PKC1, STM1, and MPT5 suppressed some phenotypes of pop2{Delta} cells, these genes might function further downstream of POP2 or bypass some Pop2p functions (Table 3). Stm1p has G4 nucleic acid–binding activity (FRANTZ and GILBERT 1995 Down), and a null allele of the stm1 mutation does not cause phenotypes, as observed with the other mpt mutations. The relationship between the G4 nucleic acid–binding activity and POP2 function remains to be elucidated. MPT5 is required for growth at high temperatures and for the recovery from mating factor–induced G1 arrest (KIKUCHI et al. 1994 Down), and it is involved in yeast cell aging by redistribution of the Sir2p-Sir3p-Sir4p complex from the telomeres to the nucleolus (KENNEDY et al. 1997 Down). MPT5 has been shown to interact with Sst2p and Cdc28p, which is involved in the pheromone signaling pathway and the cell cycle control pathway, respectively (CHEN and KURJAN 1997 Down). Since the MPT5 gene is also involved in the stress response, it may be a general suppressor of temperature stress effects.

Since the pop2{Delta} and mpt5{Delta} showed no phenotypic additivity, POP2 and MPT5 also appear to function in the same pathway. Based on the facts that overexpression of DHH1 or MPT5 can suppress the ccr4{Delta} mutants, whereas overexpression of CCR4 had no effect on dhh1{Delta} or mpt5{Delta} cells (Table 3), we hypothesize that DHH1 and MPT5 function genetically downstream of CCR4. Overexpression of DHH1, however, could not suppress any phenotypes of mpt5{Delta} cells and vice versa. Furthermore, the dhh1{Delta}mpt5{Delta} double-mutant cells showed temperature-sensitive growth, and this defect was not suppressed by 1 M sorbitol (data not shown). These results suggest that DHH1 and MPT5 genetically function in two independent pathways that act after POP2 and CCR4.

Interaction between the POP2 and PKC1-MPK1 pathways:
The protein kinase C pathway, including PKC1, BCK1, MKK1 or MKK2, and MPK1, is important for cell wall integrity in yeast (THEVELEIN 1994 Down). Mutants of PKC1 require an osmotic stabilizer (e.g., 1 M sorbitol) for survival. Also, cells carrying the pkc1{Delta} or mpk1{Delta} mutation cannot use glycerol as a sole carbon source (COSTIGAN et al. 1994 Down, Table 2). This may suggest that the PKC1-MPK1 pathway activates the transcription of genes that require nonfermentable carbon sources and those that are involved in cell wall integrity. Since PKC1 was isolated as a multicopy suppressor of pop2{Delta}, and most of the mpt mutants including pop2 itself showed staurosporine-sensitive phenotypes and inability to utilize nonfermentable carbon sources, and the temperature-sensitive cell lysis phenotype of pop2{Delta} and the cold sensitivity phenotypes of ccr4, pop2(caf1), and dbf2, were suppressed by 1 M sorbitol (LIU et al. 1997 Down), it was of great interest to us to investigate the relationship between the POP2 pathway and PKC1 pathway.

Overexpression of PKC1 suppressed temperature-sensitive growth of dhh1{Delta} or mpt5{Delta} mutants (Table 3). This suggests that DHH1 and MPT5 function upstream of PKC1. But cells carrying double mutations of pop2{Delta}pkc1{Delta}, dhh1{Delta} pkc1{Delta}, or mpt5{Delta} pkc1{Delta} were synthetically lethal, ruling out a direct and dependent interaction among PKC1 and POP2, DHH1, and MPT5 (data not shown). In addition, the dhh1{Delta} and mpt5{Delta} mutations were suppressed by overproduction of PKC1 but not by MPK1 (data not shown), and overproduction of MPT5 suppressed the mpk1 mutation (Figure 4). Because epistasis among these genes is unclear, we speculate that the POP2 pathway and the PKC1 pathway are two independent pathways that have overlapping functions. To clarify this, we are currently searching for the common target of the two pathways. It should be noted that a well-accepted model of the PKC1 pathway suggests that MPK1 is epistatic to PKC1 (THEVELEIN 1994 Down). Our finding that overproduction of PKC1 suppressed the mpk1 mutation (Figure 4) seems to conflict with this model. It is possible that this might not be a direct effect, or that overproduction of PKC1 might activate another pathway (LEE et al. 1993A Down).


*  FOOTNOTES

1 Present address: Fukushima Medical College, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima-shi, Fukushima 960-12, Japan. Back
2 Present address: Institute of Genetic Ecology, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-70, Japan. Back
3 Present address: Frontier Research Program, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-01, Japan. Back
4 Present address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rudman Hall, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824-3544. Back


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank KOUICHI ISHIGURO for providing the antibody against Gal4AD, and KENJI IRIE, DAVID LEVIN, KUNIHIRO MATSUMOTO, KATSUNORI TANAKA, and SATOSHI YOSHIDA for providing S. cerevisiae strains and plasmids. We also appreciate helpful discussions with FUMIO HISHINUMA. This research was partly supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM41215, National Science Foundation grant MCB-9561832, and Hatch project 291 (C.L.D.).

Manuscript received June 26, 1997; Accepted for publication October 8, 1997.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

BARKER, D. D., C. WANG, J. MOORE, L. K. DICKSON, and R. LEHMANN, 1992  Pumilio is essential for function but not for distribution of the Drosophila determinant nanos. Genes Dev. 6:2312-2326[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CHEN, T. and J. KURJAN, 1997  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mpt5p interacts with Sst2p and plays roles in pheromone sensitivity and recovery from pheromone arrest. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3429-3439[Abstract].

CHEN, W., E. BALZI, E. CAPEIAUX, and A. GOFFEAU, 1991  The yeast YGL023 gene encodes a putative regulatory protein. Yeast 7:309-312[Medline].

CHIANG, Y.-C., P. KOMARNITSKY, D. CHASE, and C. L. DENIS, 1996  ADR1 activation domains contact the histone acetyltransferase GCN5 and the core transcriptional factor TFIIB. J. Biol. Chem. 271:32359-32365[Abstract/Free Full Text].

COOK, W. J., D. CHASE, D. C. AUDINO, and C. L. DENIS, 1994  Dissection of the ADR1 protein reveals multiple functionally redundant activation domains interspersed with inhibitory domains: evidence for a repressor binding to the ADR1c region. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:629-640[Abstract/Free Full Text].

COSTIGAN, C., D. KOLODRUBETZ, and M. SYNDER, 1994  NHP6A and NHP6B, which encode HMG1-like proteins, are candidates for downstream components of the yeast SLT2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:2391-2403[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DALBADIE-MCFARLAND, G. and J. ABELSON, 1990  PRP5: a helicase-like protein required for mRNA splicing in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:4236-4240[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DENIS, C. L., 1984  Identification of new genes involved in the regulation of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase II. Genetics 108:833-844[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DENIS, C. L. and T. MALVAR, 1990  The CCR4 gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for both nonfermentative and spt-mediated gene expression. Genetics 124:283-291[Abstract].

DRAPER, M. P., C. L. SALVADORE AND, and C. L. SALVADORE ANDDENIS, 1995  Identification of a mouse protein whose homolog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a component of the CCR4 transcriptional regulatory complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:3487-3495[Abstract].

ESTRUCH, F. and M. CARLSON, 1993  Two homologous zinc finger genes identified by multicopy suppression in a SNF1 protein kinase mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:3872-3881[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FRANTZ, J. D. and W. GILBERT, 1995  A yeast gene product, G4p2, with a specific affinity for quadruplex nucleic acids. J. Biol. Chem. 270:9413-9419[Abstract/Free Full Text].

HANAHAN, D., 1983  Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J. Mol. Biol. 166:557-580[Medline].

HUBBARD, E. J., R. JIANG, and M. CARLSON, 1994  Dosage-dependent modulation of glucose repression by MSN3 (STD1) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:1972-1978[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ITO, H., Y. FUKUDA, K. MURATA, and A. KIMURA, 1983  Transforma-tion of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacteriol. 153:163-168[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KENNEDY, B. K., M. GOTTA, D. A. SINCLAIR, K. MILLS, and D. S. MCNABB et al., 1997  Redistribution of silencing proteins from telomeres to the nucleolus is associated with extension of life span in S. cerevisiae.. Cell 89:381-391[Medline].

KIKUCHI, Y., Y. OKA, M. KOBAYASHI, Y. UESONO, and A. TOH-E et al., 1994  A new yeast gene, HTR1, required for growth at high temperature, is needed for recovery from mating pheromone-induced G1 arrest. Mol. Gen. Genet. 245:107-116[Medline].

LEE, K. S., L. K. HINES, and D. E. LEVIN, 1993a  A pair of functionally redundant yeast genes (PPZ1 and PPZ2) encoding type 1-related protein phosphatases function within the PKC1-mediated pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:5843-5853[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LEE, K., K. IRIE, Y. GOTHO, Y. WATANABE, and H. ARAKI et al., 1993b  A yeast mitogen-activated protein kinase homolog (Mpk1p) mediates signaling by protein kinase C. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:3067-3075[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LEVIN, D. E., F. O. FIELDS, R. KUNISAWA, M. BISHOP, and J. THORNER, 1990  A candidate protein kinase C gene, PKC1, is required for the S. cerevisiae cell cycle. Cell 62:213-224[Medline].

LEVIN, D. E. and E. BARTLETT-HEUBSH, 1992  Mutations in the S. cerevisiae PKC1 gene display a cell cycle-specific osmotic stability defect. J. Cell. Biol. 116:1221-1229[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LIU, H.-Y., J. H. TOYN, Y.-C. CHIANG, M. P. DRAPER, and L. H. JOHNSTON et al., 1997  DBF2, a cell-cycle regulated protein kinase, is physically and functionally associated with the CCR4 transcriptional regulatory complex. EMBO J. 16:5289-5298[Medline].

MACDONALD, P. M., 1992  The Drosophila pumilio gene—an unusually long transcription unit and unusual protein. Development 114:221-232[Abstract].

MARGOSSIAN, S. P. and R. A. BUTOW, 1996  RNA turnover and the control of mitochondrial gene expression. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21:392-396[Medline].

MALVAR, T., R. W. BIRON, D. B. KABACK, and C. L. DENIS, 1992  The CCR4 protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains a leucine-rich repeat region which is required for its control of ADH2 gene expression. Genetics 132:951-962[Abstract].

MANIATIS, T., E. F. FRITSCH and J. SAMBROOK, 1982 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

MILLER, J., 1972 Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

NICKAS, M. E. and M. P. YAFFE, 1996  BRO1, a novel gene that interacts with components of the Pkc1p-mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2585-2593[Abstract].

ÖZCAN, S., K. FREIDEL, A. LEUKER, and M. CIRIACY, 1993  Glucose uptake and catabolite repression in dominant HTR1 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. J. Bacteriol. 175:5520-5528[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ROTHSTEIN, R., 1983  One step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 101:202-211[Medline].

SAKAI, A., Y. SHIMIZU, S. KONDOU, T. CHIBAZAKURA, and F. HISHINUMA, 1990  Structure and molecular analysis of RGR1, a gene required for glucose repression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:4130-4138[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SAKAI, A., T. CHIBAZAKURA, Y. SHIMIZU, and F. HISHINUMA, 1992  Molecular analysis of POP2 gene, a gene required for glucose-derepression of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:6227-6233[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SHERMAN, F., G. R. FINK and J. B. HICKS, 1986 Laboratory Course Manual for Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

STRAHL-BOLSINGER, S. and W. TANNER, 1993  A yeast gene encoding a putative RNA helicase of the "DEAD"-box family. Yeast 9:429-432[Medline].

TAMAOKI, T., H. NOMOTO, I. TAKAHASHI, Y. KATO, and M. MORIMOTO et al., 1986  Staurosporine, a potent inhibitor of phospholipid/Ca2+ dependent protein kinase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 135:397-402[Medline].

THEVELEIN, J. M., 1994  Signal transduction in yeast. Yeast. 10:1753-1790[Medline].

YANG, X., E. J. A. HUBBARD, and M. CARLSON, 1992  A protein kinase substrate identified by the two-hybrid system. Science 257:680-682[Abstract/Free Full Text].

YOSHIDA, S., E. IKEDA, I. UNO, and H. MITSUZAWA, 1992  Character-ization of a staurosporine- and temperature-sensitive mutant, stt1, of Saccharomyces cerevisiae : STT1 is allelic to PKC1.. Mol. Gen. Genet. 231:377-344.

ZERVOS, A. S., J. GYURIS, and R. BRENT, 1993  Mxi1, a protein that specifically interacts with Max to bind to Myc-Max recognition sites. Cell 72:223-232[Medline].




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Schwede, L. Ellis, J. Luther, M. Carrington, G. Stoecklin, and C. Clayton
A role for Caf1 in mRNA deadenylation and decay in trypanosomes and human cells
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(10): 3374 - 3388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
F. Abe and H. Minegishi
Global Screening of Genes Essential for Growth in High-Pressure and Cold Environments: Searching for Basic Adaptive Strategies Using a Yeast Deletion Library
Genetics, February 1, 2008; 178(2): 851 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
T. H. Beilharz and T. Preiss
Widespread use of poly(A) tail length control to accentuate expression of the yeast transcriptome
RNA, July 1, 2007; 13(7): 982 - 997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
D. Teixeira and R. Parker
Analysis of P-Body Assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2007; 18(6): 2274 - 2287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. Ohn, Y.-C. Chiang, D. J. Lee, G. Yao, C. Zhang, and C. L. Denis
CAF1 plays an important role in mRNA deadenylation separate from its contact to CCR4
Nucleic Acids Res., May 14, 2007; 35(9): 3002 - 3015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. T. Jonstrup, K. R. Andersen, L. B. Van, and D. E. Brodersen
The 1.4-A crystal structure of the S. pombe Pop2p deadenylase subunit unveils the configuration of an active enzyme
Nucleic Acids Res., May 14, 2007; 35(9): 3153 - 3164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. M. Wright, S. W. Fewell, M. L. Sullivan, J. M. Pipas, S. C. Watkins, and J. L. Brodsky
The Hsp40 Molecular Chaperone Ydj1p, Along With the Protein Kinase C Pathway, Affects Cell-Wall Integrity in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1649 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
V. Stribinskis and K. S. Ramos
Rpm2p, a protein subunit of mitochondrial RNase P, physically and genetically interacts with cytoplasmic processing bodies
Nucleic Acids Res., February 28, 2007; 35(4): 1301 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
M. S. Stewart, S. A. Krause, J. McGhie, and J. V. Gray
Mpt5p, a Stress Tolerance- and Lifespan-Promoting PUF Protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Acts Upstream of the Cell Wall Integrity Pathway
Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2007; 6(2): 262 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. C. Goldstrohm, D. J. Seay, B. A. Hook, and M. Wickens
PUF Protein-mediated Deadenylation Is Catalyzed by Ccr4p
J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 2007; 282(1): 109 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Weston and J. Sommerville
Xp54 and related (DDX6-like) RNA helicases: roles in messenger RNP assembly, translation regulation and RNA degradation
Nucleic Acids Res., June 14, 2006; 34(10): 3082 - 3094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]